DOCSLIB.ORG

Frog Habitats and Adaption

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Frog Habitats and Adaption Frog Habitats and Adaption 2 Frog habitats Frogs live on all the large landmasses of the world, except Antarctica and Greenland. Many people assume that they only live in moist areas, but in fact their habitats are far more varied. While they are most common in the warm, wet tropics, they also live: • in rainforests to deserts, • in alpine to coastal areas, • in treetops to under the ground, • on cliff faces to sphagnum moss bogs, • in still water to running streams. Frogs always require moisture to survive and to breed because during the tadpole phase of their life cycle, they are dependent on water. Depending on their habitat, some tadpoles will develop more quickly than others due to limitations on water sources. They are also very sensitive to water loss because their skin is permeable. This means that frogs who live in drier areas have behavioural adaptations to survive, for example burrowing, which helps to retain skin moisture, while frogs that live in moist environments are free to live above the ground. 3 Frog adaptations Frogs are especially adapted for the places they live in and their colouring is often dependent on their habitat. Many different species that live in the same types of habitats, have similar colourings that helps them to hide from potential predators. Some have even adapted to look like bird poo! The colour of frog skin can also be used to actively deter predators – some species have bright colours to indicate that they are unpleasant tasting or poisonous. Some have bright markings on their inner thighs, called flash markings, to startle predators when they jump. Many frogs that live in forests and rainforests have sticky toe discs that help them climb and keep them in place when resting on leaves and branches. Frogs that live in arid areas have tough tubercles (nodules) on their back feet to help them dig into the earth when burrowing. Frogs that swim have webbed feet to make them more efficient in the water. 4 Due to the moist environments most frogs live in, it is necessary for them to have adaptations that will protect them from the bacteria that also thrives in wet environments. Frog skin produces substances such as alkaloids, steroids and peptides which have antibacterial and antifungal properties. These substances are often released in response to stress or infection. Some frogs are adapted to live in dry deserts. When conditions become dry the frogs: • burrow down into the earth to a depth of up to a metre by shovelling the sand or mud from under them with their back feet. • make a small chamber in the earth. • form a cocoon made from many layers of dead skin, encasing their entire body. When rain falls again, frogs emerge; find mates, lay eggs and feed – all in a short space of time. The tadpoles must develop very quickly into adults before the puddle they live in dries up. 5 What is FrogID? FrogID is a national citizen science project that aims to make learning about Australian frogs, what is happening to them, and the importance of conserving frogs easy. With the FrogID app, people from all over the country can record frog calls and identify frogs in their area using their smartphones! The app is also being used to collect data on the Cane Toad, allowing us to track its whereabouts, and to identify where frog populations are thriving and where they are threatened. Using FrogID, you can help scientists determine where frogs are most at risk of habitat loss, climate change and disease. How to use the FrogID mobile app: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sl73oSP1MjE Why Frogs are important FrogID: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKzPq-gOQro What’s so important about frogs? Frogs play a vital role in many food webs, as both predators and prey. Their role as predators of insects is a key factor in the eradication of millions of pests that could destroy valuable crops. As prey, they provide food for birds, fish, snakes, and other larger animals. Tadpoles can even act as a kind of filter by feeding on algae. They are also key biological indicators of the health of the environment. Environmental degradation, climate change and disease have detrimental effects on frog populations. Their soft, absorbent skin often means that environmental changes, such as increasing pollution, are indicated early by declining populations and rising numbers of physical deformities. By returning to sites where frogs have been recorded at different times and under different weather conditions, we can track changes in frog populations and habitats over time, and so gauge the effect of environment change on different frog species. Data obtained through the app can also help us to track the spread of introduced Cane Toads. 6 Frog Habitats – Teacher Resource 1. Summary Students explore habitats and investigate the different adaptations different frog species need to survive in the habitat. 