Baylisascaris Transfuga in Captive and Free-Ranging Populations of Bears (Family: Ursidae)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Linking Behavior, Co-Infection Patterns, and Viral Infection Risk with the Whole Gastrointestinal Helminth Community Structure in Mastomys Natalensis
ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 17 August 2021 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.669058 Linking Behavior, Co-infection Patterns, and Viral Infection Risk With the Whole Gastrointestinal Helminth Community Structure in Mastomys natalensis Bram Vanden Broecke 1*, Lisse Bernaerts 1, Alexis Ribas 2, Vincent Sluydts 1, Ladslaus Mnyone 3, Erik Matthysen 1 and Herwig Leirs 1 1 Evolutionary Ecology Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, 2 Parasitology Section, Department of Biology, Healthcare and Environment, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Science, IRBio (Research Institute of Biodiversity), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 3 Pest Management Center, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania Edited by: Yadong Zheng, Infection probability, load, and community structure of helminths varies strongly between Lanzhou Institute of Veterinary and within animal populations. This can be ascribed to environmental stochasticity Research (CAAS), China or due to individual characteristics of the host such as their age or sex. Other, but Reviewed by: Mario Garrido, understudied, factors are the hosts’ behavior and co-infection patterns. In this study, we Ben-Gurion University of the used the multimammate mouse (Mastomys natalensis) as a model system to investigate Negev, Israel Si-Yang Huang, how the hosts’ sex, age, exploration behavior, and viral infection history affects their Yangzhou University, China infection risk, parasitic load, and community structure of gastrointestinal helminths. We Hannah Rose Vineer, hypothesized that the hosts’ exploration behavior would play a key role in the risk for University of Liverpool, United Kingdom infection by different gastrointestinal helminths, whereby highly explorative individuals *Correspondence: would have a higher infection risk leading to a wider diversity of helminths and a larger Bram Vanden Broecke load compared to less explorative individuals. -
The Functional Parasitic Worm Secretome: Mapping the Place of Onchocerca Volvulus Excretory Secretory Products
pathogens Review The Functional Parasitic Worm Secretome: Mapping the Place of Onchocerca volvulus Excretory Secretory Products Luc Vanhamme 1,*, Jacob Souopgui 1 , Stephen Ghogomu 2 and Ferdinand Ngale Njume 1,2 1 Department of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biology and Molecular Medicine, IBMM, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue des Professeurs Jeener et Brachet 12, 6041 Gosselies, Belgium; [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (F.N.N.) 2 Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Biotechnology Unit, University of Buea, Buea P.O Box 63, Cameroon; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 October 2020; Accepted: 18 November 2020; Published: 23 November 2020 Abstract: Nematodes constitute a very successful phylum, especially in terms of parasitism. Inside their mammalian hosts, parasitic nematodes mainly dwell in the digestive tract (geohelminths) or in the vascular system (filariae). One of their main characteristics is their long sojourn inside the body where they are accessible to the immune system. Several strategies are used by parasites in order to counteract the immune attacks. One of them is the expression of molecules interfering with the function of the immune system. Excretory-secretory products (ESPs) pertain to this category. This is, however, not their only biological function, as they seem also involved in other mechanisms such as pathogenicity or parasitic cycle (molting, for example). Wewill mainly focus on filariae ESPs with an emphasis on data available regarding Onchocerca volvulus, but we will also refer to a few relevant/illustrative examples related to other worm categories when necessary (geohelminth nematodes, trematodes or cestodes). -
Baylisascariasis
