Mechanical Engineering in Ancient Egypt, Part 65: Stelae Industry (Second Intermediate Period and New Kingdom)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mechanical Engineering in Ancient Egypt, Part 65: Stelae Industry (Second Intermediate Period and New Kingdom) International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 4 Issue 2, Mar – Apr 2018 RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Mechanical Engineering in Ancient Egypt, Part 65: Stelae Industry (Second Intermediate Period and New Kingdom) Galal Ali Hassaan Department of Mechanical Design & Production, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt Abstract: th This paper is the 65 research paper in a series investigating the evolution of mechanical engineering in ancient Egypt. It investigates the stelae industry during the Second Intermediate Period and the New Kingdom of ancient Egypt. It outlines the design , material contents , features of each stele and present location if known. The scenes characteristics and the text type and style of writing is outlined during each of the two periods under study. Keywords — Mechanical engineering; ancient Egypt; stelae industry, 2 nd Intermediate Period, New Kingdom. thesis about Late Period stelae from Saqqara I. INTRODUCTION studied a number of stelae including the stele of nh- hnsw, stele of nh-wn-nfr from the 26 th Dynasty This is the 65 paper in a series of research (reign of Psamtik I), stele of w3h-ib-r from the 26 th papers aiming at exploring the role of ancient Dynasty (reign of Amasis), stele of ih-ms and stele Egyptians in the evolution of mechanical of p3-di-hr-m-hb from the 27 th Dynasty (reign of engineering. The paper focuses on the stelae Daius) [4]. Cooney (2011) in her Ph. D. Thesis industry in ancient Egypt during the Second presented a number of stelae from the Third Intermediate to Late Periods. Intermediate Period of Egypt including the donation Teeter (2003) in her book about the ancient stele of Niumte , stele of In-Amun-nif-nebu, Egyptian treasures from the collection of the donation stele of Ker, stele of Tjerpet from the 22 nd Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago Dynasty, stele of of Ne mateped, stele of Titaru, presented a limestone stele of the household of stele of Ralamun, stele of Tefnakht from 24 th th th Sebu from the 13 -14 Dynasties, a limestone stele Dynasty, stele of Pediset and his sons , Serapeum th of Nakht from the 18 Dynasty, stele of Seti I and stele and Pasenhor stele from the 22 nd Dynasty [5]. th Ramses II from the 19 Dynasty, stele dedicated to Boraik (2013) presented a funerary stele th th deity Reshep from the 19 -20 Dynasties stele of from the New Kingdom with two scenes from the nd th the hearing ear from 22 -26 Dynasties, painted Book of Dead of Amduat [6]. Darnell (2014) nd wood stele of a lady offering to Horus from the 22 analysed the stele of Usersatet produced during the th th Dynasty, stele of Queen Amunirdis I from 25 -26 reign of Pharaoh Amenhotep II from the 18 th Dynasties, painted wood stele of Priest Harsiese Dynasty where the text filled most of the surface of th from the 26 Dynasty and Necho II donation stele the stele [7]. Tomich (2016) presented a stele from th from the 26 [1]. Exell (2006) analysed more than the 16 th Dynasty for King Bebiankh , a stele for an four hundred stelae dating to the Ramesside Period Egyptian Officer loyal to the ruler of Kush and a based on icongraphic content and function-related stele of Official Horemkhauef from the 16 th information of the stelae [2]. Dynasty [8]. Wikipedia (2017) wrote an article Kaper (2007) presented a limestone about the stele of Pasenhor dated to the year 37 of nd fragment of a hieratic stele from (probably) the 22 Pharaoh Shshonq V of the 22 nd Dynasty (730 BC) Dynasty and a stele from the reign of Teteloth III found in the Serapeum of Saqqara and now in the rd from the 23 Dynasty [3]. Labudek (2010) in his Louvre Museum [9]. Dunn (2018) presented a ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 42 Internati onal Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 4 Issue 2, Mar – Apr 2018 number of stelae from ancient Egypt and outlined locations including one text row just that the votive stelae with large ears were used fro before the seated couple. the first time during the 19 th Dynasty [10]. Hassaan (2018) studied the stelae industry in ancient Egypt during a time span from the Early Dynastic to the Middle Kingdom. He presented samples of the stelae produced in each period showing their