DOCSLIB.ORG

Qualite Des Eaux Destinees a La Consommation Humaine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Qualite Des Eaux Destinees a La Consommation Humaine MINISTERE CHARGE DE LA SANTE DIRECTION DE LA SANTE CENTRE D ’H YGIENE ET DE SALUBRITE PUBLIQUE QUALITE DES EAUX DESTINEES A LA CONSOMMATION HUMAINE A TAHITI ET DANS LES ILES ________________________________ ANNEE 2012 POLYNESIE FRANÇAISE Rapport sur la qualité des eaux destinées à la consommation humaine à Tahiti et dans les îles – Année 2012 REMERCIEMENTS Le Centre d’Hygiène et de Salubrité Publique (CHSP) remercie l’ensemble des communes de la Polynésie française qui ont contribué à l’élaboration de ce rapport. Ces remerciements vont également aux organismes publics et privés suivants pour leur efficace collaboration : - le Syndicat pour la Promotion des Communes de Polynésie française (SPC.PF), - la Subdivision Administrative des Tuamotu-Gambier (SATG), - la Polynésienne des Eaux, - le bureau d’études VAIMANA, - la DIPAC. Les renseignements qui ont été communiqués au CHSP concernant les descriptifs des divers réseaux publics et l’ensemble des efforts fournis et programmés afin d’améliorer la qualité des eaux distribuées, ont été très précieux dans le cadre de la réalisation de ce « Rapport sur la qualité des eaux destinées à la consommation humaine à Tahiti et dans les îles de l’année 2012». Ces informations sont des compléments indispensables à tous ceux qui sont concernés par l’importance du problème de l’eau. La rédaction de ce bilan a pour objectif non seulement d’informer le public de la qualité de l’eau distribuée à la population mais aussi d’en aviser les autorités politiques et les collectivités publiques communales, ces dernières étant responsables de l’approvisionnement public en eau. Centre d'Hygiène et de Salubrité Publique (CHSP) – février 2013 2 Rapport sur la qualité des eaux destinées à la consommation humaine à Tahiti et dans les îles – Année 2012 SOMMAIRE RESUME CHIFFRE...........................................................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................11 1. ORGANISATION DU CONTROLE SANITAIRE DES EAUX DESTINEES A LA CONSOMMATION HUMAINE...............................................................................................................................................................................12 1. CADRE REGLEMENTAIRE .................................................................................................................................12 2. ACTIONS MENEES PAR LE CENTRE D’HYGIENE ET DE SALUBRITE PUBLIQUE ........................13 2.1. Les contrôles du CHSP........................................................................................................................................13 2.2. Les interventions du CHSP..................................................................................................................................15 3. AUTOCONTROLE DES COMMUNES ..............................................................................................................15 3.1. Contrôle des eaux brutes.....................................................................................................................................15 3.2. Contrôle des eaux distribuées .............................................................................................................................15 2. SITUATION PAR COMMUNE....................................................................................................................................17 1. COMMUNES ET ORGANISMES AYANT REALISE LEUR PROGRAMME D’AUTOCONTROLE ..17 1.1. Papeete................................................................................................................................................................17 1.2. Syndicat Intercommunal Te Oropaa - Réseau Punaruu......................................................................................19 1.3. Faa'a ...................................................................................................................................................................20 1.4. Punaauia .............................................................................................................................................................22 1.5. Paea.....................................................................................................................................................................24 1.6. Papara.................................................................................................................................................................26 1.7. Pirae....................................................................................................................................................................28 