Water Governance Unie Van Waterschappen Water Governance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water Governance Unie Van Waterschappen Water Governance Unie van Waterschappen Koningskade 40 2596 AA The Hague PO Box 93218 2509 AE The Hague Telephone: +3170 351 97 51 E-mail: [email protected] www.uvw.nl Water governance Unie van Waterschappen Water governance The Dutch waterschap model Colofon Edition © Unie van Waterschappen, 2008 P.O. Box 93128 2509 AE The Hague The Netherlands Internet: www.uvw.nl E-mail: [email protected] Authors Herman Havekes Fon Koemans Rafaël Lazaroms Rob Uijterlinde Printing Opmeer drukkerij bv Edition 500 copies ISBN 9789069041230 Water governance Water 2 Preface Society makes demands on the administrative organisation. And rightly, too. Authorities, from municipal to European level, are endeavouring to respond. The oldest level of government in the Netherlands, that of the waterschappen, is also moving with the times in providing customised service for today’s society. This sets requirements on the tasks and the way in which they are carried out. But above all, it sets requirements on the way in which society is involved in water governance. We have produced this booklet for the interested outsider and for those who are roughly familiar with water management. It provides an understanding of what waterschappen are and do, but primarily how waterschappen work as government institutions. Special attention is paid to organisation, management and financing. These aspects are frequently raised in contacts with foreign representatives. The way we arrange matters in the Netherlands commands respect all over the world. The waterschap model is an inspiring example for the administrative organisations of other countries whose aims are also to keep people safe from flooding and manage water resources. This is apparent from the growing desire for collaboration in and outside Europe, from Indonesia to the United States and from Germany to South Africa. The booklet ‘Water governance - the Dutch waterschap model’ was drawn up for foreign colleagues in 2004. It then appeared that there was a demand for something similar in the Netherlands, too. The first two editions of Water besturen - het Nederlands Waterschapsmodel were published for this reason. We are now a few years further on. The merging of waterschappen has continued and legislation has been amended. The new Waterschappen Act has consequences for the elections and the composition of the assemblies. These developments, amongst others, have been incorporated in this third, revised edition of ‘Water Governance’. I hope that you will find the booklet interesting and informative. dr. S. Schaap Chairman of the Unie van Waterschappen 3 Table of contents 1 Preface 7 1.1 Decentralised water management, a global theme 8 1.1 The Dutch waterschap model 9 2 Waterschappen and their legal basis 13 2.1 Water governance 14 2.2 The position of the waterschappen 15 2.3 The Waterschappen Act 19 2.4 The administrative organisation of water management 20 2.5 The integration of water legislation 22 2.6 Fine-tuning and coordination 23 2.7 Participation, legal protection and supervision 24 3 Democratic legitimacy 27 3.1 The Dutch polder model 28 3.2 The composition of boards 28 3.3 Elections 32 3.4 Future developments 34 4 Financial independence as a result of their own tax system 37 4.1 Financing Dutch water management 38 4.2 Financing of regional water management by the waterschappen 40 4.3 The waterschap charges 44 4.4 The water pollution levy 47 4.5 Future developments 49 Water governance Water 4 5 A dedicated financial institution: The Nederlandse Waterschapsbank N.V. (NWB) 51 5.1 Combining strengths 52 5.2 Brief history of the Dutch situation 52 5.3 The concept of a bank 53 5.4 Form 55 5.5 Key NWB figures 57 5.6 Socially responsible business practices 58 6 The Unie van Waterschappen 59 7 Final conclusions 63 Literature 69 5 Water governance Water 6 1 Preface 1.1 Decentralised water management, a global theme Water management face enormous challenges in the 21st century. Climate changes, a rapidly increasing population and economic developments are placing a great deal of pressure on the water