DOCSLIB.ORG

An Analysis of Wisconsin Oneota Agricultural Production and Risk Management Strategies Richard Wynn Edwards University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Analysis of Wisconsin Oneota Agricultural Production and Risk Management Strategies Richard Wynn Edwards University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations December 2017 The aC nine Surrogacy Approach and Paleobotany: An Analysis of Wisconsin Oneota Agricultural Production and Risk Management Strategies Richard Wynn Edwards University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Edwards, Richard Wynn, "The aC nine Surrogacy Approach and Paleobotany: An Analysis of Wisconsin Oneota Agricultural Production and Risk Management Strategies" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 1609. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1609 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CANINE SURROGACY APPROACH AND PALEOBOTANY: AN ANALYSIS OF WISCONSIN ONEOTA AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES by Richard W. Edwards IV A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee December 2017 ABSTRACT: THE CANINE SURROGACY APPROACH AND PALEOBOTANY: AN ANALYSIS OF WISCONSIN ONEOTA AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES by Richard W. Edwards IV The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2017 Under the Supervision of Robert Jeske The goal of this research is to investigate the nature of Upper Mississippian subsistence systems (circa AD 1050-1450), to evaluate the role of agriculture, and to understand how these dietary choices are related to risk management systems and the development of cultural complexity in the Midcontinent. The research uses the Koshkonong Locality of southeastern Wisconsin as a case study and compares it to other Upper Mississippian groups throughout Wisconsin and northeastern Illinois, Middle Mississippian groups in Illinois and southeastern Wisconsin, and contemporaneous Late Woodland groups in southeastern Wisconsin. This study uses two primary lines of evidence; macrobotanical remains and dietary isotopes (δ13C and δ15N) from dogs. The dog values are interpreted as proxies for human food consumption though the lens of the canine surrogacy approach (CSA). Regionally, the data indicate maize was foundational to all examined Upper and Middle Mississippian populations, Upper Mississippians distributed food more equitably than Middle Mississippians, and each Upper Mississippian locality buffered maize in a unique manner. Locally, the data indicate that the Koshkonong residents were under stress from structural violence and that intralocality cooperation would have been essential for the subsistence system to have functioned effectively. ii © Copyright by Richard W. Edwards IV, 2017 All Rights Reserved iii For Jacob, Emily, Mason, Connor, and baby Hill You can do anything you want if you work hard and aim high iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... xiii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 EVALUATING RISK MANAGEMENT IN ONEOTA SOCIETIES: ....................................................................................... 5 PREVIOUS ONEOTA SUBSISTENCE RESEARCH: ........................................................................................................... 8 ORGANIZATION OF THE DISSERTATION: .................................................................................................................... 9 2. Cultural History and Archaeological Background ................................................................ 11 DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS OF PRIMARY STUDY SITES: ............................................................................................. 30 DESCRIPTIONS OF COMPARATIVE SITES: ................................................................................................................. 42 SUMMARY: .............................................................................................................................................................. 60 3. Risk Management and Other Theoretical Considerations .................................................... 61 INTRODUCTION: ....................................................................................................................................................... 61 DEFINING RISK: ....................................................................................................................................................... 64 GENERAL RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES:.......................................................................................................... 67 AGRICULTURAL RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES: ................................................................................................. 73 RISK AND UNCERTAINTY ......................................................................................................................................... 77 A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ONEOTA SUBSISTENCE: .................................................................................... 86 SUMMARY: ............................................................................................................................................................ 104 4. Methods & Methodology .................................................................................................... 107 INTRODUCTION: ..................................................................................................................................................... 107 PALEOETHNOBOTANICAL METHODS ...................................................................................................................... 107 PALEOETHNOBOTANY SAMPLING STRATEGY: ....................................................................................................... 125 CANINE SURROGACY APPROACH/ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS METHODS: ........................................................................ 128 EVALUATION OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS: .............................................................................................................. 130 5. Results of Macrobotanical Data Collection ........................................................................ 134 INTRODUCTION: ..................................................................................................................................................... 