DOCSLIB.ORG

Inventory of the Christchurch Art Gallery Archive

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Inventory of the Christchurch Art Gallery Archive Introduction The above archive contains material relating to the building of the Christchurch Art Gallery. Archival material begins in 1967, when the deficiencies of the current Christchurch public art gallery (Robert McDougall Art Gallery) were being realised, through to the buildings opening in 2003. Items have been organised chronologically for the majority of the material. Text placed within inverted commas “ ” indicates text taken directly from an item. Text placed within square brackets […] indicates text that has not been taken directly from an item, such as information that has been deduced from examining associated items, or from other sources for the purpose of clarification. The inventory was completed on 28 June 2010 by Fiona Simpson. Item 1 Architectural Competition Entries – Stage One Each entry has its own folder/box labelled with corresponding entry number. Most entries contain A3 drawings, written design details and architectural practise capabilities. 1 Peter Holland 2 Graeme Barr (practise capabilities missing) 3 Sir Miles Warren (no stage one entry found) 4 Ross Megget Architect 5 C.V. Barham (practise capabilities missing) 6 Architectus, Bowes Clifford Thomson 7 No entry as this number was doubled up with entry number 96 8 Noordanus Architects 9 Wilson and Hill Architects 10 Stewart Ross/Team Architecture 11 Nancy Couling/Johanna Klein Architects 12 Stephen Bird/Giles Reid Architects 13 Bull and Sullivan 14 Geoff Richards Architects Ltd 15 Copeland Associates 16 Watt Architects 17 The Buchan Group (incomplete stage one entry housed in Box 33) 18 Buchan Group Auckland 19 Jansen Luke Architects 20 Athfield Architects Ltd 21 Kingston Morrison New Work Studio 22 Blair and Co Ltd 23 Pelorus Architecture Ltd/ Hunt Davies Architects 24 Suite 17 25 Peter Beaven Architect 26 David McBride Architects 27 Vial and Bellerby 28 Boon Cox Goldsmith Jackson Ltd (incomplete drawings and practise capabilities missing) 29 Boon Cox Goldsmith Jackson Ltd 30 Architecture Warren and Mahoney 31 No entry found 32 David A. Smith Architects 33 Design Group (practise capabilities missing) 34 Creative Spaces 35 Don Donnithorne Architects 36 Sinclair Group Architects 37 Crossan Architects 38 Stephenson and Turner 39 Stephenson and Turner 40 Stephenson and Turner 41 Stephenson and Turner 42 Cook Hitchcock and Sargison 43 Patterson Co-Partners Architects Ltd with Barclay Architects Ltd 44 Hall and McKenzie 45 Hall and McKenzie 46 Arch Angles 47 Devine Erby Mazlin 48 Simpson and Thornley 49 Kingston Morrison Ltd 50 Barclay Architects/Peddle Thorp (no stage one entry found) 51 Colin J. MacLaren Architect 52 Dalman Architecture 53 Sheppard and Rout Ltd 54 John DAvenuey 55 Architecture Workshop 56 Roger Walker Ltd 57 Leuschke Architects 58 Architecture + 59 Megan Rule 60 Ian Krause Architects 61 Warren Wiggins Architects Ltd 62 Pickles and Associates 63 Intrados Architecture 64 Brocherie and Cumberpatch 65 Opus International Consultants 66 Wilkie and Bruce Architects 67 Warren Strez Wilkins Architects Ltd 68 Jasmax 69 Architecture Prime (practise capabilities missing) 70 Richard Barrett Architect 71 Fiona Christeller Architects 72 Royal Associates Ltd 73 Pascoe Linton Sellars 74 Studio South 75 Chris Adams and Partner 76 Adrian Powell Architect 77 Charles R. Thomas Associates Ltd 78 Architecture Brewer-Davidson 79 Trengrove and Blunt 80 Cowey Mills and Co Ltd 81 Stevenson and Turner 82 Michael Wyatt Architects 83 Bulleyment Fortune Architects 84 Anderson Wyllie Dodd Architects 85 Rennie Dowsett Architects 86 City Design 87 McCulloch McDowell Architects 88 Studio Architecture/ Morris Bray Architecture 89 Noel Lane Architects Ltd 90 Cuba Architects and Inscape Design 91 Boon Cox Goldsmith Jackson Ltd 92 Boon Cox Goldsmith Jackson Ltd 93 No entry found 94 Nicholas Stevens Architects/ Tonkin Zulaikha Architects Ltd 95 Architects Elliot Arden Peters Ltd 96 Craig Craig Moller/ Trengrove and Blunt No number Pete Bossley Architectural Competition Entries – Stage Two Entries housed in crate. Each entry contains a set of A1 drawings. 3 Sir Miles Warren 17 The Buchan Group (incomplete, stage two drawings also in Box 33) 33 Design Group 50 Barclay Architects/ Peddle Thorp 92 Boon Cox Goldsmith Jackson Ltd Item 2 Box: 1 1967 – 1979 Folder: 1a 1967-69 Excerpt from first annual report of the Robert McDougall Art Gallery, 31 May 1967. Highlighted section relates to requirements of staging touring exhibitions. Robert McDougall Art Gallery Director’s Report, 31 May 1968. Committee Chairman was P. J. Skellerup. Highlighted sections relate to inability of Robert McDougall Art Gallery to competently display touring exhibitions and request that Christchurch City Council would allocate more Botanic Gardens land to improve access to Art Gallery. Report by Eric Westbrook, Director of the National Gallery of Victoria, on the Robert McDougall Art Gallery, “Its Programmes and Policies”, 1969. Westbrook was invited by the Mayor to assess the Gallery and look at possible alternate sites. The report addresses the lack of facilities and staff in the current building, and its poor location. It also identifies possible areas of improvement in collection policy and the need for more funding with the suggestion of setting up a Friends of the Gallery. 