system. This applies in particular to the flat, low-lying areas of the world such as deltas, coastal and river plains where the population growth is concentrated. The government has a duty of care regarding the management of natural water systems and the safety of residents from flooding. In the Netherlands these tasks are, to a large extent, allocated to waterschappen, regional water authorities. The 26 waterschappen form the fourth government institution in the Netherlands, along with the central government, provinces and municipalities. The waterschappen, regional water authorities, are the least known governmental bodies in our urbanised country. The average citizen knows little of the work carried out for him or her by the waterschappen. He or she does, however, notice the waterschap’s tax assessment. While, in fact, the waterschap model is much admired in the international circuit as a system that is well tailored to suit its duties, is financially self-supporting and, given its history, can be deemed sustainable (waterschappen have been in existence for about 800 years). The Dutch waterschappen are not unique, and there are similar organisations in and outside Europe. The organisation and financing of decentralised water management are, however, recurrent themes in international contacts. The sophisticated waterschap system commands particular respect as regards these aspects. More than fifty percent of the Netherlands would be under water if the water management was not up to standard, so clean water and dry feet are great achievements in this country. And, indeed, if the waterschappen failed to do their work for even a single day, the lower-lying areas of the Netherlands would immediately be in trouble. At international meetings, such as the World Water Forum, the Netherlands actively contributes its experiences with the management of its regional water system, not as blueprint, but as food for thought. It may be possible to use some of the ingredients in other situations. And every little helps in the painstaking management of the global water system. After all, the second UN World Water Development Report (2006) describes the world water crisis in this century primarily as a water management crisis. Things are not standing still in the Netherlands, Dutch efforts being focused on anticipating climate change and the correct implementation of European policy, such as the Water Framework Directive. Waterschappen Water governance Water have a crucial role in this, along with their duties in the fields of safety from flooding, the management of 8 water quality and quantity, and the treatment of urban wastewater. In 2008 there will be the requisite changes as a result of the introduction of the new Waterschappen Act. These changes include a different composition and method of electing the governing bodies of waterschappen. This booklet tells the reader all about the Dutch waterschap system. It gives insight into the organisation and management of the waterschappen in the light of the current and future composition of the governing bodies. After a concise outline of the decentralised water management in the Netherlands in section 1.2, the institution of the waterschap is discussed in detail. Chapter 2 explores the legal basis of the waterschappen. Chapter 3 is devoted to their democratic legitimacy: the relationship with sections of society, such as the residents and interest groups, which deviates from general democracy. ‘Interest-pay-say’ continues to be the creed of the waterschap governing bodies. Chapter 4 explains the financing system, which involves an exceptional phenomenon: the Nederlandse Waterschapsbank N.V. (NWB), a bank established by waterschappen that provides access (though it is not the only possibility) to the capital market. The NWB is described in Chapter 5. Chapter 6 throws light on the Dutch Unie van Waterschappen, as national and international representative. Lastly, Chapter 7 contains some final conclusions. 