DOCSLIB.ORG

Homeric Greek: a Book for Beginners Homeric Greek: a Book for Beginners

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Homeric Greek: a Book for Beginners Homeric Greek: a Book for Beginners The Classical Review http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR Additional services for The Classical Review: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Homeric Greek: A Book for Beginners Homeric Greek: A Book for Beginners. By Clyde Pharr, Ph.D. (Yale), Professor of Greek in South-Western Presbyterian University. One vol. Octavo. Pp. xlii + 391. Two maps, ten plates, and numerous woodcuts. Boston, New York, Chicago: D. C. Heath and Co.; London: G. G. Harrap and Co. 8s. 6d. net. Frank Carter The Classical Review / Volume 36 / Issue 1-2 / February 1922, pp 24 - 25 DOI: 10.1017/S0009840X00015778, Published online: 27 October 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009840X00015778 How to cite this article: Frank Carter (1922). The Classical Review, 36, pp 24-25 doi:10.1017/S0009840X00015778 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR, IP address: 130.126.162.126 on 14 Mar 2015 THE CLASSICAL REVIEW that the pre-Doric tradition was based stone, and hence, on his view, a later on thicker timber than the pre-Ionic; addition. This reasoning ignores the and it is unfortunate that he entirely fact that all the chief carved members gnores Thermon. Moreover, in his both of ' Ceres ' and of the ' Basilica' anxiety to discredit the features of are of this softer stone; it also ignores Doric which suggest wooden originals, Koldewey's demonstration that the he overrates the evidence for the archaic structure of this frieze is on that canti- omission of triglyphs. He writes lever principle, which is repeated in the (p. 197): ' There is pretty clear evidence Propylaea of Mnesicles. Koldewey con- that some early entablatures had no siders and rejects the view that the triglyphs on the frieze (Cadacchio on frieze has been tampered with. Corfu, Temple in Syracuse, "Temple A fact that the manuscript was not of Ceres " at Paestum), and it is quite revised by the author should not be for- conceivable that the motive first ap- gotten, but one or two omissions must be peared as a painted decorative motive mentioned. The prehistoric Thessalian in the friezes.' It must be noted that buildings are ignored, except for an he is arguing not for the total omission allusion, unintelligible to the ordinary of the frieze member (' in Doric the reader, to ' some early megarons such frieze is seldom, if ever, omitted,'p. 294), as that of Dimini' (p. 203), but this but for the use of a smooth frieze with- slip would no doubt have been rectified. out triglyphs. For this the evidence More serious is Warren's silence about is far from clear. It is now known that the evidence upsetting the date of the Cadacchio had no frieze member at all Olympian Heraeum. (Warren seems to follow Railton's For the illustrations the editor is obsolete restoration); while for the chiefly responsible. They are mostly Temple at Syracuse there is no evidence good, but one or two are open to except the absence of regulae and the criticism. In particular, it is difficult close spacing of the columns. It is to believe that Warren would have possible that at Syracuse, as at passed Biihlmann's restoration of the Cadacchio, there was no frieze member Tiryns megaron (Fig. 37). Its pseudo- at all (abnormally close spacing makes Doric frieze is an embodiment of the difficulties similar to those of abnormally views which he most disliked. Nor wide spacing); or the intercolumnar should Fig. 58, with its obsolete ground- triglyphs may have been omitted. plans, have been borrowed from For the ' Temple of Ceres' Warren Anderson and Spiers. But the illus- argues partly from the absence of trations prepared under Warren's own regulae, but chiefly from the fact that direction (such as Figs. 86 and 94) are the triglyphs are inserted slabs of softer excellent. D. S. ROBERTSON. HOMERIC GREEK: A BOOK FOR BEGINNERS. Homeric Greek: A Book for Beginners. Greek Book' on the basis of Homeric By CLYDE PHARR, Ph.D. (Yale), rather than Attic Greek. Dr. Pharr is Professor of Greek in South-Western a real enthusiast, and such are always Presbyterian University. One vol. pleasant reading. Octavo. Pp. xlii + 391. Two maps, The book consists of three parts: ten plates, and numerous woodcuts. (1) In the introduction (pp. xiii-xlii) Boston, New York, Chicago: D. C. Dr. Pharr states his case in favour of Heath and Co.; London: G. G. Homeric, as against Attic, Greek as a Harrap and Co. 8s. 6d. net. basic study ; (2) pp. 1-189 contain an •THIS is an