Diptera Stelviana • Studia dipterologica. Supplement 21 (2014): XX-XX 7

2.23 Part 2: The taxa of the carinifrons species complex (Diptera, Tachinidae), with the description of a new West Palaearctic Preprintsubspecies andVERSION!! three lectotype designations Joachim ZIEGLER, Erikas LUTOVINOVAS and Chun-tian ZHANG

Abstract Alongside (FALLÉN, 1817), the occurrence of a second species in Europe of the Dinera carinifrons species complex has been established. This is the East Palaearctic Dinera fuscata ZHANG & SHIMA, 2006 which occurs as a distinct West Palaearctic subspecies and which is described here as Dinera fuscata occidentalis ssp. nov. ZIEGLER. In order to safeguard the nomenclatural status of the taxa in the Dinera carinifrons species complex, lectotypes are designated for Myocera antho- phila ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830, Myocera grisescens ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830, and Amyclaea ser- ©va ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1863. As a consequence, these names all fall as synonyms of Dinera carin- ifrons (FALLÉN, 1817). A detailed redescription is given of Musca carinifrons FALLÉN, 1817. An iden- tification key for the European species of the genus Dinera, as well as a correction and emendment to the identification key for the Palaearctic and Oriental species of the genus Dinera by ZHANG & SHIMA (2006), are given. Collecting data of all the material examined are listed, and the trans-Palae- arctic distribution of Dinera carinifrons as well as the disjunct-Palaearctic distribution of Dinera fuscata are illustrated. Characters of the puparium of Dinera carinifrons are described for the first time. These data are completed with notes on the biology and with information on the host species Agrilinus ater (DE GEER, 1774) and Agrilinus fimetarius (LINNAEUS, 1758) (Coleoptera ).

Introduction Twenty-one species of Dinera ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY have been recorded by ZHANG & SHIMA (2006) and ZHANG & FU (2012) from the Palaearctic and Oriental Regions. The genus is di- verse in East and South Asia, but only three species have been known from Europe: Dinera carinifrons, D. ferina and D. grisescens, all described by FALLÉN in 1817 (HERTING & DELY- DRASKOVITS 1993). Of the Dinera carinifrons species complex only one species is currently known to occur in the lowlands of Central Europe. This small and dark species has therefore been considered to be the true Dinera carinifrons (FALLÉN, 1817). But collections made in the high mountains of Europe have shown that there is a form that is similar but somewhat larger, paler and more densely microtrichose and with different head proportions, as reported by ZIEGLER & LANGE (2001, 2007) and also mentioned by TSCHORSNIG et al. (2003). Such paler specimens are also present in older collections and were apparently found in earlier times not only in the moun- It tainsis ofNOT Central Europe, allowed Scandinavia and Siberia to but also distribute in the Central European lowlands. this As a general rule European imagines of the Dinera carinifrons species complex can be as- signed to one of these two taxa by the different density of the microtrichosity and the differ- paperences in the in width theof frons andwww parafacialia. However,without the species-status permis- of these two forms has always been questioned because all the morphological characters examined show over- sionlapping states.of Tothe confirm publishingthese results, morphometric and house molecular methods ! have been used 8 ZIEGLER et al.: Tachinidae. Part 2

(LUTOVINOVAS et al. 2013), which have established that these are two distinct species. The next step was to establish the valid names for these species. In the meantime, a revision of the Palaearctic and Oriental species of the genus Dinera by ZHANG & SHIMA (2006) has appeared. This included the description of a new East Palaearctic species, Dinera fuscata, which is very similar to the dark species of Central Europe. The paler species of the European mountains was interpreted as Dinera carinifrons in the paper by ZHANG & SHIMA (2006). But determinations took place without examining the type material. For this reason, the lectotype of Musca carinifrons FALLÉN, 1817 was designated in the paper Preprintby LUTOVINOVAS et al. (2013) to correspond VERSION!! to the interpretation by ZHANG & SHIMA (2006). As a result, the future nomenclatural stability of this species has been established. The second European species was identified provisionally as Dinera fuscata ZHANG & SHIMA, 2006 by LUTOVINOVAS et al. (2013). In the present contribution we investigate whether this European-West Asian population of D. fuscata would be better ranked as a distinct species or as a subspecies. In addition, in this context the question arises whether the species name D. fuscata could perhaps be a synonym of one of the many species that ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY described in 1830 and 1863 and which were later synonymised by HERTING (1974) with Din- era carinifrons. ©Material and methods The material used for this comparative morphological study consists mostly of dry (pinned) imagines. They are stored in museums, institutions and private collections. Abbreviations for the depositories cited in this work (mostly after ARNETT et al. 1993) are as follows (with the names of the current curators in parentheses).

BLKU – Biosystematics Laboratory, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan (H. SHIMA) BMNH – Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom (N. WYATT) CZB – Collection of Joachim ZIEGLER, Bernau, CZS – Collection of Theo ZEEGERS, Soest, The Netherlands CLV – Collection of Erikas LUTOVINOVAS, Vilnius, Lithuania DZMB – Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (J. VAŇHARA) HDNS – Haus der Natur, Salzburg, Austria (I. ILLICH) HMIM – Hayk Mirzayans Museum, Department of Insect Research, Iranian Re- search Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran (E. GILASIAN) MNHN – Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France (C. DAUGERON) SDEI – Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Müncheberg, Germany (F. MENZEL) SMNH – Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm, Sweden (Y. BRODIN) SMNS – Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart, Germany (H.-P. TSCHORSNIG) SNUC – Institute of Entomology, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China (C.-t. ZHANG) SZMN – Institute of Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Zoological Museum, Novosibirsk, Russia (A. V. BARKALOV) ZMHB – Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an der Humboldt-Universität zu , Germany (J. ZIEGLER) ItZMUM is –NOT Zoological Museum, allowed Moscow State University, to Moscow, distribute Russia (A. L. OZEROV) this An extensive material was collected in the Stilfserjoch National Park (ZIEGLER 2008), for which reason these results are being published within the framework of the project “Diptera Stelviana”.paper in the www without permis- The distribution data are arranged from northwest to southeast for every country and from the oldest to the youngestsion dataset offor every the locality. publishing house ! Diptera Stelviana • Studia dipterologica. Supplement 21 (2014): XX-XX 9

Measurements and ratios follow TSCHORSNIG & HERTING (1994) and TSCHORSNIG & RICHTER (1998) or are explained in the text. Terminology of the external morphology follows MERZ & HAENNI (2000), STUCKENBERG (1999), and ZIEGLER (2003). Digital images of the heads were taken by the first author using the Leica Application Suite version 2.8.1, a zoom system (Leica Z16 APO zoom macroscope, Leica DFC 490 digital camera) and Auto-Montage Essentials version 5.03. For the field photographs of , a Can- on camera EOS 500D, Canon macro lens EF 100 mm, and a Canon macro ring lite MR-14EX Preprinthave been used. VERSION!! Results and discussion In the following section, the type material of Musca carinifrons FALLÉN, 1817 (SMNH) is redescribed and lectotypes are designated for three species described by ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, namely Myocera anthophila ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830, Myocera grisescens ROBINEAU-DES- VOIDY, 1830 and Amyclaea serva ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1863 (MNHN). As a result of these designations, these three names fall as synonyms of Dinera carinifrons (FALLÉN, 1817). The status of further names described by ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY is discussed. The West Palaearctic subspecies of Dinera fuscata is newly described as Dinera fuscata occidentalis ZIEGLER. An identification key for the European species of the genus Dinera, as well as a correction and emendation to the identification key to the Palaearctic and Oriental species of the genus Din- ©era by ZHANG & SHIMA (2006), are given. Details of all the material examined are listed, and the trans-Palaearctic distribution of Dinera carinifrons as well as the disjunct-Palaearctic dis- tribution of Dinera fuscata are illustrated. Characters of the puparium of Dinera carinifrons are described for the first time. These data are completed with notes on the biology and with information on the new host species Aphodius fimetarius (LINNAEUS, 1758).

Type material from the FALLÉN collection The material on which the description of Musca carinifrons FALLÉN, 1817 was based is located in the Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm, Sweden. In the original description, FALLÉN 1817: 243 mentions several characters which do not fit well with the interpretation of Dinera carinifrons sensu ZHANG & SHIMA, 2006 but rather agree with Dinera fuscata ZHANG & SHIMA, 2006: „15. M. carinifrons … abdomine maculatim micante“ and „ganska lik den nyss beskrif- na art, men vanligen mindre …“ [„15. M. carinifrons … abdominal maculae shining“ and „rather similar to the previously described species (= M. ferina), but usually smaller …“]. It could therefore be suspected that the type material might possibly not be taxonomically uni- form. The first author was able to borrow it and study it, and the syntype series of Musca carinifrons FALLÉN, 1817 does indeed include individuals of both European species of the Dinera carinifrons complex. This situation made it necessary to designate a lectotype for Musca carinifrons FALLÉN, 1817, which has already been published in the paper by LUTOVINO- VAS et al. (2013). A detailed redescription of this species now follows.

Redescription of Musca carinifrons FALLÉN, 1817

= Dinera carinifrons (FALLÉN, 1817) (Figs 3, 6, 9, 12, 14, 16, 18–25) It Material.is NOT Lectotype: 1ɉ. Sweden, allowed Skåne. In the description toFALLÉN writes:distribute „Arten ær hœgst allmæn från Juliithis ænda in i September, i Skånes trægårdar, på umbellater och buskar“ [„The species is most common from July right to September, in gardens in Scania, on Apiaceae and shrubs“]. Paralectotypes: 1ɉ 8ɊɊ Dinera carinifrons (FALLÉN, paper1817), and also in 1ɉ 2 ɊɊthe Dinera fuscata www occidentalis nov. without ssp. ZIEGLER. permis- Male: Body length: 7.0–10.8 mm. Colouration and microtrichosity (Fig. 20): Thorax, abdomen and legs black. Head predom- sioninantly black,of frontalthe vitta publishing dark brown. Face, facial ridge, house anterior portion of! parafacial, and 10 ZIEGLER et al.: Tachinidae. Part 2

Preprint VERSION!! ©123 Figs 1–3: Male head, lateral view; – 1: Dinera fuscata fuscata (Japan, paratype); – 2: Dinera fuscata occidentalis ssp. nov. (Iran, coll. no. 28.995); – 3: Dinera carinifrons (Swiss Alps, coll. no. 20.324). Scale bars = 1.0 mm. Photograph: J. ZIEGLER.

gena (except the genal dilation) brown in frontal view. Head covered with light grey microtri- chosity, but parafacial silvery. Palpus, scape and pedicel brown or light brown, postpedicel black with narrow basal brown portion. Thorax with yellowish-grey microtrichosity and three dark presutural longitudinal stripes dorsally. Lateral vittae narrow, median stripe broad and with the tendency to divide presuturally into 3 separate narrow vittae. Wing hyaline, weakly tinged with pale brown basally; calypter dorsally whitish, its outer margin yellowish; tegula dark brown to black, basicosta yellowish. Abdomen covered by yellowish-grey microtrichos- ity, with a light tessellate appearance. Seen at a very low angle from behind, the microtrichos- ity is dense and covers the whole of the abdominal tergites. Approximately 10 percent of the European specimens do not have the typical yellowish-grey microtrichosity but a dense blu- ish-grey microtrichosity on thorax and abdomen. Postabdominal segments 6–8, syncercus, and apical portion of sternite 5 dark brown to black. Head (Figs 3, 9): Eye bare. Face in profile 0.55–0.70 times as long as frons. Facial carina well developed. Frons narrowed to vertex, at its narrowest point 0.26–0.42 times as wide as an eye in dorsal view. Frontal vitta broader than one fronto-orbital plate. Medial (inner) vertical setae (vi) about 0.45–0.65 of eye height, lateral (outer) vertical setae (ve) indistinct. Ocellar setae (oc) proclinate, longer and stronger then medial (inner) vertical setae. Ten to fourteen inclinate fron- tal setae (fr) descending to base of antenna. Proclinate orbital setae (oe) and lateroclinate prever- tical setae absent in male. Frons without or at most with a few setulae outside row of frontal Itsetae. is Parafacial NOT bare, in profile allowed at its narrowest point to 0.5–0.8 distribute times as wide as the horizontal this width of an eye and 2.2–3.4 times as wide as the postpedicel. Facial ridge bare. Lower facial margin protruding forward, well visible in lateral view. Vibrissa inserted slightly above level of lowerpaper margin of face.in Base the of antenna www at the level of lowerwithout 0.4–0.5 of eye height. permis- Postpedicel (first flagellomere) 2.6–3.8 times as long as pedicel and 2.6–3.4 times as long as wide. Pedicel with a long seta sionwhich is equal of in length the or only publishing slightly shorter than postpedicel. house Arista plu- ! Diptera Stelviana • Studia dipterologica. Supplement 21 (2014): XX-XX 11

Preprint VERSION!! © 456 Figs 4–6: Female head, lateral view; – 4: Dinera fuscata fuscata (Japan, paratype); – 5: Dinera fuscata occidentalis ssp. nov. (Iran, coll. no. 29.002); – 6: Dinera carinifrons (Italian Alps, coll. no. 14.344). Scale bars = 1.0 mm. Photograph: J. ZIEGLER.

