Topic Abstract Korean War: Politburo of the Soviet Union, 1948

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Topic Abstract Korean War: Politburo of the Soviet Union, 1948 Topic Abstract Korean War: Politburo of the Soviet Union, 1948 National Security Apparatus | Washington, D.C. | February 11-14, 2021 A Georgetown International Relations Association, Inc. Conference Dear Delegates and Advisors, Greetings from NAIMUN LVIII! The staff has been working hard to make the conference the most rewarding and educational experience yet, and we are excited to welcome you all to D.C. in February! This document is the topic abstract for the Politburo of the Soviet Union. It contains three key elements to allow you to prepare well in advance for the committee: topic descriptions, questions to consider, and research avenues. This abstract will give you a better understanding of the committee’s content and procedures, and it can act as a starting point for further research. We hope to be of assistance to you in your preparation for NAIMUN LVIII. If you have any questions, comments, or concerns, please feel free to contact the Secretary- General, Director-General, or your Under-Secretaries-General. You may also contact your dais directly at [email protected]. We look forward to welcoming you to the NAIMUN family! Best, Alexander Chen Sanjna Jain Secretary-General Director-General [email protected] [email protected] Christopher Boose Abby Keating Under-Secretary-General, Under-Secretary-General, National Security Apparatus National Security Apparatus [email protected] [email protected] Topic Abstract | naimun.modelun.org | 2 What is the National Security Apparatus? The National Security Apparatus (NSA) is NAIMUN’s most dynamic and unique organ. The only one of its kind on the high school circuit, the NSA is made up of five crisis-style committees existing within the same universe (Think of it as the MCU of MUN). Each committee has 18-24 delegates. This year, we will continue to push the organ into uncharted territory. At NAIMUN LVIII, we will be running the Korean War, starting the committees in 1948. Unlike before, each committee represents an independent state, though this is not simply a five-way joint crisis committee. Rather, each of the five committees will have to navigate their historical alliances along communist and capitalist lines. The five committees are as follows: the Politburo of the Soviet Union (USSR), the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (PRC), the Cabinet of Kim Il-sung (N. Korea), the Cabinet of Syngman Rhee (S. Korea), and the United States Coalition. Each committee will have to consider their relationship not only with the opposing side but with their allies as well. Politburo of the Soviet Union, 1948 | naimun.modelun.org | 3 The NSA is unique on the circuit due to its interactive nature. As delegates push individual crisis arcs, their impact will go beyond their own committee and affect the other committees in the organ as well. As each committee reacts to new crises, they must carefully consider how their actions will shape the responses of other committees in the organ. Because each committee has a different focus, they will each experience the crises from different perspectives, and communication among delegates between committees will be crucial to coordinate responses on each side. The stakes are high, and we are confident that the interconnected crisis will challenge even the most seasoned delegates. As we approach the conference, more information on the specific procedures and methods that committees in the NSA will use to communicate with will be available. In preparing for the conference, it is helpful to have an overall understanding of the Korean War and how each committee will approach the crises. In your research, you may also find it useful to skim through the topic abstracts of other committees in the organ in order to have a more concrete understanding of the organ as a whole. Topic Abstract | naimun.modelun.org | 4 What is a Crisis Committee? Crisis Committees are markedly different from both GAs and ECOSOCs. They tend to focus on specific issues, geographic areas, and historical periods. For example, the Court of Louis XIV, 1665 simulates the peak years of King Louis XIV in power, tackling issues from the international expansion of the French empire to developing domestic institutions. In essence, crisis committees have a narrower and more specific focus, while GAs and ECOSOCs focus on broad global concepts and issues. Crisis committees also have the distinguishing characteristic of portfolio powers, where delegates have and can use individual powers that are part of their bio in order to shape the “world” they interact in. Crisis committees also include crisis updates, which are unplanned “crises” that delegates must resolve through debate and directives. Last, crisis committees are the smallest of committees, usually with less than 30 delegates per committee. They tend to be faster-paced and more dynamic than assemblies with set topics. Adapted from “NAIMUN Delegate Training Guide” Topics Overview As the Politburo of the