Animal Diversity Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Animal Diversity Introduction BLY102 (GENERAL BIOLOGY II) ANIMAL DIVERSITY INTRODUCTION • Animal diversity deals with natural history, classification, characteristics ,conservation and distribution information on thousands of animal species. • About 1.3million living species have been identified. • With this large variety of animals scientists must find a meaningful way of classifying, identifying and naming them. Olatubi I.V 2 CLASSIFICATION • Generally, all animals are grouped into these ranks. • Kingdom • Phylum • Class • Order • Family • Genus • Species Olatubi I.V 3 IDENTIFICATION • All animals are given two names termed ‘Binomial Nomenclature’ • First name is from the Genus the animal belongs • Second name is the name of the Species to which it belongs • For example; Homo sapiens Olatubi I.V 4 FEATURES OF ANIMALS • Some features common to all animals are highlighted below: • Mode of Nutrition: Heterotrophic. • Cell structure (Eukaryotes, no cell wall, body held together by structural proteins such as collagen) • Nervous and muscle tissues are unique to animals. • Reproduction is sexual with diploid stage dominating life cycle: • Cleavage: either spiral in Protostome or radial/ intermediate in Deuterostome. • Possess at least one larval stage Olatubi I.V 5 FEATURES OF ANIMALS cont’d • Hox genes (unique to animals): regulates the development of body forms. • Body plan (radial/bilateral, cephalization (head)). • Tissues: ectoderm(embryo surface), endoderm (archenteron),mesoderm. • *diploblastic, triploblastic • Body cavity: true coelom(derived from the mesoderm),pseudo: derived from the mesoderm and endoderm. Olatubi I.V 6 THE PROTOZOA • Derived from the greek word protos=first, zoon=animal. • They are the first assemblage of eukaryotic unicellular organisms with animal like features. • protozoans are the simplest forms of animal life Characteristics They are unicellular organisms but some are with multicellular stages in their life cycle. They show an amazing degree of differentiation at their protoplasmic level of organization. They are mostly microscopic. Many have no body axis no plane of symmetry and bodies are not divided into cells no tissues no organ. They posses functional units termed organelles. Olatubi I.V 7 THE PROTOZOA ‘xtics cont’d Locomotion is by any of the three organelles; pseudopodia, flagella and cilia. Nutrition is either autotrophic or heterotrophic. Heterotrophic forms may also be saprozoic taking in dissolved substances in their surrounding by diffusion active transport or pinacytosis. Reproduction is by Asexual and Sexual means. asexual reproduction is by binary fission, multiple fission or schizogony and budding. In sexual reproduction when nuclear material is exchanged between mates the sexual reproduction is called conjugation. Embryonic development does not occur some protozoans. occur in colonies and certain colonials 2 types of vacuoles are present food vacuole Into which food accumulates. contractile vacuole or water expulsion vesicles(wev) which function principally in osmoregulation Olatubi I.V 8 CLASSIFICATION It is difficult to classify protozoans particularly on the account of numerous modification of their life cycle but has been classified into four classes based on its locomotary organs 1. Class Rhizopoda - Locomotary organ: pseudopodia Mostly free living, some are parasitic Examples: Amoeba, Entamoeba 2. Class Mastigophora/ Flagellata - Locomotory organ: Flagella Free living or parasite. Body covered with cellulose, chitin or silica. Examples: Giardia, Euglena, Trypanosoma Olatubi I.V 9 CLASSIFICATION cont’d 3. Class Sporozoa - Locomotory organ: Absent Exclusively endoparasites Examples: Plasmodium, Monocystis 4. Class Ciliata - Locomotary organ: Cillia Nuclei two types i.e. Macronucleus and Micronucleus. Examples: Paramecium, Voricella, Blantidium 0 Olatubi I.V 1 PHYLUM PORIFERA Derived from Latin words “porus”= pore and “Ferre” = bear Characteristics Sponges are multicellular organisms having a variety of shapes. Some form crusts, some are simple tubes, some are vase shape while others can be cup shaped, massive clumps, fan shaped, finger like bulges, treelike or even bushy. They maybe soft, brittle or hard and asymmetrical but some are radially symmetrical. They posses Spicules which forms the skeletal structure where they interlock to form a delicate framework of tubes inside and outside the body and on this basis they are classified. False body cavity and all the cells and tissues surround a water filled space. 