1.8. Arue.....................................................................................................................................................................30 1.9. Mahina ................................................................................................................................................................32 1.10. Moorea ................................................................................................................................................................34 1.11. Bora Bora............................................................................................................................................................38 1.12. Huahine...............................................................................................................................................................41 1.13. Tahaa...................................................................................................................................................................43 1.14. Tumaraa ..............................................................................................................................................................46 1.15. Taputapuatea.......................................................................................................................................................48 1.16. Tubuai .................................................................................................................................................................50 1.17. Rimatara..............................................................................................................................................................52 1.18. Rurutu..................................................................................................................................................................54 1.19. Nuku Hiva............................................................................................................................................................56 1.20. Mangareva ..........................................................................................................................................................58 2. COMMUNES N’AYANT PAS REALISE LEUR PROGRAMME D’AUTOCONTROLE ........................60 2.1. Communes pouvant être classées ........................................................................................................................60 2.1.1. Teva I Uta .......................................................................................................................................................60 2.1.2. Taiarapu Ouest ...............................................................................................................................................62 2.1.3. Hitiaa O Te Ra................................................................................................................................................64 2.1.4. Taiarapu Est ...................................................................................................................................................66 2.1.5. Uturoa.............................................................................................................................................................68 2.1.6. Hiva Oa...........................................................................................................................................................70 2.2. Communes ne pouvant pas être classées.............................................................................................................73 2.2.1. Hao .................................................................................................................................................................73 2.2.2. Maupiti............................................................................................................................................................74 2.2.3. Raivavae..........................................................................................................................................................75 2.2.4. Rapa................................................................................................................................................................77 2.2.5. Ua Pou............................................................................................................................................................78 2.2.6. Ua Huka..........................................................................................................................................................80 2.2.7.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Répartition De La Population En Polynésie Française En 2017
