Review of Environmental and Regulatory Processes 3. Navigation Protection Act Page 1 of 11 Brief by the Essipit Innu First Natio

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review of Environmental and Regulatory Processes 3. Navigation Protection Act Page 1 of 11 Brief by the Essipit Innu First Natio Review of Environmental and Regulatory Processes 3. Navigation Protection Act Brief by the Essipit Innu First Nation and the Nutashkuan Innu First Nation [Logo] Essipit Innu First Nation [Logo] Nutashkuan Innu First Nation Submitted to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities December 23, 2016 Page 1 of 11 Review of Environmental and Regulatory Processes 3. Navigation Protection Act Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Interrelations between the four components of the Review ................................................... 4 2. Quality of consultation .......................................................................................................................... 4 3. Essipit Innu and Nutashkuan Innu First Nations ................................................................................... 6 3.1 Essipit Innu First Nation ............................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Nutashkuan Innu First Nation ................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Land claims ................................................................................................................................ 6 4. Water and the Innu Aitun ..................................................................................................................... 7 5. First Nation rights with regard to navigation ........................................................................................ 8 5.1 Innu holders of commercial fishing licences ............................................................................. 8 5.2 Navigation-related rights .......................................................................................................... 8 6. Issues surrounding the Navigation Protection Act ............................................................................... 8 7. Modernization of the Act ...................................................................................................................... 9 8. Conclusion and recommendations ..................................................................................................... 11 Page 2 of 11 Review of Environmental and Regulatory Processes 3. Navigation Protection Act Preliminary Note To the House of Commons Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities (TRAN) Due to the timing of this consultation and the delay in allocating funding, the Essipit Innu First Nation and the Nutashkuan Innu First Nation did not have time to submit this brief to TRAN. We hope, however, that the efforts and the work we have done will be taken into consideration in the review of the Navigation Protection Act (NPA). It should also be noted that the Mashteuiatsh First Nation did not have sufficient time to submit a request to and seek the approval by resolution of its Council to use the name Pekuakamiulnuatsh Takuhikan in this brief. However, the latter were very much involved in the drafting of this brief and if any changes are to be made following the presentation of the brief to elected representatives, you will be notified and we will send you a copy of the resolution as well as the revised version of the document. 1. Introduction1 1.1 Background The federal government launched the Review of Environmental and Regulatory Processes (the Review), one component of which was to review the Navigation Protection Act (NPA), which, in 2012 and 2013 (bills C-38 and C-45) amended the more aptly named (according to the Department2) Navigable Waters Protection Act (NWPA) and resulted in a significant reduction in the protection of countless rivers and lakes. Added to these changes were significant amendments to the Fisheries Act and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act that further endangered fish and fish habitats. The TRAN committee is responsible from reviewing the Navigation Protection Act and for ensuring that the duty to consult with Indigenous peoples is respected and that their rights, Aboriginal title, interests and concerns are taken into consideration. This should be one of the guiding principles of this Review. 1 This brief was prepared in collaboration with the First Nations of Quebec and Labrador Sustainable Development Institute, an organization under the auspices of the Assembly of First Nations of Quebec and Labrador. 2 To better reflect its intent: protecting navigation. Page 3 of 11 Review of Environmental and Regulatory Processes 3. Navigation Protection Act 1.2 Interrelations between the four components of the Review The Review is one of four components studied separately by various committees, according to different timelines. This approach limits the scope of the analyses because it fails to consider the obvious interrelations alluded to in the name of this extensive review. The strong interrelations between the effects of projects pertaining to fisheries, navigation, federal environmental assessments and the activities of the National Energy Board (NEB) cannot be ignored. For example, if the Navigation Protection Act is not revised in a coherent manner and at the same time as the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (see our brief3) and the Fisheries Act, certain development projects in or near