Confidential: for Review Only Strengthening the Third Pillar: Primary Care and the UK COVID-19 Response

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Confidential: for Review Only Strengthening the Third Pillar: Primary Care and the UK COVID-19 Response BMJ Confidential: For Review Only Strengthening the Third Pillar: Primary Care and the UK COVID-19 Response Journal: BMJ Manuscript ID BMJ-2020-058797 Article Type: Analysis BMJ Journal: BMJ Date Submitted by the 23-May-2020 Author: Complete List of Authors: Park, Sophie; UCL Medical School, Research Dept. of Primary Care and Population Health Elliott, Josephine; UCL Medical School Berlin, Anita; Queen Mary University of London, Institute of Health Science Education Haines, Andrew; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Dept of Social and Environmental Health Research Keywords: COVID-19, primary care, general practice https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj Page 1 of 17 BMJ 1 2 3 1 Manuscripts are submitted online here: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj 4 2 5 6 3 7 4 Analysis 8 5 9 10 6 Strengthening the Third Pillar: Primary Care and the UK COVID-19 11 7 Response 12 Confidential: For Review Only 13 8 14 9 Sophie Park1 15 10 Josephine Elliott 2 16 11 Anita Berlin 3 17 4 18 12 Andy Haines 19 13 20 14 1 Research Dept. of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL 21 15 2 UCL Medical School 22 16 3 Institute of Heath Science Education, Queen Mary University of London 23 4 24 17 Dept. of Public Health, Environments and Society and Dept. of Population Health, London 25 18 School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 26 19 27 20 Correspondence to: 28 21 Dr. Sophie Park 29 30 22 Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health 31 23 Royal Free Campus 32 24 Rowland Hill St. 33 25 Hampstead 34 26 London NW3 2PY 35 36 27 37 28 Email: [email protected] 38 29 Phone: 0207 794 0500 39 30 40 41 31 Word count: (Target: 1800-2000 words) 42 32 References: (up to 20 references, in Vancouver superscript style) 43 33 44 34 45 46 KEY MESSAGES 47 48 The emphasis in the UK COVID-19 response has been on public health and 49 hospital care, with the potential contribution of primary care largely 50 overlooked. Primary care strengths include provision of comprehensive 51 healthcare for individuals, continuity and gatekeeping. Planning which 52 includes and supports primary care can contribute to the COVID-19 53 response, increase resilience and minimise the impact of COVID-19 on other 54 healthcare needs. 55 56 57 Active engagement of primary care will be essential in management of the 58 second and subsequent waves of COVID-19, in order to improve care of 59 vulnerable patients in the community; reduce demands on hospital services; 60 support rehabilitation of recovering patients; improve palliative care; and https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj BMJ Page 2 of 17 1 2 3 4 sustain non-COVID 19 care. 5 6 Hospital admissions from COVID-19 require long and intensive treatment 7 with mortality often exceeding 30%. Potentially effective treatments 8 delivered early in the course of the disease in primary care settings should 9 be a priority for research funding. 10 11 ● Additional research and evaluation in primary care would inform the 12 Confidential:response to subsequent COVID-19 For waves, Review and strengthen Only the capacity of 13 primary healthcare to deal with the backlog of non-COVID-19 morbidity and 14 the medium-to-long term physical and mental health sequalae of COVID. 15 16 17 18 35 19 36 20 21 37 Contributors and sources 22 38 23 39 Sophie Park is a practising GP and clinical academic. She is Director of Medical Education 24 40 (Primary Care and Community) at UCL Medical School and Training Co-Lead for the NIHR 25 26 41 School of Primary Care Research (SPCR) Evidence Synthesis Working Group. Josephine 27 42 Elliott is a medical student and has an interest in public health and primary care, which 28 43 developed during her Masters in Medical Anthropology and internship at the WHO. Anita 29 44 Berlin is a GP and Professor of Primary Care Education at the Institute of Health Science 30 45 Education, Queen Mary University of London. Andy Haines is a Professor of Environmental 31 32 46 Change and Public Health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. He was 33 47 formerly a GP and Professor of Primary Health Care. All authors contributed to the 34 48 intellectual content contributed to drafting the text and approved the final draft. 