DOCSLIB.ORG

The Gift of the Nile Egypt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Gift of the Nile Egypt Egypt The Gift of the Nile Egypt Lower Egypt Upper Egypt Nubia Early History • Pre-Dynastic • Cultural development from at least 5000 BC. • First hieroglyphic scripts date to ca. 3400 • First Dynastic Period • 1st Dynasty 3150 – 2125 BC • 2nd Dynasty 2925 – 2700 BC • An homogenous, distinct, Egyptian culture. • Afro Asiatic is the parent language of Semitic. Old Kingdom 2700 – 1552 BC: 3rd to 12th Dynasties • 3rd Dynasty 2700 – 2625 • Pyramid of Djoser at saqqara Old Kingdom 4th Dynasty 2625 – 2510 Pyramids at Giza Established the nomes system Giza Giza Giza Khufu Khafre Sphinx Menkaure Old Kingdom • 5th – 8th Dynasties • 2510 - 2180 • 9th – 10th Dynasties • 2180 – 2040 • 9th and 10th Dynasties, capital at Herakleopolis • 11th Dynasty capital at Thebes (Luxor) • Unification of Upper and Lower Egypt by Mentuhotep II: 2040. 10th and 11th Dynasties Sais Memphis 10th Dynasty capital at Herakleopolis Herakleopolis 11th Dynasty capital at Thebes Thebes (Luxor) Middle Kingdom • Middle Kingdom 2040 – 1991 • 12th Dynasty 1991 – 1783 • The Classical Period of Egyptian history • Ammenemes I 1991 – 1962 • Seized the throne from Mentuhotep IV. • Official court moved from Thebes to Memphis • Sesostris I 1971 – 1926 • Began construction of the temple complex at Karnak The 12th Dynasty ends in decades of internal competition such that the 13th and 14 Dynasties are lost to obscurity 12th Dynasty Sais Memphis 10th Dynasty capital at Herakleopolis Herakleopolis 11th Dynasty capital at Thebes Karnak Thebes Hyksos Period Sais Hyksos – Lower Egypt Memphis 15th & 16th Dynasties: ca. 1650 – 1552 Introduction of the Chariot Herakleopolis Levantine and Minoan connections Theban - Upper Egypt 17th Dynasty: 1650 - 1552 Thebes New Kingdom • 18th Dynasty • Ahmose 1552 – 1526 • Pushed the Hyksos out of Egypt • Amenophis I 1526 – 1506 • Conquered Nubia (Kush) • Tuthmosis I 1506 – 1493 • Capital established at Memphis • Expanded the temple complex of Amun-Re at Karnak • First rock-cut tombs – Valley of the Kings New Kingdom Tuthmosis I 1506 – 1493 Sais Capital established at Memphis Memphis Expanded the temple complex of Amun- Re at Karnak Herakleopolis First rock-cut tombs – Valley of the Kings Valley of Karnak the Kings Thebes • Tuthmosis II 1493 – 1479 • Hatshepsut 1479 - 1458 • Widow of Tuthmosis II, assumed regency for her son. • Tuthmosis III (1479) – 1425 • Defeated the Sea People at the Battle of Megiddo ca. 1457 (?) • 17 campaigns into the Levant Akhenaten and Nefertiti • Crowned Amenophis IV: • 1352 – 1348 • Adopted the monotheistic cult of Aten – the Sun. • Changed his name to Akhenaten • 1348 - 1338 • Built Akhtetaten Nefertiti Akhenaten Tut • Smekhkare 1338 – 1336 • Possibly a brother of Akhenaten. • Reigned as regent • Tutankhamun 1336 – 1327 • The ‘Boy King’ • Died without an heir. • Tomb discovered by Howard Carter in 1922 Geopolitical Scene ca. 1300 BC • From the end of the 19th Dynasty (1188) to the 26th Dynasty (656) Egypt is beset by invasions and rivalries between the priests and the kings Sea Peoples Hatti Assyrians Lybians Nubians 26th & 27th Dynasties • Necho I 672 – 664 • 671: Sennacherib of Assyria conquers to Memphis • 664: Necho assists in Assyrian conquest to Thebes • Psammetichus I 664 – 610 • Re-asserts Egyptian independence • Extensive use of foreign mercenaries • Opens ports to Greek and Phoenician trade • Necho II 610 – 596 • Wars against Babylon for control of the Levant • Psammetichus II 595 – 589 • Apries 589 – 570 • Amasis 570 – 526 • Psammetichus III 526 - 525.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Egypt. the Last Centuries of the Empire (747–332 Bce)
