<<

Perceived Resource Quality as a Framework to Analyze Impacts of Climate Change on Adventure Tourism: Snow, Surf, Wind, and Whitewater

Author Buckley, Ralf

Published 2017

Journal Title Tourism Review International

Version Version of Record (VoR)

DOI https://doi.org/10.3727/154427217X15022104437729

Copyright Statement © 2017 Cognizant Communication Corporation. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.

Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/377504

Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Tourism Review International, Vol. 21, pp. 241–254 1544-2721/17 $60.00 + .00 Printed in the USA. All rights reserved. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3727/154427217X15022104437729 Copyright © 2017 Cognizant, LLC. E-ISSN 1943-4421 www.cognizantcommunication.com

PERCEIVED RESOURCE QUALITY AS A FRAMEWORK TO ANALYZE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ADVENTURE TOURISM: SNOW, SURF, WIND, AND WHITEWATER

RALF BUCKLEY

International Chair in Research, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia

Surf, snow, wind, and whitewater provide natural resources for adventure tourism. Both the resources themselves, and access for tourism, are dependent on weather and hence are affected by climate change. For some adventure tourism subsectors (e.g., and ) the industry has already responded to climate change, along with other pressures, by changing its geography and business models. In most subsectors, commercial tour operators perceive themselves as affected by short-term extreme weather events, and climate change models are not yet precise enough to predict how these will change over the short time horizons of tourism business planning. Some particular sub- sectors, however, can provide early warning indicators of industry responses to climate change. These include: heliskiing and heliboarding; professional big-wave ; and whitewater and kaya- king on snow melt, monsoon rainfall, or dam-release water flows. These responses may be detected through multiparameter models of visitor numbers and the geography of preferred sites or, more immediately, from the perceptions of commercial tourism operators involved in these subsectors.

Key words: Adventure tourism; Climate change; Impacts; Resource quality; Snow; Surf; Wind; Whitewater

Introduction specific set of adventure tourism activities, namely those involving nonmotorized and pad- Many types of tourism, recreation and sport are dlesports that rely on wind or water. These are: heavily dependent on the weather, and are hence snowboarding and skiing; surfing, sailboarding, and affected by climate change (Becken, 2013; Buckley, ; and and rafting. 2008a, 2008b; Buckley & Shakeela, 2014; Buckley, These are “rush” activities (Buckley, 2012) that sup- Gretzel, Scott, Weaver, & Becken, 2015; Day, Chin, port substantial international commercial tourism Sydnor, & Cherkauer, 2013; Goh, 20912; Gössling & industry subsectors (Buckley, 2006, 2007, 2010). Hall, 2006; Gössling, Scott, Hall, Ceron, & Dubois, I adopt a framework that treats snow, surf, wind, and 2012; Hall, 2015). Here I examine these effects for a whitewater as tourism resources of variable quality,

Address correspondence to Ralf Buckley, International Chair in Ecotourism Research, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia. Tel: +61755528675; E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] 241 242 BUCKLEY and analyzes the effects of climate change on: the three additional components. The first is that, from quality, geography, and seasonality of the physical a tourism perspective, what matters is not only the resources, as perceived by adventure tourists; the physical change itself, but how the changed physi- human constraints on access to those resources by cal environment is perceived by a particular group adventure tourists; and the interactions between the of tourists. For this analysis, this group consists of physical and human factors. practitioners in the adventure activities examined, A recent review by Rosselo-Nadal (2014) noted with various degrees of specialist expertise. that three main different theoretical approaches have The second additional component is that these been applied to date in evaluating the effects of cli- tourists consider not only a single destination and mate change on tourism. These involve physical activity, but a large set of competing destinations change, climatic index, and tourism demand models for the same activity, and competing activities at respectively, with tourism demand models subdi- either the same or different destinations. As noted vided into time series, discrete choice, and aggre- by Rosselo-Nadal (2014), “choosing a final desti- gate demand approaches (Table 1). Physical change nation is not an independent decision, but the final models focus on the local physical environments decision of a set of choices” (p. 337). In making within which tourism enterprises and stakeholders these decisions, tourists compare expected resource operate, and how the characteristics of those local quality for their preferred adventure activities, environments are modified by broader scale climate across a range of potential destinations. change. For example, more frequent extreme weather As also noted by Rosselo-Nadal (2014, p. 335), events may cause fires, floods, droughts, or storms the perceptions and preferences of tourists may and beach erosion. Climatic index models adopt a change. He argues, for example, that “it is almost broader scale approach to human physical comfort. impossible to provide information on the changing For example, they treat northern hemisphere winter preferences of potential tourists visiting mountain “sun–sand–sea” destinations as a means to improve resorts over the next 50 years” (p. 335); but that “an climatic comfort. The generally do not incorporate assessment is needed of what tourists perceive to factors such as air conditioning in tropical destina- be optimal conditions, and a subsequent evaluation tions, or the attractiveness of snow sports and indoor of future climate conditions will then determine a social events in winter (Buckley, 2008a). Tourism destination’s diminished or improved attractive- demand approaches either track or tourist numbers ness for tourists” (p. 335). The approach adopted to different destinations in parallel with weather here notes that despite these difficulties, some such parameters, or model tourist choices between desti- changes have already been identified, and others nations in relation to weather and climate. can be projected. The third additional component is that changes in tourist choices of activity and site are driven by many other factors besides resource quality: most Method notably, those related to access, infrastructure, safety, The framework adopted here (Fig. 1) is an evo- and price. In the short term, these factors can change lution of previous physical change models, with much faster, and can greatly outweigh, the physical

Table 1 Previous Approaches, Each Taken Independently

Principal Secondary Focus on

Physical environment – Degree of suitability for intended activity Comfort index – Degree of climatic comfort for human body outdoors Tourism demand Time series Temporal correlations between climate variables and tourist numbers Discrete choice Economic choice models, bundle of features Aggregate demand Trade-offs between factors influencing demand Summarized from Rossello-Nadal (2014). IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ADVENTURE TOURISM 243

Climate Social change change

Physical Social processes processes

Site physical Site social Individual and natural and built experience, environment environment expertise, interests