material, height, shape, inscriptions and present location [11]. II. STELAE INDUSTRY IN THE SECOND INTERMEDIATE PERIOD The Second Intermediate Period of Egypt th th covers the 13 to the 17 Dynasties over a time span from 1550 to 1802 BC [12]. We have a number of examples from the Second Intermediate Fig.1 Two women stele Fig.2 Stele of Ameny Period tracing the production of stelae during this from 12 th -15 th Dynasties [13]. from 12 th -14 th Dyn [14] period. They are presented as follows: - The first example is a 320 mm height - The third example is a 268 mm height sandstone stele of two women from the painted limestone stele of Siamun from th th 12 th -15 th Dynasties (2061-1640 BC) in the 12 -13 ynasties (1981 -1575 BC) in display in the Museum of Fine Arts at display in the Metropolitan Museum of Boston and shown in Fig.1 [ 13]. The Art at NY and shown in Fig. 3 [15]. It stele was of the rectangular design with was of the rectangular designed with a rounded corners and depicted two ladies domed top and rounded bottom corners. facing each other and holding a lotus It was de corated by two Wadjet eyes and flower in the right hand for the woman a Shen between them within the domed in the left and in the left hand for the top. Then came six rows of hieroglyphic woman in the right side of the stele with text followed by a scene for the owener offerings in between them. There was Siamun and his wife . unclear inscription in a horizontal ban - The fourth example is a 243 mm height above the two women. painted limestone stele of Nebiryerau th - The second example is an 0.64 m height from the 13 Dynasty in display in the limestone stele of Ameny f rom the 12 th - Metropolitan Museum of Art and shown 14 th Dynasties (1991-1640 BC) in in Fig.4 [16]. It was of the same design display in the Museum of Fine Arts at as that of Siamun (Fig.3) except the Boston and shown in Fig.2 [14]. The owner how was shown seated in the stele was of the rectangular design with lower part of the stele smelling a lotus sharp corner showing the owner Ameny flower in front of an offering table and and his wife engraved twice in the receiving offerings. middle of the stele with an offering table - The fifth example is an 0.68 m height in between them. The stele was painted limestone funerary stele of th th decorated from its top then came a three Tembu from the 13 -14 Dynasty horizontal bands full of a hieroglyphic (1750-1650 BC) in display in the text , then in the bottom of the stele Walters Art Museum at Baltimore, USA came an offering scene for Ameny and and shown in Fig.5 [17]. It was of the his wife with scripts in different same design of the stelae shown in Internati onal Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 4 Issue 2, Mar – Apr 2018 Figs.3 and 4 except the location of King striding with scenes for animals Tembu and his wife who came around him. immediately below the Wadjet eyes seate d in front of an offering table with a lady offering to them. There was a funerary scene below them and ended with a two lines horizontal text near the bottom of the stele. - The sixth example is an 0.734 m height limestone stele of Kemes from the 13 th Dynasty (1750-1720 BC) in display in the metropolitan Museum of Art (gift of Lila Acheson to the Museum in 2014) and shown in Fig.6 [18]. This stele had a unique feature since it was designed as Fig.5 Stele of Tembu from Fig. 6 Stele of Kemes th th th two-3D parts over each other. The lower 13 -14 Dynasties [17]. from 1 3 -Dynasty [18] part took the shape of a shrine and the top part had false-door deign with a figure amy be for the stele owner and inscriptions for scenes for the owner. An inverted U-band housed a hieroglyphic text. th Fig.7 Stele of Antef V from 17 Dynasty [19]. III. STELAE INDUSTRY IN THE NEW KINGDOM The New Kingdom was a strong and wealthy kingdom of ancient Egypt comprising the 18 th , 19 th and 20 th Dynasties extended over a time span from 1570 to 1077 BC [20] The production of stelae continued during the New Kingdom affected Fig.3 Stele of Siamun from Fig.4 Stele of Nebiryerau 12 th -13 th Dynasties [15]. from 13th -Dynasty [16] by the power and wealth characteristics of this Kingdom as will be depicted from the following - The seventh example is a stele of King examples: Antef V from the 17 th Dynasty (1588 -1550 - The first example is a 495.3 mm painted BC) in display in the Egyptian Museum at limestone stele of Pharaoh Ahmose, the Cairo and shown in Fig. 7 [19]. It was of the founder of the 18 th Dynasty (1549 -1524 rectangular shape type with sharp corners.
