Thames Gateway South Essex Strategic Housing Market Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thames Gateway South Essex Strategic Housing Market Assessment Thames Gateway South Essex Strategic Housing Market Assessment Final Report September 2008 www.gvagrimley.co.uk Thames Gateway South Essex Housing Group SHMA Final Report September 2008 Thames Gateway South Essex Housing Group SHMA Final Report CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1 2. DEFINING SUB-REGIONAL HOUSING MARKETS ...............................................7 3. STRATEGIC AND INVESTMENT CONTEXT........................................................21 4. DEMOGRAPHIC & SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE...............................................45 5. ECONOMIC REVIEW ...........................................................................................73 6. HOUSING STOCK AND SUPPLY TRENDS .........................................................95 7. PRIVATE SECTOR ACTIVE MARKET ...............................................................113 8. DRIVERS OF CHANGE......................................................................................151 9. SHORT-TERM MARKET OUTLOOK..................................................................155 10. FUTURE HOUSING MARKET ............................................................................171 11. HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT .....................................................................195 12. HOUSING REQUIREMENTS OF OTHER GROUPS...........................................219 13. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................239 14. FRAMEWORK FOR MONITORING AND REVIEW.............................................253 September 2008 Thames Gateway South Essex Housing Group SHMA Final Report September 2008 Thames Gateway South Essex Housing Group SHMA Final Report 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Thames Gateway South Essex Housing Group, comprising housing officers from the five local authorities of Basildon, Castle Point, Rochford, Southend-on-Sea and Thurrock, has commissioned GVA Grimley to prepare a Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) for the Thames Gateway South Essex (TGSE) sub-region. Purpose of the Strategic Housing Market Assessment 1.2 PPS3: Housing1 identifies the importance of understanding sub-regional housing markets, and taking into account market information when developing planning policies for housing provision. Strategic Housing Market Assessments (SHMAs) are intended to achieve this. They are to be a key mechanism for considering the mix of housing required, and together with Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessments (SHLAAs), are intended to inform the level of future housing provision. These assessments are intended to inform Local Development Frameworks (LDFs) and future revisions to Regional Spatial Strategies (RSSs), as well as regional and local housing strategies. For the TGSE sub-region the SHMA is required as a core element of the evidence base for the districts’ LDFs and is to inform preparation of the Sub-Regional Housing Strategy. 1.3 The Government published Practice Guidance on undertaking Strategic Housing Market Assessments in March 20072. This identifies the value of SHMAs in assisting policy development, decision-making and allocation of housing investment resources by: • Enabling regional bodies to develop long-term strategic views of housing need and demand to inform regional spatial strategies and regional housing strategies; • Enabling local authorities to think spatially about the nature and influence of housing markets in respect to their local area; • Providing robust evidence to inform policies aimed at providing the right mix of housing across the whole market area – both market and affordable housing; • Supporting local authorities to develop a strategic approach to housing through consideration of housing need and demand in all housing sectors – owner occupied, 1 CLG (November 2006) Planning Policy Statement 3 (PPS3): Housing 2 CLG (March 2007) Strategic Housing Market Assessments: Practice Guidance September 2008 1 Thames Gateway South Essex Housing Group SHMA Final Report private rented and affordable – and assessment of the key drivers and relationships in the housing market; • Drawing together the bulk of evidence required for local authorities to appraise strategic housing options including social housing allocation priorities, the role of intermediate housing products, stock renewal, conversion, demolition and transfer; and • Ensuring the most appropriate and cost-effective use of public funds. 1.4 SHMAs are intended to be prepared for ‘functional’ sub-regional housing markets, which often transcend administrative boundaries. The five local authorities in the sub-region have come together as a Housing Market Partnership to prepare the SHMA. SHMA Aims and Objectives 1.5 The SHMA provides a fit for purpose basis to develop housing and planning policies by considering the characteristics of the housing market, how key factors work together and the probable scale of change in future housing need and demand. For the purposes of the independent examination into the ‘soundness’ of Local Development Plans, the Strategic Housing Market Assessment will be considered robust and credible if it provides, as a minimum, all the core outputs and meets the requirements of the process criteria set out in the Guidance. The Core Outputs are set out below and where these can be found within the report. Figure 1.1: SHMA Core Output Requirements2 1 Estimates of current dwellings in terms of size, type, condition and Chapter 4 tenure 2 Analysis of past and current housing market trends, including the Chapters 7 and 8 balance between supply and demand in different housing