DOCSLIB.ORG

The Potential of Agroecology to Build Climate-Resilient Livelihoods and Food Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Potential of Agroecology to Build Climate-Resilient Livelihoods and Food Systems THE POTENTIAL OF AGROECOLOGY TO BUILD CLIMATE-RESILIENT LIVELIHOODS AND FOOD SYSTEMS REGIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONALLY DETERMINED CONTRIBUTIONS IN THE CARIBBEAN Gaps and opportunities in the agriculture and land use sectors THE POTENTIAL OF AGROECOLOGY TO BUILD CLIMATE-RESILIENT LIVELIHOODS AND FOOD SYSTEMS Lead Authors: Fabio Leippert Biovision Maryline Darmaun Martial Bernoux Molefi Mpheshea Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations PUBLISHED BY THE FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS AND BIOVISION FOUNDATION FOR ECOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT ROME, 2020 Required citation: Leippert, F., Darmaun, M., Bernoux, M. and Mpheshea, M. 2020. The potential of agroecology to build climate-resilient livelihoods and food systems. Rome. FAO and Biovision. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb0438en The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or Biovision Foundation for Ecological Development concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or Biovision in preference to others of a simi- lar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO or Biovisioin. ISBN 978-92-5-133109-5 © FAO, 2020 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that FAO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the FAO logo is not permitted. If the work is adapted, then it must be licensed under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If a translation of this work is created, it must include the following disclaimer along with the required citation: “This translation was not created by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original [Language] edition shall be the authoritative edition.” Disputes arising under the licence that cannot be settled amicably will be resolved by mediation and arbitration as described in Article 8 of the licence except as otherwise provided herein. The applicable mediation rules will be the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules and any arbitration will be conducted in accordance with the Arbitra- tion Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). Third-party materials. Users wishing to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or images, are responsible for determining whether permission is needed for that reuse and for obtaining permission from the copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely with the user. Sales, rights and licensing. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be pur- chased through [email protected]. Requests for commercial use should be submitted via: www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-re- quest. Queries regarding rights and licensing should be submitted to: [email protected]. CONTENTS Foreword vii Acknowledgements viii Acronyms and abbreviations x Executive summary xiii CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Rationale: bringing agroecology into climate change discussions 1 1.2 Overall objective and set-up 3 1.3 Definitions and concepts 4 1.3.1 Agroecology framework: how to understand agroecology in this study 4 1.3.2 Climate resilience 6 CHAPTER 2 International policy potential 11 2.1 Approach 12 2.2 Background on agroecology in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiations 12 2.2.1 The long road to Koronivia 12 2.2.2 Analysis of the degree of integration of agroecology into nationally determined contributions (NDCs) 13 2.3 Current dynamics in the Koronivia negotiations 15 2.3.1 The Koronivia Joint Work on Agriculture (KJWA) process and initial submissions of parties and observers 15 2.3.2 Topic 2(a): Modalities for implementation of the outcomes of the five in-session workshops on issues related to agriculture and other future topics that may arise from this work 17 2.3.3 Topic 2(b): Methods and approaches for assessing adaptation, adaptation co-benefits and resilience; and topic 2(c): Improved soil carbon, soil health and soil fertility under grassland and cropland as well as integrated systems, including water management 18 2.3.4 Topic 2(d): Improved nutrient use and manure management towards sustainable and resilient agricultural systems 19 2.3.5 Views of key stakeholders on the current discussion on the agriculture and climate change nexus in the United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) processes, including the Koronivia Joint Work on Agriculture (KJWA) 20 2.4 Outlook: future potential of agroecology to be backed by UNFCCC 21 2.5 Conclusions: potential to integrate agroecology in international climate change policies 23 CHAPTER 3 Meta-analysis: potential of agroecology to adapt and increase resilience to climate change 27 3.1 Introduction 27 iii 3.2 Methodology 28 3.3 Results 28 3.3.1 Meta-analysis and