35 49 36 50 37 51 Acknowledgements 38 52 Optionally include this section if you have any acknowledgements to make.N/A 39 40 53 41 54 42 55 Patient involvement 43 56 As The BMJ is seeking to advance partnership with patients, we also ask authors to seek 44 57 their input into articles wherever relevant, and document their involvement as patient 45 58 contributors or coauthors. In your statement, please specify how patients were involved and 46 59 how the article changed as a result of their contribution. If you did not seek input from 47 60 patients, please include a statement saying that no patients were involved. Ideally input from 48 61 patients will be sought at the article planning stage. 49 62 50 63 No patients were involved 51 64 52 65 53 66 Conflicts of Interest 54 67 We have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and have the following 55 68 interests to declare: 56 69 Note: where a competing interest exists that might disqualify an author from contributing, it is 57 70 wise to discuss it with a BMJ editor before writing the article. 58 71 We have no conflicts of interest 59 60 72 https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj Page 3 of 17 BMJ 1 2 3 73 4 74 Licence 5 75 The Corresponding Author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on 6 76 behalf of all authors, an exclusive licence (or non exclusive for government employees) on a 7 77 worldwide basis to the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd ("BMJ"), and its Licensees to permit this 8 78 article (if accepted) to be published in The BMJ's editions and any other BMJ products and 9 10 79 to exploit all subsidiary rights, as set out in The BMJ's licence. 11 80 12 81 Confidential: For Review Only 13 82 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj BMJ Page 4 of 17 1 2 3 83 Strengthening the Third Pillar: Primary Care and the UK COVID-19 4 5 84 Response 6 85 7 86 Standfirst 70 8 9 87 Most of the focus in addressing COVID-19 has been on public health and hospital-based 10 88 care. However, initial infection and many deaths occur in community settings with increasing 11 89 numbers of patients recovering from COVID-19 at home. COVID-19 clinical and research 12 90 strategiesConfidential: should capitalise on the strengths For of UK Review primary care including Only comprehensive 13 14 91 healthcare, continuity and gatekeeping, to build NHS resilience by capitalising on existing 15 92 primary care infrastructure and identifying effective, early interventions and follow-up 16 93 strategies. 17 94 18 95 19 96 The current COVID-19 response 20 21 97 This article examines current and future challenges and opportunities for primary care, and 22 23 98 highlights the urgent need for strategic planning and investment in primary care services, 24 99 evidence production and implementation. Globally, societies are attempting rapid 25 26 100 adjustments to direct and indirect consequences of life with COVID-19 1. Healthcare is at the 27 101 centre of these organisational changes, providing opportunities to draw on existing 28 29 102 strengths, and adapt systems to new challenges. Initial World Health Organisation (WHO) 30 31 103 recommendations were based on system adaptations in China, focusing predominantly on 32 104 secondary care (e.g. building new hospitals, initiating early ICU treatment) and public health 33 2 3 34 105 (e.g. early detection and institutional isolation) , . Despite the WHO’s commitment to 35 106 Universal Health Coverage and the universal access to primary care in the UK, primary care 36 37 107 has received less policy focus to date both globally and in the UK. 38 108 39 40 109 Internationally, primary care has experienced unprecedented shifts in work, with potential 41 4 42 110 short and longer-term changes of service organisation and patient outcomes . Systems 43 111 have varied in their capacity for rapid change; PPE availability; and use of volunteer support. 44 45 112 Taiwan, for example, report creating a tiered approach to primary care including walk-in 46 113 access, ‘prepared’ clinics for COVID-suspected cases, and screening 5. In Singapore, 47 48 114 existing primary care networks supported early detection and isolation 6. In anticipation of 49 50 115 subsequent peaks of COVID-19 and post-COVID morbidity, recognition that hospital case 51 116 fatality rates are over 30% (rising to 50% for those in ICU 7), and that hospitals are foci for 52 53 117 transmission, strategies are needed to refine management of patients at home and optimise 54 118 the use of NHS resources. ONS data show that many excess deaths are occurring outside 55 56 119 hospitals either from COVID-19, or from conditions for which care has been disrupted, 57 120 adding to the case for primary care response 8.