134 PALEOETHNOBOTANICAL ANALYSIS: CRESCENT BAY HUNT CLUB: ...................................................................... 134 PALEOETHNOBOTANICAL ANALYSIS: KOSHKONONG CREEK VILLAGE: ................................................................. 142 COMPARISON OF KCV AND CBHC ........................................................................................................................ 150 MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS: ................................................................................................................................... 159 DIACHRONIC TRENDS ............................................................................................................................................ 168 STRUCTURE COMPARISONS: .................................................................................................................................. 177 SUMMARY OF BOTANICAL ANALYSIS: ................................................................................................................... 182 6. Results of Isotopic Data Collection .................................................................................... 184 INTRODUCTION: ..................................................................................................................................................... 184 COMPARATIVE SITE DATA, HUMAN BONE Δ13C AND Δ15N LEVELS: ....................................................................... 185 CANINE SURROGACY APPROACH ISOTOPE RESULTS: ............................................................................................ 192 INTEGRATING THE DATASETS: A REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE .................................................................................... 197 7. Analysis and Discussion ..................................................................................................... 212 INTRODUCTION: ..................................................................................................................................................... 212 QUESTION 1: WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THE FLORAL PORTION OF THE ONEOTA DIET? ........................................... 212 1.1 WHICH PLANTS WERE THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTORS TO THE DIET? .............................................................. 212 1.2 WHAT ROLE DID AGRICULTURAL PLANTS PLAY? .......................................................................................... 213 1.3 DID THE RESIDENTS OF CBHC AND KCV RELY ON THE SAME FOODS? ........................................................ 221 1.4 DID THE RESIDENTS OF CBHC AND KCV USE THE SAME ENVIRONMENTAL
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Office of the State Archaeologist Academic Activities
    Office The Year in Review OSA mission statement, academic activities, staff achievements, annual work plan accomplishments, and plans and prospects for of the State FY 2019. By the Numbers Archaeologist 30,094 An overview of FY 2019 through numbers and charts. Fiscal Year 2019 Student Success Eighteen undergraduate and one graduate students were Annual Report involved in various OSA archaeological and related research and repository activities over the course of the fiscal year. Research The OSA conducts a wide range of research activities to discover the archaeological and architectural history of Iowa and surrounding midcontinent over the last 13,000 years. Bioarchaeology In FY 2019 the OSA Bioarchaeology Program’s efforts have focused on fulfilling its responsibilities towards the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act as well as engaging in public education and outreach events. Strategic Initiatives The OSA provides resources and opportunities that encourage the understanding, appreciation, and stewardship of Iowa’s archaeological past. OSA Mission The Year in The position of State Archaeologist was established in 1959. Read the entire mission statement Review Advisory Committee Indian Advisory Council Academic Activities OSA staff instructed four UI classes during FY 2019 including CRM Archaeology and Human Osteology. OSA hosted eight Brown Bag lectures and a creative writing class for the UI English Department. Office and Staff Achievements During FY 2019, OSA staff were recognized for their outstanding professional presence and decades of service. We also welcomed three new hires to the OSA team! FY 2019 Annual Work Plan Accomplishments In FY 2019 the OSA continued energetically pursuing research, education and outreach, and service activities throughout Iowa, the surrounding region, and internationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Geospatial Considerations Involving Historic General Land Office Maps and Late Prehistoric Bison Remains Near La Crosse, Wisconsin
    Field Notes: A Journal of Collegiate Anthropology Volume 10 Article 11 2019 Geospatial Considerations Involving Historic General Land Office Maps and Late Prehistoric Bison Remains Near La Crosse, Wisconsin Andrew M. Saleh University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/fieldnotes Recommended Citation Saleh, Andrew M. (2019) "Geospatial Considerations Involving Historic General Land Office Maps and Late Prehistoric Bison Remains Near La Crosse, Wisconsin," Field Notes: A Journal of Collegiate Anthropology: Vol. 10 , Article 11. Available at: https://dc.uwm.edu/fieldnotes/vol10/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Field Notes: A Journal of Collegiate Anthropology by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Analyzing Late Prehistoric Bison bison Remains near La Crosse, Wisconsin using Historic General Land Office Maps Andrew M. Saleh University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, USA Abstract: This study used geographic information systems, pre- historic archaeological contexts, and historic General Land Of- fice (GLO) maps to conduct a pilot inter-site analysis involving La Crosse, Wisconsin area Oneota sites with reported Bison bi- son remains as of 2014. Scholars in and around Wisconsin con- tinually discuss the potential reasons why bison remains appear in late prehistoric contexts. This analysis continued that discus- sion with updated methods and vegetation data and provides a case study showing the strength of using historic GLO maps in conjunction with archaeological studies. This research suggests that creating your own maps in coordination with the GLO’s publicly available original surveyor data is more accurate than using the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) vegetation polygon that cites the same data.
