DOCSLIB.ORG

Parody and Its Implications in Sydney's Defense of Poesie Author(S): Arthur F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parody and Its Implications in Sydney's Defense of Poesie Author(S): Arthur F Rice University Parody and Its Implications in Sydney's Defense of Poesie Author(s): Arthur F. Kinney Source: Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, Vol. 12, No. 1, The English Renaissance (Winter, 1972), pp. 1-19 Published by: Rice University Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/449970 . Accessed: 22/12/2013 19:48 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Rice University is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 138.253.100.121 on Sun, 22 Dec 2013 19:48:21 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Parodyand Its Implications inSydney's Defenseof Poesie A R TH UR F. KINNE Y Sir Philip Sidney's Defense of Poesie consciouslyparallels and bur- lesques Stephen Gosson's Schoole of Abuse (1579) in form (the classical oration), issues (listed in Sidney's reprehensio), authorities,and even illustrationsas well as in style, notably the use of euphuism.This was because Sidney recognized that-although he disagreed with Gosson's apparent position against all poetry and the simplicityand crudityof Gosson's work-his disagreementwith Gosson was not a substantial one; he resortedto parody to mask the similarityof his own argument in his "Defense." Since the comparison of texts demonstrateshow clearly this was the case, we must now redate the compositionand distributionof Sidney's treatise as late fall or early winter 1579/80. ALTHOUGH MANY SCHOLARS have com- mendedSir Philip Sidneyfor his pleasantexordium concerning the horsemasterJon Pietro Pugliano which opens his dis- tinguishedDefense of Poesie, no one has advanced any reason whySidney chose this particularanecdote to begin a carefully constructed and tightly reasoned aesthetic. Innumerable source studies have been unable to uncoverclassical sources or parallels; we generallyassume the incidentto be auto- biographicaland amusing, nothingmore. Yet the autobio- graphicaldimension is not a featureelsewhere in the Defense; it is more properlyviewed as a traditionalmeans of writing an exordium.A furtherhint, however, which sheds light on both Sidney's intentionand method,is supplied by Stephen Gosson'sSchoole of Abuse (1579), the attackon poetry,music, and drama which undoubtedlyprompted Sidney's defense.' 'Thomas Zouch maintained in 1808 that Gosson influencedSidney and in 1868 Arber,in his editionof Sidney's Apologie,flatly stated Sidney's work was "a carefullyprepared answer" to Gosson. Subsequent biog- raphers and editorsof Sidney have in the main agreed, leading William B. Wimsatt,Jr. and Cleanth Brooks to commentin Literary Criticism (New York, 1957) that "Largely from Gosson's dedication and from an allusion to this by Spenser in a letter . , but in part also from certain momentsin Sidney's argumentand certain snatches of parodied Euphuistic style which seem echoes of Gosson, Sidney's Defense of Poesie, though writtenperhaps as late as 1585, has been traditionally considereda retortto Gosson" (p. 169). See Zouch, Memoirsof the Life and Writingsof Sir Philip Sidney (York, 1808), p. 197; Edward Arber (London, 1868), p. 7; cf. George E. Woodbury,Studies of a Litterateur This content downloaded from 138.253.100.121 on Sun, 22 Dec 2013 19:48:21 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 2 PAROD Y Gossonalso began with an autobiographicalaccount. Further, he assumed in his pamphleta numberof metaphoricalroles as critic,2one of which was that of the soldier who insists men keep up their guard against the subtle evil effectsof much poetry.At one point Gosson writes, "make much of Souldiers,that are redyto executethe same with swords . the least discontinuaunceof Martiall exercise give you the foyle" (D8v). Comparethis representativeremark to Sidney's textin whichit is said of Puglianothat He said souldierswere the noblestestate of mankind, and horsementhe noblest of souldiers.He said they were the maistersof warre, and ornamentsof peace, speedie goers, and strongabiders, triumphers both in Camps and Courts: nay to so unbeleeveda point he preceeded,as that no earthlything bred such wonder to a Prince,as to be a good horseman. thenwould he adde certaine praises by telling what a peerlesse beast the horse was, the onely serviceable Courtier withoutflattery, the beast of most bewtie, faithful- nesse, courage,and such more,that if I had not bene a peece of a Logician beforeI came to him,I thinkehe (New York, 1921), p. 297. See also Mona Wilson, Sir Philip Sidney (London, 1931), p. 156; the biographiesof J. AddingtonSymonds (Lon- don and New York-,1886); H. R. Fox Bourne (New York, 1891), p. 205; E. M. Dankinger, (London, 1932), p. 159; C. Henry Warren (London, 1936), pp. 118-119; AlfredH. Bill (New York, 1937), pp. 194-195; Fred- erick S. Boas (London, 1955), p. 45; Adele Biagi (Napoli, 1958), pp. 131-136; and the editionsof Sidney's Defense, ed. Albert S. Cook (Bos- ton, 1890), pi. xii; Evelyn S. Shuckburgh(Cambridge, 1891), p. xxxiii; G. Gregory Smith (London, 1904), p. 393 et passim; and J. Churton Collins (Oxford,1907), p. xxiii. See also Joel E. Spingarn,A History of Literary Criticismin the Renaissance (New York, 1899), p. 273; George Saintsbury,A History of CriticismII (Edinburgh and London, 1902), 171-176; and Cornell M. Dowlin ,'Sidney's Two Definitionsof Poetry," Modern Language Quarterly, III (1942), 573-581; J. W. H. Atkins, English Literary Criticism: The Renascance (London, 1951), pp. 113- 138. In The Poet's Defence (Cambridge,1939), Jacob Bronowskistudies the respective positions of Gosson and Sidney as a running debate (pp. 19-56). 