Recommended publications
  • 2016-17 Department: UCL Medical School Faculty: Medical Sciences CONNECTED CURRICULUM
    UCL QUALITY REVIEW FRAMEWORK - ANNEX 6.1.3: ASER DEVELOPMENT & ENHANCEMENT PLAN Academic Session: 2016-17 Department: UCL Medical School Faculty: Medical Sciences CONNECTED CURRICULUM Last session, Departments were invited to discuss how they intended to begin their preliminary assessment of their taught provision by benchmarking each programme against the grid in the Connected Curriculum Enhancement Guide. Programmes were asked to evaluate and clearly state where the programme or cluster of similar programmes was benchmarked in relation to each dimension of the Connected Curriculum. In this section, Departments are asked to indicate the extent to which their programme(s) reflect each of the six dimensions, to highlight notable examples of good practice, and (in the Development and Enhancement plan below) to list up to six actions that the department/programme team will now take to enhance the programme(s) over the next two to three years. Departments will then be asked to review progress in relation to these actions in the Autumn 2019 ASER. The broad evaluation of the programme(s) as ‘Beginning’, ‘Developing’, ‘Developed’ or ‘Outstanding’ for each dimension will enable the Department/Programme Leader to track progress in relation to all six dimensions over time. It is intended to be a broadly agreed description of current practice in the programme(s) as a whole. General guidance on interpreting these terms is found on p6-7 of the Connected Curriculum online guide: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/teaching-learning/sites/teaching-learning/files/connected_curriculum_brochure_21_june_2017.pdf Departments may also find the ‘Twenty Questions’ on p10 helpful. If you have a large number of UG programmes in your department, a suggested approach is to use this form to provide a departmental summary of your programmes and then to identify those particular programmes which are excelling or which need more development by completing a form with a summary for each programme (or cluster of very similar programmes).
    [Show full text]
  • Projects Nominated in 2020 UCL Provosts Public Engagement
    Projects Nominated in 2020 UCL Provost's Public Engagement Awards Lead UCL Lead external Project Name UCL Department External Organisation Contact Contact A strengths-based approach to autism and employment: Insights, experiences, and Psychology and Human Development, UCL Anna Melissa best practice strategies from the Deutsche Bank UK autistic graduate internship Institute of Education – Centre for Research in Alex Wilson Deutsche Bank Romualdez programme Autism and Education Addressing Infrastructural Vulnerabilities: a participatory spatial intervention in the Andrea Rigon Development Planning Unit Joana Dabaj CatalyticAction refugee-hosting town of Bar Elias, Lebanon Evangelos Beatboxing After Laryngectomy UCL Institute of Education, Department of CCM Thomas Moors Shout at Cancer Himonides Education, Practice and Society, Institute of Building the evidence base for effective policy: the role of education in international Moses Oketch Education, Centre for Education and International Jess Atkinson Department for International Development (DFID) development Development (CEID) Ameenat Lola Childhood rare eyes disease: patient and public involvement and engagement UCL GOS Institute of Child Health Deirdre Leyden GOSH Patient and Public Involvement in Research Lead Solebo Civic Design CPD and Knowledge Exchange: Co-designing Neighbourhoods with Pablo Sendra The Bartlett School of Planning Leslie Barson Granville Community Kitchen Communities Collaborative City Planning Strategies Masters Module BPLN0033 Elena Besussi Bartlett School of
    [Show full text]
  • Review of UCL Medical School
    London regional review 2012–13 Review of UCL Medical School This visit is part of a regional review and uses a risk-based approach. For more information on this approach see http://www.gmc- uk.org/education/13707.asp. Review at a glance About the School Programme MBBS University UCL Medical School Years of course 6 Programme structure Year 1 – Fundamentals of clinical science 1 Year 2 – Fundamentals of clinical science 2 Year 3 – Scientific method in depth (iBSc) Year 4 – Integrated clinical care Year 5 – Life cycle Year 6 – Preparation for practice Number of students 1,969 (2011 MSAR) Number of LEPs UCL reported 196 clinical placements across 28 trusts or other providers, excluding GP placements. Local deanery London Deanery Last GMC visit 2004-5 QABME Outstanding actions None from last visit 1 About the visit Visit dates 22-23 November 2012 Sites visited UCL Medical School Areas of exploration MBBS Were any patient No safety concerns identified during the visit? Were any significant No educational concerns identified? Has further regulatory No action been requested via the responses to concerns element of the QIF? Summary 1 London has been chosen as the region for review in 2012-13 and all five London medical schools have been visited as part of this review. The north central regional visit team visited UCL Medical School (the School), a Division in the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, in November 2012. 2 UCL is the third largest medical school in London with 1,969 students. The School has three main clinical campuses: Bloomsbury, the Royal Free and the Whittington.
