DOCSLIB.ORG

GA Appendix 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

METREX data base ofEuropean metropolitan region and area contacts Metropolitan METREX Single and multi authority President/Mayor Minister/Committee Director Planner International region or area METREX members Chair/planning politician or Chief Planner or planning contact or European contact 1 Aachen (MHAL) Aachen (MHAL) Dr Jurgen Linden Thywissen Christian Basting (MHAL) 2 Aberdeen Aberdeen City Council Peter Cockhead 3 Alpes-Mar 1 METREX 1 Conseil Général des Alpes-Maritimes Charles Ginesy Christian Estrosi Monique Ragazzi-Cason Luc Gueydan Jean-Robert Lefevre Communaute d'agglomération de Nice 4 Amsterdam 2 METREX (2) 2 Provincie Noord-Holland Frank van Dooren Johan Ottenhof 3 Stad Amsterdam Klaas de Boer Hans Smit 5 Ankara Greater Municipality of Ankara I Melih Gökçek Omer Faruk Erciyes 6 Antwerp Provinciebestur van Antwerpen Camille Paulis Mme L Janssens Stad Antwerpen Leona Detiege M E Pairon Mme G van Hove Mme. M Melis 7 Athens 3 METREX (3) 4 Organisation of Athens Avghi Markopoulou Catherine Sykianaki 5 Prefecture of Eastern Attica Dimitrios Fragos Dimitris Pantilieris 6 Prefecture of Piraeus Mary Sorotos-Tsanakis Stavros Kostopoulos 8 Barcelona 4 METREX 7 Generalitat de Catalunya Felip Puig i Godes Albert Serratosa Francesc Carbonell Saki Aciman 9 Bari Regione Puglia Dr Friedrich Mair Provincia di Bari 10 Basel Kanton Basel-Stadt Fritz Schumacher 11 Belfast DOE Northern Ireland Dennis Glass Belfast City Council Sammy Wilson Danny Lavery Thérèse McGivern 12 Belgrade City Assembly of Belgrade Slobodan Drobnjacovics Slobodanka Jastrebic 13 Berlin Land Berlin und Land Brandenburg Peter Streider Dr LorenzRautenbauch Dr Gerd Gebhardt Wilhelm Schulte 14 Bilbao 5 METREX 8 Gobierno del Pais Vasco Martin Arregi Sanmiguel 15 Birmingham Warwickshire County Council Ian Charles Bottrill John Deegan Andy Cowan Birmingham City Council Sir Albert Bore Emtys Jones Martin Eade Jon Bloomfield 16 Bologna 6 METREX (2) 9 Regione Emilia-Romagna Renato Cocchi Roberto Raffaelli Dott Claudio Tolomelli Lodovico Gherardi 10 Provincia di Bologna Vittorio Prodi Tiberio Rabboni Claudio Paltrinieri Piero Paolo Cavalcoli 17 Bordeaux Communaute Urbaine de Bordeaux Elie Pedron 18 Bradford City of Bradford Metropolitan DC Margaret Eaton Latif Darr Alan Mainwaring Christopher Hughes 19 Bratislava City of Bratislava Marta Simova Gabriel Czech 20 Bremen Freie Hansestadt Bremen Dr Henning Scherf Dr Schulte Detlef Kniemeyer Ralph Baumheier 21 Bristol Bristol City Council George Micklewright Helen Hollands Stephen Wray John Howe James Holden 22 Brno 7 METREX 11 City of Brno Milan Simonovsky Vladimir Dominik Jaroslav Josifek Regional Authority of South Moravia Sárka Paulikova 23 Brussels 8 METREX (2) 12 Région Bruxelles-Capitale Willem Draps Kris Lauwers Myriam Goblet 13 Ville de Bruxelles Henri Simmons 24 Bucharest Bucharest Municipality Victoria-Mariella Berza Aurel Jacob 25 Budapest 9 METREX 14 Central Region of Hungary (Pro Régió Agency) András T Mészáros Tamás Lukovich Tamás Gordos 26 Cardiff Cardifff County Council Russell Goodway Gill Bird Emyr Evans 27 Chisnau Primaria Municipiului Chisnau 28 Copenhagen 10 METREX 15 Øresundkommiten (Coenhagen/Malmö) Birger Olofsson Jarl Zinn 29 den Haag Kroon/Meer 