I. Foreword ...... 06
II. Introduction ...... 07
III. Tribune Jack Lang ...... 09
IV. Tribune Ludovic Pouille ...... 11
V. Findings ...... 13
VI. Detailed data ...... 15 1. Demographics (Sample of respondents) ...... 15 2. A common perception of culture, religion, ethnicity ...... 17 3. The feeling of belonging to French society ...... 19 4. The impact on career prospects ...... 21 5. State and religion ...... 22 6. Embracing secular values ...... 23 7. Knowledge of French history and society ...... 25
VII. Appendices ...... 28
www.arabnews.fr/yougov
Arab News France communication : www.arabnews.fr Email : [email protected] - @ 2020 Saudi Research & Publishing Company All rights of translation, reproduction and adaptation reserved for all countries. I. II. Foreword Introduction
Is the sixth survey To offer a window to the Arab World and is part of a series M ore than ever, France is at the for French readers, Arab News, the lea- of polls commissioned heart of the discussion. Regardless of ding English language newspaper in the by Arab News, in collaboration its colossal internal challenges ranging Middle East, launched its French digital with YouGov from a weakening economy in times of edition in July 2020. Arab News en Fran- pandemic, to the necessity of achieving Faisal J. Abbas çais provides a daily digest of current the much contested reforms needed to Editor-in-Chief, Arab News events, cultural discoveries, and ana- lopments and rejuvenate their link with put the State’s fnancial back on track, lyses from and about the Arab region, an the Arabian heritage as France’s largest Macron’s “Hexagone” has seen a 180 de- the Nice attacks, share the same hor- ofen-misunderstood part of the world, minority group. grees shif in priorities that very sadly rifying style. to French readers across the globe. Arab News partnered with YouGov, lifed France to the top of the news head- Beyond the normal scenes of soli- The launch of Arab News en Fran- a world leader in online polls and stu- lines during the past two months. darity a nation witnesses in the afer- çais also gives an opportunity to engage dies, to lead a groundbreaking survey of Along the lines of the 2015 terrorist math of humanly shocking events, the French readers of Arab descent and help French of Arab origin and their percep- attacks trials taking place in the French fall of 2020, that has seriously wounded them better understand the global deve- tions of life in France. The sample was a capital, came three major attacks that France, will also be remembered as a representation of the online population shook not only France but the whole in- time where the very old and constant- of French of Arab descent residing in ternational public opinion. The non-or- ly adjourned debate on minorities and France. It involved 958 respondents from chestrated attacks that happened in integration re-emerged, amidst a very across France. The survey conducted less than 35 days had in common the passionate and polarized social and po- between the 8th and 14th of September re-publication of the offensive carica- litical context. 2020 is the sixth survey and is part of a tures, by the very controversial satirical Since its launch back in July 2020, series of polls commissioned by Arab magazine Charlie Hebdo. Two of them, Arab News en Français is part of the broa- News, in collaboration with YouGov that the beheading of school teacher Samuel der Arab News journey of pushing the has pioneered online surveys around Paty in Conflans-Sainte-Honorine, and boundaries of journalism and creating a the world and has been delivering de- better understanding. At Arab News, we tailed studies and insights for more than are nurturing this culture of walking the two decades. Our initiative, tackling extra mile to get closer to our audience, The results of the new joint survey the issue of integration through providing our readers with bet- are enlightening. They provide informa- through conducting a survey on ter insights and credible research. tion on the crucial problems faced by the perception French citizen Our initiative, tackling the issue of France and its minorities. All details and of Arab origins have of their life integration through conducting a sur- fgures in this report are based on ano- in France, was launched a few vey on the perception French citizen of nymous survey responses and have been weeks before the last wave of Arab origins have of their life in France, statistically validated to an error margin attacks was launched a few weeks before the last of 3.17%. wave of attacks. The unfolding of the
II. INtrOductION III. the beauty of our country While we tend to think lies in its ability to make that young generations of French from Arab descent, this colorful ensemble born in France, are more integrated than their elders, vey, Jews from Arab descent also believe into a united nation our survey shows the contrary their religion might be a social obstacle, while Christians of Arab descent do not share the same sentiment. events and their consequences were sim- Being decades old, the unresolved in- Jack Lang ply a confrmation that we are not only tegration debate appears to have a diffe- President of the Arab looking in the right direction, but also rent impact on different generations and World Institute pointing to the real problems. Backed results in an apparent generational gap, up with real data we hope to contribute according to our study. Icongratulate the management of the mate feeling about this, which may not to rationalizing what appears to become While we tend to think that young ge- Arab News for this excellent initiative. necessarily be scientifc. a highly emotional debate on minorities, nerations of French from Arab descent, The move will go a long way in conveying Despite the obstacles and diffculties, religion and integration. born in France, are more integrated the deep emotions and sentiments of France is a country that has always suc- The results of the survey conduc- than their elders, our survey shows citizens of Arab descent towards the ceeded in integrating and interweaving ted for Arab News en Français by You- the contrary: young generations have French Republic and their compatriots. different cultures, civilizations and be- Gov clearly show that the majority of a strong desire to connect with their This study, which should be appre- liefs. This country, in which we live, is a the French from Arab and Muslim des- ancestral roots, while the older ones ciated and deliberated, offers a great real melting pot and a “rainbow” nation, cent consider themselves broadly as are more attached to the values of the insight into the thoughts and conviction as Nelson Mandela used to say. integrated. They describe themselves French republic. of French citizens of Arab descent. I am It is true that our model sometimes as French citizens who adhere to the If this is to be used as an indicator, it delighted to know that a large number experiences setbacks. At present, the values of the French republic. The stu- surely points towards an endemic social of French citizens of Arab origin sup- integration of citizens of Arab descent dy however concludes that in terms of exclusion problem that no French go- port, promote and strictly follow the is being debated. Before World War II, perception, there is a certain level of vernment managed to resolve yet. values of our Republic, particularly the the focus was on the Italian workers. stigmatization within this community It also leads us to believe that this concept of «secularism», which some- Their infux sparked strong reactions in that constitutes the largest minority of generational gap comes with a commu- time is diffcult to understand outside France and in other countries. At times today’s France. This is exactly where nication gap between the French ins- our borders. they were quite intense and diffcult to the most important question comes into titutions and a large part of the young This poll, like all the polls, is relative. imagine today. play: Is integration in France a systemic French generations. As long as the youth However, I would like to convey my inti- The survey highlights one of the im- problem or a perception issue? are not heard, they will not listen. In to- portant points: We can no longer count No matter how many are the answers day’s widely open (social) media lands- the number of artists, writers, inven- and opinions related to this compli- cape, experience, from ISIS recruitment this country, in tors, technicians and workers of Arab cated question, the consequences of its campaigns to the Nice decapitations, has which we live, is a real descent who brought their talents and constant pertinence are here to stay, at proven that no establishment can afford melting pot and a “rainbow” energy to the French community to least until further notice. the consequences of losing the attention nation, as Nelson Mandela make it one of the best in the world. Religion is a main factor, and it is not of the younger audiences. France, now is used to say. Furthermore, I doubt that many exclusive to Islam. According to our sur- the time to reconnect. countries can boast to have accompli-
III. trIbuNe PAr JAck LANG IV. dialogue and tolerance help us stay together
Ludovic Pouille French Ambassador to Saudi Arabia France, which has again been hit hard Yves Le Drian, recently reminded us, by terrorism in recent weeks, is also iro- the millions of Muslims in France fully nically facing an online hate campaign belong to our national community. This that accuses the country of being Islamo- should never be questioned. Muslims in phobic. At this point, it is important to France freely exercise their faith, which recall and highlight few ground realities: is part of a protective framework that we France has the deepest respect for Islam, enforce in the spirit of equality among a religion with which it maintains age-old all religious congregations. A few facts and deep historical and cultural links. are enough to prove the point. France does not and will never In France today, there are 3,000 confuse terrorism with Islam. We must Muslim places of worship. Public televi- collectively fght terrorism in all its sion broadcasts a program on Islam eve- forms, including extremist views and ry week as part of a morning devoted to radical ideologies. It is a fght that we religions. There are Muslim chaplains in shed the kind of societal integration that housing societies play key roles in pro- want and must wage along with Muslim the Armies and hospitals of the country. France has achieved. The Franco-Syrian moting peace and harmony. Resistance compatriots, who have been one of the The public authorities nurture close cartoonist, Riad Sattouf, recently said of any kind of bigoty and hatred further prime victims of terrorism. relations with representatives of all reli- that France is a masterpiece -- a country enhances social bonds and strengthen Islam is the second religion in France. gions, especially Muslim organizations, which is capable of transforming all the sense of belonging. As the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jean- who regularly reiterate the importance multicultural contributions into incre- Finally, I would like to thank all of full respect by all citizens, regardless dible wealth and strength year afer year. those who, by will or circumstances, of their faith, for the laws of the Repu- I want to share with you a message have chosen to come to France. Parents, France has the deepest blic. This makes the foundation of the of ineradicable optimism. Of course, grandparents, uncles and aunts, Italians respect for Islam, French nation. we cannot deny the existence of discri- and Poles, Syrians and Chinese, and eve- a religion with which it In the same spirit, we want imams mination, acts of racism and prejudice. ryone else! The beauty of our country maintains deep historical and practicing in France to be trained in the However, it is through the policies of lies in its ability to make this colorful cultural links country. Along with religious learning, equality that we lead. - Our schools and ensemble into a united nation. fuency in French and knowledge of the
