DOCSLIB.ORG

Building Jerusalem? Christianity and the Labour Party

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building Jerusalem? Christianity and the Labour Party Building Jerusalem? Christianity and the Labour Party Paul Bickley About the author Copyright © 2010 by The British and Foreign Paul Bickley is a Researcher at Theos – Bible Society and Paul Bickley the public theology think-tank. With a The moral rights of the author have been background working in Parliament and asserted. public affairs, he holds an M.Litt. from the All rights reserved. No part of this publication School of Divinity at the University of may be reproduced, stored or transmitted St Andrews. Paul is married to Rebecca, and in any form or by any means, electronic or has two sons, Ernest and Arthur. mechanical, including photocopying, recording, Acknowledgements or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright The author is grateful to Stephen Timms MP, owner. This book is sold subject to the condition Jim Dobbin MP, Andy Flannagan, that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, Nick Spencer, Ian Geary, Daniel Gover and be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated Matt Rhodes for their helpful comments on without the copyright holder’s prior consent in the text, and to Jack Reid for his assistance any form of binding or cover other than that in with the bibliography. Any deficiencies which this is published and without a similar remain the author’s own. condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent publisher. Unless otherwise indicated Scripture quotations are taken from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-564-04746-8 This edition published in 2010 by The British and Foreign Bible Society Typeset by Bible Society Resources Ltd Design by CatchyMonkey Design Printed in the UK Bible Society Stonehill Green, Westlea, Swindon SN5 7DG Charity Registration No. 232759 Visit biblesociety.org.uk Contents Series foreword 1 Introduction 4 The ideological context 5 What are we looking for? 7 Notes 12 Nineteenth century engagements 14 Age of Atonement 14 Victorian Christian Socialism 16 Founding fathers and Nonconformity 22 The theology of early Labour leaders 28 The Labour Church Movement 32 Notes 36 Twentieth century engagements 39 Themes in the work of R.H. Tawney 39 The Roman Catholic tadition 46 Notes 53 Twenty-first century engagements 56 Contemporary Christian Socialism 56 Revisionism and the turn to a liberal Labour tradition 63 Notes 71 Bibliography 73 Series foreword The Bible speaks to politics because God is Presently, the public role of religion in the interested in government – the right public UK is both expanding and deepening. At ordering of our relational priorities. But the same time, it is attracting fierce criticism what about party politics? Political parties from increasingly assertive secularists. This are often tribal. Commanding our loyalty, makes the need for fresh insight on how they can often be places that both express Christianity relates to British parties an and suppress religious identity. Whether urgent priority. we like it or not, political parties dominate politics in the UK and are set to do so The first phase of the project concentrates for the foreseeable future. As collegiate on the three largest parties – Conservative, enterprises, they have traditionally provided Labour, and Liberal Democrat – but our a political focus for joining broad sets of hope is that a later phase will engage other ideas around a unifying theme or common parties as well, and from all four nations vision for society. In recent years, as the of the UK. This phase has developed with inspiration of great political ideals has the invaluable help of the three Christian waned, they have become more complex party political groups within the parties and even contradictory vehicles for concerned – the Conservative Christian representation. This offers new challenges Fellowship (CCF), the Christian Socialist and opportunities for Christian engagement Movement (CSM) and the Liberal Democrat in politics. Christian Forum (LDCF). Special thanks are due to Elizabeth Berridge (CCF), Andy This is one of three publications – extended Flannagan (CSM), and Zoe Dixon (LCDF). essays – representing the first phase of the We are immensely grateful for their Partisan project – a developing resource enthusiasm for the project, for their advice on Christianity and British political parties as it took shape, and for their assistance in initiated and funded by the Bible Society, disseminating these first fruits. We should and produced and delivered in partnership make it clear, however, that while these with the Kirby Laing Institute for Christian three organisations generously offered Ethics (KLICE). The aim of the project is to their moral and practical support for the stimulate new and robust Christian political preparation of these essays, the opinions reflection within British political parties. It expressed in them are the authors’ alone has been launched at a paradoxical time. and do not represent the official stances 1 Building Jerusalem? Series foreword of the organisations