Research and Power Reactors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Research and Power Reactors Black Yellow Magenta Cyan 1 2 3 4 Chapter 2 Powering the Nation – Research & Power Reactors 6 5 7 25 The Chain Reaction-Volume 02 (Part 01) #150 Dt.:28/10/2005 The Chain Reaction-Volume CyanMagentaYellowBlack Black Yellow Magenta Cyan Captions for Photo-Collage 1. Panoramic view of the DHRUVA and CIRUS reactors located at BARC, Trombay. 2. Neutron beam utilization facility at DHRUVA. These facilities are extensively used for characterization of materials using techniques like neutron scattering, neutron activation analysis and for isotope production. 3. Top view of ZERLINA reactor core. The advantage of this reactor is extreme flexibility of reconfiguring core geometries, which is crucial for optimization of reactor design. 4. View of the end-fitting and end shield of a Pressurised Heavy Water Reactor. This design has a unique feature of refueling without having to shut down the reactor. This has enabled achieving high plant capacity factors. 5. Steam generators for the 540 MWe reactors being constructed at TAPS. These reactors are the next generation high power PHWR’s and recently, one of the reactors was made operational. The capacity to manufacture very large components to exacting standards has been pioneered by DAE and has significantly benefited Indian industry. 6. Quality assurance - the highest priority of the Department. Dr. M.R. Srinivasan, former Chairman AEC, personally inspecting the turbine blades. 7. Top view of control plug of FBTR during out-of-pile tests. 26 The Chain Reaction-Volume 02 (Part 01) #150 Dt.:28/10/2005 The Chain Reaction-Volume CyanMagentaYellowBlack Black Yellow Research Reactors – The Test Beds of Nuclear Technology and structural materials. These could be mastered only by Magenta building test reactors, which use different types of fuels, structural materials, coolants etc. Towards this end, several Cyan research reactors were systematically designed and built during different stages of the programme. The first of these reactors was a swimming pool type of reactor, aptly christened “APSARA” – the celestial water nymph, by Pandit Nehru himself. The basic design for this reactor was frozen in July 1955 and Indian scientists and engineers completed the construction in just over a year. With APSARA, India became the first Asian country outside the erstwhile Soviet Union, to have designed Panoramic view of the DHRUVA and CIRUS reactors and built its own nuclear reactor . located in BARC The next crucial step involved the planning of larger reactors On December 2nd 1942, something incredible was happening having much higher neutron flux and power than what was at the squash courts of the university of Chicago. Enrico Fermi, available at APSARA. This plan materialized in 1960 with the the Italian born physicist was demonstrating, to the world, the building of CIRUS, a high power (40 MWt) research reactor. feasibility of extracting controlled energy from self-sustaining This reactor, then known as the Canada India Reactor or CIR neutron chain reaction. Shortly thereafter, as early as in 1944, for short, was built in collaboration with Canada. These early even before India attained independence, Bhabha was already gains catapulted India into an ambitious nuclear program. formulating the strategy for setting up a nuclear research CIRUS and APSARA became centres of excellence in nuclear programme in India. Right from the formative years of the education. Experiments carried out at APSARA and CIRUS programme, Bhabha wanted India to be self-reliant in this newly have provided the necessary confidence and expertise for emerging area. design and safe operation of many nuclear reactors in the country. In early 1961, a zero energy critical facility named ZERLINA “…The emphasis throughout has been on (Zero Energy Reactor for Lattice Investigations and New developing know-how indigenously and on growing Assemblies) was built, for studying various geometrical aspects people, able to tackle the tasks, which lie ahead…” (lattice parameters) of a reactor fuelled with natural uranium and moderated with heavy water. - H. J. Bhabha It may be recalled that the three-stage programme calls for building of plutonium based reactors in the second stage. Therefore, the next logical step was to build a critical facility, which used plutonium as fuel. Such a test reactor was built in In line with his vision, one of the earliest decisions he took 1972 and was named PURNIMA (Plutonium Reactor for was to build research reactors of different types. Each of these Neutron Investigations in Multiplying Assemblies). This reactor rapidly accelerated the learning process necessary for was intended for studying the behaviour of plutonium fuel in a developing an intimate understanding of the complex issues pulsed fast reactor (PFR). Following this, a critical facility called involved in the control of nuclear chain reaction. The design of PURNIMA-2 was designed, with a solution containing 400 gms reactors involves high levels of optimization of geometry, fuel of uranyl nitrate serving as the fuel for this facility. It attained design, safety, materials selection, irradiation behavior of fuel criticality in 1984. 