aquatic environments could be implemented without first considering Indigenous fishing rights or the principles of sustainable development. Furthermore, pursuant to the NPA, certain works (including buried pipelines and Pipelines and cables that are attached to an existing work) are not subject to notification by the Minister and therefore do not require an assessment of their impact on navigation. These are works designated as “minor” in the Minor Works and Waters Order, which also stipulates the conditions that must be respected by the persons responsible for these works. Responsibility for assessing compliance with the Order rests with the project proponent and no intervention by the Minister is required. We have here a clear example of in interrelations between the four statutes currently under review: the National Energy Board Act, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, the Navigation Protection Act and the Fisheries Act. The spill into the Chaudière River at Lac Mégantic in July 2013 is another example of these interrelations. As is the case under the Fisheries Act,4 it is no longer necessary to obtain approval from the Minister of Transport in all cases. Instead, the Minister must be advised of the planned work and it is up to the Minister to decide whether approval is necessary. Approval is required only if there is a risk of serious interference with navigation. 2. Quality of consultation Despite the government’s commitment to ensure the full participation of Indigenous peoples in this Review and to integrate their rights and interests in this process—as required under the Constitution— we find it necessary to draw the attention of the TRAN committee and the Minister of Transport to 3 Brief by the Pekuakamiulnuatsh, Essipit Innu and Nutashkuan Innu First Nations: Review of Environmental and Regulatory Processes - 1. Environmental Assessment Process, submitted to the Expert Panel for the Review of Environmental and Regulatory Processes and dated December 23, 2016, p. 15 (translator’s note: page numbers refer to French document; please verify). 4 Brief by the Pekuakamiulnuatsh, Essipit Innu and Nutashkuan Innu First Nations: Review of Environmental and Regulatory Processes - 2. Review of changes to the Fisheries Act, submitted to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans on November 30, 2016, p. 12 (translator’s note: page numbers refer to French document; please verify). Page 4 of 11 Review of Environmental and Regulatory Processes 3. Navigation Protection Act major shortcomings in this area, especially the fact that we had to deal with very tight deadlines and very restrictive funding. Further to the federal review of environmental and regulatory processes launched on June 20, 2016,5 we wish to express our views on reinstating the protective measures eliminated in 2012–2013 and ask that further protective measures be implemented under the Navigation Protection Act. Furthermore, we would like to point out that any consultation or engagement process conducted by a committee of the House of Commons or of the Senate with limited travel opportunities is not a suitable means of ensuring the full participation of First Nations; it does not meet the Crown’s duty to actively seek to reach First Nations while offering them distinct opportunities to participate in the process. Moreover, we had to deal with significant time and funding constraints in order to participate in the parliamentary committee’s engagement process. It is unrealistic and, in our opinion, disrespectful to have set a November 30, 2016,6 deadline for submitting briefs to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, given that the committee’s study was only launched on October 4. We did not received our funding notice until November 15, 2016—more than two months after we submitted a formal request7 for financial assistance. This notice stated that the funding could not be used
Recommended publications
  • Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine Summary of the Project Description
    Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine Summary of the Project Description Rio Tinto Fer et Titane WSP Canada Inc. Adress line 1 Adress line 2 Adress line 3 www.wspgroup.com WSP Canada Inc. 300-3450, boul. Gene-H.-Kruger Trois-Rivières (Qc) G9A 4M3 Tél. : 819 375-1292 www.wspgroup.com Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine Summary of the Project Description Final Version Approved by: Numéro de projet : 111-20171-02 J U N E 2 01 4 3450, boulevard Gene-H.-Kruger, bureau 300 ~ Trois-Rivières (Québec) CANADA G9A 4M3 Tél. : 819 375-8550 ~ Téléc. : 819 375-1217 ~ www.wspgroup.com Reference to be cited: WSP. 2014. Waste Rock and Water Management at the Tio Mine. Summary of the Project Description. Report produced for Rio Tinto Fer et Titane. 25 p. SUMMARY 1 GENERAL INFORMATION Rio Tinto Fer et Titane inc. (hereinafter “RTFT”) has operated, since 1989, the Havre-Saint-Pierre mine, consisting of a hemo-ilmenite deposit, at its Lake Tio mining property, located 43 km north of Havre-Saint-Pierre (see Figure 1). However, the mine has been in operation since 1950. The most recent data from the mining plan provides for the site to be in operation beyond 2050. According to this plan, the total amount of waste rock which will be generated exceeds the storage capacity available under the current mining leases, which will be reached by the end of 2017. RTFT would therefore like to obtain new land lease agreements for the disposal of waste rock to be generated until the end of the mine’s life.