    [Show full text]
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open Gregory Oregon 0171N 12796.Pdf
    CHUNKEY, CAHOKIA, AND INDIGENOUS CONFLICT RESOLUTION by ANNE GREGORY A THESIS Presented to the Conflict and Dispute Resolution Program and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science June 2020 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: Anne Gregory Title: Chunkey, Cahokia, and Indigenous Conflict Resolution This thesis has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree in the Conflict and Dispute Resolution Program by: Kirby Brown Chair Eric Girvan Member and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2020. ii © 2020 Anne Gregory This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (United States) License. iii THESIS ABSTRACT Anne Gregory Master of Science Conflict and Dispute Resolution June 2020 Title: Chunkey, Cahokia, and Indigenous Conflicts Resolution Chunkey, a traditional Native American sport, was a form of conflict resolution. The popular game was one of several played for millennia throughout Native North America. Indigenous communities played ball games not only for the important culture- making of sport and recreation, but also as an act of peace-building. The densely populated urban center of Cahokia, as well as its agricultural suburbs and distant trade partners, were dedicated to chunkey. Chunkey is associated with the milieu surrounding the Pax Cahokiana (1050 AD-1200 AD), an era of reduced armed conflict during the height of Mississippian civilization (1000-1500 AD). The relational framework utilized in archaeology, combined with dynamics of conflict resolution, provides a basis to explain chunkey’s cultural impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Investigations Into the King George
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22) Harry Gene Brignac Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brignac Jr, Harry Gene, "Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22)" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 2720. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2720 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE KING GEORGE ISLAND MOUNDS SITE (16LV22) A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology By Harry Gene Brignac Jr. B.A. Louisiana State University, 2003 May, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to God for surrounding me with the people in my life who have guided and supported me in this and all of my endeavors. I have to express my greatest appreciation to Dr. Rebecca Saunders for her professional guidance during this entire process, and for her inspiration and constant motivation for me to become the best archaeologist I can be.
