DOCSLIB.ORG

The Amencan Sociological Association Annual Meeting the Amencan FORMER PRESIDENI's of the ASSOCIATION Sociological Lester F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Amencan Sociological Association Annual Meeting the Amencan FORMER PRESIDENI's of the ASSOCIATION Sociological Lester F the amencan sociological association annual meeting the amencan FORMER PRESIDENI'S OF THE ASSOCIATION sociological Lester F. Ward Dwight Sanderson William G. Sumner George A. Lundberg association Franklin H. Giddings Rupert B. Vance Albion W. Small Kimball Young 'onnual Edward A. Ross Carl C. Taylor George E. Vincent Louis Wirtb meeting George E. Howard E. Franklin Frazier Cbarles H. Cooley Talcott Parsons Frank W. Blackmar Leonard S. Cottrell, Jr. James Q. Dealey Robert C. Angell Edward C. Hayes Dorothy Swaine Thomas James P. Lichtenberger Samuel A. Stouffer Ulysses G. Weatherly 1\ Florian Znaniecki Cbarles A. Ellwood Donald Young Robert E. Park Herbert Blmner Jobn L. Gillin Robert K. Merton William I. Thomas Robin M. 'Yilliams, Jr. Jobn M. Gillette Kingsley Davis William F. Ogburn Howard Becker Howard W. Odmn Robert E. L. Faris I , Emory S. Bogardus Paul F. Lazarsfeld Luther L. Bernard Everett C. Hughes Edward B. Reuter George C. Romans Ernest W. Burgess Pitirim A. Sorokin F. Stuart Cbapin Wilbert E. Moore Henry P. Fairchild Cbarles P. Loomis Ellsworth Faris Philip M. Hauser Frank H. Hankins Arnold M. Rose "' Edwin H. Sutherland Ralph H. Turner Robert M. Maciver Reinhard Bendix ' ,1 l Stuart A. Queen William H. Sewell j ' William J. Goode Executive Office 1722 N Street, N.W. 1973 Washington, D.C. 20036 " ·· ':', .. prOgram '' ~ .f:L';,..'i: I '•~ ' • i:. '~ ~ ) ' ~ . 8~ " " . N~w Y~rk Hilton Hotel '.: ·' :~·'·· ·" · Aug~,~sf :27-3o, J973 , 2 3 CONTENTS MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, 1973 GENERAL Im"ORMATION · ·· .·· . 7 Officers of the .Association Retet=R&mi:t6cilti9Di .' •••.•••••..••••..• : ••• •••••••••• 5 .s.ervic~s . MIRRA KOMAROVSKY, President MATILDA WHITE RILEY, Vice-Presi­ 5 Barnard College, Columbia University dent-Elect Press ':Roo'm ". .- . _; : . ~ . .' .. ~ .. 6 RAYMOND W. MACK, Vice-President Rutgers University Paper Sales . , . ~· ·. '... 6 Northwestern University J. ~TON YINGER, Secretary Professional Placement Service . .. ; ' 7 PETER M. BLAU, President-Elect ·.. Oberlin College r. Columbia University WILLIAM J. GOODE, Past-President Book EXhibig ..................................... ' , · . , : ... 7 Columbia University 7 OTTO N. LARSEN;· Executive Officer Informal~Center ····.:_···:··············· Message .......................................... 8 ~ €are.·Ccntoro ~.; .............. ·................... 8 Elected-at-Large Daily Bulletin .... ·, ...•............................·; • •.. , 8 HUBERT M. BLALOCK, JR.· SUZANNE KEIJ.ER PROGRAM NOTES University of Washington Princeton University 9 ORVILLE G. BRIM, JR. KARL F. SCHUESSLER :=:e~~ilie~ ~ · :.:..L:: · · :: ;_ ,..~ · ~ • ·: ·;Yo;~ · · · · · ··. Old Greenwich, Connecticut IDdiana University ·· 1 9 ROSE LAUB COSER RIT~ J~·; SIMON What Have We Le~~d?~n~~~ ~9 SUNY, Stony Brook VJ!h:ersity· qf IlliJiois - Sctp:htar Sessit:JB&. • • . • . • • • • 9 JAMES A. DAVIS ~9~ H; ~OLNICK NORC, Chicago UJ!i.y~t:f California, Berkeley Contrihu~d Paper Sessi6ftS . 9 JACK P. GmBS RUTH USEEM ~uncheon Roundtable Diss:ussions, .·.·...................... 10 Mi~ ~State Uni,versity University of Texas ·· · · ".........-Business Meetin ._.-. 4 ... /"'" J~ L7.'7.a:< JOSEPH GUSFIELD WALTER L WALLACE 1'"--Sectio M tin gs ;-., .... r";-;. · .• # r. .·;(/ . ~~. lO University of California,. San Diego Prhl~ton Ufiiv~ty . n ee gs ......................·................ 10 Social Events . 10 ·' Joint Meetings, .. , , .·... ·.. 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11 ---o\.c.tivities of Other Group~( .·. · · .. · . 11 ~~1iif~f ~E)( . ........................... MEMBE.Rs OF Tin: CQUNCIL, i974 ~·-~. »=' ................................... 13 Officers of the ~aqoh / COMMJITEE, C()UNCIL AND pr 17 J l'1W ,..;J30ARD ME;J3T- 't• - ---· PETER M. BLAU, President __.-NEIL' J;. ~~ER, Vice-Pmident-Elect INGS ................. 17 ~~PROGRAM sUMMARy ,., · · · · ·: · · · .. · · · · · · · · ·' · .. ·· .. )Cobimbia University University of California, Berkeley ..................................... 