    [Show full text]
  • C S a S S C C S
    C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2005/051 Document de recherche 2005/051 Not to be cited without Ne pas citer sans permission of the authors * autorisation des auteurs * A Comprehensive Framework for Un protocole d'évaluation des Assessing Changes in Fish Habitat changements de capacité de Productive Capacity Resulting From production de l'habitat du poisson Large Hydroelectric Projects lors de grands projets hydroélectriques Michel Bérubé, Richard Verdon, Gabriel Durocher, Jean-Christophe Guay Hydro-Québec Équipement Direction développement de projet et environnement 855 Sainte-Catherine est, 9ième étage Montréal, Québec H2L 4P5 * This series documents the scientific basis for the * La présente série documente les bases evaluation of fisheries resources in Canada. As scientifiques des évaluations des ressources such, it addresses the issues of the day in the halieutiques du Canada. Elle traite des time frames required and the documents it problèmes courants selon les échéanciers contains are not intended as definitive statements dictés. Les documents qu’elle contient ne on the subjects addressed but rather as progress doivent pas être considérés comme des énoncés reports on ongoing investigations. définitifs sur les sujets traités, mais plutôt comme des rapports d’étape sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the official Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans language in which they are provided to the la langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit Secretariat. envoyé au Secrétariat. This document is available on the Internet at: Ce document est disponible sur l’Internet à: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/ ISSN 1499-3848 (Printed / Imprimé) © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2005 © Sa majesté la Reine, Chef du Canada, 2005 ABSTRACT The Policy for the management of fish habitat and its No net Loss of habitat productive capacity by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) represents a challenge for the hydroelectric industry in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Notes on the Birds of Labrador
    THE AUK: A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY. VoL. xxw. JANJARY, 1910. NO. 1. ADDITIONAL NOTES ON THE BIRDS OF LABRADOR. ! BY CHARLES W. TOWNSEND• M. I)., AND A. C. BENT. Plates I-III. THE followingnotes are intendedto supplementthe 'Birds of Labrador'2 publishedin 1907. They are the resultof an ornitho- logicalexcursion to the southernLabrador coast in the springof 1909. The itinerary was as follows: Leaving Quebec on the mail steamshipon May 21, 1909, we reachedthe beginningof the LabradorPeninsula on May 23, some345 milesfrom Quebecand 30 miles to the west of SevenIslands. This point is where the 50th parallel strikesthe coastin the Gulf of St. Lawrence. From here, stoppingat a few places,we skirtedthe coastas far as Esqui- lnaux Point, wherewe left the steameron May 24. The next day we startedin a smallsail boat and cruisedfor •t weekalong the coast and ainongthe islandsto the eastwardas far as Natashquan, about85 milesfrom EsquimauxPoint and some255 milesfrom the westernmostpoint on the coastot' the LabradorPeninsula. On thistrip we landedand exploredat Betchewun,Isles des Cornellies, Piashte-bai where we ascended the river five or six miles to the falls, Great Piashte-bai,Quatachoo and Watcheeshoo. We spent two days at Natashquanand returncdby steameron the night • Read before the Nuttall Ornithological Club, November 1, 1909. • Birds of Labrador. By Charles W. Townsend, M.D. and Glover M. Allen. Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 277-428, pl. 29. Boston, July, 1907. See also Townsend, Labrador Notes, Auk, Vol. XXVI, p. 201, 1909. 1 THE AUK, VOL. XXVII. PLATE ISLANDSAT WATCHESHOD,LABRADOR. NESTINGSITES FOR GREAT BLACK-BACKED GULLS AND EH)EHS.
    [Show full text]
  • A Major Effort to Harmoniza Communities
    30th Annual Meeting – IAIA – April 2010 Environmental Impact Assessment Studies at Hydro-Québec: A Major Effort to Harmonize Communities’ Energy, Economic and Social Development Louise Emond Background By their very nature, environmental impact assessments prompt us to pay a great deal of attention to the impacts of building and operating new power generation facilities. Given the basic concern for applying caution and due care, these assessments tend to look at the ―worst-case scenario‖ in order to induce the proponent to plan appropriate mitigation measures. While they may shed light on the negative effects associated with projects, assessments underplay the extensive work devoted to ensuring that projects are harmoniously integrated into the environment. Here, I would like to focus on the procedures in use at Hydro-Québec and present a review of the methods we favor to help foster the transition to a greener economy and accentuate the positive environmental effects of hydropower development. This will be an opportunity to show an often overlooked