interesting book. It is not, edition of Iliad I., with vocabularies as the title at first suggests, a study of and exercises; (3) the remainder of Homeric phraseology from a literary the book contains a grammar and a standpoint (on which, by the way, an vocabulary. interesting treatise might be written), It is naturally the introductory but an attempt to provide a ' First polemic that first arrests attention. THE CLASSICAL REVIEW There is much to be said for Dr. Pharr's The exercises for translation from contention. To begin Greek with English are a good and essential feature Homer has the following obvious ad- of the book. Though they might be vantages : We are in a world of simple perhaps improved. sentences, and we are able to plunge In the final portion of the book, at once into first-rate literature. Dr. Grammar, there is much to note. We Pharr further urges (1) that the irregu- must be content with a few main points. larities of formation in Homeric Greek P. 217 : a wrong account is given of are fewer than in Attic, and that Attic the formation of earaoros. The general forms are explicable from Homeric, principles of ablaut, of the thematic not vice versa; (2) that the vocabulary vowel (for which a convenient symbol acquired is better as an introduction to is used), and of sonant consonants, Greek literature generally. are correctly stated (pp. 220, 221) ; but If the alternative is (as Dr. Pharr the student is not told in what parts of seems to imply for American schools) the verb the different stems occur. In between Homer and dreary parasangs the note on p. 221 the origin of of Anabasis, let us have Homer by all fievdos, TtkvQos, is incorrectly stated. means. Fortunately it is not so. But it In § 668 it should have been stated may be questioned whether Iliad I.-VI. that nominative masculines in a are is the best portion to choose. Would really vocative. In § 800 add that the not Odyssey IX.-XII. (or, if this be too short-vowel subjunctive is limited to short, VI.-XI I.) prove a more interest- non-thematic tenses, and invariable in ing First Greek Book ? But there is these. In the syntax, case-usages would much to be said in favour of the estab- be better treated under the separate lished study of Attic. headings of the absorbed cases; there In the second part of the book the is no need to darken counsel by teach- beginner, after fourteen preliminary ing a boy that ev and.o-vv govern the lessons, embarks on the Iliad. The anno- same case. No mention occurs of the tation is very complete, leaving in fact vague-local genitive, or of the internal little to the initiative of the teacher. It accusative except under the mislead- would seem hardly necessary to reprint ing term ' cognate.' Other omissions at length quite so much of the O.T.; occur. The use of the article as rela- and Dr. Pharr's zeal for colloquial vigour tive and its limitations do not seem to betrays him at times into a lack of be explained, nor the generalising re. dignity in translation. ' But shut up Some of these omissions may be, in a and sit down ' (1. 565) is not precisely book for beginners, intentional. a model for students. There are some In conclusion, we may say that Dr. other points in the commentary that Pharr's book, in spite of minor imper- might be modified with advantage. In fections, does really represent a praise- 1.28 fir/ ov xpaio-fiT) should be explained. worthy attempt at a new method, and A long note on 115 might be omitted anyone teaching Greek on the ' epic with advantage, and much of that on system ' would find it, not indeed in- 246. On 307 it would be truer to say dispensable, but a saver of much labour. that the patronymic is in Homer vir- Nor must we omit a word of praise tually a surname. More might be said for the illustrations, whose charm is in criticism of details; but it has already not diminished by their fascinating been indicated that Dr. Pharr's notes err irrelevance. chiefly in the direction of superfluity. FRANK CARTER. LATIN PHONETICS. Manuel de Phonetique latine. Par A. C. logy. Another Frenchman, to whom JURET, Professeur a l'Universite' this book is dedicated, the veteran Pro- 3e Strasbourg. Pp. 390. Paris: fessor L. Havet, is one of the few Librairie Hachette, 1921. persons who are as familiar with Com- A FRENCHMAN, Professor Meillet, now parative Philology as with Latin Litera- holds the throne of Comparative Philo- ture (and these are only two of the.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Audible Punctuation Performative Pause In