1970 Newspaper clippings from Christchurch Star; “Space Problem at Gallery”, 14 July 1970; “To Discuss Cost of Arts Support”, 21 July 1970; “Art Display”, 2 September 1970; “Gallery may be extended”, 19 September 1970. Regarding the growing problem of lack of space at the Gallery due to high attendance levels of touring exhibitions. Consideration given by Christchurch City Council Cultural Committee to extending building and hiring more staff. Newspaper clipping from The Press “Splendid Exhibition of Italian Old Masters”, 22 September 1970. Letter to the Editor from Christchurch Star, 22 September 1970, p.8. From retiring director of the Gallery, W. S. BAvenuerstock, defending the Gallery’s ‘deficiencies’ as reported on in the previous Saturday’s Christchurch Star. 1972 Robert McDougall Art Gallery Chairman’s Report to the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Committee of the Christchurch City Council, 7 March 1972. Chairman was B [Brian] Muir. Reports that the increase in attendance and services provided are increasingly difficult to maintain in the current building. [Christchurch City Council Cultural Committee] Report, 8 August 1972. It was recommended that Robert McDougall Art Gallery stay on its present site and that loading bay area was resolved. Robert McDougall Art Gallery Director’s Report, 21 August 1972 Recommendations to Christchurch City Councillors to improve Gallery parking, storage facilities and loading bay. 1973 Newspaper clipping from Christchurch Star “Museum, gallery ‘should combine’”, 13 March 1973. While attending the Art Galleries and Museums Association of New Zealand conference, Christchurch City Councillor Nancy Sutherland expresses her desire to see a union of the Canterbury Museum and Robert McDougall Art Gallery. Newspaper clipping from The Press “Amalgamation with museum suggested”, 14 March 1973. While attending the Art Galleries and Museums Association of New Zealand conference, Christchurch City Councillor Nancy Sutherland expresses her desire to see a union of the Canterbury Museum and Robert McDougall Art Gallery. Robert McDougall Art Gallery Chairman’s Report to the Parks, Recreation and Council Cultural Committee of the Christchurch City Council, 16 April 1973. A growing number of cultural initiatives involving the Gallery have contributed to the physical limitations of the building reaching “crisis proportions”. Alterations to rear of the building will no longer be sufficient to rectify the problem. Newspaper clipping from The Press “New art gallery need”, 24 April 1973. Gallery director Brian Muir interviewed regarding physical limitations of Gallery. Letter to the Editor from The Press; 24 April 1973. Letter by G.T. [Trevor] Moffitt supporting new art gallery idea. “Brief for possible extensions to the Robert McDougall Art Gallery, Christchurch”, written by B [Brian] Muir, Director. Original typed version of the brief outlining the role and function of a public art gallery; design; schedule of public and back of house areas; general areas – including parking. “Brief for extensions to the Robert McDougall Art Gallery, Christchurch”. Another typed version of the brief outlining the role and function of a public art gallery; design; schedule of public and back of house areas; general areas – including parking, with a foreward included and signed by B [Brian] Muir, 2 May 1973. Robert McDougall Art Gallery Chairman’s Report to the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Committee of the Christchurch City Council, 8 May 1973 Submitted by Director, B [Brian] Muir. Section titled "Extension of Gallery Building” includes the Brief for extensions to the Robert McDougall Art Gallery, Christchurch. With recommendations to organise a competition of local architects to design the extensions and that a committee be set up to fundraise. Robert McDougall Art Gallery Extension. Single sheet of paper marked 8.5.73 notes request for Director of the Gallery to prepare a brief on an extension of the Gallery and includes recommendations to organise a competition of local architects to design the extensions and that a committee be set up to fundraise. Newspaper clipping from The Press “Context to design gallery extension”, 19 May 1973. Notes that Christchurch architects will
Recommended publications
  • Bulletin Autumn Christchurch Art Gallery March — May B.156 Te Puna O Waiwhetu 2009

