DOCSLIB.ORG

Status of the Wood Bison (Bison Bison Athabascae) in Alberta

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Status of the Wood Bison (Bison Bison Athabascae) in Alberta Status of the Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) in Alberta Jonathan A. Mitchell and C. Cormack Gates Alberta Wildlife Status Report No. 38 January 2002 Published By: i Publication No. T/007 ISBN: 0-7785-1838-8 (Printed Edition) ISBN: 0-7785-1839-6 (On-line Edition) ISSN: 1206-4912 (Printed Edition) ISSN: 1499-4682 (On-line Edition) Series Editors: Sherry Feser and Robin Gutsell Illustrations: Brian Huffman For copies of this report, contact: Information Centre - Publications Alberta Environment/Alberta Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Division Main Floor, Great West Life Building 9920 - 108 Street Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 2M4 Telephone: (780) 422-2079 OR Information Service Alberta Environment/Alberta Sustainable Resource Development #100, 3115 - 12 Street NE Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2E 7J2 Telephone: (780) 297-3362 OR Visit our web site at : http://www3.gov.ab.ca/srd/fw/status/index.html This publication may be cited as: Mitchell, J. A. and Gates, C.C. 2002. Status of the Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) in Alberta. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Fish and Wildlife Division, and Alberta Conservation Association, Wildlife Status Report No. 38, Edmonton, AB. 32 pp. ii PREFACE Every five years, the Fish and Wildlife Division of Alberta Sustainable Resource Development reviews the status of wildlife species in Alberta. These overviews, which have been conducted in 1991, 1996 and 2000, assign individual species “ranks” that reflect the perceived level of risk to populations that occur in the province. Such designations are determined from extensive consultations with professional and amateur biologists, and from a variety of readily available sources of population data. A primary objective of these reviews is to identify species that may be considered for more detailed status determinations. The Alberta Wildlife Status Report Series is an extension of the general statusing exercises (1996 Status of Alberta Wildlife, The General Status of Alberta Wild Species 2000), and provides comprehensive current summaries of the biological status of selected wildlife species in Alberta. Priority is given to species that are potentially at risk in the province (“At Risk,” “May Be At Risk”), that are of uncertain status (“Undetermined”), or which are considered to be at risk at a national level by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). Reports in this series are published and distributed by the Alberta Conservation Association and the Fish and Wildlife Division of Alberta Sustainable Resource Development. They are intended to provide detailed and up-to-date information which will be useful to resource professionals for managing populations of species and their habitats in the province. The reports are also designed to provide current information which will assist the Alberta Endangered Species Conservation Committee to identify species that may be formally designated as “Endangered” or “Threatened” under Alberta’s Wildlife Act. To achieve these goals, the reports have been authored and/or reviewed by individuals with unique local expertise in the biology and management of each species. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The wood bison (Bison bison athabascae) is the largest terrestrial mammal in North America and originally was scattered in small, non-migratory herds from northern Alberta to Alaska. Like the plains bison (Bison bison bison), hunting nearly eliminated the wood bison at the end of the 19th century, when the species’ population reached an estimated low of 250. The bison has been an important element of the fauna of Alberta for nearly 10 000 years, providing sustenance and materials for many of Alberta’s first human residents. Bison also provide an important source of food to wolves and other animals that scavenge their carcasses. Wood bison are considered obligate grazers, primarily consuming the grasses and sedges found in the small prairies of the boreal forest. Bison may be partially responsible for maintaining these habitats. Fire suppression, disruption of flood regimes and the disappearance of bison from northern Alberta have likely combined to result in forest encroachment and eventual loss of some of these boreal prairies. Reintroduction efforts have been undertaken in northern Canada, including one location in Alberta. The Hay-Zama herd located near Assumption, Alberta was estimated to number 200 animals in March 2001. However, this herd may be threatened by the wood bison in and around Wood Buffalo National Park (WBNP), which are infected with the cattle diseases of bovine tuberculosis and bovine brucellosis. The presence of these diseases is the most significant factor limiting further recovery of Wood Bison in Alberta. Other pressures include expansion of agriculture in the boreal region, in particular commercial bison ranching, and increasing industrialization of northern parts of the province. Disease surveillance measures for the Hay-Zama herd need to be developed to protect these animals from infection. The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) lists the Wood Bison as “Threatened” but does not provide a designation for plains bison (COSEWIC 2001). Wood bison and plains bison are aggregated under the taxonomic designation Bos bison by the Canadian Endangered Species Council (2001), which lists the species as “Sensitive” in Canada. In Alberta, the wood bison is considered “At Risk” according to The General Status of Alberta Wild Species 2000 (Alberta Sustainable Resource Development 2001). Within a designated management area in the northwestern section of the province, bison are listed as “Endangered” under Alberta’s Wildlife Act. Additional research needs to be conducted to determine the status of bison between Hay-Zama and WBNP, and other areas in northern Alberta. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to acknowledge the following people who have helped in the creation of this report through contributing current information or by reviewing previous versions of the report: Adam James, Dave Moyles, Doug Culbert, Kim Morton and Robin Gutsell (Alberta Sustainable Resource Development); Sherry Feser , Dawn Birn and Isabelle Michaud (Alberta Conservation Association); Lisa Fischer (University of Calgary); Vern Neal (Little Red River and Tall Cree First Nations); Keith Lyseng (Alberta Sustainable Resource Development); Doug Scott (Canadian Food Inspection Agency); Dan Patten (Peace Country Bison Association); and John Nishi (Government of the Northwest Territories). Preparation of this report was funded by the Wildlife Management Enhancement Fund of the Alberta Conservation Association and the Fish and Wildlife Division of Alberta Sustainable Resource Development. v TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ........................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ v INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 HABITAT ............................................................................................................................ 1 CONSERVATION BIOLOGY ............................................................................................ 3 DISTRIBUTION ................................................................................................................. 5 1. Alberta .................................................................................................................... 6 2. Other Areas ............................................................................................................. 6 POPULATION SIZE AND TRENDS .................................................................................. 6 1.0 Alberta .................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Free-Ranging ............................................................................................. ..6 1.2 Captive.................................................................................................... ..10 2.0 Other Areas ....................................................................................................... ..11 2.1 Free-Ranging ........................................................................................... ..11 2.2 Captive with Conservation Objectives ...................................................... ..11 2.3 Free-Ranging/Diseased ............................................................................ ..11 LIMITING FACTORS ...................................................................................................... 12 1. Disease ................................................................................................................. 12 2. Agriculture ........................................................................................................... ..14 3. Forestry, Oil and Gas ............................................................................................. 15 4. Hunting ................................................................................................................ ..15 5. Management .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Additional MMTP Traditional Knowledge Studies
    Additional MMTP Traditional Knowledge Studies February 8, 2017 MMTP Additional Information (CEC).pdf FinalReportDakotaPlains.pdf FinalReportAddendumSagkeeng.pdf 820 Taylor Avenue • Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada • R3M 3T1 (204) 360-4394 • [email protected] February 8, 2017 Mr. Serge Scrafield Chair Clean Environment Commission 305-155 Carlton Street Winnipeg, MB R3C 3H8 Dear Mr. Scrafield: RE: Manitoba-Minnesota Transmission Project (MMTP) – Additional Material Please find enclosed additional materials pertinent to the Manitoba-Minnesota Transmission Project. These materials are provided to update the record in advance of the Clean Environment Commission hearings. The following materials related to the MMTP Environmental Impact Statement are enclosed: • Manitoba Hydro Manitoba Minnesota Transmission Project Dakota Plains Wahpeton Nation Traditional Knowledge Study, and • Sagkeeng O-Pimatiziiwin 2 Traditional Knowledge Study Manitoba-Minnesota Transmission Line Project. Should you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 204-360-4394. Regards, Original signed by Shannon Johnson Shannon Johnson Manager Licensing and Environmental Assessment Department Manitoba Hydro 820 Taylor Ave (3) Winnipeg, Manitoba R3M 3T1 Attachments: 2 September 2016 MANITOBA HYDRO MANITOBA-MINNESOTA TRANSMISSION PROJECT Dakota Plains Wahpeton Nation Traditional Knowledge Study Submitted to: Dakota Plains Wahpeton Nation Report Number: 1650733 Distribution: 1 copy Dakota Plains Wahpeton Nation REPORT 1 copy Golder Associates
    [Show full text]
  • Horned Animals