aspect of environmental impact assessments: namely, the considerable efforts made to inform the communities affected by our projects, and to implement mitigation measures designed to limit their impacts and maximize their beneficial effects. My demonstration will be based on a recent undertaking, the hydropower complex now being built on the Romaine River. This project is the largest of the current decade in Québec, and the largest infrastructure project in Canada. The impact assessment for the Romaine complex is an in-depth evaluation that runs to 10 volumes totaling nearly 2,500 pages. This assessment is backed by about 60 component studies in over 20 fields of expertise, carried out between 2004 and 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Report, the Peninsula Titanium Property Geological Report
    GM 65652 GEOLOGICAL REPORT, THE PENINSULA TITANIUM PROPERTY GEOLOGICAL REPORT The Peninsula Titanium Property Duplessis County, Puyjalon Township, Quebec NTS sheets 12L06 and 12L11 CANAMARA ERNERGY CORPORATION September 30, 2010 Ressources naturelles et Faune, Québec 3,1 MAI 2011 AU 6\151M1 Service de la Géoinformation REÇU 0 8 MAR. 2011 GM 65 652 Direction du développement minéral Michel Boily, PhD., P. Géo. 1091285 TABLE OF CONTENTS ii SUMMARY iv 1- PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 1 2-ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY 2 3- GEOLOGICAL SETTING 4 3.1- Regional Geological Setting 4 3.2-The lac St-Jean Domain 7 3.3-The Havre St-Pierre Anorthosite Suite (HSPAS) 9 3.4-The Allard-Puyjalon Lake Area 12 4- THE PENINSULA TITANIUM PROPSECT 12 4.1-Introduction 12 4.2-History of the Peninsula Property 14 4.3- Geology and Ti-Mineralization 14 5-DEPOSIT TYPE 19 6-GENESIS OF Fe-Ti DEPOSIT ASSOCIATED WITH ANORTHOSITE COMPLEXES 19 7-THE LAKE TiO ILMENITE DEPOSIT 20 8-CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 21 8.1-Budget Breakdown 24 9-REFERENCES 26 10- DATE AND SIGNATURE 29 ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Localization and bondaries of the designated claims of the Peninsula property. 3 Figure 2. Geological map of the Quebec province illustrating the different geological provinces and subprovinces and the localization of the Peninsula property. 5 Figure 3. Geology of the Grenville Province of Québec showing the location of the Peninsula property. 6 Figure 4. Simplified geological map of lithotectonic domains, stratigraphic units, principal structural elements and anorthositic massifs of the Lower North Shore area.
    [Show full text]
  • Romaine Hydroelectric Complex Project
    Bureau Joint d’audiences Review Panel publiques sur l’environnement Report 256 Romaine Hydroelectric Complex Project Investigation and Public Hearing Report February 2009 The concept of the environment The commissions of the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement examine the projects submitted to them from a sustainable development perspective, applying the concept of the environment used by higher courts, a concept that encompasses biophysical, social, economic and cultural aspects. Acknowledgments The Joint Review Panel thanks the individuals and organizations that contributed to its work, and the staff at the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency who provided the necessary support for the production of this report. Publication and Distribution Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement Édifice Lomer-Gouin Telephone: 418-643-7447 575 Saint-Amable, Office 2.10 (Toll-free): 1-800-463-4732 Quebec City, Quebec G1R 6A6 Web site: www.bape.gouv.qc.ca E-mail: [email protected] Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Place Bell Canada Telephone: 613-957-0700 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor Facsimile: 613-957-0941 Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 Web site: www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca E-mail: [email protected] Documentation concerning the Joint Review Panel’s work may be obtained from the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. Legal Deposit – Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, 2009 ISBN 978-2-550-55298-7 (printed version) ISBN 978-2-550-55299-4 (PDF) 2 February 27, 2009 Line Beauchamp Minister of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks Édifice Marie-Guyart, 30th Floor 675 René Lévesque Blvd East Quebec City, Quebec G1R 5V7 Minister: It is with great pleasure that I submit the report on Hydro-Québec’s proposed project to develop a hydroelectric complex on the Romaine River by the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Evaluation of the Potential Impacts of the Erosion of Quebec's