2. Objectives • Students are introduced to the concepts of adaptations, habitats and food webs. • They are encouraged to use design-based problem-solving skills. • Students will know different species of frogs and their associated features. 3. Curriculum links • Stage 1 • Stage 3 o ACSIS129 o ACSSU017 o ACSSU043 o ACSIS130 o ACSSU211 o ACSIS090 o ACSIS133 o ACSHE021 o ACSSU094 o ACSIS139 o ACSHE022 • Stage 4 o ACSIS140 o ACSHE034 o ACSSU112 o ACSIS144 o ACSHE035 o ACSHE120 o ACSIS145 • Stage 2 o ACSIS124 o ACSSU073 o ACSIS125 4. Resources • Habitat Sorting Game – Student Activity (pages 10-15) • Design Your Own Frog Pond -Teacher Resource (page 16) • Design Your Own Frog Pond – Student Activity (page 17) • Frogs as Bio-indicators – Student Activity (page 21) • Frogs and Climate Change – Student Activity (page 23) • Finding Frogs in Nests video - https://vimeo.com/71330538 • Tips for using FrogID video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQDF7uCjsTY • Tree Frogs and Ground-Dwelling Frogs fact sheets on Australian Museum website: https://australianmuseum.net.au/frogs-amphibians • Links to frog species and their habitats on the Australian Museum website: http://australianmuseum.net.au/frogs-amphibians • Frog hands and feet article about adaptations: http://australianmuseum.net.au/blogpost/science/put-your-hands-up-and-best-foot- forward • Keeping frogs in a Terrarium: http://australianmuseum.net.au/care-of-amphibians • Noisy frogs in your garden: http://australianmuseum.net.au/noisy-frogs • The Strangest Tadpole: http://australianmuseum.net.au/blogpost/science/the-strangest-tadpole 7 5. Session structure a) Introduction - Engage • Establish students’ prior knowledge about habitats and animals’ needs: o As humans, what do we need to survive? What do animals need to survive? What do frogs need? b) Suggested activities – Explore, Explain and Elaborate • Habitat Sorting Game (pages 10-15) o Students look at the different photos of the frogs focusing on body shape, feet (spade feet) and toe pads etc. to match frogs to one of 4 habitats. o Extension: Students could explain how the frogs’ adaptations help them survive in their habitat. • Frog Pond Activity (pages 16-20) o Students research the frogs that live in their local area and their needs. o They design a pond appropriate for their local frogs. They could draw their habitat design on paper or use a digital drawing program. o Students could also create a 3D model of their habitat inside an old shoe-box using craft materials such as crepe paper, cellophane etc. o Extension: ▪ Students consider the specific plant needs for the pond. ▪ Students design a frog pond for the school. • Frogs as Bio-indicators Activity (page 22) o Students look at the information provided and do their own research regarding how frogs can be used as bio-indicators. o Students could present their findings to the class or have a class discussion on the topic ‘Do frogs make good bio-indicators?’ • Frogs and Climate Change Activity (page 23) o Students create a digital presentation or speech to present at the United Nations Environment Program in New York about the relationship between frogs and climate change. 8 Frog Adaption and Evolution – Teacher Resource 1. Summary Students learn about how animals have evolved to suit their environments and possess adaptations that make them best suited for their environment. 2. Objectives • Students identify differences between habitats. • They link different habitats to the different frog species inhabiting a range of ecosystems • They learn about the theory of evolution by natural selection. • They learn that frogs have features that suit their habitat. 3. Curriculum links • Stage 1 • Stage 3 • Stage 5 o ACSSU211 o ACSSU043 o ACSSU176 • Stage 2 o ACSSU094 o ACSSU185 o ACSSU073 • Stage 4 o ACSIS133 o ACSIS124 4. Resources • Habitat Sorting Game – Student Activity (pages 10-15) • Frog Adaption and Evolution – Student Activity (page 21) • Classification – Student Activity (pages 24-29) • Tree Frogs and Ground-Dwelling Frogs fact sheets on Australian Museum website: https://australianmuseum.net.au/frogs-amphibians • Frog feet and hand adaptations: https://australianmuseum.net.au/blogpost/science/put-your-hands-up-and-best- foot-forward • Adaptations to hide from predators: https://australianmuseum.net.au/blogpost/amri-news/amri-bird-poo-frogs-more- species • Evolution of tree frogs: https://australianmuseum.net.au/blogpost/science/frogs-in-the-trees • ‘Flying frogs’ adaptations: https://australianmuseum.net.au/blogpost/science/aerodynamic-amphibians] • Frogs behaviour in their habitat: https://australianmuseum.net.au/blogpost/amri-news/linking-frogs-with-flows • A frog that build nests: https://vimeo.com/71330538 9 5. Session structure a) Introduction – Engage • Establish prior knowledge of types of habitats frogs may live in. • Establish prior knowledge of evolution and adaptations. • Habitat Sorting Game – Student Activity (pages 10-15) o Students look at the different photos of frogs focusing on body shape, feet (spade feet) and toe pads etc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Return Rates of Male Hylid Frogs Litoria Genimaculata, L. Nannotis, L
