Media Appearances

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Media Appearances PROFESSOR NICK BOSTROM List of Media Appearances The Future of Humanity Institute Programme on the Impacts of Future Technology Oxford Martin School & Faculty of Philosophy Oxford University www.nickbostrom.com [My work has been covered extensively in the media. I have done over 500 interviews for television news and documentaries, radio, newspapers, and magazines, including BBC, CNN, NBC, ABC News, PBS, CBC, Discovery Channel, Financial Times, New York Times, Washington Times, The New Yorker, Der Spiegel, The Independent, the Telegraph, The Sunday Times, The Guardian, The Observer, Times Higher Educational Supplement, Le Devoir, Toronto and Ottawa Suns, L’Hebdo, Utildnings Radion, Boston Globe, San Diego Union-Tribune, The Sunday Herald, Nature, New Scientist, Science & Avenir, Volkskrant, Discover Magazine, Forbes, and many others.] Media list - Interviews 1. New Scientist. September 2012. Interviewed about illiciting ‘ethical’ behaviours and responses in AI through ‘emotional’ programming. 2. Akzia Newspaper (Russian independent newspaper). September 2012. Interviewed about technological innovations and future implications. 3. BBC Documentary. August 2012. Interviewed about the future of human evolution. 4. BBC World Service. August 2012. Interviewed about the Paralympics and the ethical issues of technical enhancements. 5. Austraian Broadcasting Corporation. August 2012. Interviewed about technology, the future, and the Alpbach Forum. 6. WIRED. August 2012. Interviewed about the ethics of transhumanism. 7. Family Circle Magazine. August 2012. Interviewed about bodies of the future and ethical enhancements. 8. The Independent (documentary pitch). August 2012. Interviewed on tech forecasting. 9. ISIS. (Oxford student magazine). August 2012. Interviewed about cognitive enhancements. 10. APA - Austria Presse Agentu. July 2012. Interviewed about big picture scenarios for humanity, including the most important crucial considerations – and how can they transform into reality and the impact of future transformative technologies. 11. Global Policy journal. (video interview for website). July 2012. Interviewed about his existential risk work www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SXA0Lsy1uU&feature=player_embedded. 12. New Scientist. July 2012. Interviewed about the nature of reality and the simulation argument. 13. George Carey (documentary filmmaker). July 2012. Interviewed about transhumanism and the singularity. 1 14. Channel 4 Television (documentary). July 2012. Interviewed about prosthetics and their implications for future humans. 15. Blueprint Magazine. June 2012. Interviewed about existential risk work. 16. WIRED. June 2012. Contribution to the magazine’s monthly column, ‘The Big Question’, on the future of human enhancement through technology. 17. Michael Tennesen. (science writer, writing book). June 2012. Interviewed about the future of evolution. 18. Jennifer Anyan (visual artist). June 2012. Interviewed about intersections between visual work and human enhancement. 19. The New York Times. May 2012. Interviewed about the social and ethical implications of affective computing. 20. CBS Smart Planet. June 2012. Interviewed about artificial intelligence, and its positive and negative implications. 21. Sky Arts. May 2012. Interviewed for the series Objects of Desire (episode 5) about the meaning of objects, and the kind of objects we would like to have in the future. 22. Annalee Newitz (science journalist). May 2012. Interviewed on how humans will survive the next mass extinction. 23. Investment - Danske Banke (Danish magazine). April 2012. Interviewed about the end of the world. www.danskebank.dk/Flash/ePages/Investering-04-2012/index.html (in Danish) 24. Valor Econômico, (Brazilian daily paper). April 2012. Interviewed about cognition enhancement (smart drugs, thinking caps) and the prospect that they might become mainstream, in the workplace and in academia. 