Baylisascariasis Importance Baylisascaris procyonis, an intestinal nematode of raccoons, can cause severe neurological and ocular signs when its larvae migrate in humans, other mammals and birds. Although clinical cases seem to be rare in people, most reported cases have been Last Updated: December 2013 serious and difficult to treat. Severe disease has also been reported in other mammals and birds. Other species of Baylisascaris, particularly B. melis of European badgers and B. columnaris of skunks, can also cause neural and ocular larva migrans in animals, and are potential human pathogens. Etiology Baylisascariasis is caused by intestinal nematodes (family Ascarididae) in the genus Baylisascaris. The three most pathogenic species are Baylisascaris procyonis, B. melis and B. columnaris. The larvae of these three species can cause extensive damage in intermediate/paratenic hosts: they migrate extensively, continue to grow considerably within these hosts, and sometimes invade the CNS or the eye. Their larvae are very similar in appearance, which can make it very difficult to identify the causative agent in some clinical cases. Other species of Baylisascaris including B. transfuga, B. devos, B. schroeder and B. tasmaniensis may also cause larva migrans. In general, the latter organisms are smaller and tend to invade the muscles, intestines and mesentery; however, B. transfuga has been shown to cause ocular and neural larva migrans in some animals. Species Affected Raccoons (Procyon lotor) are usually the definitive hosts for B. procyonis. Other species known to serve as definitive hosts include dogs (which can be both definitive and intermediate hosts) and kinkajous. Coatimundis and ringtails, which are closely related to kinkajous, might also be able to harbor B. -
Combination Anthelmintic Treatment for Persistent Ancylostoma Caninum Ova Shedding in Greyhounds
CASE SERIES Combination Anthelmintic Treatment for Persistent Ancylostoma caninum Ova Shedding in Greyhounds Lindie B. Hess, BS, Laurie M. Millward, DVM, Adam Rudinsky DVM, Emily Vincent, BS, Antoinette Marsh, PhD ABSTRACT Ancylostoma caninum is a nematode of the canine gastrointestinal tract commonly referred to as hookworm. This study involved eight privately owned adult greyhounds presenting with persistent A. caninum ova shedding despite previous deworming treatments. The dogs received a combination treatment protocol comprising topical moxidectin, followed by pyrantel/febantel/praziquantel within 24 hr. At 7–10 days posttreatment, a fecal examination monitored for parasite ova. Dogs remained on the monthly combination treatment protocol until they ceased shedding detectable ova. The dogs then received only the monthly topical moxidectin maintenance treatment. The dogs remained in the study for 5–14 mo with periodical fecal examinations performed. During the study, three dogs reverted to positive fecal ova status, with two being associated with client noncompliance. Reinstitution of the combination treatment protocol resulted in no detectable ova. Use of monthly doses of combination pyrantel, febantel and moxidectin appears to be an effective treatment for nonresponsive or persistent A. caninum ova shedding. Follow-up fecal examinations were important for verifying the presence or absence of ova shedding despite the use of anthelmintic treatment. Limitations of the current study include small sample size, inclusion of only privately owned greyhounds, and client compliance with fecal collection and animal care. (JAmAnimHospAssoc2019; 55:---–---. DOI 10.5326/ JAAHA-MS-6904) Introduction include the following: moxidectina,b, milbemycin oximec, fenben- Ancylostoma caninum is a nematode of the canine gastrointestinal dazoled, and/or pyrantel-containing productse,f. -
The Carnivora (Mammalia) from the Middle Miocene Locality of Gračanica (Bugojno Basin, Gornji Vakuf, Bosnia and Herzegovina)
Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments https://doi.org/10.1007/s12549-018-0353-0 ORIGINAL PAPER The Carnivora (Mammalia) from the middle Miocene locality of Gračanica (Bugojno Basin, Gornji Vakuf, Bosnia and Herzegovina) Katharina Bastl1,2 & Doris Nagel2 & Michael Morlo3 & Ursula B. Göhlich4 Received: 23 March 2018 /Revised: 4 June 2018 /Accepted: 18 September 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract The Carnivora (Mammalia) yielded in the coal mine Gračanica in Bosnia and Herzegovina are composed of the caniform families Amphicyonidae (Amphicyon giganteus), Ursidae (Hemicyon goeriachensis, Ursavus brevirhinus) and Mustelidae (indet.) and the feliform family Percrocutidae (Percrocuta miocenica). The site is of