    [Show full text]
  • MCJA Book Reviews Volume 39, 2014
    OPEN ACCESS: MCJA Book Reviews Volume 39, 2014 Copyright © 2014 Midwest Archaeological Conference, Inc. All rights reserved. The Hoxie Farm Site Fortified Village: Late Fisher Phase Occupation and Fortification in South Chicago edited by Douglas K. Jackson and Thomas E. Emerson with contributions by Douglas K. Jackson. Thomas E. Emerson, Madeleine Evans, Ian Fricker, Kathryn C. Egan-Bruhy, Michael L. Hargrave, Terrance J. Martin, Kjersti E. Emerson, Eve A. Hargrave, Kris Hedman, Stephanie Daniels, Brenda Beck, Amanda Butler, Jennifer Howe, and Jean Nelson Research Report No. 27 Thomas E. Emerson, Ph.D. Principal Investigator and Survey Director Illinois State Archaeological Survey A Division of the Prairie Research Institute University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Investigations Conducted by: Illinois State Archaeological Survey University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Investigations Conducted Under the Auspices of: The State of Illinois Department of Transportation Brad H. Koldehoff Chief Archaeologist 2013 Contents List of Figures ...............................................................................................................................ix List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... xv Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... xix 1 Introduction Douglas K. Jackson ..................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Field Collection of Archaeological Materials and Standard Operating Procedures for Curating Department of Defense Archaeological Collections
    Guidelines for the Field Collection of Archaeological Materials and Standard Operating Procedures for Curating Department of Defense Archaeological Collections Prepared for the Legacy Resource Management Program Office Legacy Project No. 98-1714 Mandatory Center of Expertise for the Curation and Management of Archaeological Collections Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 1999 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Guidelines for the Field Collection of Archaeological Materials and Standard Operating Procedures for Curation Department of Defense Archaeological Collections 6. AUTHORS Suzanne Griset and Marc Kodack 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis District 1222 Spruce Street (CEMVS-ED-Z) St. Louis, Missouri 63103-2833 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY Legacy Resource Management Program Office REPORT NUMBER Office of Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Environmental Security) Legacy Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • Pierce Mounds Complex an Ancient Capital in Northwest Florida
    Pierce Mounds Complex An Ancient Capital in Northwest Florida Nancy Marie White Department of Anthropology University of South Florida, Tampa [email protected] Final Report to George J. Mahr, Apalachicola, Florida December 2013 ii ABSTRACT The Pierce site (8Fr14), near the mouth of the Apalachicola River in Franklin County, northwest Florida, was a major prehistoric mound center during the late Early and Middle Woodland (about A.D. 200-700) and Mississippian (about A.D. 1000-1500) periods. People lived there probably continuously during at least the last 2000 years (until right before the European invasion of Florida in the sixteenth century) and took advantage of the strategic location commanding the river and bay, as well as the abundant terrestrial and aquatic resources. Besides constructing several mounds for burial of the dead and probably support of important structures, native peoples left long midden (refuse) ridges of shells, animal bones, artifacts and blackened sandy soils, which built up a large and very significant archaeological site. Early Europeans and Americans who settled in the town of Apalachicola recognized the archaeological importance of Pierce and collected artifacts. But since the site and its spectacular findings were published by C.B. Moore in 1902, much information has been lost or misunderstood. Recent investigations by the University of South Florida were commissioned by the property owner to research and evaluate the significance of the site. There is evidence for an Early Woodland (Deptford) occupation and mound building, possibly as early as A.D. 200. Seven of the mounds form an oval, with the Middle Woodland burial mounds on the west side.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River
    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
    [Show full text]
  • Oriental Bittersweet Orientalcelastrus Bittersweet Orbiculatus Controlcontrol Guidelinesguidelines
