Yellowstone Bison Petition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Yellowstone Bison Petition Petition to List the Yellowstone Bison as Threatened or Endangered Under the Endangered Species Act Western Watersheds Project & Buffalo Field Campaign In the Office of Endangered Species U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service United States Department of Interior November 13, 2014 Petition to List the Yellowstone Bison as Threatened or Endangered Under the Endangered Species Act Western Watersheds Project & Buffalo Field Campaign Table of Contents Petitioners ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Summary ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Petition History ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Biology and Natural History........................................................................................................................... 8 Taxonomy ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Description ............................................................................................................................................ 9 Distribution ..........................................................................................................................................10 Bison Genetics & Cattle-Gene Introgression .......................................................................................11 Life History ..........................................................................................................................................14 History of Bison in Yellowstone National Park ...................................................................................15 Yellowstone Bison Metapopulation Range and Movement Patterns ...................................................15 Population Estimates and Status ..........................................................................................................20 The Yellowstone Bison Are a Distinct Population Segment of Plains Bison ................................................24 The Yellowstone Bison Meet the Criteria for Discreteness ......................................................................25 Physical and Geographic Isolation .......................................................................................................25 Physiological Isolation .........................................................................................................................27 The Yellowstone Bison Meet the Criteria for Significance ......................................................................28 Persistence of the Discrete Population Segment in an Ecological Setting Unusual or Unique for the Taxon ...................................................................................................................................................28 Loss of the Discrete Population Segment Would Result in a Significant Gap in the Range of a Taxon .............................................................................................................................................................29 The Discrete Population Segment Represents the Only Surviving Natural Occurrence of a Taxon that May Be More Abundant Elsewhere as an Introduced Population Outside its Historic Range ............29 The Discrete Population Segment Differs Markedly From Other Populations of the Species in its Genetic Characteristics ........................................................................................................................30 The Discrete Population Segment Differs Markedly From Other Populations of the Species in its Behavioral Characteristics ...................................................................................................................30 Threats ...........................................................................................................................................................32 The Present or Threatened Destruction, Modification, or Curtailment of its Habitat or Range. ..............32 Range Curtailment ...............................................................................................................................32 Livestock Grazing ................................................................................................................................33 Development and Infrastructure ...........................................................................................................34 Invasive Species ...................................................................................................................................35 Overutilization for Commercial, Recreational, Scientific, or Educational Purposes. ...............................36 Hunting ................................................................................................................................................36 Disease or Predation. ................................................................................................................................37 Predation ..............................................................................................................................................37 Disease .................................................................................................................................................37 Hemorrhagic Septicemia ......................................................................................................................37 Malignant Catarrhal Fever ...................................................................................................................38 Brucellosis ...........................................................................................................................................38 Inadequacy of Existing Regulatory Mechanisms. .....................................................................................40 Other Natural or Manmade Factors Affecting its Continued Existence. ..................................................45 Genomic Extinction .............................................................................................................................45 Petition to List the Yellowstone Bison 1 Climate Change ....................................................................................................................................47 Conclusion .....................................................................................................................................................48 Acknowledgments .........................................................................................................................................48 Literature Cited ..............................................................................................................................................49 Tables Table 1: Comparison of Plains and Wood Bison Morphology. ..................................................................... 