19 ,MATILDA WHITE RILEY, WILLIAM H. FORM, Secretary-Elect Vice-President University of Dllnois , ~.·,: AL MEETING ~ROGRAM .. , , . : . Rutgers University ' · · · ""'7"1,_(Jf t: lYlQll.day. · I Aucrn!:.tb- ~'L.fP• •. • • • • • • ••••••••••••• -_ •••••• , •••••• LE~ A. COSER, President-Elect MIRRA KOMAltOVSKY, Past-Preddent d 27 SUNY, Stony Brook Barnard College, Columbia Universi~ j ~es ay, August ~7.. ·. , .......... ·........ · .... ·...... ·: . 51 J. MILTON YINGER, Secretary OTTO N. LARSEN, Executive Officer TI1dnesday, August ..... , : ., . :, .......... : ..•......... Oberlin College 75 ursday, August 1.... , ..... .....· ...,,. .............. 93 l;).JB.ECTORY OF EXHIBITORS . Elected-at-Large ~:ADMI:Ni . •·. .. ':' ·... ::: .. :............... 113 : . .S',r.RATION HUBERT M. BLALOCK, Jr. SUZANNE KELLER University of Washington . Princeton University 2 ORVILLE G. BRIM MELVIN L KOHN 'ctgg~~Vtt~~. :: : : : : : : : : :·: :: : : : : ·: :: : ·: :: : : : : : : :.: :: ; : : : : : : 191 Old Greenwich, Connecticut National Institute of Mental Health GftY. MARX JAMES A. DA~ ·C;·~~:~e~~ 194. NORC, Chicago Massachusetts Institute of Technology ·· · · · · ··, ·· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·· ·· · · · · · · · · · · c Editors <>f J<>urnals · • · · • · • · · · • · · · · · · · • · · · · · ·' • · · • • · • •·' • • 16 JOSEPH FICHTER JEROME H. SKOLNICK ..................................... 195 Loyola University University of California, Berkeley ~· · PtQgram Committee . · RENEE FOX RUTH HILL USEEM £/ &ecuiive Office Staff· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·-· · · ·· · · · · · · 4 University of Pennsylvania Michigan. State University 4 JOSEPH R. GUSFIELD WALTERL WALLACE ~rNcr>EDCOFP)URT1ctP~~· ·················· .......... University of California, San Diego Princeton University . 197 4 5 ~~ EXECUTIVE OFFICE STAFF IN ATIENpANCE GENERAL INFORMATION Otto N. Larsen-Executive Officer Suzanne Gorman-A~vertising wzd The New York Hilton Hotel Alice F.· Myers-Administrative Exhibits . , · ' · . Officer Sharon Gray-Subscriptio~ All activities of the Annual Me~ting will be held in this headquarters Maurice Jackson-Executive Midg~ Miles-Administrat!ye hotel. The !'aciliti~s· here are such that an· sessions ahd 8ervic.es will be Specialist Assista71t located on the second and third floor, easijy ac¢¢ssible from the lobby by Joan Harris-Executive Specialist Telza Pippin~omputer Records espalators · and £r:om ·an floors of the hotel by· direc.t elevators. :Most com­ Designate Martha Rios-Ricagac:=Bookeeper · rilitte:e'' meetings; ·board meetings, and ancillary group activities Will •be Norma Blohm-Secretary JoAnn Ruckel-Publicatiohs located on the fifth floor of the hotel, which can only be' reached by certain Sarah Clement-Membership Jude Ruckel-Secretary, elevators. If you are located on upper floors of the Hilton, it is best for you Lillie Gaskins-Secretary to go to the lobby and then use a local elevator to the fifth floor. · ; The second floor ·.of the Hilton, where ASA registration is loc!lted, also c.ontains many of the, meeting. rooms: · .t, Beektluui Room' MurtaY Hill Suite· Bryant Suite Morgan Suite Clinton Suite Nassau Suite Gibson Suite Regent Room Gramercy Suite Rhinelander Gallery Madison Suite Sutton Ballroom • , _. -· <: ·I,\ • - . , The balance of the Session rooms are located on the third floor: ' i - . ' - . ' ' ~ . ' c > PROGRAM COMMITTEE ... East Ballroom · , Le Petit Trianon West Ballroom Trianon Ballroom Mercury Ballroom Rotunda MIRRA KoMARovsKY, Chair,· Barnard· ciillege, Columbia University ~ addition, a series of small meeting rooms are located on the fifth floor: JAMEs· E. BLACKWELL, 'University of M'assdchuseitS, B.oston ~. Franklin P. Adams ruDg Lardner ALLEN D. GRIMSHAW, Indiana UriiVefsity Robert Berichley Don Marquis .. · Clifton Fadiman Ogden Nil$, RAYMOND W. MACK, Northwestern University S~tt Fitzgei-ald Dor,otliy Parker Wolcott Gibbs Damon· Runyon MATILDA WHITE RILEY, Rutgers University ,~,, Lorenz. Hart Red Smith , g: Heilry · P. G. Wodebofise J. MILTON YINGER,. Oberlin College Henry James MORRIS ZELDITCH, Stanford University ·1:, ~mces Seminar Sessions Sub-Committee: GEORGE W. BOHRNSTEI>T, Chair; ILENE N. BERN- STEIN, ALLEN D. GRIMSHAW, HELENA Z. LoPATA, IRA L. REISS ' ' . r Th~ foUowing ~rvices are located on the second floor (the wide corridor Luncheon Roundtables Sub-Committee: HARRY C. BREDEMEIER, Chair; EnrnA LEH- ~ tQ~ ~§~aJ.a~ors is kpown as th~ Pt:omenade) : MAN, CoRA B·. MARRETT . 