DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian Revolution April 07

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russian Revolution April 07 £1 if sold separately Volume 3 No. 11 April 2007 workers’ liberty reason in revolt 1917: revolution for freedom and equality The Russian revolution, the Stalinist counter-revolution and the working class workers’ liberty ii Introduction: What is Trotskyism? Our fragmented tradition the allies of the Whites, the invading armies of no fewer than 14 But those were mere episodes only, not a part of, nor the By John O’Malony countries. harbingers of, a great socialist movement. At the end of the The dying Lenin, in the first place, and then the Left Second World War Stalinism loomed in the world as a great 9TH and 20th century socialism is a house of many rooms, Opposition founded in Moscow in October 1923, whose leaders power. cellars, attics, alcoves, and hidden chambers (not to speak were Trotsky and Rakovsky, had fought the Stalinist counter- The USSR in 1939 had made up a sixth of the world. At the 1of private chapels and “priest-holes”.) revolution that overthrew the workers' state. Fought it to the end of a big expansion that, though it would not end until the There are in it the utopian socialists of our pre-history death of vast numbers, almost all their number in Stalin's Russian defeat in Afghanistan (1979-89), reached its peak with reformists and revolutionists, parliamentarians and insurrection- concentration camps, jails, and homicide chambers. the proclamation of the Stalinist People's Republic of China in ists, “direct action” anarchists and union-building syndicalists, We are not here talking about apostolic succession, of a line October 1949, Stalinism controlled one-third of the surface of council communists and kibbutz-building utopian Zionists. of infallible popes culminating in Trotsky. All such notions are the earth. And then fascists sometimes proclaimed themselves social- alien to this tradition. It had mass parties, which were the main parties of the work- ists (national-socialists). So did many Third World political Leaders with acquired authority and prestige, yes; Catholic or ing class, in a number of capitalist countries, France, Italy, formations, often more fascist than socialist, such as the “Ba’th Stalinist popes, no. Indonesia, etc. Arab Socialist Parties” of Iraq and Syria. Every member of Lenin's Bolshevik party committee in For a whole historical epoch, authentic socialism, and the And Stalinism. The political reflections and tools in the October 1917 had opposed him at some previous turning point Marxism of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Luxemburg, and Trotsky, labour movements of the Russian Stalinist ruling class or another, some of them even on the October insurrection. were almost everywhere banished to the margins of the work- proclaimed themselves “communists” and “socialists”, and for Trotsky too found himself opposed by all his close comrades at ing-class movements almost everywhere. much of the 20th century were accepted as the main force of one point or another. Most “reform socialists” — but now, the socialists who communism and socialism, in bourgeois propaganda as well as This was a living movement of self-respecting, experienced wanted to replace capitalism were not too numerous among their own. militants, which conducted its affairs according to reason; reformists — rallied to the anti-Russian side of the two blocs The great names of real socialism are numerous, and are far which took it for granted that honest differences of opinion into which the world was divided. from being at one with each other: Gracchus Babeuf, Charles inevitably arise even among very like-minded people honestly Against that background, the defeated and depleted Trotskyist Fourier, Robert Owen, Etienne Cabet, Karl Marx, Frederick pursuing the same goals, and that they can only be resolved by current, always small, shrank in the 1950s to being very little Engels, Auguste Blanqui, Mikhail Bakunin, Ferdinand Lassalle, reason, discussion, and democratic decision-making. even miniscule. In its time the gap between its ideological riches Louis Michel, Wilhelm Liebknecht and his son Karl, August All extant kitsch-left notions of socialist and communist and its small forces had been one of its most characteristics Bebel, George Plekhanov, Vera Zasulich, Jules Guesde, Jean popes possessing infallibility — and the power of coercion to features. Now, in terms of its ideas, too, it shrank Jaures, Victor Griffuelhes, Paul Lafargue, Laura Lafargue, compel compliance — arose in the era of triumphant Stalinist The major surviving Trotskisant current, the