9 Table 2: Cattle-gene Introgression in Four Plains Bison Herds. ...................................................................13 Table 3: Recent Aerial Counts of Yellowstone Bison. .................................................................................22 Figures Figure 1: Historic and Current Range of the Yellowstone Bison. ................................................................11 Figure 2: Yellowstone Bison Population Trends 1936-1968. .......................................................................21 Figure 3: Yellowstone Bison Population Trends 1984-2011. .......................................................................21 Figure 4: Forest Service and BLM Livestock Grazing Allotments in Yellowstone Bison Habitat. .............33 Petition to List the Yellowstone Bison 2 Petitioners Western Watersheds Project is a regional conservation organization with offices in Arizona, California, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Wyoming. The mission of Western Watersheds Project is to protect and restore watersheds and wildlife habitats on the nation’s public lands through education, scientific study, public policy initiatives, and litigation. Contact Information: Travis Bruner Executive Director Western Watersheds Project P.O. Box 1770 Hailey, ID 83333 (208) 788-2290 <[email protected]> Buffalo Field Campaign is a regional conservation organization with offices in Montana. The mission of Buffalo Field Campaign is to stop the slaughter of Yellowstone’s wild buffalo herd, protect the natural habitat of wild free-roaming buffalo and native wildlife, and to work with people of all Nations to honor the sacredness of the wild buffalo. Contact Information: Daniel Brister Executive Director Buffalo Field Campaign P.O. Box 957 West Yellowstone, MT 59758 (406) 646-0070 <[email protected]> Please use the following address for technical correspondence regarding this petition: Michael J. Connor, Ph.D. Western Watersheds Project P.O. Box 2364 Reseda, CA 91335 (818) 345-0425 <[email protected]> Petition to List the Yellowstone Bison 3 Summary
Recommended publications
  • Montana Forest Insect and Disease Conditions and Program Highlights
    R1-16-17 03/20/2016 Forest Service Northern Region Montata Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Forestry Division In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Laccolith-Stock Controversy: New Results from the Southern Henry Mountains, Utah
    The laccolith-stock controversy: New results from the southern Henry Mountains, Utah MARIE D. JACKSON* Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218 DAVID D. POLLARD Departments of Applied Earth Sciences and Geology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 ABSTRACT rule out the possibility of a stock at depth. At Mesa, Fig. 1). Gilbert inferred that the central Mount Hillers, paleomagnetic vectors indi- intrusions underlying the large domes are Domes of sedimentary strata at Mount cate that tongue-shaped sills and thin lacco- floored, mushroom-shaped laccoliths (Fig. 3). Holmes, Mount Ellsworth, and Mount Hillers liths overlying the central intrusion were More recently, C. B. Hunt (1953) inferred that in the southern Henry Mountains record suc- emplaced horizontally and were rotated dur- the central intrusions in the Henry Mountains cessive stages in the growth of shallow (3 to 4 ing doming through about 80° of dip. This are cylindrical stocks, surrounded by zones of km deep) magma chambers. Whether the in- sequence of events is not consistent with the shattered host rock. He postulated a process in trusions under these domes are laccoliths or emplacement of a stock and subsequent or which a narrow stock is injected vertically up- stocks has been the subject of controversy. contemporaneous lateral growth of sills and ward and then pushes aside and domes the sed- According to G. K. Gilbert, the central intru- minor laccoliths. Growth in diameter of a imentary strata as it grows in diameter. After the sions are direct analogues of much smaller, stock from about 300 m at Mount Holmes to stock is emplaced, tongue-shaped sills and lacco- floored intrusions, exposed on the flanks of nearly 3 km at Mount Hillers, as Hunt sug- liths are injected radially from the discordant the domes, that grew from sills by lifting and gested, should have been accompanied by sides of the stock (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Horned Animals
    Horned Animals In This Issue In this issue of Wild Wonders you will discover the differences between horns and antlers, learn about the different animals in Alaska who have horns, compare and contrast their adaptations, and discover how humans use horns to make useful and decorative items. Horns and antlers are available from local ADF&G offices or the ARLIS library for teachers to borrow. Learn more online at: alaska.gov/go/HVNC Contents Horns or Antlers! What’s the Difference? 2 Traditional Uses of Horns 3 Bison and Muskoxen 4-5 Dall’s Sheep and Mountain Goats 6-7 Test Your Knowledge 8 Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Wildlife Conservation, 2018 Issue 8 1 Sometimes people use the terms horns and antlers in the wrong manner. They may say “moose horns” when they mean moose antlers! “What’s the difference?” they may ask. Let’s take a closer look and find out how antlers and horns are different from each other. After you read the information below, try to match the animals with the correct description. Horns Antlers • Made out of bone and covered with a • Made out of bone. keratin layer (the same material as our • Grow and fall off every year. fingernails and hair). • Are grown only by male members of the • Are permanent - they do not fall off every Cervid family (hoofed animals such as year like antlers do. deer), except for female caribou who also • Both male and female members in the grow antlers! Bovid family (cloven-hoofed animals such • Usually branched.