middle Miocene age and the biostratigraphical interpretation based on molluscs indicates Langhium, correlating Mammal Zone MN 5. The carnivore faunal assemblage suggests a possible assignement to MN 6 defined by the late occurrence of A. giganteus and the early occurrence of H. goeriachensis and P. miocenica. Despite the scarcity of remains belonging to the order Carnivora, the fossils suggest a diverse fauna including omnivores, mesocarnivores and hypercarnivores of a meat/bone diet as well as Carnivora of small (Mustelidae indet.) to large size (A. giganteus). Faunal similarities can be found with Prebreza (Serbia), Mordoğan, Çandır, Paşalar and Inönü (all Turkey), which are of comparable age. The absence of Felidae is worthy of remark, but could be explained by the general scarcity of carnivoran fossils. Gračanica records the most eastern European occurrence of H. goeriachensis and the first occurrence of A. giganteus outside central Europe except for Namibia (Africa). The Gračanica Carnivora fauna is mostly composed of European elements. Keywords Amphicyon . Hemicyon . -
Helminth Infections in Faecal Samples of Apennine Wolf (Canis Lupus
Annals of Parasitology 2017, 63(3), 205–212 Copyright© 2017 Polish Parasitological Society doi: 10.17420/ap6303.107 Original papers Helminth infections in faecal samples of Apennine wolf (Canis lupus italicus) and Marsican brown bear (Ursus arctos marsicanus) in two protected national parks of central Italy Barbara Paoletti1, Raffaella Iorio1, Donato Traversa1, Cristina E. Di Francesco1, Leonardo Gentile2, Simone Angelucci3, Cristina Amicucci1, Roberto Bartolini1, Marianna Marangi4, Angela Di Cesare1 1Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Piano D’accio, 64100-Teramo, Italy 2Abruzzo Lazio and Molise National Park, Viale Santa Lucia, 67032 Pescasseroli, Italy 3Veterinary Office, Majella National Park, Sulmona, Italy 4Department of Production and Innovation in Mediterranean Agriculture and Food Systems, University of Foggia, Via A. Gramsci, 72122-Foggia, Italy Corresponding Author: Barbara Paoletti; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. This article reports the results of a copromicroscopic and molecular investigation carried out on faecal samples of wolves (n=37) and brown bears (n=80) collected in two protected national parks of central Italy (Abruzzo Region). Twenty-three (62.2%) samples from wolves were positive for parasite eggs. Eight (34.78%) samples scored positive for single infections, i.e. E. aerophilus (21.74%), Ancylostoma/Uncinaria (4.34%), Trichuris vulpis (4.34%), T. canis (4.34%). Polyspecific infections were found in 15 samples (65.21%), these being the most frequent association: E. aerophilus and Ancylostoma/Uncinaria. Thirty-seven (46.25%) out of the 80 faecal samples from bears were positive for parasite eggs. Fourteen (37.83%) samples were positive for B. transfuga, and six (16.21%) of them also contained Ancylostoma/Uncinaria, one (2.7%) E. -
Brown Bear (Ursus Arctos) John Schoen and Scott Gende Images by John Schoen
Brown Bear (Ursus arctos) John Schoen and Scott Gende images by John Schoen Two hundred years ago, brown (also known as grizzly) bears were abundant and widely distributed across western North America from the Mississippi River to the Pacific and from northern Mexico to the Arctic (Trevino and Jonkel 1986). Following settlement of the west, brown bear populations south of Canada declined significantly and now occupy only a fraction of their original range, where the brown bear has been listed as threatened since 1975 (Servheen 1989, 1990). Today, Alaska remains the last stronghold in North America for this adaptable, large omnivore (Miller and Schoen 1999) (Fig 1). Brown bears are indigenous to Southeastern Alaska (Southeast), and on the northern islands they occur in some of the highest-density FIG 1. Brown bears occur throughout much of southern populations on earth (Schoen and Beier 1990, Miller et coastal Alaska where they are closely associated with salmon spawning streams. Although brown bears and grizzly bears al. 1997). are the same species, northern and interior populations are The brown bear in Southeast is highly valued by commonly called grizzlies while southern coastal populations big game hunters, bear viewers, and general wildlife are referred to as brown bears. Because of the availability of abundant, high-quality food (e.g. salmon), brown bears enthusiasts. Hiking up a fish stream on the northern are generally much larger, occur at high densities, and have islands of Admiralty, Baranof, or Chichagof during late smaller home ranges than grizzly bears. summer reveals a network of deeply rutted bear trails winding through tunnels of devil’s club (Oplopanx (Klein 1965, MacDonald and Cook 1999) (Fig 2). -