    Economic evaluation of the potential impacts of the erosion of Quebec’s maritime coasts in a context of climate change Research report submitted to Ouranos Under the direction of Pascal Bernatchez, Ph.D. May 2015 PRODUCTION TEAM Management and research Pascal Bernatchez, Ph. D. Coastal geomorphology and remote sensing Project manager Professor and Chairholder, Research Chair in Coastal Geoscience Laboratoire de dynamique et de gestion intégrée des zones côtières (LDGIZC) (coastal zone dynamics and integrated management laboratory) Biology, chemistry and geography department Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR) Email: [email protected] Research team Steeve Dugas, B.Sc., Research Professional, LDGIZC, UQAR Data processing and analysis, geomatics, writing Christian Fraser, M.Sc., Research Professional, LDGIZC, UQAR Data analysis, writing Laurent Da Silva, M. Sc., Economist, Ouranos Economic research, processing and analysis and writing Maude Corriveau, M.Sc., Research Professional, LDGIZC, UQAR Data processing and validation Nicolas Marion, B.Sc. student, UQAR Data processing (transfer of assessment roll parcels) Mia Charette, B.Sc. student, UQAR Data processing (Transfer of assessment roll parcels) Tessa Parisé, B.Sc. student, UQAR Data processing (Transfer of assessment roll parcels) Caroline Côté, Master’s degree (DESS) student, UQAR Data processing (Transfer of parcels identifying railways) Collaborators François Morneau, M. Sc., Scientific Coordinator, Ouranos Manon Circé, M. A., Senior Economist, Ouranos Xavier Mercier, M. Sc., Economist, Ouranos Claude Desjarlais, M. Sc., Senior Economist, Consultant, Ouranos Ursule Boyer-Villemaire, M. Sc., Oceanographer, Consultant, Ouranos Susan Drejza, M. Sc., Research Professional, LDGIZC, UQAR Complete reference Bernatchez, P., Dugas, S., Fraser, C. and Da Silva, L. (2015). Economic evaluation of the potential impacts of the erosion of Quebec’s maritime coast in a context of climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Du Nord Development Project Environmental Impact Statement
    Bay du Nord Development Project Environmental Impact Statement TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.0 Existing Human Environment ..........................................................................................7-1 7.1 Commercial Fisheries ......................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.1 Fisheries Management Areas and Data Boundaries ......................................... 7-3 7.1.2 Information Sources ..........................................................................................7-3 7.1.3 Historical Domestic Fisheries ............................................................................7-4 7.1.4 Recent Domestic Fisheries ................................................................................7-6 7.1.4.1 Domestic Harvesting Locations ...................................................... 7-6 7.1.4.2 Domestic Harvest Composition and Values .................................... 7-8 7.1.4.3 Seasonality ................................................................................... 7-12 7.1.5 International Fisheries .....................................................................................7-18 7.1.6 Key Fisheries ...................................................................................................7-22 7.1.6.1 Groundfish .................................................................................... 7-22 7.1.6.2 Snow (Queen) Crab ...................................................................... 7-38 7.1.6.3 Shrimp ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • As Hydro-Quebec, the Corporation Behind Northern Pass, Works to Dam Quebec’S Romaine River, Three Kayakers Paddle It for the Last Time in Its Natural State
    adieu, RomaineStory, photos and map by Tripp Burwell Additional Reporting by Christian Woodard As Hydro-Quebec, the corporation behind Northern Pass, works to dam Quebec’s Romaine River, three kayakers paddle it for the last time in its natural state. The power in the water is evident; what’s not clear is how Quebec’s push for hydropower dominance makes economic, social or environmental sense. Christian Woodard runs Spike rapid, near the Romaine 2 dam site at dawn. This stretch of the river will be left essentially dry by Romaine 2. 20 | FOREST NOTES Summer 2013 What we call Man’s power over Nature turns out to be a power exercised by some men over other men with Nature as its instrument. — C.S. Lewis, Abolition of Man ynamite blasts rippled the pre-dawn air as we paddled through the Romaine River’s cold, tannic water. Fog and black flies smothered the dense ever- green banks. Three of us, Christian Woodard, James Duesenberry, and I had teamed up for the last descent of this huge and steep river. For three days, Dwe had paddled through the heart of the central Quebec wilderness. That night, we had camped above Romaine 2, one of four Hydro- Quebec dam sites—the future tombstones of a once free-flowing river. A wall of gravel and boulders loomed downstream, diverting the flow into a tunnel punched through a nearby hill. We hoped to sneak through the construction and rejoin the Romaine wherever it returned to its ancient course. The groan of hydraulic machinery lifting, drilling, and crushing stone joined rhythmic thumps of underground explosions.