Soviet Union, the overarching goal remains to expand and solidify the reach of the USSR empire, whether it be near or far from the homeland. In Eastern Europe, our Politburo should strive towards creating a buffer zone of friendly states under the Soviet sphere of influence to ensure it is never invaded again. Abroad, the conflict on the Korean Peninsula is one where communism must prevail, and the Politburo will do well to engage against the spread of capitalism with necessary finesse and success. Politburo of the Soviet Union, 1948 | naimun.modelun.org | 5 Topic A: Expanding and Securing Soviet Influence In 1946, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union passed a resolution formulated by the party secretary and cultural boss at the time Andrey Aleksandrovich Zhdanov. Out of this resolution was born the Zhdanovshchina movement, an anti-Western campaign to purge Soviet society of Western culture and all vestiges of cosmopolitanism.1 The challenge remains to ensure that this campaign reaches all spheres of intellectual activity, to both destroy any trace of Western biases and revive the great Soviet society in its pure entirety. This endeavor only becomes more urgent as capitalist control spreads around the world, and it must not be allowed to taint this nation. Furthermore, the offensive American actions of the Berlin Airlift remain a direct challenge to the Soviet blockade and its representation of Soviet control in Germany.2 If left unchecked and not handled with the utmost care, further insubordination may arise in other Eastern European countries. Beyond the logistical issues of preventing the airlifts, diplomatic optics must also be preserved; actions to disprove American technological superiority and combat the vilification of the Soviet Union in the international arena must be taken.3 Questions to Consider for Further Research 1. How and with what resources can the necessary propaganda be spread to ensure that all vestiges of capitalism are rooted out? 2. What are ways to secure Soviet control over post-war Eastern Europe, especially considering the constant meddling of the US? 3. How can the Politburo work towards an effective Soviet image for the international community to recognize and respect? 1 “Zhdanovshchina.” Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, inc., July 20, 1998. https://www.britannica.com/event/Zhdanovshchina. 2 “Berlin Blockade.” Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, inc., January 28, 2020. https://www.britannica.com/event/Berlin-blockade. 3 “Berlin Airlift Begins.” History.com. A&E Television Networks, November 13, 2009. https://www.histo- ry.com/this-day-in-history/berlin-airlift-begins. Topic Abstract | naimun.modelun.org | 6 Topic B: Advancing Communism on the Korean Peninsula North Korea serves as an opportune gateway for the advancement of communism in East Asia, and Kim Il-Sung requires support and assistance from its communist allies.4 Weapons and financial support will prove essential for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) to overcome its US-backed southern neighbor, the Republic of Korea (ROK), and reunify the Korean Peninsula under communism. With the increasing threat of the Cold War and nuclear brinkmanship with the United States, Soviet leaders realize that they must engage in support through more covert means to avoid all-out world war. Mao in China represents a significant ally and potential proxy for the conflict on the Korean Peninsula.5 However the Politburo decides to engage in this conflict, whether it be through collaboration with Mao, financial assistance for Kim, or sabotage of American forces, promises to have consequential implications for the struggle between capitalism and communism. Questions to Consider for Further Research 1. How should the Soviet Union support the DPRK in its endeavors to reunify the Peninsula? 2. What potential allies or proxies can be established in the East Asian region? 3. How should the Soviet Union avoid the next world war, but still achieve its expansion of communism around the globe? 4 Wilson Center Digital Archive. “Soviet Union-North Korea Relations.” Wilson Center Digital Archive. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2020. https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/collec- tion/120/soviet-union-north-korea-relations. 5 Weathersby, Kathryn. “SOVIET AIMS IN KOREA AND THE ORIGINS OF THE KOREAN WAR, 1945-1950.” Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Florida State University, 1993. Woodrow Wilson Interna- tional Center for Scholars. http://cau.ac.kr/~seronto/SOVIET%20AIMS%20IN%20KOREA%20&%20THE%20ORI- GINS%20OF%20THE%20KOREAN%20WAR.pdf Politburo of the Soviet Union, 1948 | naimun.modelun.org | 7 Resources for Further Research Below is a list of resources that will be useful in preparing for the committee. Overall, a general understanding of the Soviet Union and the Cold War, US-Soviet relations, and the Korean peninsula would be helpful for this commitee. https://www.britannica.com/event/Korean-War Korean War - Encyclopedia Britannica https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.
