DOCSLIB.ORG

Master Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Master Bibliography SELECTED ITEMS OF MEDIA COVERAGE Selected Broadcast Comment Witness on BBC Radio 4 the Moral Maze, broadcast live at 2000 Wednesday 16th June 2010 Debate chaired by Quentin Cooper with Sir David King, Chris Whitty and Richard Davis, Material World, Radio 4 1630 Thursday 3rd January 2008 [on directions for science and innovation] Debate chaired by Sarah Montague with Tom Shakespeare, Today Programme, Radio 4 0850-0900, Friday Tuesday 4th September 2007 [on role of public in consultation on new technologies] D. Coyle, et al, Risky Business, Radio 4 ‘Analysis’ documentary, broadcast 11 December 2030, 14 December 2130, 2003 [interview on the precautionary principle] Tom Feilden, Political Interests in Biotechnology Science, Today Programme, Radio 4 0834-0843, Friday 19th September 2003 [on exercise of pressure in relation to GM Science Review Panel]. Roger Harrabin, Science Scares, Interview on the Today Programme, BBC Radio 4 0832, 10th January 2002 [on EEA report on risk and precaution]. ‘Sci-Files’, Australian National Radio, October 2000 [interview on risk, uncertainty and GM]. ‘Risk and Society’, The Commission, BBC Radio 4, 2000, 11 October 2000 [commission witness on on theme of risk and society] Selected Press Coverage of Work Andrew Jack, Battle Lines, Financial Times Magazine, 24th June 2011 [on need for tolerance of scepticism about science] Paul Dorfman, Who to Trust on Nuclear, Guardian, 14th April 2011 Charles Clover, Britain’s nuclear confidence goes into meltdown, Sunday Times, 20th March 2011 [on potential for a global sustainable energy future without nuclear power] Wendy Grossman, Other Roads, Other Voices, in Financial Times special supplement on Food Security, 14th October 2010 [on nelglected alternative paths for agricultural innovation] Tom Wakeford, The public is proved right: GM crops are no panacea, The Guardian, Wednesday 30th April 2008 [on first public participation exercise on GM foods conducted in 1998] John Vidal, Little common ground as debate warms up, Guardian, Friday 11th January 2008 [quote on economics of nuclear power] John Vidal, Scientists Take on Brown over Nuclear Plans, Guardian, front page, Friday 4th January 2008 [on personal role in collective report on nuclear consultation] Andrew Lee, ‘Path-finder’, The Engineer, 2 July 2007. [personal interview] New Statesman Editor (ed), Fears, Phobias and Facts: how risky is the real world?, New Statesman, 20 June 2005 [on rationale and methods for public engagement on risk] Anonymous, Going Public, Nature editorial, 431, 7011, 2004, p.883 [singles out deliberative mapping as a means to public engagement in innovation] Andrew Holmes, The Fear Factor, Guardian ‘Spark’, Friday, 1st October 2004 [on rationality and politics of public ‘anxieties’] Ian Sample, Rising to Power, Guardian, Thursday, 8th April 2004 [on Jim Skea accession to Director of Energy Research Centre] Anonymous, Taverne quacks Furedi’s Tune, Lobbywatch, 28th March 2004 Martin Ince, Spare Part Factory or Scientific Saviour? Times Higher Education Supplement, Friday 26th March 2004 [feature on the Deliberative Mapping technique] Mark Townsend, Probe into ‘bullying’ of GM panel scientists, Observer, 24 August 2003 [on exercise of pressure in relation to GM Science Review Panel] Andrew Rowell, Safe Science is not always good science,,Guardian, 19 August 2003 [on exercise of pressure in relation to GM Science Review Panel] John Mason, Scientist takes up GM panellists case, Financial Times, 26 July 2003 [on exercise of pressure in relation to GM Science Review Panel] Paul Brown, Alert on Spread of GM Seeds: inquiry call over threat to government scientist, Guardian 26 July 2003 [on exercise of pressure in relation to GM Science Review Panel] Mike MacCarthy, The GM Plot: scientist tried to sabotage work of top academic who is a sceptic, Independent, 26 July 2003 [on exercise of pressure in relation to GM Science Review Panel] Sean Poulter, Top Scientist was told his career was over if he dared to speak his mind about GM, Daily Mail, 25 July 2003 [on exercise of pressure in relation to GM Science Review Panel] Mark Townsend, Scientists protest at GM crops ‘stitch up’, Observer, 9 March 2003 [on concerns over neglect of uncertainty in GM Science Review] James Meek, Review of GM Strategy will Ignore Trials, Guardian, 