First Detection of Gongylonema Species in Geotrupes Mutator in Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

First Detection of Gongylonema Species in Geotrupes Mutator in Europe JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY Article | DOI: 10.21307/jofnem-2021-050 e2021-50 | Vol. 53 First detection of Gongylonema species in Geotrupes mutator in Europe Daniel Bravo-Barriga1, Manuel Martín-Pérez1,*, Jorge M. Lobo2, Ricardo Parreira3, Abstract 1 Juan Enrique Pérez-Martín The detection of three Gongylonema sp. infective larvae in two 1 and Eva Frontera specimens of the dung beetle Geotrupes mutator (Marsham, 1Parasitology Area, Department 1802) from western Spain is reported here for the first time of Animal Health, Veterinary in Europe. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed that the Faculty, University of Extremadura, analyzed specimens belong to the genus Gongylonema, but it Cáceres, Spain. was not possible to determine the species identity by the lack of 2 morphological information in the literature and because many of the Department of Biogeography and phenotypic characteristics had not yet fully developed at this juvenile Global Change, Museo Nacional de stage. Nevertheless, a phylogenetic analysis using amplified cox1 Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid, nucleotide sequences has revealed that the studied larvae could be Spain. clearly discriminated (< 89% identity) from all the other Gongylonema 3Global Health and Tropical cox1 sequences available in public genetic databases. While our Medicine (GHTM), Instituto de results are limited by the scarcity of genetic information available Higiene e Medicina Tropical (IHMT), for this genus, the possibility that the analyzed specimens might Universidade Nova de Lisboa correspond to a new species should not be ruled out, and more (UNL), Grupo de Virologia/Unidade studies are needed. The results provided in this report indicate that de Microbiología Médica, Lisbon, G. mutator is involved in the transmission cycle of Gongylonema sp. Portugal. to vertebrates in Europe. *E-mail: mmartinly@alumnos. unex.es Keywords Beetles, Geotrupes, Gongylonema, Host-parasitic relationship, Daniel Bravo-Barriga and Manuel Molecular biology, Nematodes, Spain. Martín-Pérez contributed equally to this work. This paper was edited by Zafar Ahmad Handoo. Received for publication October 07, 2020. Under the functional name of “dung beetles”, approxi- wide variety of pathogenic bacteria and/or viruses, mately 9,500 worldwide species have been grouped as well as eukaryotic parasites favouring their into the Aphodiinae, Scarabaeinae, and Geotrupinae dispersion and transmission (Nichols et al., 2017). subfamilies of the superfamily Scarabaeoidea (Löbl This is particularly true for different platyhelminthes and Smetana, 2016). Dung beetles are considered (flatworms) and nematode (roundworms) belonging the most important agents promoting the recycling to the genera Gongylonema, Spirocerca, Ascarops, of mammal faeces in terrestrial ecosystems. They Acanthocephalus, Macracanthorynchus, or Physo­ contribute to the nitrification and aeration of the cephalus (Poinar, 1975). These parasites use dung soil, seed dispersal, and the control of fly and cattle beetles as intermediate, incidental, or paratenic parasites (Nichols et al., 2008). However, as dung hosts (Mowlavi et al., 2009; Mukaratirwa et al., 2010; beetle species are in close contact with animal and Nichols and Gómez, 2014) affecting numerous spe- human faeces, they may also act as hosts for a cies of birds, other domestic or wild mammals, as © 2021 Authors. This is an Open Access article licensed under the Creative 1 Commons CC BY 4.0 license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Gongylonema detected in G. mutator: Bravo-Barriga et al. well as humans (Kinsella et al., 2016; Mukaratirwa were dehydrated through a graded series of etha- et al., 2010; Nichols and Gómez, 2014). nol from 70 to 100%, freeze-dried with liquid CO2 Gongylonema Molin, 1857 (Spirurida: Gongylo- according to the critical point method, and mounted nematidae) is a genus that includes approximately onto stubs. Mounting of the sample on the sample 50 species, which are known parasites of birds and holder was done using double-sided carbon adhesive mammals, including humans (Cordeiro et al., 2018; tape. Mounted specimens were then sputter-coated Kinsella et al., 2016). However, due to variations with a gold layer (20 nm ± 5%) and observed with an of critical phenotypic characters, morphological FE-SEM Hitachi S-4800 (FE by Field Emission, with identification of these species is difficult and their Field Emission Electron Gun). number may have been