DOCSLIB.ORG

Reference Manual on Air Transport Statistics V14 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reference Manual on Air Transport Statistics V14 1 Reference Manual on Air Transport Statistics v14 1 2017 Reference Manual on Air Transport Statistics Version N°14 September 2017 2 Reference Manual on Air Transport Statistics v14 Reference Manual on Air Transport Statistics v14 3 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 6 PART I: METHODOLOGY, DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS .............................................................. 7 1 Description of the datasets ......................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Description of the Statistical units and variables .............................................................. 10 1.2 Definitions and variables of general interest .................................................................... 10 1.2.1 Air Passenger ............................................................................................................. 10 1.2.2 Aircraft movement .................................................................................................... 10 1.2.3 Commercial aircraft movement ................................................................................ 10 1.2.4 Passenger seats available .......................................................................................... 10 1.2.5 Community airport .................................................................................................... 10 1.2.6 Community airport covered ...................................................................................... 10 1.2.7 State Flight ................................................................................................................. 11 1.2.8 Passenger unit ........................................................................................................... 11 1.2.9 Commercial air service .............................................................................................. 11 1.2.10 Scheduled air service ................................................................................................. 11 1.2.11 Non-scheduled air service ......................................................................................... 11 1.2.12 Passenger air service ................................................................................................. 12 1.2.13 All-freight and mail air service ................................................................................... 12 1.2.14 Airline (Commercial air transport operator) ............................................................. 12 1.3 Definitions and variables of interest for table A1 (flight stage) ........................................ 12 1.3.1 Flight stage ................................................................................................................ 12 1.3.2 Passengers on board ................................................................................................. 12 1.3.3 Freight and mail on board ......................................................................................... 12 1.3.4 Commercial air flight ................................................................................................. 12 1.3.5 Passenger seats available .......................................................................................... 13 1.3.6 Aircraft ....................................................................................................................... 13 1.4 Definitions and variables of interest for table B1 (on flight origin and destination) ........ 13 1.4.1 On flight origin and destination ................................................................................. 13 1.4.2 Passengers carried* ................................................................................................... 13 1.4.3 Freight and mail loaded or unloaded* ...................................................................... 14 1.5 Definitions and variables of interest for table C1 (airports) ............................................. 14 1.5.1 Passengers carried* ................................................................................................... 14 1.5.2 Freight and mail loaded or unloaded* ...................................................................... 14 1.5.3 Direct transit passengers ........................................................................................... 14 1.5.4 Transfer or indirect transit passengers ..................................................................... 14 1.5.5 Total commercial aircraft movements ...................................................................... 15 1.5.6 Total aircraft movements .......................................................................................... 15 1.6 The difference between on flight origin/destination and flight stage data ...................... 15 1.7 The reporting of airport data in table C1 .......................................................................... 19 4 Reference Manual on Air Transport Statistics v14 1.8 Codification of the type of flight ....................................................................................... 