29th November 2002 [on NGO nomination of membership to GM Science Review Panel] Roger Cowe, ‘A Mixed Chemical Reaction’, Financial Times, 12 March 2001 [on precaution report] Selected Authored Newspaper Articles A. Stirling, Let’s Hear it for Scepticism, Research Fortnight, Friday 18th February 2011 A. Stirling, A. Scott, Risky Advice, Project Syndicate, 2nd June 2011 A. Stirling, A. Scott, Risky Advice, Shanghai Daily, Shanghai, 9th June 2011 A. Stirling, A. Scott, Risky Advice and Immeasurable Uncertainties, Al Jazeera, Qatar, 6th June 2011 A. Stirling, A. Scott, Beratung von Experten ist oftmals risikoreich, Die Welt, Germany, 6th June 2011 Selected Letters to the Press A. Scott, N. Mabey, F. Berkhout, A. Stirling, C. Williams, C. Rose, M. Jacobs, R. Grove- White, I. Scoones, M. Leach, ‘Precautionary Approach to Risk Assessment’, Nature, Vol. 402, 25/11/99, p348 J. Tansey, D. Gee, M. Leach, J. Ravetz, A. Scott, A. Stirling, B. Szerszynski, T. Wakeford, Hasty energy review risks failing to win public trust, Nature, Vol. 440, 9 March 2006, p148 N. Dickson, J. Adams, A.Breckenridge, L. Byrne, C. Doyle, K. Lloyd, E. Mayo, M.Mythen, S. Neal, R. Persaud, A. Stirling, C. Tudge, I. Wright, Fears, Phobias and Facts: how risky is the real world?, New Statesman, 20 June 2005 A. Stirling, Pressure Point, letter, Observer, 7th October 2003 F. Barnaby, D. Bayliss, A. Blowers, P. Brown, P. Dorfman, D. Elliott, F. Fischer, J. Ravetz, H. Richards, H. Rothman, A. Stirling, S. Thomas, T. Wakeford, G. Walker, S. Weir, I. Welsh, P. Wilkinson, B. Wynne, A Clear and reasoned case for setting aside nuclear, The Guardian, Wednesday 9th January, 2008 T. Barker, P. Ekins, D. Elliott, N. Eyre, T. Foxon, D. Infield, C. Mitchell, A. Stirling, Add feed-in tariffs to the energy bill, The Guardian, Wednesday 30th April 2008 R. Doubleday, S. Jasanoff, M. Kearnes, P. MacNaghten, S. Owens, A. Stirling, B. Wynne, Response to the consultation on: A Vision for Science and Society, open letter to Lord Drayson, Minister of State at Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills, 15th October 2008 A. Blowers, T. Burke, P. Dorfman, D. Elliott, A. Stirling, S. Thomas, G. Walker, Nuclear Power is Not the Answer, The Independent, 25th February 2009 P. Dorfman, D. Elliott, T. Burke, A. Stirling, S. Thomas, B. Wynne, No need for nuclear power, The Independent, 4th May 2010 A. Stirling, Nuclear Threats, The Guardian, 15th November 2010 A. Stirling, No definitive answers in the nuclear debate, the Guardian, 6th April 2011. A. Stirling, Nuclear Futures, New Scientist, 13th April, 2011 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lord Sumption and the Values of Life, Liberty and Security: Before and Since the COVID-19 Outbreak John Coggon ‍
    Extended essay J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/medethics-2021-107332 on 12 July 2021. Downloaded from Lord Sumption and the values of life, liberty and security: before and since the COVID-19 outbreak John Coggon Correspondence to ABSTRACT In public spheres beyond government, values Professor John Coggon, Centre Lord Sumption, a former Justice of the Supreme Court, have been raised and debated. Perhaps inevitably, for Health, Law, and Society, University of Bristol Law School, has been a prominent critic of coronavirus restrictions given the nature and prominence of different plat- Bristol, BS8 1HH, UK; regulations in the UK. Since the start of the pandemic, he forms for public discourse, particular voices and john. coggon@ bristol. ac. uk has consistently questioned both the policy aims and the views have found particularly privileged place in regulatory methods of the Westminster government. He critical discussions of pandemic responses in the Received 15 February 2021 UK. Among these are the arguments of Lord Sump- Accepted 19 May 2021 has also challenged rationales that hold that all lives are of equal value. In this paper, I explore and question Lord tion, a former Justice of the Supreme Court. Lord Sumption’s views on morality, politics and law, querying Sumption is an eloquent and vocal critic of the the coherence of his broad philosophy and his arguments restrictions regulations (and related points of offi- regarding coronavirus regulations with his judicial cial guidance) that have been implemented since decision in the assisted- dying case of R (Nicklinson) v March 2020. These regulations have significantly