Recommended publications
  • Egypt. the Last Centuries of the Empire (747–332 Bce)
    EGYPT. THE LAST CENTURIES OF THE EMPIRE (747–332 BCE) S u m m a r y The book “Egypt. The Last Centuries of the Empire (747–332 BCE)” deals with issues related to the political and social history of Egypt in the period between the beginning of the rule of the Kushite pharaohs and Alexander the Great’s conquest of Egypt. The book comprises an introduction, ten chapters, a conclusion, three appen- dices and a bibliography. The introduction leads the reader into relevant issues and remarks on the accepted convention of providing names and a chronological table. Chapter 1 ( The Napatan Dynasty ) discusses the history of the Kushite family reign and the Kushite conquest of Egypt (25 th Dynasty). Chapter 2 ( Regarding God’s Wife of Amun ) focus- es on the rule of successive Napatan rulers (Shebitku, Shabaka), the role of God’s Wife of Amun in the ideology of royal rulers in the Late Period, and also on the 19th-century research conducted by Count Michał Tyszkiewicz in the vicinity of the tombs of God’s Wives and their Kushite courtiers. Chapter 3 ( Assyrians at the Gates ) discusses the reigns of Egypt’s last Kushite pharaohs. Chapter 4 ( The Golden Age ) summarises the first years of the 26 th Dynasty and changes initiated by its founder, Psametik I. In Chapter 5 ( Naucratis and the Sunken City ), there is a discussion of discoveries: Flinders Petrie’s discovery of Naucratis and Franck Goddio’s of Thonis- Heracleion, and also of the history of the 26 th Dynasty rulers (Necho II, Psametik II) and their relations with the Greek world.
    [Show full text]
  • Kings & Events of the Babylonian, Persian and Greek Dynasties
    KINGS AND EVENTS OF THE BABYLONIAN, PERSIAN, AND GREEK DYNASTIES 612 B.C. Nineveh falls to neo-Babylonian army (Nebuchadnezzar) 608 Pharaoh Necho II marched to Carchemesh to halt expansion of neo-Babylonian power Josiah, King of Judah, tries to stop him Death of Josiah and assumption of throne by his son, Jehoahaz Jehoiakim, another son of Josiah, replaced Jehoahaz on the authority of Pharaoh Necho II within 3 months Palestine and Syria under Egyptian rule Josiah’s reforms dissipate 605 Nabopolassar sends troops to fight remaining Assyrian army and the Egyptians at Carchemesh Nebuchadnezzar chased them all the way to the plains of Palestine Nebuchadnezzar got word of the death of his father (Nabopolassar) so he returned to Babylon to receive the crown On the way back he takes Daniel and other members of the royal family into exile 605 - 538 Babylon in control of Palestine, 597; 10,000 exiled to Babylon 586 Jerusalem and the temple destroyed and large deportation 582 Because Jewish guerilla fighters killed Gedaliah another last large deportation occurred SUCCESSORS OF NEBUCHADNEZZAR 562 - 560 Evil-Merodach released Jehoiakim (true Messianic line) from custody 560 - 556 Neriglissar 556 Labaski-Marduk reigned 556 - 539 Nabonidus: Spent most of the time building a temple to the mood god, Sin. This earned enmity of the priests of Marduk. Spent the rest of his time trying to put down revolts and stabilize the kingdom. He moved to Tema and left the affairs of state to his son, Belshazzar Belshazzar: Spent most of his time trying to restore order. Babylonia’s great threat was Media.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Handout #1 Primary Documents Bible: 2 Kings 23:25
    Daniel Handout #1 Primary Documents Bible: 2 Kings 23:25-25:21; 2 Chronicles 35:1-36:21; Jeremiah 25:1; 46-47, 52; Daniel 1:1-2 D. J. Wiseman, Chronicles of Chaldean Kings, 626-556 B.C. (1956); A. K. Grayson, Assyrian and Babylonian Chronicles (2000, new translation with commentary); J. B. Pritchard, Ancient Near Eastern Texts (ANET, excerpts) Superscription (Daniel 1:1-2) Jehoiakim, King of Judah Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon [ ← Sandwich ] Jehoiakim, King of Judah Frame (Daniel 1:1 and 21) _________ B.C. [ Bracket ] _________ B.C. Collapse of Assyrian Empire Ashurbanipal II (668-627 B.C.; alternative, 668-631 B.C.) Ashur-etel-ilani (627-623 B.C.; alternative, 631-627 B.C.) Sin-shar-iskun (627-612 B.C.; alternative, 623-612 B.C.) Assur-uballit II (612-?610/09 B.C.) Rise of the Babylonian Empire Nabopolassar (626-605 B.C.) Nebuchadnezzar II/Nebuchadrezzar (605-562 B.C.) Amel-Marduk (=Evil-merodach, 2 Kings 25:27-30) (562-560 B.C.) Neriglissar (560-558 B.C.) Labashi-marduk (557 B.C.) Nabonidus (556-539 B.C.) Co-Regent: Belshazzar (?553-539 B.C.) Contest with Egypt Rise of Saite (26th) Dynasty (664-525 B.C.); Decline of Nubian (25th) Dynasty (716-663 B.C.); Reunion of Upper and Lower Egypt (656 B.C.) Psammetichus I (Psamtik I) (664-610 B.C.) Necho II (610-595 B.C.) Psammetichus II (Psamtik II) (595-589 B.C.) Hophra/Apries (589-570 B.C.) Sandwich of Judah Josiah (640-609 B.C.) Jehohaz (3 months, 609 B.C.; 2 Kings 23:31) Jehoiakim (609-597 B.C.) Jehoiachin (3 months, 596 B.C.; 2 Kings 24:8) Zedekiah (597-586 B.C.) Nabopolassar’s Revolt Against Assyria “son of a nobody”—Nabopolassar cylinder (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing As Material Practice Substance, Surface and Medium