1 Ol atubi I.V 1 PHYLUM PORIFERA cont’d Members also possess: a few tissues with no organs. Three main layers of their body structure are: a layer of flattened epidermal cells, a semi fluid matrix and a layer of flagellated collar cell. Numerous pores by means of which water and other plankton enter the sponge body. Also used to control water flow through the spongocoel (body cavity). Flagellated cells to circulate water through a unique system of water canals. No proper digestive, nervous or circulatory system. Unique water canal system which are of three types – Asconoid, Syconoid and Leuconoid. 2 Olatubi I.V 1 PHYLUM PORIFERA cont’d The power of cell aggregation is tremendous in sponges. If cut into a million minute pieces, they can still come together and re-form into a fully functional sponge. Excretion and respiratory (gas exchange) occurs by simple diffusion Most cells of freshwater sponges contain contractile vacuoles for osmoregulation. Reproduction can be asexual or sexual; Asexual reproduction is either by fragmentation or budding Sexual reproduction is by the production of sperms from the choanocytes and eggs in the mesohyl. Sponges are generally hermaphroditic, but can be only one gender at a time, being either male or female 3 Olatubi I.V 1 CLASSIFICATION 1. Class Calcarea: This class consists of members with calcareous spicules occuring in shallow waters. Examples are Caltrina, Schypha, Leucosolenia. 2. Class Hexactinelida: members are the ‘glass sponges’ with siliceous spicules. They consist of a small group in the deep sea; their growth is orientated to the constant water currents there. Their tissues are 75% syncitial (lacking cell boundaries). Even the choanocytes are not separate cells. There are no pinacocytes and no cells with any contractility. The skeleton is a lattice made from six-rayed spicules of silica. Examples are Hyalonema(glass rope sponge), Euplectella (venus flower basket) 4 Olatubi I.V 1 CLASSIFICATION CONT’D 3. Class Demospongiae: Some are with siliceous spicules (Examples are Halichondria, the breadcrumb sponge) and others without spicules but only protein fibres (an example is the Spongia, the once commonly used bath sponge). Venus flower basket 5 bath sponge Olatubi I.V 1 PHYLUM CNIDARIA Characteristics • They are mostly marine except for hydra which is the fresh water form. • They may be sedentary or free swimming. • They are radially symmetrical and their body has two or three layers a gastrovascular cavity and • a single opening that serves as both mouth and anus which is usually surrounded by tentacles. • They possess special stinging cells called cnidocytes or cnidoblasts which helps in food capture defence mechanism and adhesion in the case of sessile cnidarian 6 Olatubi I.V 1 PHYLUM CNIDARIA cont’d • They are carnivorous and exhibit both extracellular digestion i.e. inside the nutritive cells of the endodermis. • process such as respiration and excretion occur by simple diffusion. • The nervous system is primitive and consist of a diffused net of nerve cells. • The soft body of cnidarians may be naked or supported by calcareous exoskeleton or endoskeleton. 7 Olatubi I.V 1 PHYLUM CNIDARIA cont’d • Many cnidarians exhibit polymorphism i.e. they exist in 2 different forms • ---a polyp: a tubular body form usually sessile- • ---a medusa: an umbrella shaped free swimming body form. • Polyp represent the asexual phase while the medusa represent the sexual phase of the lifecycle • a polyp give rise to medusa asexually by budding and a medusa produces polyps by sexual reproduction in which fertilized eggs develop into a ciliated free swimming planula larva. This process is termed alternation of generations/metagenesis 8 Olatubi I.V 1 CLASSIFICATION 1. Class Anthozoa • Anemones and most corals belongs to this class members are Polyps with vertical divisions(mesenteries) in the coelenteron. • They have no medusa forms. They are grouped into 2 ---alyconaria: polyps with eight mesenteries and typically eight branched tentacles Examples are Sea pens, Branching corals, Soft corals ---zoantharia: typically with six or twelve mesenteries and variable numbers of simple tentacles Examples are Anemones and True oceanic reef-buildingcorals 9 Olatubi I.V 1 CLASSIFICATION CONT’D 2. Class Scyphozoa: • In this class the medusa form is dominant but may develop from a transient polyp-like sessile stage. • Jellyfish are very common in all oceans; they may penetrate shallow seas or be washed ashore. 