reviews 29 3.3.2 Single system comparison studies 32 3.3.3 Reviews on advisory services knowledge co-creation and knowledge transfer 36 3.4 Discussion of the potential of agroecology to tackle climate change 37 3.4.1 Increasing adaptive capacity, reducing vulnerability, and mitigation co-benefits 37 3.4.2 Research gaps 38 3.4.3 Submission for Koronivia Joint Work on Agriculture: elements to be included in topics 2(b), 2(c) and 2(d) 38 3.5 Conclusions 39 CHAPTER 4 Country case studies on the policy and technical potential of agroecology 43 4.1 Overall methodology 43 4.1.1 Methodology for assessing the policy potential for agroecology 43 4.1.2 Methodology technical potential 45 4.2 Results case study Kenya 47 4.2.1 Context Kenya 47 4.2.2 Policy potential in Kenya 48 4.2.3 Technical potential in Kenya 58 4.2.4 Social dimension case study: perception of farmer communities 73 4.3 Results case study Senegal 75 4.3.1 Context Senegal 75 4.3.2 Policy potential in Senegal 76 4.3.3 Technical potential in Senegal 86 CHAPTER 5 Conclusions and recommendations 103 5.1 Overall conclusions 103 5.1.1 Agroecology is gaining momentum on the international policy level 103 5.1.2 Solid scientific evidence demonstrating that agroecology increases climate resilience 104 5.1.3 Lessons learned from Kenya and Senegal 105 5.2 Recommendations 108 5.2.1 Overall key recommendations 108 5.2.2 Further recommendations to donors, decision-makers and other stakeholders 109 5.2.3 Recommendations in the context of Koronivia 109 5.2.4 Recommendations to researchers and donors 110 References 113 Annexes 123 iv TABLES, FIGURES AND BOXES TABLES 1. An extract of SHARP scoring of agroecosystem resilience indicators based on modules and sub-indicators 46 2. Actors engaged in the Kenya policy-making process and their roles 53 3. Summary: policy potential of agroecology in Kenya 56 4. Numbers of farmers sampled from four agroecological zones in Kenya 61 5. Summary of SHARP dataset scores for sampled farmers 61 6. Priority ranking assessment (greatest priorities on top and least priorities at the end of the table) for agroecological and non-agroecological farm systems based on technical, adequacy and importance scores of each SHARP module. The lowest scoring modules are considered of the highest priority and requiring intervention 63 7. Senegal's agroecological zones and their characteristics 75 8. Stakeholders involved (light green) and currently not involved (white) in agroecology- related issues 82 9. Number of farmers sampled in 2 agro-ecological zones in Senegal 87 10. Selected SHARP themes for which agroecological farms were found to have statistical different resilience scores in the social domain compared to the control group, and the implication of these differences 90 11. Comparison between Niayes and Koussanar, on agroecosystems resilience that were statistically significant between AE and control groups. For these indicators, AE had higher resilience scores 98 12. List of indicators where greater adaptability and resilience is shown by agroecological farmers in Kenya and Senegal 106 FIGURES 1. The multilevel analysis approach 3 2. The FAO 10 elements of agroecology and Gliessman’s (2014) levels of transition towards sustainable food systems 5 3. Vulnerability, adaptation and resilience framework 7 4. Linking FAO’s 10 elements of agroecology and Gliessman’s five levels of food system transformation (inspired by HLPE report) with the 13 SHARP resilience indicators 8 5. Frequency of references to the elements of agroecology in nationally determined contributions 14 6. Percentage of countries by regions, referring to different elements of agroecology in their NDCs 15 7. Roadmap of the Koronivia Joint Work on Agriculture (KJWA) 16 8. Percentage of party (n=17) and observer (n=13) submissions to the KJWA workshop on topics 2(a) at SB49 making specific reference to any of the ten elements of agroecology 17 9.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master's Thesis
    Master’s Thesis - master Innovation Science Aquaponics Development in the Netherlands The Role of the Emerging Aquaponics Technology and the Transition towards Sustainable Agriculture Mascha Wiegand 6307345 Tulpenweg 17 63579 Freigericht Germany [email protected] +49 1607561911 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ellen H.M. Moors Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development [email protected] +31 30 253 7812 Second Reader: Dr. Koen Beumer Summary A sustainability transition in the agri-food regime is urgently required to interrupt the strong reciprocal effect between current food production standards and climate change (Willett et al., 2019). One sustainable innovation in the agri-food sector is aquaponics. Aquaponics is the combination of hydroponics and recirculating aquaculture in one controlled environment (Somerville, Cohen, Pantanella, Stankus & Lovatelli, 2014). At first sight, the water and nutrient-saving character of aquaponics, amongst other features (Somerville