    Vol. 11: 183–188, 2010 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online April 16 doi: 10.3354/esr00253 Endang Species Res OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Return rates of male hylid frogs Litoria genimaculata, L. nannotis, L. rheocola and Nyctimystes dayi after toe-tipping Andrea D. Phillott1, 2,*, Keith R. McDonald1, 3, Lee F. Skerratt1, 2 1Amphibian Disease Ecology Group and 2School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia 3Threatened Species Branch, Department of Environment and Resource Management, PO Box 975, Atherton, Queensland 4883, Australia ABSTRACT: Toe-tipping is a commonly used procedure for mark-recapture studies of frogs, although it has been criticised for its potential influence on frog behaviour, site fidelity and mortality. We com- pared 24 h return rates of newly toe-tipped frogs to those previously toe-tipped and found no evi- dence of a stress response reflected by avoidance behaviour for 3 species: Litoria genimaculata, L. rheocola and Nyctimystes dayi. L. nannotis was the only studied species to demonstrate a greater reaction to toe-tipping than handling alone; however, return rates (65%) in the 1 to 3 mo after mark- ing were the highest of any species, showing that the reaction did not endure. The comparatively milder short-term response to toe-tipping in N. dayi (24% return rate) may have been caused by the species’ reduced opportunity for breeding. Intermediate-term return rates were relatively high for 2 species, L. nannotis and L. genimaculata, given their natural history, suggesting there were no major adverse effects of toe-tipping. Longer-term adverse effects could not be ruled out for L.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Emerging Infectious Diseases on Amphibians: a Review of Experimental Studies
    diversity Review Effects of Emerging Infectious Diseases on Amphibians: A Review of Experimental Studies Andrew R. Blaustein 1,*, Jenny Urbina 2 ID , Paul W. Snyder 1, Emily Reynolds 2 ID , Trang Dang 1 ID , Jason T. Hoverman 3 ID , Barbara Han 4 ID , Deanna H. Olson 5 ID , Catherine Searle 6 ID and Natalie M. Hambalek 1 1 Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] (P.W.S.); [email protected] (T.D.); [email protected] (N.M.H.) 2 Environmental Sciences Graduate Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] (J.U.); [email protected] (E.R.) 3 Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; [email protected] 4 Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York, NY 12545, USA; [email protected] 5 US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] 6 Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence [email protected]; Tel.: +1-541-737-5356 Received: 25 May 2018; Accepted: 27 July 2018; Published: 4 August 2018 Abstract: Numerous factors are contributing to the loss of biodiversity. These include complex effects of multiple abiotic and biotic stressors that may drive population losses. These losses are especially illustrated by amphibians, whose populations are declining worldwide. The causes of amphibian population declines are multifaceted and context-dependent. One major factor affecting amphibian populations is emerging infectious disease. Several pathogens and their associated diseases are especially significant contributors to amphibian population declines.
    [Show full text]
  • Hollow-Bearing Trees As a Habitat Resource Along an Urbanisation Gradient
    Hollow-Bearing Trees as a Habitat Resource along an Urbanisation Gradient Author Treby, Donna Louise Published 2014 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith School of Environment DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/1674 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367782 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Hollow-bearing Trees as a Habitat Resource along an Urbanisation Gradient Donna Louise Treby MPhil (The University of Queensland) Environmental Futures Centre. Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast. A thesis submitted for the fulfilment for the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. December 2013. “If we all did the things we are capable of doing. We would literally live outstanding lives. I think; if we all lived our lives this way, we would truly create an amazing world.” Thomas Edison. i Acknowledgements: It would be remiss of me if I did not begin by acknowledging my principal supervisor Dr Guy Castley, for the inception, development and assistance with the completion of this study. Your generosity, open door policy and smiling face made it a pleasure to work with you. I owe you so much, but all I can give you is my respect and heartfelt thanks. Along with my associate supervisor Prof. Jean-Marc Hero their joint efforts inspired me and opened my mind to the complexities and vagaries of ecological systems and processes on such a large scale. To my volunteers in the field, Katie Robertson who gave so much of her time and help in the early stages of my project, Agustina Barros, Ivan Gregorian, Sally Healy, Guy Castley, Katrin Lowe, Kieran Treby, Phil Treby, Erin Wallace, Nicole Glenane, Nick Clark, Mark Ballantyne, Chris Tuohy, Ryan Pearson and Nickolas Rakatopare all contributed to the collection of data for this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin Zoölogisch Museum