25. Quick Roll Productions - The World Tomorrow (television discussion series). March 2012. Interviewed about the ethical and strategic implications of technological advances. 26. Ciel et Espace (French Magazine). March 2012. Interviewed for special issue on the Fermi Paradox, about the likelihood of life on other planets.. 27. Galileu Magazine.(Brazilian science magazine). March 2012. Interviewed about the potential dangers of new technologies and other threats to the human race. 28. Swedish National Television. March 2012. Interviewed about transhumanism’s vision for human enhancement and what it means for us as a species to have control of our evolution for the first time. 29. Discovery Channel (six-part television series). February 2012. Interviewed on evolution and artificial intelligence and the work of the Future of Humanity Institute. 30. The Atlantic. February 2012. Interviewed about existential risks. http://robertwiblin.com/2012/03/25/nick-bostrom-interview-on-x-risk-in-the-atlantic/ 31. NYU's Science, Health, and Environmental Reporting Program, and Scienceline. February 2012. Interviewed about neuroenhancers and how they are handled in the pharmaceutical industry. 32. Triple Helix Society. (Cambridge University magazine). January 2012. Interviewed about science and ethical impacts on wide society. 33. New Scientist. January 2012. Interviewed about existential threats to humanity in the long-term future. 2 34. Bloomberg Business Week. December 2011. Interviewed about risks to humankind for “The End of the World as We Know It” segment. (accompaniment to “Guardians of the Apocalypse” article: www.businessweek.com/magazine/guardians-of-the-apocalypse-12152011.html). 35. BBC Radio 3. (British radio). December 2011. Interviewed for “Night Waves” programme about over- population, future challenges relating to technology and ethics. www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0186dpl 36. Le TEMPS (Swiss daily newspaper). December 2011. Interviewed for special issue about the new frontiers of intelligence. 37. Capital (Bulgarian daily newspaper.) December 2011. Interviewed about the role of futurists in the decision making process, whether predictions will become more accurate and more specific, and what are the biggest trends in futurology today? 38. James Martin. (film project). November 2011. Interviewed by James Martin for a promotional film addressing global issues of the future. 39. BBC Horizon. (science programming). November 2011. Interviewed for promo documentary on artificial intelligence and Alan Turing. 40. Jay Scheib’s “World of Wires: Simulated Cities/Simulated Systems”. (theatrical performance piece). Interviewed on November 2011 as this artistic enterprise was inspired by “Are You Living in a Computer Simulation? World Premiere in New York City in January 2012, with international tour to follow. www.thekitchen.org/wire and www.jayscheib.com/wires. 41. Faszination Apokalypse: Mythen und Theorien vom Untergang der Welt. Interviewed by Thomas Grüter about end-of-the-world scenarios and probabilities. (Published November 2011 in German). 42. Scientific Etonian. (Eton College’s scientific student newspaper). November 2011. Interviewed about artificial intelligence, superintelligence, and the simulation argument. 43. BBC News (technology news website). October 2011. Interviewed about “ideas that could change the world” and how to predict the future. www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15483792 44. Vetandets värld (Swedish radio). October 2011. Interview for programme about technology's accelerating development and transhumanism. 45. Vetandets värld (Swedish radio). October 2011. Interview for radio programme: “Man Becomes Machine, Machine Becomes Man: The Next Step in Human Evolution?” 