Pages 2923-2979

% FEDERAL REGISTER

VOLUME 29 NUMBER 44

Washington, Wednesday, March 4, 1964

Contents

AGRICULTURAL MARKETING Uniform system of accounts and FEDERAL MARITIME reports for certified air carriers; SERVICE reporting requirements and re­ COMMISSION Rules and Regulations porting of indebtedness data. _ 2949 Notices Milk in certain marketing areas; Notices Agreements filed for approval: order terminating certain pro­ Supplemental air carriers; order American Mail Lines, Ltd., and visions— ______.______2926 amending interim certificates American President Lines, Navel oranges grown in Arizona and interim authority. ______: 2953 Ltd______2954 and designated part of Cali­ American President Lines, Ltd., fornia; handling limitation____ 2926 COMMERCE DEPARTMENT and Norwegian Asia Line____ 2954 Notices Campagnie Generale Transat­ See Maritime Administration. Ash Flat Sale Bam et al.; notice lantique (French Line) and of changes in names of posted Westfal-Larsen & Co___ ;_____ 2954 stockyards______2951 COMMODITY CREDIT Farrell Lines Inc., and Black CORPORATION Star Line, Ltd______2955 AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION Farell Lines Inc., and Zim Israel Rules and Regulations Navigation Co., Ltd______' 2955 AND CONSERVATION SERVICE Moore-McCormack Lines and Grains and similarly handled Rules and Regulations commodities; price support for Matson Navigation Co______2955 Moore-McCormack Lines and Wheat; farm acreage allotments, 1964 and subsequent crops; cor­ Ocean Steamship Co______2955 small farm bases and normal rection______2930 United ' Fruit Co., and Flota yields, 1964 and subsequent crops. ______2925 Mercante Grancolombiana___ 2955 FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Rules and Regulations See also Agricultural Marketing Airworthiness directives: FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION Service; Agricultural Stabiliza­ Boeing . . . ______i______2943 Notices tion and Conservation Service; Lockheed______2944 Commodity Credit Corporation; Control zones, control area exten­ Hearings, etc.: Federal Crop Insurance Cor­ sions, and transitions; altera­ Algonquin Gas Transmission poration. tion, designation and revoca­ Co------______------______2960 Delaney Oil Co. et al______2957 Notices tion (4 documents) 2930,2931, 2933 ControFzones and transition area; Natural Gas Pipeline Company North Dakota and Texas; desig­ alteration and designation____ 2932 of America.______2958 nation of areas for emergency Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line loans------;______;______2951 Federal airways, alteration; with­ drawal of amendments and re­ Co__------____:------2960 Pubco Petroleum Corp. et al___ 2956 a to m ic e n e r g y c o m m is s io n opening of comment period____ 2934 IFR a ltitu d e s; miscellaneous Smith, H. R., et al______2959 Notices # am endm ents______2934 Texas Gas Transmission Corp__ 2960 Trenchard, John______2958 Connecticut Yankee Power Co.; Transition area; designation.____ 2934 Trunkline G as Co______2956 amendment to notice of hear- Proposed Rule Making ...... — ...... 2953 Davis; airworthiness directive___ 2950 Temporary restricted area; desig­ CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD nation ______j ______2949 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Rules and Regulations Rules and Regulations Exemption of air carriers for short Montana; sport fishing: notice military contracts and FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE Ninepipe National Wildlife substitute service.,______2938 CORPORATION Refuge______i______2948 Proposed Rule Making Rules and Regulations Pablo National Wildlife Refuge- 2948 Evidence in route proceedings; Federal crop insurance 1961 and Willow Creek National Wildlife termination of rule making pro­ succeeding years; wheat; cor­ Refuge______2948 ceeding______2949 rection___... ______2925 (Continued on next page) 2923 2924 CONTENTS

FOOD AND DRUG Notices MARITIME ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION Fourth section applications for Rules and Regulations relief-— ______2969 Notices Motor carrier alternate route Values for war risks insurance____ 2944 New drugs; approval of a p p li­ deviation notices______2969 cations, December 1963.______2953 Motor carrier applications and NATIONAL PARK SERVICE certain other proceedings (2 Notices documents)______2970,2975 Regional Chief, Division of Man­ HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND Motor carrier, broker, water car­ agement Analysis and Services WELFARE DEPARTMENT rier and freight forwarder appli­ and Regional Procurement Offi­ cations— ______2960 See Food and Drug Administra­ cer; delegation of Authority____ 2953 tion. Motor carrier intrastate applica­ tions; filing______2978 Motor carrier transfer proceed­ TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTERIOR DEPARTMENT ings______2978 Notices See Fish and Wildlife Service; Rerouting of traffic: Fair value determinations : Land Management Bureau; Central Railroad Company of Welded standard steel pipe from National Park Service. New Jersey___ * ______2969 Luxembourg______2951 Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Rail­ Wooden coat hangers from INTERSTATE COMMERCE way Co______2969 ) Yugoslavia.______2952 COMMISSION LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU VETERANS ADMINISTRATION Rules and Regulations Notices Rules and Regulations Motor Carrier Annual Report California, small tract classifica­ Pension, compensation, and de­ Form C (Class m Carriers of tions (2 documents)______2952 pendency and indemnity com­ property)______2947 South Dakota; proposal with­ pensation; computation of in­ Railroad Annual Report Form A 2947 drawal and reservation of lands. 2952 come______2944 Codification Guide The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1964, and specifies how they are affected.

7 CFR 1096______2928 288______2938 1098______2928 507 (2 documents)______2943,2944 401_____ 2925 1101______2928 728___ V 2925 P roposed R u l e s : 1120______, i ______2928 907_____ 2926 73 [N e w ]— ______2949 1125..:______* ______2928 1008— 2926 241______2949 1126______2928 1009— 2926 302______2949 1128— :______2928 1031— 2926 507______2950 1129 ______2929 1035— 2927 1130 _ 2929 1036— 2927 38 CFR 1131 ______2929 1040— 2927 1132 ______2929 3______2944 1041 ______2927 1133 ______2929 1042 ______2927 1134 ______2929 46 CFR 1043— 2927 1135 _ 2929 1047— 2927 309— . ______— 2944 1137— ______2929 1048— 2927 1138______2929 1049— 2927 1421______2930 49 CFR 1062— 2927 120______2947 1066— 2928 205______2947 1067— 2928 1072— 2928 14 CFR 1075— 2928 71 [New] (7 documents)____ 2930-2934 50 CFR 1090— 2928 95 [N e w ]— ______* 2934 33 (3 documents)— ------2948

Published dally, except Sundays, Mondays, and days following official Federal holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Ser* FEHERALMREGISTER ices Administration, pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Ac , Telephone "*omS>‘ir worth " w" " 3-3261 ’ approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., ch. 8B), under regulations prescribed by thé Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President. Distribution is made only by tn Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402. , The F ederal R egister will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15.00 per year, payable advance. The charge for individual copies (minimum 15 cents) varies in proportion to the size of the issue. Remit check or mo y order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402. The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code op F ederal R egulations, which is published,,under 50 titles, P ' suant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended August 5, 1953. . The Code op F ederal R egulations is sold by the Supe tendent of Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements vary. _ tions There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal R egister, or the Code op F ederal R egulati Rules and Regulations

history acreage purposes. Under the Act, under the Soil Bank Act or section 16 (b ) Title 7— AGRICULTURE if acreage in excess of the farm wheat or (e) of the Soil Conservation and ¡acreage allotment is produced in any Domestic Allotment Act, as amended, the Chapter IV-—Federal Crop Insurance year, the wheat history acreage for that smaller of the 1964 base acreage or the Corporation, Department of Agri­ year, for purposes of determining future acreage obtained by multiplying the 1964 culture wheat acreage allotments, is considered wheat acreage, including the acreage re­ [Amdt. 66] to be equal to the farm wheat acreage garded as planted to wheat under the Soil Bank Act or section 16 (b) or (e) PART 401— FEDERAL CROP allotment. If the farm allotment is de­ rived from the small farm base provision of the Soil Conservation and Domestic INSURANCE of § 728.17 of these regulations and the Allotment Act, as amended, by the 1964 county wheat diversion credit factor. Subpart— Regulations for the 1961 operator does not intend to apply for price support, the reported acreage will (iv) For any old or new farm know­ and Succeeding Crop Years be accepted as the wheat acreage unless ingly overplanted, the farm acreage al­ Correction there is reason to believe that the report lotment for such year. is erroneous. On farms with allotments (3) To aid in the determination of the The date on which the above-named determined under the regular allotment wheat acreage on any farm for 1964, the document was adopted by the Board of provisions of § 728.16 of these regula­ operator of the farm shall be requested Directors should read February 14, 1964, tions and the operator does not want in writing on Form ASCS-222 to inform rather than February 14, 1963 as shown price support or want his farm measured the county A SCS office, prior to the final inFJR.Doc. 64-1711 (29 F.R. 2642) , pub­ for history purposes, the 1964 acreage date for disposing of excess wheat acre­ lished on February 21,1964. of wheat produced on the farm shall be age as provided in this section, the acre­ [seal] E arll H . N ik k e l , considered to be in excess of the 1964 age of wheat he intends to harvest for Secretary, farm allotment. With respect to any grain on the farm in 1964, whether he Federal Crop Insurance Corporation. farm for which the farm operator fails intends to apply for price support on the to report the 1964 wheat acreage prior to 1964 crop of wheat on the farm, and if [F.R. Doc. 64-2032; Filed, Mar 3, 1964; 8:45 a.m.j disposition date, the 1964 farm wheat he does not intend to apply for such acreage shall be considered in excess of price support and the farm allotment the allotment. is in excess of 13.5 acres, whether he Chapter VII— Agricultural Stabiliza­ The regulations are amended as requests the 1964 acreage of wheat on tion and Conservation Service follows: the farm to be determined pursuant to (Agricultural Adjustment), Depart­ 1. Section 728.10(f) is amended by in­a visit to the farm by a farm reporter. serting immediately following the para­ (i) A farm visit shall be made by a ment of Agriculture graph designation the subparagraph farm reporter to determine the 1964 PART 728— WHEAT designation “ (1)", by changing the sub- wheat acreage on any farm with an paragraph designations “(1 )” and “(2 )” effective allotment in excess of 13.5 acres Farm Acreage Allotments, Small Farm to subdivision designations “(1)” and for which price support is requested or Bases and Normal Yields for 1964 “(ii) ”, respectively, and by adding new on any such farm for which the operator and Subsequent Crop Years subparagraphs (2) and (3) to read as reports a wheat acreage not in excess follows: of the farm allotment. Pursuant to the authority contained in (2) “Wheat history acreage” for 1964 (ii) If the effective farm allotment is applicable provisions of the Agricultural 13.5 acres or less and is based upon the Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, the means:

Effective date. In order that ASC (Navel Orange Regulation 52, 29 FJR. each of the respective orders, “The ter­ county committees may apply the pro­ 2643) are hereby amended to read as mination of such provisions would result visions of these regulations to acreage follows: in the text reading as follows:“ is determinations for the 1964 crop of (i) District 1: 800,000 cartons; changed to “The termination of such wheat and in order that farm operators (ii) District 2: 475,000 cartons. provisions will result in the text reading may be notified of such determinations as follows:“ prior to the disposal dates for excess (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 601-674) wheat as provided in § 728.10, it is es­ PART 1008— MILK IN THE GREATER sential that these regulations be made Dated: February 28,1964. WHEELING MARKETING AREA effective at the earliest possible date. P a u l A . N ic h o l s o n , The following provisions relating to It is therefore determined that compli­ Deputy Director, Fruit and Vege­ the use of roller process nonfat dry miiy ance with the notice, public procedure table Division, Agricultural prices in the Class I I pricing formula: and effective date provisions of the Ad­ Marketing Service. In § 1008.51(b) (3) (ii) the provisions: ministrative Procedure Act (5 USC 1003) [F.R. Doc. 64-2059.; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; (1) “the simple average as computed is impractical and contrary to the pub­ 8:47 a.m.] by the market administrator of”. lic interest and the regulations in this (2) The “s“ in the word “averages”. part shall become effective upon publi­ (3) “and roller”. cation in the F ederal R e g ist e r . Chapter X— Agricultural Marketing (4) “respectively,”. Signed at Washington, D.C., Febru­ Service (Marketing Agreements and The termination of such provisions ary 27,1964. Orders; Milk), Department of Agri­ will result in the text reading as follows: H. D. G o d f r e y , culture (ii) From the weighted average of the Administrator, Agricultural Sta­ carlot prices per pound for nonfat dry bilization and Conservation MILK IN CERTAIN MARKETING AREAS milk solids, spray process, for human' Service. Order Terminating Certain Provisions consumption, f .o.b. manufacturing plants [F.R. Doc. 64-2061; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; of Orders in the Chicago area, as published for 8:45 a.m.] 7 CFR the period from the 26th day of the Marketing Areas Parts immediately preceding month, through Greater Wheeling, W . Va______1008 the 25th day of the current month by Chapter IX— Agricultural Marketing Clarksburg, W. Va______1009 the Department, deduct 5.5 cents and Service (Marketing Agreements and South Bend-L&Porte-Elkhart, Ind____ 1031 multiply by 8.2. Orders; Fruits, Vegetables, Tree Columbus, Ohio______1035 Northeastern Ohio______1036 Nuts), Department of Agriculture Southern Michigan______1040 PART 1009— MILK IN THE CLARKS­ [Navel Orange Reg. 52, Arndt. 1] Toledo, Ohio______1041 BURG MARKETING AREA Muskegon, Mich______1042 PART 907— N A V E L ORANGES Upstate Michigan______1043 The following provisions relating to Fort Wayne, Ind______1047 the use of roller process nonfat dry milk GROWN IN ARIZONA AND DESIG­ Greater Youngstown-Warren______1048 prices in the Class n pricing formula: NATED PART OF CALIFORNIA Indianapolis, Ind______1049 In § 1909.51(b) (3) (ii) the provisions: St. Louis, Mo______1062 (1) “the simple average as computed Limitation of Handling Sioux City, Iowa______1066 Ozarks______1067 by the market administrator of”. Findings. 1. Pursuant to the market­ Sioux Falls-Mitchell, S. Dak______1072 (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. ing agreement, as amended, and Order Black Hills, S. Dak______1075 (3) “and roller”. No. 907, as amended (7 CFR Part 907 ; 27 Chattanooga, Tenn______1090 (4) “respectively,”. F.R. 10087) , regulating the handling of Northern Louisiana______1096 The termination of such provisions navel oranges grown in Arizona and des­ Nashville, Tenn______1098 will result in the text reading as follows: ignated part of California, effective un­ Knokville, Tenn______l______1101 Lubbock-Plain view, Tex______1120 (ii) From the weighted average of the der the applicable provisions of the Agri­ Puget Sound, Wash______1125 carlot prices per pound for nonfat dry cultural Marketing Agreement Act of North Texas______1126 milk solids, spray process, for human con­ 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), and Central West Texas______1128 sumption, f.o.b. manufacturing plants in upon the basis of the recommendation Austin-Waco, Tex______1129 the Chicago area, as published for the and information submitted by the Navel Corpus Christi, Tex______1130 period from the 26th day of the immedi­ Central Arizona______.____ 1131 Orange Administrative Committee, es­ ately preceding month through the 25th tablished under the said amended mar­ Texas Panhandle______.______1132 Inland Empire______1133 day of the current month by the Depart­ keting agreement and order, and upon Western Colorado______1134 ment, deduct 5.5 cents and multiply other available information, it is hereby Colorado Springs-Pueblo______1135 by 8.2. found that the limitation of handling of Eastern Colorado______1137 such navel oranges as hereinafter pro­ Rio Grande Valley______- 1138 vided will tend to effectuate the de­ PART 1031— MILK IN THE SOUTH Pursuant to the provisions of the Agri­ clared policy of the act. BEND— LA PORTE-ELKHART MAR­ cultural Marketing Agreement Act of 2. It is hereby further found that it 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), KETING AREA is impracticable and contrary to the and of the orders regulating the handling The following provisions relating to public interest to give preliminary notice, of milk in the above designated market­ the use of roller process nonfat dry milk engage in public rule-making procedure, ing areas, it is hereby found and deter­ prices in the Class II pricing formula: and postpone the effective date of this mined that: In § 1031.54(b) (2) the provisions: amendment until 30 days after publica­ (a) The following provisions of the (1) “the arithmetical average of ”. ( tion hereof in the F ederal R egister (5 orders no longer tend to effectuate the (2 ) The “s” in the word “averages’ . U.S.C. 1001-1011) because the time in­ declared policy of the Act: (3) “and roller”. tervening between the date when infor­ The termination of such provisions mation upon which this amendment is The provisions to be terminated shall be will result in the text reading as follows: based became available and the time and are those contained in the notice of when this amendment must become ef­ proposed termination of certain provi­ (2) From the weighted average of fective in order to effectuate the declared sions of the orders issued February 11, :arlot prices per pound of spray process policy of the act is insufficient, and this 1964, by the Deputy Administrator, Reg­ aonfat dry milk for human consump­ amendment relieves restrictions on.the ulatory Programs, Agricultural Market­ tion, f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the handling of navel oranges grown in ing Service (29 F.R. 2461; F.R. Doc. 64- Chicago area, as published for the peri°“ Arizona and designated part of Cali­ 1490), ahd are set forth in full herein, from the 26th day of the preceding fornia. subject to the following modification: nonth through the 25th day of the cur­ Order, as amended. The provisions in 1. The following descriptive phrase, rent month by the Department, deduct paragraph (b) (1) (1) and (ii) of § 907.352 used with respect to the provisions of : c -.„UinliT Q O Wednesday, M arch 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2927

PART 1035— MILK IN THE COLUMBUS (2) “and roller”. (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. MARKETING AREA The termination of such provisions (3) “and roller”. will result in the text reading as follows: The termination of such provisions The following provisions relating to will result in the text reading as follows: the use of roller process nonfat dry milk (ii) From the average of the carlot prices in the Class n , Class III and Class prices per pound for nonfat dry milk (2) From the weighted average of the (not including that specifically desig­ IV pricing formulas: carlot prices per pound of spray process In § 1035.18 the provisions : nated animal feed), spray process, f.o.b. nonfat dry milk for human consumption, (1) “the arithmetical average of ”. manufacturing plants in the Chicago f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. area, as published by the Department Chicago area, as published for the pe­ | (3) “and roller”. during the month, deduct 5.5 cents, and riod from the 26th day of the immedi­ The termination of such provisions multiply by 8.2, except that if such ately preceding month to the 25th day will result in the text reading as follows: agency does not publish such prices f.o.b. of the current month by the Depart­ manufacturing plants, there shall be ment, deduct 5.5 cents and multiply by § 1035.18 Nonfat dry milk price. used for the purpose of this computation 8 .2 . "Nonfat dry milk price” means the the average of the carlot prices thereof weighted average of the carlot prices per delivered to Chicago, HI., as published PART 1048— MILK IN THE GREATER pound of spray process nonfat dry milk weekly by such agency during the month ; YOUNGSTOWN-WARREN MAR­ and in the latter event the figure “7.5” for human consumption, f.o.b. Chicago KETING AREA area manufacturing plants, as published shall be substituted for “5.5” in the above for the month by the Department. formula. The following provisions relating to the use of roller process nonfat dry milk PART 1042— MILK IN THE MUSKEGON prices in the Class n pricing formula: PART 1036— MILK IN THE NORTH­ MARKETING AREA In § 1048.50(b)(2) the provisions: EASTERN OHIO MARKETING AREA (1) “the simple average as computed The following provisions relating to by the market administrator of”. The following provisions relating to the use of roller process nonfat dry milk (2.) The "s” in the word “averages”. the use of roller process nonfat dry milk prices in the Class n pricing formula: (3) “and roller”. prices in the Class II and Class m pric­ In § 1042.52(b) the provisions: (4) “respectively,”. ing formulas: ( 1 ) “the simple average of”. The termination of such provisions In§ 1036.52(b) (2) the provisions: (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. will result in the text reading as follows: (1) “the simple average o f”. (3) “and roller”. (2) From the weighted average of (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. The termination of such provisions (3) “and roller”. carlot prices per pound for nonfat dry will result in the text reading as follows: milk solids, spray process, for human The termination of such provisions will result in the text reading as follows: (b) From the weighted average ofconsumption, lo.b. manufacturing carlot prices per pound of spray process plants in the Chicago area, as published (2) Prom the weighted average of the nonfat dry milk for human consumption, for the period from the 26th day of the carlot prices per pound of spray process f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the Chi­ immediately preceding month through nonfat dry milk solids for human con­ cago area, as published from the 26th the 25th day of the current month by sumption, f.o.b. manufacturing plants in day of the immediately preceding month the Department, deduct 5.5 cents and the Chicago area, as published for the to the 25th day of the current month by then multiply by 8.2. period from the 26th day of the immedi­ the United States Department of Agri­ ately preceding month through the 25th culture, deduct 5.5 cents and multiply day of the current month by the Depart­ by 8.2. PART 1049— MILK IN THE INDIAN­ ment of Agriculture, deduct 5.5 cents, APOLIS MARKETING AREA multiply by 8.5 and then multiply by The following provisions relating to 0.965. , PART 1043— MILK IN THE UPSTATE MICHIGAN MARKETING AREA the uSe of roller process nonfat dry milk prices in the Class II pricing PART 1040— MILK IN THE SOUTHERN The following provisions relating to form ula: MICHIGAN MARKETING AREA the use of roller process nonfat dry milk In § 1049.51(b) (2 ) the provisions: prices in the Class II and Class III pric­ (1) “the simple average of”. The following provisions relating to ing formulas: (2) Hie “s” in the word “averages”. the use of roller process nonfat dry milk In § 1043.51(b) (2) (ii) the provisions: (3) “androller”. prices in the Glass n pricing formula: (1) “tiie simple average, as computed The termination of such provisions In § 1040.52(b) tire provisions: by the market administrator, of”. will result in the text reading as follows: (1) “the simple average of”. (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. (2) From the weighted average of car- (3) “and roller”. (3) “and roller” . lot prices per pouhd of spray process (4) “respectively,” . The termination of such provisions nonfat dry milk for human consumption, The termination of such provisions will result in the' text reading as follows: f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the Chi­ will result in the text reading as follows: cago area, as published for the period (b) Prom the weighted average of car- (ii) From the weighted average offrom the 26th day o f the preceding lot prices per pound of spray process carlot prices per pound for nonfat dry month through the 25th day of the cur­ nonfat dry milk for human consumption, milk solids, spray process, for human f o.b. manufacturing plants in the Chi­ rent month by the Department, deduct consumption, f.o.b. manufacturing plants cago area, as published from the 26th 5.5 cents and multiply by 8.2. in the Chicago area, as published for the day of the immediately preceding month period from the 26th day o f the imme­ to the 25th day of the current month diately preceding month through the by the United States Department of Ag­ PART 1062— MILK IN THE ST. LOUIS 25th day of the current month by the riculture, deduct 5.5 cents and multiply MARKETING AREA by 8.2. U S.D .A , deduct 5.5 cents and then mul­ tiply by 8.2. The following provisions relating to the use of roller process nonfat dry milk PART 1041— MILK IN THE TOLEDO prices in the Class n pricing formula: MARKETING AREA PART 1047— MILK IN THE FT. WAYNE In § 1062.50(b) (2) the provisions: MARKETING AREA (17 “and roller”. The following provisions relating to (2) “respectively,”* The following provisions relating to the use of roller process nonfat dry milk The termination of such provisions Prices in the Class n pricing formula: the use of roller process nonfat dry milk will result in the text reading as follows: In § 1041.50(b) (2) (ii) the provisions: prices in the Class II pricing formula: (1) The word “arithmetical” where- In § 1047.51(b)(2) the provisions: (2) From the weighted average of car- ever it appears. (1) “the simple average of”. lot prices per pound for nonfat dry milk 2928 RULES AND REGULATIONS

solids, spray process, for human con­ butter price by 4.8 and add to such sum PART 1120— MILK IN THE LUBBOCK- sumption f.o.b. manufacturing plants in 3% cents for each full one-half cent that PLAINVIEW MARKETING AREA the Chicago area, as published for the the average of carlot prices per pound period from the 26th day of the im­ of nonfat dry milk solids, spray process, The following provisions relating to mediately preceding month through the for human consumption, f.o.b. Chicago the use of roller process nonfat dry mill; 25th day of the current month by the area manufacturing plants, for the pe­ prices in the Class n pricing formula: Department subtract 5.5 cents and multi­ riod from the 26th day of the immedi­ In § 1120.50(b) (2) the provisions: ply by 7.0. ately preceding month through the 25th (1) “the simple average as computed day of the current month by the Depart­ by the market administrator of”. PART 1066— -MILK IN THE SIOUX CITY ment of Agriculture, is above 5 cents. (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. (3) “and roller”. MARKETING AREA (4) “respectively,”. The following provision relating to the PART 1096— MILK IN THE NORTHERN The termination of such provisions use of roller process nonfat dry milk LOUISIANA MARKETING AREA will resuljb in the text reading as follows: prices in the Class n pricing formula: The following provisions relating to ( 2) Prom the weighted average of car- In § 1066.51(b) (2) the provision “and the use of roller process nonfat dry milk lot prices per pound of nonfat dry milk, roller” appearing as a part of the phrase prices in the Class n pricing formula: spray process, for human consumption, “nonfat dry milk solids, spray and roller In § 1096.51(b) (2) the provisions: f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the Chi­ process, for hum an consumption, f.o.b. (1) “the simple average as computed cago area, as published for the period manufacturing plants in the Chicago by the market administrator of”. from the 26th day of the preceding area”. (2) “and roller”. month through the 25th day of the cur­ (3) “respectively,”. rent month by the Department, deduct PART 1067— MILK IN THE OZARKS The termination of such provisions 5.5 cents and multiply by 8.16. MARKETING AREA will result in the text reading as follows:" The following provisions relating to (2) Prom the weighted average of car- PART 1125— MILK IN THE PUGET the use of roller process nonfat dry milk lot prices per pound for nonfat dry milk, SOUND MARKETING AREA prices in the Class n pricing formula: spray process, for human consumption, In § 1067.50(b) (2) the provisions: f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the The following provisions relating to (1) “and roller”. Chicago area, as published for the period the use of roller process nonfat dry milk (2) “respectively,”. from the 26th day of the preceding prices in the Class n pricing formula: The termination of such provisions month through the 25th day of the cur­ In § 1125.51(b) (2) the provisions: will result in the text reading as follows: rent month by the Department, deduct (1) “the simple average of”. 5.5 cents and multiply by 8.16. (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. (2) Prom the weighted average of car- (3) “and roller”. lot prices per pound for nonfat dry milk (4) “respectively,”. solids, spray process, for human con­ PART 1098— MILK IN THE NASHVILLE The termination of such provisions sumption f.o.b. manufacturing plants in MARKETING AREA will result in the text reading as follows: the Chicago area, as published for the The following provisions relating to period from the 26th day of the immedi­ (2) Multiply by 8.2 the weighted the use of roller process nonfat dry milk ately preceding month through the 25th average of carlot prices per pound for prices in the Class II pricing formula: day of the current month by the Depart­ nonfat dry milk solids, spray process, In § 1098.51(b) (3) (il)’ thé provisions: ment, subtract 5.5 cents and multiply by for human consumption, f.o.b. manu­ 7.0. (1) “the simple average, as computed facturing plants in the Chicago area, as by the market administrator, of”. published for the period from the 26th (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. day of the immediately preceding month PART 1072— MILK IN THE SIOUX (3) “and roller”. through the 25th day of the current FALLS-MITCHELL MARKETING AREA (4) “respectively,”. month by the Department; and The termination of such provisions The following provision relating to the will result in the text reading as follows: use of roller process nonfat dry milk PART 1126— MILK IN THE NORTH prices in the Class I I pricing form ula: (ii) Prom the weighted average of the In § 1072.51(b) (2) the provision “and carlot prices per pound for nonfat dry TEXAS MARKETING AREA roller” appearing as a part of the phrase milk, spray process, fpr hum an consump­ The following provisions relating to “nonfat dry milk solids, spray and roll­ tion, f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the the use of roller process nonfat dry milk er process, for human consumption, f.o.b. Chicago* area for the period from the prices in the Class n pricing formula: manufacturing plants in the Chicago 26th day of the immediately preceding In § 1126.51(b) (1) (ii) the provisions: area”. month through the 25th day of the cur­ (1) “the simple average as computed rent month, as published by the Depart­ by the market administrator of”. PART 1075— MILK IN THE BLACK ment, subtract 5 cents and multiply by (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. 7.5. HILLS MARKETING AREA (3) “and roller”. (4) “respectively,”. The following provision relating to the PART 1101— MILK IN THE KNOXVILLE The termination of such provisions use of roller process nonfat dry milk MARKETING AREA will result in the text reading as follows: prices In the Class II pricing formula: .. In the proviso of § 1075.51(b)(2) the The following provisions relating to the (ii) Prom the weighted average of provision “and roller”. use of roller process nonfat dry milk carlot prices per pound for nonfat dry prices in the Class n pricing formula: milk, spray process, for human consump­ In § 1101.51(b) (4) (U ) the provisions: tion, f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the PART 1090— MILK IN THE CHATTA­ (1) “arithmetical”. Chicago area, as published for the period NOOGA MARKETING AREA (2) “and roller”. from the 26th day of the preceding month The termination of such provisions through the 25th day of the current The following provisions relating to will result in the text reading as follows: month by the Department, deduct 5.5 the use of roller process nonfat dry milk (ii) Prom the average of carlot prices cents, multiply by 8.5 and then multiply prices in the Class II pricing formula: by 0.96. In § 1090.51(b)(2) the provisions: per pound of nonfat dry milk solids, spray process, for human consumption, (1) “arithmetical”. f.o.b. Chicago area manufacturing plants, (2) “and roller”. PART 1128— MILK IN THE CENTRAL as published for the period from the 26th WEST TEXAS MARKETING AREA The termination of such provisions day of the immediately preceding month will result in the text reading as follows; through the 25th day of the current The following provisions relating to the (2) The price per hundredweight com­ month by the Department of Agriculture, use of roller process nonfat dry miiK puted as follows: Multiply the Chicago subtract 5 cents and multiply by 7.5. prices in the Class n pricing formula: Wednesday, M arch 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2929

In § 1128.51(a) (2) the provisions: (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. The termination of such, provisions (1> “the simple average as computed (3) “and roller”. will result in the text reading as follows: by the market administrator of”. (4) “respectively,”. (ii) From the weighted average of car- (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. The termination of such provisions lot prices per pound for nonfat dry milk, (3) “and roller”. will result in the text reading as follows: spray process, for human consumption, (4) “respectively,”. (2) From the weighted average of car- f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the Chi­ The termination of such provisions lot prices per pound for nonfat dry milk, cago area, as published for the period will result in the text reading as follows: spray process, for human consumption, from the 26th day of the immediately (2) Prom the weighted average of car- f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the preceding month through the 25th day of lot prices per pound of nonfat dry milk, Chicago area, as published for the period the current month by the department, spray process, for human consumption, from the 26th day of the immediately deduct 5.5 cents, multiply by 8.5, and then f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the Chi­ preceding month through the 25th day multiply by 0.965., cago area, as published for the period of the current month by the Department from toe 26th day of the preceding deduct 5.5 cents, multiply by 8.5, and month through the 25th day of the cur­ then multiply by 0.965. PART 1135— MILK IN THE COLORADO rent month by the Department, deduct SPRINGS-PUEBLO MARKETING 5.5 cents, multiply by 8.5 and multiply by AREA 0.96. PART 1132— MILK IN THE TEXAS PANHANDLE MARKETING AREA The following provisions relating to the use of roller process nonfat dry milk PART 1129— MILK IN THE AUSTIN- The following provisions relating to prices in the Class n pricing formula: WACO MARKETING AREA the use of roller process nonfat dry milk In § 1135.51(b) (1) (ii) the provisions: The following provisions relating to the prices in the Class n pricing formula: (1) “the simple average, as computed use of roller process nonfat dry milk In § 1132.51(b) (2) the provisions: by the market administrator, of”. prices in the Class n pricing formula: (1) “the simple average as computed (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. In § 1129.51(a) (2) the provisions: by the market administrator of”. (3) “and roller”. (1) “the simple average, as computed (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. (4) “respectively,”. by the market administrator, of”. (3) "and roller”. The termination of such provisions (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. (4) “respectively,”. will result in the text reading as follows: The termination of such provisions (3) “and roller” . (ii) From the weighted average of car- will result in the text reading as follows: (4) “respectively,”. lot prices per pound of nonfat dry milk, The termination of such provisions (2) From the weighted average of car- spray process, for human consumption, will result in the text reading as follows: lot prices per pound for nonfat dry milk, f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the Chi­ (2) Prom the weighted average of car- spray process, for human consumption, cago area, as published for the period lot prices per pound for nonfat dry milk, f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the Chi­ from the 26th day of the immediately spray process, for human consumption, cago area, as published for the period preceding month through the 25th day of f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the Chi­ from the 26th day of the preceding the current month by the Department, cago area, as published fo r the period month through the 25th day of the cur­ deduct 5.5 cents, multiply by 8.5, and from toe 26th day of the preceding rent month by the Department, deduct then multiply by 0.965. — month through the 25th day of the cur­ 5.5 cents and multiply by 8.16. rent month by the Department, deduct 5.5 cents and multiply by 8.16. PART 1137— MILK IN THE EASTERN PART 1133— MILK IN THE INLAND COLORADO MARKETING AREA PART 1130— MILK IN THE CORPUS EMPIRE MARKETING AREA The following provisions relating to CHRISTI MARKETING AREA The following provisions relating to the use of roller process nonfat dry milk The following provisions relating to the use of roller process nonfat dry milk prices in the Class n pricing formula: the use of roller process nonfat dry milk prices in the Class n and Class in pric­ In § 1137.51(b) (1) (ii) the provisions: prices in the Class H pricing formula: ing formulas: (1) “the simple average, as computed In § 1130.50(b) (IX (ii) the provisions: In § 1133.51(c)(2) the provisions: by the market administrator, of”. (1) “the simple average as computed (1) “the simple average of ”. (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. by the market administrator, of”. (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. (3) “and roller”. (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. (3) “and roller”. (4) “respectively,”. (3) “and toiler”. '*■- ■ The termination of such provisions The termination of such provisions (4) “respectively,”. will result in the text reading as follows: will result in the text reading as follows: The termination of such provisions (2) Multiply by 8.2 the weighted aver­ (ii) From the weighted average of will result in the text reading as follows: age* of carlot prices per pound for spray carlot prices per pound of nonfat dry (ii) Prom the weighted average of process nonfat dry milk for human con­ milk, spray process, for human consump­ carlot prices per pound for nonfat dry sumption, f.o.b. manufacturing plants in tion, f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the milk, spray process, for human consump­ the Chicago area, as published for the Chicago area, as published for the period tion, f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the period from the 26th day of the immedi­ from the 26th day of the immediately Chicago area, as published for the period ately preceding month through the 25th preceding month through the 25th day of from the 26th day ' of the preceding day of the current month by the Depart­ the current month by the Department, month through the 25th day of the cur­ ment; and deduct 5.5 cents, multiply by 8.5, and rent month by the Department of A gri­ then multiply by 0.965. culture deduct 5.5 cents and multiply by 8.16. PART 1134— MILK IN THE WESTERN COLORADO MARKETING AREA PART 1138—MILK IN THE RIO PART 1131— MILK IN THE CENTRAL The following provisions relating to GRANDE VALLEY MARKETING ARIZONA MARKETING AREA the use of roller process nonfat dry milk AREA prices in the Class I I pricing formula: The following provisions relating to The following provisions relating to In § 1134.51(b) (2) (ii) the provisions: the use of roller process nonfat dry milk the use of roller process nonfat dry milk prices in the Class n and Class in pric­ (1) “the simple average, as computed prices in the Class II pricing formula: ing formulas: • by the market administrator, of”. In § 1138.51(b) (2) the provisions: Th § 1131.51(c) (2) the provisions: (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. (1) “tiie simple average as computed (1) “the simple average as computed (3) “and roller”. by the market administrator of”. by the market administrator of”. (4) “respectively,”. (2) The “s” in the word “averages”. 2930 RULES AND REGULATIONS

(3) “and roller”. Chapter XIV— Commodity Credit Cor­ was conducted which revealed that the (4) “respectively,” poration, Department of Agriculture establishment of a public-use instrument The termination of such provisions approach procedure at Anthony was will result in the text reading as follows: SUBCHAPTER B— LOANS, PURCHASES, AND not warranted. Accordingly, notice is OTHER OPERATIONS (2) From the weighted average of car-, hereby given that the proposal con­ tained in Airspace Docket No. 63-CE-75 lot prices per pound for nonfat dry milk, PART 1421— GRAINS AND RELATED spray process, for human consumption, COMMODITIES is withdrawn and, as a companion ac­ tion, the exclusion reference to the An­ f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the Chi­ S u bpar t—G e n e r a l R e g u l a t io n s G o v e r n ­ cago area, as published for the period thony control zone and transition area in g P rice S u p p o r t for t h e 1964 and from the 26th day of the preceding month as proposed in Airspace Docket No. 63- S u b s e q u e n t C rops CE-82 is being deleted from the descrip­ through the 25th day of the current tion of the proposed W ichita transition month by the Department, deduct 5.5 Correction area. cents and multiply the remainder by 8.16. In F.R. Doc. 64-1807 appearing in the Interested persons were afforded an (b ) Thirty days notice of effective date issue for Wednesday, February 26, 1964, opportunity to participate in the rule hereof are impractical, unnecessary, and at page 2686, the following changes making through submission of com­ contrary to the public interest in that: should be made to § 1421.76: ments. The Air Transport Association (1) This termination order does not 1. In the introductory paragraph, the of America (ATA) in response to the require of persons affected substantial or words “these regulations” should read notice concerning Airspace Docket No. extensive preparation prior to the effec­ “the regulations in this subpart”. 63-CE-82 advised they would interpose tive date. 2. Paragraph (g) should be added to no object to the actions proposed, (2) This termination order is neces­ read as follows:. provided that established instrument sary to reflect current marketing condi­ approach procedures would not be tions and to maintain orderly marketing (g ) The "regulations in this subpart. derogated. conditions in the marketing area. The term “the regulations in this sub­ "As the minor changes required for (3) (i) The provisions to be termi­ part” means the regulations in Subpart— approach procedures at Wichita to be nated are those which average the carlot General Regulations Governing Price ^contained within the proposed controlled price per pound of roller process nonfat Support for the 1964 and Subsequent airspace will not, in the opinion of the dry milk solids, for human consumption, Crops and in the applicable commodity FAA, derogate existing procedures, the f.o.b. manufacturing plants in the Chi­ supplement together with any amend­ A T A ’s comment has been registered as cago area with such price for spray proc­ ments thereto. presenting no objection to tne actions ess nonfat dry milk solids in the compu­ proposed in the notice. No other com­ tation of a formula price for milk of the ments were received. . class or classes specified for each of the Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND The substance of the proposed amend­ respective orders. ments having been published, and for (ii) The Dairy and Poultry Market SPACE the reasons stated herein and in the News has announced that this roller notices, the following actions are taken: process price quotation will be discontin­ Chapter I— Federal Aviation Agency 1. In § 71.171 (29 F.R. 1101), the Wich­ ued following release of the February ita, Kans. (Wichita Municipal) and SUBCHAPTER E— AIRSPACE (NEW! 1964 price. Data for this price series Wichita, Kans. (McConnell AFB), con­ have been secured through reports to the [Airspace Docket Nos. 63—CE-75,63-CE-82] trol zones are amended to read as Statistical Reporting Service by manu­ follows: V facturers and publication has been in the PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL market news reports of the Agricultural AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, W ichita, Kans. (Wichita Municipal). Within a 5-mile radius of the Wichita Marketing Service. AND REPORTING POINTS [NEW] Municipal Airport (latitude 37°30'10'' N., (iii) The effect of the termination will longitude 97°25'46” W .), within 2 miles be to use only the price for spray process Alteration of Control Zones, Revoca­ each side of the Wichita Municipal Airport solids in the computation of the respec­ tion of Control Area Extension, ILS localizer N course, extending from the tive formula prices. Prices reported for Designation and Revocation of 5-mile radius zone to the IN T of the Wichita Municipal Airport ILS localizer N course and spray process solids and roller process Transition Areas solids have been so nearly identical in the Wichita VOR 075° radial, excluding the On September 10, 1963, a notice of portion subtended by a chord drawn be­ recent months that no substantial tween the points of IN T of the 5-mile radius proposed rule making was published in change in the level of the resulting for­ zone with the Wichita, Kans. (McConnell mula prices will result at this time from the F ederal R e g ister (28 F.R. 9844) AFB) 5-mile radius control zone. the termination. stating that the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) proposed to designate the An­ Wichita, Kans. (McConnell AFB). (4) By notice issued February 11,1964 Within a 5-mile radius of McConnell AFB (29 F.R. 2461) interested parties were thony, Kans., transition area (Airspace (latitude 87°37'25" N., longitude 97"16'00'' given opportunity to present views, data Docket No. 63-CE-75). W .), within 2 miles W and 4 miles E of the and arguments with respect to proposed On October 17, 1963, a notice of pro­ McConnell AFB TACAN 008° radial, ex­ termination of such provisions. No posed rule making was published in the tending from the 5-mile radius zone to 7 views have been received offering a prac­ F ederal R egister (28 F .R . 11140) stat­ miles N of the TACAN, within 2 miles each ticable alternative to termination of the ing that the FAA proposed to alter the side of the McConnell AFB VOR 008“ radial, extending from the 5-mile radius zone to provisions under the existing circum­ Wichita, Kans. (Wichita Municipal) the VOR, and within 2 miles each side of and Wichita (McConnell AFB) control stances. the McConnell AFB TACAN 199° radial, ex­ zones, designate the W ichita transition Therefore good cause exists for making tending from the 5-mile radius zone to 6 area, revoke the Wichita control area this order effective M arch 1,1964. miles S of the TACAN, excluding the portion extension, and revoke the Arkansas subtended by a chord drawn between the It is therefore ordered, That the afore­ City, Kans., transition area (Airspace points of IN T of the 5-mile radius zone said provisions of the orders are hereby Docket No. 63-CE-82). In the Wichita with the Wichita, Kans. (Wichita Munici­ terminated. notice it was stated, in part, that the pal), control zone. (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.O. portion of the proposed Wichita transi­ 2. Section 71.181 (29 F.R. 1160) is 601-674) tion area which would coincide with the amended by adding the following trans­ Effective date: M arch 1,1964. Anthony, Kans., control zone and transi­ ition area: tion area as proposed in Airspace Docket Signed at Washington, D.C., on Febru­ No. 63-CE-75 would be excluded. Wichita, Kans. ary 28,1964. That airspace extending upward from 700 Subsequent to the publication of the feet above the surface within an 8-mile G eorge L. M e h r e n , notice proposing the designation of the radius of the Wichita Municipal Airport Assistant Secretary. Anthony transition area (Airspace Dock­ (latitude 37°39'10” N - longitude 97°25'46 [F.R. Doc. 64-2092; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; et No. 63-CE-75), an FAA review of the W .), within 2 miles each side of the Wichita 8:52 a.m.] IFR terminal traffic potential at Anthony Municipal Airport ILS localizer N course, Wednesday, M a r c h 4, 1964 FEDERAL ftEGISfER 2931 extending from the 8-mile radius area to 8 [Airspace Docket No. 63—EA—22] Old Town, Maine. miles N of the INT of the Wichita Municipal Within a 3-mile radius of Old Town Mu­ Airport ILS localizer N course and the Wich­ PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL nicipal Airport (latitude 44°57'10" N., longi­ ita VOR 075° radial, within 5 miles E and AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, tude 68°40'15'' W .). 8 miles W of the Wichita Municipal Airport b. The Bangor, Maine, control zone is ILS localizer S course, extending from the AND REPORTING POINTS [NEW] amended to read: 8-mile radius area to 12 miles S of the OM, within an 8-mile radius of McConnell APB, Alteration of Control Zones, Designa­ Bangor, Maine. Wichita, Kans. (latitude 37°37'25" N., longi­ tion of Control Zone, Revocation of Within a 7-mile radius of Dow AFB, Ban­ tude 97°16'00" W .), within 2 miles each Control Area Extension, and Desig­ gor, Maine (latitude 44°48'20'' N., longitude side of the McConnell APB IBS localizer S 68°49'32'' W .) ; within 2 miles each side of course, extending from the 8-mile radius nation of Transition Areas the Bangor VORTAC 321° radial, extending area to 8 miles S of the OM, and within a On November 13, 1963, a notice of from the 7-mile radius zone to 11 miles NW of the VORTAC; within 2 miles each side of 6-mile radius of the Beech Factory Airport, proposed rule making was published in Wichita, Kans. (latitude 37°41'10" N., longi­ the Bangor VORTAC 135° radial, extending F ederal R egister tude 97° 13'15'' W .); and that airspace ex­ the (28 F.R. 12098) from the 7-mile radius zone to 7 miles SE tending upward from 1,200 feet above the stating that the Federal Aviation Agency of the Bangor ILS OM; and within 2 miles surface bounded by a line beginning at the proposed to extensively revise the air­ each side of the Bangor VORTAC 053° radial, INT of the N boundary of V-516 and longi­ space structure in the Bangor, Maine, extending from the VORTAC to the Old tude 96°29'00'' W., thence extending NW terminal area. Town, Maine, control zone. to the INT of a line 10 miles SE of and paral­ Interested persons were afforded an c. The Augusta, Maine, control zone is lel to the Emporia, Kans., VORTAC 209° opportunity to participate in the rule amended to read: radial and latitude 37°10'00” N., thence NE making through submission of comments. along a line 10 miles SE of and parallel to Due consideration was given to all rele­ Augusta, Maine. the Emporia, Kans., VORTAC 209° radial to Within a 5-mile radius of Augusta Airport the Emporia VORTAC 134° radial, thence vant matter presented. (latitude 44°19'15'' N., longitude 69°47'45" NW along the Emporia VORTAC 134° and The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Asso­ W .) ; within 2 miles each side of the Augusta 314° radials to, and W along the N boundary ciation’s (AOPA) comment made three VOR 330° radial, extending from the 5-mile of V-10 to, and NE along, the W boundary of points. First, AOPA contended that the radius'zone to 7 miles N W of the VOR; within V-77 to, and SW along, the SE boundary of proposed southeast control zone exten­ 2 miles each side of the Augusta VOR 156° V-280 to, and.E along, the N boundary of V - sion for Dow Air Force Base, centered radial, extending from the 5-mile radius zone 10 to longitude 97°15'00" W., thence SW to on the 135° True radial of the Bangor to 7 miles SE of the VOR; and within 2 miles latitude 38°00'30'' N„ longitude 97°28'00'' W., each side of the Augusta VOR 068° radial, thence SW to the INT of the NW boundary V O R TA C, should be replaced by a 700- extending from the 5-mile radius zone to 7 of V-12 N alternate and longitude 97°56'25" foot base transition area. A control miles E of the VOR. W., thence SW along the NW boundary of zone extension was considered by AOPA V-12 N , alternate to, and S along, the W as unnecessary to accommodate the pres­ 2. Section 71.165 (29 F.R. 1073) is boundary of V-125 to, and SE along, the SW ently published instrument approaches to amended to revoke the Bangor; Maine, boundary of V-74 to the Ponca City, Okla., Dow AFB. This is a valid point, how­ control area extension. VORTAC 217° radial, thence NE along the ever, the control zone extension is re­ 3. Section 71.181 (29 F.R. 1160) is Ponca City VORTAC 217° and 047° radials quired to provide protected airspace for amended to add the following transition to, and NE along, the N W boundary of V-516 areas : to the point of beginning; and that airspace KC-97 aircraft departing Runway 15 at extending upward from 3,500 feet MSB Dow AFB and for a proposed ADF instru­ a. Bangor, Maine. bounded by a line beginning at the INT of ment approach procedure to Runway 33. That airspace extending upward from 700 the N boundary of V-516 and longitude 96 °- AOPA also raised a question regarding feet above the surface within a 17-mile 29'00" W., thence extending N W to the IN T the Dow AFB control zone extension pro­ radius of Dow APB, Bangor, Maine (latitude 44°48'20" N., longitude 68°49'32" W .) ; and of a line 10 miles SE of and parallel to the posed on the Bangor VORTAC 321° True within 2 miles each side of the Bangor Emporia, Kans., VORTAC 209° radial and radial. This extension is necessary to VORTAC 135° radial, extending from the 17- latitude 37°10'00'' N., thence NE along a protect KC-97 aircraft departing Run­ mile radius area to 14 miles SE of the Bangor line 10 miles SE of and parallel to the Em­ way 33 at Dow AFB. ILS OM; and that airspace extending upward poria, Kans., VORTAC 209° radial to, and The third point advanced by AOPA from 1,200 feet above the surface bounded SE along, the SW boundary of V-132 to, and concerned that part of the proposed by a line beginning at latitude 44°50'00" N., SE along, a line 12 miles SW of and parallel Bangor transition area which would ex­ longitude 67°56'00'' W., to latitude 44°18'30" N., longitude 67°56'00" W., to latitude 43°- to the Chanute, Kans., VOR 384° and 154° tend 5 miles each side of the Bangor radials to, and S along, the W boundary of 52'00'' N., longitude 69°00'00" W., to latitude VORTAC 262° True radial to 110 miles 43°48'00” N., longitude 69°03'00 W., to lati­ V-131 to, and SW along, the NW boundary west of the VORTA<5 and have a floor of tude 43°50'00" N., longitude 69°18'00" W., of V-516 to the point of beginning, ex­ 1,200 feet. AOPA felt that a more ap­ to latitude 43°59'00'' N., longitude 69°16'00" cluding the portions within the Ponca City, propriate floor for this portion of the W., to latitude 44°09'00" N., longitude 69°- Okla., control zone, the Ponca City, Okla., transition area would be at least 5,000 39'00" W., thence clockwise via the arc of transition area, the Emporia, Kans., control feet above mean sea level (m.s.l.). This a 14-mile radius circle centered on the zone, and the Emporia, Kans., transition proposed extension would encompass a Augusta, Maine, VOR to latitude 44°09'00" area. N., longitude 69°57'00" W., to latitude 44°- standard instrument departure pro­ 03'00" N., longitude 70°06'00" W., to latitude 3. Section 71.165 (29 F.R. 1073) is cedure used by Dow AFB traffic, including 43°50'00" N., longitude 70°12'00" W., to lati­ amended by revoking the following con­ heavily loaded KC-97 aircraft. We have tude 43°55'00" N., longitude 70°28'00" W., trol area extension: determined, however, that these aircraft to latitude 44°05'00" N., longitude 70°23'00" can reach 7,000 feet m.s.l. by 48 statute W., to latitude 44°12'00” N., longitude 70°- Wichita, Kans. miles west of the Bangor VORTAC ÎO'OO" W., to latitude 44°16'00" N„ longitude 70°14'00" W., to latitude 44°39'00" N., longi­ 4. Section 71.181 (29 F.R . 1160) is thereby permitting raising of the floor tude 69°47'00" W., to latitude 44°50'00" N., amended by revoking the following tran­ of the remainder of the transition area longitude 69°47'00" W., to latitude 45°12'00" sition area: extension to 6,500 feet m.s.l. Such ac­ N., longitude 69°23'00" W., to latitude 45°- tion is taken herein. A t the same time, 24'00" N., longitude 68°55'00" W., to latitude Arkansas City, Kans. 45°30'00" N., longitude 68°31'00" W., to lati­ the description of the westerly boundary tude 45°27'00" N., longitude 68°20'00" W., These amendments shall become ef­ . of this extension is being worded so that to latitude 45°33'00" N., longitude 68°16'00” fective 0001, e.s.t., April 30,1964. the extension will abut Blue Airway No. W., to latitude 45°38'00" N„ longitude 67°- 40'30" W., thence via the United States/ (Sec. 307(a), 72 Stat. 749; 49 U.S.C. 1348) 63 and the .Berlin, N.H., control area extension. Canadian border to latitude 45°09'00" N., Issued in Washington, D.C., on Febru­ longitude 67°23'00" W „ to latitude 45°07'00” In consideration of the foregoing, and N., longitude 67°30'00" W., to latitude ary 25,1964. for the reasons stated herein and in the 44°50'00" N., longitude 67°30'00" W., to the H . B . H e ls t r o m , notice, the following actions are taken: point of- beginning, and within 5 miles each Acting Chief, Airspace Regulations 1. Section 71.171 (29 F.R. 1101) isside of the Bangor VORTAC 262° radial, ex­ and Procedures Division. tending from 44 miles to 48 miles W of the amended as follows: VORTAC; and that airspace extending up­ [Pit. Doc. 64-2033; Piled, Mar. 3, 1964; a. The following control zone isward from 6,500 feet m.s.l. within 5 miles 8:45 a.m.] added: each side of the Bangor VORTAC 262° radial, No. 44------2 2932 RULES AND REGdLAflONS extending from 48 miles W of the VORTAC to [Airspace Docket No. 63-SW-18] AFB require 700-foot floor transition the E edge of Blue Federal Airway No. 63 and PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL area to an 8-mile radius of both airports. the Berlin, N.H., control area extension. Aircraft departing the Wiley Post Air­ b. Augusta, Maine. AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, port require 700-foot floor transition That airspace extending upward from 700 AND REPORTING POINTS [NEW] area to a 6-mile radius of this airport. feet above the surface within an 8-mile Except for the inclusion of several ir­ radius of Augusta Airport (latitude 44°19'- Alteration of Control Zones and Des­ regularly shaped areas included by the 15” N„ longitude 69°47'45” W .); and within ignation of Control Zone and Tran­ 2 miles each side of the 242° bearing from process of describing boundaries contain­ the Augusta RBN, extending from the 8-mile sition Area ing the areas to support the aforemen­ radius area to 8 miles SW of the RBN. On July 18, 1963, a notice of proposed tioned procedures, the configuration for c. Lewiston-Auburn, Maine. rule making was published in the F ed­ the consolidated 700-foot floor transition That airspace extending upward from 700 eral R egister (28 F.R. 7354) stating that area represents the minimum controlled feet above the surface within a 5-mile the Federal Aviation Agency proposed airspace required by the application of radius of Lewiston-Auburn Municipal Air­ to alter the control zones presently desig­ criteria. , port (latitude 44°02'55” N., longitude 70°- The A O P A ’s request that consideration 17'00” W .); within 2 miles each side of the nated at Oklahoma City (Will Rogers be given to raising the floor of the transi­ 199° bearing from the Lewiston-Auburn Air­ Field), and Oklahoma City (Tinker port, extending from the 5-mile radius area AFB), Okla., designate the Oklahoma tion area beyond a 25-mile radius of the to 8 miles S of the airport; and within 2 City (W iley Post Airport) control zone, point of origin, if adopted would result miles each side of the 062° bearing from the and designate the Oklahoma City tran­ in a loss of minimum altitudes for pre­ Lewiston-Auburn Airport, extending from sition area. On October 25, 1963, a sup­ scribed holding patterns, arrival and de­ the 5-mile radius area to 7 miles NE of the plemental notice of proposed rule making parture routings, and radar vectoring airport. was published amending the original which would seriously derogate the Okla­ d. W aterviUe, Maine. proposal (28 F.R. 11458). homa City terminal area air traffic con­ That airspace extending upward from 700 Interested persons were afforded an trol environment. Therefore, action is feet above the surface within a 5-mile radius taken herein to adopt the changes pro­ of Robert La Fleur Airport, WaterviUe, Maine opportunity to participate in the rule (latitude 44°32'10” N., longitude 69°40'30” making through submission of com­ posed in the notice. W .); and within 2 miles each side of the ments. The substance of the proposed amend­ 222° bearing from the Waterville RBN, ex­ Comments were received from the Air ments having been published and for the tending from the 5-mile radius area to 8 Transport Association of America (ATA) reasons stated herein and in the notices, miles SW of the RBN, excluding the portion and the Aircraft Owners and Pilots As­ the following actions are taken: within the Augusta, Maine, transition area. sociation (AOPA). 1. In § 71.171 (29 F.R. 1101), the fol­ e. Rockland, Maine. The ATA stated they would have no lowing actions are taken: That airspace extending upward from 700 objection to the action proposed pro­ a. The Oklahoma City, Okla. (Will feet above the surface within a 5-mile radius vided a minimum en route altitude of Rogers Field) control zone is amended to of the Rockland Airport (latitude 44°03'40” 3,000 feet is retained on V-77 and V - N., longitude 69° 06'05” W .); within 2 miles read: each side of the 192° bearing from the Rock­ 77E. The AOPA stated the portion of Oklahoma City, Okla. ( Will Rogers Field). land RBN, extending from the 5-mile radius the transition area proposed with a floor Within a 5-mile radius of WU1 Rogers Mu­ area to 8 miles SW of the RBN; within 2 700 feet above the surface appeared to nicipal Airport (latitude 35°23'45” N., longi­ mUes each side of the 292° bearing from the exceed the airspace essential to comply tude 97°36'30” W .), within a 5-mile radius Rockland Airport, extending from the 5-mUe with criteria and also requested that con­ of Wiley Post Airport, Oklahoma City, Okla. radius area to 7 miles W of the airport; sideration be given to raising the floor (latitude 35°32'05” N., longitude 97°38'40" and within 2 miles each side of the 332° for the portion of the 1,200-foot floor W .), within 2 miles each side of the Okla­ bearing from the Rockland Airport, extend­ transition area beyond a 25-mile radius homa City ILS localizer N course, extending ing from the 5-mile radius area to 7 miles from the W ill Rogers Field 5-mile radius NW of the airport. of the point of origin. As minimum en route altitudes of 3,000 zone to the Tulakes, Okla., RBN, within 2 f. Bar Harbor, Maine. feet are being adopted for V-77 and V - miles SW and 3 miles NE of the Oklahoma That airspace extending upward from 700 City VORTAC, 107° radial, extending from feet above the surface within a 5-mUe radius 77E south of Oklahoma City, the A T A ’s the Will Rogers Field 6-mile radius zone to of Bar Harbor Municipal Airport (latitude comment has been registered as offer­ the VORTAC, within 2 miles each side of the 44°27'00” N., longitude 68°21'45” W .); with­ ing no objection to the actions proposed Oklahoma City ILS localizer S course, ex­ in 2 miles each side-of the 019° bearing from in the notice. The perimeter config­ tending from the Will Rogers Field 5-mile the Bar Harbor RBN, extending from the uration for the consolidated 700-foot radius zone to the OM, and within 2 miles 5-mile radius area to 8 miles NE of the floor transition area surrounding the each side of the Oklahoma City VORTAC RBN; within 2 miles e&ch side of the 331° airports present within the Oklahoma 050° radial, extending from the Wiley Post bearing from the Bar Harbor Airport, extend­ Airport 5-mile radius zone to the VORTAC, City terminal area complex was based ing from the 5-mile radius area to 7 miles excluding the portion which coincides with N W of the airport; within 2 miles each side on the following: the Oklahoma City (Wiley Post Airport) of the 201° bearing from the Bar Harbor Air­ 1. Protection of procedure turn area, control zone. port, extending from the 5-mile radius area Will Rogers Field AL-3 0 l-ILS-R NY-3 5 to 7 miles SW of the airport; and within 2 instrument approach procedure. (Pro­ b. The Oklahoma City, Okla. (Tinker miles each side of the 271° bearing from tection to 12 miles south of the Will AFB) control zone is amended to read: the Bar Harbor Airport, extending from the Rogers LOM required.) 5-mile radius area to 7 miles W of the airport. Oklahoma City, Okla. (Tinker AFB). 2. Protection of procedure turn area, Within a 5-mile radius of Tinker AFB g. P rin ceton , Maine. Will Rogers Field AL-301-VOR instru­ (latitude 35°24'50” N., longitude 97°23'35" That airspace extending upward from 700 ment approach procedure. (Protection W .), within 2 miles each side of the Tinker feet above the surface within a 5-mile radius to 12 miles northwest of the Oklahoma AFB VOR 360° radial, extending from the of Princeton Airport (latitude 45°12'05” N., City VORTAC required.) 5-mile radius zone to 12 miles N of the VOR, longitude 67°34'00” W .); and within 2 miles and within 2 miles each side of the Tinker each side of the Princeton VOR 143° radial, 3. Protection after penetration turn of AFB TACAN 006° and 175° radials, extending extending from the 5-mile radius area to the Will Rogers Field JAL-3 01-VOR-ADF- from the 5-mile radius zone to 8.5 miles N VOR. ILS-RWY-17 instrument approach pro­ and S of the TACAN. cedure. (Protection to 12 miles north These amendments shall become ef­ 2. Section 71.171 (29 F.R. HOD is fective 0001, e.s.t., April 30, 1964. of Tulakes RBN required.) 4. Protection of procedure turn area, amended by adding the following: (Secs. 307(a) and 1110, 72 Stat. 749 and 800; Tinker AFB, AL-299-ADF instrument 49 U.S.C. 1348 and 1510, and Executive Order Oklahoma City, Okla. (Wiley Post Airport). 10854, 24 F.R. 9565) approach procedure. (Protection to 12 Within a 5-mile radius of Wiley Post Air­ miles north of Tinker AFB RBN re­ port (latitude 35°32'05” N., longitude 97- Issued in Washington, D.C., on Feb­ quired.) r 38'40” W .), and within 2 miles each side of ruary 25, 1964. 5. Protection of Tinker AFB AL-299- the Oklahoma City VORTAC 050° radial, ex­ H . B. H e ls t r o m , T AC AN-2 instrument approach proce­ tending from the 5-mile radius zone to the Acting Chief, Airspace Regulations VORTAC, excluding the portion S of a line dure. (Protection to 10 miles southeast extending through latitude 35°26'33” and Procedures Division. of TACAN required.) longitude 97°46'21” W., and latitude 35°28 - [F.R. Doc. 64-2034; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; 6. Protection of turbojet aircraft de­ 00” N., longitude 97°36'05” W., effective from 8:45 a.m.] parting Will Rogers Field and Tinker 0600 to 2200 hours, local time, daily. Wednesday, M arch 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2933