    [Show full text]
  • Review 2011 1 Research
    LONDON’S GLOBAL UNIVERSITY ReviewHighlights 2011 2011 Walking on Mars © Angeliki Kapoglou Over summer 2011, UCL Communications held a The winning entry was by Angeliki Kapoglou (UCL Space photography competition, open to all students, calling for & Climate Physics), who was selected to serve as a member images that demonstrated how UCL students contribute of an international crew on the Mars Desert Research Station, to society as global citizens. The term ‘education for global which simulates the Mars environment in the Utah desert. citizenship’ encapsulates all that UCL does to enable Researchers at the station work to develop key knowledge students to respond to the intellectual, social and personal needed to prepare for the human exploration of Mars. challenges that they will encounter throughout their future careers and lives. The runners-up and other images of UCL life can be seen at: www.flickr.com/uclnews Contents Research 2 Follow UCL news www.ucl.ac.uk Health 5 Insights: a fortnightly email summary Global 8 of news, comment and events: www.ucl.ac.uk/news/insights Teaching & Learning 11 Events calendar: Enterprise 14 www.events.ucl.ac.uk Highlights 2011 17 Twitter: @uclnews UCL Council White Paper 2011–2021 YouTube: UCLTV Community 21 In images: www.flickr.com/uclnews Finance & Investment 25 SoundCloud: Awards & Appointments 30 www.soundcloud.com/uclsound iTunes U: People 36 http://itunes.ucl.ac.uk Leadership 37 UCL – London’s Global University Our vision Our values • An outstanding institution, recognised as one of the world’s
    [Show full text]
  • Ucl Medical School Internal Quality Review
    UCL MEDICAL SCHOOL INTERNAL QUALITY REVIEW Contents INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................................4 Regulatory Framework.........................................................................................................................................4 Overview of Educational Organisational Structures ............................................................................................4 Overview of Educational Programmes.................................................................................................................5 SECTION 1. KEY DEVELOPMENTS......................................................................................................................7 1.1 Findings from previous review .......................................................................................................................7 1.2 Progress on implementation of the recommendations ................................................................................10 1.2.1 MBBS ....................................................................................................................................................10 1.2.2 Postgraduate Education ........................................................................................................................13 SECTION 2. STUDENTS, STAFF AND LEARNING RESOURCES.....................................................................15 2.1 Student Profile..............................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Ed
    Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Teaching ‘… an admirable testament to UCL’s ambition to foster innovative, evidence-based and thoughtful approaches to teaching and learning. There is much to learn from here.’— Professor Karen O’Brien, Head of the Humanities Division, University of Oxford ‘Research and teaching’ is a typical response to the question, ‘What are universities for?’ For most people, one comes to mind more quickly than the other. Most undergraduate students will think of teaching, while PhD students will think of research. University staff will have similarly varied reactions depending on their roles. Emphasis on one or the other has also changed over time according to governmental incentives and pressure. Davies and Norbert Pachler ed. Jason P. For some decades, higher education has been bringing the two closer together, to the point of them overlapping, by treating students as partners and nding ways of having them learn through undertaking research. Drawing on a range of examples from across the disciplines, this collection demonstrates how one research-rich university, University College London (UCL), has set up initiatives to raise the pro le of teaching and give it parity with research. It explains what staff and students have done to create an environment in which students can learn by discovery, through research- based education. ‘… an exemplary text of its kind, offering much to dwell on to all interested in advancing university education.’— Ronald Barnett, Emeritus Professor of Higher Education, University College London Institute of Education Dr Jason P. Davies is a Senior Teaching Fellow at the UCL Arena Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • UCL MEDICAL SCHOOL Clinical and Professional Practice, Medical Student Administration University College London JOB DESCRIPTION