    [Show full text]
  • National Bison Range Is Administered by the U.S
    REGULATIONS • Remain at your car and on the road. If you are near bison do not get out of your vehicle. • Hiking is permitted only on designated footpaths. • Trailers and other towed units are not allowed on the Red Sleep Mountain Drive. • Motorcycles and bicycles are permitted only on the paved drives below the cattle guards. x% Place of Discovery • No overnight camping allowed. • Firearms are prohibited. • All pets must be on a leash. • Carry out all trash. • All regulations are strictly enforced. • Our patrol staff is friendly and willing to answer your questions about the range and its wildlife. 3/4 MILE CAUTIONS • Bison can be very dangerous. Keep your distance. • All wildlife will defend their young and can hurt you. • Rattlesnakes are not aggressive but will strike if threatened. Watch where you step and do not go out into the grasslands. <* The Red Sleep Mountain Drive is a one-way mountain road. It gains 2000 feet in elevation and averages a 10% downgrade for about 2 miles. Be sure of your braking power. • Watch out for children on roadways especially in the picnic area and at popular viewpoints. • Refuge staff are trained in first aid and can assist you. Where to Start? Contact them in an emergency. The best place to start your visit to the ADMINISTRATION Bison Range is the Visitor Center. Here The National Bison Range is administered by the U.S. Fish you will find informative displays on and Wildlife Service as a part of the National Wildlife Refuge System. Further information can be obtained from the the bison, its history and its habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mackenzie Wood Bison (Bison Bison Athabascae) C.C
    ARCTIC VOL. 43, NO. 3 (SEPTEMBER 1990) P. 231-238 Growth and Dispersal of an Erupting Large Herbivore Population in Northern Canada: The Mackenzie Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) C.C. GATES' and N.C. LARTER' (Received 6 September 1989; accepted in revised form Il January 1990) ABSTRACT. In 1963,18 wood bison (Bison bison athabuscue)were introduced to the Mackenzie Bison Sanctuary. Thepopulation has grown at a mean exponential rate of r = 0.215 f 0.007, reaching 1718 bison 2 10 months of age by April 1987. Analysis of annual population growth revealed a maximum exponential rateof r = 0.267 in 1975, followed by a declining rate, reaching a low value of r = 0.103 in 1987. Selective predation on calves was proposed as a mechanism to explain the declining rate of population growth. The area occupiedby the population increased at an exponential rate of0.228 f 0.017 km2.year". The dispersal ofmature males followed a pattern described as an innate process, while dispersal of females and juveniles exhibited characteristicsof pressure-threshold dispersal. Key words: erupting population, dispersal, wood bison, Bison bison athabascae, Northwest Rrritories RJ~SUMÉ.En 1963, on a introduit 18 bisons des bois(Bison bison athabuscue)dans la Rtserve de bisons Mackenzie.La population a connu un taux moyen de croissance exponentielle der= 0,215 f 0,007, atteignant 1718 bisons qui avaient 10 mois ou plus en avril 1987. Une analyse de la croissance annuelle de la population montre un taux moyen de croissance exponentielle der = 0,267 en 1975, suivid'un taux en baisse jusqu'B r = 0,103 en 1987.On avanceque la prkdation selectives'optrant sur les veauxexplique la baisse du taux de croissance lade population.
