Spiritual Soul Instructions and View of the World

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spiritual Soul Instructions and View of the World RUDOLF STEINER Spiritual Teachings Concerning the Soul and Observation of the World Eighteen public lectures held in Berlin from 6th September 1903 until 8th December 1904 Translation of volume 52 of the Complete Works by Rudolf Steiner, original title: Spirituelle Seelenlehre und Weltbetrachtung, edited by Rudolf Steiner-Nachlassverwaltung Dornach (Switzerland), second edition 1986. ©1972 Rudolf Steiner-Nachlassverwaltung, Dornach (Switzerland) Preface to this Edition The talks of this volume belong to that part of Rudolf Steiner’s lecturing work with which he turned to the general public. “Berlin had been the starting point for this public lecturing activity. What was treated in other cities in single talks could be expressed here in a coherent course of lectures whose topics merge into each other. They thereby received the character of a well-founded methodical introduction to spiritual science and could count on a regularly returning audience to which it was crucial to penetrate deeper and deeper into the fields of knowledge being revealed to it anew, while the bases of the understanding of the offered material were given to the newcomers.” (Marie Steiner) Since Rudolf Steiner could correct the transcripts only in few cases because of lack of time, his reservation has to be taken into consideration with all publications of talks: “It has just to be accepted that mistakes may be found in the transcripts not checked by me.” The first of five lecture courses of this volume deals with the eternal core of the human being, the soul, the concept of God, and Christianity in the theosophical view and in the scientific discussion. In the second course, Rudolf Steiner — like in his Philosophy of Freedom — indicates the hopelessness and consequences of Kant’s philosophy and shows the way to a knowledge of the spirit. There follows the representation of the relation of the soul to the body, to destiny and to the spirit. The historical soul doctrines are compared with the contemporary ones. The explanations about the soul in the hypnotic state already point to the fourth course of lectures which deal with the search for the supersensible experience in spiritism, hypnotism, and somnambulism. In doing so, Rudolf Steiner shows the justified meeting points and the necessary differences between these movements and theosophy. Four talks on challenges of theosophy by questions of the human beings and by the criticism of science finish the volume. Contents I The Eternal and the Transient in the Human Being Berlin, 6th September 1903 II The Origin of the Soul Berlin, 3rd October 1903 III The Nature of God from the Theosophical Standpoint Berlin, 7th November 1903 IV Theosophy and Christianity Berlin, 4th January 1904 V The Epistemological Bases of Theosophy, Part I Berlin, 27th November 1903 VI The Epistemological Bases of Theosophy, Part II Berlin, 4th December 1903 VII The Epistemological Bases of Theosophy, Part III Berlin, 17th December 1903 VIII Theosophical Teachings of the Soul, Part I Berlin, 16th March 1904 IX Theosophical Teachings of the Soul, Part II Berlin, 23rd March 1904 X Theosophical Teachings of the Soul, Part III Berlin, 30th March 1904 XI Theosophy und Spiritism Berlin, 1st February 1904 XII Theosophy und Somnambulism Berlin, 7th March 1904 XIII The History of Spiritism Berlin, 30th May 1904 XIV The History of Hypnotism und Somnambulism Berlin, 6th June 1904 XV What Does the Modern Human Being Find in Theosophy? Berlin, 8th March 1904 XVI What Do Our Scholars Know about Theosophy? Berlin, 28th April 1904 XVII Is Theosophy Unscientific? Berlin, 6th October 1904 XVIII Is Theosophy Buddhist Propaganda? Berlin, 8th December 1904 The Eternal and the Transient of the Human Being Berlin, 6th September 1903 The object about which I will talk here is certainly one in which all people are interested. Who could say that he is not interested in the question of immortality with all his thoughts? We need only to realise that the human being thinking of death feels a horror. Even the few people who are weary of life and look for rest in death cannot get through this horror completely. One has tried to answer this question in the most different way. Remember, however, that nobody can speak about anything impartially in which he is interested. Will he be able to speak then impartially about this question which is of the deepest interest for his whole life? And, besides, you must take something else into consideration: how much does depend on it for the culture. The development of our whole culture depends on it how this question is answered. The standpoint of somebody to the cultural