sectors and price/ affordability. Description of key drivers underpinning the housing market 3 Estimates of total future numbers of households, broken down by Chapter 10 age and type where possible 4 Estimates of current number of households in housing need Chapter 11 5 Estimates of future households that will require affordable housing Chapter 11 6 Estimates of future households requiring market housing Chapter 13 7 Estimates of the size of affordable housing required Chapter 13 8 Estimates of household groups who have particular housing Chapter 12 requirements September 2008 2 Thames Gateway South Essex Housing Group SHMA Final Report 1.6 This SHMA is being undertaken in accordance with the Practice Guidance. It includes an assessment of housing needs but incorporated into a wider process with the aim of understanding the operation of the housing market and future housing requirements across tenures. The assessment of housing needs is undertaken using secondary data sources, without primary survey work. The Guidance sets out that whether the assessment is based upon secondary or survey data should not be a factor in determining whether the assessment is robust and credible, as no single approach or particular dataset will result in a definitive assessment of housing need and demand. 1.7 The Government’s Practice Guidance sets out a structure and key research questions for the SHMA. These are set out below. Figure 1.2: Key Research Questions2 Stage Step Research Questions Current 1. The demographic and • What is the current demographic profile of Housing economic context the area? Market • What is the current economic profile? • How have these profiles changed over the last 10 years? 2. The housing stock • What is the current housing stock profile? • How has the stock changed over the last 10 years? 3. The active market • What do the active market indicators tell us about current demand, particularly house prices/affordability? • How has demand changed? 4. Bringing the evidence • How are market characteristics related to together each other geographically? • What do the trends in market characteristics tell us about the key drivers in the market area? • What are the implications in terms of the balance between supply and demand access to housing? • What are the key issues for future policy/strategy? Future 1. Indicators of future • How might the total number of households Housing demand change in the future? How are household Market types changing, e.g. is there an aging population? • How might economic factors influence total future demand? • Is affordability likely to worsen or improve? 2. Bringing the evidence • What are the key issues for future together policy/strategy? Housing Need 1. Current housing need • What is the total number of households in housing need currently (gross estimated)? 2. Future need • How many newly arising households are likely to be in housing need (gross annual estimate)? September 2008 3 Thames Gateway South Essex Housing Group SHMA Final Report 3. Affordable housing supply • What is the level of existing affordable housing stock? • What is the likely level of future annual supply? 4. Housing requirements of • What is the current requirement for households in need affordable housing from households in need? • What are the requirements for different sized properties? • How is the private rented sector used to accommodate need? 5. Bringing the evidence • What is the total number of households in together need (net annual estimate)? • What are the key issues for future policy/strategy? • How do the key messages fit with the findings from analysis of the current and future housing market? Housing Families, Older People, • What are the housing requirements of Requirements Minority and hard to reach specific groups of local interest/importance? of Specific households and households Household with specific
Recommended publications
  • A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration the Tunnel Is Essential to East London and Thames Gateway’S Economic Success the A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration
    The A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration The tunnel is essential to East London and Thames Gateway’s economic success The A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration Thank you for taking the trouble to find out more about the proposed A13 Riverside Tunnel. The tunnelling of a 1.3km stretch of the A13 will not only improve traffic flow along this key route, mitigating the two notorious bottlenecks at the Lodge Avenue and Renwick Road junctions, but will also transform a severely blighted area. As well as creating a new neighbourhood of over 5,000 homes called Castle Green, the tunnel will act as a catalyst for the building of another 28,300 homes in London Riverside, while creating over 1,200 jobs and unlocking significant business and commercial growth in the surrounding area. The tunnel is essential to east London and the Thames Gateway’s economic success and will stimulate growth along its route as well as easing congestion. It also signifies a new way of working in this country adapted from successful models from other European cities. A large proportion of the scheme could be self-financing, with the majority of the funding being generated by the tunnel itself, through the land value uplift and sale of the homes, the community infrastructure levy and new homes bonus. If the government also supports our proposal for stamp duty devolution in Castle Green, then this would mean further significant funding for the scheme could be secured. Cllr Darren Rodwell Cllr Roger Ramsey Leader of Barking and Dagenham Council Leader of Havering Council Road to Regeneration 03 About the A13 The A13 is one of the busiest arterial routes into the capital, connecting the county of Essex with central London.