27 The Chain Reaction-Volume 02 (Part 01) #150 Dt.:28/10/2005 The Chain Reaction-Volume CyanMagentaYellowBlack Black In the early seventies, a need was felt for a research reactor 1985, with indigenous plutonium-uranium mixed carbide fuel, Yellow having even larger neutron flux and irradiation volumes than providing valuable design and operational experience. Based CIRUS, for meeting the growing requirements for radioisotopes on the successful operation of FBTR, broad based R&D and Magenta and research. This culminated in building of a totally indigenous component development , adequate experience and confidence was gained to embark on commercial phase of fast reactor Cyan 100 MWt research reactor, having the highest flux in Asia at that time. It attained criticality in August 1985 and was named DHRUVA. programme in terms of 500 MWe FBR at Kalpakkam in 2003. Apart from thermal power reactors, it was also realized in As a part of studies with 233U fuel, a 30 kW pool type research the initial stages that adequate energy security could be reactor, KAMINI (Kalpakkam MINI), was designed and built. provided only by taking recourse to fast reactors as second Prior to this, a mock up of the core of this reactor, was built and stage power programme. Towards, gaining first hand made critical in April 1992. It was given the name PURNIMA-3. experience in the fast reactor technology, it was decided to KAMINI was made operational in 1996. This reactor is being construct a Fast Breeder Test Reactor (FBTR) at Reactor extensively used as a neutron source for research applications Research Centre, Kalpakkam (later renamed as Indira Gandhi such as neutron radiography of irradiated nuclear fuel and pyro- Centre for Atomic Research). FBTR was commissioned in devices for the Indian Space programme. Fission, Chain Reaction and Criticality When neutrons strike a uranium-235 nucleus (red ball in figure) in the fuel, sometimes the nucleus splits into two smaller nuclei or undergoes fission. These nuclei called fission fragments usually have different sizes. The kinetic energy of the fission fragments is transferred to other atoms in the fuel as heat energy, which is eventually used to produce steam to drive the turbines. Every fission event results in the release of 2 to 3 energetic neutrons. For every fission event, if at least one of the emitted neutrons, on an average, causes another fission, a self-sustaining chain reaction will result. Under such a condition, when the power remains constant in time, or the chain reaction is so controlled that exactly only one neutron from every fission event contributes to the subsequent fission process, the reactor is said to have become critical. 28 The Chain Reaction-Volume 02 (Part 01) #150 Dt.:28/10/2005 The Chain Reaction-Volume CyanMagentaYellowBlack Black Yellow Moderator The chances of occurrence of a fission event are greatly enhanced if the energetic fission neutrons are slowed down to very Magenta low energies (thermal energies). This is done when the neutrons lose their energy on being elastically or inelastically scattered Cyan by light atoms or molecules. These substances made of such light atoms/ molecules are called moderators - usually light water (H2O) or heavy water (D2O). Graphite is also occasionally used for this purpose. Schematic Representation of hydrogen and deuterium Schematic of light water and Heavy water molecules A good moderator is one that rapidly slows down neutrons by taking away their kinetic energy, but does not absorb them. Light water slows down neutrons better than heavy water, but it also absorbs more neutrons. When natural uranium (containing only 0.7% of fissile nuclei with the remaining 99.3% being 238U atoms that can contribute to non-fission absorption) is used as fuel, and light water is used as moderator, not enough neutrons are available to sustain the fission chain reaction. Therefore heavy water is used in PHWR’s, which uses natural uranium oxide as fuel. In enriched fuel having more 235U or Pu, light water can, however, be