DOCSLIB.ORG

Systematic Review of the Frog Family Hylidae, with Special Reference to Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis and Taxonomic Revision

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Systematic Review of the Frog Family Hylidae, with Special Reference to Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis and Taxonomic Revision SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE FROG FAMILY HYLIDAE, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO HYLINAE: PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS AND TAXONOMIC REVISION JULIAÂ N FAIVOVICH Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology (E3B) Columbia University, New York, NY ([email protected]) CEÂ LIO F.B. HADDAD Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de BiocieÃncias, Unversidade Estadual Paulista, C.P. 199 13506-900 Rio Claro, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil ([email protected]) PAULO C.A. GARCIA Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes, AÂ rea de CieÃncias da SauÂde Curso de Biologia, Rua CaÃndido Xavier de Almeida e Souza 200 08780-911 Mogi das Cruzes, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil and Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de SaÄo Paulo, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil ([email protected]) DARREL R. FROST Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]) JONATHAN A. CAMPBELL Department of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, Texas 76019 ([email protected]) WARD C. WHEELER Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]) BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 294, 240 pp., 16 ®gures, 2 tables, 5 appendices Issued June 24, 2005 Copyright q American Museum of Natural History 2005 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................... 6 Resumo ........................................................................ 7 Resumen ....................................................................... 8 Introduction .................................................................... 9 Materials and Methods .......................................................... 9 Taxon Sampling .............................................................. 9 Outgroup Selection ........................................................ 13 Basal Neobatrachians .................................................... 13 Ranoidea ............................................................... 13 Hyloidea ............................................................... 13 The Ingroup: Hylidae ...................................................... 14 Hemiphractinae ......................................................... 15 Pelodryadinae ........................................................... 17 Phyllomedusinae ........................................................ 19 Hylinae ................................................................ 20 Gladiator Frogs ....................................................... 21 Andean Stream-Breeding Hyla .......................................... 26 The 30-Chromosome Hyla ............................................. 27 Middle American/Holarctic Clade ....................................... 32 Casque-Headed Frogs and Related Genera ............................... 38 Species and Species Groups of Hyla Not Associated with Other Clades ..... 40 Other Genera ......................................................... 41 Character Sampling .......................................................... 43 Gene Selection ............................................................ 43 DNA Isolation and Sequencing .............................................. 43 Morphology .............................................................. 44 Da Silva's (1998) Dissertation .......................................... 45 Phylogenetic Analysis ........................................................ 45 Results ....................................................................... 48 Discussion .................................................................... 49 Major Patterns of Relationships of Hylidae and Outgroups ....................... 49 Pelodryadinae and Phyllomedusinae ........................................... 50 Pelodryadinae ............................................................. 53 Phyllomedusinae .......................................................... 54 Major Patterns of Relationships Within Hylinae ................................. 54 South American I Clade .................................................... 54 Andean Stream-Breeding Hyla and the Tepuian Clade ....................... 57 Gladiator Frogs ......................................................... 59 Atlantic/Cerrado Clade ................................................... 59 Green Clade ............................................................ 60 True Gladiator Frog Clade ................................................ 60 South American II Clade ................................................... 61 Relationships of Scinax .................................................. 61 Lysapsus, Pseudis, and Scarthyla .......................................... 