46. The Oxford Student (newspaper). October 2011. Interviewed about existential risk. http://oxfordstudent.com/2011/11/30/nick-bostrom-on-the-future-of-humanity-institute/ 47. John Nyzell (University of Lund). September 2011. Interview about liberal eugenics and human enhancement. 48. Cosmos (Australian popular science magazine) September 2011. Interviewed for “Made to Order” about the ethical questions of technology, medicine, and post-humanism. www.cosmosmagazine.com/issues/2011/42/ 49. Sciences et Avenir (French monthly magazine). September 2011. Interviewed about the future of mankind. 50. New Scientist. September 2011. Interviewed for “Ultimate Guide to the Multiverse” about multiverse theories and simulated universes. 51. ISIS Magazine. (Oxford University student publication). September 2011. Interviewed about human enhancement. 3 52. Sveriges Radio (Swedish radio). August 2011. Interviewed about technology, transhumanism, and communication, http://sverigesradio.se/sida/default.aspx?programid=2946 53. Channel 4 / Wellcome Trust. (television documentary.) August 2011. Interviewed about the ethics of technology and medicine. 54. Scientific American (Rita J. King guest blog). July 2011. Interviewed for “Technogenic Disasters: A Deadly New Normal for the Media”. 55. Science & Vie (French leading science/popular magazine). June 2011. Interviewed about global catastrophic risks 56. Sole Møller (Danish freelance journalist). June 2011. Interviewed about brain training. www.solemoller.com 57. New Scientist Magazine. June 2011. Interviewed about the simulation argument. 58. The Ego Trick: What Does It Mean To Be You? (book publication by Julian Baggini, Granta Books, 2011) Interviewed about the ethics of enhancement and transhumanism. 59. Current Sponge (promotional pilot film: “The Real Limitless”). June 2011. Interviewed about cognitive enhancement, physical performance and life expectancy enhancement,
Recommended publications
  • Apocalypse Now? Initial Lessons from the Covid-19 Pandemic for the Governance of Existential and Global Catastrophic Risks
    journal of international humanitarian legal studies 11 (2020) 295-310 brill.com/ihls Apocalypse Now? Initial Lessons from the Covid-19 Pandemic for the Governance of Existential and Global Catastrophic Risks Hin-Yan Liu, Kristian Lauta and Matthijs Maas Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract This paper explores the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic through the framework of exis- tential risks – a class of extreme risks that threaten the entire future of humanity. In doing so, we tease out three lessons: (1) possible reasons underlying the limits and shortfalls of international law, international institutions and other actors which Covid-19 has revealed, and what they reveal about the resilience or fragility of institu- tional frameworks in the face of existential risks; (2) using Covid-19 to test and refine our prior ‘Boring Apocalypses’ model for understanding the interplay of hazards, vul- nerabilities and exposures in facilitating a particular disaster, or magnifying its effects; and (3) to extrapolate some possible futures for existential risk scholarship and governance. Keywords Covid-19 – pandemics – existential risks – global catastrophic risks – boring apocalypses 1 Introduction: Our First ‘Brush’ with Existential Risk? All too suddenly, yesterday’s ‘impossibilities’ have turned into today’s ‘condi- tions’. The impossible has already happened, and quickly. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, both directly and as manifested through the far-reaching global societal responses to it, signal a jarring departure away from even the © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/18781527-01102004Downloaded from Brill.com09/27/2021 12:13:00AM via free access <UN> 296 Liu, Lauta and Maas recent past, and suggest that our futures will be profoundly different in its af- termath.