underestimated (Setsuda Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from indivi- et al., 2018). Gongylonema infection is a neglected dual worms found in beetles using an NZY tissue gDNA zoonotic parasitic disease, reported in several kit (NZYTech) following the manufacturer’s instructions. countries, that is mainly caused by consumption of The cox1 genes were partially amplified using the contaminated water, raw food, or accidental ingestion primer set NTF and NTR following a PCR protocol of host insects (Xiaodan et al., 2018). Gongylonema previously described for the analysis of Spirurida species follow a terrestrial indirect life cycle involving (Casiraghi et al., 2001), and the product was sent for approximately 50 species of insects as intermediate sequencing to STABvida (https://www.stabvida.com/ hosts, such as dung beetles and cockroaches es). Sequences were edited in Chromas Lite 2.1.1 (Mowlavi et al., 2009; Mukaratirwa et al., 2010). How- (Technelysium Pty Ltd) and consensus sequences ever, the paucity of available observations prevents for each forward/reverse pair were created in BioEdit estimating the network of relationships between Sequence Alignment Editor (version 7.2.5, Carlsbad, these parasites and dung beetles (Nichols et al., CA. USA). Finally, the nucleotide sequences obtained 2017). In the present study, we aim to improve the (> 652 pb in length) were deposited at the DNA Data knowledge about these relationships by describing, Bank of Japan (DDBJ: accession numbers LC577505 for the first time, a Gongylonema species hosted by a and LC612845). In addition to the specimens collected European Geotrupinae species, and also comparing in the course of this study, a DNA extract prepared the genetic relationships of the specimens found with using a formerly unidentifiedGongylonema specimen, other nematode taxa by analyzing the mitochondrial obtained from Otus scops, Spain, and analyzed in a cox1 genetic sequences. previous study (Esperón et al., 2013), was provided by its authors in order to obtain its corresponding Materials and methods sequence for the cox1 barcode section (DDBJ: accession numbers LC620542). In October 2017, a sampling of beetles captured Phylogenetic analyses were carried out based on by 27 pitfall traps was carried out according to a the construction of multiple alignments of nucleo- standardized sampling procedure (Lobo et al., 1988). tide (nt) sequences either comprising a wide range The collections were carried out in three localities of of nematodes (including Cylicospirura, Dirofilaria, western Spain, in the provinces of Salamanca and Gongylonema, Mastophorus, Onchocerca, Physalo­ Zamora. Three types of excrements (pig, bovine, ptera, Setaria, Spirocerca, and Thelazia; n = 31) or canine) were used as bait or attractant at each restricted to the Gongylonema genus (n = 18). These location. The captures of each trap were collected were constructed using the iterative G-INS-I method 65−80 h after trap placements and immediately as implemented in MAFFT vs. 7 (https://mafft.cbrc. deposited in 10 × 10 × 10 cm plastic containers con- jp/alignment/server/) followed by their edition using taining soil and stored at 15°C during transport to GBlocks (http://molevol.cmima.csic.es/castresana/ the laboratory. The collected adult specimens with Gblocks_server.html). Phylogenetic trees were built infective larvae were identified using morphological using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) optimization identification keys provided by Martín-Piera and criterium and the Mega X software (Kumar et al., López-Colón (2000). The beetles were dissected 2018), and their topological stability was assessed by under a stereoscope for the detection of nematode bootstrapping with 1,000 re-samplings of the aligned larvae. In case of infection, larvae were placed in sequence data. Alternatively, a Bayesian approach 70% ethanol until molecular analyses could be was also used for phylogenetic reconstruction, taking performed, with the exception of one worm selected advantage of the BEASTv1.10.4 software (Suchard for optical (× 100−200; Nikon eclipse 80i and digital et al., 2018). For both situations, the best-fitting evolu- photomicrography system, DXM1200F) and scanning tionary model used was GTR + Γ + I. Bayesian analyses electron (SEM) microscopy. For SEM, specimens included two independent Markov chain Monte-Carlo 2 JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY (MCMC) runs carried out assuming a lognormal- externally, a circle of cephalic papillae constituted by relaxed molecular clock (as suggested by Mega X four large papillae could also be observed (Fig. 1.5). Molecular Clock test), and a constant population Two large amphids were located lateral to the mouth coalescent prior. These runs were executed until and two lateral depressions. Two lateral alae extend 1 × 108 states were sampled (10% of which were throughout the body length (Fig. 1.6). Finally, the discarded as burn-in), and the final tree sample was caudal region of the worm was adorned with a tuft of summarized as a maximum clade credibility (MCC) a dozen cuticular fingerings (Fig. 1.7). tree. Regarding molecular
