DOCSLIB.ORG

Caudal Distraction by Rat Snakes (Colubridae, Elaphe): a Novel Behavior Used When Capturing Mammalian Prey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Caudal Distraction by Rat Snakes (Colubridae, Elaphe): a Novel Behavior Used When Capturing Mammalian Prey Great Basin Naturalist Volume 59 Number 4 Article 8 10-15-1999 Caudal distraction by rat snakes (Colubridae, Elaphe): a novel behavior used when capturing mammalian prey Stephen J. Mullin University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Mullin, Stephen J. (1999) "Caudal distraction by rat snakes (Colubridae, Elaphe): a novel behavior used when capturing mammalian prey," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 59 : No. 4 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol59/iss4/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Great Ba....in Naturalist 59(4), ©1999, pp. 361....167 CAUDAL DISTRACTION BY RAT SNAKES (COLUBHIDAE, ELAPHE): A NOVEL BEHAVIOR USED WHEN CAPTURING MAMMALIAN PREY Stephen]. Mullin1 AJ3S11UCT.--el.mthtl movement in snakes trulY serve ei.ther a pl'Cdatory (e.g., caudal luring) or defensive (e.g., rattling, aposem,ttism) fUllction, I descliho n new behavioral pattern of tai.l movement in snakes. Gray rat snakl.'$ (Elaphe OhSO!etd spiloid.es) fi)raging on ~ma11 mmnmnls (Mus d01ne~·ticus) Inoved. their tails in un erratic, whiplike fashion uIter detecting prey in their vidnity. The thrashing movement in the horizontal plfme was audibly and visually obviolls, resulting in dis­ placement of leaf litter around the hlil. All subjects displayed the behavior, hilt not in all foraging episodes. Shorler durations ofcaudal distraction~1.l1lecl in greater predator SIIt.'t.'eSS during the 1st attempt <It prey c<lpl'ure. Caudal dis­ traction may facilitate prey capture by gray rat snakes by directing tbe attention of prey away fmm lhe approHching head of the snake. Key words: caudal diJplalj, pre<!awry behaviol; deceit, Elaphe obsolela, flUUnrludian p'-ey, rat snake, Cnlul.1t'hlae. Visual communication by snakes (Carpenter 1993, Rahatsky and Farrell 1996) and at least 1 1977, Carpenter and Ferguson 1977) occurs in lizard specics (Morray et at. 1991). It is typi­ the absence of appendages used by many cally displayed by snakes foraging from lin other vertebrate taxa (CuUen 1972, Enquist et ambush posture (Chiszar et al. 1990). al. 1985). Limblessness necessitates the use of Both defensive tail vibration and caudal lur­ head, body, or tail for visual display. Snake de­ ing have been observed in rat snakes (Elaphe fens:ive displays frequently il1volve tail move­ obsolet<I; TIebout 1997; personal observation). ment or posturing (Greene 1988, Sazima and While observing a gray rat snake (E. o. spiloides) Abe 1991). In particnl",; members of the sub­ foraging for a small mammal (Mus dorne.1icus), family Crotalinae have evolved a specialized 1 recorded a tail display unlike that of either morphology at the taU tip, the rattle. Greene loring (Chiszar et aI. 1990) or defensive rat­ (1992) suggested that the incipient structure tling or tail vibration (Greene 1988). During serves us a warning device to snake predators. subsequent observations, several individuals a conclusion that is the subject of continued displayed similar taU movement when approach­ discussion (Sisk and Jackson 1997, Tiehout ing their prey. The purpose of this study is to 1997). Several species ofcolubrid snakes (Greene descrihe a heretofore undocurnented prellu­ 1988) and other elongate reptiles (Greene 1973) tory behavior of gray rat snakes that was dis­ also perform defensive tail displays. played only in tl,e presence of mammalian Another fonn of taU movement, termed prey. Frequency and duration of this behavior caudal/tIring, fucilitates prey capture. This be­ and its facilitation of prey capture arc also havior is described as a slow, undulatory or reported. Becaose this behavior parallels cau­ vermiform movement of the tail while it is dal luring and defensive tail vibration, I term held upright in close proximity to the snake's the novel behavior caudal distraction.. head (Heatwole ,uld Davison 1976). Caudallur­ ing is presumably mimetiC, in that the move­ MATERIALS AND METHODS ment is thought to resemble an insect huva OT worm and thus attracts potential prey to within r first noticcd caudal disb'action in a 113­ striking dLstance of the otherwise motionless em snout-vent length (SVL) female gray rat snake. Caudal luring has been documcnted in snake foraging for a mixed-sb'ain mouse (M. nearly aU fiunilies of snakes (Carpenter et at. domesticus). The snake was in an enclosure 1978, Radcliffe et al. 1980, Sazima and Puorto tllat simulated a bottomland hardwood forest 1Dellurtll1<:nt of 13inJO/,.'Y. University of Me,nphi~> Mell1phl~, TN 38152. l'r~enl (u::Idre$~' [kplll'tO\onl of 13iolOjl;1cul Scf«llOO&. EiI.I!I,,·n lllilmis UIlive-!'