    Horned Animals In This Issue In this issue of Wild Wonders you will discover the differences between horns and antlers, learn about the different animals in Alaska who have horns, compare and contrast their adaptations, and discover how humans use horns to make useful and decorative items. Horns and antlers are available from local ADF&G offices or the ARLIS library for teachers to borrow. Learn more online at: alaska.gov/go/HVNC Contents Horns or Antlers! What’s the Difference? 2 Traditional Uses of Horns 3 Bison and Muskoxen 4-5 Dall’s Sheep and Mountain Goats 6-7 Test Your Knowledge 8 Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Wildlife Conservation, 2018 Issue 8 1 Sometimes people use the terms horns and antlers in the wrong manner. They may say “moose horns” when they mean moose antlers! “What’s the difference?” they may ask. Let’s take a closer look and find out how antlers and horns are different from each other. After you read the information below, try to match the animals with the correct description. Horns Antlers • Made out of bone and covered with a • Made out of bone. keratin layer (the same material as our • Grow and fall off every year. fingernails and hair). • Are grown only by male members of the • Are permanent - they do not fall off every Cervid family (hoofed animals such as year like antlers do. deer), except for female caribou who also • Both male and female members in the grow antlers! Bovid family (cloven-hoofed animals such • Usually branched.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mackenzie Wood Bison (Bison Bison Athabascae) C.C
    ARCTIC VOL. 43, NO. 3 (SEPTEMBER 1990) P. 231-238 Growth and Dispersal of an Erupting Large Herbivore Population in Northern Canada: The Mackenzie Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) C.C. GATES' and N.C. LARTER' (Received 6 September 1989; accepted in revised form Il January 1990) ABSTRACT. In 1963,18 wood bison (Bison bison athabuscue)were introduced to the Mackenzie Bison Sanctuary. Thepopulation has grown at a mean exponential rate of r = 0.215 f 0.007, reaching 1718 bison 2 10 months of age by April 1987. Analysis of annual population growth revealed a maximum exponential rateof r = 0.267 in 1975, followed by a declining rate, reaching a low value of r = 0.103 in 1987. Selective predation on calves was proposed as a mechanism to explain the declining rate of population growth. The area occupiedby the population increased at an exponential rate of0.228 f 0.017 km2.year". The dispersal ofmature males followed a pattern described as an innate process, while dispersal of females and juveniles exhibited characteristicsof pressure-threshold dispersal. Key words: erupting population, dispersal, wood bison, Bison bison athabascae, Northwest Rrritories RJ~SUMÉ.En 1963, on a introduit 18 bisons des bois(Bison bison athabuscue)dans la Rtserve de bisons Mackenzie.La population a connu un taux moyen de croissance exponentielle der= 0,215 f 0,007, atteignant 1718 bisons qui avaient 10 mois ou plus en avril 1987. Une analyse de la croissance annuelle de la population montre un taux moyen de croissance exponentielle der = 0,267 en 1975, suivid'un taux en baisse jusqu'B r = 0,103 en 1987.On avanceque la prkdation selectives'optrant sur les veauxexplique la baisse du taux de croissance lade population.
    [Show full text]
  • Bovine Benefactories: an Examination of the Role of Religion in Cow Sanctuaries Across the United States
    BOVINE BENEFACTORIES: AN EXAMINATION OF THE ROLE OF RELIGION IN COW SANCTUARIES ACROSS THE UNITED STATES _______________________________________________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board _______________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ________________________________________________________________ by Thomas Hellmuth Berendt August, 2018 Examing Committee Members: Sydney White, Advisory Chair, TU Department of Religion Terry Rey, TU Department of Religion Laura Levitt, TU Department of Religion Tom Waidzunas, External Member, TU Deparment of Sociology ABSTRACT This study examines the growing phenomenon to protect the bovine in the United States and will question to what extent religion plays a role in the formation of bovine sanctuaries. My research has unearthed that there are approximately 454 animal sanctuaries in the United States, of which 146 are dedicated to farm animals. However, of this 166 only 4 are dedicated to pigs, while 17 are specifically dedicated to the bovine. Furthermore, another 50, though not specifically dedicated to cows, do use the cow as the main symbol for their logo. Therefore the bovine is seemingly more represented and protected than any other farm animal in sanctuaries across the United States. The question is why the bovine, and how much has religion played a role in elevating this particular animal above all others. Furthermore, what constitutes a sanctuary? Does
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Bison (Bison Bison Athabascae)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Threatened and Endangered Species Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) The wood bison (Bison bison athabascae) is the largest native land mammal in North America. They have a large triangular head, a thin beard, and rudimentary throat mane; their horns usually extend above the hair on their head; and the highest point of their hump is forward of their front legs. These physical characteristics distinguish them from the plains bison (Bison bison bison), which is the subspecies that occurs on the prairies of the continental United States. Protected Status The wood bison is listed as threatened under the 1973 Endangered Species Act (ESA). In Canada the wood bison is protected as threatened under the Species at Risk Act. Range and Population Size The wood bison is adapted to meadow Wood bison cow and calf at the Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center. Doug Lindstrand and forest habitats in subarctic regions. Historically, its range was generally north of that occupied by Canada, hunting is strictly regulated uninfected herds. Captive herds the plains bison, and included most and is not a threat to the species as of disease-free animals have been boreal regions of northern Alberta; it once was. The main threats are established in both Alaska and northeastern British Columbia; diseases of domestic cattle (bovine Russia. a small portion of northwestern tuberculosis and bovine brucellosis), Saskatchewan; the western which were unintentionally introduced Alaska’s Captive Herd Northwest Territories; most of the to wood bison in the early 1920s, The captive herd in Alaska is being Yukon Territory; and much of interior and loss of habitat (primarily from cared for at the Alaska Wildlife Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Report and Assessment of Wood Bison in the NWT (2016)