    Bulletin Autumn Christchurch Art Gallery March — May B.156 Te Puna O Waiwhetu 2009

    Bulletin Autumn Christchurch Art Gallery March — May B.156 Te Puna o Waiwhetu 2009 1 BULLETIN EDITOR Bulletin B.156 Autumn DAVID SIMPSON Christchurch Art Gallery March — May Te Puna o Waiwhetu 2009 GALLERY CONTRIBUTORS DIRECTOR: JENNY HARPER CURATORIAL TEAM: KEN HALL, JENNIFER HAY, FELICITY MILBURN, JUSTIN PATON, PETER VANGIONI PUBLIC PROGRAMMES: SARAH AMAZINNIA, LANA COLES PHOTOGRAPHERS: BRENDAN LEE, DAVID WATKINS OTHER CONTRIBUTORS ROBBIE DEANS, MARTIN EDMOND, GARTH GOULD, CHARLES JENCKS, BRIDIE LONIE, RICHARD MCGOWAN, ZINA SWANSON, DAVID TURNER TEL: (+64 3) 941 7300 FAX: (+64 3) 941 7301 EMAIL: [email protected], [email protected] PLEASE SEE THE BACK COVER FOR MORE DETAILS. WE WELCOME YOUR FEEDBACK AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE ARTICLES. CURRENT SUPPORTERS OF THE GALLERY AALTO COLOUR CHARTWELL TRUST CHRISTCHURCH ART GALLERY TRUST COFFEY PROJECTS CREATIVE NEW ZEALAND ERNST & YOUNG FRIENDS OF CHRISTCHURCH ART GALLERY GABRIELLE TASMAN HOLMES GROUP HOME NEW ZEALAND LUNEYS PHILIP CARTER PYNE GOULD CORPORATION SPECTRUM PRINT STRATEGY DESIGN & ADVERTISING THE PRESS THE WARREN TRUST UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY FOUNDATION VBASE WARREN AND MAHONEY Visitors to the Gallery in front of Fiona Hall’s The Price is Right, installed as part of the exhibition Fiona Hall: Force Field. DESIGN AND PRODUCTION ART DIRECTOR: GUY PASK Front cover image: Rita Angus EDITORIAL DESIGN: ALEC BATHGATE, A Goddess of Mercy (detail) 1945–7. Oil on canvas. Collection CLAYTON DIXON of Christchurch Art Gallery Te PRODUCTION MANAGER:
  • Minutes of Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