3. Section 71.181 (29 F.R. 1160) is Amarillo control zone, as proposed for m.s.l. which coincides with Federal airways is excluded. amended by adding the following transi- alteration, be expanded to include the tionarea: ■ ^ Tradewind Airport, and objected to the 4. In § 71.181 (29 F.R. 1160) the B or­ revision of instrument approach pro­ Oklahoma City, OJcla. ger, Tex., transition area is amended to That airspace extending upward from 700 cedures, including the cancellation of read: one VOR approach procedure, to permit feet above the surface within the area Borger, Tex. bounded by a line beginning at latitude reduction of the southwest control zone That airspace extending upward from 700 35°15'30'' N., longitude 97°19'00" W.; to lati­ extension. feet above the surface within a 5-mile radius tude 35°23'00" N., longitude 97°14'30" W.; to Instrument approach procedure AL- of the Hutchinson County Airport, Borger, latitude 35°40'30" N., longitude 97°14'30" 19-VOR-2 was cancelled because pro­ Tex. (latitude 35°41'55" N., longitude 101°- W.; to latitude 35°40'30" N., longitude 97°- cedure AL-19-VOR-3 provides the same 23'40" W .); within 2 miles each side of the 28'30" W.; to latitude 35°39'00" N., longi­ 141° bearing from latitude 35°41'30" N„ tude 97°40'00'' W.; to latitude 35°33'00" N., type of approach with the same mini­ mums. AL-19-VOR-3 was merely re­ longitude 101°23'45" W., extending from the longitude 97°50'00" W.; to latitude 35°34'30'' 5-mile radius area to 8 miles SE of latitude N„ longitude 97°58'00'' W.; to latitude 35°- vised to require crossing the TLB outer 35°41'30" N., longitude 101°23'45" W. 22'30" N., longitude 98°02'00" W.; to latitude marker at the same altitude as specified 35T8'00" N., longitude 97°42'00" W.; to lati­ for,the ILS instrument approach pro­ These amendments shall become effec­ tude 35°08'00" N., longitude 97°42'00" W.; cedure. This revision is not considered tive 0001, e.s.t., April 30, 1964. to latitude 35°08'00" N., longitude 97°28'00" as derogating execution of the instru­ W.; to latitude 35° 15'30" N., longitude 97 °- (Sec. 307(a), 72 Stat. 749; 49 U.S.C. 1348) 28'00" W.; and within 8 miles N W and 5 miles ment approach procedure. With regard to inclusion of Tradewind Airport in the Issued in Washington, D.C:, on Febru­ SE of the Oklahoma City VORTAC 230° ra­ ary 25, 1964. dial, extending from the VORTAC to 12 miles Amarillo control zone, such action is not SW of the VORTAC; and that airspace ex­ warranted until such time as communi­ H . B. H e ls t r o m , tending upward from 1,200 feet above the cations can be provided at Tradewind Acting Chief, Airspace Regulations surface within a 57-mile radius of latitude Airport down to and including the run­ and Procedures Division. 35°25'50" N„ longitude 97°35T0" W., within way surface. Therefore, action is taken 6 miles SE and 9 miles NW of the Oklahoma [F.R. Doc. 64-2036; Filed, Mar. 3. 1964; City VORTAC 242° radial, extending from the herein in accordance with the proposals 8:45 a.m.] 57-mile radius area to 52 miles SW of the stated in the notice. VORTAC, within 6 miles S and 9 miles N of The substance of the proposed amend­ the Oklahoma City VORTAC 282° radial, ex­ ments having been published, and for [Airspace Docket No. 63-WE-22] tending from the 57-mile radius area to 62 the reasons stated herein and in the no­ part miles W of the VORTAC, and within 8 miles 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL tice, the following actions are taken; AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, W and 5 miles E of the 360° and 180° bear­ 1. In § 71.165 (29 F.R. 1073), the fol­ ings from Searcy Field, Stillwater, Okla. lowing control area extension is revoked : AND REPORTING POINTS [NEW] (latitude 36°09'30" N., longitude 97°05'00" W.), extending from 13 miles N to 7 miles S Amarillo, Tex. Alteration of Control Zone, Designa­ of the airport, excluding the portion N of a tion of Transition Area, and Revo­ line extending from latitude 35°54'00” N., 2. In § 71.171 (29 F.R. 1101), the A m a­ longitude 98°25'00" W., to latitude 35°48'00" rillo, Tex., control zone is amended to cation of Control Area Extension N„ longitude 98°18'00" W., to latitude 36 °- read: On July 18, 1963, a notice of proposed 03'00" N., longitude 97°23'30" W., to lati­ tude 36°13'25" N., longitude 97°18'20" W. Amarillo, Tex. rule making was published in the F ederal Within a 5-mile radius of the Amarillo R egister (28 F.R. 7358) stating that the These amendments shall become effec­ AFB/Municipal Airport (latitude 35°13'10" Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) pro­ tive 0001, e.s.t., April 30, 1964. N., longitude 101°42'40" W .); within 2 miles posed to alter the control zone, revoke each side of the AmariUo VORTAC 221° (Sec. 307(a), 72 Stat. 749; 49 Ü.S.C. 1348) the control area extension and designate radial, extending from the 5-mile radius zone a transition area at Medford, Oreg. to the VORTAC; within 2 miles each side of Issued in Washington, D.C., on Febru­ Interested persons were afforded an ary 25,1964. the Amarillo RBN 011° bearing, extending from the 5-mile radius zone to 8 miles N of opportunity to participate in the rule H . B. H e ls t r o m , the RBN; within 2 miles each side of the ex­ making through submission of com­ Acting Chief, Airspace Regulations tended centerline of the Amarillo AFB/ ments. Due consideration was given to and Procedures Division. Municipal Airport Runway 21, extending all relevant matter presented. [F.R. Doc. 64-2035; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; from the 5-mile radius zone to 4.5 miles SW The Aircraft Owners and Pilots As­ 8:45 a.m.] of the lift-off end of the runway. sociation (AOPA) concurred with the 3. In § 71.181 (29 F.R. 1160), the fol­ control zone alteration and the estab­ [Airspace Docket No. 63-SW-18] lowing is added : lishment of the portion of the proposed transition area with a floor of 700 feet PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL Amarillo, Tex. above the surface. However, the AOPA That airspace extending upward from 700 suggested that the portion of the pro­ AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, feet above the surface within a 20-mile radius AND REPORTING POINTS [NEW] of the Amarillo AFB/Municipal Airport (lati­ posed 1,200 foot area west of Medford, tude 35°13'10" N., longitude 101°42'40" W .); based on the Medford VORTAC 270° Alteration of Control Zone and Tran­ that airspace extending upward from 1,200 True radial, extending from the 23-mile sition Area; Revocation of Control feet above the surface within the area radius area to Victor 27 and the portion Area Extension; and Designation bounded by a line beginning at latitude north of Medford, based on the Medford 36°01'00" N., longitude Î01°24'00" W.; to VORTAC 352° True radial, extending of Transition Area latitude 35°56'00" N., longitude 101°01'00" from the 18-mile radius area to 55 miles W.; to latitude 35°42'00" N., longitude On August 24, 1963, a notice of p 101°01'00" W.; to latitude 35°42'00" N., lon­ north of the VORTAC, be raised from Posed rule making wife published in gitude 100°29'00" W.; to latitude 35°28'00" 1,200 feet above the surface to 6,500 feet Federal R egister (28 F.R. 9358) stat: N., longitude 100°29'00" W.; to latitude MSL or higher. In addition, AOPA sug­ that the Federal Aviation Agency p 35°18'00" N., longitude 101°10'00" W.; to gested that, for ease of charting and de­ Posed to alter the Amarillo, Tex., c< latitude 34°59'00" N., longitude 101°10'00" scription, the proposed 18- and 23-mile trol zone and the Borger, Tex., transit: W.; to latitude 34°59'00" N., longitude radius areas be deleted and a 25-mile 101°27'00" W.; to latitude 34°40'00" N„ area; revoke the Amarillo control a: radius area be substituted therefor, ex­ longitude 101°39'00" W.; to latitude 34°40'- extension and designate the Amar: 00" N., longitude 102°18'00" W.; to latitude cluding the unneeded portions beyond 18 transition area. 35°09'00" N., longitude 1Q2°25'00" W.; to miles northwest and northeast of Med­ Interested persons were afforded latitude 35°37'00" N., longitude 102°05'00" ford. opportunity to participate in the r W.; to latitude 35°43'00" N., longitude With regard to the comments received making through submission of co 101°44'00" W.; to point of beginning; and from AOPA, the FAA has determined ments. Due consideration was given that airspace extending upward from 8,000 that the 25-mile radius area, suggested an relevant matter presented within feet m.s.l. within 5 miles each side of the 1 Amarillo VORTAC 297° radial, extending from by the AOPA would include two small nne allotted for receipt of comments. the 1,200-foot area boundary to 52 miles N W areas that are not necesary for 3FR re­ fhe Air Transport Association of the VORTAC. The portion of this transi­ quirements. In accord with the intent of America (ATA) recommended that tion area extending upward from 8,000 feet the C A R Amendments 60-21/60-29 im- 2934 RULES AND REGULATIONS plementation program, only that amount the portion within the Roseburg, Oreg., [Airspace Docket No. 63-SO-94] of controlled airspace required to protect transition area. PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL instrument operations will be designated. These amendments shall become effec­ With regard to the proposed controlled tive 0001, e.s.t., April 30, 1964. AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE airspace west of Medford, the PAA has AND REPORTING POINTS [NEW]' (Sec. 307(a), 72 Stat. 749; 49 U.S.C. 1348) determined that the floor of the proposed Designation of Transition Area 1.200 foot area west of Medford could Issued in Washington, D.C., on Febru­ be raised to 6,500 feet m.s.l. with no ad­ ary 25,1964. On November 22,1963, a notice of pro­ verse effect on instrument operations at H . B. H e l s t r o m , posed rule making was published in the Medford. However, raising the floor of Acting Chief, Airspace Regulations F ederal R egister (28 F.R. 12368) stating the area proposed for designation with a and Procedures Division. that the Federal Aviation Agency pro­ floor of 1,200 feet above the surface north [F R . Doc. 64-2037; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; posed to designate a transition area at of Medford combined with the proposed 8:45 a.m.] Vicksburg, Miss. revocation of a portion of Victor 23 east Interested persons were afforded an alternate, and the proposed realign­ opportunity to participate in the rule [Airspace Docket No. 61-FW-24] ment of V-121 through Milo intersection making through submission of comments. north of Medford, would adversely affect PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL All comments received were favorable. instrument operations within the Med­ AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, The substance of the proposed amend­ ford terminal area and between the M ed­ AND REPORTING POINTS [NEW] ment having been published and for the ford, Roseburg, Oreg., and Eugene, Oreg., reasons stated in the notice, the follow­ terminals. Therefore, the actions taken Withdrawal of Amendments and ing action is taken:.. herein will reflect the adjustment of the Reopening of Comment Period Section 71.181 (29F.R. 1160) is amend­ floor of controlled airspace only in the ed by adding the following: On October 18, 1963, there were pub­ portion of the proposed transition area Vicksburg, Miss. lished in the F ederal R egister (28 F R . west of Medford. That airspace extending upward from 700 The substance of the proposed amend­ 11185) amendments to Part 71 [New] feet above the surface within a 6-mile radius ments having been published and for of the Federal Aviation Regulations of the Vicksburg Municipal Airport (latitude the reasons stated herein and in the which realigned VOR Federal airways 32°14’20" N., longitude 90°55'40" W .); within notice, the following actions are taken: Nos. 157, 243, 819, 839, and 881 via a new 2 miles each side of the 276° bearing from the 1. In § 71.171 (29 F.R. 1101) the M ed­ VOR to be installed in the vicinity of Vicksburg Municipal Airport, extending from the 6-mile radius area to 8 miles W of the ford, Oreg., control zone is amended to Waycross, Ga. These amendments were to become effective December 12, 1963. airport; and that airspace extending upward read: from 1,200 feet above the surface within 8 This effective date was subsequently miles S and 5 miles N of the 276° bearing Medford, Oreg. postponed until April 2, 1964 (28 F.R. Within a 5-mile radius of Medford Munic­ from the Vicksburg Municipal Airport, ex­ 12925, 29 F.R. 1561) due to a delay in the ipal Airport (latitude 42°22'15" N., longi­ tending from the airport to ■ 12 miles W; tude 122°52'20'' W .); within 2 miles each commissioning of the Waycross VOR. and within 5 miles each side of the 096* side of the Medford ILS localizer N course, It now appears that the Waycross VOR bearing from the Vicksburg Municipal Air» extending from the 5-mile radius zone to will not be commissioned until July of port, extending from the airport to 12 6 miles N of the OM, and within 2 miles each 1964. miles E. side of the Medford RR N course, extending The period for comment on the notice This amendment shall become ef­ from the 5-mile radius zone to 5.5 miles N of proposed rule making for Airspace fective 0001, eA.t., April 30, 1964. of the RR. Docket No. 61-FW-24 terminated on De­ (Sec. 307(a), 72 Stat. 749; 49 U.S.C. 1348) 2. Section 71.165 (29 P.R. 1073) is cember 14, 1962. It would be necessary amended to revoke the following: to postpone the effective date for the Issued in Washington, D.C., on Feb­ Medford, Oreg. final rule at least until July 1964. ruary 25,1964. Therefore, in view of the amount of time H . B. H elstrom , 3. Section 71.181 (29 P.R. 1160) is that will have elapsed between the close Acting Chief, Airspace Regulations amended by adding the following: of the period for comment and the com­ and Procedures Division. Medford, Oreg. missioning of the Waycross VOR, the [F.R. Doc. 64r-2039; Filed, Mar. 3, 1904; That airspace extending upward from 700 FAA has determined that a further op­ 8:46 a.m.] feet above the surface within 2 miles each portunity should be afforded to interested side of the Medford ILS localizer N course, persons to submit comments. This extending from 6 miles N to 9 miles N of the would allow for consideration of the pro­ SUBCHAPTER F— AIR TRAFFIC AND GENERAL OM, and within 3 miles E and 2 miles W of the posal in the light of the current aero­ Medford VORTAC 352® radial, extending from OPERATING RULES [NEW! nautical situation. the VORTAC to 8 miles N of the VORTAC; [Reg. Docket No. 4020; Arndt. 112] and that airspace extending upward from In consideration of the foregoing, 1.200 feet above the surface within an 18-mile notice is hereby given that the amend­ PART 95— IFR ALTITUDES (NEW! radius of the Medford VORTAC, extending ments contained in Airspace Docket 61- clockwise from a line 6 miles N of and parallel FW -24 (28 F.R. 11185, 12925, 29 F it. Miscellaneous Amendments to the Medford VORTAC 270® radial to a line 1561) are withdrawn, and that the time This amendment is adopted to provide 5 miles SE of and parallel to the Medford for which Comments will be received for VORTAC 235® radial; within a 23-mile safety in air commerce for IFR opera­ consideration on the proposal in the No­ radius of the Medford VORTAC, extend­ tions by prescribing the IFR altitudes ing clockwise from a line 5 miles SE of tice of Proposed Rule Making (26 at which all aircraft shall be flown over and parallel to the Medford VORTAC 235® F.R. 5527) is reopened for 30 days from a specified route or portion thereof. radial to a line 6 miles N of and parallel the date of publication of this Notice in -These altitudes also assure navigational to the Medford VORTAC 270® radial; the F ederal R eg ister . Communications coverage that is adequate and free of fre­ that airspace E of Medford, extending from should be submitted in triplicate to the the 18-mile radius area bounded on the N by Director, Southern Region, Attn: Chief, quency interference for such a route or latitude 42°28'00" N., on the E by the arc of Air Traffic Division, Federal Aviation portion thereof. a 40-mile radius circle centered on the As a situation exists w hich demands Klamath Falls, Oreg., VORTAC, on the S Agency, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Ga., by V-122, and on the SW by V—23; that air­ 30320. im m ediate action in the interest of space N of Medford within 6 miles E and (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act, 1958 (72 safety, I find that compliance with the 10 miles W of the Medford VORTAC 352® Stat. 749,49 UJS.C. 1348)) notice and public procedure provisions radial, extending from the 18-mile radius of the Administrative Procedure Act is area to 55 miles N of the VORTAC, and that Issued in Washington, D.C., on Feb­ airspace S of Medford extending from the ruary 25,1964. impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective 18-mile radius area bounded on the E by H . B. H e ls t r o m , V-23, and on the SW by V-23W; that airspace Acting Chief, Airspace Regulations within less than 30 days from publication. extending upward from 6,500 feet MSL W of and Procedures Division. In view of the foregoing and pursuant Medford within 6 miles N and 7 miles S of the Medford VORTAC 270° radial, extending from [F R . Doc. 64-2038; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; to the authority delegated to me by the the 23-mile radius area to V-27, excluding 8:46 a.m.] Administrator (24 F.R. 5662), Part 95 Wednesday, M arch 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2935

[New! (14 C FR Part 95 [N e w ]) is 7 Lim a : Section 95.6007 V O R Federal airway 7 From Nassau, Bh. RBn; to Thompson INT, amended as follows: is amended to read in part : Bh.; MEA *2,000. *1,200— MOCA. Section 95.102 Amber Federal airway From Thompson INT, Bh.; to High Rock From Muscle Shoals, Ala., VOR; to Green 2 is amended to read in part: INT, Bh.; MEA *2,000. *1,000—MOCA. Hill INT, Ala.; MEA *2,200. *2,000— MOCA. Prom Green Hill INT, Ala.; to Graham, US.-Canadian Border; to Northway, From High Rock INT, Bh.; to Grand Ba­ Prom Tenn., VOR; MEA 3,100. Alaska, LFR; MEA 6,400. hama AAFB, Bh. RBn; MEA *2,000. *1,200— MOCA. From »Bull Head INT, 111., to * »Deerfield Section 95.115 Amber Federal airway From Grand Bahama AAFB, Bh. RBn; to INT, 111.; MEA 2,500. *2,500— MRA. 15 is amended to read in part; Halibut INT, Bh.; MEA *1,500. *1,400— **2,600— MRA. MOCA. From Deerfield INT, 111.; to *Papi INT, HI.; Annette Island, Alaska, LFR; to Prom From Halibut INT, Bh.; to West Palm MEA 2,500. *2,500— MRA. Island INT, Alaska; MEA 4,700. Guard Beach, Fla., RBn; MEA *2,000. *1,400— From Chicago Heights, 111., VOR, via E alter.; to *Whitefish INT, 111., via E alter.; Section 95.612 Blue Federal airway 12 MOCA. MEA 2,500. *2,500—rMRA. is amended to read: . 8 Lim a : From Fort Lauderdale, Fla., RBn; to Pike Section 95.6008 V O R Federal airway 8 Prom McGrath, Alaska, LFR; to Galena, INT, Bh.; MEA *2,000. *1,300— MOCA. Alaska, LFR; MEA *6,000. *5,500—MOCA. From Pike INT, Bh.; to Akron INT, Bh.; is amended to delete: MEA *2,000. *1,000— MOCA. Section 95.679 Blue Federal airway 79 From Bryce Canyon, Utah, VOR, via S From Collar INT, Bh.; to Grand Bahama, alter.; to *Hanksville, Utah, VOR, via S is amended to read in part: Bh. AAFB RBn; MEA *1,500. *1,200— MOCA. alter.; MEA 13,000. *11,000— MCA Hanks- Prom Annette Island, Alaska, LFR; to 10 Lim a: ville VOR, southwestbound. Guard Island INT, Alaska; MEA 4,700. From Miami, Fla., RBn; to Guppy INT, Bh.; From Grand Junction, Colo., VOR, via S MEA 2,000. alter.; to Kremmling, Colo., VOR, via S alter.; Section 95.1001 Direct route— U.S. is From Guppy INT, Bh.; to Grand Bahama, MEA 14,000. amended to read in part: Bh. AAFB RBn; MEA *2,000. *1,200— MOCA. ' Section 95.6008 V O R Federal airway 8 Prom Dyersburg, Tenn.,VOR; to Memphis, Section 95.6001 V O R Federal airway 1 is amended to read in part: Term., VOR, via DYR-180/MEM-0450; MEA is amended to read in part: 2,500. From Findlay, Ohio, VOR; to Upper San­ 2 Lima: . a From Barnegat, N.J. VOR; to Int. 171° dusky INT, Ohio; MEA 2,500. Prom Perrine, Fla. RBn to Int. 090° bear­ magnetic radial, Kennedy VOR, and 053° From Upper Sandusky INT, Ohio; to Mans­ ing; from Perrine RBn and 111° bearing; magnetic radial, Barnegat VOR; MEA *3,000. field, Ohio, VOR; MEA 2,200. from Bimini RBn; MEA *2,000. *1,600— *1,600— MOCA. From Kilgore INT, Ohio to Pittsburgh, Pa., MOCA. From Int. 171° magnetic radial, Kennedy VOR; MEA 3,200. Prom Int. 090° bearing; from Perrine RBn VOR, and 053° magnetic radial, Barnegat From Cordova, 111., VOR; to Hinckley INT, and 111° bearing; from Bimini RBn; to VOR; to Kennedy, N.Y., VOR; MEA *2,000. 111.; MEA 2,100. Nassau, Bh. RBn; MEA *2,000. *1,300— *1,500— MOCA. MOCA. From Kennedy, N.Y. VOR; to Int. 011° Section 95.6010 VO R Federal airway 10 3 Lima: • magnetic radial, Kennedy VOR, and 217° is amended to read in part: magnetic radial, Trinity VOR; MEA *2,500. Prom Bimini, Bh. RBn; to India route, via From Dodge City, Kans., VOR, via S alter.; 086° magnetic bearing; from ZBB; MEA *1,500— MOCA. to Pratt INT, Kans., via S alter.; MEA *4,300. From Int. 011° magnetic iradial, Kennedy *2,000. *1,300— MOCA. *3,700— MOCA. 4 Lima: VOR, and 217° magnetic radial, Trinity VOR; From Pratt INT, Kans., vifi^S alter.; to Prom West Palm Beach, Fla., RBn; to to Trinity, N.Y. VOR; MEA *2,500. *1,900— Hutchinson, Kans., VOR; via S alter.; MEA limini, Bh. RBn; MEA *2,000. *1,400— MOCA. *4,300. *3,200— MOCA. MOCA. Prom Bimini, Bh. RBn; to Nassau, Bh. Section 95.6002 V O R Federal airway 2 Section 95.6011 V O R Federal airway 11 RBn; MEA *2,000. *1,300— MOCA. is amended to read in part: is amended to read in part: Section 95.1001 Direct route— U.S. is From Elmo INT, Minn., via N alter.; to From Fort Wayne, Ind., VOR; to Edgerton River Falls INT, Wis., via N alter.; MEA amended by adding: INT, Ohio; MEA *3,000. *2,600— MOCA. 2,500. From Edgerton INT, Ohio; to »Pioneer INT, Prom Fillmore, Calif., VOR; to Fellows, From »Wenatchee, Wash., VOR; via N Ohio; MEA **3,500. *3,500— MRA. **2,300— Calif., VOR; MEA 9,500. alter.; to Ephrata, Wash., VOR; via N alter.; MOCA. Prom San Simon, Ariz., VOR; to Redrock MEA 5,000. *9,200— MCA Wenatchee VOR, INT, N. Mex., MEA *11,500. *8,500— MOCA. westbound. Section 95.6012 V O R Federal airway 12 Prom Redrock INT, N. Mex.; to Dusty INT, Section 95.6003 V O R Federal airway 3 is amended to delete: N. Mex.; MEA *23,000. *11,500— MOCA. From Hector, Calif., VOR, via N alter.; to Prom Dusty INT, N. Mex.; to *Socorro, N. is amended to read in part: Goffs, Calif., VOR; via N alter.; MEA 9,000. Mex., VOR; MEA **#15,500. *10,700— MCA From Trinity, N.Y., VOR; to Bethany INT, From Groffs, Calif., VOR; via N alter.; to Socorro VOR, southwestbound. **12,500— Conn.; MEA 2,100. Needles, Calif., VOR; via N alter.; MEA MOCA. #23,000— MAA. 8 ,000. Prom Tucson, Ariz., VOR; to Triplet INT, Section 95.6004 V O R Federal airway 4 From Dayton, Ohio, VOR, via S alter.; Ariz.; MEA *16,000. *10,500—MOCA. is amended to read in part: to London INT, Ohio, via S alter.; MEA Prom Triplet INT, Ariz.; to St. Johns, Ariz. - From Cherokee, Wyo., VOR; to *Laramie, *3,000. *2,500— MOCA. VOR; MEA *16,000. *13,500— MOCA. Wyo., VOR; MEA **14,000. *12,500— MCA From London INT, Ohio, via S alter.; to Prom Eglin AFB, Fla., VOR; to Tyndall Laramie VOR, westbound- *10,000— MCA Appleton, Ohio VOR, via S alter.; MEA 2,500. APB, Fla., VOR; MEA 1,500. Laramie VOR, southeastbound. **12,800— Prom Eglin AFB, Fla., VOR; to Tyndall MOCA. Section 95.6012 V O R Federal airway 12 APB, Fla., LF/RBn; MEA 1,500. From *Laramie, Wyo., VOR, via N alter.; is amended to read in part: Prom *Silo INT, Colo.; to Franktown INT, to Nunn INT, Colo., via N alter.; MEA Colo;; MEA 9,100. *11,200— MCA Silo INT, From Appleton, Ohio VOR; to Roscoe INT, **11,000. *10,000— MCA Laramie VOR, southwestbound. Ohio; MEA 3,100. southeastbound. **10,800— MOCA. 2 Lima: Prom Roscoe INT, Ohio; to Newcomers- Prom Nassau, Bh. RBn; to San Salvador, Section 95.6005 V O R Federal airway 5 town, Ohio, VOR; MEA 2,900. Bo-, AAFB RBn; MEA *2,000. *1,200— is amended to read in part: MOCA. Section 95.6013 V O R Federal airway 13 Prom San Salvador, Bh., AAFB RBn; to From Kennesaw INT, Ga.; to Dalton INT, is amended to delete: Yankee 2 INT, Bh.; MEA *2,000. *1,200— Ga.; MEA 4,000. From Neosho, Mo., VOR, via W alter.; to MOCA. Fröm Dalton INT, Ga.; to Chattanooga, Waco INT, Mo., via W alter.; MEA *3,000. 4 Lima: Tenn., VOR; MEA 3,000. *2,700— MOCA. Prom Nassau, Bh. RBn; to Yankee 1 INT, Section 95.6006 V O R Federal airway 6 Prom Waco INT, Mo., via W alter.; to Bh.; MEA *2,000. *1,200— MOCA. Butler, Mo., VOR, via W alter.; MEA *3,000. is amended to read in part: 5 Lima: *2,500— MOCA. Nassau, Bh. RBn; to Eleuthera AAFB, From Cordova, 111., VOR; to Hinckley INT, Section 95.6014 V O R Federal airway 14 Bh. RBn; MEA *2,000. *1,200— MOCA. 111.; MEA 2,100. 6 Lima: From Brighton INT, Ind.; to *Pioneer is amended to read in part: Prom Nassau, Bh. RBn; to Thompson INT, INT, Ohio; MEA **4,000. *3,500— MRA. From Childress, Tex., VOR; to Hobart, Bh.; MEA *2,000. *1,200— MOCA. **2,300— MOCA. Okla., VOR; MEA *3,700. *3,600— MOCA. Prom Thompson INT, Bh.; to Bimini, Bh. From Solberg, N.J. VOR; to Kennedy, N.Y. From Hobart, Okla., VOR; to Minco INT, RBn; MEA *2,000. *1,300— MOCA. VOR; MEA 2,000. Okla.; MEA 3,100. 2936 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Prom Findlay, Ohio, VOR; to Attica, Ohio, Section 95.6030 V O R Federal airway 30 From Springfield, Mo., VOR; via W alter • VOR; MEA 2,500. is amended to read in part: to »Nevada INT, Mo., via W alter- mea **3,000. *3,000— MRA. **2,300—MOCA Section 95.6015 V O R Federal airway 15 From Colts Neck, N.J., VOR; to Kennedy, From Nevada INT, Mo., via W alter.; to is amended to read in part: N.Y., VOR, MEA 1,700. Butler, Mo.; VOR, via W alter.; MEA *2*600 From Dallas, Tex., VOR; to *Gunter INT, From Kennedy, N.Y., VOR, to Beach INT, *1,900— MOCA. Tex.; MEA **2,500. *2,600— MRA. **2,100— N.Y.; MEA *6,000. *1,500— MOCA. MOCA. Section 95.6072 V O R Federal airway 72 Section 95.6038 V O R Federal airway 38 is amended to read in part: Section 95.6016 VO R Federal airway 16 is amended to read in part: From Findlay, Ohio, VOR; to Attica Ohio is amended to read in part: From Fort Wayne, Ind., VOR; to Convoy VOR; MEA 2,500. From »Salt Flat, Tex., VOR, via N alter.; INT, Ohio; MEA 2,200. to Wink, Tex., VOR, via N alter.; MEA 10,800. From Convoy INT, Ohio; to Findlay, Ohio, Section 95.6084 V O R Federal airway 84 VOR; MEA 2,500. *10,000—MCA Salt Flat VOR, eastbound. is amended to read in part: From »Salt Flat, Tex., VOR; to Wink, Tex., From Appleton, Ohio, VOR; to Zanesville, Ohio, VOR; MEA 3,100. From Northbrook, 111., VOR; to *Papi INT VOR; MEA 10,000. *9,100— MCA Salt Flat 111.; MEA 2,000. *2,500— MRA. VOR, eastbound. From Zanesville, Ohio, VOR; to Dexter INT, Ohio; MEA 3,000. Section 95.6094 V O R Federal airway 94 Section 95.6017 V O R Federal airway 17 From Dexter INT, Ohio; to Parkersburg, is amended to read in part: is amended to read in part: W. Va., VOR; MEA 2,500. From »Salt Flat, Tex., VOR; to Wink, Tex, From Webb INT, Tex.; to Cotulla, Tex., Section 95.6044 V O R Federal airway 44 VOR; MEA 10,000. *9,100— MCA Salt Plait VOR; MEA *2,200. *2,000— MOCA. is amended to read in part: VOR, eastbound. Section 95.6018 VO R Federal airway 18 From Barnegat, N.J., VOR; to Int. 171° From Jamestown INT, La.; to Monroe, La., VOR; MEA *2,000. *1,900— MOCA. is amended to read in part: magnetic radial, Kennedy VOR, and 053° magnetic radial, Barnegat VOR; MEA *3,000. Section 95.6100 VOR Federal airway From Dallas, Tex., VOR; to ^Sabine INT, *1,600— MOCA. 100 is amended to read in part: Tex.; MEA *2,200. *1,700— MOCA. From Int. 171° magnetic radial, Kennedy From Quitman, Tex., VOR, via S alter.; VOR, and 053° magnetic radial, Barnegat From Northbrook, 111., VOR; to »Deerfield to Woodlawn INT, Tex., via S alter.; MEA VOR; to Riverhead, N.Y., VOR; MEA *2,000. IN T k 111.; MEA 2,000. *2,500— MRA. *2,200. *1,700— MOCA. *1,500— MOCA. From Deerfield INT, 111.;, to »Whiteflsh From Shreveport, La., VOR; to Monroe, INT, 111.; MEA 2,000. *2,500— MRA. La., VOR; MEA *2,000. *1,900— MOCA. Section 95.6046 V O R Federal airway 46 From Whiteflsh INT, I l l j to Keeler, Mich., From Shreveport, La., VOR, via S alter.; is amended to read in part: VOR; MEA 2,000. to Monroe, La., VOR, via S alter.; MEA *2,000. *1,900— MOCA. From Kennedy, N.Y., VOR; to Deer Park, Section 95.6102 V O R Federal airway N.Y., VOR; MEA 1,700. From Shreveport, La., VOR, via N alter.; 102 is amended to read in part: to * Cotton INT, La., via N alter.; MEA Section 95.6051 V O R Federal airway 51 From »Salt Flat, Tex., VOR; to Carlsbad, **1,800. *2,000—MRA; **1,300— MOCA. is amended to read in part: N. Mex., VOR; MEA 10,800. *10,000—MCA Salt Flat VOR, northeastbound. Section 95.6019 VO R Federal airway 19 From Kennesaw INT, Ga., via W alter.; is amended to read in part: to Dalton INT, Ga., via W alter.; MEA 4,000. Section 95.6105 VOR Federal airway From Dalton INT, Ga,, via W alter.; to From Cimarron, N. Mex., VOR; to Gordon 105 is amended to read in part: Chattanooga, Tenn., VOR, via W alter.; MEA INT, Colo.; MEA *11,000. *10,400— MOCA. 3,000. From *Las Vegas, Nev.., VOR; to * »Charles­ Section 95.6020 V O R Federal airway 20 ton INT, Nev., westbound; MEA 10,500, Section 95.6054. V O R Federal airway 54 eastbound; MEA 7,000. *8,500— MCA Las is amended to read in part: is amended to read in part: Vegas VOR, westbound. * * 11,000—MRA. From Central INT, Ala., via N alter.; to From Muscle Shoals, Ala., VOR, via N •Miller INT, Ala., via N alter; MEA 2,600. Section 95.6112 VOR Federal airway ,*5,300—MRA. alter.; to Toney INT, Ala., via N alter.; MEA 112 is amended to delete: 2 ,200. Section 95.6022 V O R Federal airway 22 From *Portland, Oreg., VOR, via N alter.; Section 95.6057 V O R Federal airway 57 to The Dalles, Oreg., VOR, via N alter., MEA is amended to read in part: is amended to read in part: **8,000. *4,700— MCA Portland VOR, east- From Brookley, Ala., VOR; to * Daphne INT, bound. **7,000— MOCA. From Muscle Shoals, Ala., VOR; to Green Ala.; MEA **2,000. *2,500— MRA. **1,700— MOCA. Hill INT, Ala.; MEA *2,200. *2,000— MOCA. Section 95.6114 V O ii Federal airway From Daphne INT, Ala.; to *Dale INT, Ala.; From Green Hill INT, Ala.; to Graham, 114 is amended to read in part: Tenn., VOR; MEA 3,100. MEA **2,000. *2,500— MRA. **1,700— From Childress, Tex., VOR; to Vernon INT, MOCA. Section 95.6059 VO R Federal airway 59 Tex.; MEA *3,700. *3,600— MOCA. Section 95.6025 VO R Federal airway 25 is amended to read in part: From Vernon INT, Tex.; to Wichita Falls, is amended to read in part: Tex., VOR; MEA *3,000. *2,500— MOCA. Freon Parkersburg, W . Va., VOR; to Cald­ From Dallas Tex., VOR, via N alter.; to well INT, Ohio; MEA 2,800. From *Red Bluff, Calif., VOR.; to * »Whit­ Sabine INT, Tex., via N alter.; MEA *2,200. more INT, Calif.; MEA 5,000. *5,000—MCA From Caldwell INT, Ohio; to Newcomers-- *1,700— MOCA. town, Ohio, VOR; MEA 3,000. > Red Bluff VOR, southbound. **7,000— MCA From Gregg County, Tex., VOR, via N alter.; Whitmore INT, northbound. Section 95.6061 V O R Federal airway 61 to Woodlawn INT, Tex., via N alter.; MEA From Whitmore INT, Calif.; to Mount is amended to read in part: *2,200. *1,900— MOCA. Dome INT, Calif.; MEA 11,000. From »Ellensburg, Wash., VOR; to From Bridgeport, Tex., VOR; to Postoak. Section 95.6115 VO R Federal airway * »Wenatchee, Wash., VOR; MEA 8,500. INT, Tex.; MEA *3,000. *2,300— MOCA. 115 is amended to read in part: *7,100—MCA Ellensburg VOR, northbound. Section 95.6066 VO R Federal airway 66 From Rutledge INT, Tenn.; to Rose Hill * *7,500— MCA Wenatchee VOR, southbound. is amended to read in part: INT, Va.; MEA 5,400. From Rose Hill INT, Va.; to Whitesburg, Section 95.6026 V O R Federal airway 26 From Bridgeport, Tex., VOR; to Prosper Ky., VOR; MEA 6,000. is amended to read in part: INT, Tex.; MEA *2,600. *2,100— MOCA. From Whitesburg, Ky., VOR; to Whirlwind INT, W. Va.; MEA 6,000. From Philip, S. Dak., VOR; to Pierre, S. Section 95.6069 V O R Federal airway 69 Dak., VOR; MEA *4,000. *3,600— MOCA. is amended to read in part: Section 95.6119 V O R Federal airway From Pierre, S. Dak., VOR; to Huron, S. From Shreveport,' La., VOR; to »Cotton 119 is amended to read in part: Dak., VOR; MEA *4,000. *3,600— MOCA. INT, La.; MEA **1,800. *2,000—MRA. From Parkersburg, W . Va., VOR; to Bealls- From Philip, S. Dak., VOR, via S alter.; to * *1,300—MOCA. ville INT, Ohio; MEA 2,500. Pierre, S. Dak., VOR, via S alter.; MEA *4,000. From Cotton INT, La.; to »Gordon INT, *3,400— MOCA. La.; MEA **2,000. *3,000—MRA. **1,600— Section 95.6120 V O R Federal airway From Pierre, S. Dak., VOR, via S alter.; to MOCA. 120 is amended to read in part: Stephan INT, S. Dak., via S alter.; MEA From Gordon INT, La.; to El Dorado, Ark., VOR; MEA *2,000. *1,600— MOCA. From Dupree, S. Dak., VOR; to Pierre, S. *3,900. *3,400—MOCA. Dak., VOR; MEA *4,300. *3,500— MOCA. From Stephan INT, S. Dak.t via S alter.; to Section 95.6071 V O R Federal airway 71 From Pierre, S. Dak., VOR; to Stephan Huron, S. Dak., VOR, via S alter.; MEA 3,400. is amended to delete: INT, S. Dak.; MEA *3,900. *3,400—MOCA. Wednesday, M arch 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2937

