The Influence of Human Settlements on Gastrointestinal Helminths of Wild Monkey Populations in Their Natural Habitat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Influence of Human Settlements on Gastrointestinal Helminths of Wild Monkey Populations in Their Natural Habitat The influence of human settlements on gastrointestinal helminths of wild monkey populations in their natural habitat Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines DOKTORS DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN (Dr. rer. nat.) Fakultät für Chemie und Biowissenschaften Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) – Universitätsbereich genehmigte DISSERTATION von Dipl. Biol. Alexandra Mücke geboren in Germersheim Dekan: Prof. Dr. Martin Bastmeyer Referent: Prof. Dr. Horst F. Taraschewski 1. Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Eckhard W. Heymann 2. Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Doris Wedlich Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 16.12.2011 To Maya Index of Contents I Index of Contents Index of Tables ..............................................................................................III Index of Figures............................................................................................. IV Abstract .......................................................................................................... VI Zusammenfassung........................................................................................VII Introduction ......................................................................................................1 1.1 Why study primate parasites?...................................................................................2 1.2 Objectives of the study and thesis outline ................................................................4 Literature Review.............................................................................................7 2.1 Parasites and host ecology .........................................................................................8 2.1.1 Terminology .........................................................................................................9 2.1.2 Parasites and their role in population regulation ...........................................11 2.2 Disease and wildlife conservation............................................................................14 2.2.1 Disease in the human-wildlife interface ...........................................................16 2.2.2 Cross-transmission between humans and primates .......................................18 2.3 Primates, Protozoa and Macroparasites ................................................................22 2.3.1 Protozoa ..............................................................................................................23 2.3.2 Helminths ...........................................................................................................24 2.3.3 Cross-transmission of macroparasites .............................................................27 Materials and Methods..................................................................................29 3.1 Non-invasive study....................................................................................................30 3.2. Sampling regime ......................................................................................................31 3.3. Laboratory methods................................................................................................33 3.3.1 Sedimentation procedure and microscopic examination ...............................33 3.3.2 Coproculture ......................................................................................................36 3.4 Estimation of intensity of infection by fecal egg counts ........................................37 3.5 Behavioral observations...........................................................................................39 3.6 Statistical analyses ....................................................................................................40 Peru ...........................................................................................................42 4.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................43 Index of Contents II 4.2 Materials and Methods ............................................................................................44 4.2.1 Study animals .....................................................................................................44 4.2.2 Study area ...........................................................................................................46 4.2.3 Study groups ......................................................................................................47 4.2.4 Study period and sample collection .................................................................49 4.3 Results........................................................................................................................50 4.3.1 Human fecal samples .........................................................................................50 4.3.2 Tamarin fecal samples ......................................................................................54 4.4 Discussion ..................................................................................................................71 4.4.1 Human fecal samples .........................................................................................71 4.4.2 Tamarin fecal samples ......................................................................................73 Thailand .........................................................................................................89 5.