1. Regist:J::a~<;m .. -:Promenade Contributed Papers Sub-Committee: RICHARD L. SIMPsoN, Chair; M. ELAINE BURGESs, " · '2. .ASA · Desk.,.,_Promenade ERDMAN B. PALMORE · ·'·' ' ' 9. l:I:OSpitality~Promenade •t~~'"c4, Luncheon Roundtable Ticket Desk"-Promenade ~.,.,,,§,. ABA Exec:utive Office-.,Morgan Suite . 6. Informal Exchange Contact Center-Morgan Suite 7 7. Book Exhibits-Rhinelander Gallery summ~d ,and discussed. Therefore, ypu are urged ·to obtain. copies· of 8. Press Room-Gibson Suite such,papers prior to the sessions. '· .• _ . , · . · · 9. Paper Sales~linton Swte Authors .who brought multiple. copies of their papers rather than mailing 10. Placement Service--Sutto~ Ballroom them beforehand should take their papers to the Clinton Suite. : The Exe.cutiv~. Office regrets that many papers are not available because ·Registration the authors either did not submit copies or preferred not to have them dis­ 1 • c( f ' • ' \ 1: ) \ ' r '1. +, , .~ __ , Pre~re~*~ts :m~y pi~k up their kits:,l,lnd P,adges; oth~fS. piay fegjs~~r, tributed. The papers to be given at the Refresher Lectures and'
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Board Committee Faculty Staff Documents B9 5
    I-B-9 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL AND UNIVERSITY CENTER APPOINTMENT WITH IMMEDIATE TENURE OF DR. VAN C. TRAN WHEREAS, Van C. Tran has been described by external reviewers as both a “rising star in the field of immigration integration” and “the most well-known scholar of migration and its intersection with urban sociology of his generation”; and WHEREAS, he is the recipient of numerous fellowships and grants, and the prestigious Nancy W. Malkiel Scholars Award from the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation; and WHEREAS, his scholarship to date consists of an impressive fifteen refereed articles, six book chapters and six journal articles and two book manuscripts in preparation; and WHEREAS, in addition to being an outstanding scholar, Dr. Tran is an exceptional educator having won the Faculty Mentoring Award from the Graduate Student Advisory Council of Columbia University and the Columbia University Presidential Award for Teaching; and WHEREAS Van C. Tran is the quintessential CUNY success story, a refugee whose family settled in New York City, he graduated as valedictorian of Hostos Community College, then from Hunter College summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa,, and earned a Ph.D. in Sociology and Social Policy from Harvard University; and WHEREAS, Dr. Tran has won awards bestowed upon him as a faculty member at Columbia University and has been an exceptionally productive scholar, an outstanding teacher and college citizen, and has a strong national profile in discipline; and WHEREAS, although his scheduled tenure review year at Columbia has not yet arrived, his appointment with tenure is strongly and enthusiastically supported by the Sociology program faculty of the Graduate School; now therefore be it RESOLVED, that Van C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revival of Economic Sociology
    Chapter 1 The Revival of Economic Sociology MAURO F. G UILLEN´ , RANDALL COLLINS, PAULA ENGLAND, AND MARSHALL MEYER conomic sociology is staging a comeback after decades of rela- tive obscurity. Many of the issues explored by scholars today E mirror the original concerns of the discipline: sociology emerged in the first place as a science geared toward providing an institutionally informed and culturally rich understanding of eco- nomic life. Confronted with the profound social transformations of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the founders of so- ciological thought—Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, Georg Simmel—explored the relationship between the economy and the larger society (Swedberg and Granovetter 1992). They examined the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services through the lenses of domination and power, solidarity and