DOCSLIB.ORG

Plains Bison Bison Bison Bison

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plains Bison Bison Bison Bison COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Plains Bison Bison bison bison in Canada THREATENED 2004 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2004. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the plains bison Bison bison bison in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 71 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Greg Wilson and Keri Zittlau for writing the status report on the plains bison Bison bison bison in Canada prepared under contract with Environment Canada. The report was overseen and edited by Marco Festa-Bianchet, the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Species Specialist Co-chair. COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Parks Canada for providing partial funding for the preparation of this report. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Ếgalement disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le bison des prairies (Bison bison bison) au Canada. Cover illustration: Plains bison — Illustration by Wes Olson. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2004 Catalogue No. CW69-14/379-2004E-PDF ISBN 0-662-37298-0 HTML: CW69-14/379-2004E-HTML 0-662-37299-9 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – May 2004 Common name Plains bison Scientific name Bison bison bison Status Threatened Reason for designation There are currently about 700 mature bison of this subspecies in three free-ranging herds and about 250 semi- captive mature bison in Elk Island National Park. The largest free-ranging herd, in the Pink Mountain area of BC, is outside the historical range of this subspecies. The population in Prince Albert National Park is increasing by about 10% a year. The greatest problem facing these bison in Canada is the lack of habitat, due to conversion to agriculture and urbanization. Additional threats include domestic cattle disease and the risk of genetic pollution from escaped ranched bison, including some that may carry cattle genes. The total number of free-ranging and semi- captive mature bison of this subspecies is just under 1000, and there are fewer than five populations. Occurrence British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba Status history Designated Threatened in May 2004. Assessment based on a new status report. iii COSEWIC Executive Summary Plains Bison Bison bison bison Species information Plains bison, Bison bison bison Linnaeus 1758, are one of two subspecies of Bison bison, along with Bison bison athabascae Rhoads 1897, the wood bison. Distribution Plains bison were once widespread across North America, but now only occur in fragmented populations throughout their historic range. Wild populations occur in British Columbia and Saskatchewan. Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba contain semi-wild or captive herds. Habitat The Canadian range of plains bison once extended over the prairies, including grasslands, shrublands and some woodland areas. However, plains bison will only exist in regions containing suitable grasslands and meadows. Much of the original plains bison habitat has changed drastically during the last century due to agricultural conversion and urbanization. A large amount of the current Canadian bison range is under government protection, and no changes are expected in habitat availability. Although little remains of the original traditional prairie habitat for plains bison, some reintroduction opportunities do exist. Biology Plains bison are polygynous mammals. They are gregarious and herd size and structure vary throughout the year. Males establish a fluid dominance hierarchy, where dominance rankings often change within a breeding season, and many males breed each year. Bison are well adapted to exist in native grasslands and meadow regions. They primarily consume sedges and grasses. Population sizes and trends The Canadian population of plains bison includes 670-740 mature animals in three free-ranging herds and 250-270 mature animals in one semi-wild herd. An additional iv 63-83 mature bison occur in four small, captive populations. All populations, except for Pink Mountain, are stable or increasing in size. Elk Island National Park, the semi-wild herd, is either the direct or indirect source for all plains bison herds in Canada. Limiting factors and threats The largest impediment to plains bison conservation is a lack of habitat. Most of its original range has been lost to agriculture and urban development. There are, however, a few areas where reintroductions may still be possible. A number of plains bison populations in the United States have hybridized with cattle. To date, Elk Island National Park and Pink Mountain, the only Canadian plains bison surveyed for cattle genes, have shown no evidence of hybridization. Only three free-ranging herds of plains bison are subject to natural selective factors. Two of these populations are small, with 100 and 320 bison. Most