!'It.v. Charleston, IL 61920. 361 362 GREAT BASiN NATURALIST [Volume 59 habitat (see below). Behavior was documented Adult male lllic-e were placed in the enclo­ on videotape to permit detailed description. sure for a minimum of 10 min for acclimatiza­ Several other adult snakes displayed this tion. Only adult maJe mice having dark brown behavior with IitUe departure from the oligi­ pelage were used as prey duling the observa­ nal pattern. To examine possible differences in tions to minimize visual and vomeronasal dif­ capture success and latency to prey capture ferences among prey available to snakes (J ~oop that might be dependent on the use of this 1970) and provide prey visually similar to behavior, I recorded adult gray rat snakes (n those which sn.\kes encounter in the field. All =15) involved in {(>raging episodes under sim­ mice had similar mass (30.7 + 0.5 g, n = 30), ilar conditions. although the ratio of prey mass to snake mass Subjects (10 males and 5 females. >100 cm was not fixed during the study. A gray rat snake SVL) were obtained fi·OOl forested and semi· was placed in thc corner of the enclosure far­ rural areas within Shelby County, Tennessee, thest removed from the prey. Because observer and maintained 'in captivity at temperature presence may influence snake behavior (Drum­ and photopeliod regimes of 26-29°C and mond 198.3), behaviors were recorded by a 14:10 h light:dark, respectively. Suhjects had video carner.! on a tripod elevated over the spent between 1 and 16 months in captivity enclosure floor. The camera was always Oli­ prior to examination. Snakes were housed jn­ ented toward the snake, meauing that possible uividually in cages measuring a minimum of differences in prey behavior were not recorded. 30 x 60 x 30 ern, provided with water ad libi­ Occasionallv,, caudal distraction was initiated tum, and fed either KorUlem Bobwhite Quail with the b,il outside the field of view; bow­ (Colinus vir{"rinianlls) eggs or mixed-strain mice ever, tail movement was audibly discernible as weekly. Excepting; o<..:ca.~iona1 cage cleaning and leaf litte.- in the immediate vicinity was dis­ monthly SVL (±O.5 Col) measurements, sub­ turbed and could thus be recorded from its jects were handled as little as possihle to mini.· initial occurrence. mize any hehavioral modifications resulting The latency to suc(.--essfiIl mouse capture may from prolonged captivity (Warwick 1990, Ford lwve depended, in part, on initial distances 1995). Because recently fed snakes may exhibit separating the snake and its prey. Howevel; shilts in behavioral pattern (Beck 1996) or the colJlined, relatively sm,Jl euclosure proba­ alteTation of locomotor pClformance (Martin bly limited the influence of initial separation 1996), individuals were placed on a restricted distance. Missed attempts at capturing the diet (water alone) for 3 wk prior to experimen­ mouse and frequency and duration of caudal llJ trials. Between 23 April 1995 and 25 March distraction were recorded from videotaped 1996, snakes were allowed to forage indiVidu­ observations. A repeated-measures analysis of ally for mice on at least 2. different occasions, variance (ANOVAR; each mbject was recorded each separated by a 3-wk resmeted diet. on 2 occasions) was used to determine An enclosure (2.25 m2 and 2 m in height), whether those snakes exhibiting caudill dis­ c'Onstructed to simulate bottomland hardwood traction required fewer attempts to Sllccess­ forest ofthe wildlile m'magement area ofnearby /llily capture mke. l'aramemc statistics (Scheffe Mecman-Shelby Forest State Park (MSFSP), 1959, Cohen 1965) were also used to detect Tennessee, ,;vas maintained at the photoperiod any relationships between frequency and/or and temperature regimes described above. duration of caudal distraction and snake gen­ ArtHicial vegetation simulated mean recorded der (ANOVAR) or sile (Pearson's regression). level of vegetation density al MSFSP (mea­ Statistical tests were conducted using Super­ sured in June 19<J4; ,. + 1 Sf = 64 + 2.3 plants ANOVA~ software (Abacus Conccpts) at an 01-2, n = 144). Leaves, obtained at field siles accepted sil,'Dificanee level ofa = 0.05. where snakes were collected, pro,idee! a nat­ ural