inequal- ity, structure and agency, and ideology and culture. The classics thus planted the seeds for the systematic study of social classes, gender, race, complex organizations, work and occupations, economic devel- opment, and culture as part of a unified sociological approach to eco- nomic life. Subsequent theoretical developments led scholars away from this originally unified approach. In the 1930s, Talcott Parsons rein- terpreted the classical heritage of economic sociology, clearly distin- guishing between economics (focused on the means of economic ac- tion, or what he called “the adaptive subsystem”) and sociology (focused on the value orientations underpinning economic action). Thus, sociologists were theoretically discouraged from participating 1 2 The New Economic Sociology in the economics-sociology dialogue—an exchange that, in any case, was not sought by economists. It was only when Parsons’s theory was challenged by the reality of the contentious 1960s (specifically, its emphasis on value consensus and system equilibration; see Granovet- ter 1990, and Zelizer, ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Theorem and the Matthew Hfed?
    The Thomas Theorem and The Matthew Hfed? ROBERT K MERI'ON, Cohmbiu University and Russell Sage Foundation Eponymy in science is the practice of affixing the names of scientists to what they have discovered or are believed to have discovered,’ as with Boyle’s Law, Halley’s comet, Fourier’s transform, Planck’s constant, the Rorschach test, the Gini coefficient, and the Thomas theorem This article can be read from various sociological perspectives? Most specifical- ly, it records an epistolary episode in the sociointellectual history of what has ’ The definition of epw includes the cautionary phrase,“or are belkvedto have discovered,” in order to take due note of “Stigkr’s Law of Eponymy” which in its strongest and “simplest form is this: ‘No scientific discovery is named after its original discovereV (Stigler 1980). Stigler’s study of what is generally known as “the normal distribution” or “the Gaussian distribution” as a case in point of his ixonicaBy self-exemplifyingeponymous law is based in part on its eponymous appearance in 80 textbooks of statistics, from 1816 to 1976. 2 As will become evident, this discursive composite of archival dccuments, biography of a sociological idea, and analysis of social mechanisms involved in the diffusion of that idea departs from the tidy format that has come to be p&bed for the scientific paper. This is by design and with the indulgent consent of the editor of SocialForces. But then, that only speaks for a continuing largeness of spirit of its editorial policy which, back in 1934, allowed the ironic phrase “enlightened Boojum of Positivism” (with its allusion to Lewis Carroll’s immortal The Hunting of the &ark) to appear in my very fist article, published in this journal better than 60 Y- ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Theory's Essential Texts
    Conference Information Features • Znaniecki Conference in Poland • The Essential Readings in Theory • Miniconference in San Francisco • Where Can a Student Find Theory? THE ASA July 1998 THEORY SECTION NEWSLETTER Perspectives VOLUME 20, NUMBER 3 From the Chair’s Desk Section Officers How Do We Create Theory? CHAIR By Guillermina Jasso Guillermina Jasso s the spring semester draws to a close, and new scholarly energies are every- where visible, I want to briefly take stock of sociological theory and the CHAIR-ELECT Theory Section. It has been a splendid privilege to watch the selflessness Janet Saltzman Chafetz A and devotion with which section members nurture the growth of sociological theory and its chief institutional steward, the Theory Section. I called on many of you to PAST CHAIR help with section matters, and you kindly took on extra burdens, many of them Donald Levine thankless except, sub specie aeternitatis, insofar as they play a part in advancing socio- logical theory. The Theory Prize Committee, the Shils-Coleman Prize Committee, SECRETARY-TREASURER the Nominations Committee, and the Membership Committee have been active; the Peter Kivisto newsletter editor has kept us informed; the session organizers have assembled an impressive array of speakers