Section 95.6121 V O R Federal airway Section 95.6167 V O R Federal airway Section 95.6243 V O R Federal airway 121 is amended to read in part: 167 is amended to read in part: 243 is amended to read in part: Prom Medford, Oreg., VOR; to Milo INT, Prom Coyle, N.J., VOR; to Int. 057* mag­ From Kennesaw INT, Ga.; to Dalton INT, Oreg., southbound: MEA 6,600; northbound: netic radial, Coyle VOR and 207* magnetic Ga.; MEA 4,000. MEA 7,000. radial, Kennedy VOR; MEA 3,000. Prom Dalton INT, Ga.; to Chattanooga, Prom Milo INT, Oreg.; to Roseburg, Oreg., Prom Int. 057* magnetic radial, Coyle VOR Tenn., VOR; MEA 3,000. VOR, westbound; MEA 5,500; eastbound; and 207* magnetic radial, Kennedy VOR; to MEA 6,500. Kennedy, N.Y., VOR; MEA 1,700. Section 95.6248 V O R Federal airway Prom Kennedy, N.Y., VOR; to Jericho INT, 248 is amended to delete: Section 95.6132 V O R Federal airway N.Y.; MEA *2,000. *1,500— MOCA. Prom Avenal, Calif., VOR, via S alter.; to 132 is amended to delete: Prom Northport INT, N.Y.; to Sound INT, Derby INT, Calif., via S alter.; MEA 7,000. Prom Chanute, Kans., VOR, via S alter.; N.Y; MEA 2,000 From »Derby INT, Calif., via S alter.; to McCune INT, Kans., via S alter.; MEA From Sound INT, N.Y.; to Wallingford INT, to McKittrick INT, Calif., via S alter., *2,800. *2,100— MOCA. Conn.; MEA *2,000. *1,800— MOCA. northeastbound; MEA 3,000, southwest- Prom McCune INT, Kans., via S alter.; Prom Wallingford INT, Conn.; to Hartford, bound; MEA 7,000. *7,000—MCA Derby INT, to Waco INT, Mo., via S alter.; MEA 3,000. Conn., VOR; MEA 2,000. north westbound. Prom Chanute, Kans., VOR, via S alter.; Section 95.6182 V O R Federal airway Prom McKittrick INT, Calif., via S alter.; to Waco INT, Mo., via S alter.; MEA #2,500. 182 is amended to delete: to Bakersfield, Calif., VOR, via S alter.; MEA ¿Utilizing Joplin LOM. 3.000. Waco INT, Mo., via S alter.; to Miller INT, Prom »Portland, Oreg., VOR, via N alter.; Mo., via S : alter.; MEA *3,000. *2,300— to The Dalles, Oreg., VOR, via N alter.; MEA Section 95.6251 V O R Federal airway MOCA. **8,000. *4,700— MCA Portland VOR, east- 251 is amended to read in part: Prom Miller INT, Mo., via S alter.; to bound. **7,000— MOCA. Prom Sparta, N.J., VOR; to Int. 092° Springfield, Mo., VOR, via S alter.; MEA magnetic radial, Sparta VOR and 244° mag­ *3,000. *2,600— MOCA. Section 95.6191 V O R Federal airway 191 is amended to read in part: netic radial, Trinity VOR; MEA 2,500. Section 95.6133 V O R Federal airway Prom Int. 092° magnetic radial, Sparta 133 is amended to read in part: Prom Northbrook, 111., VOR; to Forrest VOR and 244° magnetic radial, Trinity VOR; INT, 111.; MEA 2,000. to Trinity, N.Y., VOR; MEA *2,000. > *1,900— Prom Sugar Grove INT, N.C.; to Keystone Prom Forrest INT, 111.; to Taylor INT, Wis.; MOCA. INT, W. Va.; MEA 7,000. MEA *3,000. *2,000— MOCA. From Trinity, N.Y., VOR; to Bethany INT, Prom Keystone INT, W. Va.; to Charleston, Conn.; MEA 2,100. W. Va., VOR; MEA 7,200. Section 95.6205 V O R Federal airway Prom Bethany INT, Conn.; to Hartford, Prom Charleston, W . Va., VOR; to Home­ 205 is amended to delete: Conn., VOR; MEA *2,700. *2,100—MOCA. town INT, Ohio; MEA 2,500. From Springfield, Mo., VOR, via W alter.; Prom Hometown INT, Ohio; to Zanesville, Section 95.6257 V O R Federal airway to »Schell City INT, Mo., via W alter.; MEA Ohio, VOR; MEA 2,900. **3,000. *3,500— MRA. * *2,300— MOCA. 257 is amended to delete: Prom Zanesville, Ohio, VOR; to Tiverton, Prom Schell City INT, Mo., via W alter.; From Promontory Point INT, Utah, via W Ohio, VOR; MEA 2,900. to Blue Springs, Mo., VOR, via W alter.; MEA alter.; to Malad City, Idaho, VOR, via W Section 95.6135 V O R Federal airway *3,500. *2,300— MOCA. alter.; MEA 10,000. 135 is amended to read in part: Section 95.6210 V O R Federal airway Section 95.6260 V O R Federal airway Prom *Las Vegas, Nev., VOR; to * ♦Charles­ 210 is amended to read in part: 260 is amended to read in part: ton INT, Nev., westbound; MEA 10,500; east- Prom Tiverton, Ohio, VOR; to Irondale bound; MEA 7,000. *8,500— MCA Las Vegas Prom Swiss INT, W. Va., via N alter.; to INT, Ohio; MEA *3,100. *2,500— MOCA. VOR, westbound. * * 11,000— MRA. Rainelle, W. Va., VOR, via N alter.; MEA 6.000. Section 95.6213 V O R Federal airway Section 95.6139 V O R Federal airway 213 is amended to read in part: Section 95.6272 V O R Federal airway 139 is amended to read in part: Prom Robbinsville, N.J., VOR; to Kennedy, 272 is amended to read in part: Prom Shark INT, N.J.; to Int. 125° mag­ N.Y., VOR; MEA 2,000. netic radial, Kennedy VOR, and 236° mag­ Prom Sayre, Okla., VOR; to Bessie INT, Prom Bolton INT, N.C.; to Wallace INT, netic radial, Hampton VOR; MEA *6,000. Okla.; MEA *3,900. *3,500— MOCA. N.C.; MEA *3,000. *1,400— MOCA. *1,500—MOCA. Prom Sayre, Okla., VOR, via S alter.; to Prom Wallace INT, N.C.; to Eureka INT, Prom Int. 125° magnetic radial, Kennedy »Washita INT, Okla., via S alter.; MEA N.C.; MEA *3,400. *1,400— MOCA. VOR, and 236° magnetic radial, Hampton **4,000. *4,000— MCA Washita INT, west­ bound. * *3,500— MOCA. VOR; to Beach INT, N.Y.; MEA *5,000. Section 95.6214 V O R Federal airway *1,400—MOCA. From Sayre, Okla., VOR, via N alter.; to 214 is amended to read in part: Weatherford INT, Okla., via N alter.; MEA Section 95.6140 V O R Federal airway Prom Columbus, Ohio, VOR; to Hanover *4,000. *3,500— MOCA. HO is amended to read in part: INT, Ohio; MEA 2,600. Section 95.6298 V O R Federal airway Prom Hanover INT, Ohio; to Zanesville, Prom Amarillo, Tex., VOR; to Sayre, Okla., 298 is amended to delete: VOR; MEA *5,300. *4,700— MOCA. Ohio, VOR; MEA 2,900. Prom Amarillo, Tex., VOR, via N alter.; to Prom Zanesville, Ohio, VOR; to Bellaire, Prom Casper, Wyo., VOR; to Smithwick, Ohio, VOR; MEA 3,100. *Pampa INT, Tex., via N alter.; MEA **5,300. S. Dak., VOR; MEA 8,100. *6,000—MRA. * *4,700— MOCA. Prom Smithwick, S. Dak., VOR; to Winner, Section 95.6217 V O R Federal airway S. Dak., VOR; MEA *5,200. *4,600— MOCA. Prom Pampa INT, Tex., via N alter.; to 217 is amended to read in part: Sayre, Okla., VOR, via N alter.; MEA *5,300. Prom Winner, S. Dak., VOR; to Sioux Palls, *4,500—MOCA.' Prom Chicago O ’Hare, 111., VOR; to Tay­ „ S. Dak., VOR; MEA 4,000. Prom Sayre, Okla., VOR; to Weatherford lor INT, Wis.; MEA *3,000. *2,000— MOCA. Section 95.6408 Hawaii VOR Federal INT, Okla.; MEA/4,000. *3,500— MOCA. Prom Weathefford INT,. Okla.; to »Omega Section 95.6226 V O R Federal airway airway 8 is amended to read in part: INT, Okla.; MEA **4,000. *3,500— MRA. 226 is amended to read in part: Prom Palmtree INT, Hawaii; to Molokai, *3,300—MOCA. Hawaii, VOR; MEA 3,000. Prom Stillwater, N.J., VOR; to Kennedy, Section 95.6144 V O R Federal airway N.Y., VOR; MEA 2,500. Section 95.6443 V O R Federal airway m is amended to read in part: 443 is amended to read in part; Section 95.6232 V O R Federal airway Prom Appleton, Ohio, VOR; to Zanesville, Prom Tiverton, Ohio, VOR, via E alter.; Ohio, VOR; MEA 3,100. 232 is amended to read in part: to Cleveland, Ohio, VOR, via E. alter.; MEA From Zanesville, Ohio, VOR; to Beallsville From Tannersvihe, Pa„ VOR; to Ken­ *3,000. *2,500— MOCA. INT, Ohio; MEA 3,100. nedy, N.Y., VOR; MEA 2,500. From Port Wayne, Ind., VOR; to Convoy Section 95.6488 V O R Federal airway INT, Ohio; MEA 2,200. Section 95.6234 V O R Federal airway 488 is added to read: Tr/^°m Convoy INT, Ohio; to Findlay, Ohio, 234 is amended to read in part: Prom Galena, Alaska, VOR; to Tanana, VOR; MEA 2,500. Alaska, VOR; MEA 6,000. Prom »Greensburg INT, Kans.; to Pratt ' Section 95.6157 V O R Federal airway From Galena, Alaska, VOR, via S alter.; INT, Kans.; MEA **5,200. *5,200— MRA. to Tanana, Alaska, VOR, via S alter.; MEA io7 is amended to read in part: * *3,500— MOCA. 6,000. Prom Colts Neck, N.J., VOR; to Kennedy, Prom Pratt INT, Kans.; to Hutchinson, Prom Tanana, Alaska, VOR; to Nenana, N-Y„ VOR; MEA 1,700. Kans., VOR; MEA *4,300, *3,200— MOCA. Alaska, VOR; MEA 4,700. 2938 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Section 95.6508 V O R Federal airway From Sound INT, N.Y.; to Int. 105° mag­ Chapter II— Civil Aeronautics Board 508 is amended to read in part: netic radial, Trinity VOR and 236° magnetic radial, Hartford VOR; MEA *2,000. *1,800— SUBCHAPTER A— ECONOMIC REGULATIONS From Middleton Island, Alaska, VOR; to MOCA. [Reg. No. ER-401 ] ♦Steward INT, Alsaka; MEA 9,000. *9,500— MRA. Section 95.875 VO R Federal airway 875 PART 288— EXEMPTION OF AIR CAR. From Steward INT, Alaska; to *Skllak INT, is amended to read in part: Alaska; MEA 9,000. *4,700— MCA Skilak INT, RIERS FOR SHORT NOTICE MILI­ From Bethany INT, Conn., to Trinity, N.Y„ southeastbound. VOR; MEA 2,100. TARY CONTRACTS AND SUBSTI- TUTE SERVICE Section 95.6802 V O R Federal airway Section 95.6880 V O R Federal airway 802 is amended to read in part: 880 is amended to read in part: Amendment of Part From Appelton, Ohio, VOR; to Roscoe INT, From *Papi INT. 111.; to Northbrook, HI., Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Ohio; MEA 3,100. VOR; MEA 2,000. *2,500— MRA. From Roscoe INT, Ohio; to Newcomers- Board at its office in Washington, D.C., town, Ohio, VOR; 2,900. Section 95.6881 V O R Federal airway on the 28th day of February 1964. On September 11, 1963 (EDR-60, 28 Section 95.6804 V O R Federal airway 881 is amended to read in part: F.R. 9989) the Board proposed certain From Tiverton, Ohio, VOR; to Zanesville, 804 is amended to read in part: amendments to Parts 288 and 399 of its Ohio, VOR; MEA 2,900. From Irondale INT, Ohio; to Tiverton, From Zanesville, Ohio, VOR; to Hometown regulations. Comments were filed, and Ohio, VOR; MEA *3,100. *2,500— MOCA. INT, Ohio; MEA 2,900. on December 9, 1963, in response to re­ Section 95.6810 V O R Federal airway From Hometown INT, Ohio; to Charleston, quests from certain carriers a supple­ 810 is amended to read in part: W. Va., VOR; MEA 2,500. mental notice was issued inviting inter­ ested persons to meet informally with the Section 95.6885 V O R Federal airway From Northbrook, 111., VOR; to *Deerfleld Board’s staff on December 17, 1963, to INT, 111.; MEA 2,000. *2,500— MRA. 885 is amended to read in part: From Deerfield INT, 111.; to »Whitefish discuss specific issues raised in the com­ From Barnegat, N.J., VOR; to Int. 171° INT, 111.; MEA 2,000. *2,500— MRA. ments (28 F.R. 13460). Supplementary magnetic radial,- Kennedy VOR, and 053° From Whitefish INT, 111.; to Keeler, Mich., comments were also invited to be sub­ magnetic radial, Barnegat VOR; MEA *3,000. VOR; MEA 2,000. mitted by December 24, 1963. *1,600— MOCA. All contentions and supporting mate­ Section 95.6837 V O R Federal airway From Int. 171° magnetic radial, Kennedy rials properly before the Board1 have 837 is amended to read in part: VOR, and 053° magnetic radial, Bamegat VOR; to Int. 095° magnetic radial, Ken­ been carefully considered and the Board’s From Shark INT, N.J.; to Int. 125° magnetic nedy VOR, and 231° magnetic radial River- decision was announced in a press re­ radial, Kennedy VOR and 236° magnetic head VOR; MEA *2,000. *1,500— MOCA. lease dated February 7, 1964. The rules radial, Hampton VOR; MEA *6,000. *1,500— From Int. 095° magnetic radial Kennedy issued herewith implement that decision. MOCA. VOR, and 231° magnetic radial, Riverhead 1. Rate levels. In general, thé com­ From Int. 125° magnetic radial, Kennedy VOR; to Beach INT, N.Y.; MEA *6,000. ments of the M A T S contractors were op­ VOR, and 236° magnetic radial, Hampton *1,500— MOCA. VOR; to Beach INT, N.Y.; MEA *5,000. posed to the proposed minimum rate re­ *1,400— MOCA. Section 95.6888 V O R Federal airway ductions. Only Slick supported the rates 888 is amended to read in part: proposed.- P a n American argued that the Section 95.6839 V O R Federal airway proposed cut in the cargo minimum was 839 is amended to read in part: From Beach INT, N.Y.; to- Int. 125° mag­ netic radial, Kennedy VOR, and 236° mag­ not large enough. Trans World Airlines, From Parkersburg, W. Va., VOR; to Cald­ netic radial, Hampton VOR; MEA *5,000. Inc., and Southern Air Transport, Inc. well INT, Ohio; MEA 2,800. *1,400— MOCA. (Southern) * did not comment. The re­ From Caldwell INT, Ohio; to Newcomer s- From Int. 125° magnetic radial, Kennedy maining MATS contractors, however, town, Ohio, VOR; MEA 3,000. VOR, and 236° magnetic radial, Hampton generally took the position that some or VOR; to Shark INT, N.J.; MEA *6,000. all of the proposed reductions were too Section 95.6843 V O R Federal airway *1,500— MOCA. 843 is amended to read in part: severe or that no reduction at all should Section 95.1510 V O R Federal airway be made during fiscal year 1964. From Chattanooga, Tenn., VOR; to Dalton INT, Ga.; MEA 3,000. 1510 is amended to read in part: In this case we have followed the same From Dalton INT, Ga.; to Kennesaw INT, From Yardley, Pa., VOR; to Kennedy, N.Y., practice used in the past when changes Ga.; MEA 4,000. VOR; MEA 14,500; MAA 24,000. were proposed in the Part 288 minimum From Kennedy, N.Y., VOR; to Nantucket, rates. The carriers were informally re­ Section 95.6853 V O R Federal airway Mass., VOR; MEA 14,500; MAA 24,000. quested to submit cost data and, after 853 is amended to to read in part: certain adjustments, the new minimum Section 95.1645 V O R Federal airway From Appleton, Ohio, VOR; to Zanesville, rates based thereon were proposed. The 1645 is deleted: Ohio, VOR; MEA 3,100. adjusted cost data for the individual Section 95.1682 V O R Federal airway From Zanesville, Ohio, VOR; to Beallsville M A T S contractors were attached to 1682 is amended to read in part: INT, Ohio; MEA 3,100. EDR-60 as Appendix A. Further adjust­ From Fort Wayne, Ind., VOR; to Convoy From Kennedy, N.Y., VQR; to Hampton, ments have been made to those data in INT, Ohio; MEA 2,200. N.Y., VOR; MEA 14,500; MAA 24,000. From Convoy INT, Ohio; to Findlay, Ohio, light of the comments received. This VOR; MEA 2,500. , Section 95.1691 V O R Federal airway information is attached hereto as Ap­ 1691 is amended to read in part: pendix A .8 In addition a summary deal­ Section 95.60855 V O R Federal airway ing with passenger operations is at­ From Coyle, N.J., VOR; to Kennedy, N.Y., 855 is amended to read in part: tached as Appendix B.s This Appendix VOR; MEA 14,500; MAA 24,000. From Pittsburgh, Pa., VOR; to Kilgore INT, is essentially a revised version of the Ohio; MEA 3,200. Section 95.1722 V O R Federal airway table that appeared on page 4 of the From Mansfield, Qhio, VOR; to Upper 1722 is deleted: explanatory statement accompanying Sandusky INT, Ohio; MEA 2,200. EDR-60. The existing rate levels, those These amendments are made under the From Upper Sandusky INT, Ohio; to proposed in EDR^60, and those adopted Findlay, Ohio, VOR; lyiEA 2,500. authority of sections 307 (c ), 313(a), and 601 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 herein are as follows: Section 95.6856 V O R Federal airway (49 U.S.C. 1348(c), 1354(a), 1421; 72 1A letter from Pan American World Air­ 856 is amended to read in part: Stat. 749, 752, 775). These rules shall ways, Inc. (Pan American) dated January become effective April 2,1964. 14, 1964, was not timely filed. Neither it nor From Northbrook, 111., VOR; to *Deerfleld responsive letters from The Flying 7%®* INT, 111.; MEA 2,000. *2,500— MRA. Issued in Washington, D.C., on Febru­ Line Inc. (Flying Tiger) dated January 20, From Deerfield INT, HI.; to * Whitefish INT, ary 20,1964. 1964, and The Slick Corporation (Slick) dated 111.; MEA 2,000. *2,500— MRA. G e o . H . W e it z , January 30, 1964, were considered. From Whitefish INT, HI.; to Keeler, Mich., Acting Director, 3 Southern’s contract calls only for P“ " VOR; MEA 2,000. Flight Standards* Service. operations in the Pacific. As subsequent y indicated, the rate levels applicable to sue Section 95.6863 V O R Federal airway [F.R. Doc. 64-2000; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; operations have not been, changed. 863 is amended to read in part: 8:45 a.m.] * Filed as part of the original document. Wednesday, M arch 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2939

cating that either a reduction or increase Present1 Proposed Adopted Unit would be justified. B. Cargo rates. Of the three CL-44 C en ts C en ts C en ts operators which now furnish almost all Round-trip passenger. 2.75 2.5 2.55 Per passenger-mile. One-way passenger.... 4.2 4.2 4.2 Do. of the MATS all cargo charters, two, Round-trip cargo----- . - 12.5 11.5 11.5 Per ton-mile. Flying Tiger and Seaboard, found fault One-way cargo------21.5 21.0 21.0 Do. Convertible cargo----- 15.0 12.5 (s) Do. with the proposed reductions in the Mixed.------2.5 2.55 Per passenger-mile. cargo minimum rates. In Slick’s opinion, the new rates will be economically sound. 1 In EDK-60 we proposed to maintain the existing rate levels for application to piston services in areas where turbine Most of the objections of Flying Tiger operations are not feasible. That proposal has been adopted. and Seaboard went to adjustments in 2 The all passenger minimum of 2.55 cents per passenger mile is made applicable to all legs of convertible operations. their cost data— especially those dealing A. Passenger rates. A major problemthan 9 percent. The unit costs of the with utilization. However, such adjust­ in setting the level of the passenger remaining - three route carriers, North­ ments appear to be sound, as will be sub­ piinimiim arises from the fact that the west Airlines, Inc., Seaboard World Air­ sequently indicated, and the reasonable­ cost data before us present a picture of lines, Inc. (Seaboard) and Riddle Air­ ness of the proposed rates is borne out by substantial disparities in the unit costs lines, Inc. (R iddle), is higher, and they the adjusted cost data. of individual carriers. M A T S ’ recent would not realize a full return of 9 per­ Flying Tiger objects particularly to the conversion to an almost all turbine cent. Despite the fact that some con­ reduction in the one-way cargo rate. It operation, and the high fixed cost as­ tractors contend that it results in giv­ was indicated in EDR-60 that the differ­ sociated with such aircraft, has rendered ing undue weight to the low costs of Pan ential in the yield between the one-way the Question of daily aircraft utilization American, we believe that a rate based and round-trip cargo rates was intended critical. Route operators can usually largely on the weighted average cost of in part to reflect the cost savings inher­ obtain satisfactory aircraft, utilization the route carriers is entirely appropriate. ent in flying the backhaul empty. Fly­ rates by integrating their M ATS opera­ Such an approach is comparable to that ing Tiger contends that this cost savings tions with their scheduled services and of looking at the overall rate of return has already been reflected in the cargo thus the problem is not grave in their on investment of the domestic air car­ cost data since almost all cargo charters case. The supplemental carriers, how­ rier industry as a factor bearing on the are one-way. ever, have no route authority and must reasonableness of the general fare level. While it is true in the case of Slick, look to commercial charters in order to It results in a rate that provides all which does not object to the new rates, better their utilization rate. Assuming carriers an opportunity to realize a re­ and Flying Tiger that almost all cargo no MATS expansion and no commercial turn that is neither excessive, nor un­ charters are of a one-way character, such charters, the supplementals’ utilization duly low, in the case of any of the indi­ is not the case with Seaboard. Sea­ rate would depend on the fixed buy of vidual route carriers. It also assures board’s cargo charters are almost all their MATS contract. On an average, MATS that its rates are based on rea­ round-trip. The 21 cents per ton-mile this amounts to about five hours of sonably efficient operations. rate represents a reduction of 11.5 per­ utilization per day, which compares with The supplementals are a special prob­ cent from a round-trip rate based on system utilization rates of better than lem. How they will do under this rate Seaboard’s computed costs of 11.84 cents nine hours per day for such carriers as depends largely on the question of utili­ per ton mile. Carrier submittals indi­ Northwest Airlines, Inc. (Northwest) and zation. Assuming minimum utilization, cate that approximately 5 percent of the Pan American. i.e., only that produced by the fixed buy backhauls are put to some revenue use, The individual cost disparities are not of their contract, they might be hard which would account for approximately entirely due to utilization differences. pressed. However, thus far during this half of the 11.5 percent spread. It ap­ Reference to Appendix B shows, however, fiscal year the expansion rate has gen­ pears reasonable to expect that the re­ that the spread between the costs of the erally exceeded the carriers’ estimates. maining 6.5 percent can be realized route carriers, all of which have fairly In addition, acquisition of more modem through cost savings on the ferry leg, e.g., satisfactory utilization rates, is not large. jet aircraft may aid the supplementals by flying shorter routings and skipping Appendix B also shows that at utilization in their quest for 'more commercial intermediate stops. It should also be rates of 7 or 8 hours per day, which are charters. If the supplementals are sue-/’ noted that, although it does not contend comparable to those of the route carriers, cessful in improving their utilization that it would be improper to make any the supplementals’ costs would not be out materially, the new rate will be entirely allowance, Flying Tiger does not suggest of line with those of the other MATS adequate. For example, as shown in what would be a proper differential. contractors. W e are always faced with Appendix B, at seven hours per day As previously indicated, it is Pan individual disparities in fixing a single utilization, two of the supplementals American’s position that the cargo rate rate applicable to more than one carrier. would realize a return of 9 percent or should be cut even further. It argues Here, it appears that the problem would more. At eight hours of utilization, the that the large new pure jet convertible be no greater than that faced in ordinary weighted average cost for all carriers in­ aircraft are more efficient than turbo­ rate cases were it not for the problem of cluding the supplementals would ap­ prop CL-44 aircraft. Since the great the supplementals’ low utilization esti­ proximate the 2.55 cent rate. In any bulk of the MATS cargo charters are mates. However, all interested parties case, we do not feel that it would be ap­ presently being performed with CL-44’s, are opposed to any abandonment of the propriate to fix the rate with reference the costs of operating that aircraft type uniform rate approach because of this to the extremely low level of utilization are the appropriate measure to use here Problem. estimated by the supplementals. To do and the rate established herein appears The new round-trip passenger mini­ so would result in unreasonable profits to be sound for this fiscal year. How­ mum rate is 2.55 cents per passenger for the route carriers, who account for ever, it is expected that in fiscal year 1965 mile, or .05 cents higher than the rate approximately three-fourths of the pure jets (DC-8F and B-707-320C) will proposed in EDR-60. It is, of course, a dollar volume of the fixed and guaran­ be used to an increasing extent for M A T S judgment figure based largely on the cost teed expansion contracts for the current charters. Accordingly the Board con­ data of the route operators*, and thus fiscal year. It would also mean that templates an early notice of proposed assumes a utilization rate comparable to MATS would be deprived of the inher­ rule making for the purpose of setting the route carriers’ average. It is intend­ ent efficiencies of the new turbine air­ new minimum rates for MATS cargo ed neither to prefer the low cost carrier craft and that the rate was based on charters which would take into account or unduly prejudice those with higher what is an essentially inefficient opera­ the costs of pure jet operations. costs, it is 0.2 cents higher than the tion. C. Mixed and convertible rates. Mixed omputed weighted average route car­ In EDR-60, no change was proposed in and convertible rates have heretofore eer cost of 2.53 cents per passenger the one-way passenger rate. The pro­ been set to produce a yield between that ue. The estimated unit costs of the posal to maintain the one-way passen­ of the all passenger and all cargo rates wo carriers, Pan American and Trans ger rate at the existing level has proved in recognition that cargo transportation Airwftys, Inc. (T C A ), is be- to be largely noncontroversial, and no is less expensive than passenger. EDR- w “ “s level, and their return higher evidence has been presented herein indi­ 60 would have continued that approach. 2940 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Opposition expressed in the comments nonobjective standards or they would Some carriers have submitted more cur­ was based primarily on the asserted high give no weight at all to the fact that rent data, or support for upward adjust­ costs of converting the new large jet air­ M ATS operations can be integrated with ments in reported data. These have craft from a passenger to a cargo con­ regular commercial operations to produce have been incorporated in the revisions figuration, and vice versa, and on alleged higher utilization. to Appendix A, except that Trans Carib­ higher crew costs. For this reason, it is No evidence has been presented that bean’s estimate for DC-8F airframe over­ deemed appropriate to make the higher would cast doubt on the validity of using hauls has been reduced to the equivalent all passenger minimum applicable to experienced system average utilization of $35 per hour, the maximum provision these services in order to cover the higher rates for costing MATS operations. On for jet aircraft for which there are Board conversion costs. Some carriers have al­ the contrary, the system average appears Records. Costs relating to altering con­ leged that these services are even more to be the soundest and most objective figurations in mixed services and of con­ costly than all passenger operations. standard. In the case of TCA and Rid­ versions from all-passenger to all-cargo They have not produced data substanti­ dle, however, it appears that use of 1962 (or vice versa) have been eliminated be­ ating these allegations, however, and the data will not be representative of their cause they are not incurred in normal limited data available to us thus far indi­ future operations. Accordingly, we have all-passenger , round-trip services which cates that the passenger rate will be ade­ reduced their utilization factor to equal constitute the greatest preponderance of quately compensatory. their forecast system average for this services to which the passenger minimum D. Piston rates. Those who com­year. rates apply. The adjusted forecasts re­ mented on piston rates were divided with Many adjustments were general in ap­ flect a 10-year life for all jet aircraft, in­ respect to whether the piston minimums plication. The return element was ad­ cluding T C A which reports for Form 41 should be reduced to the same level as justed upward from 8 to 9 percent in purposes on the basis of a 14-year life. the jet minimums in areas where such view of risks related to the attainment Objection was raised to the Board’s re­ aircraft compete. Those contending of economical daily utilization under the ducing the estimate for Pan American’s that the piston minimums should not be contracts; income tax was adjusted to ground costs per plane-mile to that of reduced argued that such aircraft would reflect the deduction afforded by esti­ Northwest, the next higher carrier. Be­ continue to be used for smaller loads mated interest expense; working capital cause Pan American’s aircraft are larger even at the higher unit rate. However, it was estimated on the basis of one month’s than Northwest’s it appears appropriate is our view that higher unit minimum cash operating expenses; investment to make allowance for this by using the rates for piston aircraft would largely was adjusted to a July 1, 1963, basis seat-mile cost, which reflects the greater price them out of the market especially in instances when the carriers used De­ capacity, rather than the plane-mile cost in view of the large degree of flexibility cember 31, 1962, or some other date; basis, which indicates equivalent costs for available to MATS in making up loads. amortization of preoperating expenses dissimilar capacity aircraft. Pan Ameri­ We have thus determined to have the was standardized to reflect a 5-year can’s ground costs before adjustment same minimum applicable to both types amortization period; certain accounting are more than double the average of the of aircraft in areas where they com­ classification adjustments were made; a other carriers, and are almost 26 per­ pete. However, nothing herein would few obvious clerical errors were cor­ cent above that of the next highest car­ prevent a carrier from offering to per­ rected; and gaps and deficiencies in the rier. Adjustment of such high costs at form a particular operation more suit­ carriers’ data were remedied as appro­ least to the level of the next highest es­ able to a smaller piston airplane at a priate. The only issues raised by the timate appears to be both reasonable and rate above the general minimum. foregoing adjustments pertain to the necessary. With respect to piston rates in areas basing of working capital on one month’s 3. General contentions. One carrier where jets cannot operate, we have cash operating expenses and to an ac­ has characterized the basic methodology adopted language suggested by MATS counting reclassification of passenger li­ used here as an added cost approach, which would tighten the description of ability insurance from flight operations presumably on the theory that it is the the areas involved. EDR-60 would have to passenger service category pertinent intention that MATS be charged only established new mixed rates for such to Capitol Airways, Inc. It appears that for the additional costs attributable to operation, and this has been eliminated the current disbursement procedures for such services. W e disagree. The ap­ here. The contracts provided for mixed MATS contract services are compatible proach provides for a fair allocation of rates to be constructed by applying the with the one month’s basis and, there­ carrier costs, including overhead, be­ tween M A T S and other services. It is passenger and cargo minimums to the fore, the Board adjustments are reason­ conceded that the supplementals’ costs proportions carried. These rates were able. The accounting reclassification currently tend to be higher than those approved by the exemption order and adjustment affects only the costing of of the route carriers principally because it was not our intention to change them. all-cargo, convertible, and mixed cargo- of the former’s lower level of anticipated 2. Rate-making cost adjustments. Aspassenger services. Since the reclassifi­ aircraft utilization. Refusal to give such earlier noted, the minimum rates es­ cation has no effect on the carrier’s total costs greater weight in determining the tablished herein are based on an evalua­ cost for all-passenger service, no objec­ industry minimum rate stems from ® tion of cost data submitted by the car­ tion remains in respect to costing the conviction that such approach would riers. Such data have, however, been all-passenger services. produce an excessive and unreasonable adjusted in a number of areas, and it A number of specific adjustments, is with respect to these adjustments that shown in Appendix A and revisions It is also suggested that any revision many objections have been raised. Both thereto, do not appear to be controver­ of current minimum rates be deferred EDR-60 adjustments and revised adjust­ sial; Some others require discussion. since inadequate cost and operating data ments are reflected in Appendix A. By World Airways, Inc. (World) has pro­ are available for the convertible jets, te., far the most controversial adjustment vided explanations of the nature of its the DC-8F and the B-707-320C. Al­ is that dealing with utilization. breach of warranty insurance and Boe­ though actual data related to these Most route carriers estimated daily ing proprietary and vendor spares which aircraft are limited we are not disposed aircraft utilization at a level below that indicate that the Board’s adjustments to defer the instant rate review on indicated by their system average. In pertaining thereto were incorrect. Ac­ this ground. First, the current MATS each such case the utilization factor was cordingly, revised cost estimates are charter operations are being performed adjusted in EDR-60 to equal their ex­ shown in Appendix A reversing such pre­ with a greater preponderance of jet and perienced 1962 system average. vious elimination. Seaboard objects to having seven classifications of its ex­ turbo-prop aircraft than in earlier years. The objectors have not come forward Such aircraft produce lower unit costs with any sounder basis for estimating penses adjusted downward by the Board. than the piston types in earlier use and on utilization. For the most part they Data reported on Form 41 for the 12 months ended September 30, 1963, the which the current rates were in large would estimate utilization on the basis part predicated. This circumstance was of their forecast MATS business alone latest available, bear out the propriety and remains the principal reason for un­ or at some arbitrary point between the of the Board’s adjusted estimate. In dertaking the current rate review. Sec­ level provided by MATS work alone and fact, the latest exprience tends to show that indicated by their system average. that the Board’s, adjusted estimates ond, although specific data are not gen­ Their estimates are thus either based on slightly overstate Seaboard’s costs. erally available for the convertible je , Wednesday, M arch 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2941

ouch is known about the cost character­ carrier on a given flight is prevented We are satisfied that the proposed istics of earlier jet aircraft and there is from carrying the specified minimum regulations are well within the Board’s no reason to believe that the convertible and the rule is thus phrased. We are authority. W e are not attempting here jets will be more costly to.operate per not persuaded that this provision will to regulate rates and fares as such but passenger-mile or per ton-mile. Indeed result in widespread uneconomic prac­ rather to impose reasonable conditions the reverse should be true. tices. Such provision would not reduce upon the exercise of exemption authority It is contended that our approach fails the cost to MATS per ton delivered nor to perform MATS charter operations. to give adequate recognition to the car­ afford M ATS any incentive to encourage We find that the minimum rate condi­ riers’ commitment to CRAP. • It is con­ the use of this provision beyond the ex­ tions are required in order to prevent tended that a carrier to obtain a M ATS tent intended. Until some evidence to destructive competition in the rates for contract had to commit additional air­ the contrary is presented we will as­ MATS charter business and that they craft to CRAP which are subject to call sume that both long and short term con­ are reasonable conditions upon the at varying levels of national emergency. tracts will be written on the basis of at exemptions we have granted. It is not suggested just how such addi­ least the normal minimum load require­ 9. Discrimination. World has chal­ tional recognition should be given. In ment. In the event that undesirable lenged the proposed rates on the ground any event, we see no basis for adding practices may develop, the Board will that they are unjustly discriminatory some factor to the rate otherwise deter­ not hesitate to reconsider this provision. against ordinary commercial charters. mined. We have considered and relied 6. Free use of excess capacity. The This argument is largely based on the upon the'carriers’ costs including a fair Board proposed to amend Part 288 to allegation that the service to which the return on investment. To the extent that recognize a new MATS contractual pro­ military rates apply is similar to and this comment goes to the question vision relating to the use of any capac­ contemporaneous with civilian charter whether these minimum rates would be ity over and above the contract load. service, and that the circumstances and reasonable in the event of partial or full The provisions would permit the car­ conditions under which the military and activation of the C R A P fleet, such ques­ rier to use any such excess capacity for civilian charters are rendered do not tion is not before the Board in this pro­ route support and, if not so used, to differ substantially. In view of the very ceeding. The rates herein established carry additional MATS traffic at no ex­ basic difference in the services and the may or may not be reasonable for such tra charge. Five of the carriers raised substantial differences in the circum­ services depending on relevant circum­ strong objections to this proposal. Basi­ stances and conditions of carriage, we stances. . cally the objection is that actual capac­ find little merit in the argument Two carriers argue that the proposed ity available is variable in some degree presented. rates give no weight to depreciation re­ and the ability of carriers to offer it In the first place, the costs to the car­ maining on piston aircraft no longer free to M A T S would be an effective com­ rier of generating and servicing MATS used in M ATS services. This is true. petitive device. Stated differently, such charters are less than for commercial We see no basis to charge MATS with “free” carriage would dilute the average charters. In addition, MATS contrac­ costs related to equipment or facilities price per ton or passenger on that trip. tors purchase aviation fuel from MATS not used in such services. Although we are concerned with these at special rates and MATS provides a 4. Minimum aircraft loads. The only potential problems, we will make final large measure of the ground services major objections to the proposed mini­ the proposed provision. The purpose of which the carriers would have to provide mum aircraft loads (i.e., the number of our minimum rate regulation in this area in ordinary commercial service; further, passengers or tons of cargo) relate to is to preserve sound economic conditions no landing fees are charged for landings the proposal to fix the minimum cargo in the industry and not maintain an at M A T S bases. load for the B-707-320C and D C -8 F at absolutely rigid price structure per se. Moreover a carrier ordinarily may rely 32.5 tons. It is contended that this W e are not convinced on the present rec­ on commercial charters only for sporadic amount is far below the actual capabil­ ord that this provision will be disruptive. business, while a M ATS contractor is as­ ity of these aircraft. It is doubtful that any given carrier sured of a fairly substantial volume of The principal purpose behind setting would consistently be at either an ad­ charters spread out over the fiscal year these minimum loads at an artificially vantage or disadvantages in this regard. that his contract covers. All of these low level was to produce a better rela­ In fact, the increase in the minimum factors point to the conclusion that the tionship between the plane mile yield load required for the B-707-320C and cost of providing MATS charters is less of cargo and passenger service. Upon DC -8F, previously referred to, elimi­ than that of commercial charters, and further reflection, however, and in light nates the reason behind most of the ob­ none of the parties to this proceeding of the comments, we have concluded jections. Neither should this provision have shown the differential in favor of that the minimum load requirements result in rates that are not fair and M ATS resulting from the proposed mini- should approximate the capacity of the reasonable since any such extra traffic mums to be more than is justified by cost aircraft. We have accordingly revised would be carried at very little additional considerations. the load standards for the B-707-320C cost. W e will expect the carriers to Finally it may be added that such and DC-8P to 36.5 tons. maintain appropriate records showing differentials have been in effect for a 5. Deficit traffic. The Board proposed the occasions and extent to which this number of years without serious chal­ to add a new provision to Part 288 which provision is exercised for use at such time lenge. would permit a carrier to accept a load as this provision may be further evalu­ 10. Retroactivity. In EDR-60, car­ 10 percent below the minimum load ated. riers were put on notice that we were specified when unable to carry the full 7. Substitute service. The definition considering making the rates finally amount specified. In such instance the of substitute service and the rules relat­ adopted effective retroactively to October cwner would be paid only for the traffic ing thereto are being adopted in the form 1,1963. ~ Several carriers objected to ret­ actually carried but would be absolved proposed in EDR-60, effective March 1, roactive application of any such changes. oi any obligation, as now exists, to pro­ 1964. An order amending the interim The carriers argue that the bidding for vide for the carriage of the “deficit” certificates of the supplemental carriers the contracts for fiscal year 1964 was traffic on some other flight. This pro­ to authorize substitute service is being on the basis of the existing higher rates; vision was suggested by MATS and issued concurrently with these rules. that although the 1964 contracts speci­ ^ tentatively by the Board -as a 8. Authority to issue rules fixing mini­ fied that any reduction in minimum rates cation current procedures mum rates for MATS charters. A ques­ dining the fiscal year would be made nich might save money for both ear­ tion has been raised as to the Board’s available to M ATS, the carriers could not ners and MATS. power to establish minimum rates in this have anticipated the substantial reduc­ ffr^°wCaiI*ers °P,P°se its adoption on the proceeding. It is contended that the tions involved herein; that the cost data rat"; "hat It may permit uneconomic Board does not have authority to estab­ for pure jets are too inconclusive at the rate cutting. W e did not visualize this lish minimum rates by the adoption of present time to be used as the basis for to on,as enabling a carrier regularly economic regulations and also is with­ new rates; and that, generally, retroac­ it S ” ? bel°w-minimum loads. Rather out authority to regulate rates applica­ tivity impairs the carriers’ ability to anri ^ Vended to meet the occasional ble to charters in foreign air transpor­ make business decisions and causes con­ infrequent situations in which a tation. fusion and hardship. 2942 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Upon consideration of all of the cojn- tice MATS charter service, the award (ii) Round-trip cargo services—12.5 ments, we have determined to make the contains or is accompanied by a written cents per cargo ton-mile. rates effective as of January 1, 1964. statement of the military establishment (iii) One-way passenger services—4.2 In reaching this conclusion, we have that such award is for transportation cents per passenger-mile. balanced the considerations advanced by necessary to fulfill unforeseen military (iv ) O ne-way cargo services—21.5 the carriers against the fact that all car­ requirements as to which time is of the cents per cargo ton-mile. essence. riers have been on notice of our tentative Provided, That a minimum of 15.0 cents determination to make the rates retro­ 4. Amend § 288.5 to read as follows: per cargo ton-mile shall apply to Seg­ active, as well as the interests of the ments of round trips on which cargo is Government as rate payer in paying no § 288.5 Exemption. carried in cases where passengers are more than reasonable rates for trans­ (a) Subject to the provisions of this carried on one or more other segments portation services. part and the conditions imposed, air car­ of the round trip. Provided further, Since Part 288 did not contain mini­ riers holding authority from the Board That, subject to the provisions of para­ mum load standards for many new air­ to engage in air transportation of per­ graph (b ) of this section, the minimum craft used for the first time this year, sons and/or property by the use of large rates specified above shall not be appli­ MATS put the proposed standards in aircraft and which have contractually cable to the passengers or cargo carried effect on October 1, 1963. It would be committed their CRAF aircraft to the on a particular trip in excess of the impractical to make the load standards Department of Defense are hereby ex­ amount that the contract calls for MATS retroactive, and we will accordingly rat­ empted from the following provisions of to supply and the carrier to provide ify M ATS action by making the proposed Title IV of the Federal Aviation Act of space. standards effective from October 1,1963, 1958, as amended, and the Board’s Eco­ (2) For services performed from Jan­ through February 29, 1964. The new nomic Regulations: uary 1, 1964, through February 29,1964, standards contained herein are made other than services specified in subpara­ effective March 1, 1964, and thereafter. j Section 403 of the Act; Part 221 of the Regulations. graph (3) of this paragraph: In view of the foregoing, the Board (i) All round trips on which passen­ (b) Subject to the provisions of this finds that there is good cause to make gers are carried on at least one segment this rule effective on less than 30 days’ part and the conditions imposed, air thereof— 2.55 cents per passenger-mile. carriers, other than supplemental air notice. (ii) Round-trip cargo services— 11.5 EDR-60 also proposed a change in carriers, holding authority from the cents per cargo ton-mile. Board to engage in air transportation of § 399.36 of the policy statements. This (iii) One-way passenger and mixed persons and/or property by the use of amendment was accomplished on Janu­ passenger-cargo services—4.2 cents per ary 29, 1964 when Part 399 was reissued large aircraft and which have contrac­ passenger-mile. tually committed their CRAF aircraft to by Regulation Policy Statement No. 21. (iv) O ne-way cargo services—21.0 The provision has been renumbered as the Department of Defense, are hereby cents per cargo ton-mile. § 399.16. exempted from the following provisions In consideration of the foregoing, the of Title IV of the Federal Aviation Act' of Provided, That, subject to the provisions Civil Aeronautics Board hereby amends 1958, as amended, and the Board’s Eco­ of paragraph (b) of this section, the Part 288 of the Economic Regulations nomic Regulations: minimum rates specified above shall not be applicable to the passengers or cargo (14 CFR Part 288), effective March 1, Section 401(a) of the Act; Part 202 of the 1964, as follows: Regulations; Part 207 of the Regulations. carried on a particular trip in excess of 1. Amend the title of Part 288 to read the amount that the contract calls for as set forth above. 5. Amend § 288.6 to read as follows: M ATS to supply and the carrier to pro­ 2. Amend § 288.1 by adding immedi­ vide space. § 288.6 Scope of exemption. ately after the definition of “Short notice (3) For services performed from Jan­ M ATS charter service” and immediately The exemptions granted in § 288.5 ex­ uary 1, 1964, through February 29, 1964 before the definition of “Supplemental tend only to transportation of persons within the State of Alaska; between the air carrier” a new definition of “Substi­ and/or property under agreements for State of Hawaii, Midway, Johnston, tute service” to read as follows: short notice MATS charter service as Kwajalein, or Eniwetok; between defined herein, where the award "con­ Japan, Guam, Okinawa, Formosa, or the § 288.1 Definitions. tains, or is accompanied by, the written Philippines; or to or from the Canal ***** statement set forth in the proviso to Zone: “Substitute service” means the per­ § 288.2, and to substitute service as de­ (i) Round-trip pasenger services—2.75 formance by an air carrier of foreign or fined herein. This authority is in addi­ cents per passenger-mile. overseas air transportation, or air trans­ tion to all other authority to engage in (ii) Round-trip cargo services— 12.5 portation between the 48 contiguous air transportation issued by the Board cents per cargo ton-mile. States, on the one hand, and the State of to any air carried and will not be con­ (iii) One-Way passenger services—4.2 Alaska or Hawaii, on the other hand, in strued as in any manner limiting such cents per passenger-mile. planeload lots pursuant to an agreement other authority. (iv) O ne-way cargo services—21.5 cents per cargo ton-mile. with another air carrier to fulfill such 6. Amend the introductory language other air carrier’s contractual obligation and paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of Provided, That a minimum Of 15.0 cents to perform such air transportation for § 288.7 to read as follows: per cargo ton-mile shall apply to seg­ MATS and when the performance of ments of round trips on which cargo is such air transportation is not to take § 288.7 Reasonable level of compensa­ carried, in cases where passengers are place during a period longer than three tion. carried on one or more other segments weeks. It shall be a condition on the exemp­ of the round trip. * * * * * tions granted by this part that the level Provided further, That, subject to the 3. Amend § 288.2 to read as follows: of compensation for transportation pro­ provisions of paragraph (b) of this sec­ vided for short notice MATS charter § 288.2 Applicability. tion, the minimum rates specified above service and substitute service shall not shall not be applicable to passengers or be uneconomically low. This part applies to substitute service cargo carried on a particular trip in ex­ and short notice MATS charter service (a ) Minimum charges. In the ab­ cess of the amount that the contract calls by air carriers holding economic author­ sence of specific Board approval, the for M A T S to supply and the carrier to ity from the Board to provide air trans­ compensation for such services shall not provide space. , portation of persons and/or property by be less than the following: (4 ) For services performed on ana the use of large aircraft and which have (1) For services performed from Octo­ contractually committed their CRAF air­ ber 1,1963 through Decmber 31,1963: after March 1, 1964, other than services craft to the Department of Defense: (i) Round-trip passenger services— specified in subparagraphs (5) and (0) Provided, That, in the case of short no­ 2.75 cents per passenger-mile. of this paragraph: Wednesday, M a r c h 4, 1964 FEDERAL'REGISTER 2943