    Writing as Material Practice Substance, surface and medium Edited by Kathryn E. Piquette and Ruth D. Whitehouse Writing as Material Practice: Substance, surface and medium Edited by Kathryn E. Piquette and Ruth D. Whitehouse ]u[ ubiquity press London Published by Ubiquity Press Ltd. Gordon House 29 Gordon Square London WC1H 0PP www.ubiquitypress.com Text © The Authors 2013 First published 2013 Front Cover Illustrations: Top row (from left to right): Flouda (Chapter 8): Mavrospelio ring made of gold. Courtesy Heraklion Archaelogical Museum; Pye (Chapter 16): A Greek and Latin lexicon (1738). Photograph Nick Balaam; Pye (Chapter 16): A silver decadrachm of Syracuse (5th century BC). © Trustees of the British Museum. Middle row (from left to right): Piquette (Chapter 11): A wooden label. Photograph Kathryn E. Piquette, courtesy Ashmolean Museum; Flouda (Chapter 8): Ceramic conical cup. Courtesy Heraklion Archaelogical Museum; Salomon (Chapter 2): Wrapped sticks, Peabody Museum, Harvard. Photograph courtesy of William Conklin. Bottom row (from left to right): Flouda (Chapter 8): Linear A clay tablet. Courtesy Heraklion Archaelogical Museum; Johnston (Chapter 10): Inscribed clay ball. Courtesy of Persepolis Fortification Archive Project, Oriental Institute, University of Chicago; Kidd (Chapter 12): P.Cairo 30961 recto. Photograph Ahmed Amin, Egyptian Museum, Cairo. Back Cover Illustration: Salomon (Chapter 2): 1590 de Murúa manuscript (de Murúa 2004: 124 verso) Printed in the UK by Lightning Source Ltd. ISBN (hardback): 978-1-909188-24-2 ISBN (EPUB): 978-1-909188-25-9 ISBN (PDF): 978-1-909188-26-6 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bai This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Egypt's Foreign Policy During the Saite Period
    AN ANALYSIS OF EGYPT'S FOREIGN POLICY DURING THE SAITE PERIOD by JULIEN BOAST A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of MPHIL(B) in EGYPTOLOGY Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity School of Historical Studies The University of Birmingham September 2006 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This study consists of an analysis of Egyptian foreign policy during the Saite period (including the reign of Necho I), and also briefly examines the actions of the Twenty-fifth Dynasty in order to establish the correct context. Despite the large gaps in the historical record during this period, judicious use of sources from a number of different cultures allows the historian to attempt to reconstruct the actions of the time, and to discuss possible motivations for them, seeking to identify concerns linking the foreign policy of all the Saite kings. Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank the Arts and Humanities Research Council, whose support has been vital in the undertaking of this study. I would also like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Who in Ancient Egypt
    Who’s Who IN ANCIENT EGYPT Available from Routledge worldwide: Who’s Who in Ancient Egypt Michael Rice Who’s Who in the Ancient Near East Gwendolyn Leick Who’s Who in Classical Mythology Michael Grant and John Hazel Who’s Who in World Politics Alan Palmer Who’s Who in Dickens Donald Hawes Who’s Who in Jewish History Joan Comay, new edition revised by Lavinia Cohn-Sherbok Who’s Who in Military History John Keegan and Andrew Wheatcroft Who’s Who in Nazi Germany Robert S.Wistrich Who’s Who in the New Testament Ronald Brownrigg Who’s Who in Non-Classical Mythology Egerton Sykes, new edition revised by Alan Kendall Who’s Who in the Old Testament Joan Comay Who’s Who in Russia since 1900 Martin McCauley Who’s Who in Shakespeare Peter Quennell and Hamish Johnson Who’s Who in World War Two Edited by John Keegan Who’s Who IN ANCIENT EGYPT Michael Rice 0 London and New York First published 1999 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004. © 1999 Michael Rice The right of Michael Rice to be identified as the Author of this Work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gift of the Nile Egypt