    [Show full text]
  • A Middle Holocene Steppe Bison and Paleoenvironments from the Versleuce Meadows, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada Grant D
    1138 ARTICLE A middle Holocene steppe bison and paleoenvironments from the Versleuce Meadows, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada Grant D. Zazula, Elizabeth Hall, P. Gregory Hare, Christian Thomas, Rolf Mathewes, Catherine La Farge, André L. Martel, Peter D. Heintzman, and Beth Shapiro Abstract: A partial skeleton of a bison was recovered during residential house construction in Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. The specimen represents a young (estimated 6 year old) bison individual that died, was partially scavenged by carnivores, and subsequently buried by calcareous silt sediment in a pond or small lake during the middle Holocene, ϳ5400 years ago. Palaeoenvironmental data, including molluscs, pollen, vascular plant, and bryophyte macrofossils demonstrate that the small waterbody was surrounded by white spruce dominated boreal forest. Morphometric analysis of the skeleton reveals that its taxonomic affinity is ambiguous, likely owing to it representing an ontogenetically young individual, though it does share some cranial and horn core characteristics of named species such as Bison occidentalis or Bison priscus. Mitochondrial genomic data confirm that this bison belongs to Clade 2A (northern clade), which represents Pleistocene steppe bison (B. cf. priscus) in Beringia through the Holocene and is not represented in living bison species. These data further demonstrate that northern steppe bison population survived the late Pleistocene extinction event, persisted locally in southern Yukon into the Holocene, and are best characterized as a species with a high degree of morphological variability and ecological flexibility. Résumé : Le squelette partiel d’un bison a été récupéré durant la construction d’immeubles résidentiels a` Whitehorse (Yukon, Canada). Le spécimen représente un unique jeune bison (d’âge estimé a` 6 ans) qui est mort, a été partiellement dévoré par des carnivores pour ensuite être enseveli sous du silt calcareux dans un étang ou un petit lac durant l’Holocène moyen, il y a ϳ5400 ans.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Bison (Bison Bison Athabascae)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Threatened and Endangered Species Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) The wood bison (Bison bison athabascae) is the largest native land mammal in North America. They have a large triangular head, a thin beard, and rudimentary throat mane; their horns usually extend above the hair on their head; and the highest point of their hump is forward of their front legs. These physical characteristics distinguish them from the plains bison (Bison bison bison), which is the subspecies that occurs on the prairies of the continental United States. Protected Status The wood bison is listed as threatened under the 1973 Endangered Species Act (ESA). In Canada the wood bison is protected as threatened under the Species at Risk Act. Range and Population Size The wood bison is adapted to meadow Wood bison cow and calf at the Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center. Doug Lindstrand and forest habitats in subarctic regions. Historically, its range was generally north of that occupied by Canada, hunting is strictly regulated uninfected herds. Captive herds the plains bison, and included most and is not a threat to the species as of disease-free animals have been boreal regions of northern Alberta; it once was. The main threats are established in both Alaska and northeastern British Columbia; diseases of domestic cattle (bovine Russia. a small portion of northwestern tuberculosis and bovine brucellosis), Saskatchewan; the western which were unintentionally introduced Alaska’s Captive Herd Northwest Territories; most of the to wood bison in the early 1920s, The captive herd in Alaska is being Yukon Territory; and much of interior and loss of habitat (primarily from cared for at the Alaska Wildlife Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Collections in the Archives
