L CF OTST FC 0317 Conference Handbook.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

L CF OTST FC 0317 Conference Handbook.Indd Conference handbook OTST 2017 Optical Terahertz Science and Technology 2–7 April 2017 University College London London, UK http://otst2017.iopconfs.org/home Organised by the Instrument Science and Technology Group Contents Enquiries 2 Sponsors 2 Location 3 Registration 3 Catering 3 Presenters information 4 Programme 5 Social programme 5 Exhibition 6 Travel 6 Visas 6 Safety information 7 Local information 7 IOP Membership 7 Maps 9 rd 43 IOP Plasma Physics Conference 2016 1 Enquiries Conference Organiser Jon Roe Institute of Physics 76 Portland Place London W1B 1NT, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7470 4908 E-mail: [email protected] OTST 2017 Chairs Dr Oleg Mitrofanov, University College London, UK Dr Miriam Serena Vitiello NEST, Istituto Nanoscienze CNR and Scuola Normale Superiore, Italy Programme committee Richard Averitt, University of California, San Diego, USA Frank Hegmann, University of Alberta, Canada Rainer Hillenbrand, CIC nanoGUNE, Spain Michael Johnston, University of Oxford, UK Kodo Kawase, Nagoya University, Japan Andrea Markelz, University at Buffalo, SUNY, USA Daniel Mittleman, Brown University, USA Ajay Nahata, University of Utah, USA Charles Schmuttenmaer, Yale University, USA Masayoshi Tonouchi, Osaka University, Japan Peter Uhd Jepsen, DTU, Denmark Karl Unterrainer, TU Wien, Austria The OTST 2017 conference is organised by: IOP Instrument Science and Technology Group Sponsors 2 43rd IOP Plasma Physics Conference 2016 Disclaimer The Institute of Physics, University College London, and their approved representatives cannot take responsibility for any accident, loss or damage to participants or their property during the conference. Location The conference will be held at University College London from 2-7 April 2017. The easiest access point to registration will be via the main entrance on Gower Street. The exhibition will take place alongside catering up until Thursday 6 April. The talks will take place in the Cruciform lecture theatre located over the road, 1 minute away. The North and South Cloisters (location of welcome reception and poster sessions) are not marked on the map. Both are situated in the Wilkins Building and directions will be clearly sign posted. Venue address: University College London Gower St, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 6BT For information about the venue, please visit their website: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ All location maps can be downloaded here. Registration Registration will open on Sunday afternoon for the tutorials in the Main Quad and Sunday evening in South Cloisters for the welcome reception. Times are as follows: Date Times Sunday 2 April 2017 12:30 – 19:00 Monday 3 April 2017 08:00 – 20:00 Tuesday 4 April 2017 08:00 – 19:30 Wednesday 5 April 2017 08:00 – 19:00 Thursday 6 April 2017 08:00 – 18:00 Friday 7 April 2017 09:00 – 18:00 On arrival, each participant will receive a delegate pack containing a lanyard badge, programme, delegate list, folder, note pad and pen. Please wear your badge at all times because this will help with security and enable you to identify your fellow delegates. Replacement badges can be issued at the registration desk. The conference abstract book will be made available to delegates as a PDF file in advance of the conference. The abstract book will also be available in hard copy and will form part of your delegate pack. Messages A message board will be placed near the registration desk. Participants should check the board for messages as an attempt to locate participants will only be made in the case of an emergency. During registration times, messages can be left by emailing [email protected] Messages can also be left by telephoning +44 07737 117388. Catering Lunches, and refreshments during the conference are included in the registration fee and served at set times during the conference programme. An evening welcome reception will take place in North Cloisters on Sunday evening and will include finger food and beverages. rd 43 IOP Plasma Physics Conference 2016 3 Please refer to the table below for locations and timings. Sunday 2 April Tutorial registration 12:30–13:30 Welcome reception 17:15–19:00 Monday 3 April Registration 07:30–08:20 Refreshment break 10:00-10:30 Lunch 12:15-14:00 Refreshment break 16:45–17:30 Reception 19:00-20:00 Tuesday 4 April Registration 08:00-08:30 Refreshment break 10:00-10:30 Lunch 12:00-14:00 Refreshment break 16:30-17:30 Wednesday 5 April Registration 08:00-08:30 Refreshment break 10:00-10:30 Lunch 12:00-14:00 Refreshment break 16:30-17:30 Thursday 6 April Registration 08:00-08:30 Refreshment break 10:00-10:30 Lunch 12:00-14:00 Conference Banquet 18:00-22:30 Friday 7 April Registration 09:00-09:30 Refreshment Break 10:45:11:30 Lunch and close 12:15 Dietary requirements Participants with special dietary requirements are asked to