IV. trIbuNe PAr LudOVIc POuILLe V. Integrated ... two-thirds ...
the country, which enshrines equality A bout a century has passed since the survey as its motto, strives to ensure migrants started focking to France from highlights a feeling that everyone’s opinion and North Africa. France is perhaps more of exclusion among French belief is respected familiar with Arabs and Arab culture people of Arab descent than most other European nations. Yet for past two decades, a wave of Islamist fundamental principles of the Republic sanction them and that is what we are extremism and violence has started af- dents of the survey are aware of the must be part of this training. doing. fecting French cities and culture. The French system and its history and stric- As for foreign funding, we want it to Besides the protective legal framework, “Muslim Problem”, as it is generally tly follow fundamental French values. be transparent in order to ensure that it it is also crucial to hold on to the funda- called, has become the mainstream lens More importantly, they don’t support is not vectored towards radical ideology mental realities of the country. for understanding its largest minority religious interference in politics and ap- or divisions within French society. France would not be France without with prime focus on a tiny group that preciate the secular system applied in Freedom, equality and fraternity Muslims. The cultural history of France does not represent the wider culture of France, which they would openly cham- are universal values. They are not the would not be the same without the cen- French people of Arab descent. pion in their country of origin. property of a state and it is everyone’s turies-old encounter with the Arab re- Policy makers, social scientists and The survey not only outlines conside- duty to protect and promote them. We gion, which has been fascinating and analysts emphasize the importance of rable opportunities for building bridges must encourage dialogue to strengthen inspiring our writers, painters, scien- integration in the face of policies that but also highlights a feeling of exclusion mutual respect. It is on these principles tists and architects. effectively cancel cultural symbols and among French people of Arab descent. that the democratic and secular model Nor would we be what we are today beliefs from their countries of origin. While nearly half of the respondents of our Republic is based. Without pitting without the tremendous contribution French Arabs are ofen the subject of believe that neither their ethnicity nor communities against each other, the to our cultural heritage of artists, in- heated debates and over-simplifcations their religion has had an impact on their French model is meant to be neutral and tellectuals, creators from the Arab and that do not take into account their re- sense of belonging to French society, a impartial. That is how it protects them Muslim World who contribute to the ligious, ethnic and cultural diversity. signifcant minority identifes its eth- all. France, which enshrines equality universal French melting pot. Instead of trying to understand the nicity (28%) or their religion (25%) as a as its motto, strives to ensure that eve- As French Ambassador to Saudi Ara- complexity, pundits and right-wing po- barrier to their inclusion and believes ryone’s opinion and belief is respected. bia, I will continue to ardently promote liticians warn that the very essence of that the ethnicity of their name (36%) We are and will remain vigilant against cultural dialogues between our two so- being French is at risk by a growing mi- has a negative impact on their career any hate speech or racism. While there cieties and, particularly, the youths, nority that aims to isolate itself. prospects. Sixty-four percent of the may sometimes be tensions, our duty is with mutual respect and a constant en- The Arab News/YouGov survey of respondents claim that French people, to ease them. deavour to understand each other. Each French people of Arab descent presents in general, have negative views about Discrimination or hate speech is one of us needs to take the path of dia- a markedly different and more compel- Arabs. Indicatively, 67% of the Muslims contrary to our values. Our duty is to logue and tolerance. ling image of French Arabs. Respon- and 61% of the Jews feel that their faith
V. INtéGrés… Au deux tIers… VI. detailed data: sample of respondents
Gender Age
selected a team, would support the team is negatively perceived. In addition, the of the country of origin, while close to majority is not in favor of the regula- 70% of them are born in France. tions on clothing of a religious nature, The Arab News/ YouGov French Arab which they believe is being pushed for survey focuses on three fundamental nearly three quarters to create a massive points: they are mainly division between religious and secular • French Arabs have in large part from North Africa, forces in France. assimilated into French life but speak Arabic and identify with The survey underlines the widening do not feel accepted into French Arab cultural values. gap between the generations. The French society. They feel stigmatized. M ost respondents are first-genera- youth of Arab descent seem less inclined • They have considerable appre- tion French citizens, with nearly a quar- to join institutions, unlike their elders. ciation for core French values ter being second-generation Arabs born This last point represents a signifcant like secularism and believe se- in France. They are mainly from North challenge for the future, as many young cular systems can beneft their Africa, speak Arabic and identify with French people of Arab origin seem to go countries of origin so much so Arab cultural values. However, they are back to their parents’ roots. Thus, rein- that they would openly champion strongly assimilated as French citizens, forcing their feeling of ‘otherness’. it in their countries of origin. have a good knowledge of the politics, Contrary to stereotypes, older ge- • The gap between French Arabs history and the laws of the country. The neration seem to be more in line with and their compatriots is wide- majority has a good level of education, secular values and support of natio- ning as younger people of Arab although the declared income is on an nal symbols, 72% of 55 years and older descent exhibit less enthusiasm average less than 40,000 euros. who selected a team, would support the for French national institutions. • 90% of the 958 people questioned French national team if a game were • Different religions are perceived are from North Africa descent played against the national team of their differently by French society. (Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia). country of origin. However, the study • Unlike the stereotype, the majo- and currently working (65%). highlights an important and worrying rity of respondents are educated • 69% were born in France. The trend with 58% of the 18 to 24 years, who and employed. youngest of them (80%) are
VI. detAILed dAtA VI. detAILed dAtA A common country of origin perception of culture, religion & residential area ethnicity hile the French are viewed in a W rather positive manner in the countries of origin of the respondents, the French of Arab descent on the contrary think that they are poorly regarded by their French compatriots. About 59% of the respondents believe compared to 46% of women. This negative employment status that the French are viewed positively in perception is also higher among residents their country of origin (the lowest rate of of large cities (41%) than among those li- favorable responses being that of 18-24 ving in villages or rural areas (31%). year old, at 44%), against only 28% of the Religion seems to be generally per- respondents who think that French see ceived in a much more negative way in their compatriots in the same way. France. Overall, 59% of respondents However, men and women seem to have different opinions on this subject. Perception of French people For example, among French people of in North Africa and perception Arab descent, only 33% of men think their mainly second-generation of nationals of the country French citizens, most of their pa- people are viewed negatively in France, of origin in France rents being born abroad, mainly Base: Total sample: 958 respondents
in North Africa (83%). education level • Three quarters (74%) speak Arabic
• Three quarters (73%) declare themselves to be followers of the
Islamic faith. The sample of respondents is of people of Arab descent in France. The study data has been weighted by sex to best refect the demographic variations of the French population of Arab origin.