    Minutes of Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee

    Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee OPEN MINUTES Date: Friday 9 April 2021 Time: 9.03am Venue: Council Chamber, Environment Canterbury, 200 Tuam Street, Christchurch Present Chairperson Jim Palmer Members Mayor Lianne Dalziel , Christchurch City Council Councillor Mike Davidson , Christchurch City Council Councillor Sara Templeton , Christchurch City Council Chairperson Jenny Hughey , Environment Canterbury Councillor Phil Clearwater , Environment Canterbury Councillor Grant Edge , Environment Canterbury Mayor Sam Broughton , Selwyn District Council Councillor Malcolm Lyall , Selwyn District Council Councillor Sophie McInnes , Selwyn District Council Mayor Dan Gordon , Waimakariri District Council Councillor Niki Mealings , Waimakariri District Council Councillor Neville Atkinson , Waimakariri District Council Jane Huria , Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu Sir John Hansen , Canterbury District Health Board (Non-Voting Member) Ian Duncan, New Zealand Transport Agency 9 April 2021 Nathaniel Heslop Committee & Hearings Advisor 941 6444 [email protected] www.ccc.govt.nz Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee 09 April 2021 The agenda was dealt with in the following order. 1. Apologies / Ngā Whakapāha Committee Resolved GCPC/2021/00009 That the apologies received from Gail Gordon for absence be accepted. Mayor Dan Gordon/Councillor Phil Clearwater Carried 2. Declarations of Interest / Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga There were no declarations of interest recorded. 3. Deputations by Appointment / Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga There were no deputations by appointment. 4. Confirmation of Previous Minutes / Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua Committee Resolved GCPC/2021/00010 That the open and public excluded minutes of the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee meeting held on Friday, 12 March 2021 be confirmed. Councillor Neville Atkinson/Mayor Lianne Dalziel Carried Sir John Hansen left the meeting at 9.25am and returned at 10.04am during discussion of Item 5.
  • The Story up to Now Architects, President (2014–16) of the by Bill Mckay

    The Story up to Now Architects, President (2014–16) of the by Bill Mckay

    FREE Please take one. Issue One An offering of New Zealand Architecture and Design. — 2016 — 10. 14. 26. The diversity of New Class of ’15: the creative Innovative work by design- Zealand’s architecture and inspiring designs oriented companies is is highlighted in Future that received the highest showcased in the hosting Islands, the country’s architectural honours at space at the venue of the exhibition in the Biennale the 2015 New Zealand New Zealand architecture Architeturra 2016. Architecture Awards. exhibition in Venice. Joyful architecture Children playing on the roof of Amritsar, the Wellington house that was a career-long project of Sir Ian Athfield (1940– 2015), an outstanding figure in New Zealand architecture. More village than residence, Amritsar has captivated visitors for 40 years. One new fan is U.S. critic Alexandra Lange (see page 9). Photograph courtesy Athfield Architects. Our archipelago has been discovered by a succession cultural and spiritual importance around which of voyagers and explorers over the centuries but was dwellings were clustered. one of the last significant land masses to be peopled. As the Māori population increased and society The story Around 800 years ago, in the last thrust of human became more tribalised, strategic hillsides were expansion throughout the Pacific Ocean, expert nav- secured during periods of warfare by large-scale igators sailing sophisticated doubled-hulled vessels earthworks and palisades known as pā. The history landed in the southern reach of Polynesia (‘many of New Zealand architecture is not just one of arrival up to now islands’) and adapted their way of life to a colder, and the adaptation and evolution of building forms more temperate land.
  • Reflect Reconciliation Action Plan

    Reflect Reconciliation Action Plan

    Reflect Reconciliation Action Plan November 2020 – February 2022 Architectus acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples of this nation as the Traditional Custodians of the lands on which our company is located and where we conduct our business. We pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging. Architectus is committed to honoring Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ unique cultural and spiritual relationships to the land, waters and seas and their rich contribution to society About the artwork Architectus commissioned Heather Kamarra Shearer to complete a unique art piece to support our first Reconciliation Action Plan. This artwork is both a representation of a ‘map and an agreement’, at the start of the Architectus reconciliation action journey, that expresses the elements of cultural understanding required for Architectus to effectively contribute to reconciliation with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. The understanding between Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal world views are represented by the two halves of the symbol for Aboriginal community and the protractor coming together and completing the circle in the centre of the painting is surrounded by people of all cultural background. This symbol of balance, understanding and mutual respect is set in the centre of the perspective, acknowledging that achieving this balance is still off in the future. But may-be not too far away. 1 A message from Reconciliation Australia Reconciliation Australia welcomes Since 2006, RAPs have provided a framework It is critical to not only uphold all five dimensions for organisations to leverage their structures of reconciliation, but also increase awareness Architectus to the Reconciliation and diverse spheres of influence to support the of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, Action Plan (RAP) program with the national reconciliation movement.
  • Christchurch City Council Agenda