Recommended publications
  • Linking Behavior, Co-Infection Patterns, and Viral Infection Risk with the Whole Gastrointestinal Helminth Community Structure in Mastomys Natalensis
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 17 August 2021 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.669058 Linking Behavior, Co-infection Patterns, and Viral Infection Risk With the Whole Gastrointestinal Helminth Community Structure in Mastomys natalensis Bram Vanden Broecke 1*, Lisse Bernaerts 1, Alexis Ribas 2, Vincent Sluydts 1, Ladslaus Mnyone 3, Erik Matthysen 1 and Herwig Leirs 1 1 Evolutionary Ecology Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, 2 Parasitology Section, Department of Biology, Healthcare and Environment, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Science, IRBio (Research Institute of Biodiversity), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 3 Pest Management Center, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania Edited by: Yadong Zheng, Infection probability, load, and community structure of helminths varies strongly between Lanzhou Institute of Veterinary and within animal populations. This can be ascribed to environmental stochasticity Research (CAAS), China or due to individual characteristics of the host such as their age or sex. Other, but Reviewed by: Mario Garrido, understudied, factors are the hosts’ behavior and co-infection patterns. In this study, we Ben-Gurion University of the used the multimammate mouse (Mastomys natalensis) as a model system to investigate Negev, Israel Si-Yang Huang, how the hosts’ sex, age, exploration behavior, and viral infection history affects their Yangzhou University, China infection risk, parasitic load, and community structure of gastrointestinal helminths. We Hannah Rose Vineer, hypothesized that the hosts’ exploration behavior would play a key role in the risk for University of Liverpool, United Kingdom infection by different gastrointestinal helminths, whereby highly explorative individuals *Correspondence: would have a higher infection risk leading to a wider diversity of helminths and a larger Bram Vanden Broecke load compared to less explorative individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography [1] Manual of Veterinary Parasitological Labora­ Visser (1991); Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stutt­ tory Techniques, Reference Book 418 (1987); gart, Germany HMSO Copyright Unit, Norwich, UK [13] G. Uilenberg; Centre de cooperation interna­ [2] Currem Veterinary Therapy 3: Food Animal tionale en recherche agronomique pour le Practice/J.L. Howard (1993); W.B. Saunders developpement (CIRAD) et Departement Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA d'Elevage et de Medicine Veterinaire (EMVT), [3] Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Maison-Alfort Cedex, France Domesticated Animals/E.].L. Soulsby (1982); [14] Veterinary ProtozoologylN.D. Levine (1985); Balliere Tindall, Division of Cassell Ltd.; Lon­ The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, don, UK USA [4] F. Hörchner, A.O. Heydorn, E. Schein, D. [15] Utrecht University, Department of Parasitolo­ Mehlitz, Institut für Parasitologie und gy and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, Tropenveterinärmedizin, Berlin, Germany The Netherlands [5] Veterinary Helminthology/R.K. Reinecke (1983); [16] Manual of Tropical Veterinary Parasitolo­ Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin, Ger­ gyltranslated by M. Shah-Fischer and R.R. Say many (1989); CAB International, Oxon, UK [6] Parasites of Cattle (1981); Merck & Co., Inc., [17] ILRAD (1989) Annual Repqrt of the Interna­ Rahway N]., . USA tional Laboratory for Research on Animal Dis­ [7] Diagnose und Therapie der Parasiten von eases; International Laboratory for Research Haus-, Nutz- und HeimtierenlH. Mehlhorn, D. on Animal Diseases, Nairobi, Kenya Düwel und W. Raether (1986); Gustav Fischer [18] Helminthes et Helminthoses des Ruminants Verlag, Sruttgart, Germany Domestiques d'Afrique Tropicale/M. Graber er [8] S. Geerts, Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical C. Perrotin (1983); Les Editions du Point Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium Veterinaire, Maisons-Alfort, France [9] Traite d'Helminthologie Medicale et Yethi· [19] Veterinary Parasitology/G.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Genomics of the Major Parasitic Worms