20 2 Classifications ............................................................................................................................ 20 2.1 Country code ..................................................................................................................... 20 2.2 Airport code ....................................................................................................................... 20 2.3 Air transport operator code .............................................................................................. 21 2.4 Aircraft code ...................................................................................................................... 22 3 Data transmission Format: Standardisation and validation ...................................................... 22 3.1 Transmission of results ...................................................................................................... 22 3.2 Description of the data files and transmission format ...................................................... 22 3.3 Data Transmission ............................................................................................................. 24 3.3.1 General recommendations ........................................................................................ 24 3.3.2 eDAMIS presentation ................................................................................................ 25 3.3.3 Standardization of message format for data exchange: Statistical Data and Metadata eXchange (SDMX) ...................................................................................................................... 28 4 Questionnaire on aviation statistics .......................................................................................... 29 5 Voluntary data transmission ..................................................................................................... 29 5.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 29 5.2 Definitions ......................................................................................................................... 31 5.2.1 Type of operation ...................................................................................................... 31 5.3 Values to be collected ....................................................................................................... 34 5.3.1 Registered aircraft ..................................................................................................... 34 5.3.2 Flights ........................................................................................................................ 35 5.3.3 Hours flown ............................................................................................................... 35 PART II: NATIONAL METHODOLOGIES .................................................................................................. 36 1 Information on Dataset A1: FS data .......................................................................................... 37 2 Information on Dataset B1 : OFOD data ................................................................................... 48 3 Information on Datasets A1 and B1 .......................................................................................... 56 4 Information on Dataset C1 ........................................................................................................ 63 5 Information on data compilation, validation and delivery practices ........................................ 67 6 New methodological information ............................................................................................. 83 PART III: PROCEDURES FOR DATA TREATMENT AND DISSEMINATION ................................................ 86 1 Description of the data integration process .............................................................................. 86 2 Description of the quality checks .............................................................................................. 88 2.1 Quality checks results communicated to the countries .................................................... 88 2.1.1 Compliance with the Regulation checks...................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flytoget Airport Express Train
    NSB Lokaltog NSB Regiontog Trondheim Gjøvik Lillehammer Local trains Regional trains R 30 Raufoss R 10 Moelv Reinsvoll Brumunddal Spikkestad – Lillestrøm Drammen – Lillehammer Eina Hamar Røros L 1 Stasjonene Blommenholm, R 10 *Høvik og Stabekk er midlertidig Bleiken Stange stengt. R 11 Skien – Eidsvoll L 3 Tangen Skøyen – Ski Jaren 4N L 2 Stopper på alle stasjoner. Oslo S – Halden R 20 Enkelte avganger til/fra Göteborg Gran R 11 L 12 Rushtidavganger Skøyen – Ski * Tog retning Halden – ingen Lunner Eidsvoll L 2X stopper ikke på alle stasjoner. avstigning før Moss. Roa Eidsvoll verk L 13 Grua Oslo S – Gjøvik Dal Oslo S – Jaren R 30 På Stryken stopper toget Harestua Oslo Lufthavn Hauerseter L 3 * Stryken Oslo Airport Stopper på alle stasjoner ved behov i bestemte perioder. * Nordby På Stryken stopper toget Hakadal * 2Ø Jessheim ved behov i bestemte perioder. Varingskollen Åneby L 14 L 12 Kongsberg – Eidsvoll Steinberg betjenes kun av Nittedal Kongsvinger *enkelte rushtidsavganger. 3Ø Kløfta Soner 1 Movatn Lindeberg Snippen Stockholm Drammen – Dal Frogner L 13 Kjelsås Skarnes Leirsund Nydalen 2Ø Årnes 4N Asker – Kongsvinger Grefsen Bodung L 14 Tuen og Bodung betjenes L 1 * *kun av enkelte rushtidsavganger. Tøyen Haga Auli Skøyen – Moss 1 Rånåsfoss 3Ø L 21 Soner Bryn Alna NylandGrorudHaugenstuaHøybråtenLørenskogHanaborgFjellhamarStrømmenSagdalen Blaker L 22 Skøyen – Mysen * Stabekk Sørumsand Til/fra Oslo S – Rakkestad i rushtiden. * Høvik Svingen * Blommenholm Sandvika Slependen m * strø Tuen Billingstad NerdrumFetsund Lysaker Hvalstad Lille
