DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Environmental Impact Statement EAST LINK PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Appendix H4 Historic and Archaeological Resources Technical Report FINAL EIS July 2011 SOUND TRANSIT EAST LINK PROJECT Appendix H4 Historic and Archaeological Resources Technical Report Prepared for: Sound Transit Prepared by: Historical Research Associates, Inc. CH2M HILL July 2011 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ ES-1 Project Overview ................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Archaeology ........................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Historic Resources ................................................................................................................................................. ES-1 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Description ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Description of Alternatives .............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2.1 Segment A: Interstate 90 .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2.2 Segment B: South Bellevue .............................................................................................................. 1-2 1.2.3 Segment C: Downtown Bellevue .................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.4 Segment D: Downtown Bellevue to Overlake Transit Center .................................................... 1-4 1.2.5 Segment E: Overlake Transit Center to Downtown Redmond .................................................. 1-5 2.0 Laws and Regulations .................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Federal Laws and Regulations ......................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Washington State Laws..................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Municipal Regulations ...................................................................................................................................... 2-1 3.0 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Area of Potential Effects ................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Data Collection ................................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Archaeological Study ........................................................................................................................................ 3-2 3.3.1 Archaeological Sensitivity Models ................................................................................................. 3-2 3.3.2 Selection of Geotechnical Boring Locations for Archaeological Survey ................................... 3-3 3.3.3 Archaeological Survey ..................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.4 Inventory of Buildings and Structures............................................................................................................ 3-5 3.5 Evaluation of Register Eligibility ..................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.6 Approach to Effects Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.7 Potential Mitigation Measures ......................................................................................................................... 3-7 4.0 Agency and Tribal Consultation .................................................................................................................................. 4-1 5.0 Environmental Context .................................................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 Natural Setting ................................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Geomorphic Setting ........................................................................................................................................... 5-1 6.0 Cultural Context .............................................................................................................................................................. 6-1 6.1 Previous Cultural Resource Management Studies........................................................................................ 6-1 6.2 Prehistory ............................................................................................................................................................ 6-1 6.2.1 Paleoindian (14,000 BC to 11,000 BC) ............................................................................................ 6-2 6.2.2 Archaic (10,500 BC to 4,400 BC) ...................................................................................................... 6-2 6.2.3 Pacific (4,400 BC to About AD 1775) .............................................................................................. 6-2 6.2.4 Project Vicinity Prehistory .............................................................................................................. 6-2 6.3 Ethnography ....................................................................................................................................................... 6-4 6.4 History ................................................................................................................................................................ 6-5 7.0 Affected Environment .................................................