62 Sphaenorhynchus, Xenohyla, and the 30-Chromosome Hyla .................. 63 Middle American/Holarctic Clade ........................................... 66 Lower Central American Lineage ......................................... 70 Real Hyla .............................................................. 72 South American/West Indian Casque-Headed Frogs ............................ 72 Taxonomic Conclusions: A New Taxonomy of Hylinae and Phyllomedusinae ......... 74 Hylinae Ra®nesque, 1815 ..................................................... 75 2 2005 FAIVOVICH ET AL.: PHYLOGENY OF HYLIDAE 3 Cophomantini Hoffmann, 1878 .............................................. 75 Aplastodiscus A. Lutz in B. Lutz, 1950 .................................... 76 Aplastodiscus albofrenatus Group ....................................... 82 Aplastodiscus albosignatus Group ....................................... 82 Aplastodiscus perviridis Group ......................................... 82 Bokermannohyla, new genus .............................................. 82 Bokermannohyla circumdata Group ..................................... 82 Bokermannohyla claresignata Group .................................... 83 Bokermannohyla martinsi Group ........................................ 83 Bokermannohyla pseudopseudis Group .................................. 83 Hyloscirtus Peters, 1882 ................................................. 84 Hyloscirtus armatus Group ............................................. 84 Hyloscirtus bogotensis Group ........................................... 84 Hyloscirtus larinopygion Group ......................................... 85 Hypsiboas Wagler, 1830 .................................................. 85 Hypsiboas albopunctatus Group ........................................ 86 Hypsiboas benitezi Group .............................................. 86 Hypsiboas faber Group ................................................ 87 Hypsiboas pellucens Group ............................................. 87 Hypsiboas pulchellus Group ............................................ 87 Hypsiboas punctatus Group ............................................ 88 Hypsiboas semilineatus Group .......................................... 88 Species of Hypsiboas Unassigned to Group .............................. 89 Myersiohyla, new genus .................................................. 89 Dendropsophini Fitzinger, 1843 ............................................. 90 Dendropsophus Fitzinger, 1843 ........................................... 90 Dendropsophus columbianus Group ..................................... 90 Dendropsophus garagoensis Group ...................................... 90 Dendropsophus labialis Group .......................................... 91 Dendropsophus leucophyllatus Group .................................... 91 Dendropsophus marmoratus Group ...................................... 91 Dendropsophus microcephalus Group ................................... 91 Dendropsophus minimus Group ......................................... 92 Dendropsophus minutus Group ......................................... 92 Dendropsophus parviceps Group ........................................ 93 Species of Dendropsophus Unassigned to Group .......................... 93 Lysapsus Cope, 1862 .................................................... 93 Pseudis Wagler, 1830 .................................................... 93 Scarthyla Duellman and de SaÂ, 1988 ...................................... 94 Scinax Wagler, 1830 ..................................................... 94 Scinax catharinae Clade ............................................... 95 Scinax ruber Clade .................................................... 96 Sphaenorhynchus Tschudi, 1838 .......................................... 97 Xenohyla Izecksohn, 1996 ................................................ 98 Hylini Ra®nesque, 1815 .................................................... 98 Acris DumeÂril and Bibron, 1841 .......................................... 99 Anotheca Smith, 1939 ................................................... 99 Bromeliohyla new genus ................................................. 99 Charadrahyla, new genus ................................................ 99 Duellmanohyla Campbell and Smith, 1992 ................................ 100 Ecnomiohyla, new genus ................................................ 100 Exerodonta Brocchi, 1879 ............................................... 100 Exerodonta sumichrasti Group ......................................... 101 4 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 294 Species of Exerodonta Unassigned to Group ............................ 101 Hyla Laurenti, 1768
Load more

Recommended publications
  • El Grado De Protección De Los Anfibios Patagónicos De Argentina