questions is quite different if he believes in the eternal of the human being. One hears saying that it was wrong to give the human being this hope of a next world. The poor man would be put off until the next world and would be thereby prevented from creating a better life here. Others say that only in this way existence can generally be endured. If with such a matter the wishes of the human beings are considered so strongly, all the reasons are looked out for it. It would have mattered a little to the human being to prove that two times two are not four if his happiness had depended on this proof. Because the human being could not omit to let his wishes have a say in this question of immortality, it had to be put over and over again. Because the subjective feeling of happiness is involved in this question. However, just this fact has made this question so suspicious to the modern natural sciences. And rightly so! Just the most significant men of this science expressed themselves against the immortality of the human being. Ludwig Feuerbach says: “one thought immortality first and then proved it.” Thus he suggests that the human being tried to find arguments because he wishes them. David Friedrich Strauss and recently Ernst Haeckel in his World Riddles express themselves in a similar way. If now I had to say something that violates the modern natural sciences, I would not be able to speak about this question. But just the admiration of Haeckel’s great achievements in his fields and for Haeckel as one of the most monumental spirits of the present time lets me take a stand in his sense against his conclusions. Today, something else than fighting against the natural sciences is my object. Theosophy is not against the natural sciences, but goes with them. But, besides, it does not stop. It does not believe that we have gone so wonderfully far only in the 19-th century; while during all centuries before unreason and superstition would have held sway, now truth has been brought to light only by the science of our time. If truth stood on such weak feet, one could have little confidence. However, we know that truth formed the core in the teachings of wisdom of Buddha, of the Jewish priests et cetera. It is the task of theosophy to search for this core in all different theories. But it also does not spare the science of the 19-th century. Because this is in such a way, we are certainly allowed to deal with the question also from the standpoint of science. It can form the basis that way from which we start if we search for the eternal in the human being. Feuerbach is certainly right with his remark quoted before if he turns against the method of the science of the last fourteen centuries. However, he is wrong concerning the wisdom of former times. Because the way to guide the human being to the cognition of truth in the ancient schools of wisdom was totally different. Only during the later centuries of Christianity the faith was demanded to which then the scholars produced the proofs. That was not the case in the mysteries of antiquity. That wisdom which was not disseminated just like that, which remained a possession of few people, which was delivered to the initiate by instructions of the priests in holy temple sites, had another avenue to lead their pupils to truth. They kept the knowledge secret to those who were not prepared. One would have regarded it as profaned if one had informed anybody without selection. One only regarded somebody as worthy who had developed his cultural life by means of long exercise to understand the truth in higher sense. One tells in the traditions of Judaism that when once a rabbi pronounced something of the secret knowledge his listeners reproached him: “o old man, had you been quiet! What have you done! You bewilder the people.” — One saw a big threat betraying the mysteries if they were in everybody’s mouth and would be desecrated and distorted that way. Only in holy shyness one approached them. The probation was strict which the pupils of the mysteries had to go through. Our time can hardly imagine the severe probations which were imposed on the pupil. We find with the Pythagoreans that the pupils called themselves listeners. For years they are only silent listeners, and it is according to the spirit of this time that this silence extended up to five years. They are silent in this time. Silence, that is in this case: renunciation of any discussion, of any criticism. Today where the principle applies: “test everything and keep the best” — where everybody believes to be able to judge about everything where with the help of journalism everybody forms his judgment quickly also about that which he does not understand at all, one has no notion of that which one demanded from a pupil at that time.
