Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 49 Issue 1 Article 4 April 1972 Amtrak: Rail Renaissance or Requiem William E. Thoms Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation William E. Thoms, Amtrak: Rail Renaissance or Requiem, 49 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 29 (1972). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol49/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact
[email protected],
[email protected]. AMTRAK: RAIL RENAISSANCE OR REQUIEM? WILLIAM E. THOMS* I. DECLINE AND FALL in an OR ONE HALF-CENTURY, the American passenger train has been Faccelerating stage of decline. In the early twenties the river steamers had vanished, the bus had not emerged, automobiles were an urban luxury of questionable reliability, and the airplane was still an ex- perimental novelty. Reliance on railroads for transport of passengers was as great as reliance on the private automobile today. Transportation was carried out directly by private railroad cor- porations on a for-profit basis. The conditions of a free market never were perfectly apparent in these operations, since fares, schedules, and frequency of service were subject to the authority of various state regu- latory bodies and of the Interstate Commerce Commission. But private ownership and comparative lack of subsidy were hallmarks of American rail passenger transportation, which distinguished it from the majority of Western nations.