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Archaeological Properties ................................................................................................................................ 7-1 7.1.1 Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites ................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.2 Results of Archaeological Sensitivity Mapping and Implications for Archaeological Resources...................................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.3 Results of Archaeological Survey ................................................................................................... 7-3 7.2 Traditional Cultural Properties ....................................................................................................................... 7-4 7.3 Historic Buildings and Structures ................................................................................................................... 7-4 7.3.1 Segment A ......................................................................................................................................... 7-7 7.3.2 Segment B ........................................................................................................................................ 7-14 East Link Project Final EIS iii Contents July 2011 Contents 7.3.3 Segment C ........................................................................................................................................ 7-18 7.3.4 Segment D ....................................................................................................................................... 7-26 7.3.5 Segment E ........................................................................................................................................ 7-27 7.3.6 Maintenance Facility Surroundings ............................................................................................. 7-29 8.0 Environmental Effects ........................................................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1 Archaeological Sites .................................................................................................................................. 8-2 8.1.1 Description ................................................................................................................................... 8-2 8.1.2 Effects During Operation and Construction ........................................................................... 8-2 8.2 Traditional Cultural Properties ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geotechnical Report Alteration of Geologic Hazard Areas City of Redmond
    Attachment 13 Sound Transit | Downtown Redmond Link Extension Design-Build Contract No. RTA/CN 0148-18 Geotechnical Report Alteration of Geologic Hazard Areas City of Redmond April 7, 2020 Prepared for: Prepared by: Attachment 13 Geotechnical Report – Alteration of Geologic Hazard Areas Revision History/Signature Page Version Description/Comment Geotechnical Report – Geologic Hazard Areas, City 0 January 6, 2020 of Redmond Geotechnical Report – Geologic Hazard Areas, City 1 January 16, 2020 of Redmond Geotechnical Report – Geologic Hazard Areas, City 2 March 19, 2020 of Redmond Geotechnical Report – Geologic Hazard Areas, City 3 April 7, 2020 of Redmond Sound Transit | Downtown Redmond Link Extension Page | ii April 7, 2020 Attachment 13 Geotechnical Report – Alteration of Geologic Hazard Areas EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Downtown Redmond Link Extension (DRLE) project extends East Link light rail from Redmond Technology Center Station to downtown Redmond and will consist of two parallel lines of track running side by side. The project alignment runs along eastbound State Route 520 (SR 520) through critical landslide hazard areas (geologic hazard areas) between NE 60th Street and the SR 520/West Lake Sammamish Parkway NE interchange. The existing steep slopes in this area of the project are considered a potential landslide hazard by the City of Redmond. The project alignment cannot avoid these potential landslide hazard areas (steep slopes) due to the limited space between SR 520 and the adjacent private properties above the slopes. As a result, landslide hazards along the project are either reduced or not adversely affected through use of earth retaining systems (e.g. retaining walls) in areas of slope cut or by placing fill retention systems at the base of existing steep slopes, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • HERITAGE REFLECTOR March 2013 Volume XIII Issue I