    Christchurch City Council Agenda

    CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA THURSDAY 9 JULY 2015 9.30AM COUNCIL CHAMBER, CIVIC OFFICES, 53 HEREFORD STREET We’re on the Web! www.ccc.govt.nz/Council/Agendas/ AGENDA - OPEN CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Thursday 9 July 2015 at 9.30am in the Council Chamber, Civic Offices, 53 Hereford Street Council: The Mayor, (Chairperson). Councillors, Vicki Buck, Jimmy Chen, Phil Clearwater, Pauline Cotter, David East, Jamie Gough, Yani Johanson, Ali Jones, Glenn Livingstone, Paul Lonsdale, Raf Manji, Tim Scandrett, Andrew Turner ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. NO 1. APOLOGIES 1 2. DECLARATION OF INTEREST 1 3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 1 4. PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS 1 5. REPORT OF THE AKAROA/WAIREWA COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 6 MAY 2015 3 6. REPORT OF THE LYTTELTON/MT HERBERT COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 20 MAY 2015 7 7. REPORT OF THE HAGLEY/FERRYMEAD COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 3 JUNE 2015 13 8. REPORT OF THE HAGLEY/FERRYMEAD COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 17 JUNE 2015 19 9. REPORT OF THE RICCARTON/WIGRAM COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 2 JUNE 2015 23 10. REPORT OF THE RICCARTON/WIGRAM COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 16 JUNE 2015 33 11. REPORT OF THE JOINT EXTRAORDINARY MEETING OF THE SPREYDON/HEATHCOTE 39 COMMUNITY BOARD AND RICCARTON/WIGRAM COMMUNITY BOARD OF 8 JUNE 2015 12. REPORT OF THE SHIRLEY/PAPANUI COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 3 JUNE 2015 61 13. REPORT OF THE SHIRLEY/PAPANUI COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 17 JUNE 2015 73 14. REPORT OF THE SPREYDON/HEATHCOTE COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 3 JUNE 2015 79 15. REPORT OF THE BURWOOD/PEGASUS COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING OF 2 JUNE 2015 85 16.
  • Our Gathering Place

    Our Gathering Place

    Our gathering place Proudly managed by ASM Global Nau mai haere mai ki Te Pae Ōtautahi Welcome to Te Pae Christchurch Convention Centre View from Victoria Square – Architectural Render Welcome to Te Pae Christchurch The South Island Christchurch City Located in the middle of the South A vibrant, walkable city centre Island, home to New Zealand’s most showcasing innovation and urban beautiful scenery and experiences. regeneration. River Promenade Location Architectural Collaboration Looking out over the Ōtākaro A beautifully designed building using Avon River promenade, right in natural materials and reflecting the the heart of Christchurch CBD. braided rivers of our landscape. Flexible Spaces Global Expertise Designed to adapt to your event Experienced management by ASM requirements, from international Global – our team are dedicated to conferences to bespoke gatherings. the success of your event. View from Oxford Terrace – Architectural Render OUR STORY Te Pae Christchurch Convention Centre is the city’s gathering place – an architectural and social landmark designed as a welcoming heart in the centre of Christchurch. Opening in 2021, Te Pae Christchurch Convention Centre will become a showcase of the very best of Canterbury and the wider South Island. From rich and authentic food and cultural offerings, to seamless hosting and flawless technology, our focus is on providing our guests with the opportunity to share knowledge, make connections and enjoy a genuine and enriching experience in a world class environment. Te Pae Christchurch at night – Architectural Render Te ūnga, ko Aotearoa Destination New Zealand Introduction Destination New Zealand New Zealand Destination The South Island Getting Here Te Pae Christchurch Venue Spaces Explore Christchurch City of Innovation About Us 5 Lake Gunn, Fiordland NEW ZEALAND Aotearoa New Zealand is a country rich in culture and Aotearoa, the Land of the stunning natural landscapes.
  • How the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence Led to a Departure from Concrete Technologies

    How the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence Led to a Departure from Concrete Technologies