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/140838 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-09-25 and may be subject to change. AUDIBLE PUNCTUATION Performative Pause in Homeric Prosody Audible Punctuation: Performative Pause in Homeric Prosody Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. dr. Th.L.M. Engelen, volgens besluit van het college van decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 21 mei 2015 om 14.30 uur precies door Ronald Blankenborg geboren op 23 maart 1971 te Eibergen Promotoren: Prof. dr. A.P.M.H. Lardinois Prof. dr. J.B. Lidov (City University New York, Verenigde Staten) Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. dr. M.G.M. van der Poel Prof. dr. E.J. Bakker (Yale University, Verenigde Staten) Prof. dr. M. Janse (Universiteit Gent, België) Copyright©Ronald Blankenborg 2015 ISBN 978-90-823119-1-4 [email protected] [email protected] All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the author. Printed by Maarse Printing Cover by Gijs de Reus Audible Punctuation: Performative Pause in Homeric Prosody Doctoral Thesis to obtain the degree of doctor from Radboud University Nijmegen on the authority of the Rector Magnificus prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek and Roman Perceptions of the Afterlife in Homer's
    McNair Scholars Journal Volume 11 | Issue 1 Article 2 2007 Greek and Roman Perceptions of the Afterlife in Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey and Virgil’s Aeneid Jeff Adams Grand Valley State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/mcnair Recommended Citation Adams, Jeff (2007) Gr" eek and Roman Perceptions of the Afterlife in Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey and Virgil’s Aeneid," McNair Scholars Journal: Vol. 11: Iss. 1, Article 2. Available at: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/mcnair/vol11/iss1/2 Copyright © 2007 by the authors. McNair Scholars Journal is reproduced electronically by ScholarWorks@GVSU. http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/ mcnair?utm_source=scholarworks.gvsu.edu%2Fmcnair%2Fvol11%2Fiss1%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages Greek and Roman Perceptions of the Afterlife in Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey and Virgil’s Aeneid Abstract Homer’s Odyssey says that death “is the This study is a literary analysis of way of mortals, whenever one of them Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey and Virgil’s should die, for the tendons no longer Aeneid. Of specific interest are the hold flesh and bones together, but the interactions of Achilles, Odysseus, strong might of blazing fire destroys and Aeneas with their beloved dead. these things as soon as the spirit has left I focused on what each party, both the the white bones, and the soul, having living and the dead, wanted and the flown away like a dream, hovers about.”1 results of their interaction. Methods People have always been fascinated by included reading passages from the death and the afterlife.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of Mycenaean Words Relating to Meals, Meal Rituals, and Food*
    THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MYCENAEAN WORDS RELATING TO MEALS, MEAL RITUALS, AND FOOD* The importance of feasts and other forms of social rituals surrounding meals is well known to participants in the DAIS con[erence. Given the attention that the Linear B tablets give to the production, management, distribution, offering and consumption of foodstuffs, and the documentation of agents for the procurement and preparation of food, it may seem surprising that the vocabulary for meals per se is so meager in comparison with later Greek vocabulary: ariston, deipnon, dorpon, eranos (apwrnv, 8e1nvov, Mpnov, epavoc;). Even dais (8aic;a 'repas, banquet ou chacun a sa part') is missing fromthe banqueting and other food distribution texts, despite the importance and prevalence of the root from which it derives1 in other Mycenaean Greek vocabulary connected with the social distribution of resources, e.g., da-mo (damos) and verbal forms e-pi-de-da-to, e-pi-da-to, o-da-sa-to. In the context of our discussion of feasting, we should note that the root cpay- (which formspart of the historical suppletive verbal system for the action 'to eat') in Inda-European has the meaning 'partager, recevoir une part', (i.e., it is in the same semantic fieldas 8aioµm). cpay- eventually is semantically specialized in historical Greek in its use in the aorist system as 'eat'. Here we discuss the Linear B anq. historical Greek terminology for 'meals' in order to arrive at a clearer view of what the data far banqueting actually are and what factors, historical, cultural and social, might explain why the Linear B tablets offer their peculiar documentation.