(i) All round trips on which passen­ Por P eriod January 1, 1964-February 29, 1964 than 75 percent of the round-trip all­ gers are carried on at least one segment passenger rate specified in paragraphs thereof—2.55 cents per passenger-mile. Number of Tons of cargo (a) and (b) of this section in all cases passengers (ii) Round-trip cargo services— 11.5 where passengers are carried on any cents per cargo ton-mile. other part of the whole trip. (¡ii) One-way passenger and mixed Convertible Aircraft type All-passen­ flights pursu­ 7. Amend § 288.8 to read as follows: passenger-cargo services—4.2 cents per ger mixed A ll ant to the rates and con­ cargo specified in § 288.8 Filing o f reports. passenger-mile. vertible flights paragraph (a) (iv) One-way cargo services— 21.0 flights (3) of this (a ) Contents of reports. W ithin 10 section cents per cargo ton-mile. days of the last flight under each award of a short notice MATS contract or Provided, That, subject to the provisions B-707-320C 165 32.60 of paragraph (b ) of this section the mini­ D C-8F...... 165 32.50 agreement for substituted service per­ mum rates specified above shall not be B-707 (other)...... 159 formed pursuant to authorization DO-8 (other)..... 149 applicable to the passengers or cargo car­ CD-44...... 148 29.35 granted by this part, air carriers per­ ried on a particular trip in excess of the D-1649A...... 95 .18.00 15.00 forming short notice MATS charter L-1049-C/E/G/H. 95 18.00 15.00 service or substitute service shall file with amount that the contract calls for M A T S DC-7-B/C/CF/F. 95 18.00 15.00 to supply and the carrier to provide L-1049A...... 88 15.00 12.00 the Board reports covering such opera­ DC-7...... 88 15.00 12.00 tions and containing the following in­ space. DC-6-A/B/C 83 13.00 12.00 (5) For services performed on and DC-4______60 8.00 6.00 formation: after March 1, 1961, other than services (1 ) A true copy of the award in the specified in subparagraph (6) of this For Period on and A fter M arch 1, 1964 case of short notice M ATS charters and, paragraph, within the State of Alaska; in the case of substitute service, a state­ ment indicating the carrier on behalf of between the State of Hawaii, Midway, Number of Tons of cargo Johnston, Kwajalein, or Eniwetok; be­ passengers which the service was performed, the tween Japan, Guam, Okinawa, Formosa, type of aircraft called for by the MATS or the Philippines; or to or from the Convertible contract, and the date on which it agreed Aircraft type All-passen­ flights pursu­ to perform the substitute service; Canal Zone: ger mixed A ll ant to the rates (i) Round-trip passenger services— and con­ cargo specified in (2) Number of trips, and date each vertible flights paragraph (a) trip originated; 2.75 cents per passenger-mile. flights (5) of this (ii) Round-trip cargo services— 12.5 section (3) Origin point, intermediate points cents per cargo ton-mile. (operational and traffic), and destination point of each trip; (iii) One-way passenger services— 4.2 B-707-320-B/C__ 165 36.50 cents per passenger-mile. DC-8F ...... 165 36*50 (4) Type of aircraft used for each B-707-300 series... 159 trip; (iv) One-way cargo services-1-^ 1.5 B-707-100 series.. 149 cents per cargo ton-mile. DC-8 (other). 147 (5) Aircraft miles (statute) flown on CB-44 148 29.35 each trip; Provided, That, a minimum of 15.0 cents B-1649A...... 95 18.00 15.00 Lr-1049-C/E/G/H. 95 18.00 15.00 (6) Number of passengers and/or tons per cargo ton-mile shall apply to seg­ DC-7-B/C/CF/F. .95 18.00 15.00 of cargo carried on each segment of each ments of round trips on which cargo is L-1049A...... 88 15.00 12.00 trip; and DC-7. ______88 15.00 12.00 carried, in cases where passengers are DC-6-A/B/C..... 83 13.00 12.00 (7) Contract price per passenger and/ carried on one or more other segments DC-4______60 8.00 6.00 or ton of cargo. of the round trip. (b ) Filing. Three copies of the reports Provided further, That subject to the Provided, That, for the purpose of this shall be filed with the Office of Carrier provisions of paragraph (b) of this sec­ paragraph (b), compensation equal to Accounts and Statistics of the Board. tion, the minimum rates specified above the minimum rate applied to the load (Secs. 204(a), 407, and 416 of the Federal shall not be applicable to passengers or that actually can be accommodated Aviation Act of 1958; 72 Stat. 743, 766, 771; cargo carried on a particular trip in ex­ shall be considered economic whenever 49 U.S.C. 1324, 1877, 1386) cess of the amount that the contract a carrier is prevented from accommo­ N ote: The reporting requirements con­ calls for M ATS to supply and the carrier dating a load equal to the minimum spe­ tained herein have been approved by the to provide space. cified above, for reasons other than Bureau of the Budget in accordance with (6) The compensation for substitute adverse weather, off-loading by MATS, the Federal Reports Act of 1942. service shall not be less than that which or the bulk of the cargo supplied by By the Civil Aeronautics Board. the prime. contractor would have re­ MATS, but in no event less than 90 per­ ceived under his contract with MATS. cent of the above minimum loads. [ s e a l ] H arold R. S an d e r so n , (b) Minimum aircraft loads. The (c ) Round-trip services defined on Secretary. minimum charges established by para­ and after January 1,1964. For purposes (F.R. Doc. 64-2086; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; graph (a) of this sectionshall be deemed of this section, round-trip services means 8:51 a.m.] economic only when the. resulting rev­ short notice M ATS charter service where enues are at least the equivalent of such (1) passengers and/or cargo are trans­ charges applied to the following mini­ ported on two or more successive revenue Chapter III— Federal Aviation Agency mum loads: flights and the last revenue flight ter­ SUBCHAPTER C— AIRCRAFT REGULATIONS minates within 250 statute miles of the [Reg. Doc. No. 1725; Arndt. 695] Period October 1, 1963-December 31, 1963 point of origin of the first revenue flight, (2) the scheduling permits departures PART 507— Al R WORTH IN ESS Number of Tons of cargo within 4 hours after arrival at each DIRECTIVES passengers point to be served except at one point Aircraft type where the aircraft may be scheduled for Boeing Models 707 and 720 Series All-passen­ All-cargo Converti­ departure within 72 hours after arrival, Aircraft ger flights flights ble flights and (3) the air carrier operates en route not more than one ferry flight not ex­ Amendment 596, 28 F:R. 7937, AD 63- B-707-320C___. .. 16-1, requires inspection and rework of DC-8F 165 32.50 ceeding 50 statute miles without com­ 32.50 the latch lock on the aft thrust reverser B-707 (other)' 159 pensation and not more than one ferry p oth er)----- 149 flight not exceeding 1,500 statute miles on Boeing Models 707 and 720 Series air­ L-1649A 148 29.35 27.00 for compensation equal to not less than craft equipped with JT3D^1 or -3 en­ 15.00 gines. The manufacturer has now modi­ {rIM9-Ç/È'/G/g_ 95 18.00 15.00 75 percent of the round-trip cargo rate ^ / O / C F / F . 95 18.00 fied the aft thrust reverser sleeve posi­ 15.00 specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of DC-7 ------88 15.00 12.00 tion indicating switch to indicate latch gc^A/E/c 15.00 12.00 this section where only cargo is carried 83 13.00 12.00 lock engagement as well as sleeve posi­ 60 8.00 6.00 on the other portions of the whole trip tion. Latch lock engagement will be de­ and for compensation equal to not less noted in the cockpit through actuation 2944 RULES AND REGULATIONS of a light by the modified indicating accomplished, inspect the beam cap tie-in deleting paragraph (c) of §309.2- and switch. Therefore, Amendment 596 is fittings, Lockheed P/N’s 311134L and by adding a new center heading and 311134R, for cracks in the area of the .16 being amended by adding a new para­ group of sections as set forth below:' radius near the center of the fitting using graph to permit the relocation of the in­ dye penetrant or FAA-approved equivalent. Stores and Supplies dicating switch. Gain access to the part through opening Sec. Since this amendment provides an al­ No. 87 as described in Figure 1-3 of the ternative means of compliance and im­ Model 1049 Maintenance Instructions 309.201 Purpose. 309.202 Definitions. poses no additional burden on any per­ Manual. (b ) Replace any cracked fitting with a 309.203 Value at time of loss. son, notice and public procedure hereon 309.204 Proof of loss. are unnecessary, and the amendment new fitting of the same part number before further flight, except that the aircraft may may be made effective upon publication A u t h o r it y : The .provisions of §§ 309.201- be ferried in accordance with the provisions 309.204 issued under sec. 204, 49 Stat. 1987, in the F ederal R eg ister . of CAR 1.76 to the base at which the repairs as amended; sec. 1209, 64 Stat. 775, as In consideration of the foregoing, and are to be accomplished. amended; 70 Stat. 984; 46 U.S.C. 1114, 1289. pursuant to the authority delegated to This amendment shall become effec­ me by the-Administrator (25 F.R. 6489), S tores an d S u p p l ie s tive April 6,1964. § 507.10(a) of Part 507 (14 CFR Part § 309.201 Purpose. 507), is amended as follows: (Secs. 313fa ), 601, 603; 72 Stat. 752, 775, 776; Amendment 596, 28 F.R. "7937, A D 63- 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421,1423) It is the purpose of §§ 309.201 through 16-1, Models 707 and 720 Series aircraft, Issued in Washington, D.C., on Febru­ 309.24 to prescribe the method for de­ is amended by adding the following new ary 26, 1964. termining the values of stores and sup­ paragraph (g) to read: G . S. M o o re, plies on board a vessel when lost, for (g ) The aft thrust reverser position indi­ Director, which claims for loss will be paid, and to cating switch may be relocated in accordance Flight Standards Service. prescribe the procedure for payment of with Boeing Service Bulletin 1896 or FAA ap­ claims for such loss, when stores and [F.R. Doc. 64-2041; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; proved equivalent Approval of any equiv­ supplies are covered under a disburse­ 8:46 a.m.] « alent means shall be processed through the ments clause of a W ar Risk Hull Insur­ Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, ance Binder or a W ar Risk Hull Insur­ Western Region, Los Angeles, California. ance Policy issued by the United States When the approved switch relocation is in­ Title 38— PENSIONS, BONUSES, corporated, compliance with the provisions on forms prescribed by §§ 308.106 and of paragraphs (a) through (e) of this AD is 308.107 of this chapter, or when stores no longer required. (Boeing Service Bulletin AND VETERANS’ RELIEF and supplies are covered by a War Risk No. 1896 pertains to this subject.) Chapter I— Veterans Administration Disbursements Policy issued by the United States pursuant to section 1203(c) This amendment shall become effec­ PART 3— ADJUDICATION of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as tive M arch 4, 1964. amended (46 U.S.C. 1283(c)). The ves­ (Secs. 313(a), 601, 603; 72 Stat. 752, 775, 776; Subpart A— Pension, Compensation, sel values established by §§ 309.1 through 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423) and Dependency and Indemnity 309.8 (General Order 82) do not include any allowance fo r the loss of stores and Issued in Washington, D.C., on Febru­ Compensation supplies, as distinguished from equip­ ary 26, 1964. * COMPUTATION OF INCOME ment and spare parts which are included G. S. M o ore, in such vessel values. Director, In § 3.260, paragraph (c) is amended Flight Standards Service. to read as follows: § 309.202 Definitions. [F.R. Doc. 64-2040; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; § 3.260 Computation o f income. Stores juid supplies are those articles 8:46 a.m.] * * * * * and commodities used and consumed in (c) Proportionate income limitations; the day-to-day operation of a vessel by [Reg. Docket No. 3036; Arndt. 694] excess income. A proportionate income the operation and maintenance of ma­ limitation will be established under the chinery ancj equipment; the maintenance PART 507—-AIRWORTHINESS conditions set forth in paragraph (d) of of clean and sanitary conditions; the DIRECTIVES this section except where application of feeding of passengers, officers, and crew; Lockheed Models 1049 C, D, E, G, and a proportionate income limitation would and stocked for the use and convenience result in payment of a lower rate than of passengers, officers, and crew. Vessel H Series Aircraft would be payable on the. basis of income stores and supplies include (a) consum­ A proposal to amend Part 507 of the for the full calendar year. able stores, (b ) subsistence stores, (c) regulations of the Administrator to in­ * # * * * slop chest, (d ) bar stock, and (e) fuel, as clude an airworthiness directive requir­ (72 Stat. 1114; 38 UB.C. 210) defined in Maritime Administration In­ ing inspection of the beam cap tie-in ventory Books, Forms MA-4736, A This VA regulation is effective the date through K. fittings and replacement of any found of approval. cracked on Lockheed Models 1049 C, D, § 309.203 Value at time of loss. E, G, and H Series aircraft was pub­ Approved: February 26,1964. lished in 29 F.R. 268. By direction of the Administrator. The value of unused stores and sup­ Interested persons have been afforded plies on board a vessel at the time of [ s e a l ] W . J. D r iver , an opportunity to participate in the Deputy Administrator. loss, and for which claims for loss will making of the amendment. No objec­ be paid equals: tions were received. [F.R. Doc. 64-2084; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; (a) The value of such stores and sup­ 8:51 a.m.] In consideration of the foregoing, and plies on board at the completion of the pursuant to the authority delegated to previous voyage, plus me by the Administrator (25 F.R. 6489), Title 46— SHIPPING (b) The value of stores and supplies § 507.10(a) of P art 507 (14 C FR Part purchased and placed on board the ves­ 507), is hereby amended by adding the Chapter II— Maritime Administration, sel before the commencement of the voy­ following new airworthiness directive: Department of Commerce age during which the loss occurred, plus L ockheed. Applies to all Models 1049C, (c) The value of stores and supplies SUBCHAPTER G— EMERGENCY OPERATIONS 1049D, 1049E, 1049G, and 1049H Series purchased and placed on board the ves­ aircraft. [General Order 100] Compliance required as indicated. sel after the commencement of such voy­ As the result of a metallurgical investiga­ PART 309— VALUES FOR WAR RISK age, less tion which revealed a beam cap tie-in fitting INSURANCE (d) That portion of the sum of para­ fatigue crack, attributed to improperly ori­ graphs (a ), (b ), and (c) of this section ented material grain direction of the part, Miscellaneous Amendments which was sold, transferred, used or con­ accomplish the following: (a ) Within 350 hours* time in service after Part 309 is hereby revised by changing sumed to, but not including, the date of the effective date of this AD, unless already the part heading as set forth above; by the loss. Wednesday, M arch 4, 1964 FEDERAI REGISTER 2945

§309.204 Proof of loss. sel was ready to sail, determined by cer­ The period for which the vessel was stored tified inventories of the owner of with Stores and SuppUes for use on the voy­ Claims for reimbursement for total loss age on which she was lost, beginning with amounts on board the vessel at the ter­ of stores and supplies may be submitted the last day of storing, w a s ____— days for mination of the preceding voyage or by the owner to the Chief, Division of Consumable Stores,______days for Sub­ date of last inventory, less actual con­ Insurance, Maritime Administration, sistence Stores,______days for Slop Chest, sumption to date of sailing, plus a cer­ Washington, D.C., 20235, based on one of ______days for Bar Stock and ______days tified statement by the owner of actual for Fuel. The number of days from the last two alternative methods of proof, as pro­ additional purchases made from date of day of storing to, but not including, the vided in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this termination of the preceding voyage or date on which the vessel was lost, was — .— section. Owners may use either method date or last inventory to date vessel was days for Consumable Stores,______days for for each category of stores and supplies. Subsistence Stores, ____days for Slop lost, subject to audit by the Maritime (a) Formula. In cases where the C h e s t ,______days for Bar Stock and Administration, less owner and the Chief, Division of Insur­ ______days for Fuel. (2) The average daily consumption ance, Maritime Administration, have I. Consumable (Excluding Subsistence) cost determined by dividing the amount agreed, in advance of the loss, upon Stores: 8 determined as in subparagraph (l)'* of (A ) The average daily consumption cost amounts representing, or the method for of Consumable Stores for this vessel for the determining, the average daily consump­ this paragraph by the number of days for which the vessel was stored) times year prior to the voyage on which she was tion costs of stores and supplies for the lost was 4 $______. the number of days from the date the owner’s vessel, claims for total loss of (B) The figure required for (A) is not such stores and supplies may be sub­ vessel was ready to sail to, but not includ­ readily available, and the average daily cost mitted by the owner on Affidavit in Proof ing, the date of loss, plus actual amount of Consumable Stores for this vessel for the of consumable stores transferred or sold. of Claim for the loss of stores and sup­ last calendar year set up on the Owner’s The values of subsistence stores, slop books was 4 $______plies, Exhibit A. In such cases, the The amount of Consumable Stores on value of the consumable stores at time of chest, bar stock, and fuel, at the time of loss are determined in the same manner, board at the time this vessel was ready to loss is determined as follows: - supported by certified inventories of the sail (the number of days for which the ves­ (1) The value of consumable stores on sel was stored times the average daily con­ board at the time the vessel was ready owner and invoices. sumption cost, as above) was $______to sail, determined by multiplying the Effective date. The foregoing shall be­ To this amount is added the actual cost number of days for which the vessel is come effective thirty days after its pub­ of Consumable Stores purchased in Foreign Ports for the homeward voyage (as per state­ stored by the average daily consumption lication in the F ederal R e g ist e r . ment attached) 8 $______making the total cost in dollars, plus Dated: February 26,1964. The average daily consumption cost, as (2) The cost of consumable stores, if above, times the number of days from the any, purchased in foreign ports for the R obert E. G il e s , date the vessel was ready to sail to, but not homeward voyage, less Acting Maritime Administrator. including, the date of loss, as above, is (3) The average daily consumption Ex h ib it A cost times the number of days from the To this amount is added the actual amount AFFIDAVIT IN PROOF OF CLAIM FOB THE LOSS date the vessel was ready to sail to, but of Consumable Stores transferred or sold (as OF UNUSED STORES AND SUPPLIES ON BOARD per statement attached) $______making not including, the date of loss, plus the THE SS,------$______which, subtracted from the amount actual amount of consumable stores State of \ of Consumable Stores on board at date of transferred or sold. The values of slop Co u n t y o f / ss’ sailing, as above, is $______which sum is chest stores, bar stock and fuel, at the claimed to be the actual value of the vessel’s time of loss are determined in the same I am the ______of -______the unused Consumable Stores at the time of the Owner of the S S _____which was lost manner by using the applicable daily loss, according to the best of deponent’s as a result of enemy action on or about knowledge, information and belief. consumption costs for such stores. The the _____ - day o f ______— . I make value of subsistence stores at the time II. Subsistence Stores: this affidavit in support of the above-named The amount of Subsistence. Stores on of loss is determined as follows: Owner’s claim for the loss of the actual board, that is the number of the crew signed (i) The value of subsistence stores on value of the said vessel’s unused Stores and on ( ) and the average number of passen­ board at the time the vessel was. ready to Supplies. The statements herein contained gers, if any ( ), times the number of days sail, determined by multiplying the are based upon the personal knowledge of for which the vessel was stored as above ( ), agreed cost for one man per day by the deponent or upon the books of records of times the applicable factor6 of cost for one the Owner or its agent which deponent be­ man per day ( ) was ____ _ number of crew signed on and the num­ lieves are true and accurate. ber of passengers, if any, and multiply­ To this amount is added the actual cost of (A ) “Stores and Supplies”, for loss of Subsistence Stores purchased in Foreign ing that product by the number of days which claim is being made, are limited to Ports for the homeward voyage (as per state­ for which the vessel is stored, plus consumable and subsistence stores as de­ ment attached)5 $------making the amount (ii) The cost of subsistence stores, if fined in Maritime Administration Inventory on board on date of sailing ______any, purchased in foreign ports for the Manual, Vessel Inventories, Part I, and do The amount of Subsistence Stores con­ homeward voyage, less not include radio supplies, expendable equip­ sumed, that is the number of crew signed ment, scrap, junk and spare parts.1 on ( ) and the average number of passen­ (m The number of crew signed on (B) It has been the consistent account­ and the average number of passengers, if gers, if any ( ) times the number of days ing practice of the Owner to group together between the last day of storing the vessel and any, times the agreed cost of one man Consumable Stores as defined in the Mari­ the date on which the vessel was lost ( ) per day times the number of days from time Administration Inventory Manual, Ves­ times the applicable factor8 of cost for one the date the vessel was ready to sail to, sel Inventories, Part I, and Expendable Equip­ man per day was $______but not including, the date of loss, plus ment, but the amount herein stated to be To this amount is added the actual amount the actual amount of subsistence stores the value of consumable stores for the pur­ of Subsistence Stores transferred or sold (as pose of making this claim does not exceed transferred or sold. per statement attached), $______, making ______2 percent of the aggregate of such con­ (b) Verified costs.. In cases where the $______which, subtracted from the amount sumable stores and expendable equipment.1 of Subsistence Stores on board at date of owner and the chief, Division of Insur­ I am familiar with the insurance carried on sailing, as above, is $____ which sum is ance, Maritime Administration, have not the Stores and Supplies on the S S ______; claimed to be the actual value of the un­ agreed in advance of the loss upon and, from the effective date of War Risk used Subsistence Stores at the time of the amounts representing, or the method Insurance Policy issued by the for determining, the average daily con­ United States of America, which covers the 8 If the figure needed to fill the blank in sumption costs of Stores and Supplies total loss of Stores and Supplies in the paragraph (A) or (B) is not available, the for the owner’s vessel, claims for total amount of $______to the date of such ves­ formula cannot be used; the Owner must loss of such Stores and Supplies must sel’s loss o n ______there was no war submit actual inventories and a record of be submitted by the owner on Affidavit risk insurance on such Stores and Supplies purchases on Affidavit Exhibit B. m Proof of Claims for the Loss of Stores other than that provided by said Binder or ‘ Strike out paragraph (A) or (B ). and Supplies, Exhibit B. In such cases, Policy. • 8 Strike out this sentence if vessel was lost on outward leg of voyage. the value of the consumable stores will ^Strike out either paragraph (A) or (B). amount on board at date of sailing $------be determined as follows: 2 Insert percentage agreed upon with Chief, 8 The factor of cost per man per day, as The value of consumable stores Division of Insurance, Maritime Administra­ prescribed by the Maritime Administration on board the vessel at the time the ves­ tion. for voyages beginning in 19 , is $------... 2946 RULES AND REGULATIONS loss, according to the best of deponent’s V. F u e l:» I am familiar with the insurance carried knowledge, information and belief. (A ) The average daily consumption cost on the Stores and Supplies, on the ss HI. Slop Chest:* of Fuel for this vessel for the year prior -______; &nd, from the effective date (A ) The average daily consumption cost of to the voyage on which she was lost was of War Risk Insurance 5 ^ er 2° ...... - Slop Chest Stores for this vessel for the year u $______. prior to the voyage on which she was lost (B) The figure required for (A) is not issued by the United States of America, which was 8 $______readily available, and the average daily cost covers the total loss of Stores and Supplies in (B) The figure required for (A) is not of Fuel for this vessel for the last calendar the amount of $____’■__, to the date of such readily available, and the average daily cost year set up on the Owner’s books was vessel’s loss o n ______there was no war of Slop Chest Stores for this vessel for the « $______' risk insurance on such Stores and Supplies last calendar year set up on the Owner’s The amount of Fuel on board at the time other than that provided by said Binder or books was *$______. this vessel was ready to sail (the number of Policy. The amount of Slop Chest Stores on board days for which the vessel was stored times The period for which the vessel was stored at the time this vessel was ready to sail (the the average daily consumption cost, as with Stores and Supplies for use on the number of days for which the vessel vtas above) was $______voyage on which she was lost, beginning stored times the average daily consumption To this amount is added the actual cost with the last day of storing, w a s ______days cost, as above) was $______of Fuel purchased in Foreign Ports for home­ for Consumable Stores,______days for Sub­ To this amount is added the actual cost of ward voyage (as per statement attached)6 sistence Stores,____ _ days for Slop Chest, Slop Chest Stores purchased In Foreign Ports $------making the total amount on hand ------days for Bar Stock a n d ______days for the homeward voyage (as per statement at date of sailing $______for Fuel. The number of days from the last attached)5 $______making the total amount The. average daily consumption cost, as day of storing to, but not including, the date on hand at date of sailing $______above, times the number of days from the on which the vessel was lost, was _____ The average daily consumption cost, as date the vessel was ready to sail to, but days for Consumable Stores,______days for above times -the number of days from the not including, the date of loss, as above, is Subsistence Stores, ______days for Slop date the vessel was ready to sail to, but not ----- Chest, — — days for Bar Stock an d _____ including, the date of loss, as above, is To this amount is added the actual amount days for Fuel. $ ------of Fuel transferred or sold (as per state­ I. Consumable (excluding Subsistence) To this is added the actual amount of Slop ment attached) $______making $______Stores: Chest Stores transferred or sold (as per. which, subtracted from the amount of Fuel (1) The value of Consumable Stores on statement attached) $_____ , making $______on board at the time of sailing, as above, board the vessel at the time the vessel was which, subtracted from the amount of Slop is $------which sum is claimed to be the ready to sail, as shown by the attached Chest Stores on board at date of sailing, as actual value of the vessel’s unused Fuel at certified inventory of amounts on board the above, is $______which sum is claimed to be the time of the loss according to the best vessel at the termination of the preceding the actual value of the vessel’s unsold Slop of deponent’s knowledge, information and voyage or date of last inventory o n _____ Chest Stores at the time of the loss accord- belief. ------less actual consumption to date of ing to the best of deponent’s knowledge, in­ sailing, amounting to $8___plus the formation and belief. Claim is hereby made for: actual additional purchases made for the IV. Bar Stock :> Unused Consumable Stores, other voyage on which the vessel was lost, as shown (A) The average daily consumption cost than— by the attached invoices, amounting to of Bar Stock for this vessel for the year Subsistence Stores.______$______$______was $______prior to the voyage on which she was lost Subsistence Stores______(2) The average daily consumption factor was 10 $______Slop Chest______¡j.______of $------(determined by dividing the (B) The figure required for (A) is not Bar Stock______1 ______amount determined as in (1) by the number ] readily available, and the average daily cost tF u e l ___i ______of days for which the vessel was stored) of Bar Stock for this vessel for the last times the number of days from the date calendar year set up on the Owner’s, books T o t a l______$______the vessel was ready to sail to, but not in­ was 10 $__- ___ _ B y ; ------. . . . . ------cluding, the date of loss ( ) is $-_____ The amount of Bar Stock on board at the To this amount is added the actual amount time this vessel was ready to sail (the num­ Sworn to before me th is ______day of of Consumable Stores transferred or sold (as ber of days for which the vessel was stored ...... 19... per statement attached) $______making times the average daily consumption cost, $------which, subtracted from the amount as above) was $______Notary P u b lio of Consumable Stores on board at the time To this, amount is added the actual cost the vessel was ready to sail, as shown in (1) of Bar Stock purchased in Foreign Ports for Ex h ib it B above, is $______, which sum is claimed to the homeward voyage (as per statement at­ AFFIDAVIT IN PROOF OF CLAIM FOR THE LOSS OF be the actual value of the vessel’s unused tached)6 $______making the total amount UNUSED STORES AND SUPPLIES O N BOARD THE Consumable Stores at the time of the , loss on hand at date of sailing $______ss ______according to the best of deponent’s knowl­ The average daily consumption cost, as edge, information and belief. above, times the number of days from the State o f 1 II. Subsistence Stores: date the vessel was ready to sail to, but Co u n t y of/ * (1) The value of Subsistence Stores on not including, the date of loss, as above, I am t h e ______of ______the board the vessel at the time the vessel was is ____ _ Owner of the S S ______, which was lost ready to sail, as shown by the attached cer­ To this amount is added the actual amount as a result of enemy action on or about the tified inventory of amounts on board the ves­ of Bar Stock transferred or sold (as per state­ ------day o f ------I make this sel at the termination of the preceding voy­ ment attached) $______making $______, affidavit in support of the above-named age or date of last inventory o n __'------which, subtracted from the amount of Bar Owner’s claim for the loss of the actual value less actual consumption to date of sailing, Stock on board at the time of sailing, as of the said vessel’s unused Stores and Sup­ amounting to $_____ plus the actual addi­ above, is $______which sum is claimed to plies. The statements herein contained are tional purchases made for the voyage on be the actual value of the vessel’s unused based upon the personal knowledge of which the vessel was lost, as shown by the Bar Stock at the time of the loss according deponent or upon the books of records of the attached invoices, amounting to $------to the best of deponent’s knowledge, informa­ Owner or its agent which deponent believes was $______tion and belief. are true and accurate. (2) The average daily consumption factor “Stores and Supplies”, for loss of which of $------(as determined by dividing the am ount,determined as in (1) by the num­ 5 See footnote on page 2945. claim is being made, are limited to consum­ ber of days for which the vessel was stored) 7 If the figure needed to fill the blank in able and subsistence stores as defined in times the number of days from the date the paragraph (A ) or (B ) is not available, the Maritime Administration Inventory Manual, vessel was ready to sail to, but not including, formula cannot be used; the Owner must Vessel Inventories, Part I, and do not include the date of loss ( ■ ) is $______submit actual inventories and a record of radio supplies, expendable equipment, scrap, junk and spare parts. To this amount is added to the actual purchases on Affidavit Exhibit B. amount of Subsistence Stores transferred 8 Strike out paragraph (A) or (B ). or sold (as per statement attached) $------* 8 If the figure needed to fill the blank in 11 If the figure needed to fill the blank in making $______which, subtracted from the paragraph (A ) or (B ) is not available, the paragraph (A ) or (B ) is not available, the amount of Subsistence Stores on board at formula cannot be used; the Owner must formula cannot be used; the Owner must the time the vessel was ready to sail, as shown submit actual inventories and a record of submit actual inventories and a record of purchases on Affidavit Exhibit B. purchases on Affidavit Exhibit B. in (1) above, is $______which sum Is 10 Strike out paragraph (A) or (B ). M Strike out paragraph (A) or (B ). claimed to be the actual value of the ves- Wednesday, M arch 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2947

«el’s unused Subsistence Stores at the time the loss according to the best of deponent’s (Sec. 12, 24 Stat. 383, as amended; 49 U.S.C. of the loss according to the best of deponent’s knowledge, information and belief. 12. Interpret or apply sec. 20, 24 Stat. 386, Knowledge, information and belief. Claim is hereby made for: as amended; 49 U.S.C. 20) (1) The value of Slop Chest Stores on Unused Consumable Stores, other And it is further ordered, That copies board the vessel at the time the vessel was than— ready to sail, as shown by the attached cer­ Subsistence Stores______$______of this order and of Annual Report tified inventory of amounts on board the Subsistence Stores______Form A shall be served on all line-haul vessel at the termination of the preceding Slop Chest______and switching and terminal railroad voyage or date of last inventory o n ------Bar Stock______•______;______companies of Class I, subject to the pro­ less actual consumption to date of sailing, Fuel ______L______visions of section 20, Part I of the Inter­ amounting to $______plus the actual addi­ tional purchases made for the voyage' on T o t a l______$______state Commerce Act, and upon every which the vessel was lost, as shown by the receiver, trustee, executor, administra­ attached invoices, amounting to $------By: ...... tor or assignee of any such railroad com­ was$------Sworn to before me this ______day of pany, and that notice of this order shall (2) The average daily consumption factor ______19__ be given to the general public by deposit­ of $— — (determined by dividing the ing a copy in the office of the Secretary amount determined as in (1) by the number Notary Public of the Commission at Washington, D.C., of days for which the vessel was stored) and by filing it with the Director, Office times the number of days from the date the [F.R. Doc. 64-2021; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; vessel was ready to sail to, but not including, 8:45 a.m.] of the Federal Register. the date of loss ( )is$------By the Commission, Division 2. To this amount is added the actual amount of Slop Chest Stores transferred or [ s e a l ] H arold D . M cC o y , sold (as per statement attached) $------Secretary. pairing $______, which, subtracted from the Title 49— TRANSPORTATION [F.R. Doc. 64-2073; Filed, Max. 3, 1964; amount of Slop Chest Stores on board at Chapter I— Interstate Commerce 8:49 a.m.] the time the vessel was ready to sail, as shown in (1) above, is ------, which sum Commission is claimed to be the actual value of the ves­ SUBCHAPTER B— CARRIERS BY MOTOR VEHICLES sel’s unused Slop Chest Stores at the time SUBCHAPTER A— GENERAL RULES AND of the loss according to the best of de­ REGULATIONS PART 205— REPORTS OF MOTOR ponent’s knowledge, information and belief, CARRIERS IV. Bax Stock: PART 120— ANNUAL, SPECIAL OR (1) The value of Bar Stock on board the PERIODICAL REPORTS Annual Reports of Class III Carriers vessel at the time'^the vessel was ready to of Property sail, as shown by the attached certified in­ Railroad Annual Report Form A ventory of amounts on board the vessel at At a Session of the Interstate Com­ the termination of the preceding voyage or At a session of the Interstate Com­ merce. Commission, division 2, held at its date of last inventory on ______less merce Commission, Division 2, held at office in Washington, D.C., on the 20th actual consumption to date of sailing, its office in Washington, D.C., on the 26th day of November A.D. 1963. amounting to $______, plus the actual ad­ day of February A.D. 1964. The matter of annual reports of Class ditional purchases made for the voyage on The matter of annual reports of line- III motor carriers of property being which the vessel was lost, as shown by the haul and switching and terminal railroad under consideration, and the changes to attached invoices, amounting to $______was companies of Class I being under fur­ be effectuated by this order being minor (2) The average daily consumption factor ther consideration, and the changes to revisions and clarification of reporting of $.------(determined by dividing the be made by this order being minor requirements for such motor carriers, amount determined as in (1) by the number changes in the data to be furnished, rule-making procedures under section 4 of days for which the vessel was stored) times rule-making procedures under section 4 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 the number of days from the date the vessel of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 1003, being deemed unnecessary: was ready to sail to, but not including, the U.S.C. 1003, being deemed unnecessary: It is ordered, That § 205.3 of the order date of loss ( ) is$______• It is ordered, That § 120.11 of the order To this amount is added the actual amount of June 23, 1960, in the matter of Motor of Bar Stock transferred or sold (as per of February 8, 1963 in the matter of Carrier Annual Report Form C (Class III statement attached) $______, making Railroad Annual Report Form A, be, and Carriers of Property), be, and it is $------which, subtracted from the amount it is hereby, modified and amended, with hereby, modified and amended, with re­ of Bar Stock on board at the time the vessel respect to annual reports for the year spect to annual reports for the year was ready to sail, as shown in (1) above, is ended December 31, 1963, and subse­ ended December 31,1963, and subsequent $------which sum is claimed to be the quent years, to read as shown below. years, to read as shown below: actual value of the vessel’s unused Bar Stock It is further ordered, That 49 CFR at the time of the loss according to the best It is further ordered, That 49 CFR of deponent’s knowledge, information and 120.11, be, and it is hereby, modified and 205.3 be, and it is hereby, modified and belief. amended to read as follows: amended to read as follows: V. Fuel: § 120.11 Form prescribed for Class I § 205.3 Annual reports o f Class III car­ (1) The value of Fuel on board the vessel railroads. at the time the vessel was ready to sail, as riers of property. shown by the attached certified inventory Commencing with reports for the year Commencing with the year ended De­ of amounts on board the vessel at the termi­ ended December 31,1963, and thereafter, cember 31, 1963, and for subsequent nation of the preceding voyage or date of until further order, all line-haul and years thereafter, until further order, all last inventory o n ______less actual con­ sumption to date of sailing, amounting to switching and terminal railroad com­ Class III motor carriers of property, as - — * Plus the actual additional purchases panies of Class I, as described in § 126.1, defined in § 182.01-1 of this chapter, viz., naade for the voyage on which the vessel was viz., of this chapter, all carriers with carriers having average annual gross op­ lost, as shown by the attached invoices, average annual operating revenues of erating revenues (including interstate amounting to $______was $______$3,000,000 or more, subject to the provi­ and intrastate) of less than $200,000 (2) The average daily consumption fac­ sions of section 20, Part I of the Inter­ from property motor carrier operations, tor of $------(determined by dividing the state Commerce Act, are required to file are required to file annual reports in amount determined as in (1) by the num- er of days for which the vessel was stored) annual reports in accordance with Rail­ accordance with Motor Carrier Annual mes the number of days from the date the road Annual Report Form A, which is Report Form C (property), which is at­ vessel was ready to sail to, but not including, attached to and made a part of this sec­ tached to and made a part of this sec­ the date of loss ( ) is $______tion.1 Such annual report shall be filed tion.1 Such report shall be filed in the . w,thiS amoun^ is added the actual amount in duplicate in the Bureau of Transport Bureau of Transport Economics and Sta­ Fuel transferred or sold (as per state- Economics and Statistics, Interstatè tistics, Interstate Commerce Commis­ TOhfv attached) — , making $______Commerce Commission, Washington, sion, Washington, D.C., 20423, on or 5“’ subtracted from the amount of Fuel D.C., 20423, on or before March 31 of before April 30 of the year following the t ^ me the vessel was ready the year following the year to which it year to which it relates. ° fT 1’ 68 shown in ( l ) above, is $______relates. (Sec. 204, 49 Stat. 546, as amended; 49 U.S.C. of tv, SUm is cla*me

And it is further ordered, That a copy to the end of the migratory waterfowl govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas of this order and of Motor Carrier An­ hunting season. Area N o.: 2. South generally, which are set forth in Title 50 nual Report Form C (property) shall be shore from south end of main dike to Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33, and served on all Class in motor carriers south end of the Allentown bridge open are effective to M arch 1, 1965. of property subject to its provisions, and from July 15, 1964, through February upon every trustee, receiver, executor, 28, 1965, except closed from September P a u l T . Q u ic k , administrator, or assignee of any such 8, 1964, to the end of the migratory Regional Director, Bureau of motor carrier, and that notice of this waterfowl hunting season. Area No. 3. Sport Fisheries and W ildlife. order shall be given to the general public The area of the main dike open all year, F e b r u a r y 20,1964. by depositing a copy in the office of the except closed during the migratory {F.R. Doc. 64—2045; Filed, Mar. 3, ; Secretary of the Commission at Wash­ waterfowl hunting season. 1964 8:46 am .] ington, D.C., and by filing a copy with The provisions of this special regula­ the Director of the Federal Register. tion supplement the regulations which By the Commission, Division 2 govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally, which are set forth in Title 50, PART 33— SPORT FISHING [ s e a l ] H arold D . M cC o y , Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33, and Willow Creek National Wildlife Secretary. are effective to March 1, 1965. Refuge, Montana [F.R. Doc. 64-2074; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; P a u l T . Q u ic k , 8:49 am .] Regional Director, Bureau of The following special regulation is Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. issued and is effective on date of publication in the F ederal R egister. F ebr uar y 20,1964. § 33.5 Special regulations; sport fish­ Title 50— WILDLIFE AND [F.R. Doc. 64-2044; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; ing; for individual wildlife refuge 8:45 a.m.] areas. FISHERIES M o n t a n a Chapter 1—Bureau of Sport Fisheries / PART 33— SPORT FISHING WILLOW CREEK NATIONAL WILDLIFE and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife REFUGE Service, Department of the Interior Pablo National Wildlife Refuge, Montana Sport fishing on the W illow Creek Na­ PART 33— SPORT FISHING tional Wildlife Refuge, Montana, is per­ The following special regulation is mitted only on the area designated by Ninepipe National Wildlife Refuge, issued and is effective on date of signs as open to fishing. This open area, Montana publication in the F ederal R eg ister . comprising 1,420 acres, is delineated on maps available at the refuge headquar­ § 33.5 Special regulations; sport fish­ The following special regulation is is­ ters, Benton Lake National Wildlife sued and is effective on date on publica­ ing; for individual wildlife refuge Refuge, P.O. Box 2624, Great Falls, Mon­ tion in the F ederal R egister. areas. M o n t a n a tana, and from the office of the Regional § 33.5 Special regulations; sport fish­ Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and in g; for individual 'wildlife refuge PABLO NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Wildlife, 1002 Northeast Holladay Street, areas. Sport fishing on the Pablo National Portland, Oregon, 97208. Sport fishing M o n t a n a Wildlife Refuge. Montana, is permitted shall be in accordance with all applicable only on the area designated by signs as State regulations, subject to the follow­ NINEPIPE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE open to fishing. This open area, com­ ing special conditions: Sport fishing on the Ninepipe National prising 1,900 acres, is delineated on maps (1) Open season: Entire year, except Wildlife Refuge, Montana, is permitted available at the refuge headquarters, closed from September 8 through Decem­ only on the area designated by signs as National Bison Range, Moiese, Montana, ber 31, 1964. open to fishing. This open area, com­ 59824, and from the office of the Regional (2) Boats with or without motors may prising 2,062 acres, is delineated on maps Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and be used during the fishing season. available at the refuge headquarters and Wildlife, 1002 Northeast Holladay Street, The provisions of this special regula­ from the office of the Regional Director, Portland, Oregon, 97208. Sport fishing tion supplement the regulations which Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, shall be in accordance with all applicable govern fishing on wildlife, refuge areas 1002 Northeast Holladay Street, Port­ State regulations, subject to the follow­ generally, which are set forth in Title 50, land, Oregon, 97208. Sport fishing shall ing special conditions: Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33, and be in accordance with all applicable State Open season: The north and east are effective to M arch 1, 1965. regulations, subject to the following spe­ shorelines from the inlet canal to the , P a u l T . Q u ic k , cial conditions: south end of the main dike are open from Regional Director, Bureau of Area No. 1. North shore from north July 15, 1964, through February 28,1965, Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. end of main dike to the south end of, the except during the migratory waterfowl Allentown bridge, and that portion of the hunting season. F e b r u a r y 20,1964. refuge lying east of Highway 93, open The provisions of this special regula­ IFJR. Doc. 64-2046; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; all year, except closed September 8,1964, tion supplement the regulations which 8:46 am .] [1 4 CFR Part 302 1 mit a freedom of operation for the op­ posing forces participating in the exer­ CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD [Procedural Begs. Docket No. 13117] cise. It is anticipated that this freedom [1 4 CFR Part 241 1 EVIDENCE IN ROUTE PROCEEDINGS of operation will result in large numbers [Docket Nos. 14997,15002] of troops and aircraft being concentrated Proposed Termination of Rule Making in various sectors of the area as the exer­ UNIFORM SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTS Proceeding cise progresses. The activities to be con­ ducted which would be hazardous to non­ AND REPORTS FOR CERTIFICATED F e b r u a r y 27,1964. AIR CARRIERS participating aircraft include parachute On October 21, 1961, a notice of pro­ drops of personnel and heavy equipment; posed rule making was published in the Proposed Reporting Requirements heavy concentrations of high speed jet F ederal R egister (26 F.R. 9913) pro­ and Reporting of Indebtedness Data fighter aircraft executing simulated dive posing to amend Part 302 of the Proce­ bombing and strafing attacks and recon­ dural Regulations (14 C F R Part 302) to M arch 2, 1964. naissance missions; aijd, U.S. Army provide that in route proceedings con­ drone aircraft. No live ordnance will be The Board, by publication in 29 F.R. ducted pursuant to section 401 of the Act 1658 and 29 F.R. 1737 and by circulation expended. no evidence shall be received by the Ex­ The restricted area would be desig­ of notices of proposed rule making aminer with respect to the specific (EDR-65 dated January 29, 1964 and nated from 0000 P.s.t. M ay 17, 1964, to schedules which an applicant carrier 2359 P.s.t., M ay 30, 1964. Designated EDR-66 dated January 30, 1964) gave proposes to operate pursuant to the altitudes would be from the surface to notice that it had under consideration route authorization applied for, except and including 14,000 feet MSL except amendments to Part 241 of its Economic when, in the opinion of the Examiner, that the ceiling of the restricted area Regulations. In EDR-65 the Board the nature of the issues being litigated Would be 8,000 feet for the airspace proposed miscellaneous amendments to warrants the reception of such evidence. within the confines of V-8N and V-16 simplify, clarify and correct inade­ W hen so received, it would be limited to and the airspace between V-16 and the zero-time schedules. quacies in the reporting requirements, southern boundary of the area. Upon consideration of the comments and in EDR-66 it proposed to require Provisions would be made by the Air submitted in response to the notice of reporting of data concerning issues of Force for pilots to contact the exercise proposed rule making, the Board finds long-term and short-term debt and ma­ director to obtain authorization to con­ that the disadvantages which would re­ jor lease obligations. By a supplemental duct flights of critical necessity or emer­ sult should this rule be adopted would gency in nature within the restricted notice of rule making dated February 26, outweigh its predicted advantages. The area. 1964 (29 F.R. 2792) in response to the Board has decided, therefore, that the request of several carriers, the time for proposed amendment should not be The Los Angeles ARTC Center would submitting comments on these proposals adopted. be designated as the controlling agency was extended from February 28, to M arch Accordingly, the Board hereby termi­ and the Air Force Strike Command, 20,1964. nates the rule making proceeding Docket Langley AFB, Virginia, the using agency. Air carriers affected have requested 13117. If this action is taken, temporary re­ through the Air Transport Association (Sec. 204(a), 72 Stat. 743; 49 U.S.C. 1324. stricted area “Desert Strike” would be that an informal meeting be held be­ Interpret or apply sec. 1001, 72 Stat. 788; 49 designated as follows: U.S.C. 1481) tween interested persons and the Board’s Boundaries: staff to explore various aspects of the By the Civil Aeronautics Board. Beginning at latitude 35°34'30" N., longi­ proposed rules changes including a pos­ tude 116°23'30'' W.; to latitude 35°33'00'' [ s e a l ] H arold R. S a n d e r so n , N., longitude 114°10'00" W.; to latitude sible alternative method for the Board Secretary. 33°45'00'' N„ longitude 113°20'00'' W.; to to obtain the data contemplated without [F.R. Doc. 64-2087; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; latitude 33°30'00" N., longitude 113°33'00'' requiring that the same information be 8:51 a n . ] W.; to latitude 33°30'00'' N., longitude submitted in successive years or in a pub­ 114°30'00" W.; to latitude 33°45'00" N., lic record. The Board finds that good longitude 114°30'00'' W j to latitude 3 3 °4 5 W ' N., longitude 115°00'00" W.; to cause has been shown and that it would FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY latitude 33°30'00'' N., longitude 115°00'00" be in the public interest to grant the W.; to latitude 33°30'00" N., longitude request for an informal meeting. [1 4 CFR Part 73 [New] ] 115°20'00" W.; to latitude 34>°00'00'' N., Accordingly, notice is hereby given that [Airspace Docket No. 64-LAX-2] longitude 115°20'00'' W.; to latitude 34°14'00'' N., longitude 115°44'00'' W.; to on Tuesday, M arch 10, 1964 at 10 :00 TEMPORARY RESTRICTED AREA latitude 34°25'00" N., longitude 115°44'00'' o’clock e.s.t., at the Board’s offices, Room W.; to latitude 34°25'00'' N., longitude 911 Universal Building, 1825 Connecticut Proposed Designation 115°47'00'' W.; to latitude 34°33'00" N., Avenue NW., Washington, D.C., an in­ longitude 115°47'00'' W.; to latitude Notice is hereby given that the Federal 34°35'30" N., longitude 115°58'00” W.; to formal meeting will be held between the Aviation Agency is considering an latitude 34°41'00'' N., longitude 116°03'00'' staff of the Board and interested persons amendment to § 73.25 of the Federal W.; to latitude 34°43'00" N., longitude to discuss the proposed amendments to Aviation Regulations, the substance of 116°17'00'' W.; to latitude 34°43'00" N., Part 241 and possible alternatives there­ which is stated below. longitude 116°26'30'' W.; to latitude 34°40'30" N:, longitude 116°29'40'' W.; to to. Observations made orally at the The Department of the Air Force has latitude 35o07'00'' N., longitude 116°47'45'' meeting may be included in written com­ requested designation of a temporary W.; to latitude 35°07'00'' N., longitude ments submitted on or before M arch 20, restricted area of approximately 14,500 116°34'00" W.; to latitude 35°18'45'' N„ 1964. square nautical miles which encompasses longitude 116°18'45'' W.; to latitude a portion of southeast California, south­ 35°28'35" N., longitude 116°18'45" W.; to (Secs. 204(a) and 407 of the Federal Aviation ern Nevada and northwest Arizona to point of beginning. Act of 1958. 72 stat. 743 and 766; 49 us0> contain hazardous activities to be con­ Designated altitudes. Surface to 14,000 1377 1324 and ) ducted in conjunction with a military feet MSL, except surface to 8,000 feet MSL for the airspace within the confines of V-8N exercise known as “Desert Strike.” This [ seal] H arold R. Sa n d e r so n , and V-16 and the airspace between V-16 and exercise will involve approximately Secretary. the southern boundary of the area. 100,000 men and 1,000 military aircraft. Time of designation. Continuous from [PR. Doc. 64-2164; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; The location for “Desert Strike” was se­ 0000 P.s.t. May 17, 1964, to 2359 P.s.t. May 8:53 a.m.] lected because the terrain features per­ 30, 1964. 2949 2950 PROPOSED RULE MAKING

Controlling agency. F e d e ra l Aviation Issued in Washington, D.C., on March 507 (14 C FR Part 507), by adding the Agency, Los Angeles ARTC Center, Palmdale, 2, 1964. following airworthiness directive: California. D avis A irckaitp P roducts. Applies to all air­ Using agency. United States Air Force D . E. B a r r o w , craft equipped with Davis Aircraft P/N Strike Command, Langley AFB, Virginia. Acting Chief, Airspace Regulations and Procedures Division. FDC—2700 Series safety belts manufac­ Since the Air Force has requested that tured prior to September 1, 1963. [F.R. Doc. 64-2135; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; Compliance required within 125 hours’ the restricted area be established by 8:53 am .] time in service after the effective date of May 17, 1964, it is necessary that the this AD. Federal Aviation Agency take expedi­ As the result of the investigation of reports tious action to process this request. To [14 CFR Part 507 ] of the faUure of Davis Aircraft P/N FDC- 2700 Series safety belts to latch properly, ensure that any action taken will be [Reg. Docket No. 4024] it has been determined that binding of the properly portrayed on appropriate aero­ Proposed Airworthiness Directives latching mechanism has resulted from the nautical charts, a sharp reduction in the loss of lubricant during belt cleaning proc­ normal time period allotted for public DAVIS AIRCRAFT PRODUCTS esses and also from certain manufacturing and assembly errors. comment is required. SAFETY BELTS (a) Inspect each belt assembly as follows: Interested persons may submit such The Federal Aviation Agency has (1) Determine whether the buckle cover written data, views or arguments as they under consideration a proposal to amend P/N FD—2674 is fully closed. If the buckle may desire. Communications should be Part 507 of the regulations of the Ad­ cover Is fully opened and does not auto­ matically snap back into the completely submitted in triplicate to the Director, ministrator to include an airworthiness closed position when released, it may be Western Region, Attn: Chief, Air Traf­ directive for Davis Aircraft Products assumed that the spring is damaged. fic Branch, Federal Aviation Agency, P/N FDC-2700 Series safety belts. Serv­ (2) Slowly raise the buckle cover taking Western Region A rea Office, P.O. Box ice difficulties have been reported where­ careful note of any tendency of binding of in the belts failed to latch properly. It the latching mechanism components. The 45018, Los Angeles, California, 90045. has been determined that binding of the buckle cover P/N FD-2674 and release latch All communications received within fif­ latching mechanism has resulted from P/N FD-2668 must be free to snap into the teen days after publication of this notice the loss of lubricant during belt cleaning fully closed position when the buckle cover is opened and released. in the F ederal R egister will be consid­ processes and also from certain manu­ (b ) J f any of the deficiencies specified in ered before action is taken on the pro­ facturing and assembly errors. To cor­ (a ) are found, disassemble and further in­ posed amendment.. No public hearing is rect this unsafe condition, this AD re­ spect the components to determine whether contemplated at this time, but arrange­ quires inspection of the belt assemblies they meet the following requirements: ments for informal conferences with and replacement and relubrication of the (1) The tangs car straight ends of the coil spring P/N FD-3007 shall be %2±tfo inch and Federal Aviation Agency officials may be components. Interested persons are invited to par­ be .straight throughout this length. (A bent made by contacting the Chief, Air Traf­ tang will result in binding of the latching ticipate in the making of the proposed fic Branch, Western Region Area Of­ mechanism.) rule by submitting such written data, fice, or the Chief, Airspace Regulations (2) The release latch P/N FD-2668, shall views or arguments as they may desire. be counterbored in one end to receive spring and Procedures Division, Federal Avia­ Communications should identify the P/N FD-3007. The counterbored depth shall tion Agency, Washington, D.C., 20553. regulatory docket number and be sub­ be 1%2 ± % 2 inch. Any data, views or arguments presented mitted in duplicate to the Federal Avia­