    A CHANGE OF SCENE: HOW THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE LED TO A DEPARTURE FROM CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES Morten Gjerde 1 School of Architecture, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand Over time, nature can expose even the slightest weakness. This became very clear following a sequence of unexpected earthquakes that struck in Christchurch, New Zealand earlier this decade. At the time the quakes struck, research and development with concrete building technology Canterbury had gained an international reputation and contributed significantly to the region's development. Structural and architectural innovation helped make concrete the material of choice for new commercial buildings. The paper outlines some of the key architectural and structural innovations evident in the buildings of the city. The earthquake sequence exposed several shortcomings in the design, construction and maintenance of buildings, including to several buildings that represent key moments along the innovation pathway. Now that the rebuild is well under way it is becoming clear with every building that is completed that the city’s visual character will be significantly different. The emerging character appears to be developing around the global materials of steel and glass, with concrete no longer featuring in the ways it had. The paper discusses the background to this departure and how it signals the end of a productive period of innovation with this local material. Keywords: Christchurch earthquakes, performance, concrete, disaster, innovation INTRODUCTION Throughout its brief history of post-colonial settlement, and prior to the widespread losses arising from the 2010-12 seismic sequence, Christchurch had gained a well-deserved reputation for the quality of its built environment.
  • Minutes of Council

    Minutes of Council

    Christchurch City Council MINUTES Date: Tuesday 6 August 2019 Time: 9.38am (The purpose of this meeting was to receive deputations on the Global Settlement Report. The report was then considered by the Council on 8 August 2019) Venue: Council Chambers, Civic Offices, 53 Hereford Street, Christchurch Present Chairperson Mayor Lianne Dalziel Deputy Chairperson Deputy Mayor Andrew Turner Members Councillor Vicki Buck Councillor Jimmy Chen Councillor Phil Clearwater Councillor Pauline Cotter Councillor Mike Davidson Councillor David East Councillor Anne Galloway Councillor James Gough Councillor Yani Johanson Councillor Aaron Keown Councillor Glenn Livingstone Councillor Raf Manji Councillor Tim Scandrett Councillor Deon Swiggs Councillor Sara Templeton 6 August 2019 Principal Advisor Brendan Anstiss General Manager Strategy and Transformation Tel: 941 8999 Samantha Kelly Council Secretary 941 6227 [email protected] www.ccc.govt.nz Watch Council meetings live on the web: http://councillive.ccc.govt.nz/live-stream Council 06 August 2019 The agenda was dealt with in the following order. 1. Apologies No apologies were received. 2. Declarations of Interest There were no declarations of interest recorded. 3. Public Participation 3.1 Public Forum There were no public forum presentations. 3.2 Deputations by Appointment The following deputations were received regarding item 5. Global Settlement Agreement. 3.2.1 Property Council - Roger Davidson and Antony Gough. 3.2.2 Chamber of Commerce - Leeann Watson. 3.2.3 The Otakaro Regeneration Company - Rob Kerr, of Kerr & Partners. 3.2.4 Riverlution - Hayley Guglietta and Emma Woods. Councillor Gough left the meeting at 10.20am and returned at 10.20am during deputation 3.2.5.
  • 402 Montreal Street, Christchurch

    402 Montreal Street, Christchurch

    DISTRICT PLAN –LISTED HERITAGE PLACE HERITAGE ASSESSMENT – STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE HERITAGE ITEM NUMBER 391 DWELLING AND SETTING– 402 MONTREAL STREET, CHRISTCHURCH PHOTOGRAPH: M. VAIR-PIOVA, 2014 HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE Historical and social values that demonstrate or are associated with: a particular person, group, organisation, institution, event, phase or activity; the continuity and/or change of a phase or activity; social, historical, traditional, economic, political or other patterns. The dwelling at 402 Montreal Street has historical and social significance for its connection to Reverend John Aldred and Joseph Colborne Veel. The dwelling was built in 1878 when builder Henry Haggerty leased the property from the Rev. John Aldred and raised a mortgage to build on the site. Rev. Aldred, after whom Beveridge Street was once named, was an ordained Wesleyan minister, had arrived in New Zealand in 1840. He settled in Christchurch in 1854 as one of the first Wesleyan clergyman in the town and was granted land in Durham Street North by the Superintendent in 1856. Aldred was sent to Dunedin in 1864 but he later returned to live in St Albans. Haggerty encountered financial difficulties and sold the property to Dan Griffiths in 1882. Griffiths owned it for 10 years before Joseph Colborne Veel purchased part of the property in a mortgagee sale. Oxford-educated, Veel arrived in New Zealand in 1857, where he joined Page 1 the staff of The Press and subsequently became editor, a position he held until 1878. Veel also served on the Canterbury College Board of Governors and was secretary to the North Canterbury Education Board.
  • A City for All Seasons. a Case Study of Urban Place Promotion

