Flying Cloud Bunt and Leach Lines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Flying Cloud Bunt and Leach Lines Line arrangement from the Boucher 1916 modelLine arrangement of the Flying from Cloud The in Boucherthe Boston1916 Museum model of of Fine the Arts, Flying W.A. Cloud in the White’s 1933 plan “Transverse Rigging seize bunt line block to backstay Boston Museum of Fine Arts and from Plan ShowingW.A. White Masts ’s sheet and Spars, titled “Transverse line runs aft of sail to StandingRigging Rigging Plan and Showing Yard Halyards Masts and” Spars, pin via fairleads (s) Line sizesStanding from GeorgeRigging Biddlecombe and Yard Halyards ” in all masts royal bunt lines 1.5” “The Arthis of 1933 Rigging plans” (1848 for the and Flying Ben Cloud. Lankford’sLine 1979sizes planfrom “PeterRigging Force’s 1826 seize bunt line block to backstay Sections/Sails“Tables”,” fromGeorge Model Biddlecombe’s Shipways. 1848 “The Art of Rigging” and Ben Lankford’s All red linessheet p&s titled except “Rigging where notedSections/Sails” All blocks p&s except those marked “C” (Center), line runs aft of sail to “P” (port)from or “S” his (starboard) 1979 plans for the Flying Fish all masts royal bunt lines 1.5” pin via fairleads (p) All blocksfrom single Model except Shipways. those marked “D” (Double) or “T” (tripple) seize bunt line D block to lift seize bunt line blocks to jackstay, lines run aft of sail to pins via fairleads bunt line goes through eye inner bunt line on leech line outer bunt line fore & main topgallant bunt lines 2”, mizzen 1.75” topgallant leech line fore & main 2”, mizzen 1.75” seize bunt & leech line blocks to jackstay, blocks tied to upper top aft of sail lines run aft of sail to pins via fairleads inner bunt line topsail leech line outer bunt line fore & main 3”, mizzen 2.5” fore & main topsail bunt lines 3”, mizzen 2.5” seize bunt line blocks to jackstay, blocks tied to lower top aft of sail lines run aft of sail to pins via seize leech line block to jackstay, fairleads all lines shown are forward of the sails except for the lines to the pins which are aft of the sail fore & main course leech lines 3”, mizzen 2” inner bunt line leech line middle bunt line outer bunt line fore & main course bunt lines 3.5”, mizzen 2.5” buntline hitch rope size block size 1.25” 4” FORE MAST LOOKING FORWARD 1.5” 5” 2” 6” BUNTS & LEECHES 2.5 7” 2.75” 8” STANDING RIGGING 3” 9” 3.5” 10” 4” 12” 4.5” 13” 5” 14” 2021-06-30 FLYING CLOUD - FORE MAST © Scott Bradner - 2021.
Recommended publications
  • The Junk Rig Glossary (JRG) Version 20 APR 2016
    The Junk Rig Glossary (JRG) Version 20 APR 2016 Welcome to the Junk Rig Glossary! The Junk Rig Glossary (JRG) is a Member Project of the Junk Rig Association, initiated by Bruce Weller who, as a then new member, found that he needed a junk 'dictionary’. The aim is to create a comprehensive and fully inclusive glossary of all terms pertaining to junk rig, its implementation and characteristics. It is intended to benefit all who are interested in junk rig, its history and on-going development. A goal of the JRG Project is to encourage a standard vocabulary to assist clarity of expression and understanding. Thus, where competing terms are in common use, one has generally been selected as standard (please see Glossary Conventions: Standard Versus Non-Standard Terms, below) This is in no way intended to impugn non-standard terms or those who favour them. Standard usage is voluntary, and such designations are wide open to review and change. Where possible, terminology established by Hasler and McLeod in Practical Junk Rig has been preferred. Where innovators have developed a planform and associated rigging, their terminology for innovative features is preferred. Otherwise, standards are educed, insofar as possible, from common usage in other publications and online discussion. Your participation in JRG content is warmly welcomed. Comments, suggestions and/or corrections may be submitted to [email protected], or via related fora. Thank you for using this resource! The Editors: Dave Zeiger Bruce Weller Lesley Verbrugge Shemaya Laurel Contents Some sections are not yet completed. ∙ Common Terms ∙ Common Junk Rigs ∙ Handy references Common Acronyms Formulae and Ratios Fabric materials Rope materials ∙ ∙ Glossary Conventions Participation and Feedback Standard vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Sloop Welcome Crew Training Manual