Canadian plains bison populations were founded with between 10 and 50 individuals from Elk Island National Park, raising concerns as to their levels of genetic diversity. Efforts to conserve plains bison in Canada are hampered by the lack of a consensus for protection between provincial and federal legislation. Hybridization with wood bison may also be a threat to the conservation of plains bison in Canada. Game ranching poses a threat to plains bison; there is a risk of hybridization between wild plains bison populations and ranched herds of wood and plains bison when ranched animals escape. At present, no Canadian plains bison population is infected with any disease that jeopardizes its existence. However, domestic cattle can act as disease reservoirs for bison, and their proximity could put the health of some bison herds at risk. Special significance of the species Millions of plains bison once roamed the prairies of North America, where they were the dominant herbivore. As such, they greatly affected the Great Plains ecosystem. The histories of plains bison and Aboriginal Peoples in North America are inextricably linked. Existing protection or other status designations Bison have a global heritage status rank of G4, meaning they are globally common but rare in parts of their range. The General Status of Species in Canada classifies bison as Sensitive. In British Columbia and Manitoba, plains bison are listed as Vulnerable. In Saskatchewan, plains bison are listed as At Risk. In Alberta, plains bison are considered extirpated from provincial land. Plains bison are classified as domestic animals in Alberta and Manitoba. The Pink Mountain herd in British Columbia is on land that is not protected by a government agency, but is protected from unregulated hunting under the B.C. Wildlife Act. v COSEWIC HISTORY The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) was created in 1977 as a result of a recommendation at the Federal-Provincial Wildlife Conference held in 1976. It arose from the need for a single, official, scientifically sound, national listing of wildlife species at risk. In 1978, COSEWIC designated its first species and produced its first list of Canadian species at risk. On June 5, 2003, the Species at Risk Act (SARA) was proclaimed. SARA establishes COSEWIC as an advisory body ensuring that species will continue to be assessed under a rigorous and independent scientific process. COSEWIC MANDATE The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) assesses the national status of wild species, subspecies, varieties, or other designatable units that are considered to be at risk in Canada. Designations are made on native species and include the following taxonomic groups: mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fishes, arthropods, molluscs, vascular plants, mosses, and lichens. COSEWIC MEMBERSHIP COSEWIC comprises members from each provincial and territorial government wildlife agency, four federal organizations (Canadian Wildlife Service, Parks Canada Agency, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and the Federal Biosystematic Partnership, chaired by the Canadian Museum of Nature), three nonjurisdictional members and the co-chairs of the species specialist and the Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge subcommittees. The committee meets to consider status reports on candidate species. DEFINITIONS (after May 2004) Species Any indigenous species, subspecies, variety, or geographically or genetically distinct population of wild fauna and flora. Extinct (X) A species that no longer exists. Extirpated (XT) A species no longer existing in the wild in Canada, but occurring elsewhere. Endangered (E) A species facing imminent extirpation or extinction. Threatened (T) A species likely to become endangered if limiting factors are not reversed. Special Concern (SC)* A species that may become a threatened or an endangered species because of a combination of biological characteristics and identified threats. Not at Risk (NAR)** A species that has been evaluated and found to be not at risk. Data Deficient (DD)*** A species for which there is insufficient scientific information to support status designation. * Formerly described
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Horned Animals