    Répartition de la population en Polynésie française en 2017 PIRAE ARUE Paopao Teavaro Hatiheu PAPEETE Papetoai A r c h MAHINA i p e l d FAA'A HITIAA O TE RA e s NUKU HIVA M a UA HUKA r q PUNAAUIA u HIVA OA i TAIARAPU-EST UA POU s Taiohae Taipivai e PAEA TA HUATA s NUKU HIVA Haapiti Afareaitu FATU HIVA Atuona PAPARA TEVA I UTA MOO REA TAIARAPU-OUEST A r c h i p e l d Puamau TAHITI e s T MANIHI u a HIVA OA Hipu RA NGIROA m Iripau TA KAROA PUKA P UKA o NA PUKA Hakahau Faaaha t u Tapuamu d e l a S o c i é MAKEMO FANGATA U - p e l t é h i BORA BORA G c a Haamene r MAUPITI Ruutia A TA HA A ARUTUA m HUAHINE FAKARAVA b TATAKOTO i Niua Vaitoare RAIATEA e TAHITI r TAHAA ANAA RE AO Hakamaii MOORE A - HIK UE RU Fare Maeva MAIAO UA POU Faie HA O NUKUTAVAKE Fitii Apataki Tefarerii Maroe TUREIA Haapu Parea RIMATARA RURUTU A r c h Arutua HUAHINE i p e TUBUAI l d e s GAMBIE R Faanui Anau RA IVAVAE A u s Kaukura t r Nombre a l AR UTUA d'individus e s Taahuaia Moerai Mataura Nunue 20 000 Mataiva RA PA BOR A B OR A 10 000 Avera Tikehau 7 000 Rangiroa Hauti 3 500 Mahu Makatea 1 000 RURUT U TUBUAI RANGIROA ´ 0 110 Km So u r c e : Re c en se m en t d e la p o p u la ti o n 2 0 1 7 - IS P F -I N SE E Répartition de la population aux Îles Du Vent en 2017 TAHITI MAHINA Paopao Papetoai ARUE PAPEETE PIRAE HITIAA O TE RA FAAA Teavaro Tiarei Mahaena Haapiti PUNAAUIA Afareaitu Hitiaa Papenoo MOOREA 0 2 Km Faaone PAEA Papeari TAIARAPU-EST Mataiea Afaahiti Pueu Toahotu Nombre PAPARA d'individus TEVA I UTA Tautira 20 000 Vairao 15 000 13 000 Teahupoo 10 000 TAIARAPU-OUEST
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin D'information
    BULLETIN D’INFORMATION #40 60 personnes ont été dépistées positives sur les 2965 tests effectués depuis le début de l’épidémie, en Polynésie française. A ce jour, 4 personnes sont toujours sous surveillance et 56 ont été autorisées à sortir d’isolement. A noter : dorénavant les mises à jour du carré épidémiologique ne se feront qu’en jours ouvrés. Chiffres clés Continuité territoriale Nombre total de cas COVID-19 60 Ce dimanche 10 mai, des résidents polynésiens et Nombre total de cas COVID-19 hospitalisés leurs familles ont pu être rapatriés de métropole au fenua. Au total, ce sont 53 personnes qui sont - en cours 1 logés au centre d’hébergement étudiant (CHE) de - depuis le début de l’épidémie 4 Outumaoro et à Tibériade, à Taiarapu Ouest (cf : photo 1). COVIDNombre-19 de en cas Polynésie COVID-19 français admis ene réanimation 0 Conformément à l’engagement sur l’honneur qu’ils Nombre de décès lié au COVID-19 0 ont signé avant leur départ ils seront placés en quarantaine pendant quatorze jours, à l’issue desquels ils subiront à nouveau un test de Fig. 1. Nombre de cas cumulés COVID-19 en PF par date dépistage qui, s’il est négatif, leur permettra de rentrer à leur domicile. Les personnes qui sont revenues au fenua par le vol de continuité territoriale du 22 avril 2020, ont pu rejoindre leur famille et leur maison, tous ont été testé négatifs, au terme de leur quarantaine. Ce quatrième vol de la continuité territoriale a acheminé près de 15 tonnes de fret pour un volume de 120 mètres cube dont 42 mètres cube, de matériel médical.
    [Show full text]
  • COPLARE on Waste in Oceania
    COPLARE on Waste in Oceania Waste in Oceania. Oceania? My atlas does not know any Oceania and in the German geography classes we did not learn about this term during our school days. Who else but honeymooners might be interested in the South Sea Islands? Do they have any relevance for the global structure? Oceania in the strictest sense are the islands lying between the west coast of the United States and Australia south of the equator: the Easter Island and Pitcairn, the Marquesas, Tuamotus, the Society, Gambier and the Austral Islands, the Cook Islands, Niue, Samoa, Tonga, Fiji, Vanuatu, New Caledonia as well as the Solomon Islands. Strictly speaking, the islands of Micronesia, Papua New Guinea and New Zealand also belong to Oceania but we will ignore them for now in order to make it easier for us. Between Panama and Sydney there are 14.000 km of water where several thousand islands are spread. For the purpose of comparison: Frankfurt to Bangkok means only about 9.000 km. and within the national territory of French Polynesia, the island Nuku Hiva (Marquesas) is e.g. 1.900 km away from the island Tubuai (Austral Islands). Munich is as far away from Istanbul as Nuku Hiva from Tubuai. The distances between the islands are enormous and most of the islands are tiny. Many of them have only a few hundred inhabitants. In order to get a clearer idea, just look at the enclosed table and keep in mind that this table only maps the most densely populated islands. A total of 17.000 people e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources Variability and the Rise of Tahitian Chiefdoms