/ Notices DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT UF THE TREASURY Agricultural Marketing Service Office of the Secretary ASH FLAT SALE BARN ET AL. [AA 643.3-C] Notice of Changes in Names of Posted WELDED STANDARD STEEL PIPE FROM Stockyards LUXEMBOURG It has been ascertained, and notice is hereby given, that the names of the live­ stock markets referred to herein, which were posted on the respective dates speci­ Fair Value Determination fied below as being subject to the provisions of the Packers and Stockyards Act, F e b r u a r y 20,1964. 1921, as amended (7 U.S.C. 181 et seq.), have been changed as indicated below. A complaint was received that welded Original Name of Stockyard, Current Name of Stockyard standard steel pipe from Luxembourg Location, and Date of Posting and Date of Change in Name was being sold in the United States at A rkansas less than fair value within the meaning Ash Plat Sale Barn, Ash Flat, Mar. 18, 1960______Ash Flat Livestock Auction Co., Nov. 8, of the Antidumping Act of 1921. 1963. I hereby determine that welded stand­ Colorado ard steel pipe from Luxembourg is not being, nor likely to be, sold at less than Western Slope Livestock Commission Co., Mont­ Western Slope Livestock Commission fair value within the meaning of section 'Co., Jan. 24, 1964. rose, Mar. 11,1957. 201(a) of the Antidumping Act, 1921, I daho as amended (19 U.S.C. 1 6 0 (a)). Emmett Livestock Commission Co., Emmett, Emmett Livestock Commission Co., Inc., Statement of reasons: Dec. 10, 1951. Jan. 4,1964. All such pipe imported into the United Jerome Livestock Commission Co., Jerome, Jerome Livestock Commission Co., Inc., States from Luxembourg since Novem­ Mar. 29, 1950. July 28, 1963. ber of 1962 was produced by one firm. I owa Exclusive of the pipe sold to the United Diagonal Livestock Auction, Diagonal, May 16, Diagonal Livestock Auction, Inc., Feb. 1, States, the preponderance of this firm’s 1959. 1964. sales were made otherwise than for home Mic h ig an consumption in Luxembourg. There­ Dundee Livestock Co., Dundee, Apr. 22, 1959— ____ Dundee Livestock Sales, Inc., Dec. 18, fore, for the purpose of determining 1963. whether or not such merchandise was being sold in the United States at less M ississippi than fair value, this firm’s prices to Clay County Stockyards, Inc., West Point, Feb. 11, West Point Livestock Auction, Inc., the United States were compared with 1959. '/'vi:.'Apr. 4, 1963. its prices to third countries. Sales to the United States are made N ebraska through agents to unrelated purchasers. Atkinson Stockyards Co., Atkinson, June 19, 1939__Atkinson Livestock Market, Feb. 7, 1964. Purchase price is represented by the Farmers Livestock Auction, South Sioux City, Lockwood Livestock Auction, Jan. 15, weighted-average f.o.b. Luxembourg Apr. 30, 1959. 1964. price to the United States exclusive of Ok la h o m a selling commissions. Owen Bros. Livestock Auction Co., Idabel, Jan 13, Idabel Livestock Commission Co., Inc,, 1955. - . Feb. 14,1964. Comparisons were made on the basis Temple Auction Sale, Temple, Apr. 7, 1959______Temple Auction Sales Co., Aug. 27, 1963. of prices per hundred feet of pipe. Therefore, to the weighted-average f.o.b. Done at Washington, D.C., this 26th day of February 1964. Luxembourg mill price to third coun­ tries exclusive of selling commissions, H. L. J o n e s , Chief, Rates and Registrations Branch, Packers and the cost of the additional steel required Stockyards Division, Agricultural Marketing'Service. to produce the thicker-walled pipe sold to the United States was added. Based [F.R. Doc. 64-2060; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; 8:47 a.m.] upon published quantity discounts, an allowance was made to reflect the dif­ Office of the Secretary T exas ferences due to the relative quantities Harris. Montgomery. involved in sales in each market. An NORTH DAKOTA AND TEXAS allowance was also made for the de­ Pursuant to the authority set forth creased output experienced by the roll­ Designation of Areas for Emergency above, emergency loans will not be made ing and galvanizing mills when produc­ Loans in the above-named North Dakota ing the thinner-walled pipe sold to third counties after December 31, 1964, or in countries. Finally, an allowance was For the purpose of making emergency the above-named Texas counties after made for the cost of technical assistance loans pursuant to section 321 of the Con­ June 30, 1964, except to applicants who incurred only on sales to third countries solidated Farmers Home Administration previously received emergency or special and purchasers’ advertising costs which Act of 1961 (7 U.S.C. 1961), it has been livestock loan assistance and who can were assumed by the producer to arrive determined that in the hereinafter- qualify under established policies and at the net adjusted price to third coun­ named counties in the States of North procedures. tries. Dakota and Texas, natural disasters The resultant comparison revealed nave caused a need for agricultural credit Done at Washington, D.C., this 28th that purchase price was less than the not readily available from commercial day of February 1964. net adjusted price to third countries in oanks, cooperative lending agencies, or O r v il l e L. F r e e m a n , some instances. However, subsequent other responsible sources. Secretary. price revisions by the manufacturer North Dako ta [F R . Doc. 64-2062; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; eliminated all existing margins so that LaMour« ‘ Ransom. 8:48 a.m.] there were no longer any instances in 2951 2952 NOTICES which purchase price was less than the ing Act, 1921, as amended (19 U.S.C. withdrawals and the requirements of ap. net adjusted price to third countries. 160(c)). plicable law, rules, and regulations. As to sales made prior to the price [ s e a l ] J a m e s A. R eed, D errel S. F u l w ider, revisions, it was determined that the Assistant Secretary Acting District Manager. quantities and margins involved were of the Treasury. not more than insignificant. (F R . Doc. 64—2048; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964- This determination and the statement [F.R. Doc. 64-2091; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; 8:46 am .] of reasons therefor are published pur­ 8:52 a.m.] suant to section 201

T12N..R.2E., National Park Service Procurement Officer may execute and sec. 4, se%n w %n e%, N»/2 swy4 Nwy4 approve contracts not in excess of $50,000 NEy4 ,Ey2 Ey2 swy4 NEy4> swy4 sEy4 swy4 [Order No. 1, Arndt. 2] for supplies, equipment and services. NEy4, n y2 se%ne 1,4 nwy4, E%swy4 NEy4 NWy4, SE%NE^SE%NW%, NE&SE& REGIONAL CHIEF, DIVISION OF MAN­ This authority may be exercised by these officers in behalf of any office or area for sEy4 NW%, n y2 Nwy4 sey4 n w y4, swy4 AGEMENT ANALYSIS AND SERV­ Nwy4 sE%NWi4 , sw %se%n w %, sy2 which the National Capital Regional O f­ n y2 n e >4 ne y4 sw %, s ^ ne^ ne^ sw ^, ICES AND REGIONAL PROCURE­ fice serves as the field finance office, N>/2 NEy4 Nwy4 SEy4> sy2 Ny2 Nwy4 Nwy4 MENT OFFICER except the National Capital Office, D e­ sEy4> sy2 Nwy4 NWi4SEy4; sign and Construction. Sec. 33, SEy4NEy4NEy4, Nwy4NEy4SEy4 Amendment of Delegation of Author­ 2 4 (National Park Service Order No. 14 (19 F.R. NEy4, E % W y SEiANE%, NW%NEi NE% ity With Respect to Timber Sales 8824), as amended; 39 Stat. 535, 16 U.S.C., s e »/4, sy2NEy4NEy4 SEy4, Nwy4 Nwy4 sec. 2) n e % s e »4. . and Purchases of Lands and Water T.8N..R. 3 E., Rights Date: January 13, 1964. Sec. 1, S W % NE NE % NE i/4, S^NWy4 NE% NEi/4, Sy2 NE%NE%, SE%NE»4NW% Section l(n) of Order No. 1, issued T . S u t t o n J ett, NEy4, SE y4 SW NW14 NE y4, SEy4 NW% January 14, 1963 (28 F.R. 1811), is Regional Director, NEl/4- 'i amended to read as follows: 'National Capital Region. T.11N..R.3E., Sec. 19, S»4 NE%NE%NEVi, Ny2N W % N E i4 (n) Sales of timber pursuant to section [F.R. Doc. 64-2050; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; NEi4 , SE%NW%NE%NE%; 3 of the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 8:47 a.m.] 20 4 4 Sec. , NWi N E % N W i NW%. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1952 ed., sec. 3). T. 12 N., R. 3 E., Sec. 29, NWi4NWi4SE%NE^4. A new section l(o ) is hereby added to T.8N..R.4E., Sec. 6, SW y4 S W % NW y4 NW . Order No. 1, issued January 14, 1963 (28 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDU­ T.10N..R.6 E., F.R. 1811) as follows: Sec. 5, N y2 NW % NE 1,4 SW % S W >4, SE% CATION, AND WELFARE NE%SW^SW%, Ny2 Ny2 NW»ASW% (o) Acceptance of donations of lands swy4, Ny2 sy2 swy4 sw^. and water rights, exchanges of lands and Food and Drug Administration T.10N..R.8E., water rights, and purchase of lands and Sec. 18, NE%NW%, N^NW^NW^, SW% water rights. NEW DRUGS NW%NW%, N^SWi4 NWy4, N&S & sw&Nwyi, w^NEy4 SE%Nwy4 , n w % Section 4 of Order No. 1, issued Jan­ Approval of Applications, December sEy4 Nwyi, n y2 s w y, s e y4 n w %. uary 14, 1963 (28 F.R. 1811), is amended 1963 The areas described aggregate approxi­ to read as follows: mately 316.25 acres. As provided in § 130.33 of the new-drug S e c . 4. Regional Chief, Division of regulations (21 CFR 130.33; 28 F.R. R. P a u l R ig t r u p , Management Analysis and Services and 6377), notice is given of the following Manager, Land Office. Regional Procurement Officer. The new drugs for which applications have [F.R. Doc. 64r-2049; Piled, Max. 3, 1964; Regional Chief, Division of Management been approved during the month of 8:47 a.m.] Analysis and Services, and the Regional December 1963:

Drugs' foe H uman U se

Established name (if any) or active Trade name Class o f compound Applicant Date approved How dis­ ingredients pensed 1

Meprobamate______T _____ Tranquilizei;...... Wynlit Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 91 Dec. 5, 1963; Dec. 9, 1963...... Rx. Main St., Madison, N.J. Anticoagulant acid citrate dextrose Hematainer Blood Bank Anticoagulant_____ Courtland Labs., Los Angeles, Calif.. Dec.-9,1963...... Rx. solution in plastic containers. Unit. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., High­ Dec. 10,1963...... OTC. way 202, Raritan, N.J. Chloroquine phosphate, primaquine Winthrop Labs., 1460 Broadway, Dec. 18,1963...... Rx. phosphate, . New York, N.Y.

D rugs for Veterinary U se

Carboxylic acid resin adsorbate o f Neomycin Polycarboxylate. Antibiotic...... S. B. Penick & Co., 100 Church St., May 27, 1963 (inadvertently OTC. neomycin. New York, N.Y. omitted from Aug. 6, 1963, listing). Elemental iron complex-sodium algi­ New Pharmatinic 60, New Hematinic...... Pharmachem Corp., Bethlehem, Pa. Dec. 6, 1963...... OTC. nate. Pharmatinic 100.

1 The abbreviation “ R x ” means restricted b y law to prescription only; the abbreviation “ O T C ” applies to drugs that by law are not required to be sold on prescription.

Dated: February 26,1964. „ G e o . P. L a r r ic k , Commissioner of Food and Drugs. [F.R. Doc. 64-2085; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; 8:51 a.m.]

Hearing Examiner, Atomic 'Energy Com­ ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION mission, as Chairman of the Atomic CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Safety and Licensing Board in place of [Docket 14850; Order No. E-20522] [Docket No. 50-213] Arthur ~W. Murphy, Esq. SUBSTITUTE SERVICE FOR SHORT CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC Dated at Washington, D.C., this 2d NOTICE MILITARY CONTRACTS POWER CO. day of March 1964. Order Amending Interim Certificates Amendment to Notice of Hearing U n it e d S tates A t o m ic and Interim Authority E n e r g y C o m m is s io n , The Notice of Hearing in the cap­ Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics W . B. M cC o o l , tioned matter dated February 28, 1964 Board at its office in Washington, D.C., Published in the F ederal R egister oe Secretary. on the 28th day of February 1964. ebruary 29, 1964, is hereby amended tc [F.R. Doc. 64-2154; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; H ie Board, by Order E-20150, adopted designate Samuel W . Jensch, ChieJ 8:53 a.m.] November 4, 1963, directed all interested 2954 NOTICES persons to show cause, within 15 days This order shall be published in the Interested parties may inspect this from the service of such order, why the F ederal R egister. agreement and obtain copies thereof at Board should not make final the ten­ By the Civil Aeronautics Board. the Bureau of Foreign Regulation, Fed­ tative findings and conclusions stated eral Maritime Commission, Washington, therein and amend the interim certifi­ Is e a l ] H arold R. S an d e r so n , D.C., or may inspect a copy at the offices cates and interim authority of certain Secretary. of the District Managers of the Commis­ specified supplemental air carriers in the [F.R. Doc. 64-2088; Piled, Mar. 3, 1964; sion in New York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., manner outlined in the form attached 8:52 a.m.] and San Francisco, Calif., and may sub­ thereto. mit to the Secretary, Federal Maritime No objections to the Board’s order to Commission, Washington, D.C., 20573, show cause have been received.1 There­ within 20 days after publication of this fore, the Board shall make final the ten­ FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION notice in the F ederal R egister, written statements with reference to the agree­ tative findings and conclusions contained AMERICAN MAIL LINE, LTD., AND in Order E-20150, and amend the interim ment and their position as to approval, AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. certificates and interim authority of the disapproval or modification, together several. supplemental carriers noted in Notice of Filing of Agreement with a request for hearing, should such hearing be desired. such order in the manner outlined Notice is hereby given that the fol­ Dated; February 28,1964. below.2 lowing described agreement has been It is ordered, That: The interim cer­ filed with the Commission for approval By order of the Federal Maritime tificates for supplemental air service of pursuant to section 15 of the Shipping Commission. AAXICO Airlines, Inc.; American Flyers Act, 1916 (39 Stat. 733; 75 Stat. 763 ; 46 T h o m as L is i, Airline Corp.; Capitol Airways, Inc.; UJ3.C. 814): Secretary. Johnson Flying Service, Inc.; Modem Agreement 9314, between American [F it. Doc. 64-2066; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; Air Transport, Inc.; Overseas National Mail Line, Ltd., and American President 8:48 a.m.] Airways, Inc.; Saturn Airways, Inc.; Lines, Ltd., provides for a through bill­ Southern Air Transport, Inc.; Trans In­ ing arrangement for commercial cargo COMPAGNIE GENERALE TRANSAT­ ternational Airlines, Inc.; United States transported in the trade from Indone­ sian ports to ports in Oregon, Washing­ LANTIQUE (FRENCH LINE), AND Overseas Airlines, Inc.; World Airways, ton and Western Canada with tranship­ WESTFAL-LARSEN & CO. A/S (IN­ Inc. and Zantop Air Transport, Inc., and ment at Manila, Hong Kong, Yokohama TEROCEAN LINE) the interim authority for supplemental or Kobe inaccordance with the terms and air service held by Purdue Aeronautics conditions as set forth in the agreement. Notice of Filing of Agreement Corporation, be and hereby are amended Interested parties may inspect this Notice is hereby given that the follow­ so as to authorize the holders, subject to agreement and obtain copies thereof at ing described agreement has been filed the provisions hereinafter set forth, Pu b­ the Bureau of Foreign Regulation, Fed­ with the Commission for approval pur­ lic L aw 87-528 and Title IV of the Fed­ eral Maritime Commission, Washington, suant to section 15 of the Shipping Act, eral Aviation Act of 1958, and the orders, D.C., or may inspect a copy at the offices 1916 (39 Stat. 733; 75 Stat. 763; 46 U.S.C. rules and regulations issued thereunder, of the District Managers of the Commis­ 814) : Agreement 9312 between Compagnie to provide “substitute service.” “Sub­ sion in New York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., and San Francisco, Calif., and may sub­ Generale Transatlantique (French Line) stitute service” means the performance mit to the Secretary, Federal Maritime and W estfal-Larsen & Co. A/S (Inter­ by an air carrier of foreign or overseas Commission, Washington, D.C., 20573, ocean Line), covers an arrangement re­ air transportation, or air transpotation within 20 days after publication of this lating to the trade from United States between the 48 contiguous states, on the notice in the F ederal R egister, written and Canadian ports on the Pacific Coast one hand, and the state of Alaska or statements with reference to the agree­ of North America and Ensenada, Mexico, Hawaii, on the other hand, in planeload ment and their position as to approval, to ports of the United Kingdom, Eire, lots pursuant to an agreement with disapproval, or modification, together Scandinavia, Continental Europe and another air carrier to fulfill such other with a request for hearing, should such Africa, whereby the parties will main­ air carrier’s contractual obligation to hearing be desired. tain synchronized sailings, subject, how­ ever, to such variations and alterations perform such air transportation for Dated: February 28,1964. as may be agreed upon by the parties and MATS and when the performance of B y order of the Federal Maritime Com­ as are necessitated by cargo requirements such air transportation is not to take mission. or inducements, or by force majeure, in place during a period longer than three T h o m a s L i s i , accordance with the terms and conditions weeks. Secretary. set forth in the agreement. The exercise of the authority to en­ Interested parties may inspect this [F.R. Doc. 64-2065; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; gage in substitute service shall be subject agreement and obtain copies thereof at 8:48 ajn .] to the provisions of Part 288 of the the Bureau of Foreign Regulation, Fed­ Board’s economic regulations and to the eral Maritime Commission, Washington, terms and conditions in the respective AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD., D.C., 20573, or play inspect a copy at the interim certificates and interim authority AND NORWEGIAN ASIA LINE offices of the District Managers of the Commission in New York, N.Y., New of each carrier. Notice of Filing of Agreement Orleans, La., and San Francisco, Calif.. and may submit to the Secretary. Fed­ 1 The Board’s order to show cause stated Notice is hereby given that the follow­ eral Maritime Commission, Washington, that if no objections are filed, further pro­ ing described agreement has been filed D.C., 20573, within 20 days after publica­ cedural steps shall be deemed waived and with the Commission for approval pur­ tion of this notice in the F ederal R egis­ the matter submitted to the Board for is­ suant to section 15 of the Shipping Act, suance of a final order. ter, written statements with reference to 1916 (39 Stat. 733 ; 75 Stat. 763; 46 2 The Board, in Order E-20150, tentatively the agreement and their position as to concluded that the interim certificate held U.S.C. 814): approval, disapproval, or modification, by Standard Airways, Xnc., should be Agreement 9316, between American together with a request for hearing, amended. However, the Board subsequently President Lines, Ltd., and Norwegian should such hearing be desired. suspended Standard’s interim certificate. Asia Line provides for a through billing Dated: February 28,1964. Order E-20468, adopted February 12, 1964 arrangement restricted to the transpor­ (Docket 13890). The Board does not believe tation of Frozen Prawns in the trade By order of the Federal Maritime that it would be appropriate to take any from Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia to Commission. action respecting Standard’s interim certifi­ Honolulu, Hawaii, with transhipment at T h o m a s L is i, cate pending final resolution of the matters Secretary. raised in Docket 13890. Therefore, we shall Hong K ong in accordance with the terms not amend Standard’s Interim certificate at and conditions as set forth in the agree­ (F.R. Doc. 64-2067; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964! this time. ment. 8:48 aJtn.] Wednesday, M a rc h 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2955

FARRELL LINES INCORPORATED AND Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C., Agreement 9320, between Moore- BLACK STAR LINE, LTD. 20573, Within 20 days after publication McCormack Lines and The Oceanic of this notice in the F ederal R e g ister , Steamship Company, provides for the Notice of Filing of Agreement written statements with reference to the appointment by Moore-McCormack Lines of The Oceanic Steamship Com­ Notice is hereby given that the follow­ agreement and their position as to ap­ pany as its general passenger agent in ing described agreement has been filed proval, disapproval, or modification, to­ Sydney and Melbourne, Australia and with the Commission for approval pur­ gether with a request for hearing, should in Auckland, New Zealand, which ap­ suant to section 15 of the Shipping Act, such hearing be desired. pointment The Oceanic Steamship Com­ 1916 (39 Stat. J33; 75 Stat. 763; 46 U.S.C. Dated: February 28, 1964. pany accepts with respect to the vessels 814): designated and operated by Moore- Agreement 9318 between Fari\ell Lines By order of the Federal Maritime McCormack Lines in its various services. Incorporated and Black Star Line, Ltd.,, Commission. provides for a through billing arrange­ T h o m a s L i s i , The agreement also provides the rates of compensation to be paid by Moore- ment for cargo transported in the trade Secretary. between Harbel and Cape Palmas, [F.R. Doc. 64-2069; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; McCormack Lines to The Oceanic Liberia, on the one hand, and United 8:48 a.m.] Steamship Company for the perform­ States Great Lakes ports, on the other ance of the services described in the agreement. hand, with transhipment at Monrovia, MOORE-McCORMACK LINES AND Liberia in accordance with terms and Interested parties may inspect this MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY conditions set forth in the agreement. agreement and obtain copies thereof at Interested, parties may inspect this Notice of Filing of Agreement the Bureau of Foreign Regulation, Fed­ agreement and obtain copies thereof at eral Maritime Commission, Washington, Notice is hereby given that the follow­ D.C., or may inspect a copy at the offices the Bureau of Foreign Regulation, Fed­ ing described agreement has been filed eral Maritime Commission, Washington, of the District Managers of the Com­ with the Commission for approval pur­ mission in New York, N.Y., New Orleans, D.C., 20573, or may inspect a copy at the suant to section 15 of the Shipping Act, offices of the District Managers of the La., and San Francisco, Calif., and may 1916 (39 Stat. 733; 75 Stat. 763; 46 U.S.C. submit to the Secretary, Federal Mari­ Commission in New York, N.Y., New 8 1 4 ):v Orleans, La., and San Francisco, Calif., time Commission, Washington, D.C., Agreement 9319, between Moore-Mc- 20573 within 20 days after publication and may submit to the Secretary, Fed­ Cormack Lines and Matson Navigation eral Maritime Commission, Washington, of this notice in the F ederal R egister, Company, provides for the appointment written statements with reference to the D.C., 20573, within 20 days after publica­ by Moore-McCormack Lines of Matson tion of this notice in the F ederal R e g is ­ agreement and their position as to ap­ Navigation Company as its general pas­ ter, written statements with reference to proval, disapproval, or modification to­ senger agent in Honolulu, Hawaii, which gether with a request for hearing, should the agreement and their position as to appointment Matson Navigation Com­ approval, disapproval, or modification, such hearing be desired. pany accepts with respect to the vessels together with a request for hearing, designated and operated by Moore-Mc­ Dated: February 28, 1964. should such hearing be desired. Cormack Lines in its various services. By order of the Federal Maritime Dated: February 28, 1964. The agreement also provides the rates of Commission. compensation to be paid by Moore-Mc­ By order of the Federal Maritime T h o m a s L i s i , Cormack Lines to Matson Navigation Commission. Secretary. Company for the performance of the T h o m a s L i s i , services described in the agreement. [FJR. Doc. 64-2071; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; Secretary. 8:48 a.m.] Interested parties may inspect this [F.R. Doc. 64-2068; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; agreement and obtain copies thereof at 8:48 a.m.] the Bureau of Foreign Regulation, Fed­ UNITED FRUIT COM PANY AND FLOTA eral Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C., or may inspect a copy at the offices MERCANTE GRANCOLOMBIANA FARRELL LINES INCORPORATED AND of the District Managers of the Commis­ Notice of Filing of Agreement ZIM ISRAEL NAVIGATION CO., LTD. sion in New York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., and San Francisco, Calif., and may sub­ Notice is hereby given that the follow­ Notice of Filing of Agreement mit to the Secretary, Federal Maritime ing described agreement has been filed Commission, Washington, D.C., 20573, with the Commission for approval pur­ Notice is hereby given that the follow­ within 20 days after publication of this suant to section 15 of the Shipping Act, ing described agreement has been filed notice in the F ederal R eg ister , written 1916 (39 Stat. 733; 75 Stat. 763; 46 U.S.C. with the Commission for approval pur­ statements with reference to the agree­ 814): suant to section 15 of the Shipping Act, ment and their position as to approval, Agreement 9313, between United Fruit 1916 (39 Stat. 733; 75 Stat. 763; 46 U.S.C. disapproval, or modification, together Company and Flota Mercante Granco- 8 1 4 ): with a request for hearing, should such lombiana, covers a through billing ar­ Agreement 9317 between Farrell Lines hearing be desired. rangement on cargo from Bocas del Toro Incorporated and Zim Israel Navigation Dated: February 28, 1964. (Almirante), Republic of Panama; Port Co., Ltd., provides for a through billing Limon, Costa Rica; and Pacific Ports of arrangement for cargo transported in By order of the Federal Maritime Commission. Central America, to U.S. Atlantic and p ® trade between Harbel and Cape T h o m a s L i s i , Gulf ports, with transhipment at Cristo­ almas, Liberia, on the one hand, and Secretary. bal, Canal Zone. United States Great Lakes ports, on the [F.R. Doc. 64-2070; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; Interested parties may inspect this other hand, with transhipment at Mon­ 8:48 ajn.J agreement and obtain copies thereof at rovia, Liberia in accordance with terms the Bureau of Foreign Regulation, Fed­ &nd conditions set forth in the agree­ eral Maritime Commission, Washington, ment. MOORE-McCORMACK LINES AND D.C., or may inspect a copy at the office's THE OCEANIC STEAMSHIP COM­ Interested parties may inspect this of the District Managers of the Commis­ PANY j.^e®ment and obtain copies thereof at sion in New York, N.Y., New Orleans, proi »l?reau of foreign Regulation, Fed- Notice of Filing of Agreement La., and San Francisco, Calif., and may Dr Commission, Washington, Notice is hereby given that the follow­ submit to the Secretary, Federal Mari­ offl ’ or may inspect a copy at the ing described agreement has been filed time . Commission, Washington, D.C., a JM* District Managers of the with the Commission for approval pur­ 20573, within 20 days after publication wmmisston in New York, N.Y., New O r- suant to section 15 of the Shipping Act, of this notice in the F ederal R e g ister , mnTT ’ L?‘’ and San Francisco, Calif., and 1916 (39 Stat. 733; 75 Stat. 763; 46 U.S.C. written statements with reference to the submit to the Secretary, Federal 814); agreement and their position as to ap- No. 44------6 2956 NOTICES proval, disapproval, or modification, to­ Schedules; i.e., P-1, R-l, G-l, SG-1, Copies of the proposed rate changes gether with a request for hearing, should P-2, R-2, and SG-2. In addition, the have been served by Trunkline upon all such hearing be desired. proposed changes also include a new Rate customers and State commissions. Com­ Schedule G-2 which is available to any ments may be filed with the Commission Dated: February 28,1964. natural gas distributor at delivery points on or before March 16, 1964. By order of the Federal Maritime on Trunkline’s transmission line between Tuscola, Illinois, and the northern ter­ Jo s e ph H . G utride, Commission. Secretary. T h o m a s L i s i , minus of the line on the Indiana-Michi­ Secretary„ gan border. Thé rates contained in Rate [F.R. Doc. 64-2106; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964: Schedule G-2 are the same as those for 8:52 ajn .] [F.R. Doc. 64-2072; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; 8:49 a.m.] Rate Schedule P-2. The annual decrease in rate level is [Docket Nos. RI64-541, etc.] approximately $8.6 million, based upon sales for the 12 months’ period ending FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION September 30, 1963, and includes the PUBCO PETROLEUM CORP. ET AL. recent reduction in the Federal income [Docket No. RP64-19] Order Accepting Rate Filing, Permit­ tax rate for corporations from 52 per­ TRUNKLINE GAS CO. cent to 50 percent. ting Substitution of Rate Filing, Pro­ The proposed tariff revisions are ac­ viding for Hearings on and Suspen­ Notice of Proposed Changes in Rates companied by Trunkline’s agreement to sion of Proposed Changes in Rates1 and Charges further reduce its rates and charges in F ebruary 28,1964. order to reflect the Commission’s decision F ebruary 26, 1964. Take notice that on February 26, 1964, with respect to the use of liberalized de­ The above-named Respondents have Trunkline Gas Company tendered for preciation in computing Federal income tendered for filing proposed changes in filing proposed changes in its FPC Gas tax allowances as set forth in Opinion presently effective rate schedules for Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, subject to No. 417, Alabama-Tennessee Natural sales of natural gas subject to the juris­ the provisions of section 4 of the Natural Gas Company, 31 FPC , issued Feb­ diction of the Commission. The pro­ Gas Act, to become effective on April 1, ruary 3, 1964. Such further reductions posed changes, which constitute in­ 1964. The proposed changes reflect de­ are subject to certain terms and con­ creased rates and charges, are desig­ creased rates and charges in all of its tingencies specified in the agreement. nated as follows:

Rate Effective Date Cents per Mcf Rate in sched­ Supple­ Purchaser and producing Date date sus- effect sub- No. Respondent ule ment area annual filing unless pended • ject to / No. No. increase tendered sus­ until— Rate in Proposed refund in pended effect increased rate docket Nos.'

RI64-541... Pubco Petroleum Corp., 7 7 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (Decrease 1-27-64 8 2-27-64 H 6-26-64 « 813.2295 4 « « i 8 « 14.2486 RI64-91. P.O. Box 1419, Albu­ (South Blanco Pictured $(4)P querque, N. Mex., Cliffs Field and Blanco Attn: Mr. Frank D. Mesa Verde Field, Rio Gorham, Jr. Arriba County, N. Mex.) (San Juan Basin Area). 4 « « 8 10 14,2486 RI64-644... 13 13 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (Decrease 1-27-64 82-27-64 H 6-26-64 » »13.2295 RI64-92. (Basin Dakota Field, San $ (16))8 Juan and Rio Arriba Counties, N. Mex.) (San Juan Basin Area). RI64-629... Sohiio Petroleum Co. 63 4 Northern Natural Gas Co. $4,440 1-27-64 » 3-15-64 8-15-64 8 » 10.7008 4* is ia H.7199 (Operator), et al., 970 (Various Fields, Lea First National Annex, County, N. Mex.) (Per­ Oklahoma City, Okla., mian Basin Area). ‘ Attn: Gas-Gasoline Division). RI64-630__ Northeast Blanco Devel­ 1 6 El Paso Natural Gas Co. 32,464 1-27-64 3 2-27-64 7-27-64 8 13.0 46« »14.2486 opment Corp. (Op­ (Blanco Field, San Juan erator), et al., 2020 and Rio Arriba County, First National Build­ N. Mex.) (San Juan Basin ing, Oklahoma City 2, Area). Okla., Attn: Mr. Oliver W. Cates. RI64-631__ Texas Gulf Producing 13 3 Northern Natural Gas Co. 45 1-30-64 8 3- 1-64 8- 1-64 10.50 41211.7212 Co., P.O. Box 61289, (Monument Field, Lea Houston, Tex., Attn: County, N. Mex.) (Per­ E. E. Parks. mian Basin Area).

2 Adjustment to annual amount previously reported. • Previously reported as 14.2501 cents per Mcf (suspended in Docket No. RI64-541 * The stated effective date is the first day after expiration of the required statutory until June 26,1964). . notice. 1» previously reported as 14.2501 cents per Mcf (suspended in Docket No. kim o n « Periodic rate increase. until June 26,1964). , s Pressure base is 15.026 psia. .— . n The stated effective date is the effective date requested by Respondent. « Includes partial reimbursement for full 2.65 percent New Mexico School Tax. Pressure base is 14.65 psia. ■ ,• „„„ ■„ i For gas produced from Mesa Verde formation. i* Subject to deduction of 0.4875 cent per Mcf for gas delivered below 600 psig. 8 Includes 1.0 cent per Mcf minimum guarantee for liquids. u The end of the suspension period previously ordered in said docket. Pubco Petroleum Corporation, Pubco in section 4(d) of the Natural Gas Act Pubco and Northeast. El Paso questions Petroleum Corporation (Operator), et to permit an earlier effective date for the right of these producers under their al. (both referred to herein as Pubco), the aforementioned producers’ rate fil­ tax reimbursement clauses to file rate and Northeast Blanco Development Cor­ ings and such requests are denied. increases reflecting tax reimbursement poration (Operator), et al. (Northeast) The proposed rate filings of Pubco computed on the basis of an increase in request an effective date of January 1, and Northeast reflect partial reimburse­ tax rate by the New Mexico Legislature 1964, for their proposed rate filings. ment for the full 2.55 percent New Mex­ in excess of .55 percent. While El Paso Texas Gulf Producing Company requests ico Oil and Gas Emergency School Tax concedes that the New Mexico tax lejps- an effective date of February 1, 1964, which was increased from 2.0 percent to lation effected a higher tax rate of at for its proposed rate increase. Good 2.55 percent on April 1,1963. The buyer, cause has not been shown for waiving El Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso) 1_Does not consolidate for hearing or dis­ the 30-day notice requirement provided has protested the rate increases filed by pose of the several matters herein. Wednesday, M a r c h 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2957

least .55 percent, they claim there is RI64-544, respectively, and should be [Docket Noe. 0-20556 and RI60-458] controversy as to whether or not the suspended until June 26, 1964, the ex­ DELANEY OIL CO. ET AL. new legislation effected an increased tax piration date of the suspension period rate in excess of .55 percent. Under the in said dockets. Order Accepting Offer of Settlement, circumstances, we shall provide that the (3) It is necessary and proper in the Requiring Filing of Notice o f hearings provided for herein for Pubco public interest and to aid in the enforce­ Change and Contract Amendment, and Northeast shall concern themselves ment of the provisions of the Natural wiih the contractual basis for the pro­ Gas Act that the Commission enter upon and Terminating Proceedings ducers’ rate filings which El Paso has hearings concerning the contractual F e b r u a r y 25,1964. protested. basis of the proposed rate filings which On January 6, 1964, Delaney Oil Com­ Pubco’s rate filings were tendered to El Paso has protested, as set forth above, pany (Operator), et al. (Delaney) sub­ correct the tax reimbursement portion and the statutory lawfulness of all of mitted an offer of settlement in these of previous filings which have been sus­ the producers’ proposed changes, and proceedings pursuant to § 1.18(e) of the pended. Pubco’s filing, designated as that the above-designated supplements Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ Supplement No. 6 to Pubco’s FPC Gas to be suspended and the use thereof cedure. The offer involves proposed in­ Rate Schedule No. 7, reflects an increase deferred as hereinafter ordered. creased rates for sales of natural gas in rate from 11.2104 cents to 12.2295 The Commission orders: made to Tennessee Gas Transmission cents per Mcf, at 15.025 psia, for gas (A) Supplement No. 6 to Pubco’s FPC Company (TGT) by Delaney. The offer sold to El Paso from the South Blanco Gas Rate Schedule No. 7 is hereby ac­ relates to a sale made under Delaney’s Pictured Cliffs Field and Blanco Mesa cepted for filing subject to the suspension FPC Gas Rate Schedule No. 1 in Duval Verde Field, Rio Arriba County, New proceeding in Docket No. RI64-537 and is County, Texas (Texas R.R. Com. District Mexico. With respect to such supple­ effective as of January 27,1964. No. 4). Each of the proposed increased ment, we believe it should be accepted (B) Supplements Nos. 7 and 13 to ratés were suspended by order of the for filing and made subject to the sus­ Pubco Petroleum Corporation and Pubco Commission for the statutory period, and pension proceeding in Docket No. RI64- Petroleum Corporation (O perator), et al. were made effective by Delaney on July 537, to be effective as of January 27,1964, FPC Gas Rate Schedules Nos. 7 and 13, 6 and December 7, 1960. the date the suspended rate in said dock­ respectively, are hereby substituted for _ Under the terms of the offer, Delaney et went into effect subject to refund. the previous rates in Docket Nos. RI64- proposes to eliminate the favored-nation, Pubco’s proposed rate filings, desig­ 541 and RI64-544 and are suspended price redetermination and the periodic nated as Supplements Nos. 7 and 13 to until June 26, 1964, as hereinafter escalation provisions from its rate sched­ Pubco’s FPC Gas Rate Schedules Nos. 7 ordered. ule and to establish a 15-cent per Mcf and 13 (Operator), et al., respectively, (C) Pursuant to the authority of the rate for the subject sale. Delaney’s an­ should be permitted to supersede the pre­ Natural Gas Act, particularly sections 4 nual revenues will be decreased about vious rates in Docket Nos. RI64-541 and and 15 thereof, the Commission’s rules $1,975 from the presently effective rates. RI64-544, and be suspended in the re­ of practice and procedure, and the regu­ No protests or objections have been filed spective dockets until June 26, 1964, the lations under the Natural Gas Act (18 to the offer. expiration date of the suspension period C FR Chapter I ) , public hearings shall be Delaney, in its offer, proposes to refund for the previous filings. held upon dates to be fixed by notices all amounts collected, subject to refund, Supplements Nos. 7 and 13 to Pubco’s from the Secretary concerning the con­ for sales of natural gas to T G T under the FPC Gas Rate Schedules Nos. 7 and 13 tractual basis of the proposed rate filing (Operator), et al., respectively, and the which El Paso has protested, as set forth subject rate schedule in excess of the set­ rate filing of Northeast provide for tax above, and the statutory lawfulness of tlement rate.1 The estimated total dol­ lars to be refunded approximates $5,800, reimbursement computed on the contract all of the producers’ proposed rate exclusive of interest. base rate of 12.0 cents per M cf exclu­ changes contained in the above-desig­ sive of 1.0 cent per Mcf minimum nated rate supplements. The proposed settlement is consistent guarantee for liquids. The addition of (D) Pending hearings and decisions with the provisions of the Second this minimum guarantee of 1.0 cent per thereon, the rate supplements herein are Amendment to the Commission’s State­ Mcf to the base rate of 12.0 cents per suspended and their use deferred until ment of General Policy No. 61-1, issued Mcf plus tax reimbursement results in the date shown in the “Date suspended December 20, 1960, 24 FPC 1107, as a total proposed rate in excess of the until” column, and thereafter until made amended by Order 264, issued March 27, 13.0 cents per Mcf area ceiling for in­ effective as prescribed by the Natural 1963, 29 FPC 589, and its acceptance creased rates in the San Juan Basin Gas Act. would serve the public interest. Area. (E) Until otherwise ordered by the However, we desire to make it clear The proposed increased rates and Commission, neither the suspended sup­ that acceptance of Delaney’s offer of set­ Charges exceed the applicable area price plements, nor the rate schedules sought tlement shall not be construed as ap­ levels for increased rates as set forth to be altered, shall be changed until dis­ proval of any future increased rate filed m the Commission’s Statement of G en­ position of these proceedings or expira­ in accordance with its reservation of the eral Policy No. 61-1, as amended (18 C FR tion of the suspension period. right to file increases to cover future tax Chapter I, Part 2, 2.56). (F) Notices of intervention or peti­ increases. Nor, may our action herein The proposed changed rates and tions to intervene may be filed with the be construed as constituting approval of charges may be unjust, unreasonable, Federal Power Commission, Washington, any future rate increase that may be filed unduly discriminatory, or preferential, D.C., 20426, in accordance with the rules under the subject rate schedule, and is or otherwise unlawful. of practice and procedure (18 CFR 1.8 without prejudice to any findings or or­ The Commission finds: and 1.37(f)) on or before April 14, 1964. der of the Commission in any future pro­ . . ®°°d cause has been shown that ceedings, including area rate or other By the Commission. Commissioner pne 12.2295 cents per M cf rate, con- similar proceedings, involving Delaney’s Woodward not participating in the sus­ jained in Supplement No. 6 to Pubco’s rate and rate schedule. pension of the filings in Docket No. Gas Rate Schedule No. 7, should The Commission finds: The proposed RP64-541, Pubco Petroleum Corporation, tn ^ cep^ed for filing and made subject settlement of each of the above-desig­ Docket No. RP64-544, Pubco Petroleum rate suspension proceeding in nated proceedings, on the basis described Corporation (Operator), et al., and ocket No. RI64-537 and permitted to herein, as more fully set forth in the Docket No. RI64-630, Northeast Blanco fj?16 effective as of January 27, 1964. offer of settlement filed with the Com­ Development Corporation (Operator), mission by Delaney on January 6, 1964, ®00d cause exists that Supple- etaL mmsNos. 7 and 13 to Pubco’s FPC Gas is in the public interest and appropriate «ate Schedules Nos. 7 and 13 (O perator), [ s e a l ] J o s e ph H. G tjtride, tA K * respectively, should be permitted Secretary. 1 Delaney’s FPC Gas Rate Schedule No. 1 Is subject to a dehydration charge by TGT, for insubstituted for the periodic rate [F.R. Doc. 64-2053; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; which allowance must be made in computing «creases in Docket Nos. RI64-541 and 8:47 a.m.] the refund. 2958 NOTICES to carry out the provisions of the Natural October 18, 1963, and February 20, 1964, Protests or petitions to intervene may Gas Act and should be approved and Natural Gas Pipeline Company of Amer­ be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ made effective as hereinafter ordered. ica (Applicant), 122 South Michigan sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in ac­ The Commission orders: Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60603, filed in cordance with the rules of practice and (A ) The offer of settlement filed with Docket No. CP64-71 (phase H ) an appli­ procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or the Commission by Delaney January 6, cation pursuant to section 7(c) of the before M arch 20, 1964. 1964, is hereby approved in accordance Natural Gas Act for a certificate of pub­ Jo s e ph H . G utride, lic convenience and necessity authorizing with the provisions of this order. Secretary. (B ) Delaney shall file, within 30 days the construction, acquisition and opera­ from the date of issuance of this order, tion of certain facilities in order to en­ [F.R. Doc. 64-2052; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; a notice of change in rate providing for able Applicant to purchase and receive 8:47 ajn .] the 15-cent per Mcf rate specified in its from Humble Oil & Refining Company offer of settlement, and an executed con­ (Humble) and Pan American Petroleum tractual amèndment to its P P C G as Rate Corporation (Pan American)1 natural [Docket No. RI64-625 etc.] Schedule No. 1, eliminating the favored- gas produced from the Sal del Ray, La JOHN TRENCHARD ET AL. nation, price redetermination, and the Coma, Cerda and Willamar Fields in periodic escalation provisions therefrom. Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas, Order Providing for Hearing on and The notice of change and the contractual all as more fully set forth in the appli­ Suspension of Proposed Changes amendment shall be submitted in ac­ cation, as amended and supplemented, on cordance with Part 154 of the Commis­ file with the Commission and open to, in Rates, and Allowing Rate sion’s regulations under the Natural Gas public inspection. Changes To Become Effective Sub­ À Specifically, Applicant proposes the ject to Refund 1 (C) Delaney shall refund to TGT to following in phase II: the date of issuance of this order the dif­ 1. To construct and operate 18.9 miles F ebr uar y 26,1964. ference between the rates collected sub­ of 16-inch pipeline in Kenedy and Brooks The Respondents named herein have ject to refund under the rate schedule Counties, Texas; filed proposed changes in rates and herein and the settlement.rate, making 2. To construct and operate 31.5 miles charges of currently effective rate sched­ account for proper charges, with simple of 12-inch pipeline in Willacy and ules for sales of natural gas under Com­ interest at 7 percent, and shall report to Kenedy Counties, Texas; mission jurisdiction, as set forth in Ap­ the Commission, in writing, within 30 3. To acquire from Humble and op­ pendix A hereof. days from the date of issuance of this erate 14.19 miles of 10-inch pipeline in The proposed changed rates and order, the amount of such refund, show­ Hidalgo and Kenedy Counties, Texas, charges may be unjust, unreasonable, ing separately the amount of principal and, unduly discriminatory, or preferential, or and interest, and the bases for deter­ 4. To construct and operate metering otherwise unlawful. mination, together with a copy of a re­ and miscellaneous appurtenant facilities. The Commission finds: It is in the lease from TG T with respect to such re­ The application indicates the total es­ public interest and consistent with the funds. timated cost of Applicant’s Phase H pro­ Natural Gas Act that the Commission (D) Upon notification by the Secre­ posals to be approximately $2,139,000. enter upon hearings regarding the law­ tary of the Commission that Delaney has Of this amount, approximately $269,000 fulness of the proposed changes, and that complied with the terms and conditions is applicable to the acquisition cost of the supplements herein- be suspended of the order, the rate and charge of 15 the Humble facilities. and their use be deferred as ordered cents per M cf at 14.65 psia, specified In its This matter is one that should be dis­ below. offer of settlement, subject to any appli­ posed of as promptly as possible under The Commission orders: cable contract deductions, shall be effec­ the applicable rules and regulations and (A) Under the Natural Gas Act, par­ tive as of the date of issuance of this to that end: ticularly sections 4 and 15, the regulations order, the above designated proceedings Take further notice that preliminary pertaining thereto (18 C FR Chapter I), shall be deemed terminated, and severed staff analysis has indicated that there and the Commission’s rules of practice from the consolidated area rate proceed­ are no problems which would warrant and procedure, public hearings shall be ing (Texas Gulf Coast Area) in Docket a recommendation that the Commission held concerning the lawfulness of the No. AR64-2 without further order of the designate this application for formal proposed changes. Commission. hearing before an examiner and that, (B) Pending hearings and decisions (E) The acceptance by the Commis­ pursuant to the authority contained in thereon, the rate supplements herein are sion of Delaney’s offer of settlement is and subject to the jurisdiction conferred suspended and their use deferred until without prejudice to any findings or de­ upon the Federal Power Commission by date shown in the “Date suspended terminations that may be made in any sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas until” column, and thereafter until made proceeding now pending, or hereafter in­ Act, and the Commission’s rules of prac­ effective as prescribed by the Natural Gas stituted by or against Delaney, includ­ tice and procedure, a hearing may be Act: Provided, however, that the supple­ ing area rate or other similar proceed­ held without further notice before the ments to the rate schedules filed by Re­ ings. Commission on this application provided spondents, as set forth herein, shall be­ come effective subject to refund on the By the Commission. no protest or petition to intervene is filed within the time required herein. date and in the manner herein prescribed [ s e a l] Jo s e ph H . G u t r id e , Where a protest or petition for leave if within 20 days from the date of the issuance of this order Respondents shall Secretary. to intervene is timely filed, or where the each execute and file under its above- [F.R. Doc. 64-2051; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; Commission on its own motion believes 8:47 a.m.] designated docket number with the that a form al hearing is required, further Secretary of the Commission its agree­ notice of such hearing will be duly given. ment and undertaking to comply with [Docket No. CP64-71 (Phase II) * ] Under the procedure herein provided the refunding and reporting procedure for, unless otherwise advised, it will be required by the Natural Gas Act ana NATURAL GAS PIPELINE COMPANY unnecessary for Applicant to appear or § 154.102 of the regulations thereunder, O F A M E R IC A be represented at the hearing. accompanied by a certificate showing Notice of Application service of copies thereof upon all pur­ chasers under the rate schedule involved. in phase I hereof Applicant was authorized F e b r u a r y 27,1964. to construct and operate certain facilities Unless Respondents are advised to the Take notice that on September 23, in order to receive gas produced by Texaco, contrary within 15 days after the filing 1963, as amended and supplemented on Inc., from the Kelsey and Encinitas Fields, of their respective agreements and un­ Brooks County, Texas. dertakings, such agreements and under- *The application in this docket is divided 1 Humble’s and Pan American’s applications into two phases. This notice pertains ex­ were filed and noticed in Docket Nos. CI64- clusively to phase II of said application. By 297 and CI64-299 (Humble) and in Doc­ 1 Does not consolidate for hearing or dis Commission order issued December 24, 1963, ket No. CI64-377 (Pan Am erican). pose of the several matters herein. Wednesday, M a r c h 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2959

dertakings shall be deemed to have been position of these proceedings or expira­ of practice and procedure (18 CFR 1.8 accepted. tion of the suspension period. and 1.37(f)) on or before April 8, 1964. (C) Until otherwise ordered by the (D) Notices of intervention or peti­ By the Commission. Commission, neither the suspended sup­ tions to intervene may be filed with the plements, nor the rate schedules sought Federal Power Commission, Washington, [ s e a l ] J o s e ph H. G u t r id e , to be altered, shall be changed until dis- D.C., 20426, in accordance with the rules Secretary.

Cents per Mcf Rate in Rate Sup- Amount Date Effective Date effect sub- Docket Respondent sched­ ple- Purchaser and producing area of annual filing date un­ sus­ ject to . No. ule ment increase tendered less sus­ pended Rate in Proposed refund in No. No. pended until— effect increased docket rate Nos.

EI64-625... John Trenchard, 1 10 Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. $3,772 1-27-64 *2-27-64 *2-28-64 4 » 10.5 * 713.0 1520 Floribunda (Worland Field, Washakie and Ave., Burlingame, Big Horn Counties, Wyo.). Calif. BIM-626— J. B. Whisenant, 1 7 4,526 2- 4-64 «3-6-64 »3- 7-64 4 * 10.5 « 713.0 1468 West 14th St., Long Beach 13, Calif. RI64-627_ Skelly Oil Co., 90 10 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (Jiearilla (Decrease 1-27-74 *2-27-64 *2-28-64 22 >*14.0536 7 92912.0495 R164-495. P.O. Box 1650, “O” Lease, South Blanco Field, $(665)) Tulsa 2, Okla., Rio Arriba County, N. Mex.) Attn: Mr. Richard (San Juan Basin Area). J. Dent. BI64-628_ Big Marsh Oil Co., 1 4 United Fuel Gas Co.2* (Big Marsh $21,168 1-31-64 «3- 2-64 *3- 3-64 19.0 9 24 21.0 P.O. Box 1273, Field, Raleigh County W. Va.). Charleston, W. Va.