    [Show full text]
  • Attribution and Response to Cybercrime/Terrorism/Warfare Susan W
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 97 Article 2 Issue 2 Winter Winter 2007 At Light Speed: Attribution and Response to Cybercrime/Terrorism/Warfare Susan W. Brenner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Susan W. Brenner, At Light Speed: Attribution and Response to Cybercrime/Terrorism/Warfare, 97 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 379 (2006-2007) This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/07/9702-0379 THE JOURNALOF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 97. No. 2 Copyright 0 2007 by NorthwesternUniversity. Schoolof Low Printedin U.S.A. "AT LIGHT SPEED": ATTRIBUTION AND RESPONSE TO CYBERCRIME/TERRORISM/WARFARE SUSAN W. BRENNER* This Article explains why and how computer technology complicates the related processes of identifying internal (crime and terrorism) and external (war) threats to social order of respondingto those threats. First, it divides the process-attribution-intotwo categories: what-attribution (what kind of attack is this?) and who-attribution (who is responsiblefor this attack?). Then, it analyzes, in detail, how and why our adversaries' use of computer technology blurs the distinctions between what is now cybercrime, cyberterrorism, and cyberwarfare. The Article goes on to analyze how and why computer technology and the blurring of these distinctions erode our ability to mount an effective response to threats of either type.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Television Programmes and Patient Behaviour
    Gesnerus 76/2 (2019) 225–246, DOI: 10.24894/Gesn-en.2019.76011 Doing the Work of Medicine? Medical Television Programmes and Patient Behaviour Tim Boon, Jean-Baptiste Gouyon Abstract This article explores the contribution of television programmes to shaping the doctor-patient relationship in Britain in the Sixties and beyond. Our core proposition is that TV programmes on medicine ascribe a specifi c position as patients to viewers. This is what we call the ‘Inscribed Patient’. In this ar- ticle we discuss a number of BBC programmes centred on medicine, from the 1958 ‘On Call to a Nation’; to the 1985 ‘A Prize Discovery’, to examine how television accompanied the development of desired patient behaviour during the transition to what was dubbed “Modern Medicine” in early 1970s Brit- ain. To support our argument about the “Inscribed Patient”, we draw a com- parison with natural history programmes from the early 1960s, which simi- larly prescribed specifi c agencies to viewers as potential participants in wild- life fi lmmaking. We conclude that a ‘patient position’ is inscribed in biomedical television programmes, which advance propositions to laypeople about how to submit themselves to medical expertise. Inscribed patient; doctor-patient relationship; biomedical television pro- grammes; wildlife television; documentary television; BBC Horizon Introduction Television programmes on medical themes, it is true, are only varieties of tele- vision programming more broadly, sharing with those others their programme styles and ‘grammar’. But they
    [Show full text]
  • The Disappearing Human: Gnostic Dreams in a Transhumanist World
    religions Article The Disappearing Human: Gnostic Dreams in a Transhumanist World Jeffrey C. Pugh Department of Religious Studies, Elon University, Elon, NC 27244-2020, USA; [email protected] Academic Editor: Noreen Herzfeld Received: 25 January 2017; Accepted: 18 April 2017; Published: 3 May 2017 Abstract: Transhumanism is dedicated to freeing humankind from the limitations of biological life, creating new bodies that will carry us into the future. In seeking freedom from the constraints of nature, it resembles ancient Gnosticism, but complicates the question of what the human being is. In contrast to the perspective that we are our brains, I argue that human consciousness and subjectivity originate from complex interactions between the body and the surrounding environment. These qualities emerge from a distinct set of structural couplings embodied within multiple organ systems and the multiplicity of connections within the brain. These connections take on different forms, including structural, chemical, and electrical manifestations within the totality of the human body. This embodiment suggests that human consciousness, and the intricate levels of experience that accompany it, cannot be replicated in non-organic forms such as computers or synaptic implants without a significant loss to human identity. The Gnostic desire to escape our embodiment found in transhumanism carries the danger of dissolving the human being. Keywords: Singularity; transhumanism; Merleau-Ponty; Kurzweil; Gnosticism; AI; emergence; technology 1. Introduction In 1993, the mathematician and science fiction writer Vernor Vinge gave a talk at the Vision 21 symposium sponsored by NASA introducing the idea of the Singularity, an evolutionary moment when we would create the capacity for superhuman intelligence that would transcend the human and take us into the posthuman world (Vinge 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • PDF ( Founders, and Developers at Europe’S Iconic Startup Event