    Resources variability and the rise of Tahitian chiefdoms: perspectives from landscape, settlement pattern studies and oral traditions Tamara Maric Université de Paris-1, Panthéon-Sorbonne, [email protected] M. Hinanui Cauchois University of Hawaii at Manoa [email protected] Introduction This paper presents an overview of chiefdoms in four major the Tamatoa in Ra’iatea as well as the chiefdoms of Maeva in locations of the Society Islands (French Polynesia), their late Huahine and the Marama in Mo’orea. These accounts will be pre-contact importance and their link with exploitation of crossed with available archaeological data. While providing a natural resources. Many sources, ethnohistoric and oral GIS database and sets of maps combining those various traditions, emphasize the intensity of warfare during the pre- factors (archaeology, environment and oral traditions), we contact period, intensified through the arrival of the first expect to highlight some relationship patterns between Europeans in the archipelago at the end of the 18th century. territoriality, exploitation of resources and power in the We examine which factors might have influenced the Society Islands. We also hope that our perspectives will development of chiefdoms in this specific region and their contribute to set up issues for further archaeological research potential impact on the emergence of territoriality and in the region. warfare. We look at several examples of settlement patterns in four islands of the Society archipelago, identified as important chiefdoms (Tahiti, Moorea, Raiatea and Huahine) and their relationship with various environmental factors such as topography, soil types, hydrology, distance to water access, rainfall and wind patterns, spatial distribution of agricultural complexes, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • TAHITI NUI Tu-Nui-Ae-I-Te-Atua
    TAHITI NUI Tu-nui-ae-i-te-atua. Pomare I (1802). ii TAHITI NUI Change and Survival in French Polynesia 1767–1945 COLIN NEWBURY THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF HAWAII HONOLULU Open Access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities / Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. Licensed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 In- ternational (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits readers to freely download and share the work in print or electronic format for non-commercial purposes, so long as credit is given to the author. Derivative works and commercial uses require per- mission from the publisher. For details, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. The Cre- ative Commons license described above does not apply to any material that is separately copyrighted. Open Access ISBNs: 9780824880323 (PDF) 9780824880330 (EPUB) This version created: 17 May, 2019 Please visit www.hawaiiopen.org for more Open Access works from University of Hawai‘i Press. Copyright © 1980 by The University Press of Hawaii All rights reserved. For Father Patrick O’Reilly, Bibliographer of the Pacific CONTENTS Dedication vi Illustrations ix Tables x Preface xi Chapter 1 THE MARKET AT MATAVAI BAY 1 The Terms of Trade 3 Territorial Politics 14 Chapter 2 THE EVANGELICAL IMPACT 31 Revelation and Revolution 33 New Institutions 44 Churches and Chiefs 56 Chapter 3 THE MARKET EXPANDED 68 The Middlemen 72 The Catholic Challenge 87 Chapter 4 OCCUPATION AND RESISTANCE 94 Governor Bruat’s War 105 Governor Lavaud’s
    [Show full text]
  • Trier SES Déchets
    N°18 TE VEA O TE H NU LE JOURNAL DU TRI MARS 2011 Moana, un nouvel animateur SEP > Page 5 PAGES JEU CONCOURS DOSSIER TRIER 8/10 81 cm UNE TV LCD 81CM SES DÉCHETS, Photos non contractuelles c’est UTILe et vraiment FACILE ! PAGE 15 EDITO CaP sur l’avenir ! Un contenu plus étoffé, des actualités internationales, des espaces dédiés au témoignage de partenaires, une orientation graphique plus professionnelle… telles sont les principales caractéristiques de la nouvelle version du Journal du tri. Un changement qui se veut être dans la lignée du nouveau souffle qui anime désormais l’équipe de la SEP. Si la mission principale de la SEP reste le traitement de nos déchets, des plus « banals » aux plus toxiques, l’année 2011 est cependant résolument tournée vers demain. Cette année de transition prépare la nouvelle donne qui redéfinira la place et l’avenir de la SEP, comme acteur incontournable du traitement des déchets en Polynésie française. Ainsi, en prévision du transfert définitif de la compétence du traitement des déchets aux communes à partir du 1er janvier 2012, une refonte administrative et juridique, actuellement à l’étude, est nécessaire. Le capital de la SEP devra s’ouvrir plus largement aux communes afin de resserrer les liens et de consolider le partenariat avec les 12 municipalités d’ores et déjà adhérentes au programme “bac vert - bac gris” élaboré par la SEP. 2011 devrait voir la mise en place de binômes SEP – agent communal de collecte, pour des actions de sensibilisation conjointe dans les quartiers. En effet, la SEP deviendrait un véritable outil au service des communes.