Recommended publications
  • The Gnostic Myth of Sophia in Dark City (1998) Fryderyk Kwiatkowski Jagiellonian University in Kraków, [email protected]
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Nebraska, Omaha Journal of Religion & Film Volume 21 Article 34 Issue 1 April 2017 4-1-2017 How To Attain Liberation From a False World? The Gnostic Myth of Sophia in Dark City (1998) Fryderyk Kwiatkowski Jagiellonian University in Kraków, [email protected] Recommended Citation Kwiatkowski, Fryderyk (2017) "How To Attain Liberation From a False World? The Gnostic Myth of Sophia in Dark City (1998)," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 21 : Iss. 1 , Article 34. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol21/iss1/34 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Religion & Film by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. How To Attain Liberation From a False World? The Gnostic Myth of Sophia in Dark City (1998) Abstract In the second half of the 20th century, a fascinating revival of ancient Gnostic ideas in American popular culture could be observed. One of the major streams through which Gnostic ideas are transmitted is Hollywood cinema. Many works that emerged at the end of 1990s can be viewed through the ideas of ancient Gnostic systems: The Truman Show (1998), The Thirteenth Floor (1999), The Others (2001), Vanilla Sky (2001) or The Matrix trilogy (1999-2003). In this article, the author analyses Dark City (1998) and demonstrates that the story depicted in the film is heavily indebted to the Gnostic myth of Sophia.
    [Show full text]
  • El Doctor Justinus Kerner Y La Vidente De Prevorst: Un Caso De “Psicoterapia” En La Primera Mitad Del Siglo XIX
    Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 2020, Vol. 41(1), 29–37 Revista de Historia de la Psicología www.revistahistoriapsicologia.es El Doctor Justinus Kerner y la vidente de Prevorst: Un caso de “psicoterapia” en la primera mitad del siglo XIX Roberto García Álvarez y José Carlos Loredo Narciandi Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), España INFORMACIÓN ART. RESUMEN Recibido: 17 octubre 2019 En este articulo analizamos la práctica clínica llevada a cabo por el Doctor Justinus Kerner (1786-1862) con Aceptado: 2 marzo 2020 la denominada Vidente de Prevorst (1801-1829).La consideramos como una práctica psicológica informal dentro del contexto de la medicina romántica y las ideas espiritistas. De hecho, fue un antecedente Palabras clave del espiritismo posterior y, a nuestro juicio, contenía un sistema psicológico implícito, con su propia Espiritismo, psicoterapia, definición de subjetividad. Este sistema y, sobre todo, sus prácticas entroncarán indirectamente con la tecnologías del Yo, psicoterapia moderna. Para mostrar en qué sentido, y a modo de estudio de un caso, acudimos a algunas Kerner ideas de Héctor González y Marino Pérez y a la Teoría de los Factores Comunes de Jerome D. Frank. Doctor Justinus Kerner and the Seeress of Prevorst: A case of “psychotherapy” in the first half of the 19th century ABSTRACT Key words This paper aims to analyze the clinical practice carried out by Dr. Justinus Kerner (1786-1862) on the Psychoterapy, so-called Seeress of Prevorst (1801-1829). We consider it as an informal psychological practice within Kerner, a context of romantic medicine and spiritist ideas. In fact, it was an antecedent of later spiritism and spiritism, technologies of the Self it involved an implicit psychological system with its own definition of subjectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Theodora's Prophetic Revelation
    David W. Wood Theodora’s Prophetic Revelation The Open Biographical Secrets of Rudolf Steiner’s Drama Characters, Part II The present text is a continuation of the research approach followed in our earlier article “The Course of Dr. Strader’s Life”. It seeks to uncover the identity of the real-life historical personality behind Rudolf Steiner’s drama character of the seeress Theodora.1 This character is in turn a metamorphosis of the figure of the Hawk in Goethe’s Fairy Tale. Both Theodora and the Hawk unite in themselves two events: they reflect the final glow of a past epoch before catching the first rays of a newly dawning day. Spiritual Realism Steiner’s very first idea for a theatre play in Munich in the summer of 1910 was not to perform a mystery drama of his own composition, but a dramatized version of Goethe’s Fairy Tale of the Green Snake and Beautiful Lily. However, the project ran into difficulties. The fairy tale images that were suitable for Goethe’s epoch had to be metamorphosed and rendered more realistic in Steiner’s time: “It did not work. One had to conceive it in a much more realistic manner. And out of this there arose the Portal of Initiation. It is obvious: during Goethe’s time the epoch had not yet arrived in which one could carry over what could be seized in fine fairy tale images into the real figures that are in the Portal of Initiation.”2 Steiner designated the art of this first drama as “spiritual realism”, because it sought to depict in an artistic manner real spiritual experiences: “It is carried out with a certain aesthetic feeling, everything in it is spiritual-realistic.