30 Dijon Communaute d'agglomération Dijonnaise Isabelle Brun 31 Dortmund Kriesfreie Stadt Dortmund Günter Samtlebe Horst Glaser Bernd Reiff 32 Dresden Stadt Dresden Günter Just Jörn Walter 33 Dublin Dublin Regional Authority Betty Coffey Patricia Potter Mary Darley 34 Duisberg Kriesfreie Stadt Duisberg Bärbel Zieling Thomas Grothe 35 Dusseldorf Landeshaupstadt Düsseldorf Marlies Smeets Bayer 36 Edinburgh The City of Edinburgh Council Donald Anderson Robert Cairns 37 Essen Kriesfreie Stadt Essen Annette Jäger Francke 38 Eurociudad 11 METREX 16 Communauté d'agglomération de D Ander Arzelus Vasca Bayonne Bayonne-Angle-Biarritz Dna Elena Moreda St Sebastián Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa 39 Firenze Provincia di Firenze Michelle Gesualdi Luciana Cappelli Luigi Ulivieri 40 Frankfurt Kreisfreie Stadt Frankfurt am Main Petra Roth Planungsverband Frankfurt Region Rhein Main Sabine von Bebenburg Helga Steindorf 41 Gdansk Gdansk City Council Tomasz Posacki Ryszard Gruda Edmund Wisiewski (Roman Sebastyanski) Chris Johnson 42 Geneva Ville de Geneve Michel Ruffieux Marie-Jose Wiedemer-d'Ozio 43 Genova 12 METREX 17 Provincia di Genova Marta Vincenzi Pierpaolo Tomiolo 44 Glasgow 13 METREX 18 Glasgow City Council James Gordon Steven Purcell Rodger McConnell John Bury Scottish Enterprise Glasgow Ron Culley Gordon Kennedy Liz Gribben Glasgow & Clyde Valley Structure James Coyle Vincent Goodstadt Grahame Buchan Plan Joint Committee 19 The Scottish Greenbelt Company Ltd Edward Roe John Brown 45 Göteborg The Gothenburg Region Association Erik Palme Hans Ander of Local Authorities 46 Granada 14 METREX 20 Ayuntamiento de Granada D Francisco Ruiz Dávila D José Luis Canavate 47 Grenoble Grenoble Alpes Métropole Philippe Douste-Blazy Marc Bel 48 Hamburg Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg Willfreid Maier Walter Catherine Hoja 49 Hannover Landeshaupstadt Hannover Herbert Schmalstieg Jürgen Eppinger D Reinhardt Martinsen Jürgen Kriegel 50 Helsinki 15 METREX 21 Helsinki City Council Suvi Rihtniemi Jussi Vuorinen 22 YTV Helsinki Metropolitan Antti Viren 51 Istanbul Istanbul Greater City Authority 52 Izmir 53 Katowice Katowice City Council Marek Tomaszewski Dr Justyna Gorgon 54 Kiev State Administration for the City of Kyiv 55 Köln Kreisfreie Stadt Köln Norbert Burger J Diehl 56 Krakow 16 METREX 23 Municipality of Krakow Krzystof Bieda Kazimierz Trafas 57 Leeds Leeds City Council Brian Walker Elizabeth Minkin John Lynch 58 Leipzig Stadt Leipzig Wolfgang Tiefensee Reinhardt Wolpert Wolfgang Kunz Prof D Joachim Burdaik 59 Lille Communauté urbaine de Lille Pierre Mauroy M. Guilleminot Pierre-Yves Delcours 60 Lisboa 17 METREX 24 Area Metropolitana de Lisboa Dr José Eduardo Costa Dra Dalila Arraújo 61 Liverpool Liverpool City Council Mike Storey Peter Millea Mike Burchnall Carol Judge 62 Ljubljana City of Ljubljana Viktorija Potocnik Joze Dekleva Marjan Bezan 63 London 18 METREX 25 Greater London Authority Ken Livingstone Nicky Gavron Hannah Crook 64 Luxembourg Scholtes Stolb 65 Lviv City of Lviv State Administration Vasyl S Kuybida Ivan Levytsky Taras Voznyak 66 Lyon Communauté Urbaine de Grand Lyon Gérard Collomb Benoît Quignon 67 Madrid Ayuntamiento de Madrid D I Del Río Garcia de Sola Cristobal D Frenando Martínez Vidal 68 Malaga Ayuntamiento