    [Show full text]
  • A Description of London's Economy Aaron Girardi and Joel Marsden March 2017
    Working Paper 85 A description of London's economy Aaron Girardi and Joel Marsden March 2017 A description of London's economy Working Paper 85 copyright Greater London Authority March 2017 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queens Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk Tel 020 7983 4922 Minicom 020 7983 4000 ISBN 978-1-84781-648-1 Cover photograph © London & Partners For more information about this publication, please contact: GLA Economics Tel 020 7983 4922 Email [email protected] GLA Economics provides expert advice and analysis on London’s economy and the economic issues facing the capital. Data and analysis from GLA Economics form a basis for the policy and investment decisions facing the Mayor of London and the GLA group. GLA Economics uses a wide range of information and data sourced from third party suppliers within its analysis and reports. GLA Economics cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or timeliness of this information and data. The GLA will not be liable for any losses suffered or liabilities incurred by a party as a result of that party relying in any way on the information contained in this report. A description of London's economy Working Paper 85 Contents Executive summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 2 The structure of London’s local economies .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WAKERING ROAD, THORPE BAY, SOUTHEND, ESSEX LA FITNESS Wakering Road, Thorpe Bay, Southend, Essex LA FITNESS Wakering Road, Thorpe Bay, Southend, Essex
    WELL SECURED FREEHOLD LEISURE INVESTMENT WITH DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL WAKERING ROAD, THORPE BAY, SOUTHEND, ESSEX LA FITNESS Wakering Road, Thorpe Bay, Southend, Essex LA FITNESS Wakering Road, Thorpe Bay, Southend, Essex Investment Summary Health and Fitness Club with 2 tennis courts and indoor swimming pool. Secured to L A Fitness Ltd for a further 30.5 years. Annual fixed uplifts at 2.5% per annum compound until December 2016. Passing rent reflects £74.28 per sq m (£6.90 per sq ft). Highly reversionary ERV at £107.64 per sq m (£10.00 per sq ft). Total net internal area of 2,811 sq m (30,248 sq ft). 102 car parking spaces providing an excellent ratio of 1:28 sq m (1:297 sq ft). Site area of 0.93 hectares (2.29 acres). Capital value reflects £1,410 per sq m (£131 per sq ft) and £4.3 million per hectare (£1.7 million per acre). Situated in an affluent residential suburb of Southend-on-Sea. Residential potential, subject to the necessary consents. Purchase price in excess of £3,950,000. Net initial yield of 5.0%. Reversionary yield of 7.2%. True equivalent yield of 6.6%. LA FITNESS Wakering Road, Thorpe Bay, Southend, Essex Location Communications Southend-on-Sea is the principal commercial centre in Essex and a popular tourist The north east quadrant of the M25 provides access to Southend via the A12 at resort. The town is situated approximately 72.0 kilometres (45.0 miles) east of Central Junction 28, the A127 at Junction 29 and the A13 at Junction 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Structures for Development: Getting Them Right
    1 Please do not quote until published, Feb 2008 Edwards, M (2008) 'Structures for development in Thames Gateway: getting them right' in London's Turning: the prospect of Thames Gateway Eds. Phil Cohen and Mike Rustin. London, Ashgate. Details at https://www.ashgate.com/shopping/title.asp?key1=&key2=&orig=results&isbn=0%207546%207063%205 Chapter sixteen Structures for development: getting them right Michael Edwards, Bartlett School of Planning, UCL The Thames Gateway is an enormous undertaking. In many respects it resembles some of the earlier major projects of British town planning like the Milton Keynes generation of new towns or the London's Docklands development. Like them, it may come to be regarded by some as a great achievement of public policy and by others as a great disaster. The fact that positive and negative views can be taken of the same project does not (or does not merely) reflect alternative subjective perspectives: it stems from the fact that there are real conflicts