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................90 5.2 Materials and Methods ............................................................................................91 5.2.1 Study animals .....................................................................................................91 5.2.2 Study area ...........................................................................................................94 5.2.3 Study groups ......................................................................................................95 5.2.4 Study period and sample collection .................................................................99 5.2.5 Behavioral data collection ...............................................................................100 5.3 Results......................................................................................................................101 5.4 Discussion ................................................................................................................131 5.4.1 Human fecal samples...........................................................................................131 5.4.2 Macaque samples.................................................................................................135 General Discussion .......................................................................................148 6.1 Disease risk and anthropogenic influence ............................................................150 6.2 Parasites and their impact on the host’s survival................................................154 6.3 Seasonality of the results........................................................................................157 6.4 Directions for further research .............................................................................158 References .....................................................................................................160 Acknowledgments.........................................................................................210 Appendices ....................................................................................................211 Curriculum vitae ..........................................................................................227 Index of Tables III Index of Tables Table 3.1 Description of activity categories applied in the “instantaneous scan sampling”. ........................ 40 Table 4.1 Tamarin study group composition. ................................................................................................... 47 Table 4.2 Composition of gender and age classes of sampled humans from Diamante. ............................... 47 Table 4.3 Human parasite identification. .......................................................................................................... 52 Table 4.4 Descriptive statistics of length and width for eggs of four parasite morphospecies from male and female villagers from Diamante................................................................................................................ 53 Table 4.5 Intensity of infection in human stool samples from Diamante........................................................ 53 Table 4.6 Tamarin parasite identification......................................................................................................... 56 Table 4.7 Descriptive statistics of length and width for eggs of six parasite morphospecies found in tamarins. ..................................................................................................................................................... 57 Table 4.8 Effects of host species and host group on PSR (ANOVA)............................................................... 59 Table 4.9 P-values of Fisher’s exact test comparing prevalence of parasite infection in tamarins.. ............ 63 Table 4.10 Fecal egg and larvae output in tamarin groups.............................................................................. 65 Table 4.11 Mann Whitney
Recommended publications
  • Linking Behavior, Co-Infection Patterns, and Viral Infection Risk with the Whole Gastrointestinal Helminth Community Structure in Mastomys Natalensis
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 17 August 2021 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.669058 Linking Behavior, Co-infection Patterns, and Viral Infection Risk With the Whole Gastrointestinal Helminth Community Structure in Mastomys natalensis Bram Vanden Broecke 1*, Lisse Bernaerts 1, Alexis Ribas 2, Vincent Sluydts 1, Ladslaus Mnyone 3, Erik Matthysen 1 and Herwig Leirs 1 1 Evolutionary Ecology Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, 2 Parasitology Section, Department of Biology, Healthcare and Environment, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Science, IRBio (Research Institute of Biodiversity), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 3 Pest Management Center, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania Edited by: Yadong Zheng, Infection probability, load, and community structure of helminths varies strongly between Lanzhou Institute of Veterinary and within animal populations. This can be ascribed to environmental stochasticity Research (CAAS), China or due to individual characteristics of the host such as their age or sex. Other, but Reviewed by: Mario Garrido, understudied, factors are the hosts’ behavior and co-infection