et al., 2014), sound promising for a transition towards sustainable agriculture. Therefore, the following research question emerged: How can the emerging aquaponics technology contribute to the sustainability transition in the Dutch agri- food sector based on Dutch aquaponics developments in the period 2008-2018? To answer this overarching research question, three sub-questions were developed. An integrated framework combining the multilevel perspective (MLP) and the technological innovation system (TIS) was used to understand the dynamics between overall structural trends, the current Dutch agri-food sector and the emerging aquaponics innovation. The innovation was also set into a broader European context. The research was of exploratory nature and used a qualitative content analysis to process 23 interviews, scientific articles, practitioner websites, publication, patent and Google Trend statistics, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Zero Budget Natural Farming: Myth and Reality
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Zero budget Natural Farming: Myth and Reality Prajapati, Hari Ram Kamala Nehru College, DU, Banaras Hindu University 11 September 2019 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/104813/ MPRA Paper No. 104813, posted 31 Dec 2020 10:18 UTC Zero budgets Natural Farming: Myth and Reality Dr. Hari Ram Prajapati1 Assistant Professor Economics Section, MMV, BHU Abstract India is one of the largest agrarian economy in the world, where, about 44 per cent of the workforce are employed in agriculture contributing 14 percent of the GDP and about 10 percent of the country’s exports. However, the productivity of the labour force engage in agriculture has continuously decline. The conventional farming method has become unfeasible due to ever raising input prices. This has led to increase in rural indebtedness and serious agrarian crisis in India. The Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF) can help to eliminating rural indebtedness and degradation of natural resources in India. This paper presents some empirical evidence on ZBNF and its related myth and reality. Key words: Zero Budget Natural Farming, Rural Indebtedness, Agrarian Crisis JEL Classification: Q14, Q16 Introduction: In India agriculture remains the key sector of Indian economy, where half of the country‟s population depends it‟s for their livelihood. Agriculture and allied activity contribute 17 percent to Grass Value Added (GAV) of National Income (MOA, 2017). After 1977, a major transition has been seen in Indian agriculture sector and shifted from subsistence to commercial farming. This transition helps country to attain self-sufficiency and nutritional security of growing population.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Global Warming Within 1.5°C Constrains Emergence of Aridification
    ` Keeping global warming within 1.5°C constrains emergence of aridification Chang-Eui Park1, Su-Jong Jeong1*, Manoj Joshi2, Timothy J. Osborn2, Chang-Hoi Ho3, Shilong Piao4,5,6, Deliang Chen7, Junguo Liu1, Hong Yang8,9, Hoonyoung Park3, Baek-Min Kim10, Song Feng11 1School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech), Shenzhen, China 2Climatic Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK 3School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea 4Key Laboratory of Alpine Ecology and Biodiversity, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 5Sino-French Institute for Earth System Science, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China 6Center for Excellence in Tibetan Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China 7Department of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden 8EAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland 9Faculty of Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland 10Korea Polar Research Institution, Inchon, Korea 11Department of Geosciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 72701, AR, USA Nature Climate Change (Accepted) *Corresponding author: Prof. Su-Jong Jeong, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China ([email protected]) ` Aridity – the ratio of atmospheric water supply (precipitation; P) to demand (potential evapotranspiration; PET) – is projected to decrease (i.e., become drier) as a consequence of anthropogenic climate change, aggravating land degradation and desertification1-6. However, the timing of significant aridification relative to natural variability – defined here as the time of emergence for aridification (ToEA) – is unknown, despite its importance in designing and implementing mitigation policy7-10.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Farming Vs Organic Farming