    Bulletin Zoölogisch Museum UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM Vol. 14 No. 8 1995 Revised catalogue of the type specimens of Recent Amphibians and Reptiles in the “Zoölogisch Museum” University of Amsterdam the Netherlands L. van Tuijl INTRODUCTION This is a revision of the catalogue issued in 1966 Reptilia: Ablepharus boutonii furcata (syntype), (Daan & Hillenius) of type specimens of amphibians Ablepharus burnetti (2 syntypes), Gehyra interstitialis and reptiles in the collections of the ”Zoologisch (holotype), Lygosoma florense (2 syntypes), Museum Amsterdam” (ZMA), also named: Institute Lygosoma minutum rotundirostrum (syntype), for Systematics and Population Biology, of the Lygosoma mivarti obscurum (6 syntypes) Lygosoma University of Amsterdam.These include 51 holotypes, verreauxii biunguimaculata (3 syntypes). 1 neotype, 20 lectotypes, 84 syntypes, 63 paralecto- types, 187 paratypes; only the type specimens in ZMA collection are recorded. Curators of the Amphibia / Reptilia collection of the In many cases, type specimens have been sent to ZMA, (Zoologisch Museum Amsterdam) were: Prof. other museums: AMS, BMNH, EHT, FMNH, MCZ, Max (C. W.) Weber from 1883 to 1922, Dr. P. N. van NMBA, NMW, RMNH, UNSM, and ZSM. Kampen from 1900 to 1905, Dr. Nelly (P. J.) de Rooy The following type specimens are missing in the ZMA from 1907 to 1922, Prof. L. F. de Beaufort from 1922 collection: to 1949, and Dr. D. Hillenius from 1954 to 1987. At Amphibia: Chaperina basipalmata (syntype), Choe- the moment the collections are curated by the author rophryne proboscidea (holotype), Dyscophina volzi (2 with assistance of Dr. H. Nijssen. paralectotypes), Metopostira macra (holotype), Whenever possible, the remaining type specimens Nectophryne sumatrana (2 paralectotypes), Rana in other collections are mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar Site: Ecological Character Description in Good Faith, Exercising All Due Care and Attention
    Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site Ecological character description Disclaimer The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW (DECCW) has compiled the Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site: Ecological character description in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECCW does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or of the Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts. Acknowledgements Phil Straw, Australasian Wader Studies Group; Bob Creese, Bruce Pease, Trudy Walford and Rob Williams, Department of Primary Industries (NSW); Simon Annabel and Rob Lea, NSW Maritime; Geoff Doret, Ian Drinnan and Brendan Graham, Sutherland Shire Council; John Dahlenburg, Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority. Symbols for conceptual diagrams are courtesy of the Integration and Application Network (ian.umces.edu/symbols), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. This publication has been prepared with funding provided by the Australian Government to the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority through the Coastal Catchments Initiative Program. © State of NSW, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, and Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority DECCW and SMCMA are pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for The
    Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for the Bellinger River Snapping Turtle (Myuchelys georgesi) December, 2016 1 Workshop participants. Back row (l to r): Ricky Spencer, Bruce Chessman, Kristen Petrov, Caroline Lees, Gerald Kuchling, Jane Hall, Gerry McGilvray, Shane Ruming, Karrie Rose, Larry Vogelnest, Arthur Georges; Front row (l to r) Michael McFadden, Adam Skidmore, Sam Gilchrist, Bruno Ferronato, Richard Jakob-Hoff © Copyright 2017 CBSG IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Jakob-Hoff, R. Lees C. M., McGilvray G, Ruming S, Chessman B, Gilchrist S, Rose K, Spencer R, Hall J (Eds) (2017). Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for the Bellinger River Snapping Turtle. IUCN SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. Cover photo: Juvenile Bellinger River Snapping Turtle © 2016 Brett Vercoe This report can be downloaded from the CBSG website: www.cbsg.org. 2 Executive Summary The Bellinger River Snapping Turtle (BRST) (Myuchelys georgesi) is a freshwater turtle endemic to a 60 km stretch of the Bellinger River, and possibly a portion of the nearby Kalang River in coastal north eastern New South Wales (NSW).