    Comparative genomics of the major parasitic worms International Helminth Genomes Consortium Supplementary Information Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 4 Contributions from Consortium members ..................................................................................... 5 Methods .................................................................................................................................... 6 1 Sample collection and preparation ................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 Data production, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (WTSI) ........................................................................ 12 DNA template preparation and sequencing................................................................................................. 12 Genome assembly ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Assembly QC ................................................................................................................................................. 14 Gene prediction ............................................................................................................................................ 15 Contamination screening ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Human Settlements on Gastrointestinal Helminths of Wild Monkey Populations in Their Natural Habitat
    The influence of human settlements on gastrointestinal helminths of wild monkey populations in their natural habitat Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines DOKTORS DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN (Dr. rer. nat.) Fakultät für Chemie und Biowissenschaften Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) – Universitätsbereich genehmigte DISSERTATION von Dipl. Biol. Alexandra Mücke geboren in Germersheim Dekan: Prof. Dr. Martin Bastmeyer Referent: Prof. Dr. Horst F. Taraschewski 1. Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Eckhard W. Heymann 2. Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Doris Wedlich Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 16.12.2011 To Maya Index of Contents I Index of Contents Index of Tables ..............................................................................................III Index of Figures............................................................................................. IV Abstract .......................................................................................................... VI Zusammenfassung........................................................................................VII Introduction ......................................................................................................1 1.1 Why study primate parasites?...................................................................................2 1.2 Objectives of the study and thesis outline ................................................................4 Literature Review.............................................................................................7 2.1 Parasites
    [Show full text]
  • Early Developmental Stages of Nematodes Occurring in Swine
    EARLY DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES OF NEMATODES OCCURRING IN SWINE By JOSEPH E. ALICATA Junior Zoolofllst Zoological Division Bureau of Animal Industry UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, WASHINGTON, D. C. Technical Bulletin No. 489 December 1935 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON, D. C. EARLY DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES OF NEMATODES OCCURRING IN SWINE By JOSEPH E. ALICATA Junior zoologist, Zoological Division, Bureau of Animal Industry CONTENTS Page Morphological and experimental data—Con. Page Introduction 1 Ascaridae. _ 44 Historical résumé 2 Ascaris suum Goeze, 1782 44 General remarks on life histories of groups Trichuridae 47 studied _. 4 Trichuris suis (Schrank, 1788) A. J. Abbreviations and symbols used in illus- Smith, 1908 47 trations __ 5 Trichostrongylidae 51 Morphological and experimental data 5 HyostrongylîLS rubidus (Hassall and Spiruridae 5 Stiles, 1892) HaU,.1921 51 Gongylonema pulchrum Molin, 1857.. 5 Strongylidae. _— — .-. 68 Oesophagostomum dentatum (Ru- Ascarops strongylina (Rudolphi, 1819) dolphi, 1803) Molin, 1861 68 Alicata and Mclntosh, 1933 21 Stephanurus dentatus Diesing, 1839..- 73 Physocephalus sexalatus (Molin, 1860) Strongyloididae 79 Diesing, 1861 27 Strongyloides ransomi Schwartz and Metastrongyhdae 33 AUcata, 1930. 