    HERITAGE REFLECTOR March 2013 Volume XIII Issue I Vision To be a destination heritage Something to ‘cluck’ about! museum and research facility that enhances Jane Morton excited about community identity Education Coordinator the possibility through the preservation of having a and stewardship of the Thanks to the vision of both similar hands- Eastside’s history. Stu Vander Hoek and Tim on activity Johnson, Eastside Heritage right here in Mission Center now has its very own Bellevue. interactive chicken coop To steward Eastside history complete with faux chickens Tim called by actively collecting, and wooden eggs! the Museum preserving, and interpreting Curator in documents and artifacts, This will be a perfect addition Colorado and by promoting public to our farm activities both at for further involvement in and KidsQuest Children’s Museum information appreciation of and Kelsey Creek Fraser Cabin. and then built this heritage through Kids will be able to collect eggs EHC our very are kept with nest boxes for educational programming in baskets, weigh them, and see own modified version with a egg-laying. The number of and community outreach. how much they were worth in roof and the ability to travel! small coops in urban areas the late 1880s. What could you He purchased an antique egg has been growing with many buy from selling your eggs? scale; got the wooden eggs families enjoying fresh eggs from a company in Texas; each day! and the stuffed chickens from In this a company in Snohomish The EHC chicken coop will (websites are so helpful!) make its debut at the April 18th “Farm Life” event at KidsQuest Tim also figured out a way for Issue Children’s Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • SR 520, I-5 to Medina: Bridge Replacement and HOV Project Area Encompasses One of the Most Diverse and Complex Human and Natural Landscapes in the Puget Sound Region
    Chapter 4: The Project Area’s Environment Chapter 4: The Project Area’s Environment The SR 520, I-5 to Medina: Bridge Replacement and HOV Project area encompasses one of the most diverse and complex human and natural landscapes in the Puget Sound region. It includes areas in Seattle from I-5 to the Lake Washington shore, the waters of Lake Washington, and a portion of the Eastside communities and neighborhoods from the eastern shoreline of the lake to Evergreen Point Road. It also includes densely developed urban and suburban areas and some of the most critical natural areas and sensitive ecosystems that remain in the urban growth area. The project area includes the following: ▪ Seattle neighborhoods—Eastlake, Portage Bay/Roanoke, North Capitol Hill, Montlake, University District, Laurelhurst, and Madison Park ▪ The Lake Washington ecosystem and the bays, streams, and wetlands that are associated with it ▪ The Eastside community of Medina ▪ Usual and accustomed fishing areas of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, who have historically used the area’s fisheries resources and has treaty rights for their protection and use This chapter describes what the project area is like today, setting the stage for the project’s effects described in Chapters 5 and 6. 4.1 Transportation The configuration of SR 520 today, with its inadequate shoulders and gaps in HOV lanes, makes the corridor especially prone to traffic congestion. And, as commuters on SR 520 know, the corridor is overloaded with traffic on a regular basis. Population and employment continue to grow both on the Eastside and in Seattle, resulting in new travel patterns and a steady rise in the number of vehicles crossing the Evergreen Point Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • An Oral History Project Catalogue
    1 A Tribute to the Eastside “Words of Wisdom - Voices of the Past” An Oral History Project Catalogue Two 2 FORWARD Oral History Resource Catalogue (2016 Edition) Eastside Heritage Center has hundreds of oral histories in our permanent collection, containing hours of history from all around East King County. Both Bellevue Historical Society and Marymoor Museum had active oral history programs, and EHC has continued that trend, adding new interviews to the collection. Between 1996 and 2003, Eastside Heritage Center (formerly Bellevue Historical Society) was engaged in an oral history project entitled “Words of Wisdom – Voices of the Past.” As a part of that project, Eastside Heritage Center produced the first Oral History Resource Catalogue. The Catalogue is a reference guide for researchers and staff. It provides a brief introduction to each of the interviews collected during “Words of Wisdom.” The entries contain basic information about the interview date, length, recording format and participants, as well as a brief biography of the narrator, and a list of the topics discussed. Our second catalogue is a continuation of this project, and now includes some interviews collected prior to 1996. The oral history collection at the Eastside Heritage Center is constantly expanding, and the Catalogue will grow as more interviews are collected and as older interviews are transcribed. Special thanks to our narrators, interviewers, transcribers and all those who contributed their memories of the Eastside. We are indebted to 4Culture for funding this project. Eastside Heritage Center Oral History Committee 3 Table of Contents Forward and Acknowledgments pg. 2 Narrators Richard Bennett, with Helen Bennett Johnson pg.
    [Show full text]
  • 17411 Ne Union Hill Road | Building a 17425 Ne Union Hill Road | Building B