Recommended publications
  • The Revolutions of 1989 and Their Legacies
    1 The Revolutions of 1989 and Their Legacies Vladimir Tismaneanu The revolutions of 1989 were, no matter how one judges their nature, a true world-historical event, in the Hegelian sense: they established a historical cleavage (only to some extent conventional) between the world before and after 89. During that year, what appeared to be an immutable, ostensibly indestructible system collapsed with breath-taking alacrity. And this happened not because of external blows (although external pressure did matter), as in the case of Nazi Germany, but as a consequence of the development of insuperable inner tensions. The Leninist systems were terminally sick, and the disease affected first and foremost their capacity for self-regeneration. After decades of toying with the ideas of intrasystemic reforms (“institutional amphibiousness”, as it were, to use X. L. Ding’s concept, as developed by Archie Brown in his writings on Gorbachev and Gorbachevism), it had become clear that communism did not have the resources for readjustment and that the solution lay not within but outside, and even against, the existing order.1 The importance of these revolutions cannot therefore be overestimated: they represent the triumph of civic dignity and political morality over ideological monism, bureaucratic cynicism and police dictatorship.2 Rooted in an individualistic concept of freedom, programmatically skeptical of all ideological blueprints for social engineering, these revolutions were, at least in their first stage, liberal and non-utopian.3 The fact that 1 See Archie Brown, Seven Years that Changed the World: Perestroika in Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 157-189. In this paper I elaborate upon and revisit the main ideas I put them forward in my introduction to Vladimir Tismaneanu, ed., The Revolutions of 1989 (London and New York: Routledge, 1999) as well as in my book Reinventing Politics: Eastern Europe from Stalin to Havel (New York: Free Press, 1992; revised and expanded paperback, with new afterword, Free Press, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • 1992 a Glorious Model of Proletarian Internationalism: Mao Zedong and Helping Vietnam Resist France
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified 1992 A Glorious Model of Proletarian Internationalism: Mao Zedong and Helping Vietnam Resist France Citation: “A Glorious Model of Proletarian Internationalism: Mao Zedong and Helping Vietnam Resist France,” 1992, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Luo Guibo, "Wuchanjieji guojizhuyide guanghui dianfan: yi Mao Zedong he Yuan-Yue Kang-Fa" ("A Glorious Model of Proletarian Internationalism: Mao Zedong and Helping Vietnam Resist France"), in Mianhuai Mao Zedong (Remembering Mao Zedong), ed. Mianhuai Mao Zedong bianxiezhu (Beijing: Zhongyang Wenxian chubanshe, 1992) 286-299. Translated by Emily M. Hill http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/120359 Summary: Luo Guibo recounts China's involvement in the First Indochina War and its assistance to the Viet Minh. Credits: This document was made possible with support from the MacArthur Foundation and the Leon Levy Foundation. Original Language: Chinese Contents: English Translation One Late in 1949, soon after the establishment of New China, Chairman Ho Chi Minh and the Central Committee of the Indochinese Communist Party (ICP) wrote to Chairman Mao and the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), asking for Chinese assistance. In January 1950, Ho made a secret visit to Beijing to request Chinaʼs assistance in Vietnamʼs struggle against France. Following Hoʼs visit, the CCP Central Committee made the decision, authorized by Chairman Mao, to send me on a secret mission to Vietnam. I was formally appointed as the Liaison Representative of the CCP Central Committee to the ICP Central Committee. Comrade [Liu] Shaoqi personally composed a letter of introduction, which stated: ʻI hereby recommend to your office Comrade Luo Guibo, who has been a provincial Party secretary and commissar, as the Liaison Representative of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party.