so-called “ortho- Eleanor Marx, Pavel Axelrod, Peter Kropotkin, James Connolly, and bourgeois reaction. This is how Lenin, writing in 1907, dox Trotskyists”, organised in the “Fourth International” of Daniel De Leon, Jim Larkin, Eugene Debs, Christian Rakovsky, defined the relationship between party democracy and majority James P Cannon, Michel Pablo, and Ernest Mandel and its Henry Hyndman, Ernest Belfort Bax, William Morris, Keir rule in action. splinters, sided with the Stalinist camp in the world polarisation Hardie, Klara Zetkin, Rosa Luxemburg, Sylvia Pankhurst, Karl “The principle of democratic centralism and autonomy for into two blocs. They were “critically”, but “unconditionally”, Kautsky, Rosa Luxemburg, Vladimir Lenin, Vladimir local Party organisations implies universal and full freedom to for the “defence” of the Stalinist bloc against the other bloc and Shliapnikov, Leon Trotsky, Chen Duxiu, Antonio Gramsci, criticise, so long as this does not disturb the unity of a definite all its full and partial partisans. The expansion of the Stalinist Leon Sedov, James P Cannon, Leon Lesoil, Pantelis action... Criticism within the basis of the principles of the party bloc was they insisted the World Revolution advancing, to be Pouliopoulos, Abram Leon, Ta Thu Thau, Henk Sneevliet, Max programme must be quite free... not only at party meetings but sure advancing in unexpected and uncongenial (“deformed”) Shachtman... also at public meetings.” ways. The Communist International picked up and subsumed many By the time of Trotsky’s death at the hand of Stalin’s assassin For the USSR and the East European satellite states they of the threads of earlier socialism, and wove them into a more on 21 August 1940, this great socialist tradition had dwindled advocated Trotsky's programme of working-class revolution. or less coherent strategy of working-class struggle for power — down to a few tiny organisations in, perhaps, a couple of dozen Following Trotsky, they called what they advocated a “political the direct action of the French and American syndicalists, the countries. It would dwindle further. revolution”, but in fact what they advocated was a profound political “syndicalism” of the De Leonites, the revolutionary The fundamental reason for that was the rise of Stalinism, social revolution, the destruction of the Stalinist state power and parliamentarianism of Liebknecht, the sometimes acute criti- which for most of the 20th century dwarfed and overshadowed its replacement by a working-class regime based on workers' cism by communist-anarchists of the parliamentarians of the socialism. councils. That meant a fundamental transformation in property, pre-1914 Socialist International, the concern with national liber- A bureaucracy collectively “owning” the state had expropri- from ownership by the totalitarian state which owned by the ation of such as James Connolly, and all that was healthy in ated the workers in the USSR, depriving them of all rights and Stalinist autocracy to ownership by a democratic working-class previous socialist activity and theorising. using them far worse than the workers in any capitalist countries quasi-state. They denounced bourgeois democracy and parliamentarism worse, even than in Nazi Germany. It turned them into slaves or For the countries in which Stalinist guerrilla armies had won in the name of the fuller democracy of workers' councils — and (as Trotsky wrote in 1939) semi-slaves. power in civil wars and made their own Stalinist states, the their criticism of bourgeois democracy would later, like so much The new ruling class continued to call itself communist and “orthodox Trotskyists” tended to advocate not revolution but else, be annexed and put to its own pernicious uses by totalitar- Marxist; it defined and camouflaged its own savage rule over reform as the way to working-class democracy. ian Stalinism. the working class as the rule of the working class over society; In this their politics were a hybrid of Trotsky's and those of The Russian working class, in their unprecedented creativity it presented its anti-socialist and anti-working class revolution the pre-war Brandlerite “Right Communists” or “liberal — for instance, in creating soviets (workers' councils) — and as the living continuity of the October revolution. Stalinists”. The influential writer Isaac Deutscher, though he the Bolsheviks who led them to victory had in life found solu- By repeated purges, ideological bamboozlement, by bribery, had been a Trotskyist from 1932 until 1940, was after that a tions to many of the problems that had perplexed earlier social- and corruption, they took control of the Communist Brandlerite in his ideas. Brandlerite politics and assessments ist thinkers. International, the powerful international network of revolution- suffuse his very widely read three-volume biography of Trotsky, What had all the different strands of socialism in common? ary working-class organisations made up of people who had and his biography of Stalin. What, with their different