    A T B E A R C R E E K 17411 NE UNION HILL ROAD | BUILDING A 17425 NE UNION HILL ROAD | BUILDING B Redmond, Washington 98052 IMPROVEMENTS UNDERWAY Building B Common Lobby Refresh PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS TO INCLUDE: • Speculative Suite • Lobby Refresh • Improved Access to Bear Creek Parking ratio: By 2024, Redmond Recent courtyard Abundant nearby 3.06/1,000 SF will be connected improvements amenities including free surface parking to the Light Rail include new Redmond Town Center’s system through four outdoor seating & numerous shopping, Redmond stations bocce ball court dining & entertainment options Bike share program Fiber optics Regional Park & Ride available for tenants provided by Frontier located across sole use, perfect for Communications the street from the use on the numerous property surrounding bike trails 520 163 8 405 SITE PLAN 52 15 805 15 5 105 SR-520 210 90 110 AVO 134 95 680 ND ALE NE UNION HILL RO R OAD EXT 56 195 ENS ION Building B 47 91 AD 110 Building A 17 85 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Speculative Suite Reception Rendering CONNECTING PEOPLE TO THE COMMUNITY SOUND TRANSIT EAST LINK EXTENSION BELLEVUE CBD BELLEVUE OVERLAKE VILLAGE STATION Opening 2023 REDMOND TECHNOLOGY CENTER STATION Opening 2023 LAKE SAMMAMISH MARYMOOR PARK FUTURE ESTIMATED LIGHT RAIL TRAVEL TIMES SeaTac Airport Station > SE Redmond Station 68 minutes Westlake Station > SE Redmond Station 39 minutes International District Station > SE Redmond Station 34 minutes Downtown Bellevue Station > SE Redmond Station 15 minutes Overlake Village Station > SE
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Transit Procurement & Contracts Division Date
    Request for Information Downtown Redmond Link Extension (DRLE) Project To: Prospective Proposers From: Sound Transit Procurement & Contracts Division Date: January 16, 2018 Downtown Redmond Link Extension (DRLE) Project Sound Transit is requesting industry comments on its upcoming Downtown Redmond Link Extension (DRLE) Project, located in the City of Redmond in King County, Washington. Sound Transit anticipates utilizing the Design-Build delivery method for this Project. The Project will extend light rail for 3.4 miles from the Redmond Technology Center Station at NE 40th Street to Downtown Redmond. Project elements include a double-track guideway (elevated and at-grade), one elevated station, one at-grade station, structured and surface parking, civil and site work, roadway work, and bus transit facilities. Sound Transit is providing prospective proposers interested in the Project an opportunity to review the Project and provide feedback. At this time, Sound Transit is only requesting comments and will not provide any responses. Sound Transit requests that prospective Proposers submit comments by January 26, 2018. Please submit all comments to: Petra Payne Sr. Design & Construction Contracts Specialist Sound Transit 401 S. Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-2826 Email: [email protected] The information contained in this document is subject to change prior to the issuance of the Request for Qualifications. Downtown Redmond Link Extension RFI P a g e | 1 January 2018 Request for Information Downtown Redmond Link Extension (DRLE) Project Sound Transit is particularly seeking the industry’s perspective and feedback related to: Whether there are concerns with performing the Design-Build work for the DRLE Project near and under SR-520 corridor, rebuilding the on and off ramps at the SR-202/SR-520 interchange, and working in downtown? Potential locations for staging areas are identified in the attached drawings.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Law Project List
    05-07 House Transportation Committee Current Law Projects ($ in Thousands) 10-Yr Route Leg Dist Project Title Ad Date 05-07 Total Improvement Mobility 003 23 SR 3/SR 303 I/C (WAAGA WAY) - NEW RAMP 05/16/05 16,241 16,241 004 19 SR 4/SVENSEN`S CURVE - REALIGNMENT 3,390 4,380 005 29,27,25,30,33,11,37I-5/TACOMA TO EVERETT - FREIGHT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS 333 333 005 30 I-5/SR 161 I/C & SR 18 I/C 2,580 2,580 005 30,33,11 I-5/PIERCE CO. LINE TO TUKWILA I/C - HOV 09/10/90 49,467 50,154 005 33,11 I-5/PIERCE CO. LINE TO TUKWILA I/C - HOV AND CLIMBING LANE 10/10/94 0 0 005 32 I-5/NE 175TH ST TO NE 205TH ST - NORTHBOUND AUXILIARY LANE 10/04/04 5,881 5,881 005 21,01 I-5/196TH ST SW(SR 524) I/C - PHASE C:COLLECTOR-DISTRIBUTOR LANES 0 0 005 01,21,44,38 I-5/164TH ST SW TO SR 526 - HOV AND INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS 07/15/96 857 1,855 005 44,21 I-5/128TH ST SW (SR96) INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 005 44,21 SR5/124TH ST. SW, BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN O`XING 05/31/05 3,901 3,901 005 44,38 I-5/SR 526 TO MARINE VIEW DRIVE - HOV LANES 112,968 200,968 005 10 I-5/172ND ST NE (SR 531) INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS 05/10/04 2,544 2,544 005 42 I-5 BLAINE EXIT I/C IMPROVEMENTS 1,900 2,493 005 25,27 I-5/PORT OF TACOMA RD TO KING CO LINE - HOV 88 319 005 25,27 I-5/PORT OF TACOMA RD TO KING CO LINE - HOV 01/20/09 2,811 29,834 005 22 I-5/MARTIN WAY O`XING - BIKE LANES 05/07/07 60 659 005 25,27 I-5/PORT OF TACOMA I/C, CORE HOV 382 715 005 29,27 I-5/SR 16 REALIGNMENT AND HOV CONNECTORS 741 1,760 005 29,27 I-5/SR 16 I/C / 38TH ST I/C - CORE HOV 07/17/00 1,827 158,145 005 29,27 I-5/S 48TH TO PACIFIC AVENUE - CORE HOV 02/22/05 73,947 86,493 005 28,29,27,25 I-5/TACOMA VIC HOV - PROJECT DEFINITION 993 993 005 20 I-5/GRAND MOUND TO MAYTOWN - WIDENING 3,969 73,792 005 22 I-5/CHEHALIS WESTERN TRAIL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE - NEW STRUCTURE 09/06/05 2,006 2,006 005 49 COLUMBIA RIVER CROSSING/ VANCOUVER- EIS 2,402 3,448 005 49,18 I-5/NE 134TH ST INTERCHANGE (I-5/I-205)- REBUILD TO RELIEVE CONGEST.