substrate on the ellclosure floor. Light RESULTS intensity on the enclosure Hoor approximated Description levcls measured at MSFSP during UlC vegeta­ tion sampling period (for IllJiher details on Caudal distraction is the use of tail move­ hahitat sampling and enclosure construction, ments by an elongate predator which serve to see Mullin 1998, Mullin et al. 1998). hold the attention of a prey animal while the 1999J CAUDAL BEHAVIOR IN El..1I'H£ 363 predator's bead is moved to within slrildng distraction dJsplay; instances ofstationary t:au­ range ofthe prey. dal distraction were frequently accompanied In E. o. spiloides c-audal disb1lction displaL-ed by some time displaying the hehavior while leaves near the blil. was visually conspicnous advancing toward the mouse. There was no when unobscurcd by emergent vegetation, and difference in the amount of time a snake dis­ was audible from a distance ofseveral meters.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evidence of Lingual-Luring by an Aquatic Snake
    Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 34 No. 1 pp 67-74, 2000 Copyright 2000 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Evidence of Lingual-luring by an Aquatic Snake HARTWELL H. WELSH, JR. AND AMY J. LIND Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 1700 Bayview Dr., Arcata, California 95521, USA. E-mail: hwelsh/[email protected] ABSTRACT.-We describe and quantify the components of an unusual snake behavior used to attract fish prey: lingual-luring. Our earlier research on the foraging behavior of the Pacific Coast aquatic garter snake (Thamnophis atratus) indicated that adults are active foragers, feeding primarily on aquatic Pacific giant salamanders (Dicamptodon tenebrosus) in streambed substrates. Juvenile snakes, however, use primarily ambush tactics to capture larval anurans and juvenile salmonids along stream margins, behaviors that include the lingual-luring described here. We found that lingual-luring differed from typical chemosensory tongue-flicking by the position of the snake, contact of the tongue with the water surface, and the length of time the tongue was extended. Luring snakes are in ambush position and extend and hold their tongues out rigid, with the tongue-tips quivering on the water surface, apparently mimicking insects in order to draw young fish within striking range. This behavior is a novel adaptation of the tongue-vomeronasal system by a visually-oriented predator. The luring of prey by snakes has been asso- luring function (Mushinsky, 1987; Ford and ciated primarily with the use of the tail, a be- Burghardt, 1993). However, Lillywhite and Hen- havior termed caudal luring (e.g., Neill, 1960; derson (1993) noted the occurrence of a pro- Greene and Campbell, 1972; Heatwole and Dav- longed extension of the tongue observed in vine ison, 1976; Jackson and Martin, 1980; Schuett et snakes (e.g., Kennedy, 1965; Henderson and al., 1984; Chizar et al., 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Selection by an Ectothermic Predator in a Dynamic Thermal Landscape
    Received: 2 May 2017 | Revised: 16 August 2017 | Accepted: 17 August 2017 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3440 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Resource selection by an ectothermic predator in a dynamic thermal landscape Andrew D. George1 | Grant M. Connette2 | Frank R. Thompson III3 | John Faaborg1 1Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA Abstract 2Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Predicting the effects of global climate change on species interactions has remained Front Royal, VA, USA difficult because there is a spatiotemporal mismatch between regional climate models 3U.S.D.A. Forest Service Northern Research and microclimates experienced by organisms. We evaluated resource selection in a Station, Columbia, MO, USA predominant ectothermic predator using a modeling approach that permitted us to Correspondence assess the importance of habitat structure and local real- time air temperatures within Andrew D. George, Department of Biology, Pittsburg State University, Pittsburg, KS USA. the same modeling framework. We radio- tracked 53 western ratsnakes (Pantherophis Email: [email protected] obsoletus) from 2010 to 2013 in central Missouri, USA, at study sites where this spe- cies has previously been linked to prey population demographics. We used Bayesian discrete choice models within an information theoretic framework to evaluate the sea- sonal effects of fine- scale vegetation structure and thermal conditions on ratsnake resource selection. Ratsnake resource selection was influenced most by canopy cover, canopy cover heterogeneity, understory cover, and air temperature heterogeneity. Ratsnakes generally preferred habitats with greater canopy heterogeneity early in the active season, and greater temperature heterogeneity later in the season. This sea- sonal shift potentially reflects differences in resource requirements and thermoregula- tion behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/06/2021 09:29:00AM Via Free Access 42 Luiselli Et Al