Site tourism Site tourism Individual resource factors, resource preferences physical factors, social

Activity quality Infrastructure availability access seasonality price risk, safety desirability

Perceived attractiveness of each site, by each tourist, as a resource for each adventure tourism activity

Multifactor comparison against many other sites, worldwide, depending on relative rankings of each site

Tourist destination choice

Figure 1. Framework for tourism resource approach. effects produced by climate change. Time series, these affect the various types of adventure tour- discrete choice, and aggregate demand models can ism through several different mechanisms. First, include these rapidly changing factors, but physical climate change affects the short‑term availability, change and climatic index models have been devel- timing, and quality of snow, surf, wind, and white- oped at longer timescales. water, which provide the basic natural resources for For the adventure tourism sector specifically, the these types of adventure tourism. Second, climate framework adopted here is that snow, surf, wind, change affects the risks and enjoyment associated and whitewater are perceived by practitioners as with using natural resources for adventure tour- weather‑dependent resources for adventure tour- ism (e.g., through avalanche or flood risk, rain ism. These resources differ between sites, vary and ice, drought and fire, and wildlife populations between seasons, and change between years. The and migrations). Third, in the slightly longer term, quality of each of these resources is evaluated in changes in weather patterns can influence physi- considerable detail by individual adventure practi- cal terrain features, such as watercourses or coastal tioners. Perceptions of quality differ between prac- sandbars, affecting the value of individual sites for titioners, depending on expertise, experience, and adventure tourism. interests. The global geography and economics of Fourth, climate change can modify the human adventure tourism is determined by the interaction or social factors, such as access to specific sites. between these physical factors and human social For example, high‑altitude airstrips or airports may factors applicable across the entire tourism industry become unusable because of increasing cloud and (Buckley, 2006, 2010; Buckley et al., 2015). fog; parks agencies and other land managers may Under the framework adopted here, climate close access to particular sites because of increased change influences weather patterns and trends, and risk of fire; or access roads may be blocked by 244 BUCKLEY floods or cut by landslides. Finally, relatively small Results physical changes at individual sites may change Snowboarding and Skiing their position in the relative ranking of similar sites worldwide, with large‑scale consequences for visi- The snowsports industry has already undergone tation and hence economics. substantial changes as a result of a combination I adopt a multimethod triangulated qualitative of climate change and economic factors. These approach, including participant observation, standard changes have been most noticeable in countries ethnography, and retrospective analytical autoeth- with smaller snowfields and more restricted sea- nography (Anderson, 2006; Tolich, 2010; Buckley sons, such as Australia. However, at least some of 2015a, 2016). That is, I apply professional knowl- these changes have also affected the world’s largest edge within an academic context. My role and position concentrations of ski resorts, in the European as participant observer, ethnographer, and autoeth­ ­ and the North American Rocky Mountains. nographer was as a long-term intermediate-skill prac- The ways in which tourism industry has been titioner in these adventure tourism activities, namely affected by climate change, and is responding to snowboarding (snow), surfing (surf), kiteboarding such changes, have been studied in greater detail (wind), and kayaking (whitewater). This includes for the ski and sector than for any other individual and group recreational practice, and par- adventure activity. For example, there are previ- ticipation in commercial adventure tourism either as ous studies from: and (Brouder & client or staff (e.g., safety kayaker). Lundmark, 2011; Falk & Hagsten, 2016; Moen Data were collected for >4,000 participant days & Fridman, 2007); Finland and (Haanpää, over >40 years. I compiled information on each Juhola, & Landauer, 2015; Landauer, Pröbstl, & of the four factors outlined above, for each of the Haider, 2012); Scotland (Hopkins & Maclean, 2014); four adventure tourism activities considered. Where Slovakia (Demiroglu, Kučerová, & Ozcelebi, 2015); relevant and available, I also compiled secondary Canada (Dawson, Havitz, & Scott, 2011; Rutty et data for individual adventure tourism sites and des­ al., 2015); Nepal (Nepal, 2010); Bolivia (Kaenzig, tinations, a multiple case study approach. Such data Rebetez, & Serquet, 2016); New Zealand (Hopkins, are derived principally from practitioner publica­ 2014, 2015); and Australia (Cocolas, Walters, tions both printed and online, and, to a smaller extent, & Ruhanen, 2016; Morrison & Pickering, 2013; from mass media, social media, government reports, Pickering & Buckley, 2010). commercial tourism industry publications and web- Broadly, the effects of climate change have been sites, and academic publications related to specific to reduce the reliability of high‑quality snow at lower sites and activities. altitudes. These ski fields do still receive snow- Using this approach, I aim to identify, for each of fall, but the proportion of years with short seasons the adventure tourism subsectors considered: and poor quality snow, and hence a high reliance on expensive artificial snowmaking, has increased. 1. Just what resources are required, and how resource This changes the economics of these operations, quality is perceived by practitioners. because costs increase and the income‑producing 2. How these perceived resources depend on weather period becomes shorter. In addition, as the reliability and other factors affected by climate change, and of high‑quality snow decreases, individual ski desti- how they are expected to be modified by climate nations suffer reputational damage and become less change. competitive, forcing them to reduce prices and hence 3. How tourist access to adventure resources of further reducing revenue. higher and lower quality may be affected. To combat these economic changes, resorts suf- 4. What other social, political, and market trends fering from poorer or less reliable snowfall have influence tourist choice of adventure destination. taken several steps, broadly successful to date. The 5. Which fine-scale component of each subsector first is to increase artificial snowmaking so as to is likely to act as the most sensitive indicator of extend the effective operating season. However, climate change. this has limitations because of cost, lack of water, IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ADVENTURE TOURISM 245 and the reduced number of days with below-zero and reducing the ability of ski resorts to rely solely nighttime temperatures, necessary for artificial snow­ on winter revenues. making (Pickering & Buckley, 2010). The second The fourth approach was a major change in the measure has been to promote particular destina- basic business model, from reliance on lift ticket tions as family‑friendly multiactivity winter sports revenue to reliance on property development. Many destinations, encouraging inexperienced skiers and mountain resorts that hold land in freehold or snowboarders to bring children for activities that long‑term leasehold were able to obtain additional do not require high‑quality snow. development rights. These resorts sold or leased The third approach has been to expand the activ­ subdivisions for private residential, timeshare, or ities offered to include summer as well as winter tourist accommodation, or constructed such devel- sports, rebranding the destinations as mountain resorts opments themselves. That is, they switched to a rather than ski resorts. This expanded season provides resort–residential model, comparable to those used greater profitability for tourist accommodation and in coastal marinas. retail outlets. It also provides limited additional clien- The fifth approach is political. These corporations tele for ski lifts, principally by adapting the chairs or argued initially that climate change was not occur- gondolas to carry mountain bikes, and using the ski ring, so as to prevent sell‑off by investors while runs for downhill . they repositioned themselves as four‑season moun- However, despite the enormous growth in the tain resort–residential developments. Once this was popularity of mountain biking in recent years, the achieved, they then commenced political lobbying numbers of mountain biking lift customers in sum- for increased development rights and privileges, on mer do not yet match