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jewish Socialists Around Vpered1
    BORIS SAPIR JEWISH SOCIALISTS AROUND VPERED1 SOCIALIST PROPAGANDA AMONG JEWS AND VPERED The importance of the "Lavrists" or "Vperedovtsy", named after the publication Vpered (Forward) (i873-1877) founded and edited by Peter Lavrovich Lavrov, in the evolution of the socialist ideas and groups in Russia has been recognized by historians from Alphonse Thun to Franco Venturi.2 The journal's role in the dissemination of the socialist credo among Russian Jews has never been seriously disputed, although seldom recorded in concrete terms. Of the leading Lavrists only Nicolas Kuliabko-Koretskii left memoirs.3 But he, as well as Lavrov who compiled an interesting outline of the main phases of the "Narodnichestvo"4 were not exceedingly interested in the Jewish aspect of their oeuvre. They touched this topic only in passing and, if at all, referred to Liberman whose Jewish socialism captivated their imagination. There was no reason for them to indicate and to dwell on the Jewish origin of socialist Jews in their midst who never associated themselves with any Jewish cause or aspirations. The outsiders who did so many years afterwards, knew too little about the internal affairs of Vpered and, therefore, either exaggerated its influence among Jews or underestimated the importance of leading Jewish Lavrists or, which 1 With slight changes this paper was read at the YIVO Research Conference on Jewish participation in movements devoted to the cause of social progress, New York, September 10-13, '964. 1 A. Thun, Geschichte der revolutionaren Bewegung in Russland, Leipzig 1883; F. Venturi, Roots of Revolution, London i960. The reader of this journal may find a condensed treatment of the position and influence of Vpered in Boris Sapir, Unknown Chapters in the history of Vpered, in: International Review of Social History, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Lenin, What Is to Be Done.Indd
    XIII Editor’s Preface This work saw the light of day in the heat of a decisive battle for the international proletariat. What Is to Be Done? constituted the essential weapon with which to fight revisionism. This, even in its Russian form, denied the scientific nature of Marxist analysis, i.e. it excluded for the proletariat even the possibility of equip- ping itself with a strategy. What Is to Be Done? is the precious magnifying glass that allows us to reread the chapters of the history of our class from a Leninist point of view. In order to do this, we can follow the Russian script. Between 1884 and 1894, Marxist theory gathered strength, but the Marxists, among the currents of avant-garde thought, only had very few disciples. Between 1894 and 1898, the labour movement revealed its political awakening in the struggle via strikes. 1898-1902 was a period of dispersion, of theoretical and organisational eclecticism ; it was the artisanal phase of the political struggle fought by the vanguard of the Russian proletariat. What Is to Be Done? was published as the theoretical guidebook allowing that phase to be left behind. Lenin focused on the Russian precursors of revolutionary Marxism. The latter had the merit of being considered the world vanguard of the revolutionary democratic movement. Lenin hoped that the nascent social-democratic movement would be able to be nurtured with the « same devoted de- termination and vigour ». Eighteen years later, in “Left-Wing” Communism : an Infantile Disorder, he picked up this concept again and underlined it : « For about half a century – approximately from the forties to the nineties of the last century – progressive thought in XIV Lenin – What Is to Be Done Russia, oppressed by a most brutal and reactionary tsarism, sought eagerly for a correct revolutionary theory, and fol- lowed with the utmost diligence and thoroughness each and every “last word” in this sphere in Europe and America.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MENSHEVIKS in 1917 by Olegpmwkov Bachelor of Arts