    [Show full text]
  • A HISTORY of the PELASGIAN THEORY. FEW Peoples Of
    A HISTORY OF THE PELASGIAN THEORY. FEW peoples of the ancient world have given rise to so much controversy as the Pelasgians; and of few, after some centuries of discussion, is so little clearly established. Like the Phoenicians, the Celts, and of recent years the Teutons, they have been a peg upon which to hang all sorts of speculation ; and whenever an inconvenient circumstance has deranged the symmetry of a theory, it has been safe to ' call it Pelasgian and pass on.' One main reason for this ill-repute, into which the Pelasgian name has fallen, has been the very uncritical fashion in which the ancient statements about the Pelasgians have commonly been mishandled. It has been the custom to treat passages from Homer, from Herodotus, from Ephorus, and from Pausanias, as if they were so many interchangeable bricks to build up the speculative edifice; as if it needed no proof that genealogies found sum- marized in Pausanias or Apollodorus ' were taken by them from poems of the same class with the Theogony, or from ancient treatises, or from prevalent opinions ;' as if, further, ' if we find them mentioning the Pelasgian nation, they do at all events belong to an age when that name and people had nothing of the mystery which they bore to the eyes of the later Greeks, for instance of Strabo;' and as though (in the same passage) a statement of Stephanus of Byzantium about Pelasgians in Italy ' were evidence to the same effect, perfectly unexceptionable and as strictly historical as the case will admit of 1 No one doubts, of course, either that popular tradition may transmit, or that late writers may transcribe, statements which come from very early, and even from contemporary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece--Selected Problems
    REPORT RESUMES ED 013 992 24 AA 000 260 GREECE -- SELECTED PROBLEMS. BY- MARTONFFY, ANDREA PONTECORVO AND OTHERS CHICAGO UNIV., ILL. REPORT NUMBER BR-62445...1 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.50HC-$4.60 113F. DESCRIPTORS- *CURRICULUM GUIDES, *GREEK CIVILIZATION, *CULTURE, CULTURAL INTERRELATIONSHIPS,*PROBLEM SETS, *SOCIAL STUDIES, ANCIENT HISTORY, HIGH SCHOOL CURRICULUM A CURRICULUM GUIDE IS PRESENTED FOR A 10-WEEK STUDYOF ANCIENT GREEK CIVILIZATION AT THE 10TH -GRADE LEVEL.TEACHING MATERIALS FOR THE UNIT INCLUDE (1) PRIMARY ANDSECONDARY SOURCES DEALING WITH THE PERIOD FROM THE BRONZE AGETHROUGH THE HELLENISTIC PERIOD,(2) GEOGRAPHY PROBLEMS, AND (3) CULTURAL MODEL PROBLEM EXERCISES. THOSE CONCEPTSWITH WHICH THE STUDENT SHOULD GAIN MOST FAMILIARITY INCLUDETHE EXISTENCE OF THE UNIVERSAL CATEGORIES OF CULTURE(ECONOMICS, SOCIAL ORGANIZATION, POLITICAL ORGANIZATION,RELIGION, KNOWLEDGE, AND ARTS), THE INTERRELATEDNESS OF THESE CATEGORIES AT ANY GIVEN POINT IN TIME, AND THEINFLUENCE WHICH CHANGES IN ONE OF THESE MAY FLAY INPRECIPITATING LARGE -SCALE SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CHANGE. ANINTRODUCTION TO THE BIOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS (INDIVIDUAL GENETICCOMPOSITIONS) AND GEOGRAPHICAL DETERMINANTS (TOPOGRAPHY, CLIMATE,LOCATION, AND RESOURCES) OF GREEK CIVILIZATION IS PROVIDED.THE STUDENT IS ALSO INTRODUCED TO THE IDEA OF CULTURALDIFFUSION OR CULTURE BORROWING. (TC) .....Siiiir.i.......0.161,...4iliaalla.lilliW116,6".."`""_ GREECE:, SELEcT DPRO-BLES . Andrea POcorvoMartonffy& JOISApt, I. g ... EdgarBerwein, Geral Edi rs 4 CHICAGO SOCIALSTU i OJECT TRIAL EDITION Materials
    [Show full text]
  • Greek (GREK) 1
    Greek (GREK) 1 GREK 101 Elementary Classical Greek I GREEK (GREK) Intensive introduction to Classical Greek morphology and syntax. This course includes exercises in grammar, Greek composition, and translation GREK 015 Elementary Modern Greek I from Greek to English. Emphasis is placed upon developing the ability to This course is designed for students with no prior knowledge of the read Greek with facility. modern Greek Language. Instructions are theme based and is supported For BA Students: Language Course by a Textbook as well as other written or audiovisual material. It provides Taught by: Nishimura-Jensen the framework for development of all communicative skills (reading, Course usually offered in fall term writing, comprehension and speaking) at a basic level. The course also Activity: Seminar introduces students to aspects of Modern Greek culture that are close to 1.0 Course Unit students' own horizon, while it exposes them to academic presentations GREK 102 Elementary Classical Greek II of Greek history, arts, and current affairs. Quizzes, finals and short Students complete their study of the morphology and syntax of Classical individual work with presentation are the testing tools. The completion Greek. We begin the semester with continuing exercises in grammar and of this unit does NOT satisfy the language requirement. Prerequisite: translation, then gradually shift emphasis to reading unadapted Greek Offered through Penn Language Center. texts. For BA Students: Language Course For BA Students: Language Course Taught by: Tsekoura Taught by: Nishimura-Jensen Course not offered every year Course usually offered in spring term Activity: Lecture Prerequisite: GREK 101 1.0 Course Unit Activity: Seminar Notes: Offered through Penn Language Center.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of the Greek Pluperfect
    Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics The Origin of the Greek Pluperfect Version 1.0 July 2007 Joshua T. Katz Princeton University Abstract: The origin of the pluperfect is the biggest remaining hole in our understanding of the Ancient Greek verbal system. This paper provides a novel unitary account of all four morphological types— alphathematic, athematic, thematic, and the anomalous Homeric form 3sg. ᾔδη (ēídē) ‘knew’—beginning with a “Jasanoff-type” reconstruction in Proto-Indo-European, an “imperfect of the perfect.” © Joshua T. Katz. [email protected] 2 The following paper has had a long history (see the first footnote). This version, which was composed as such in the first half of 2006, will be appearing in more or less the present form in volume 46 of the Viennese journal Die Sprache. It is dedicated with affection and respect to the great Indo-Europeanist Jay Jasanoff, who turned 65 in June 2007. *** for Jay Jasanoff on his 65th birthday The Oxford English Dictionary defines the rather sad word has-been as “One that has been but is no longer: a person or thing whose career or efficiency belongs to the past, or whose best days are over.” In view of my subject, I may perhaps be allowed to speculate on the meaning of the putative noun *had-been (as in, He’s not just a has-been; he’s a had-been!), surely an even sadder concept, did it but exist. When I first became interested in the Indo- European verb, thanks to Jay Jasanoff’s brilliant teaching, mentoring, and scholarship, the study of pluperfects was not only not a “had-been,” it was almost a blank slate.
    [Show full text]
  • The World of Homer R.F.Willetts Mycenean
    THE WORLD OF HOMER R.F.WILLETTS MYCENEAN SOCIETY I shall b6gin with a quotation. It is from George Grote's History of Greece published in 1846. This is what he said about the Trojan War: "Though literally believed, reverentially cherished, and numbered among the gigantic phenomena of the past, by the Grecian public, it is in the eyes of modern inquiry essentially a legend and nothing more. If we are asked whether it be not a legend embodying portions of historical matter, and raised upon a basis of truth ...... if we are asked whether there was not some such historical Trojan war as this, our answer must be, that as the possibility of it cannot be denied, so neither can the reality of it be affirmed. We possess nothing but the ancient epic itself with¬ out any independent evidence." In 1846 there were no accepted objective criteria, in the form of buildings, pottery, jewellery and armour, which could be relied upon to form an independent witness of the material realities of the world which emerges in the Homeric poems. The history of Greece began approximately with the First Olympiad in 776 B.C.. Everything that went before, including the Homeric Age, was legend or myth. And now, what is sometimes described as the Aegean Civilization has been discovered by archaeology. The objective criteria of Greek pre¬ history now reach back to the beginning of the Iron Age, throughout the whole of the Bronze Age and into Neolithic times. The pre-history of mainland Greece begins with a Neolithic Age which ended about 3,000 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • What the Butler Saw: Some Thoughts on the Mycenaean O- ~ Jo- Particle1
    WHAT THE BUTLER SAW: SOME THOUGHTS ON THE MYCENAEAN O- ~ JO- PARTICLE1 Many sentences on the Mycenaean tablets contain a particle spelt o- or jo-, which in the vast majority of cases appears in sentence-initial position, and usually draws the verb into second position ('verb second' or V2 order). It is written contiguously with the following word, regardless of whether that is the verb or not. PY Ta 711.1 is typical: (1) o-wi-de pu2-ke-qi-ri o-te wa-na-ka te-ke au-ke-wa da-mo-ko-ro ... wide Phugegwrins hôte wanaks thëke Augëwân dâmokoron ... saw Ρ.-ΝΟΜ when king-NOM appointed A.-ACC. d.-ACC '... Phugegwrins saw when the king appointed Augewas as damokoros' This acts as the heading for a set of tablets listing items of furniture and other banqueting equipment which were the subject of an audit by a man named Phugegwrins before a feast on the occasion of the appointment of a man named Augëwâs to the office of damokoros. This use as a tablet or set heading is typical. According to Gallavotti (1956, pp. 5-10) these are pronouns; o- is the demonstrative /ho/ < *so (= Greek ó), while jo- is the relative /hos/ < *yos (= Greek ός). The starting point of his argument is that in PY Aq 64 (the text of which is printed below, p. 332, where I discuss it more fully) o-u-qe in lines 3-4 is not the negative /oukwe/ but a demonstrative pronoun /ho-u-kwe/ formed from the pronominal *so, with the addition of a 'particella dittica' /-u-/ (seen in o-v- τος) and the /kwe/ (-Te) formant; it stands as the subject of the verb a-ke-re-se.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of the Greek Epic Author(S): M