mose, total width of arista including plumosity about 1.5 times as wide as postpedicel. Gena wide, height of gena 0.4–0.5 times vertical diameter of eye when head is viewed in profile. Postocular setae curving forwards. Occiput covered with white setulae and on its upper part behind the postocular row with 3–4 rows of fine black setae. Prementum about 4.2–6.1 times as long as wide and 0.7–1.0 times as long as the horizontal width of an eye. Palpus pale, cylindrical, apically light club-shaped and sometimes darkened, 1.65–2.25 times as long as postpedicel and 1.15–1.55 times as long as the horizontal width of an eye, with setulae. Thorax: Prosternum bare, proepisternum pilose. Postpronotal lobe with 3 strong basal setae arranged in a triangle and 2 (–3) smaller setae, one placed between middle and inner basal seta and the other present between the inner basal seta and the inner border of the postpronotal lobe. Scutum with 1–2+2–3 acrostichal (acr), 3+3(–4) dorsocentral (dc), 0+2 intra-alar (ia) setae, 1–2 posthumeral, 2 notopleural, 1 presutural seta and 3–4 supra-alar setae (the first postsutural supra-alar seta shorter and thinner than notopleural setae), postalar callus with 2 setae. Anatergite bare below lower calypter. Anepimeral seta strong, well differentiated from adjacent setulae, but shorter than strongest katepisternal seta. Katepimeron bare or with a few fine setulae. Katepisternum with 3 setae. Posterior lappet of posterior thoracic spiracle large, subcircular. Postmetacoxal area membraneous. Scutellum with 3 pairs of strong marginal se- tae (basal, subapical, and apical setae); apical setae horizontal and crossed. Dorsal surface of scutellum with 1–2 pairs of setae. It Wingis : NOTSecond costal sectionallowed without setulae ventrally. to Costaldistribute seta not differentiated. thisFourth costal section 2.5–5.0 times as long as sixth costal section. Relative length of second , third and fourth sectors of costa approximately 1 : 2 : 1. Vein R without setae. Base of vein R paper in the www without1 permis-4+5 with 2–4 setulae dorsally and 1–4 ventrally. CuA1 bare. Wing cell r4+5 open or closed just at wing margin. Vein M obtusely curved. sion of the1 publishing house ! 12 ZIEGLER et al.: Tachinidae. Part 2

78 9 Preprint VERSION!!

10 11 12 ©

Figs 7–9: Male head, dorsal view. – 7: Dinera fuscata fuscata (Japan, paratype); – 8: Dinera fuscata occidentalis ssp. nov. (Italian Alps, coll. no. 20.554); – 9: Dinera carinifrons (Austrian Alps, coll. no. 21.924). Scale bars = 1.0 mm. Photograph: J. ZIEGLER. Figs 10–12: Female head, dorsal view; – 10: Dinera fuscata fuscata (paratype, Japan); – 11: Dinera fuscata occiden- talis ssp. nov. (Iran, coll. no. 29.002); – 12: Dinera carinifrons (Italian Alps, coll. no. 14.344). Scale bars = 1.0 mm. Photograph: J. ZIEGLER.

Legs: Fore leg: Coxa with bare medial surface; tibia (t1) with 2 posterior setae, a row of 3–5 fine anterodorsal setae and 1–3 posterodorsal setae on basal 2/3; preapical anterodorsal seta longer then preapical dorsal seta, 1 apical anteroventral seta, posteroventral seta undeveloped; tarsus long, 1.3–1.5 times of head height; claws in male longer than 5th tarsomere. Mid leg:

Tibia (t2) with 2–3 anterodorsal setae, 1–4 posterodorsal setae, 1–2 posterior setae, and 1

ventral seta. Hind leg: Posterior coxal margin bare; tibia (t3) with a row of several irregular anterodorsal setae, 2–3 posterodorsal setae, 2 anteroventral setae, and 2 dorsal preapical se- tae, equal in length or preapical anterodorsal seta a little shorter than preapical dorsal seta; 1 apical anteroventral seta, posteroventral seta undeveloped. Abdomen: Long-ovate in shape. Syntergite 1+2 excavated middorsally only on basal ½; with 1 pair of strong erect median marginal setae and 1 pair of long and strong lateral marginal setae; tergite 3 with at least 2 pairs of median marginal and 2 pairs of lateral marginal setae, or with a row of marginal setae; tergite 4 with a complete row of marginal setae; tergites 3 and 4 usually without lateral discal and median discal setae, sometimes with a few erect median discal setulae; Ittergite is 5 with NOT rows of marginal allowed and discal setae. Setulae to on abdomen distribute long, predominantly semi- this erect, except tergite 5 which has irregularly arranged erect setulae. Tergite 5 dorsally approxi- mately equal in length to tergite 4. Sternites overlapped by ventral edges of tergites. Terminaliapaper (Figs 14,in 16, the18, 19): Terminaliawww elongated, without 1.5 times longer than permis-wide in caudal view. Cerci wide at base and strongly narrowed at apex in caudal view, in lateral view angu- late at 2/3 of itssion length; surstylus of wide the and round publishing dorsally at apex in lateral view;house gonopod ! Diptera Stelviana • Studia dipterologica. Supplement 21 (2014): XX-XX 13

long and bent posteriorly; par- amere slightly longer than basiphallus; distiphallus slen- der, membraneous apical part straight or curved, 1.5–2.5 times as long as sclerotized basal part. PreprintFemale (Figs 6, 12, 21), dif- VERSION!!13 14 fers from male as follows: Body length: 6.5–8.5 mm. Head: Frons much broader than in male, at its narrowest point 1.05–1.35 times as wide as an eye in dorsal view. Gena wider, height of gena 0.4–0.5 times vertical diameter of eye when head is viewed in profile. Medial (inner) vertical setae ©(vi) about 0.75–0.95 of eye height, lateral (outer) vertical 15 16 setae (ve) differentiated, strong but only about half as long as Figs 13–16: Epandrium, surstyli and cerci. – 13, 14: lateral view; – 15, 16: medial vertical seta. 2 strong caudal view. – 13, 15: Dinera fuscata occidentalis ssp. nov.; – 14, 16: Din- era carinifrons. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. Drawings by J. ZIEGLER. proclinate orbital setae (oe) and 1 lateroclinate prevertical setae present. 5–9 inclinate frontal setae (fr). Legs: Claws and pulvilli shorter than fifth tarsomere. Abdomen: Syntergite 1+2 usually without strong erect median marginal setae and long and strong lateral marginal seta; tergites 3 and 4 without lateral discal and median discal setae; setulae on abdomen shorter than in males, recumbent except on a lateral stripe.

17 18

It is NOT allowed to distribute this paper in the www without19 permis- Figs 17–19: Hypandrium, pregonite, postgonite, and aedeagus. – 17: Dinera fuscata occidentalis ssp. nov. in lateral view; – 18: Dinera carinifrons in lateral view, with variation in the aedeagus. – 19: Dinera carinifrons in dorsal sionview. Scale of bar = 0.5the mm. Drawings publishing by J. ZIEGLER. house ! 14 ZIEGLER et al.: Tachinidae. Part 2

Preprint VERSION!! ©

Fig. 20: A male of Dinera carinifrons from the alpine locality „Glurnser Alm“ (Stilfserjoch National Park) feeding on nectar on flowers of Myosotis alpestris. Photograph: J. ZIEGLER, 4 July 2005.

Additional material of Dinera carinifrons (FALLÉN, 1817) examined The figures in square brackets correspond to the numbered localities on the map of Central Europe (Fig. 23). ALBANIA: Berat, Poliçan west of Tomor (=Tomorri Mtn.), Pindus Mtn. Range, 1ɉ 02.–12.VI.1961, leg. Albanien-Exp. DEI (SDEI). Tirana, Iba, Krraba Mts., 1ɉ 17.–22.VI.1961, leg. Albanien-Exp. DEI (SDEI). ARMENIA: Kotayk, Garni east of Yerevan, 1,320 m, 2ɉɉ 21.V.2010, leg. T. ROMIG & K. GHABABYAN (CZB, ZMHB); Geghadir northwest of Garni east of Yerevan, 1,610 m, 1ɉ 16.V.2010, leg. T. ROMIG & K. AGHABABYAN (CZB). AUSTRIA: Tirol, Nauders south of Landeck [36], 1Ɋ 13.–18.VII.1938 (BMNH); Rofental (Ötztaler Alpen) [37], 1,920–2,100 m, 1ɉ 16.VII.1964, leg. A. C. PONT (BMNH); Zwieselstein south of Sölden (Ötztaler Alpen) [37], Venter Ache, 1,470–1,540 m, 1ɉ 26.VII.1972, leg. A. C. PONT (BMNH); Obergurgl, part of Sölden (Ötztaler Alpen) [37], Auf der Nase, 2,020–2,040 m, 1ɉ 06.VII.1981, leg. A. C. PONT (BMNH). Kärnten, Schachnern southeast of Heiligenblut (Hohe Tauern) [38], 1,520 m, 2ɉɉ 2ɊɊ 24.VII.2001, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Große Fleiss northeast of Heiligenblut (Hohe Tauern) [38], 2ɉɉ 23.VIII.1927, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Kleine Fleiß eastnortheast of Heiligenblut (Hohe Tauern) It[38], is 1,750 NOTm, 15ɉɉ 10ɊɊ 23.VII.2001,allowed leg. LANGE & ZtoIEGLER (CZB);distribute Gasthaus Kasereck north this of Heiligenblut (Hohe Tauern) [38], 1,900 m, 1ɉ 4ɊɊ 02.VIII.1993, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (SDEI, CZB) (see also ZIEGLER 2001); Kräuterwand near Schöneck northwest of Heiligenblut (Hohe Tauern) [38], 1,600 m, 1ɉ 20.VII.1999, 1ɉ 1Ɋ 30.VII.2000, 10ɉɉ 10ɊɊ 21.VII.2001, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Gast- hauspaper Schöneck northwest in of Heiligenblutthe www (Hohe Tauern) [38], without 1,850 m, 1ɉ 01.VIII.1993 permis-(see also ZIEGLER 2001), 3ɉɉ 1Ɋ 25.VII.1999, 4ɉɉ 2ɊɊ 29.VII.2000, 3ɉɉ 2ɊɊ 27.VII.2011, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Zirknitztal northeast of Großkirchheim (Hohe Tauern) [39], 1,700 m, 3ɉɉ 24.VII.2001, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB);sion Kötschach-Mauthen of [40], the 1Ɋ 1928, publishing coll. B. LICHTWARDT (SDEI). house ! Diptera Stelviana • Studia dipterologica. Supplement 21 (2014): XX-XX 15

Preprint VERSION!! ©

Fig. 21: Dinera carinifrons from the oreale (high montane) locality „Weisser Knott“ (Stilfserjoch National Park). A female sitting on a leaf of Alnus viridis. Photograph: J. ZIEGLER, 30 June 2009.

BELGIUM: Namur, Hastière, 1ɉ 18.VII.1898, coll. C. J. WAINWRIGHT (BMNH). BULGARIA: Sofia, Zelin south of Botevgrad, 500 m, 1Ɋ 09.VI.–05.VII.1998, leg. C. V. ACHTERBERG, R. DE VRIES, P. V. ATANASSOVA (CZS). CROATIA: Dalmatia, 1ɉ (before 1879), leg. J. ERBER, coll. H. LOEW (ZMHB). CZECH REPUBLIC: Bohemia, Pec pod Sněžkom (Krkonoše) [„Petzer“] near Trudnov [27], 1ɉ 17.VIII.1909, 5ɉɉ 1Ɋ 21.VIII.1909, leg. O. DUDA (ZMHB); Špindlerův Mlýn (Krkonoše) [„Spindel- mühle“] near Trudnov [27], 3ɉɉ (before 1931), coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Martinice v Krkonošich (Krkonošze) near Jilemnica [27], 1ɉ 08.VIII. (before 1960), leg. J. ČEPELÁK (CZB). FRANCE: Hautes-Pyrénées, Gavarnie, Lac de Gaube, 1,725 m, 1ɉ 05.VIII.1911, leg. C. J. WAIN- WRIGHT (BMNH). Isère, Saint-Pierre de Chartreuse north of Grenoble [52], 5ɉɉ 25.–28.VII.1914 (MNHN). Savoie, Plan Lachat north of the Col du Galibier south of Valloire [53], 2,000 m; 3ɉɉ 16.VII.1997, 2ɊɊ, 07.VIII.1998, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). Hautes-Alpes, Col du Lautaret [54], 1ɉ VII. (before 1931), coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); La Grave-la-Meije [54] west of Briançon, 1ɉ 09.VII.1951, coll. R. DAHL (BMNH); mountain peak westnorthwest of Col du Lautaret [54], 2,191 m, It 1isɉ 15.VII.1997, NOT leg. LANGE allowed & ZIEGLER (CZB); Bois duto Rif Blancdistribute north of La Madeleine northwest this of Briançon [54], 1,950 m, 10ɉɉ 5ɊɊ 14.VII.1997, 8ɉɉ 6ɊɊ, 07.VIII.1998, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Sommet du Prorel west of Briançon [55], 2,566 m, 1Ɋ 06.VIII.1998, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Serre Blanc south of Sommet du Prorel west of Briançon [55], 2,400 m, 3ɊɊ 06.VIII.1998, leg. paperLANGE & Z IEGLERin (CZB) the (see alsowww TSCHORSNIG et al.without 2003); Les Têtes northwest permis- of l’Argentière [55], 2,044 m, 2ɉɉ 3ɊɊ 04.VIII.1998, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Vallée de la Rivière northwest of Brunissard [56], 1,820 m, 8ɉɉ 13.VII.1997, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Forêt de Boscodon south- sionwest of Embrunof (Chaînethe de Parpaillon)publishing [57] 1,170 m, 6ɉɉ 01.VII.1997, house leg. LANGE ! & ZIEGLER (CZB). 16 ZIEGLER et al.: Tachinidae. Part 2

Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, Larche northeast of Barcelonnette [58], 1ɉ 1925, leg. R. BENOIST (MNHN); Saint-Lois near Uvernet-Fours south of Barcelonnette [58], 1ɉ 1925, leg. R. BENOIST (MNHN). GEORGIA: Racha-Lechkhimi–Kvemo-Svaneti, Road to Mamison Pass near Oni (Caucasus) above Kutaisi, 1Ɋ 01.IX.1903 [50550], leg. T. BECKER (ZMHB). Kakheti, Omalo-Shenako, 1,700 m, 1Ɋ 08.VII.2012, leg. T. ZEEGERS (CZS). GERMANY: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Sassnitz [1], 1Ɋ (before 1931), coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Stralsund [2], 3ɊɊ (before 1848), leg. W. F. ERICHSON (ZMHB); Stralsund [2], 2ɊɊ 12.VIII.1894, 2ɊɊ 14.VIII.1894, 2ɊɊ 19.VIII.1894, leg. C. F. KETEL (SDEI) (ZIEGLER 2000); Elmenhorst near Grim- men [3], 1Ɋ 13.VIII.1893, leg. C. F. KETEL (SDEI) (ZIEGLER 2000); Bützow [4], 1Ɋ 30.VI.1901, 1ɉ Preprint20.VII.1901, 3ɉɉ 22.VII.1901, 2ɉɉ 2ɊɊVERSION!! 26.VII.1901, 1ɉ 31.VIII.1901, leg. C. F. KETEL (SDEI) (ZIEGLER 2000); Woldegk [5], 1Ɋ 12.VIII.1900, leg. C. F. KETEL (SDEI) (ZIEGLER 2000). Niedersach- sen, Dannenberg/Elbe [6], 1ɉ (approx. 1950), coll. E. KIRCHBERG (ZMHB). , 4ɊɊ (with- out data, probably Neuruppin), coll. E. MEHR (ZMHB); Oderberg (Barnim) [7], 1ɉ 01.VIII.1920, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Finkenkrug near [8], 1ɉ 14.VIII.1898, coll. B. LICHTWARDT (SDEI); Buckow (Märkische Schweiz) [10], 1Ɋ 20.VIII.1905, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Ketzin/Havel north- west of Potsdam [11], 1Ɋ V.1926, coll. B. LICHTWARDT (SDEI); Michendorf-Wilhelmshorst south of Potsdam [11], 1ɉ 30.VI.1928, leg. J. GÜNTHER (ZMHB); Frankfurt/Oder [12], 1Ɋ VII.1856, coll. H. LOEW (ZMHB); Frankfurt/Oder [12], 1ɉ 27.VI.1902, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Frankfurt/Oder-Mark- endorf, Sandberge [12], 1Ɋ 25.VII.1926, coll. M. P. RIEDEL (ZMHB). Berlin: Berlin [9], 1Ɋ (before 1895), coll. GERSTAECKER (ZMHB); Berlin-Pankow, Französisch-Buchholz [9], 1ɉ VIII.1915, leg. M. WECHSEL (ZMHB). Sachsen-Anhalt, Genthin [13], 1ɉ 01.VIII.1889, 1Ɋ 20.VII.1904, leg. P. STEIN (ZMHB); Wörlitz near Wittenberg [14], 1Ɋ 01.VI.1903, coll. B. LICHTWARDT (SDEI). Sachsen, Nieder- au near Meißen [15], 1ɉ 1Ɋ 10.VI.1889, coll. B. LICHTWARDT (SDEI); Dresden [16], 1ɉ 1Ɋ 1892, ©ɉɉ ɊɊ ɉ 4 5 21.–23.VIII.1903, coll. B. LICHTWARDT (SDEI). Nordrhein-Westfalen, Detmold [17], 1 30.VII.1889, coll. B. LICHTWARDT (SDEI). Thüringen, Tambach-Dietharz near [18], 1Ɋ VII. (before 1931), coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Pößneck-Schweinitz south of Jena [19], 1ɉ 09.VIII.1906, leg. M. P. RIEDEL (ZMHB); Schwarzburg near -Rudolstadt [19], 2ɉɉ VIII.1897, coll. L. OLD- ENBERG (SDEI); coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI). Rheinland-Pfalz, Ahr Vall. [20], 1ɉ 19.VIII.1908, coll. M. P. R IEDEL (ZMHB). Bayern, München [21], 1ɉ 08.VIII.1920, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI). GREECE: Ioannina, Vikos Gorge south of Kleidonia (Pindus Mts), 1ɉ 09.V.2005, leg. T. ZEEGERS (CZS). ITALY: Südtirol, Finail west of Vernagt im Schnalstal [41], 1,750m, 20ɉɉ 2ɊɊ 01.VIII.1995, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (SDEI, CZB); Kurzras im Schnalstal [41], 2,000 m, 15ɉɉ 01.VIII.1995, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (SDEI, CZB); Trafoi [42], 1ɉ VII.1896, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Sulden [42], 2ɉɉ 28.– 29.VII.1909, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Stelvio [42], 1Ɋ 11.VIII.1909, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); St. Martin am Kofel bei Latsch im Vinschgau [43], 1,700 m, 4ɉɉ 11.VII.2003, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB) and many additional specimens from Parco Nazionale dello Stelvio and surrounding areas by LANGE & ZIEGLER (ZIEGLER et al. 2001, 2003, 2013); Hirzerhütte west of Saltaus [44], 2ɉɉ 1Ɋ 02.VIII.1995, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (SDEI, CZB); Rueffenberg southeast of Brixen (Dolomiti) [45], 1,850m, 2ɉɉ 1Ɋ 06.VIII.1999, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Plose southeast of Brixen (Dolomiti) [45], 2,050 m, 1ɉ 06.VIII.1999, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Wolkenstein in Gröden (Dolomiti) [46], 1,800 m, 5ɉɉ, 14.VI.1925, leg. M. P. RIEDEL (ZMHB); Piz Culac southeast of Wolkenstein (Dolomiti) [46], 2,086 m, 2ɉɉ 2ɊɊ 02.VIII.1999, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Col Raiser northeast of St. Christina (Dolomiti) [46], 2,106 m, 1ɉ 05.VIII.1999, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). Sondrio, Pedenos- so (Valdidentro) northwest of Bormio, Torri di Fraele [47], 1,810 m, 5ɉɉ 15.VII.2003, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). Trentino, Monte Spinale east of Madonna di Campiglio [48], 2,100 m, 1ɉ 1Ɋ 02.VIII.1994, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (SDEI, CZB). Val Aosta, Derby [49], 1ɉ 14.IX.1967, leg. B. HERTING (SMNS). Vercelli, Alagna (Pennine Alps) [50], 1,200–1,800 m, 1ɉ 27.–30.VII.1959, leg. E. LINDNER (SMNS). Verbano-Cusio-Ossola, Macugnaga (Valle Anzasca) [50], 2ɉɉ 31.VII.1900, coll. ItL. OisLDENBERG NOT (SDEI). Firenze allowed, Palazzuolo sul Senio (Apennin) to [51], distribute 1ɉ VIII.1987 (SMNS). Macera- this ta, Bolognola northwest of Macerata, Monti Sibillini, 1,100 m, 2ɉɉ 15.VIII.–15.IX.1919, leg. O. QUERCI (BMNH); 1Ɋ VIII.1920, leg. O. QUERCI (BMNH). NORWAYpaper: Hedmark in, Eidskog the 1Ɋ IX.1900, www leg. STRAND (SDEI).without permis- POLAND: Zachodniopomorskie, Żukowo Morskie [„Suckow“] west of Darłowo [22], 1ɉ 16.VII.1900, 1Ɋ 23.VII.1903, 1ɉ (without data), leg. M. P. RIEDEL (ZMHB); Szczecinek [„Neustettin“] [23], 1Ɋ 28.VII.1895, leg. sionM. P. RIEDEL (ZMHB). of Lubuskiethe, Śpublishingwiniary [„Schweinert“] near Skwierzyna house [24] 1ɉ ! Diptera Stelviana • Studia dipterologica. Supplement 21 (2014): XX-XX 17

(before 1920), leg. R. STOBBE (ZMHB). Dolnośląskie, Niemcza [„Nimptsch”] east of Dzierżoniów [25], 1Ɋ 13.VI.1900, 1Ɋ 30.V.1901, 1ɉ 04.VI.1901, 1ɉ 06.VI.1901, 1ɉ 11.VI.1901, 1ɉ 19.VII.1901, 2ɊɊ 22.VI.1901, 1Ɋ 12.VIII.1901, 1ɉ 1Ɋ 02.IX.1901, 2ɉɉ 31.V.1908, 2ɉɉ 1Ɋ 22.VI.1908, 1Ɋ 25.VII.1908, 1ɉ 27.VII.1908, 1ɉ 05.VIII.1908, 1Ɋ 15.VIII.1908, 1Ɋ 19.VIII.1908, 3ɊɊ 24.VIII.1908, 1Ɋ 15.VI.1909, 1ɉ 04.VIII.1909, 1ɉ 21.VIII.1909, 1Ɋ 05.VI.1910, 1ɉ 08.VI.1910, 1ɉ 09.VI.1910, 1ɉ 10.VI.1910, 2ɊɊ 11.VI.1910, 1Ɋ 12.VI.1910, 3ɉɉ 13.VI.1910, 1Ɋ 31.VII.1910, 1Ɋ 26.VIII.1910, 1Ɋ 09.VIII.1910, 1Ɋ 29.VIII.1911, leg. O. DUDA (ZMHB); Kudowa-Zdrój [„Cudowa/Bad Kudowa“] near Kłodzko [26], 1ɉ (before 1879), coll. H. LOEW (ZMHB), and a recent finding near Kudowa-Zdrój (Central Sudetes) [26] on 15.IX.2000 is noted by ZHANG & SHIMA (2006); Międzyórze [„Wölfels- grund“] southeast of Bystrzyca Kłodzka [26], 1Ɋ 29.VI.1905, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Lądek- Preprint VERSION!!ł Ɋ IEDEL Zdrój [„Bad Landeck“] southeast of K odzko [26], 1 VI.1920, leg. M. P. R (ZMHB); Stara Bystrzyca [„Wustung“] near Bystrzyca Kłodzka [26], 1ɉ 06.VIII.1922, 1ɉ 20.VIII.1922, 1ɉ 12.VIII.1923, 1Ɋ 05.IX.1923, 1ɉ 1Ɋ 24.VIII.1928, leg. O. DUDA (ZMHB). Podlaskie, Knyszyn Forest near Białystok, 1Ɋ 27.VII.2001 (after ZHANG & SHIMA 2006). ROMANIA: Caraș-Severin, Mehadia north of Orșova, 2ɉɉ 08.VII.1912, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI). RUSSIA: Central District, Moskovskaya Oblast, Vereya southwest of Moscow, 1ɉ 23.VI. (without year), leg. B. ROHDENDORF (ZMUM); Kolomna southeast of Moscow, 1ɉ 2.VII. (without year), leg. B. ROHDENDORF (ZMUM). Siberian District, Novosibirskaya Oblast, Motkovo east of Novosibirsk, 1ɉ 15.VIII.1986, leg. AGARKOVA (SZMN); Altai Krai, Troitskoye southeast of Barnaul, 1ɉ 16.VIII.1987, leg. N. G. KOLOMYETZ (SZMN). Far Eastern District, Primorskiy Kray, Shkutovskiy Rayon, Peishula, Ussuriysky Zapovednik northnortheast of Vladivostok, 1ɉ 06.IX.1972, leg. N. G. KOLOMYETZ (SZMN); Lesnoy Kordon northnortheast of Vladivostok, 1Ɋ 03.IX.1977, leg. KOLOMYETZ (SZMN). ©SLOVAKIA: Trenčin, Trenčin [„Trenscin“], 1ɉ 18.VII.1907, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI). SPAIN: Huesca, Sallent de Gállego (Pirineos), 4ɉɉ 23.VIII.2000, leg. H.-P. TSCHORSNIG (SMNS). Lleida, Sort, Cardós Vall., Tavascan, Pleta del Prat / Noarre / Graus (Pirineos), 3ɉɉ 28.–30.VIII.2001, leg. T. ZEEGERS (CZS). Girona, Vallter above Setcases (Pirineos) 1,500 m, 3ɉɉ 08.VII.1997; Vallter above Setcases (Pirineos) 2,100 m, 1ɉ 08.VII.1997, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Cataluña, Nuria, 1 Ɋ 25.VII.1996, leg J. T. SMIT (CZS). SWEDEN: Skåne, Skäralid, 1ɉ 27.VIII.1928, leg. O. RINGDAHL (SMNS). SWITZERLAND: Jura, Domont near Delémont [28], 1ɉ 09.VIII.1966, leg. B. HERTING (SMNS). Bern, Grindelwald [29], 1,700 m, 1ɉ 2ɊɊ 29.VII.2002, leg. H.-P. TSCHORSNIG (SMNS). Wallis, Arolla [30], part of Evolène, 2,600 m, 1ɉ 07.VIII.1914, coll. C. J. WAINWRIGHT (BMNH), 1ɉ 14.–16.VIII 1947, leg. J. SMART (BMNH); between Zermatt and Taesch [31], 1ɉ 03.VIII.1907, coll. C. J. WAINWRIGHT (BMNH); Visperterminen south of Visp, Rothorn [31], 2,150–2,320 m, 1ɉ 11.VIII.1997, leg. B. MERZ (CZS); Fur- ka-Pass [32], 1,900–2,300 m, 1ɉ 20.–23.VII.1911, leg. T. BECKER (ZMHB); Ulrichen northeast of Brig [32], 1,400 m, 3ɊɊ 31.VII.1998, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Riederalp north of Mörel near Brig [32], 2,000 m, 2ɉɉ 01.VII.2000, 4ɉɉ 02.VII.2000, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Riederhorn northeast of Brig [32], 1,800 m, 4ɉɉ 02.VII.2000, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). Tessin, Paltano (Val Bedretto) south- west of Airolo [32], 1,950 m, 2ɉɉ 30.VII.1998, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). Graubünden, Mastac north of Rossa (Val Calanca) [33], 1,250 m, 9ɉɉ 1Ɋ 29.VII.1998, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Zernez (Rätische Alpen) [34], 1,600 m, 1ɉ 1Ɋ 03.VII.2000, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); St. Moritz (Engadin) [35], 11ɉɉ 6ɊɊ 20.–29.VII.1902, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Silvaplana (Engadin) [35], 1ɉ 02.VIII.1906, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Maloja (Engadin) [35], 1ɉ 20.VII.1906, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI). TURKEY: Kars, Soganli 30 km west of Sarkamiș (Güllü Mts), 2,100 m, 1ɉ 01.–02.VII.1983, leg. W. SCHACHT (SMNS). UKRAINE: Poltawa, Mirgorod district, Yaresky at river Psel, 1ɉ 13.VI.1919, leg. I. A. FABRI (ZMUM)