    HMAS WELCOME ARMED SLOOP WELCOME CREW TRAINING MANUAL Discovery Center ~ Great Lakes 13268 S. West Bayshore Drive Traverse City, Michigan 49684 231-946-2647 [email protected] (c) Maritime Heritage Alliance 2011 1 1770's WELCOME History of the 1770's British Armed Sloop, WELCOME About mid 1700’s John Askin came over from Ireland to fight for the British in the American Colonies during the French and Indian War (in Europe known as the Seven Years War). When the war ended he had an opportunity to go back to Ireland, but stayed here and set up his own business. He and a partner formed a trading company that eventually went bankrupt and Askin spent over 10 years paying off his debt. He then formed a new company called the Southwest Fur Trading Company; his territory was from Montreal on the east to Minnesota on the west including all of the Northern Great Lakes. He had three boats built: Welcome, Felicity and Archange. Welcome is believed to be the first vessel he had constructed for his fur trade. Felicity and Archange were named after his daughter and wife. The origin of Welcome’s name is not known. He had two wives, a European wife in Detroit and an Indian wife up in the Straits. His wife in Detroit knew about the Indian wife and had accepted this and in turn she also made sure that all the children of his Indian wife received schooling. Felicity married a man by the name of Brush (Brush Street in Detroit is named after him).
    [Show full text]
  • Cruising Sails: Mainsails by Carol Hasse (A Shorter Version of This Article Originally Appeared in Cruising World Magazine.)
    Cruising Mainsails 1 Cruising Sails: Mainsails By Carol Hasse (A shorter version of this article originally appeared in Cruising World magazine.) We were night sailing through the coral strewn Bahamas, broad reaching at hull speed in uncomfortably rising seas and winds. Our course was set for tropical warmth and the adventures only sailors can experience. Somewhere between the exquisite Berry Islands and Nassau Harbor (though we may just as well have been somewhere between hell and high water with all the visuals of a coal bin), it was time to jibe. It had to be a controlled jibe of course; the 616 square foot mainsail of our 50’ gaff schooner was, indeed, a force to be reckoned with. Carefully easing the preventer that was secured to the aft end of our 500-pound 30-foot boom, we bore off downwind. Predictably and powerfully, the not much lighter (or shorter) gaff arced across the sky from windward to leeward. In the “split second” before the boom jibed over to join the gaff on our new tack, the mainsail ripped from leech to luff just above the clew reinforcing patch. With dispatch born of necessity, we tucked in a belated reef, neatly hiding the offending seam in the bunt of the sail. It wasn’t long before another jibe was called for, and despite the impeccable timing of our well-orchestrated crew, the mainsail was ripped again from leech to luff, this time along the seam above the reef clew reinforcing patch. It is with much embarrassment that I admit we committed this act a third time, ripping our mainsail above its second (and final) reef clew’s reinforcing patch—once more from leech to luff.
    [Show full text]
  • ! £?::::::::,» || Xssi Shamrock's First Spin
    Nb, SUNDAY.oU.m^ai. JUNE 28. 1903. YOKE DAILYDATLY TRIBUNE.TTCTBT action win be. bit Iwill certainly protect myself NEW-NTCW-YOKK CHICAGO my players from nurh ruffianism. 10 INVADERS LOSE TO and W,rsr» Dreyfus* SANDY HOOK Referring to th- <*»*"*of « Davis. MS UPTON'S TWO YACHTS OFF stated that he preferred not to express* ?.r> opin- ion for as one of the league owners, he may bar* and Base "\u25a0 implicit Home Team Good at Hitting Steal- to sit in Judgment the case. He ha* SHAMROCK'S FIRST SPIN. confidence In Pulllaro. however, and it is said ing and Clearly Outclass Visitors. that he approves his action, rhougn he win not say so. [BYTELEGRAPH TO TflE TRIBUNE.] third TRIAL Chicago. June 27.-The Invaders lost th«-ir "While Colon*! Dreyfrwn is h<*re to '"""'i**** THE INITIAL HERE. to-day by «core of 1to to straight game to Chicago a th* ruffianism MMI has been shown Mana?w clearly The bat- might be 4 Th- visitors were outclassed. Clark* It la »tigg*i"t*<J that It w*»u good and the baas of the home team was for him to look into th* rowdyism that tin? The score: this "*'••'* A Fine Burst Speed— Forma! stealing better. shown by hi? m-n at the Polo Cnwtt* of CHICAGO NEW- YORK. in the game h*r» on May 13. when the Ptttsburst To-morrotc. abrlbpoaei ab 1 a i% unsportsmanlike Race — — Jl%J % *% % players Indulged in unfair and — in the seventh — this iram". 1 tactics. Doheny In making high fly.