    [Show full text]
  • Il Caso Della Veggente Di Prevorst
    Francesco Lamendola Leggere con lo stomaco, vedere gli spiriti: il caso della veggente di Prevorst Uno dei libri del paranormale che ebbero più larga diffusione nel XIX secolo, affascinando migliaia di lettori e suscitando accese discussioni, fu Die Seherin von Prevorst del dottor Justinus A. C. Kerner, dedicato a un caso notevolissimo di facoltà chiaroveggenti e medianiche, da parte di un soggetto femminile altamente sensitivo. Fu un'opera che fece epoca, spingendo il pubblico delle persone colte a prendere posizione pro o contro la veridicità degli straordinari fenomeni in esso riferiti con abbondanza di particolari. Poi, dopo alcuni decenni di appassionati dibattiti, l'interesse per quel «caso» andò gradualmente smorzandosi e alcuni studiosi del paranormale, che inizialmente si erano mostrati possibilisti sulla serietà di esso, finirono per bollarlo come un gigantesca cantonata, e vi misero una pietra sopra. Ma chi era Justinus Kerner? Si trattava di un medico tedesco dalle idee piuttosto eterodosse, che passava per un eccentrico, forse anche per la sua passione di comporre canzoni e scrivere poesie. Simili attitudini non erano particolarmente apprezzate dalla maggior parte dei suoi sussiegosi colleghi; né la società tedesca dei primi decenni dell'Ottocento era l'ambiente più idoneo per apprezzare una visione spregiudicata della medicina, e in genere della scienza, com'era la sua. Possiamo bene immaginare che la pedanteria professorale doveva essere la regola, piuttosto che l'eccezione; e che uomini di scienza liberi da pregiudizi accademici, come lo era Kerner, costituivano delle vere e proprie mosche bianche. Nel 1826, Kerner aveva quarant'anni ed esercitava a professione medica a Weisberg, nei pressi di Heilbronn, circa a metà strada fra Heidelberg e Stoccarda.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mystic Journey of the Soul
    The Mystic Journey of the Soul Gul Afroz Zaman Abstract This article briefly outlines the journey a soul is required to make if it wants to attain a state of union with the Eternal from the confines of its material life on earth. Some basic concepts of the Christian and Sufi esoteric traditions as well as Baha'i mysticism are reviewed. The ultimate goal of these spiritual teachings is the same; the need to come as close to the Source or Creator as possible. The paths may differ slightly, but the need to attain to the "Heavenly Homeland", is the central theme that links them together. Introduction As there are many esoteric traditions within each religion, it is not possible, in this short article, to describe them all so only some basic concepts of the Christian, Sufic and Baha'i teachings are reviewed. One overriding question which has always confronted man is how to undertake this journey, so as to transcend human limitations and to achieve enlightenment, or union with God. Most religions of the world have an exoteric (outer) meaning and an esoteric (inner) meaning. We start with the outer and gradually move to the inner world as and when our spirit longs for a nearness to our creator. This is usually done with short periods of meditation and prayer. The meditation can be based on a word, a sentence, a short prayer or silence. This enables us to reduce and ultimately stop the constant mental dialogue and chatter. This process takes time and effort, and most of all, persistence.