Geographic distribution and seasonal occurrence of Dinera carinifrons (FALLÉN, 1817) It isA trans-Palaearctic NOT species. allowed Its refugial area during to the lastdistribute glaciation was probably situatedthis in Ussuria, Russian Far East (based on LATTIN 1967). At present it is distributed from Spain paper(Pyrenees) in the westthe to Ussuria www (KOLOMYETZ 1974,without RICHTER 1986, ZIEGLER permis- & SHIMA 1996) in the east; including Siberia (KOLOMYETZ 1974) and Mongolia (RICHTER 1976). In the western Palaearctic the species is known from Norway, Sweden and Finland (HYÖNTEISTIETOKANTA sion2012) inof the north the to Italy (Apennin),publishing Croatia, Albania, Greece house (northern Pindus) ! and Armenia 18 ZIEGLER et al.: Tachinidae. Part 2

Preprint VERSION!!

©Fig. 22: Trans-Palaearctic distribution of Dinera carinifrons. The locality data are listed under „Redescription / Material examined“.

(Lesser Caucasus) in the south (Fig. 22). Not in Great Britain and Iran and Middle Asia. STEIN (1924) writes that at the time in Central Europe the species was „überall verbreitet und nirgends selten“ [„distributed everywhere, and nowhere rare“]. At the same time, he was the first to note that there were two „forms“ under the name Myiocera carinifrons. He mentions an aberrant specimen from Bad Kissingen and a second one from Sweden. Both specimens differed from others with dense microtrichosity by having a dark body colour and abdominal pattern similar to M. ferina – a description that fits Dinera fuscata occidentalis. Apparently a century ago this species was rare in the Central European lowlands. In the last 50 years, however, the positions have reversed. Dinera fuscata occidentalis is now widespread here, whilst Dinera carinifrons has not been found in the lowlands since 1960 (Fig. 23). But Dinera carinifrons does still occur in some of the European mountains (Central Sudetes, Jura Mountains, Alps, Apen- nines, Pyrenees) as well as in the lowlands of East Europe. At present it is found in the Alps in the high montane (oreal), subalpine and alpine altitudinal zones (1,400–2,400 m). Seasonal occurrence of adults: May – September, in the Central European mountains most common in summer from the end of June to the end of August. Imagines visit flowers (many Apiaceae, Thymus, Mentha, Achillea, Leucanthemum, Gypsophila, Senecio and others). Hosts: Agrilinus ater (DE GEER, 1774) (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae) was published as the host of Dinera carinifrons in Scotland (PELHAM-CLINTON 1959). But this record refers most probably to Dinera fuscata occidentalis, because all examined material from Scotland (and Great Britain) concern only this species (see additional remarks under hosts of Dinera fuscata occidentalis). ItIn theis Berlin NOT collection (ZMHB) allowed one male of Dinera carinifronsto distribute has been found with the labelthis data „Peyritschia“ and „Berlin-Buchholz / aus Aphod. fime- / tarius. Aug. 1915. / Max Wech- sel S. G“. This is the first record of Agrilinus fimetarius (LINNAEUS, 1758) (Coleoptera Scara- baeidae)paper as a host inof a tachinid the and wwwit is the first safe without record of a host of Dinera permis- carinifrons. Current locality data: Germany, Berlin-Pankow, Französisch-Buchholz, August 1915, leg. M. WECHSEL. A partlysion destroyed pupariumof the was pinned publishing beneath the fly. house ! Diptera Stelviana • Studia dipterologica. Supplement 21 (2014): XX-XX 19

Preprint VERSION!! ©

It is NOT allowed to distribute this paper in the www without permis- Fig. 23: Recent distribution of Dinera carinifrons in Central Europe and in the Alps based on the material studied by the authors. The figures correspond to the numbered localities listed under „Description / Material examined“. sionWhite dots: of Records the up to 1960. publishing Red dots: Records after 1960. house ! 20 ZIEGLER et al.: Tachinidae. Part 2

24 25

Figs 24, 25: Puparium of Dinera Preprint VERSION!!carinifrons; – 24: posterior part in lateral view. The posterior spiracles are shifted dorsally and are some- what raised; – 25: posterior part in dorsal view. The spiracular plates are close together. They each have three short straight spiracular slits. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. Photographs J. ZIEGLER. Puparium (Figs 24, 25): Only the posterior part of the puparium remains. It is elongated, and microtrichia bands are absent. The posterior spiracles are relatively small and are shifted dor- sally (insertion type V of ZIEGLER 1998) as well as being somewhat raised (Fig. 24). Spiracular ©plate with three short straight spiracular slits, and the cicatrix (ecdysial scar) in a lateral mar- ginal position. The two spiracular plates are separated by a very small distance of about 1/10 of the diameter of a spiracular plate (Fig. 25). The puparium thus resembles that of (FALLÉN, 1817) and those of Billaea-species (ZIEGLER 1998: 164).

Type material in the ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY collection The remains of ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY’s collection are in the Muséum National d´Histoire Na- turelle, Paris, France. The greater part of the Diptera collection has been destroyed (HERTING 1974; EVENHUIS et al. 2010, Appendix II). Like HERTING (1974: 40), the first author of the present paper was only able to find a few samples still remaining in the ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY collection which come into question as synonyms of Dinera carinifrons. The type material of Myocera anthophila ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830 and Myocera grisescens ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830 has survived, and in addition there was one type specimen of Amyclaea serva ROBINEAU- DESVOIDY, 1863. The original size of the type series is not known, but both European species, Dinera carini- frons and D. fuscata, are represented in the presumable type series. In order to ensure stability in nomenclature, lectotypes have been designated for these three species, and in this way the interpretation of Dinera carinifrons by ZHANG & SHIMA (2006) is followed. Lectotype designations Myocera anthophila ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830 was described from both sexes and was said to be the most abundant species of the genus, being found at the end of summer on many Apiaceae flowers. Only one ɉ remains from the type series, which HERTING (1974) also saw and syno- nymised with Dinera carinifrons. This specimen is herewith designated as lectotype (Coll. No. It480). is Thorax NOT and abdomen haveallowed been consumed by Dermestes to distribute and only vestiges remain includ- this ing the external parts of the postabdomen. Whilst the upper surface of the abdomen is very dark (microtrichosity rubbed off), the undersurface of the abdomen is evenly and densely grey micro- trichose.paper The synonymy in ofthe Myocera www anthophila with withoutDinera carinifrons can bepermis- confirmed. A red label with the printed text „LECTOTYPUS / Myocera / anthophila / ROBINEAU-DESV. 1830 / desig. ZIEGLER 2010“sion has been ofattached the by the first publishing author to the pin of the lectot ype.house ! Diptera Stelviana • Studia dipterologica. Supplement 21 (2014): XX-XX 21

In the original description, Myocera grisescens ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830 is said to have been found in Paris and to be in the collection of the COMTE DE SAINT-FARGEAU. HERTING (1974: 40) examined 1ɉ and 1Ɋ from the syntype series, and the first author found both specimens again. The ɉ is herewith designated as lectotype (Coll. No. 476). In this specimen the thorax has been hollowed out, and the head and five legs are missing; the abdomen is densely micro- trichose. The lectotype belongs to Dinera carinifrons (FALLÉN, 1817). A red label with the printed text „LECTOTYPUS / Myocera / grisescens / ROBINEAU-DESV. 1830 / desig. ZIEGLER 2010“ has been attached by the first author to the lectotype. Even ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY himself Preprintsynonymised Myocera grisescens RVERSION!!OBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830 with Musca carinifrons FALLÉN, 1817 (sensu lato) in his posthumously published work of 1863. However, the Ɋ has the characters of Dinera fuscata ZHANG & SHIMA, 2006. In this specimen thorax and abdomen have also been eaten by Dermestes, and the head and all legs are missing. There are discrepancies between the text of the description of Myocera grisescens and this female specimen in particular. For this reason it was not labelled as a type. The name grisescens is a homonym, preoccupied by (FALLÉN, 1817). Both sexes are mentioned in the original description of Amyclaea serva ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1863. HERTING (1974: 40) listed 1Ɋ. The first author located this specimen and it is herewith designated as lectotype (Coll. No. 473). It is identical with Dinera carinifrons (FALLÉN, 1817). ©The thorax has been hollowed out, and the left wing and all legs are missing. A red label with the printed text „LECTOTYPUS / Amyclaea / serva / ROBINEAU-DESV. 1863 / desig. ZIEGLER 2010“ has been attached by the first author to this type specimen. Doubtful taxa Under the name Myocera vaga ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1863 (Coll. No. 481) there is a pin with a few remains of the thorax and the wings. It is not possible to identify this species. No type material could be found in the Paris collection of any of the other species that come into consideration as synonyms of Dinera carinifrons or D. fuscata. Furthermore, ROBINEAU-DES- VOIDY’s descriptions do not allow any definite conclusions to be drawn. These names are therefore listed as doubtful taxa, and they are the species which were enumerated in the cata- logue of HERTING & DELY-DRASKOVITS (1993): Dinera albida ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1863; Din- era cylindrica ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830; Myocera calcium ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830; My- ocera nomada ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830 and Myocera squalida ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1863. In addition Dinera cinerea ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1863 and Dinera grisea ROBINEAU-DES- VOIDY, 1830 need to be considered. No type material of these species survives. HERTING (1974: 39) synonymised them both according to their descriptions with Dinera carinifrons (sensu lato). Myocera fera ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830 was also synonymised with Musca carinifrons by ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY (1863) himself. However the descriptions of these three species do not indicate with any certainty whether they really do belong to the species described in the present work as Dinera carinifrons or to Dinera fuscata. For this reason they should no longer be listed as synonyms and are included here under doubtful taxa.