    Horned Animals In This Issue In this issue of Wild Wonders you will discover the differences between horns and antlers, learn about the different animals in Alaska who have horns, compare and contrast their adaptations, and discover how humans use horns to make useful and decorative items. Horns and antlers are available from local ADF&G offices or the ARLIS library for teachers to borrow. Learn more online at: alaska.gov/go/HVNC Contents Horns or Antlers! What’s the Difference? 2 Traditional Uses of Horns 3 Bison and Muskoxen 4-5 Dall’s Sheep and Mountain Goats 6-7 Test Your Knowledge 8 Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Wildlife Conservation, 2018 Issue 8 1 Sometimes people use the terms horns and antlers in the wrong manner. They may say “moose horns” when they mean moose antlers! “What’s the difference?” they may ask. Let’s take a closer look and find out how antlers and horns are different from each other. After you read the information below, try to match the animals with the correct description. Horns Antlers • Made out of bone and covered with a • Made out of bone. keratin layer (the same material as our • Grow and fall off every year. fingernails and hair). • Are grown only by male members of the • Are permanent - they do not fall off every Cervid family (hoofed animals such as year like antlers do. deer), except for female caribou who also • Both male and female members in the grow antlers! Bovid family (cloven-hoofed animals such • Usually branched.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mackenzie Wood Bison (Bison Bison Athabascae) C.C
    ARCTIC VOL. 43, NO. 3 (SEPTEMBER 1990) P. 231-238 Growth and Dispersal of an Erupting Large Herbivore Population in Northern Canada: The Mackenzie Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) C.C. GATES' and N.C. LARTER' (Received 6 September 1989; accepted in revised form Il January 1990) ABSTRACT. In 1963,18 wood bison (Bison bison athabuscue)were introduced to the Mackenzie Bison Sanctuary. Thepopulation has grown at a mean exponential rate of r = 0.215 f 0.007, reaching 1718 bison 2 10 months of age by April 1987. Analysis of annual population growth revealed a maximum exponential rateof r = 0.267 in 1975, followed by a declining rate, reaching a low value of r = 0.103 in 1987. Selective predation on calves was proposed as a mechanism to explain the declining rate of population growth. The area occupiedby the population increased at an exponential rate of0.228 f 0.017 km2.year". The dispersal ofmature males followed a pattern described as an innate process, while dispersal of females and juveniles exhibited characteristicsof pressure-threshold dispersal. Key words: erupting population, dispersal, wood bison, Bison bison athabascae, Northwest Rrritories RJ~SUMÉ.En 1963, on a introduit 18 bisons des bois(Bison bison athabuscue)dans la Rtserve de bisons Mackenzie.La population a connu un taux moyen de croissance exponentielle der= 0,215 f 0,007, atteignant 1718 bisons qui avaient 10 mois ou plus en avril 1987. Une analyse de la croissance annuelle de la population montre un taux moyen de croissance exponentielle der = 0,267 en 1975, suivid'un taux en baisse jusqu'B r = 0,103 en 1987.On avanceque la prkdation selectives'optrant sur les veauxexplique la baisse du taux de croissance lade population.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Bison (Bison Bison Athabascae)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Threatened and Endangered Species Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) The wood bison (Bison bison athabascae) is the largest native land mammal in North America. They have a large triangular head, a thin beard, and rudimentary throat mane; their horns usually extend above the hair on their head; and the highest point of their hump is forward of their front legs. These physical characteristics distinguish them from the plains bison (Bison bison bison), which is the subspecies that occurs on the prairies of the continental United States. Protected Status The wood bison is listed as threatened under the 1973 Endangered Species Act (ESA). In Canada the wood bison is protected as threatened under the Species at Risk Act. Range and Population Size The wood bison is adapted to meadow Wood bison cow and calf at the Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center. Doug Lindstrand and forest habitats in subarctic regions. Historically, its range was generally north of that occupied by Canada, hunting is strictly regulated uninfected herds. Captive herds the plains bison, and included most and is not a threat to the species as of disease-free animals have been boreal regions of northern Alberta; it once was. The main threats are established in both Alaska and northeastern British Columbia; diseases of domestic cattle (bovine Russia. a small portion of northwestern tuberculosis and bovine brucellosis), Saskatchewan; the western which were unintentionally introduced Alaska’s Captive Herd Northwest Territories; most of the to wood bison in the early 1920s, The captive herd in Alaska is being Yukon Territory; and much of interior and loss of habitat (primarily from cared for at the Alaska Wildlife Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Report and Assessment of Wood Bison in the NWT (2016)