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Flora of the Society Islands: Ericaceae to Apocynaceae
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY NUMBER 17 Partial Flora of the Society Islands: Ericaceae to Apocynaceae Martin Lawrence Grant, F. Raymond Fosberg, and Howard M. Smith SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1974 ABSTRACT Grant, Martin Lawrence, F. Raymond Fosberg, and Howard M. Smith. Partial Flora of the Society Islands: Ericaceae to Apocynaceae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 17, 85 pages, 1974.-Results of a botanical inves- tigation of the Society Islands carried out by Grant in 1930 and 1931, and subsequent work on the material collected and other collections in the U.S. herbaria and other published works are reported herein. This paper is a partial descriptive flora of the Society group with a history of the botanical exploration and investigation of the area. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Srnithsonian Year. SI PRESS NUMBER 5056. SERIES COVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllurn juponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Grant, Martin Lawrence, 1907-1968. Partial flora of the Society Islands: Ericaceae to Apocynaceae. (Smithsonian contributions to botany, no. 17) Supt. of Docs. no.: SI 1.29:17. 1. Botany-Society Islands. I. Fosberg, Francis Raymond, 1908- , joint author. 11. Smith, Howard Malcolm, 1939- , joint author. 111. Title. IV. Series: Smithsonian Institution. Smith- sonian contributions to botany, no. 17. QK1.2747 no. 17 581’.08s [581.9’96’21] 73-22464 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, US. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Price $1.75 (paper cover) The senior author, after spending almost a year during 1930 and 1931 in the Society Islands, collecting herbarium material and ecological data, worked inten- sively on a comprehensive flora of this archipelago for the next five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexe 2 Attribution Des Points De Bonus ( Zonage Geographique)
    ANNEXE 2 ATTRIBUTION DES POINTS DE BONUS ( ZONAGE GEOGRAPHIQUE) ILES DU VENT ILES DU VENT Etablissement Commune Groupe ETABLISSEMENT ILE GROUPE FARAHEI (REP Plus) FAAA 1 MAIAO MOOREA-MAIAO 2 FARAHEI NUI (REP Plus) FAAA 1 ILES SOUS LE VENT HEIRI M (REP Plus) FAAA 1 ETABLISSEMENT ILE GROUPE PAMATAI (REP Plus) FAAA 1 ANAU BORA BORA 2 PIAFAU (REP Plus) FAAA 1 FAANUI BORA BORA 2 RUATAMA M. (REP Plus) FAAA 1 NAMAHA I (ex TIIPOTO M.) BORA BORA 2 TEROMA (REP Plus) FAAA 1 NAMAHA II BORA BORA 2 VAIAHA (REP Plus) FAAA 1 NAMAHA III BORA BORA 2 VEROTIA M. (REP Plus) FAAA 1 APATEA (REP Plus) PAPARA 1 AUSTRALES TAHARUU (REP Plus) PAPARA 1 TAHARUU M. (REP Plus) PAPARA 1 Etablissement Ile Groupe TIAMA'O (REP Plus) PAPARA 1 AHUREI RAPA 2 TUAMOTU-GAMBIER Etablissement Ile Groupe TUAMOTU-GAMBIER FAAITE (REP Plus) FAAITE 1 ARATIKA (REP Plus) ARATIKA 1 Etablissement Ile Groupe KAUEHI (REP Plus) KAUEHI 1 AMANU AMANU 2 NIAU (REP Plus) NIAU 1 HEREHERETUE HEREHERETUE 2 MANIHI (REP Plus) MANIHI 1 MAKATEA MAKATEA 2 AVATORU (REP Plus) RANGIROA 1 MAROKAU MAROKAU 2 TIPUTA (REP Plus) RANGIROA 1 RARAKA RARAKA 2 TAKAROA (REP Plus) TAKAROA 1 TEMATANGI TEMATANGI 2 RIKITEA (REP Plus) GAMBIERS 1 TEPOTO TEPOTO 2 HAO (REP Plus) HAO 1 VAIRAATEA VAIRAATEA 2 HIKUERU (REP Plus) HIKUERU 1 FAKAHINA FAKAHINA 2 MAKEMO (REP Plus) MAKEMO 1 FANGATAU FANGATAU 2 TAENGA (REP Plus) TAENGA 1 TAKUME TAKUME 2 NUKUTAVAKE (REP Plus) NUKUTAVAKE 1 VAHITAHI VAHITAHI 2 PUKA PUKA (REP Plus) PUKA PUKA 1 AHE AHE 2 APATAKI APATAKI 2 KATIU KATIU 2 PUKARUA PUKARUA 2 RAROIA RAROIA 2 TATAKOTO TATAKOTO 2 TUREIA
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Biological Control of the Glassy-Winged Sharpshooter