It is NOTDescription allowed of Dinera fuscata occidentalisto distribute ZIEGLER ssp. nov. this (Figs 2, 5, 8, 11, 13, 15, 17, 26, 27, 28) Holotype: 1ɉ. GERMANY, Thüringen, Kyffhäuser Mts north of Bad Frankenhausen, 300 m alt., paper51°22´29´´N in011° 05´41´´E, the 02.VI.1991, www leg. LANGE without& ZIEGLER [original labels permis- printed on white paper: „GERMANY: Thüringen / Bad Frankenhausen Kyffhäuser / 51°22´29´´N 011° 05´41´´E / 02.VI.1991 300 m / leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER // 07.448“]. The first author added a label printed on red paper: „HOLO- sionTYPUS /of Dinera the/ fuscata occidentalis publishing / ZIEGLER 2013“. The holotype house has been deposited ! in the Muse- 22 ZIEGLER et al.: Tachinidae. Part 2

um für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity at the Humboldt Uni- versity Berlin, Germany. Paratypes: All specimens are labelled with „PARATYPUS / Dinera / fuscata occidentalis / ZIEGLER 2013“ (printed on red paper). For the deposition of paratypes see abbreviations. AUSTRIA: Salzburg, Piffalm south of Ferleiten (Hohe Tauern), 1,400 m, 1Ɋ 30.VII.1993 (12.253), leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (SDEI). Kärnten, Heiligenblut (Hohe Tauern), 1,600 m, 1ɉ 20.VII.1999 (18.975), 1ɉ 24.VII.1999 (19.033), 2ɉɉ 30.VII.2000 (20.722, 20.723), leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (SDEI, ZMHB). GERMANY: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Wokuhl southeast of Neuruppin, 100 m, 1ɉ 28.VII.2012 (34.479), leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). Sachsen-Anhalt, Stiege near Hasselfelde (Harz), 520 m, 4ɉɉ 11.VIII.2000 (21.053–21.056), leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (BLKU, CZB, CZS, ZMHB). Thüringen, Brandesbachtal near Preprintɉ VERSION!! Ilfeld (Harz), 400 m, 1 11.VIII.2000 (21.085), leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER, (CZB); Saalebachtal near Schmiedefeld (Thüringer Wald), 670 m, 1ɉ 12.VIII.2000 (21.125), leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER, (CZB). IRAN: Mazanderan, Eshkatechal southwest of Ramsar (Kuhha-ye Alborz), 1,220– 1,570 m, 6ɉɉ 3ɊɊ 28.VII.2005 (28.993, 94, 96–97, 99, 29.031–34), 3ɉɉ 3ɊɊ 29.VII.2005 (29.051–61), 4ɉɉ 3ɊɊ, 13.VII.2008 (31.731–37), leg. ZIEGLER (BMNH, HMIM, SMNS, ZMHB). ITALY: Südtirol, Martelltal, Rifugio Borromeo 1ɉ 07.VII.2000 (20.554), leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Suldental, Innersulden, 1ɉ 30.VII.1999 (19.411), leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CLV); Tartscher Tal near Trafoi, 1ɉ 27.VII.1999 (19.210), leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (SNUC); Gomagoi near Stilfser Joch, 1ɉ 03.VII.2009 (32.333), leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB) (Fig. 26); Vinschgau, St. Martin am Kofel near Latsch, 1ɉ 04.VIII.1995 (14.336), leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (SNUC); Schnalstal near Meran, Vernagt, 1ɉ 01.VIII.1995 (14.128), leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (BLKU). Male: Body length: 5.3–9.9 mm. ©Colouration and microtrichosity (Figs 26, 27): Thorax, abdomen and legs black. Head predominantly black, frontal vitta dark brown. Face, facial ridge, anterior portion of parafa- cial, and gena (except the genal dilation) brown in frontal view. Head including parafacial covered with light grey microtrichosity. Palpus, scape and pedicel brown or light brown, post- pedicel black with narrow basal brown portion. Thorax with whitish-grey microtrichosity and three dark presutural longitudinal stripes dorsally. Lateral vittae narrow, median stripe broad and with a tendency to divide presuturally into 3 separate vittae. Wing hyaline, evenly and weakly tinged with pale brown; calypter dorsally light brown, its outer margin whitish; tegula dark brown to black, basicosta yellowish. Abdomen covered by greyish-white microtrichosity laterally and brownish microtrichosity dorsally. Abdominal microtrichosity with a tessellate appearance, even when seen at a very low angle from behind. Postabdomen segments 6–8, syncercus, and apical portion of sternite 5 dark brown to black. Head (Figs 2, 5, 8): Eye bare. Face in profile 0.55–0.70 times as long as frons. Facial carina well developed. Frons narrowed to vertex, at its narrowest point 0.20–0.30 times as wide as an eye in dorsal view. Frontal vitta broader than one fronto-orbital plate. Medial (inner) vertical setae (vi) about 0.40–0.50 of eye height, lateral (outer) vertical setae (ve) indistinct. Ocellar setae (oc) proclinate, longer and stronger than medial (inner) vertical setae. Nine to twelve inclinate frontal setae (fr) descending to base of antenna. Proclinate orbital setae (oe) and lateroclinate prevertical setae absent in male. Frons without or at most with a few fine setulae outside of row of frontal seta. Parafacial bare, in profile at its narrowest point 0.35–0.62 times as wide as the horizontal width of an eye and 2.0–3.0 times as wide as the postpedicel. Facial ridge bare. Lower facial margin protruding forward, well visible in lateral view. Vibrissa in- serted slightly above level of lower margin of face. Base of antenna at the level of lower 0.4– It0.5 ofis eye height.NOT Postpedicel allowed (first flagellomere) 2.6–3.8 to times distribute as long as pedicel and 2.6–3.4 this times as long as wide. Pedicel with a long seta which is equal in length or only slightly shorter than postpedicel. Arista plumose, total width of arista including plumosity about 1.5 times as widepaper as postpedicel. in Height the of gena www0.30–0.45 times ofwithout vertical diameter of eyepermis- when head is viewed in profile. Postocular setae curving forward. Occiput covered with white setulae and on its upper partsion behind the postocularof the row with publishing 3–4 rows of fine black setae. house Prementum ! Diptera Stelviana • Studia dipterologica. Supplement 21 (2014): XX-XX 23

slender, about 5.0–6.6 times as long as wide and 0.7–1.0 times as long as the horizontal width of an eye. Palpus pale, sometimes apically darkened 1.35–1.95 times as long as postpedicel and 1.10–1.45 times as long as the horizontal width of an eye, slender and cylindrical, with setulae. Thorax: Prosternum bare, proepisternum pilose. Postpronotal lobe with 3 strong basal setae arranged in a triangle and (1)–2–(3) smaller setae, one placed between middle and inner basal seta and the other present between the inner basal seta and the inner border of the postpronotal lobe. Scutum with 1–2+2–3 acrostichal (acr), 3+3(–4) dorsocentral (dc), 0+2 intra-alar (ia) Preprintsetae, 1(–2) posthumeral, 2 notopleural, VERSION!! 1 presutural seta, and 3 supra-alar setae (the first postsutural supra-alar seta shorter and thinner then the notopleural setae), postalar callus with 2 setae. Anatergite bare below calypter. Anepimeral seta strong, well differentiated from adja- cent setulae, but shorter than strongest katepisternal seta. Katepimeron bare or with a few fine setulae. Katepisternum with 3 setae. Posterior lappet of posterior thoracic spiracle large, sub- circular. Postmetacoxal area membraneous. Scutellum with 3 pairs of strong marginal setae (basal, subapical, and apical setae); apical setae horizontal and crossed. Dorsal surface of scutellum with 1–2 pairs of setae. Wing: Second costal section without setulae ventrally. Costal seta not differentiated. Fourth costal section 2.5–5.0 times as long as sixth costal section. Relative length of second, third

and fourth sectors of costa approximately as 1:2:1. Vein R1 without setae. Base of vein R4+5 ©with 2–5 setulae dorsally and 1–4 ventrally. CuA bare. Wing cell r open or closed just at 1 4+5

wing margin. Vein M1 obtusely curved.

Legs: Fore leg: Coxa with bare medial surface; tibia (t1) with 2 posterior setae, a row of 3–5 fine anterodorsal setae and a row of 2–3 posterodorsal setae on basal 2/3; preapical anterodor- sal seta longer than preapical dorsal seta, 1 apical anteroventral seta, posteroventral seta unde- veloped; tarsus long, 1.4 times of head height; claws in male longer than fifth tarsomere. Mid

leg: Tibia (t2) with (1)–2 anterodorsal setae, 2–4 posterodorsal setae, 1–2 posterior setae, and

1 ventral seta. Hind leg: Posterior coxal margin bare; tibia (t3) with a row of several irregular anterodorsal setae, 2 posterodorsal setae, 2 ventral setae, and 2 dorsal preapical setae, equal in length or preapical anterodorsal seta a little shorter than preapical dorsal seta; 1 apical anter- oventral seta, posteroventral seta undeveloped. Abdomen: Long ovate in shape. Syntergite 1+2 excavated middorsally only on basal half; with 1 pair of strong erect median marginal setae and 1 pair of long and strong lateral marginal setae; tergite 3 with at least 2 pairs of median marginal and 2 pairs of lateral marginal setae, or with a row of marginal setae; tergite 4 with a complete row of marginal setae; tergites 3 and 4 usually without lateral discal and median discal setae, sometimes with a few erect median discal setulae; tergite 5 with rows of marginal and discal setae. Setulae on abdomen long, predominantly semi- erect, except tergite 5 which has irregularly arranged erect setulae. Tergite 5 dorsally approxi- mately equal in length to tergite 4. Sternites overlapped by ventral edges of tergites. Terminalia (Figs 13, 15, 17): Terminalia compact, 1.3 times longer than wide in caudal view; cerci wide at base and narrowed in distal half, in lateral view semicircular curved; surstylus wide and round dorsally at apex in lateral view (Figs 13, 15); gonopod long and bent poste- riorly; paramere slightly shorter than basiphallus; distiphallus slender, membraneous apical It partis straight NOT or curved, aboutallowed 2–3 times as long asto sclerotized distribute basal part (Fig. 17). this Female (Figs 5, 11), differs from male as follows: Body length: 5.2–8.5 mm. Head: Frons much broader than in male, at its narrowest point 0.95–1.25 times as wide as an eye in dorsal paperview. Gena inwider, heightthe of genawww 0.45–0.55 times without vertical diameter of eye permis- when head is viewed in profile. Medial (inner) vertical setae (vi) about 0.60–0.85 of eye height, lateral (outer) sionvertical ofsetae ( vethe) differentiated, publishing strong but only about half house as long as medial ! vertical seta. 2 24 ZIEGLER et al.: Tachinidae. Part 2

Preprint VERSION!! ©

Fig. 26: A male of Dinera fuscata occidentalis ssp. nov. on a leaf of Corylus avellana. This specimen was collected at the montane locality “Gomagoi” (Stilfserjoch National Park) and was later on included in the series of paratypes. Photograph: J. ZIEGLER, 3 July 2009. strong proclinate orbital setae (oe) and 1 lateroclinate prevertical setae present. 5–8 inclinate

frontal setae (fr). Legs: Claws and pulvilli shorter than fifth tarsomere. Mid tibia (t2) with 2–

(3) anterodorsal setae. Hind tibia (t3) with 2–(3) posterodorsal setae. Abdomen: Syntergite 1+2 usually without strong erect median marginal setae and long and strong lateral marginal seta; tergites 3 and 4 without lateral discal and median discal setae; setulae on abdomen short- er than in males, recumbent except on a lateral stripe. Etymology: The name „occidentalis“ [Latin, an adjective, meaning „western“], refers to the western Palaearctic distribution area. Additional material examined ARMENIA: Lori, Margahovit east of Vanadzor, 1,950 m, 3ɊɊ 19.–30.VI.2011, 1ɉ 3ɊɊ 09.– 10.VII.2011, leg. T. ZEEGERS (CZS) (ZEEGERS 2012, as D. carinifrons). AUSTRIA: Niederösterreich, Puchberg am Schneeberg bei Wien, 1Ɋ VII. 1954, leg. O. RINGDAHL It(BMNH). is TirolNOT, Mayrhofen betweenallowed Ginzling and Steinbockhaus to distribute(Zillertaler Alpen), 1,300–1,400 thism, 1ɉ 31.VII.1969, leg. A. C. PONT (BMNH); between Alpenrose and Mayrhofen (Zillertaler Alpen), 1,000– 1,300 m, 1Ɋ 05.VIII.1969, leg. A. C. PONT (BMNH). Salzburg, Kapruner Tal near Kaprun (Hohe Tauern), 980 m, 1ɉ 31.VII.2011, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). Steiermark, „Styria alp.“ 1ɉ VII.1950, leg.paper O. RINGDAHL (BMNH).in the Kärnten , wwwKräuterwand near Schöneckwithout northwest of Heiligenblut permis- (Hohe Tauern), 1,600 m, 1ɉ 12ɊɊ 20.VII.1999, 4ɉɉ 3ɊɊ 24.VII.1999, 20ɉɉ 10ɊɊ 30.VII.2000, 20ɉɉ 15ɊɊ 21.VII.2001, 3ɉɉ 12ɊɊ 26.VII.2011, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB, SDEI, ZMHB); Gasthaus Schöneck northwestsion of Heiligenblut of (Hohe the Tauern) 1,850publishing m, 1Ɋ 29.VII.2000, 4ɉɉ 8ɊɊ house 27.VII.2011, ! Diptera Stelviana • Studia dipterologica. Supplement 21 (2014): XX-XX 25

Preprint VERSION!! ©

Fig. 27: Dinera fuscata occidentalis ssp. nov. (male) on flowers of Achillea millefolium at the montane locality “Gomagoi” (Stilfserjoch National Park). Photograph: J. ZIEGLER, 3 July 2009.

leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB, HDNS); Schachnern southeast of Heiligenblut (Hohe Tauern) 1,420 m, 2ɉɉ 02.VIII.2000, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (HDNS); Steinernes Meer northeast of Arnoldstein (Unteres Gailtal), 550 m, 1ɉ 1Ɋ 06.VIII.2000, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). AZERBAIJAN: Yardymly, Avash, 1,200–1,500 m, 2ɉɉ 17.VI.1996, leg. M. HAUSER (SMNS). BELGIUM: Luxembourg, Tellin-Grupont, 1Ɋ 24.VII.1989, leg. T. ZEEGERS (CZS). BULGARIA: Sofia, University Exper. Farm, 1Ɋ 10.VII.–07.VIII.1998, leg. P. V. ATANASSOVA (CZS). FRANCE: Ardennes, Omont south of Charleville-Mézières, 1ɉ 20.VIII.1908 (MNHN); Vendresse south of Charleville-Mézières, 1Ɋ 23.VIII.1911, 1ɉ 02.VIII.1912, 1ɉ VIII.1928, leg. R. BENOIST (MNHN). Morbihan, Pluvigner north of Anray, 1ɉ 29.VIII.1910, 1ɉ 02.IX.1910, 1ɉ 26.IX.1910, 1ɉ 30.IX.1910 (MNHN). Hautes-Alpes, Bois du Rif Blanc north of la Madeleine northwest of Briançon, 1,950 m, 1ɉ 07.VIII.1998, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB) (TSCHORSNIG et al. 2003, as D. carinifrons). Hautes-Pyrénées, Argelèz-Gazost, 500 m, 1Ɋ 11.VIII.1911, leg. WAINWRIGHT (BMNH). GEORGIA: Abkhazia, Sochumi, 2ɊɊ 01.IX.1932, leg. B. ROHDENDORF (ZMUM); Racha-Lechkhi- mi–Kvemo-Svaneti, Road to Mamison Pass near Oni (Caucasus) above Kutaisi, 8ɊɊ 01.IX.1903 It [50530,is NOT 50548, 50549], leg.allowed T. BECKER (ZMHB). to distribute this GERMANY: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Sassnitz, 1ɉ (before 1931), coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Wokuhl southeast of Neuruppin, 1Ɋ 28.VII.2012, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). Brandenburg, Briesetal papernear Birkenwerder in southeastthe of Oranienburg,www 1Ɋ 11.VIII.2012,without leg. LANGE & Zpermis-IEGLER (CZB). Sachsen- Anhalt, Tangerhütte (Altmark), 1Ɋ 25.VIII.1983, leg. J. ZIEGLER (CZB); Tangerhütte, Mahlpfuhler Fenn (Altmark), 1Ɋ 28.VII.1985, leg. J. ZIEGLER (CZB) (ZIEGLER 1993, as D. carinifrons); Dessau, 1Ɋ sion01.VII.1958, of leg. theWALLIS (Z IEGLERpublishing 1984, as D. carinifrons); Schierke house near Wernigerode ! (Harz), 600 m, 26 ZIEGLER et al.: Tachinidae. Part 2

1Ɋ 28.VII.1990, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Sorge near Wernigerode (Harz), 500 m, 1Ɋ 17.VII.1993, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Leckenkopf southwest of Stiege near Hasselfelde (Harz) 520 m, 6ɉɉ 4ɊɊ 11.VIII.2000, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Siptenfelde west of Harzgerode (Harz), 380 m, 1Ɋ 18.VI.2006, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Blauer See near Rübeland (Harz) 425 m, 1ɉ 31.VII.1982, 20ɉɉ 2ɊɊ 23.VIII.1983, leg. J. ZIEGLER (CZB), 1Ɋ 28.VII.1990; 1Ɋ 05.VIII.2011, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). Thüringen, Ilfeld (Harz) near Nordhausen, 1Ɋ 19.VII.1914, 1ɉ 09.VIII.1914, 1ɉ 1Ɋ 18.VIII.1914, 1ɉ 29.VIII.1914, 1ɉ 10.VII.1915, leg. O. DUDA (ZMHB); Brandesbachtal northeast of Ilfeld (Harz) 400 m, 2ɊɊ 22.VII.1990, 2ɊɊ 28.VII.1990, 2ɊɊ 17.VII.1993, 10ɉɉ 6ɊɊ 11.VIII.2000, 5ɉɉ 05.VIII.2011, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Steinthaleben (Kyffhäuser), Habichtstal, 1ɉ 30.V.1990, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Schönau vor dem Walde southwest of Gotha, 350 m, 1ɉ 1Ɋ 18.VIII.1982, Preprint2ɊɊ 22.VIII.1982, leg. J. ZIEGLER (CZB) VERSION!!(ZIEGLER 1987, as D. carinifrons); Finsterbergen southwest of Gotha, 500 m, 1ɉ 24.VIII.1982, leg. J. ZIEGLER (CZB) (ZIEGLER 1987, as D. carinifrons); Engelsbach southwest of Gotha, 400 m, 2ɉɉ 1Ɋ 24.VIII.1982, 1ɉ 1Ɋ 27.VIII.1982, leg. J. ZIEGLER (CZB) (ZIE- GLER 1987, as D. carinifrons); Saalebachtal southwest of Schmiedefeld am Rennsteig (Thüringer Wald) 670 m, 8ɉɉ 4ɊɊ 12.VIII.2000, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Unterer Schneetiegel west of Gehlberg near Ilmenau (Thüringer Wald), 650 m, 1ɉ 1Ɋ 24.VII.1982, 1ɉ 1Ɋ 26.VIII.1982, leg. ZIEGLER, 1ɉ 01.VIII.1992, 4ɉɉ 12.VIII.2000, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). Nordrhein-Westfalen, Lippetal-Oest- inghausen north of Soest, 1Ɋ 31.VIII.1954, coll. B. HERTING (SMNS). Baden-Württemberg, Baiers- bronn-Schönmünzach near Freudenstadt, 1ɉ VIII.1898, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Beuron near Sieg- maringen, 1ɉ 1925, coll. B. LICHTWARDT (SDEI); Schliengen south of Müllheim, 1Ɋ 01.VI.1960, leg. D. SCHRÖDER (SMNS). Bayern, Lohr am Main west of Aschaffenburg, Mühlbach, 1ɉ 08.VI.1958, coll. B. HERTING (SMNS); Watzmann near Berchtesgaden, 1,900 m, 1ɉ 21.VII.1922, leg. M. P. RIEDEL (ZMHB); Bad Hindelang-Hinterstein im Ostrachtal (Oberallgäu), 1Ɋ 22.VII.1925, coll. O. DUDA ©(ZMHB); München, 1Ɋ 01.IX.1909, coll. Fränkisches Museum in Würzburg (SDEI). IRAN: Mazanderan, Eshkatechal southwest of Ramsar (Kuhha-ye Alborz), 1,220–1,570 m, 4ɊɊ 28.VII.2005, 1ɉ 3ɊɊ 29.VII.2005, 2ɉɉ 2ɊɊ 13.VII.2008, 1Ɋ 14.VII.2008, leg. ZIEGLER (ZMHB). ITALY: Südtirol, Rueffenberg southeast of Brixen (Dolomiti) 1,850 m, 2ɉɉ 06.VIII.1999, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Unteres Eggental southeast of Bozen, 600 m, 1Ɋ 03.VIII.1995, leg. LANGE & ZIE- GLER (CZB); Hirzerhütte west of Saltaus (Sarntaler Alpen), 2,100 m, 1ɉ 02.VIII.1995, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (SDEI); Finail west of Vernagt, 1,750 m, 3ɉɉ 01.VIII.1995, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB, SDEI) (see also LANGE & ZIEGLER 2001 & 2003, as D. carinifrons); Trafoi, 1ɉ 15.VIII.1909, leg. M. P. RIEDEL (ZMHB); Gomagoi near Stilfser Joch, 6ɉɉ 03.VII.2009, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); and additional specimens from Trentino-Alto Adige and Parco Nazionale dello Stelvio collected by LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB, SDEI, ZMHB) (ZIEGLER et al. 2001, 2003, 2013). Sondrio, Forni Vall. near S. Cater- ina Valfurva, 2ɉɉ 18.VII.2003, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). Trentino, Madonna di Campiglio, 1ɉ 07.VIII.1899, 1ɉ 1Ɋ 09.VIII.1899, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI); Dolomiti di Brenta, Val Genova, 1ɉ VII.1899, coll. L. OLDENBERG (SDEI). . LITHUANIA: Marijampole, Suvalkija, Želsva, 2ɉɉ 12.–18.VIII.2006, leg. E. LUTOVINOVAS (CLV). POLAND: Podlaskie, Białowieža, 2ɊɊ 07.–09.VIII.1991, leg. T. ZEEGERS (CZS); Suwalki, Folwark, 1Ɋ 14.VIII.1991, leg. T. ZEEGERS (CZS). Podkarpackie, Bieszcady, Ustryki Górny, 1Ɋ 23.VII.1991, leg. T. ZEEGERS (CZS). ROMANIA: Transylvania, Mureș County, Orșova, 1ɉ 16.VI.1871, coll. H. LOEW (ZMHB); Brașov County, 15 km southeast of Săcele (Muntii Baiului) 800 m, 1Ɋ 13.VII.1999, leg. T. ROMIG (CZB). RUSSIA: Central District, Tambov Oblast, Tambov, Tsna Vall., 1ɉ 16.VIII.1990, leg. LANGE & ZIE- GLER (CZB). SERBIA: Nišava, Bancarevo (Suva Planina), 9 km east of Niš, 300 m, 1Ɋ 09.VI.2009, leg. G. PEN- NARDS (CZS). SLOVAKIA: Žilina, Vratna Vall. (Malá Fatra) near Žilina, 1ɉ 09.IX.1992, leg. M. V. VEEN (CZS). Brat- Itislava is, Pezinok, NOT 1ɉ 08.VIII.1977, allowed leg. J. ČEPELÁK (DZMB). Nitrato, Nitra, distribute Mt Zobor, 500 m, 1Ɋ 26.VII.1981, this leg. J. ZIEGLER (CZB); Nitra-Štitáre, 300 m, 3ɊɊ 30.VII.1981, leg. J. ZIEGLER (CZB); Štúrovo, Kováčovské kopce, 300 m, 1ɉ 27.VII. 1981, leg. J. ZIEGLER (CZB) (ZIEGLER 1992, as D. carinifrons). SPAINpaper: Huesca, Sallent in de theGállego (Pirineos), www 1ɉ 23.VIII.2000, without leg. H.-P. TSCHORSNIG permis- (SMNS). SWEDEN: Skåne, Stenestad east of Helsingborg, 1ɉ 16.VIII.1908, leg. RINGDAHL (ZMHB). SWITZERLAND: Waadt, Les Diablerets, part of Ormont-Dessus, 15 km east of Aigle, 1ɉ VII.1952, coll. R. DAHL (BMNH).sion Bern, Grindelwald of the northwest publishing of Unter Lauchbühl, 1,550 m, 2ɉɉ house 27.VII.2002, ! Diptera Stelviana • Studia dipterologica. Supplement 21 (2014): XX-XX 27

leg. H.-P. TSCHORSNIG (SMNS). Graubünden, Mastac north of Rossa (Val Calanca), 1,250 m, 1ɉ 29.VII.1998, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Klosters-Serneus (Prättigau), 1ɉ VIII.1907, coll. L. OLDEN- BERG (SDEI); Selva (Surselva) southwest of Disentis, 1,500 m, 1Ɋ 26.VI.2000, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB); Zernez (Rätische Alpen) 1,600 m, 3ɉɉ 03.VII.2000, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). Wallis, Lötschental, 2ɉɉ 1Ɋ (before 1941), leg. EIGEN, coll. M. P. RIEDEL (ZMHB); Rischmald near Bitsch southeast of Brig, 1,250 m, 1Ɋ 30.VI.2000, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). Tessin, Frasco (Val Verzasca) north of Locarno, 900 m, 5ɉɉ 5ɊɊ 28.VII.1998, leg. LANGE & ZIEGLER (CZB). . TURKEY: Rize, Ovit Da—i south of Ikizdere (Karadeniz Mts), 1,500 m, 2ɊɊ 11.VII.1985, leg. W. SCHACHT (SMNS). PreprintUNITED KINGDOM: ENGLAND, DevonVERSION!!, Lynton, 1ɉ 05.VIII.1895, coll. C. J. WAINWRIGHT (BMNH). Somerset, Hawkridge near Spaxton, west of Bridgwater, 2ɉɉ 26.VIII.1950, leg. E. A. FONSECA (BMNH); 1ɉ 05.IX.1951, leg. J. COWLEY (BMNH); Edington in Sedgemoor, east of Bridgwater, 1Ɋ 12.IX.1951, leg. J. COWLEY (BMNH); Horner near Porlock, west of Minehead, 1Ɋ 15.VI.1952, leg. E. A. FONSECA (BMNH). Hampshire, Lyndhurst southwest of Southhampton, 1Ɋ 08.VIII.1894, 1ɉ 13.VIII.1894, coll. YERBURY (BMNH); New Forest southwest of Southhampton, 1ɉ 28.VII.1896, 1Ɋ 21.VIII.1897, leg. F. C. ADAMS (BMNH); Brockenhurst southwest of Southhampton, 1ɉ 1ɉ VIII.1900, coll. RICARDO (BMNH). Herefordshire, Botany Bay east of Hereford, 1ɉ 1Ɋ 20.VIII.1898, coll. J. H. WOOD (BMNH). Worces- terhire, Wyre Forest west of Kidderminster, 1ɉ 09.IX.1900, coll. C. J. WAINWRIGHT (BMNH). Shrop- shire, Church Stretton, 1ɉ 13.VI.1937 coll. C. J. WAINWRIGHT (BMNH). WALES, Rhondda Cynon Taf, Mountain Ash, 1ɉ 12.VIII.1957, leg. F. MALTICK (BMNH). Gwynedd, Moel Llyfnant, Llanuwchllyn, 1ɉ 08.VIII.1893, coll. C. J. WAINWRIGHT (BMNH). SCOTLAND, Highland, Rannoch Moor west of Pitlochry, 1ɉ 24.VII.1902, coll. C. J. WAINWRIGHT ©(BMNH); Glenmore east of Aviemore, 1Ɋ 06.VII.1936, coll. C. J. WAINWRIGHT (BMNH); The Mound north of Dornoch near Loch Fleet, 1ɉ 03.VIII.1936, coll. C. J. WAINWRIGHT (BMNH); Ballachulish, south of Fort William, 1ɉ 15.VII.1955, C. H. ANDREWES (BMNH); Aviemore, 1ɉ 30.VI.1959, C. H. ANDREWES (BMNH); Lochinver, 1Ɋ 22.–25.VI.1965, leg. E. A. FONSECA (BMNH). Moray, Bridge of Brown, between Granton-on-Spey and Tomintoul, 1Ɋ 09.VIII.1935, coll. C. J. WAINWRIGHT (BMNH). Geographic distribution and seasonal occurrence (Fig. 28): This West Palaearctic subspe- cies probably had its refugial area during the last glaciation in the Hyrcanian area, North Iran (based on LATTIN 1967). Distributed from Spain (Pyrenees) and Great Britain in the west to

It is NOT allowed to distribute this paper in the www without permis- Fig. 28: Disjunct Palaearctic distribution of Dinera fuscata. The locality data are listed under „Description / Mate- sionrial examined“, of and the cited from ZpublishingHANG & SHIMA (2006). house ! 28 ZIEGLER et al.: Tachinidae. Part 2

Iran (northern slope of Elburz) in the east; from Scotland and Sweden in the north to Italy (Alps), Serbia, north Turkey (Karadenýz Mts) and Armenia (Lesser Caucasus) in the south. Not in Middle Asia, Siberia and the Far East. In the Alps, most common from the foothills to the montane altitudinal zone (0–1,600 m). At present, widespread in the Central European lowlands and in the lower parts of the mountains. According to what was found in the older collections, it was probably a rare species in Central Europe about a hundred years ago and was known only from Ilfeld (Harz) in and from Bad Kissingen (STEIN 1924: 240), München, Berchtesgaden, and Bad Hindelang-Hinterstein in Bavaria. PreprintSeasonal occurrence of adults: June – September,VERSION!! in Central Europe most common in summer (July and August).