patterns. In this study, we Ben-Gurion University of the used the multimammate mouse (Mastomys natalensis) as a model system to investigate Negev, Israel Si-Yang Huang, how the hosts’ sex, age, exploration behavior, and viral infection history affects their Yangzhou University, China infection risk, parasitic load, and community structure of gastrointestinal helminths. We Hannah Rose Vineer, hypothesized that the hosts’ exploration behavior would play a key role in the risk for University of Liverpool, United Kingdom infection by different gastrointestinal helminths, whereby highly explorative individuals *Correspondence: would have a higher infection risk leading to a wider diversity of helminths and a larger Bram Vanden Broecke load compared to less explorative individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastrointestinal Helminthic Parasites of Habituated Wild Chimpanzees
    Aus dem Institut für Parasitologie und Tropenveterinärmedizin des Fachbereichs Veterinärmedizin der Freien Universität Berlin Gastrointestinal helminthic parasites of habituated wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in the Taï NP, Côte d’Ivoire − including characterization of cultured helminth developmental stages using genetic markers Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Veterinärmedizin an der Freien Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Sonja Metzger Tierärztin aus München Berlin 2014 Journal-Nr.: 3727 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung des Fachbereichs Veterinärmedizin der Freien Universität Berlin Dekan: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Jürgen Zentek Erster Gutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna Zweiter Gutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Heribert Hofer Dritter Gutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Achim Gruber Deskriptoren (nach CAB-Thesaurus): chimpanzees, helminths, host parasite relationships, fecal examination, characterization, developmental stages, ribosomal RNA, mitochondrial DNA Tag der Promotion: 10.06.2015 Contents I INTRODUCTION ---------------------------------------------------- 1- 4 I.1 Background 1- 3 I.2 Study objectives 4 II LITERATURE OVERVIEW --------------------------------------- 5- 37 II.1 Taï National Park 5- 7 II.1.1 Location and climate 5- 6 II.1.2 Vegetation and fauna 6 II.1.3 Human pressure and impact on the park 7 II.2 Chimpanzees 7- 12 II.2.1 Status 7 II.2.2 Group sizes and composition 7- 9 II.2.3 Territories and ranging behavior 9 II.2.4 Diet and hunting behavior 9- 10 II.2.5 Contact with humans 10 II.2.6
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 51(2) 1984
    Volume 51 July 1984 PROCEEDINGS ^ of of Washington '- f, V-i -: ;fx A semiannual journal of research devoted to Helminthohgy and all branches of Parasitology Supported in part by the -•>"""- v, H. Ransom Memorial 'Tryst Fund : CONTENTS -j<:'.:,! •</••• VV V,:'I,,--.. Y~v MEASURES, LENA N., AND Roy C. ANDERSON. Hybridization of Obeliscoides cuniculi r\ XGraybill, 1923) Graybill, ,1924 jand Obeliscoides,cuniculi multistriatus Measures and Anderson, 1983 .........:....... .., :....„......!"......... _ x. iXJ-v- 179 YATES, JON A., AND ROBERT C. LOWRIE, JR. Development of Yatesia hydrochoerus "•! (Nematoda: Filarioidea) to the Infective Stage in-Ixqdid Ticks r... 187 HUIZINGA, HARRY W., AND WILLARD O. GRANATH, JR. -Seasonal ^prevalence of. Chandlerellaquiscali (Onehocercidae: Filarioidea) in Braih, of the Common Grackle " '~. (Quiscdlus quisculd versicolor) '.'.. ;:,„..;.......„.;....• :..: „'.:„.'.J_^.4-~-~-~-<-.ii -, **-. 191 ^PLATT, THOMAS R. Evolution of the Elaphostrongylinae (Nematoda: Metastrongy- X. lojdfea: Protostrongylidae) Parasites of Cervids,(Mammalia) ...,., v.. 196 PLATT, THOMAS R., AND W. JM. SAMUEL. Modex of Entry of First-Stage Larvae ofr _^ ^ Parelaphostrongylus odocoilei^Nematoda: vMefastrongyloidea) into Four Species of Terrestrial Gastropods .....:;.. ....^:...... ./:... .; _.... ..,.....;. .-: 205 THRELFALL, WILLIAM, AND JUAN CARVAJAL. Heliconema pjammobatidus sp. n. (Nematoda: Physalbpteridae) from a Skate,> Psammobatis lima (Chondrichthyes: ; ''•• \^ Rajidae), Taken in Chile _... .„ ;,.....„.......„..,.......;. ,...^.J::...^..,....:.....~L.:.....,
    [Show full text]
  • Angiostrongylus Cantonensis: a Review of Its Distribution, Molecular Biology and Clinical Significance As a Human
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303551798 Angiostrongylus cantonensis: A review of its distribution, molecular biology and clinical significance as a human... Article in Parasitology · May 2016 DOI: 10.1017/S0031182016000652 CITATIONS READS 4 360 10 authors, including: Indy Sandaradura Richard Malik Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiolo… University of Sydney 10 PUBLICATIONS 27 CITATIONS 522 PUBLICATIONS 6,546 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Derek Spielman Rogan Lee University of Sydney The New South Wales Department of Health 34 PUBLICATIONS 892 CITATIONS 60 PUBLICATIONS 669 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Create new project "The protective rate of the feline immunodeficiency virus vaccine: An Australian field study" View project Comparison of three feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) point-of-care antigen test kits using blood and saliva View project All content following this page was uploaded by Indy Sandaradura on 30 May 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. 1 Angiostrongylus cantonensis: a review of its distribution, molecular biology and clinical significance as a human pathogen JOEL BARRATT1,2*†, DOUGLAS CHAN1,2,3†, INDY SANDARADURA3,4, RICHARD MALIK5, DEREK SPIELMAN6,ROGANLEE7, DEBORAH MARRIOTT3, JOHN HARKNESS3, JOHN ELLIS2 and DAMIEN STARK3 1 i3 Institute, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia 2 School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia 3 Department of Microbiology, SydPath, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 1. a Total of 247 Identified Taxa List and the AEFR Where Each Taxon Occured In