79 Metastrongylus salmi Gedoelst, 1923— 33 Comparative morphology of eggs and third- Metastrongylus elongattbs (Dujardin, stage larvae of some nematodes occurring 1845) Railliet and Henry, 1911 37 in swine 85 Choerostrongylus pudendotectus (Wos- Summary 87 tokow, 1905) Skrjabin, 1924 41 Literature cited 89 INTRODUCTION The object of this bulletin is to present the result^ of an investiga- tion on the early developmental stages of nematodes of common occur- rence in domestic swine. Observations on the stages in the definitive host of two of the nematodes, Gongylonema pulchrum and Hyostrongy- lus rubidus, are only briefly given, however, since little is known of these stages in these nematodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Differing Effects of Standard and Harsh Nucleic Acid Extraction Procedures on Diagnostic Helminth Real-Time Pcrs Applied to Human Stool Samples
    pathogens Article Differing Effects of Standard and Harsh Nucleic Acid Extraction Procedures on Diagnostic Helminth Real-Time PCRs Applied to Human Stool Samples Tanja Hoffmann 1, Andreas Hahn 2 , Jaco J. Verweij 3 ,Gérard Leboulle 4, Olfert Landt 4, Christina Strube 5 , Simone Kann 6, Denise Dekker 7 , Jürgen May 7 , Hagen Frickmann 1,2,† and Ulrike Loderstädt 8,*,† 1 Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Bundeswehr Hospital Hamburg, 20359 Hamburg, Germany; [email protected] (T.H.); [email protected] or [email protected] (H.F.) 2 Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; [email protected] 3 Laboratory for Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, 5042 AD Tilburg, The Netherlands; [email protected] 4 TIB MOLBIOL, 12103 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] (G.L.); [email protected] (O.L.) 5 Institute for Parasitology, Centre for Infection Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany; [email protected] 6 Medical Mission Institute, 97074 Würzburg, Germany; [email protected] 7 Infectious Disease Epidemiology Department, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine Hamburg, 20359 Hamburg, Germany; [email protected] (D.D.); [email protected] (J.M.) Citation: Hoffmann, T.; Hahn, A.; 8 Department of Hospital Hygiene & Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Göttingen, Verweij, J.J.; Leboulle, G.; Landt, O.; 37075 Göttingen, Germany Strube, C.; Kann, S.; Dekker, D.; * Correspondence: [email protected] May, J.; Frickmann, H.; et al. Differing † Hagen Frickmann and Ulrike Loderstädt contributed equally to this work. Effects of Standard and Harsh Nucleic Acid Extraction Procedures Abstract: This study aimed to assess standard and harsher nucleic acid extraction schemes for on Diagnostic Helminth Real-Time diagnostic helminth real-time PCR approaches from stool samples.
    [Show full text]
  • And a Host List of These Parasites
    Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 74:315–337 (2007) A check list of the helminths of guineafowls (Numididae) and a host list of these parasites K. JUNKER and J. BOOMKER* Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria Private Bag X04, Onderstepoort, 0110 South Africa ABSTRACT JUNKER, K. & BOOMKER, J. 2007. A check list of the helminths of guineafowls (Numididae) and a host list of these parasites. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 74:315–337 Published and personal records have been compiled into a reference list of the helminth parasites of guineafowls. Where data on other avian hosts was available these have been included for complete- ness’ sake and to give an indication of host range. The parasite list for the Helmeted guineafowls, Numida meleagris, includes five species of acanthocephalans, all belonging to a single genus, three trematodes belonging to three different genera, 34 cestodes representing 15 genera, and 35 nema- todes belonging to 17 genera. The list for the Crested guineafowls, Guttera edouardi, contains a sin- gle acanthocephalan together with 10 cestode species belonging to seven genera, and three nema- tode species belonging to three different genera. Records for two cestode species from genera and two nematode species belonging to a single genus have been found for the guineafowl genus Acryllium. Of the 70 helminths listed for N. meleagris, 29 have been recorded from domestic chick- ens. Keywords: Acanthocephalans, cestodes, check list, guineafowls, host list, nematodes, trematodes INTRODUCTION into the southern Mediterranean region several mil- lennia before turkeys and hundreds of years before Guineafowls (Numididae) originated on the African junglefowls from which today’s domestic chickens continent, and with the exception of an isolated pop- were derived.