    Egypt The Gift of the Nile Egypt Lower Egypt Upper Egypt Nubia Early History • Pre-Dynastic • Cultural development from at least 5000 BC. • First hieroglyphic scripts date to ca. 3400 • First Dynastic Period • 1st Dynasty 3150 – 2125 BC • 2nd Dynasty 2925 – 2700 BC • An homogenous, distinct, Egyptian culture. • Afro Asiatic is the parent language of Semitic. Old Kingdom 2700 – 1552 BC: 3rd to 12th Dynasties • 3rd Dynasty 2700 – 2625 • Pyramid of Djoser at saqqara Old Kingdom 4th Dynasty 2625 – 2510 Pyramids at Giza Established the nomes system Giza Giza Giza Khufu Khafre Sphinx Menkaure Old Kingdom • 5th – 8th Dynasties • 2510 - 2180 • 9th – 10th Dynasties • 2180 – 2040 • 9th and 10th Dynasties, capital at Herakleopolis • 11th Dynasty capital at Thebes (Luxor) • Unification of Upper and Lower Egypt by Mentuhotep II: 2040. 10th and 11th Dynasties Sais Memphis 10th Dynasty capital at Herakleopolis Herakleopolis 11th Dynasty capital at Thebes Thebes (Luxor) Middle Kingdom • Middle Kingdom 2040 – 1991 • 12th Dynasty 1991 – 1783 • The Classical Period of Egyptian history • Ammenemes I 1991 – 1962 • Seized the throne from Mentuhotep IV. • Official court moved from Thebes to Memphis • Sesostris I 1971 – 1926 • Began construction of the temple complex at Karnak The 12th Dynasty ends in decades of internal competition such that the 13th and 14 Dynasties are lost to obscurity 12th Dynasty Sais Memphis 10th Dynasty capital at Herakleopolis Herakleopolis 11th Dynasty capital at Thebes Karnak Thebes Hyksos Period Sais Hyksos – Lower Egypt Memphis
    [Show full text]
  • Cyberscribe 162 1
    Cyberscribe 162 1 CyberScribe 162 - February 2009 Because some of the themes match images close to the CyberScribe's heart, he intends to start this column by noting the reopening of a gallery in the British Museum...a gallery dedicated to the masterpieces from the tomb of Nebamun. No one really knows who he was, the location of his tomb has been lost, but the plaster panels preserved in London and a few other places have been recleaned, reconserved and are brilliant in their new surroundings. Thee are quite simply, the best and most recognized of all wall art themes from ancient Egypt. They have been off display for years while they underwent intensive work to assure that they are stable, that the paints will not further deteriorate...and now they have their own gallery. The CyberScribe was permitted to see several of the famous panels while they were in storage...and without their protective glass sheets. They are lovely beyond words...and the CyberScribe knows that he will probably never again have that wonderful opportunity. A few of the photos from that day are appended below. In an article from ' The Guardian' (http://www.guardianweekly.co.uk/?page=editorial&id=879&catID=10) (edited for length here), we learn (from the words of Richard Parkinson, a curator in the Department of Ancient Egypt and Sudan, at the British Museum): "You might think that after 10 years just focused on these paintings from his funerary chapel, I'd feel very close to Nebamun. But in fact we still know very little about him.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Architecture of the Cemetery of El-Hawawish at Akhmim in Upper Egypt in the Old Kingdom
    A Study of the Architecture of the Cemetery of El-Hawawish at Akhmim in Upper Egypt in the Old Kingdom * jfe * Elizabeth M. Thompson, B.A., Dip. in Ancient Documentary Studies (Macquarie University) Thesis submitted for the Degree of Master of Arts within Macquarie University, Division of Humanities, School of Ancient History, Sydney. November, 2001 * * * I, Elizabeth M. Thompson, certify that the work presented here has not been submitted for a higher degree to any other university or institution. SUMMARY The thesis examines the architectural features and measurements of the rock hewn tombs in the necropolis of El-Hawawish at Akhmim, the capital o f the ninth province in Upper Egypt and a major administrative centre. The cemetery contains the burials of high and middle rank officials who administered the province in the Old Kingdom from the Fifth to the Eighth Dynasties (c. 2400-2160B.C.). The tombs are examined firstly, to determine whether architectural features could assist in the dating of their owners and secondly, whether certain features and measurements are indicative of the rank of these officials. Comparisons are made with tombs in the Memphite and provincial cemeteries and a study of the various elements of tomb architecture at El-Hawawish showed a chronological development similar to that observed in the tombs of the royal necropoli at Giza and Saqqara. Particular features which were introduced in certain reigns here can be found in what appear to be contemporary tombs at El-Hawawish and other provincial cemeteries. The rank of tomb owners is clearly revealed in the larger or smaller dimensions of chapels and burial chambers, and by the inclusion of certain features.