    Biol Invasions (2008) 10:135–148 DOI 10.1007/s10530-007-9116-y ORIGINAL PAPER Engineering an invasion: classical biological control of the glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca vitripennis, by the egg parasitoid Gonatocerus ashmeadi in Tahiti and Moorea, French Polynesia Julie Grandgirard Æ Mark S. Hoddle Æ Jerome N. Petit Æ George K. Roderick Æ Neil Davies Received: 13 October 2006 / Accepted: 19 April 2007 / Published online: 25 May 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract The glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homa- surveys during the first year of their interaction in lodisca vitripennis Germar (=H. coagulata Say) French Polynesia (until mid-May 2006). The impact (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), invaded Tahiti in 1999 of G. ashmeadi on H. vitripennis was extremely rapid and spread rapidly to the main island groups of and high. Parasitism of H. vitripennis egg masses by French Polynesia becoming an important pest. It G. ashmeadi has averaged 80–100% in Tahiti since threatened agriculture, native biodiversity, and the introduction of the parasitoid, and populations of created serious social and recreational problems. H. vitripennis nymphs and adults have decreased by Further, massive uncontrolled populations on Tahiti more than 90% since December 2005. Populations presented an elevated invasion threat to other South of H. vitripennis have been successfully maintained Pacific nations. In 2004, a classical biological control at this low level for more than 1 year. The same program against H. vitripennis was initiated in French results were obtained in nearby Moorea where the Polynesia using the highly host-specific egg parasit- parasitoid was probably spread by the unregulated oid Gonatocerus ashmeadi Girault (Hymenoptera: transport of plants infested with parasitized H.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilan De La Recherche Archéologique En Polynésie Française
    [ Dossier d'Archéologie Polynésienne ] n° 4 Bilan de la recherche archéologique en Polynésie française 2003 - 2004 Textes réunis par H ENRI M ARCHESI Service de la culture et du patrimoine Tahiti : 2005 BILAN DE LA RECHERCHE ARCHÉOLOGIQUE EN POLYNÉSIE FRANÇAISE - 2003-2004 4 Sommaire H. Marchesi et T. Maric Bilan et perspectives.....................................................................................................................................07 ILES DU VENT COMMUNE DE MO'OREA, COMMUNE ASSOCIÉE DE AFAREAITU M. Guérout et R. Veccella La fouille archéologique sous-marine du site de la passe Tupapaurau à Mo’orea, Iles de la Société .......................................................................15 COMMUNE DE MO'OREA - MAIAO, COMMUNE ASSOCIÉE DE PAPETOAI M. H. Cauchois Prospection archéologique à Apo’ota’ata, Papetoai, Moorea .........................................................23 COMMUNE DE MO'OREA - MAIAO, COMMUNE ASSOCIÉE DE PAPETOAI J. G. Khan An Archaeological Survey of the Upper Amehiti Sector, ‘Opunohu Valley, Mo‘orea, Society Islands..............................................................................................................................33 COMMUNE DE MO'OREA - MAIAO, COMMUNE ASSOCIÉE DE PAPETOAI H. Marchesi et al. Etude préliminaire du site de Maraeteuta ..............................................................................................41 COMMUNE DE HITIAA O TE RA, COMMUNE ASSOCIÉE DE PAPENO'O B. Mou et al. Diagnostic archéologique du site côtier Ha’apaiano’o.......................................................................47
    [Show full text]
  • Managing the Impacts of the Little Fire Ant (Wasmannia Auropunctata) in French Polynesia