    The Rise of the Greek Epic Author(s): M. L. West Reviewed work(s): Source: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 108 (1988), pp. 151-172 Published by: The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/632637 . Accessed: 04/07/2012 06:05 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Hellenic Studies. http://www.jstor.org Journal of Hellenic Studies cviii (1988) 15I-I72 THE RISE OF THE GREEKEPIC MY title is familiar as that of a book, and my subject may be thought to call for one. I hope in due course to explore the genesis of the Homeric poems in that format, and what I have to say here may take its place there in a maturer form (wiser, fatter). For the moment I offer merely a provisional attempt to trace out the stages by which the epic tradition developed, stopping short of any discussion of the Iliad and Odyssey themselves. Any such attempt necessarily involves a certain amount of rehearsal of familiar arguments, and, if it is to be plausible, a fair measure of concurrence in familiar conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 - Introduction
    Chapter 1 - Introduction This study utilises a commercially available tagged corpus of ancient Greek to investigate a group of words that originated in Proto-Indo-European and show a number of interesting and diverse features in the modern descendants of that language, including Greek and English. I establish a statistical method for use in a corpus-linguistic, quantitative approach to the collection and interpretation of data, and use the results to develop and test hypotheses about the nature and cause of language change and to identify variations possibly unobservable by other methods, thus making them available for further study. Why study Greek? Ancient Greek continues to be learnt and studied because of the importance and prestige of Classical Greece and its literature, philosophy and polity to the history of western civilisation. Within Greece it has usually also been a compulsory school subject for reasons of national consciousness and identity. As long as interest in ancient history and the roots of our culture continues, it will be desirable for a linguistic approach to the study of the language to be maintained as one of the necessary tools for understanding ancient documents and culture. But, like Chinese, Greek is a language with a long and near-continuous recorded history, offering a unique source for the study of language change in general. At least in its written form, today’s Greek is recognisable as a version of the language of Homer nearly three thousand years ago.1 This conservatism is unusual in the world’s languages and deserves investigation, but at the 1 Substantial sound changes are obscured by historical spelling, but there is a high degree of retention of lexical items and of morphology (particularly in the nominal system).
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Languages of the Balkans
    ANCIENT LANGUAGES OF THE BALKANS b y RADOSLAV KATICIC Part one 1976 MOUTON THE HAGUE • PARIS © Copyright 1976 in The Netherlands. Mouton & Co. N.V., Publishers, The Hague. No part o f this book may be translated or reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm, or any other means, without written permission from the publishers. Printed in Hungary PREFACE In a short introductory outline such as the present one it is impos­ sible to handle a complex and delicate subject in any exhaustive and balanced manner. The presentation will always be eclectic and must thus remain the responsibility of the author. In this survey, the selection of data and of scholarly opinions that are treated at some length is the result of personal experience with the field of study. In some way, it is the book the author wishes he could have had at his disposal when, eleven years ago, he began the study of the languages of the ancient Balkans. This is the spirit in which he would like it to be accepted. Another person’s presen­ tation would be different. It cannot be otherwise in a field in which the body of universally shared opinions and received doctrines is small and the approaches of those concerned with it vary considerably. More space has been given to the literary sour­ ces than one would expect in such a series; however, for this subject it was vital to provide the appropriate philological and: historical basis. The bibliography, too, is selective, and here again a personal note could not be avoided.
    [Show full text]