    [Show full text]
  • Come, It Won't Cost You a Cent!
    @je Jlafning fto>& PART TWO. SAVANNAH, GA.. SUNDAY, MAY 10, ISM. PAGES 9 TO 16. ••JACK” HAS A JEW THICK TO 80IN6 TO DECORATE ? HERE'S ALL THE BUNTIHB YOU WANT. | - LEAKY. A WONDERFUL MAN. UD ES WAITING ROOM-SECOND FLOOR. The Old Method ( Furling Topsail. I)oue Away YVltta on a Ship With Progressive Owners. HIS SUCCESS BROUGHT ON AN From the New York Tribune. Come, It by steam Cost the inroads made the You on Won’t a All ATTACK FROM HIS RIVALS. Cent! business of pushing vessels along, of •which the wind had a monopoly not so No toll gates of any kind™nobody at the doors to conduct you—-nobody to inveigle you to buy—no many years ago, have not stopped the officious spirits of invention from finding out new Which Resulted In Letting the l*eo- attentions anywhere. ways of doing things in connection with I>ie Know of His Marvelous Work. sailing ships. To the eye of the ordinary History Repents Itself and Oppres- the rigging of a ship is a •‘landlubber’’ sion Is Denotineed—Another In- A fearfully and wonderfully tangled mess of Free Pass—As Free As the Air You Breathe— stance W here Merit W ins. ropes and lines, but to the sailor, whose business it is to know all about the ropes History has taught us and since time im- To ramble and enjoy yourself, and show your friends, up and down as far as you like and as long please, and things, the maze and the various parts memorial It has been demonstrated that as you from seven in the which compose it are the embodiment of any attempt to oppress an individual or morning until seven in the evening.
    [Show full text]
  • SPARS and STANDING RIGGING.' § L
    Plate No. 20. CHAPTER III. SPARS AND STANDING RIGGING.' § l. MASTS. Lower masts in modern ships are usually QUilt up of steel plates stiffened in various ways by steel shapes. (Plate 20.) Built-up masts of wood are no longer used, although lower masts made of single pine sticks are· not uncommon in sailing ships of moderate size. Topmasts and topgallant masts are still made of wood, usually of pine. The details of masts are shown in Plates. 20 and 21. .The mast rests on a step, placed as low .as possible; usually on the keelson. At the lower e·nd is ·a tenon fitting·· into a m o.r ti s e at the step. Where the mast passes through the successive decks, timbers are built in from beam to beam, form­ ing p artn e r s ; the space between these and the mast being filled by tightly-fitting wedges. The masthead is smaller than the body of the mast, and at the shoulder, called the h o u n d s , where the reduction in size is made, heavy knees or b ibb s , are bolted on, widening . the shoulder and forming a secure support for the t res t I e ­ trees ; stout fore and aft pieces which, in their turn, support the c r o s s - t r e e s , the t o p , the t o p m a s t , and the eyes of the lower rigging. The cross-trees are athwartship pieces crossing the trestle-trees forward and abaft the masthead, and forming the principal pa·rt of the framing of the to p.