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Brown Tree Frog
    Our Wildlife Fact Sheet Southern Brown Tree Frog Southern Brown Tree Frogs are one of Victoria’s common frog species. Scientific name Litoria ewingi Did you know? The Southern Brown Tree Frog is an agile hunter. It can leap to catch insects in mid flight. Their large sticky toes make them great climbers. Figure 1. Southern Brown Tree Frog metamorphs © A. Houston Female Southern Brown Tree Frogs can lay up to 600 DSE 2008 eggs at a time. Distribution It takes between 12 and 26 weeks for Southern Brown Southern Brown Tree Frogs occur in southern Victoria, tadpoles to turn into frogs. Tasmania and along the south coast of New South Wales. Description They are found across most of southern, central and Southern Brown Tree Frogs grow up to about 50 mm in north-eastern Victoria, but do not occur in the north- length. west corner of the state. In north-central Victoria and in Their colour is true to their name as they are brown on parts of the state’s north-east they are replaced by the their backs. The backs of their thighs are yellowish to closely-related Plains Brown Tree Frog (Litoria bright orange, and they have a white grainy belly. They paraewingi). also have a distinctive white stripe from the eye to their fore-leg. Their skin is smooth with small lumps. They have webbing on their feet that goes half way up their toes while their fingers have no webbing at all. Breeding males have a light brown vocal sac. Diet Southern Brown Tree Frogs feed mainly on flying insects such as mosquitoes, moths and flies.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Advice Litoria Dayi Lace-Eyed Tree Frog
    THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 The Minister’s delegate approved this Conservation Advice on 13/07/2017. Conservation Advice Litoria dayi lace-eyed tree frog Conservation Status Litoria dayi (lace-eyed tree frog) is listed as Endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act) effective 16 July 2000. The species is eligible for listing under the EPBC Act as on 16 July 2000 it was listed as Endangered under Schedule 1 of the preceding Act, the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). Species can also be listed as threatened under state and territory legislation. For information on the current listing status of this species under relevant state or territory legislation, see http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/sprat.pl . The main factor that was the cause of the species being eligible for listing in the Endangered category was a dramatic range contraction with an observed reduction in population size of greater than 50 percent. Populations are no longer present at altitudes greater than 300 m, likely due to chytridiomycosis (Hero et al. 2004). This species’ status under the EBPC Act is currently being reviewed as part of a species expert assessment plan for frogs. Description The lace-eyed tree frog was recently transferred to the genus Litoria from the genus Nyctimystes after Kraus (2013) showed that it did not meet the morphological characteristics for assignment to that genus (Cogger 2014). This species is a small to medium sized frog growing to 50 mm in snout-to-vent length.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overdue Review and Reclassification of the Australasian
    AustralasianAustralasian JournalJournal ofof HerpetologyHerpetology ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) Hoser, R. T. 2020. For the first time ever! An overdue review and reclassification of Australasian Tree Frogs (Amphibia: Anura: Pelodryadidae), including formal descriptions of 12 tribes, 11 subtribes, 34 genera, 26 subgenera, 62 species and 12 subspecies new to science. Australasian Journal of Herpetology 44-46:1-192. ISSUE 46, PUBLISHED 5 JUNE 2020 Hoser, R. T. 2020. For the first time ever! An overdue review and reclassification of Australasian Tree Frogs (Amphibia: Anura: Pelodryadidae), including formal descriptions of 12 tribes, 11 subtribes, 34 genera, 26 130 Australasiansubgenera, 62 species Journal and 12 subspecies of Herpetologynew to science. Australasian Journal of Herpetology 44-46:1-192. ... Continued from AJH Issue 45 ... zone of apparently unsuitable habitat of significant geological antiquity and are therefore reproductively Underside of thighs have irregular darker patches and isolated and therefore evolving in separate directions. hind isde of thigh has irregular fine creamish coloured They are also morphologically divergent, warranting stripes. Skin is leathery and with numerous scattered identification of the unnamed population at least to tubercles which may or not be arranged in well-defined subspecies level as done herein. longitudinal rows, including sometimes some of medium to large size and a prominent one on the eyelid. Belly is The zone dividing known populations of each species is smooth except for some granular skin on the lower belly only about 30 km in a straight line. and thighs. Vomerine teeth present, but weakly P. longirostris tozerensis subsp. nov. is separated from P.