    SPECIES STATUS REPORT Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) Sakāwmostos (Cree) e ta oe (Sout Slave ) e en á e ejere, t a n a n’jere ( en sųł n ) Dachan tat w ’aak’ (Teetł’ t Gw ’ n) Aak’ , a antat aak’ (Gw a Gw ’ n) Łek'a e, łuk'a e, kedä- o’, ejed (Kaska ene) Ejuda (Slavey) Tl'oo tat aak'ii, dachan tat aak'ii, akki chashuur, nin shuurchoh, nin daa ha-an (Van Tat Gw ’ n) in the Northwest Territories Threatened April 2016 Status of Wood Bison in the NWT Species at Risk Committee status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of species suspected of being at risk in the Northwest Territories (NWT). Suggested citation: Species at Risk Committee. 2016. Species Status Report for Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) in the Northwest Territories. Species at Risk Committee, Yellowknife, NT. © Government of the Northwest Territories on behalf of the Species at Risk Committee ISBN: 978-0-7708-0241-7 Production note: The drafts of this report were prepared by Kristi Benson (traditional and community knowledge component) and Tom Chowns (scientific knowledge component), under contract with the Government of the Northwest Territories, and edited by Claire Singer, Michelle Ramsay and Kendra McGreish. For additional copies contact: Species at Risk Secretariat c/o SC6, Department of Environment and Natural Resources P.O. Box 1320 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 Tel.: (855) 783-4301 (toll free) Fax.: (867) 873-0293 E-mail: [email protected] www.nwtspeciesatrisk.ca ABOUT THE SPECIES AT RISK COMMITTEE The Species at Risk Committee was established under the Species at Risk (NWT) Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives of Saskatchewan Dakota/Lakota Elders on the Treaty Process Within Canada.” Please Read This Form Carefully, and Feel Free to Ask Questions You Might Have
    Perspectives of Saskatchewan Dakota/Lakota Elders on the Treaty Process within Canada A Dissertation Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Interdisciplinary Studies University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Leo J. Omani © Leo J. Omani, copyright March, 2010. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of the thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis was completed. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain is not to be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Request for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis, in whole or part should be addressed to: Graduate Chair, Interdisciplinary Committee Interdisciplinary Studies Program College of Graduate Studies and Research University of Saskatchewan Room C180 Administration Building 105 Administration Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada S7N 5A2 i ABSTRACT This ethnographic dissertation study contains a total of six chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Wood Bison Reintroduction Fact Sheet
    Scott Michaelis, AWCC Cathie Harms, ADF&G (952) 836-7719; [email protected] (907) 459-7231; [email protected] 1. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) plans to restore wood bison to Alaska’s landscape in March/April 2015. The wood bison to be released are descendants of 66 animals obtained from Canada in 2003 and 2008 and have been held at the Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center (AWCC) in Portage. 2. Bison will be released in the lower Innoko and Yukon River area. (This is not the Innoko National Wildlife Refuge.) No other releases are currently planned. Although ADF&G previously proposed reintroduction in the Yukon Flats and Minto Flats, the Innoko region was chosen due to quantity/quality of habitat, support from local people, and lack of landowner concerns about conflicts with development. 3. ADF&G plans to release 100 female and young bison near Shageluk, about 300 miles west of Anchorage, in spring 2015. Six loads of 14-30 bison (depending on age and sex of the animals) will be will be placed in specially designed containers, trucked from AWCC to Anchorage International Airport and flown in C-130 Hercules cargo aircraft to Shageluk. The bison will be held in temporary pens outside of Shageluk and will be released after they have acclimated to the area. After release, they will be closely monitored for at least the first year. Depending on funding, additional bulls may be transported at a later time. 4. Starting with 100 animals provides sufficient genetic diversity of the founder population and adequate reproductive potential to allow an excellent chance of success of the restoration effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Plains Bison Bison Bison Bison