    [Show full text]
  • From Proletarian Internationalism to Populist
    from proletarian internationalism to populist russocentrism: thinking about ideology in the 1930s as more than just a ‘Great Retreat’ David Brandenberger (Harvard/Yale) • [email protected] The most characteristic aspect of the newly-forming ideology... is the downgrading of socialist elements within it. This doesn’t mean that socialist phraseology has disappeared or is disappearing. Not at all. The majority of all slogans still contain this socialist element, but it no longer carries its previous ideological weight, the socialist element having ceased to play a dynamic role in the new slogans.... Props from the historic past – the people, ethnicity, the motherland, the nation and patriotism – play a large role in the new ideology. –Vera Aleksandrova, 19371 The shift away from revolutionary proletarian internationalism toward russocentrism in interwar Soviet ideology has long been a source of scholarly controversy. Starting with Nicholas Timasheff in 1946, some have linked this phenomenon to nationalist sympathies within the party hierarchy,2 while others have attributed it to eroding prospects for world This article builds upon pieces published in Left History and presented at the Midwest Russian History Workshop during the past year. My eagerness to further test, refine and nuance this reading of Soviet ideological trends during the 1930s stems from the fact that two book projects underway at the present time pivot on the thesis advanced in the pages that follow. I’m very grateful to the participants of the “Imagining Russia” conference for their indulgence. 1 The last line in Russian reads: “Bol’shuiu rol’ v novoi ideologii igraiut rekvizity istoricheskogo proshlogo: narod, narodnost’, rodina, natsiia, patriotizm.” V.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Ties and the Selection of China's Political Elite
    Social Ties and the Selection of China’s Political Elite Raymond Fisman, Jing Shi, Yongxiang Wang, and Weixing Wu∗ This version: April 29, 2019 Abstract We study how sharing a hometown or college connection with an incumbent member of China’s Politburo affects a candidate’s likelihood of selection as a new member. In specifications that include fixed effects to absorb quality differences across cities and colleges, we find that hometown and college connections are each associated with 5-9 percentage point reductions in selection probability. This “connections penalty” is equally strong for retiring Politburo members, arguing against quota-based explanations, and it is much stronger for junior Politburo members, consistent with a role for intra-factional competition. We show that our findings differ sharply from earlier work both because of our more rigorous empirical specification as well as our emphasis on shared hometown and college – rather than shared workplace – connections. JEL classification: D72; P26 Keywords: Social Ties, Political Connections, Political Elite, Politburo, China ∗Boston University, RMIT, University of Southern California, and the University of International Business and Economics respectively. We thank Daniel Berkowitz, Patrick Francois, Ruixue Jia, Victor Shih, and Francesco Trebbi for useful feedback. Jin Wang and Hao Yin provided excellent RA work. 1 1 Introduction We study the selection of officials into the Central Politburo (hereafter Politburo), the most powerful body in the Chinese government. Beyond the direct importance of understanding what determines the top leadership of the world’s most populous nation (and second largest economy), our work may provide insights into the complexities involved in bureaucratic promotion in political and non- political organizations more generally.
    [Show full text]
  • December 13, 1977 Report on the Official Friendship Visit to the DPRK by the Party and State Delegation of the GDR, Led by Comrade Erich Honecker
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified December 13, 1977 Report on the Official Friendship Visit to the DPRK by the Party and State Delegation of the GDR, led by Comrade Erich Honecker Citation: “Report on the Official Friendship Visit to the DPRK by the Party and State Delegation of the GDR, led by Comrade Erich Honecker,” December 13, 1977, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, SAPMO-BA, DY 30, J IV 2/2A/2123. Translated by Grace Leonard. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/112308 Summary: Report on the official visit to the DPRK of a GDR delegation led by Erich Honecker. Included are the summary of the visit and the text of the Agreement on Developing Economic and Scientific/Technical Cooperation. Original Language: German Contents: English Translation CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE SOCIALIST UNITY PARTY -- Internal Party Archives -- From the files of: Politburo Memorandum No. 48 13 December 1977 DY30/ Sign.: J IV 2/2 A -- 2123 Report on the official friendship visit to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea by the Party and state delegation of the German Democratic Republic, led by Comrade Erich Honecker, Secretary General of the Central Committee of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany and Chairman of the State Council of the German Democratic Republic, from 8 to 11 December 1977. ________________________________________________________________________ At the invitation of the Central Committee of the Korean Workers Party and the Council of Ministers of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a Party and state delegation from the German Democratic Republic, led by Comrade Erich Honecker, Secretary General of the Central Committee of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany and Chairman of the State Council of the German Democratic Republic, made an official friendship visit to the DPRK from 8 to 11 December 1977.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tragicomedy of Romanian Communism
    RESEARCH REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : THE TRAGICOMEDY OF ROMANIAN COMMUNIS M AUTHOR : Vladimir Tismanean u CONTRACTOR : Foreign Policy Researc h Institute PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Vladimir Tismanean u COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 903-0 4 DATE : September, 198 9 The work leading to this report was supported by funds provided b y the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . Th e analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those o f the author . a NOTE This report, based on an article to be published i n Eastern EuropeanPolitics andSocieties, is an inciden- tal product of the Council Contract identified on the title page . It is not the Final Report, which wa s distributed in August, 1989 . TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Stalin's Romanian Disciples 1 1 The Comintern and the RCP 1 6 Stalinism for All Seasons 3 4 The Anti-De-Stalinization Platform 3 9 The Road to Absolute Power 43 The Manipulated Manipulator 47 Assault on the Party Apparatus 5 2 Notes 57 The Tragicomedy of Romanian Communis m Vladimir Tismanean u Un monde sans tyrans serait aussi ennuyeux qu'un jardi n zoologique sans hyenes . E . M . Cioran, Histoire et utopi e Now, despite eternal cabals in the inner clique and unendin g shifts of personnel, with their tremendous accumulation o f hatred, bitterness, and personal resentment, the Leader' s position can remain secure against chaotic palace revolution s not because of his superior gifts, about which the men in hi s intimate surroundings frequently have no great illusions, bu t because of these men's sincere and sensible conviction tha t without him everything would be immediately lost .