and topics. And thus, we can look forward to our COUNCIL meeting in August as a time for intellectual consolidation and intellectual progress. Keith Doubt Gary Alan Fine The section program for the August meetings includes one regular open session, one Stephen Kalberg roundtables session, and the three-session miniconference, entitled “The Methods Michele Lamont of Theoretical Sociology.” Because the papers from the miniconference are likely to Emanuel Schegloff become the heart of a book, I will be especially on the lookout for discussion at the miniconference sessions that could form the basis for additional papers or discus- Steven Seidman sion in the volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Van C
    Curriculum vitae Van C. Tran Van C. Tran The Graduate Center, CUNY http://vanctran.org/ PhD Program in Sociology [email protected] 365 Fifth Avenue, 6112.04 (212) 817-8786 New York, NY 10016 December 2019 EDUCATION Harvard University PhD in Sociology and Social Policy 2007-2011 Committee: Mary Waters (Chair), Orlando Patterson, William J. Wilson, Christopher Winship Dissertation: “Rethinking Culture and Structure: Race, Class and Assimilation in America” AM in Sociology with Distinction 2004-2007 City University of New York (CUNY) Hunter College, BA in Sociology, Summa Cum Laude & Phi Beta Kappa 2002-2004 Hostos Community College, AA in Liberal Arts, Class Valedictorian Speaker 1999-2002 ACADEMIC POSITIONS The Graduate Center, City University of New York Associate Professor of Sociology 2019- Deputy Director, Center for Urban Research 2019- Faculty Associate, Institute for Demographic Research 2019- Columbia University Associate Professor of Sociology 2019-2019 Assistant Professor of Sociology 2013-2019 Founding Faculty, Race, Ethnicity and Migration (REM) Workshop 2014-2019 Affiliated Faculty, Center for the Study of Ethnicity and Race (CSER) 2014-2019 Affiliated Faculty, Columbia Population Research Center (CPRC) 2014-2019 Affiliated Faculty, Urban Studies Program, Barnard College 2014-2019 Affiliated Faculty, Interdisciplinary Center for Innovative Theory and Empirics 2018-2019 Affiliated Faculty, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholar 2013-2014 University of Pennsylvania Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society
    [Show full text]
  • Further Notes on Why American Sociology Abandoned Mass Communication Research
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (ASC) Annenberg School for Communication 12-2008 Further Notes on Why American Sociology Abandoned Mass Communication Research Jefferson Pooley Muhlenberg College Elihu Katz University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Pooley, J., & Katz, E. (2008). Further Notes on Why American Sociology Abandoned Mass Communication Research. Journal of Communication, 58 (4), 767-786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00413.x This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/269 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Further Notes on Why American Sociology Abandoned Mass Communication Research Abstract Communication research seems to be flourishing, as vidente in the number of universities offering degrees in communication, number of students enrolled, number of journals, and so on. The field is interdisciplinary and embraces various combinations of former schools of journalism, schools of speech (Midwest for ‘‘rhetoric’’), and programs in sociology and political science. The field is linked to law, to schools of business and health, to cinema studies, and, increasingly, to humanistically oriented programs of so-called cultural studies. All this, in spite of having been prematurely pronounced dead, or bankrupt, by some of its founders. Sociologists once occupied a prominent place in the study of communication— both in pioneering departments of sociology and as founding members of the interdisciplinary teams that constituted departments and schools of communication. In the intervening years, we daresay that media research has attracted rather little attention in mainstream sociology and, as for departments of communication, a generation of scholars brought up on interdisciplinarity has lost touch with the disciplines from which their teachers were recruited.