    DiciembreEcología Austral de 2007 17:269-279. Diciembre PROTECCIÓN 2007 DE ANFIBIOS PATAGÓNICOS 269 Asociación Argentina de Ecología El grado de protección de los anfibios patagónicos de Argentina * CARMEN ÚBEDA & DORA GRIGERA Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina. RESUMEN. En este trabajo se evalúa si las áreas protegidas de la Patagonia brindan una protección adecuada a los anfibios de esta región. Se analizó la distribución y la categoría de conservación de 31 taxa de anuros en función de la ubicación de las áreas protegidas, particularmente del sistema nacional. Seis taxa no se registraron en unidad de protección alguna, siendo la mayoría de ellos típicos de estepa. Todos los anfibios de bosque se encuentran al menos en un área protegida. Cinco de los taxa que se consideran amenazados, y uno insuficientemente conocido, no están comprendidos en ninguna unidad de protección. Otros anfibios amenazados, incluyendo microendemismos y un género monotípico, están en áreas que por falta de implementación o control no garantizan su conservación. La contigüidad entre varios Parques Nacionales argentinos y chilenos a lo largo de los Andes patagónicos contribuye a la protección de los anfibios de bosque, mientras que esta situación favorece a una sola de las especies esteparias. Se concluye que las razones históricas que influyeron en la ubicación de las áreas protegidas, afectaron positivamente a la batracofauna de los bosques, quedando fuera de las áreas nacionales la mayoría de los taxa endémicos de estepa, cuya protección en áreas no pertenecientes al sistema nacional es deficiente o nula. [Palabras clave: anuros, conservación, áreas protegidas, declinación de anfibios, amenazas a la biodiversidad, Patagonia] ABSTRACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Amphibians of Argentina: an Update and Evaluation of National Assessments
    Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 11(1) [General Section]: 36–44 (e135). Conservation status of Amphibians of Argentina: An update and evaluation of national assessments 1,3Marcos Vaira, 1Laura C. Pereyra, 1Mauricio S. Akmentins, and 2Jon Bielby 1Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas (INECOA), CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Jujuy, Av. Bolivia 1711 (4600), San Salvador de Jujuy, ARGENTINA 2Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UNITED KINGDOM Abstract.—We present a review on the conservation status of the 177 species and subspecies of amphibians of Argentina and compare the first national assessment, conducted in 2000, with the most recent one, from 2012, to determine changes in conservation status over time. We also evaluate the degree of taxonomic and geographic non-randomness in extinction risk among these taxa. The present study shows an improvement in the knowledge of amphibian diversity in Argentina, but also increasing evidence of population declines and species absences. Twenty-two species showed a genuine increase in threat status between national assessments, and habitat loss and/or degradation, chytrid fungus infection, and introduction of invasive species have been reported as the main threats. Randomization tests showed families Telmatobiidae and Batrachylidae to be over-threatened and Hylidae and Leptodactylidae to be significantly under-threatened. Also, four ecoregions were shown to be significantly over-threatened (Patagonian Steepe, Patagonian Woodlands, Puna, and Yungas Forests). This evaluation help to identify groups of species that face similar suites and intensities of threat as a result of their overlapping geographical distributions and shared biological susceptibility as a result of their evolutionary history.
    [Show full text]
  • Unesp INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS – RIO CLARO       
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “JÚLIO DE MESQUITA FILHO” unesp INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS – RIO CLARO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS (ZOOLOGIA) LEVANTAMENTO DA HERPETOFAUNA DO PARQUE NATURAL MUNICIPAL NASCENTES DE PARANAPIACABA, SANTO ANDRÉ, SP Vivian Carlos Trevine Dissertação apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Campus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Mestre em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia). Setembro - 2011 Vivian Carlos Trevine Levantamento da Herpetofauna do Parque Natural Municipal Nascentes de Paranapiacaba, Santo André, SP Dissertação apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Campus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Mestre em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia). Orientador: Prof. Dr. Hussam El Dine Zaher Rio Claro 2011 Vivian Carlos Trevine Levantamento da Herpetofauna do Parque Natural Municipal Nascentes de Paranapiacaba, Santo André, SP Dissertação apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Campus de Rio Claro,Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Mestre em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia). Comissão Examinadora ____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ Rio Claro, 30 de agosto de 2011. Se um dia eu enxerguei mais longe, foi por estar de pé sobre ombros de gigantes. Isaac Newton AGRADECIMENTOS A Hussam Zaher pela oportunidade de trabalhar no MZUSP, pela orientação, paciência e por todo o apoio no desenvolvimento do mestrado. A Célio F. B. Haddad por possibilitar o financiamento das viagens de campo (proc. Fapesp 2008/50928-1), imprescindível para a realização deste trabalho, e também pela hospitalidade em Rio Claro e acesso à coleção CFBH.