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Famine in Soviet Ukraine: Toward New Avenues Of
    THE GREAT FAMINE IN SOVIET UKRAINE: TOWARD NEW AVENUES OF INQUIRY INTO THE HOLODOMOR A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Troy Philip Reisenauer In Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major Department: History, Philosophy, and Religious Studies June 2014 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title THE GREAT FAMINE IN SOVIET UKRAINE: TOWARD NEW AVENUES OF INQUIRY INTO THE HOLODOMOR By Troy Philip Reisenauer The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. John K. Cox Chair Dr. Tracy Barrett Dr. Dragan Miljkovic Approved: July 10, 2014 Dr. John K. Cox Date Department Chair ABSTRACT Famine spread across the Union of Social Soviet Republics in 1932 and 1933, a deadly though unanticipated consequence of Joseph Stalin’s attempt in 1928 to build socialism in one country through massive industrialization and forced collectivization of agriculture known as the first Five-Year Plan. This study uses published documents, collections, correspondence, memoirs, secondary sources and new insight to analyze the famine of 1932-1933 in Ukraine and other Soviet republics. It presents the major scholarly works on the famine, research that often mirrors the diverse views and bitter public disagreement over the issue of intentionality and the ultimate culpability of Soviet leadership. The original contribution of this study is in the analysis of newly published primary documents of the 1920s and 1930s from the Russian Presidential Archives, especially vis-à-vis the role of Stalin and his chief lieutenants at the center of power and the various representatives at the republic-level periphery.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Thinking U.S.-Soviet Relations in 1956: Nikita Khrushchev's Secret Speech, the Poznán Revolt, the Return of Władysław Gomułka, and the Hungarian Revolt
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2014 Re-Thinking U.S.-Soviet Relations in 1956: Nikita Khrushchev's Secret Speech, the Poznán Revolt, the Return of Władysław Gomułka, and the Hungarian Revolt Emily Parsons Trinity College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Parsons, Emily, "Re-Thinking U.S.-Soviet Relations in 1956: Nikita Khrushchev's Secret Speech, the Poznán Revolt, the Return of Władysław Gomułka, and the Hungarian Revolt". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2014. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/365 1 Re-Thinking U.S.-Soviet Relations in 1956: Nikita Khrushchev’s Secret Speech, the Poznań Revolt, the Return of Władysław Gomułka, and the Hungarian Revolt Emily Parsons History Department Senior Thesis Advisor: Samuel Kassow Trinity College 2013-2014 2 Table of Contents: Acknowledgements 3 Introduction 4 Part One: The Chronology of the Events of the Cold War in 1956 12 Chapter 1: Do As I Say Not As I Do: Nikita Khrushchev’s Secret Speech 13 Chapter 2: The Eastern Bloc Begins to Crack: Poznań Revolt and Polish October 21 Chapter 3: Khrushchev Goes Back on His Word: The Hungarian Revolt of 1956 39 Part Two: The United States Reactions and Understanding of the Events of 1956 60 Chapter 4: Can Someone Please Turn on the Lights? It’s Dark in Here: United States Reactions to the Khrushchev’s Secret Speech 61 Chapter 5: “When They Begin to Crack, They Can Crack Fast.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulbricht Embattled: the Quest for Socialist Modernity in the Light of New Sources Author(S): Jeffrey Kopstein Source: Europe-Asia Studies, Vol
    Ulbricht Embattled: The Quest for Socialist Modernity in the Light of New Sources Author(s): Jeffrey Kopstein Source: Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 46, No. 4, Soviet and East European History (1994), pp. 597- 615 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/152929 Accessed: 22/03/2010 17:14 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=taylorfrancis. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Europe-Asia Studies. http://www.jstor.org EUROPE-ASIASTUDIES, Vol. 46, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    The Carl Beck Papers in Russian and East European Studies . No. 901 The Public Politics ofA1eksandr Nikolaevich Yakovlev, 1983-1989 Jonathan Harris University of Pittsburgh Center for Russian and East European Studies Jonathan Harris (Ph.D. Columbia University, 1966) is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Pittsburgh. He isthe author ofIdeolog}'and IntemationalPolitics: A Guide to Soviet Analysis and After tire Kratkii Kurs: Soviet Leadership Conflict over Theoretical Education, 1956-1961, as well as articles on Soviet domestic and foreign policies in Survey, Soviet