3. Class Cubozoa: • Their Medusae is with four sides and a marginal shelf • Found in tropical seas, e.g. Australia, where they are known as ‘sea wasps’ and can be poisonous to humans. • They are very different from scyphozoa by having elaborate eyes Examples include Box jellies 0 Olatubi I.V 2 CLASSIFICATION CONT’D 4. Class hydrozoa: • Typically with both polyp and medusa stages in the life cycle. • The polyps are small, without mesenteries in the coelenteron, and the medusa may have a shelf Examples are Hydra, Physalia,Obelia, Tubularia • Hydra lives
Recommended publications
  • Hollow-Bearing Trees As a Habitat Resource Along an Urbanisation Gradient
    Hollow-Bearing Trees as a Habitat Resource along an Urbanisation Gradient Author Treby, Donna Louise Published 2014 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith School of Environment DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/1674 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367782 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Hollow-bearing Trees as a Habitat Resource along an Urbanisation Gradient Donna Louise Treby MPhil (The University of Queensland) Environmental Futures Centre. Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast. A thesis submitted for the fulfilment for the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. December 2013. “If we all did the things we are capable of doing. We would literally live outstanding lives. I think; if we all lived our lives this way, we would truly create an amazing world.” Thomas Edison. i Acknowledgements: It would be remiss of me if I did not begin by acknowledging my principal supervisor Dr Guy Castley, for the inception, development and assistance with the completion of this study. Your generosity, open door policy and smiling face made it a pleasure to work with you. I owe you so much, but all I can give you is my respect and heartfelt thanks. Along with my associate supervisor Prof. Jean-Marc Hero their joint efforts inspired me and opened my mind to the complexities and vagaries of ecological systems and processes on such a large scale. To my volunteers in the field, Katie Robertson who gave so much of her time and help in the early stages of my project, Agustina Barros, Ivan Gregorian, Sally Healy, Guy Castley, Katrin Lowe, Kieran Treby, Phil Treby, Erin Wallace, Nicole Glenane, Nick Clark, Mark Ballantyne, Chris Tuohy, Ryan Pearson and Nickolas Rakatopare all contributed to the collection of data for this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for The
    Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for the Bellinger River Snapping Turtle (Myuchelys georgesi) December, 2016 1 Workshop participants. Back row (l to r): Ricky Spencer, Bruce Chessman, Kristen Petrov, Caroline Lees, Gerald Kuchling, Jane Hall, Gerry McGilvray, Shane Ruming, Karrie Rose, Larry Vogelnest, Arthur Georges; Front row (l to r) Michael McFadden, Adam Skidmore, Sam Gilchrist, Bruno Ferronato, Richard Jakob-Hoff © Copyright 2017 CBSG IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Jakob-Hoff, R. Lees C. M., McGilvray G, Ruming S, Chessman B, Gilchrist S, Rose K, Spencer R, Hall J (Eds) (2017). Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for the Bellinger River Snapping Turtle. IUCN SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. Cover photo: Juvenile Bellinger River Snapping Turtle © 2016 Brett Vercoe This report can be downloaded from the CBSG website: www.cbsg.org. 2 Executive Summary The Bellinger River Snapping Turtle (BRST) (Myuchelys georgesi) is a freshwater turtle endemic to a 60 km stretch of the Bellinger River, and possibly a portion of the nearby Kalang River in coastal north eastern New South Wales (NSW).