    Table 1. A total of 247 identified taxa list and the AEFR where each taxon occured in. Phylum Class Order Family Species (Genus) 1st AEFR 2nd AEFR 3rd AEFR SP-1 Arthropoda Insecta Megaloptera Corydalidae Protohermes grandis + SP-2 Arthropoda Insecta Megaloptera Corydalidae Neochauliodes sp. + SP-3 Arthropoda Insecta Megaloptera Sialidae Sialis japonica + SP-4 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Coenagrionidae Cercion sexlineatum + + SP-5 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Gomphidae Sieboldius sp. + SP-6 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Gomphidae Davidius moiwanus + SP-7 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Gomphidae Nihomogomphus sp. + SP-8 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Gomphidae Onychogomphus sp. + SP-9 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Gomphidae Trigomphus sp. + SP-10 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Gomphidae Sinictinogomphus sp. + SP-11 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Gomphidae Stylurus sp. + + SP-12 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Gomphidae Anisogomphus sp. + SP-13 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Gomphidae Ictinogomphus sp. + SP-14 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Gomphidae Lamelligomphus sp. + Water 2019, 11, 1550; doi:10.3390/w11081550 www.mdpi.com/journal/water Water 2019, 11, 1550 2 of 18 Phylum Class Order Family Species (Genus) 1st AEFR 2nd AEFR 3rd AEFR SP-15 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Gomphidae Phaenandrogomphus sp. + + SP-16 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Gomphidae Burmagomphus sp. + + SP-17 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Libellulidae Crocothemis sp. + + SP-18 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Libellulidae Tholymis tillarga + + SP-19 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Libellulidae Brachydiplax sp. + + SP-20 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Libellulidae Trithemis sp. + SP-21 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Libellulidae Trithemis aurora + SP-22 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Libellulidae Orthetrum sp. + SP-23 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Libellulidae Sympetrum sp. + SP-24 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Calopterygidae Matrona sp. + + SP-25 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Calopterygidae Matrona cornelia + SP-26 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Corduliidae Epophthalmia elegans + SP-27 Arthropoda Insecta Odonata Platycnemididae platycnemis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascaris Lumbricoides, Roundworm, Causative Agent Of
    http://www.MetaPathogen.com: Human roundworm, Ascaris lumbricoides ● Ascaris lumbricoides taxonomy ● Brief facts ● Developmental stages ● Treatment ● References Ascaris lumbricoides taxonomy cellular organisms - Eukaryota - Fungi/Metazoa group - Metazoa - Eumetazoa - Bilateria - Pseudocoelomata - Nematoda - Chromadorea - Ascaridida - Ascaridoidea - Ascarididae - Ascaris - Ascaris lumbricoides Brief facts ● Together with human hookworms (Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus also described at MetaPathogen) and whipworms (Trichuris trichiura), Ascaris lumbricoides (human roundworms) belong to a group of so-called soil-transmitted helminths that represent one of the world's most important causes of physical and intellectual growth retardation. ● Today, ascariasis is among the most important tropical diseases in humans with more than billion infected people world-wide. Ascariasis is mostly seen in tropical and subtropical countries because of warm and humid conditions that facilitate development and survival of eggs. The majority of infections occur in Asia (up to 73%), followed by Africa (~12%) and Latin America (~8%). ● Ascaris lumbricoides is one of six worms listed and named by Linnaeus. Its name has remained unchanged up to date. ● Ascariasis is an ancient infection, and A. lumbricoides have been found in human remains from Peru dating as early as 2277 BC. There are records of A. lumbricoides in Egyptian mummy dating from 1938 to 1600 BC. Despite of long history of awareness and scientific observations, the parasite's life cycle in humans, including the migration of the larval stages around the body, was discovered only in 1922 by a Japanese pediatrician, Shimesu Koino. ● Unlike the hookworm, whose third-stage (L3) larvae actively penetrate skin, A. lumbricoides (as well as T. trichiura) is transmitted passively within the eggs after being swallowed by the host as a result of fecal contamination.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of South African Wildlife. XIX. the Prevalence of Helminths in Some Common Antelopes, Warthogs and a Bushpig in the Limpopo Province, South Africa