    [Show full text]
  • Gray Notebook 37
    The Gray GNB Notebook 37 WSDOT’s quarterly performance report Quarter ending on transportation systems, programs, March 31, 2010 and department management published Paula J. Hammond, P. E. May 21, 2010 Secretary of Transportation In this edition Annual Reports Safety Rest Areas Post Winter Highway Maintenance Aviation Trucks, Goods & Freight Water Quality Wetlands Protection Quarterly Reports Incident Response Rail Ferries Capital Projects Workforce Special Reports Federal Recovery Act- funded Projects WSDOT ’s New Stormwater Permit www.wsdot.wa.gov/ accountability Executive Summary Performance highlights in this edition of the Gray Notebook This edition of the Gray Notebook presents information on WSDOT’s performance for the quarter ending March 31, 2010, as well as seven annual and three semi-annual reports. Selected highlights from this edition include: • Truck freight volumes in 2009 began to rebound to pre-2008 levels, but other freight modes report mixed performance in 2009 and 2008. In 2009, marine shipments were down 12.5%, but Washington grain and produce rail car usage both improved. In 2008, total rail freight shipments were down .25%, but total air freight shipments increased by 5%. The Truck Freight Performance Measure pilot project will help WSDOT identify freight bottlenecks in the Puget Sound region as well as major cross-state truck corridors. WSDOT will continue to develop strategic business directions for the new transportation policy goal addressing Economic Vitality set by the Legislature in March 2010 (see page 45). (Trucks, Goods & Freight Annual Report; pp. 46-54) • More than 21.8 million visitors made use of the state’s Safety Rest Areas, an increase of 7% over 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Link of I-90 Ends 30-Year Saga by Peggy Reynolds, Seattle Times, 9 Sept 1993
    Last Link Of I-90 Ends 30-Year Saga By Peggy Reynolds, Seattle Times, 9 Sept 1993 Erica Clibborn's red convertible will be one of the first cars Sunday across the new Lacey V. Murrow Floating Bridge, last link in a project that started before Erica was born. The University of Washington junior, who will be going home to Mercer Island for Sunday dinner, was born in 1973, the year a federal court sent the Seattle-area stretch of Interstate 90 back to square one. By then, I-90 already reached most of the 3,063 miles from Boston to south Bellevue, and the final major segment had been in the works for 10 years. It would be another 20 years before that last 7 miles would be finished. That completion will be marked this weekend with an array of public events, and Clibborn and other drivers should be able to go across the eastbound span by 5 p.m. Sunday. That opening means that I-90 survived the anti-government sentiment of the late 1960s, the mass-transit worship of the '70s and the budget cutbacks of the '80s - even while other urban interstate projects were biting the dust in New York, Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Washington, San Francisco and Portland. Nevertheless, whether or not I-90 was really needed was subject to debate at all levels. It attracted a formidable enemies list, and was rescued regularly by a cast of hundreds. Without any one of its friends in local governments, on the state Transportation Commission, in the Legislature and in Congress, I-90 could have ended in south Bellevue instead of making it to its junction with Interstate 5 in Seattle.