in the society and thus different criteria for judging success. The Thames Gateway project poses daunting choices for those with the power to decide on the future development of South East England. Government and the Mayor of London both agree that much of the wider South East's growth should be concentrated in the Thames estuary (DCMS 2006; Mayor of London 2004). They share the intention that London will expand to the East, not to the West, and that the rationality of capitalist growth is the unquestionable way forward. This chapter explores aspects of this supposed rationality, arguing that the aspirations of 'sustainability' and 'community' cannot be achieved in the neo-liberal framework which is on offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoeburyness Coastal Management Scheme Non- Technical Study
    Shoeburyness Coastal Management Scheme Non- Technical Study Southend-on-Sea Borough Council This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. The consultant has followed accepted procedure in providing the services but given the residual risk associated with any prediction and the variability which can be experienced in flood conditions, the consultant takes no liability for and gives no warranty against actual flooding of any property (client’s or third party) or the consequences of flooding in relation to the performance of the service. This report has been prepared for the purposes of informing the Shoeburyness Flood and Erosion Risk Management Scheme only. Shoeburyness Coastal Management Scheme 2 Contents Introduction 4 Aim of Document 4 Shoeburyness Coastal Management Scheme Area 5 The Need for Action 6 Key Issues for the Frontage 6 Section 1: Thorpe Bay Yacht Club to the groyne between the beachs huts on the beach and those on the promenade 6 Section 2: The groyne between the beach and those on the promenade to the H.M.Coastguard 6 Section 3: HM.Coastguard Station to World War 2 Quick Fire Battery 6 Flood and Erosion Risk 7 Flood Risk 7 Erosion Risk 7 Current Risks 7 Managing Impacts on the Environment 8 Designated Areas 8 Coastal Squeeze 8 Environmental Report 8 Appraisal Process 9 Task 1: Long List of Options 10 Task 2: Develop the Short List of Options 10 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition, Cooperation, Co-Opetition. a Conceptualization of the ‘Network Brand’
    Competition, Cooperation, Co-opetition. A conceptualization of the ‘Network Brand’ Cecilia Pasquinelli Istituto di Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna Abstract - Place branding relies on the assumption of inter-territorial competition which seems to be the overall approach to place management. Competition involves not only cities but also provinces, nations, states, villages and supra-national regions. However, there is room for sustaining that competition is not an exhaustive key for understanding regional development and, consequently, for interpreting place marketing and branding. Within the general frame of competition, regions and local areas may seek inter- territorial cooperation in order to enrich their offer and enhance their competitiveness. In this regard, a gap in place branding and marketing literature is identified and this paper contributes to filling it, by proposing a conceptualization of the “network brand”. Assuming cooperation/co-opetition as a way to face inter-territorial competition, this research is in charge of answering to the following research questions. Firstly, to what extent network and network brand building is a pragmatic process i.e. inspired by market principles, rather than being a political process i.e. highly related to power game emerging within and among the involved territories? Secondly, to what extent the network brand is a “post-modern” brand? A secondary research was carried out by reviewing 12 inter-territorial networking experiences in Europe and US. Concerning the first research question, evidence suggests that, beyond a surface of pragmatism, there might be a political process leading to the emergence of a network brand. Moreover, there is a chance that in some cases a pragmatic approach to networking tends to turn into a political process by means of institutional spillovers, turning the network into a political arena.