    [Show full text]
  • The Earliest Dated Monument of Amasis and the End of the Reign of Apries Author(S): Anthony Leahy Source: the Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol
    The Earliest Dated Monument of Amasis and the End of the Reign of Apries Author(s): Anthony Leahy Source: The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol. 74 (1988), pp. 183-199 Published by: Sage Publications, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3821755 Accessed: 05-03-2018 18:54 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Sage Publications, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology This content downloaded from 128.148.254.57 on Mon, 05 Mar 2018 18:54:37 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms (I83) JEA 74 THE EARLIEST DATED MONUMENT OF AMASIS AND THE END OF THE REIGN OF APRIES By ANTHONY LEAHY Publication of a donation stela BM 952 (year one of Amasis) followed by analysis of the sources for the civil war with Apries (P. BM 10113, Elephantine stela, cuneiform tablet BM 33041, Herodotus, Diodorus Siculus). P. BM 101 13 and BM 952 together show that Apries was still recognized at Thebes in October, 570, over eight months after the first monument dated by Amasis. It is argued that Apries was in Egypt for the whole of that period and only went abroad after his defeat at 'Immw/Momemphis.
    [Show full text]
  • Demotic Egyptian Instruments of Transfer As Evidence for Private Ownership of Real Property
    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 71 Issue 1 Symposium on Ancient Law, Economics and Society Part II: Ancient Rights and Wrongs / Article 10 Symposium on Ancient Law, Economics and Society Part II: Ancient Near Eastern Land Laws October 1995 Demotic Egyptian Instruments of Transfer as Evidence for Private Ownership of Real Property J.G. Manning Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation J.G. Manning, Demotic Egyptian Instruments of Transfer as Evidence for Private Ownership of Real Property, 71 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 237 (1995). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol71/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. DEMOTIC EGYPTIAN INSTRUMENTS OF TRANSFER AS EVIDENCE FOR PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OF REAL PROPERTY* J.G. MANNING** "The Ptolemaic law of things is dominated by the distinction between possession and ownership. This distinction has found expression in the terminology: KupiEia -dt Kp6TIraiq denoting, in this connection, possession and ownership. The corresponding terms are KupiE6Etv Kai Kparrdv. Sometimes, however, they are used interchangeably .... Raphael Taubenschlag, The Law of Greco- Roman Egypt in the Light of the Papyri, p. 173. r-Iny jd r ms.t hwy r sh.t "Borrow money at interest, invest it in land." A demotic wisdom text (P.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedice PARIS Obsah
    Expedice PARIS Obsah KATEDRÁLA NOTRE-DAME ........................................................................................................................... 8 MĚSTSKÁ RADNICE ........................................................................................................................................10 PYRAMIDA V LOUVRU .................................................................................................................................. 10 SACRÉ-COEUR ................................................................................................................................................. 13 Montmartre ..........................................................................................................................................................14 The Sacred-Heart Basilica of Montmartre ...........................................................................................................14 Čtvrť Le Marais ...................................................................................................................................................15 ČTVRŤ LA DÉFENSE ....................................................................................................................................... 15 Archa obrany - L'Arche de la Défense .................................................................................................................15 GÉODE ..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]