    Page 1 of 11 Original Research Parasites of South African wildlife. XIX. The prevalence of helminths in some common antelopes, warthogs and a bushpig in the Limpopo province, South Africa Authors: Little work has been conducted on the helminth parasites of artiodactylids in the northern 1 Ilana C. van Wyk and western parts of the Limpopo province, which is considerably drier than the rest of the Joop Boomker1 province. The aim of this study was to determine the kinds and numbers of helminth that Affiliations: occur in different wildlife hosts in the area as well as whether any zoonotic helminths were 1Department of Veterinary present. Ten impalas (Aepyceros melampus), eight kudus (Tragelaphus strepsiceros), four blue Tropical Diseases, University wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus), two black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou), three gemsbok of Pretoria, South Africa (Oryx gazella), one nyala (Tragelaphus angasii), one bushbuck (Tragelaphus scriptus), one Correspondence to: waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus), six warthogs (Phacochoerus aethiopicus) and a single bushpig Ilana van Wyk (Potamochoerus porcus) were sampled from various localities in the semi-arid northern and western areas of the Limpopo province. Email: [email protected] New host–parasite associations included Trichostrongylus deflexus from blue wildebeest, Postal address: Agriostomum gorgonis from black wildebeest, Stilesia globipunctata from the waterbuck and Private bag X04, Fasciola hepatica in a kudu. The mean helminth burden, including extra-gastrointestinal Onderstepoort 0110, South Africa helminths, was 592 in impalas, 407 in kudus and blue wildebeest, 588 in black wildebeest, 184 in gemsbok, and 2150 in the waterbuck. Excluding Probstmayria vivipara, the mean helminth Dates: burden in warthogs was 2228 and the total nematode burden in the bushpig was 80.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Articles Current Knowledge About Aelurostrongylus Abstrusus Biology and Diagnostic
    Annals of Parasitology 2018, 64(1), 3–11 Copyright© 2018 Polish Parasitological Society doi: 10.17420/ap6401.126 Review articles Current knowledge about Aelurostrongylus abstrusus biology and diagnostic Tatyana V. Moskvina Chair of Biodiversity and Marine Bioresources, School of Natural Sciences, Far Eastern Federal University, Ayaks 1, Vladivostok 690091, Russia; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Feline aelurostrongylosis, caused by the lungworm Aelurostrongylus abstrusus , is a parasitic disease with veterinary importance. The female hatches her eggs in the bronchioles and alveolar ducts, where the larva develop into adult worms. L1 larvae and adult nematodes cause pathological changes, typically inflammatory cell infiltrates in the bronchi and the lung parenchyma. The level of infection can range from asymptomatic to the presence of severe symptoms and may be fatal for cats. Although coprological and molecular diagnostic methods are useful for A. abstrusus detection, both techniques can give false negative results due to the presence of low concentrations of larvae in faeces and the use of inadequate diagnostic procedures. The present study describes the biology of A. abstrusus, particularly the factors influencing its infection and spread in intermediate and paratenic hosts, and the parasitic interactions between A. abstrusus and other pathogens. Key words: Aelurostrongylus abstrusus , cat, lungworm, feline aelurostrongylosis Introduction [1–3]. Another problem is a lack of data on host- parasite and parasite-parasite interactions between Aelurostrongilus abstrusus (Angiostrongylidae) A. abstrusus and its definitive and intermediate is the most widespread feline lungworm, and one hosts, and between A. abstrusus and other with a worldwide distribution [1]. Adult worms are pathogens. The aim of this review is to summarise localized in the alveolar ducts and the bronchioles.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthelmintic Resistance of Ostertagia Ostertagi and Cooperia Oncophora to Macrocyclic Lactones in Cattle from the Western United States
    Veterinary Parasitology 170 (2010) 224–229 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Veterinary Parasitology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/vetpar Anthelmintic resistance of Ostertagia ostertagi and Cooperia oncophora to macrocyclic lactones in cattle from the western United States M.D. Edmonds, E.G. Johnson, J.D. Edmonds ∗ Johnson Research LLC, 24007 Highway 20-26, Parma, ID, 83660, USA article info abstract Article history: In June 2008, 122 yearling heifers with a history of anthelmintic resistance were obtained Received 15 October 2009 from pastures in northern California and transported to a dry lot facility in southwest- Received in revised form 28 January 2010 ern Idaho, USA. Fifty heifers with the highest fecal egg counts were selected for study Accepted 24 February 2010 enrollment. Candidates were equally randomized to treatment with either injectable iver- mectin (Ivomec®, Merial, 0.2 mg kg−1 BW), injectable moxidectin (Cydectin®, Fort Dodge, Keywords: 0.2 mg kg−1 BW), oral fenbendazole (Safe-Guard®, Intervet, 5.0 mg kg−1 BW), oral oxfenda- Anthelmintic resistance zole (Synanthic®, Fort Dodge, 4.5 mg kg−1 BW), or saline. At 14 days post-treatment, Cattle Bovine nematodes were recovered from the abomasum, small intestine, and large intestine. Par- Nematodes asitism was confirmed in the control group when 10/10 animals were infected with Efficacy adult Ostertagia ostertagi and 9/10 animals with both developing and early L4 stages of Cooperia O. ostertagi. Similarly, 9/10 animals were parasitized with adult Cooperia spp. Fenbenda- Ostertagia zole and oxfendazole efficacy verses controls were >90% against adult Cooperia spp., while moxidectin caused an 88% parasite reduction post-treatment (P < 0.05).