    [Show full text]
  • Schools Admission Policies Directory 2020/2021
    Schools Admission Policies Directory 2020/2021 South Essex Basildon, Brentwood, Castle Point and Rochford Districts Apply online at www.essex.gov.uk/admissions Page 2 South Essex Online admissions Parents and carers who live in the Essex You will be able to make your application County Council area (excluding those online from 11 November 2019. living in the Borough of Southend-on-Sea or in Thurrock) can apply for their child’s The closing date for primary applications is 15 January 2020. This is the statutory national school place online using the Essex closing date set by the Government. Online Admissions Service at: www.essex.gov.uk/admissions The online application system has a number of benefits for parents and carers: • you can access related information through links on the website to find out more about individual schools, such as home to school transport or inspection reports; • when you have submitted your application you will receive an email confirming this; • You will be told the outcome of your online application by email on offer day if you requested this when you applied. Key Points to Remember • APPLY ON TIME - closing date 15 January 2020. • Use all 4 preferences. • Tell us immediately in writing (email or by letter) about any address change. • Make sure you read and understand the Education Transport Policy information on www.essex. gov.uk/schooltransport if entitlement to school transport is important to you. School priority admission (catchment) areas are not relevant to transport eligibility. Transport is generally only provided to the nearest available school where the distance criteria is met.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Areas.Qxd
    WOULD YOU LIVE HERE? MAKING THE GROWTH AREAS COMMUNITIES OF CHOICE JIM BENNETT WITH DAVID HETHERINGTON, MAX NATHAN AND CHRIS URWIN i ippr The Institute for Public Policy Research (ippr) is the UK’s leading progressive think tank and was established in 1988. Its role is to bridge the political divide between the social democratic and liberal traditions, the intellectual divide between academia and the policy making establishment and the cultural divide between government and civil society. It is first and foremost a research institute, aiming to provide innovative and credible policy solutions. Its work, the questions its research poses and the methods it uses are driven by the belief that the journey to a good society is one that places social justice, democratic participation and economic and environmental sustainability at its core. For further information you can contact ippr’s external affairs department on [email protected], you can view our website at www.ippr.org and you can buy our books from Central Books on 0845 458 9910 or email [email protected]. Our trustees Chris Powell (Chairman) Chai Patel (Secretary) Jeremy Hardie (Treasurer) Professor Kumar Bhattacharyya Carey Oppenheim Lord Brooke Sir Michael Perry Lord Eatwell David Pitt-Watson Lord Gavron Dave Prentis Professor Anthony Giddens Lord Puttnam Lord Hollick Sir Martin Rees Jane Humphries Ed Sweeney Roger Jowell Baroness Williams Neil Kinnock Baroness Young of Old Scone Frances O’Grady © IPPR 2006 CONTENTS About the authors iv Acknowledgements iv List of abbreviations v Executive summary vi 1 Introduction 1 2 The policy context for housing growth 3 3 The Growth Areas and housing supply 6 4 The Growth Area communities 20 5 The Growth Area economies 29 6 Delivering growth: infrastructure and structures 45 7 Conclusions and recommendations 50 Appendix: Estimating the infrastructure costs of higher 56 housing growth targets References 59 About the authors Jim Bennett is a Senior Research Fellow at ippr.