those of skiing and snow- the grounds of economic hardship as a result of cli- boarding lift customers in winter. Most mountain mate change (Buckley, 2008a, 2008b). bikers have access to free areas closer to home All of these approaches have maintained the than ski resorts, and are prepared to use these sites commercial profitability of longstanding in preference, with the same bikes that they would developments, largely by reducing their reliance on use at the resorts. This contrasts with skiing and high-quality snow cover. That is, they have delib- snowboarding, where different equipment is used erately driven a form of recreational succession for cross‑country or back‑country skiing, split‑board or Disneyfication, so that they still have satisfied snowboarding, or the combined use of customers, though not the same customers as have and . As a result, in skiing and snow- visited historically. They have changed from cus- boarding the resort‑based participation greatly out- tomers who need high-quality snow to customers weighs the non-resort‑based participation, whereas who are satisfied with lower quality snow or do not in mountain biking the reverse applies. need snow at all. Where land tenure and development planning For experienced skiers and snowboarders whose approvals permit, some mountain resorts have choice of destination is driven principally by snow expanded to include completely unrelated sum- quality, however, climate change is indeed alter- mer activities such as golf. This does not extend ing the attractiveness of different sites. In general, the lift season, but provides a substantial supply of lower latitude and lower altitude sites, which were high‑paying customers for tourist accommodation previously attractive because of easy access and and retail facilities. All of these season‑extending more comfortable weather conditions, are now approaches reflect: the increasing capital cost of becoming less attractive because the snow cover is lift and resort development; the increasing invest- poorer and less reliable. Higher altitude and higher ment in accommodation, retail, and ancillary facili- latitude sites, where snow quality and reliability ties; and increasing competition between resorts, remain high, have thus become differentially attrac- to minimize basic lift ticket prices. That is, these tive and hence more profitable, leading to increased changes would have occurred irrespective of cli- investment in access and infrastructure. mate change. The effect of climate change has been Therefore, over the next few decades we are to hasten this process, by shortening the ski season likely to see some changes in the geography of 246 BUCKLEY skiing and snowboarding as a result of climate particularly for lower latitude, lower altitude resorts change. However, shorter term changes are driven where the effects of climate change are most signifi- more by economics and politics, and their effects cant to date, but these are also the resorts with great- on access and infrastructure. For example, there est opportunities for summer mountain tourism. is high‑quality snow in the mountains of northern There is also a trend for aggregation of resort oper- Iran. This destination is growing in popularity for ating companies into larger and larger commercial international visitors but with political restrictions entities (Siegler, 2016). This provides some hedging associated with visa requirements. There is good against climate change by increasing the geographi- snow in parts of Russia, but concerns over safety cal spread of sites controlled by single corporations, and levels of service still set barriers to large‑scale in case customers shift destinations between seasons. international inbound ski and snowboard tourism. Again, however, this consolidation is commonplace There is ample snow in Greenland, but very little in many industry sectors. Overall, therefore, it is dif- infrastructure, high costs, and uncertain weather. ficult to disentangle the effects of climate change Some of these barriers are overcome by the from other commercial considerations, especially at upmarket heliski and heliboard sector, which oper- single sites. It is only by following large‑scale pat- ates at much lower volumes and much higher terns in visitor numbers and preferences, in conjunc- prices than resort‑based snow tourism. Currently, tion with year‑by‑year records of climate, snowfall, the most heavily visited heliski destinations are in snowpack, and snow quality, that we can expect to the mountains of southwestern Canada, where the unravel these different drivers. world’s two largest heliski operators are based. At the other end of the skiing and snowboarding There are smaller operations in Alaska, Colorado, industry, the much more mobile helitourism sector Utah, New Zealand, Peru, India, Russia, Greenland, has both greater client pressure, and fewer obsta- and elsewhere. Although the large Canadian com- cles, in moving to new geographic areas. We may panies operate out of purpose‑built lodges, many therefore expect to see the geography of heliskiing of the others rely on existing hotels or backcountry and heliboarding change more rapidly in response lodges, built for summer activities such as fishing to climate change than the geography of large or wildlife watching. Their capital investment is resorts. Even in the helitour sector, however, there thus much smaller than the large‑scale resort resi- are substantial investments in individual sites that dential developments. companies are unlikely to relinquish unless their Heliski and heliboard operators are not entirely operations become unprofitable. The principal con- mobile, because of access, terrain, permits, safety, sideration is the history of negotiations to obtain and the economics of helicopter charter. Even so, exclusive operating permits across large areas of we can anticipate that as the geography of snow high-quality terrain. It is these permits that are the quality changes, the heliski sector will be the first most bankable component of a commercial heliski to respond. This applies particularly because the business and justify the investment of capital to heliski and heliboard market depends heavily on construct luxury lodges. marketing the highest quality untracked powder Therefore, we may anticipate that commer- snow. The geography of the heliski/heliboard sec- cially successful heliski and heliboard operators tor is thus a leading indicator of the effects of cli- will adopt two separate strategies to respond to mate change on adventure tourism. climate change. The first is to expand their clien- In tracking the effects of climate change on skiing tele at their existing operations. Even in poor snow and snowboarding, therefore, we have two separate years, heliskiing and heliboarding generally pro- sets of indicators, each confounded by unrelated vide far better snow conditions than resort skiing commercial and political factors. For high‑volume and snowboarding, because they operate on largely fixed‑site resorts, there is a strong trend to diversify untracked snow. Therefore, heliski operators mar- revenue streams to reduce reliance on high-quality ket at ski resorts and gateway airports to increase snowfall, but this trend is also driven by other com- demand for their products and maintain prices. mercial factors (e.g., maximizing return on very The second strategy is to explore new loca- large fixed capital investment). This trend applies tions, by marketing new and especially exclusive IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ADVENTURE TOURISM 247 opportunities to their existing clientele, many rather than collapse; and calm conditions or offshore of whom are extremely wealthy and well able to winds to create a clean and glassy wave face. afford premium prices. We can anticipate that The best incident waves commonly occur on large well‑known heliski and heliboard companies coastlines that face large expanses of open ocean. with well‑established reputations will not use their These receive waves generated by storms or own names directly in these explorations, so as to winds hundreds or thousands of kilometers away. avoid any reputational risk if they prove unsatis- As those waves propagate across the ocean from factory. Instead, we may anticipate that these com- the area where they were initially generated, the panies may support such new ventures indirectly, wave trains become more highly organized, with by providing their most trusted and experienced increasingly regular height and spacing. When they heli‑guides with access to client lists and helicopter reach the receiving coastline, they arrive as regular charter contracts, and by cross‑marketing within long‑period swell, with regular patterns of smaller their own marketing materials. Such approaches and larger wave sets, and a simple wave shape with have already been adopted in some cases. no secondary features. The longer the upwind fetch, If new destinations prove successful, we can the better