    SPECIES STATUS REPORT Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) Sakāwmostos (Cree) e ta oe (Sout Slave ) e en á e ejere, t a n a n’jere ( en sųł n ) Dachan tat w ’aak’ (Teetł’ t Gw ’ n) Aak’ , a antat aak’ (Gw a Gw ’ n) Łek'a e, łuk'a e, kedä- o’, ejed (Kaska ene) Ejuda (Slavey) Tl'oo tat aak'ii, dachan tat aak'ii, akki chashuur, nin shuurchoh, nin daa ha-an (Van Tat Gw ’ n) in the Northwest Territories Threatened April 2016 Status of Wood Bison in the NWT Species at Risk Committee status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of species suspected of being at risk in the Northwest Territories (NWT). Suggested citation: Species at Risk Committee. 2016. Species Status Report for Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) in the Northwest Territories. Species at Risk Committee, Yellowknife, NT. © Government of the Northwest Territories on behalf of the Species at Risk Committee ISBN: 978-0-7708-0241-7 Production note: The drafts of this report were prepared by Kristi Benson (traditional and community knowledge component) and Tom Chowns (scientific knowledge component), under contract with the Government of the Northwest Territories, and edited by Claire Singer, Michelle Ramsay and Kendra McGreish. For additional copies contact: Species at Risk Secretariat c/o SC6, Department of Environment and Natural Resources P.O. Box 1320 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 Tel.: (855) 783-4301 (toll free) Fax.: (867) 873-0293 E-mail: [email protected] www.nwtspeciesatrisk.ca ABOUT THE SPECIES AT RISK COMMITTEE The Species at Risk Committee was established under the Species at Risk (NWT) Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Plains Bison and Wood Bison Conservation in Canada
    Bison Conservation in Canada Shelley Pruss Parks Canada Agency Greg Wilson Environment and Climate Change Canada 19 May 2016 1 Canada is home to two subspecies of bison Key morphological differences between Wood Bison bull (Bison bison athabascae) Plains Bison bulls(Bison bison bison) Line drawing courtesy of Wes Olson taken from COSEWIC. 2013. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Plains Bison (Bison bison bison) and the Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) in Canada. 2 PLAINS BISON All wild Plains Bison subpopulations in Canada today are the descendants of approximately 81 ancestors captured in three locations in the 1870s and 1880s, and persist as a tiny fraction of their original numbers (~30 million in North America). WOOD BISON Alaska Dept of Fish and Game Historical (pre-settlement) distribution of Wood Bison and Plains Bison in North America. Modified from Gates et al. (2010). Polygons courtesy of Keith Aune, Wildlife Conservation Society (COSEWIC 3 2013) The Species at Risk Act The federal government is responsible for implementing the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA) • Purpose: to prevent species from being extirpated or becoming extinct and to provide for recovery of species at risk The key provisions of SARA are: • Prohibitions against killing or harming listed species on federal lands • Requirement to develop a national recovery strategy and action plan(s) and to identify critical habitat to the extent possible for Extirpated, Endangered, and Threatened species • Management plans are developed for species of Special
    [Show full text]
  • LANDFIRE Biophysical Setting Model Biophysical Setting: 9814340 Texas-Louisiana Coastal Prairie
    LANDFIRE Biophysical Setting Model Biophysical Setting: 9814340 Texas-Louisiana Coastal Prairie This BPS is lumped with: 1487 This BPS is split into multiple models: BpS 1434 is systematically lumped with 1487. BpS 1487 is too fine for mapping and modeling. General Information Contributors (also see the Comments field) Date 1/24/2007 Modeler 1 Chris Harper [email protected] Reviewer Modeler 2 Ron Masters [email protected] Reviewer Modeler 3 Patrick Walther [email protected] Reviewer Vegetation Type Dominant Species Map Zone Model Zone ANGE Upland 98 Alaska Northern Plains Grassland/Herbaceous SCSC California N-Cent.Rockies General Model Sources PAVIS Great Basin Pacific Northwest Literature SPSP Great Lakes South Central Local Data TRDA3 Hawaii Southeast Expert Estimate PAHE2 Northeast S. Appalachians SONU2 Southwest MOCE2 Geographic Range This BpS encompasses non-saline tallgrass prairie vegetation ranging along the coast of LA and TX. This coastal prairie region once covered as much as nine million acres (Grace 2000). The prairie region of southwestern LA was once extensive (~ 2.5 million acres) but today is limited to small, remnant parcels (100-1000ac). Gulf Coast and inland varying distances from 50-150 miles (80-240 km) from south TX to LA and the mouth of the Mississippi River. In LA, it is bordered to the north and east by Southern Floodplain Forest (Kuchler 1964). To the south and west it also joins with the desert grasslands. This BpS is found in MZ37 in ECOMAP subsections 232Ea and 232Eb. Biophysical Site Description This BpS is found on Vertisols and Alfisols which developed over Pleistocene terraces flanking the Gulf Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • The Destruction of the Bison an Environmental History, –