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Plains Bison Bison bison bison in Canada THREATENED 2004 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2004. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the plains bison Bison bison bison in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 71 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Greg Wilson and Keri Zittlau for writing the status report on the plains bison Bison bison bison in Canada prepared under contract with Environment Canada. The report was overseen and edited by Marco Festa-Bianchet, the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Species Specialist Co-chair. COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Parks Canada for providing partial funding for the preparation of this report. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Ếgalement disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le bison des prairies (Bison bison bison) au Canada. Cover illustration: Plains bison — Illustration by Wes Olson. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2004 Catalogue No. CW69-14/379-2004E-PDF ISBN 0-662-37298-0 HTML: CW69-14/379-2004E-HTML 0-662-37299-9 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – May 2004 Common name Plains bison Scientific name Bison bison bison Status Threatened Reason for designation There are currently about 700 mature bison of this subspecies in three free-ranging herds and about 250 semi- captive mature bison in Elk Island National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Bison Restoration in Alaska: a Review of Environmental and Regulatory Issues and Proposed Decisions for Project Implementation
    Wood Bison Restoration in Alaska: A Review of Environmental and Regulatory Issues and Proposed Decisions for Project Implementation Painting by Randall Compton Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation April 2007 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report and environmental review of wood bison restoration in Alaska was made possible by generous contributions from Safari Club International Foundation and the Pope & Young Club. Additional support for printing and distribution of the report was provided through the State Wildlife Grant program. ADF&G would like to hear your views on the wood bison restoration project The purpose of this report is to provide the public and decision makers with comprehensive information on wood bison restoration, to fully identify and discuss the issues related to wood bison restoration in Alaska, and provide an opportunity for additional public review and comment. Public comment on this report will be used to help make decisions on whether ADF&G will proceed with wood bison restoration in Alaska and, if the project proceeds, will play a significant role in determining where initial wood bison restoration efforts will be focused. Comments should be received by June 30, 2007 at: Comments can also be sent by fax to Wood Bison Environmental Review Comments (907) 452-6410 or email at ADF&G, Division of Wildlife Conservation [email protected] 1300 College Road Fairbanks, AK 99701-1599 The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) administers all programs and activities free from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Notebook Series: American Bison
    American Bison The two modern subspecies of North American bison are plains bison (Bison bison bison) and wood bison (Bison bison athabascae). Various forms of bison existed in Alaska for several hundred thousand years, and until recently were one of the most abundant large animals on the landscape. Wood bison were the last subspecies to occur in Alaska and evolved from their larger-horned Pleistocene ancestors. They lived in parts of Interior and Southcentral Alaska for several thousand years before disappearing during the last few hundred years. These animals were an important resource for native peoples who hunted them for their meat and hides. Plains bison occurred in southern Canada and the lower 48 states. This animal shaped the lifestyle of the Plains Indians and figured prominently in American history before they were brought to near extinction by the late 1800s. Nineteen plains bison were transplanted to present day Delta Junction, Alaska from Montana in 1928. Alaska's existing wild bison are descendants of these 19 animals. Transplants have created additional herds at Copper River, Chitina River, and Farewell. Small domestic herds are located in agricultural areas on the mainland and on Kodiak and Popov Islands. There were approximately 700 wild plains bison in the state in 2007. Efforts are underway to restore wood bison to parts of their original range in Alaska. By 1900 there were fewer than 300 wood bison remaining in North America, but conservation efforts in Canada have allowed them to increase and there are now over 4,000 animals in healthy free-ranging herds. The planned reintroduction of wood bison to Alaska could increase this number substantially during the coming decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the State of Conservation of Wood Buffalo National Park World Heritage Site (Canada)
    December 1st, 2020 REPORT ON THE STATE OF CONSERVATION OF WOOD BUFFALO NATIONAL PARK WORLD HERITAGE SITE (CANADA) IN RESPONSE TO: WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE DECISION 43 COM 7B.15 1 DECEMBER 2020 Wood Bison herd in the Peace-Athabasca Delta, Wood Buffalo National Park (Photo: J. McKinnon, Parks Canada) i December 1st, 2020 Table of Contents List of Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Response to the decision of the World Heritage Committee ............................................................................. 3 2.1 Responses to specific requests of Decision 43 COM 7B.15. ................................................................................ 3 2.2 Overview of progress on Action Plan implementation ....................................................................................... 8 3. Other current conservation issues identified by the State Party which may have an impact on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value ..................................................................................................................................... 17 4. Potential major restorations, alterations and/or new construction(s) intended within the property, the buffer zone(s) and/or corridor or other areas, where such developments
    [Show full text]