de Málaga Dna Celia Villalobos Gonzalo Padron Ramirez Javier Gutierrez Sordo 69 Mälmo (see Copenhagen/Malmö) 70 Manchester Manchester City Council Richard Leese Val Stevens Peter Babb David Carter 71 Marseille Communauté urbaine Marseille Provence Métropole Jean-Claude Gaudin Anne-Marie Charvet 72 Milano 19 METREX 26 Regione Lombardia Giulano Sala Luciana Genoli 73 Minsk Municipality of Minsk D Alexander Kolontay 74 München 20 METREX 27 Regionaler Planungsverband München Kristian Breu Landeshaupstadt München Klaus Schussmann Stephan Reiss-Schmidt 75 Nancy Agence d'Urbanisme de l'Agglomération Nancéenne André Rossinot André Rongeot 76 Nantes Communauté urbaine de Nantes Jean-Marc Ayrault Laurent Théry Jean Yves Pailloux 77 Napoli Provincia di Napoli Prof Amato Lamberti Prof Guido Riano Tommaso Sodano 78 Newcastle City of Newcastle-upon-Tyne Council Tony Flynn Kevan Jones John Miller Jane Hedges 79 Nicosia Municipality of Nicosia Lellos Demetriades Andreas Ashiotis 80 Nürnberg Stadt Nürnberg Dr Peter Schönlein Herrn Bandilla 81 Odessa City of Odessa Council Eduard I Gurvits Svitlana Boivakh 82 Oslo Oslo City Council Dr Ellen de Vibe 83 Palermo Provincia Regionale di Palermo Giuseppe la Porta Salvatorre Meli 84 Paris Conseil Régional d’Ile de France Jocelyne Riou Jean-François Chougnet Luc Darloy Alain le Saux 85 Porto 21 METREX 28 Area Metropolitana do Porto Valentim Loureiro Dr António Tavares 86 Poznan Poznan City Council Wojciech Kaczmarek Krzysztof Urbaniak 87 Prague 22 METREX 29 City of Prague Zdenek Kovarik Dr Milan Turba 88 Riga 23 METREX 30 City of Riga Council Andris Berzins Eva Kalvina Inguss Vircavs 89 Roma 24 METREX (2) 31 Regione Lazio Pietro Badaloni Armando Dionisi 32 Provincia di Roma Silvano Moffa Mario Canapini Maria Prezioso 90 Rotterdam 25 METREX 33 Rotterdam City Council Hans Kombrink Fred de Ruiter Richard Kouprie 91 Rouen Communauté de l"Agglomération Rouennaise François Zimeray 92 Ruhr Kommunalverband Ruhrgebeit Wilhelm Pütter 93 Salzburg Land Salzburg Franz Dollinger 94 Sarajevo City of Sarajevo 95 Sevilla 26 METREX (2) 34 Junta de Andalucia Dna Josefina Cruz Vallón Dna Gloria Verga González 35 Ayuntamiento de Sevilla D Rafael Carmona Ruiz D José Garcia-Tapial y Leon 96 Sheffield Sheffield City Council Peter Moore John Mothersole 97 Skopje Skopje City Council Naste Spasovski Jovan Manasievski 98 Sofia Sofia Municipality Stefan Sofianski Stoyan Yanev Boryana Savova 99 S C Metro 27 METREX (2) Borough of Bournemouth Wilson Bird/Madden 36 Borough of Poole Bob Williams David Ralph City of Portsmouth Leo Madden City of Southampton June Bridle Phil Bird Susan Mullan 100 St Peters'g St Petersburg Administration Oleg Kharchenko Victor Polishchuk 101 Stockholm 28 METREX (2) 37 Stockholm County Council Elwe Nilsson Bo Malmsten Hans Hede 38 Stockholm City Council Carl Cederschöld Bertil Karlberg Mats Pemer 102 Strasbourg Communauté urbaine de Strasbourg Robert Grossman Alain de Bouteiller 103 Stuttgart 29 METREX 39 Verband Region Stuttgart Fritz Dr Bernd Steinacher Dr. Jüergen Wurmthaler 104 Szczecin 30 METREX 40 Municipality of Sczeczin Marek
Recommended publications
  • Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site Supplementary Planning Document – Liverpool City Council Consultation – Wirral Council Response ______

    Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site Supplementary Planning Document – Liverpool City Council Consultation – Wirral Council Response ______

    WIRRAL COUNCIL CABINET – 9th April 2009 REPORT OF THE DEPUTY CHIEF EXECUTIVE/DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE SERVICES LIVERPOOL MARITIME MERCANTILE CITY WORLD HERITAGE SITE SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT – LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL CONSULTATION – WIRRAL COUNCIL RESPONSE _________________________________________________________________________ 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Liverpool City Council has issued a consultation draft Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) on the Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site (WHS), which includes the Liverpool Waterfront and parts of Liverpool City Centre. The Liverpool Waterfront has a buffer zone extending to the centre of the River Mersey, with rigorous controls on development to be provided in that zone by policies in the emerging Liverpool Local Development Framework. The City Council’s draft SPD sets out a more detailed planning policy framework for the WHS, which has an overall aim of encouraging economic regeneration, whilst ensuring the protection of the outstanding universal value of the WHS. 1.2 Consultation responses are required by 14 th April and Cabinet is asked to agree that the comments of the Director of Corporate Services within this report form the response to Liverpool City Council on the Liverpool World Heritage Site Supplementary Planning Document. 2. The Consultation Supplementary Planning Document Outlined 2.1 The Liverpool WHS was defined by the United Nations Educational and Scientific Organisation (UNESCO) in 2004 as: ‘the supreme example of a commercial port at the time of Britain’s greatest global influence’ . Both the port and parts of the city centre were included to reflect the influence on the built environment of the early development of dock construction, port management and international trading systems in the 18 th and 19 th centuries.
  • Household Flood Resilience and Protection