    DELPHI – INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEW 2019 | VOLUME 2 | NUMBER 2 OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES CYBERWARFARE Cyberwar and Mediation Theory Nolen Gertz, Peter-Paul Verbeek and David M. Douglas AI AND DEMOCRACY The Impact of Disinformation, Social Bots and Political Targeting Maja Brkan DIGITAL PLATFORMS Why Europe Needs Public Funding for Platform Development Paul Nemitz and Arndt Kwiatkowksi BERLIN December 11–12 Arena Berlin Join thousands of investors, Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) www.lexxion.eu founders, and developers at Europe’s iconic startup event. TechCrunch.com/DisruptBerlin Get 15% OFF Disrupt Berlin Passes DELPHI Delphi 2|2019 Contents I Contents Editorial 63 Cees Zweistra Articles Artificial Intelligence and Democracy: 66 The Impact of Disinformation, Social Bots and Political Targeting Maja Brkan Cyberwar and Mediation Theory 72 Nolen Gertz, Peter-Paul Verbeek and David M. Douglas Steps to Designing AI-Empowered Nanotechnology: 79 A Value Sensitive Design Approach Steven Umbrello OutlOOk What Is the Business Value of Ethical Tech? 84 Contributions by Steffen Augsberg, Siri Beerends, Ida Rust, Paul Nemitz, Nicholas Borsotto and Vuyiswa M’Cwabeni repOrt Understanding ‘AI Made in Germany’: 87 A Report on the German Startup Landscape Jessica Schmeiss and Nicolas Friederici OpiniOn Why Europe Needs Public Funding for Platform Development 95 Paul Nemitz and Arndt Kwiatkowksi stArtup Digest How Ethical Debates Can Enrich Data Science and Artificial Intelligence 99 Interviews with Elena Poughia and Zara Nanu Anna Laesser BOOk reviews Towards
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Research on Catastrophic and Existential Risk
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE Working together to face humanity's greatest threats: Introduction to The Future of Research in Catastrophic and Existential Risk AUTHORS Currie, AM; Ó hÉigeartaigh, S JOURNAL Futures DEPOSITED IN ORE 06 February 2019 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/35764 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Working together to face humanity’s greatest threats: Introduction to The Future of Research on Catastrophic and Existential Risk. Adrian Currie & Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh Penultimate Version, forthcoming in Futures Acknowledgements We would like to thank the authors of the papers in the special issue, as well as the referees who provided such constructive and useful feedback. We are grateful to the team at the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk who organized the first Cambridge Conference on Catastrophic Risk where many of the papers collected here were originally presented, and whose multi-disciplinary expertise was invaluable for making this special issue a reality. We’d like to thank Emma Bates, Simon Beard and Haydn Belfield for feedback on drafts. Ted Fuller, Futures’ Editor-in-Chief also provided invaluable guidance throughout. The Conference, and a number of the publications in this issue, were made possible through the support of a grant from the Templeton World Charity Foundation (TWCF); the conference was also supported by a supplementary grant from the Future of Life Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
    [Show full text]
  • What Lies Beneath 2 FOREWORD
    2018 RELEASE THE UNDERSTATEMENT OF EXISTENTIAL CLIMATE RISK BY DAVID SPRATT & IAN DUNLOP | FOREWORD BY HANS JOACHIM SCHELLNHUBER BREAKTHROUGHONLINE.ORG.AU Published by Breakthrough, National Centre for Climate Restoration, Melbourne, Australia. First published September 2017. Revised and updated August 2018. CONTENTS FOREWORD 02 INTRODUCTION 04 RISK UNDERSTATEMENT EXCESSIVE CAUTION 08 THINKING THE UNTHINKABLE 09 THE UNDERESTIMATION OF RISK 10 EXISTENTIAL RISK TO HUMAN CIVILISATION 13 PUBLIC SECTOR DUTY OF CARE ON CLIMATE RISK 15 SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTATEMENT CLIMATE MODELS 18 TIPPING POINTS 21 CLIMATE SENSITIVITY 22 CARBON BUDGETS 24 PERMAFROST AND THE CARBON CYCLE 25 ARCTIC SEA ICE 27 POLAR ICE-MASS LOSS 28 SEA-LEVEL RISE 30 POLITICAL UNDERSTATEMENT POLITICISATION 34 GOALS ABANDONED 36 A FAILURE OF IMAGINATION 38 ADDRESSING EXISTENTIAL CLIMATE RISK 39 SUMMARY 40 What Lies Beneath 2 FOREWORD What Lies Beneath is an important report. It does not deliver new facts and figures, but instead provides a new perspective on the existential risks associated with anthropogenic global warming. It is the critical overview of well-informed intellectuals who sit outside the climate-science community which has developed over the last fifty years. All such expert communities are prone to what the French call deformation professionelle and the German betriebsblindheit. Expressed in plain English, experts tend to establish a peer world-view which becomes ever more rigid and focussed. Yet the crucial insights regarding the issue in question may lurk at the fringes, as BY HANS JOACHIM SCHELLNHUBER this report suggests. This is particularly true when Hans Joachim Schellnhuber is a professor of theoretical the issue is the very survival of our civilisation, physics specialising in complex systems and nonlinearity, where conventional means of analysis may become founding director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate useless.