• The stated effective date is the effective date requested by Respondent. 9 Renegotiated rate Increase. 2 The suspension period is limited to one day. 10 For gas produced from Cancra Formation (below Pictured Cliffs Formation) in 2 Subject to upward adjustment of 0.25 cent per Mcf tor each treatment if buyer is wells 12,13 and 15 only. not required to sweeten and/or remove moisture. 11 For gas produced from below Pictured Cliffs Formation. • Includes C.6 cent per Mcf upward adjustment for delivery pressure (800 psig). 12 Includes 1.0 cent per Mcf minimum guarantee for liquids. • Favored-nation rate increase. 18 Buyer and seller are affiliated with the Columbia Gas System, Inc. 7 Pressure base is 15.025 psia. 14 Pressure base is 15.325 psia. •The stated effective date is the first day after expiration of the required statutory

Big Marsh Oil Company (Big Marsh) proposed rates, being lower than the Under the terms of the offer, Smith requests an effective date of M arch 1, contractually authorized rates, are con­ proposes to eliminate the favored-nation, 1964, for its proposed renegotiated rate sidered to be “fractured” rates. The and the periodic escalation provisions increase. John Trenchard (Trenchard) 15.384- cent rates provided in the con­ from its rate schedule and to establish a and J. B. Whisenant (Whisenant) re­ tracts, however, exceed the applicable 15-cent per M cf rate for the subject sale. quest an effective date of January 27, area price level. Had Trenchard and Smith’s annual revenues will be de­ 1964 and February 4, 1964, respectively, Whisenant’s instant filings been accom-. creased about $920 from the presently for their proposed favored-nation rate panied by a waiver of the right to file for effective rates. No protests or objections increases. Good cause has. not been a 15.384-cent per M cf rate or a con­ have been filed to the offer. shown for waiving the 30-day notice re­ tractual amendment substituting the Smith, in its offer, proposes to refund quirement provided in section 4(d) of 13.0-cent per M cf rate in place of the all amounts collected subject to refund, the Natural Gas Act to permit an earlier 15.384- cent rate, we would not suspend for sales of natural gas to T G T under the effective date for the aforementioned the aforementioned producers’ rate fil­ subject rate schedule in excess of the producers’ rate filings and such requests ings. But, in the absence of such as­ settlement rate.1 The estimated total are denied. surance, we conclude that Trenchard and dollars to be refunded approximates Skelly Oil Company (Skelly) has sub­ Whisenant’s filings should be suspended $2,740 exclusive of interest. mitted a letter agreement which provides for one day, as hereinafter ordered. The proposed settlement is consistent for a 1.0-cent per M cf reduction in price [F.R. Doc. 64-2055; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; with the provisions of the Second and deletion of the contractually pro­ 8:47 a.m.] Amendment to the Commission’s State­ vided for 1.0-cent per M cf minimum ment of General Policy No. 61-1, issued guarantee for liquids as consideration December 20, 1960, 24 FPC 1107, as [Docket No. RI61-29] for a reduction in line pressure from 500 amended by Order No. 264, issued March Psig to 250 psig. Skelly’s proposed de­ H. R. SMITH ET AL. 27, 1963, 29 F P C 589, and its acceptance creased rate is for low pressure gas, and would serve the public interest. even though below the area ceiling price, Order Accepting Offer of Settlement, However, we desire to make it clear is suspended because the reduction in Requiring Filing of N o tice o f that acceptance of Smith’s offer of settle­ Pressure will later result in a compression ment shall not be construed as approval cost to buyer. Such cost will cause the Change and Contract Amendment, of any future increased rate filed in ac­ Proposed rate to exceed the applicable and Terminating Proceedings cordance with its reservation of the right «ea ceiling for pipeline quality gas. to file increases to cover future tax in­ F e b r u a r y 25, 1964. !^ e r t he circumstances, we believe that creases. Nor, may our action herein be «kelly’s proposed decrease in rate should O n January 6,1964, H. R. Smith (O per­ construed as constituting approval of °e suspended for one day from Febru- ator), et al., (Smith) submitted an offer any future rate increase that may be &Iahu 1964, requested effective date. of settlement in these proceedings pur­ filed under the subject rate schedule, and Although Big M arsh’s proposed rate in - suant to § 1.18(e) of the Com m ission’s is without prejudice to any findings or rease is below the increased rate ceil- rules of practice and procedure. The order of the Commission in any future r ~ , West Virginia as set forth in the offer involves a proposed increased rate proceedings, including area rate or other ommission’s Statement of General for a sale of natural gas made to Tennes­ similar proceedings, involving Smith’s hey No. 61-1, as amended, it should see Gas Transmission Company (TGT) rate and rate schedule. iiffiii ®?ended for one day because of an by Smith. The offer relates to a sale The Commission finds: The proposed affiliation between the buyer and seller. made under Smith’s FPC Gas Rate settlement of each of the above-desig­ ini>T- ®**c~ard and Whisenant’s proposed Schedule No. 8 in Nueces County, Texas nated proceedings, on the basis described •«creased rates from 10.5 cents to 13.0 (Texas R.R. Com. District No. 4). The niiooKiPer does not exceed the ap- proposed increased rate was suspended 1 Smith’s FPC Gas Rate Schedule No. 8 is thA r«e ar^a price level as set forth in by order of the Commission for the statu­ subject to a dehydration charge by TGT, for emi ^°.1?amission’s Statement of G en - tory period, and was made effective by which aUowance must be made in computing Policy No. 61-1, as amended. The Smith on January 7,1961. the refund. 2960 NOTICES herein, as more fully set forth in the of­ the provisions of section 4 of the Natural customers and State commissions. Com­ fer of settlement filed with the Commis­ Gas Act, to become effective on March 1, ments may be filed with the Commission sion by Smith on January 6, 1964, is in 1964. The proposed changes reflect de­ on or before M arch 16,1964. the public interest and appropriate to creased rates and charges in all of its J o s e p h H . G utride, carry out the provisions of the Natural rate schedules; i.e., in Original Volume Secretary. Gas Act and should be approved and No. 1, Rate Schedules F -l, ERS-1, 1-1, made effective as hereinafter ordered. and E -l, and in Original Volume No. 2, [F.R. Doc. 64-2104; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964- The Commission orders : Rate Schedules X -l, and X-5. 8:52 a.m.] (A) The offer of settlement filed with The annual decrease in rate level is the Commission by Smith on January 6, approximately $538,000, based upon sales [Docket No. RP64-20] 1964, is hereby approved in accordance during the 12 months’ period ending De­ with the provisions of this order. cember 31, 1962, and includes the recent TEXAS GAS TRANSMISSION CORP. (B ) Smith shall file, within 30 days reduction in the Federal income tax rate from the date of issuance of this order, for corporations from 52 percent to 50 Notice of Proposed Changes in Rates a notice of change in rate providing for percent. and Charges the 15-cent per Mcf rate specified in its The proposed tariff revisions are ac­ offer of settlement, and an executed con­ companied by Algonquin’s agreement to F ebr uar y 28, 1964. tractual amendment to its FPC Gas Rate further reduce its rates and charges in Take Notice that on February 26,1964, Schedule No. 8, eliminating the favored- order to reflect the Commission’s de­ Texas Gas Transmission Corporation nation and the periodic escalation pro­ cision with respect to the use of liberal­ tendered for filing proposed changes in visions therefrom. The notice of change ized depreciation in computing Federal its FPC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Vol­ and the contractual amendment shall be income tax allowances, as set forth in ume No. 1, and Original Volume No. 2, submitted in accordance with Part 154 Opinion No.. 417, Alabama-Tennessee to become effective as of January 1,1964, ] of the Commission’s Regulations under Natural Gas Company, 31 FPC , The proposed changes reflect decreases in the Natural Gas Act. issued February 3, 1964. Such further rates and charges in its rate schedules; (C) Smith shall refund to TGT to the reductions are subject to certain terms i.e., in Second Revised Volume No. 1, date of issuance of this order the differ­ and contingencies specified in the agree­ Rate Schedules G -l, G-2, G-3, G-4, SG- ence between the rates collected subject ment. 1, SG -2, SG -3, SG -4, 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, to refund under the rate schedule here­ Copies of the proposed rate changes EM-1, EM-2, EM-3, EM-4, TES-1, XS-2, in and the settlement rate, making ac­ have been served by Algonquin upon all XS-3, XS-4, CD-I, CDL-4, CD-4 and count for proper charges, with simple customers and State commissions. Com­ ACQ-3, and in Original Volume No. 2, interest at 7 percent, and shall report to ments may be filed with the Commission Rate Schedule X-21. the Commission, in writing, within 30 on or before M arch 16,1964. The annual decrease in rate level is days from the date of issuance of this or­ approximately $650,000, based upon sales J o s e ph H . G u t r id e , der, the amount of such refund, show­ for the 12 months’ period ended Decem­ Secretary. ing separately the amount of principal ber 31, 1963, and reflects the recent re­ and interest, and the bases for determi­ [F.R. Doc. 64-2103; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; duction in the Federal income tax rate nation, together with a copy of a release 8:52 a.m.] for corporations from 52 percent to 50 from TG T with respect to such refunds. percent. (D) Upon notification by the Secre­ [Docket No. RP64-18] Copies of the proposed rate changes tary of the Commission that Smith has have been served by Texas Gas upon all complied with the terms and conditions PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO. customers and State commissions. Com­ of the-order, the rate and charge of 15 ments may be filed with the Commission cents per Mcf at 14.65 psia, specified in Notice of Proposed Changes in Rates on or before M arch 16,1964. its offer of settlement, subject to any ap­ and Charges J o s e ph H . G utride, plicable contract deductions, shall be ef­ Secretary. fective as of the date of issuance of this F e b r u a r y 28, 1964. order, the above designated proceeding Take notice that on February 26,1964, [F.R. Doc. 64-2105; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; shall be deemed terminated, and severed Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company 8:52 a.m.] from the consolidated área rate proceed­ tendered for filing proposed changes in ing (Texas Gulf Coast Area) in Docket its FPC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. No. AR64-2 without further order of the 1, subject to the provisions of section Commission. 4 of the Natural Gas Act, to become effec­ INTERSTATE COMMERCE (E) The acceptance by the Commis­ tive on April 1, 1964. The proposed sion of Smith’s offer of settlement is changes reflect decreased rates and COMMISSION without prejudice to any findings or de­ charges in all of its rate schedules; i.e., [Notice No. 608] terminations that may be made in any G -l, G-2, G-3, SG-1, SG-2, SG-3, LS-1, proceeding now pending, or hereafter in­ S-l, SS-1, OS-1,1-1,1-2, and 1-3. The MOTOR CARRIER, BROKER, WATER stituted by or against Smith, including annual decrease in rate level is approxi­ CARRIER AN D FREIGHT FOR­ area rate or other similar proceedings. mately $7.4 million, based upon sales WARDER APPLICATIONS By the Commission. during the 12 months’ period ending Oc­ tober 31, 1963, and includes the recent F ebr uar y 28,1964. [ s e a l ] J o s e ph H. G u t r id e , reduction in the Federal income tax The following applications are gov­ Secretary. rate for corporations from 52 percent to erned by § 1.2471 of the Commission s [F.R. Doc. 64-2054; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; 50 percent. general rules of practice (49 CFR 1.247), 8:47 a.m.] The proposed tariff revisions are ac­ published in the F ederal R e g is t e r , issue companied by Panhandle’s agreement to of December 3,1963, effective January further reduce its rates and charges in 1964. These rules provide, among other [Docket No. RP64-21] order to reflect the Commission’s deci­ things, that a protest to the granting m sion with respect to the use of liberalized ALGONQUIN GAS TRANSMISSION CO. an application must be filed with tne depreciation in computing Federal in­ Commission within 30 days after date Notice of Proposed Changes in Rates come tax allowances as set forth in Opin­ of notice of filing of the application is and Charges ion No. 417, Alabama-Tennessee Natural published in the F ederal R e g is t e r . Fai- Gas Company, 31 FPC , issued Feb­ ure seasonably to file a protest will F e b r u a r y 28, 1964. ruary 3, 1964. Such further rate re­ construed as a waiver of opposition an Take notice that on February 27,1964, ductions are subject to certain terms Algonquin Gas Transmission Company and contingencies specified in the 1 Copies of special rule 1.247 can he ob tendered for filing proposed changes in agreement. tained by writing to the Secretary, I its FPC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. Copies of the proposed rate changes state Commerce Commission, Washingw . 1 and Original Volume No. 2, subject to have been served by Panhandle upon all D.C., 20423. Wednesday, M a rc h 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2961

participation in the proceeding. A pro- No. MC 3062 (Sub-No, 20), filed Feb­ Authority sought to operate as a contract I test under these rules should comply with ruary 13, 1964. Applicant: L. A. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular § 1.40 of the general rules of practice TUCKER TRUCK LINES, INCORPO­ routes, transporting: Anhydrous am­ which requires that it set forth specif- RATED, 1451 Independence, Cape Gi­ monia, in bulk in tank vehicles, from ( ically the grounds upon which it is made rardeau, Mo. Applicant’s attorney: G. Sterlington, La., to points in Arkansas, and specify with particularity the facts, M. Rebman, Suite 1230, Boatmen’s Bank Mississippi, and Texas, and rejected [ matters, and things relied upon, but shall Building, St. Louis 2, Mo. Authority shipments, on return. not include issues or allegations phrased sought to operate as a common carrier, N o t e : Applicant states the proposed service generally. Protests not in reasonable by motor vehicle, over regular routes, will be under a continuing contract with compliance with the requirements of the transporting: General commodities (ex­ Commercial Solvents Corporation, of Ster­ rules may be rejected. The original and cept those of unusual value, Classes A lington, La. Applicant is authorized to con­ six (6) copies of the protest shall be and B explosives, household goods as duct operations as a common carrier in Cer­ ! filed with the Commission, and a copy defined by the Commission, commodities tificate No. MC 123993; therefore dual opera­ shall be served concurrently upon ap­ in bulk, commodities requiring special tions may be involved. If a hearing is plicant’s representative, or applicant if equipment, and those injurious or con­ deemed necessary applicant requests it be held at New Orleans, La. no representative is named. I f the pro­ taminating to other lading), serving test includes a request for oral hearing, New Hamburg, Mo., as an o.^-route point No. MC 41255 (Sub-No. 41), filed Feb­ such request shall meet the requirements in connection with applicant’s authorized ruary 17, 1964. Applicant: GLOSSON of § 1.247(d) (4) of the special rule. Sub­ regular routes, between St. Louis, Mo., MOTOR LINES, INC., Route 9 (Box sequent assignment of these proceedings on the one hand, and, on the other, Cape 11 A), Hargrave Road, Lexington, N.C. for oral hearing, if any, will be by Com­ Girardeau and Sikeston, Mo. Applicant’s attorney: James E. Wilson, mission order which will be served on Perpetual Building, 1111 E Street NW., N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, each party of record. applicant requests it be held at St. Louis, Washington 4, D.C. Authority sought No. MC 151 (Sub-No. 23), filed Feb­ Mo. to operate as a common carrier, by mo­ ruary 11, 1964. Applicant: LO VE LA C E tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ TRUCK SERVICE, INC., 425 North Sec­ No. MC 28132 (Sub-No. 67), filed Feb­ porting: New furniture, crated and un­ ruary 10, 1964. Applicant: HVIDSTEN ond Street, Terre Haute, Ind. Authority crated, as described in Appendix II to TRANSPORT, INC., 2225 West County sought to operate as a common carrier, the report in Descriptions in Motor Car­ Road, D, Box 2805, St. Paul 12, Minn. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, rier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209, from transporting: Fresh meats, from Terre Applicant’s attorney: Alan Foss, First Toccoa, Ga.. to points in Alabama, Ar­ Haute, Ind., to Marion, 111. National Bank Building, Fargo, N. Dak. kansas, Connecticut, Delaware, District Authority sought to operate as a common No. MC 720 (Sub-No. 4), filed Febru­ of Columbia, Florida, Kentucky, Louisi­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular ary 13,1964. Applicant: B IR D T R U C K ­ ana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, routes, transporting: Petroleum and pe­ ING COMPANY, INC., Waupun, Wis. Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jer­ troleum products, in bulk, in tank vehi­ Applicant’s attorney: Claude J. Jasper, sey, New York, North Carolina, Okla­ cles, from Huron, S. Dak., and points 111 South Fairchild Street, Madison 3, homa, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, within 25 miles thereof, to points in Wis. Authority sought to operate as a South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Ver­ North Dakota and Minnesota. common carrier, by motor vehicle, over mont, Virginia, and West Virginia, and irregular routes, transporting: Frozen N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary ap­ refused and rejected shipments, on re­ foods, from Darien, Wis., to points in plicant requests that it be held at Minne­ turn. apolis, Minn. Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Illinois, Min­ N o t e : Common control may be involved. nesota, Iowa, St. Louis, Mo., Louisville, No. MC 31879 (Sub-No. 11), filed Feb­ If a hearing is deemed necessary applicant Ky., and Pittsburgh, P a . ruary 19, 1964. Applicant: EXHIBI­ requests it be held at Atlanta, Ga. TORS FILM DELIVERY & SERVICE CO. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, No. MC 52458 (Sub-No. 185), filed applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111. INC., 120 West 17th Street, Kansas City, February 13, 1964. Applicant: T. I. Mc- Mo. Applicant’s attorney: James W. CORMACK TRUCKING CO., INC., U.S. No. MC 1743 (Si.b-No. 1), filed Feb­ Wrape, 2111 Sterick Building, Memphis, ruary 14, 1964. Applicant: G E O R G E L. Route 9, Woodbridge, N.J. Applicant’s Term., 38103. Authority sought to oper­ attorney: Chester A. Zyblut, 1000 Con­ W IC KER, 906 Loucks Avenue, Scottdale, ate as a common carrier, by motor vehi­ necticut Avenue NW., Washington, D.C„ Pa. Applicant’s attorney: Arthur J. Dis- cle, over irregular routes, transporting: hn, 302 Frick Building, Pittsburgh 19, 20036. Authority sought to operate as a General commodities (except Classes A common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Pa. Authority sought to operate as a and B explosives, housèhold goods as de­ irregular routes, transporting: Vegetable common carrier, by . motor vehicle, over fined in Practices of Motor Common irregular routes, transporting: General oils, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from points Carriers of Household Goods, 17 M.C.C. in North Carolina, South Carolina, and commodities (except those of unusual 467, commodities in bulk, and livestock), Georgia to Boonton, N.J. value, livestock, Classes A and B explo­ between Kansas City, Mo. (and its Com­ sives, household goods as defined by the mercial Zone), and points in Kansas on N o t e : Common control may be involved. "'fission, commodities in bulk, com­ and east of U.S. Highway 81 from the If a hearing is deemed necessary applicant requests it be held at New York, N.Y. . modities requiring special equipment, and Nebraska-Kansas State line to the Okla- those injurious or contaminating to other homa-Kansas State line including points No. MC 52869 (Sub-No. 73), filed lading), between Scottdale, Pa., on the within 8 miles of said highway, restricted February 19, 1964. Applicant: NORTH­ ah6 “and> and> on the other, points in to shipments of 100 pounds or less and ERN TANK LINE, a corporation, 511 Allegheny, Fayette, and Westmoreland further restricted to perform no service Pleasant Street, Miles City, Mont. Ap­ Counties, Pa. for the transportation of any package or plicant’s attorney: Alan Foss, First Na­ . °TE: a hearing is deemed necessary, article weighing in excess of 100 pounds tional Bank Building, Fargo, N. Dak. applicant requests it be held at Pittsburgh, per package or article, nor in excess of Authority sought to operate as a com­ 100 pounds per shipment per day from mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ TTn°'MC 1827 (Sub-No. 43) (C O R R E C - one consignor at one location to one con­ regular routes, transporting: Petroleum " ¡ w , filed January 30, 1964, published signee at one location. and petroleum products, in bulk, in tank ERft" R egister issue February 12, N o t e : Common control may be involved. vehicles from points in Hanson, Davi­ i&Riia rePublished as corrected this If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant son, and Beadle Counties, S. Dak., to r S DAnPPlicant: K - w . M cK EE I N - requests it be held at Kansas City, Mo., points in North Dakota, Montana, Min­ Topeka, Wichita, or Parsons, Kans. nesota, Nebraska, Iowa, and Wyoming. pS t ?,Ra te d > 2811 Highway 55, st. 55H8. Applicant’s repre- No. MC 41116 (Sub-No. 17), filed Feb­ N o t e : I f a hearing is deemed necessary, A v^ ' i A‘ R- F°wler, 2288 University ruary 10, 1964. Applicant: MRS. LOIS applicant requests it be held at Minneapolis, venue, St. Paul 14, Minn. M. FOGLEMAN, doing business as Minn. ist^shnJ^u PurPose of this republication F O G E L M A N T R U C K LIN E , Post Office No. M C 55236 (Sub-No. 81) (A M E N D ­ as a that aPPbcant proposes to operate Box 603, Crowley, La. Applicant’s attor­ M E N T ), filed January 29,1964, published ¿ L I T V carrler- a common carrier, ney: Austin L. Hatchell, Suite 1009, in F ederal R eg ist e r , issue February 12, p u b lish ed . Previously Perry-Brooks Building, Austin 1, Tex. 1964, and republished as amended this 2962 NOTICES issue. Applicant: O LSO N T R A N S P O R ­ Delaware Counties, N.Y., and those points Applicants representative: George A TATION COMPANY, a corporation, 1970 in that part of New York, east of the Olsen, 69 Tonnele Avenue, Jersey City 6, South Broadway, Green Bay, Wis. Ap­ Hudson River, and south of a line begin­ N.J. Authority sought to operate as a plicant’s attorney: Robert H. Levy, 105 ning at Albany, N.Y., and extending east common carrier, by motor vehicle, over West Adams Street, Chicago 3, 111. Au­ through West Sand Lake, N.Y., to the irregular routes, transporting: Such thority sought to operate as a common New York-Massachusetts State line, in­ commodities as are handled, sold or carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular cluding West Sand Lake and points on dealt in by grocery stores, and payer and routes, transporting: Hydroflusilicic acid, the indicated portions of the highways paper articles from New York, N.Y., to in bulk, in tank vehicles, from Mason specified. points in Bergen, Monmouth, Passaic, City, Iowa, to points in Illinois, Michigan, N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary Essex, Hudson, Union, Middlesex, and Minnesota, and Wisconsin. applicant requests it be held at Newark, N.«T Morris Counties, N.J. N ote: The purpose of this republication is No. MC 61319 (Sub-No. 1), filed N o t e : Applicant states that if thè above to broaden the territorial description by February 5, 1964. Applicant: JOHN authority is granted it wiU request cancel­ showing the destination points as named lation of the portion of its present authority above instead of Chicago, Chicago Heights, JOSEPH .O’MARA AND JAMES P. covering groceries, from New York, N.Y. to and Peoria, HI., Kalamazoo, Mich., Milwau­ OTklARA, a partnership, doing business points in Bergen, Monmouth, Passaic, Essex, kee, Wis., and Minneapolis and St. Paul, as MEEHAN COMPANY, 2324 North Hudson, Union, Middlesex, and Morris Coun­ Minn., as previously published. Sixth Street, Philadelphia, Pa. Appli­ ties, N.J. The purpose of this republication cant’s attorney: Ralph C. Busser, Jr., is to add the note above. No. MC 56679 (Sub-No. 13), filed 1710 Locust Street, Philadelphia 3, Pa. February 13, 1964. Applicant: BROWN No. M C 67234 (Sub-No. 9), filed Feb­ Authority sought to operate as a common TRANSPORT CORP., Manau Lane, ruary 17, 1964. Applicant: UNITED carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Waynesboro, Ga. Applicant’s attorney: VAN LINES, INC., No. 1 United Drive, routes, transporting: Pianos, organs, and R. J. Reynolds, Jr., Suite 403-11 Healey Fenton, Mo. Applicant’s attorney: accessories, and hi-fi and stereo sets, Building, Atlanta, Ga. Authority sought G. M. Rebman, 1230 Boatmen’s Bank between Philadelphia, Pa., ahd points in to operate as a common carrier, by motor Building, St. Louis, Mo. Authority Chester, Montgomery, Delaware, and vehicle, over regular routes, transport­ sought to operate as a common carrier, Bucks Counties, Pa., on the one hand, ing: General commodities (except those by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, and, on the other, points in New Jersey, of unusual value, and except Classes A transporting: Household goods, as de­ Delaware, and Maryland. and B explosives, household goods as de­ fined by the Interstate Commerce Com­ fined in Practices of Motor Common N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary mission in 17 M.C.C. 465, (1) between Carriers of Household Goods, 17 M.C.C. applicant requests it be held at Philadelphia, points in Alaska, and (2) between points 467, commodities in bulk, and those re­ Pa. in the United States, on the one hand, quiring special equipment), serving the No. MC 65626 (Sub-No. 11), filed Feb­ and, on the other, points in Alaska.

off-route point of Huber, Ga., in connec­ ruary 14, 1964. Applicant: FREDONIA N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary tion with applicant’s presently authorized E X PR ESS, INC., Post Office Box 222, applicant requests it be held at St. Louis, Mo. operations. Fredonia, N.Y. Applicant’s attorney: E. Stephen Heisley, Transportation Build­ No. M C 79737 (Sub-No. 13), filed Feb­ N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary ruary 17, 1964. Applicant: SOUTH­ applicant requests it be held at Atlanta, Ga. ing, Washington, D.C. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor WESTERN TRANSPORTATION CO., No. MC 59014 (Sub-No. 30), filed Feb­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ INC., 816 W ater Street, Canon City, Colo. ruary 11, 1964. Applicant: TALLANT ing: (1) Beer and ale (except in bulk, in Applicant’s attorney: John P. Thomp­ TRANSFER, INC., 1341 Second Avenue tank vehicles), from Dunkirk, N.Y., to son, 450 Capitol Life Building, Denver, SW. (Post Office Box 98), Hickory, N.C. points in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Colo. Authority sought to operate as a Applicant’s attorney: James E. Wilson, Ohio, and damaged and refused ship­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Perpetual Building, 1111 E Street NW., ments, and empty beer and ale cases with irregular routes, transporting: (1) Ore Washington 4, D.C. Authority sought to bottles, on return, and (2) empty con­ and heavy machinery, from points in operate as a common carrier, by motor tainers, glass, metal and plastic, from Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico; Utah, and vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ points in New Jersey, to Dunkirk, N.Y. Wyoming, to the mill of Cotter Corpo­ ing: Bituminized fiber conduit and bitu- ration located at Canon City, Colo., and minized sewer pipe and fittings, from N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary (2) perlite and vermiculite, from Flor­ applicant requests it be held at Buffalo, N.Y. Louisiana, Mo., to points in North Caro­ ence, Colo., to-points in Arizona, Kansas, lina, and damaged, defective, returned No. MC 65802 (Sub-No. 27), filed Feb­ Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and rejected shipments, on return. ruary 12, 1964. Applicant: LYNDEN and Wyoming, and empty containers or N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary TRANSFER, INC., Post Office Box 433, other such incidental facilities (not spec­ applicant requests it be held at Charlotte, Lynden, Wash. Applicant’s attorney: ified) used in transporting the above- N.C., or Washington, D.C. James T. Johnson, 609 Norton Building, specified commodities, on return. Seattle, Wash. Authority sought to No. MC 59507 (Sub-No. 9), filed Feb­ N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary operate as a common carrier, by motor ruary 17, 1964. Applicant: EDGAR H. applicant requests it be held at Denver, Colo. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ ALLEN & SON, INC., 825 Fairfield Ave­ ing: General commodities (except those No. M C 80428 (Sub-No. 35), filed nue, Kenilworth, N.J. Applicant’s at­ of unusual value, household goods, as February 19, 1964. Applicant: MC­ torney: August W. Heckman, 297 Acad­ defined by the Commission, commodities BRIDE TRANSPORTATION, DiU emy Street, Jersey City 6, N.J. Authority in bulk, and commodities requiring spe­ Main Street, Goshen, N.Y. AppUcants sought to operate as a common carrier, cial equipment), between Eastport, attorney: Martin Werner, 2 West 45t by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Idaho on the one hand, and on the other, Street, New York 36, N.Y. Author? transporting: Lumber, ties, wooden poles, Spokane, Wash. sought to operate as a common earn , wooden piling, steel piling, structural by motor vehicle, over irregular rou" ,’ steel beams, contractors’ supplies, and N o t e : Applicant states the proposed serv­ transporting: Such commodities as ice is “limited to shipments moving to or equipment requiring special handling, dealt in by a processor, manufacturer equipment and riggings, treated lumber, from Alaska.” It is further noted that com­ mon control may be involved. If a hearing distributor of dairy products, n forest products, treated and untreated is deemed necessary applicant requests it Goshen, N.Y., to points in New Jer«tf< poles, pilings and cross bars, treated and be held at Seattle, Wash. empty containers or other such i untreated, from Old Bridge, Madison dental facilities used in transporting No. MC 66531 (Sub-No, 2) (AMEND­ Township, Middlesex County, N.J., to above described commodities, and MENT), filed January 27, 1964, pub­ Newport, Del., New London, Conn., points turned, refused or rejected shipmen s in Connecticut west of the Connecticut lished in F ederal R eg ister , issue o f Feb­ River, Scranton, and Reading, Pa., and ruary 12, 1964, amended February 13, such commodities, on return. points in Pennsylvania, south of U.S. 1964, and republished as amended this N o t e : Applicant states that no Highway 22, and east of U.S. Highway issue. Applicant: IN T E R S T A T E G R O ­ authority sought. If a hearing i at 309, those points in Orange, Rockland, CERY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, INC., necessary applicant requests it o Sullivan, Ulster, Greene, Albany, and 144 Barrow Street, New York 14, N.Y. New York, N.Y. Wednesday, M a r c h 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2963

No. MC 83539 (Sub-No. 112), filed Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North - other irregular routes, transporting: February 13, 1964. Applicant: C & H Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Dairy products (including but not lim­ TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., 1935 Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South ited to cheese spreads, qnd cheese dips), West Commerce Street, Post Office Box Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vir­ from Dallas and Fort Worth, Tex., to 5976, Dallas, Tex. Applicant’s attorney: ginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and points in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, W. T. Brunson, 419 Northwest Sixth Wyoming. North Carolina, South Carolina, and

Street, Oklahoma City, Okla. Authority N o t e : The purpose of this republication is Tennessee (except Memphis). sought to operate as a common carrier, to indicate that two (2) movements are in­ N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, volved in the proposed operations, in lieu of applicant requests it be held at Dallas, Tex. transporting: (1 ) Boilers, and compo­ the radial movement, previously published. nents when moving in connection there­ No. MC 111044 (Sub-No. 1), filed Feb­ No. MC 95920 (Sub-No. 16) (AMEND­ with, and (2 ) machinery, equipment, ruary 17, 1964. Applicant: SOUTHERN M E N T ) , filed January 24,1964, published material and supplies, used in the instal­ O R E G O N T R A N S F E R & ST O R A G E CO., in F ederal R egister issue of February 5, lation and dismantling of such boilers, a corporation, Post Office Box 1445, M ed­ 1964. Applicant: SANTRY TRUCKING from Tacoma, Wash., to points in Ari­ ford, Oreg. Applicant’s attorney: Earle COMPANY, 11552 Southwest Barbur zona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, V. White, Fifth Avenue Building, 2130 Boulevard, Portland 23, Oreg. Appli­ Dlinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Southwest Fifth Avenue, Portland 1, cant’s attorney: George R. LaBissoniere, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Oreg. Authority sought to operate as a 333 Central Building, Seattle 4, Wash. Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Authority sought to operate as a contract Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, irregular routes, transporting: General carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular and Wyoming. commodities (except Classes A arid B ex­ routes, transporting: Transformers and plosives) , between points in Jackson and Note: Applicant states it will tack the pro­ transformer parts, machinery, materials, Josephine Counties, Oreg. posed authority with its presently held rights supplies, and accessories, from W a u ­ in MC 83539 Subs 14, 21, 39, and 102, to per­ kesha, and Beaver Dam, Wis., and Rock­ N o te: Applicant states no duplicating au­ form a through service to points beyond the thority is sought. If a hearing is deemed ford, 111., to Portland, Oreg., and empty proposed destination territory. If a hearing necessary, applicant requests it be held at is deemed necessary applicant requests it be containers, reflected or spoiled malt bev­ Medford, Oreg. held at Seattle, Wash. erages, hops, in bales, rice, grain, infu­ sorial earth, brewer's malt, advertising No. MC 1128Q1 (Sub-No. 8) (AMEND­ No. MC 94265 (Sub-No. 126), filed matter, and other ingredients used in the M E N T ) , filed January 29,1964, published February 12,1964. Applicant: B O N N E Y manufacture of malt beverages, on F ederal R egister issue of February 12, MOTOR EXPRESS, INC., Post Office return. 1964, amended February 20, 1964, and Box 12388, Thomas Comer Station, republished, as amended, this issue. A p ­ N o t e : Applicant states that the proposed Norfolk, Va. Applicant’s attorney: plicant: TRANSPORT SERVICE CO., a Wilmer B. Hill, Transportation Building, service is to be performed under contract with R.T.E. Corporation. corporation, 5100 West 41st Street, Chi­ Washington, D.C. Authority sought to cago 50, 111. Applicant’s attorney: Robert operate as a common carrier, by motor No. MC 102682 (Sub-No. 244), filed H. Levy, 105 West Adams Street, Chicago vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ December 5, 1963. Applicant: HUGHES 3, HI. Authority sought to operate as a ing: Meats, meat products, meat by­ TRANSPORTATION, INC., Post Office common carrier, by motor vehicle, over products, and articles distributed by meat Box 851, Charleston, S.C. Applicant’s irregular routes, transporting: H ydro- packinghouses, as described in sections attorney: Frank B. Hand, Jr., 921 17th fluosilicic acid, in bulk, in tank vehicles, A and C of appendix I to the report in Street NW., Washington 6, D.C. Au­ from Mason City, Iowa, to points in Il­ Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certifi­ thority sought to operate as a common linois, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wiscon­ cates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from the carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular sin. plant site of Swift & Company, located routes, transporting: Ammunition and at or near Grand Island, Nebr., to points explosives, rejected shipments and empty N o t e : The purpose of this republication is to broaden the destination area. in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Con­ containers therefor, between Charlotte, necticut, New York, New Jersey, Penn­ N.C., on the one hand, and, on the No. MC 113434 (Sub-No. 15), filed sylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, other, Sunny Point Army Terminal lo­ February 14, 1964. Applicant: GRA- West Virginia, North Carolina, and the cated near South Port, N.C., Seymour BELL TRUCK LINE, INC., 670 Lincoln District of Columbia. Johnson Air Force Base located near Avenue, Holland, Mich. Applicant’s at­ Note: Common control may be involved. Goldsboro, N.C., the Marine Corps Air torney: Wilhelmina Boersma, 2850 Pe­ H a hearing is deemed necessary applicant Station located near Cherry Point, N.C., nobscot Building, Detroit 26, Mich. Au­ requests it be held at Omaha, Nebr. Camp Lejeune, N.C., and points in Geor­ thority sought to operate as a common No. MC 95084 (Sub-No. 40) (CLARI­ gia, South Carolina, and Florida. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular FICATION) , filed January 22,1964, pub­ -No. MC 106644 (Sub-No. 49), filed routes, transporting: Canned goods, from Fennville, South Haven, and Benton lished in F ederal R e g ister , issue Febru­ February 13, 1964. Applicant: SUPE­ ary 20,1964, and republished as clarified RIOR TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., Harbor, Mich., to points in Wisconsin. tins issue. Applicant: HOVE TRUCK 520 Bedford Place NE., Atlanta, Ga. A p ­ N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary LINE, a corporation, Stanhope, Iowa. plicant’s attorney: Guy H. Postell, Suite applicant requests it be held at either Lans­ Applicant’s representative: Kenneth F. 693, 1375 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta ing, Mich., or Chicago, 111. 9, Ga. Authority sought to operate as Dudley, 901 South Madison Avenue, Post No. MC 113861 (Sub-No. 28) (COR­ a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Office Box 622, Ottumwa, Iowa. Author­ RECTION) , filed February 5, 1964, pub­ irregular routes, transporting: Cast iron ity sought to operate as a common car- lished F ederal R egister, February 20, pipe, fittings, accessories, and parts ner‘ by motor vehicle, over irregular 1964, and republished as corrected this thereof, structural and reinforcing steel, routes, transporting: Agricultural ma- issue. Applicant: W O O T E N T R A N S ­ including 'angles, bars, channels, rods, cninery, implements, and parts, as de­ PORTS, INC., 153 Gaston Avenue, Mem­ strips, valves, and hydrants, metal tanks, scribed in appendix X H to the report in phis, Tenn. Applicant’s attorney: Louis and, contractors’ outfits and equipment, descriptions in Motor Carrier Certifi- I. Dailey, 2111 Sterick Building, Mem­ between points in Alabama, on and north •' 209, farm equipment, phis 3, Tenn. ua iron and steel products, (1) between of U.S. Highway 80, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Oklahoma. N o te: The purpose of this republication is L-mT8 ,m Iowa and (2) from points in to show the Docket number as MC 113861 wa (except Bettendorf, Burlington, N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary (S u b -2 8 ), in lieu of MC 113861 (Sub-8) as harles City, Davenport, Des Moines, applicant requests it be held at Birmingham, previously published. Dubuque, Ottumwa, Sioux City, and Ala. * No. M C 114969 (Sub-No. 15), filed Feb­ Aterloo, Iowa), to points in Alabama, No. MC 107107 (Sub-No. 299), filed ruary 13, 1964. Applicant: PROPANE Arkansas, California, Colorado, Dela- February 19, 1964. Applicant: ALTER- TRANSPORT, INC., 27 Water Street, Are, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois^-Indiana, MAN TRANSPORT LINES, INC., Post Milfprd, Ohio. Applicant’s attorney: nsas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Office Box 65 (Allapattah Station), M i­ Leonard D. Slutz, 900 Tri-State Build­ f “ii ne^ota’ Mississippi, Missouri, M on - ami, Fla. Authority sought to operate ing, Cincinnati 2, Ohio. Authority a> Nebraska, New Hampshire, New as a common carrier,'by motor vehicle, sought to operate as a common carrier, No. 44____-6 2964 NOTICES by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, FROZEN EXPRESS, INC., Elm Springs, Greeley, Colo. Applicant’s attorney transporting: Liquefied petroleum gas, Ark. Applicant’s attorneys: A. Alvis Paul F. Sullivan, 612 B arr Building, 910 in bulk, in tank vehicles, and refused or Layne, Pennsylvania Building, Wash­ 17th Street, N W ., Washington, D.C. Au­ rejected shipments of the above described ington, D.C., and John H. Joyce, 26 North thority sought to operate as a contract commodity, between points in Wayne College, Fayetteville, Ark. Authority carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular County, Mich., and points in Ohio and sought to operate as a common carrier, routes, transporting: Animal and poul­ Indiana. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, try feeds, and animal and poultry feed transporting: Foodstuffs, from Siloam ingredients,. from Lucerne and Ault, N o t e : Ii a hearing Is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Columbus, Springs, Ark» and within a 10-mile Colo., to points in New Mexico, Kansas, O h io . radius thereof, Gentry, Ark., points in Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, South Da­ Kansas and Oklahoma, to points in kota, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, and No. MC 115331 (Sub-No. 68), filed Louisiana, Tennessee, Mississippi, Ala­ Utah. February 19, 1964. Applicant: TRUCK bama, Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, TRANSPORT, INC» 707 Market Street, N o t e : _Applicant states the service to be and South Carolina. performed will be under a contract with The St. Louis, Mo. Authority sought to op­ Fair Company. If a bearing is deemed nec­ erate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ N o t e ; The purpose of this republication is to broaden the scope of the origin territory. essary applicant requests it be held at Den­ hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: ver, Colo. Fertilizer, from Whitewater, Wis., to No. MC 117119 (Sub-No. 139) (AM END­ points in Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Ken­ M ENT), filed February 10, 1964, pub­ No. M C 119732 (Sub-No. 4), filed Feb­ ruary 10, 1964. Applicant: G E O R G E tucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, lished in F ederal R egister issue Febru­ Ohio, and Wisconsin, and empty con­ ary 26,1964, and republished as amended ZE T T E L M E IE R A N D JESSE RUFFALO, tainers or other incidental facilities (not this issue. Applicant: W IL L IS S H A W doing business as PLA IN FIELD TRUCK­ specified) used in transporting the above FROZEN EXPRESS, INC., Elm Springs, ING CO., Plainfield, Wis. Applicant’s described commodity, on return. Ark. Applicant's attorney: John H. attorney: Edward Solie, 1 South Pinck­ Joyce, 26 North College, Fayetteville, ney Street, Madison 3, Wis. Authority N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, sought to operate as a contract carrier, applicant requests it be held at either Ark. Authority sought to operate as a by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Chicago, 111. or Louisville, Ky. common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Food­ transporting: Bean harvesting machin­ No. MC 115331 (Sub-No. 69), filed ery (bean harvesters) between points in stuffs, from Siloam Springs, Ark., and February 19, 1964. Applicant: TRUCK Wisconsin, Illinois, and Indiana. points within 10 miles thereof of Siloam TRANSPORT, INC., 707 Market Street, Springs and Gentry, Ark., and Kansas, N o t e : Applicant states no serv ice between St. Louis, Mo. Authority sought to op­ Okla., to points in Arizona, California, points in a single State. The proposed oper­ erate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ Colorado, Idaho, Minnesota,. Montana, ation will be under a continuing contract hicle, over irregular routes, transport­ with the Green Giant Co. If a hearing is Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, ing: Feed ingredients, from Montpelier, deemed necessary, applicant requests it be Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washing­ Iowa, and points within 5 miles thereof, beld at Madison, Wis. to points in Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, ton, and Wyoming. The purpose of this republication is to add points within a No. M C 120176 (Sub-No. 5) , filed Feb­ North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, ruary 17, 1964. Applicant: THEODORE Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, and Iowa, 10-mile radius of Siloam Springs, Ark., Gentry, Ark., and Kansas, Okla. - “TED” MAESTAS, doing business as and empty containers or other such in­ T H R A SH E R F R E IG H T , Gerlach, Nev. cidental facilities (not specified) used in No. MC 117956 (Sub-No. 3), filed Feb­ ruary 11, 1964. Applicant: HUGH H. Authority sought to operate as acommon transporting the above named commodi­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular ties on return. SCOTT, doing business as SCOTT TRANSFER CO., 920 Ashby Street SW., routes, transporting: General commodi­ N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary Atlanta, Ga., 30310. Applicant’s at­ ties, serving the off-route points of Fly­ applicant requests it be held at Davenport, torney: R. J. Reynolds, Jr., 403-11 ing Ranch, Nev., located ten (10) miles Iowa. Healey Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30303. north of Reno, Nev., and Rocketdyne No. MC 115840 (Sub-No. 9), filed Feb­ Authority Sought to operate as a common Test Site and Operations Building, lo­ ruary 24, 1964. Applicant: COLONIAL carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular cated approximately eighteen (18) to. FAST FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1215 routes, transporting: Pepper, when thirty (30) miles northeast of Reno, ia Bankhead Highway West, Post Office shipped with salt, from Avery Island, La., connection with applicant’s authorized Box 2169, Birmingham, Ala. Authority to points in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, regular route operations between Reno sought to operate as a common carrier, South Carolina, and Tennessee. and Gerlach, Nev., over Nevada High­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, way 33. N o t e : If a bearing is deemed necessary transporting: Salt and salt products, applicant requests it be held at Atlanta, Ga. N ote: I f a hearing is deemed necessary ap­ from Chalmette, La., to points in Ala­ plicant requests it be beld at Carson City, bama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, and No. MC 118457 (Sub-No. 3), filed Feb­ Nev. Mississippi. ruary 19,1964. Applicant: T H O M A S W . ROBBINS AND RAYMOND S. FULDA, No. M C 120624 (Sub-No. 1), filed Feb­ N o t e : I f a hearing is deemed necessary, ruary 17, 1964. Applicant: DEAN’S doing business as ROBBINS DISTRIB­ applicant requests it be held at New (Or­ M O V IN G A N D D E LIVE R Y, INC., 120 UTING COMPANY, 1113 Grand Avenue, leans, La. West Mulberry, Springfield, Ohio. Ap­ Racine, Wis. Applicant’s attorney: plicant’s attorney: James R. Stiverson, No. MC 115841 (Sub-No. 164), filed W illiam C. Dineen, 710 North Plankinton 50 W est Broad Street, Columbus 15, Ohio. February 17, 1964. Applicant: COLO­ Avenue, Milwaukee, Wis. Authority Authority sought to operate as a common NIAL REFRIGERATED TRANSPOR­ sought to operate as a common carriery carrier, by motor vehicle, over irreguw TATION, INC., 1215 Bankhead Highway by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, routes, transporting: General commodi­ West, Post Office Box 2169, Birmingham, transporting: Foods, foodstuffs, and food ties (except articles of unusual value, Ala. Authority sought to operate as a preparations, empty containers or other Classes A and B explosives, household common carrier, by motor vehicle, over such incidental facilities (not specified) goods as defined by the Commission, irregular routes, transporting: Meats, used in transporting the above-specified meat products, meat byproducts, dairy commodities, and damaged and returned commodities in bulk, and those requiring products, and articles distributed by shipments, between points in Milwaukee, special equipment), and empty contain­ meatpacking houses, from Grand Island, Waukesha, and Jefferson Counties, Wis., ers or other such incidental facilities, Nebr. to points in Kentucky, Tennessee, on throne hand, and, on the other, points used in transporting the above com­ Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, in Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio. modities, between Springfield, Ohio, an Louisiana, Virginia; North Carolina, and the N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary ap­ points within 5 miles thereof, on 0 South Carolina. plicant requests it be beld at Milwaukee, Wis. hand, and, on the other, points in O No. MC 117119 (Sub-No. 137) (AM END­ n-n* c/ym+V. n f U S TTiphWaV 224. M ENT) , filed February 11, 1964, pub­ No. MC 119710 (Sub-No. 6), filed Feb­ lished in F ederal R egister, issue Febru­ ruary 14, 1964. Applicant: JOHN L. N ote: If a bearing is deemed necessary P ary 26,1964, and republished as amended SHUPE AND IVAN D. SHUPE, doing plicant requests it be held at Colum this issue. Applicant: W IL L IS S H A W business as, SH U PE BROS., 2600 Bypass, Ohio. Wednesday, M arch 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2965