'Gosson assigns four roles to the critic; besides that discussed here he treats the critic as a host who welcomes his reader to a nourishing argument,a teacher who instructsin virtue and its abuse, and a doctor who attemptsto amputate corruptioncaused by bad poetry.For a full discussion of these roles and the ways Gosson uses them to develop his argument,see my earlier essay, "Stephen Gosson's Art of Argumen- tation in The Schoole of Abuse," Studies in English Literature, VII (1967), 43-54. This content downloaded from 138.253.100.121 on Sun, 22 Dec 2013 19:48:21 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions ARTHUR F. KINNEY 3 would have perswaded me to have wished my selfe a horse.8 Along with a delightfulgeneral satire of the Court,Pugliano is made to burlesqueGosson's words by applyingthem to a horse ratherthan the rider and this mockeryin turn allows Sidney to satirize the credibilityof the foolish readers of Gosson's Schoole of Abuse. Implicationsin Sidney's exordium emerge: Gossonproceeds from scattered observations on Lon- don theatersto a theory"so unbeleeved";his praise and con- demnationare characterizedby extremelanguage; "a peece of a Logician" is able to respondto Gosson's argumentbut, since no one has, the need for a "defense" against Gosson's "attack"is now apparent. Of course this is not instantlyclear, and it may even seem forced.Sidney's Defense is generallysweet, subtle, and comic: a workof good humor.But if we add to this a line of parody on the hypothesisthat the work is throughouta sophisticated responseto Gosson,then the exordiumlogically and stylistic- ally coheres. Further we can trace conscious parallels and burlesque: in Sidney's use of the formof a judicial oration; in the massive array of classical authority(where Sidney frequentlychooses Gosson's authorities and even his sources); in the satire of (and parodyof) euphuism,the stylein which Gossonwrote The Schooleof Abuse. The parallelpresentations, in fact,continue to the pointwhere, in his reprehensio,Sidney answersprecisely those charges which Gosson alone had listed against poetry,and it is part of my purposeto examine some of those parallels here. But I am also interestedin the reason Sidneyused parody: I thinkhe did so because he was in many ways in agreementwith Gosson's position and so could not directlyoppose it. If this hypothesisis true,however, we need 'B1-Blv; I, 150. I have been aided in this study by William Elwood who furnishedme with an IBM printoutof Robert Sidney's ms., the Pon- sonby quarto, and the Olney 1914 edition of the Defense as parallel texts. Quotations are from the Ponsonby quarto as collated with the text in G. Gregory Smith, Elizabethan Critical Essays, I, (Oxford, 1904), 150-207,but these have also been collated with the Olney quarto and the ms. I have chosen Ponsonby for the reasons advanced by Feuillerat in his edition of Sidney's Prose Works, III, (Cambridge, 1912-1926),v-vi, a choicesupported by William Ringler who, in reading both quartos against the Penshurst ms. recently discovered,tells me that the Olney is a later text with sophisticatedinterpolations in all likelihoodnot in Sidney's originaltext. This content downloaded from 138.253.100.121 on Sun, 22 Dec 2013 19:48:21 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 4 PARODY to redate Sidney's Defense to the winter of 1580, while the object of the parody was still fresh in his readers' minds. I shall conclude,therefore, with some additionalevidence sug- gesting a date of compositionfor the Defense considerably earlier than the one we have been persuadedto give it. I Stephen Gosson's Schoole of Abuse was entered in the Stationer'sRegister on 22 July1579; the pamphletwas dedi- cated to "the right noble Gentleman,Master Philip Sidney Esquier." On 5 and 16 October,1579, in a letterto Gabriel Harvey dated from Leicester House, the London home of Sidney's uncle,Edmund Spenser wrote "Newe Books I heare of none,but onlyof one, that writinga certaineBooke, called The School of Abuse, and dedicatingit to Maister Sidney, was for hys labor scorned: if at least it be in the goodnesse of that nature to scorne.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Uses of Melancholy Among Military Nobles in Late Elizabethan England