    [Show full text]
  • The Edward R. Murrow of Docudramas and Documentary
    Media History Monographs 12:1 (2010) ISSN 1940-8862 The Edward R. Murrow of Docudramas and Documentary By Lawrence N. Strout Mississippi State University Three major TV and film productions about Edward R. Murrow‟s life are the subject of this research: Murrow, HBO, 1986; Edward R. Murrow: This Reporter, PBS, 1990; and Good Night, and Good Luck, Warner Brothers, 2005. Murrow has frequently been referred to as the “father” of broadcast journalism. So, studying the “documentation” of his life in an attempt to ascertain its historical role in supporting, challenging, and/or adding to the collective memory and mythology surrounding him is important. Research on the docudramas and documentary suggests the depiction that provided the least amount of context regarding Murrow‟s life (Good Night) may be the most available for viewing (DVD). Therefore, Good Night might ultimately contribute to this generation (and the next) having a more narrow and skewed memory of Murrow. And, Good Night even seems to add (if that is possible) to Murrow‟s already “larger than life” mythological image. ©2010 Lawrence N. Strout Media History Monographs 12:1 Strout: Edward R. Murrow The Edward R. Murrow of Docudramas and Documentary Edward R. Murrow officially resigned from Life and Legacy of Edward R. Murrow” at CBS in January of 1961 and he died of cancer AEJMC‟s annual convention in August 2008, April 27, 1965.1 Unquestionably, Murrow journalists and academicians devoted a great contributed greatly to broadcast journalism‟s deal of time revisiting Edward R. Murrow‟s development; achieved unprecedented fame in contributions to broadcast journalism‟s the United States during his career at CBS;2 history.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital News Report 2018 Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2018 2 2 / 3
    1 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018 Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2018 2 2 / 3 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, David A. L. Levy and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2018 4 Contents Foreword by David A. L. Levy 5 3.12 Hungary 84 Methodology 6 3.13 Ireland 86 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.14 Italy 88 3.15 Netherlands 90 SECTION 1 3.16 Norway 92 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 8 3.17 Poland 94 3.18 Portugal 96 SECTION 2 3.19 Romania 98 Further Analysis and International Comparison 32 3.20 Slovakia 100 2.1 The Impact of Greater News Literacy 34 3.21 Spain 102 2.2 Misinformation and Disinformation Unpacked 38 3.22 Sweden 104 2.3 Which Brands do we Trust and Why? 42 3.23 Switzerland 106 2.4 Who Uses Alternative and Partisan News Brands? 45 3.24 Turkey 108 2.5 Donations & Crowdfunding: an Emerging Opportunity? 49 Americas 2.6 The Rise of Messaging Apps for News 52 3.25 United States 112 2.7 Podcasts and New Audio Strategies 55 3.26 Argentina 114 3.27 Brazil 116 SECTION 3 3.28 Canada 118 Analysis by Country 58 3.29 Chile 120 Europe 3.30 Mexico 122 3.01 United Kingdom 62 Asia Pacific 3.02 Austria 64 3.31 Australia 126 3.03 Belgium 66 3.32 Hong Kong 128 3.04 Bulgaria 68 3.33 Japan 130 3.05 Croatia 70 3.34 Malaysia 132 3.06 Czech Republic 72 3.35 Singapore 134 3.07 Denmark 74 3.36 South Korea 136 3.08 Finland 76 3.37 Taiwan 138 3.09 France 78 3.10 Germany 80 SECTION 4 3.11 Greece 82 Postscript and Further Reading 140 4 / 5 Foreword Dr David A.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Technical Series No. 87 Assessing Progress Towards Aichi Biodiversity Target 6 on Sustainable Marine Fisheries