No. M C123407 (Sub-No. 10), filed Feb­ 1, Tex. Authority sought to operate as a torney: Herbert Burstein, 160 Broadway, ruary 10, 1964. Applicant: SEURING common carrier, by motor vehicle, over New York 38, N.Y. Authority sought to TRANSIT, INC., 2424 M innehaha Ave- Irregular routes, transporting: Silicate of operate as a contract carrier, by motor : nue) Minneapolis, Minn. Applicant’s a t- soda briquettes, in bulk, in dump and vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ ; torney: Michael E. Miller, First National hopper-type trailers, from Dallas, Tex., ing: Trucks, truck chassis and automo­ Bank Building, Fargo, N. Dak. Author­ to Mobile, Ala., Brain, La., and Little biles, in driveaway service, between New ity sought to operate as a common car­ Rock and Crossett, Ark. York, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular N o t e : The purpose of this republication other, points in Westchester, Rockland, routes, transporting: Roofing, roofing is to add “in hopper-type trailers.” Putnam, Orange, Dutchess, Ulster, Nas­ materials and supplies, paint, building sau, and Suffolk Counties, N.Y., and Es­ paper, and insulation and insulation ma­ No. MC 125205 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ sex, Union, Passaic, Morris, Bergen, terials, from Minneapolis-St. Paul, ruary 13, 1964. Applicant: P. C. TAY­ Hudson, and Middlesex Counties, N.J. Minn., to points in Wisconsin. LOR, doing business as TAYLOR TRUCKING COMPANY, 908 First Ave­ N ote: Applicant states that the1 proposed Note: Common control may be involved. operations will be under a continuing con­ If a bearing is deemed necessary applicant nue, SE, Moultrie, Ga. Applicant’s tract with the General Motors Overseas Oper­ requests that it be held at Minneapolis, attorney: Sol H. Proctor, 1730 Lynch ations, Division of General Motors Corpora­ Minn. Building, Jacksonville 2, Fla. Authority tion. It is further noted that if a hearing sought to operate as a common carrier, is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be No. MC 123819 (Sub-No. 4), filed Feb­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, held at New York, N.Y. ruary 19, 1964. Applicant: ACE transporting: Fertilizer and fertilizer FREIGHT LINES, IN C., 459 East No. MC 125788 (Sub-No. 1), filed Feb­ materials (except such commodities in Mallory Street., Memphis, Tenn. Ap­ ruary 11, 1964. Applicant: RAYMOND bulk, in tank vehicles), (a) from Albany, plicant’s attorney: Bill R. Davis, 2111 A. HARSCH, 53 Evans Avenue, Elmont, Ga., to points in Florida, and (b) from Sterick Building., Memphis, Tenn., 38103. N.Y. Applicant’s representative: Bert Charleston, S.C., to points in Florida and Authority sought to operate as a com­ Collins, 140 Cedar Street, New York 6, Georgia. mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ N.Y. Authority sought to operate as a No. MC 125293 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ regular routes, transporting: Urea (ex­ contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over ruary 10, 1964. Applicant: ROBERT E. cept in tank vehicles), from Memphis irregular routes, transporting: Kitchen AHERN, doing business as INDUSTRIAL and Woodstock, Tenn., to points in A la­ units, uncrated, together with parts and CONTRACT CARRIERS, 1942 Westlake, bama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, K en­ accessories as utilized in the installation Seattle, Wash. Applicant’s attorney: tucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North and/or assembly of such units, between George R. LaBissoniere, 33 Central Build­ Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, and East Rockaway (Nassau County), N.Y., ing, Seattle 4, Wash. Authority sought Tennessee, and empty containers and on the one hand, and, on the other, to operate as a contract carrier, by motor other such incidental facilities (not spec­ points in Connecticut, Delaware, District vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ ified) used in transporting the above de­ of Columbia, Maryland, Massachusetts, ing: (1) Industrial chemicals, in drums, scribed commodities, on return. New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsyl­ cartons and bags, consisting of acids, vania, Rhode Island, and Virginia. Re­ Note: Applicant states that the proposed aluminum sulphate, sodium sulphate, striction: The proposed service is to be servile is to be restricted against the trans­ soda ash, copper sulphate, sodium sul­ portation of the above named commodity, in performed under contract or continuing bags, from the points of origin named above phate, soida ash, copper sulphate, plating contracts with Whitehall Cabinets, Inc. compounds, detergents and filtering to Atlanta, Ga., and those points in Alabama N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary ap­ on and bounded by a line beginning at the agents, from points in California, to plicant requests It be held at New York, N.Y. Alabama-Tennessee State line and extending points in Oregon, Washington, and along U.S. Highway 43 and Alabama Highway Idaho, (2) metal products, consisting of No. MC 125861 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ 5 to junction U.S. Highway 278 at Haleyville, aluminum and steel trim, perimeter pipe, ruary 18, 1964. Applicant: NOEL Ala., and thence east along U.S. Highway 278 furnace duct, gutter, downspout, garbage TRANSFER & PACKAGE DELIVERY to Junction U.S. Highway 231, approximately SERVICE, INC., 1400 Selby Avenue, St. 8 miles northeast of Blountsville, Ala., thence cans and pails, from Portland, Oreg., to along U.S. Highway 231 to the Tennessee- points in Washington, Idaho, Utah, and Paul, Minn. Applicant’s representative: Alabama State line, and thence along the California, and (3) used barrels and sal­ Robert E. Swanson, Griggs Midway Tennessee-Alabama State line to the point of vaged drums, from points in Utah, Idaho, Building, 1821 University Avenue, St. beginning, if a hearing is deemed necessary Nevada, Washington, and California, to Paul, Minn., 55104. Authority sought to applicant requests it' be held at Memphis, Portland, Oreg. operate as a contract carrier, by motor Tenn. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ N o t e : Applicant states the service as pro­ No. MC 124154 (Sub-No. 4 ), filed Feb- posed above in (1) and (2) will be under ing: Dish washers, freezers, garbage dis­ Wary 12, 1964. Applicant: W . D. W IN ­ contract for Great Western Chemical Com­ posals, refrigerators and vacuum clean­ GATE, doing business as W IN G A T E pany and General Metalcraft only, and in ers, from St. Paul, Minn., to Hudson, Wis. (3) under contract for Reimann & McKinney TRUCKING C O M PAN Y, Post Office Box N ote: Applicant states the proposed oper­ only. I f a hearing is deemed necessary ap­ r j “’ Albany, Ga. Applicant’s attorney: ations will be performed for the account of plicant requests it be held at Portland, Whirlpool Corporation, St. Paul Division, St. Ariel V. Conlin, Suite 626 Fulton National Oreg. | f an7 .building, Atlanta, Ga. Authority Paul, Minn. If a hearing is deemed neces­ No. MC 125522 (Sub-No. 1), filed Feb­ sary, applicant requests it be held at Minne­ | sought to operate as a com m on carrier, apolis, Minn, oy motor vehicle, over irregular routes, ruary 13, 1964. Applicant: SUNBURY j transporting: Commodities, which be­ TRANSPORT LIMITED, Hoyt, New No. MC 125878 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ cause of size or weight require the use Brunswick, Canada. Applicant’s attor­ ruary 14, 1964. Applicant: EMPIRE *mPecia! e1ulPnient and handling, be- ney: Francis E. Barrett, Jr., 182 Forbes TIMBER TREATING COMPANY, a cor­ tween points in Dougherty County, Ga., Building, Forbes Road (at South Shore poration, Post Office Box 353, Riverton, Plaza), Braintree 84, Mass. Authority in m e ilan^> and, on the other, points Wyo. Applicant’s representative: Del- worth Carolina, Tennessee, Alabama, sought to operate as a common carrier, m ar S. Eno, Post Office Box 460, Estes Mississippi, and Florida. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Park, Colo. Authority sought to op­ transporting: Lumber, hardwood floor­ erate as a contract carrier, by motor a hearing is deemed necessary ing and pres-to-logs, from the ports of applicant requests it be held at Albany, Ga. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ entry on the international boundary line ing: Wood chips, from Dubois, Wyo., to 124236 (Sub-No. 14) (A M E N D - between the United States and Canada railhead within 5 miles of Riverton, Wyo. J^NT), filed January 31,1964, published located at or near Calais, Vanceboro, and Houlton, Maine, to points in Connecti­ N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary Register issue of February 12, applicant requests it be held at Cheyenne, cut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hamp­ rehw^mende

Boulevard, Los Angeles, Calif., 90017. No. M C 126009, filed February 13,1964. Muskogee, and Oklahoma City, Okla­ Authority sought to operate as a com­ Applicant: OHIO LIMESTONE COM­ homa, Omaha, Nebr., Montgomery City mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ PANY, a corporation, 6205 Alexandria and Kansas City, Mo., Iowa Falls, and regular routes, transporting: Alfalfa Drive, Cleveland, Ohio. Applicant’s at­ Davenport, Iowa, Fort Worth, Tex., La­ pellets, in bulk, in hopper-type vehicles, torney: George S. Maxwell, Suite 948 fayette, and Richmond, Ind., and Battle from points in Imperial, Kern, Los An­ Leader Building, Cleveland 14, Ohio. Creek, Mich., (2) from Joplin, and geles, Riverside, Santa Barbara, and Authority sought to operate as a contract Springfield, Mo., and Rich Hill, Mo., and Tulare Counties, Calif., to Sacramento carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular the area within a radius of ten (10) miles Harbor, San Diego Harbor, Stockton routes, transporting: Limestone, lime, of Rich Hill, and Noel, Mo., and points Harbor, and the Los Angeles Harbor haydite and salt, in truck loads, in bulk, within a radius of ten (10) miles of Noel, commercial zone, Calif., and rejected in dump trucks from Cleveland, Ohio, to to Russellville, and Springdale, Ark.! and contaminated shipments on return. points in Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Vir­ Memphis, Tenn., Shreveport, La., Van­ ginia, Kentucky, and Michigan and dalia, and Bloomington, HI., Muskogee, N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary applicant requests it be at Los Angeles, rejected, refused and damaged shipments and Oklahoma City, Okla., Omaha, Nebr.| Calif.. on return. Iowa Falls, and Davenport, Iowa, Fort Worth, Tex., Lafayette, and Richmond, No. M C 126003, filed February 10,1964. N o t e : Applicant states the proposed opera­ tions will be under contract for the Cuyahoga Ind., and Battle Creek, Mich. Applicant: ANTHONY TASSO, doing Lime Company, Cleveland, Ohio (limestone, business as M & T AUTO WRECKERS, N o t e : Applicant states the requested au­ lim e), The Hydraulic Press Brick Co., Cleve­ thority will be under contract with Ralston- 762 Bergen Street, Brooklyn, N.Y. Ap­ land, Ohio (haydite), and The International Purina Company. If a hearing is deemed plicant’s attorney: Morris Honig, 150 Salt Co., Cleveland, Ohio (salt). If a hear­ necessary applicant requests that it be held Broadway, New York 38, N.Y. Author­ ing is deemed necessary, applicant requests at either Little Rock, Ark„ or ,St. Louis, Mo. ity sought to operate as a common car­ it be held at Cleveland, Ohio. rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular No. M C 126015, filed February 17,1964. No. M C 126010, filed February 13,1964. Applicant: T H E TE N S E N CORPORA­ routes, transporting: Wrecked, disabled, Applicant: THOMAS W. LIPINSKI, do­ inoperative, stolen and repossessed T IO N , 841 Allwood Road, Clifton, N.J. ] ing business as T. W. LIPINSKI TRUCK­ Applicant’s attorney: William S. Rosen, motor vehicles and trailers and replace­ ING, 3914 North Aydelotte, Shawnee, ments thereof; house trailers; fork lift 400 Minnesota Building, St. Paul, Minn., Okla. Authority sought to operate as a 55101. Authority sought to operate as trucks and car and truck cranes; by common carrier, by motor vehicle, over wrecking and towing equipment, be­ a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Sand, irregular routes, transporting: Tools and tween points in New York, New Jersey, rock and gravel, from Fort Gibson, Okla., Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, Vir­ merchandise dealt in by wholesale and to Van Buren, Ark., and Fort Smith, retail hardware dealers, and book covers, ginia, the District of Columbia, Con­ Ark. necticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, book binders and paper products, from Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary New York, N.Y., Newark, Hoboken and applicant requests it be held at Oklahoma Jersey City, N.J., and Philadelphia, Pa., Ohio. City, Okla. to Chicago, HL, and Minneapolis, Minn., N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary No. M C 126012, filed February 14,1964. and empty containers or other incidental applicant requests it be held at New York, Jacilities (not specified) used in trans­ N.Y. Applicant: ICE SERVICE COMPANY, a corporation, 2722 Guinotte Avenue, K an ­ porting the above described commodities, No. M C 126005, filed February 13,1964. sas City, Mo. Authority sought to op­ and exempt commodities, on return. Applicant: HUBERT CECIL, doing busi­ erate as a contract carrier, by motor N o t e : Applicant states the proposed op­ ness as CECIL TRUCKING, Olive Hill, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ erations will be limited (a) to a transporta­ Ky. Applicant’s attorney: Fred F. ing : Frozen food products, between Kan­ tion service to be performed under a con­ Bradley, Seventh Floor, McClure Build­ sas City, Mo., on the one hand, and, on tinuing contract with only two (2) shippers, and (b ) to shipments originating on the ing, Frankfort, Ky. Authority sought the other, Lincoln and 'Omaha, Nebr., wharves, docks or piers at origin points to operate as a common carrier, by motor and Emporia, Hutchinson, Lawrence, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ named above. It is further noted that a Leavenworth, Manhattan, Pittsburg, Sa- motion to dismiss accompanied this ap­ ing: (1) Crushed stone, limestone, gravel, lina, Topeka, and Wichita,-Kans. plication. If a hearing is deemed neces­ dense grade aggregate and agriculture sary, applicant requests it be held at Min­ N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary lime, from the Carter County Stone neapolis, Minn. Company Quarry, located on UJS. H igh­ applicant requests it be at Kansas City, Mo. No. M C 126016, filed February 17,1964. way 60 approximately three (3) miles No. M C 126013, filed February 17,1964. Applicant: WILLIAM C. ROGERS, do­ east of Olive Hill, Ky., to points in Law­ Applicant: ROY DOUGLAS', 507 West ing business as ROGERS TRANSFER rence, Scioto, and Gallia Counties, Ohio, Palmdale, Tucson, Ariz. Authority CO., Box 296, Fairfield, HI. Applicants and points in Cabell, Putnam, 'Wayne, sought to operate as a common carrier, attorney: M ack Stephenson, First Na­ and Lincoln Counties, W. Va., and (2) by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, tional Bank Building, Springfield, Ill- sand, from the Jerry Sand & Gravel transporting: Adobe bricks and blocks, Authority sought to operate as a contract Company, located on old U.S. Highway from the port o l entry on the interna­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular 52, approximately one (1) mile from tional boundary line between the United routes, transporting: (1) A utom otive South Point, Ohio, to points in Boyd, States and Mexico at or near Nogales, parts, tractor parts, airplane parts ana Carter, Elliot, Greenup, Lawrence, Lewis, Ariz., to points in Arizona. stationary engine parts, from Fairfield, and Rowan Counties, Ky. N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, 111., to points in Indiana and Missouri, N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary applicant requests it be held at Tucson or and (2) metals used in the manufacture applicant requests it be held at LouisviUe, Phoenix, Ariz. of automotive parts, tractor parts, air­ Ky. plane parts and stationary engine Part’ No. M C 126014, filed February 16,1964. from destination points in (1) above, to No. M C 126008, filed February 12, 1964. Applicant: ELMER D. PALMER, Route origin point in (1) above. Applicant: LAKE STATES CARRIERS, 1, Pea Ridge, Ark. Applicant’s attorney: INC., Post Office Box 177, Wheeling, HI. John H. Joyce, 26 North College, Fay­ Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Authority sought to operate as a contract applicant requests it be held at Spring etteville, Ark. Authority sought to op­ . carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular erate as a contract carrier, by motor ve­ 111 routes, transporting: Products of alumi­ hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: No. M C 126017, filed February 17,1964. num and plastic and commodities, and Poultry offal meal (ground and cooked Applicant: ROBERTK. LEAjdoingbusi­ . machinery used in the manufacture, dis­ poultry offal), feather meal ( ground and ness as BOB LEA TRUCKING, tribution and use of these products, be­ cooked with additives), in bulk, (1) from North Montana, Helena, Mont, a p p tween points in Illinois, Ohio, Arkansas, Russellville, Ark., Fort Smith, Ark., cant’s attorney: C. W. Leaphart, •> Nebraska, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Texas, Siloam Springs, Ark., and points within Montana Club Building, Helena, Mon, Missouri, Indiana, and Iowa. a radius of ten (10) miles of Siloam Authority sought to operate as a .c^ _ iilar carrier, by motor vehicle, over N o t e i I f a hearing is deemed necessary Springs, to Memphis, Tenn., Shreveport, routes, transporting: (1) Prefabricated applicant requests it be at Chicago, 111. La., Vandalia, and Bloomington, HI. Wednesday, M a r c h 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2967

house and building materials, including transporting: Passengers and their bag­ Indianapolis 4, Ind. Authority sought but not limited to sheet rock and tar, gage, and express and newspapers, in the to operate as a common carrier, by motor from Helena and Missoula, Mont., to same vehicle with passengers, between vehicle, over regular routes, transport­ points in Idaho and Wyoming, (2) sheet Poughkeepsie, N.Y., and Millbrook, N.Y., ing: General commodities (except those rock and tar from Cody, Wyo., to Helena over U.S. Highway 44 serving all inter­ of unusual value, livestock, Classes A and Missoula, Mont., and (3) sand from mediate points. and B explosives, household goods as de­ Boise, Idaho to Helena and Missoula, N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary ap­ fined by the Commission, commodities in Mont. plicant requests it be held at Albany, N.Y. bulk, commodities requiring special Note: Applicant states the proposed oper­ equipment, and those injurious or con­ ations transporting prefabricated houses in No. MC 116139 (Sub-No. 1), filed Feb­ taminating to other lading) between (1) above will be under contract, for the ruary 17, 1964. Applicant: PAT & Richmond, Ind., and Connersville, Ind.; Anaconda Company, a Montana corporation, GORDON, INC., Post Office Box 38, Mt. from Richmond over U.S. Highway 27 to and the sheet rock and tar in (2) above will Ephraim, N.J. Applicant’s representa­ Liberty, thence over Indiana Highway be under contract, for the Monarch Lumber tive: Charles H. Trayford, 220 East 42d Company and Linder-Kind Lumber Company. 44 to Connersville, and return over the Street, New York 17, N.Y. Authority same route, serving Liberty as an inter­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant sought to operate as a common carrier, requests it be held at Helena, Mont. mediate point. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, No. MC 126020, filed February 17,1964. transporting: Passengers and their bag­ N o t e : Applicant states that it is presently Applicant: GARY FEEZOR, doing busi­ gage cend personal effects, in the same authorized to serve Richmond and Conners­ ville, Ind., and holds alternate route au­ ness as GARY FEEZOR TRUCKING, vehicle with passengers, in charter oper­ thority between those cities, the same as set 1313 East Southern Avenue, Mesa, Ariz. ations, providing round-trip and one­ forth above. Applicant’s attorney: Franklin K. Gibson, way sightseeing, pleasure, educational Suite 1, Luhrs Tower, 45 W est Jefferson, and recreational tours, beginning and/or Ño. MC 45857 (Sub-No. 42), filed Feb­ Phoenix, Ariz. Authority sought to ending at points in Burlington, Camden, ruary 17,1964. Applicant: P IC -W A L S H operate as a contract carrier, by motor and Gloucester Counties, N.J., and ex­ FREIGHT CO., a corporation, 731 Camp­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ tending to points in New York, New bell Avenue, St. Louis 15, Mo. Appli­ ing: Lumber and forest products, from Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Mary­ cant’s attorney: John Paul Jones, "100 Cutter, Snowflake, M cNary, and Eagar, land, Virginia, and the District of Jefferson Avenue, Memphis 3, Tenn. Ariz., to points in Texas, Oklahoma, and Columbia. Authority sought to operate as a common Kansas, and grain, on return. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular N o t e : A motion to dismiss accompanied routes, transporting: General commod­ this application. If a hearing is deemed Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, ities (except those of unusual value, applicant requests it be held at Phoenix, Ariz. necessary, applicant requests it be held at Philadelphia, Pa. Classes A and B explosives, household No. MC 126022, filed February 19, goods, as defined by the Commission, 1964. Applicant: PLAZA EXPRESS, No. MC 125160 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ commodities in bulk, and those requir­ INC., 280 Route 3, Secaucus, N.J. Ap­ ruary 18, 1964. Applicant: EASTERN ing special equipment), from Golden and plicant’s representative: Bert Collins, 140 LIMOUSINE SERVICE, INCORPO­ Belmont, Miss., to Memphis, Tenn. Cedar Street, New York 6, N.Y. Author­ RATED, Sunset Drive, Naugatuck, Conn. No. MC 48958 (Sub-No. 72), filed Feb­ ity sought to operate as a contract car­ Authority sought to operate as a com­ ruary 17, 1964. Applicant: ILLINOIS­ ter, by motor vehicle, over irregular mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ CALIFORNIA EXPRESS, INC., 510 East routes, transporting: Candy, confection­ regular routes, transporting: Passengers 51st Avenue, Denver 16, Colo. Authority ery and bakery products, and materials and their baggage and small pets, be­ sought to operate as a common carrier, and supplies, except in bulk, in tank tween Waterbury, Naugatuck, Seymour, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, vehicles, between points in New York, Derby, and Stratford, Conn., on the one transporting: General commodities (ex­ N.Y., commercial zone, on the one hand, hand, and, on the other, Flushing cept Classes A and B explosives, com­ and, on the other, New Rochelle, N.Y. Meadows (World’s Fair Site), Flushing, modities in bulk, household goods as N.Y. Note: Applicant states the proposed opera­ defined by the Commission and commod­ tions will be performed under contract with N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary ities requiring special equipment), (1) Murray-Alien Imports, Inc., New Rochelle, applicant requests it be held at Waterbury between Chama, N. Mex., and Bloomfield, «•Y, i t is further noted that a motion to or Hartford, Conn. N. Mex., over New Mexico Highway 17, dismiss accompanied this application. If a No. M C 126919, filed February 14, 1964. serving all intermediate points, and (2) hearing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ between Aztec, N. Mex., and Blanco, N. quests it be h eld at New York, N.Y. Applicant: GREYHOUND LINES OF CANADA, LTD., 222 First Avenue SW., Mex.: from Aztec, N. Mex., over New No. MC 126025, filed February 19, 1964. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Applicant’s Mexico Highway 173 to junction New Applicant: B A LLA R D T R A N S F E R O F attorney: Robert J. Bernard, 140 South, Mexico Highway 17 at Blanco, and return WASHINGTON, INC., doing business as, Dearborn Street, Chicago 3, 111. Au­ over the same routes, serving all inter­ BALLARD TR A N SFE R CO., 2417 North­ thority sought to operate as a common mediate points. west Market Street, Seattle, W ash. A p - carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular No. MC 103378 (Sub-No. 285), filed P want's representative: Joseph © . Earp, routes, transporting: Passengers and February 13, 1964. Applicant: PETRO­ «1 Lyon Building, 607 Third Avenue, their baggage in round-trip charter LEUM CARRIER CORPORATION, 369 oeattle 4, Wash. Authority sought to operations, from ports of entry on the Margaret Street, Jacksonville, Fla. Ap­ operate as a contract carrier, by motor international boundary line between the plicant’s attorney: Martin Sack, 710 enicle, over irregular routes, transport- United States and Canada located in Atlantic Bank Building, Jacksonville 2, s: Iron and, steel articles, from Seattle, Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Fla. Authority sought to operate as a wash., to points in Idaho and Oregon. North Dakota, Minnesota, Alaska, and common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Nitrogen rm o^: Applicant states the above proposed Sault Ste. Marie, Mich., to points in the ppwationa will be performed under a con- United States except Hawaii. fertilizer solutions, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from points in Richmond in® Contract with Northwest Steel Roll- N o t e : Common control may be involved. inf i f ! r ’ Inc- of Seattle, Wash. If a hear- County, Ga., to points in North Carolina If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant and Virginia. it ho . , med necessary, applicant requests requests it be held in Minneapolis, Minn. 14 be held at Seattle, Wash No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 641), filed A pplications i n W h ic h H a n d l in g W i t h ­ February 13, 1964. Applicant: CHEM­ M otor C arriers o p P assengers o u t O ral H ea r in g H as B e e n E lected ICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 MC 47495 (Sub-No. 7>, filed Feb- East Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, MOTOR CARRIERS OP PROPERTY in S lV 964’ Applicant: MOUNTAIN Pa. Applicant’s attorney: Edwin H. van aS 7 C° ACH LINES, INC., 38 Lafayette No. MC 40235 (Sub-No. 27), filed Feb­ Deusen (same address as applicant). W 0Ue’ 90xsackie, N.Y. Applicant’s at- ruary 18, 1964. Applicant: I.R.C. & D. Authority sought to operate as a common S ; ; ? : .James H - Glavin H I, 54 Broad MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., 128 South carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular street, Waterford, N.Y. Authority Second Street, Richmond, Ind. Appli­ routes, transporting: Cement, in bulk, b v * ^ V u operate a® a common carrier, cant’s attorney: Ferdinand Bom, 1017- from Bellingham, Mass., to points in New motor vehicle, over regular routes, 19 Chamber of Commerce Building, Hampshire. 2968 NOTICES

No. MC 112668 (Sub-No. 29), filed and Rutherford Counties, N.C., and thence over unnumbered highway to I February 19,1964. Applicant: H A R V E Y empty containers or other such inci­ Stratton Mountain Ski Area, and return 1 R. S H IP L E Y & SONS, INC., Post Office, dental facilities used in transporting the over the same route, serving all inter- 1 Finksburg, Md. Applicant’s representa­ above described commodities, produce mediate points, (13) between junction ] tive: Donald E. Freeman, 172 East Green and exempt commodities on return. U.S. Highway 4 and Vermont Highway Street, Westminster, Md., 21157. Au­ N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, 100 west of Sherburne, Vt., and the thority sought to operate as a common applicant requests it be held in Asheville, Killington Basin Ski Area: from junc­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular N.C., or Charlotte, N.C. tion U.S. Highway 4 and Vermont High­ routes, transporting: Stone and stone way 100, over U.S. Highway 4 to junction M otor C arriers o f P assengers products, in bulk, in dump vehicles, from U.S. Highway 4 and unnumbered high­ Medford, Md., to points in the District No. MC 45626 (Sub-No. 51), filed Feb­ way, thence over unnumbered highway ! of Columbia, Delaware, Maryland, Penn- ruary 10, 1964. Applicant: VERMONT to the Killington Basin Ski Area, and syvlania, West Virginia, and Virginia. TRANSIT CO., INC., 135 St. Paul Street, return over the same route, serving all No. MC 114194 (Sub-No. 68), filed Burlington, Vt. Applicant’s attorney: intermediate points, (14) between ! February 14, 1964. Applicant: KREI- J. G. Dail, Jr., 2001 Massachusetts Ave­ Springfield, Vt., and Bellows Falls, Vt.: DER TRUCK SERVICE, INC., 8003 Col­ nue NW., Washington, D.C., 20036. Au­ from Springfield over an unnumbered linsville Road, East St. Louis, Mo. thority sought to operate as a common highway passing through Brockways Authority sought to operate as a com­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular Mills to Saxtons River, thence over Ver? mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ routes, transporting: Passengers and mont Highway 121 to Bellows Falls, and regular routes, transporting: Livestock their baggage, and express and newspa­ return over the same route, serving all and poultry feed ingredients, and blends, pers, in the same vehicle with passengers, intermediate points, (15) between Ches­ in bulk, and rejected shipments, be­ in special operations, (1) between Troy, ter, Vt., and Bellows Falls, Vt.: from tween East St. Louis, 111., on the one Vt., and Jay Peak Ski Area: from Troy Chester over Vermont Highway 35, to hand, and, on.the other, Dupo, 111. over Vermont Highway 101 to unnum­ junction Vermont Highway 121, thence bered highway, thence over unnumbered over Vermont Highway 121 to Bellows N o te: Applicant states it intends to tack Falls, Vt., and return over the same this applied for authority to its Sub 19 at highway to Jay Peak Ski Area, and re­ Dupo, 111. turn over the same route, serving all route, serving all intermediate points, intermediate points, (2) between Under­ (16) between W est Bridgewater, Vt., and No. MC 115162 (Sub-No. 87), filed hill Flats, Vt., and Underhill Ski Bowl Bondville, Vt.: from West Bridgewater February 18, 1964. Applicant: WAL­ Area: from Underhill Flats on Vermont over Vermont Highway 100 to junction TER POOLE, doing business as POOLE Highway 15, thence over unnumbered Vermont Highway 30, thence over Ver­ TRUCK LINE, Evergreen, Ala. Appli­ highway to Underhill Ski Bowl Area, and mont Highway 30 to Bondville, Vt., and cant’s attorney: Hugh R. Williams, 3029 return over the same route, serving all return over the same route, serving all West Fairview Avenue, Montgomery 6, intermediate points, (3) between junc­ intermediate points, (17) between Ala. Authority sought to operate as a tion U.S. Highway 5 and Vermont Bridgewater Corners, Vt., and junction common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Highway 114, and East Burke, Vt., over Vermont Highways 100A and 100, over irregular routes, transporting: Lumber, Vermont Highway 114, serving all inter­ Vermont Highway 100A, serving all in­ between points in Alabama. mediate points, (4) between West Burke, termediate points, and (18) between No. MC 125844 (Sub-No. 2), filed Vt., and Burke Mountain Ski Area, over Wallingford, Vt., and junction Vermont February 13, 1964. Applicant: BIO- unnumbered highway, serving all inter­ Highways 155 and 100: from Walling­ M ED-HU, INC., 10100 Preston Highway, mediate points, (5) between junction ford over Vermont Highway 140 to East Louisville 19, Ky. Applicant’s attor­ Vermont Highway 100 and unnumbered W allingford, thence over Vermont High­ ney: Ollie L. Merchant, 140 South Fifth highway south of Irasville, Vt., and Glen way 155 to junction Vermont Highway Street, Louisville 2, Ky. Authority Ellen Ski Area, over unnumbered high­ 100, and return over the same route, sought to operate as a common carrier, way, serving all intermediate points, (6) serving all intermediate points. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, between East Barre, Vt., and South No. M C 126007, filed February 13,1964. transporting: Human placentas, from Royalton, Vt., over Vermont Highway Applicant: PROCTOR MILLER, doing points in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, 110, serving all intermediate points, (7) business as MILLER BUS LINE, 408 Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, between Chelsea, Vt., and Ely, Vt., over Summit Street, Doniphan, Mo. Appli­ Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mis­ Vermont Highway 113, serving all inter­ cant’s attorney: Thomas P. Rose, Jeffer­ sissippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, mediate points, (8) between Post Mills, son Building, Jefferson City, Mo. Au­ New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Vt., and East Thetford, Vt., over Vermont thority sought to operate as a common Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wis­ Highway 113A, serving all intermediate carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular consin, to Zionsville, Ind. points, (9) between Rochester, Vt., and routes, transporting: Passengers, and No. MC 125997, filed February 10, Castleton, V t.: from Rochester over Ver­ their baggage, and express, mail and 1964. Applicant: L. C. FOESCH, doing mont Highway 73 to Brandon, Vt., thence newspapers, in the same vehicle with business as FOESCH TRANSFER LINE, over unnumbered highway to Hubbard- R&ssengers, between Poplar Bluff, Mo^ Post Office Box 434, Shawano, Wis. ton, Vt., thence over Vermont Highway 30 and Doniphan, Mo.: from Poplar Bluff Authority sought to operate as a contract to Castleton, and return over the same over U.S. Highway 67 to junction U.S. carrier, by motor vehicle, over'irregular route, serving Castleton, for purpose of Highway 160, thence over U.S. Highway routes, transporting: Lumber and lumber joinder with carrier’s existing certifi­ 160 to junction Missouri Highway 21, products, between Shawano, Wis., and cated routes, (10) between Windsor, Vt., thence over U.S. Highway 160 and Mis­ points in Illinois and Michigan. and junction Vermont Highways 106 and souri Highway 21, to Doniphan, Mo., ana No. MC 126006, filed February 13, 10: from Windsor over Vermont High­ return over the same route, serving the 1964. Applicant: BILL L. POTTS, do­ way 44 to junction Vermont Highway Highway Patrol Station, Good Hope ing business as POTTS TRUCKING 106, thence over Vermont Highway 106, School, Blue Moon, Ponder’s Store, Mor­ COMPANY, Balsam Road, Waynesville, to junction Vermont Highway 10, and gan’s Comer, County lin e, Fairdealing. N.C. Applicant’s attorney: Robert R. return over the same route, with right of M iller’s Store, Cyprus Creek, Barker sta­ Williams, 4 South Pack Square, Ashe­ joinder at Amsden, (11) between junc­ tion, Bethany, and junction U.S. Hig - ville, N.C. Authority sought to operate tion U.S. Highway 5 and unnumbered way 160 and Missouri Highway 21, as as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, highway north of Ascutney, Vt., and intermediate points. over irregular routes, transporting: junction unnumbered highway and Ver­ Fertilizer, fertilizer components and A pplications for B rokerage l ic e n s e s mont Highway 44, over unnumbered agricultural ammonium nitrate and ni­ highway, serving all intermediate points, MOTOR CARRIERS OF PASSENGERS trate of soda, in bags from Savannah (12) between junction Vermont High­ and Augusta, Ga., Birmingham and No. MC 12828 (Sub-No. D. ways 11 and 30, near Snow Valley, Vt., Sheffield, Ala., to points in Clay, Chero­ ruary 3, 1964. Applicant: KENNEih kee, Graham, Swain, Macon, Jackson, and Stratton Mountain Ski Area, near D. VAN WAGENEN, doing business a Haywood, Buncombe, Madison, Yancey, So. Londonderry, Vt,: from junction W YOMING CHARTER COACH TOURS- Mitchell, Burke, Transylvania, Hender­ Vermont Highways 11 and 30 over Ver­ 1218 South Elm Street, Casper, wy- son, Polk, McDowell, Avery, Watauga, mont Highway 30 to Bondville, Vt., For a license (B M C 5) to engage in op Wednesday, M a r c h 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2969

erations as a broker at Casper, Wyo., less otherwise modified, changed, sus­ FS A No. 38844: Liquid caustic soda in arranging for transportation in inter- pended or annulled. from Charleston, S.C. Filed by O. W. j state or foreign commerce of passengers It is further ordered, That this amend­ South, Jr., agent (No. A4458), for inter­ and their baggage, in charter operations, ested rail carriers. Rates on liquid caus­ beginning and ending at points in W yo- ment shall become effective at 11:59 p.m., February 29, 1964, and that this order tic soda, in tank car loads, from Charles­ ; ming, Billings, Mont., and Denver, Colo., ton, S.C., to Franklin, Va. | anfl extending to points in Alaska. shall be served upon the Association of American Railroads, Car Service Divi­ Grounds for relief: Market competi­ Note: Applicant holds authority in MC sion, as agent of all railroads subscribing tion. 1 2 8 2 8 as a broker to arrange for transporta- to the car service and per diem agree­ Tariff : Supplement 69 to Southern I tlon of passengers and their baggage, begin­ ment under the terms of that agreement, Freight Association, Agent, tariff I.C.C, ning and ending at points in Wyoming, S-207. Billings, Mont., and Denver, Colo., and ex­ and by filing it with the Director, Office tending to points in the United States, ex­ of the Federal Register. F S A No. 38845: Liquid caustic soda cept Alaska and Hawaii. The purpose of the from Saltville, Va. Filed by O. W. Instant application is to include Alaska.. Issued at Washington, D.C., February South, Jr., agent (No. A4459), for inter­ 28, 1964. ested rail carriers. Rates on liquid caus­ By the Commission. I n ter state C o m m e r c e tic soda, in tank car loads, from Salt­ [seal] H arold D. M cC o y , C o m m is s io n , ville, Va., to Cartersville, Ga. Secretary. [ s e a l ] C h ar les W . T a y l o r , Grounds for relief: Market competi­ Agent. tion. [F.R. Doc. 64-2081; Piled, Mar. 3, 1964; 8:50 a.m.] [FJt. Doc. 64-2076; Piled, Mar. 3, 1964; Tariff: Supplement 69 to Southern 8:49 a.m.] Freight Association, agent, tariff I.C.C. S-207. [Rev. S.0.562; Taylor’s I.C.C. Order 162, F S A No. 38846: Iron and steel articles Amdt. 1] FOURTH SECTION APPLICATIONS to Greenville, Miss. Filed by Illinois KANSAS, OKLAHOMA & GULF FOR RELIEF Freight Association, agent (No. 228), for RAILWAY CO. interested rail carriers. Rates on iron F e b r u a r y 28,1964. and steel articles, viz: angles; bars, re­ Rerouting of Traffic Protests to the granting of an appli­ inforcement; beams; channels; coiled cation must be prepared in accordance steel; floor plates and sheets; piling; Upon further consideration of Taylor’s with Rule 1.40 of the General Rules of pipe; tubing; tees and zees, in carloads, K I.C.C. Order No. 162 (Kansas, Oklahoma Practice (49 C FR 1.40) and filed within from Chicago, Joliet and South Chicago, I & Gulf Railway Company) and good 15 days from the date of publication of HI., Gary, and Indiana Harbor, Ind., to I cause appearing therefor: this notice in the F ederal R eg ister . Greenville, Miss. ! It is ordered, That, Taylor’s I.C.C. Or- L o n g - a n d -S h o r t H a u l Grounds for relief: Barge competition. ! der No. 162 be, and it is herby, amended Tariff : Supplement 5 to Hlinois Freight I by substituting the following paragraph F S A No. 38840: "Liquid caustic soda Association, agent, tariff I.C.C. 1033. (g) for paragraph (g) thereof: from Charleston, S.C. Filed by O. W. By the Commission. (g) Expiration date. This order shall South, Jr., agent (No. A4454), for and on expire at 11:59 p.m., April 30, 1964, un­ behalf of Southern Railway Co. Rates [ s e a l ] H arold D . M cC o y , less otherwise modified, changed, sus­ on liquid caustic soda, in tank car loads, Secretary. pended or annulled. from Charleston, S.C., to Danville, Va. [F.R. Doc. 64-2077; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; Grounds for relief: Market competi­ 8:49 a.m.] It is further ordered, That this amend­ tion. ment shall become effective at 11:59 Tariff: Supplement 69- to Southern Pm., February 29, 1964, and that this Freight Association, agent, tariff I.C.C. [Notice No. 294] order shall be served upon the Associa- S-207. MOTOR CARRIER ALTERNATE ROUTE I tion of American Railroads, Car Serv­ FSA No. 38841: Liquid caustic soda ice Division, as agent of all railroads from Saltville, Va. Filed by O. W. South, DEVIATION NOTICES subscribing to the car service and per Jr., agent (No. A4455), for interested F e b r u a r y 28, 1964. diem agreement under the terms of that rail carriers. Rates on liquid caustic The following letter-notices of pro­ agreement, and by filing it with the Di­ soda, in tank car loads, from Saltville, rector, Office of the Federal Register. posals to operate over deviation routes Va., to Augusta, Ga., Clearwater, Gran- for operating convenience only have Issued at Washington, D.C., Febru­ iteville and Langley, S.C. been filed with the Interstate Commerce ary 27, 1964. Grounds for relief: Market competi­ Commission, under the Commission’s tion. deviation rules revised, 1957 (49 C FR I nterstate C o m m erce Tariff: Supplement 69 to Southern 211.1(c)(8)) and notice thereof to all C o m m is s io n , ^ [SEAL] Freight Association, agent, tariff I.C.C. interested persons is hereby given as C h arles W . T a y l o r , S-207. Agent. provided in such rules (49 C FR 2111 F S A No. 38842: Soda ash from Salt­ ( d ) (4 ) ) . [F.R. Doc. 64-2075; Piled, Mar. 3, 1964; ville, Va. Filed by O. W. South, Jr., Protests against the use of any pro­ 8:49 a.m.J agent (No. A4456), for interested rail posed deviation route herein described carriers. Rates on soda ash, in covered may be filed with the Interstate Com­ lRev. S.O. 562; Taylor’s I.C.C. Order 1 hopper cars, in carloads, from Saltville, merce Commission in the manner and Amdt. 1 ] Va., to Cedar Springs, Ga. » form provided in such rules (49 CFR Grounds for relief: Market competi­ [ CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY < 211.1(e)) at any time but will not oper­ tion. ate to stay commencement of the pro­ NEW JERSEY Tariff: Supplement 69 to Southern posed operations unless filed within 30 Freight Association, agent, tariff I.C.C. Rerouting of Traffic days from the date of publication. S-207. Successively filed letter-notices of the lcp°? iiirther consideration of Taylo F S A No. 38843: Liquid caustic soda same carrier under the Commission’s from Charleston, S.C. Filed by O. W. road rw !? r No' 165 (The Central Ra deviation rules revised, 1957, will be South, Jr., agent (No. A4457), for inter­ cause of New Jersey) and go numbered consecutively for convenience ause appearing therefor: ested rail carriers. Rates on liquid caus­ in identification and protests if any tic soda, in tank car loads, from Charles­ d erN o T fi^ ’ Ttiat’ Taylor’s I.C.C. O should refer to such letter-notices by ton, S.C., to Nixon, Ga. by subsHff^6’ and it; k hereby. amend number. Grounds for relief: Market competi­ (g) for nnUting the IolIowing paragra] ior paragraph (g ) thereof: tion. M otor C arrier o f P r o pe r t y Tariff: Supplement 69 to Southern No. MC 730 (Deviation No. 26), expire date‘ This order sh) Freight Association, Agent, tariff I.C.C. at 11 -89 P.m„ M arch 31, 1964, va PACIFIC INTERMOUNTAIN EXPRESS S-207. CO., P.I.E. Building, 14th and Clay 2970 NOTICES

Streets, P.O. Box 958, Oakland, Calif., No. MC 75320 (Deviation No. 20), junction unnumbered highway near Tur- applicant’s attorney: W. S. Pilling (same CAMPBELL SIXTY SIX EXPRESS, rell, Aik., thence over unnumbered high­ address as applicant), filed October 6, INC., P.O. Box 807, Springfield, Mo., way via Turrell, Clarksdale, Jericho, and 1963. Carrier proposes to operate as a filed February 19, 1964. Carrier pro­ Marion to junction U.S. Highway 63 via common carrier, by motor vehicle, of poses to operate as a common carrier, by West Memphis to junction U.S. Highway general commodities, with certain ex­ motor vehicle, of general commodities, 61, thence over U.S. Highway 61 to ceptions, over a deviation route as fol­ with certain exceptions, over a deviation Memphis and return over the same route. lows: from Artesia, Colo., over Colorado route as follows: from junction U.S. No. M C 2890 (Deviation No. 38) Highway 64 to junction Colorado High­ Highways 61 and 70 and Interstate High­ AMERICAN BUSLINES, INC., 1805 ways 13 and 789, thence over Colorado way 55 approximately 3 miles west of Leavenworth Street, Omaha 2, Nebr., Highways 13 and 789 to Rifle, Colo., Memphis, Tenn., over Interstate High­ filed February 17, 1964. Applicant pro­ thence over U.S. Highway 6 to junction way 55 to junction U.S. Highway 61 ap­ poses to operate as a common carrier, U.S. Highway 40, north of Georgetown, proximately three miles south of Blythe- by motor vehicle, of passengers and their Colo., and return over the same route, ville, Ark., and return over the same baggage, over a deviation route as fol­ for operating convenience only. The route, for operating convenience only. lows: from Baltimore, Md., over U.S. notice indicates that the carrier is pres­ The notice indicates that the carrier is Highwhy 40 to junction UJS. Highway ently authorized to transport the same presently authorized to transport the 522 at Hancock, Md., thence over U.S. commodities over a pertinent service same commodities over a pertinent serv­ Highway 522 to junction Interstate route as follows: from Denver, Colo., ice route as follows: from Memphis, Highway 70, thence over Interstate over U.S. Highway 40 to Salt Lake City, Tenn., over U.S. Highway 61 to St. Louis, Highway 70 to Breeze wood, Pa., and re­ Utah, and return over the same route. Mo., and return over the same route. turn over the same route, for operating No. MC 29988 (Deviation No. 14), -No. MC 76032 (Deviation No. 9), convenience only. The notice indicates DENVERr-CHICAGO TRUCKING COM­ NAVAJO FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1205 that the carrier is presently authorized PANY, INC., 45th and Jackson Streets, South Platte River Drive, Denver, Colo., to transport passengers over a pertinent Denver, Cok>., applicant’s attorney: Ed­ 80223, applicant’s attorney: Ken Wolford service route as follows: from Baltimore ward G. Bazelon, 39 South La Salle (same address as applicant), filed Febru­ over U.S. Highway 140 to junction un­ Street, Chicago, 111., filed February 17, ary 17, 1964. Carrier proposed to oper­ numbered highway at or near Sandy- 1964. Carrier proposes to operate as a ate as a common carrier, by motor vehi­ ville, Md., thence over unnumbered high­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, of cle, of general commodities, with certain way (now U.S. Highway 140) to West­ general commodities, with certain ex­ exceptions, over a deviation route as minster, Md., thence over Maryland ceptions, over a deviation route as fol­ follows: from the junction unnumbered Highway 97 to Emittsburg, Md., thence lows: from junction U.S. Highway 30 and California highway (formerly portion over M aryland Highway 97 to the Mary­ Nebraska Highway 92, approximately 3 U.S. Highway 66) and U.S. Highway 66 land-Pennsylvania State line, thence miles southwest of Clarks, Nebr., over (also known as Interstate Highway 15), over Pennsylvania Highway 16 to Mc- Nebraska Highway 92 to Omaha, Nebr., at or near Victorville, Calif., over Inter­ Connellbsurg, Pa., thence over U.S. High­ thence over South Omaha Bridge to state Highway 15 to junction U.S. High­ way 30 to Pittsburgh, Pa., and return Iowa Highway 92, thence over Iowa High­ way 66, at or near Barstow, Calif., and over the same route. way 92 to junction Iowa Highway 48, return over the same route, for operating By the Commission. at or near Griswold, Iowa, thence over convenience only. The notice indicates Iowa Highway 48 to junction U.S. High­ that the carrier is presently authorized [ s e a l ] H arold D. M cCoy, Secretary. way 6, thence over UJ3. Highway 6 to to transport the same commodities over a junction Iowa Highway 149, near Home­ pertinent service route as follows: from [P.E. Doc. 64-2078; Piled, Mar. 3, 1964; stead, Iowa, thence over Iowa Highway Los Angeles, Calif., over U.S. Highway 66 8:50 ajn.] 149 to junction U.S. Highway 30, at or to junction unnumbered highway (for­ near Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and return merly portion U.S. Highway 66), thence [Notice No. 606] over the same route, for operating con­ over unnumbered highway via Oro venience only. The notice indicates that Grande and Lenwood, Calif., to Barstow, MOTOR CARRIER APPLICATIONS AND the carrier is presently authorized to thence over U.S. Highway 66 /to A l­ CERTAIN OTHER PROCEEDINGS transport the same commodities over a buquerque, N. Mex., and return-over the F ebruary 28, 1964. pertinent service route as follows: from same route. Denver, Colo., over U.S. Highway 85 to No. MC 105957 (Deviation No. 9), Section A. The following publications Greeley, Colo., thence over U.S. Highway DELTA MOTOR LINE, INC., 301 South are governed by the new Special Rule 34 to junction U.S. Highway 6, thence 11th Street, Fort Smith, Ark., filed Feb­ 1.247 of the Commission’s rules of prac­ over U.S. Highway 6 to Sterling, Colo, ruary 17,1964. Carrier proposes to oper­ tice, published in the F ederal Register, (also from Denver over U.S. Highway 6 ate as a common carrier, by motor vehi­ issue of December 3, 1963, which became to Sterling), thence over U.S. Highway cle of general commodities, with certain effective January 1, 1964. Section B. The following publications 138 to Junction U.S. Highway 30, thence exceptions, over a deviation route as fol­ are governed by the Interstate Commerce over U.S. Highway 30 to junction Al­ lows: from junction U.S. Highways 70, ternate U.S. Highway 30, thence over 61, and 63 and Interstate Highway 55 Commission’S general rules °f Prf Alternate U.S. Highway 30 to Chicago, approximately 3 miles west of Memphis, including spécial rules (49 CFR l governing notice of filing of applications 111., and return over the same route. Tenn., over Interstate Highway 55 to by motor carriers of property of passen­ No. MC 52953 (Deviation No. 6) ET & St. Louis, Mo., and return over the same gers or brokers under sections 206, 2u , WNC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, route for operating convenience only. and 211 of the Interstate Commerce Act 132 Legion Street, Johnson City, Tenn., The notices indicates that the carrier is and certain other proceedings with r - filed February 18, 1964. Carrier pro­ presently authorized to transport the poses to operate as a common carrier, by same commodities over a pertinent route spect thereto. , . „ All hearings and prehearing coni - motor vehicle, of general commodities, as follows: from St. Louis over U.S. High­ ences will be called at 9:30 a.m., Un with certain exceptions, over a devia­ way 67 to junction UJS. Highway 61, States standard time (or 9:30 ? m h. tion route as follows: from junction U.S. thence over U.S. Highway 61 via Crystal daylight saving time, if that time is Highways 61, 70, and Interstate Highway City, Perryville, and Jackson, Mo., to served), unless otherwise specified. 55 over Interstate Highway 55 to junc­ junction Missouri Highway 34, thence tion U.S. Highway 61 and Interstate over Missouri Highway 34 to Cape Gi­ A pplications A s sig n e d for O ral H earing Highway 55, and return over the same rardeau, Mo., thence over Missouri High­ S e c t io n A route, for operating convenience only. way 74 to junction U.S. Highway 61, The notice indicates that the carrier is thence over U.S. 61 to junction unnum­ MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY presently authorized to transport the bered highway near Sikeston, Mo., same commodities over a pertinent serv­ No. M C 50069 (Sub-No. 291), ^ thence over unnumbered highway via ice route as follows: from Memphis, bruary 23, 1964. Appfic^: ^ Tenn., over U.S. Highway 61 to Blythe- Sikeston to junction U.S. Highway 61, NERS TRANSPORT & TER M ^ ville, Ark., and return over the same thence over U.S. Highway 61 to Blythe- DRPORATION, 111 West Jac^ route.' ville, thence over U.S. Highway 61 to Wednesday, M a r c h 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2971