1.2 The Dutch waterschap model A large part of our country is kept dry (or wet) by artificial means. In the past areas that were originally peat and marsh were brought under cultivation. The land was adapted to suit habitation, agriculture, industry and recreation. This was accompanied by an extensive infrastructure that included not only roads and railways, but primarily investments in water management. The Dutch seem to take for granted the efforts required to keep the land dry, to produce water of a high quality and to harmonise water management with social functions in our densely-populated country. The Dutch feel safe, protected as they are by dunes, dams and dikes. However, without the continuous operation and maintenance of the many dikes, locks, pumping stations, flood barriers, canals and ditches, the safety of more than nine million Dutch would be jeopardised. And this is precisely what the waterschappen do. 9 Waterschap figures, 2007. Number of all in-waterschappen 26 Number of employees approx. 11.000 Length of primary dikes managed approx. 3.450 km Length of water courses managed approx. 55.000 km Length of roads managed approx. 7.000 km Number of treatment plants approx. 390 Number of pollution units treated approx. 23 million Waterschappen are government institutions, with tasks in the fields of policy development, granting permits and monitoring and treating urban wastewater. They are also active in the field of environmental development. Interests in the field of spatial planning and the environment
Recommended publications
  • Presentatie Bor Waal Merwede
    Bouwsteen Beeld op de Rivieren 24 november 2020 – Bouwdag Rijn 1 Ontwikkelperspectief Waal Merwede 24 november 2020 – Bouwdag Rijn 1 Ontwikkelperspectief Waal Merwede Trajecten Waal Merwede • Midden-Waal (Nijmegen - Tiel) • Beneden-Waal (Tiel - Woudrichem) • Boven-Merwede (Woudrichem – Werkendam) Wat bespreken we? • Oogst gezamenlijke werksessies • Richtinggevend perspectief gebruiksfuncties rivierengebied • Lange termijn (2050 en verder) • Strategische keuzen Hoe lees je de kaart? • Bekijk de kaart via de GIS viewer • Toekomstige gebruiksfuncties zijn met kleur aangegeven • Kansen en opgaven met * aangeduid, verbindingen met een pijl • Keuzes en dilemma’s weergegeven met icoontje Synthese Rijn Waterbeschikbaarheid • Belangrijkste strategische keuze: waterverdeling splitsingspunt. • Meer water via IJssel naar IJsselmeer in tijden van hoogwater (aanvullen buffer IJsselmeer) • Verplaatsen innamepunten Lek voor zoetwater wenselijk i.v.m. verzilting • Afbouwen drainage in buitendijkse gebieden i.v.m. langer vasthouden van water. Creëren van waterbuffers in bovenstroomse deel van het Nederlandse Rijnsysteem. (balans • droge/natte periodes). Natuur • Noodzakelijk om robuuste natuureenheden te realiseren • Splitsingspunt is belangrijke ecologische knooppunt. • Uiterwaarden Waal geschikt voor dynamische grootschalige natuur. Landbouw • Nederrijn + IJssel: mengvorm van landbouw en natuur mogelijk. Waterveiligheid • Tot 2050 zijn dijkversterkingen afdoende -> daarna meer richten op rivierverruiming. Meer water via IJssel betekent vergroten waterveiligheidsopgave
    [Show full text]
  • Gebiedsdossier Waterwinning Leidsche Rijn
    Naarden Huizerhoogt! Amstelveen Aalsmeer Abcoude Nigtevecht! Bussum ! Hilversumse! Crailo Blaricum Meent TITEL Eempolder ! 0 2,5 km Nederhorst! Ankeveen den Berg DOMEIN LEEFOMGEVING, TEAM GIS | ONDERGROND: 2020, KADASTER | 06-1 1 -20 | 1 234501 | A0 Nes ! aan de Amstel Putten Grondwaterbescherming Eemnes Laren Eemdijk! Boringsvrije zone 100-jaarsaandachtsgebied Baambrugge! Uithoorn Waterwingebied 's-Graveland! Bunschoten-Spakenburg Grondwaterbeschermingsgebied ! Kortenhoef WaterwingebiedKrachtighuizen (bijz. regels) Amstelhoek! ! Loenersloot! Vreeland ! Waverveen! Kerklaan! Hilversum Huinen Nijkerk Baarn Loenen! aan de Vecht Vinkeveen Oud-Loosdrecht! Mijdrecht De Hoef! ! Nieuw-Loosdrecht Holkerveen Wilnis Nieuwersluis! Nijkerkerveen! Nieuwer! Ter Aa Boomhoek! Hoogland Muyeveld! Voorthuizen ! Breukelen Scheendijk Lage Vuursche! Zwartebroek! Breukeleveen! Hollandsche! Rading Hoevelaken ! Tienhoven Soest ! ! Amersfoort Terschuur Noorden GEBIEDSDOSSIER Amersfoort-Koedijkerweg ! Portengensebrug Bethunepolder Oud-Maarsseveen! Maartensdijk! ! WATERWINNING Woerdense Verlaat Stoutenburg! LEIDSCHE RIJN Westbroek! Kockengen! ! Maarsseveen! Molenpolder Soestduinen Amersfoort-Berg ! Den Dolder Barneveld ! Maarssen Achterveld Leusden Groenekan Bilthoven Oud Zuilen! Kanis! ! Haarzuilens Groenekan! ! Beukbergen De Glind! ! Huis! ter Soesterberg Leusden-Zuid Heide ! Kamerik! Sterrenberg Zegveld! Beerschoten De Bilt Leidsche Rijn Vleuten Zeist Woerden Zeist Harmelen Utrecht De Meern Lunteren Woudenberg Scherpenzeel ! Nieuwerbrug! Austerlitz aan den Rijn