Ministry of Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Production of Religious Broadcasting: the Case of The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenGrey Repository The Production of Religious Broadcasting: The Case of the BBC Caitriona Noonan A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Centre for Cultural Policy Research Department of Theatre, Film and Television University of Glasgow Glasgow G12 8QQ December 2008 © Caitriona Noonan, 2008 Abstract This thesis examines the way in which media professionals negotiate the occupational challenges related to television and radio production. It has used the subject of religion and its treatment within the BBC as a microcosm to unpack some of the dilemmas of contemporary broadcasting. In recent years religious programmes have evolved in both form and content leading to what some observers claim is a “renaissance” in religious broadcasting. However, any claims of a renaissance have to be balanced against the complex institutional and commercial constraints that challenge its long-term viability. This research finds that despite the BBC’s public commitment to covering a religious brief, producers in this style of programming are subject to many of the same competitive forces as those in other areas of production. Furthermore those producers who work in-house within the BBC’s Department of Religion and Ethics believe that in practice they are being increasingly undermined through the internal culture of the Corporation and the strategic decisions it has adopted. This is not an intentional snub by the BBC but a product of the pressure the Corporation finds itself under in an increasingly competitive broadcasting ecology, hence the removal of the protection once afforded to both the department and the output.
    [Show full text]
  • The Idea of the Labyrinth
    ·THE IDEA OF · THE LABYRINTH · THE IDEA OF · THE LABYRINTH from Classical Antiquity through the Middle Ages Penelope Reed Doob CORNELL UNIVERSITY PRESS ITHACA AND LONDON Open access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities/Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. Copyright © 1990 by Cornell University First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 1992 Second paperback printing 2019 All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. Visit our website at cornellpress.cornell.edu. Printed in the United States of America ISBN 978-0-8014-2393-2 (cloth: alk. paper) ISBN 978-1-5017-3845-6 (pbk.: alk. paper) ISBN 978-1-5017-3846-3 (pdf) ISBN 978-1-5017-3847-0 (epub/mobi) Librarians: A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress An open access (OA) ebook edition of this title is available under the following Creative Commons license: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by- nc-nd/4.0/. For more information about Cornell University Press’s OA program or to download our OA titles, visit cornellopen.org. Jacket illustration: Photograph courtesy of the Soprintendenza Archeologica, Milan. For GrahamEric Parker worthy companion in multiplicitous mazes and in memory of JudsonBoyce Allen and Constantin Patsalas Contents List of Plates lX Acknowledgments: Four Labyrinths xi Abbreviations XVll Introduction: Charting the Maze 1 The Cretan Labyrinth Myth 11 PART ONE THE LABYRINTH IN THE CLASSICAL AND EARLY CHRISTIAN PERIODS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Saturday, July 7, 2018 | 15 | WATCH Monday, July 9
    6$785'$<-8/< 7+,6,6123,&1,& _ )22' ,16,'( 7+,6 :((. 6+233,1* :,1(6 1$',<$ %5($.6 &KHFNRXW WKH EHVW LQ ERWWOH 683(50$5.(7 %(67 %8<6 *UDE WKH ODWHVW GHDOV 75,(' $1' 7(67(' $// 7+( 58/(6 :H FKHFN RXW WRS WUDYHO 1$',<$ +XVVDLQ LV D KDLUGU\HUV WR ORRN ZDQWDQGWKDW©VZK\,IHHOVR \RXGRQ©WHDWZKDW\RX©UHJLYHQ WRWDO UXOHEUHDNHU OXFN\§ WKHQ \RX JR WR EHG KXQJU\§ JRRG RQ WKH PRYH WKHVH GD\V ¦,©P D 6KH©V ZRQ 7KLV UHFLSH FROOHFWLRQ DOVR VHHV /XFNLO\ VKH DQG KXVEDQG $EGDO SDUW RI WZR YHU\ %DNH 2II SXW KHU IOLS D EDNHG FKHHVHFDNH KDYH PDQDJHG WR SURGXFH RXW D VOHZ RI XSVLGH GRZQ PDNH D VLQJOH FKLOGUHQ WKDW DUHQ©W IXVV\HDWHUV GLIIHUHQW ZRUOGV ¤ ,©P %ULWLVK HFODLU LQWR D FRORVVDO FDNH\UROO VR PXFK VR WKDW WKH ZHHN EHIRUH 5(/$; DQG ,©P %DQJODGHVKL§ WKH FRRNERRNV DQG LV DOZD\V LQYHQW D ILVK ILQJHU ODVDJQH ZH FKDW VKH KDG DOO WKUHH *$0(6 $336 \HDUROG H[SODLQV ¦DQG UHDOO\ VZDS WKH SUDZQ LQ EHJJLQJ KHU WR GROH RXW IUDJUDQW &RQMXUH XS RQ WKH WHOO\ ¤ SUDZQ WRDVW IRU FKLFNHQ DQG ERZOIXOV RI ILVK KHDG FXUU\ EHFDXVH ,©P SDUW RI WKHVH 1DGL\D +XVVDLQ PDJLFDO DWPRVSKHUH WZR DPD]LQJ ZRUOGV , KDYH ¦VSLNH§ D GLVK RI PDFDURQL ¦7KH\ ZHUH DOO RYHU LW OLNH WHOOV (//$ FKHHVH ZLWK SLFFDOLOOL ¤ WKH ¨0XPP\ 3OHDVH FDQ ZH KDYH 086,& QR UXOHV DQG QR UHVWULFWLRQV§ :$/.(5 WKDW 5(/($6(6 ZRPDQ©V D PDYHULFN WKDW ULJKW QRZ"© , ZDV OLNH ¨1R +HQFH ZK\ WKUHH \HDUV RQ IURP IRRG LV PHDQW +RZHYHU KHU DSSURDFK WR WKDW©V WRPRUURZ©V GLQQHU ,©YH :H OLVWHQ WR WKH ZLQQLQJ *UHDW %ULWLVK %DNH 2II WR EH IXQ FODVKLQJDQG PL[LQJ IODYRXUVDQG MXVW FRRNHG LW HDUO\ \RX©YH JRW ODWHVW DOEXPV WKH /XWRQERUQ