    10.6094/helden.heroes.heros./2014/QM/04 36 Andreas Schlüter Humouring the Hero: The Uses of Melancholy among Military Nobles in Late Elizabethan England The interest of this article is twofold: fi rst, to aggressive foreign policy against Spain that establish and explore the intricate connection involved England with military on the continent between two key concepts in the fashioning of from the mid-1570s (“Leicester-Walsing ham English military nobles: the hero and melan- alliance”, Adams 25 and passim). The queen choly; and second, to explain their usages and herself referred to Sidney once as “le plus ac- usefulness in the last decades of the sixteenth compli gentilhomme de l’Europe” (Sidney, Cor- century, when both terms were used a lot more respondence II 999). He travelled Europe exten- frequently than ever before in the English lan- sively and brought many ideas and practices of guage (see, for hero, Simpson et al. 171 and the Mediterranean Renaissance and of the Euro- Low 23–24, and for melancholy, Babb 73). It is pean republic of letters into the practical life and possible to link this increase at least partially to behaviour of his generation of fellow court hope- the advance ment of one particular social fi gura- fuls, such as Walter Raleigh, Robert Devereux, tion1: the generation of young courtiers of Queen the 2nd Earl of Essex, and Fulke Greville. In this Elizabeth I who were born around 1560 and climate of “intellectual bombardment” by human- stepped into the courtly sphere in the 1580s and ist ideas as well as by Calvinist beliefs (Waller 1590s.
    [Show full text]
  • Grotesque Transformations and the Discourse of Conversion in Robert Greene's Works and Shakespeare's Falstaff
    Grotesque Transformations and the Discourse of Conversion in Robert Greene's Works and Shakespeare's Falstaff Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors DiRoberto, Kyle Louise Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 08:47:04 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/203437 GROTESQUE TRANSFORMATIONS AND THE DISCOURSE OF CONVERSION IN ROBERT GREENE'S WORK AND SHAKESPEARE'S FALSTAFF by Kyle DiRoberto _____________________ Copyright © Kyle DiRoberto A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2011 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Kyle DiRoberto entitled Grotesque Transformations and the Discourse of Conversion in Robert Greene's Work and Shakespeare's Falstaff. and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11/8/11 Dr. Meg Lota Brown _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11/8/11 Dr. Tenney Nathanson _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11/8/11 Dr. Carlos Gallego Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of English Literature MICHAEL ALEXANDER
    A History of English Literature MICHAEL ALEXANDER [p. iv] © Michael Alexander 2000 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W 1 P 0LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2000 by MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world ISBN 0-333-91397-3 hardcover ISBN 0-333-67226-7 paperback A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 O1 00 Typeset by Footnote Graphics, Warminster, Wilts Printed in Great Britain by Antony Rowe Ltd, Chippenham, Wilts [p. v] Contents Acknowledgements The harvest of literacy Preface Further reading Abbreviations 2 Middle English Literature: 1066-1500 Introduction The new writing Literary history Handwriting
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Philip Sidney: an Apology for Poetry Or the Defence of Poesy Unit 5
    Sir Philip Sidney: An Apology for Poetry or The Defence of Poesy Unit 5 Unit 5: SIR PHILIP SIDNEY: AN APOLOGY FOR POETRY OR THE DEFENCE OF POESY UNIT STRUCTURE: 5.1 Learning Objectives 5.2 Introduction 5.3 English Criticism in the time of the Renaissance 5.4 Sidney: The Critic 5.5 Sidney’s An Apology for Poetry 5.6 Important Concepts of the Text 5.7 Reception of Sidney as a Critic 5.8 Let us Sum up 5.9 Further Reading 5.10 Answers to Check Your Progress (Hints Only) 5.11 Possible Questions 5.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVES After going through this unit, you will be able to read about English criticism during the time of the Renaissance • discuss Sidney as one of the greatest English critics • trace the importance An Apology of Poetry in terms of the various issues raised by Sidney • discuss the major concepts dealt with by Sidney in the text • identify the relevance and influence of Sidney’s doctrine in the history of English criticism 5.2 INTRODUCTION This is the last unit of this Block. In this unit, you will be introduced to English criticism during the Renaissance through a discussion of Philip Sidney’s An Apology for Poetry. Although Sidney is best known as a critic of the Renaissance period, he was also a great poet, a creative writer, a noble and virtuous man. He is also one who embodies the MA English Course 4 (Block 1) 77 Unit 5 Sir Philip Sidney: An Apology for Poetry or The Defence of Poesy aristocratic ideals of the Renaissance man, by virtue of his being a courtier, soldier, statesman, amateur scholar, and a legendary figure in his time.