    [Show full text]
  • Colchester Borough Council
    Colchester Borough Council Weekly List of Planning Applications Received NOTE: Application type Codes are as follows: Advertisement ADC Consent MLB Listed Building O99 Outline (Historic) Outline (8 Week COU Change of Use MLD Demolition of a Listed Building O08 Determination) Outline (13 Week ECC County Council MOL Overhead lines O13 Determination) ECM County Matter MPA Prior Approval F99 Full (Historic) Agricultural Reserved Matters (8 Week Full (8 Week MAD Determination MRM Determination) F08 Determination) Reserved Matters (13 Week Full (13 Week MCA Conservation Area MRN Determination) F13 Determination) Certificate of Reserved Matters (16 Week Full (16 Week MCL Lawfulness MRO Determination) F16 Determination) Planning Portal Demolition in Removal/Variation of a Applications (Temporary MDC Conservation Area MRV Condition PX* Code) Government Department Renewal of Temporary MGD Consultation MTP Permission The undermentioned planning applications have been received by this Council under the Town and Country Planning Acts during the period of the week ending: 19/10/18 Where HOUSEHOLDER appears under application detail, the application and any associated Listed Building application can be determined under delegated authority even if objections are received by the Council, unless the application is called in by Members within 21 days of the date at the foot of this list. Please note: 1. The Planning database has now changed - consequently application numbers may no longer be sequential as they are also used for Preliminary Enquiries (not
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Gateway South Essex Fundamental Review Of
    Thames Gateway South Essex Fundamental Review of Strategic Housing Market Assessment Review 2013 Report of Findings December 2013 Opinion Research Services | The Strand • Swansea • SA1 1AF | 01792 535300 | www.ors.org.uk | [email protected] Opinion Research Services | Thames Gateway South Essex SHMA 2013 – Report of Findings December 2013 Contents 1. Foreword........................................................................................................ 6 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Private Rented Sector ............................................................................................................................ 6 Housing Delivery .................................................................................................................................... 6 Benefit Reform ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Population ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Older People .......................................................................................................................................... 7 London .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sponsored Walk Saturday 10Th October 2020
    th Sponsored Walk Saturday 10 October 2020 Firstly, thank you for joining us on this sponsored walk to raise funds for our programs, and raising awareness of recovery. Our programs enable people to understand why they started to use in the first place, and offer long term trauma informed support, for as long as a person needs us. Secondly, due to Corona Virus, we all need to be mindful of social distancing and with that in mind, when walking and interacting please follow government advice. Please bring your own facemasks and hand sanitiser. More information can be found at https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus Start time: From 17:00 to 18:30 Location: East Beach, Shoeburyness, SS3 9AE Meeting point: Opposite East Beach Car Park is a children’s play area. We shall meet within that vicinity. Volunteers will be stood with our banner Aspirations Program Community Interest Company Company number: 12596744 Facilities: There are public toilets, but please bring your own water and food. You will pass shops along the walk. Parking: East Beach Car Park, is opposite our meeting point. This is a paid car park. Nearest bus stop: Next to our meeting point. Bus times and destinations can be found https://moovitapp.com/index/en-gb/public_transportation-line-9-London_and_South_East-2122-970986- 3663783-1 Nearest train station: Shoeburyness Train, High Street, Shoeburyness, Essex, SS3 9AW is a 5 minutes walk to East Beach. C2C Trains come from London and stop locally along the way. https://www.c2c-online.co.uk/stations/shoeburyness-station/ For those parking at East Beach, you will be able to get the train back from Leigh-on-Sea, which is our end point.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving up a Gear: New Challenges for Housing Associations
    moving up a gear: new challenges for housing associations The Smith Institute The Smith Institute is an independent think tank that has been set up to look at issues which flow from the changing relationship between social values and economic imperatives. If you would like to know more about the Smith Institute please write to: new challenges for housing associations Edited by Denise Chevin The Director The Smith Institute 3rd Floor 52 Grosvenor Gardens London SW1W 0AW Telephone +44 (0)20 7823 4240 Fax +44 (0)20 7823 4823 Email [email protected] Website www.smith-institute.org.uk Registered Charity No. 1062967 2008 Designed and produced by Owen & Owen THE SMITH INSTITUTE moving up a gear: new challenges for housing associations Edited by Denise Chevin Published by the Smith Institute ISBN 1 905370 32 6 This report, like all Smith Institute monographs, represents the views of the authors and not those of the Smith Institute. © The Smith Institute 2008 THE SMITH INSTITUTE Contents Preface Wilf Stevenson, Director, Smith Institute 3 Introduction Denise Chevin, Editor of Building 5 Chapter 1: Housing policy and the role of housing associations Andy Love MP, Co-chair of the All-party Group on Homelessness & Housing Need 12 Chapter 2: New landscapes in affordable housing Peter Marsh, Deputy Chief Executive of the Housing Corporation 20 Chapter 3: Mutual respect to deliver the communities we want David Orr, Chief Executive of the National Housing Federation 28 Chapter 4: From meeting need to matching housing aspirations David Cowans,
    [Show full text]