    A City for All Seasons. a Case Study of Urban Place Promotion

    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. A CITY FOR ALL SEASONS A CASE STUDY OF URBAN PLACE PROMOTION A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management at Lincoln University by Andrea Schollmann Lincoln University 1997 -. -~,. - ': '''----- ABSTRACT Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree ofM.P.R & T.M. A CITY FOR ALL SEASONS A CASE STUDY OF URBAN PLACE PROMOTION by Andrea Schollmann Promoting cities as tourism de~tinations is seen as a way to enable growth. This promotion involves the projection of selective imagery to specific target groups and often includes the physical reshaping of places to fit a promotable image. Attempts to understand these processes have often focused on one of two approaches: a global perspective stressing the consumptive nature of the tourist gaze and the resultant commodification of place at the local level; and a local perspective emphasising difference and uniqueness. My thesis outlines an investigation into the promotion of the city of Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Architectus. 2 TP SUBMISSION 10/04/18 Drawing Subsisting in These Drawings, Plans, Designs and Architectus Melbourne Specifications

    Architectus. 2 TP SUBMISSION 10/04/18 Drawing Subsisting in These Drawings, Plans, Designs and Architectus Melbourne Specifications

    EXTERNAL FINISHES SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION FT01 Tower curtain wall - south facade Structurally glazed curtain wall with blind mullions. High performance IGU - clear with low. Black powdercoat finish (internal mullions and framing). e coat and body tint to inner pane. Integrated shadowbox spandrel panel, expressed Translucent silver-grey glass. shadow gap. Spandrel panel - powdercoat, colour to match timber finish. FT02 Tower curtain wall - north facade Structurally glazed curtain wall with blind mullions. High performance IGU - clear with low- Black powdercoat (internal mullions and framing). e coat and body tint to inner pane. Integrated shadowbox spandrel panel, expressed Translucent silver-grey glass. shadow gap. Double horizontal shading louvre - powdercoat black metal finish. Spandrel panel - powdercoat, colour to match timber finish. Podium - dark glazed brick FT03 Tower curtain wall - west + east fagades Structurally glazed curtain wall with blind mullions. High performance IGU - clear with low. Black powdercoat finish (internal mullions and framing). e coat and body tint to inner pane. Integrated shadowbox spandrel panel, expressed Translucent silver-grey glass. FT08 shadow gap. Internal timber joinery seat, internal vertical shading fins. Spandrel panel - powdercoat, colour to match timber finish. FT04 Podium - west facade Structurally glazed curtain wall with blind mullions. High performance IGU - clear with low. Black powdercoat finish. e coat and body tint to inner pane. Internal reveals visible behind. External metal framing Translucent silver-grey glass. - powdercoat black finish. Spandrel panel - powdercoat, colour to match timber finish. FT05 Podium - north + south façades Structurally glazed curtain wall with blind mullions. High performance IGU - clear with low. Black powdercoat finish. e coat and body tint to inner pane.
  • New Zealand Hansard Precedent Manual

    New Zealand Hansard Precedent Manual

    IND 1 NEW ZEALAND HANSARD PRECEDENT MANUAL Precedent Manual: Index 16 July 2004 IND 2 ABOUT THIS MANUAL The Precedent Manual shows how procedural events in the House appear in the Hansard report. It does not include events in Committee of the whole House on bills; they are covered by the Committee Manual. This manual is concerned with structure and layout rather than text - see the Style File for information on that. NB: The ways in which the House chooses to deal with procedural matters are many and varied. The Precedent Manual might not contain an exact illustration of what you are looking for; you might have to scan several examples and take parts from each of them. The wording within examples may not always apply. The contents of each section and, if applicable, its subsections, are included in CONTENTS at the front of the manual. At the front of each section the CONTENTS lists the examples in that section. Most sections also include box(es) containing background information; these boxes are situated at the front of the section and/or at the front of subsections. The examples appear in a column format. The left-hand column is an illustration of how the event should appear in Hansard; the right-hand column contains a description of it, and further explanation if necessary. At the end is an index. Precedent Manual: Index 16 July 2004 IND 3 INDEX Absence of Minister see Minister not present Amendment/s to motion Abstention/s ..........................................................VOT3-4 Address in reply ....................................................OP12 Acting Minister answers question.........................