    [Show full text]
  • For Review Only
    Page 63 of 123 Evolution Moen et al. 1 1 2 3 4 5 Appendix S1: Supplementary data 6 7 Table S1 . Estimates of local species composition at 39 sites in Middle America based on data summarized by Duellman 8 9 10 (2001). Locality numbers correspond to Table 2. References for body size and larval habitat data are found in Table S2. 11 12 Locality and elevation Body Larval Subclade within Middle Species present Hylid clade 13 (country, state, specific location)For Reviewsize Only habitat American clade 14 15 16 1) Mexico, Sonora, Alamos; 597 m Pachymedusa dacnicolor 82.6 pond Phyllomedusinae 17 Smilisca baudinii 76.0 pond Middle American Smilisca clade 18 Smilisca fodiens 62.6 pond Middle American Smilisca clade 19 20 21 2) Mexico, Sinaloa, Mazatlan; 9 m Pachymedusa dacnicolor 82.6 pond Phyllomedusinae 22 Smilisca baudinii 76.0 pond Middle American Smilisca clade 23 Smilisca fodiens 62.6 pond Middle American Smilisca clade 24 Tlalocohyla smithii 26.0 pond Middle American Tlalocohyla 25 Diaglena spatulata 85.9 pond Middle American Smilisca clade 26 27 28 3) Mexico, Durango, El Salto; 2603 Hyla eximia 35.0 pond Middle American Hyla 29 m 30 31 32 4) Mexico, Jalisco, Chamela; 11 m Dendropsophus sartori 26.0 pond Dendropsophus 33 Exerodonta smaragdina 26.0 stream Middle American Plectrohyla clade 34 Pachymedusa dacnicolor 82.6 pond Phyllomedusinae 35 Smilisca baudinii 76.0 pond Middle American Smilisca clade 36 Smilisca fodiens 62.6 pond Middle American Smilisca clade 37 38 Tlalocohyla smithii 26.0 pond Middle American Tlalocohyla 39 Diaglena spatulata 85.9 pond Middle American Smilisca clade 40 Trachycephalus venulosus 101.0 pond Lophiohylini 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Evolution Page 64 of 123 Moen et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Environmental Drivers with Amphibian Species Diversity in Ponds from Subtropical Grasslands
    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2015) 87(3): 1751-1762 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520140471 www.scielo.br/aabc Linking environmental drivers with amphibian species diversity in ponds from subtropical grasslands DARLENE S. GONÇALVES1, LUCAS B. CRIVELLARI2 and CARLOS EDUARDO CONTE3*,4 1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19020, 81531-980 Curitiba, PR, Brasil 2Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rua Cristovão Colombo, 2265, Jardim Nazareth, 15054-000 São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brasil 3Universidade Federal do Paraná. Departamento de Zoologia, Caixa Postal 19020, 81531-980 Curitiba, PR, Brasil 4Instituto Neotropical: Pesquisa e Conservação. Rua Purus, 33, 82520-750 Curitiba, PR, Brasil Manuscript received on September 17, 2014; accepted for publication on March 2, 2015 ABSTRACT Amphibian distribution patterns are known to be influenced by habitat diversity at breeding sites. Thus, breeding sites variability and how such variability influences anuran diversity is important. Here, we examine which characteristics at breeding sites are most influential on anuran diversity in grasslands associated with Araucaria forest, southern Brazil, especially in places at risk due to anthropic activities. We evaluate the associations between habitat heterogeneity and anuran species diversity in nine body of water from September 2008 to March 2010, in 12 field campaigns in which 16 species of anurans were found. Of the seven habitat descriptors we examined, water depth, pond surface area and distance to the nearest forest fragment explained 81% of total species diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tadpoles of Two Species of the Bokermannohyla Circumdata Group (Hylidae, Cophomantini)
    Zootaxa 4048 (2): 151–173 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4048.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E3DFCE3C-F71E-4A40-9800-F7A7C2FA1D57 The tadpoles of two species of the Bokermannohyla circumdata group (Hylidae, Cophomantini) TIAGO LEITE PEZZUTI1,4, MARCUS THADEU TEIXEIRA SANTOS1, SOFIA VELASQUEZ MARTINS1, FELIPE SÁ FORTES LEITE2, PAULO CHRISTIANO ANCHIETTA GARCIA1 & JULIÁN FAIVOVICH3 1Laboratório de Herpetologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil 2Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Campus Florestal, Florestal, Minas Gerais, Brasil 3División Herpetología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales-CONICET, Angel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR, Buenos Aires, Argen- tina; and Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires 4Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We describe the external morphology and oral cavity of the