    [Show full text]
  • THE INVENTION of the CRITIC in ENGLAND, 1570-1640 William
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository THE INVENTION OF THE CRITIC IN ENGLAND, 1570-1640 William McCullough Russell A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English and Comparative Literature. Chapel Hill 2009 Approved by: Jessica Wolfe Reid Barbour Mary Floyd-Wilson Darryl Gless Ritchie Kendall © 2009 William McCullough Russell ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT WILLIAM McCULLOUGH RUSSELL: The Invention of the Critic in England, 1570-1640 (Under the direction of Jessica Wolfe) This dissertation examines the social and intellectual forces that shaped the idea of the literary critic in early modern England. Histories of criticism too often neglect critical identity, fastidiously tracing the development of such concepts as imitation yet taking for granted the idea of the critic as stable and transparent. This study complicates that idea by historicizing it in the very period when the word critic first began to signify an expert in literary judgment. Revising reductive assessments of this era of criticism as the sum of its classical parts, I argue that the idea of the critic in early modern England was negotiated in a discourse equally responsive to classical precedent and to the economic, political, and religious circumstances of a rapidly changing national landscape. Such pivotal moments as the erection of public theaters in London, the Marprelate controversy, the tide of anti-intellectualism rising from what Gabriel Harvey called “the world of business,” and the English chapter of the scientific revolution forced English critics from Sidney to Jonson to reevaluate the basis and scope of critical authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Culture of Shakespeare's England
    MILITARY CULTURE OF SHAKESPEARE’S ENGLAND by DONG HA SEO A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY The Shakespeare Institute School of English, Drama and American & Canadian Studies College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis examines the development of military culture in, and its effects on, early modern English society. Militarism during the late Elizabethan and early Stuart periods was not reinforced by military institutions directly interfering with the private lives of individuals, or by controlling the thoughts and actions of the whole nation. It was, however, strongly influenced by the culture of a military elite, represented by leading noblemen such as Leicester, Sidney, Essex, and Prince Henry, who paid considerable attention to the theatrical aspects of formal and ceremonial occasions and how their military role was portrayed in art and literature. Unlike the usual traditional portrayal of these prominent figures as incompetent military leaders who rushed blindly forwards in pursuit of military glory, we will see that through their aristocratic patronage of various art forms they promoted their image as competent Protestant warriors, and helped the public to be receptive to a variety of military ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterodox Drama: Theater in Post-Reformation London
    Heterodox Drama: Theater in Post-Reformation London Musa Gurnis-Farrell Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2011 © 2011 Musa Gurnis-Farrell All rights reserved ABSTRACT Heterodox Drama: Theater in Post-Reformation London Musa Gurnis-Farrell In “Heterodox Drama: Theater in Post-Reformation London,” I argue that the specific working practices of the theater industry generated a body of drama that combines the varied materials of post-Reformation culture in hybrid fantasies that helped audiences emotionally negotiate and productively re-imagine early modern English religious life. These practices include: the widespread recycling of stock figures, scenarios, and bits of dialogue to capitalize on current dramatic trends; the collaboration of playwrights and actors from different religious backgrounds within theater companies; and the confessionally diverse composition of theater audiences. By drawing together a heterodox conglomeration of Londoners in a discursively capacious cultural space, the theaters created a public. While the public sphere that emerges from early modern theater culture helped audience members process religious material in politically significant ways, it did so not primarily through rational-critical thought but rather through the faculties of affect and imagination. The theater was a place where the early modern English could creatively reconfigure existing confessional identity categories, and emotionally experiment with the rich ideological contradictions of post-Reformation life. ! Table of Contents Introduction: Heterodoxy and Early Modern Theater . 1 Chapter One: “Frequented by Puritans and Papists”: Heterodox Audiences . 23 Chapter Two: Religious Polemic from Print into Plays . 64 Chapter Three: Martyr Acts: Playing with Foxe’s Martyrs on the Public Stage .