concerned nor of the Our hope is that the Partisan project parties to which they are affiliated (nor of will bring fresh theological depth, self- the project’s two institutional sponsors). awareness, and critical potential to conversations already under way about the These essays are offered as a part of a contribution of Christian faith to British conversation that has been going on party politics. The essays leave no doubt for many years among party political that Christianity has made notable – at Christians. As ‘critical friends’ of the times perhaps even decisive – contributions parties, the authors were each asked to to the thinking and practice of the parties. address the role of Christianity within At the same time, they proceed from the them. We commissioned Joshua Hordern, recognition that today these contributions Paul Bickley and Stephen Backhouse to are not only ignored by many, but also often engage – appreciatively but frankly – with resisted or derided by some voices within the history, theology and broad policy the parties. Among the latter are those orientations of the party traditions to which who still subscribe to the discredited – yet they were assigned. We invited them to surprisingly tenacious – social-scientific identify the characteristic historical and myth that modernisation necessarily (and contemporary ‘gifts’ given by the Christian rightly) brings with it the privatisation of faith to the party tradition in question, religion and the secularisation of the public but also to employ insights from Christian square. The Partisan project sets itself political theology to confront the party’s squarely against that myth and seeks to vulnerabilities or Achilles’ heels where they underline the legitimacy of a wide variety found them. Within those broad parameters of faith-based contributions to political the authors were given freedom to develop debate, within an open democratic forum in their arguments as they saw fit, with their which robust political parties will continue own preferred emphases, and in their own to play an indispensable role. distinctive idioms. Importantly, the books seek to be discursive, not definitive. Each No one involved in the project – least of offers a particular (theological) reading of all the authors themselves – pretends that the history and contemporary condition of these essays are anything more than one the political party concerned, in recognition modest contribution to a debate that needs that there are, of course, other equally to take place at many levels and to involve legitimate and necessary readings. We a wide range of participants – and not are very grateful to the authors for the only Christians. Yet, given the widespread intelligence and dedication with which they popular disillusionment with and rose to the demanding challenges of our disengagement from party politics – indeed commission. from the whole political process – in recent 2 Building Jerusalem? Series foreword years, the ‘convictional health’ of parties is of vital concern for our entire parliamentary democracy. Everyone involved in this project would share the conviction that, as an ancient prophet warned another nation in crisis, ‘where there is no vision, the people perish’ ccfwebsite.com (Proverbs 29.18, AV). We hope that these essays stimulate new thinking about the urgent need for, and the desirable contents of, new political visions shaped by a primary Christian identity and biblical worldview. thecsm.org.uk We hope too that they will offer food for the journey for those already working within British political parties, and inspire others to consider entering the party political fray themselves as a constructive, honourable and missional arena of authentic Christian citizenship – for the common good of the ldcf.net whole nation. David Landrum (Senior Parliamentary Officer, Bible Society) biblesociety.org.uk Jonathan Chaplin (Director, KLICE) klice.co.uk 3 Introduction Introduction In the 1906 General Election, the Labour Representation Committee (LRC) fielded over fifty candidates for election. Owing to a pact with the powerful Liberal Party of the day, around thirty of these had a straight run at their seats. Twenty-nine were elected, with a further Liberal member joining the group early in the Parliament. As a result of the Lib/Lab pact and – in the light of the Taff Vale judgement – the slow awakening of the trade unions’ political consciousness, the labour movement now had independent political representation.1 They sat on the opposition benches, elected their own whips and officers, and gave themselves a new name: the Labour Party. This looks like a moment when British gentleman?’ asked John Ball, Lollard priest politics changed irrevocably. In spite of a and ringleader of the Peasants’ Revolt.3 Liberal landslide in 1906, that party would The Christian tradition and the witness of suffer a ‘strange death’ within a generation its Scriptures are shot through with the and for the rest of the twentieth century demand for justice and righteousness.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Official Ideology in the People's Republic of China - Evolution and Impact on Foreign Policy