    THE MENSHEVIKS IN 1917 r:. = BY OLEGpmwKOV Bachelor of Arts Moscow State Pedagogical Institute Moscow, USSR 1983 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS July 1992 THE MENSHEVIKS IN 1917 Thesis Approved: Thesis Advisor 0 Dean of the Graduate College 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express sincere appreciation to Dr. George F. Jewsbury and Dr. Joel M. Jenswold for their encouragement and advice throughout my graduate program. Many thanks also go to Dr. W. Roger Biles for serving on my graduate committee. Their suggestions and support were very helpful throughout the study. To Wann Smith for his expert typing and proofing skills; to Oscar Kursner for his help in translation. My wife, Y elaina Khripkov, encouraged and supported me all the way and helped me keep the end goal constantly in sight. Thanks go to her for her undivided time in the final stages of the project. She prov 1ded moral support and was a real believer in my abilities. 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. The Main Approaches to the Study of the Russian Revolution in American Historiography 2 The Study of Menshevism in the U.S. 6 Soviet Scholars on Menshevism 8 Sources 1 2 Themes and Problems 14 II. Tiffi "HONEYMOON' OF Tiffi REVOLUTION_~-~-~! 8 The Necessity for the Dual Power 1 8 The Essence and Structure of Dual Power 2 7 Establishing of the Revolutionary Defensists Policy3 5 III. THE APRIL CRISIS AND ITS CONSEQUENCES _____4 7 The First Clash.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Darlington, RR
    Introduction Darlington, RR Title Introduction Authors Darlington, RR Type Book Section URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/17902/ Published Date 2008 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Introduction Introduction During the first two decades of the twentieth century, amidst an extraordinary international upsurge in strike action, the ideas of revolutionary syndicalism connected with and helped to produce mass workers’ movements in a number of different countries across the world. An increasing number of syndicalist unions, committed to destroying capitalism through direct industrial action and revolutionary trade union struggle, were to emerge as either existing unions were won over to syndicalist principles in whole or in part, or new alternative revolutionary unions and organizations were formed by dissidents who broke away from their mainstream reformist adversaries. This international movement experienced its greatest vitality in the period immediately preceding and following the First World War, from about 1910 until the early 1920s (although the movement in Spain crested later). Amongst the largest and most famous unions influenced by syndicalist ideas and practice were the Confédération Générale du Travail (CGT) in France, the Confederación Nacional de Trabajo (CNT) in Spain, and the Unione Sindacale Italiana (USI) in Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • LES ANARS Des Origines À Hier Soir
    AL 224 - JANVIER 2000 . LES ANARS des origines à hier soir DOSSIER EN GUISE D'INTRODUCTION... Une mémoire pour le futur . AUX ORIGINES... Des refus essentiels . BAKOUNINE ET... La Première Internationale . DES ATTENTATS AU SYNDICALISME... Le temps des actes . LE TEMPS DES REALISATIONS... Révolutions sociales . Les Anars des origines à hier soir... Une grande fresque historique de 48 pages A4 dont des extraits sont disponibles ici peut être commandée en version papier (avec de nombreuses illustrations et une trentaine de portraits individuels) au prix de 200 fb ou 30 ff à verser sur le compte 001-0536851-32 de 22-Mars éditions ou par chèque à l'ordre d'Alternative Libertaire à la BP 103 - 1050 Ixelles 1 - Bruxelles . EN MOUVEMENT ATTAC : grain de sable ? Alternative Libertaire CONTR'INFO Ce que vous ne deviez pas savoir sur Nihoul Marc Reinsinger Les Anars des origines à hier soir Éditions du Monde Libertaire Éditions Alternative Libertaire (extraits choisis) ******************** EN GUISE D'INTRODUCTION Une mémoire pour le futur Depuis quelques années, leurs drapeaux (noir ou noir et rouge) flottent à nouveau dans les manifs. Leurs militants sont toujours plus présents dans les luttes et les mouvements sociaux. Leurs radios, leurs journaux, leurs librairies, leurs livres, leurs brochures... chahutent les idées en place et en font naître de nouvelles. Les réunions publiques, conférences, colloques... qu'ils organisent, dans leurs locaux, se font chaque jour plus nombreux et passent de moins en moins inaperçus. Leurs organisations spécifiques, leurs syndicats, les différentes alternatives qu'ils animent, sortent peu à peu de la confidentialité. Leur nombre (grandissant), leur sérieux (jamais dénué d'humour), leur courage (incontestable), leur intransigeance (énervante), leur manière d'être (aux antipodes du paraître), leur révolte (permanente), leurs principes (fascinants), leurs mots d'ordre (radicaux), leurs propositions (évidentes), leurs rêves (bouleversants)..