    Managing the impacts of the little fire ant (Wasmannia auropunctata) in French Polynesia A report prepared by the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme for the Government of French Polynesia and Fonds Pacifique 2014 SPREP Library/IRC Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Vanderwoude, Casper … [et al.] Managing the impacts of the little fire antsWasmannia ( auropunctata) in French Polynesia. – Apia, Samoa : SPREP, 2014. 48 p. 29 cm. ISBN: 978-982-04052-1-9 (print) 978-982-04052-2-6 (e-copy) 1. Ants – Fire ants – French Polynesia. 2. Ants – Fire ants – Control – French Polynesia. I. Haynes, David. II. Richards, Esther. III. Quinquis, Bran. IV. Moverley, David. V. Skelton, Posa.A. VI. Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) VII. Title. All rights for commercial / for profit reproduction or translation, in any form, reserved. SPREP authorises the reproduction or translation of this material for scientific, educational or research purposes, provided that SPREP and the source document are properly acknowledged. Permission to reproduce the document and / or translate in whole, in any form, whether for commercial / for profit or non-profit purposes, must be requested in writing. 595.796 SPREP T: +685 21929 PO Box 240 F: +685 20231 Apia E: [email protected] Samoa W: www.sprep.org SPREP’s Vision: The Pacific environment, sustaining our livelihoods and natural heritage in harmony with our cultures. Managing the impacts of the Little Fire Ant (Wasmannia auropunctata) in French Polynesia Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme Apia, SAMOA June, 2014 Acknowledgements The concept for this project was developed following a visit and a request for assistance from Bran Quinquis, Deputy Mayor of Mahina Commune, French Polynesia, to SPREP in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Management Profiles : a Directory of Pacific Island Governments and Non-Government Agencies with Coastal Management Related Responsibilities
    A Directory of COASTAL Pacific Island MANAGEMENT Governments and non Government PROFILES Agencies with Coastal Management related Responsibilities henfeld ac W vid Da Photo: SPREP South Pacific Regional Environment Programme SPREP Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Coastal Management Profiles : A Directory of Pacific Island Governments and non-Government Agencies with Coastal Management Related Responsibilities. – Apia, Samoa : SPREP, 1999. vi, 205 p. ; 29 cm ISBN: 982-04-0198-4 1. Coastal zone management – Oceania – Directories. 2. Coastal engineering - Oceania – Directories. I. South Pacific Regional Environment Programme. 025.1641 Published in June 1999 by the South Pacific Regional Environment Programme PO Box 240 Apia, Samoa Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.sprep.org.ws/ Produced by SPREP Edited by Carole Hunter Layout and design by Andreas Wagner (WWd, Australia) email: [email protected] Cover photo: David Wachenfeld (Triggerfish Images, Australia) email: [email protected] Typeset in 9.5/12 (New Century Schoolbook) Printed on recycled paper 90gsm Savannah Matt Art (60%) by Quality Print Ltd, Fiji © South Pacific Regional Environment Programme, 1999. The South Pacific Regional Environment Programme authorises the reproduction of this material, whole or in part, in any form provided appropriate acknowledgement is given. Original Text: English SPREP’s Climate Change and Integrated Coastal Management Programme COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROFILES A DIRECTORY OF PACIFIC ISLAND GOVERNMENTS AND NON GOVERNMENT AGENCIES WITH COASTAL MANAGEMENT RELATED RESPONSIBILITIES South Pacific Regional Environment Programme FOREWORD hese Coastal Management Profiles are a direct response to country requests for a directory containing guidance on who is doing what Tin coastal management within the Pacific islands region.
    [Show full text]