    [Show full text]
  • University of Dundee BBC Moral Maze Lawrence, John; Visser, Jacky
    University of Dundee BBC moral maze Lawrence, John; Visser, Jacky; Reed, Chris Published in: Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018 DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-465 Publication date: 2018 Licence: CC BY-NC Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication in Discovery Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Lawrence, J., Visser, J., & Reed, C. (2018). BBC moral maze: Test your argument. In S. Modgil, K. Budzynska, J. Lawrence, & K. Budzynska (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2018 (Vol. 305, pp. 465-466). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 305). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-465 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 Computational Models of Argument 465 S. Modgil et al. (Eds.) © 2018 The authors and IOS Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Indirect Defensive Responses to Hostile Questions in British Broadcastnews Interviews
    Dangjie Ji-Indirect Defensive Responsesto Hostile Questions In British BroadcastNews Interviews INDIRECT DEFENSIVE RESPONSES TO HOSTILE QUESTIONS IN BRITISH BROADCAST NEWS INTERVIEWS (2 Volumes) (Vol. 2) Dangjie Ji PhD University of York Centre of Communication Studies December2008 TJIo ML 2ý Dangjie Ji-Indirect Defensive Responsesto Hostile Questions In British BroadcastNews Interviews TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 2 Cover (Vol. 2) 312 Table of Contents (Vol. 2) 313 Appendices Appendix A: Transcript Symbols in this thesis 314 Appendix B: Data Transcriptions for this thesis 320 Notes 568 Bibliography 570 313 Dangjie Ji-Indirect Defensive Responsesto Hostile Questions In British BroadcastNews Interviews APPENDICES Appendix A: Transcription rules in this thesis 1. Transcript Symbols: [ Separateleft squarebrackets, one above the other on two [ successivelines with utterancesby different speakers,indicates a point of overlap onset, whether at the start of an utterance or later. ] Separateright squarebrackets, one above the other on two ] successivelines with utterancesby different speakers indicates a point at which two overlapping utterances both end, where one ends while the other continues, or simultaneous moments in overlapswhich continue. { Thesesymbol are used to mark overlapping when more than two } persons are talking at the same time. Similar to the symbols of [ ], { marks the beginning of the overlapping, and } marks the end of overlapping. = Equal signs indicate `latching', i. e. without break or silence between utterancesbefore and after the sign. They are used in two circumstances: a) When indicating `latching' of utterancesbetween two different speakers,they come in pairs-one at the end of a line and another at the start of the next line or one shortly thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • BBC Religion & Ethics Review
    BBC Religion & Ethics Review December 2017 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 3. THE ROLE OF THE BBC ............................................................................................................................................... 8 4. THE CHALLENGES WE FACE ............................................................................................................................... 11 5. HOW WE WILL RESPOND .................................................................................................................................... 14 6. CHANGING HOW WE DO THINGS ............................................................................................................. 26 7. APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................................................................... 30 2 1. FOREWORD The start of a new Charter period is a good time for the BBC to assess how we are delivering on the religious and ethical aspects of our public service mission. We know – our research tells us – that today’s audiences are interested in learning more in this area. People of all ages, and of all faiths and none,