    Contributions to Zoology, 74 (1/2) 41-49 (2005) Analysis of a herpetofaunal community from an altered marshy area in Sicily; with special remarks on habitat use (niche breadth and overlap), relative abundance of lizards and snakes, and the correlation between predator abundance and tail loss in lizards Luca Luiselli1, Francesco M. Angelici2, Massimiliano Di Vittorio3, Antonio Spinnato3, Edoardo Politano4 1 F.I.Z.V. (Ecology), via Olona 7, I-00198 Rome, Italy. E-mail: [email protected] 2 F.I.Z.V. (Mammalogy), via Cleonia 30, I-00152 Rome, Italy. 3 Via Jevolella 2, Termini Imprese (PA), Italy. 4 Centre of Environmental Studies ‘Demetra’, via Tomassoni 17, I-61032 Fano (PU), Italy Abstract relationships, thus rendering the examination of the relationships between predators and prey an extreme- A field survey was conducted in a highly degraded barren en- ly complicated task for the ecologist (e.g., see Con- vironment in Sicily in order to investigate herpetofaunal com- nell, 1975; May, 1976; Schoener, 1986). However, munity composition and structure, habitat use (niche breadth and there is considerable literature (both theoretical and overlap) and relative abundance of a snake predator and two spe- empirical) indicating that case studies of extremely cies of lizard prey. The site was chosen because it has a simple community structure and thus there is potentially less ecological simple communities, together with the use of appropri- complexity to cloud any patterns observed. We found an unexpect- ate minimal models, can help us to understand the edly high overlap in habitat use between the two closely related basis of complex patterns of ecological relationships lizards that might be explained either by a high competition for among species (Thom, 1975; Arditi and Ginzburg, space or through predator-mediated co-existence i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2009 RURAL LIVING in ARIZONA Volume 3, Number 2
    ARIZONA COOPERATIVE E TENSION THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND LIFE SCIENCES Backyards& Beyond Spring 2009 RURAL LIVING IN ARIZONA Volume 3, Number 2 Spring 2009 1 Common Name: Globemallow Scientific Name: Sphaeralcea spp. Globemallow is a common native wildflower found throughout most of Arizona. There are 16 species (and several varieties) occurring in the state, the majority of which are perennials. They are found between 1,000 and 6,000 feet in elevation and grow on a variety of soil types. Depending on the species, globemallows are either herbaceous or slightly woody at the base of the plant and grow between 2-3 feet in height (annual species may only grow to 6 inches). The leaves are three-lobed, and while the shape varies by species, they are similar enough to help identify the plant as a globemallow. The leaves have star-shaped hairs that give the foliage a gray-green color. Flower color Plant Susan Pater varies from apricot (the most common) to red, pink, lavender, pale yellow and white. Many of the globemallows flower in spring and again in summer. Another common name for globemallow is sore-eye poppy (mal de ojos in Spanish), from claims that the plant irritates the eyes. In southern California globemallows are known as plantas muy malas, translated to mean very bad plants. Ironically, the Pima Indian name for globemallow means a cure for sore eyes. The Hopi Indians used the plant for healing certain ailments and the stems as a type of chewing gum, and call the plant kopona.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Australasian Society for the Study of Animal Behaviour & the International Union for the Study of Social Insects (Australian Chapter)