tadpoles of Bokermannohyla caramaschii and B. diamantina respectively from the states of Espírito Santo and Bahia, Brazil. Larvae of both species are distinguished from each other by external characters such as body shape, labial tooth-row formula, number of marginal papillae, coloration and internal oral anatomy features. Some of the character states of the tadpoles of B. caramaschii and B. diamantina that are shared with all other described tadpoles of the Bokermannohyla circumdata group, such as the absence/reduction of small flaps with accessory labial teeth laterally in the oral disc, and the absence/reduction of submarginal papillae, may represent mor- phological synapomorphies of this species group, or at least of some internal clade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Most Frog-Diverse Place in Middle America, with Notes on The
    Offcial journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(2) [Special Section]: 304–322 (e215). The most frog-diverse place in Middle America, with notes on the conservation status of eight threatened species of amphibians 1,2,*José Andrés Salazar-Zúñiga, 1,2,3Wagner Chaves-Acuña, 2Gerardo Chaves, 1Alejandro Acuña, 1,2Juan Ignacio Abarca-Odio, 1,4Javier Lobon-Rovira, 1,2Edwin Gómez-Méndez, 1,2Ana Cecilia Gutiérrez-Vannucchi, and 2Federico Bolaños 1Veragua Foundation for Rainforest Research, Limón, COSTA RICA 2Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, 11501-2060 San José, COSTA RICA 3División Herpetología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘‘Bernardino Rivadavia’’-CONICET, C1405DJR, Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA 4CIBIO Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBIO, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas 7, 4485-661 Vairão, Vila do Conde, PORTUGAL Abstract.—Regarding amphibians, Costa Rica exhibits the greatest species richness per unit area in Middle America, with a total of 215 species reported to date. However, this number is likely an underestimate due to the presence of many unexplored areas that are diffcult to access. Between 2012 and 2017, a monitoring survey of amphibians was conducted in the Central Caribbean of Costa Rica, on the northern edge of the Matama mountains in the Talamanca mountain range, to study the distribution patterns and natural history of species across this region, particularly those considered as endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. The results show the highest amphibian species richness among Middle America lowland evergreen forests, with a notable anuran representation of 64 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista 6-1 Jan-Jun 2007 RGB NOVA.P65
    Phyllomedusa 6(1):61-68, 2007 © 2007 Departamento de Ciências Biológicas - ESALQ - USP ISSN 1519-1397 Visual and acoustic signaling in three species of Brazilian nocturnal tree frogs (Anura, Hylidae) Luís Felipe Toledo1, Olívia G. S. Araújo1, Lorena D. Guimarães2, Rodrigo Lingnau3, and Célio F. B. Haddad1 1 Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista. Caixa Postal 199, 13506-970, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]. 2 Departamento de Biologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Goiás. Caixa Postal 131, 74001-970, Goiânia, GO, Brazil. 3 Laboratório de Herpetologia, Museu de Ciências e Tecnologia & Faculdade de Biociências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Av. Ipiranga, 6681, 90619-900, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Abstract Visual and acoustic signaling in three species of Brazilian nocturnal tree frogs (Anura, Hylidae). Visual communication seems to be widespread among nocturnal anurans, however, reports of these behaviors in many Neotropical species are lacking. Therefore, we gathered information collected during several sporadic field expeditions in central and southern Brazil with three nocturnal tree frogs: Aplastodiscus perviridis, Hypsiboas albopunctatus and H. bischoffi. These species displayed various aggressive behaviors, both visual and acoustic, towards other males. For A. perviridis we described arm lifting and leg kicking; for H. albopunctatus we described the advertisement and territorial calls, visual signalizations, including a previously unreported behavior (short leg kicking), and male-male combat; and for H. bischoffi we described the advertisement and fighting calls, toes and fingers trembling, leg lifting, and leg kicking. We speculate about the evolution of some behaviors and concluded that the use of visual signals among Neotropical anurans may be much more common than suggested by the current knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2. Animals