VI. detAILed dAtA VI. detAILed dAtA the feeling of belonging to Perception of their religion in France Base: Total sample: 952 respondents French society.
believe that their religion is negatively Perception of respondents’ viewed in France. 67% of the Muslims Faith in France overwhelmingly believe their faith is negatively perceived, while 61% of the Jews feeling similar negativity toward their religion. While 92% of the Chris- tians French of Arab origin overwhel- mingly believe that their religion is po- sitively viewed. Regarding the way in which Arabs sense of inclusion are perceived in France, almost two- in French society thirds (64%) of those questioned consi- der them to be viewed negatively. This feeling is clearly expressed among res- Perception of Arabs hen asked about the impact their W pondents aged 55 and over (73%). in France religion and origin had on their sense of People living in rural areas of belonging to French society, nearly half France, on the other hand, seem of respondents said that neither their to be relatively more positive religion nor origin had any impact. The than average, 27% think rest seem to be divided between those
that being Arab is viewed who think these factors have enhanced favorably against 16% of their sense of belonging and those who the total sample popu- think they have been an obstacle to their lation. full inclusion in French society.
VI. detAILed dAtA
the impact on career prospects
R eligion and race appear to have a si- Impact of race and religion milar infuence on the career prospects on career opportunities of French people of Arab descent. While *Impact of race and religion on respondents’ career opportunities were asked separately in two questions. about half of them say that neither Base: lef column sample: 942 people, 940 right religion nor race has impacted their careers, around 3 in 10 respondents say religion or race has negatively impacted their careers. Only around 20% think, on the contrary, that these factors have positively infuenced their work oppor- The loyalty expressed to the French we can see a profound gap with older tunities in the country. football team also seems to be linked generations with 58% of those aged 35- Women, in particular, believe that to age. While from those who selected a 44 say they would support on the contra- neither religion (61%) nor race (53%) team more than half (58%) of 18-24 years ry the France team and 72% of people had an impact on their careers, a pro- old say they would support their home above 55 years would support the French portion well above the opinion of men country’s soccer team against France, team. (41% and 38% respectively).
Which team would you cheer for
VI. dONNées détAILLées VI. detAILed dAtA state and religion
Interestingly, more than half (54%) limiting the expression of religious dress of those surveyed believe religion plays tends to increase. a negative role in politics. There exist For instance, 34% of people with an- an important gap between younger ge- nual revenues below E 20k support that nerations and older generations. With law while 49% of people with annual in- 46% of the 18-24 years old feeling that come above E 40k support it. religion plays a negative role, while 55% of the 25-34 and 55% for the 35-44 years segments. It is important to note role of religion in politics that the percentage increases to 60% for the 45-54 years, that feel that role of re- ligion in politics is negative. A minority of men say race (35%) on their career prospects (the highest While, overall, respondents believe and religion (33%) have negatively in- proportion concerns 35-44 years old at that religion and politics are not neces- fuenced their career prospects. 41%). The level of education was the sarily compatible, they nonetheless are Respondents claim that it is the eth- most important factor in advancing of the opinion that people should have nic origin of their name that had the their careers (49% mentioned a positive the right to dress as they wish and that most signifcant negative impact (36%) impact). the government should not intervene to impose laws that limit the wearing of religious clothing. Impact on career opportunity Overall, 62% of respondents oppose Base: sample column 1 from lef: 929 people, column 2: 929, column 3: 929, column 4: 935, column 5: 931. such laws, while 45% of men and 48%
of people living in rural areas of France are in favor of such decisions. The num- should government ber of people in favor of laws restricting have laws limiting the wearing of religious clothing ap- the expression pears to increase with age. Only 29% of of religious dress ?
the youngest (18-24) are in favor, while 50% of those over 55 support them. It is important to note that income level play an important impact on the answer of the respondents. As annual income increases, support for the laws
VI. detAILed dAtA VI. detAILed dAtA embracing secular values knowledge of French history and society What is interesting to note with re- in their country of origin. Fify gard to Secularism with the French four percent think that the mo- people of Arab descent surveyed is that del of secularism is appropriate 65% of respondents, and almost 80% of for the Arab to solve their pro- A series of questions aimed those over 45, say they would actively belmes, and 76% of people to test the knowledge of res- champion French values of secularism above 55 years. pondents about French histo- ry and institutions. The results championing French secularism reveal that the oldest groups model in home country have a better understanding of French institutions and are better able to clearly identify key fgures, personalities and historical events in France and its history. Almost three quarters of those polled (72%) rightly chose Jean Castex as the current Prime Minister (at the time the survey rent constitution was adopted, a slightly was conducted). It is interesting to note higher percentage (48%) among those that only 49% of respondents aged 18 to who completed their higher education. 24 chose Mr. Castex, compared to 38% For 27% of those polled, 1789, the year of who chose the previous Prime Minister, the French Revolution, would be the year Édouard Philippe. of adoption of the current constitution, Is secularism a solution for problemes of the Arab? More than two in fve people (44%) this number being highest among the cite 1958 as the year in which the cur- oldest individuals (35% among those 55
Who is the current Prime Minister of France?
What is the current Who built the Palace of conclusion constitution in France? Versailles? Against all stereotypes, the study highlights issues that have been known and not necessarily highlighted or dealt with over the years. French of Arab descent are mostly “Republicans” who defend the values of the Republic but they feel stigmatized. They perceive that their religion and their ethnicity are negatively viewed. It is also important to note that despite this they do not perceive that their religion or ethnicity was a hindrance in their career or their integration into the French society, an important statement that proves that the structure of the society has allowed and promoted a strong integration. This leads us to believe that the core issue that needs to be tackled is the perception issue in which culture exchanges and history and over). However, 75% of those ques- Which is the longest can help better understand each other and make everyone feel tioned correctly answer that the regime river of France? more integrated.
in France is that of the Fifh Republic. Still on the history of France, near- ly four-ffhs (77%) of French people of Arab descent rightly chose Louis XIV as the king who ordered the construction of the Palace of Versailles. A more precise knowledge of the his- tory of France is among the oldest (92% of those over 55). In addition, three-ffhs (61%) of those questioned identifed the Bastille as originally a prison. Rhône. In fact, the Rhine is the longest ri- There is a greater confusion among ver that partially crosses France (as well respondents when asked to name the as fve other countries), while the Loire longest river in France: 32% opted for the is the longest river that fows entirely in Seine, 27% for the Loire and 22% for the France.