used as moderator. Breeding and fuel utilization Judicious utilization of nuclear fuel is an important consideration for the long-term exploitation of nuclear energy. Therefore, an optimum use of both fissile and fertile isotopes is essential. Fertile isotopes like 238U and 232Th are converted into fissile 239Pu and 233U in a reactor. In a PHWR, some amount of 239Pu is also formed. However, the quantity of fissile 235U consumed (0.5%) is greater than the quantity of fissile Pu (~0.3%) that is produced. The ratio of fissile isotopes produced in a reactor to that which is consumed is called the breeding ratio. When this ratio is greater than one, more fissile material is produced than is consumed. Reactors for which the breeding ratio is more than one are called breeder reactors.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 1991-92
    ANNUAL REPORT 1991-92 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ATOMIC ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD BOMBAY ATOMIC ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD Shri S.D. Soman ... Chairman Dr. R.D. Lele ... Member Consultant Physician and Director of Nuclear Medicine, Jaslok Hospital & Research Centre, Bombay. Dr. S.S. Ramaswamy ... Member Retd. Director General, Factory Advice Service & Labour Institute Bombay. Dr. A. Ciopalakrishnan ... Member Director, Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute Durgapur S.Vasant Kumar ... Ex-officio Chairman, Member Safety Review Committee for Operating Plants (SARCOP), Bombay Dr. K.S. Parthasarathy ... Secretary Dy. Director, AERB Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, Vikram Sarabhai Bhavari, Anushakti Nagar, Bombay-400 094. ATOMIC ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD The Atomic Energy Regulatory Board was constituted on November 15. 1983 by the President of India by exercising the powers conferred by Section 27 of the Atomic Energy Act 1962 (33 of 1962) to cany out certain regulatory and safety functions under the Act The regulatory authority (Annexure-I) of AERB is derived from rules and notifications promulgated under the Atomic Energy Act 1962 and Environmental Protection Act 1986 The mission of the Beard is to ensure that the use of ionizing radiation and nuclear energy in India does not cause undue risk to health safety and the environment The Board consists of a full time Chairman, an ex-officio Member, three part time Members and a Secretary The bio-data of its members is given in Annexure-ll AERB is supported by th? Advisory Committees for Proiect Salety Review (ACPSRs one for the nuclear power projects and the other for heavy water projects) Ihe Safely Review Committee for Operating Plants (SARCOP) and Salety Review Committee for Applications ol Radiation (SARCARt The memberships of these committees are given in Annexure-lll The ACPSR recommends to the AERB.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule India Andpakistansanctionsother 15 Cfrparts742and744 Bureau Ofexportadministration Commerce Department of Part II 64321 64322 Federal Register / Vol
    Thursday November 19, 1998 Part II Department of Commerce Bureau of Export Administration 15 CFR Parts 742 and 744 India and Pakistan Sanctions and Other Measures; Interim Rule federal register 64321 64322 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 223 / Thursday, November 19, 1998 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau of missile technology reasons have been Export Administration, Department of made subject to this sanction policy Bureau of Export Administration Commerce, P.O. Box 273, Washington, because of their significance for nuclear DC 20044. Express mail address: explosive purposes and for delivery of 15 CFR Parts 742 and 744 Sharron Cook, Regulatory Policy nuclear devices. [Docket No. 98±1019261±8261±01] Division, Bureau of Export To supplement the sanctions of Administration, Department of RIN 0694±AB73 § 742.16, this rule adds certain Indian Commerce, 14th and Pennsylvania and Pakistani government, parastatal, India and Pakistan Sanctions and Avenue, NW, Room 2705, Washington, and private entities determined to be Other Measures DC 20230. involved in nuclear or missile activities FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: to the Entity List in Supplement No. 4 AGENCY: Bureau of Export Eileen M. Albanese, Director, Office of to part 744. License requirements for Administration, Commerce. Exporter Services, Bureau of Export these entities are set forth in the newly ACTION: Interim rule. Administration, Telephone: (202) 482± added § 744.11. Exports and reexports of SUMMARY: In accordance with section 0436.