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Cutter Sherbourne
    Sails There are many arguments for adding or omitting the sails on a model ship. There is no right answer and I decided to have a combination of set and furled sails on my model of HM cutter Sherbourne in 1/64 scale to provide 'life' to a static subject. This article is an extract from a much longer work on super detailing the Caldercraft kit of Sherbourne. Please contact the author if you want to purchase a copy. Real sails were made from canvas cloths which in the Royal Navy in the 18th and 19th century were 2 feet wide. The cloths were laid next to each other and the seams were folded over and stitched with a double seam. Extra cloths were stitched over areas which were subject to heavy wear such as the corners of the sail and bands across the sail where the reef ropes were inserted. Around the edge of the sail was a bolt rope and a number of rope eyes known as cringles which were used to attach the running rigging to the sail. The bolt rope was stitched to the rear surface of a square sail and usually to the port side of a fore-and-aft sail. Varieties of fine cloth such as cotton lawn have been used for model sails reasonably successfully in large scales. A thread pitch of at least 200 threads per inch is needed but this is still far from true scale size and is equivalent to a canvas with threads which are over 6mm diameter. Any sewing methods for representing the seams are unsuitable in a small scale since the stitch sizes and weight of thread will be far too heavy.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Rigs
    Types of Rigs Rigs and Rigging Sloop Ketch Yawl Gaff Cutter Schooner Toronto Brigantine Topsail Schooner Brig Brigantine Barque Barquentine Fully Rigged Ship 1 2 Gaff Rig vs Marconi (Bermuda) Rig Sloop • One mast • Fore and aft rigged • One head sail • This is the most commonly seen rig Bermuda rigged sail Gaff rigged sail these days Spray – sailed around the world in -Sail only has one halyard -Sail has a peak and a throat halyard 1895 by Joshua Slocum, who wrote - Less sail area -Greater sail area for same height “Sailing Alone Around the World” - Easier to set -Requires more people to set 3 4 Cutter Schooner • One mast • Two or more masts • Fore and aft rigged • Rigged Fore and Aft • Forward mast is shorter or • More than one headsail, usually with a equal to after mast(s) headrig as well • Can be gaff rigged – Bluenose • Can be Bermuda rig – Challenge • Grand Banks Fishing Schooner Bluenose II maiden voyage 1963 Maurice Crosby 5 6 Topsail Schooner Ketch • Two or more masts • Two masts • Gaff rigged sails on all • Fore and aft rigged lower masts, square sails on some masts • Mizzen mast forward of • A version with raked masts, the rudder post (mizzen called the Baltimore provides some drive) Clipper, was much favoured by privateersmen • Aft mast is shorter than in the War of 1812 (Pride of the forward mast Baltimore II) (compare to Schooner) Ketch in Stormy Weather V. Howes 1896 http://www.pride2.org/history/index.php 7 8 Yawl Barque • Two masts • Three or more • Fore and Aft rigged masts • Mizzen mast aft of the • All masts except
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Sail-Making
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com Theartofsail-making Art J^S. /10<f. I X 8 i I 1 6- THE ART SAIL-MAKING, AS PRACTISED IN ©De Bogal Kali!?, AND ACCORDING TO THE MOST APPROVED METHODS IN THE ACCOMPANIED WITH THE PARLIAMENTARY REGULATIONS RELATIVE TO SAILS AND SAIL-CLOTH ; €!je atrmiraltj} Instructions for MANUFACTURING CANVAS FOR HER MAJESTY'S NAVY, Form of Tender, g-c. ILLUSTRATED BY NUMEROUS FIGURES, WITH FULL AND ACCURATE TABLES. - .'"'.- ?i?> THE FOURTH EDITION, ''"?-/. CORRECTED AND IMPROVED. — {'o LONDON: PRINTED FOR CHARLES WILSON, (Late J. W. Norie and Wilson,) CHARTSELLER TO THE ADMIRALTY, THE HON. EAST INDIA COMPANY, AND CORPORATION OP TRINITY HOUSE, At tbe Navigation Warehouse and Naval Academy, No. 157, LEADENHALL STREET. 1843. Entered at Stationers' Hall. 1. Dennett, Printer, 121, Fleet Street. PREFACE. The following Treatise on Sail-making was first pub lished in " The Elements and Practice of Rigging, Seamanship, Naval Tactics," &c. &c. a work in two volumes quarto. As an object of particular convenience and advan tage to Naval Artists, the then proprietor had been solicited to separate the arts there treated of, and to pub lish them in a smaller form. In compliance with this request, the work was re-published in four volumes octavo, with a separate volume of plates. The first edition of the Art of Sail-making was pro duced in the present form, and met with a favourable reception, from the merits of its correct delineation and clear description ; by these its utility was felt, and its value justly appreciated of greater import.