    [Show full text]
  • Anarcho-Syndicalism in the 20Th Century
    Anarcho-syndicalism in the 20th Century Vadim Damier Monday, September 28th 2009 Contents Translator’s introduction 4 Preface 7 Part 1: Revolutionary Syndicalism 10 Chapter 1: From the First International to Revolutionary Syndicalism 11 Chapter 2: the Rise of the Revolutionary Syndicalist Movement 17 Chapter 3: Revolutionary Syndicalism and Anarchism 24 Chapter 4: Revolutionary Syndicalism during the First World War 37 Part 2: Anarcho-syndicalism 40 Chapter 5: The Revolutionary Years 41 Chapter 6: From Revolutionary Syndicalism to Anarcho-syndicalism 51 Chapter 7: The World Anarcho-Syndicalist Movement in the 1920’s and 1930’s 64 Chapter 8: Ideological-Theoretical Discussions in Anarcho-syndicalism in the 1920’s-1930’s 68 Part 3: The Spanish Revolution 83 Chapter 9: The Uprising of July 19th 1936 84 2 Chapter 10: Libertarian Communism or Anti-Fascist Unity? 87 Chapter 11: Under the Pressure of Circumstances 94 Chapter 12: The CNT Enters the Government 99 Chapter 13: The CNT in Government - Results and Lessons 108 Chapter 14: Notwithstanding “Circumstances” 111 Chapter 15: The Spanish Revolution and World Anarcho-syndicalism 122 Part 4: Decline and Possible Regeneration 125 Chapter 16: Anarcho-Syndicalism during the Second World War 126 Chapter 17: Anarcho-syndicalism After World War II 130 Chapter 18: Anarcho-syndicalism in contemporary Russia 138 Bibliographic Essay 140 Acronyms 150 3 Translator’s introduction 4 In the first decade of the 21st century many labour unions and labour feder- ations worldwide celebrated their 100th anniversaries. This was an occasion for reflecting on the past century of working class history. Mainstream labour orga- nizations typically understand their own histories as never-ending struggles for better working conditions and a higher standard of living for their members –as the wresting of piecemeal concessions from capitalists and the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Syndicalism and the Influence of Anarchism in France, Italy and Spain
    Syndicalism and the Influence of Anarchism in France, Italy and Spain Ralph Darlington, Salford Business School, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT Phone: 0161-295-5456 Email: [email protected] Abstract Following the Leninist line, a commonly held assumption is that anarchism as a revolutionary movement tends to emerge in politically, socially and economically underdeveloped regions and that its appeal lies with the economically marginalised lumpenproletariat and landless peasantry. This article critically explores this assumption through a comparative analysis of the development and influence of anarchist ideology and organisation in syndicalist movements in France, Spain and Italy and its legacy in discourses surrounding the nature of political authority and accountability. Keywords: syndicalism, anarcho-syndicalism, revolution, unionism, France, Spain, Italy. Introduction Many historians have emphasised the extent to which revolutionary syndicalism was indebted to anarchist philosophy in general and to Bakunin in particular, with some - 1 - even using the term ‘anarcho-syndicalism’ to describe the movement. 1 Certainly within the French, Italian and Spanish syndicalist movements anarchists or so-called ‘anarcho-syndicalists’ were able to gain significant, albeit variable, influence. They were to be responsible in part for the respective movements’ rejection of political parties, elections and parliament in favour of direct action by the unions, as well as their conception of a future society in which, instead of a political
    [Show full text]
  • The Influences of Chernyshevsky, Tkachev, and Nechaev on The