    [Show full text]
  • An Overdue Review and Reclassification of the Australasian
    AustralasianAustralasian JournalJournal ofof HerpetologyHerpetology ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) Hoser, R. T. 2020. For the first time ever! An overdue review and reclassification of Australasian Tree Frogs (Amphibia: Anura: Pelodryadidae), including formal descriptions of 12 tribes, 11 subtribes, 34 genera, 26 subgenera, 62 species and 12 subspecies new to science. Australasian Journal of Herpetology 44-46:1-192. ISSUE 46, PUBLISHED 5 JUNE 2020 Hoser, R. T. 2020. For the first time ever! An overdue review and reclassification of Australasian Tree Frogs (Amphibia: Anura: Pelodryadidae), including formal descriptions of 12 tribes, 11 subtribes, 34 genera, 26 130 Australasiansubgenera, 62 species Journal and 12 subspecies of Herpetologynew to science. Australasian Journal of Herpetology 44-46:1-192. ... Continued from AJH Issue 45 ... zone of apparently unsuitable habitat of significant geological antiquity and are therefore reproductively Underside of thighs have irregular darker patches and isolated and therefore evolving in separate directions. hind isde of thigh has irregular fine creamish coloured They are also morphologically divergent, warranting stripes. Skin is leathery and with numerous scattered identification of the unnamed population at least to tubercles which may or not be arranged in well-defined subspecies level as done herein. longitudinal rows, including sometimes some of medium to large size and a prominent one on the eyelid. Belly is The zone dividing known populations of each species is smooth except for some granular skin on the lower belly only about 30 km in a straight line. and thighs. Vomerine teeth present, but weakly P. longirostris tozerensis subsp. nov. is separated from P.
    [Show full text]
  • ARAZPA YOTF Infopack.Pdf
    ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Information pack ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Printing: The ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign pack was generously supported by Madman Printing Phone: +61 3 9244 0100 Email: [email protected] Front cover design: Patrick Crawley, www.creepycrawleycartoons.com Mobile: 0401 316 827 Email: [email protected] Front cover photo: Pseudophryne pengilleyi, Northern Corroboree Frog. Photo courtesy of Lydia Fucsko. Printed on 100% recycled stock 2 ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Contents Foreword.........................................................................................................................................5 Foreword part II ………………………………………………………………………………………… ...6 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................9 Section 1: Why A Campaign?....................................................................................................11 The Connection Between Man and Nature........................................................................11 Man’s Effect on Nature ......................................................................................................11 Frogs Matter ......................................................................................................................11 The Problem ......................................................................................................................12 The Reason
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Review of the Frog Family Hylidae, with Special Reference to Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis and Taxonomic Revision
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE FROG FAMILY HYLIDAE, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO HYLINAE: PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS AND TAXONOMIC REVISION JULIAÂ N FAIVOVICH Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology (E3B) Columbia University, New York, NY ([email protected]) CEÂ LIO F.B. HADDAD Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de BiocieÃncias, Unversidade Estadual Paulista, C.P. 199 13506-900 Rio Claro, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil ([email protected]) PAULO C.A. GARCIA Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes, AÂ rea de CieÃncias da SauÂde Curso de Biologia, Rua CaÃndido Xavier de Almeida e Souza 200 08780-911 Mogi das Cruzes, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil and Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de SaÄo Paulo, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil ([email protected]) DARREL R. FROST Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]) JONATHAN A. CAMPBELL Department of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, Texas 76019 ([email protected]) WARD C. WHEELER Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]) BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 294, 240 pp., 16 ®gures, 2 tables, 5 appendices Issued June 24, 2005 Copyright q American Museum of Natural History 2005 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................... 6 Resumo .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics, Classification, and Biogeography of the Treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae)
    Zootaxa 4104 (1): 001–109 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4104.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D598E724-C9E4-4BBA-B25D-511300A47B1D ZOOTAXA 4104 Phylogenetics, classification, and biogeography of the treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae) WILLIAM E. DUELLMAN1,3, ANGELA B. MARION2 & S. BLAIR HEDGES2 1Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, 1345 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7593, USA 2Center for Biodiversity, Temple University, 1925 N 12th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122-1601, USA 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by M. Vences: 27 Oct. 2015; published: 19 Apr. 2016 WILLIAM E. DUELLMAN, ANGELA B. MARION & S. BLAIR HEDGES Phylogenetics, Classification, and Biogeography of the Treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae) (Zootaxa 4104) 109 pp.; 30 cm. 19 April 2016 ISBN 978-1-77557-937-3 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-938-0 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2016 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/j/zt © 2016 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use.