    UCL MEDICAL SCHOOL Clinical and Professional Practice, Medical Student Administration University College London JOB DESCRIPTION Job Title: Clinical and Professional Practice Tutor x 6 Division: UCL Medical School Sub Department: Clinical and Professional Practice, Medical Student Administration Location: Bloomsbury, Royal Free or Whittington Campus Grade: 7 Hours: Part-time and Sessional, mainly on Thursdays and Fridays with some scope for flexibility The MBBS Clinical and Professional Practice Modules The Clinical and Professional Practice (CPP) modules make up almost 20% of the overall MBBS programme. Learning in CPP is central to understanding medicine as an integrated whole. There are 15 CPP modules, each organised over six years: Student centred learning, patient centred learning: 1. Portfolio a. Y1 online submission at end of year b. Y2 online submission at end of year c. Y4 E-portfolio d. Y5 E-portfolio and Case of the Month e. Y6 E-portfolio and Case of the Month Patient Pathways: 2. Integrated and Community Care (Y1) 3. Cardio-metabolic Medicine (Y2) 4. Cancer Medicine (Y4) 5. Person-centred (Y5) Integrated Vertical Strands: 6. Anatomy and Imaging 7. Clinical Skills and Practical Procedures 8. Pathological Sciences 9. Use of Evidence 10. Use of Medicines Overarching Themes: 11. Mental Health Page 1 of 5 12. Social Determinants of Health a. Epidemiology b. Global Health c. Medical Sociology d. Public Health 13. Ethics and Law 14. Clinical Communication 15. Professional Practice a. Professionalism b. E-health The organisation of the CPP is complex, from both an administrative and academic perspective. CPP teaching takes place both as centrally organised and ‘peel off’ activities in dedicated teaching sessions and activities fully integrated into the horizontal modules.
    [Show full text]
  • For Peer Review Only
    BMJ Open BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013897 on 2 December 2016. Downloaded from “You can’t be a person and a doctor”. The work-life balance of doctors in training: a national qualitative study ForJournal: peerBMJ Open review only Manuscript ID bmjopen-2016-013897 Article Type: Research Date Submitted by the Author: 15-Aug-2016 Complete List of Authors: Rich, Antonia; University College London Medical School, Research Department of Medical Education Viney, Rowena; University College London Medical School, Research Department of Medical Education Needleman, Sarah; University College London Medical School, Research Department of Medical Education Griffin, Ann; University College London, Medical School Woolf, Katherine; University College London, Academic Centre for Medical Education <b>Primary Subject Medical education and training Heading</b>: Secondary Subject Heading: Qualitative research QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, work-life balance, MEDICAL EDUCATION & http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ Keywords: TRAINING, women, gender, medical training on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml Page 1 of 86 BMJ Open BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013897 on 2 December 2016. Downloaded from 1 2 3 4 “You can’t be a person and a doctor”. The work-life balance of 5 6 doctors in training: a national qualitative study 7 8 9 Dr Antonia Rich, Research Associate1 10 Dr Rowena Viney, Research Associate1 11 Dr Sarah Needleman, Clinical Teaching Fellow1
    [Show full text]
  • BMJ Open Is Committed to Open Peer Review. As Part of This Commitment We Make the Peer Review History of Every Article We Publish Publicly Available
    BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020930 on 7 April 2018. Downloaded from BMJ Open is committed to open peer review. As part of this commitment we make the peer review history of every article we publish publicly available. When an article is published we post the peer reviewers’ comments and the authors’ responses online. We also post the versions of the paper that were used during peer review. These are the versions that the peer review comments apply to. The versions of the paper that follow are the versions that were submitted during the peer review process. They are not the versions of record or the final published versions. They should not be cited or distributed as the published version of this manuscript. BMJ Open is an open access journal and the full, final, typeset and author-corrected version of record of the manuscript is available on our site with no access controls, subscription charges or pay-per-view fees (http://bmjopen.bmj.com). If you have any questions on BMJ Open’s open peer review process please email [email protected] http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. BMJ Open BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020930 on 7 April 2018. Downloaded from Building motivation to participate in a Quality Improvement Collaborative; a qualitative participatory evaluation Journal: BMJ Open ManuscriptFor ID peerbmjopen-2017-020930 review only Article Type: Research Date Submitted by the Author: 05-Dec-2017 Complete List of Authors: Lalani, Mirza; Primary Care and