    Household Flood Resilience and Protection

    Household flood resilience and protection: a Defra consultation workshop (E8515) Manchester United Football Club, Sir Matt Busby Way, Old Trafford, Manchester - NAME POSITION ORGANISATION STATUS Mr Shaun Alexander Merseyside Waste & Disposal Delegate Mr Mark Bartlett Civil Contingencies Lancaster City Council Delegate Officer Mr Geoff Baslett Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Delegate Mr John Batty Director Bluejohn Marketing Chairman Mr David Beddoes Student University of Wolverhampton Delegate Mr David Bithell Public Health Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council Delegate Services Manager Mr Rob Bromley Emergency Planning Trafford Metropolitan Borough Delegate Officer Mr Samuel Brougham Architect/Sustainabilit PRP Architects Delegate y Consultant Mr Mark Camborne Health,Safety & Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council Delegate Resilience Manager Ms Rita Carletti Project Officer Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council Delegate Mr Philip Charles Project Manager CIRIA CIRIA Staff Mr Ian Clark Principal Engineer RSK Group Ltd Delegate Mr Derek Cochrane Director Derek Cochrane Associates Delegate Ms Aimee Conroy Traniee Emergency Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council Delegate Planning Officer Mr Stephen Corrigan Head of Emergency Liverpool Primary Care Trust Delegate Planning Mrs Maureen Denham Claims Handler RBS Delegate Mr Ian Dixon Watch Manager Merseyside Fire & Rescue Service Delegate Mr Mark Ellis Regeneration Team Capita Symonds Ltd Delegate Leader Miss Emma-Jane Ellison Emergency Planning Shropshire County Council Delegate Officer Mr Glenn Finch Special
  • Historical and Contemporary Archaeologies of Social Housing: Changing Experiences of the Modern and New, 1870 to Present

    Historical and Contemporary Archaeologies of Social Housing: Changing Experiences of the Modern and New, 1870 to Present

    Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Emma Dwyer School of Archaeology and Ancient History University of Leicester 2014 Thesis abstract: Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Emma Dwyer This thesis has used building recording techniques, documentary research and oral history testimonies to explore how concepts of the modern and new between the 1870s and 1930s shaped the urban built environment, through the study of a particular kind of infrastructure that was developed to meet the needs of expanding cities at this time – social (or municipal) housing – and how social housing was perceived and experienced as a new kind of built environment, by planners, architects, local government and residents. This thesis also addressed how the concepts and priorities of the Victorian and Edwardian periods, and the decisions made by those in authority regarding the form of social housing, continue to shape the urban built environment and impact on the lived experience of social housing today. In order to address this, two research questions were devised: How can changing attitudes and responses to the nature of modern life between the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries be seen in the built environment, specifically in the form and use of social housing? Can contradictions between these earlier notions of the modern and new, and our own be seen in the responses of official authority and residents to the built environment? The research questions were applied to three case study areas, three housing estates constructed between 1910 and 1932 in Birmingham, London and Liverpool.
  • Policy 11.Qxd.Qxd

    Policy 11.Qxd.Qxd

    GERMANY’S ELECTORAL SYSTEM AT 60: TRENDS AND REFORMS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY AICGS GERMAN-AMERICAN ISSUES 11 Karen Donfried Olaf Gersemann Beate Jochimsen Jörg Siegmund AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CONTEMPORARY GERMAN STUDIES THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 3 About the Authors 5 The American Institute for Contemporary German Studies strengthens the German-American relation - The Decline of the Volksparteien 7 ship in an evolving Europe and changing world. The Institute produces objective and original analyses of Economic Challenges for the New German Government 19 developments and trends in Germany, Europe, and the United States; creates new transatlantic networks; and facilitates dialogue among the busi - The German Fiscal Federal System 27 ness, political, and academic communities to manage differences and define and promote common inter - U.S. Expectations of Germany after the Election 37 ests. ©2009 by the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies ISBN 1-933942-22-3 ADDITIONAL COPIES: Additional Copies of this Policy Report are available for $5.00 to cover postage and handling from the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 202/332-9312, Fax 202/265-9531, E-mail: [email protected] Please consult our website for a list of online publications: http://www.aicgs.org The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. germany’s electoral system at 60 FOREWORD When Germany elected a new government on 27 September 2009, it did so not with an eye to the party, economic, or political successes of the previous sixty years.
  • Framework Users (Clients)

    Framework Users (Clients)