    EGYPT. THE LAST CENTURIES OF THE EMPIRE (747–332 BCE) S u m m a r y The book “Egypt. The Last Centuries of the Empire (747–332 BCE)” deals with issues related to the political and social history of Egypt in the period between the beginning of the rule of the Kushite pharaohs and Alexander the Great’s conquest of Egypt. The book comprises an introduction, ten chapters, a conclusion, three appen- dices and a bibliography. The introduction leads the reader into relevant issues and remarks on the accepted convention of providing names and a chronological table. Chapter 1 ( The Napatan Dynasty ) discusses the history of the Kushite family reign and the Kushite conquest of Egypt (25 th Dynasty). Chapter 2 ( Regarding God’s Wife of Amun ) focus- es on the rule of successive Napatan rulers (Shebitku, Shabaka), the role of God’s Wife of Amun in the ideology of royal rulers in the Late Period, and also on the 19th-century research conducted by Count Michał Tyszkiewicz in the vicinity of the tombs of God’s Wives and their Kushite courtiers. Chapter 3 ( Assyrians at the Gates ) discusses the reigns of Egypt’s last Kushite pharaohs. Chapter 4 ( The Golden Age ) summarises the first years of the 26 th Dynasty and changes initiated by its founder, Psametik I. In Chapter 5 ( Naucratis and the Sunken City ), there is a discussion of discoveries: Flinders Petrie’s discovery of Naucratis and Franck Goddio’s of Thonis- Heracleion, and also of the history of the 26 th Dynasty rulers (Necho II, Psametik II) and their relations with the Greek world.
    [Show full text]
  • Kings & Events of the Babylonian, Persian and Greek Dynasties
    KINGS AND EVENTS OF THE BABYLONIAN, PERSIAN, AND GREEK DYNASTIES 612 B.C. Nineveh falls to neo-Babylonian army (Nebuchadnezzar) 608 Pharaoh Necho II marched to Carchemesh to halt expansion of neo-Babylonian power Josiah, King of Judah, tries to stop him Death of Josiah and assumption of throne by his son, Jehoahaz Jehoiakim, another son of Josiah, replaced Jehoahaz on the authority of Pharaoh Necho II within 3 months Palestine and Syria under Egyptian rule Josiah’s reforms dissipate 605 Nabopolassar sends troops to fight remaining Assyrian army and the Egyptians at Carchemesh Nebuchadnezzar chased them all the way to the plains of Palestine Nebuchadnezzar got word of the death of his father (Nabopolassar) so he returned to Babylon to receive the crown On the way back he takes Daniel and other members of the royal family into exile 605 - 538 Babylon in control of Palestine, 597; 10,000 exiled to Babylon 586 Jerusalem and the temple destroyed and large deportation 582 Because Jewish guerilla fighters killed Gedaliah another last large deportation occurred SUCCESSORS OF NEBUCHADNEZZAR 562 - 560 Evil-Merodach released Jehoiakim (true Messianic line) from custody 560 - 556 Neriglissar 556 Labaski-Marduk reigned 556 - 539 Nabonidus: Spent most of the time building a temple to the mood god, Sin. This earned enmity of the priests of Marduk. Spent the rest of his time trying to put down revolts and stabilize the kingdom. He moved to Tema and left the affairs of state to his son, Belshazzar Belshazzar: Spent most of his time trying to restore order. Babylonia’s great threat was Media.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Handout #1 Primary Documents Bible: 2 Kings 23:25
    Daniel Handout #1 Primary Documents Bible: 2 Kings 23:25-25:21; 2 Chronicles 35:1-36:21; Jeremiah 25:1; 46-47, 52; Daniel 1:1-2 D. J. Wiseman, Chronicles of Chaldean Kings, 626-556 B.C. (1956); A. K. Grayson, Assyrian and Babylonian Chronicles (2000, new translation with commentary); J. B. Pritchard, Ancient Near Eastern Texts (ANET, excerpts) Superscription (Daniel 1:1-2) Jehoiakim, King of Judah Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon [ ← Sandwich ] Jehoiakim, King of Judah Frame (Daniel 1:1 and 21) _________ B.C. [ Bracket ] _________ B.C. Collapse of Assyrian Empire Ashurbanipal II (668-627 B.C.; alternative, 668-631 B.C.) Ashur-etel-ilani (627-623 B.C.; alternative, 631-627 B.C.) Sin-shar-iskun (627-612 B.C.; alternative, 623-612 B.C.) Assur-uballit II (612-?610/09 B.C.) Rise of the Babylonian Empire