    [Show full text]
  • Rodentia: Cricetidae) En El Bosque Relicto De Cachil (Provincia Contumazá, Departamento Cajamarca, Perú)
    Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos Universidad del Perú. Decana de América Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas Escuela Profesional de Ciencias Biológicas Nematofauna del género Thomasomys coues, 1884 (Rodentia: cricetidae) en el bosque relicto de cachil (provincia Contumazá, departamento Cajamarca, Perú) TESIS Para optar el Título Profesional de Biólogo con Mención en Zoología AUTOR María Andrea POLO GONZALES ASESOR Lidia Rosa SANCHEZ PEREZ Lima, Perú 2020 Reconocimiento - No Comercial - Compartir Igual - Sin restricciones adicionales https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Usted puede distribuir, remezclar, retocar, y crear a partir del documento original de modo no comercial, siempre y cuando se dé crédito al autor del documento y se licencien las nuevas creaciones bajo las mismas condiciones. No se permite aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros a hacer cualquier cosa que permita esta licencia. Referencia bibliográfica Polo, M. (2020). Nematofauna del género Thomasomys coues, 1884 (Rodentia: cricetidae) en el bosque relicto de cachil (provincia Contumazá, departamento Cajamarca, Perú). Tesis para optar el título de Biólogo con Mención en Zoología. Escuela Profesional de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú. Hoja de metadatos complementarios Código ORCID del autor 0000-0002-5217-151X DNI o pasaporte del autor 73001614 0000-0001-7609-9498 Código ORCID del asesor Código RENACYT: P001097 DNI o pasaporte del asesor 08758229 DIVERSIDAD DE MAMÍFEROS Y SUS PARÁSITOS Y SU IMPLICANCIA EN Grupo de investigación ENFERMEDADES ZOONÓTICAS EMERGENTES Perú Vicerrectorado de Investigación y Posgrado (VRIP) Agencia financiadora Programa de Proyectos de Investigación para Grupos de Investigación B17100921 Perú, Departamento Cajamarca, Provincia Contumazá, Distrito Contumazá, Bosque de Ubicación geográfica donde se Cachil.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Book (PDF)
    L fLUKE~ AI AN SNAILS, FLUKES AND MAN Edited by Director I Zoological Survey of India ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA 1991 © Copyright, Govt of India. 1991 Published: August 1991 Based on the lectures delivered at the Training Programme on Snails, Flukes and Man held at Calcutta. (November 1989) Compiled by N.V. Subba Rao, J. K. Jonathan and C.B. Srivastava Cover design: Manoj K. Sengupta Indoplanorbis exustus in the centre with Cercariae around. PRICE India : Rs. 120.00 Foreign: £ 5.80; $ 8.00 Published by the Director, Zoological Survey of India Calcutta-700 053 Printed by : Rashmi Advertising (Typesetting by its associate Mis laser Kreations) 7B, Rani Rashmoni Road, Calcutta-700 013 FOREWORD Zoological Survey of India has been playing a key role in the identification and study of faunal resources of our country. Over the years it has built up expertise on different faunal groups and in order to disseminate that knowledge training and extension services have been devised. Hitherto the training programmes were conducted In entomology, taxidermy and omithology. The scope of the training programmes has now been extended to other groups and the one on Snails, Flukes and Man is the first step in that direction. Zoological Survey of India has the distinction of being the only Institute where extensive and in-depth studies are pursued on both molluscs and helminths. The training programme has been of mutual interest to malacologists and helminthologlsts. The response to the programme was very encouraging and scientific discussions were very rewarding. The need for knowledge .and Iterature on molluscs was keenly felt.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenolepis Nana Is a Ubiquitous Parasite, Found Throughout Many Developing and Developed Countries
    Characterisation of Community-Derived Hymenolepis Infections in Australia Marion G. Macnish BSc. (Medical Science) Hons Division of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Murdoch University Western Australia This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Murdoch University 2001 I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main work which has not been submitted for a degree at any other educational institution. ………………………………………………. (Marion G. Macnish) Characterisation of Community-Derived Hymenolepis Infections in Australia ii Abstract Hymenolepis nana is a ubiquitous parasite, found throughout many developing and developed countries. Globally, the prevalence of H. nana is alarmingly high, with estimates of up to 75 million people infected. In Australia, the rates of infection have increased substantially in the last decade, from less than 20% in the early 1990’s to 55 - 60% in these same communities today. Our knowledge of the epidemiology of infection of H. nana is hampered by the confusion surrounding the host specificity and taxonomy of this parasite. The suggestion of the existence of two separate species, Hymenolepis nana von Siebold 1852 and Hymenolepis fraterna Stiles 1906, was first proposed at the beginning of the 20th century. Despite ongoing discussions in the subsequent years it remained unclear, some 90 years later, whether there were two distinct species, that are highly host specific, or whether they were simply the same species present in both rodent and human hosts. The ongoing controversy surrounding the taxonomy of H. nana has not yet been resolved and remains a point of difference between the taxonomic and medical literature.
    [Show full text]