    TC622 – NORTH WEST CONSTRUCTION HUB MEDIUM VALUE FRAMEWORK (2019 to 2023) Framework Users (Clients) Prospective Framework users are as follows: Local Authorities - Cheshire - Cheshire East Council - Cheshire West and Chester Council - Halton Borough Council - Warrington Borough Council; Cumbria - Allerdale Borough Council - Copeland Borough Council - Barrow in Furness Borough Council - Carlisle City Council - Cumbria County Council - Eden District Council - South Lakeland District Council; Greater Manchester - Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council - Bury Metropolitan Borough Council - Manchester City Council – Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council - Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council - Salford City Council – Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council - Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council - Trafford Metropolitan Borough - Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council; Lancashire - Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council – Blackpool Borough Council - Burnley Borough Council - Chorley Borough Council - Fylde Borough Council – Hyndburn Borough Council - Lancashire County Council - Lancaster City Council - Pendle Borough Council – Preston City Council - Ribble Valley Borough Council - Rossendale Borough Council - South Ribble Borough Council - West Lancashire Borough Council - Wyre Borough Council; Merseyside - Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council - Liverpool City Council - Sefton Council - St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council - Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council; Police Authorities - Cumbria Police Authority - Lancashire Police Authority - Merseyside
  • Merseyside Leaders and Chief Executives' Meeting

    Merseyside Leaders and Chief Executives' Meeting

    Liverpool City Region Port Access Steering Group Terms of Reference 1. Introduction The Terms of Reference set out below outline context, governance, focus and responsibilities of the Liverpool City Region (LCR) Port Access Steering Group. The Group has been established to support the City Region Cabinet and Local Enterprise Partnership and the delivery of the LCR City Region Deal commitment to address transport access to the Port of Liverpool in support of the wider Superport proposals. 2. Terms of Reference Purpose . To deliver the commitments in the Liverpool City Region Deal relating to access to the Port of Liverpool. To facilitate the delivery of the packages of transport measures across all modes that will provide the required transport access improvements for the future of the Port of Liverpool through the development and implementation of an agreed work programme. Shared priority statement . To see the realisation of the economic benefits of SuperPort and the Port of Liverpool expansion for the wider City Region and for the local communities near the Port. To support interventions that will mitigate and manage the environmental impacts of port expansion and associated transport activity Accountability . The partners within the Group will be accountable to each other to ensure that partnership working is productive, sustainable and supportive. Partners responsible for specific interventions will be accountable to the Steering Group for ensuring the delivery those interventions. The Steering Group will be directly accountable to the Liverpool City Region Cabinet. Reports on progress will also be provided for information to and engagement with the Local Transport Plan Board, the Local Transport Body, the Local Enterprise Partnership Superport Committee and the City Region Deal Implementation group.
  • Effectiveness of SRB Programmes Scrutiny

    Effectiveness of SRB Programmes Scrutiny

    Scrutiny Report to City Council The Effectiveness of Birmingham SRB Programmes in Getting People into Work safeguarded’ be retained only as an ancillary outcome measure of the employment impact. 5. Thematic regeneration schemes such as Enterprise Link, Core Skills and the CEBP were designed to focus on one particular aspect of the problems facing the community or business. Arguably this single focus has enabled the schemes to have greater impact. The early programmes arose partly because the funding previously allocated to those types of actions was brought into the SRB. Many of the comments we received about the early rounds indicated concern because the various agencies “who were said to be trying to get their money back.” However the schemes in Birmingham such as the Core Skills Programme have been nationally recognised as innovative best practice and several comments were received on the positive impact the schemes have had on mainstream services. 6. The area-based schemes are all complex initiatives targeting large densely populated urban areas. Within the scope of the SRB the programmes have tried to create a balance between projects designed to address social, economic and physical issues. In SRB 1 for example the total grant was £12.8m and the key actions included commercial area improvements, housing and education and labour market initiatives. The nature of the market failure in these areas is so severe that the programmes are in danger of spreading themselves too thinly to achieve a significant impact. This point was made several times by programme managers and board members alike. 6.3 The Partnership Process and Management arrangements 6.3.1 The Partnership Process A central feature to the SRBCF has been the partnership approach to regeneration.
  • Administrative & Public