    ASSAB 2007 AUSTRALASIAN SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR & THE INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL INSECTS (AUSTRALIAN CHAPTER) 12-15 April 2007 The Australian National University Canberra Venue Robertson Lecture Theatre Research School of Biological Sciences Building 46E Hosted by the Research School of Biological Sciences 2 Sponsored by the ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision Science (ACEVS) http://www.vision.edu.au/ LOCAL HOSTS: JOCHEN ZEIL Visual Sciences, Research School of Biological Sciences The Australian National University AJAY NARENDRA Visual Sciences, Research School of Biological Sciences The Australian National University ROB HEINSOHN Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies The Australian National University JAN HEMMI Visual Sciences, Research School of Biological Sciences The Australian National University RICHARD PETERS Visual Sciences, Research School of Biological Sciences The Australian National University WITH SPECIAL THANKS TO THE ASSAB TREASURER, XIMENA NELSON & THE ASSAB PRESIDENT PHIL TAYLOR FOR THEIR SUPPORT Thursday, 12 April Friday, 13 April Saturday, 14 April Sunday, 15 April 8:00 Plenary Lecture Tinbergen Centenary Lecture IUSSI Lecture 9:00 ASSAB 2007 Barbara Webb Chris Evans & Jochen Zeil Ryszard Maleszka 12 - 15 April 2007 09:30 09:30 09:30 Session 3: RSBS Session 8: Session 12: 10:00 SENSORY SYSTEMS & SOCIAL INSECTS I COMMUNICATION I HOMING & NAVIGATION Tea/CoffeeTea/Coffee Break Break Tea/Coffee Break 11:00 Session 9: FORAGING, COMPETITION & Session 4: LIFE HISTORIES I Session 13:
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy Of
    Serological Relationships among some Midwestern Snakes Sherman A. Minton Jr., Department of Microbilogy and Immunology Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202 Abstract Using immunoelectrophoresis, serum samples from 24 species of midwestern snakes were reacted against antiserums raised against serums of Elaphe obsoleta, Natrix sipedon, and Agkistrodon piscivorus. On the basis of immunoelectrophoretic patterns, three clusters of species can be recognized. One consists of Natrix (3 sp.), Thamnophis (2 sp.), Regina septemvittata, Clonophis kirtlandi, Storeria dekayi and Virginia valeriae. A second consists of Elaphe (2 sp.), Lampropeltis (3 sp.) and Pituophis melanoleucus. The third consists of Agkistrodon (2sp.), Sistrurus catenatus, and Crotalus horridus. Five species {Coluber constrictor, Diadophis punctatus, Carphophis amoenus, Farancia abacura, and Heterodon platyrhinos) do not fit well into any of the above groups nor do they appear closely related to each other. Immunoelectrophoretic patterns do not indicate a markedly closer relationship between the Natrix and Elaphe groups of nonvenomous snakes than exists between these groups and the Agkistrodon group of pit vipers. Elaphe, Natrix and Agkistrodon all have species in east Asia, and the American groups presumably evolved from this stock. Other relationships and their zoogeographic implications are discussed. Introduction About 38 species of snakes occur in Indiana and adjoining states. Traditional taxonomy divides them into two families, the venomous pit vipers (Crotalinae, now generally considered a subfamily of the Viperidae) and the "typical nonvenomous snakes" of the family Colubridae. However, work during the past decade by investigators using both morphological and nonmorphological criteria has shown the Colubridae to be a highly heterogenous group (2,6,9,12,13).
    [Show full text]
  • American Corn Snake Risk Assessment
    Invasive animal risk assessment Biosecurity Queensland Agriculture Fisheries and Department of American corn snake Elaphe guttata Steve Csurhes and Paul Fisher First published 2009 Updated 2016 © State of Queensland, 2016. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0/au/deed.en" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en P e s t a n i m a l r i s k a s s e s s m e n t : American corn snake Elaphe guttata 2 Contents Summary 4 Introduction 5 Identity and taxonomy 5 Taxonomy 5 Description and biology 5 Diet 7 Reproduction 7 Predators and diseases 7 Origin and distribution 9 Status in Australia and Queensland 10 Preferred habitat 10 History as a pest elsewhere 11 Pest potential in Queensland 11 Climate match 11 Habitat match 12 Generalist diet 13 High fecundity 13 Risk of introduction and release 13 Numerical risk analysis 13 Appendix 14 Risk assessment using the Australian reptile and amphibian model 14 Risk assessment using the bird and mammal model (adapted for reptiles) 14 References 15 P e s t a n i m a l r i s k a s s e s s m e n t : American corn snake Elaphe guttata 3 Summary Elaphe guttata (American corn snake) is a small to medium-sized slender snake up to 180 cm long, native to the south-eastern United States.