Union, and Slavic Review. Dr. Harris contributed to Elite Studies and Communist Politics: Essays in Memory of Carl Beck, edited by Ronald Linden and Bert Rockman. His paper "Ligachev on Glasnost and Perestroika" appeared #706 in the Carl BeckPapers in March 1989. December 1990 ISSN 0889-275X The Carl BeckPapers: Editors: William Chase, Bob Donnorummo, Ronald Linden Assistant Editor: Mitchell Bjerke Design and Layout: Robert Supansic Submissions to The Carl BeckPapers are welcome. Manuscripts must be in English, double spaced throughout, and less than 100 pages in length. Acceptance is based on anonymous review. Mail submissions to: Editor, The Carl Beck Papers, Center for Russian and East EuropeanStudies, 4021 Forbes Quadrangle, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 During the first five years of his reign as General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CC/CPSU) M.S. Gorbachev has changed the structure of authority in the USSR's political system. He initially regarded the interlocking directorate of Politburo and Secretariat as the final source of authority and the ul­ timate driving force for his program of reform, the CC/CPSU as a mini­ parliament for the discussion and elaboration of his proposals, and the CPSU's apparatus of full time officials as the major instrument to assure the program's implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Publication
    COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPER #54 Sino-Hungarian Relations and the 1956 Revolution By Péter Vámos November 2006 THE COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPER SERIES Christian F. Ostermann, Series Editor This paper is one of a series of Working Papers published by the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. Established in 1991 by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Cold War International History Project (CWIHP) disseminates new information and perspectives on the history of the Cold War as it emerges from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side” of the post-World War II superpower rivalry. The project supports the full and prompt release of historical materials by governments on all sides of the Cold War, and seeks to accelerate the process of integrating new sources, materials and perspectives from the former “Communist bloc” with the historiography of the Cold War which has been written over the past few decades largely by Western scholars reliant on Western archival sources. It also seeks to transcend barriers of language, geography, and regional specialization to create new links among scholars interested in Cold War history. Among the activities undertaken by the project to promote this aim are a periodic BULLETIN to disseminate new findings, views, and activities pertaining to Cold War history; a fellowship program for young historians from the former Communist bloc to conduct archival research and study Cold War history in the United States; international scholarly meetings, conferences, and seminars; and publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing Committee (In Rank Order) Remaining Members from the 18Th Central Committee Politburo
    Chinese Communist Party (CCP) 19th Central Committee Politburo Standing Committee (in rank order) Remaining members from the 18th Central Committee Politburo New members to the 19th Central Committee Politburo The Politburo Standing Committee (PBSC) is comprised of the CCP’s top- ranking leaders and is China’s top decision-making body within the Politburo. It meets more frequently and often makes XI JINPING LI KEQIANG LI ZHANSHU WANG YANG WANG HUNING ZHAO LEJI HAN ZHENG key decisions with little or no input from 习近平 李克强 栗战书 汪洋 王沪宁 赵乐际 韩正 the full Politburo. The much larger Central President; CCP General Premier, State Council Chairman, Chairman, Director, Office of CCP Secretary, CCP Central Executive Vice Premier, Secretary; Chairman, CCP Born 1953 Standing Committee of Chinese People’s Political Comprehensively Deepening Discipline Inspection State Council Committee is, in theory, the executive Central Military Commission National People’s Congress Consultative Conference Reform Commission Commission Born 1954 organ of the party. But the Politburo Born 1953 Born 1950 Born 1955 Born 1955 Born 1957 exercises its functions and authority except the few days a year when the Members (in alphabetical order) Central Committee is in session. At the First Session of the 13th National People’s Congress in March 2018, Wang Qishan was elected as the Vice President of China. The vice presidency enables Wang to be another important national leader without a specific party portfolio. But in China’s official CCP pecking order, CAI QI CHEN MIN’ER CHEN
    [Show full text]