    [Show full text]
  • Myall Lakes Ramsar Site
    Myall Lakes Ramsar site Ecological character description Myall Lakes Ramsar site Ecological character description Disclaimer The Office of Environment and Heritage NSW (OEH) has compiled this document in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. OEH does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. Acknowledgements This document has been compiled with the help of many people in NSW Government agencies, and other people with expertise in ecology, hydrology, geomorphology and limnology. Those people include Steve Smith, Fiona Miller and Susanne Callaghan, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service; Peter Myerscough, Honorary Research Associate, University of Sydney; Matt Dasey, OEH; Peter Scanes, Kirsty Brennan, John Porter and Nick Carlile, Scientific Services, OEH; Matt Bell, Great Lakes Council; Meagan Callaghan, Manly Hydraulics Laboratory; Trudy Walford, NSW Department of Primary Industries; and David Turner. This publication has been prepared with funding provided by the Australian Government. Symbols for conceptual models are courtesy of the Integration and Application Network (ian.umces.edu/symbols), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. © State of NSW, Office of Environment and Heritage NSW. OEH is pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetofaunal Community of the Constructed Lime Kiln Bay Wetland, South Sydney, New South Wales
    Research Reports Herpetofaunal community of the constructed Lime Kiln Bay Wetland, south Sydney, New South Wales Matthew Mo NSW Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Woodbridge Road, Menangle NSW 2568. Email: [email protected] Abstract The Lime Kiln Bay Wetland in south Sydney was constructed between 1999 and 2001. This paper provides the first comprehensive description of the herpetofaunal assemblage at the site from observations made between 2006 and 2014. Twenty-three species were detected: six frogs (Hylidae, Limnodynastidae, Myobatrachidae), one freshwater turtle (Cheluidae), 12 lizards (Agamidae, Carphodactylidae, Scincidae, Varanidae) and four snakes (Colubridae, Elapidae, Pythonidae). (The Victorian Naturalist 132 (3) 2015, 64–72) Keywords: constructed wetland, frog, reptile, species assemblage, urban ecology Introduction The Oatley Bushland Corridor is an important vations between 2006 and 2014, and compares stretch of remnant habitat in the St George area the frog and reptile assemblages of the study of southern Sydney (Waterhouse 1997), along area with those of the Wolli Creek Valley and with the Wolli Creek Valley and Rockdale Rockdale Wetland Corridor. Wetland Corridor. It supports a broad range of habitats, including two endangered ecologi- Methods cal communities (Swamp Sclerophyll Forest Study area on coastal floodplain, and Swamp Oak Flood- The Lime Kiln Bay Wetland is built on one of plain Forest). A key feature of the area is the the last natural floodplains in the Georges River constructed Lime Kiln Bay Wetland, restored catchment (Bavor et al. 1995), nestled between as part of Hurstville City Council’s rehabilita- the suburbs of Oatley, Mortdale and Peakhurst tion of recreational spaces (Bavor et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Tree Frog
    Husbandry Manual For Common Name: Green tree frog Scientific Name: Litoria caerulea (Amphibia: Family): Hylidae Compiler: Brad Harper Date of Preparation: 13/8/07 Western Sydney Institute of TAFE, Richmond Course Name and Number: Cert 3 Captive animals 1068 Lecturer: Graeme Phipps 1 DISCLAIMER The information held with in this Husbandry Manual should only be used as a guide. Views and opinions expressed by the author may not necessarily be that of others working with such species. The information held within can only be used as a general guide in the husbandry and care of the species outline within this Husbandry Manual. The Author Brad Harper with 4 of his pet Litoria caerulea Amphibian Husbandry Manual- Litoria caerulea- Brad Harper 2008 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 5 2 TAXONOMY ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 NOMENCLATURE .......................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 SUBSPECIES .................................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 RECENT SYNONYMS ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 OTHER COMMON NAMES ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Declines and Disappearances of Australian Frogs Ed by Czechura, G.V