    [Show full text]
  • SR 519 Intermodal Access Project Phase 2
    SR 519 I NTERMODAL A CCESS P ROJECT P HASE 2: S OUTH ATLANTIC C ORRIDOR Transportation Discipline Report Prepared for Prepared by: THE TRANSPO GROUP Final February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................................................... XI GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL TERMS .................................................................................................................XIII SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... XV 1 What is the Proposed Action and why is it needed? ........................................................................................ xv 2 What is the affected environment?.................................................................................................................. xvi 3 How were the effects of the project on transportation analyzed?....................................................................xvii 4 What transportation effects could occur during construction of the project, and what mitigation is proposed? ......................................................................................................................................................xviii 5 What transportation effects could occur during operation of the project, and what mitigation is proposed? ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arts & Culture
    CITY OF BELLEVUE GRAND arts & culture Planning and Community Development July 11, 2017 Special Meeting “The arts are an important expression of how people think of and experience the city and each other. Bellevue seeks to foster a strong arts and cultural community chiefly supported through a wide range of artists, art and cultural institutions, and arts groups offering a variety experiences to an engaged audience.” -City of Bellevue, Comprehensive Plan, Urban Design & the Arts Element A g e n d a Tuesday, July 11, 2017 Bellevue Arts Commission Meeting: 4:30 p.m. Bellevue City Hall, 1E-109 Commission Staff Contact: 425.452.4105 1. CALL TO ORDER 4:30 Chair Manfredi will call the meeting to order. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES 4:30 – 4:35 A. Chair Manfredi will ask for approval of the agenda. B. Chair Manfredi will ask for approval of the June 2017 regular meeting minutes. 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 4:35 – 4:40 Chair Manfredi will entertain oral communications limited to three minutes per person or five minutes if representing the official position of a recognized community organization for other than main agenda items and public hearing subject. A maximum of three people are permitted to speak to each side of any one topic. 4. ACTION ITEMS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Grand Connection Briefing 4:40 – 5:10 B. Draft Grand Connection Art & Cultural Element 5:10 – 5:55 C. Bellevue Creative Edge update 5:55 – 6:10 5. COMMISSION QUICK BUSINESS 6:10 – 6:15 6. REPORTS 6:15 – 6:20 A.
    [Show full text]
  • East Link Light Rail Draft EIS -- Excerpts Only
    See the Fact Sheet for persons who may be contacted for additional information concerning this document. Abstract Sound Transit proposes to construct and operate an Downtown Redmond via either Redmond Way or the eastern extension of the Link light rail system BNSF Railway corridor. Alternatives considered providing urban transportation improvements in the include a No Build Alternative, one alternative for Central Puget Sound metropolitan region. The East Segment A, five alternatives for Segment B, six Link project would connect to the rail system’s Initial alternatives for Segment C, four alternatives for Segment in downtown Seattle and extend the system Segment D, three alternatives for Segment E, and four east to Mercer Island, Bellevue, and Redmond. maintenance facility alternatives. Overall, the project Alternatives are considered in five geographic would have between 10 and 13 stations. Interim segments in this EIS. Segment A, Interstate 90, termini could occur at the east end of Segment C or connects downtown Seattle to Mercer Island and any station in Segments D or E. Construction is South Bellevue via I-90. Segment B, South Bellevue, expected to start in 2013, with operation under way connects I-90 to approximately SE 6th Street along one between 2020 and 2021. The analysis and impact of three corridors: Bellevue Way, 112th Avenue SE, or information in this EIS addresses potential long-term the BNSF Railway right-of-way. Segment C, and short-term impacts of transportation; acquisitions, Downtown Bellevue, would travel through displacements and relocations; land use; economics; downtown Bellevue between approximately SE 6th social impacts, community facilities, and Street and an I-405 crossing at either NE 6th Street or neighborhoods; visual and aesthetic resources; air NE 12th Street on either an at-grade, elevated, or quality and greenhouse gas; noise and vibration; tunnel profile.
    [Show full text]