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin, Development, and History of the Norwegian Seventh-Day Adventist Church from the 1840S to 1889" (2010)
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2010 The Origin, Development, and History of the Norwegian Seventh- day Adventist Church from the 1840s to 1889 Bjorgvin Martin Hjelvik Snorrason Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, Christianity Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Snorrason, Bjorgvin Martin Hjelvik, "The Origin, Development, and History of the Norwegian Seventh-day Adventist Church from the 1840s to 1889" (2010). Dissertations. 144. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/144 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. ABSTRACT THE ORIGIN, DEVELOPMENT, AND HISTORY OF THE NORWEGIAN SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH FROM THE 1840s TO 1887 by Bjorgvin Martin Hjelvik Snorrason Adviser: Jerry Moon ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: THE ORIGIN, DEVELOPMENT, AND HISTORY OF THE NORWEGIAN SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH FROM THE 1840s TO 1887 Name of researcher: Bjorgvin Martin Hjelvik Snorrason Name and degree of faculty adviser: Jerry Moon, Ph.D. Date completed: July 2010 This dissertation reconstructs chronologically the history of the Seventh-day Adventist Church in Norway from the Haugian Pietist revival in the early 1800s to the establishment of the first Seventh-day Adventist Conference in Norway in 1887.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Defence in Northern Europe
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Matti Hongisto Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Pekka Sivonen, National Defence College Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Ministry of Defence Col. Erkki Nordberg, Defence Staff Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 266 FIN - 00171 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 10 AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 ISBN 951-25-0873-7 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1997: National Defence College All rights reserved Oy Edita Ab Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1997 INTRODUCTION The historical progress of air power has shown a continuous rising trend. Military applications emerged fairly early in the infancy of aviation, in the form of first trials to establish the superiority of the third dimension over the battlefield. Well- known examples include the balloon reconnaissance efforts made in France even before the birth of the aircraft, and it was not long before the first generation of flimsy, underpowered aircraft were being tested in a military environment. The Italians used aircraft for reconnaissance missions at Tripoli in 1910-1912, and the Americans made their first attempts at taking air power to sea as early as 1910-1911.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leading Search Engine Solution Used by 7 French Airports Liligo.Com Has Just Signed a Partnership with Strasbourg Airport
    Press Release Paris, 31/03/2014 liligo.com: the leading search engine solution used by 7 French airports liligo.com has just signed a partnership with Strasbourg airport. To date, 7 main French airports have chosen liligo solution, making liligo.com the leading provider to power their websites with its innovative state of the art flights, hotels and car hire white label search engine product. liligo.com search engine white-label solution is comprehensive and unbiased. These core values are essential to airports websites as is also the ability to withstand very important search volumes. For these reasons, several French airports, representing 22.3% of passengers’ traffic in France, chose liligo.com’s “tailor-made” approach. Marseille Provence Airport, France’s 3rd largest regional airport for passenger traffic* with more than 8 million passengers and 108 direct destinations, has been using liligo.com’s white-label solution since 2008. The airport is Routes Europe 2014 host and liligo.com is sponsoring the event. Toulouse - Blagnac Airport, France’s 4th largest regional airport, with 7.5 million passengers in 2013*, hundreds of direct destinations and growing traffic, has also chosen liligo.com's white-label solution. Toulouse - Blagnac Airport is connected to all of Europe's major hubs. “Toulouse-Blagnac Airport has chosen liligo.com to help our passengers find the best travel solutions from Toulouse, whether they are looking for flights, holidays or hotels,” comments Jean- Michel Vernhes, Head of the Airport's Board of Directors. “With liligo.com, our passengers can compare the best travel offers and filter their searches by timetables, departure times, airlines, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference List Safety Approach Light Masts