notify the conference office by e-mail prior to their arrival if they have not already done so when registering. Those with special dietary requirements are asked to make themselves known to the catering team. It will not be possible to provide an alternative menu unless prior notification has been received. Nut allergies – unfortunately the venue cannot provide assurances that food has not been cross-contaminated with traces of nuts during ingredient processing at manufacture’s sites, and during food preparation and on-site. For this reason, we are unable to provide guarantees that any of the food served is free from nuts or trace elements. Please e-mail [email protected] if you have any queries. Presenter’s information Oral presentations The lecture theatre (Cruciform Building lecture theatre) is equipped with the following audio-visual equipment: • Computer with PowerPoint facilities (Office XP and Windows XP) • Data projector and projector screen • Microphone – Radio x1 (Lapel) / Laser point Speakers wishing to use additional audio-visual equipment or intending to present from a Macintosh computer are asked to contact Jon Roe ([email protected]) before the conference. The campus have a mini-display port/HDMI adapter that will work with Macs that use a mini-display port but it is advised that you bring your own adaptor. 4 43rd IOP Plasma Physics Conference 2016 Speakers are requested to bring their presentations on a USB memory stick in either Office 2007 or .pdf format and preload them onto the laptop located in the lecture theatre. Speakers should save their presentation into the appropriate pre-named session folders pre-set on the desktop and files should be saved by speakers surname and initial. To optimise compatibility, particularly for the inclusion of multimedia components, PowerPoint presentations should have been saved using PowerPoint’s “Package for CD” facility. Direct connection of personal laptops (with set up in the break prior to the corresponding session) is an acceptable but not preferred alternative. The lecture theatre is reasonably large, and speakers should use a minimum 15-point font size in PowerPoint slides to ensure legibility. Presenters are asked to prepare their talks to match the allocated times which will be rigidly enforced. • Plenary (45 minutes) • Invited talks (30 minutes) • Contributed talks (15 minutes) Poster information If you are presenting a poster please ensure that you display your poster on the board number that matches your poster number in the programme. The poster sessions will be broken down over three days - Monday, Wednesday and Thursday. We ask all presenters to stick to their slot and dismount posters at the close of each day. Poster session 1 - Monday 3 April - Mount poster anytime from 8:30. Dismount before close Poster session 2 - Wednesday 5 April - Mount poster anytime from 8:30. Dismount before close Poster session 3 - Thursday 6 April - Mount poster anytime from 8:30. Dismount before close Although organisers will endeavour to save poster material, no guarantee can be made for posters not removed by the scheduled times. Posters must not be larger than A0 in size and should be a portrait format. The poster board measures 6ft (1830mm) tall by 3ft (940mm) wide, and therefore if your poster does not fit within these dimensions, we cannot guarantee it will be displayed. Fixing material will be provided to mount your poster. Content Posters are a visual presentation of your research and as such we recommend that you use schematic diagrams, graphs and tables, where possible, rather than just text. Please use an appropriate sized font so the information is legible at a distance of about 3' or 1 metre Programme Please refer to the website at http://otst2017.iopconfs.org/612004 for the latest programme. Social programme A welcome reception will take place on Sunday 2 April following the afternoon's tutorials at 17:15 in the South Cloisters Building. South Cloisters is located opposite the marquee. A campus map is appended at the back of this document. The exhibition reception on Monday will be held at 19:00 in the Marquee and will consist of a selection of alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks and nibbles. rd 43 IOP Plasma Physics Conference 2016 5 The conference banquet will be held at the Churchill War Museum on Thursday 6 April and is included in your registration fee. Further instructions will be given on the day but all delegates are to meet at the main quad at 18:00. Coaches will collect participants on Gordon Street at 18:15. Return Coaches to University College London will depart from the Churchill War Museum at 22:30. Excursions Three excursions will run on Friday afternoon to Windsor Castle, Imperial War Museum Duxford and a boat tour from Westminster to Greenwich. There are limited spaces available on each trip so if you haven’t already confirmed and would like to take part, please log back in to your registration and select the trip you would like to attend.