    Article ID: AEN-2021-02-02-020 Natural Farming vs Organic Farming Y. B. Vala1* and M. H. Chavda2 1M.Sc Scholar, Department of Agronomy, C. P. College of Agriculture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar-388 506, Gujarat 2Ph.D Scholar, Department of Agronomy, C. P. College of Agriculture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar-388 506, Gujarat *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] “Natural farming is a farming practice that initates the way of nature,” it was practiced in Japan by Masanobu Fukuoka and Mokichi Okada. It is described as “the natural way of farming” or “do nothing farming”. “Organic Farming is a holistic system designed to optimize the productivity and fitness of diverse communities within the agro-ecosystem, including oil, organisms, plants, livestock and people. The principal goal of organic production is to development enterprises that are sustainable and harmonious with the environment”. The most significant difference between Natural and organic farming is that Natural farming based on natural resource or on farm products to fights the weeds, pests and disease, whereas organic farming permits no chemical intervention. Organic farming simply utilizes farming techniques like crop rotation, mulching, composting, green manuring, etc to grow chemical free foods. “The ultimate goal of farming should not only be the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings and nature.” ~ Said by Masanobu Fukuoka What is Natural Farming ? In principle, practitioners of natural farming maintain that it is not a technique but a view, or a way of seeing ourselves as a part of nature, rather than separate from or above it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Animals in Eco-Functional Intensification of Organic Agriculture
    Sustainable Agriculture Research; Vol. 4, No. 3; 2015 ISSN 1927-050X E-ISSN 1927-0518 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The Role of Animals in Eco-functional Intensification of Organic Agriculture Mette Vaarst1 1 Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Research Centre Foulum, P. O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark Correspondence: Mette Vaarst, Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Research Centre Foulum, P. O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark. Tel: 45-2290-1344. E-mail: [email protected] Received: February 22, 2015 Accepted: May 4, 2015 Online Published: June 20, 2015 doi:10.5539/sar.v4n3p103 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/sar.v4n3p103 Abstract Eco-functional intensification is understood as building synergies in multi-functional and resilient agricultural systems in harmony with their surrounding environment and human systems, to the benefit of diversified production of food and beyond, as in, for example, ecosystem services. Integration of animals into eco-functionally intensified agricultural systems to enhance agricultural, ecological and social systems, can contribute to driving a future sustainable development of organic agricultural and food systems. This approach may respond to challenges of an increasing industrialization of livestock in the global north, a process which has led to heavy reliance on external inputs, and, to a large extent, a detachment of animals from farming systems, especially in the global south. Animals are living sentient beings, but often not acknowledged as such. Complex, well-integrated systems can be organized so that they support the health and welfare of animals, and let these animals be valuable resources within the farming system.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovations in Natural Farming Through Organic Farming Vs. Chemical Farming: an Empirical Study on Farmers of Odisha
    ISSN- 2394-5125 VOL 7, ISSUE 12, 2020 INNOVATIONS IN NATURAL FARMING THROUGH ORGANIC FARMING VS. CHEMICAL FARMING: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON FARMERS OF ODISHA Mr. Prakash Jha1 , Dr. Manjusmita Dash2 1Research Scholar - Department of Business Administration, Utkal University, Vani Vihar – 751004, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India 2Faculty - Department of Business Administration, Utkal University, Vani Vihar – 751004, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India Received: 14 March 2020 Revised and Accepted: 8 July 2020 ABSTRACT: Being the largest private sector ‗agriculture‘ enjoys a very important position in Indian economy. As it is having link from various sectors like production, processing and marketing; agriculture continuously dominate to change in the India. Agriculture is the main occupation in India as large population is living in the rural areas and having agriculture as their livelihood. Natural farming through organic farming development in the agriculture sector aims to increase the productivity, efficiency and level of employment and further aims to protect and preserve the natural resources by the over utilization of pesticides. The paper aims to study the significance of the natural farming through organic cultivation and a comparison with chemical farming in the field of agriculture. KEYWORDS: Natural farming, Organic, Sustainability, Biodiversity, Economic Sustainability, Social Sustainability. I. INTRODUCTION Agriculture occupies the most important position in Indian economy. The role of agricultural sector in Indian economy can be seen during its contribution to GDP (Gross domestic Product) and employment. This sector also contributes much to sustainable economic development of the country. The sustainable agriculture development of every country depends upon the judicious mix of their available natural resources. The big objective for the improvement of agriculture sector can be realize through rapid growth of agriculture which depends upon increasing the area of cultivation, cropping intensity and productivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Solutions for Agricultural Productivity