    [Show full text]
  • PART I the Columbia School 10 Peter Simonson the Columbia and Gabriel School Weimann
    Critical Research at Columbia 9 PART I The Columbia School 10 Peter Simonson The Columbia and Gabriel School Weimann Introduction That canonic texts refuse to stand still applies, a fortiori, to the classics of the Columbia “school.” The pioneering work of Paul Lazarsfeld and associates in the 1940s and 1950s gave communications research its very name and yet, at the same time, evoked devastating criticism. The Chi- cago school decried Columbia’s psychologistic and positivistic bias and denounced its pronouncement of “limited effects”; the Frankfurt school refused to accept that audience likes and dislikes had any bearing on understanding the culture industry; and British cultural studies threw darts at the idea of defining media functions by asking audiences how they “use” them. Todd Gitlin went so far as to accuse Lazarsfeld’s “domin- ant paradigm” of willfully understating the persuasive powers of the media, thereby relieving their owners and managers of the guilt they ought to feel. It is true that the Columbia school – not satisfied to infer effects from content – developed methodologies for studying audience attitudes and behavior; it is true that sample surveys were preferred to ethnographic study or other forms of qualitative analysis; it is true that many studies were commercially sponsored, even if their products were academic; and it is true that media campaigns, like it or not, have only limited effects on the opinions, attitudes, and actions of the mass audience. But it is also true that, in the meantime, some of Columbia’s harshest critics have themselves turned (perhaps too much so) to “reception” studies – that is to say, toward Columbia-like observations of the relative autonomy of audience decodings.
    [Show full text]
  • Universiv Micrdmlms International Aoon.Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Ml 48106
    INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality o f the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “ Missing Page(s)” . I f it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image o f the page can be found in the adjacent frame. I f copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part o f the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer o f a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. I f necessary, sectioning is continued again-beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Bibliography on the History of American Sociology
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 2005 Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology Michael R. Hill [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Social Psychology and Interaction Commons Hill, Michael R., "Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology" (2005). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 348. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/348 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Hill, Michael R., (Compiler). 2005. Centennial Bibliography of the History of American Sociology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. CENTENNIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN SOCIOLOGY Compiled by MICHAEL R. HILL Editor, Sociological Origins In consultation with the Centennial Bibliography Committee of the American Sociological Association Section on the History of Sociology: Brian P. Conway, Michael R. Hill (co-chair), Susan Hoecker-Drysdale (ex-officio), Jack Nusan Porter (co-chair), Pamela A. Roby, Kathleen Slobin, and Roberta Spalter-Roth. © 2005 American Sociological Association Washington, DC TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: Each part is separately paginated, with the number of pages in each part as indicated below in square brackets. The total page count for the entire file is 224 pages. To navigate within the document, please use navigation arrows and the Bookmark feature provided by Adobe Acrobat Reader.® Users may search this document by utilizing the “Find” command (typically located under the “Edit” tab on the Adobe Acrobat toolbar).