    [Show full text]
  • Wouter J.Hanegraaff
    WOUTER J. HANEGRAAFF LIST OF PUBLICATIONS VERSION 10 JANUARY 2017 1988 ‘De gnosis van Arnold Schönberg’ [The gnosis of Arnold Schönberg], Vooys: Tijdschrift voor Letteren 7:1 (1988), 28-37. 1989 ‘Krishnamurti en de Theosofische Vereniging’ [Krishnamurti and the Theosophical Society], Religieuze Bewegingen in Nederland 19 (1989), 61-94. 1990 ‘Esoterie en muziek: Aan de hand van Schönberg en Webern’ [Esotericism and Music: With Reference to Schönberg and Webern], Mens en Melodie 45:4 (1990), 194-201. Pietro Redondi, Galilei, Ketter: De politieke machtsstrijd rond het proces tegen Galileo Galilei, 1633 (Agon: Amsterdam, 1989). Review in Aanzet 8:3 (1990), 260-263. 1991 ‘Channeling-literatuur: Een vergelijking tussen de boodschappen van Seth, Armerus, Ramala, en “A Course in Miracles”’ [Channeling-Literature: A Comparison between the Messages of Seth, Armerus, Ramala, and “A Course in Miracles”], Religieuze Bewegingen in Nederland 22 (1991), 9-44. 1992 ‘A Dynamic Typological Approach to the Problem of “Post-gnostic” Gnosticism’, ARIES 16 (1992), 5-43. ‘Esoterie, occultisme en (neo)gnostiek: historische en inhoudelijke verbanden’ [Esotericism, Occultism and (Neo)Gnosticism: Connections in Terms of History and of Content], Religieuze Bewegingen in Nederland 25 (1992), 1-28. S. van Wersch, De gnostisch-occulte vloedgolf van Simon de Tovenaar tot New Age: Een kritische beoordeling (Kok: Kampen, 1990). Review in Nederlands Theologisch Tijdchrift 46:3 (1992), 247-248. 1993 ‘In den beginne was de toorn: Het demonische bij Jacob Böhme’ [In the Beginning there was Wrath: The Demonic in Jacob Böhme], in: Ab de Jong & Aleid de Jong (eds.), Kleine Encyclopedie van de Toorn (Utrechtse Theologische Reeks 21), Utrecht 1993, 43-56.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Godless People, Doubt, and Atheism
    IntroductIon Godless People, Doubt, and Atheism Ruy Llera Blanes and Galina Oustinova-Stjepanovic Abstract: In the introduction to this special issue, we set the agenda for researching the aspirations and practices of godless people who seek to thin out religion in their daily lives. We reflect on why processes of disengagement from religion have not been adequately researched in anthropology. Locating this issue’s articles in the anthropological literature on doubt and atheism, we argue for the importance of a com- parative investigation to analyze people’s reluctance to pursue religion. Keywords: atheism, disbelief, disengagement from religion, doubt, god- less people, non-religion, unbelief Being Godless In the current climate of false prophecies of secularism and numerous theories of the resurgence of religions, it is rather unusual to study a way of disengag- ing from religion. A bulk of recent ethnographies tell stories about technologies of self and the adept cultivation of religious dispositions (Mahmood 2005), learning to discern God (Luhrmann 2007), and enacting divine presences in physical rituals, speech acts, dream visions, or materials (Engelke 2007). Ritu- als of presencing the transcendent, the divine, or the immaterial (e.g., Orsi 2005) and well-rehearsed arguments about the resilience of religious spiritu- alities in politics (Bubandt and van Beek 2012) seem to be the order of the day. Building on the growing interest in researching how people demarcate the boundaries of religion and what falls outside (Engelke 2012b, 2014), this special issue suggests that ‘being godless’ is an important empirical reality that encompasses processes, aspirations, and practices that purposefully or inad- vertently lead to the attenuation of one’s religious life.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Rahner on the Soul