    [Show full text]
  • Sidney Ebook Cover.Jpg
    Sir Philip Sidney’s An Apology for Poetry and Astrophil and Stella: Texts and Contexts Introduction ........................................................................9 An Apology for Poetry ..........................................................55 Astrophil and Stella ...........................................................127 From Sidney’s Letters .......................................................211 The Quarrel over Poetry: Selected Attacks and Defenses ...218 Plato, from the Republic and the Laws .....................218 Boccaccio, from Genealogy of the Gentile Gods, Book 14 ............................................................224 Juan Luis Vives, Truth Dressed Up, or of Poetic License: To What Extent Poets May be Permitted to Vary from the Truth ........................................234 Sir Thomas Elyot, The Defense of Good Women .........236 Julius Caesar Scaliger, from Poetics ...........................238 Richard Willes, from A Disputation Concerning Poetry ...............................................................246 Theodore Beza, “A Sportful Comparison between Poets and Papists,” from Flowers of Epigrams ......259 Theodore Beza, from Abraham’s Sacrifice) .................261 Stephen Gosson, The School of Abuse .......................263 Edmund Spenser, from Spenser and Gabriel Harvey, from Two Other Very Commendable Letters of the Same Men’s Writing: Both Touching the Foresaid Artificial Versifying ...............................272 George Puttenham, fromThe Art of English Poesy .....273 Suggestions
    [Show full text]
  • Giovanni Florio's First Fruites (1578): Dialogue and Cultural Exchange in Elizabethan England
    Giovanni Florio’s First Fruites (1578): Dialogue and Cultural Exchange in Elizabethan England David Chidgey Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2013 School of Languages and Linguistics University of Melbourne Abstract In this thesis I investigate the ambitious nature of Giovanni Florio’s First Fruites (1578), an Italian-English dialogue manual in parallel-text format. The ambitiousness of the text has been suggested by Frances Yates (1934), Michael Wyatt (2005) and, most importantly, Florio himself. Yates assessed Florio’s outlook as more literary and courtly than his predecessors, and Wyatt noted that the text tackles a variety of difficult grammatical issues from the opening dialogue. Their reading of First Fruites as ambitious is based on an analysis of its language pedagogy in comparison to Claudius Hollyband’s The French Littelton (1576). This thesis argues that Florio took advantage of a broader tradition of language manuals, and situates the text within that tradition. The connections between First Fruites and the earlier tradition (which are discussed for the first time in this work) show that Florio's manual not only taught English and Italian cultures and languages but also provided an introduction to vernacular rhetoric and literature for the benefit of the budding English diplomatic and courtly elite. Florio was born in London c. 1553. His father, Michel Angelo Florio, was an Italian Protestant who had fled the Roman Inquisition and emigrated to England during the reign of Edward VI, where he came under the protection of John Dudley, the Duke of Northumberland.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Spanish Sentiment in English Literary and Political Writing 1553
    Anti-Spanish sentiment in English literary and political writing 1553-1603 Mark G Sanchez Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The University of Leeds The School of English June, 2004 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. 1 Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to my PhD research supervisor, Dr. Michael G. Brennan,for his unstinting supportand scholarlyguidance from 2000 to 2004. I would also like to thank the Schoolof English, and in particular ProfessorDavid Fairer, for having offered me the chanceto study at Leedsduring the last eight years. Finally, I would like to expressmy thanks to Dr. Bernard Linares, the Gibraltarian Minister for Education and Training, and to the librarians and staff of the Brotherton University Library, Leeds. 11 Abstract This thesis examines anti-Spanish sentiment within Marian and Elizabethan literary and political writing. Although its primary aim is to reinvigorate the reader's perceptions about a topic that has traditionally been subject to considerable scholarly neglect, four `core' objectives can still be identified (a) to demonstrate how `anti-Spanishness' began as a deliberate, highly systematic attempt to tackle a number of unresolved issues within the minds