    front.qxd 1/28/00 10:59 AM Page v The Destruction of the Bison An Environmental History, 1750–1920 ANDREW C. ISENBERG Princeton University front.qxd 1/28/00 10:59 AM Page vi published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru, uk http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa http://www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain © Andrew C. Isenberg 2000 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Ehrhardt 10/12 pt. System QuarkXPress [tw] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data Isenberg, Andrew C. (Andrew Christian) The destruction of the bison : an environmental history, 1750–1920 / Andrew C. Isenberg. p. cm. – (Studies in environment and history) Includes index. isbn 0-521-77172-2 1. American bison. 2. American bison hunting – History. 3. Nature – Effect of human beings on – North America. I. Title. ql737.u53i834 2000 333.95´9643´0978 – dc21 99-37543 cip isbn 0 521 77172 2 hardback front.qxd 1/28/00 10:59 AM Page ix Contents Acknowledgments page xi Introduction 1 1 The Grassland Environment 13 2 The Genesis of the Nomads 31 3 The Nomadic Experiment 63 4 The Ascendancy of the Market 93 5 The Wild and the Tamed 123 6 The Returns of the Bison 164 Conclusion 193 Index 199 ix intro.qxd 1/28/00 11:00 AM Page 1 Introduction Before Europeans brought the horse to the New World, Native Americans in the Great Plains hunted bison from foot.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Chance for the Plains Bison
    ARTICLE IN PRESS BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION xxx (2007) xxx– xxx available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Review Second chance for the plains bison Curtis H. Freesea,*, Keith E. Auneb, Delaney P. Boydc, James N. Derrd, Steve C. Forresta, C. Cormack Gatese, Peter J.P. Goganf, Shaun M. Grasselg, Natalie D. Halbertd, Kyran Kunkelh, Kent H. Redfordi aNorthern Great Plains Program, World Wildlife Fund, P.O. Box 7276, Bozeman, MT 59771, USA bMontana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, 1420 E 6th Avenue, Helena, MT 59620, USA cP.O. Box 1101, Redcliff, AB, Canada T0J 2P0 dDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4467, USA eFaculty of Environmental Design, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T6G 2E1 fUSGS Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, P.O. Box 173492, Bozeman, MT 59717-3492, USA gLower Brule Sioux Tribe, Department of Wildlife, Fish and Recreation, P.O. Box 246, Lower Brule, SD 57548, USA hNorthern Great Plains Program, World Wildlife Fund, 1875 Gateway South, Gallatin Gateway, MT 59730, USA iWCS Institute, Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Blvd., Bronx, NY 10460, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Before European settlement the plains bison (Bison bison bison) numbered in the tens of mil- Received 30 July 2006 lions across most of the temperate region of North America. Within the span of a few dec- Received in revised form ades during the mid- to late-1800s its numbers were reduced by hunting and other factors 12 November 2006 to a few hundred. The plight of the plains bison led to one of the first major movements in Accepted 27 November 2006 North America to save an endangered species.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List Plains Bison As Threatened Under the ESA. James A
    Petition to list plains bison as threatened under the ESA. James A. Bailey, PhD. Belgrade, MT [email protected] Summary: I petition to list wild plains bison (Bison bison bison) as threatened under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended, in order to conserve the subspecies and the ecosystems upon which plains bison depend. I find that each of the four major ecotypes of plains bison in the United States is likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future and that each ecotype is not sufficiently abundant or distributed, nor properly managed, to fulfill stated purposes of the ESA. While the number of plains bison in wild and conservation herds has not declined in about 70 years, there are numerous threats to the future of wild plains bison that are not apparent in the total number of animals. Wild plains bison are threatened with loss of potential habitat, introgression with cattle genes, loss of genetic diversity, domestication and loss of wildness, disappearance of ecological effectiveness, and lack of effective, coordinated and persistent state and federal programs to restore the subspecies. Should the Fish and Wildlife Service contend that listing plains bison is not warranted, I request that each major ecotype of wild plains bison be listed as threatened, as a significant distinct population segment (DPS), under the ESA in order to conserve the ecotypes and the ecosystems upon which these ecotypes depend. I suggest four major ecotypes of plains bison be considered as significant DPS’s to retain allelic diversity of plains bison in the future, so that bison may again fulfill their evolved ecological role as a keystone interactive species across examples of significant portions of the subspecies’ historic range.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Wood Bison Reintroduction Fact Sheet