    Sustainable nutrition outlook Many agricultural researchers are now look- ing to a set of practices known as sustainable intensification. The specifics vary depending on the setting, but a growing number of exam- ples from around the world highlight the pos- sibility of a second green revolution — one that GREEN INK LTD. UK INK LTD. GREEN might better live up to its name. Many roads to sustainability The concept of sustainable intensification was popularized2 in 1997 by Jules Pretty, an envi- ronmental scientist at the University of Essex in Colchester, UK. His goal was to challenge the idea that increasing yield is inherently incom- patible with environmental health, with an agricultural philosophy that encompasses parameters such as biodiversity and water quality as well as the social and economic welfare of farmers. Researchers have defined the scope of sustainable intensification in dif- ferent ways, but the big picture, says Pretty, entails recognizing that agriculture is inexo- rably connected with the environment and designing cultivation strategies accordingly. “Components of sustainable systems tend to be multifunctional,” he says. “You want a diverse system that provides support to pollinators, FOR AFRICA/ICIPE/ AGRICULTURE SUSTAINABLE CLIMATE-SMART, SYSTEM: FARMING THE ‘PUSH–PULL’ A farmer inspects her maize crop, grown using a ‘push–pull’ approach. fixes nitrogen and provides a break against insects.” Advocates of sustainable intensifica- tion recognize that global agriculture can’t be reinvented in one fell swoop and that progress Natural solutions for will come from incremental steps that improve efficiency, as well as more-dramatic measures that redesign the farming landscape. agricultural productivity Lucas Garibaldi, an agroecologist at the National University of Río Negro in Bariloche, Argentina, has focused on pollinators as a Scientists are pursuing sustainability strategies for crucial component of what he calls ecologi- cal intensification.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Alternatives to Industrial Agriculture Brian Koch ENVR 395 Research Seminar Advisors: Derek Larson & Jean Lavigne
    The Global Food System: Sustainable Alternatives to Industrial Agriculture Brian Koch ENVR 395 Research Seminar Advisors: Derek Larson & Jean Lavigne Abstract Methods Results A functioning food system should produce food effectively and An evaluation of six agro-ecological farming techniques (organic, hydroponics, perennial, -The Green Revolution spurred the beginning of industrialized sustainably. The current global food system relies unsustainably on integrated pest management, aquaponics, and no till agriculture) provided a means to agriculture, an unsustainable system which utilizes chemicals, industrial agriculture. Alternative techniques could solve the issues of critique sustainable farming systems in comparison with industrial agriculture. A matrix monoculture, degrades the environment, human health, and promotes unsustainable production. Six agro-ecological farming methods were scaling system was constructed to compare each of the proposed techniques could large-scale farming evaluated through environmental, social, and economic lenses which improve or degrade within the specific criteria: environmental degradation, human health, specifically addressed environmental degradation, human health, and -Six agro-ecological agricultural techniques analyzed provide the educational and communal importance of small scale farming. and farm size. The status quo was the baseline at three for each criteria. Environmental environmental, social, and economic benefits degradation must be improved by signs of soil health, biodiversity, and drastic reductions These techniques would promote sustainability by improving soil health -Implementation of these techniques provides potential to increase and integrity and enhancing biodiversity within cropping systems, in chemical applications must be exhibited to score a four and a five or six if significant biodiverse crop production, improve soil integrity, increasing resource improving human health by producing various types of crops necessary signs are shown.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Farming As a Development Strategy: Who Are Interested and Who Are Not?