Recommended publications
  • 2016-17 Department: UCL Medical School Faculty: Medical Sciences CONNECTED CURRICULUM
    UCL QUALITY REVIEW FRAMEWORK - ANNEX 6.1.3: ASER DEVELOPMENT & ENHANCEMENT PLAN Academic Session: 2016-17 Department: UCL Medical School Faculty: Medical Sciences CONNECTED CURRICULUM Last session, Departments were invited to discuss how they intended to begin their preliminary assessment of their taught provision by benchmarking each programme against the grid in the Connected Curriculum Enhancement Guide. Programmes were asked to evaluate and clearly state where the programme or cluster of similar programmes was benchmarked in relation to each dimension of the Connected Curriculum. In this section, Departments are asked to indicate the extent to which their programme(s) reflect each of the six dimensions, to highlight notable examples of good practice, and (in the Development and Enhancement plan below) to list up to six actions that the department/programme team will now take to enhance the programme(s) over the next two to three years. Departments will then be asked to review progress in relation to these actions in the Autumn 2019 ASER. The broad evaluation of the programme(s) as ‘Beginning’, ‘Developing’, ‘Developed’ or ‘Outstanding’ for each dimension will enable the Department/Programme Leader to track progress in relation to all six dimensions over time. It is intended to be a broadly agreed description of current practice in the programme(s) as a whole. General guidance on interpreting these terms is found on p6-7 of the Connected Curriculum online guide: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/teaching-learning/sites/teaching-learning/files/connected_curriculum_brochure_21_june_2017.pdf Departments may also find the ‘Twenty Questions’ on p10 helpful. If you have a large number of UG programmes in your department, a suggested approach is to use this form to provide a departmental summary of your programmes and then to identify those particular programmes which are excelling or which need more development by completing a form with a summary for each programme (or cluster of very similar programmes).
    [Show full text]
  • Projects Nominated in 2020 UCL Provosts Public Engagement
    Projects Nominated in 2020 UCL Provost's Public Engagement Awards Lead UCL Lead external Project Name UCL Department External Organisation Contact Contact A strengths-based approach to autism and employment: Insights, experiences, and Psychology and Human Development, UCL Anna Melissa best practice strategies from the Deutsche Bank UK autistic graduate internship Institute of Education – Centre for Research in Alex Wilson Deutsche Bank Romualdez programme Autism and Education Addressing Infrastructural Vulnerabilities: a participatory spatial intervention in the Andrea Rigon Development Planning Unit Joana Dabaj CatalyticAction refugee-hosting town of Bar Elias, Lebanon Evangelos Beatboxing After Laryngectomy UCL Institute of Education, Department of CCM Thomas Moors Shout at Cancer Himonides Education, Practice and Society, Institute of Building the evidence base for effective policy: the role of education in international Moses Oketch Education, Centre for Education and International Jess Atkinson Department for International Development (DFID) development Development (CEID) Ameenat Lola Childhood rare eyes disease: patient and public involvement and engagement UCL GOS Institute of Child Health Deirdre Leyden GOSH Patient and Public Involvement in Research Lead Solebo Civic Design CPD and Knowledge Exchange: Co-designing Neighbourhoods with Pablo Sendra The Bartlett School of Planning Leslie Barson Granville Community Kitchen Communities Collaborative City Planning Strategies Masters Module BPLN0033 Elena Besussi Bartlett School of
    [Show full text]
  • Review of UCL Medical School
    London regional review 2012–13 Review of UCL Medical School This visit is part of a regional review and uses a risk-based approach. For more information on this approach see http://www.gmc- uk.org/education/13707.asp. Review at a glance About the School Programme MBBS University UCL Medical School Years of course 6 Programme structure Year 1 – Fundamentals of clinical science 1 Year 2 – Fundamentals of clinical science 2 Year 3 – Scientific method in depth (iBSc) Year 4 – Integrated clinical care Year 5 – Life cycle Year 6 – Preparation for practice Number of students 1,969 (2011 MSAR) Number of LEPs UCL reported 196 clinical placements across 28 trusts or other providers, excluding GP placements. Local deanery London Deanery Last GMC visit 2004-5 QABME Outstanding actions None from last visit 1 About the visit Visit dates 22-23 November 2012 Sites visited UCL Medical School Areas of exploration MBBS Were any patient No safety concerns identified during the visit? Were any significant No educational concerns identified? Has further regulatory No action been requested via the responses to concerns element of the QIF? Summary 1 London has been chosen as the region for review in 2012-13 and all five London medical schools have been visited as part of this review. The north central regional visit team visited UCL Medical School (the School), a Division in the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, in November 2012. 2 UCL is the third largest medical school in London with 1,969 students. The School has three main clinical campuses: Bloomsbury, the Royal Free and the Whittington.