Hosts: The host record of Agrilinus ater (DE GEER, 1774) (as Aphodius) for „Billaea carini- frons“ from Scotland of PELHAM-CLINTON (1959) will unfortunately remain doubtful. PELHAM- CLINTON surely was not able to differentiate between what we understand today as Dinera carinifrons and D. fuscata occidentalis. Furthermore the author had only the „shrivelled re- mains“ of a single female which he identified after „soaking in phenol“. So, even if this spec- imen would still be available for study, it is probable that no clear decision is possible to which species it belongs. But the results of our investigations make it probably that only one species of the Dinera carinifrons species group exists in England, Wales and Scotland. There- ©fore the host record Agrilinus ater (DE GEER, 1774) (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae) of PELHAM- CLINTON concern most probably Dinera fuscata occidentalis. Puparium unknown.

Dinera fuscata fuscata ZHANG & SHIMA, 2006 (Figs 1, 4, 7, 10, 28) Several morphological differences between fuscata and occidentalis can be gleaned from the description of the species and from the identification key. However, the number of acrostichal setae on the scutum, the number of anterodorsal setae on mid tibia and the number of lateral discal setae and median discal setae on tergites 3 and 4 are highly variable in both subspecies and are not suitable defining them. In fact, the only distinct differences are to be found in the development of the palpi and in the proportions of the head, and these are taken account of in the following identification key. Apart from the localities of the paratypes published by ZHANG & SHIMA (2006) we add here additional unpublished material of Dinera fuscata fuscata from China. CHINA: Zhejiang, Tianmu Mountain, 13ɉɉ 2ɊɊ 27.IV.–10.V.1987, leg. X.-k. SUN (SNUC). Si- chuan, Omei Mountain, Baoguosi, 550–750 m, 1ɉ 04.IV.1957, Z.-y. WANG (SNUC); Siguniang Moun- tain, Ganzi, 3,300 m, 1ɉ 30.VI.1983, X.-z. ZHANG (SNUC). Nanping, Jiuzhaigou, 2,350–2,550 m, 1ɉ 05.IX.1983, X.-z. ZHANG (SNUC). Yunnan, Meilixueshan Mountain, Deqin, 3350 m, 2ɉɉ VII.– VIII.1982, X.-z. ZHANG & H.-c.CAI (SNUC). Remarks Specimens of Dinera fuscata occidentalis are morphologically and at the molecular level Itdistinctly is NOTseparated from Japaneseallowed populations of toD. fuscata distribute fuscata (LUTOVINOVAS et thisal. 2013). However, in China there are intermediate populations which also exhibit a great deal of infraspecific variation. As a result, when Chinese material is added to East Palaearctic specimenspaper of D. fuscatain ,the these can www no longer be clearly without separated in all casespermis- from West Palaearctic specimens by one or several morphological characters. For this reason the West Palaearctic populationssion are notof considered the to bepublishing a separate species but rather ashouse the subspe- ! Diptera Stelviana • Studia dipterologica. Supplement 21 (2014): XX-XX 29

cies of a polytypic species geographically restricted to a particular region. The question of possible further subspecific status for the Chinese populations can only be resolved by fur- ther detailed investigations. These morphological and genetic results are in agreement with the widely separated areal of D. carinifrons and D. fuscata in the east and the extensive overlapping in the areal of D. carinifrons and D. fuscata occidentalis in the west (Figs 22, 28). The coexistence of these two species in the West Palaearctic area can be explained by a period of isolation during the ice ages with interrupted gene flow between the two species. It can be hypothesised that refugia Preprintfor the trans-Palaearctic species DineraVERSION!! carinifrons during the last glaciation were in Ussuria, Russian Far East, whilst the West Palaearctic populations of Dinera fuscata survived the cli- max of the last glaciation in the Hyrcanian area, North Iran (based on LATTIN 1967). The East Palaearctic populations of D. fuscata apparently used several different refugial areas in Japan and China, which is now reflected in the special morphological and genetic heterogeneity of these populations. The recent changes in the areal of Dinera-species in Central Europe document the ongoing dynamics of these processes (compare Fig. 23). The regression of D. carinifrons in the Central European lowlands is one of the few examples of such large-scale changes that often unfold unnoticed. People are quick to make the contemporary climate change responsible for these ©widespread changes. However, this reduction in distribution range is much too large-scale to be explained exclusively by climate changes. Analogies can also be found in the striking recent expansion of certain species which is also not solely linked to climatic changes (ZIE- GLER 2012).

Correction and emendment to the identification key to Palaearctic and Oriental species of the genus Dinera by ZHANG & SHIMA (2006) The characters used by ZHANG & SHIMA (2006) in their identification key to separate Dinera carinifrons and Dinera fuscata, namely the thoracic pattern and the number of acrostichal setae, are very variable and are therefore unsuitable. They are omitted here. Statements about the width of the frons are defined more precisely and supplemented with other characters. The identification key offered here should replace the key by ZHANG & SHIMA (2006) from couplet 17 onwards. 17. Larger pale species with body length 6.5–10.8 mm; abdomen covered with dense yel- lowish-grey (rarely bluish-grey) microtrichosity with only a light tessellate appearance, but seen at a very low angle from behind the microtrichosity is dense and covers the whole of the abdominal tergites; lower calypter dorsally whitish, its outer margin yel- lowish; palpus 1.65–2.25 times as long as postpedicel and 1.15–1.55 times as long as the horizontal width of an eye, cylindrical, apically gently club-shaped. Male: Frons at its narrowest point 0.26–0.42 times as wide as an eye in dorsal view; parafacial wide, in profile at its narrowest point 0.5–0.8 times as wide as the horizontal width of an eye; postabdomen slightly elongated, 1.5 times longer than wide in caudal view, syncercus flat in lateral view, paramere slightly longer than basiphallus. Female: Frons at narrow- It is estNOT point 1.05–1.35 allowed times as wide as an eye to in dorsal distribute view; medial (inner) vertical this setae about 0.75–0.95 of eye height...... D. carinifrons (FALLÉN) – Smaller dark species with body length 5.3–9.9 mm; abdomen covered by greyish-white papermicrotrichosity in the laterally www and dark brownish without microtrichosity dorsally, permis- microtrichosity with a tessellate appearance, even when seen at a very low angle from behind; lower calypter siondorsally of lightthe brown publishing(especially in males), its outer marginhouse whitish; palpus ! shorter, 1.10– 30 ZIEGLER et al.: Tachinidae. Part 2

1.95 times as long as postpedicel, and 0.90–1.45 times as long as the horizontal width of an eye, slender and cylindrical. Male: Frons at its narrowest point 0.15–0.30 times as wide as an eye in dorsal view; parafacial narrower, in profile at its narrowest point 0.35– 0.62 times as wide as an eye in horizontal view; postabdomen compact, 1.3 times longer than wide in caudal view, syncercus convex in lateral view, paramere slightly shorter than basiphallus. Female: Frons at narrowest point 0.95–1.25 times as wide as eye in dorsal view; medial (inner) vertical setae about 0.60–0.85 of eye height...... 18 Preprint18. Palpus stocky, dark brown or blackVERSION!! (rarely pale in Chinese specimens), 0.90–1.15 times as long as the horizontal width of an eye. Male frons at its narrowest point 0.15–0.25 times as wide as an eye in dorsal view. Distribution: East Palaearctic (China and Japan)...... D. fuscata fuscata ZHANG & SHIMA – Palpus slender, yellowish, sometimes darkened apically, 1.05–1.45 times as long as the horizontal width of an eye. Male frons at its narrowest point 0.20–0.30 times as wide as an eye in dorsal view. Distribution: West Palaearctic, from Iran to Spain...... D. fuscata occidentalis ZIEGLER

Key to West Palaearctic species of Dinera For the identification of Central European and West Palaearctic material, the key by TSCHORSNIG ©& HERTING (1994) has been translated into English, modified, and expanded to include Dinera fuscata occidentalis.

1. Abdominal syntergite 1+2 middorsally excavated only at base. Wing cell r4+5 closed at wing margin or with a short petiole. Tibia yellow, femora yellow or brown. Abdomen covered by dense yellowish-grey microtrichosity, without a tessellate appearance. Smaller species, body length 4–7 mm...... D. grisescens (FALLÉN)

– Abdominal syntergite 1+2 middorsally excavated at least on basal half. Wing cell r4+5 open. Legs dark brown or black. Abdomen covered by microtrichosity, with a (slight or strong) tessellate appearance...... 2 2. Syntergite 1+2 middorsally excavated to posterior margin. Scutum with 4 postsutural dorsocentral setae. Abdomen dark with a strong tessellate appearance. Larger species, body length 8–14 mm...... D. ferina (FALLÉN) – Syntergite 1+2 middorsally excavated on basal half. Scutum usually with 3 (rarely with 4) postsutural dorsocentral setae. Abdomen with a slight or strong tessellate appearance. Middle sized species, body length 5–11 mm...... 3 3. Larger pale species with 6.5–10.8 mm body length; abdomen covered by dense yellow- ish-grey (rarely bluish-grey) microtrichosity, with only a slight tessellate appearance which is not or barely visible when seen at a very low angle from behind; calypter dorsally whitish, its outer margin yellowish; palpus 1.65–2.25 times as long as postpedi- cel and 1.15–1.55 times as long as the horizontal width of an eye, cylindrical, apically slightly club-shaped. Male: Frons at its narrowest point 0.26–0.42 times as wide as an eye in dorsal view; parafacial wide, in profile at its narrowest point 0.5–0.8 times as wide as the horizontal width of an eye; postabdomen slightly elongated, approx. 1.5 It istimes NOT longer than wide allowed in caudal view, fused toportion distribute of syncercus straight in lateral this view, paramere slightly longer than basiphallus. Female: Frons at its narrowest point paper1.05–1.35 timesin as thewide as anwww eye in dorsal view;without medial (inner) vertical permis- setae about 0.75–0.95 of eye height...... D. carinifrons (FALLÉN) – In the average smaller dark species with 5.3–9.9 mm body length; abdomen covered by greyish-whitesion microtrichosity of laterally the and publishing dark brownish microtrichosity housedorsally, with ! Diptera Stelviana • Studia dipterologica. Supplement 21 (2014): XX-XX 31

a tessellate appearance similar to D. ferina, even when seen at a very low angle from behind; calypter dorsally light brown (especially in males), its outer margin whitish; palpus shorter, 1.35–1.95 times as long as postpedicel, and 1.05–1.45 times as long as the horizontal width of an eye, slender and cylindrical. Male: Frons at its narrowest point 0.20–0.30 times as wide as an eye in dorsal view; parafacial narrower, in profile at its narrowest point 0.35–0.62 times as wide as an eye in horizontal view; postabdomen compact, 1.3 times longer than wide in caudal view, fused portion of syncercus convex in lateral view, paramere slightly shorter than basiphallus. Female: Frons at its narrow- Preprintest point 0.95–1.25 times as wideVERSION!! as an eye in dorsal view. Medial (inner) vertical setae about 0.60–0.85 of eye height...... D. fuscata occidentalis ssp. nov. ZIEGLER

Acknowledgements Our grateful thanks are offered to all the colleagues who allowed us access to their collections or provided parts of their collections on loan: Dr A. V. BARKALOV (Novosibirsk, Russia), Dr Yngve BRODIN (Stockholm, Sweden), Dr Christophe DAUGERON (Paris, France), Dr Frank MENZEL (Müncheberg, Germany), Dr Andrey L. OZEROV (Moscow, Russia), Dr Hiroshi SHIMA (Fukuoka, Japan), Dr Hans-Peter TSCHORSNIG (Stuttgart, Germany), Nigel WYATT (Lon- don, United Kingdom) and Theo ZEEGERS (Soest, The Netherlands). Christer BERGSTRÖM (Uppsala, Sweden) kindly translated the text of the original description of Musca carinifrons. We are also grateful to Dr. Hans-Peter TSCHORSNIG and Theo ZEEGERS for their valuable comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript, and to Dr Adrian C. PONT (Oxford, United Kingdom) for linguistic assistance with the English text. In addition, the first author thanks his wife ©Christiane LANGE (Bernau, Germany) for her participation in the fieldwork over many years. Riassunto. PLATZHALTER: Alongside Dinera carinifrons (FALLÉN, 1817), the occurrence of a sec- ond species in Europe of the Dinera carinifrons species complex has been established. This is the East Palaearctic Dinera fuscata ZHANG & SHIMA, 2006 which occurs as a distinct West Palaearctic subspecies and which is described here as Dinera fuscata occidentalis ssp. nov. ZIEGLER. In order to safeguard the nomenclatural status of the taxa in the Dinera carinifrons species complex, lectotypes are designated for Myocera anthophila ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830, Myocera grisescens ROBINEAU- DESVOIDY, 1830, and Amyclaea serva ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1863. As a consequence, these names all fall as synonyms of Dinera carinifrons (FALLÉN, 1817). A detailed redescription is given of Musca carinifrons FALLÉN, 1817. An identification key for the European species of the genus Dinera, as well as a correction and emendment to the identification key for the Palaearctic and Oriental species of the genus Dinera by ZHANG & SHIMA (2006), are given. Collecting data of all the material exam- ined are listed, and the trans-Palaearctic distribution of Dinera carinifrons as well as the disjunct- Palaearctic distribution of Dinera fuscata are illustrated. Characters of the puparium of Dinera car- inifrons are described for the first time. These data are completed with notes on the biology and with information on the host species Agrilinus ater (DE GEER, 1774) and Agrilinus fimetarius (LINNAEUS, 1758) (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae).