    [Show full text]
  • Vice-Chancellor‟S Report
    Vice-Chancellor‟s Report Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi founded by the philanthropist, industrialist Late Shri B.M. Birla in 1955, attained the status of a Deemed to be University in the year 1986. The rich legacy of the founder has been carried forward by his son Padma Bhushan Late Shri. G. P. Birla and his grandson, the present Chairman of our Board of Governors, Shri C. K. Birla through continued emphasis on academic excellence and contribution to nation building. BIT Mesra, by virtue of the quality of its academic programmes, has consistently been ranked amongst the leading technical Institutes of the country. The Institute offers academic programmes in 17 disciplines in the main Mesra campus and has 626 faculty members and over 12,000 students spread across various campuses The Institute has taken many initiatives to strengthen and expand the Teaching – Learning environment and to generate career opportunities for the students in reputed organizations. Some of these initiatives are the G P Birla Scholarship Scheme, Best Student‘s Project Award, Inter Hostel Indoor Sports Award and a strong campus placement programme. A brief report on salient activities of the Institute, undertaken during the year 2018-19 follows. 1. Board of Governors: Key decisions regarding development of the institute which were taken by the BOG are listed below. Revised UG and PG curricula conforming to Outcome-Based Education (OBE)/Choice Based Credit System (CBCS) and revised Ph.D. Ordinance have been made operational in the AY 18-19. 9 UG students participated in Immersive Summer Research Experience (ISRE) at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT), Chicago and 3 at Carnegie Melon University (CMU) with equal sharing of expenses by BIT, BIT Mesra Alumni Association-North America (BITMAA-NA) and the participants The 7th CPC stands fully implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Newsletter Volume 1 Issue 1 November 2019
    Volume-1 Issue-1 For Internal Private Circulation only FROM CHAIRMAN’S DESK Dr. U. Kamachi Mudali Chairman IIChE-MRC Indian Institute Of Chemical Engineers is a confluence of streams of professionals from academia, research institute and industry. It was founded by Dr. Hira Lal Roy before Indian Independence in order to cluster stalwarts in Chemical Engineering from various professions to support the chemical industries as well as Institutes by providing a forum for interaction and joint endeavors. IIChE- MRC conducts and supports many events through out the year and feels it prudent to share its achievements with all members. Hence, IIChE-MRC decided to publish this quarterly e- newsletter for the benefit of all members from academia, research institute, industry and student chapters to gain acquaintance with current events, technical articles on Industry and upcoming events of IIChE-MRC. I hope that this e-newsletter proves beneficial to the chemical engineering as well as allied sciences readers and encourage them to take up joint ventures with immense participation towards the Nation building. Dr. U. Kamachi Mudali IIChEMRC Executive Committee Dr. U. Kamachi Mudali, Hon. Chairman Mr. Rajesh Jain Member Dr Anita Kumari Hon. Vice Chairperson Mr. Ravindra Joshi Member Dr. Alpana Mahapatra Member Dr. Bibhash Chakravorty Hon. Secretary Dr. T.L. Prasad Member Mr. Dhawal Saxena Hon. Jt Secretary Mr. V.Y.Sane Member Mr. Mahendra Patel Hon. Treasurer Mr. Joy Shah Member Mr. Shreedhar .M. Chitanvis Member Dr. Aparna M. Tamaskar Member INDIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS Mumbai Regional Centre B-18, Vardhman Complex, Gr Floor, Opp Home Town & 247 Park, LBS Marg, Vikhroli (West), Mumbai - 400 083 1 November 2019 IICHE MRC E-NEWSLETTER 1 Volume-1 Issue-1 INDEX From Chairman’s Desk / IICHEMRC Executive Committee Index / Editor’s Corner / Disclaimer Recent Events / Forthcoming Events • Workshop on Solid Waste Management on 24/09/2019 at IITB I by NAE, IITB, IIChE & IEA.