    [Show full text]
  • "Black Snakes": Identification and Ecology1
    WEC214 "Black Snakes": Identification and Ecology1 Steve A. Johnson and Monica E. McGarrity2 Introduction Black-Colored Snakes in the Southeast The southeastern United States is home to a great diversity of snakes. There are about 45 species of Some snake species look quite similar and may snakes (only 6 of which are venomous) that may be be difficult for those inexperienced with snakes to found along the Atlantic and Gulf coastal states from confidently identify. Among these are several species Louisiana to North Carolina. These snakes live in a of southeastern snakes commonly called “black variety of upland and wetland habitats and play snakes” because of their primarily black coloration. important roles in the region's ecology. They are These include the Black Swampsnake, Black both predators and prey, and thus form important Ratsnake, Ring-necked Snake, Red-bellied links in natural food webs. Mudsnake, Black Pinesnake, Eastern Indigo Snake and the Southern Black Racer. The latter two — Regrettably, populations of many species of Eastern Indigo and Black Racer—are the species snakes are declining not only throughout the most often referred to as “black snakes”. southeastern United States but also worldwide. These declines are largely due to habitat loss and In addition to those listed above, individuals of degradation, high mortality on roads and pollution several species of water snakes, the Eastern associated with development, agriculture and other Hog-nosed Snake and the venomous Cottonmouth human activities. In addition, introduction of Moccasin may be black colored to a great extent, invasive species, disease, parasitism and even climate depending on the age of the individual and the habitat change may exert negative effects on snake in which it is found.
    [Show full text]
  • Prey-Handling Behavior of Hatchling Elaphe Helena (Colubridae)
    Herpetologica, 59(4), 2003, 469–474 Ó 2003 by The Herpetologists’ League, Inc. PREY-HANDLING BEHAVIOR OF HATCHLING ELAPHE HELENA (COLUBRIDAE) 1,2 RITA S. MEHTA Department of Biology, University of Texas, Tyler, TX 75719, USA ABSTRACT: The effects of prey size on prey-handling behavior for 60 ingestively naive hatchling Elaphe helena were studied in the laboratory. Hatchlings were randomly assigned to one of three diet categories in which prey (Mus musculus) varied by relative mass differences of 20–35%, 40–46%, or 50–59% of an individual snake’s own body mass. The effects of prey size on capture position, direction of ingestion, condition of prey at ingestion (dead/alive), feeding duration, and prey-handling tactic were observed and recorded for each feeding episode. Results indicated that prey size significantly affected the prey-handling behavior of hatchling E. helena. In the largest relative mass category, hatchlings captured prey by the anterior end more often than in the smaller two relative mass categories. Prey from the smallest relative mass category were simply seized whereas, in the medium and large categories, pinion and constriction behaviors were observed. Time to subdue and ingest the prey item increased with prey size categories. Key words: Colubridae; Effects of prey size; Elaphe helena; Prey-handling behavior THE SIZE, type, and activity level of various (i.e., press prey against the substrate with the prey are thought to influence the feeding anterior portion of the body) and constrict behaviors for many advanced snakes (de small active mice than nestling rats. Further- Queiroz, 1984; Moon, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Nelson Et Al No Highlight-1 Edit Changes
    1 Receiver psychology and the design of the deceptive caudal luring signal of the death 2 adder 3 Ximena J. Nelsona,b* Daniel T. Garnettc, 1 Christopher S. Evansb, 2 4 5 aSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury 6 bCentre for the Integrative Study of Animal Behaviour, Macquarie University 7 cDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University 8 Received 6 July 2009 9 Initial acceptance 4 September 2009 10 Final acceptance 30 November 2009 11 MS. number: 09-00453R 12 13 *Correspondence: X. J. Nelson, School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, 14 Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand. 15 E-mail address: [email protected] (X. J. Nelson). 16 1D. T. Garnett is at the Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, 17 NSW 2109 Australia. 18 2C. S. Evans is at the Centre for the Integrative Study of Animal Behaviour, Macquarie 19 University, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia. 20 1 21 Signal design can reflect the sensory properties of receivers. The death adder, Acanthophis 22 antarcticus, attracts prey by wriggling the distal portion of its tail (caudal luring). To 23 understand the design of this deceptive signal, we explored perceptual processes in a 24 representative prey species: the Jacky dragon, Amphibolurus muricatus. We used 3D 25 animations of fast and slow death adder luring movements against different backgrounds, to 26 test the hypothesis that caudal luring mimics salient aspects of invertebrate prey. Moving 27 stimuli elicited predatory responses, especially against a conspicuous background. To identify 28 putative models for caudal luring, we used an optic flow algorithm to extract velocity values 29 from video sequences of 61 moving invertebrates caught in lizard territories, and compared 30 these to the velocity values of death adder movements.