    [Show full text]
  • Sportvisserijgebruik ARK, Ijssel En Ijsselmeer
    Rapportage Sportvisserijgebruik Overijsselse Vecht Resultaten sportvisserijonderzoek 2013 Statuspagina Titel Sportvisserijgebruik Overijsselse Vecht; resultaten sportvisserijonderzoek 2013 Samenstelling Sportvisserij Nederland Postbus 162 3720 AD Bilthoven www.sportvisserijnederland.nl Auteur Roland van Aalderen en Remko Verspui E-mail [email protected] Aantal pagina’s 62 Trefwoorden Overijsselse Vecht, sportvisserij, roving survey, aerial survey, creel census, sportvissers enquête, benutting Versie Definitief Projectnummer AV2011-04,05,06 Datum juli 2014 Bibliografische referentie: Aalderen, R.A.A. van, 2013. Sportvisserijgebruik Overijsselse Vecht. Sportvisserij Nederland, Bilthoven. © Sportvisserij Nederland (Bilthoven) Niets uit dit rapport mag worden vermenigvuldigd door middel van druk, fotokopie, microfilm of op welke andere wijze dan ook zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de copyright- houder. Samenvatting In de maanden juni tot en met september 2013 heeft er een onderzoek plaatsgevonden naar het sportvisserijgebruik van de Overijsselse Vecht. De Vecht ontspringt in Duitsland en heeft een lengte van 167 kilometer, waarvan 60 kilometer in Nederland. In Nederland stroomt de rivier langs Hardenberg, Ommen, Dalfsen en Zwolle. Het is een populair viswater voor recreanten, maar er worden ook veel viswedstrijden gevist. Het onderzoek had de opzet van een zogenaamde ‘roving survey’. In de onderzoeksperiode is negen maal over het gebied gevlogen waarbij sportvissers zijn geteld en op een topografische kaart geregistreerd. Daarnaast zijn door vrijwilligers op negen momenten interviews afgenomen bij sportvissers langs de waterkant en zijn vangstlogboeken uitgedeeld. In totaal zijn er 258 sportvissers waargenomen vanuit de lucht en zijn 38 sportvissers geïnterviewd. Dit aantal is te laag om een betrouwbare typering van het sportvisserijgebruik van de Overijsselse Vecht te geven. Met behulp van landelijke data over het gedrag van sportvissers zijn de tellingen geëxtrapoleerd naar een totaal jaarbezoek.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Mortality of Invasive Zebra and Quagga Mussels by Desiccation During Severe Winter Conditions
    Aquatic Invasions (2014) Volume 9, Issue 3: 243–252 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2014.9.3.02 Open Access © 2014 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2014 REABIC Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species (April 21–25, 2013, Niagara Falls, Canada) Research Article Mass mortality of invasive zebra and quagga mussels by desiccation during severe winter conditions Rob S.E.W. Leuven1*, Frank P.L. Collas1, K. Remon Koopman1, Jon Matthews1 and Gerard van der Velde2,3 1Radboud University Nijmegen, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Department of Environmental Science, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands 2Radboud University Nijmegen, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands 3Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] (RSEWL), [email protected] (FPLC), [email protected] (KRK), [email protected] (JM), [email protected] (GvdV) *Corresponding author Received: 28 February 2014 / Accepted: 21 July 2014 / Published online: 2 August 2014 Handling editor: Vadim Panov Abstract Within impounded sections of the rivers Rhine and Meuse, epibenthic macroinvertebrate communities are impoverished and dominated by non-native invasive species such as the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) and quagga mussel (Dreissena rostriformis bugensis). In the winter of 2012 management of the water-level resulted in a low-water event in the River Nederrijn, but not in the River Meuse. Low-water levels persisted for five days with average daily air temperatures ranging from -3.6 to -7.2˚C.