    [Show full text]
  • P.Chellapandi, P.Puthiyavinayagam, T.Jeyakumar S.Chetal and Baldev Raj Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research Kalpakkam - 603102
    P.Chellapandi, P.Puthiyavinayagam, T.Jeyakumar S.Chetal and Baldev Raj Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research Kalpakkam - 603102 IAEA-Technical Meeting on ‘Design, Manufacturing and Irradiation Behavior of Fast Reactor Fuels’ 30 May-3 June 2011, IPPE, Russia Scope of Presentation Nuclear Power & FBR Programme in India Economic advantages of high burnups Int. experience on achieving high burnup Roadmap of enhancing the burnup Experience with carbide & oxide fuels Highlights of R&D Future Plans India’s Nuclear Roadmap 70000 • PHWRs from indigenous Uranium Nuclear Power Capacity • PHWRs from imported Uranium 60000 Projection (in MWe) • Imported LWR to the max. extent of 40 GW(e) 50000 • PHWRs from spent enriched U from LWRs 40000 (undersafeguard) 30000 • FBRs from reprocessed Pu and U from PHWR 20000 • FBRs from reprocessed Pu and U from LWR (undersafeguard) 10000 • U-233-Thorium Thermal / Fast Reactors 0 2010 2012 2017 2022 2032 • India has indigenous nuclear power program (4780 MW out of 20 reactors) and expects to have 20,000 MWe nuclear capacity on line by 2020 and 63,000 MWe by 2032. • Now, foreign technology and fuel are expected to boost India's nuclear power plans considerably. All plants will have high indigenous engineering content. • India has a vision of becoming a world leader in nuclear technology due to its expertise in fast reactors and thorium fuel cycle. FBR Programme in India • Indigenous Design & Construction Future FBR • Comprehensiveness in development of • 1000 MWe • Pool Type Design, R&D and Construction • Metallic fuel • High Emphasis on Scientific Breakthroughs • Serial constr. • Indegenous • Synthesis of Operating Experiences • Beyond 2025 • Synthesis of Emerging Concepts (Ex.GENIV) • Focus on National & International Weight in t No.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Zirconium and Nickel Based Alloys and Zirconium Oxides
    NET318_proof ■ 22 February 2017 ■ 1/7 Nuclear Engineering and Technology xxx (2017) 1e7 Available online at ScienceDirect 65 66 1 67 2 Nuclear Engineering and Technology 68 3 69 4 70 5 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/net 71 6 72 7 73 8 74 9 Original Article 75 10 76 11 Analysis of Zirconium and Nickel Based Alloys and 77 12 78 13 Zirconium Oxides by Relative and Internal 79 14 80 15 81 16 Monostandard Neutron Activation Analysis 82 17 83 18 Q1 Methods 84 19 85 20 * 86 21 a b, a,1 Q15 Q2Amol D. Shinde , R. Acharya , and A.V.R. Reddy 87 22 88 Q3 a Analytical Chemistry Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India 23 89 b Radiochemistry Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India 24 90 25 91 26 92 article info abstract 27 93 28 94 29 Article history: Background: The chemical characterization of metallic alloys and oxides is conventionally 95 30 Received 9 March 2016 carried out by wet chemical analytical methods and/or instrumental methods. Instru- 96 31 Received in revised form mental neutron activation analysis (INAA) is capable of analyzing samples nondestruc- 97 32 1 August 2016 tively. As a part of a chemical quality control exercise, Zircaloys 2 and 4, nimonic alloy, and 98 33 99 34 Accepted 19 September 2016 zirconium oxide samples were analyzed by two INAA methods. The samples of alloys and Available online xxx oxides were also analyzed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy 100 35 101 (ICP-OES) and direct current Arc OES methods, respectively, for quality assurance pur- 36 102 Keywords: poses.