organized the incident wave on the receiv- anticipate that the larger operators will then incorpo- ing coastline. There are many mathematical models rate them into their routine offerings. Alternatively, that plot and predict the propagation of waves, as a if new destinations are developed successfully by function of weather conditions over entire oceans, small independent companies, we can anticipate and these are used to forecast surf for recreational that larger operators will then seek to buy out those and professional surfers and surf events. independents. There are indeed indications that all Once an incident swell reaches a receiving coast- these expectations are being fulfilled. Again, how- line, the conversion of swell to surf depends on ocean ever, they may simply reflect good business practices floor bathymetry and topography. At the same time, to expand both markets and products, irrespective of shorelines composed of mobile sediment, such as climate change. sand, gravel, or coral rubble, are themselves modi- In addition, the availability of new heliski and fied by incident surf, so their local‑scale planform heliboard destinations is determined by human as and bathymetry vary depending on recent wave well as physical geography. There are practical fac- history (Buckley, 2008a; Clifton, Ware, Coverdale, tors such as access and infrastructure, including the & Hanson-Boyd, 2013; Kūle, Haller, Varjopuro, availability of reliable helicopters and pilots. There & Alberth, 2013; Raybould, Anning, Fredline, & are also legal and political factors, such as the abil- Ware, 2015). Bedrock coastlines are not themselves ity to obtain operating permits, to conduct business directly changed by recent surf history. However, in the country concerned, and for clients to obtain there are many surf breaks where a rocky headland visas. Therefore, changes in the geography of heliski controls the shape of a sandbar, but the actual wave and heliboard tourism may well be influenced by breaks along the sand rather than the rock itself. In climate change and they may also be controlled by such cases, even though recent surf history does not unrelated commercial and political factors. Perhaps affect the rocky headland, it does affect the quality only the owners of the operations concerned know of the surf break by modifying the adjacent sand- which of these influences predominate. bar. The point breaks on Australia’s Gold Coast provides good examples of this. Whether rock, reef, rubble, or sand, the detailed Surfing, Sailboarding, and Kiteboarding topography of the sea floor, relative to water depth Surfing depends on surf, and the availability, and incident wave shape, determines how the waves quality and reliability of surfable waves differs enor­ break. At the simplest level, the shape of a breaking mously between sites, at both regional and local wave is determined by the vertical slope, horizontal scales (Buckley, 2002, 2006; Espejo, Losada, & angle, and water depth over the seafloor feature that Méndez, 2014; Scarfe, Healy, & Rennie, 2009). To is causing the wave to break. Thus, for example, a create rideable surf requires: incident waves; a sea­ vertical obstruction protruding above water level, floor topography that will cause the waves to peel such as a cliff, simply reflects the incident wave 248 BUCKLEY back to sea. A vertical obstruction that ends below receive multiple swells simultaneously, of different water level, such as a reef or rock ledge, causes sizes and from different directions, and these inter- the incident wave to break either sharply or gen- act to form more complex breaking surf. As incident tly depending on the swell height relative to water waves meet an underwater obstruction and begin to depth. A very gently shelving shoreline creates break, the forward propagation speed of the breaking spilling waves, where the topmost section crumbles section is reduced, so the wave becomes refracted. into whitewater, and the wave energy dissipates This is known to surfers as a bending wave. This gradually. Depending on the energy of incident effect is accentuated where waves break on under- waves, gently shelving beaches may experience water features that are themselves curved, such as either accretion or erosion from the effects of surf. the fringing reefs of small tropical islands. Depending on water depth, a more steeply shelv- When a wave is propagating across deep water, ing shoreline causes the top of the incident swell only the waveform moves forward, and the water to pitch and plunge outwards, creating a hollow itself does not. Once the wave breaks and crumbles breaking wave shaped like a pipe, tube, or barrel. into whitewash, however, the water itself moves If the direction of the incident wavetrain is nor- physically towards the shore. When it subsequently mal to the shelving underwater feature, so that the flows back towards the ocean, this creates currents, entire wave meets the underwater obstruction simul- known as rips, which may flow parallel, normal taneously, then the wave will fold over and collapse or diagonal to the shoreline. These rips affect the everywhere at the same time. This is known to surf- shape of subsequent breaking waves. Underwater ers as a close‑out. If incident waves meet the under- bathymetry is rarely regular, so few waves break water feature at an angle, however, then the wave in a perfect or ideal shape. Each wave has differ- will break sequentially from one end towards the ent sections, which may be fast, slow, fat, hollow, other, creating good conditions for surfing. The angle clean, or crumbling, and every wave is different. between the incident waves and the underwater fea- All these factors, except the baserock topog- ture, known as the peel angle, determines how fast raphy of coastlines and ocean floors, depend on the breaking section moves along the wave. Surfers weather, climate, and climate change. Swell is gen- of different ability can perform different types of erated principally by atmospheric low‑pressure sys- surfing maneuvers on waves of different size, steep- tems. Larger, more intense, longer lasting and slower ness, and speed. moving lows produce larger and more consistent The third major factor affecting surf quality is swells. Any change in climate that affects the loca- wind, which affects the fine‑scale shape of the wave tion, intensity, duration, frequency, and seasonal tim- as it breaks. Under calm conditions or light offshore ing of atmospheric low‑pressure systems necessarily winds, the wave face will be smooth, known to surf- also affects the geography, seasonality, and quality ers as a clean wave. For large powerful swells, of surf. a strong offshore wind can render the breaking sec- Different surf tourism destinations commonly tion of the wave steeper or, in surfing terminology, offer different types and qualities of swell at dif- more hollow. Onshore wind, however, creates crum- ferent times of year, and this affects their attrac- bling waves, less steep and more ragged. Skilled surf- tiveness and consequently their prices, customer ers can still ride these waves, using a variety of aerial volume, and net revenue. Where storms track close or semiaerial maneuvers such as boosts and floaters, to coastlines, they create storm surge, a localized but clean waves are much preferred. Depending on increase in mean sea level caused by reduced atmo- wind speed and direction, diagonal onshore, long- spheric pressure. Where this is coupled with large shore, or slightly offshore winds are preferred for swell and high tides, it can create a very different sailboarding, and diagonal onshore winds for kite- pattern of swells and surf than occurs when swell boarding. These are considered below. arrives from low-pressure systems that are too far All of these components and mechanisms affecting away to create storm surge or affect local wind con- wave shape and surf quality are infinitely variable, ditions on the receiving coastline. and the summary above is but the merest outline. For sedimentary and mixed coastlines, storm For example, it is commonplace for coastlines to conditions can also create substantial changes in IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ADVENTURE TOURISM 249 ocean bedforms, changing the surf in ways that per- factors (Buckley, Guitart, & Shakeela, 2017; O’Brien sist well after the storm itself has died away. Such & Ponting, 2013). There may be potential cases in changes are especially significant where storms the future where access roads on public easements generate swells from a different direction to pre- are cut by coastal erosion, exacerbated by climate vailing conditions. On sandy coastlines, this can change, and the roads could not be replaced because create substantial changes in shoreline planform. surrounding lands are privately owned. Any such Large storms can also transport sediment past head- cases are currently very much in a minority, but may lands, into estuaries, or even to the edge of the con- potentially increase in