    Administrative & Public

    VINCENT FRASER QC Year of call: 1981 Year of silk: 2001 Clerked by: Gary Smith Mark Ronson AREAS OF EXPERTISE: Administrative & Public Law Environment Licensing Local Government Planning Administrative & Public Law Vincent is a leading practitioner in many aspects of Administrative, Public and Local Government Law, advising regularly on several areas which are closely associated with Vincent's other practice areas, including Education, Highways, and Licensing. Amongst other matters he has dealt with Byelaws and orders, Constitutional issues, Council finance including council Tax and domestic rating, Education, highways and public rights of way, ombudsman's powers and procedures, Road traffic regulations and Standards, conduct and probity of local government officials and boundary reviews. Significant Reported Cases Education Vincent advises on wide range of education issues, including special needs, education reorganisation and finance. Highways Vincent regularly advises on and appears in cases involving highways and rights of way including litigation and footpath and rights of way inquiries. He has appeared in cases addressing the existence, extent and status of highways. He has regularly appeared in court and at inquiries addressing stopping up and diversion of highways. He has advised on and promoted traffic regulation orders at inquiry. He has appeared in arbitration addressing utilities in the highway. Human Rights Vincent advises on and appears in litigation addressing human rights. Judicial Review Vincent has extensive experience advising on and appearing in judicial reviews. Local Government Vincent deals with local authority powers, administration and finance. Election law Vincent has experience of boundary reviews, for example successfully representing Wirral BC at the review into the Merseyside constituencies.
  • Liverpool City Council: Representation

    Liverpool City Council: Representation

    Tony Reeves Chief Executive 24 May 2021 Catherine Frances Director General, Local Government, Strategy And Analysis Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF Dear Ms. Frances Liverpool City Council at its meeting on 19th May, considered the ‘Best Value’ Inspection Report undertaken by Max Caller, Mervyn Greer and Viviane Geary and your letter dated 24th March 2021 setting out the Secretary of State’s proposed intervention package for Liverpool. By unanimous agreement at Full Council, I have been instructed to send this letter outlining the council’s response, together with the detailed tables attached at Annex A. The Mayor and Leaders from all opposition parties are clear in their commitment to collectively leading the Council’s improvement journey and playing a full role in the design, implementation and monitoring of the Improvement Plan. The report acknowledges our openness and co-operation with the inspection team as they conducted their work and I would equally like to put on record, our thanks for their professionalism and subsequent ongoing support, as we develop our response to the report and improvement plans. As you will be aware, at our suggestion, we have consulted Max Caller on urgent property transactions. We are also doing so on the recruitment of a new City Solicitor and Monitoring Officer, resulting from the retirement of the current post holder. Max Caller has also been consulted on transitional arrangements for the Monitoring Officer position and either he or incoming Commissioners, will be involved in all further decisions leading up to the appointment of a new postholder.
  • Newsletter Vom 09. November 2018