    DUDLEY KN ,;Y NAVAL POS i u, uUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA 93943-5101 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS OFFICIAL IDEOLOGY IN THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA - EVOLUTION AND IMPACT ON FOREIGN POLICY Gerald F. Harper, Jr. June 1998 Thesis Advisors: Monte R. Bullard Mary P. Callahan Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved REPORT OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information suggestions for reducing this burden to Washington Headquarters Services. Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) 2 REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 98 Master's Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS OFFICAL IDEOLOGY IN THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA- EVOLUTION AND IMPACT ON FOREIGN POLICY 6. AUTHOR(S) Harper, Gerald F., Jr. 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Repression and Ideology, Full Report
    Challenging the Right, Advancing Social Justice REPRESSION AND IDEOLOGY The Legacy of Discredited Centrist/Extremist Theory By Chip Berlet and Matthew N. Lyons 1998 Political Research Associates (PRA) is a progressive think tank devoted to supporting movements that are building a more just and inclusive democratic society. We expose movements, institutions, and ideologies that undermine human rights. Copyright ©2014, Political Research Associates Political Research Associates 1310 Broadway, Suite 201 Somerville, MA 02144-1837 www.politicalresearch.org design by rachelle galloway-popotas, owl in a tree TABLE OF CONTENTS: • Introduction • Part One:Two Flawed Theories o Countersubversion Theory and Conspiracist State Repression § The Slippery Slope Theory of Subversion § The Onion-ring Theory of Subversion § Focus on Individual Aberration o Criticism of Centrist/Extremist Theory • Part Two: Government Abuses Bolstered by Flawed Analytical Models o Current Repressive Aspects Of Centrist/Extremist Theory o Liberal & Neoconservative Cooperation with State Repression o Some Examples § The San Francisco Spying Scandal § RICO and Anti-abortion Terrorism § The Patriot and Armed Militia Movements • Conclusions • About the Authors • Footnotes • Selected Bibliography INTRODUCTION NEW INTRODUCTION: Two social science models used by the U.S. government–“countersubversion theory” and “centrist/extremist theory”–wrongly assume there is criminal intent and activity behind all mass movements that are critical of the government.1 Centrist/extremist theory (sometimes called Classical Theory” or the “Pluralist School), lumps together dissidents, populists of the left and right, supremacists and terrorists as an irrational lunatic fringe. The image of a democratic elite guarding the vital center against irrational populists has appealed strongly to many defenders of the status quo, but as a reading of US political traditions it is strikingly twisted and inconsistent.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Friendship in Early America
    CAMPBELL, THERESA J., Ph.D. Political Friendship in Early America. (2010) Directed by Dr. Robert M. Calhoon. 250 pp. During the turbulent decades that encompassed the transition of the North American colonies into a Republic, America became the setting for a transformation in the context of political friendship. Traditionally the alliances established between elite, white, Protestant males have been most studied. These former studies provide the foundation for this work to examine the inclusion of ―others‖ -- political relationships formed with and by women, persons of diverse ethnicities and races, and numerous religious persuasions -- in political activity. From the outset this analysis demonstrates the establishment of an uniquely American concept of political friendship theory which embraced ideologies and rationalism. Perhaps most importantly, the work presents criteria for determining early American political friendship apart from other relationships. The central key in producing this manuscript was creating and applying the criteria for identifying political alliances. This study incorporates a cross-discipline approach, including philosophy, psychology, literature, religion, and political science with history to hone a conception of political friendship as understood by the Founding Generation. The arguments are supported by case studies drawn from a wide variety of primary documents. The result is a fresh perspective and a new approach for the study of eighteenth century American history. POLITICAL FRIENDSHIP IN EARLY AMERICA by Theresa J. Campbell A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Greensboro 2010 Approved by Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Party Registration Decisions-English Version