Nabopolassar (626-605 B.C.) Nebuchadnezzar II/Nebuchadrezzar (605-562 B.C.) Amel-Marduk (=Evil-merodach, 2 Kings 25:27-30) (562-560 B.C.) Neriglissar (560-558 B.C.) Labashi-marduk (557 B.C.) Nabonidus (556-539 B.C.) Co-Regent: Belshazzar (?553-539 B.C.) Contest with Egypt Rise of Saite (26th) Dynasty (664-525 B.C.); Decline of Nubian (25th) Dynasty (716-663 B.C.); Reunion of Upper and Lower Egypt (656 B.C.) Psammetichus I (Psamtik I) (664-610 B.C.) Necho II (610-595 B.C.) Psammetichus II (Psamtik II) (595-589 B.C.) Hophra/Apries (589-570 B.C.) Sandwich of Judah Josiah (640-609 B.C.) Jehohaz (3 months, 609 B.C.; 2 Kings 23:31) Jehoiakim (609-597 B.C.) Jehoiachin (3 months, 596 B.C.; 2 Kings 24:8) Zedekiah (597-586 B.C.) Nabopolassar’s Revolt Against Assyria “son of a nobody”—Nabopolassar cylinder (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • ROYAL STATUES Including Sphinxes
    ROYAL STATUES Including sphinxes EARLY DYNASTIC PERIOD Dynasties I-II Including later commemorative statues Ninutjer 800-150-900 Statuette of Ninuter seated wearing heb-sed cloak, calcite(?), formerly in G. Michaelidis colln., then in J. L. Boele van Hensbroek colln. in 1962. Simpson, W. K. in JEA 42 (1956), 45-9 figs. 1, 2 pl. iv. Send 800-160-900 Statuette of Send kneeling with vases, bronze, probably made during Dyn. XXVI, formerly in G. Posno colln. and in Paris, Hôtel Drouot, in 1883, now in Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum, 8433. Abubakr, Abd el Monem J. Untersuchungen über die ägyptischen Kronen (1937), 27 Taf. 7; Roeder, Äg. Bronzefiguren 292 [355, e] Abb. 373 Taf. 44 [f]; Wildung, Die Rolle ägyptischer Könige im Bewußtsein ihrer Nachwelt i, 51 [Dok. xiii. 60] Abb. iv [1]. Name, Gauthier, Livre des Rois i, 22 [vi]. See Antiquités égyptiennes ... Collection de M. Gustave Posno (1874), No. 53; Hôtel Drouot Sale Cat. May 22-6, 1883, No. 53; Stern in Zeitschrift für die gebildete Welt 3 (1883), 287; Ausf. Verz. 303; von Bissing in 2 Mitteilungen des Kaiserlich Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Athenische Abteilung xxxviii (1913), 259 n. 2 (suggests from Memphis). Not identified by texts 800-195-000 Head of royal statue, perhaps early Dyn. I, in London, Petrie Museum, 15989. Petrie in Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland xxxvi (1906), 200 pl. xix; id. Arts and Crafts 31 figs. 19, 20; id. The Revolutions of Civilisation 15 fig. 7; id. in Anc. Eg. (1915), 168 view 4; id. in Hammerton, J. A.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Egypt's Foreign Policy During the Saite Period
    AN ANALYSIS OF EGYPT'S FOREIGN POLICY DURING THE SAITE PERIOD by JULIEN BOAST A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of MPHIL(B) in EGYPTOLOGY Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity School of Historical Studies The University of Birmingham September 2006 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This study consists of an analysis of Egyptian foreign policy during the Saite period (including the reign of Necho I), and also briefly examines the actions of the Twenty-fifth Dynasty in order to establish the correct context. Despite the large gaps in the historical record during this period, judicious use of sources from a number of different cultures allows the historian to attempt to reconstruct the actions of the time, and to discuss possible motivations for them, seeking to identify concerns linking the foreign policy of all the Saite kings. Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank the Arts and Humanities Research Council, whose support has been vital in the undertaking of this study. I would also like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into a Translucent Name Bead*