    Vol. 3, No. 1 Journal of Sustainable Development Organic Farming as A Development Strategy: Who are Interested and Who are not? Mette Vaarst Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Aarhus P.O.Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark Tel: 45-22-901-344 E-mail: Mette.Vaarst[a]agrsci.dk Abstract Much evidence shows that implementation of organic farming (OF) increases productivity in the Global South, and that it will be possible to feed a growing world population with food produced in OF systems. OF is explored, analysed and discussed in relation to the principles of Ecology, Health, Care and Fairness as enunciated by IFOAM, as a developmental strategy. Major financial powers are involved in the agro-related industries. A number of civil society-based organisations point to the major negative side effects of the trade with and use of agro-chemical products environmentally and in the further deepening of the gaps between rich and poor. The MDGs target the environmental sustainability explicitly, and OF is regarded as being a relevant strategy to meet many goals. A global development strategy is needed that explicitly includes future generations, ecosystems, biodiversity and plant and animal species threatened by eradication. Keywords: Organic farming principles, Health, Care, Fairness, Ecology, Development strategy, Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), Food security 1. Introduction: Organic and agro-ecological agriculture can feed the world – if we want to Organic and agro-ecological farming methods are based on the key principles of Health, Ecology, Fairness and Care enunciated by IFOAM (IFOAM, 2005; see Table 1). These principles are implemented in various sets of standards, legislation and guidelines in different countries, and are valued by the consumers and citizens of those countries for different reasons, such as that they guarantee healthy food production, assure environmental protection and emphasise local resources and food systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Allen Press
    GROWING POWER is a national nonprofit organization and land trust supporting people from diverse backgrounds, and the environments in which they live, by helping to provide equal access to healthy, high-quality, safe and affordable food for people in all communities. TOGETHER WE ARE GROWING POWERpress kit FEATURED IN NYTimes Magazine FEATURED IN Oprah Magazine FEATURED IN Time Magazine SEE Page 12 SEE Page 17 SEE Page 7 GROWING POWER press kit CONTACT 5500 W. Silver Spring Dr. Phone: (414) 527-1546 Milwaukee WI 53218 Fax: (414) 527-1908 VISIT www.growingpower.org contents 3 about WILL ALLEN 4 about GROWING POWER FAST FACTS about GROWING POWER 5 good food MANIFESTO 8 areas of EXPERTISE Founded: 1993 Former pro basketball player Will Allen 9 2008 MacARTHUR FELLOWS Founder: Location: Milwaukee, WI, with satellite offices in 10 press CLIPS Chicago, IL, and Madison, WI 10 …. TIME Magazine, May 2010 What is Growing Power? 11 … New York Times Magazine, July 1, 2009 Growing Power is the last working farm inside the Milwaukee city limits, with six historic greenhouses, 15 … O (Oprah) Magazine, August 2009 year-round hoop-houses, and farm animal pens 16 … Bon Appetit, June 2010 supporting several agricultural functions - all orga- nized within 3 acres. Growing Power is the leader in 17 … Milwaukee Magazine, April 2010 integrated, diversified urban sustainable agriculture 24 … United Hemispheres, October 2010 and a center of innovation, learning, and inspiration. 25 … Urban Farm Magazine, Spring 2010 Growing Power and the community 29 … Milwaukee Courier, May 29, 2010 In 2010, over 15,000 visitors explored the Growing Power Community Food Center and three thousand 30 … Outpost Exchange Magazine, July 2009 volunteers contributed countless volunteer hours of 35 Awards and Recognition farm labor to Growing Power.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Design a Pro-Poor Payment for Environmental Service