the future. It is also possible tinental shelf, where it can be lost completely from that where access to particular surf breaks is through the nearshore seafloor zone. public protected areas, any future climate‑related Climate change is affecting the world’s oceans, increase in fire frequency could also lead to access as well as its atmosphere and weather patterns. The restriction. However, such cases are likely to remain three principal effects are: sea level rise; ocean relatively uncommon. warming; and ocean acidification. Increases in mean The effects of climate change on sailboarding sea level have already occurred worldwide and are and kiteboarding include all of those relating to continuing, possibly at an accelerating rate, but not surfing, with the additional factor of wind speed uniformly: the rate is higher at some coastal loca- and direction. Different sailboarding and kiteboard- tions than others. Although the short‑term effects of ing sites and destinations have very different wind increases in mean sea level are much smaller than regimes, created by different meteorological condi- those associated with changes in storm patterns, the tions. There are storm winds and sea breezes, trade long‑term effect is to modify shoreline and near- winds and gorge winds, lake winds and katabatic shore sediment transport processes, contributing to winds, the harmattan of northwestern Africa and changes in surf breaks. Increases in mean sea level the levanter of southern Spain, and very many more. also act as an addition to tide height, at all stages of Winds vary by place, season, time of day, and other the tidal cycle. The proportional addition in more weather conditions. Some winds are predictable and significant in microtidal than macrotidal regions. others are not. Some sailboarders and kiteboarders Climate change is warming the oceans as well as prefer flat water for speed sailing; others prefer the atmosphere. Heat is transferred through conduc- wind chop on lakes or rivers for jumps and aerial tion and convection, and also by increased direct maneuvers; others prefer ocean surf for wave riding radiation, where cloud cover is reduced. Reciprocal and big airs. heat transfers between atmosphere and ocean are Climate change predictions are not yet suffi- one of the causes of increased storminess. In addi- ciently accurate or detailed to specify how wind tion, increased temperatures in the shallow oceans, regimes are likely to change at a local scale. Although and particularly the more frequent and severe atmospheric circulation patterns are a key compo- extreme temperature events in the tropical oceans, nent of climate models, they are commonly calcu- have led to widespread coral bleaching events in lated at relatively broad spatial scales, and seasonal the world’s tropical reefs. At the same time, increas- rather than short‑term timescales. It will probably ing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations are prove easier to predict changes for regions that increasing the oceanic concentrations of dissolved have powerful and stable seasonal patterns in wind carbon dioxide, leading to acidification. This acidi- regime, with reliable current forecasting, than for fication is contributing to the death of hard corals, areas where wind regimes are more variable and and their gradual erosion and replacement by soft short‑term weather forecasting less reliable. corals and algae (Reyes-Nivia, Diaz-Pulido, Kline, The effects of climate change on surfing, sail- Guldberg, & Dove, 2013). These combined effects ing, and kiteboarding conditions will be felt first are likely to change the configuration of reef breaks through changing geography and frequency of over the next few decades, with consequent effects extreme weather events creating very large swells. on surf quality. These very large waves are not part of mainstream At present, changes in access to surf breaks are recreational and commercial surfing. They are rid- driven principally by legal, political, and economic den only by sponsored professional surfers using 250 BUCKLEY tow‑in equipment, commonly with boat and heli- In some countries, all three categories are required to copter support. Some of these waves are far off- release a minimum flow to maintain in‑stream eco- shore, and do not break at all except during the systems, but such flows are rarely enough to provide largest swells. We can anticipate that the effects for recreational whitewater rafting and kayaking. of climate change may become noticeable for In a few countries and a few cases, rivers have sponsored professional surfers, surf movies, and been dammed either specifically to provide water big‑wave competitions before they become notice- flows for rafting and kayaking, or jointly to pro- able on surf tourism more broadly. vide for recreational as well as other uses. In China, for example, many of the watercourses used for piaoliu ziyou are dammed upstream specifically Whitewater Rafting and Kayaking to provide regulated water flows for commercial Whitewater paddlesports depend on river flows, tourism (Buckley, McDonald, Duan, Sun, & Chen, and hence on rainfall patterns, as well as on ter- 2014). The Tully River in north Queensland, Aus- rain and topography. Worldwide, by far the major- tralia, downstream of the Tully‑Millstream Dam, ity of whitewater rafting and kayaking sites rely releases a short timed pulse each day for use by on unregulated rivers where stream flow depends commercial raft tour operators, though this is not entirely on rainfall and runoff. The proportion of its principal function. sites that use rivers whose flow is regulated by dam Dams are built specifically to change the sea- releases is much smaller, but some of those sites sonal or diurnal patterns of water flow downstream, receive particularly high‑volume use. where run‑of‑river water flows are otherwise inad- Dam‑release sites may be considered in two equate for the intended purpose. Any change in categories. Most dams were built to store water climate that affects rainfall patterns will also affect for agricultural irrigation, urban water supply, or future releases. This applies particularly in those hydroelectric power generation. For these, the tim- areas of the world where droughts are intensifying. ing and volume of water releases are determined In addition, as the world’s human population contin- by those uses, without consideration of tourism ues to grow, with consequent increases in demand or recreation. Urban water supply dams may not and competition for water, there is continuing and release any water downstream at all, except when increasing pressure to build more dams. This pres- they are filled to overflowing. Large irrigation sure is intensified both by increasing demand for dams commonly release water only as required by electrical power and by political pressure to transi- downstream growers, creating large flows during a tion from carbon‑intensive thermal power stations short growing season, with very low flows during to renewable sources including hydroelectricity. the rest of the year. The overall net result is that more and more riv- In some countries, hydroelectric power provides ers are dammed in more and more places, and dam part of the base load, and these dams release water releases are less frequent and lower in volume. This continuously. In other countries, base load is pro- applies particularly for high‑volume, high‑gradient vided from thermal power stations, and hydroelec- rivers in deeply incised channels in mountain- tric power is used to provide peak load, because ous terrain, and especially where river flow does output can be adjusted at much shorter timescales not vary greatly from year to year, even if it may than for thermal power stations. In these cases, be strongly seasonal. These are the watercourses water is commonly released in two pulses each day, that provide the greatest and most economically coinciding with morning and evening peak power efficient opportunities to store large volumes of demand. Depending on the length of the river cor- water at minimum cost, with lowest losses to sur- ridor downstream, these pulses become smoothed face evaporation or overtopping, and the smallest and attenuated as they down river. Perhaps the number of dry years. This contrasts with rivers run- best known example of this type of river flow is the ning through broad low‑gradient floodplains, with Grand Canyon of the Colorado, with pulses created high variability in flow between years, where it is by twice‑daily releases from the Glen Canyon Dam. difficult to capture and store water effectively, and IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ADVENTURE TOURISM 251 the terrain gradient provides insufficient head for or over other independent issues, this may well hydroelectric power generation. reduce the accessibility of relevant river sections Unfortunately for the whitewater rafting and worldwide. kayaking sector, the rivers that are preferred for All river flows, including