    REFERENCE LIST SAFETY APPROACH LIGHT MASTS Updated: 24 April 2014 1 (10) AFRICA Angola Menongue Airport 2013 Benin Cotonou Airport 2000 Burkina Faso Bobo Diaulasso Airport 1999 Cameroon Douala Airport 1994, 2009 Garoua Airport 2001 Cap Verde Praia Airport 1999 Amilcar Capral Airport 2008 Equatorial Guinea Mongomeyen Airport 2010 Gabon Libreville Airport 1994 M’vengue Airport 2003 Ghana Takoradi Airport 2008 Accra Kotoka 2013 Guinea-Bissau Bissau Airport 2012 Ivory Coast Abidjan Airport 2002 Yamoussoukro Airport 2006 Kenya Laikipia Air Base 2010 Kisumu Airport 2011 Libya Tripoli Airport 2002 Benghazi Airport 2005 Madagasgar Antananarivo Airport 1994 Mahajanga Airport 2009 Mali Moptu Airport 2002 Bamako Airport 2004, 2010 Mauritius Rodrigues Airport 2002 SSR Int’l Airport 2011 Mauritius SSR 2012 Mozambique Airport in Mozambique 2008 Namibia Walvis Bay Airport 2005 Lüderitz Airport 2005 Republic of Congo Ollombo Airport 2007 Pointe Noire Airport 2007 Exel Composites Plc www.exelcomposites.com Muovilaaksontie 2 Tel. +358 20 754 1200 FI-82110 Heinävaara, Finland Fax +358 20 754 1330 This information is confidential unless otherwise stated REFERENCE LIST SAFETY APPROACH LIGHT MASTS Updated: 24 April 2014 2 (10) Brazzaville Airport 2008, 2010, 2013 Rwanda Kigali-Kamombe International Airport 2004 South Africa Kruger Mpumalanga Airport 2002 King Shaka Airport, Durban 2009 Lanseria Int’l Airport 2013 St. Helena Airport 2013 Sudan Merowe Airport 2007 Tansania Dar Es Salaam Airport 2009 Tunisia Tunis–Carthage International Airport 2011 ASIA China
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of Airport Operations(Pp
    Accepted manuscript. Not for distribution. Please quote as: Beria, P., Laurino, A., & Nadia Postorino, M. (2017). Low-Cost Carriers and Airports: A Complex Relationship. In The Economics of Airport Operations(pp. 361-386). Emerald Publishing Limited. Book series: Advances in Airline Economics Volume 6: “Economics of airport operations” CHAPTER 14 Low-cost carriers and airports: A complex relationship Paolo Beria*, Antonio Laurino and Maria Nadia Postorino *author contact information: [email protected] Abstract In the last decades, low-cost carriers have generated several changes in the air market for both passengers and airports. Mainly for regional airports, low-cost carriers have represented an important opportunity to improve their connectivity levels and passenger traffic. Furthermore, many regional airports have become key factors to regenerate the local economy by improving accessibility and stimulating several markets, such as tourism. However, the relationship between low-cost carriers and airports is rather complex and the outcomes not always predictable. In order to analyse and understand better such relationship and its outcomes, this chapter discusses the main underlying factors identified in: relation with the regional air market (secondary/primary airports), balance of power (dominated/non-dominated airports) and industrial organisation (bases/non-bases). Starting from the proposed Relative Closeness Index, which combines yearly airport passengers and distance between airport pairs, a large sample of European airports is analysed. Then, a smaller sub-sample – which includes selected, significant case studies referring to mid-sized airports – is discussed in detail. Among the main findings, airports sharing their catchment area with others are in a very risky position, due to the potential mobility of LCCs, while geographically isolated airports in good catchment areas can better counterbalance the power of carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL AVIATION REPORT GUIDANCE – December 2013
    GENERAL AVIATION REPORT GUIDANCE – December 2013 Changes from November 2013 version Annex C – Wick Airport updated to reflect that it is approved for 3rd country aircraft imports No other changes to November version Introduction These instructions have been produced by Border Force are designed and published for General Aviation1 pilots, operators and owners of aircraft. They help you to complete and submit a General Aviation Report (GAR) and inform you about the types of airport you can use to make your journey. The instructions explain: - What a General Aviation Report (GAR) is What powers are used to require a report Where aircraft can land and take off When you are asked to submit a General Aviation Report (GAR); When, how and where to send the GAR How to complete the GAR How GAR information is used Custom requirements when travelling to the UK The immigration and documentation requirements to enter the UK What to do if you see something suspicious What is a General Aviation Report (GAR)? General Aviation pilots, operators and owners of aircraft making Common Travel Area2 and international journeys in some circumstances are required to report their expected journey to the Police and/or the Border Force command of the Home Office. Border Force and the Police request that the report is made using a GAR. The GAR helps Border Force and the Police in securing the UK border and preventing crime and terrorism. What powers are used to require a report? An operator or pilot of a general aviation aircraft is required to report in relation to international or Channel Islands journeys to or from the UK, unless they are travelling outbound directly from the UK to a destination in the European Union as specified under Sections 35 and 64 of the Customs & 1 The term General Aviation describes any aircraft not operating to a specific and published schedule 2 The Common Travel Area is comprised of Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands Excise Management Act 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • General Aviation Report (GAR) Guidance – January 2021