    [Show full text]
  • New Canalization of the Nederrijn and Lek Main
    NEW CANALIZATION OF THE NEDERRIJN AND LEK MAIN REPORT Design of a weir equipped with fibre reinforced polymer gates which is designed using a structured design methodology based on Systems Engineering 25 January 2013 : Henry Tuin New canalization of the Nederrijn and Lek Main report Colophon Title: New canalization of the Nederrijn and Lek – Design of a weir with fibre reinforced polymer gates which is made using a structured design methodology based on Systems Engineering Reference: Tuin H. G., 2013. New canalization of the Nederrijn and Lek – Design of a weir with fibre reinforced polymer gates which is designed using a structured design methodology based on Systems Engineering (Master Thesis), Delft: Technical University of Delft. Key words: Hydraulic structures, weir design, dam regime design, Systems Engineering, canalization of rivers, fibre reinforced polymer hydraulic gates, Nederrijn, Lek, corridor approach, river engineering. Author: Name: ing. H.G. Tuin Study number: 1354493 Address: Meulmansweg 25-C 3441 AT Woerden Mobile phone number: +31 (0) 641 177 158 E-mail address: [email protected] Study: Civil Engineering; Technical University of Delft Graduation field: Hydraulic Structures Study: Technical University of Delft Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Section of Hydraulic Engineering Specialisation Hydraulic Structures CIE 5060-09 Master Thesis Graduation committee: Prof. drs. ir. J.K. Vrijling TU Delft, Hydraulic Engineering, chairman Dr. ir. H.G. Voortman ARCADIS, Principal Consultant Water Division, daily supervisor Ir. A. van der Toorn TU Delft, Hydraulic Engineering, daily supervisor Dr. M.H. Kolstein TU Delft, Structural Engineering, supervisor for fibre reinforced polymers : ARCADIS & TUDelft i New canalization of the Nederrijn and Lek Main report Preface & acknowledgements This thesis is the result of the master Hydraulic Engineering specialization Hydraulic Structures of the faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences of the Delft University of Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Robust Monitoring ƒ 2009.02.02.1 Visualisation of Levee Quality Based on Sensor Data
    Robust monitoring 2009.02.02.1 Visualisation of levee quality based on sensor data Version number 1 Date December 23, 2009 Status Final Owners Deltares, TNO, IBM Confidential Not confidential 2009.02.02.1 - Visualization of levee quality based on sensor data Table of contents Document Management ............................................................................................ 3 Management summary .............................................................................................. 4 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Approach ................................................................................................... 5 2 Vision on smart levees ...................................................................................... 8 2.1 Introduction of the driving forces and trends............................................... 8 2.2 Vision on a Flood Control System .............................................................. 9 2.3 Timelines in sensor data .......................................................................... 11 2.4 Perspectives of a Flood Control System .................................................. 12 2.5 Robustness .............................................................................................. 15 3 Understanding the Dutch water safety management situation ......................... 22 3.1 Water safety management chain .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Infographic Over Het Operationeel Watermanagement Op De Nederrijn En Lek
    Infographic over het Operationeel Watermanagement op de Nederrijn en Lek Inleiding Deze infographic omvat een kaart van de Nederrijn, de Lek en enkele omliggende wateren. Daarin zijn feiten over het operationeel watermanagement opgenomen op de betreffende locatie. Dit zijn schutsluizen, inlaten, spuisluizen, gemalen, keersluizen, stormvloedkeringen en vismigratievoorzieningen. Ook zijn de meetlocaties en de streefpeilen weergegeven. Daarnaast is een uitgebreide toelichting gegeven over het operationeel waterbeheer op de Nederrijn en de Lek. Het Watersysteem De Nederrijn en de Lek zijn samen één van de drie Rijntakken. Ze zijn van stuwen voorzien om zo de waterverdeling tussen Nederrijn-Lek en de IJssel te kunnen beïnvloeden, en de waterstanden op eerstgenoemde riviertak te reguleren. Door het stuwbeheer wordt gezorgd voor voldoende zoetwateraanvoer naar het IJsselmeer en naar de omliggende gebieden, de chloride terugdringing in het benedenrivierengebied en voldoende waterdiepte voor de scheepvaart. Bovenstrooms Driel De Duitse Rijn komt bij Lobith binnen en gaat over in de Nederlandse Boven- Rijn. In Lobith wordt de waterafvoer en waterstand gemeten welke belangrijk is voor het hanteren van het stuwplan. Tussen Tolkamer en Millingen is het Bijlandsch Kanaal aangelegd. Deze gaat bij de Pannerdensche kop, over in de Waal en het Pannerdensch Kanaal. Bij normale en hoge afvoeren stroomt ongeveer twee derde van het water naar de Waal en één derde naar het Pannerdensch Kanaal. Het Pannerdensch Kanaal gaat over in de Nederrijn, en bij de IJsselkop splitst de IJssel zich van de Nederrijn af. De verdeling van het water bij de IJsselkop is afhankelijk van de stand van de stuw in Driel. Van Driel tot aan Hagestein In de Nederrijn en de Lek liggen 3 stuwen die volgens een stuwplan bediend worden.