snowmelt runoff, mon- dam construction are precisely the same as those soon flows, and dam releases, are very strongly that provide the best and most reliable recreational dependent on rainfall, and rainfall patterns are rapids. Therefore, climate change is likely to reduce already changing in many parts of the world as a opportunities for whitewater rafting and kayaking, consequence of global climate change. For all com- by increasing the number of good whitewater riv- mercial whitewater rafting and kayaking tours that ers that are dammed, and reducing the volume and operate only during a limited season, dependent frequency of usable dam‑release flows. on river flows, climate change is already creating However, currently most whitewater rafting and commercial consequences. kayaking rely on free‑flowing rivers without dams. Commercial whitewater tours are finely turned to Some of these flow consistently year‑round and others particular water flow volumes in individual rivers. only seasonally or intermittently. Many midvolume These affect: launch and takeout points; overnight rivers in mountainous cool temperate regions, for campsites; downstream progress and total trip length; example, provide the best conditions for whitewater safety precautions and the time taken to scout indi- rafting and kayaking during spring snowmelt, when vidual rapids; the size, type, and capacity of water- substantial volumes of precipitation stored as snow- craft used; and group size and guide-to-client ratios. packs are released over a relatively short period of All of these factors, as well as the length of the time. If either winter snowfall or spring temperatures operating season, influence the commercial viabil- change to any significant degree, this will modify the ity of individual tour operations, and the companies water flows in these rivers, and hence the available that run them. period, and river conditions, for whitewater rafting The relative profitability of different types of and kayaking. whitewater tourism product, on different sections In tropical and subtropical rivers, in contrast, of different rivers, thus depends on detailed water seasonal flow patterns are caused by the alterna- flow patterns, and hence on climate. As with rain- tion of wet and dry seasons, with peak flows during fall patterns more generally, it is difficult to differ- monsoon rains. Again, if climate change modifies entiate whether the particular patterns in any one the timing, duration, intensity, or total rainfall dur- season may or may not reflect longer term climate ing monsoons or wet seasons, this will affect river change. However, multiyear trends in rainfall and flow and the consequent opportunities for white­ river flows are indeed reflected in the changing water rafting and kayaking. geography of the commercial rafting and kayaking As with other types of adventure tourism, the adventure tourism sector. whitewater rafting and kayaking sector is depen- dent on aspects of human as well as physical geog- Conclusions raphy. In particular, it requires access to rivers, either at single points for so‑called park-and-play The various types of adventure tourism that kayaking on standing waves, or more commonly, depend on wind, snow, and waves will all be affected at put‑in and take‑out points for downriver trips, by climate change. These effects will include: those whether single or multiday. Access requires both due directly to changes in weather patterns; those the physical ability to get to the watercourse at a caused by indirect effects through changing human point where boats can be launched or landed, and geography and political ecology; and those created also the legal right to use those access points, the by market reactions to both of these. The direct economic ability to do so from the tourist’s home- effects are likely to be somewhat damped, as human town or country, and the political and social condi- societies in general, and tourism and tourists in par- tions to make the journey safely. If climate change ticular, find ways to adapt and respond to modified leads to increasing conflict, either over water itself weather patterns. As noted above, the most expert 252 BUCKLEY subsectors of each adventure tourism activity are look at the tongues of glaciers. Where those gla- likely to provide the first indication of climate ciers are retreating, those tours are affected. Simi- change effects, because they are most sensitive to larly, where routes cross icefalls, the quality of the natural resources used. climate change can create noticeable and persistent However, the market‑related effects are likely to increases in risk. This has occurred, for example, at be amplified, principally by substitution between the Khumbu Icefall on the principal route to climb different destinations. Tourists and their travel Mount Everest. agents select individual destinations for particular For those adventure tourism activities involving adventure activities by comparing a large basket of surf and snow, wind and whitewater, however, the different factors. The relative importance of differ- first observable effects of climate change are likely ent factors, such as access, price, and social effects, to be due to changes in destinations preferred by differs considerably between different subsectors more experienced tourists seeking optimum con- of the adventure tourism market. ditions. Such changes will be detectable by corre- For more experienced adventure tourism practi- lating: multiyear sequences in weather, wave, and tioners, the quality of snow, surf, wind, or white- water flow conditions; social media commentary water is the primary consideration (Buckley, 2012, on sites and destinations; travel agent perspectives 2015b, 2016). That is, these individuals would prefer on changing preferences; new locations adver- to save up for several years if necessary, in order tised by leading commercial tour operators in each to enjoy the best location and conditions for their subsector; and actual tourist numbers for relevant chosen activity. They are constantly concerned enterprises at different destinations. to compare the reputation of different alternative Future research in this field could thus take a destinations, with strong reliance on social media. number of different directions. To correlate the Within frameworks for destination image, their per- changing geography of adventure tourism directly ceptions are influenced more powerfully by auton- with climate change will require large multiyear sets omous and organic rather than induced sources of of data on tourist numbers, climate parameters, and information. a range of commercial variables to distinguish the Under these conditions, a single poor season at many different potential drivers of tourist numbers any site yields negative e‑WOM, which can quickly at different countries, destinations, and companies. trigger a major change in destination image and A less definitive but more immediate approach reputation, altering the geography of tourist flows would be to ask the owners of adventure tour com- so as to favor competing destinations offering the panies how their businesses have been affected by same activity. These market‑driven mechanisms changes in the quality of the natural resources on are already in operation, and the consequences of which they depend, namely snow, surf, wind, and climate change will simply add one further factor. water. This approach also provides opportunities Indeed, when tour operators are asked about to examine the interactions between physical and their responses to longer term climate change, their human geography, and the effects of competition actual responses relate only to short‑term weather, between companies and destinations within the rel- and its effects on cancellations either by clients or evant adventure tourism subsectors. In parallel with by the operator for safety reasons. Given the dif- this approach, surveys or interviews with individual ficulties in distinguishing statistically whether any adventure tourists could help to reveal how they are short‑term sequence of weather events does or does responding to perceived changes in the quality of not reflect longer term climate change, it will be natural resources at different sites. difficult to measure directly how climate change Finally, we could search for indicators in the affects most adventure tour businesses. most climate‑sensitive components of each of these There are a few exceptions where climate change adventure tourism subsectors. As outlined above, has a cumulative effect on physical features, and these might include the geography of heliski and this affects tourism operations that rely on those heliboard tourism and professional big‑wave surf- features. For example, in some parts of the world ing, and the timing and length of season for rivers there are commercial tours or boat trips to reliant on snowmelt runoff or monsoon rains. IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ADVENTURE TOURISM 253