    General Aviation Report (GAR) Guidance – January 2021 Changes to the 2019 version of this guidance: • Updated Annex C (CoA list of airports) Submitting a General Aviation Report to Border Force under the Customs & Excise Management Act 1979 and to the Police under the Terrorism Act 2000. Introduction These instructions are for General Aviation (GA) pilots, operators and owners of aircraft. They provide information about completing and submitting a GAR and inform you about the types of airport you can use to make your journey. The instructions explain: 1. What is General Aviation Report (GAR) 2. Powers used to require a report 3. Where aircraft can land and take off 4. When, how and where to send the GAR 5. How to submit a GAR 6. How to complete the GAR 7. How GAR information is used 8. Customs requirements when travelling to the UK 9. Immigration and documentation requirements to enter the UK 10. What to do if you see something suspicious 1. General Aviation Report (GAR) GA pilots, operators and owners of aircraft making Common Travel Area1 and international journeys in some circumstances are required to report or provide notification of their expected journey to UK authorities. The information provided is used by Border Force and the Police to facilitate the smooth passage of legitimate persons and goods across the border and prevent crime and terrorism. 2. Powers used to require a report An operator or pilot of a GA aircraft is required to report in relation to international or Channel Island journeys to or from the UK under Sections 35 and 64 of the Customs & Excise Management Act 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Case No COMP/M.3770 - LUFTHANSA / SWISS
    EN Case No COMP/M.3770 - LUFTHANSA / SWISS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(2) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 04/07/2005 In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3770 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 04.07.2005 SG-Greffe(2005) D/202898 In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article PUBLIC VERSION 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are MERGER PROCEDURE shown thus […]. Where possible the information ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. To the notifying party Dear Sir/Madam, Subject: Case No COMP/M.3770- Lufthansa/Swiss Notification of 20.05.2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 139/20041 1. On 20 May 2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking Deutsche Lufthansa AG (“Lufthansa”, Germany), the holding company of the Lufthansa Group, acquires control of the whole of Swiss International Air Lines Ltd (“Swiss”, Switzerland), by way of purchase of shares. 2. Given the bilateral Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (the “ATA”)2, the Commission has exceptionally full jurisdiction to assess potential competition concerns in Switzerland and, in particular, any concerns on routes between Switzerland and third countries under Article 11(1) of the ATA.
    [Show full text]
  • Persontogtrafikk Hokksund-Hønefoss (Randsfjordbanen) Mange Mennesker Og Mye Miljø for Lite Penger!
    Persontogtrafikk Hokksund-Hønefoss (Randsfjordbanen) Mange mennesker og mye miljø for lite penger! Bergensbanen «Buskerud fylkeskommune vil overfor Jernbanedirektoratet arbeide for persontrafikk på Randsfjordbanen som Hønefoss overordnet strategi, og at det blir en ryggrad i det framtidige ”kollektivtilbudet mellom Hokk- sund og Hønefoss. Jernbane- direktoratet bes vurdere og kostnadsberegne en kortsiktig løsning inntil Ringeriksbanen • I 2000 ble persontog avviklet og er ferdig» erstattet med buss. Vedtak fra Buskerud fylkes- kommune, juni 2018 • I 2020 er det kun to stopp i Vikersund Lillestrøm døgnet hver vei for Bergens- «Økt togtrafikk til og fra toget på Vikersund stasjon, Ringerike kan gjøre det inter- i tillegg til godstrafikk. essant med ny persontrafikk Oslo på Randsfjordbanen, noe som kan gi raske forbindelser fra • Fra 2021 blir det kun godstrafikk Sandvika f. eks. Modum til Oslo (Bergenstoget føres over Roa når via Ringerike. På kort sikt er det mer et politisk spørsmål Drammen stasjon skal oppgraderes). om banen skal ha person- togtrafikk ut over fjerntogene» Hjemmeside Bane Nor, januar 2020 Hokksund Drammen ” • Randsfjordbanen er en 54 kilomter lang strekning med fra 2700 i 2006. hovedlinjestandard. God traseføring muliggjør rask • Det er stor tilstrømning til kultur- og helseinstitusjoner kjøring. som Blaafarveværket, Vikersundbakken og Modum Bad. • Et togtilbud på den eksisterende Randsfjordbanen • Befolkningen i Modum er svært engasjerte i å få et ernøkkelen for å samle bo- og arbeidsområdene pendlertilbud med tog. Det er politisk enighet om at Ringerike, Midt-Buskerud, Eiker, Kongsberg og togtilbudet er avgjørende for videre utvikling i Drammen. Med Ringeriksbanen i drift vil Vikersund regionen. være cirka 55 minutter fra Oslo. Dette kan oppnås • Store deler av Riksvei 35 mellom Hokksund og Hønefoss uten store investeringer.