    [Show full text]
  • Elaphe Subocularis (Brown) Trans-Pecos Rat Snake
    268.1 REPTILIA: SQUAMATA: SERPENTES: COLUBRIDAE ELAPHE SUBOCULARIS Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. of the Edwards Plateau south through Coahuila and Chihuahua, Mexico, including portions of eastern Durango and western Nue• WORTHINGTON,RICHARDD. 1980. Elaphe subocularis. vo Leon. Literature records include the following: New Mexico (Lewis, 1948, 1950; Dowling, 1957; Jameson, 1957; Gehlbach, 1959); Texas (Raun and Gehlbach, 11172and references there• Elaphe subocularis (Brown) in; Mather and Dixon, 1976; Tryon, 1976; Worthington, 1976); Trans-Pecos rat snake Chihuahua (Axtell and Webb, 1963); Coahuila (Smith, 1939; Schmidt and Owens, 1944); Durango (Webb, 1960); Nuevo Coluber subocularis Brown, 1901:492. Type-locality, "Davis Leon (Martin del Campo, 1953; Conant, 1965). Mountains, fifty miles southwest of Pecos, near the head of Toyah Creek." Holotype, Acad. Natur. Sci. Philadelphia 13733, adult male, collected by Mr. E. Mayenberg, 1901 (not • FOSSIL RECORD. Brattstrom (1964) reported Elaphe sub• examined by author). ocularis from several Pleistocene cave deposits on the western Elaphe subocularis: Stejneger and Barbour, 1917:84. Name val• flank of Pyramid Peak, Organ Mountains, Dona Ana County, New idated by Internat!. Comm. Zoo!. Nomenc!., 1965:182. Mexico .. Elaphe sclerotica: Smith, 1941:135. Substitute name for Coluber subocularis Brown, a secondary homonym of Bascanion sub• • PERTINENTLITERATURE. Important reviews are Dowling oculare Cope, 1866; name invalidated by Internat!. Comm. (1957), Wright and Wright (1957),
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Use and Seasonal Activity Patterns of the Great Plains Ratsnake (Elaphe Guttata Emoryi) in Central Texas
    THE SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST 53(4):444–449 DECEMBER 2008 HABITAT USE AND SEASONAL ACTIVITY PATTERNS OF THE GREAT PLAINS RATSNAKE (ELAPHE GUTTATA EMORYI ) IN CENTRAL TEXAS JINELLE H. SPERRY* AND CHRISTOPHER A. TAYLOR Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820 *Correspondent: [email protected] ABSTRACT—The Great Plains ratsnake (Elaphe guttata emoryi) is a poorly known species of the central and southern United States. We captured 24 Great Plains ratsnakes over 3 years at Fort Hood, Texas, and used radiotelemetry to determine habitat use and seasonal activity patterns of five adult male snakes. Great Plains ratsnakes showed an affinity for human-made structures with the majority of locations in rock structures used to control erosion. When compared to random sites, snake-selected sites were in areas of increased structure with more trees and ground cover and closer to habitat edges. Despite Great Plains ratsnakes having been documented preying on nests of arboreal birds, tracked snakes were found almost exclusively at or below ground level. Snakes were active year round and did not exhibit distinct hibernation times or sites. Snakes exhibited a bimodal pattern of activity with peaks in late spring and autumn, most likely due to temperature constraints. RESUMEN—La serpiente (Elaphe guttata emoryi) es una especie muy poco conocida de la parte central y sur de los Estados Unidos. Capturamos 24 E. g. emoryi en Fort Hood, Texas, durante 3 an˜os y usamos radiotelemetrı´a en cinco serpientes macho adultas para determinar su uso de ha´bitat y su actividad estacional.
    [Show full text]