References Dawson, J., Havitz, M., & Scott, D. (2011). Behavioral adaptation of alpine skiers to climate change: Examining Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of activity involvement and place loyalty. Journal of Travel Contemporary Ethnography, 35, 373–395. & Tourism Marketing, 28(4), 388–404. Becken, S. (2013). Measuring the effect of weather on tour- Day, J., Chin, N., Sydnor, S., & Cherkauer, K. (2013). Weather, ism a destination- and activity-based analysis. Journal of climate, and tourism performance: a quantitative analysis. Travel Research, 52, 156–167. Tourism Management Perspectives, 5, 51–56. Brouder, P., & Lundmark, L. (2011). Climate change in Demiroglu, O. C., Kučerová, J., & Ozcelebi, O. (2015). Northern Sweden: Intra-regional perceptions of vulner- Snow reliability and climate elasticity: case of a Slovak ability among winter-oriented tourism businesses. Jour- ski resort. Tourism Review, 70(1), 1–12. nal of Sustainable Tourism, 19, 919–933. Espejo, A., Losada, I. J., & Méndez, F. J. (2014). Surfing Buckley, R. C. (2002). Surf tourism and sustainable devel- wave climate variability. Global and Planetary Change, opment in Indo-Pacific Islands. I. The industry and the 121, 19–25. islands. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 10, 405–424. Falk, M., & Hagsten, E. (2016). Importance of early snow- Buckley, R. C. (2006). Adventure tourism. Wallingford, UK: fall for Swedish ski resorts: Evidence based on monthly CAB International. data. Tourism Management, 53, 61–73. Buckley, R. C. (2007). Adventure tourism products: Price, Goh, C. (2012). Exploring impact of climate on tourism duration, size, skill, remoteness. Tourism Management, demand. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(4), 1859–1883. 28, 1428–1433. Gössling, S., & Hall, C. M. (2006). Uncertainties in predict- Buckley, R. C. (2008a). Climate change: tourism destination ing tourist flows under scenarios of climate change. Cli- dynamics. Tourism Recreation Research, 33, 354–355. matic Change, 79(3–4), 163–173. Buckley, R. C. (2008b). Misperceptions of climate change Gössling, S., Scott, D., Hall, C. M., Ceron, J. P., & Dubois, damage coastal tourism: Case study of Byron Bay, Aus- G. (2012). Consumer behaviour and demand response of tralia. Tourism Review International, 12(1), 71–88. tourists to climate change. Annals of Tourism Research, Buckley, R. C. (2010). Adventure tourism management. 39(1), 36–58. Oxford, UK: Elsevier. Haanpää, S., Juhola, S., & Landauer, M. (2015). Adapting to Buckley, R. C. (2012). Rush as a key motivation in skilled climate change: Perceptions of vulnerability of down-hill adventure tourism: Resolving the risk recreation para- ski area operators in Southern and Middle Finland. Cur- dox. Tourism Management, 33(4), 961–970. rent Issues in Tourism, 18(10), 966–978. Buckley, R. C. (2015a). Autoethnography helps analyse Hall, C. M. (2015). Mountaineering and climate change. emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 209. In G. Musa, J. Higham, & A. Thompson-Carr (Eds.). Buckley, R. C. (2015b). Adventure thrills are addictive. Mountaineering tourism (pp. 240–243). Oxon, UK: Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1915. Routledge. Buckley, R. C. (2016). Qualitative analysis of emotions: fear Hopkins, D. (2014). The sustainability of climate change and thrill. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1187. adaptation strategies in New Zealand’s ski industry: A Buckley, R., Gretzel, U., Scott, D., Weaver, D., & Becken, range of stakeholder perceptions. Journal of Sustainable S. (2015). Tourism megatrends. Tourism Recreation Tourism, 22(1), 107–126. Research, 40(1), 59–70. Hopkins, D. (2015). The perceived risks of local climate Buckley, R. C., Guitart, D., & Shakeela, A. (2017). Con- change in Queenstown, New Zealand. Current Issues in tested surf tourism resources in the Maldives. Annals of Tourism, 18(10), 947–965. Tourism Research, 64, 185–199. Hopkins, D., & Maclean, K. (2014). Climate change percep- Buckley, R. C., McDonald, K., Duan, L., Sun, L., & Chen, tions and responses in Scotland’s ski industry. Tourism L. X. (2014). Chinese model for mass adventure tourism. Geographies, 16(3), 400–414. Tourism Management, 44, 5–13. Kaenzig, R., Rebetez, M., & Serquet, G. (2016). Climate Buckley, R., & Shakeela, A. (2014). Climate change hotspots change adaptation of the tourism sector in the Bolivian in the tourism sector. In P. Burton (Ed.), Responses to Andes. Tourism Geographies, 18(2), 111–128. climate change: Lessons from an Australian hotspot Kūle, L., Haller, I., Varjopuro, R., & Alberth, J. (2013). Cli- (pp. 77–84). Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO. mate change impacts on coastal tourism in the Baltic Sea Clifton, C. A., Ware, D., Coverdale, S., & Hanson-Boyd, C. region. Coastline Reports, 21, 91–132. Retrieved from (2013). Climate change risks for Victoria’s surf coast. In http://spicosa.databases.eucc-d.de/files/documents/00​ Coasts and Ports 2013: 21st Australasian Coastal and 001153_CR_21_pp91-132.pdf Ocean Engineering Conference and the 14th Australasian Landauer, M., Pröbstl, U., & Haider, W. (2012). Managing Port and Harbour Conference (p. 204). Barton, Australia: cross-country skiing destinations under the conditions of Engineers Australia. climate change: Scenarios for destinations in Austria and Cocolas, N., Walters, G., & Ruhanen, L. (2016). Behavioural Finland. Tourism Management, 33(4), 741–751. adaptation to climate change among winter alpine tourists: Moen, J., & Fredman, P. (2007). Effects of climate change an analysis of tourist motivations and leisure substitutabil- on in Sweden. Journal of Sustainable Tour- ity. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 24(6), 846–865. ism, 15(4), 418–437. 254 BUCKLEY