    Karl Rahner on the Soul Rev. Terrance W. Klein, S.T.D. Fordham University Karl Rahner rejects the notion that when Christians speak of a soul they are citing a surreptitious citizen of a realm that lies beyond or above science. For Rahner, the purpose of calling the soul the supernatural element of the human person is not to establish two spheres within one human being, but rather to attest to the sheer gratuity of our orientation toward God in Christ. When we use the word “spirit,” we philosophically reference our disposition over and against the world. When we use the word “soul,” we theologically assert the ultimate orientation of this spirit towards God. On Interpretation First, a word about interpretation, which is my task. One of the great Heidegger-inspired insights of twentieth century philosophy is that of the hermeneutical circle. Essentially the notion that we cannot simply seize the insights of another as though these were objects lying ready to hand. Rather, when we try to understand another, we become de facto interpreters, because we can’t help but approach the other in the light of our own preunderstanding. Hence, one cannot hope to approach a text without prejudice, which is always present. What one can do is to try to expose one’s own preunderstanding, so that, brought to light, its engagement with the text can be seen for what it is, a starting place in what is ultimately a conversation with the author. Gadamer taught us that what ultimately makes the conversation a fruitful dialogue, rather than a rapacious misreading, is a common tradition, the mutual questions and concerns that both the author and the interpreter share.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pantheism of Goethe in Its Relation to That of Spinoza
    University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Theses and Dissertations 1918 The pantheism of Goethe in its relation to that of Spinoza Hans Naether State University of Iowa Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd This work has been identified with a Creative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0. Material in the public domain. No restrictions on use. This thesis is available at Iowa Research Online: https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/4084 Recommended Citation Naether, Hans. "The pantheism of Goethe in its relation to that of Spinoza." MA (Master of Arts) thesis, State University of Iowa, 1918. https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.xi8mcgqv Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd THE PANTHEISM OF GOETHE IN ITS RELATION TO THAT OF SPINOZA. A THESIS submitted to The Faculty of the Graduate College of the State University of Iowa in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS by Hans Naether. State University of Iowa 1918. TABLE Of CONTENTS. Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION. 1-8. Chapter 2. MARKED INFLUENCES IN THE 'DEVELOPMENT OF GOETHE ’s THOUGHT. 4-13. Chapter 8. WHAT IS PANTHEISM? 14-16. ! Chapter 4. THE PANTHEISM OF GO^TBE.c"' 19-25. Chapter 5. DID SFIN07A TEACH AN IMMANENT GOD? 26-29. Chapter 6. THE RELATION OE GOETHE. TO SPIN02A . 80-47. Chapter 7. GOETHE’S C M CONCEPTION OE GOD. 46-55. Chapter 8. GCETHE.'S PHILO POPE'S IN FAUST. 46-72. Chapter S. GOETHE’S 'APPROACH TO THEISM. 73—j—96. 1. THE PANTHEISM OE GOETHE IN ITS RELATION TO THAT 0? SPINOZA.
    [Show full text]
  • “For All Those Seeking Integration Between Doctrine and Life, Demkovich’S Soul-Centered Spirituality Provides a Key
    “For all those seeking integration between doctrine and life, Demkovich’s soul-centered spirituality provides a key. Spirituality animates doctrine, which in turn gives meaning to life. An animating spirituality requires religious commitment to beliefs and a community that embodies them. At a time when spiritualities proliferate, and we may not know which way to turn, Demkovich’s approach is both grounded and life-giving.” — Donald Goergen, OP St. Dominic Priory, St. Louis, Missouri Author of Sexual Celibate and Fire of Love: Encountering the Holy Spirit “People often declare, ‘I’m spiritual but not religious.’ Yet as Michael Demkovich so convincingly argues in his wise and erudite new book, A Soul-Centered Life, spirituality not grounded in religious community nor firmly tethered to solid doctrine fails to deliver, for ultimately it cannot address the great questions of life. Packed to overflowing with theological and historical riches, Demkovich’s book takes its stand against private, self-pleasing spiritualities and points the way toward a fully integrated, deeply meaningful, intellectually satisfying Christian life.” — Paula Huston Author of Forgiveness: Following Jesus into Radical Loving A Soul-Centered Life Exploring an Animated Spirituality Michael Demkovich, OP A Michael Glazier Book LITURGICAL PRESS Collegeville, Minnesota www.litpress.org A Michael Glazier Book published by Liturgical Press. Cover design by Ann Blattner. Photo courtesy of Photos.com. Excerpts from Ignatius of Loyola: Spiritual Exercises and Selected Works (CWS; Edited by George E. Ganss, SJ). Copyright © 1991 by George E. Ganss, SJ. Paulist Press, Inc., New York/Mahwah, NJ. Reprinted by permission of Paulist Press, Inc. www.paulistpress.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Religion
    * Philosophy of Religion An Anthology SEVENTH EDITION MICHAEL REA University of Notre Dame LOUIS P. POJMAN Late of the United States Military Academy, West Point CENGAGE Learning· Australia • Brazil• Mexico • Singapore • United Kingdom• United States PLATO• IMMORTALITY OF THE SOUL 677 364 676 PART VII• DEATH AND IMMORTALITY should remember a lot of what A remembers; fi.1rthermore, B should remember at the c11tire history (!f IVcste111 philosophy is b11t aj(1(1t11orc to Plato. T71c cxm71ts that comprise thcji1llml'- made i11g sclffti!>ll co11re111 Plillo's l'i<'ll's abollf the so11/. Ammlil(I! to Plato, h11111c111 bcil(l!S 11rc composed <!( pain" least some of what A takes to be "present expe1ience." There should also be some fll'O s11bs1i111C!'s: bod)' a11d so11/. Qf these, the 1111c scf( is the so11/, 1Fhich !iJJcs 011 (!ficr the death <!f rhc LOil. ·. continuity among their goals, desires, and other mental states. (This is not body. All <!(Plato's 11'1iti11gs arc i11 thc.f(1m1 !11 the.first (fi·o111 Alribiadcs I) .Socra- peopl• to deny that goals, beliefa, and desires change over time. But the idea is that if B tes mx11cs ll'ith Alcibiades abo11t the !nil' scff 771c scco11d diah\l!llC ({i-0111 the Phacdo) takes place ill bum exists, say, a mere ten seconds later than A, and if B has beliefs, desires, goals, and priso11, ll'hcre Sormtcs mJJairs his e.\W11tio11. J-le is <:OiTcd ,, ll'a)' <!( esrnpe /mt njerts it, mg11il(I! that it (Exod memo1ies vi1tually 11011e of which overlap with A's, then 13 just is not the same per- 11'011/d be i111111oral to.flee s11ch aJ1tc 111 this time mu/ that he is ccrtai11 '!(a bettcr l!fi· qfier death.
    [Show full text]
  • Personhood, the Soul and Non-Conscious Human Beings: Some Critical Reflections on Recent Ormsf of Argumentation Within the Pro-Life Movement
    Salve Regina University Digital Commons @ Salve Regina Faculty and Staff - Articles & Papers Faculty and Staff Summer 2007 Personhood, the Soul and Non-Conscious Human Beings: Some Critical Reflections on Recent ormsF of Argumentation within the Pro-Life Movement Peter J. Colosi Salve Regina University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/fac_staff_pub Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, Other Philosophy Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Colosi, Peter J., "Personhood, the Soul and Non-Conscious Human Beings: Some Critical Reflections on Recent Forms of Argumentation within the Pro-Life Movement" (2007). Faculty and Staff - Articles & Papers. 63. https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/fac_staff_pub/63 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Staff at Digital Commons @ Salve Regina. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty and Staff - Articles & Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Salve Regina. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Personhood, the Soul, and Non-Conscious Human Beings: Some Critical Reflections on Recent Forms of Argumentation within the Pro-Life Movement Peter J. Colosi ABSTRACT This paper has grown out of concerns that I have about the way in which some pro-life arguments have been developing recently, and it is written in a spirit of frank dialogue with those whom I consider allies. I present three basic problems within some prominent contemporary pro-life argumenta- tion, all three of which are rooted in a general tendency towards relying on empirical science in an increasingly exclusive way as the foundation of those arguments.
    [Show full text]