    Oriental bittersweet OrientalCelastrus bittersweet orbiculatus ControlControl GuidelinesGuidelines NH Department of Agriculture, Markets & Food, Division of Plant Industry, 29 Hazen Dr, Concord, NH 03301 (603) 271-3488 Common Name: Oriental Bittersweet Latin Name: Celastrus orbiculatus New Hampshire Invasive Species Status: Prohibited (Agr 3800) Native to: Japan, China, Korea Photos by: Douglas Cygan Description: Deciduous vine reaching heights of 40-60'. Bark: Tannish, furrowed. Leaves: Alternate, ovate, bluntly toothed, 3-4'' long by 2/3’s as wide, tapered at the base. Flowers: Small, greenish, blooming in spring. Fruit: Yellow dehiscent capsule surrounding an orange-red aril. Fruits occur in the axils of the stems whereas native bittersweet (Celastrus scandens) fruits at the ends. Zone: 4-8. Habitat: Disturbed edges, roadsides, fields, forests and along rivers and streams. Spread: Birds and humans. Comments: Very aggressive, climbs up and over trees and smothers them. Do not buy wreaths made of these vines. Controls: Difficult to manage. Cutting, pulling, or recommended herbicide use applied to foliage, bark, or cut-stump. General Considerations The introduction of Oriental bittersweet to non infested areas is generally associated with birds and small mammals feeding on the abundant fruits in the fall and excreting the seeds as they move from one area to another. Dispersal is also associated with human activities where earth moving activities occur or when the vines and fruits are collected in the fall for ornamental wreathes and decorations (which is prohibited) and then carelessly discarded. Seed viability and germination rate is relatively high at 90% in the spring of the subsequent growing season, but drops off significantly the following year.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Plant Inventory 21St Century Planting Design and Management
    Tree of Heaven, Ailanthus altissima Species characteristics: • Deciduous Tree • Size: up to 80 feet • Flowers: clusters of yellow-green flowers at the ends of upper branches • Leaves: pinnately compound with 11-14 leaflets • Fruit: seeds develop in the fall, each seed is con tained in a sumara, yellow green changing to orange red in fall, brown in winter • Bark: gray with a snake skin like texture, lenticles WINCHESTER What makes this plant so aggressive? HIGH SCHOOL • Rapid growth rate, saplings can grow 3-4 feet per year • Mature tree can produce 350,00 seeds per year • Seeds are transported by wind and water. • Roots give off a toxin that can inhibit the growth of other plants. • Root sprouts up to 50 feet from trunk. N Why is this plant so damaging to native plant communities? It out competes native species for light. It forms impenetrable SHORE ROAD thickets and tolerates adverse soil conditions. SKILLINGS ROAD 0 50 100 200 Factors that limit species growth: It is intolerant of full shade. Management strategies • Hand pulling of seedlings. • Cutting twice per year, once in June, and again September 15th. • Herbicide application, cut trees and apply undiluted GRIFFIN triclopyr (Brush-B-Gone) to the stump or cut and PHOTOGRAPHY MUSEUM spray resprouts. JENKS CENTER POLICE STATION Species characteristics: • Deciduous woody twining vine FIRE • Size: Can reach 18 meters in height STATION • Flowers: female plants produce small greenish flowers • Leaves: variable in size and shape, alternate arrangement, broadly oblong to sub orbicular,
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Archaeologist Volume 37 No
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 37 NO. 3 FALL 1987 Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio TERM EXPIRESs A.SO. OFFICERS Back Issues President Maitha Potter Otto. Ohio Historical Society, Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: Columbus, OH 43211-Tel, 614/297-2641; Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N Converse $ 5,00 Home 614/846-7640 Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 4 00 Vice-President Donald A Casto, 138 Ann Ct., Lancaster Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N Converse $10.00 The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N Converse $15 00 OH 43130-Tel 614/653-9477 Back issues —black and white —each $ 4 00 Exec Sec. Michael W Schoenfeld, 524 Sycamore Dr.. Back issues —lour full color plates -each $ 4 00 Pickenngton. OH 43147 -Tel 614/837-7088 Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 Treasurer Stephen J Parker, 1859 Frank Dr., Lancaster, are generally out of print but copies are available from time to OH43130-Tel 614 653-6642 time Write to business office for prices and availability Recording See Barbara Motts, 7050 Refugee Rd . Canal Winchester, OH 431 10-Tel 614/837-4862; ASO Chapters Bus 614 898-41 16 Ininied. Past Pres. Don Gehlbach, 3435 Sciotangy Dr., Aboriginal Explorers Club Columbus, OH 43221 -Tel, 614/459-0808; President: Mark Cline. 1127 Esther, Wellsville, OH 439 Bus 614/888-3572 Blue Jacket Editor Robert N Converse. 199 Converse Dr., Plain City, President: Phil Brandt. 6796 C.R 14, West Liberty, OH 43357 OH 43064 - Tel 614 873-5471 Cuyahoga Valley 1990 Stephen Puttera, Jr., 4696 Hillside Rd., Seven Hills, OH President: Bill Mitchell, 153 Sterling Ave,, Orrville, OH 44667 Meeting Place: Summit Lapidary Club, 244 Chestnut Blvd 44131 -Tel.
    [Show full text]