    [Show full text]
  • ARAZPA Amphibian Action Plan
    Appendix 1 to Murray, K., Skerratt, L., Marantelli, G., Berger, L., Hunter, D., Mahony, M. and Hines, H. 2011. Guidelines for minimising disease risks associated with captive breeding, raising and restocking programs for Australian frogs. A report for the Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. ARAZPA Amphibian Action Plan Compiled by: Graeme Gillespie, Director Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria; Russel Traher, Amphibian TAG Convenor, Curator Healesville Sanctuary Chris Banks, Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria. February 2007 1 1. Background Amphibian species across the world have declined at an alarming rate in recent decades. According to the IUCN at least 122 species have gone extinct since 1980 and nearly one third of the world’s near 6,000 amphibian species are classified as threatened with extinction, placing the entire class at the core of the current biodiversity crisis (IUCN, 2006). Australasia too has experienced significant declines; several Australian species are considered extinct and nearly 25% of the remainder are threatened with extinction, while all four species native to New Zealand are threatened. Conventional causes of biodiversity loss, habitat destruction and invasive species, are playing a major role in these declines. However, emergent disease and climate change are strongly implicated in many declines and extinctions. These factors are now acting globally, rapidly and, most disturbingly, in protected and near pristine areas. Whilst habitat conservation and mitigation of threats in situ are essential, for many taxa the requirement for some sort of ex situ intervention is mounting. In response to this crisis there have been a series of meetings organised by the IUCN (World Conservation Union), WAZA (World Association of Zoos & Aquariums) and CBSG (Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, of the IUCN Species Survival Commission) around the world to discuss how the zoo community can and should respond.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of Gastrointestinal Helminths from the Wokan Cannibal Frog, Lechriodus Melanopyga (Amphibia: Limnodynastidae), from Papua New Guinea1
    First Report of Gastrointestinal Helminths from the Wokan Cannibal Frog, Lechriodus melanopyga (Amphibia: Limnodynastidae), from Papua New Guinea1 Stephen R. Goldberg,2 Charles R. Bursey,3 and Fred Kraus4 Abstract: The initial gastrointestinal helminth list is established for Lechriodus melanopyga (Doria) from Papua New Guinea. Examination of the digestive tracts of 16 L. melanopyga from April–May (n ¼ 14) and October (n ¼ 2) re- vealed six helminth species: Digenea: Mesocoelium monas; Nematoda: Aplectana macintoshii, Cosmocerca novaeguineae, Oswaldocruzia bakeri, Abbreviata sp. (larvae in cysts); Acanthocephala: Acanthocephalus bufonis. Cosmocerca novaeguineae was present in the greatest numbers (171) and shared the highest prevalence (88%) with Acanthocephalus bufonis. Lechriodus melanopyga represents a new host record for each of these helminths. New Guinea is a new locality record for Mesocoe- lium monas and Acanthocephalus bufonis. The family Limnodynastidae consists of materials and methods eight genera with over 40 species, of which Limnodynastes and Lechriodus occur in both Sixteen Lechriodus melanopyga (mean snout- Australia and New Guinea; all other genera vent length, 50.0 G 2.46 SD; range, 46.6– are restricted to Australia (Zug et al. 2001, 56.0 mm) were collected by hand by F.K. Frost et al. 2006). The Wokan cannibal frog, from 29 April to 2 May 2002 and 5 October Lechriodus melanopyga (Doria) is a medium- 2002 at Duabo, 10.4184333 S, 150.3068333 sized, dull brown frog rarely more than 50 E (WGS 84 datum), 300 m, Pini Range, mm long that ranges across New Guinea Milne Bay, Papua New Guinea. Frogs were (Zweifel 1972, Gu¨nther 2003) and breeds in fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and shallow forest swamps and puddles (Menzies preserved in 70% ethanol.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Cane Toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT
    supervising scientist 164 report A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park RA van Dam, DJ Walden & GW Begg supervising scientist national centre for tropical wetland research This report has been prepared by staff of the Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist (eriss) as part of our commitment to the National Centre for Tropical Wetland Research Rick A van Dam Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, Locked Bag 2, Jabiru NT 0886, Australia (Present address: Sinclair Knight Merz, 100 Christie St, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia) David J Walden Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia George W Begg Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia This report should be cited as follows: van Dam RA, Walden DJ & Begg GW 2002 A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT The Supervising Scientist is part of Environment Australia, the environmental program of the Commonwealth Department of Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia 2002 Supervising Scientist Environment Australia GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801 Australia ISSN 1325-1554 ISBN 0 642 24370 0 This work is copyright Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Supervising Scientist Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction
    [Show full text]