    [Show full text]
  • Separating Indian Military and Civilian Nuclear Facilities
    Separating Indian Military and Civilian Nuclear Facilities Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) By David Albright and Susan Basu December 19, 2005 The agreement announced on July 18, 2005 by President George Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh regarding the establishment of a U.S.-India “global partnership” will require changes to U.S. non-proliferation laws and policies and could dramatically increase nuclear and nuclear-related commerce with India. Part of this agreement is an Indian commitment to separate its civil and military nuclear programs and put declared civil facilities under international safeguards. Safeguards should apply in perpetuity, with minor, standard exceptions that do not include use in nuclear explosives or weapons. In addition, safeguarded nuclear material should not co-mingle with unsafeguarded nuclear material in any facility, unless this unsafeguarded nuclear material also comes under safeguards. This latter condition is an example of “contamination,” a key principle of safeguards. Although these conditions do not appear to have been accepted by India, they are necessary to prevent civil nuclear cooperation from benefiting India’s nuclear weapons program. To accomplish these goals, India needs to place all its nuclear facilities not directly associated with nuclear weapons production or deployment under safeguards. India has many civil nuclear facilities in this category. In addition, India should place its nuclear facilities associated with its naval nuclear fuel cycle under international safeguards. Exempting such naval-related facilities from safeguards would undermine efforts to safeguard such facilities in non-nuclear weapon states party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Brazil accepted safeguards on its prototype naval reactor and its enrichment plants at Aramar dedicated to the production of naval reactor fuel.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Security: a Fortnightly Newsletter from Caps
    NUCLEAR SECURITY: A FORTNIGHTLY NEWSLETTER FROM CAPS NUCLEAR SECURITY: A FORTNIGHTLY NEWSLETTER FROM CAPS Vol 11, No. 15, 01 JUNE 2017 OPINION – Manpreet Sethi Nuclear India at 19: Keep Focus Right on CONTENTS Deterrence OPINION NUCLEAR STRATEGY India completes 19 years as a nuclear armed state BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENCE this month. This period is no more than an eye blink in the life of a nation, but India has made NUCLEAR ENERGY significant progress towards operationalisation NUCLEAR COOPERATION of its deterrence capability (it was on May 11 URANIUM PRODUCTION and 13, 1998 that India conducted nuclear tests NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION at the Pokhran range in Rajasthan. India has since NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT declared a moratorium on testing). NUCLEAR SAFETY It has worked according to a plan in the form of a NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT nuclear doctrine that it gave to itself in August 1999, and which was formalised, with largely the same attributes as mentioned in the draft, by the But it seeks to deter the adversary from making government of the day in January 2003. this move by holding up for him the prospect of massive retaliation which The doctrine defined a India has eschewed the first use of would negate any benefit narrow role for India’s nuclear weapons, leaving it to the of his action. This is a nuclear weapons — only adversary to take the difficult decision purely deterrence doctrine, for deterrence against of making the first nuclear move. But and that really is the only nuclear weapons of the it seeks to deter the adversary from purpose of nuclear adversary.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power Business Executive V P L&T Ltd
    11TH NUCLEAR ENERGY CONCLAVE Steering Committee Dr S Banerjee Shri Anil Razdan Dr. R. B. Grover Chairman, Nuclear Energy President, IEF & Member, AEC & Group, IEF, Chancellor, Homi Former Secretary,Power Former Vice Chancellor Bhabha National Institute Homi Bhabha & Former Chairman, AEC & National Institute Secretary, DAE Ms. Minu Singh Shri V.P. Singh Shri P.P. Yadav Shri Anil Parab M.D., Nuvia India Former ED, BHEL ED (Nuclear Power Business Executive V P L&T Ltd. Development), BHEL Dr Harsh Mahajan Shri Amarjit Singh, MBE Shri S.C. Chetal Shri S.M. Mahajan Director, Mahjan Imaging Secretary General, IEF Former Director, IGCAR & Convener, Nuclear Group, Mission Director, AUSC Project IEF, Former ED, BHEL & Consultant (Power Sector) Organiser India Energy Forum: The Forum is a unique, independent, not-for-profit, research organization and represents energy sector as a whole. It is manned by highly qualified and experienced energy professionals committed to evolving a national energy policy. The Forum's mission is the development of a sustainable and competitive energy sector, promoting a favourable regulatory framework, establishing standards for reliable and safety, ensuring an equitable deal for consumers, producers and the utilities, encouraging efficient and eco-friendly development and use of energy and developing new and better technologies to meet the growing energy needs of the society. Its membership includes all the key players of the sector including BHEL, NTPC, NHPC, Power Grid Corporation, Power Finance Corporation, Reliance Energy, Alstom and over 100 highly respected energy experts. It works closely with various chambers and trade associates including Bombay Chamber, Bengal Chamber, Madras Chamber, PHD Chamber, Observer Research Foundation, IRADE, INWEA,Indian Coal Forum, and FIPI.