February 15, 2012 Chapter 34 Notes: Flatworms, Roundworms and Rotifers
February 15, 2012 Chapter 34 Notes: Flatworms, Roundworms and Rotifers Section 1 Platyhelminthes Section 2 Nematoda and Rotifera 34-1 Objectives Summarize the distinguishing characteristics of flatworms. Describe the anatomy of a planarian. Compare free-living and parasitic flatworms. Diagram the life cycle of a fluke. Describe the life cycle of a tapeworm. Structure and Function of Flatworms · The phylum Platyhelminthes includes organisms called flatworms. · They are more complex than sponges but are the simplest animals with bilateral symmetry. · Their bodies develop from three germ layers: · ectoderm · mesoderm · endoderm · They are acoelomates with dorsoventrally flattened bodies. · They exhibit cephalization. · The classification of Platyhelminthes has undergone many recent changes. Characteristics of Flatworms February 15, 2012 Class Turbellaria · The majority of species in the class Turbellaria live in the ocean. · The most familiar turbellarians are the freshwater planarians of the genus Dugesia. · Planarians have a spade-shaped anterior end and a tapered posterior end. Class Turbellaria Continued Digestion and Excretion in Planarians · Planarians feed on decaying plant or animal matter and smaller organisms. · Food is ingested through the pharynx. · Planarians eliminate excess water through a network of excretory tubules. · Each tubule is connected to several flame cells. · The water is transported through the tubules and excreted from pores on the body surface. Class Turbellaria Continued Neural Control in Planarians · The planarian nervous system is more complex than the nerve net of cnidarians. · The cerebral ganglia serve as a simple brain. · A planarian’s nervous system gives it the ability to learn. · Planarians sense light with eyespots. · Other sensory cells respond to touch, water currents, and chemicals in the environment. -
Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus Arctos and U
East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2017 Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus Benjamin James Hillesheim East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Hillesheim, Benjamin James, "Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3261. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3261 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus ____________________________________ A thesis presented to the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences ____________________________________ by Benjamin Hillesheim May 2017 ____________________________________ Dr. Blaine W. Schubert, Chair Dr. Steven C. Wallace Dr. Josh X. Samuels Keywords: Ursidae, Geometric morphometrics, Ursus americanus, Ursus arctos, Last Glacial Maximum ABSTRACT Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus by Benjamin J. Hillesheim Despite being separated by millions of years of evolution, black bears (Ursus americanus) and brown bears (Ursus arctos) can be difficult to distinguish based on skeletal and dental material alone. Complicating matters, some Late Pleistocene U. americanus are significantly larger in size than their modern relatives, obscuring the identification of the two bears. -
Coyote Canis Latrans in 2007 IUCN Red List (Canis Latrans)
MAMMALS OF MISSISSIPPI 10:1–9 Coyote (Canis latrans) CHRISTOPHER L. MAGEE Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, 39762, USA Abstract—Canis latrans (Say 1823) is a canid commonly called the coyote. It is dog-like in appearance with varied colorations throughout its range. Originally restricted to the western portion of North America, coyotes have expanded across the majority of the continent. Coyotes are omnivorous and extremely adaptable, often populating urban and suburban environments. Preferred habitats include a mixture of forested, open, and brushy areas. Currently, there exist no threats or conservation concerns for the coyote in any part of its range. This species is currently experiencing an increasing population