    [Show full text]
  • Review 2011 1 Research
    LONDON’S GLOBAL UNIVERSITY ReviewHighlights 2011 2011 Walking on Mars © Angeliki Kapoglou Over summer 2011, UCL Communications held a The winning entry was by Angeliki Kapoglou (UCL Space photography competition, open to all students, calling for & Climate Physics), who was selected to serve as a member images that demonstrated how UCL students contribute of an international crew on the Mars Desert Research Station, to society as global citizens. The term ‘education for global which simulates the Mars environment in the Utah desert. citizenship’ encapsulates all that UCL does to enable Researchers at the station work to develop key knowledge students to respond to the intellectual, social and personal needed to prepare for the human exploration of Mars. challenges that they will encounter throughout their future careers and lives. The runners-up and other images of UCL life can be seen at: www.flickr.com/uclnews Contents Research 2 Follow UCL news www.ucl.ac.uk Health 5 Insights: a fortnightly email summary Global 8 of news, comment and events: www.ucl.ac.uk/news/insights Teaching & Learning 11 Events calendar: Enterprise 14 www.events.ucl.ac.uk Highlights 2011 17 Twitter: @uclnews UCL Council White Paper 2011–2021 YouTube: UCLTV Community 21 In images: www.flickr.com/uclnews Finance & Investment 25 SoundCloud: Awards & Appointments 30 www.soundcloud.com/uclsound iTunes U: People 36 http://itunes.ucl.ac.uk Leadership 37 UCL – London’s Global University Our vision Our values • An outstanding institution, recognised as one of the world’s
    [Show full text]
  • Ucl Medical School Internal Quality Review
    UCL MEDICAL SCHOOL INTERNAL QUALITY REVIEW Contents INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................................4 Regulatory Framework.........................................................................................................................................4 Overview of Educational Organisational Structures ............................................................................................4 Overview of Educational Programmes.................................................................................................................5 SECTION 1. KEY DEVELOPMENTS......................................................................................................................7 1.1 Findings from previous review .......................................................................................................................7 1.2 Progress on implementation of the recommendations ................................................................................10 1.2.1 MBBS ....................................................................................................................................................10 1.2.2 Postgraduate Education ........................................................................................................................13 SECTION 2. STUDENTS, STAFF AND LEARNING RESOURCES.....................................................................15 2.1 Student Profile..............................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Ed
    Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Teaching ‘… an admirable testament to UCL’s ambition to foster innovative, evidence-based and thoughtful approaches to teaching and learning. There is much to learn from here.’— Professor Karen O’Brien, Head of the Humanities Division, University of Oxford ‘Research and teaching’ is a typical response to the question, ‘What are universities for?’ For most people, one comes to mind more quickly than the other. Most undergraduate students will think of teaching, while PhD students will think of research. University staff will have similarly varied reactions depending on their roles. Emphasis on one or the other has also changed over time according to governmental incentives and pressure. Davies and Norbert Pachler ed. Jason P. For some decades, higher education has been bringing the two closer together, to the point of them overlapping, by treating students as partners and nding ways of having them learn through undertaking research. Drawing on a range of examples from across the disciplines, this collection demonstrates how one research-rich university, University College London (UCL), has set up initiatives to raise the pro le of teaching and give it parity with research. It explains what staff and students have done to create an environment in which students can learn by discovery, through research- based education. ‘… an exemplary text of its kind, offering much to dwell on to all interested in advancing university education.’— Ronald Barnett, Emeritus Professor of Higher Education, University College London Institute of Education Dr Jason P. Davies is a Senior Teaching Fellow at the UCL Arena Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • UCL MEDICAL SCHOOL Clinical and Professional Practice, Medical Student Administration University College London JOB DESCRIPTION