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY Grief As Medicine for Grief: Complaint Poetry in Early Modern England, 1559-1609 a DISSERTATION SUBMITT
    NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY Grief as Medicine for Grief: Complaint Poetry in Early Modern England, 1559-1609 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Field of English By Joanne Teresa Diaz EVANSTON, ILLINOIS December 2008 2 © Copyright by Joanne Teresa Diaz 2008 All Rights Reserved 3 ABSTRACT Grief as Medicine for Grief: Early Modern Complaint Poetry in England, 1559-1609 Joanne Teresa Diaz This dissertation traces the meaning and scope of early modern complaint poetry. I argue that what I understand as a secular “poetics of dissatisfaction” arose to fill the void left when religious auricular confession was no longer an institutionalized practice, and that this mode of literary expression was itself shaped by the evolving legal discourse of complaining. These articulations of dissatisfaction cross genre, style, and medium, but they all share a common language with two prominent discourses: the penitential literature of the Reformation, which worked to refigure confession when it was no longer a sacrament; and juridical testimony, which regularly blurred the line between auricular confession in the ecclesiastical courts and secular jurisprudence in the common law courts. Complaint poetry investigates questions about evidence, sincerity, and the impossibility of ever doing—or saying—enough about despair; it also considers the imaginative implications of a post-Reformation world in which the remedy for despair might be its poetic expression. Critics have long seen emergent interiority as a defining characteristic of early modern poetry; however, I argue that complaint poems are argumentative, highly emotional, and committed to revealing a shattered self in publicly staged distress.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 10: Module 08: E Text
    Paper 10: Module 08: E Text MHRD-UGC ePG Pathshala - English Principal Investigator & Affiliation: Prof. Tutun Mukherjee, University of Hyderabad Paper No & Title: Literary Criticism and Theory (Paper 10) Paper Coordinator & Affiliation: Dr. Anita Bhela, Delhi College of Arts and Commerce, University of Delhi Module Number & Title: Sir Philip Sidney: “An Apology for Poetry (08) Content Writer's Name & Affiliation: Dr. Anita Bhela, Delhi College of Arts and Commerce, University of Delhi Name & Affiliation of Content Reviewer: Dr. Omana Antony, K. R. Mangalam University Name & Affiliation of Content Editor: Dr. Omana Antony, K. R. Mangalam University Biography Sir Philip Sidney was born on November 30, 1554 at Penshurst, Kent, England and died on October 17, 1586 at Arnhem, Netherlands. He was a courtier, statesman, soldier, critic, and poet who earned for himself the reputation of being an ideal gentleman. He belonged to a noble family of statesmen. His father, Sir Henry Sidney, was appointed Lord President of Wales and three times Lord Deputy of Ireland. His uncle, Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester, was Queen Elizabeth’s most trusted adviser. Sidney had his early education at Shrewsbury School, where he developed friendship with classmate Fulke Greville, who later also became his biographer. At age 18, he moved on to Christ Church, Oxford and studied there for three years. From 1572-1575 he went on a tour of Europe and visited France, Germany, Austria, Hungary Poland, and Italy. On this tour, he gained knowledge of European politics, music, astronomy, geography and perfected his knowledge of Latin, French, and Italian. During his travels, he became acquainted with prominent European statesmen and scholars, including the humanist scholar Hubert Languet, who strongly influenced his religious and political beliefs.
    [Show full text]