    [Show full text]
  • Topgallant Yard Lift
    Euromodel Royal William.12.Mast Construction. September 2021 TRANSLATION LINKS 1. type into your browser ... english+italian+glossary+nautical terms 2. utilise the translation dictionary ‘Nautical Terms & Expressions’ from Euromodel website An interpretive review of the Euromodel Kit Royal William 1st. Rate English Vessel Originally launched in 1670 as the 100-gun HMS Prince Re-built and launched in 1692 as the HMS Royal William Finally re-built again and ... Launched 1719 Scale 1:72 Checked the Essential Resource Information File ? 12.MAST CONSTRUCTION September 2021 This paper is based on the supplied drawings, external references, kit material – and an amount of extra material. It serves to illustrate how this ship might be built.The leve l of complexity chosen is up to the individual This resource information was based on the original text supplied by Euromodel and then expanded in detail as the actual ship was constructed by MSW member piratepete007. [Additional & exceptional support was gratefully received from another MSW member marktiedens. My sincere thanks to him and other MSW members.] 1 Euromodel Royal William.12.Mast Construction. September 2021 Neither the author or Euromodel have any commercial interest in this information and it is published on the Euromodel web site in good faith for other persons who may wish to build this ship. Euromodel does not accept any responsibility for the contents that follow. This is not an instructional manual but is a collaboration amongst a number of MSW members whose interpretations were based on the drawings and the supplied kit. • Additional material used was dictated by personal choices.
    [Show full text]
  • Sails MB.Pdf 599.13 Kb
    Sails There are many arguments for adding or omitting the sails on a model ship. There is no right answer and I decided to have a combination of set and furled sails on my model of HM cutter Sherbourne in 1/64 scale to provide 'life' to a static subject. This article is an extract from a much longer work on super detailing the Caldercraft kit of Sherbourne. Please contact the author if you want to purchase a copy. Real sails were made from canvas cloths which in the Royal Navy in the 18th and 19th century were 2 feet wide. The cloths were laid next to each other and the seams were folded over and stitched with a double seam. Extra cloths were stitched over areas which were subject to heavy wear such as the corners of the sail and bands across the sail where the reef ropes were inserted. Around the edge of the sail was a bolt rope and a number of rope eyes known as cringles which were used to attach the running rigging to the sail. The bolt rope was stitched to the rear surface of a square sail and usually to the port side of a fore-and-aft sail. Varieties of fine cloth such as cotton lawn have been used for model sails reasonably successfully in large scales. A thread pitch of at least 200 threads per inch is needed but this is still far from true scale size and is equivalent to a canvas with threads which are over 6mm diameter. Any sewing methods for representing the seams are unsuitable in a small scale since the stitch sizes and weight of thread will be far too heavy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Sea Shanties on Classical Music
    Piratical Debauchery, Homesick Sailors, and Nautical Rhythms: The Influence of Sea Shanties on Classical Music Pallas Catenella Choi Riedler Advisor: Gurminder Kaur Bhogal, Music Wellesley College May 2017 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Prerequisite for Honors in Music © Pallas Catenella, 2017 Catenella 2 Come all you young sailormen, listen to me. I’ll sing you a song of the fish in the sea, and it’s… Windy weather, boys, stormy weather, boys, When the wind blows, we’re all together, boys, Blow ye winds westerly, blow, ye winds, blow, Jolly Sou’wester, boys, steady she goes. ~ Traditional Catenella 3 Table of Contents Introduction: Serenading Sea-dogs and Swashbuckling Songsters ..................................................... 4 The Sea Shanty ............................................................................................................................................. 5 I. Echoes of Ancient Seafarers: A Condensed History of Sea Shanties ................................................ 6 II. Cross-Cultural Origins of the Sea Shanty: Delving Briefly into Ethnomusicological Territories ....................................................................................................................................................... 13 Musical Examples of Sea Shanties ........................................................................................................ 18 III. The Swashbuckler Identity .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]