    2018 Party registration decisions Decisions by the Commission to approve or reject applied for party names, descriptions and emblems in date order You can find the current registration details of the applicants by clicking on their name An overview of the rules on registering a political party names, descriptions and emblems can be found here Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which part decision rejection applied of the UK? for 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Name Both Unions Party All of Great Approve Britain 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Description Scotland for Both Unions: All of Great Approve UK Europe Britain 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Description Together we are all All of Great Reject Does not meet the requirements of strongest Britain a description 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Emblem All of Great Reject Confusingly similar to another Britain already registered party 10.12.18 Both Unions Party Name Both Unions Party of Northern Approve Northern Ireland Ireland 10.12.18 Ein Gwlad Name Ein Gwlad Wales Reject Application incomplete 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description Future Shepton – Working England Approve together for Shepton 10.12.18 Future Shepton Description A fresh approach with Future England Approve Shepton 1 Decisions on party registration applications made in 2018 Type of Application Identity Date of The identity mark applied applies to Registration Further information/ Reason for Applicant name Mark decision for which
    [Show full text]
  • David Miliband President International Rescue & Co-Chairman Global Ocean Commission
    David Miliband President International Rescue & Co-Chairman Global Ocean Commission David Miliband is President and Chief Executive of International Rescue Committee (IRC), the renowned New team of over 12,000 people. The IRC helps people all over the world whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by learning and economic support to people in 40 countries, with many special programs designed for women and children. Every year, the IRC resettles thousands of refugees in 22 U.S. cities. David was the UK’s Foreign Secretary from 2007-10. Aged 41, he became the youngest person in 30 years to hold the position. He was responsible for a global network of 16,000 diplomats in over 160 countries. He established a distinctive and respected voice for an internationalist Britain, from the war in Afghanistan to the Iranian nuclear programme to engagement with the world’s emerging powers. David’s advocacy of a global role for a strong European foreign policy led to him being widely supported for the new job of EU High Representative for Foreign Aairs – a position he declined to continue his work in Britain. 1994 to 2001, authoring the manifestos on which Labour was elected to oce. As Minister for Schools from 2002 to 2004 he was regarded as a leader of reform. As Secretary of State for the Environment, he pioneered the championed the renaissance of Britain’s great cities. David set up "Movement for Change", which is training 10,000 community organisers in the UK to make changes in their own communities. He was also Vice Chairman of Sunderland Football Club until 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons for Labour Barbara Castle
    34 soundings issue 1 Autumn 1995 Lessons for Labour Barbara Castle Barbara Castle recounts from her experience how much 'old Labour' achieved in its periods of office. She warns New Labour against the accommodations to financial orthodoxy which wrecked previous Labour governments, and declares that unemployment is the blight that most needs to be challenged. I think it is common knowledge that I am 'Old Labour'. At 84 some people would describe that as 'Very Old'. As a schoolgirl in Bradford in the 1920s 1 rubbed shoulders with party veterans- like Fred Jowett who was to become a Cabinet Minister in the first ever Labour Government in 1924- He had been brought up in the infamous back-to-back slum terraces whose sanitation consisted of a row of 'privy middens' - a chain of earth closets between the terraced houses, serving all of them. No water flushing, of course. Just the nightly clearance of the accumulated excrement by mysterious 'night soil' men. Fresh air never blew through the back-to-backs and bathrooms were unknown. So am I just an old sentimentalist living in the past? I only wish this degradation of so many of our fellow citizens was past history. Of course, we all have water closets today - if we have a home. At least Fred Jowett had a roof over his head which is more than we can say of everyone in our 'prosperous' 35 Soundings society 70 years on from my Bradford days. In fact, the technological revolution has left as many human scars as the industrial one did.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theological Socialism of the Labour Church
    ‘SO PECULIARLY ITS OWN’ THE THEOLOGICAL SOCIALISM OF THE LABOUR CHURCH by NEIL WHARRIER JOHNSON A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham May 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The thesis argues that the most distinctive feature of the Labour Church was Theological Socialism. For its founder, John Trevor, Theological Socialism was the literal Religion of Socialism, a post-Christian prophecy announcing the dawn of a new utopian era explained in terms of the Kingdom of God on earth; for members of the Labour Church, who are referred to throughout the thesis as Theological Socialists, Theological Socialism was an inclusive message about God working through the Labour movement. By focussing on Theological Socialism the thesis challenges the historiography and reappraises the significance of the Labour