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Impacts on Surface Water Quality and Nutrient Loads in 2 Lowland Polder Catchments: Monitoring the Greater Amsterdam Area
    1 Groundwater impacts on surface water quality and nutrient loads in 2 lowland polder catchments: monitoring the greater Amsterdam area 3 Liang Yu1, 2, Joachim Rozemeijer3, Boris M. van Breukelen4, Maarten Ouboter2, Corné van der Vlugt2, 4 Hans Peter Broers5 5 1Faculty of Science, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1181HV, The Netherlands 6 2 Waternet Water Authority, Amsterdam, 1096 AC, The Netherlands 7 3Deltares, Utrecht, 3508 TC, The Netherlands 8 4Department of Water Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 9 Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands 10 5TNO Geological Survey of The Netherlands, Utrecht, 3584 CB, The Netherlands 11 Correspondence to: Hans Peter Broers ([email protected]) 12 Abstract. The Amsterdam area, a highly manipulated delta area formed by polders and reclaimed lakes, struggles with high 13 nutrient levels in its surface water system. The polders receive spatially and temporally variable amounts of water and 14 nutrients via surface runoff, groundwater seepage, sewer leakage, and via water inlet from upstream polders. Diffuse 15 anthropogenic sources, such as manure and fertilizer use and atmospheric deposition, add to the water quality problems in 16 the polders. The major nutrient sources and pathways have not yet been clarified due to the complex hydrological system in 17 such lowland catchments with both urban and agricultural areas. In this study, the spatial variability of the groundwater 18 seepage impact was identified by exploiting the dense groundwater and surface water monitoring networks in Amsterdam 19 and its surrounding polders. Twenty-five variables (concentrations of Total-N, Total-P, NH4, NO3, HCO3, SO4, Ca, and Cl in 20 surface water and groundwater, N and P agricultural inputs, seepage rate, elevation, land-use, and soil type) for 144 polders 21 were analysed statistically and interpreted in relation to sources, transport mechanisms, and pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Market Garden WWII
    Operation Market Garden WWII Operation Market Garden (17–25 September 1944) was an Allied military operation, fought in the Netherlands and Germany in the Second World War. It was the largest airborne operation up to that time. The operation plan's strategic context required the seizure of bridges across the Maas (Meuse River) and two arms of the Rhine (the Waal and the Lower Rhine) as well as several smaller canals and tributaries. Crossing the Lower Rhine would allow the Allies to outflank the Siegfried Line and encircle the Ruhr, Germany's industrial heartland. It made large-scale use of airborne forces, whose tactical objectives were to secure a series of bridges over the main rivers of the German- occupied Netherlands and allow a rapid advance by armored units into Northern Germany. Initially, the operation was marginally successful and several bridges between Eindhoven and Nijmegen were captured. However, Gen. Horrocks XXX Corps ground force's advance was delayed by the demolition of a bridge over the Wilhelmina Canal, as well as an extremely overstretched supply line, at Son, delaying the capture of the main road bridge over the Meuse until 20 September. At Arnhem, the British 1st Airborne Division encountered far stronger resistance than anticipated. In the ensuing battle, only a small force managed to hold one end of the Arnhem road bridge and after the ground forces failed to relieve them, they were overrun on 21 September. The rest of the division, trapped in a small pocket west of the bridge, had to be evacuated on 25 September. The Allies had failed to cross the Rhine in sufficient force and the river remained a barrier to their advance until the offensives at Remagen, Oppenheim, Rees and Wesel in March 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Tussen Vecht En Eem