V. Appendices
Q1. What is your country of origin (i.e. the country of your lineage/ ancestry)? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 955 286 669 133 311 313 134 64 602 98 74 26 155 617 297 41 Unweighted base Base 955 458 497 143 294 310 134 75 625 93 74 30 132 608 299 49 Base Algeria 43% 40% 46% 42% 42% 38% 51% 56% 42% 45% 55% 44% 41% 42% 45% 49% Algeria Morocco 32% 31% 33% 37% 32% 37% 27% 14% 32% 37% 31% 15% 35% 36% 26% 19% Morocco Tunisia 14% 15% 13% 10% 15% 17% 11% 16% 16% 10% 9% 20% 12% 13% 17% 19% Tunisia Lebanon 3% 3% 2% 1% 4% 1% 3% 4% 3% 4% 1% 2% 2% 2% 4% - Lebanon Egypt 2% 3% 1% 4% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% - 2% 3% 2% 1% 3% Egypt Other Arab Country 6% 7% 4% 5% 5% 6% 5% 9% 6% 3% 3% 16% 6% 5% 7% 10% Other Arab Country CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 282 500 173 542 413 117 394 433 190 225 526 14 311 250 164 101 Unweighted base Base 299 486 171 528 427 115 387 441 192 215 537 11 297 258 187 85 Base Algeria 40% 43% 50% 44% 43% 36% 43% 45% 47% 48% 40% 53% 45% 45% 36% 41% Algeria Morocco 35% 31% 30% 34% 31% 35% 32% 32% 28% 32% 34% 34% 33% 27% 36% 39% Morocco Tunisia 15% 15% 11% 14% 14% 14% 14% 15% 14% 11% 16% 13% 14% 16% 17% 12% Tunisia Lebanon 4% 2% 1% 2% 3% 5% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% - 1% 3% 5% 3% Lebanon Egypt 3% 2% 1% 1% 3% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% - 2% 1% 3% - Egypt Other Arab Country 4% 7% 6% 5% 6% 9% 7% 4% 6% 5% 6% - 6% 7% 3% 6% Other Arab Country (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q2. Were you born in France? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 952 284 668 131 311 310 134 66 599 98 74 27 154 617 295 40 Unweighted base Base 951 455 496 140 294 306 134 77 620 93 74 32 132 607 297 47 Base Yes 69% 74% 66% 80% 64% 73% 71% 55% 73% 62% 65% 55% 62% 69% 71% 72% Yes No 31% 26% 34% 20% 36% 27% 29% 45% 27% 38% 35% 45% 38% 31% 29% 28% No CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 280 498 174 541 411 119 394 428 187 225 525 15 311 250 162 101 Unweighted base Base 296 483 171 526 425 117 387 436 188 215 536 12 297 259 183 85 Base Yes 71% 70% 64% 72% 67% 83% 69% 66% 76% 76% 65% 57% 63% 72% 81% 55% Yes No 29% 30% 36% 28% 33% 17% 31% 34% 24% 24% 35% 43% 37% 28% 19% 45% No (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q3. Were your parents born in France? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 958 287 671 133 311 313 135 66 604 98 74 27 155 619 298 41 Unweighted base Base 958 460 498 143 294 310 135 77 626 93 74 32 132 609 300 49 Base Yes 25% 26% 24% 31% 27% 23% 23% 22% 25% 28% 21% 27% 24% 23% 28% 29% Yes No 75% 74% 76% 69% 73% 77% 77% 78% 75% 72% 79% 73% 76% 77% 72% 71% No CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 283 500 175 543 415 119 395 433 190 225 528 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 300 486 173 529 429 117 389 441 192 215 539 12 298 259 188 85 Base Yes 26% 24% 27% 23% 27% 35% 23% 24% 32% 26% 22% 25% 25% 21% 29% 15% Yes No 74% 76% 73% 77% 73% 65% 77% 76% 68% 74% 78% 75% 75% 79% 71% 85% No (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
V. Appendices
Q4. Where were your parents born? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 721 212 509 90 227 243 108 53 453 71 57 20 120 477 215 29 Unweighted base Base 718 340 378 99 216 239 104 60 467 67 59 23 101 467 216 34 Base North Africa 86% 83% 90% 83% 84% 89% 90% 82% 87% 77% 85% 90% 88% 88% 82% 93% North Africa Sub-Saharan Africa 3% 4% 3% 7% 5% 2% 2% 1% 2% 10% 7% - 2% 3% 5% 5% Sub-Saharan Africa Asia 3% 5% 1% 4% 4% 1% 3% 4% 3% 2% 4% 7% - 3% 4% - Asia Europe 3% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 7% 4% 1% - 3% 2% 3% 5% - Europe North America 1% 1% 1% 1% - 2% - 3% 1% 3% - - - 1% 1% - North America Other 4% 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% 2% 4% 3% 6% 4% - 8% 4% 4% 2% Other CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 214 379 128 417 304 79 300 334 130 164 416 11 232 198 120 85 Unweighted base Base 223 368 127 405 313 76 298 336 131 159 419 9 224 204 133 73 Base North Africa 85% 86% 88% 90% 81% 73% 87% 89% 75% 88% 89% 92% 87% 87% 89% 89% North Africa Sub-Saharan Africa 1% 4% 6% 2% 5% 9% 2% 3% 8% 2% 2% 8% 2% 2% 2% 2% Sub-Saharan Africa Asia 4% 3% 1% 2% 5% 2% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% - 1% 5% 4% - Asia Europe 7% 1% 1% 2% 4% 5% 3% 2% 5% 3% 2% - 3% 2% 4% 2% Europe North America - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 1% - 2% 0% - - North America Other 2% 4% 4% 3% 4% 9% 3% 3% 7% 3% 3% - 4% 3% 1% 6% Other (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q5. do you speak Arabic? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 957 286 671 133 311 312 135 66 603 98 74 27 155 618 298 41 Unweighted base Base 956 458 498 143 294 308 135 77 625 93 74 32 132 608 300 49 Base Yes 74% 73% 74% 69% 76% 80% 65% 64% 74% 78% 72% 63% 75% 79% 66% 59% Yes No 26% 27% 26% 31% 24% 20% 35% 36% 26% 22% 28% 37% 25% 21% 34% 41% No CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 282 500 175 542 415 119 395 432 189 225 528 15 311 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 298 486 173 527 429 117 389 439 190 215 539 12 296 259 188 85 Base Yes 76% 74% 71% 78% 69% 61% 74% 77% 69% 69% 77% 88% 77% 73% 78% 79% Yes No 24% 26% 29% 22% 31% 39% 26% 23% 31% 31% 23% 12% 23% 27% 22% 21% No (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q6. How are French people regarded in your country of origin? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 958 287 671 133 311 313 135 66 604 98 74 27 155 619 298 41 Unweighted base Base 958 460 498 143 294 310 135 77 626 93 74 32 132 609 300 49 Base Positively 59% 55% 61% 44% 63% 60% 62% 54% 60% 63% 49% 48% 54% 62% 55% 35% Positively Neutrally 23% 24% 23% 35% 26% 19% 18% 21% 22% 21% 38% 27% 23% 22% 26% 27% Neutrally Négatif 9% 12% 7% 9% 7% 13% 8% 9% 10% 9% 6% 7% 10% 10% 9% 10% Négatif Don’t know/ Can’t say 9% 9% 9% 11% 5% 9% 12% 15% 8% 7% 7% 17% 13% 6% 10% 28% Don’t know/ Can’t say CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 283 500 175 543 415 119 395 433 190 225 528 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 300 486 173 529 429 117 389 441 192 215 539 12 298 259 188 85 Base Positively 60% 60% 51% 62% 54% 59% 58% 59% 54% 54% 62% 63% 60% 64% 58% 59% Positively Neutrally 23% 22% 27% 21% 26% 25% 25% 21% 24% 30% 21% 19% 25% 21% 21% 20% Neutrally Negatively 10% 9% 10% 9% 10% 7% 8% 11% 7% 9% 10% 6% 5% 8% 16% 7% Negatively Don’t know/ Can’t say 6% 9% 12% 8% 10% 9% 9% 8% 15% 7% 7% 12% 10% 7% 5% 13% Don’t know/ Can’t say (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
V. Appendices