trend. Published 5 December 2008 by the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Mississippi State University Coyote location (Jackson 1951; Young 1951; Berg and Canis latrans (Say, 1823) Chesness 1978; Way 2007). The species is sexually dimorphic, with adult females distinctly CONTEXT AND CONTENT. lighter and smaller than adult males (Kennedy Order Carnivora, suborder Caniformia, et al. 2003; Way 2007). Average head and infraorder Cynoidea, family Canidae, subfamily body lengths are about 1.0–1.5 m with a tail Caninae, tribe Canini. Genus Canis consists length of about Young 1951). The skull of the of six species: C. aureus, C. latrans, C. lupus, coyote (Fig. 2) progresses through 6 distinct C. mesomelas, C. simensis, and C. adustus. developmental stages allowing delineation Canis latrans has 19 recognized subspecies between the age classes of juvenile, immature, (Wilson and Reeder 2005). young, young adult, adult, and old adult (Jackson 1951). -
VIRGINIA BLACK BEAR What Kind of Bears Are in Virginia? 101
VIRGINIA BLACK BEAR What Kind of Bears Are In Virginia? 101 Jaime Sajecki Bear Project Leader ………Black Bears! What Kind of Bears Are In What Kind of Bears Are In Virginia? Virginia? Brown and Blond Phase Black Bear Cubs Brown Bear What Kind of Bears Are In What Kind of Bears Are In Virginia? Virginia? Only 58% of Virginians correctly named black bears as the only species of bear living in Virginia. Brown Bear Brown Bear 1 Weight Males (boars) Females (sows) adult weight adult weight LIFE HISTORY 200-500 100-250 OF BLACK pounds pounds BEARS Large, Non-retractable Claws Senses Nearsighted Keen sense of smell/hearing Bears can see in color: This helps them find insects and small Climbing trees colorful berries while foraging. Digging up insects Bears stand on their hind legs to get a better view and to smell and “taste” the air Defense Behaviors Movements SPRING/SUMMER Solitary most of the time. • Bears leave dens in search of food - Food is limited Active at dawn and dusk • Female bears : Travel with cubs • Male bears: Mostly solitary Omnivorous and opportunistic • Yearlings may be with siblings • Yearlings left to fend for themselves when female ready to mate again 2 Movements What Bears Eat FALL • ~75% of the bear’s diet consists of vegetative FOOD! FOOD! FOOD! matter; berries, nuts, grasses, and fruits Bears can forage up to 20 hours a day in preparation for denning • ~25% consists of insects, larvae, carrion, small animals, and fish. Although they are not particularly good hunters, they have been known to prey on small to medium- sized mammals such as rodents and deer fawns. -
A Study of the Nematode Capillaria Boehm!
A STUDY OF THE NEMATODE CAPILLARIA BOEHM! (SUPPERER, 1953): A PARASITE IN THE NASAL PASSAGES OF THE DOG By CAROLEE. MUCHMORE Bachelor of Science Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1982 Master of Science Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1986 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 1998 1ht>I~ l qq ~ 1) t-11 q lf). $ COPYRIGHT By Carole E. Muchmore May, 1998 A STUDY OF THE NEMATODE CAPILLARIA BOEHM!. (SUPPERER, 1953): APARASITE IN THE NASAL PASSAGES OF THE DOG Thesis Appro~ed: - cl ~v .L-. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My first and most grateful thanks go to Dr. Helen Jordan, my major adviser, without whose encouragement and vision this study would never have been completed. Dr. Jordan is an exceptional individual, a dedicated parasitologist, indefatigable and with limitless integrity. Additional committee members to whom I owe many thanks are Dr. Carl Fox, Dr. John Homer, Dr. Ulrich Melcher, Dr. Charlie Russell. - Dr. Fox for assistance in photographing specimens. - Dr. Homer for his realistic outlook and down-to-earth common sense approach. - Dr. Melcher for his willingness to help in the intricate world of DNA technology. - Dr. Charlie Russell, recruited from plant nematology, for fresh perspectives. Thanks go to Dr. Robert Fulton, department head, for his gracious support; Dr. Sidney Ewing who was always able to provide the final word on scientific correctness; Dr. Alan Kocan for his help in locating and obtaining specimens. Special appreciation is in order for Dr. Roger Panciera for his help with pathology examinations, slide preparation and camera operation and to Sandi Mullins for egg counts and helping collect capillarids from the greyhounds following necropsy.