    [Show full text]
  • Norway, That Could Affect Norwegian Security and Damage National Interests in the Coming Year
    Analyses of Crisis Scenarios 2019 DSB ANALYSES OF CRISIS SCENARIOS 2019 1 DISASTERS THAT MAY AFFECT NORWEGIAN SOCIETY Issued by: Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection (DSB) 2019 ISBN: 978-82-7768-472-7 (PDF) Cover and design: Dinamo Printed by: ETN Grafisk, Skien 2 ANALYSES OF CRISIS SCENARIOS 2019 DSB SEVERE WEATHER Hurricane on the coast. Frøya municipality, Trøndelag. / SAMPHOTO WUTTUDAL TORE PHOTO DSB ANALYSES OF CRISIS SCENARIOS 2019 3 4 NASJONALTANALYSES OF RISIKOBILDE CRISIS SCENARIOS 2013 DSB 2019 DSB NATIONAL RISK AND THREAT ASSESSMENTS The DSB’s Analyses of Crisis Scenarios (ACS)1 is one of four threat and risk assessments published every year. The others are published by the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST), the Norwegian Intelligence Service (NIS) and the Norwegian National Security Authority (NSM). The PST’s primary responsibility is to prevent and investigate crimes against national security. The PST’s annual threat assessment discusses situations, usually in Norway, that could affect Norwegian security and damage national interests in the coming year. These include threats from state actors in the form of foreign intelligence services, their current intelligence targets and the services’ operational patterns in Norway. The assessments also deal with threats from non-state actors, especially threats of politically motivated violence by extremist groups or individuals. The assessments have a time horizon of one year and are published in the first quarter. The NIS’s primary task is to warn of external threats and support the development of Norwegian security, foreign and defence policy. The service publishes an annual assessment of the international situation and foreign threats of significance to Norway and Norwegian interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Årsrapport 2013
    Norges Luftsportforbund Årsrapport 2013 Årsrapport Norges Luftsportforbund 2013 1 Norges Luftsportforbund Årsrapport 2013 INNHOLD Side Styrets årsberetning 2013 3 Økonomisk årsberetning 2013 15 Vedlegg: 1 Ballongseksjonen 18 2 Fallskjermseksjonen 20 3 Hang- og paragliderseksjonen 25 4 Mikroflyseksjonen 29 5. Modellflyseksjonen 34 6 Motorflyseksjonen 39 7 Seilflyseksjonen 46 8 Komiteer, utvalg og internasjonale delegater 51 9 Ansatte 54 10 Klubber tilsluttet NLF med medlemstall 55 2 Norges Luftsportforbund Årsrapport 2013 1 Styrets årsberetning 2013 Luftsportstinget Luftsportstinget 2013 ble avholdt den 7. april på Radisson Blu Airport Hotel Gardermoen. Foruten de lovbestemte tingsakene vedtok luftsportstinget ny lov for forbundet, basert på NIFs reviderte lovnorm for særforbund, samt en endring i loven om ungdomsrepresentasjon i seksjonsstyrene. Det ble videre vedtatt en mindre endring i statuttene for hederstegn. Styrets sammensetning President: Rolf Liland 1.visepresident: Tor Schaathun 2.visepresident: Christina Wiig Styremedlemmer: Carita Gyldenskog Ranvik (ungdomsrepresentant) Mikael Klingberg (ballong) Ramsy Suleiman (fallskjerm) Christer Bonde (HG/PG) Kåre Halmleid-Østerud (*) (mikrofly) (til 19. november) Stein Erik Lundblad (*) (mikrofly) (fra 19. november) Asle Sudbø (modellfly) Stig Hoftaniska (motorfly) Håvard Gangsås (seilfly) Varamedlemmer: Tobias Veland (ungdom), Hans Rune Mikkelsen (ballong), Ingela Reppe (fallskjerm), Knut Kåstad Nygard (HG/PG), Stein Erik Lundblad (*) (mikrofly), Haagen Valanes (modellfly), Bjørn Skogøy (motorfly) og Mariann Moen (seilfly). (*) Kåre Halmeid-Østerud ba i august om å bli fritatt fra vervet som styremedlem (og som leder av Mikroflyseksjonen (fra 29. august)). Forbundsstyremøtet 19. november aksepterte anmodningen og personlig varamedlem Stein-Erik Lundblad overtok som fast styremedlem. Kontrollkomité: Håvard Rognerud (*) (leder - til juli), Lars Rasmussen (*) (leder – fra juli) og Inger Grimstad (medlemmer). Hans F. Wille (*) og Pernille Olafsen (varamedlemmer).
    [Show full text]