    THE INFLITENCES OF CHERNYSHEVSKY, TKA,CHEV, AI'ID NECHAEV ON TIIE POLTTTCAL THOUGHT OF V.I. LETITIN THE INFLUENCES OF CHERNySHEVSKY, TKACHEV, AND NECHASV ON THE POLITICAL THOUGHT OF V.I. LENIN BY IAII GRAEI.{E WALLACE, B"A. (Hons) A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilnent of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University (c) Copyright by Ian Wallace lAct{ASTER UNIVERSITY LTBRARY I,IASTER OF ARTS (L9921 Mc}TASTER I'NIVERSITY (Political Science) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The fnfluences of Chernyshevsky, Tkachev, and Nechaev on the political thought of V.f. Lenin. AIIIHOR: Ian Graene Wallace, B.A. (Hons) (McMaster University) SIJPERVISOR: Professor Marshall Goldstein. NIJI{BER OF PAGES: v, L82 lt ABsTRACT The collapse of the Soviet Union has challenged Marxist political theory. Many people saw the collapse of the Soviet Union as a defeat of Marxisn. Most scholars of Poritical Theory rearize that Lenin did not folrow Marxist writings. However, most still consider Lenin as predominately a Marxist. This thesis witl examine the source of Lenin,s ideas on Class, the Party, and the Revolution, and will trace these differences with Marx to chernyshevsky, Tkachev, and Nechaev. rt will irrustrate the extent of the influence of Lenints Russian, non-Marxist, predecessors. Lenin did indeed study and adopt aspects of Marxisn, but he d.iffered with hin in some important areas, particularly Class, the Party, and the Revolution. Marx, writing in western Europe, sought human emancipation, whire Lenin, in backlrard, autocratic Russia, sought political emancipation from the Tsarist autocracy. This resurted in differences between the thought and writings of Lenin and Marx.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-08-06 *** ISBD LIJST *** Pagina 1 ______Monografie Ni Dieu Ni Maître : Anthologie De L'anarchisme / Daniel Guérin
    ________________________________________________________________________________ 2015-08-06 *** ISBD LIJST *** Pagina 1 ________________________________________________________________________________ monografie Ni Dieu ni Maître : anthologie de l'anarchisme / Daniel Guérin. - Paris : Maspero, 1973-1976 monografie Vol. 4: Dl.4: Makhno ; Cronstadt ; Les anarchistes russes en prison ; L'anarchisme dans la guerre d'Espagne / Daniel Guérin. - Paris : Maspero, 1973. - 196 p. monografie Vol. 3: Dl.3: Malatesta ; Emile Henry ; Les anarchistes français dans les syndicats ; Les collectivités espagnoles ; Voline / Daniel Guérin. - Paris : Maspero, 1976. - 157 p. monografie De Mechelse anarchisten (1893-1914) in het kader van de opkomst van het socialisme / Dirk Wouters. - [S.l.] : Dirk Wouters, 1981. - 144 p. meerdelige publicatie Hem Day - Marcel Dieu : een leven in dienst van het anarchisme en het pacifisme; een politieke biografie van de periode 1902-1940 / Raoul Van der Borght. - Brussel : Raoul Van der Borght, 1973. - 2 dl. (ongenummerd) Licentiaatsverhandeling VUB. - Met algemene bibliografie van Hem Day Bestaat uit 2 delen monografie De vervloekte staat : anarchisme in Frankrijk, Nederland en België 1890-1914 / Jan Moulaert. - Berchem : EPO, 1981. - 208 p. : ill. Archief Wouter Dambre monografie The floodgates of anarchy / Stuart Christie, Albert Meltzer. - London : Sphere books, 1972. - 160 p. monografie L' anarchisme : de la doctrine à l'action / Daniel Guerin. - Paris : Gallimard, 1965. - 192 p. - (Idées) Bibliotheek Maurice Vande Steen monografie Het sociaal-anarchisme / Alexander Berkman. - Amsterdam : Vereniging Anarchistische uitgeverij, 1935. - 292 p. : ill. monografie Anarchism and other essays / Emma Goldman ; introduction Richard Drinnon. - New York : Dover Public., [1969?]. - 271 p. monografie Leven in de anarchie / Luc Vanheerentals. - Leuven : Luc Vanheerentals, 1981. - 187 p. monografie Kunst en anarchie / met bijdragen van Wim Van Dooren, Machteld Bakker, Herbert Marcuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online
    A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://eprints.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details Lenin and the Iskra Faction of the RSDLP 1899-1903 Richard Mullin Doctor of Philosophy Resubmission University of Sussex March 2010 1 I hereby declare that this thesis has not been submitted in whole or in part to another University for the award of any other degree ……………………………….. 2 Contents Contents.......................................................................................................................3 Acknowledgements……………..…………………………………………………...4 Abstract........................................................................................................................5 Notes on Names, Texts and Dates…….....……………………..…………………...6 Chapter One: Historical and Historiographical Context…………………..…....7 i) 1899-1903 in the Context of Russian Social-Democratic History and Theory …12 ii) Historiographical Trends in the Study of Lenin and the RSDLP …………...…..23 iii) How the thesis develops