    Newsletter Vom 09. November 2018

    NEWSLETTER DER PRESSESTELLE DES SENATS | 09.11.2018 Wochenrückblick 02. bis 09. November 2018 Liebe Leserinnen und Leser, wir wünschen Ihnen informative Einblicke beim Lesen des Wochenrückblicks der Pressestelle des Senats. Die Senatspressestelle bei Twitter: twitter.com/RathausHB_news Bürgermeister Carsten Sieling bei Facebook: facebook.com/carstensieling Das Rathaus bei Facebook: facebook.com/RathausBremen "Was geht mich das an?" – 21. "Nacht Mit Highspeed in die digitale Zukunft: der Jugend" im Rathaus Startschuss für Gigabit in Bremen und Bremerhaven 09.11.2018 Unter dem Motto "Was geht mich das an?" kamen gestern Abend (Donnerstag, 8. November 2018) wieder über 1000 Menschen zur 21. "Nacht der Jugend" in das Bremer Rathaus. 80 Jahre nach der 09.11.2018 Vodafone stellt sein komplettes Kabel- Reichspogromnacht stellten Jugendliche die Frage Glasfasernetz in Bremen und Bremerhaven auf nicht nur in Bezug auf die Vergangenheit, sondern vor Gigabit um. Ab sofort bietet Vodafone hier rund allem auch für die Gegenwart. 340.000 Kabel-Haushalten Internetanschlüsse mit weiter Geschwindigkeiten von bis zu 1.000 Megabit pro Sekunde im Download an. weiter Bürgermeister Carsten Sieling: Bremen übernimmt Vorsitz der Antisemitismus entschieden Konferenz der Sportministerinnen bekämpfen und Sportminister für 2019 und 2020 08.11.2018 Bürgermeister Dr. Carsten Sieling hat zum 08.11.2018 Das Land Bremen übernimmt zum entschiedenen Kampf gegen alle Formen von Jahreswechsel 2018/2019 für zwei Jahre den Vorsitz Antisemitismus aufgerufen. "Antisemitismus hat in in der Konferenz der Sportministerinnen und Bremen keinen Platz: egal ob er von rechts oder links, Sportminister (SMK). Auf der heutigen SMK-Sitzung von Moslems, Christen oder Atheisten, von Menschen (8. November) im Saarländischen St.
  • Where Science Drives New Business. the Future of Knowledge Process Outsourcing in Liverpool City Region

    Where Science Drives New Business. the Future of Knowledge Process Outsourcing in Liverpool City Region

    KNOWLEDGE PROCESS OUTSOURCING WHERE SCIENCE DRIVES NEW BUSINESS. THE FUTURE OF KNOWLEDGE PROCESS OUTSOURCING IN LIVERPOOL CITY REGION The convergence of science, technology, engineering and financial services puts us on the cusp of a new business revolution. For businesses looking to solve complex data challenges or redefine customer relationship and business development processes, Liverpool City Region is leveraging a unique set of nationally-significant science assets to become a leader in exploring the possibilities of knowledge process outsourcing. Image courtesy of STFC From Robotic Process Automation software pioneers Blue Prism, to high performance computing, data analytics and cognitive technologies based at Sci-Tech Daresbury, this is a place where scientists, engineers and mathematicians are driving innovative solutions for the financial and business services sector. Home to the UK’s first Bull Sequana X1000 supercomputer. It will allow industry users to try out the state-of-the-art technology and develop applications using the latest advances in artificial intelligence and high performance data analytics. WE ARE READY FOR BUSINESS. HARNESSING THE POWER OF HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING Liverpool City Region is home to the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) Hartree Centre an internationally-recognised hub for high performance computing, data analytics and machine learning. These converging technologies are increasingly combined by scientists to address problems across a wide range of sectors from food production to cancer care. Backed by over £170 million of government funding and significant partnerships with organisations such as IBM and Atos, the Hartree Centre is home to some of the most technically advanced high performance computing, data analytics, machine learning technologies and experts in the UK.
  • Liverpool City Region Spatial Planning Statement of Common Ground

    Liverpool City Region Spatial Planning Statement of Common Ground

    Liverpool City Region Spatial Planning Statement of Common Ground October 2019 i Table of Contents 1 Parties Involved ........................................................................................................ 3 Principal Signatories ........................................................................................................ 3 2 Signatories ................................................................................................................ 4 3 Strategic Geography ................................................................................................. 6 4 Strategic Planning Matters ........................................................................................ 8 Liverpool City Region Spatial Development Strategy ...................................................... 8 Housing ........................................................................................................................... 8 Housing delivery and unmet need .................................................................................... 8 Employment Land ......................................................................................................... 11 Strategic B8 sites ............................................................................................................. 11 Green Belt ..................................................................................................................... 11 Retail Hierarchy in the City Region ...............................................................................