    UCL MEDICAL SCHOOL Clinical and Professional Practice, Medical Student Administration University College London JOB DESCRIPTION Job Title: Clinical and Professional Practice Tutor x 6 Division: UCL Medical School Sub Department: Clinical and Professional Practice, Medical Student Administration Location: Bloomsbury, Royal Free or Whittington Campus Grade: 7 Hours: Part-time and Sessional, mainly on Thursdays and Fridays with some scope for flexibility The MBBS Clinical and Professional Practice Modules The Clinical and Professional Practice (CPP) modules make up almost 20% of the overall MBBS programme. Learning in CPP is central to understanding medicine as an integrated whole. There are 15 CPP modules, each organised over six years: Student centred learning, patient centred learning: 1. Portfolio a. Y1 online submission at end of year b. Y2 online submission at end of year c. Y4 E-portfolio d. Y5 E-portfolio and Case of the Month e. Y6 E-portfolio and Case of the Month Patient Pathways: 2. Integrated and Community Care (Y1) 3. Cardio-metabolic Medicine (Y2) 4. Cancer Medicine (Y4) 5. Person-centred (Y5) Integrated Vertical Strands: 6. Anatomy and Imaging 7. Clinical Skills and Practical Procedures 8. Pathological Sciences 9. Use of Evidence 10. Use of Medicines Overarching Themes: 11. Mental Health Page 1 of 5 12. Social Determinants of Health a. Epidemiology b. Global Health c. Medical Sociology d. Public Health 13. Ethics and Law 14. Clinical Communication 15. Professional Practice a. Professionalism b. E-health The organisation of the CPP is complex, from both an administrative and academic perspective. CPP teaching takes place both as centrally organised and ‘peel off’ activities in dedicated teaching sessions and activities fully integrated into the horizontal modules.
    [Show full text]
  • For Peer Review Only
    BMJ Open BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013897 on 2 December 2016. Downloaded from “You can’t be a person and a doctor”. The work-life balance of doctors in training: a national qualitative study ForJournal: peerBMJ Open review only Manuscript ID bmjopen-2016-013897 Article Type: Research Date Submitted by the Author: 15-Aug-2016 Complete List of Authors: Rich, Antonia; University College London Medical School, Research Department of Medical Education Viney, Rowena; University College London Medical School, Research Department of Medical Education Needleman, Sarah; University College London Medical School, Research Department of Medical Education Griffin, Ann; University College London, Medical School Woolf, Katherine; University College London, Academic Centre for Medical Education <b>Primary Subject Medical education and training Heading</b>: Secondary Subject Heading: Qualitative research QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, work-life balance, MEDICAL EDUCATION & http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ Keywords: TRAINING, women, gender, medical training on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml Page 1 of 86 BMJ Open BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013897 on 2 December 2016. Downloaded from 1 2 3 4 “You can’t be a person and a doctor”. The work-life balance of 5 6 doctors in training: a national qualitative study 7 8 9 Dr Antonia Rich, Research Associate1 10 Dr Rowena Viney, Research Associate1 11 Dr Sarah Needleman, Clinical Teaching Fellow1
    [Show full text]
  • BMJ Open Is Committed to Open Peer Review. As Part of This Commitment We Make the Peer Review History of Every Article We Publish Publicly Available
    BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020930 on 7 April 2018. Downloaded from BMJ Open is committed to open peer review. As part of this commitment we make the peer review history of every article we publish publicly available. When an article is published we post the peer reviewers’ comments and the authors’ responses online. We also post the versions of the paper that were used during peer review. These are the versions that the peer review comments apply to. The versions of the paper that follow are the versions that were submitted during the peer review process. They are not the versions of record or the final published versions. They should not be cited or distributed as the published version of this manuscript. BMJ Open is an open access journal and the full, final, typeset and author-corrected version of record of the manuscript is available on our site with no access controls, subscription charges or pay-per-view fees (http://bmjopen.bmj.com). If you have any questions on BMJ Open’s open peer review process please email [email protected] http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. BMJ Open BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020930 on 7 April 2018. Downloaded from Building motivation to participate in a Quality Improvement Collaborative; a qualitative participatory evaluation Journal: BMJ Open ManuscriptFor ID peerbmjopen-2017-020930 review only Article Type: Research Date Submitted by the Author: 05-Dec-2017 Complete List of Authors: Lalani, Mirza; Primary Care and