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 1982 2 from the President
    PARTICIPANT Table of Contents The Pitzer College magazine, Fall 1982 2 From the President 2 From the Editor The Pitzer Participant (USPS 970-280) is 3 Pitzer on the Population published quarterly by Pitzer College, Studies and Public Health lOSO N. Mills Avenue, Claremont, Ca. 917ll. Second class permit granted by Map Claremont, Ca. 91711. by Joanne Siegmann '79 Volume 17, Number I, Fall 1982 with assistance from Ann Stromberg Editor: Katharine M. Morsberger Staff Photographer: Sue Keith 6 Technology, Politics, and Design: Shields / Stoddard Society in China Cover: Brad Kadel '82 (right) and by Rudi Volti Terry Schuler, Director of Personnel Relations at Avery On Confronting the labels, confer a moment about 7 an aspect of production. Meaning of Human Photo: Sue Keith Meaning Photographers: George Adams, by Glenn Goodwin Shireen Alafi '76, Sue Keith, John Kruissink, Kathryn Lamb '78, 8 Organizational Studies: Agnes Lawson, Arthur Mathern, Linda Mooser, Robert E. Morsberger, Internships: Students in the Bob Penn '78, Glenn Potts, Workplace Saul Schuster, Wesley Tanimura '85, Toru Yamazoe by Anne Lieberman '83 10 New Resources: Earning a Degree While on the Job II Management Seminar: Business Comes to Campus I2 Five-Year Program: Pitzer B.A., CGS M.A. 16 From the Trustees 13 A Brief Social History of Conjuring by Peter M. Nardi IS Pitzer Profiles: Inge Bell by Laud Humphreys Homer Garcia by Martha Quintana '83 17 From the Alumni 17 At Pitzer 18 Beyond Pitzer From the From the President Editor In the following pages, you will learn more about some of these inter­ ests in a large measure through the CCASIONALLY, I encounter HEN PREPARING this issue on wo;ds of a number of Pitzer's graduates O someone who wonders how Pitzer W sociology and organizatio~al College can be both a liberal arts college in sociology and organization~ studies, studies, your editor began to feel hke an interdisciplinary concentratIOn.
    [Show full text]
  • Dept Newsletter Fa05 Copy.Indd
    Sociology Outlook I S ISSUE I 2005 Illinois Sociology Znaniecki Conference Draws International Speakers and Participants Florian Znaniecki was a Professor of Sociology at Illinois from 1940 to 1958. Though Professor Znaniecki was quite prolific in his scholarly career, his most famous contribution is his renowned immigration study (co-authored with W. I. Thomas), The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. In order to honor his legacy and to remain mindful of our own departmental history, we hosted The Znaniecki Conference and 6th Annual Transnational Workshop on April 21 and 22 of this year. These two days of panels and discussion were invigorating, lively, and even drew a few visitors from other university communities to our doorstep. Day 1 of the gathering was focused on Professor Znaniecki’s ideas and an extension of those ideas. Day 2 was a Transnational Workshop that remained in tune with the previous day’s proceedings by employing a theme of “Transmigration.” Therefore, we were able to observe some of the effects (direct and indirect) of Professor Znaniecki’s work not only in a historical sense, but in a contemporary one as well. Our keynote speaker on Day 1, Professor Elzbieta Halas of the University of Warsaw, opened up the days’ events with some thoughts on “Culture and Power.” Furthermore, Professor Halas was making a personal reconnection, as she had been a visiting scholar in our department during the 1980s. She remarked on how glad she was not only to be at the conference but also to be back in Urbana-Champaign, strolling on the Quad, and seeing old faces from her time here.
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts and the Social Order Robert K
    CYAN MAGENTA YELLOW BLACK Concepts and the Social Order Robert K. Merton and the Future of Sociology Table of Contents The volume offers a comprehensive perspective on knowledge production in the field of sociology. About the Editors Moreover, it is a tribute to the scope of Merton’s work and the influence Merton has had on the work List of Illustrations and Tables and life of sociologists around the world.This is reflected in each of the 12 chapters by internationally Yehuda Elkana Institute of Advanced Study, Berlin Book Concept and Preface Yehuda Elkana acclaimed scholars witnessing the range of fields Merton has contributed to as well as the personal Note to Sound and SculptureAmos Elkana and Alexander Polzin András Szigeti Central European University impacthehashadonsociologists. Introduction György Lissauer Freelance researcher 1. The Paradoxes of Robert K. Merton: Fragmentary Among others, the chapters deal with history and social context, an exploration of sociology in three Reflections Arnold Thackray very different countries; the relationship between science and society; the role of experience and the 2. Looking for Shoulders to Stand on, or for a Paradigm for the Sociology of Science Anna Wessely conceptual word; the “Matthew effect” and “repetition with variation.”The contributors consider a 3. R. K. Merton in France: Foucault, Bourdieu, Latour and number of Mertonian themes and concepts, re-evaluating them, adapting them, highlighting their Edited by Yehuda Elkana, and the Invention of Mainstream Sociology in Paris Jean-Louis continuedrelevanceandthusopeningawellofpossibilitiesfornewresearch. Fabiani 4. Merton in South Asia: The Question of Religion and the Modernity of Science Dhruv Raina 5. The Contribution of Robert K.
    [Show full text]