    INSIGHTS INTO A TRANSLUCENT NAME BEAD* [PLANCHES XIII-XIV] BY PETER PAMMINGER Institut für Ägyptologie der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Saarstr. 21 (Campus) D-55099 MAINZ Recently, while visiting a private collection in Belgium, I became aware of a rock- crystal bead of quite distinctive qualities, which might once have belonged to the royal entourage of the 25th dynasty King Piye. The object was acquired not long ago on the art market, unfortunately without any proof of provenance. Its owner was kind enough to grant me permission to publish it. The bead itself (diameter 1.8 to 2.5 cm) has been drilled through (the hole 1.0 to 1.1 cm wide), embodying a sheet of gold in its core. One side of the surface being decorated with a raised cartouche bearing the inscription Mn-Ìpr-R{, the opposite side depicting a vulture1 who is carrying in each claw a symbol of {nÌ. Inbetween these two motives are situated two raised circular dots, each obviously representing a sun-disc (fig. + pl. XIII). * Abbreviations generally in accordance with Helck, W. und W. Westendorf (eds.), Lexikon der Ägyptologie (=LÄ), vol. VII, 1989, p. IX-XXXVIII. In addition: — RMT: Regio Museo di Torino. — Andrews, Jewellery I: C.A.R. Andrews, Jewellery I. From the Earliest Times to the Seventeenth Dynasty. Catalogue of Egyptian Antiquities in the British Museum VI, 1981. — Hall, Royal Scarabs: H.R.(H.) Hall, Catalogue of Egyptian Scarabs, etc., in the British Museum. Vol. I: Royal Scarabs, 1913. — Jaeger, OBO SA 2: B. Jaeger, Essai de classification et datation des scarabées Menkhéperrê (OBO SA 2), 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Portrait Versus Ideal Image فن تصوير الوجه (البورتريه)
    PORTRAIT VERSUS IDEAL IMAGE فن تصوير الوجه (البورتريه) Dimitri Laboury EDITORS WILLEKE WENDRICH Editor-in-Chief Area Editor Material Culture University of California, Los Angeles JACCO DIELEMAN Editor University of California, Los Angeles ELIZABETH FROOD Editor University of Oxford JOHN BAINES Senior Editorial Consultant University of Oxford Short Citation: Laboury, 2010, Portrait versus Ideal Image. UEE. Full Citation: Laboury, Dimitri, 2010, Portrait versus Ideal Image. In Willeke Wendrich (ed.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, Los Angeles. http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz0025jjv0 1141 Version 1, October 2010 http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz0025jjv0 PORTRAIT VERSUS IDEAL IMAGE فن تصوير الوجه (البورتريه) Dimitri Laboury Porträt versus Idealbildnis Portrait ou image idéal(isé)e Ancient Egyptian art’s concern with individualized human representation has generated much debate among Egyptologists about the very existence of portraiture in Pharaonic society. The issue has often—if not always—been thought of in terms of opposition between portrait and ideal image, being a major topic in the broader question of realism and formal relation to reality in ancient Egyptian art. After a brief analysis of the problem from a theoretical point of view, the article deals with the Egyptological reception of the subject and considers the concepts involved in the notion of portrait within the context of ancient Egyptian thought. A few significant cases selected from the corpus of royal statuary are then investigated in order to elucidate the motives and modalities of the interaction between portrait and ideal image in ancient Egyptian individualized representations. إن إھتمام الفن المصري القديم بتصوير اﻹنسان بطريقة فردية مصدر لكثير من الجدل ما بين علماء المصريات حول وجود فن تصوير الوجه (البورتريه) بالمجتمع الفرعوني.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palace of Apries (Memphis 11)