Zusammenfassung. Neben Dinera carinifrons (FALLÉN, 1817) wurde das Vorkommen einer zweiten Art der Dinera carinifrons Artengruppe in Europa festgestellt. Es handelt sich um die aus der Ost- paläarktis bekannte Dinera fuscata ZHANG & SHIMA, 2006, die hier mit einer westpaläarktischen Unterart vorkommt, und unter dem Namen Dinera fuscata occidentalis ssp. nov. ZIEGLER beschrie- ben wird. Zur Absicherung des nomenklatorischen Status der Taxa der Dinera carinifrons Artengru- ppe werden Lectotypen für Myocera anthophila ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830; Myocera grisescens ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830 und Amyclaea serva ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1863 festgelegt. Dadurch wer- den diese Namen zu Synonymen von Dinera carinifrons (FALLÉN, 1817). Von Musca carinifrons FALLÉN, 1817 wird eine ausführliche neue Beschreibung gegeben. Eine Bestimmungstabelle für die It iseuropäischen NOT Arten der Gattungallowed Dinera sowie eine toKorrektur distribute und Ergänzung zum Bestimmungss- this chlüssel der paläarktischen und orientalischen Arten der Gattung Dinera von ZHANG & SHIMA (2006) werden vorgelegt. Das gesamte untersuchte Material wird mit den Funddaten aufgelistet und die transpaläarktische Verbreitung von Dinera carinifrons sowie die disjunct-paläarktische Verbreitung papervon Dinera in fuscata the werden dargestellt.www Das Puparium without von Dinera carinifrons permis- wird erstmals bes- chrieben. Bemerkungen zur Biologie und die Mitteilung der Wirtsarten Agrilinus ater (DE GEER, sion1774) andof Agrilinus the fimetarius publishing (LINNAEUS, 1758) (Coleoptera houseScarabaeidae) ergänzen ! die Angaben. 32 ZIEGLER et al.: Tachinidae. Part 2

Literature ARNETT, R. H., SAMUELSON, G. A. & NISHIDA, G. M. (1993): The insect and spider collections of the world. 2nd edition. – Gainesville. For a digital version with additions and corrections by EVENHUIS, N. L. see http:// hbs.bishopmuseum.org/codens/codens-r-us.html. EVENHUIS, N. L.; O’HARA, J. E.; PAPE, T. & PONT A.C. (2010): Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera genus-Group Names. Part I: André Jean-Baptiste Robineau-Desvoidy. – Zootaxa 2373: 1–265. FALLÉN, C. F. (1817): Beskrifning öfver de i Sverige funna fluge arter, som kunna föras till slägtet Musca. Första afdelningen. – Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, 3 (1816): 226–254. HERTING, B. (1960): Biologie der westpaläarktischen Raupenfliegen (Dipt., Tachinidae). – Monografien zur ange- wandte Entomologie 16: 166 pp. PreprintHERTING, B. (1974): Revision der von ROBINEAU VERSION!!-DESVOIDY beschriebenen europäischen Tachiniden und Rhinophori- den (Diptera). – Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie A (Biologie) 264: 46 pp. HERTING, B. & DELY-DRASKOVITS, Á. (1993): Family Tachinidae. In: SOÓS Á. & PAPP, L. (eds). Catalogue of Palaearc- tic Diptera. 13: 118–458. – Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest. HYÖNTEISTIETOKANTA (2012): Entomological database Hyönteistietokanta. –http://hyonteiset.luomus.fi/insects/main/ EntDatabase.html [Download 17.12.2012]. ICZN [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999): International Code of Zoological Nomen- clature. Fourth edition adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences, 306 pp. – International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London. KOLOMYETZ, N. G. (1974): Materialy po faune i biologii Deksiy (Diptera, Tachinidae) Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka. – Fauna i ekologia nasekomykh Sibiri 1974: 132–153. LATTIN, G. DE (1967): Grundriss der Zoogeographie. 602 pp. – Stuttgart. LUTOVINOVAS, E.; MALENOVSKY, I; TÓTHOVÁ, A.; ZIEGLER, J. & VAÒHARA, J. (2013): Taxonomic approach to the tachi- nid flies Dinera carinifrons (Fallén) (Diptera: Tachinidae) and Dinera fuscata using molecular and mor- © phometric data. – Journal of Insect Science 13 (139): 1–18, Wisconsin. Available online: http:// www.insectscience.org/13.139. MERZ, B. & HAENNI, J.-P. (2000): Morphology and terminology of adult Diptera (other than terminalia). In: PAPP, L. & DARVAS, B. (eds). Contribution to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera. Vol. 1, General and Applied Dipterol- ogy, 21–51. – Science Herald, Budapest. PELHAM-CLINTON, E. C. (1959): The host of Billaea carinifrons (Fallén) (Dipt. Tachinidae) – Entomologist´s Month- ly Magazine 95: 87. RICHTER, V. A. (1976): The tachinids (Diptera, Tachinidae) of the Mongolian People’s Republic. – Nasekomye Mon- golii 4: 529–595 [in Russian]. RICHTER, V. A. (1986): On the fauna of tachinids (Diptera, Tachinidae) of the Far East. – Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR 146: 87–116 [in Russian]. ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, J. B. (1830): Essai sur les myodaires. Mémoires présentés par divers savans à l’Académie Royale des Sciences de l’Institut de France, 2 (2): 813 pp. ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, J. B. (1863): Histoire naturelle des diptères des environs de Paris. Oeuvre posthume du Dr Robineau-Desvoidy. Publiée par les soins de sa famille, sous la direction de M. H. Monceaux. 2 vols, 1143 & 920 pp. – Paris. STUCKENBERG, B. R. (1999): Antennal evolution in the Brachycera (Diptera) with a reassessment of terminology relating to the flagellum. – Studia dipterologica 6: 33–48. TSCHORSNIG, H.-P. & HERTING, B. (1994): Die Raupenfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae) Mitteleuropas: Bestimmungsta- bellen und Angaben zur Verbreitung und Ökologie der einzelnen Arten. – Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie A, (Biologie) 506: 1–170. TSCHORSNIG, H.-P. & RICHTER, V. A. (1998): Family Tachinidae. In: PAPP, L. & DARVAS, B. (eds). Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera (with special reference to flies of economic importance). Higher Brachycera, Volume 3: 691–827. – Science Herald, Budapest. TSCHORSNIG, H.-P.; ZIEGLER, J. & HERTING, B. (2003): Tachinid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae) from the Hautes-Alpes, France. – Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie A (Biologie) 656: 1–62; Stuttgart. ZEEGERS, T. (2012): Notes on the Tachinidae of Armenia. – The Tachinid Times 25: 7-11. ZHANG, C.-t. & FU, C. (2012): Three new species of Dinera ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY from China (Diptera: Tachinidae). – Zootaxa 3275: 20–28. ItZHANG is, C.-t. NOT& SHIMA, H. (2006): Aallowed systematic study of the genus to Dinera RdistributeOBINEAU-DESVOIDY from the Palaearctic this and Oriental Regions (Diptera: Tachinidae). – Zootaxa 1243: 1–60. ZIEGLER, J. (1984): Raupenfliegen aus der Umgebung von Dessau (Dipt., Tachinidae). – Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, Neue Folge 31: 41–68. ZpaperIEGLER, J. (1987): Faunistische in the Notizen zu wwwRaupenfliegen (Dipt., without Tachinidae), 5. Leinatal im permis-Thüringer Wald. – Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte 30: 121–123 (Jahrgang 1986). ZIEGLER, J. (1992): Bemerkenswerte Raupenfliegen (Diptera, Tachinidae) aus dem Tríbeč-Gebirge. – Rosalia 8: 215–222. sion of the publishing house ! Diptera Stelviana • Studia dipterologica. Supplement 21 (2014): XX-XX 33

ZIEGLER, J. (1993): Raupenfliegen aus der Umgebung von Magdeburg (Diptera, Tachinidae). – Beiträge zur Ento- mologie 43: 393–415. ZIEGLER, J. (1998): Die Morphologie der Puparien und der larvalen Cephalopharyngealskelette der Raupenfliegen (Diptera, Tachinidae) und ihre phylogenetische Bewertung. – Studia dipterologica Supplement 3: 244 pp. ZIEGLER, J. (2000): Tachinidae. In: ZIEGLER, J. & MENZEL, F. (Hrsg.): Die historische Dipteren-Sammlung CARL FRIEDRICH KETEL. Revision einer zwischen 1884 und 1903 angelegten Sammlung von Zweiflüglern (Dip- tera) aus Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. – Nova Supplementa Entomologica 14: 201–229. ZIEGLER, J. (2002): Tachinidae (Raupenfliegen). In: MENZEL, F. & ZIEGLER, J. (Hrsg.): Neue Funde von Zweiflüglern (Diptera) aus dem Nationalpark Hohe Tauern in Österreich nebst Angaben zum Blütenbesuch und der Be- schreibung von zwei neuen Trauermückenarten (Sciaridae). – Studia dipterologica 8 (2): 399–403. PreprintZIEGLER, J. (2003): Ordnung Diptera, Zweiflügler VERSION!! (Fliegen und Mücken). In: DATHE, H. H. (ed). Lehrbuch der Spe- ziellen Zoologie. Begründet von Alfred KAESTNER. 2. Auflage. Band I: Wirbellose Tiere, 5. Teil: Insecta, 756–860. – Spektrum Akademischer Verlag; Heidelberg, Berlin. ZIEGLER, J. (2008): General Part. In: ZIEGLER, J. (2008) (ed.): Diptera Stelviana. A dipterological perspective on a changing alpine landscape. Results from a survey of the biodiversity of Diptera (Insecta) in the Stilfserjoch National Park (Italy). Volume 1 – Studia dipterologica Supplement 16: 1–64, 360–395; Halle (Saale), Ampyx-Verlag. ZIEGLER, J. (2012): Rezente Arealerweiterungen bei Wanzenfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae, Phasiinae) in Nordostdeut- schland und eine Übersicht zur Gesamtverbreitung von fünf Arten. – Studia dipterologica 18 (1/2): 29–54. ZIEGLER, J. (2014): Tachinidae. Part 3: Results from Malaise traps. In: ZIEGLER, J. (2013) (ed.): Diptera Stelviana. A dipterological perspective on a changing alpine landscape. Results from a survey of the biodiversity of Diptera (Insecta) in the Stilfserjoch National Park (Italy). Volume 2 – Studia dipterologica Supplement 21: 360–395. ZIEGLER, J. & LANGE, C. (2001): Asselfliegen, Fleischfliegen und Raupenfliegen (Diptera: Rhinophoridae, Sarcopha- gidae, Tachinidae) aus Südtirol (Italien). – Gredleriana 1: 133–170. ©ZIEGLER, J. & LANGE, C. (2007): Raupenfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae) aus dem Nationalpark Stilfserjoch (Nordital- ien): Teil 2. – Forest Observer 2/3 (2006): 169–204. ZIEGLER, J. & TSCHORSNIG, H.-P. (2014): Tachinidae. Part 4: A overview. In: ZIEGLER, J. (2013) (ed.): Diptera Stelvi- ana. A dipterological perspective on a changing alpine landscape. Results from a survey of the biodiversity of Diptera (Insecta) in the Stilfserjoch National Park (Italy). Volume 2 – Studia dipterologica Supplement 21: 360–395.

Authors’ addresses Dr Joachim ZIEGLER Museum für Naturkunde Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Invalidenstrasse 43 D-10115 Berlin Germany E-mail: [email protected] Erikas Lutovinovas Lithuanian Entomological Society Akademijos 2 LT-08412 Vilnius Lithuania E-mail: [email protected]

It Dris Chun-tian NOT ZHANG allowed to distribute this Institute of Entomology Shenyang Normal University paperShenyang 110034in the www without permis- China sionE-mail: [email protected] the publishing house !