    Examples of collections and resources supporting research about Land, Land Use, the Environment and Conservation in Montana held at Archives & Special Collections at the Mansfield Library, University of Montana-Missoula A separate list is available for collections with content focused on Forests and the Timber Products Industry. Note: In most cases links are provided from the titles of collections to the guides to those collections. The collections themselves are not digitized and therefore are not yet available online. This list is not comprehensive. Papers of Individuals and Families G. M. Brandborg Papers (1893-1977), Mss 691, 14.5 linear feet Papers of Guy M. "Brandy" Brandborg, long-time employee of the U. S. Forest Service, and Forest Supervisor of the Bitterroot National Forest from 1935-1955. The collection includes files related to Brandborg's interest in and activities related to wilderness, conservation, and watershed protection efforts in Montana, and two memorial scrapbooks documenting his activities in favor of sustainable timber harvesting and against extensive clearcutting. Stewart M. Brandborg Papers (1932-2000), Mss 699, 45.0 linear feet This collection consists of the professional papers of environmental activist Stewart M. Brandborg. A graduate of the University of Montana and the University of Idaho, Brandborg was hired as assistant conservation director for the National Wildlife Federation in 1954. In 1956 he was elected to the governing board of The Wilderness Society and in 1960 was hired as their associate executive director. He served as director of The Wilderness Society from 1964-1977. Brandborg’s papers include correspondence, research files and other documents from his time with The Wilderness Society, as well as material documenting his work with the National Wildlife Federation, the National Park Service, Wilderness Watch, and Friends of the Bitterroot (Montana.) Arnold Bolle Papers (1930-1994), Mss 600, 40.7 linear feet Arnold Bolle was a leading figure in the Montana conservation movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Report and Assessment of Wood Bison in the NWT (2016)
    SPECIES STATUS REPORT Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) Sakāwmostos (Cree) e ta oe (Sout Slave ) e en á e ejere, t a n a n’jere ( en sųł n ) Dachan tat w ’aak’ (Teetł’ t Gw ’ n) Aak’ , a antat aak’ (Gw a Gw ’ n) Łek'a e, łuk'a e, kedä- o’, ejed (Kaska ene) Ejuda (Slavey) Tl'oo tat aak'ii, dachan tat aak'ii, akki chashuur, nin shuurchoh, nin daa ha-an (Van Tat Gw ’ n) in the Northwest Territories Threatened April 2016 Status of Wood Bison in the NWT Species at Risk Committee status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of species suspected of being at risk in the Northwest Territories (NWT). Suggested citation: Species at Risk Committee. 2016. Species Status Report for Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) in the Northwest Territories. Species at Risk Committee, Yellowknife, NT. © Government of the Northwest Territories on behalf of the Species at Risk Committee ISBN: 978-0-7708-0241-7 Production note: The drafts of this report were prepared by Kristi Benson (traditional and community knowledge component) and Tom Chowns (scientific knowledge component), under contract with the Government of the Northwest Territories, and edited by Claire Singer, Michelle Ramsay and Kendra McGreish. For additional copies contact: Species at Risk Secretariat c/o SC6, Department of Environment and Natural Resources P.O. Box 1320 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 Tel.: (855) 783-4301 (toll free) Fax.: (867) 873-0293 E-mail: [email protected] www.nwtspeciesatrisk.ca ABOUT THE SPECIES AT RISK COMMITTEE The Species at Risk Committee was established under the Species at Risk (NWT) Act.
    [Show full text]
  • COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL COPYRIGHTED I