    [Show full text]
  • Translational Research Office, UK
    Impact Objectives • Use the Therapeutic Innovation Networks (TINs) to harness the translational experience and infrastructure of UCL and its NIHR Biomedical Research Centres to provide education, support and encouragement to early career scientists to translate their novel science • Maximise University College London’s ability to quickly and efficiently translate disease-related discoveries into high-quality therapeutic interventions and tangible treatments for patients • Ensure all TINs have an industry network with the aim of using their know-how and resource to aid the development of the portfolio The innovation game Professor David Lomas discusses the Therapeutic Innovation Networks (TINs), which are facilitating and accelerating enterprise at University College London (UCL), UK Can you begin by commercialising biomedical therapies. These of our national and international standing. introducing yourself? forums are also used to discuss barriers and For example, we have used the TINs to hurdles, and approaches to overcome them. assess our strengths and weaknesses in cell, I am Vice-Provost The Cell, Gene & Regenerative Medicine gene and regenerative therapies, and work (Health) at UCL, Head TIN has been very effective in pulling out how we can collaborate effectively with of the School of Life & the community together and articulating industry and our London partners: King’s Medical Sciences and our strengths in this area. UCL has more College London, Imperial College London Head of the UCL Medical School. I also serve research and clinical activity in the area of cell and Queen Mary University of London. This as the Academic Director of UCL Partners’ and gene therapy than any other university allows for economy of scale, more rapid Academic Health Science Centre and as a in the UK and, indeed, has a clinical portfolio translation and more effective competition Director of The Francis Crick Institute, Africa of comparable size to that of the whole of for research and enterprise income, Health Research Institute, MedCity, Non- Spain or Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Lecturer in Paediatrics Job Description
    UCL SCHOOL OF LIFE AND MEDICAL SCIENCES UCL FACUTY OF POULATION HEALTH SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH CLINICAL LECTURER IN PAEDIATRICS JOB DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION The UCL Institute of Child Health (ICH) The mission of the UCL Institute of Child Health is to improve the health and well-being of children, and the adults they will become, through world-class research, education and public engagement. This strategy has been informed by the insights gained from visits to six other internationally excellent children’s academic medical centres and by detailed discussions internally and with our external partners, including GODH, GOSH Children’s Charity, the wider UCL community, UCL Partners and funding bodies. The UCL Institute of Child Health, together with its clinical partner Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, forms the largest concentration of children’s health research outside North America. In 2013 ICH developed a new academic strategy which focuses on five scientific programmes: • Genetics and Genomic Medicine • Population, Policy and Practice • Developmental Biology and Cancer • Developmental Neurosciences • Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Four key principles underpin these programmes and the academic strategy: Interdisciplinarity. ICH will facilitate the best scientists, from all relevant academic and clinical disciplines, to work together to address fundamental questions to improve the health of children. Accelerating translation. ICH will support the rapid translation of findings from basic discoveries relevant to understanding of health and disease, to clinical studies, more directly aimed at improving the clinical care of children. We will also support “reverse translation” from observations in clinical and population studies to basic studies which address mechanisms of health and disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Plan 2017-18
    BUSINESS PLAN 2017‐18 1 Contents MedCity Vision and 3-5 year long range view ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Themes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Organisational Values ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Action Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Key Performance Indicators .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Assumptions................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Risk Plan .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]