    [Show full text]
  • Larva Migrans Importance Larva Migrans Is a Group of Clinical Syndromes That Result from the Movement of Overview Parasite Larvae Through Host Tissues
    Larva Migrans Importance Larva migrans is a group of clinical syndromes that result from the movement of Overview parasite larvae through host tissues. The symptoms vary with the location and extent of the migration. Organisms may travel through the skin (cutaneous larva migrans) or internal organs (visceral larva migrans). Some larvae invade the eye (ocular larva migrans). Each form of the disease can be caused by a number of organisms. The Last Updated: December 2013 syndromes are loosely defined and the list of causative agents varies with the author. Cutaneous Larva Migrans Larval migration in the skin of the host causes cutaneous larva migrans. These infections are often acquired by skin contact with environmental sources of larvae, such as the soil. The larvae cause a pruritic, migrating dermatitis as they travel through the skin. Many of these infections are self-limiting. Animal hookworms are the most common cause of cutaneous larva migrans in humans. Ancylostoma braziliense is the most important species. Less often, cutaneous larva migrans is caused by A. caninum, A.,ceylanicum, A. tubaeforme, Uncinaria stenocephala or Bunostomum phlebotomum. In their usual hosts, the entry of hookworm larvae into the skin is followed by penetration of the dermis. In the dermis, the larvae enter via veins or lymphatic vessels, eventually reach the blood, and migrate through the lungs before reaching the intestines, where they mature into adults. In abnormal hosts such as humans, zoonotic hookworms can enter the epidermis, but most species cannot readily penetrate the dermis. Instead, these larvae remain trapped in the skin. and migrate for a time in the epidermis before dying.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I. Therapeutic Recommendations (Reprinted from the Medical Letter) the Medical Letter® on Drugs and Therapeutics
    Appendix I. Therapeutic Recommendations (Reprinted from The Medical Letter) The Medical Letter® On Drugs and Therapeutics Published by The Medical Letter, Inc .• 1000 Main Street, New Rochelle, NY. 10801 • A Nonprofit Publication Vol. 35 (Issue 911) December 10, 1993 DRUGS FOR PARASITIC INFECTIONS Parasitic infections are found throughout the world. With increasing travel, immigration, use of immunosuppressive drugs, and the spread of AIDS, physicians anywhere may see infections caused by previously unfamiliar parasites. The table below lists first-choice and alternative drugs for most parasitic infections. Adverse effects of antiparasitic drugs are listed on page 120. For information on the safety of antiparasitic drugs in pregnancy, see The Medical Letter Handbook of Antimicrobial Therapy, 1992, page 151. DRUGS FOR TREATMENT OF PARASITIC INFECTIONS Infection Drug Adult Dosage* Pediatric Dosage* AMEBIASIS (Entamoeba histolytica) a.ymptomatlc Drug of choice: lodoquinol' 650 mg tid x 20d 30-40 mg/kg/d in 3 doses x 20d OR Paromomycin 25-30 mg/kg/d in 3 doses x 7d 25-30 mg/kg/d in 3 doses x 7d Alternative: Diloxanide furoate' 500 mg tid x 10d 20 mg/kg/d in 3 doses x 10d mild to mod.rat. Int•• tlnal dl••••• Drugs of choice:3 Metronidazole 750 mg tid x 10d 35-50 mg/kg/d in 3 doses x 10d OR Tinidazole' 2 grams/d x 3d 50 mg/kg (max. 2 grams) qd x 3d s.v.r. Int•• tlnal dis.as. Drugs of choice:3 Metronidazole 750 mg tid x 10d 35-50 mg/kg/d in 3 doses x 10d OR Tinidazole' 600 mg bid x 5d 50 mg/kg (max.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. National Animal Parasite Collection Records
    U.S. National Animal Parasite Collection Records 1767-2003 Figure 1. USDA-ARS Animal Parasitology Institute logo Collection 223 167 Linear Feet United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Library Special Collections 10301 Baltimore Avenue Beltsville, MD 20705 Table of Contents Container List.................................................................................................................................. 2 Series I. Parasite Illustrations. 1767-1971. 46 boxes. ................................................................ 2 Subseries I.A. Standard-size Illustrations. 1767-1963. 26 boxes. ...................................................... 2 Subseries I.B. Oversize Illustrations. 20 boxes. ................................................................................ 97 Series II. Parasite Photographic Materials. 1902-1977. 51 boxes. ....................................... 114 Subseries II.A. Lantern Slides. 1906-1940, undated. 9 boxes. ...................................................... 114 Subseries II.B. Glass Plate Negatives. 1902-1938, undated. 31 boxes. ......................................... 115 Subseries II.C. Glass Exhibit Plates. Undated. 3 boxes. ................................................................ 117 Subseries II.D. Parasite Photographs. 1909-1965, undated. 6 boxes. ............................................ 117 Subseries II.E. Publication Process Galleys and Negatives. 1955. 2 boxes. .................................. 124 Series III. History of the Animal Parasite