Q7. How are the people of your country of origin perceived by other French people? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 958 287 671 133 311 313 135 66 604 98 74 27 155 619 298 41 Unweighted base Base 958 460 498 143 294 310 135 77 626 93 74 32 132 609 300 49 Base Positively 28% 35% 22% 28% 31% 27% 24% 27% 30% 28% 17% 14% 28% 30% 22% 34% Positively Neutrally 24% 25% 23% 26% 24% 23% 26% 21% 24% 24% 34% 29% 20% 23% 28% 22% Neutrally Négatif 40% 33% 46% 35% 39% 41% 40% 45% 39% 42% 39% 54% 38% 40% 41% 25% Négatif Aucune idée 8% 6% 10% 11% 6% 9% 9% 7% 7% 6% 10% 2% 14% 7% 9% 18% Aucune idée CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 283 500 175 543 415 119 395 433 190 225 528 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 300 486 173 529 429 117 389 441 192 215 539 12 298 259 188 85 Base Positively 25% 33% 21% 28% 28% 32% 28% 27% 30% 27% 28% 25% 29% 30% 30% 20% Positively Neutrally 25% 24% 23% 23% 25% 24% 23% 24% 21% 25% 25% 32% 22% 24% 25% 23% Neutrally Negatively 46% 34% 44% 41% 39% 31% 40% 41% 34% 42% 41% 12% 40% 41% 40% 41% Negatively Don’t know/ Can’t say 5% 9% 12% 8% 8% 12% 8% 7% 15% 6% 6% 31% 9% 6% 5% 16% Don’t know/ Can’t say (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q8. What is your faith? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 957 287 670 132 311 313 135 66 604 98 73 27 155 619 297 41 Unweighted base Base 957 460 497 142 294 310 135 77 626 93 73 32 132 609 300 49 Base Christian 8% 9% 6% 8% 7% 7% 7% 12% 8% 6% 3% 22% 7% 7% 9% 11% Christian Muslim 73% 71% 75% 71% 74% 80% 70% 50% 73% 78% 75% 51% 76% 76% 67% 79% Muslim Jewish 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 3% - 2% 2% 2% 3% - Jewish Atheist 11% 12% 10% 14% 12% 6% 10% 26% 11% 8% 15% 25% 6% 9% 16% 10% Atheist Other faith 6% 5% 7% 4% 5% 4% 10% 11% 6% 4% 7% - 9% 7% 5% - Other faith CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 282 500 175 543 414 119 395 432 190 225 527 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 299 486 173 529 429 117 389 440 192 215 538 12 298 259 188 85 Base Christian 9% 6% 9% 6% 9% 16% 8% 6% 10% 6% 8% - 6% 8% 10% 6% Christian Muslim 69% 77% 70% 79% 66% 59% 73% 77% 69% 78% 73% 81% 76% 73% 71% 81% Muslim Jewish 2% 3% 2% 2% 3% 7% 1% 2% 3% 2% 2% - 3% 2% 3% 1% Jewish Atheist 13% 10% 10% 8% 15% 14% 12% 10% 13% 10% 11% - 8% 13% 11% 7% Atheist Other faith 7% 4% 9% 5% 6% 4% 7% 5% 5% 5% 6% 19% 7% 4% 5% 5% Other faith (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q9. How are followers of your faith perceived in France? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 952 285 667 132 310 313 134 63 604 97 74 25 152 617 294 41 Unweighted base Base 952 457 495 141 293 310 134 74 626 92 74 30 130 608 296 49 Base Positively 41% 48% 34% 53% 42% 34% 36% 47% 40% 40% 42% 48% 40% 38% 43% 53% Positively Negatively 59% 52% 66% 47% 58% 66% 64% 53% 60% 60% 58% 52% 60% 62% 57% 47% Negatively CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 282 498 172 541 411 117 393 431 189 224 525 14 311 250 165 99 Unweighted base Base 299 483 170 527 425 114 386 439 191 214 535 11 297 258 188 84 Base Positively 35% 44% 41% 38% 44% 53% 39% 38% 45% 41% 39% 40% 41% 35% 43% 33% Positively Negatively 65% 56% 59% 62% 56% 47% 61% 62% 55% 59% 61% 60% 59% 65% 57% 67% Negatively (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
V. Appendices
Q10.a How are followers of your faith perceived in France? (christians)...... Unweighted base: 69 ...... Base: 951 ...... Positively: 92% ...... Negatively: 8% Q10.b How are followers of your faith perceived in France? (Muslims) ...... Unweighted base: 701 ...... Base: 951 ...... Positively: 33% ...... Negatively: 67% Q10.c How are followers of your faith perceived in France? (Jews) ...... Unweighted base: 20 ...... Base: 951 ...... Positively: 39% ...... Negatively: 61% Q10.d How are followers of your faith perceived in France? (Others) ...... Unweighted base: 162 ...... Base: 951 ...... Positively: 52% ...... Negatively: 48%
Q11. How has your religion affected your sense of inclusion in French society? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 952 287 665 132 308 312 135 65 600 97 73 27 155 617 294 41 Unweighted base Base 954 460 494 142 291 309 135 77 623 93 73 32 132 608 297 49 Base Helped 27,5% 32% 24% 27% 31% 26% 24% 24% 28% 32% 20% 29% 26% 29% 25% 27% Helped Hindered 24,9% 28% 22% 28% 24% 29% 19% 17% 27% 24% 18% 20% 21% 27% 22% 19% Hindered No impact 47,6% 40% 55% 45% 45% 45% 57% 59% 45% 44% 62% 51% 53% 45% 53% 53% No impact CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 281 496 175 541 411 118 392 431 187 224 527 14 309 250 165 100 Unweighted base Base 298 483 173 527 426 116 386 439 190 214 538 11 296 259 188 85 Base Helped 22% 33% 23% 29% 26% 43% 25% 25% 33% 28% 25% 20% 32% 25% 29% 14% Helped Hindered 30% 23% 22% 27% 23% 22% 23% 28% 23% 24% 26% 7% 23% 27% 30% 18% Hindered No impact 48% 44% 56% 44% 52% 35% 52% 47% 44% 48% 48% 74% 46% 48% 40% 68% No impact (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q12. How has your origin affected your sense of inclusion in French society? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 925 279 646 130 301 303 129 62 586 95 73 24 147 601 284 40 Unweighted base Base 927 447 480 140 284 299 130 74 610 90 73 29 125 593 287 47 Base Helped 27,9% 34% 22% 26% 31% 25% 31% 22% 28% 38% 20% 32% 21% 30% 24% 23% Helped Hindered 27,5% 31% 24% 24% 25% 33% 20% 36% 29% 24% 20% 35% 25% 29% 25% 20% Hindered No impact 44,6% 35% 53% 50% 44% 42% 50% 41% 42% 38% 60% 32% 54% 40% 52% 57% No impact CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 273 484 168 524 401 115 382 419 178 216 519 12 301 248 159 99 Unweighted base Base 289 473 165 509 417 114 375 429 179 206 531 10 286 256 183 84 Base Helped 22% 32% 26% 29% 26% 37% 27% 26% 33% 25% 27% 23% 32% 25% 29% 13% Helped Hindered 32% 26% 26% 30% 24% 24% 26% 30% 25% 30% 28% - 24% 29% 36% 22% Hindered No impact 46% 42% 49% 40% 50% 39% 47% 44% 41% 44% 45% 77% 44% 47% 34% 64% No impact (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q13a. What impact has your race had on your career opportunities? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 942 282 660 129 306 308 134 65 593 95 73 26 155 611 293 38 Unweighted base Base 942 452 490 138 289 305 134 76 615 91 73 30 132 601 297 45 Base Positive impact 23% 27% 19% 26% 25% 21% 20% 19% 24% 26% 16% 18% 18% 24% 20% 24% Positive impact Negative impact 31% 35% 28% 26% 33% 32% 32% 31% 32% 36% 31% 26% 28% 32% 32% 19% Negative impact No impact 46% 38% 53% 48% 42% 47% 48% 50% 44% 38% 53% 56% 55% 44% 49% 56% No impact CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 279 493 170 539 403 118 388 426 187 222 519 14 302 249 164 99 Unweighted base Base 295 480 167 526 416 116 381 434 189 213 529 11 289 257 187 83 Base Positive impact 21% 25% 19% 24% 21% 36% 19% 23% 27% 25% 21% 20% 23% 21% 25% 14% Positive impact Negative impact 35% 30% 28% 32% 30% 24% 31% 34% 30% 27% 34% 7% 30% 30% 36% 27% Negative impact No impact 44% 45% 53% 44% 49% 40% 51% 43% 43% 48% 46% 74% 46% 48% 39% 59% No impact (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