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 11. I Have Approached This Subject in Greater Detail in J. D
    NOTES Introduction 11. I have approached this subject in greater detail in J. D. White, Karl Marx and the Intellectual Origins of Dialectical Materialism (Basingstoke and London, 1996). 12. V. I. Lenin, Collected Works, Vol. 38, p. 180. 13. K. Marx, Grundrisse, translated by M. Nicolaus (Harmondsworth, 1973), p. 408. 14. N. I. Ziber, Teoriia tsennosti i kapitala D. Rikardo v sviazi s pozdneishimi dopolneniiami i raz"iasneniiami. Opyt kritiko-ekonomicheskogo issledovaniia (Kiev, 1871). 15. N. G. Chernyshevskii, ‘Dopolnenie i primechaniia na pervuiu knigu politicheskoi ekonomii Dzhon Stiuarta Millia’, Sochineniia N. Chernyshevskogo, Vol. 3 (Geneva, 1869); ‘Ocherki iz politicheskoi ekonomii (po Milliu)’, Sochineniia N. Chernyshevskogo, Vol. 4 (Geneva, 1870). Reprinted in N. G. Chernyshevskii, Polnoe sobranie sochineniy, Vol. IX (Moscow, 1949). 16. Arkhiv K. Marksa i F. Engel'sa, Vols XI–XVI. 17. M. M. Kovalevskii, Obshchinnoe zemlevladenie, prichiny, khod i posledstviia ego razlozheniia (Moscow, 1879). 18. Marx to the editorial board of Otechestvennye zapiski, November 1877, in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works, Vol. 24, pp. 196–201. 19. Marx to Zasulich, 8 March 1881, in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works, Vol. 24, pp. 346–73. 10. It was published in the journal Vestnik Narodnoi Voli, no. 5 (1886). 11. D. Riazanov, ‘V Zasulich i K. Marks’, Arkhiv K. Marksa i F. Engel'sa, Vol. 1 (1924), pp. 269–86. 12. N. F. Daniel'son, ‘Ocherki nashego poreformennogo obshch- estvennogo khoziaistva’, Slovo, no. 10 (October 1880), pp. 77–143. 13. N. F. Daniel'son, Ocherki nashego poreformennogo obshchestvennogo khozi- aistva (St Petersburg, 1893). 14. V. V. Vorontsov, Sud'by kapitalizma v Rossii (St Petersburg, 1882).
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing Historical Experiences and Ways of Life. Ed. by Alf LÜ
    International Review of Social History 43 (1998), pp. 137–160 1998 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis BOOK REVIEWS The History of Everyday Life: Reconstructing Historical Experiences and Ways of Life. Ed. by Alf Lu¨dtke. Transl. by William Templer. [Princeton Studies in Culture/Power/History.] Princeton University Press, Princeton 1995. xiii, 318 pp. $49.50;£37.30. (Paper: $18.95;£15.95.) Alf Lu¨dtke’s volume on everyday life brings to the English-speaking audience a range of writings published earlier in German. Alltagsgeschichte, or the study of everyday life, emerged in Germany in the mid-1970s and by the 1980s there was a virtual flood of literature on the theme both inside and outside academia. In the context of the German social sciences, Alltagsgeschichte was an oppositional movement in the same way as peo- ple’s history was in the nineteenth century. ln many ways the emergence of Alltagsge- schichte in Germany in the 1980s did for the social sciences what the discovery of the common people did almost two centuries ago. By celebrating the common people Herder and his contemporaries in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century valorized tradition against the Enlightenment emphasis on reason. By shifting the his- torian’s gaze to the realm of the everyday, Lu¨dtke and others critique teleological frame- works which focus on broader structures and processes of change. But just as people’s history was appropriated in different ways within different historiographical traditions, there is a heterogeneity of perspectives on everyday life. Many of the themes on which studies of everyday life focus – family, gender, sexu- ality, religion and community – became an important part of the social history agenda in the 1960s.
    [Show full text]