    Secretariat of the CBD Technical Series No. 87 Convention on Biological Diversity ASSESSING PROGRESS87 TOWARDS AICHI BIODIVERSITY TARGET 6 ON SUSTAINABLE MARINE FISHERIES CBD Technical Series No. 87 Assessing Progress towards Aichi Biodiversity Target 6 on Sustainable Marine Fisheries Serge M. Garcia and Jake Rice Fisheries Expert Group of the IUCN Commission of Ecosystem Management Published by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity ISBN: 9789292256616 Copyright © 2020, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views reported in this publication do not necessarily represent those of the Convention on Biological Diversity. This publication may be reproduced for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holders, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The Secretariat of the Convention would appreciate receiving a copy of any publications that use this document as a source. Citation Garcia, S.M. and Rice, J. 2020. Assessing Progress towards Aichi Biodiversity Target 6 on Sustainable Marine Fisheries. Technical Series No. 87. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, 103 pages For further information, please contact: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity World Trade Centre 413 St. Jacques Street, Suite 800 Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2Y 1N9 Phone: 1(514) 288 2220 Fax: 1 (514) 288 6588 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.cbd.int This publication was made possible thanks to financial assistance from the Government of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Arturo Reyes-Sandoval Associate Professor / Profesor Asociado the Jenner Institute Nuffield Department of Medicine University of Oxford
    CURRICULUM VITAE Dr. Arturo Reyes-Sandoval Associate Professor / Profesor Asociado The Jenner Institute Nuffield Department of Medicine University of Oxford Associate Professor at the University of Oxford since 2015. Principal investigator leading a group of scientist composed by 4 postdoctoral scientists, 2 PhD students and a project manager. 56 publications in international journals, H-index 22 and 2133 citations to his research work. 15 grants awarded for a total of £11 million pounds awarded by British Institutions and CONACyT. 8 patents and registrations, 6 as inventor. Educational Qualifications: Degree Award Subject University Year PhD Graduated Doctoral Thesis in Molecular National Polytechnic 2005 with honours Medicine Institute M.Sc. (Hons) Graduated Cytopathology National Polytechnic 1995 with honours Institute University Prize as best Microbiology National Polytechnic 1993 degree student. Institute Finished 1st of 150 students Academic Positions Held: Institution Position Held Start Date End Date University of Oxford Associate Professor 26/03/2015 - The Jenner Institute Wellcome Trust 01/02/2012 01/02/2017 Nuffield Department of Clinical Career development Medicine, University of Oxford Fellow (During this period I received the titles of University Research Lecturer (1 December 2012) and Associate Professor. (26 March 2015). The Jenner Institute Senior Postdoctoral 01/01/2011 31/01/2012 Nuffield Department of Clinical Research Scientist / Medicine, University of Oxford NDM Research Fellow Junior Postdoctoral 24/09/2004 31/12/2010 Research Scientist The Wistar Institute Pre-doctoral trainee 24/09/1999 24/09/2004 Philadelphia Recognition I: Prizes, honours and awards 2016 Nominated by the Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Mexican Embassy to the UK for the 2016 prize on Science and Technology.
    [Show full text]