    AC20 Doc. 8.5 Annex (English only/Seulement en anglais/Únicamente en inglés) REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE ANALYSIS OF TRADE TRENDS WITH NOTES ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF SELECTED SPECIES Volume 2. Animals Prepared for the CITES Animals Committee, CITES Secretariat by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre JANUARY 2004 AC20 Doc. 8.5 – p. 3 Prepared and produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE (UNEP-WCMC) www.unep-wcmc.org The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognise the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. Prepared for: The CITES Secretariat, Geneva A contribution to UNEP - The United Nations Environment Programme Printed by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK © Copyright: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre/CITES Secretariat The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hylidae, Anura) and Description of Ocellated Treefrog Itapotihyla Langsdorffii Vocalizations
    Current knowledge on bioacoustics of the subfamily Lophyohylinae (Hylidae, Anura) and description of Ocellated treefrog Itapotihyla langsdorffii vocalizations Lucas Rodriguez Forti1, Roseli Maria Foratto1, Rafael Márquez2, Vânia Rosa Pereira3 and Luís Felipe Toledo1 1 Laboratório Multiusuário de Bioacústica (LMBio) e Laboratório de História Natural de Anfíbios Brasileiros (LaHNAB), Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil 2 Fonoteca Zoológica, Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid, Spain 3 Centro de Pesquisas Meteorológicas e Climáticas Aplicadas à Agricultura (CEPAGRI), Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil ABSTRACT Background. Anuran vocalizations, such as advertisement and release calls, are informative for taxonomy because species recognition can be based on those signals. Thus, a proper acoustic description of the calls may support taxonomic decisions and may contribute to knowledge about amphibian phylogeny. Methods. Here we present a perspective on advertisement call descriptions of the frog subfamily Lophyohylinae, through a literature review and a spatial analysis presenting bioacoustic coldspots (sites with high diversity of species lacking advertisement call descriptions) for this taxonomic group. Additionally, we describe the advertisement and release calls of the still poorly known treefrog, Itapotihyla langsdorffii. We analyzed recordings of six males using the software Raven Pro 1.4 and calculated the coefficient Submitted 24 February 2018 of variation for classifying static and dynamic acoustic properties. Accepted 30 April 2018 Results and Discussion. We found that more than half of the species within the Published 31 May 2018 subfamily do not have their vocalizations described yet. Most of these species are Corresponding author distributed in the western and northern Amazon, where recording sampling effort Lucas Rodriguez Forti, should be strengthened in order to fill these gaps.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Table S1. Temporal, Spectral, and Scaling Variables from Calls Of
    Table S1. Temporal, spectral, and scaling variables from calls of poison frogs including phylogeny identifier (Phy ID), locality, call behavior, habit, temperature, size, number of recordings, multinote call features, units of repetition (UR), initial pulse-note, and middle pulse-note parameters. Analyzed Phy Locality Call Temp SVL (mm) Genus Species Latitude Longitude Habit recordings ID ID Behavior °C N ! SD N of ♂ Allobates algorei 60 El Tama 7.65375 -72.19137 concealed terrestrial 23.50 8 18.90 0.70 3 Allobates brunneus 37 Guimaraes -15.2667 -55.5311 -- terrestrial 26.50 1 16.13 0.00 1 Allobates caeruleodactylus 48 Borba -4.398593 -59.60251 exposed terrestrial 25.60 12 15.50 0.40 1 Allobates crombiei 52 Altamira -3.65 -52.38 concealed terrestrial 24.10 2 18.10 0.04 2 Allobates femoralis 43 ECY -0.633 -76.5 concealed terrestrial 25.60 20 23.58 1.27 6 Allobates femoralis 46 Porongaba -8.67 -72.78 exposed terrestrial 25.00 1 25.38 0.00 1 Allobates femoralis 44 Leticia -4.2153 -69.9406 exposed terrestrial 25.50 1 20.90 0.00 1 Allobates femoralis 40 Albergue -12.8773 -71.3865 exposed terrestrial 26.00 6 21.98 2.18 1 Allobates femoralis 41 CAmazonico -12.6 -70.08 exposed terrestrial 26.00 12 22.43 1.06 4 Allobates femoralis 45 El Palmar 8.333333 -61.66667 concealed terrestrial 24.00 27 25.50 0.76 1 Allobates granti 49 FG 3.62 -53.17 exposed terrestrial 24.60 8 16.15 0.55 1 Allobates humilis 59 San Ramon 8.8678 -70.4861 concealed terrestrial 19.50 -- 21.80 -- 1 Allobates insperatus 54 ECY -0.633 -76.4005 exposed terrestrial 24.60 18 16.64 0.93 7 Allobates aff.
    [Show full text]