    How to design a pro-poor payments for environmental services (PES) mechanism in the forest frontier? Lessons from action-research in Madagascar A. Toillier* and G. Serpantié** *CIRAD, UMR Innovation **IRD, UMR GRED Keywords: PES, watershed, pro-poor, co-design, local knowledge, farm-level, smallholders, slash-and- burn agriculture, forest conservation, Madagascar. Abstract PES is considered new incentive tools for managing both the environment and rural development in developing countries. However, designing mechanisms tailored to smallholder characteristics and rural development requirements remains a challenge, particularly in tropical countries where the forest sector is characterized by long-standing patterns of inequality and poverty. In order to switch from theoretical principles to a really innovative management tool addressing local issues, we argue that it is necessary to include as from the beginning the characteristics of agricultural dynamics, and to involve local stakeholders in co-designing the ES and in solving problems encountered in their delivery. Through an action-research framework, we explored the characteristics of a “pro-poor” watershed-based PES mechanism associated with a hydropower project. The study site is located in the agricultural frontier of a rainforest in eastern Madagascar. We built a local and inclusive knowledge system based on (1) local and scientific knowledge on the relationships between land use and water services, (2) stakeholder perceptions on the electrification project, and (3) the heterogeneity of livelihoods of targeted households. We were then able to clarify what the environmental service and governance scheme could be. The main results show the necessity of going beyond economic and hydrologic rationales that usually underlie watershed-based PES development.
    [Show full text]
  • AGROECOLOGY: the Bold Future of Farming in Africa
    AGROECOLOGY The Bold Future of Farming in Africa ! Agroecology: The Bold Future of Farming in Africa • 1 “If anyone still entertained doubts as to the benefits of agroecology and as to whether it can meet the challenges of this century, this collection of essays provides a compelling answer.” Olivier De Schutter, Co-Chair of IPES-Food and Former UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food “There could not have been a more opportune time to publish Agroecology: The Bold Future of Farming in Africa.” Hans R Herren, World Food Prize (1995) and Right Livelihood (2013) Laureate. “It would be unscientific to ignore this evidence. The future of Africa’s agriculture lies in the hands and minds of Africa’s ecological farmers.” “The evidence and case studies Dr Vandana Shiva, Founder of in this report point to one Navdanya, Author of The Violence of the Green Revolution, Stolen inevitable conclusion: African Harvest, Who Really Feeds farmers hold the keys to the World. unlocking the potential of agroecological farming systems for improved nutrition, livelihoods, and biodiversity.” Jennifer Astone, Executive Director, Swift Foundation “Agroecology is the most important word no one knows: It represents a proven way of growing food that is best for people, the planet and the climate.” Anna Lappe, Small Planet Institute Cover Photo: Drought resistant pearl millet for resilience. Photo: Mwanzo Millinga Photo:2 • Agroecology: Kerry Farrelly The Bold Future of Farming in Africa AGROECOLOGY: The Bold Future of Farming in Africa With contributions from: Case studies from: Miguel Altieri TRAX, Ghana Mariann Bassey BERMA, Kenya Nnimmo Bassey Never Ending Food, Malawi Million Belay Send a Cow, Ethiopia Lim Li Ching Ruzivo Trust, Zimbabwe Steve Gliessman G BIACK, Kenya Bernard Y.
    [Show full text]