    [Show full text]
  • Translational Research Office, UK
    Impact Objectives • Use the Therapeutic Innovation Networks (TINs) to harness the translational experience and infrastructure of UCL and its NIHR Biomedical Research Centres to provide education, support and encouragement to early career scientists to translate their novel science • Maximise University College London’s ability to quickly and efficiently translate disease-related discoveries into high-quality therapeutic interventions and tangible treatments for patients • Ensure all TINs have an industry network with the aim of using their know-how and resource to aid the development of the portfolio The innovation game Professor David Lomas discusses the Therapeutic Innovation Networks (TINs), which are facilitating and accelerating enterprise at University College London (UCL), UK Can you begin by commercialising biomedical therapies. These of our national and international standing. introducing yourself? forums are also used to discuss barriers and For example, we have used the TINs to hurdles, and approaches to overcome them. assess our strengths and weaknesses in cell, I am Vice-Provost The Cell, Gene & Regenerative Medicine gene and regenerative therapies, and work (Health) at UCL, Head TIN has been very effective in pulling out how we can collaborate effectively with of the School of Life & the community together and articulating industry and our London partners: King’s Medical Sciences and our strengths in this area. UCL has more College London, Imperial College London Head of the UCL Medical School. I also serve research and clinical activity in the area of cell and Queen Mary University of London. This as the Academic Director of UCL Partners’ and gene therapy than any other university allows for economy of scale, more rapid Academic Health Science Centre and as a in the UK and, indeed, has a clinical portfolio translation and more effective competition Director of The Francis Crick Institute, Africa of comparable size to that of the whole of for research and enterprise income, Health Research Institute, MedCity, Non- Spain or Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Lecturer in Paediatrics Job Description
    UCL SCHOOL OF LIFE AND MEDICAL SCIENCES UCL FACUTY OF POULATION HEALTH SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH CLINICAL LECTURER IN PAEDIATRICS JOB DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION The UCL Institute of Child Health (ICH) The mission of the UCL Institute of Child Health is to improve the health and well-being of children, and the adults they will become, through world-class research, education and public engagement. This strategy has been informed by the insights gained from visits to six other internationally excellent children’s academic medical centres and by detailed discussions internally and with our external partners, including GODH, GOSH Children’s Charity, the wider UCL community, UCL Partners and funding bodies. The UCL Institute of Child Health, together with its clinical partner Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, forms the largest concentration of children’s health research outside North America. In 2013 ICH developed a new academic strategy which focuses on five scientific programmes: • Genetics and Genomic Medicine • Population, Policy and Practice • Developmental Biology and Cancer • Developmental Neurosciences • Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Four key principles underpin these programmes and the academic strategy: Interdisciplinarity. ICH will facilitate the best scientists, from all relevant academic and clinical disciplines, to work together to address fundamental questions to improve the health of children. Accelerating translation. ICH will support the rapid translation of findings from basic discoveries relevant to understanding of health and disease, to clinical studies, more directly aimed at improving the clinical care of children. We will also support “reverse translation” from observations in clinical and population studies to basic studies which address mechanisms of health and disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Plan 2017-18
    BUSINESS PLAN 2017‐18 1 Contents MedCity Vision and 3-5 year long range view ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Themes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Organisational Values ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Action Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Key Performance Indicators .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Assumptions................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Risk Plan .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]