    [Show full text]
  • India's Stocks of Civil and Military Plutonium and Highly Enriched Uranium, End 2014
    PlutoniumPlutonium andand HighlyHighly EnrichedEnriched UraniumUranium 20152015 INSTITUTEINSTITUTE FOR FOR SCIENCE SCIENCE AND AND INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL SECURITY SECURITY India’s Stocks of Civil and Military Plutonium and Highly Enriched Uranium, End 20141 By David Albright and Serena Kelleher-Vergantini November 2, 2015 1 This report is part of a series on national and global stocks of nuclear explosive materials in both civil and military nuclear programs. This work was generously funded by a grant from the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI). This work builds on earlier work done at ISIS by one of the authors. 440 First Street NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20001 TEL 202.547.3633 Twitter @TheGoodISIS E-MAIL [email protected] • www.isis-online.org Contents Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 2 1. India’s Civil Plutonium Stockpile .................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Civil Plutonium Production ........................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Plutonium Separation ................................................................................................................. 5 1.2.1 India’s Fast Breeder Reactors .............................................................................................. 6 1.3 Unirradiated Plutonium Inventory .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • India's Pathway to Sumit Ganguly Pokhran H
    India's Pathway to Sumit Ganguly Pokhran H The Prospects and Sources of New Delhi's Nuclear Weapons Program On May 11 and 13, 1998, India set off five nuclear devices at its test site in Pokhran in the northwestern Indian state of Rajasthan-its first such tests in twenty-four years. The initial test had been carried out at the same site on May 18, 1974. Not unexpectedly, as in 1974 much of the world community, including the majority of the great powers, unequivocally condemned the Indian tests.' The coalition national government, dominated by the jingoistic Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), knew that significant international pressures would be brought to bear upon India once it breached this important threshold. Yet the BJP chose to disregard the likely adverse consequences and departed from India's post- 1974 "nuclear option" policy, which had reserved for India the right to weaponize its nuclear capabilities but had not overtly declared its weapons capability. National governments of varying political persuasions had adhered to this strategy for more than two decades. A number of seemingly compelling possibilities have been offered to explain India's dramatic departure from its policy of nuclear restraint. None, however, constitutes a complete explanation. Yet each offers useful insights into the forces that led to the Indian nuclear tests. One explanation holds that the chauvinistic BJP-led government conducted the tests to demonstrate both its own virility to the Indian populace and India's military prowess to the rest of the world. A second argument suggests that the BJP conducted the tests to cement its links with contentious parliamentary allies.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Mining & Milling Industry in India
    UraniumUranium MiningMining && MillingMilling IndustryIndustry inin IndiaIndia PerPer CapitaCapita PowerPower ConsumptionConsumption 7382 7281 8000 7000 5843 6000 5000 4000 2400 3000 Energy kWh/Capita 2000 473 1000 0 Germany Japan U.K. World India Country Power:Power: TheThe urgenturgent needneed • Per capita power consumption is low. • Installed generation cap. to be raised from 138.73 to 417GWe by 2020 • Share of nuclear power to increase from 4120 to 20,000 MWe by 2020 • Uranium requirement to increase accordingly PowerPower SourcesSources andand ConstraintsConstraints COAL : •Inadequate coal reserves •Strain on transportation •High ash in Indian coal and low calorific value. • CO 2 emissions OIL & GAS AS FUEL : •Inadequate reserve, 70% requirement is met by import •Complex geo-political environment PowerPower SourcesSources andand ConstraintsConstraints HYDROELECTRIC Limited to geographically suitable sites Sites are mostly away from demand centers. Dependent on rain-fall. Effect on ecology Displacement of vast population. NON-CONVENTIONAL Limited scope at present level of technology Poor capacity factor Diffused and intermittent source “……….. We must break the constraining limits of power shortages, which retard our development. Nuclear energy is not only cost effective, it is also a cleaner alternative to fossil fuels……” Dr. Manmohan Singh, Kalapakkam, rd 23 Oct,2004 EnergyEnergy SecuritySecurity forfor IndiaIndia Non- conventional Nuclear 20% 2.0% Nuclear 2.5% Hydro 26.0% Non- conventional 7% Fossil fuels Hydro 61% Fossil fuels
    [Show full text]