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyers in the Moral Maze
    Volume 49 Issue 4 Article 4 2004 Lawyers in the Moral Maze Mark A. Sargent Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr Part of the Accounting Law Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, and the Securities Law Commons Recommended Citation Mark A. Sargent, Lawyers in the Moral Maze, 49 Vill. L. Rev. 867 (2004). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol49/iss4/4 This Symposia is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Law Review by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Sargent: Lawyers in the Moral Maze 2004] LAWYERS IN THE MORAL MAZE MARK A. SARGENT* I. INTRODUCTION T HE Securities and Exchange Commission's Standards of Professional Conduct for Attorneys1 represent an attempt to solve a problem. The problem is that ethical obligations, state law and self-interest apparently do not give lawyers sufficient incentives to report law violations by corporate managers "up the ladder" to appropriate decisionmakers within the corpo- rate client, or to disclose illegality to regulators. That problem is consid- ered serious, because it is believed to have resulted in lawyers' at least passive complicity in managerial wrongdoing. That complicity violated lawyers' fiduciary obligation to their corporate client and betrayed their public trust as gatekeepers, thereby contributing to the recent epidemic of corporate fraud and corporate governance failures. Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that the problem, as just defined, is real and serious.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release from VLV Embargoed to 00:01 Monday 2 November 2020
    Press release from VLV Embargoed to 00:01 Monday 2 November 2020 VLV AWARDS FOR EXCELLENCE IN BROADCASTING 2019 WINNERS VLV Awards honour drama Gentleman Jack, Channel 4’s Dispatches, the 90-minute documentary about the great classical singer Janet Baker In Her Own Words, Sky News’ children’s programme FYI, and broadcasters Katya Adler and Sarah Montague. The VLV Awards for Excellence in Broadcasting 2019, which cover programmes broadcast in 2019, have been announced to celebrate many aspects of television and radio with programmes, individuals and channels nominated and voted for by VLV members – their viewers and listeners. The winners include BBC Europe Editor, Katya Adler, and BBC World At One presenter, Sarah Montague, drama Gentleman Jack, radio comedy series The Unbelievable Truth and documentary series The Americas with Simon Reeve. News and current affairs programmes featured strongly among the winners this year with honours going to PM, Dispatches and two children’s series, Newsround, which receives the Naomi Sargant award for its longstanding work in bringing news to children, and Sky News’/Sky Kids’ children’s news series FYI. The full lists of the 2019 winners and nominees are below. Colin Browne, Chairman of VLV, said “These awards demonstrate that 2019 was a year in which British broadcasters provided a huge range of quality and diverse programmes for listeners and viewers. They include comedies, drama and factual programmes as well as notably featuring high quality news journalism at a time when reliable, accurate news
    [Show full text]
  • SARAH MONTAGUE BBC Radio 4 Presenter and One of the Regulars on the Today Programme
    SARAH MONTAGUE BBC Radio 4 Presenter and one of the regulars on the Today programme Sarah Montague is one of the main anchors on BBC Radio 4’s Today Programme, since 2001. It is Radio 4’s most popular news and current affairs programme and reaches an average of over six million listeners every week in the early mornings. In addition since 1999, Sarah has been one of the presenters of HARDtalk, a one- to-one in depth interview series for BBC World. HARDtalk interviews international political leaders to entertainers; from corporate decision-makers to ordinary individuals facing huge challenges, asking hard-hitting questions and covering sensitive topics, to