    TVE 1 le jrg. nr.2, mei 1993 Tussen Vecht en Eem ,3688b6ÉS8%S ll!!l!!iliiii!lllllilHl|iwawsjs». ^ÉHiiiiimiijl!1: mm S3 Nederhorst is :l den * illiiiil Berg iff# Tijdschrift van de Vereniging van Vrienden van het Gooi en dè Dit tijdschrift wil verleden, heden en toekomst van het Gooi en omstreken in al zijn facetten belichten, met als invalshoeken historisch perspectief, natuur, landschap en ruimtelijke ordening. Het wordt toegezonden aan de leden van de Vereniging van Vrienden van het Gooi en de donateurs van de Stichting Tussen Vecht en Eem. De Vereniging van Vrienden van het Gooistelt zich tot De Stichting Tussen Vecht en Eemoverkoepelt ruim 25 doel zowel in het landelijk als in het stedelijk gebiedlokale het en regionale organisaties op historisch en eigen karakter van het Gooi en omstreken zo goedaanverwant gebied. Zij bevordert en verbreidt de kennis mogelijk te bewaren en een goed natuurbeheer te op historisch gebied betreffende de streek, onder andere bevorderen. Zij streeft hierbij naar een milieubeheerin en het Goois Museum te Hilversum. Voorts ijvert zij voor een ruimtelijke ordening, die aantasting van natuur-het enbehoud van cultuurhistorische en karakteristieke cultuurwaarden tegengaan of voorkomen. Het bestuurwaarden. De Stichting organiseert jaarlijks een open dag volgt de ruimtelijke ordening op de voet, adviseertin overéén van de gemeenten in de regio. De stichting is en maakt zonodig bezwaar tegen voorgenomen plannen.opgericht in 1970, maar vormt in feite de voortzetting Er is een door de vereniging ingestelde Gooise van de in 1934 opgerichte Stichting ’Museum voor het Natuurwacht, die misbruik en ontsiering van de natuurGooi en Omstreken’, later ’Vereniging van Vrienden tegen moet gaan.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Armoured Brigades (1944-45)]
    31 March 2017 [INDEPENDENT ARMOURED BRIGADES (1944-45)] th 4 Armoured Brigade (1) Headquarters, 4th Armoured Brigade & Headquarters Squadron nd The Royal Scots Greys (2 Dragoons) (2) rd 3 County of London Yeomanry (Sharpshooters) (3) th 44 Royal Tank Regiment (4) nd 2 Bn. The King’s Royal Rifle Corps (5) th 4 Regiment, Royal Horse Artillery (6) No. 271 Forward Delivery Squadron, Royal Armoured Corps 4th Armoured Brigade Signals, Royal Corps of Signals 5th Company, Royal Army Service Corps th 14 Light Field Ambulance, Royal Army Medical Corps (7) 4th Armoured Brigade Ordnance Field Park, Royal Army Ordnance Corps 4th Armoured Brigade Workshops, Royal Electrical & Mechanical Engineers © www.BritishMilitaryH istory.co.uk Page 1 31 March 2017 [INDEPENDENT ARMOURED BRIGADES (1944-45)] NOTES: 1. At the outbreak of war, this formation was known as the Heavy Armoured Brigade, and was stationed in Egypt. It commenced under command of the Armoured Division (Egypt), which became the 7th Armoured Division, with the brigade adopting a black Jerboa as its formation sign, hence becoming known as the ‘Black Rats’. As an independent brigade, it served in Tunisia, Sicily and in Italy, before returning to the United Kingdom in January 1944. Brigadier (Temporary) John Cecil CURRIE, D.S.O.**, M.C., a highly decorated Regular Army officer in the Royal Horse Artillery, had assumed command of the brigade on 16 March 1944 (having commanded it on a previous occasion) and took it to France. The brigade landed in Normandy on 7 June 1944, under the command of I Corps. It came under the command of VIII Corps for the battle of The Oden between 25 June and 2 July and the battle for Caen between 4 and 18 July 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • Retrospective Analysis of Water Management in Amsterdam, the Netherlands
    water Article Retrospective Analysis of Water Management in Amsterdam, The Netherlands Sannah Peters 1,2, Maarten Ouboter 1, Kees van der Lugt 3, Stef Koop 2,4 and Kees van Leeuwen 2,4,* 1 Waternet (Public Water Utility of Amsterdam and Regional Water Authority Amstel, Gooi and Vecht), P.O. Box 94370, 1090 GJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (M.O.) 2 Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands; [email protected] 3 World Waternet, P.O. Box 94370, 1090 GJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] 4 KWR Water Research Institute, P.O. Box 1072, 3430 BB Nieuwegein, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The capital of The Netherlands, Amsterdam, is home to more than 800,000 people. Devel- opments in water safety, water quality, and robust water infrastructure transitioned Amsterdam into an attractive, economically healthy, and safe city that scores highly in the field of water management. However, investments need to be continued to meet future challenges. Many other cities in the world have just started their transition to become water-wise. For those cities, it is important to assess current water management and governance practices, in order to set their priorities and to gain knowledge from the experiences of more advanced cities such as Amsterdam. We investigate how Amsterdam’s water management and governance developed historically and how these lessons can be used to further improve water management in Amsterdam and other cities. This retrospective analysis starts at 1672 and applies the City Blueprint Approach as a baseline water management assessment.
    [Show full text]