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum/Erratum
    Labrador – Island Transmission Link Aboriginal Communities and Land Use Component Study – Addendum/Erratum 1. Additional information on the study team for the Aboriginal Communities and Land Use Component Study Nalcor has used a variety of information sources, including: data gathered directly from an Aboriginal group, community or organization; information produced by an Aboriginal group, community or organization; information produced by third parties (e.g., government information, academic research) and information shared by an Aboriginal group, community or organization with Nalcor during its consultation activities. The component study preparation was led by Gale Warren, BA (Hons), MA (Aboriginal Relations Lead, Environment and Aboriginal Affairs, Lower Churchill Project, Nalcor Energy) and Mary Hatherly BA, LLB, LLM (Aboriginal Agreements Lead, . Contributing authors included Elisabeth Poirier- Garneau , MEnv (Aboriginal Relations Coordinator, Environment and Aboriginal Affairs, Lower Churchill Project), Virginia Soehl , BSc, MRM (Senior Advisor, Aboriginal Engagement, Environment and Aboriginal Affairs, Lower Churchill Project), and Emma Sharkey, BA, MA (Aboriginal Relations Coordinator, Environment and Aboriginal Affairs, Lower Churchill Project). 2. Definition of contemporary land use The year AD 1960 is generally used to define the beginning of the Contemporary Period, as it coincides with the time that the Innu were settled permanently in communities. Permanent settlement resulted in a number of notable changes to their long-standing patterns of land use and harvesting. However, to focus the baseline on “current” land use, the last 20 years was used as the time period for the baseline description for land use. Where such information was not available, the more general definition was used with dates of land use data indicated where relevant and available.
    [Show full text]
  • A Forest of Blue: Canada's Boreal
    A Forest of Blue Canada’s Boreal the pew environment Group is the also benefitting the report were reviews, conservation arm of the pew Charitable edits, contributions and discussions trusts, a non-governmental organization with sylvain archambault, Chris Beck, that applies a rigorous, analytical Joanne Breckenridge, Matt Carlson, approach to improve public policy, inform david Childs, Valerie Courtois, ronnie the public and stimulate civic life. drever, sean durkan, simon dyer, www.pewenvironment.org Jonathon Feldgajer, suzanne Fraser, Mary Granskou, larry Innes, Mathew the Canadian Boreal Initiative and the Jacobson, steve kallick, sue libenson, Boreal songbird Initiative are projects anne levesque, lisa McCrummen, of the pew environment Group’s tony Mass, suzann Methot, Faisal International Boreal Conservation Moola, lane nothman, Jaline Quinto, Campaign, working to protect the kendra ramdanny, Fritz reid, elyssa largest intact forest on earth. rosen, hugo seguin, Gary stewart, allison Wells and alan Young. Authors Jeffrey Wells, ph.d. the design work for the report was ably Science Adviser for the International carried out through many iterations by Boreal Conservation Campaign Genevieve Margherio and tanja Bos. dina roberts, ph.d. Boreal Songbird Initiative Suggested citation Wells, J., d. roberts, p. lee, r, Cheng peter lee and M. darveau. 2010. a Forest of Global Forest Watch Canada Blue—Canada’s Boreal Forest: the ryan Cheng World’s Waterkeeper. International Global Forest Watch Canada Boreal Conservation Campaign, seattle. Marcel darveau, ph.d. 74 pp. Ducks Unlimited Canada this report is printed on paper that is 100 percent post-consumer recycled fiber, Acknowledgments For their review of and comments on processed chlorine-free.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Analysis of the Impact of the Romaine Hydroelectric Project On
    INSTITUT NATIONAL DE SANTÉ PUBLIQUE DU QUÉBEC Summary Analysis of the Impact of the Romaine Hydroelectric Project on the Health of the Population: Monitoring the Situation in the COLLECTION Municipality of Havre-Saint-Pierre PUBLIC PUBLIC POLICY AND Summary Analysis of the Impact of the Romaine Hydroelectric Project on the Health of the Population: Monitoring the Situation in the Municipality of Havre-Saint-Pierre Vice-présidence aux affaires scientifiques Juillet 2013 AUTHORS Julie St-Pierre, Planning, programming and research officer, Vice-présidence aux affaires scientifiques, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Roseline Lambert, Planning, programming and research officer, Vice-présidence aux affaires scientifiques, Institut national de santé publique du Québec EDITOR Julie St-Pierre, Planning, programming and research officer, Vice-présidence aux affaires scientifiques, Institut national de santé publique du Québec WITH THE COOPERATION OF: Maude Chapados, Planning, programming and research officer, Vice-présidence aux affaires scientifiques, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Geneviève Lapointe, Planning, programming and research officer, Vice-présidence aux affaires scientifiques, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Lucie Lemieux, medical consultant Vice-présidence aux affaires scientifiques, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Isabelle Samson, medical specialist in public health and preventive medicine, on a fellowship with the Public policy team LAYOUT AND PROOFREADING Manon Dussault, administrative technician Vice-présidence aux affaires scientifiques, Institut national de santé publique du Québec TRANSLATION The translation of this publication was made possible with funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada. This document is available in its entirety in electronic format (PDF) on the Web site of the Institut national de santé publique du Québec at: http://www.inspq.qc.ca.
    [Show full text]