get behind the stories that make the news. Topics In the past, since joining the BBC in 1997, she has also presented BBC2’s Newsnight, BBC1’s Breakfast with Frost, Evening News bulletins on BBC1, as well Facilitators as being a key presenter on BBC News Channel. Sarah works regularly in the corporate sector hosting conferences, chairing discussions and interviewing CEO’s. She has hosted the Nominet Forum for seven years running and has also hosted the Jersey Finance Trusts Seminar for the past four years. She has also interviewed the Nobel Prize winners for BBC World News. Sarah started her career in finance working as a stockbroker and Eurobond dealer with Natwest Capital Markets, London. Then in 1991 she became a reporter at Channel Television in Guernsey. She moved back to London in 1994 as a freelance news reporter before joining Reuters Television in 1995. She did a stint at Sky News in 1996 where she presented their main business and news programmes before joining the BBC in 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading and Viewing List Recommended by Teachers : Y13 to Higher Education
    Reading and Viewing List recommended by Teachers : Y13 to Higher Education Please also check out https://www.gresham.ac.uk/schools for a wide range of lectures online in all subject areas, including Law, Media, Epidemiology as well as all the ‘standard’ academic subjects. Mathematics Author/Publisher Any books by… Matt Parker Any books by… Simon Singh The Tipping Point Malcolm Gladwell How an idea takes hold… Music Music- A Very Short Introduction Nicholas Cook A History of Western Music Donald Grout Music in Everyday Life Tia DeNora Stylistic Harmony Anna Butterworth ‘Western Music’ Encyclopaedia Britannica How to Listen to Jazz Ted Gioia Jazz Bob Blumenthal A Student’s Guide to Harmony and Counterpoint Hugh Benham History Rethinking History Keith Jenkins The Pursuit of History John Tosh Select your own historical topic and read around it as much as possible- internet searches, documentaries etc. Sapiens Yuval Noah Harari ‘Grand-Sweep’ of human history. Fascinating, readable and long. Will keep you going! Homo Deus Yuval Noah Harari As above. The future based on past patterns of human behaviour. Bess of Hardwick Mary S Lovell Well researched. Great life of a great woman. A History of the World in 100 Objects Neil MacGregor 100 objects from the British Museum, and what they show us about human civilisation. Art: AQA Art and Design Student Handbook Nelson Thornes (publisher) This is Modern Art Matthew Collins A World of History of Art Honour and Fleming Ways of Seeing John Berger Art Now 4 Hans Werner Holzwarth Illustration Now Julius Wiedermann
    [Show full text]
  • DN Master Doc COMMISSIONING GUIDELINES SPRING 2011
    COMMISSIONING GUIDELINES SPRING 2012 1: THE COMMISSIONING PROCESS..............................................................................2 1:1 TIMETABLE.........................................................................................................2 1:2 HOW TO SUBMIT AN IDEA TO RADIO 4...........................................................3 1:3 RESPONSES TO PROPOSALS.........................................................................5 1:4 HOW THE COMMISSIONING BRIEFS WORK...................................................7 1:5 FAQ ABOUT THE COMMISSIONING PROCESS & PROTEUS.........................9 1:6 BBC GUIDELINES & COMPLIANCE.................................................................11 1:7 CHECKLIST FOR DRAMA AND SCRIPTED COMEDY....................................12 1:8 SUPPORTING MATERIALS FOR DRAMA AND COMEDY..............................13 2: THE BBC RADIO 4 AUDIENCE.................................................................................15 3: DRAMA COMMISSIONING BRIEFS..........................................................................17 4: COMEDY & ENTERTAINMENT COMMISSIONING BRIEFS.....................................46 5: SPECIALIST FACTUAL BRIEFS...............................................................................60 6: GENERAL FACTUAL BRIEFS...................................................................................79 7: SPECIAL EVENTS AND SEASONS...........................................................................96 8: WORKING WITH BBC RADIO 4................................................................................98
    [Show full text]