    BRITISH SCHOOL OF ARCHAEOLOGY IN EGYPT AND EGYPTIAN RESEARCH ACCOUNT FIFTEENTH YEAR, 1909 THE PALACE OF APRIES (MEMPHIS 11) W. M. FLINDERS PETRIE HON.D.C.L., LL.D., LITT.D., PH.D. F.R.S.. F.B.A., HON.F.S.A. (SCOT.) MEMBER OF THE ROYAL IRISH ACADEMY MEMBER OF THE IMPERIAL GERMAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE CORRESPONDING MEMBER OF THE SOCIBTY OF ANTHROPOLOGY, BERLIN MEMBER OF THE ROMAN SOCIETY OF ANTHROPOLOGY MEMBER OP THE SOCIETY OF NORTHERN ANTIQUARIES MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY EDWARDS PROFESSOR OF EGYPTOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON WITH A CHAPTER BY DR. J. H. WALKER LONDON SCHOOL OF ARCHAEOLOGY IN EGYPT UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, GOWER STREET, W.C. AND BERNARD QUARITCH 11, GRAFTON STREET, NEW BOND STREET, W. 1909 PRlNTBD BY H&zELL, WATSON AND YINEY. LD., LONDON AND AYLB(IBUKY. BRITISH SCHOOL OF ARCHAEOLOGY IN EGYPT AND EGYPTIAN RESEliRCH ACCOUNT matron : THE EARL OF CROMER, G.C.B., G.C.M.G., K.C.S.I., Etc., Etc. GENERAL COMMITTEE (*Executive Members) LORDAVEBURY 'Prof. ERNESTGARDNER Sir C. SCOTTMONCRIEFF WALTERBAILY Prof. PERCYGARDNER ROBERTMOND HENRYBALFOUR Rt. Hon. Sir G. T. GOLDIE Prof. MONTAGUE FREIHERRYON BISSING Prof. GOWLAND WALTERMORRISON Dr. T. G. BONNEY Mrs. J. R. GREEN *Miss M. A. MURRAY Rt. Hon. JAMESBRYCE Dr. A. C. HADDON Prof. P. E. NEWBERRY Prof. J. B. BURY JESSE HAWORTH Dr. PAGEMAY *SOMERSCLARKE Dr. A. C. HEADLAM F. W. PERCIVAL EDWARDCLODD *Sir ROBERTHENSLEY (Chairman) Dr. PINCHES W. E. CRUM D. G. HOGARTH Dr. G. W. PROTHERO Prof. BOYDDAWKINS Sir H. H. HOWORTH Dr. G. REISNER Prof. Sir S. DILL Baron A.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexandrea Ad Aegyptvm the Legacy of Multiculturalism in Antiquity
    Alexandrea ad aegyptvm the legacy of multiculturalism in antiquity editors rogério sousa maria do céu fialho mona haggag nuno simões rodrigues Título: Alexandrea ad Aegyptum – The Legacy of Multiculturalism in Antiquity Coord.: Rogério Sousa, Maria do Céu Fialho, Mona Haggag e Nuno Simões Rodrigues Design gráfico: Helena Lobo Design | www.hldesign.pt Revisão: Paula Montes Leal Inês Nemésio Obra sujeita a revisão científica Comissão científica: Alberto Bernabé, Universidade Complutense de Madrid; André Chevitarese, Universidade Federal, Rio de Janeiro; Aurélio Pérez Jiménez, Universidade de Málaga; Carmen Leal Soares, Universidade de Coimbra; Fábio Souza Lessa, Universidade Federal, Rio de Janeiro; José Augusto Ramos, Universidade de Lisboa; José Luís Brandão, Universidade de Coimbra; Natália Bebiano Providência e Costa, Universidade de Coimbra; Richard McKirahan, Pomona College, Claremont Co-edição: CITCEM – Centro de Investigação Transdisciplinar «Cultura, Espaço e Memória» Via Panorâmica, s/n | 4150-564 Porto | www.citcem.org | [email protected] CECH – Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos | Largo da Porta Férrea, Universidade de Coimbra Alexandria University | Cornice Avenue, Shabty, Alexandria Edições Afrontamento , Lda. | Rua Costa Cabral, 859 | 4200-225 Porto www.edicoesafrontamento.pt | [email protected] N.º edição: 1152 ISBN: 978-972-36-1336-0 (Edições Afrontamento) ISBN: 978-989-8351-25-8 (CITCEM) ISBN: 978-989-721-53-2 (CECH) Depósito legal: 366115/13 Impressão e acabamento: Rainho & Neves Lda. | Santa Maria da Feira [email protected] Distribuição: Companhia das Artes – Livros e Distribuição, Lda. [email protected] Este trabalho é financiado por Fundos Nacionais através da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia no âmbito do projecto PEst-OE/HIS/UI4059/2011 manetho and the history of egypt luís manuel de Araújo University of Lisbon.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Egyptians– History LKS2 Terms 3 and 4
    Grand Designs Ancient Egyptians– History LKS2 Terms 3 and 4 Timeline 3500 BC Early settlers in the Nile valley 3100 BC Hieroglyphic script developed Narmer unifies Upper and Lower Egypt 2700 BC First stone pyramid built 2600 BC Pyramids of Giza built 2200 BC Various kings rule over Egypt 2055 BC Mentuhotep II gained control of entire country 2000 – Agricultural development of the Faiyum 1700 BC Earliest parts of Temple of Karnak built Egyptians control Nubia 1700 BC Hyksos rulers took control of Delta region 1600 BC Ahmose unifies country 1400 BC Tutankhamun became pharaoh 1100 BC Upper and Lower Egypt split 525 BC Persians conquer Egypt Grand Designs Rivers– Geography