V. Appendices
Q13b. What impact has your religion had on your career opportunities? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 937 284 653 130 304 305 132 66 590 98 73 26 150 609 288 40 Unweighted base Base 940 455 485 140 287 304 132 77 615 93 73 30 128 601 292 47 Base Positive impact 20,4% 25% 16% 21% 26% 19% 15% 12% 23% 23% 17% 13% 11% 22% 17% 20% Positive impact Negative impact 28,4% 33% 24% 27% 26% 31% 32% 23% 29% 28% 22% 23% 32% 29% 28% 18% Negative impact No impact 51,2% 41% 61% 52% 48% 49% 54% 65% 49% 49% 61% 64% 57% 49% 54% 62% No impact CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 276 488 173 532 405 117 385 425 183 223 519 12 301 249 162 98 Unweighted base Base 293 477 171 520 420 115 380 435 185 214 531 10 290 257 186 83 Base Positive impact 17% 24% 17% 20% 20% 30% 15% 23% 23% 23% 18% 32% 22% 16% 28% 12% Positive impact Negative impact 35% 25% 27% 32% 24% 28% 27% 29% 28% 25% 30% 8% 27% 27% 35% 25% Negative impact No impact 49% 51% 56% 47% 56% 42% 58% 48% 49% 52% 51% 61% 52% 57% 37% 63% No impact (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q14a. How have each of the following impacted your career opportunities? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 929 276 653 130 299 304 133 63 586 98 74 25 146 604 289 36 Unweighted base Base 927 442 485 138 282 301 132 74 606 93 74 30 124 594 291 42 Base Positive impact 31% 38% 24% 33% 36% 29% 24% 29% 33% 32% 27% 29% 20% 31% 31% 30% Positive impact Negative impact 15% 12% 18% 18% 17% 15% 12% 9% 14% 15% 18% 7% 19% 15% 16% 15% Negative impact No impact 54% 50% 58% 49% 47% 57% 64% 62% 52% 52% 55% 63% 61% 55% 53% 56% No impact CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 276 484 169 529 400 116 387 417 180 218 519 12 302 245 164 100 Unweighted base Base 291 468 168 514 413 114 379 425 178 209 530 10 286 253 187 84 Base Positive impact 29% 33% 28% 29% 33% 35% 29% 32% 32% 26% 32% 54% 32% 24% 43% 17% Positive impact Negative impact 18% 13% 15% 16% 14% 16% 14% 15% 18% 18% 13% 8% 15% 14% 14% 13% Negative impact No impact 53% 54% 57% 55% 53% 49% 57% 53% 50% 56% 55% 38% 53% 61% 43% 69% No impact (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q14b. colour of skin Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 929 277 652 129 300 303 132 65 585 98 73 27 146 605 288 36 Unweighted base Base 928 444 484 137 283 301 131 77 605 93 73 32 124 595 290 42 Base Positive impact 25% 29% 21% 28% 31% 22% 19% 19% 27% 27% 19% 32% 16% 25% 25% 30% Positive impact Negative impact 24% 30% 19% 20% 22% 29% 24% 23% 25% 25% 16% 15% 26% 25% 22% 28% Negative impact No impact 51% 42% 59% 52% 47% 49% 57% 58% 48% 48% 65% 53% 58% 50% 53% 43% No impact CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 277 483 169 528 401 115 385 419 180 218 519 12 299 246 164 100 Unweighted base Base 292 467 168 514 414 113 378 426 179 209 530 10 283 255 187 84 Base Positive impact 22% 26% 26% 26% 24% 30% 20% 28% 27% 24% 25% 32% 27% 20% 32% 15% Positive impact Negative impact 29% 23% 21% 26% 22% 22% 24% 25% 30% 22% 23% 8% 20% 28% 28% 17% Negative impact No impact 49% 51% 53% 48% 54% 48% 55% 48% 43% 54% 52% 61% 52% 52% 40% 68% No impact (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
V. Appendices
Q14c. ethnic name Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 929 276 653 129 300 303 133 64 588 96 73 25 147 604 288 37 Unweighted base Base 927 442 485 137 283 300 131 76 608 92 73 30 125 594 290 43 Base Positive impact 20,5% 23% 18% 20% 25% 20% 15% 19% 21% 20% 20% 24% 16% 20% 20% 31% Positive impact Negative impact 35,6% 39% 32% 26% 34% 41% 37% 37% 37% 42% 21% 37% 34% 36% 35% 29% Negative impact No impact 43,9% 37% 50% 54% 41% 40% 48% 44% 42% 38% 59% 39% 50% 44% 45% 40% No impact CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 275 485 169 528 401 116 386 418 181 218 517 13 302 246 163 99 Unweighted base Base 290 468 168 513 414 114 379 426 179 209 528 11 286 255 186 83 Base Positive impact 15% 23% 24% 21% 19% 22% 19% 21% 23% 20% 19% 36% 23% 17% 24% 14% Positive impact Negative impact 42% 33% 32% 37% 34% 33% 34% 37% 37% 31% 37% 21% 32% 37% 44% 29% Negative impact No impact 43% 44% 45% 42% 47% 45% 46% 41% 40% 48% 44% 42% 44% 46% 32% 57% No impact (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q14d. education level Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 935 278 657 130 301 305 134 65 589 98 74 25 149 607 292 36 Unweighted base Base 933 445 488 138 285 301 133 77 610 93 74 30 126 597 294 42 Base Positive impact 49% 56% 42% 52% 52% 47% 37% 61% 50% 47% 61% 76% 33% 49% 48% 46% Positive impact Negative impact 11% 11% 12% 10% 12% 11% 13% 9% 12% 12% 4% 3% 12% 10% 14% 11% Negative impact No impact 40% 33% 46% 38% 35% 43% 50% 29% 38% 41% 35% 21% 55% 41% 38% 43% No impact CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 276 486 173 532 403 117 388 421 181 220 520 14 304 246 164 100 Unweighted base Base 291 471 171 517 416 114 381 429 180 211 531 11 288 255 187 84 Base Positive impact 54% 44% 53% 45% 54% 46% 47% 52% 35% 42% 56% 41% 48% 44% 59% 38% Positive impact Negative impact 11% 12% 10% 12% 11% 9% 10% 13% 18% 12% 9% - 11% 10% 13% 6% Negative impact No impact 35% 44% 37% 43% 35% 45% 44% 35% 46% 46% 35% 59% 41% 46% 28% 56% No impact (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q14e. Where you live Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 931 278 653 130 301 304 132 64 586 98 74 25 148 604 290 37 Unweighted base Base 930 445 485 138 285 301 131 76 607 93 74 30 126 594 293 44 Base Positive impact 31,5% 36% 28% 37% 34% 29% 24% 33% 34% 32% 25% 45% 21% 31% 32% 36% Positive impact Negative impact 18,8% 21% 17% 11% 21% 20% 18% 20% 19% 16% 18% 13% 22% 20% 17% 18% Negative impact No impact 49,8% 44% 55% 52% 45% 50% 57% 47% 47% 52% 58% 42% 57% 49% 52% 46% No impact CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 276 486 169 531 400 116 389 417 181 219 519 12 302 246 163 100 Unweighted base Base 291 471 168 516 414 114 383 425 180 211 530 10 287 255 186 84 Base Positive impact 32% 32% 30% 30% 33% 36% 30% 32% 31% 30% 32% 32% 33% 29% 37% 23% Positive impact Negative impact 21% 18% 17% 20% 17% 15% 17% 21% 20% 17% 19% 15% 19% 17% 23% 12% Negative impact No impact 47% 50% 53% 49% 50% 49% 52% 47% 49% 53% 49% 53% 48% 54% 40% 66% No impact (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
V. Appendices