    [Show full text]
  • Zoonotic Infections – an Overview
    14.1 CHAPTER 14 Zoonotic infections – an overview John M. Goldsmid 14.1 INTRODUCTION Zoonotic infections can be defined as infections of animals that are naturally transmissible to humans. As such they are worldwide and often spread with humans through their companion and domestic animals. However, when humans move to new areas or come into contact with different animal species (eg moving into newly cleared natural forest areas), then new zoonoses may emerge or are recognised, and it is significant that many of the new or newly recognised emerging infections of humans are zoonotic in origin1. The probable reasons for the emergence of new zoonotic diseases are many and include, as described by McCarthy and Moore2 for the Helminth zoonoses: “changes in social, dietary or cultural mores, environmental changes, and the improved recognition of heretofore neglected infections often coupled with an improved ability to diagnose infection”. Zoonotic infections may be very localised in their distribution and often reflect particular associations between the natural reservoir hosts and humans – they are thus often influenced by human dietary habits, behaviour and relationships with different animal species. For the practising physician, the knowledge that a disease is zoonotic, is of particular significance in the differential diagnosis (hence the need in all history taking, of asking the question of contact with animals), and in the prevention and control of such diseases. A list of the more important/significant zoonotic infections is given in Table 1 which also outlines the aetiological agent of the disease; its usual animal reservoir host and rough geographical distribution. In some cases, where the vector may serve as a reservoir, it is included under reservoir hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalian Gastrointestinal Parasites in Rainforest Remnants of Anamalai Hills, Western Ghats, India
    Mammalian gastrointestinal parasites in rainforest remnants of Anamalai Hills, Western Ghats, India † DEBAPRIYO CHAKRABORTY , SHAIK HUSSAIN, DMAHENDAR REDDY, SACHIN RAUT, SUNIL TIWARI, VINOD KUMAR and GOVINDHASWAMY UMAPATHY* Laboratory for the Conservation of Endangered Species, CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India *Corresponding author (Fax, 00-91-40-27160311; Email, [email protected]) †Present address: Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University and Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, USA Habitat fragmentation is postulated to be a major factor influencing infectious disease dynamics in wildlife popula- tions and may also be responsible, at least in part, for the recent spurt in the emergence, or re-emergence, of infectious diseases in humans. The mechanism behind these relationships are poorly understood due to the lack of insights into the interacting local factors and insufficient baseline data in ecological parasitology of wildlife. Here, we studied the gastrointestinal parasites of nonhuman mammalian hosts living in 10 rainforest patches of the Anamalai Tiger Reserve, India. We examined 349 faecal samples of 17 mammalian species and successfully identified 24 gastroin- testinal parasite taxa including 1 protozoan, 2 trematode, 3 cestode and 18 nematode taxa. Twenty of these parasites are known parasites of humans. We also found that as much as 73% of all infected samples were infected by multiple parasites. In addition, the smallest and most fragmented forest patches recorded the highest parasite richness; the pattern across fragments, however, seemed to be less straightforward, suggesting potential interplay of local factors. [Chakraborty D, Hussain S, Reddy DM, Raut S, Tiwari S, Kumar V and Umapathy G 2015 Mammalian gastrointestinal parasites in rainforest remnants of Anamalai Hills, Western Ghats, India.
    [Show full text]