    Declines and Disappearances of frogsAUSTRALIAN Edited by Alastair Campbell Biodiversity Group Environment Australia GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 © Commonwealth of Australia 1999 Published by Environment Australia. ISBN 0 642 54656 8 Published December 1999 This work is copyright. Information presented in this document may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes, subject to the inclusion of acknowledgment of the source and provided no commercial usage or sale of the material occurs. Reproduction for purposes other than those given requires written permission from Environment Australia. Requests for permission should be addressed to Assistant Secretary, Corporate Relations and Information Branch, Environment Australia, GPO Box 787, Canberra, ACT, 2601. For copies of this publication, please contact Environment Australia’s Community Information Unit on freecall 1800 803 772. The views expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Commonwealth of Australia. The Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for any advice or information in relation to this material. Front cover photo: Litoria rheocola, Creek Frog Environment Australia Library Photo by: Keith McDonald Designed by: Di Walker Design, Canberra Contents Foreword Preface The Gordian Knots of the International Declining Amphibian Populations Task Force (DAPTF) Stan Orchard 9 A Review of Declining Frogs in Northern Queensland Keith McDonald and Ross Alford 14 Chytrid Fungi and Amphibian Declines: Overview, Implications and Future Directions Lee Berger,
    [Show full text]
  • Frog Habitats and Adaption
    Frog Habitats and Adaption 2 Frog habitats Frogs live on all the large landmasses of the world, except Antarctica and Greenland. Many people assume that they only live in moist areas, but in fact their habitats are far more varied. While they are most common in the warm, wet tropics, they also live: • in rainforests to deserts, • in alpine to coastal areas, • in treetops to under the ground, • on cliff faces to sphagnum moss bogs, • in still water to running streams. Frogs always require moisture to survive and to breed because during the tadpole phase of their life cycle, they are dependent on water. Depending on their habitat, some tadpoles will develop more quickly than others due to limitations on water sources. They are also very sensitive to water loss because their skin is permeable. This means that frogs who live in drier areas have behavioural adaptations to survive, for example burrowing, which helps to retain skin moisture, while frogs that live in moist environments are free to live above the ground. 3 Frog adaptations Frogs are especially adapted for the places they live in and their colouring is often dependent on their habitat. Many different species that live in the same types of habitats, have similar colourings that helps them to hide from potential predators. Some have even adapted to look like bird poo! The colour of frog skin can also be used to actively deter predators – some species have bright colours to indicate that they are unpleasant tasting or poisonous. Some have bright markings on their inner thighs, called flash markings, to startle predators when they jump.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for The
    Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for the Bellinger River Snapping Turtle (Myuchelys georgesi) December, 2016 1 Workshop participants. Back row (l to r): Ricky Spencer, Bruce Chessman, Kristen Petrov, Caroline Lees, Gerald Kuchling, Jane Hall, Gerry McGilvray, Shane Ruming, Karrie Rose, Larry Vogelnest, Arthur Georges; Front row (l to r) Michael McFadden, Adam Skidmore, Sam Gilchrist, Bruno Ferronato, Richard Jakob-Hoff © Copyright 2017 CBSG IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Jakob-Hoff, R. Lees C. M., McGilvray G, Ruming S, Chessman B, Gilchrist S, Rose K, Spencer R, Hall J (Eds) (2017). Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for the Bellinger River Snapping Turtle. IUCN SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. Cover photo: Juvenile Bellinger River Snapping Turtle © 2016 Brett Vercoe This report can be downloaded from the CBSG website: www.cbsg.org. 2 Executive Summary The Bellinger River Snapping Turtle (BRST) (Myuchelys georgesi) is a freshwater turtle endemic to a 60 km stretch of the Bellinger River, and possibly a portion of the nearby Kalang River in coastal north eastern New South Wales (NSW).
    [Show full text]