Q15. if the French national football team were playing against the national team of your country of origin, which would you cheer for? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 666 220 446 111 217 211 87 40 433 65 57 16 95 435 207 24 Unweighted base Base 684 352 331 121 210 216 90 47 460 65 58 19 83 446 209 29 Base France 53% 55% 50% 42% 50% 58% 51% 72% 57% 54% 25% 80% 38% 57% 45% 44% France My country of origin 47% 45% 50% 58% 50% 42% 49% 28% 43% 46% 75% 20% 62% 43% 55% 56% My country of origin CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 190 361 115 381 285 89 265 304 146 159 351 10 219 170 129 57 Unweighted base Base 209 361 114 383 300 92 271 312 150 155 372 7 210 178 153 50 Base France 59% 52% 45% 55% 49% 67% 51% 50% 55% 45% 55% 30% 49% 57% 60% 36% France My country of origin 41% 48% 55% 45% 51% 33% 49% 50% 45% 55% 45% 70% 51% 43% 40% 64% My country of origin (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q16. in your opinion, when French people speak about «Arabs» what is their connotation? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 958 287 671 133 311 313 135 66 604 98 74 27 155 619 298 41 Unweighted base Base 958 460 498 143 294 310 135 77 626 93 74 32 132 609 300 49 Base Positive 16,2% 20% 13% 14% 22% 16% 12% 6% 18% 26% 5% 7% 9% 18% 12% 18% Positive Negative 64,4% 62% 66% 59% 63% 65% 67% 73% 65% 52% 62% 76% 69% 63% 70% 53% Negative Neutral 19,4% 18% 21% 27% 14% 19% 22% 21% 17% 22% 33% 17% 23% 19% 18% 29% Neutral CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 283 500 175 543 415 119 395 433 190 225 528 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 300 486 173 529 429 117 389 441 192 215 539 12 298 259 188 85 Base Positive 14% 19% 11% 18% 14% 27% 13% 16% 26% 13% 14% 19% 18% 13% 21% 5% Positive Negative 69% 62% 63% 64% 65% 56% 66% 65% 55% 64% 68% 43% 65% 71% 63% 63% Negative Neutral 17% 19% 26% 18% 21% 17% 21% 18% 18% 23% 18% 38% 17% 16% 16% 32% Neutral (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q17. How do you regard the role of religion in politics? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 958 287 671 133 311 313 135 66 604 98 74 27 155 619 298 41 Unweighted base Base 958 460 498 143 294 310 135 77 626 93 74 32 132 609 300 49 Base Positive 16,5% 22% 11% 17% 20% 18% 10% 8% 18% 23% 12% 10% 11% 19% 13% 10% Positive Negative 53,9% 48% 59% 46% 55% 55% 60% 51% 56% 50% 48% 59% 51% 53% 57% 50% Negative Neutral 29,6% 30% 30% 37% 26% 27% 30% 41% 27% 27% 41% 32% 38% 28% 31% 40% Neutral CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 283 500 175 543 415 119 395 433 190 225 528 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 300 486 173 529 429 117 389 441 192 215 539 12 298 259 188 85 Base Positive 13% 19% 16% 20% 13% 28% 14% 16% 20% 19% 14% 19% 16% 15% 20% 9% Positive Negative 60% 52% 49% 53% 55% 48% 56% 54% 53% 51% 56% 37% 56% 56% 57% 45% Negative Neutral 27% 29% 35% 27% 32% 25% 30% 30% 28% 30% 30% 44% 28% 28% 23% 45% Neutral (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
V. Appendices
Q18. do you believe that government should have laws limiting the expression of religious dress? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 958 287 671 133 311 313 135 66 604 98 74 27 155 619 298 41 Unweighted base Base 958 460 498 143 294 310 135 77 626 93 74 32 132 609 300 49 Base Yes 38% 45% 31% 29% 37% 37% 43% 50% 43% 36% 17% 52% 25% 40% 36% 29% Yes No 62% 55% 69% 71% 63% 63% 57% 50% 57% 64% 83% 48% 75% 60% 64% 71% No CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 283 500 175 543 415 119 395 433 190 225 528 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 300 486 173 529 429 117 389 441 192 215 539 12 298 259 188 85 Base Yes 44% 36% 32% 38% 38% 48% 33% 40% 44% 31% 39% 26% 34% 40% 49% 21% Yes No 56% 64% 68% 62% 62% 52% 67% 60% 56% 69% 61% 74% 66% 60% 51% 79% No (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q19. do you believe that secularism would be a solution to problems Arabs are facing? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 958 287 671 133 311 313 135 66 604 98 74 27 155 619 298 41 Unweighted base Base 958 460 498 143 294 310 135 77 626 93 74 32 132 609 300 49 Base Yes 54% 53% 55% 51% 54% 48% 57% 76% 55% 55% 44% 73% 50% 55% 54% 43% Yes No 46% 47% 45% 49% 46% 52% 43% 24% 45% 45% 56% 27% 50% 45% 46% 57% No CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 283 500 175 543 415 119 395 433 190 225 528 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 300 486 173 529 429 117 389 441 192 215 539 12 298 259 188 85 Base Yes 59% 51% 52% 55% 52% 63% 53% 52% 56% 51% 55% 43% 50% 57% 58% 40% Yes No 41% 49% 48% 45% 48% 37% 47% 48% 44% 49% 45% 57% 50% 43% 42% 60% No (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q20. Would you champion French values of secularism in your country of origin? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 958 287 671 133 311 313 135 66 604 98 74 27 155 619 298 41 Unweighted base Base 958 460 498 143 294 310 135 77 626 93 74 32 132 609 300 49 Base Yes 65% 64% 66% 56% 61% 64% 79% 78% 66% 66% 55% 70% 62% 66% 63% 60% Yes No 35% 36% 34% 44% 39% 36% 21% 22% 34% 34% 45% 30% 38% 34% 37% 40% No CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 283 500 175 543 415 119 395 433 190 225 528 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 300 486 173 529 429 117 389 441 192 215 539 12 298 259 188 85 Base Yes 68% 65% 60% 66% 64% 78% 63% 64% 70% 61% 65% 56% 64% 72% 60% 59% Yes No 32% 35% 40% 34% 36% 22% 37% 36% 30% 39% 35% 44% 36% 28% 40% 41% No (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
V. Appendices
Q21. Who is the current prime Minister of France? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 958 287 671 133 311 313 135 66 604 98 74 27 155 619 298 41 Unweighted base Base 958 460 498 143 294 310 135 77 626 93 74 32 132 609 300 49 Base Emmanuel Macron 8% 8% 7% 10% 13% 4% 5% - 7% 8% 4% - 13% 7% 8% 11% Emmanuel Macron Jean Castex 72% 71% 72% 49% 62% 80% 86% 95% 75% 69% 56% 98% 62% 74% 70% 58% Jean Castex Edouard Philippe 16% 16% 18% 38% 18% 12% 7% 5% 14% 18% 39% 2% 21% 15% 19% 29% Edouard Philippe Jean Yves Le Drian 4% 5% 3% 2% 7% 4% 2% - 4% 5% 1% - 3% 4% 4% 2% Jean Yves Le Drian CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 283 500 175 543 415 119 395 433 190 225 528 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 300 486 173 529 429 117 389 441 192 215 539 12 298 259 188 85 Base Emmanuel Macron 6% 8% 9% 6% 9% 9% 6% 8% 10% 6% 7% 31% 5% 4% 10% 8% Emmanuel Macron Jean Castex 74% 71% 70% 74% 70% 65% 74% 72% 62% 68% 77% 57% 73% 81% 70% 67% Jean Castex Edouard Philippe 14% 17% 20% 15% 19% 20% 16% 16% 23% 24% 12% 12% 19% 12% 12% 22% Edouard Philippe Jean Yves Le Drian 6% 4% 1% 5% 2% 5% 4% 4% 5% 2% 4% - 3% 3% 8% 3% Jean Yves Le Drian (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q22. When was the current constitution adopted? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 958 287 671 133 311 313 135 66 604 98 74 27 155 619 298 41 Unweighted base Base 958 460 498 143 294 310 135 77 626 93 74 32 132 609 300 49 Base 1789 26,6% 26% 27% 24% 25% 30% 20% 35% 27% 27% 25% 25% 26% 26% 27% 29% 1789 1945 16,8% 16% 18% 18% 18% 14% 17% 19% 16% 20% 18% 12% 18% 16% 16% 27% 1945 1958 44% 44% 44% 44% 42% 42% 55% 40% 45% 39% 46% 51% 42% 44% 46% 35% 1958 1993 12,6% 13% 12% 14% 15% 14% 8% 6% 12% 15% 11% 12% 14% 14% 11% 8% 1993 CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 283 500 175 543 415 119 395 433 190 225 528 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 300 486 173 529 429 117 389 441 192 215 539 12 298 259 188 85 Base 1789 28% 26% 26% 28% 24% 22% 28% 27% 24% 25% 28% 32% 27% 25% 29% 25% 1789 1945 12% 19% 18% 17% 16% 19% 18% 16% 22% 21% 14% 12% 17% 18% 14% 17% 1945 1958 49% 41% 45% 40% 48% 45% 44% 43% 35% 42% 48% 37% 42% 47% 45% 48% 1958 1993 11% 14% 12% 14% 11% 15% 10% 14% 19% 13% 10% 19% 14% 11% 13% 11% 1993 (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q23. What French Republic are we currently in? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 958 287 671 133 311 313 135 66 604 98 74 27 155 619 298 41 Unweighted base Base 958 460 498 143 294 310 135 77 626 93 74 32 132 609 300 49 Base 1st 5% 6% 5% 4% 10% 4% 1% 3% 5% 5% 2% 5% 7% 5% 5% 8% 1st 3rd 7% 7% 7% 7% 10% 6% 2% 8% 6% 7% 3% 20% 9% 6% 8% 3% 3rd 5th 75% 76% 74% 72% 70% 78% 80% 81% 76% 75% 83% 71% 66% 75% 76% 73% 5th 6e 13% 11% 14% 16% 11% 12% 16% 8% 12% 13% 12% 5% 18% 13% 11% 16% 6e CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 283 500 175 543 415 119 395 433 190 225 528 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 300 486 173 529 429 117 389 441 192 215 539 12 298 259 188 85 Base 1st 3% 6% 7% 5% 6% 6% 4% 7% 10% 5% 4% 19% 6% 3% 6% 3% 1st 3rd 6% 6% 9% 6% 8% 11% 6% 6% 12% 4% 6% 6% 8% 5% 5% 4% 3rd 5th 78% 75% 71% 75% 75% 67% 78% 75% 63% 75% 79% 75% 74% 83% 74% 72% 5th 6th 13% 12% 14% 14% 11% 16% 13% 12% 15% 16% 11% - 12% 8% 14% 21% 6th (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
V. Appendices
Q24. Who built the palais de Versailles? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 958 287 671 133 311 313 135 66 604 98 74 27 155 619 298 41 Unweighted base Base 958 460 498 143 294 310 135 77 626 93 74 32 132 609 300 49 Base Napoleon Bonaparte 13,3% 13% 14% 19% 12% 16% 9% 4% 12% 23% 13% - 16% 14% 12% 15% Napoleon Bonaparte Louis XIV 76,9% 76% 78% 67% 74% 77% 86% 92% 79% 70% 73% 90% 71% 76% 79% 76% Louis XIV Charles de Gaulle 6,4% 7% 6% 8% 9% 5% 3% 3% 6% 4% 11% 10% 9% 6% 7% 6% Charles de Gaulle Albert Camus 3,4% 4% 3% 6% 5% 2% 2% 1% 3% 3% 4% - 5% 4% 2% 3% Albert Camus CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 283 500 175 543 415 119 395 433 190 225 528 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 300 486 173 529 429 117 389 441 192 215 539 12 298 259 188 85 Base Napoleon Bonaparte 7% 16% 16% 13% 14% 15% 12% 14% 21% 13% 11% 12% 14% 13% 9% 8% Napoleon Bonaparte Louis XIV 83% 75% 74% 76% 78% 73% 80% 76% 62% 77% 82% 81% 76% 82% 80% 83% Louis XIV Charles de Gaulle 7% 6% 8% 7% 6% 6% 5% 7% 11% 7% 4% 6% 7% 3% 6% 9% Charles de Gaulle Albert Camus 4% 3% 3% 5% 2% 6% 3% 3% 6% 2% 3% - 3% 2% 5% - Albert Camus (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q25. What was the Bastille before it was destroyed? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 958 287 671 133 311 313 135 66 604 98 74 27 155 619 298 41 Unweighted base Base 958 460 498 143 294 310 135 77 626 93 74 32 132 609 300 49 Base Palace 17% 16% 18% 21% 20% 18% 11% 8% 16% 23% 18% 10% 22% 16% 18% 19% Palace Prison 61% 64% 58% 62% 51% 60% 73% 78% 62% 55% 69% 71% 51% 59% 65% 60% Prison Army Barracks 12% 12% 13% 11% 13% 14% 8% 11% 12% 13% 7% 15% 18% 14% 9% 16% Army Barracks Hospital 10% 8% 11% 6% 16% 8% 7% 3% 11% 9% 6% 5% 9% 10% 9% 5% Hospital CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 283 500 175 543 415 119 395 433 190 225 528 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 300 486 173 529 429 117 389 441 192 215 539 12 298 259 188 85 Base Palace 15% 18% 17% 16% 18% 14% 20% 14% 19% 16% 16% 26% 21% 14% 13% 24% Palace Prison 66% 56% 64% 59% 63% 63% 61% 61% 50% 58% 66% 50% 57% 65% 65% 60% Prison Army Barracks 11% 13% 12% 15% 10% 10% 11% 14% 17% 13% 10% 19% 11% 12% 14% 9% Army Barracks Hospital 7% 12% 7% 10% 9% 13% 8% 10% 13% 13% 7% 6% 11% 9% 9% 8% Hospital (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Q26. What is France’s longest river? Total Gender Age Professional Situation Marital status Male Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ Work Unemployed Student Retirement Other In a relationship Single Other Unweighted base 958 287 671 133 311 313 135 66 604 98 74 27 155 619 298 41 Unweighted base Base 958 460 498 143 294 310 135 77 626 93 74 32 132 609 300 49 Base Seine 32,4% 32% 33% 42% 31% 32% 33% 20% 30% 40% 36% 22% 37% 32% 32% 32% Seine Loire 26,8% 29% 25% 19% 22% 29% 31% 45% 28% 20% 31% 46% 19% 28% 28% 8% Loire Rhône 22,3% 22% 22% 20% 23% 24% 21% 18% 23% 24% 17% 12% 22% 24% 17% 31% Rhône Rhin 18,5% 17% 20% 19% 24% 15% 15% 17% 19% 16% 16% 20% 21% 16% 22% 29% Rhin CSP Children Residential area Education Annual personal income CSP + CSP - Inactifs With Without A village S/medium A big N Bac(2) Higher Other Less than 20 000 € 40 000 € Not children children or rural area Town(3) City Bac(1) Education 20 000 € to 39 000 € and more specified Unweighted base 283 500 175 543 415 119 395 433 190 225 528 15 312 251 165 101 Unweighted base Base 300 486 173 529 429 117 389 441 192 215 539 12 298 259 188 85 Base Seine 31% 34% 30% 32% 33% 36% 31% 32% 36% 32% 31% 38% 34% 32% 25% 30% Seine Loire 31% 23% 29% 27% 27% 20% 32% 25% 16% 26% 31% 31% 26% 27% 36% 22% Loire Rhone 23% 22% 21% 25% 20% 26% 21% 22% 28% 23% 21% 6% 24% 20% 25% 19% Rhone Rhin 15% 20% 20% 16% 21% 19% 16% 21% 20% 20% 17% 25% 16% 21% 14% 28% Rhin (1) Non-Bachelors, (2) Bachelors or Equivalent, (3) A small town or a medium-sized town.
Acknowledgments At the outset, I would like to express my utmost gratitude to the Editor- in-Chief, Faisal J. Abbas for his leadership, inspiration, and support for the Arab News en français project. I wish to thank Julien Hawari and his Special Edition team, and the contribution of Lara Barazi and Zeina Zbibo, who were invaluable in developing the survey, the evaluation of the results, and the overall review for this report. I would also like to thank Aziz Kamel for his creative support in preparing the layout of the report, visuals, and infographics. Arab News also thanks all YouGov contributors for providing insights and analyses of the results of this publication. Finally, I am forever grateful, for the continued support provided by the Arab News team members around the world.
Ali itani Regional Director Arab News Japan and Arab News en français