    Scott Michaelis, AWCC Cathie Harms, ADF&G (952) 836-7719; [email protected] (907) 459-7231; [email protected] 1. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) plans to restore wood bison to Alaska’s landscape in March/April 2015. The wood bison to be released are descendants of 66 animals obtained from Canada in 2003 and 2008 and have been held at the Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center (AWCC) in Portage. 2. Bison will be released in the lower Innoko and Yukon River area. (This is not the Innoko National Wildlife Refuge.) No other releases are currently planned. Although ADF&G previously proposed reintroduction in the Yukon Flats and Minto Flats, the Innoko region was chosen due to quantity/quality of habitat, support from local people, and lack of landowner concerns about conflicts with development. 3. ADF&G plans to release 100 female and young bison near Shageluk, about 300 miles west of Anchorage, in spring 2015. Six loads of 14-30 bison (depending on age and sex of the animals) will be will be placed in specially designed containers, trucked from AWCC to Anchorage International Airport and flown in C-130 Hercules cargo aircraft to Shageluk. The bison will be held in temporary pens outside of Shageluk and will be released after they have acclimated to the area. After release, they will be closely monitored for at least the first year. Depending on funding, additional bulls may be transported at a later time. 4. Starting with 100 animals provides sufficient genetic diversity of the founder population and adequate reproductive potential to allow an excellent chance of success of the restoration effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Bison Restoration in Alaska: a Review of Environmental and Regulatory Issues and Proposed Decisions for Project Implementation
    Wood Bison Restoration in Alaska: A Review of Environmental and Regulatory Issues and Proposed Decisions for Project Implementation Painting by Randall Compton Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation April 2007 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report and environmental review of wood bison restoration in Alaska was made possible by generous contributions from Safari Club International Foundation and the Pope & Young Club. Additional support for printing and distribution of the report was provided through the State Wildlife Grant program. ADF&G would like to hear your views on the wood bison restoration project The purpose of this report is to provide the public and decision makers with comprehensive information on wood bison restoration, to fully identify and discuss the issues related to wood bison restoration in Alaska, and provide an opportunity for additional public review and comment. Public comment on this report will be used to help make decisions on whether ADF&G will proceed with wood bison restoration in Alaska and, if the project proceeds, will play a significant role in determining where initial wood bison restoration efforts will be focused. Comments should be received by June 30, 2007 at: Comments can also be sent by fax to Wood Bison Environmental Review Comments (907) 452-6410 or email at ADF&G, Division of Wildlife Conservation [email protected] 1300 College Road Fairbanks, AK 99701-1599 The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) administers all programs and activities free from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Notebook Series: American Bison
    American Bison The two modern subspecies of North American bison are plains bison (Bison bison bison) and wood bison (Bison bison athabascae). Various forms of bison existed in Alaska for several hundred thousand years, and until recently were one of the most abundant large animals on the landscape. Wood bison were the last subspecies to occur in Alaska and evolved from their larger-horned Pleistocene ancestors. They lived in parts of Interior and Southcentral Alaska for several thousand years before disappearing during the last few hundred years. These animals were an important resource for native peoples who hunted them for their meat and hides. Plains bison occurred in southern Canada and the lower 48 states. This animal shaped the lifestyle of the Plains Indians and figured prominently in American history before they were brought to near extinction by the late 1800s. Nineteen plains bison were transplanted to present day Delta Junction, Alaska from Montana in 1928. Alaska's existing wild bison are descendants of these 19 animals. Transplants have created additional herds at Copper River, Chitina River, and Farewell. Small domestic herds are located in agricultural areas on the mainland and on Kodiak and Popov Islands. There were approximately 700 wild plains bison in the state in 2007. Efforts are underway to restore wood bison to parts of their original range in Alaska. By 1900 there were fewer than 300 wood bison remaining in North America, but conservation efforts in Canada have allowed them to increase and there are now over 4,000 animals in healthy free-ranging herds. The planned reintroduction of wood bison to Alaska could increase this number substantially during the coming decades.
    [Show full text]