Morrison, C., & Pickering, C. M. (2013). Perceptions of scenarios increase microbioerosion of coral skeletons. climate change impacts, adaptation and limits to adap- Global Change Biology, 19, 1919–1929. tion in the Australian Alps: The ski-tourism industry and Rosselo-Nadal, J. (2014). How to evaluate the effects of climate key stakeholders. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(2), change on tourism. Tourism Management, 42, 334–340. 173–191. Rutty, M., Scott, D., Johnson, P., Jover, E., Pons, M., & Nepal, S. K. (2013). Mountain tourism and climate change: Steiger, R. (2015). Behavioural adaptation of skiers to implications for the Nepal Himalaya. Nepal Tourism and climatic variability and change in Ontario, Canada. Jour- Development Review, 1(1), 1–14. nal of and Tourism, 11, 13–21. O’Brien, D., & Ponting, J. (2013). Sustainable surf tourism: Scarfe, B. E., Healy, T. R. & Rennie, H. G. (2009). Research- A community centered approach in Papua New Guinea. based surfing literature for coastal management and Journal of Sport Management, 27, 158–172. the science of surfing—a review. Journal of Coastal Pickering, C., & Buckley, R. C. (2010). Climate response by Research, 253, 539–557. the ski industry: The shortcomings of snowmaking for Siegler, K. (2016). Vail resorts to buy Canada’s Whistler Australian resorts. Ambio, 39(5–6), 430–438. Blackcomb for $1.06 billion. Retrieved from http://www. Raybould, M., Anning, D., Fredline, L., & Ware, D. (2015). npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/08/08/489244335/ Urban beach venues: Vulnerability and sustainability vail-resorts-to-buy-canadas-whistler-blackcomb-for-1- in the face of climate change. International Journal of 06-billion Event Management Research, 10(1), 84–105. Tolich, M. (2010). A critique of current practice: Ten foun- Reyes-Nivia, C., Diaz-Pulido, G., Kline, D., Guldberg, O. dational guidelines for autoethnographers. Qualitative H., & Dove, S. (2013). Ocean acidification and warming Health Research, 20, 1599–1610.