    [Show full text]
  • Research Note: Former Special Advisers in Cabinet, 1979-2013
    Research Note: Former Special Advisers in Cabinet, 1979-2013 Executive Summary Sixteen special advisers have gone on to become Cabinet Ministers. This means that of the 492 special advisers listed in the Constitution Unit database in the period 1979-2010, only 3% entered Cabinet. Seven Conservative party Cabinet members were formerly special advisers. o Four Conservative special advisers went on to become Cabinet Ministers in the 1979-1997 period of Conservative governments. o Three former Conservative special advisers currently sit in the Coalition Cabinet: David Cameron, George Osborne and Jonathan Hill. Eight Labour Cabinet members between 1997-2010 were former special advisers. o Five of the eight former special advisers brought into the Labour Cabinet between 1997-2010 had been special advisers to Tony Blair or Gordon Brown. o Jack Straw entered Cabinet in 1997 having been a special adviser before 1979. One Liberal Democrat Cabinet member, Vince Cable, was previously a special adviser to a Labour minister. The Coalition Cabinet of January 2013 currently has four members who were once special advisers. o Also attending Cabinet meetings is another former special adviser: Oliver Letwin as Minister of State for Policy. There are traditionally 21 or 22 Ministers who sit in Cabinet. Unsurprisingly, the number and proportion of Cabinet Ministers who were previously special advisers generally increases the longer governments go on. The number of Cabinet Ministers who were formerly special advisers was greatest at the end of the Labour administration (1997-2010) when seven of the Cabinet Ministers were former special advisers. The proportion of Cabinet made up of former special advisers was greatest in Gordon Brown’s Cabinet when almost one-third (30.5%) of the Cabinet were former special advisers.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham's Evangelical Free Churches and The
    BIRMINGHAM’S EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCHES AND THE FIRST WORLD WAR by ANDY VAIL A Thesis Submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY School of History & Cultures College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham 2019 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis demonstrates that the First World War did not have a major long-term impact on the evangelical free churches of Birmingham. Whilst many members were killed in the conflict, and local church auxiliaries were disrupted, once the participants – civil and military – returned, the work and mission of the churches mostly continued as they had before the conflict, the exception being the Adult School movement, which had been in decline prior to the conflict. It reveals impacts on local church life, including new opportunities for women amongst the Baptist and Congregational churches where they began to serve as deacons. The advent of conscription forced church members to personally face the issue as to whether as Christians they could in conscience bear arms. The conflict also speeded ecumenical co-operation nationally, in areas such as recognition of chaplains, and locally, in organising local prayer meetings and commemorations.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing the Line Between News and the Business of News: Exploring Journalists' Use of Twitter Jukes, Stephen
    www.ssoar.info Crossing the line between news and the business of news: exploring journalists' use of Twitter Jukes, Stephen Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Jukes, S. (2019). Crossing the line between news and the business of news: exploring journalists' use of Twitter. Media and Communication, 7(1), 248-258. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1772 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183–2439) 2019, Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 248–258 DOI: 10.17645/mac.v7i1.1772 Article Crossing the Line between News and the Business of News: Exploring Journalists’ Use of Twitter Stephen Jukes Faculty of Media and Communication, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] Submitted: 7 September 2018 | Accepted: 4 January 2018 | Published: 21 March 2019 Abstract Anglo-American journalism has typically drawn a firm dividing line between those who report the news and those who run the business of news. This boundary, often referred to in the West as a ‘Chinese Wall’, is designed to uphold the inde- pendence of journalists from commercial interests or the whims of news proprietors. But does this separation still exist in today’s age of social media and at a time when news revenues are under unprecedented pressure? This article focuses on Twitter, now a widely used tool in the newsroom, analysing the Twitter output of 10 UK political correspondents during the busy party conference season.
    [Show full text]