LKS2 Terms 3 and 4 Grand Designs Ancient Egyptian Art LKS2 Terms 3 and 4 Religion and Art Much of the artwork created by the Ancient Egyptians had to do with their religion. They would fill the tombs of the Pharaohs with paintings and sculptures. Much of this art- work was there to help the Pharaohs in the afterlife. Tem- ples were another popular place for art. The temples often held large statues of their gods as well as many paintings on the walls. Above is an example of the intri- cate work of Ancient Egyptian sculpture. It is the funerary mask of a pharaoh named Tutankhamen. The expression on his face is the same used to convey the look of all the pharaohs throughout the histo- ry of Egypt. The colouring of the collar is made with semiprecious Egyptian Painting and Tomb stones and the stripes on the head- Walls dress are made with blue glass.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 ALLEN Page 1 Friday, July 23, 2004 9:54 AM
    01 ALLEN Page 1 Friday, July 23, 2004 9:54 AM Some Theban Officials of the Early Middle Kingdom James P. Allen ver the course of his Egyptological career, the name of William Kelly Simpson has become nearly synonymous with OMiddle Kingdom studies. Although his interests have included most aspects of ancient Egyptian civilization, Kelly’s first love has always been the literature, art, and history of the Middle Kingdom. The list of his publications bears eloquent witness to just how much his scholarship has expanded and enriched our knowledge in these areas over the past forty years. It is my privilege to offer the present study— which covers an equivalent span of time in the formation of the Middle Kingdom—in tribute to Kelly’s scholarship, and with affection to an es- teemed colleague and a treasured friend. The recent redating of the tomb of Meket-re (TT 280, fig. 1) to the early years of Amenemhat I has provided a new benchmark for the art and history of the early Middle Kingdom.1 Given the service of Meket- re under Mentuhotep II (see below), this new dating now provides evi- dence for an official career stretching from the last decades of Mentuhotep II (ca. 2030–2010 B.C. in the traditional chronology), through the reign of Mentuhotep III (ca. 2010–1998 B.C.) and the end of the Eleventh Dynasty, to the first years of Dynasty 12 (ca. 1991–1981 B.C.). The titles preserved in Meket-re’s tomb are mr ∞tmt “Overseer of the Seal” and mr pr wr “Chief Steward.”2 The former identifies him as 1 Dorothea Arnold, “Amenemhat I and the Early Twelfth Dynasty at Thebes,” MMJ 26 (1991), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Earliest Dated Monument of Amasis and the End of the Reign of Apries Author(S): Anthony Leahy Source: the Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol
    The Earliest Dated Monument of Amasis and the End of the Reign of Apries Author(s): Anthony Leahy Source: The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol. 74 (1988), pp. 183-199 Published by: Sage Publications, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3821755 Accessed: 05-03-2018 18:54 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Sage Publications, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology This content downloaded from 128.148.254.57 on Mon, 05 Mar 2018 18:54:37 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms (I83) JEA 74 THE EARLIEST DATED MONUMENT OF AMASIS AND THE END OF THE REIGN OF APRIES By ANTHONY LEAHY Publication of a donation stela BM 952 (year one of Amasis) followed by analysis of the sources for the civil war with Apries (P. BM 10113, Elephantine stela, cuneiform tablet BM 33041, Herodotus, Diodorus Siculus). P. BM 101 13 and BM 952 together show that Apries was still recognized at Thebes in October, 570, over eight months after the first monument dated by Amasis. It is argued that Apries was in Egypt for the whole of that period and only went abroad after his defeat at 'Immw/Momemphis.
    [Show full text]