    Avalanche Campground (MT), 66 Big Horn Equestrian Center (WY), Index Avenue of the Sculptures (Billings, 368 MT), 236 Bighorn Mountain Loop (WY), 345 Bighorn Mountains Trail System INDEX A (WY), 368–369 AARP, 421 B Bighorn National Forest (WY), 367 Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness Backcountry camping, Glacier Big Red (Clearmont, WY), 370 (MT), 225–227 National Park (MT), 68 Big Red Gallery (Clearmont, WY), Academic trips, 44–45 Backcountry permits 370 Accommodations, 413–414 Glacier National Park (MT), Big Salmon Lake (MT), 113 best, 8–10 54–56 Big Sheep Creek Canyon (MT), 160 for families with children, 416 Grand Teton (WY), 325 Big Sky (MT), 8, 215–220 Active vacations, 43–52 Yellowstone National Park Big Sky Brewing Company AdventureBus, 45, 269 (MT—WY), 264 (Missoula, MT), 93 Adventure Sports (WY), 309, 334 Backcountry Reservations, 56 Big Sky Candy (Hamilton, MT), 96 Adventure trips, 45–46 Backcountry skiing, 48 Big Sky Golf Course (MT), 217 AdventureWomen, 201–202 Backroads, 45, 46 Big Sky Resort (MT), 216–217 Aerial Fire Depot and Baggs (WY), 390 Big Sky Waterpark (MT), 131 Smokejumper Center (Missoula, Ballooning, Teton Valley (WY), Big Spring (MT), 188 MT), 86–87 306 Big Spring Creek (MT), 187 Air tours Bannack (MT), 167, 171–172 Big Timber Canyon Trail (MT), 222 Glacier National Park (MT), 59 Bannack Days (MT), 172 Biking and mountain biking, 48 the Tetons (WY), 306 Barry’s Landing (WY), 243 Montana Air travel, 409, 410 Bay Books & Prints (Bigfork, MT), Big Sky, 216 Albright Visitor Center 105 Bozeman, 202 (Yellowstone), 263, 275
    [Show full text]
  • Bison and Biodiversity: History of a Keystone Species
    Spring/Summer 2020 MONTANA NTO PROMOTE ANDa CULTIVATE THEt APPRECIATION,u UNDERSTANDINGr AND STEWARDSHIPa OFli NATURE THROUGHs EDUCATIONt Bison and Biodiversity: History of a Keystone Species Heartbeats & Hibernation | All About Antlions | Birding in Spain and Montana | Visions of Earth MONTANA Naturalist Spring/Summer 2020 inside Features 4 BISON AND BIODIVERSITY: A CASE STUDY Exploring the history of North America’s keystone herbivore BY GIL GALE 8 HEARTBEATS AND HIBERNATION 4 8 IN THE ROCKIES Getting at the heart of surviving winter in Montana Departments BY HEATHER MCKEE 3 TIDINGS 10 NATURALIST NOTES Antlions: A Conversation of Observations 22 12 GET OUTSIDE GUIDE Book review: The Lost Words; 10 nature writing activity; phenology scavenger hunt; Kids’ Corner: tree painting by Lila Farrell; Pablo 4th-grade science projects 17 IMPRINTS Farewell to Lisa Bickell; upcoming exhibits; new summer 24 camp offerings; welcome to 24 Jennifer Robinson; Drop in with a FAR AFIELD Naturalist; As To The Mission; Birding in Spain 2019 auction thank yous BY PEGGY CORDELL 17 19 26 VOLUNTEER SPOTLIGHT MAGPIE MARKET Cover – A Bullock’s Oriole (Icterus bullockii) Alyssa Giffin perches on a branch above Pauline Creek at the National Bison Range on a gorgeous June 27 22 REFLECTIONS day. Bullock’s Orioles are summer residents COMMUNITY FOCUS Visions of Earth in Montana. Photo by Merle Ann Loman, Working for Wilderness: amontanaview.com. The Great Burn Conservation No material appearing in Montana Naturalist Alliance may be reproduced in part or in whole without the BY ALLISON DE JONG written consent of the publisher. All contents © 2020 The Montana Natural History Center.
    [Show full text]
  • B2158 Pt 08 Text
    Previous section Volume contents Processes of Laccolithic Emplacement in the Southern Henry Mountains, Southeastern Utah By Marie Jackson1 CONTENTS References Cited............................................................................................................. 27 FIGURES 1. Simplified geologic map of the south Henry Mountains .......................................... 52 2. Interpretive radially oriented cross sections through Mounts Holmes, Ellsworth, and Hillers ................................................................................................................. 54 3. Zijderveldt plots showing the progressive demagnetization of a diorite porphyry sample from sill A in cross section C–C′.................................................................. 56 4. G.K. Gilbert’s concept of laccoliths in Henry Mountains ........................................ 56 5. Structure contour maps and cross sections of Mounts Holmes, Ellsworth, and Hillers, illustrating C.B. Hunt’s concept of relationships between the stocks and uplifts of the beds ............................................................................................... 57 6. Vertical cross sections showing states in growth of central intrusions and domes in the Henry Mountains ................................................................................. 58 A sequence of sedimentary rocks about 4 km thick was New geologic mapping (Jackson and Pollard, 1988) bent, stretched, and uplifted during the growth of three igne- demonstrates that the sedimentary
    [Show full text]