sought to operate as a common carrier, HEARING: April 6, 1964, at the Mid­ Minn. Applicant’s attorney: Donald A. L motor vehicle, over irregular routes, land Hotel, Chicago, HI., before Exam ­ Morken, 1000 First National Bank Build­ transporting: Chemicals, in bulk, in tank iner Louis G. LaVecchia. ing, Minneapolis, Minn. Authority [vehicles from Columbus, Ohio, to points S e c t io n B sought to operate as a common carrier, in Illinois and Wisconsin. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, : HEARING: M arch 24,1964, at the New MOTOR CARRIERS OF Pif&PERTY transporting: New and used items, Post Office Building, Columbus, Ohio, No. MC 2165 (Sub-No. 16), filed Oc­ whether of special or regular design, and before Examiner Parks M. Low. tober 9, 1963. Applicant: LANGDON whether to be permanently attached or ; No.M C 9 5 2 1 2 (Sub-No. 35) (C O R R E C ­ TRUCK LINES, INC., Lyndonville, N.Y. otherwise, crated and uncrated, as fol­ TION), filed August 14, 1963, published Applicant's representative: Raymond A. lows: dental, church, hospital, house­ [fidehal R e g is t e r issue February 19, Richards, 35 Curtice Park, Webster, hold, institutional, library, laboratory, 1964, republished as corrected this and N.Y. Authority sought to operate as a medical, office, physicians’, scientific, [¿sue. Applicant: H E LE N R. H E N D E R - common carrier, by motor vehicle, over school and store appliances, cabinets, ISON, business as H. R. H E N D E R - doing irregular routes, transporting: Empty cases, equipment, fixtures, furniture and ISON, Post Office Box 327, Seneca, HI. drums, used, for reconditioning purposes, furnishings, floor coverings, new and attorney: Joseph M. Scanlan, [Applicant’s which, when full, move inbound via the used store and building appliances, West Washington Street, Chicago 2, [ill same carrier, from Buffalo, Canisteo, equipment, fixtures, furniture and fur­ ni. Crittenden, Olean, Orchard Park, and nishings, organs, pianos, consoles, I Note: The purpose of this republication. SinClairville, N.Y., and points in that benches, claviers, speakers, and other I Is to show Chicago, 111., as the place of hear­ part of New York bounded by a line be­ musical instruments, caskets and burial ing which w a s omitted in previous publi- ginning at the Niagara River just north cases, coolers and refrigerators, dupli­ I cation. of Niagara Falls, N.Y., and extending cating and reproducing equipment, vend­ HEARING: April 16, 1964, at the M id- along New York Highway 31 to Lock- ing machines and coin operated amuse­ Hand Hotel, Chicago, IH., before E xam - port, N.Y., thence along New York ment devices and voting machines (1) liner Laurence E. Masoner. Highway 93 to junction New York High­ between Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minn., No. MC 109689 (Sub-No. 154), filed way 5 just south of Akron, N.Y., thence on the one hand, and, on the other, February 23, 1964. Applicant: W . S. along New York Highway 5 to Batavia, points in Iowa, Illinois, Kansas, Mis­ HATCH Co., a corporation, 643 South 800 N.Y., thence along New York Highway 33 souri, Montana, Nebraska, North Da­ West, Woods Cross, Utah. Applicant’s to Rochester, N.Y., thence along city kota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin, (2) attorney: Mark K. Boyle, 345 South State streets (formerly shown as New York between points in Wisconsin, on the one Street, Salt Lake City, Utah. Authority Highway 2) to Lake Ontario, thence hand, and, on the other, points in Iowa, [sought to operate as a common carrier, along the shore of Lake Ontario to the Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Niagara River, thence along the Niagara North Dakota, and South Dakota, and [transporting: Liquid chemicals, in bulk River to points of beginning, including (3) between points in Hlinois, on the from Henderson, Nev., to points in points on the indicated portions of the one hand, and, on the other, points in [Arizona. highways specified, to Newark, N.J. Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Ne­ HEARING: M arch 10, 1964, at the HEARING: A pril 13, 1964, at the braska, North Dakota, and South Da­ Arizona Corporation Commission, Phoe­ Manger Hotel, Rochester, N.Y., before kota, and points in Wisconsin located on nix, Ariz., before Joint Board No. 168, or, Examiner Lacy W. Hinely. and west of a line beginning at Ashland, if the Joint Board waives its right to par­ No. MC 2165 (Sub-No. 17), filed Oc­ Wis., and extending over Wisconsin ticipate before Examiner John S. Messer. tober 9, 1963. Applicant: LANGDON Highway 13 to Sauk City, Wis., thence No. MC 110420 (Sub-No. 365), filed TRUCK LINES, INC., Lyndonville, N.Y. over Wisconsin Highway 78 to junction February 20, 1964. Applicant: Q U A L ­ Applicant’s representative: Raymond A. Wisconsin Highway 92, thence over W is­ ITY CARRIERS, INC., 100 South Calu- Richards, 35 Curtice Park, Webster, N.Y. consin Highway 92 to junction Wisconsin iffiet Street, Burlington, Wis. Authority Authority sought to operate as a com­ Highway 69, thence over Wisconsin sought to operate as a common carrier, mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ Highway 69 to the Wisconsin-Illinois [by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, regular routes, transporting: Empty con­ State line. [transporting: Fertilizers and fertilizer tainers and empty paperboard cartons, HEARING: May 4, 1964, in Room Materials, in bulk, in tank or hopper ve­ knocked down, when shipped in mixed B-29, Federal Building and U.S. Court­ hicles, from Fulton, HI., to points in H - truckloads with petroleum produets, (the house, 110 South Fourth Street, Minne­ ™ , Iowa, and Wisconsin. empty containers and empty paperboard apolis, Minn., before Examiner Joseph cartons not to exceed 10 percent of total A. Reilly. I Note: Common control may be involved. weight of shipment), from Bayonne, No. MC 73165 (Sub-No. 179), filed De­ I HEARING: April 2, 1964, at the M id- N.J., to Buffalo, Canisteo, Crittenden, cember 16, 1963, published in F ederal I » Hotel, Chicago, HI., before Joint Olean, Orchard Park, and Sinclairville R eg ist e r issue February 12, 1964, [Board No. 111. N.Y., and points in that part of New amended February 24, 1964, and repub­ I Jo . MC 112801 (Sub-No. 10), filed York bounded by a line beginning at the lished as amended this issue. Applicant: |“ ™ y 17, 1964. Applicant: TRANS - Niagara River just north of Niagara EAGLE MOTOR LINES, INC., 830 TORT SERVICE CO., a corporation, Post Falls, N.Y., extending along New York North 33d, Birmingham, Ala. Appli­ t(®ce Box 272, Chicago, 111. Applicant’s Highway 31 to Lockport, N.Y., thence cant’s attorney: Donald L. Morris, 937 IWorneys: Ronald N. Cobert, and Leon- along New York Highway 93 to junction Bank for Savings Building, Birmingham J . f Jaskiewicz, Munsey Building, New York Highway 5 just south of Akron, 3, Ala. Authority sought to operate as I S X nf ton’ D -c - 20004. Authority N.Y., thence along New York Highway 5 a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over to operate as a common carrier, ugnt to Bataiva, N.Y., thence along New York irregular routes, transporting: (1) Iron 1 j ; . Vell*cle’ over irregular routes, Highway 33 to Rochester, N.Y., thence and steel, and iron and-steel articles, (in­ Glycerine, in bulk, in along city streets (formerly shown as New cluding, but not limited to, valves, fire ; r r chicles, from the plant site of York Highway 2) to Lake Ontario, hydrants, and parts and accessories j Manufacturing Plant, lo- thence along the shore of Lake Ontario ! or near Aurora, HI., to points therefor>, and (2) pipe and pipe fittings, to the Niagara River, thence along the from points in Alabama, to points in nut ^ihlgan 811(1 Missouri, and (2) eoco- Niagara River to point of beginning, in­ leriiTii* *oap liquid soap, and in - Arkansas, Oklahoma, and points in cluding points on the indicated portions thero * including fatty acids Louisiana west of the Mississippi River. of the highways specified. [ thP ni * in tank vehicles, from HEARING: April 13, 1964, at the N o t e : Applicant states the above author­ [ turin^Si Si^e Arniour Soap M anufac- ity will be restricted against the transporta­ Dl located at or near Aurora, Manger Hotel, Rochester, N.Y., before tion of commodities used in or in connec­ 111 Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Examiner Lacy W. Hinely. tion with the discovery, development, produc­ uri> Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. No. MC 35358 (Sub-No. 15), filed No­ tion, refining, manufacturing, processing, vember 4, 1963. Applicant: BERGER storage, transmission, and distribution of i Plicanfa ^earing is deemed necessary &p- natural gas and petroleum and their prod­ D.c. etlUests it be held at Washington, TRANSFER & STORAGE, INC., 3720 ucts and by-products. The purpose of this Macalaster Drive NE., Minneapolis, republication is to show the aforementioned No. 44------7 2972 NOTICES restriction and clarify commodity descrip­ HEARING: Remains as assigned, torney: Robert E. Borii, Suite 214-21« tion. March 25, 1964, at the Georgia Public Grant Bldg., Atlanta 3, Ga. Authority] HEARING: Remains as assigned April Service Commission, 244 Washington sought to operate as a common carrierI 6, 1964, at the Hotel Thomas Jefferson, Street SW., Atlanta, Ga., before Joint by motor vehicle, over irregular routes! Birmingham, Ala., before Examiner Board No. 157. transporting: (1) Radiators, air heat-1 James O’D. Moran. No. MC 106644 (Sub-No. 50), filed Feb­ ing or cooling, iron or steel combine« No. MC 95540 (Sub-No. 563), filed No­ ruary 25, 1964. Applicant: SUPERIOR with other metal; radiators, air heatl vember 20, 1963. Applicant: W ATKINS TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., 520 Bed­ ing or cooling, aluminum, brass, bronze] MOTOR LINES, INC., Albany Highway, ford Place NE., Atlanta, Ga. -Applicant’s or copper; cooling or freezing machines1 Thomasville, Ga. J Authority sought to attorney: Guy H. Postell, Suite 693, 1375 condensers, equalizers, or exchangers operate hs a common carrier, by motor Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta 9, Ga. Au­ gas or liquid; coolers, heat exchangersj vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ thority sought to operate as a common or equalizers for air, gas, or liquids; ain ing: Frozen foods, from the plant site of carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular coolers, heaters, humidifiers, cie-humidiA The Kitchens of Sara Lee, located at routes, transporting: Iron and steel, and fiers or washers and blowers or jam Deerfield, HI., to points in Connecticut, iron and steel articles, including, but not combined; blowers, rotary, or exhaum Delaware, Mainfe, M aryland, M assa­ limited to, valves, fire hydrants, and pipe fans, iron; compressors or pumps, gad chusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, and pipe fittings and parts and acces­ or liquid, electric motors, or parts; mol New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode sories thereof, from points in Alabama, chinery parts, iron or steel; machinem Island, Vermont, and the District of to points -in Arkansas, Oklahoma, and parts, aluminum, brass, bronze or cop-1 Columbia. points in Louisiana west of the Missis­ per; and (2) parts, attachments and acA sippi River. cessories of and for the commodities] N ote: Common control may be involved. HEARING: April 6, 1964, at the Hotel described in (1) above, from the plant] HEARING: April 20, 1964, at the Mid­ Thomas Jefferson, Birmingham, Ala., site of the Trane Company at La Crosse] land Hotel, Chicago, HI., before E x­ before Examiner James O’D. Moran. Wis., to points in Alabama, Tennessee] aminer Joseph A. Reilly. No. M C 109210 (Sub-No. 137) Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South] No. MC 96025 (Sub-No. 26) (AMEND­ (AM ENDM ENT), filed December 3, 1963, Carolina, Virginia, and Mississippi. F ederal R eg ister M ENT), filed September 27, 1963, pub­ published issue Feb­ N ote : The purpose of this republication is] ruary 19, 1964, amended February 22, lished in F ederal R egister December 18, to add tire destination state of Tennessee. 1 1963, amended February 18, 1964, and 1964, and republished as amended this issue. Applicant: C R A N E L B. H E R N ­ HEARING: April 30, 1964, at the Fed-j republished as amended this issue. A p­ eral Building, Milwaukee, Wis., before] plicant: DEWELL WILLIAM HOSKINS, DON, Box 605, Hampton, S.C. Appli­ cant’s representative: Charles R. Green- Examiner Joseph A. Reilly. doing business as HOSKINS’ TRUCK No. M C 112474 (Sub-No. 7), filed De-| SERVICE, Post Office Box 66, Malvern, well (same address as applicant). Authority sought to operate as a common cember 19, 1963. Applicant: WALTER] Ark. Applicant’s attorney: Louis Tar- R O W A N r Allen Street Extension, James-] lowski, 914 Pyramid Life Building, Little carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Equipment mate­ town, N.Y. Applicant’s attorney: Ken­ Rock, Ark. Authority sought to oper­ neth T. Johnson, Bank of Jamestown] rials and supplies, used in the conduct ate as a common carrier, by motor Building, Jamestown, N.Y. Authority! of a door manufacturing company, from vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ sought to operate as a common carrier J points in Alabama, Connecticut, Dela­ ing: (A ) Lumber and lumber mill prod­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,! ware, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hli­ ucts, and plywood, from points in Ar­ transporting: Pepper in packages when] nois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, kansas to points in Kansas, Missouri, shipped with salt, from Watkins Glen,] Mississippi, Massachusetts, Maryland, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Hlinois, Indiana, N.Y., to points in Erie, Crawford, Me- ] Maine, Michigan, North Carolina, New Iowa, Kentucky, Wisconsin, Michigan, Kean, Potter, and W arren Counties, Pa. ] York, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Texas, Nebraska, and Minnesota, HEARING: April 16, 1964, at the] Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, (B ) plywood, from-points in Arkansas to Hotel Buffalo, Washington and Swan] Wisconsin, Florida, to Vamville, S.C. points in Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Streets, Buffalo, N.Y., before Examiner Tennessee, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Ken­ N ote: The purpose of this republication is Lacy W . Hinely. ] tucky, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Texas, to show the origin and destination points as No. M C 115840 (Sub-No. 8) (AMEND-J Nebraska, and Minnesota, and (C) proposed by applicant to read as shown M ENT), filed December 16, 1963, pub­ above, in lieu of those as previously pub­ empty containers or other such inci­ lished in F ederal Register issue February] lished. dental facilities (not specified) used in 12, 1964, and republished as amended transporting the above described com­ HEARING: Remains as assigned April this issue. Applicant: COLONIAL FAST j modities, on return. 2,1964, at the U.S. Court Rooms, Colum­ FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1215 Bankhead Highway W est (Post Office Box 2169), N ote: The purpose of this republication is bia, S.C., before Chief Hearing Examiner to delete part 2 of (A ) as previously James C. Cheseldine. Birmingham, Ala. Applicant’s attorney, j published. No. MC 109478 (Sub-No. 71), filed Donald L. Morris, 937 Bank for Savings j December 13, 1963. Applicant: W ORS- Building, Birmingham 3, Ala. Authority j HEARING: Remains as assigned TER MOTOR LINES, INC., East Main sought to operate as a common earner,] March 31, 1964, at the Arkansas Com­ Road, Rural Delivery No. 1, North East, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,^ merce Commission, Justice Building, Pa. Applicant’s attorney: William W. transporting: (1) Iron and steel, ana iron\ State Capitol, Little Rock, Ark., before Knox, 23 W est 10th Street, Erie, Pa., and steel articles,, including, out noi Examiner Leo A. Riegel. 16501. Authority sought to operate as a limited to valves, fire hydrants, and pat**, N o . M C 103051 (Sub-No. 16 5) common carrier, by motor vehicle, over and accessories therefor, and (2). P***! (AMENDMENT), filed December 24, irregular routes, transporting: Soy bean and pipe fittings, from points in Alabama 1963, published in F ederal R egister is­ oil, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from to points in Arkansas, Oklahoma, ana sue January 29, 1964, and republished as Decatur, 111., to Lockport, N.Y. points in Louisiana west of the Miss amended this issue. Applicant: FLE E T sippi River. TRANSPORT COMPANY, INC., 340 N ote: Common control may be involved. N o te: Applicant states that the J Armour Drive NE., Atlanta, Ga., 30324. HEARING: April 16,1964, at the Hotel operation is to be restricted against the j Applicant’s attorney: R. J. Reynolds, Jr., Buffalo, Washington and Swan Streets, portation of commodities used in or j Suite 403-11 Healey Building, Atlanta, Buffalo, N.Y., before Examiner Lacy W. nection with the discovery, development, Ga., 30303. Authority sought to oper­ Hinely. production, refining, manufacturing, p ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ No. M C 111545 (Sub-No. 59) (A M E N D ­ ing, storage, transmission, and distnb hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: of natural gas and petroleum and "J. ., n M ENT), filed September 4, 1963, pub­ republ Dry bulk fertilizer, in dump and hopper products. The purpose of this lished F ederal R eg ist e r issue of Novem­ is to add the restriction shown above. type vehicles, from points in Muscogee ber 29,1963, amended December 23,1963, and Dougherty Counties, Ga., to points and republished as amended, this issue. HEARING: Remains as assigned, April in Alabama. Applicant: HOME TRANSPORTATION 6, 1964, at the Hotel Thomas Jeffwso - Birmingham, Ala., before Examm N ote: The purpose of this republication is COMPANY, INC., 334 South Four Lane to add Dougherty County as an origin area. Highway, Marietta, Ga. Applicant’s at­ Tomac fVn MnvflTl Wednesday, M a r c h 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2973

No.MC 117815 (Sub-No. 16) (A M E N D - the highways will be furnished and con­ HEARING: April 9, 1964, at the Fed­ ¡MENT), filed December 16, 1963, pub- trolled by the shipper owning the prod­ eral Building, Syracuse, N.Y., before [lished Fed eral R e g i s t e r issue February 5, uct being moved, and all responsibility, Examiner Lacy W . Hinely. 11964, amended February 17, 1964, and direction and control of said vehicles republished as amended this issue. A p ­ while operating over said highways, will A pplications U nd er S e c t io n s 5 and 210a(b) plicant: PULLEY FREIGHT LINES, be the sole and exclusive responsibility INC., 2341 Easton Boulevard, Des Moines, of the shipper. The following applications are gov­ Iowa. Applicant’s representative: W il­ N o t e : Common control may be involved. erned by the Interstate Cpinmerce Com­ liam A. Landau, 1307 East W alnut, Des mission’s special rules governing notice Moines, Iowa. Authority sought to op­ HEARING: M ay 6,1964, in Room B-29, of filing of application by motor carriers erate as a common carrier, by motor Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, of property or passengers under sections vehicle, over irregular routes, transport- 110 South Fourth Street, Minneapolis, 5(a) and 210a(b) of the Interstate Com­ [ing: Meats, meat products, meat byprod­ Minn., before Joint Board No. 142, or, if merce Act and certain other proceedings ucts, dairy products and articles dis- the Joint Board waives its right to par­ with respect thereto (49 C FR 1.240). \tritmted by meat packinghouses, as de­ ticipate before Examiner Joseph A. scribed in Appendix I to the report in Reilly. MOTOR CARRIERS OP PROPERTY Descriptions in M otor Carrier Certifi­ No. MC 125701, filed September 23, No. MC-F-8667 (CORRECTION) âtes, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except 1963. Applicant: RALPH P. WILLIAMS, (NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, [liquid commodities, in bulk, in tank doing business as CAYUGA TRANS­ INC.—CONTROL—CONTINENTAL VAN ! vehicles), from the plant site of Armour PORT CO., Box 248, Cayuga, N.Y. Ap­ LINES, INC.), published in the Febru­ & Co. located at or near Worthington, plicant’s attorney: Murray J. S. Kirsh- ary 12, 1964, issue of the F ederal R e g is ­ Minn., to points in Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, tein, 103 Oriskany Street East, Utica 2, ter on page 2404. NORTH AMERICAN Missouri, and Wisconsin. N.Y. Authority sought to operate as a VAN LINES, INC., is authorized to op­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over erate as a common carrier in all states in t Note: Applicant states the proposed service will be restricted against tacking or inter­ irregular routes, transporting: Animal the United States and the District of linking at the involved origin. Further noted and poultry feeds and animal and poul­ Columbia. Further, the application as that the purpose of this republication is to try feed ingredients, in bags and in bulk, filed requests not only approval of con­ show the destination state Michigan as (a) from Waverly and Cayuga, N.Y,, to trol of CONTINENTAL VAN LINES, shown in previous publication, has been points in Bradford, Tioga, Sullivan, Sus­ INC., by NORTH AMERICAN VAN deleted. quehanna, and Wyoming Counties, Pa., LIN E S, INC., but also seeks approval of HEARING: Remains as assigned and (b) from Horseheads, N.Y., to points the cancellation of CONTINENTAL VAN f March 23, 1964, at the M idland Hotel, in Wyoming, Susquehanna, Potter, Ti­ LINES, INC.’s certificate of public con­ Chicago, 111., before Examiner Raymond oga, Bradford, Sullivan and Lycoming venience and necessity in No. MC-39. V.Sar. Counties, Pa., and returned, refused and No. MC-F-8678 (A-P-A TRANSPORT No.MC 118776 (Sub-No. 7) (C O R R E C ­ rejected commodities, in (a) and (b) CORP.—PURCHASE—MARS EXPRESS, TION), filed November 4,1963, published above, on return. INC.), published in the February 26, ederal egister 1964, issue of the F ederal R egister on F R issue February 26,1964, N o t e : Applicant presently holds the au­ and republished as corrected this issue. thority in (b ) above as a contract carrier in page 2723. Application filed February Applicant: C. L. CO NN ER S, INC., Post MC 124210 and the purpose of this portion 18, 1964, for temporary authority under (Mice Box 712, Quincy, HI. Applicant's of the application is to convert from a con­ section 210a(b). attorney: Mack Stephenson, First Na* tract to a common carrier. No. MC-F-8679. Authority sought for « Bank Building, Springfield, HI. control by HALLAMORE MOTOR HEARING: April 10, 1964, at the Fed­ TRANSPORTATION, INC., 795 Ply­ ™ purpose of this republication is to eral Building, Syracuse, N.Y., before Ex­ show the place of hearing as Spring- mouth Street, Holbrook, Mass., of KEN­ aminer Lacy W . Hinely. field, HI., which was omitted in previous NEBEC TRUCKING CO., INC., 396 Main No. MC 125716, filed November 26, Publication. Street, South Portland, Maine, and for 1963. Applicant: RENAUD GALIPEAU, HEARING: Remains as assigned, AprI acquisition by JOSEPH L. BARRY, also Rural Route 4 Normand Street, Sheer- of Holbrook, Mass., of control of KEN­ [L i , a*\ the U.S. Court Rooms anc brooke, Quebec. Authority sought to federal Building, Springfield, HI., befor< NEBEC TRUCKING CO., INC., through operate as a common carrier, by motor Examiner Louis G. LaVecchia. the acquisition by HALLAMORE vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC 123593 (Sub-No. 1), filed Sep- MOTOR TRANSPORTATION, INC. ing: Bananas, from New York, N.Y., to Applicants’ attorney: Francis E. Barrett, 8 * " » . 1963- Applicant: HURLETS the port of entry on the international TRANSPORT C O M PAN Y, LTD., 141 Jr., 182 Forbes Building, Forbes Road, boundary line between the United States Braintree 84, Mass. Operating rights : «orth Augusta Road, Brockville, Ontario and Canada at or near Derby Line, N.Y., pZLda- > Applicant’s representative : sought to be controlled: Road-building and empty containers or other such inci­ machinery and contractors? equipment, 3 “* ? A. Richards, 3 5 Curtice Park dental facilities (riot specified)' used in rost Offlee Box 2 5 , Webster, N.Y. Au- as a common carrier, over irregular transporting the above described com­ to operate as a contract routes, between points in Connecticut, sought modities, on return. m°tpr vehicle, over irregular Maine, Massachusetts, New York, and n n S transP°rting: Castings, from the HEARING: April 8, 1964, at the Fed­ Pennsylvania; and road-building con­ eral Building, Albany, N.Y., before tractors’ materials and supplies, when a™ n erï ry on the International bound- 2 ® * between the United States and Examiner Lacy W . Hinely. transported together with road-building No. MC 125828, filed November 20, contractors’ machinery and equipment, « S a N°Y“ear Rooseveltown' N Y " 40 1963. Applicant: CHARLES J. REITH, between points in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, and Pennsyl­ ttiu&JS?-'' ApriI ®. 1964, at the Fed- 319 Stonecrest Drive, DeWitt, N.Y. Ap­ vania. HALLAMORE MOTOR TRANS­ am r S r dlng’ ®yracuse» N.Y., before E x­ plicant’s representative: Raymond A. aminer Lacy w . Hinely. PORTATION, INC., is authorized to Richards, 35 Curtice Park, Webster, N.Y. operate as a common carrier in M assa­ 196^° *25693* filed September 2 3 , Authority sought to operate as a contract chusetts. Pennsylvania, New York, I SDPPTvA£PliCarit: M O T O R TRUCK carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New Strpof o P ° '’ a corPoration, 1145 Homei routes, transporting: Malt beverages, (1) Hampshire. Application has been filed a t E ’pWStkPaul 16’ Mlnil- Applicant's from ports of entry on the international for temporary authority under section Natmr^'T?°nald A- Morken, 1000 First boundary line between the United States 210a(b). Minn Building, Minneapolis 2, and Canada, located in New York, to No. MC-F-8680. Authority sought for a com AUth0rity ®°ught to operate as points in New Jersey, New York, and purchase by WILLIS SHAW FROZEN I ir r e ^ r Carrier‘ motor vehicle, over Pennsylvania, and (2) from Newark, EXPRESS, INC., Elm Springs, Ark., of the operating rights of A & A PRODUCE leum . J L routes> transporting: Petro- N.J., to Syracuse, N.Y., and empty con­ CO. (JAMES W. HOLDER, TRUSTEE), from qlirf 111 ln tank vehicles, tainers or other such incidental facilities Highway 68, West Springdale, Arkansas, sot? 5 Perî0r’ Wls- to points in Minne- (not specified) used in transporting the and for acquisition by W ILLIS D. SHAW , erein all vehicles operated over commodities specified above, on return. HELEN LORENE SHAW, both of Elm 2974 NOTICES

Springs, Ark., and JOHN G. WIRSIG, the intermediate and off-route points of ducted in connection with carrier’s reg- ] Fayetteville, Ark., of control of such Bangor and Northampton, Pa., Newark, ular route operations herein above au- j rights through the purchase. Appli­ Jersey City, Hoboken, Plainfield, Ridge­ thorized in (B ) and shall not be con­ cants’ attorney and representative: A. field, Summit, and Morristown, N.J., strued as an independent irregular route I Alvis Layne, 952 Pennsylvania Building, points in Bergen, Hudson, Union, and authority; (C) general commodities, Washington, D.C., and James W. Hold­ Essex Counties, N.J., and points in tween Butler, N.J., and points in Essex I er, Trustee, North College, Fayetteville, Passaic Comity, N.J., east of U.S. High­ Passaic, Hudson, and Bergen Counties Ark. Operating rights sought to be way 202, unrestricted, and the off-route N.J., on the one hand, and, on the other, transferred: Bananas, as a common car­ points of Stroudsburg, Pa., and Lynd- New York, N.Y.; wearing apparel, wear- I rier over irregular routes, from Mobile, hurst, N.J., restricted against the trans­ ing apparel materials, and tablecloths, Ala., and New Orleans, La., to Coffey- portation of traffic originating at or between Pottsville, Pa., and points ville, Kans., Pittsburgh, Kans., and destined to Stroudsburg and Lyndhurst, within 30 miles thereof, on the one hand, j Springfield, Mo.; and a certificate has between Sunbury, Pa., and Lewistown, and, on the other, Baltimore, Md., and been authorized in No. M C-118260 Sub- Pa., between Pottsville, Pa., and Millers- Washington, D.C., RESTRICTION: The No. 4, covering the transportation of burg, Pa., between Frackville, Pa., and authority granted herein shall be bananas, over irregular routes, from M o­ Hazleton, Pa., serving all intermediate restricted against the transportation of bile, Ala., and New Orleans, La., to Tulsa, points, between Pottsville, Pa., and traffic moving between Syracuse and Okla. Vendee is authorized to operate Hazleton, Pa., serving all intermediate Binghamton, N.Y., on the one hand, and, as a common carrier in Arkansas, Ala­ points, and the off-route points of on the other, Williamsport, Pa., or points bama, Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Geor­ Weatherly and Freeland, Pa., between in the New York, N.Y., commercial zone, gia, California, Texas, Colorado, Connec­ Berwick, Pa., and Northumberland, Pa., as defined by the Commission, or in ticut, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kan­ serving all intermediate points, between Bergen, Hudson, Essex, Union or Passaic sas, Tennessee, Utah, Kentucky, Louisi­ Cortland, N.Y., and Binghamton, N.Y., Counties, N.J. M A S T E N .TRANSPOR­ ana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, serving no intermediate points, but TATION, INC., is authorized to operate Minnesota, Virginia, Washington, Mis­ serving the off-route points of Homer as a common carrier in Maryland, Dela­ souri, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, and McGraw, N.Y., between Harrisburg, ware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New New Jersey, West Virginia, New Mex­ Pa., and Baltimore, Md., between Nichol­ York, and the District of Columbia. ico, New York, Nevada, North Dakota, son, Pa., and W . Pittston, Pa., between Application has been filed for temporary North Carolina, Oklahoma, Wisconsin, Endicott, N.Y., and Binghamton, N.Y., authority under section 210a(b) . Oregon, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Is­ between Lemoyne, Pa., and Hershey, Pa., No. MC-F-8682. Authority sought land, South Carolina, South Dakota, and serving no intermediate points, between for purchase by G R E A T FALLS TRANS­ the District of Columbia. Application Baltimore, Md., and Alexandria, Va., FER & STORAGE COMPANY, doing has been filed for temporary authority serving all intermediate points, and off- business" as SUHR TRANSPORT, 117 under section 210a(b). route points in Maryland and Virginia Park Drive, Great Falls, Mont., of the No. MC-F-8681. Authority sought for within 5 miles of the District of Colum­ operating rights of C. B. EDMONDS, control by MASTEN TRANSPORTA­ bia, and points within 6 miles of Balti­ doing business as C. B. EDMONDS TION, INC., Rehoboth Boulevard, Mil­ more, two alternate routes for operating T R A N SPO R T A T IO N , Post Office Box 28, ford, Del., of BINGHAMTON WARE­ convenience only; (B ) General commod­ Cody, Wyo., and for acquisition by CARL HOUSE & TERMINAL, INC., P.O. Box ities, excepting, among others, household H. SU H R , S r., 2404 Fourth Avenue 127, Lemoyne, Pa., and for purchase by goods and commodities in bulk, between North, Great Falls, Mont., of control of MASTEN TRANSPORTATION, INC., of New York, N.Y., and Reading, Pa., serv­ such rights through the purchase. Ap­ the operating rights and property of ing all intermediate and certain off- plicants’ attorney: Randall Swanberg, BINGHAMTON WAREHOUSE & TER­ route points, between Reading, Pa., and 314 Montana Building, Post Office Box MINAL, INC., and for acquisition by L. J. Hanover, Pa., serving all intermediate 2567, Great Falls, Mont. Operating LISHON, JR., EVELYN M. LISHON, and certain off-route points, between rights sought to be transferred: Ma­ L. J. LISHON, IH, all of Rehoboth Reading, Pa., and Harrisburg, Pa., serv­ chinery, materials, supplies, and equip­ Boulevard, Milford, Del., and DIANE ing all intermediate and certain off-route ment, incidental to, or used in, the LISHON BIDDLE, Dorset Drive, points, between Reading, Pa., and Sun­ construction, development, operation, Broomall, Pa., of control of such rights bury, Pa., between' Tamaqua, Pa., and and maintenance of facilities for the and property through the transaction. Hometown, Pa., between Pottsville, Pa., discovery, development, and production Applicant’s attorneys: Jack R. Turney, and Millersburg, Pa., between Lancaster, of natural gas and petroleum, as a com­ Jr., 2001 Massachusetts Avenue NW., Pa., and Harrisburg, Pa., between Read­ mon carrier over irregular routes, be­ Washington, D.C., 20036, and Harry C. ing, Pa., and Phoenixville, Pa., between tween points in Wyoming and Montana: Ames, Jr., Transportation Building, Allentown, Pa., and Mauch Chunk, Pa., machinery, materials, equipment ana Washington, D.C., 20006. Operating between Sunbury, Pa., and Harrisburg^ supplies used in, or in connection with rights sought to be controlled and trans­ Pa., between Ashland, Pa., and Potts­ the construction, operation, repair, serv­ ferred: (A) General commodities, ex­ ville, Pa., between Easton, Pa., and icing, maintenance and dismantling of cepting, among others, household goods Bangor, Pa., between Allentown, Pa., and pipe lines, including the stringing ana and commodities in bulk, as a common Souderton, Pa., serving all intermediate picking up thereof, between points in carrier over regular routes, serving the points, three alternate routes for operate W yoming and Montana. Vendee is au­ site of the International Business Ma­ ing convenience only; general commodi­ thorized to operate as a common cornet 1 chines Corporation Distribution Center ties, except those of unusual value, in Montana, California, Colorado, Idaho, located in Hampden Township, Cumber­ Classes A and B explosives, livestock, al­ Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, land County, Pa., as an off-route point coholic liquors, household goods as de­ North Dakota, and South Dakota. Ap­ in connection with carrier’s otherwise fined by the Commission, commodities plication has been filed for temporary authorized regular-route operations, be­ in bulk, and those requiring special authority under section 210a(b). No. MC-F-8683. Authority sought lor tween Syracuse, N.Y., and Hanover, Pa., equipment, between Reading, Pa., and purchase by A LB U Q U E R Q U E PHOENIX between Endicott, N.Y., and Bingham­ Baltimore, Md., serving no intermediate ton, N.Y., between Lancaster, Pa., and points; general commodities, excepting, EXPRESS, INC., 4500 McLeod RoadN* Harrisburg, Pa., between Lancaster, Pa., among others, household goods and (M ailing address: Post Office Box 404 , Albuquerque, N. Mex., 87103, of a portion and York, Pa., serving certain inter­ commodities in bulk, over irregular mediate and off-route points, between routes, between certain points in Penn­ of the operating rights of NAvaj FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1205 Soum Syracuse, N.Y., and Chenango Forks, sylvania, RESTRICTION: The irregular Platte River Drive, Denver 23, Colo., ana N.Y., between Tunkhannock, Pa., and route authority granted herein in (B) junction Pennsylvania Highway 92 and shall not be utilized to render service be­ for acquisition by DUNCAN A. McLE > U.S. Highway 11, between Manchester, tween any two points which carrier may Post Office Box 404, Albuquerque, Md., and Reistertown, Md., serving no serve in performance of the regular route of control of such rights through purchase. Applicants’ attorney and r p intermediate points, between Williams­ operations herein above authorized in port, Pa., and New York, N.Y., serving (B) and all irregular route operations resentative: Paul F. Sullivan, 612 Building, 910 17th Street, Washm^to , all intermediate points in Pennsylvania, authorized herein in (B) shall be con­ Wednesday, M a rch 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2975

DC., 20006, and Duncan A. McLeod, DLEWEST FREIGHTWAYS, INC., 6810 filing as here published in each proceed­ Post Office Box 404, Albuquerque, N. Prescott Avenue, St. Louis, Mo. 63147, ing. All of the proceedings are subject Mex., 87103. Operating rights sought to and for acquisition by LEONARD B. to the special rules of procedure for be transferred: General commodities, BROWNPP. L. CASE, and GEORGE C. hearing outlined below: excepting, among others, household JOHNSTON, all of Dallas 21, Tex., of Special rules of procedure for hearing. goods and commodities in bulk, as a control of such rights through the pur­ (1) All of the testimony to be adduced by common carrier over regular routes, be­ chase. Applicants’ attorney: Reagan applicant’s company witnesses shall be tween the junction of Texas Highway 115 Sayers, Century Life Building, Fort in the form of written statements which and Texas Farm Road 128 (formerly Worth 2, Tex. Operating rights sought shall be submitted at the hearing at the f Texas Farm Road 781), and Jal, N. Mex., to be transferred: General commodities, time and place indicated. [serving all intermediate points, over an excepting, among others, household (2) All of the written statements by i alternate route for operating conven- goods and commodities in bulk, as a applicant’s company witnesses shall be | ience only; class A and B explosives, and common carrier over regular routes, be­ offered in evidence at the hearing in the | general commodities, except those of un­ tween Kansas City, Mo., and Henryetta, same manner as any other type of evi­ usual value, household goods as defined Okla., serving the intermediate points of dence. The witnesses submitting the by the Commission, commodities in bulk, Sapulpa and Okmulgee, Okla., and inter­ written statements shall be made avail­ commodities requiring special equip­ mediate and off-route points in the Kan­ able at the hearing for cross-examina­ ment, and those injurious or contaminat­ sas City, M o.-Kans., commercial zone, tion, if such becomes necessary. ing to other lading, between Hobbs, N. and the Tulsa, Okla., commercial zone, (3) The written statements by appli­ Mex., and Wink, Tex., between Andrews, each as defined by the Commission; cant’s company witnesses, if received in Tex., and Kermit, Tex., serving all in­ general commodities, except Classes A evidence, will be accepted as exhibits. termediate points, between Kermit, Tex., and B explosives (except fireworks and To the extent the written statements and Andrews, Tex., serving all inter­ small arms am m unition), livestock, refer to attached documents such as mediate points, and serving certain off- corpses, currency, bullion, articles of copies of operating authority, etc., they route points with certain restrictions, be­ virtu, exposed motion picture film, house­ should be referred to in written tween Andrews, Tex., and Eunice, N. hold goods, commodities in bulk, and statement as numbered appendices Mex., serving all intermediate points; those requiring special equipment, be­ thereto. general commodities, except household tween St. Louis, Mo., and Tulsa, Okla., (4) The admissibility of the evidence goods as defined by the Commission, be­ serving the intermediate and off-route contained in the written statements and tween Kermit, Tex., and Monahans, Tex., points in the Tulsa, Okla., commercial the appendices thereto, will be at the serving no intermediate points; gov­ zone as defined by the Commission, RE­ time of offer, subject to the same rules ernment-owned compressed gas trailers, STRICTION: Service is not authorized as if the evidence were produced in the loaded with compressecLgas (Other than with respect to any shipment originating usual manner. liquefied petroleum gas) or empty, be­ at or destined to Belleville, 111., and Per- (5) Supplemental testimony by a wit­ tween all of the points and over the regu­ ryville, St. Charles, St. Clair, and Sulli­ ness to correct errors or to supply in­ lar and alternate routes in and through van, Mo. Vendee is authorized to oper­ advertent omissions in his written state­ the States of New Mexico and Texas. ate as a common carrier in Texas, ment is permissible. Vendee is authorized to operate as a Oklahoma, Missouri, and Kansas. Ap­ S ection A common carrier in Arizona, and New plication has not been filed for temporary Mexico. Application has not been filed authority under section 210a(b). MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY for temporary authority under section 210a(b). By the Commission. No. MC 52110 (Sub-No. 81), filed Feb­ ruary 19, 1964. Applicant: BRADY | Note: Applicants’ counsel requests that [ seal] H arold D. M cC o y , I No, MC-110264 Sub-30, be handled concur­ Secretary. MOTORFRATE, INC., 1223 Sixth Ave­ rently. nue, Des Moines, Iowa. Applicant’s at­ [F.R, Doc. 64-2079; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; torney: Homer E. Bradshaw, Suite 510 No. MC-F-8684. Authority sought for 8:50 a.m.] Central National Building, Des Moines 9, Purchase by KEYSTONE MOTOR EX - Iowa. Authority sought to operate as ; ? *NC., 2412 Collis Avenue, Post [Notice No. 607] a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over | Office Box 5497, Huntington, 3, W . Va., irregular routes, transporting: Meats, \of a Portion of the operating rights and MOTOR CARRIER APPLICATIONS AND meat products and meat "byproducts and t certain property of H A T C H E R T R U C K - CERTAIN OTHER PROCEEDINGS articles distributed by meat packing­ |ING COMPANY, INC., 2210 Winston houses, as described in Sections A and C Avenue, Roanoke, Va., and for acquisi- F ebruary 28,1964. of Appendix I, 61 M.C.C. 209, from the associated transport Jy , Section A. The following publications plant site of Armour and Co., located at in c ., 380 Madison Avenue, New York 2, are governed by the new § 1.247 of the or near Worthington, Minn., to St. Louis, control of such rights and prop­ Commission’s rules of practice, published and St. Joseph, Mo., Chicago, 111., K an­ erty through the purchase. Applicants’ in the F ederal R egister, issue of Decem­ sas City, Mo.-Kans., Om aha and Lincoln, attorneys: John P. McMahon, 44 East ber 3, 1963, which became effective Nebr., Louisville, Ky., points in Indiana Broad Street, Columbus 15, Ohio, and January 1,1964. and Ohio, points in Michigan, on and STWL Sullivan, Walbridge Build- Section B. The following publications south and west of U.S. Highway 10 be­ sonffb^fflai° ?’ N Y * °P erating rights are governed by the Interstate Commerce sought to be transferred: General com- tween and including Ludington and Commission’s general rules of practice Flint, Mich., and on and south of Michi­ excepting, among others, including special rules (49 C F R 1.241) gan Highway 21 between Flint, Mich., usehold goods and commodities in governing notice of filing of applications uc, as a common carrier, over irregu- and Port Hurton, Mich., including Port by motor carriers of property or passen­ Huron, Mich. rfnw?Ute-?L.between Roanoke, Va., and gers or brokers under sections 206, 209, Points within five miles thereof, on the and 211 of the Interstate Commerce Act N ote: Applicant states the authority one hand, and, on the other, points in and certain other proceedings with re­ sought will be restricted against tacking and interlining at Worthington, Minn. wSt K ? West Virginia located on or spect thereto. f thoii7pfHUfS- Highway 60- Vendee is au- All hearings and prehearing confer­ HEARING: M arch 23, 1964, at the [ iri to operate as a common carrier ences will be called at 9:30 a.m., UJ3. Midland Hotel, Chicago, HI., before Ex­ a n / iS ylYania' West Virginia, Ohio, standard time (or 9:30 a.m., local day­ aminer Raymond V. Sar. filed f f nYUcky‘ ^PPiication has notbeen light saving time, if that time is ob­ No. MC 52110 (Sub-No. 82), filed Feb­ I yon 2ioa(bTPOrary authority un

irregular routes, transporting: Frozen No. MC 114045 (Sub-No. 131), filed Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and foods, from Darien, Wis., to points in February 14, 1964. Applicant: TRANS­ 766 (except commodities in bulk in tank Missouri and Iowa; points in South COLD EXPRESS, INC., Post Office Box vehicles) from the plant site of Armour Dakota on and east of U.S. Highway 81 5842, Dallas, Tex. Authority sought to & Company located at or near Worthing­ and on and south of U.S. Highway 12; operate as a common carrier, by motor ton, Minn., to points in the Upper Penin­ points in Nebraska on and east of U.S. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ sula of Michigan, Wisconsin and Illinois. Highway 183; points in Kansas on and ing : Meat, meat products, meat byprod­ N o t e : Applicant states the proposed op­ east of U.S. Highway 81; and points in ucts, and articles distributed by meat erations will be limited to shipments origi­ Minnesota on and south of U.S. High­ packinghouses as described in Sections nating at the plant site of Armour & Com­ way 12 including points in the Minne- A and C of Appendix I of Descriptions in pany and further restricted against tacking apolis-St. Paul commercial zone. M otor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 a t o rigin . N o te: Applicant states the authority and 766 (except commodities in bulk, HEARING: M arch 23, 1964, at the sought will be restricted against the privilege in tank vehicles), from the plant site Midland Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Ex­ of tacking or interlining at Darien, Wis. of Armour and Company located at or aminer Raymond V. Sar. near Worthington, Minn., to points in HEARING: April 22,1964, at the M id ­ No. M C 123069 (Sub-No. 4), filed Feb­ Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Dis­ ruary 14, 1964. Applicant: ALLER & land Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Examiner trict of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Joseph A. Reilly. SHARP, INC., 817 West Fifth Avenue, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Columbus, Ohio. Applicant’s attorney: No. M C 95540 (Sub-No. 572), filed Feb­ Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, ruary 25, 1964. Applicant: WATKINS Joseph M. Scanlan, 111 West Washing­ Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New ton Street, Chicago 2, 111. Authority MOTOR LINES, INC., Albany Highway, Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Thomasville, Ga. Authority sought to sought to operate as a common carrier, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, operate as a common carrier, by motor Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ transporting: Meats, meat products, and West Virginia. ing: Meats, meat products, meat by­ meat byproducts, and articles distrib­ products and articles distributed by meat N o t e : Applicant states that the proposed uted by meat packinghouses, other than packinghouses, as described in Sections service will be limited to shipments originat­ commodities in bulk, in tank vehicles, ing at the plant site of Armour and Com­ A and C, Appendix I, in Descriptions in as described in sections A and C, Appen­ pany and further restricted against tacking dix I, in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Motor Carrier Certificates 61 M.C.C. 209 at point of origin. and 766, from the plant site of Armour Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from and Company at or near Worthington, HEARING: M arch 23, 1964, at the the plant site of Armour & Company at Minn., to points in Arizona, Arkansas, M idland Hotel, Chicago', 111., before Ex­ or near Worthington, Minn., to points California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, aminer Raymond V. Sar. in Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, and West Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, No. MC 119816 (Sub-No. 3) (AMEND­ Virginia. Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. MENT), filed February 12, 1964, pub­ HEARING: M arch 23, 1964, at the RESTRICTION: Authority sought is lished in F ederal R eg ister issue Febru­ Midland Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Ex­ limited to shipments originating at the ary 19,1964, and republished as amended aminer Raymond V. Sar. plant site of Armour and Company and this issue. Applicant: FLE E TLIN E , INC., No. M C 124078 (Sub-No. 101), filed further restricted against tacking at 1984 Oakdale Avenue, West St. Paul, February 14, 19 64. Applicant: origin, and against commodities in bulk, Minn. Applicant’s attorney: Joseph M. S C H W E R M A N T R U C K IN G CO., a cor­ in tank vehicles. Scanlan, 111 West Washington Street, poration, 611 South 28th Street, Milwau­ HEARING: M arch 23, 1964, at the Chicago 2, 111. Authority sought to op­ kee, 46, W is. Applicant’s attorney: Midland Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Ex­ erate as a common carrier, by motor James R. Ziperski (same address as ap­ aminer Raymond V. Sar. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ plicant) . Authority sought to operate as No. MC 107403 (Sub-No. 537), filed ing: Meats, meat products, meat by­ a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over February 19, 1964. Applicant: MAT- products, and articles distributed by irregular routes, transporting: Petroleum LACK, INC., 10 West Baltimore Avenue, meat packinghouses (other than com­ and petroleum products, including naph­ tha (excluding all other acids and chem­ Lansdowne, Pa. Authority sought to modities in bulk, in tank vehicles), as operate as a common carrier, by motor described in Sections A and C, Appendix icals), in bulk, in tank vehicles, from vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ I, in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Cer­ Colonial Pipeline facilities and termi­ porting: Petroleum and petroleum prod­ tificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from nals located in Alabama, Delaware, Geor­ ucts, in bulk, in tank vehicles from the the plant site of Arm our & Company, gia, M aryland, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Colonial Pipeline Company terminals located at or near Worthington, Minn., Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia to located at points in Delaware, Maryland, to points in Wisconsin, Illinois, Iowa, points in Alabam a, Connecticut, Dela­ New Jersey, New York, and Pennsyl­ North Dakota, South Dakota, and the ware, District of Columbia, Florida, vania to points in Connecticut, Delaware, Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Massa­ District of Columbia, Maryland, Massa­ N ote : Applicant states that the above pro­ chusetts, Mississippi, New Jersey, New chusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsyl­ posed operations will involve shipments York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylva­ vania, Rhode Island, Virginia, and West . originating from the plant site of Armour & nia, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Ten­ Virginia. Company, at or near Worthington, Minn. The purpose of this republication is to show nessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. HEARING: April 6, 1964, at the Office the addition of Illinois to destination HEARING: April 6, 1964, at the Of­ of the Interstate Commerce Commission, territory. fices of the Interstate Commerce Com- Washington, D.C., before Examiner Leo missioh, Washington, D.C., before Ex­ M. Pellerzi. HEARING: R em ain s as assigned No. MC 107818 (Sub-No. 32), filed March 23, 1964, at the Midland Hotel, aminer Leo M. Pellerzi. February 10, 1964. Applicant: GREEN- Chicago, 111., before Examiner Raymond No. MC 124213 (Sub-No. 2), fiIed ruary 24, 1964. Applicant: SWIFT­ STEIN TRUCKING COMPANY, a corpo­ V. Sar. LIN E S, INC., Post Office Box 158, Omaha ration, 280 N W . 12th Avenue, Pompano No. MC 119974 (Sub-No. 5), filed 7, Nebr. Applicant’s attorney: Val M. Beach, Fla. Applicant’s attorney: Mar­ February 20, 1964. Applicant: L. C. L. Higgins, 1000 First National Bank Build­ tin Sack, 710 Atlantic Bank Building, TRANSIT COMPANY, a corporation, 520 ing, Minneapolis, Minn. Authority Jacksonville 2, Fla. Authority sought to North Roosevelt Street, Green Bay, Wis. sought to operate as a common came, operate as a common carrier, by motor Applicant’s attorney: Edward Solie, 715 by motor vehicle, over irregular route, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ First National Bank Building, Madison 3, transporting: Meats, meat products, ing : Frozen foods, from Darien, Wis., to Wis. Authority sought to operate as a meat byproducts and articles ^ tru nn v points in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over by meat packinghouses, as described i Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, irregular routes, transporting r Meats, meat products, meat byproducts and sections A and C, Appendix I, Descrip­ South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. tions in Motor Carrier Certificates, oi HEARING: April 22, 1964, at the articles distributed by meat packing­ M.C.C. 209 and 766, from the plant sue Midland Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Ex­ houses, as described in sections A and C, of Armour & Co., located at or n aminer Joseph A. Reilly. Appendix I, in Descriptions in Motor Wednesday, M a rch 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2977

Worthington, Minn., to points in Illinois, No. MC 29566 (Sub-No. 85), filed De­ Office Box 65, Allapattah Station, Miami, Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, and W is­ cember 26, 1963. Applicant: SOUTH­ Fla. Authority sought to operate as a consin, and em pty containers, or other WEST FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1400 common carrier, by motor vehicle, over such incidental facilities (not specified), Kansas AVenue, Kansas City 5, Kans. irregular routes, transporting: Frozen used in transporting the above described Authority sought to operate as a common foods, from Darien, Wis., to points in commodities, on return. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, HEARING: March 23, 1964, at the routes, transporting: Frozen foods, from Mississippi, North Carolina, South Caro­ Midland Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Ex­ Darien, Wis., to points in Arkansas, Iowa, lina, Tennessee, and Virginia. aminer Raymond V. Sar. Kansas, Louisiana (except New Orleans), N o t e : Applicant states the proposed service Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Okla­ S ection B will be restricted to shipments originating at homa, South Dakota, and Texas, and Darien, Wis., thereby eliminating the possi­ MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY rejected shipments thereof, on return. bility of tacking or interlining at such point. No. MC 10761 (Sub-No. 150), filed D e- N o t e : Common control may be involved. HEARING: April 22, 1964, at the Mid­ Icember 30, 1963. Applicant: T R A N S - HEARING: April 22, 1964, at the Mid­ land Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Examiner I AMERICAN FREIGHT LINES, INC., land Hotel, Chicago, HI., before Exam ­ Joseph A. Reilly. 11700 North Waterman Avenue, Detroit 9, iner Joseph A. Reilly. No. MC 107515 (Sub-No. 464), filed I Mich. Applicant’s attorney: Howell No. MC 75185 (Sub-No. 243), filed De­ December 1963. Applicant: REFRIG­ I Ellis, Suite 616-618 Fidelity Building, 111 cember 18, 1963. Applicant: SERVICE ERATED TRANSPORT CO., INC., 290 [Monument Circle, Indianapolis 4, Ind. TRUCKING CO., INC., Box 276, Fed- University Avenue SW., Atlanta, Ga. [Authority sought to operate as a com- eralsburg, Md. Applicant’s attorney: Applicant’s attorney: Paul M. Daniell, [mow carrier, by motor vehicle, over regu­ James W . Lawson, 1000 16th Street NW., Suite 214-217 Standard Federal Building, lar routes, transporting: Frozen foods, Washington 36, D.C. Authority sought Atlanta, Ga. Authority sought to oper­ [from the plant site of Libby, McNeill and to operate as a common carrier, by mo­ ate as a common carrier, by motor [Libby, located at or near Darien, Wis., to tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ [points in Maine, New Hampshire, Ver­ porting: Frozen foods, from Darien, ing: Frozen foods, from Darien, Wis., to mont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Wis., to points in Maine, New Hampshire, points in Maine, New Hampshire, Ver­ Rhode Island, New York New Jersey, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, mont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode [Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, and Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Island, New York, New Jersey, Penn­ the District of Columbia, and refused Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, Dis­ sylvania, Maryland, Delaware, District of and rejected shipments, of the commodi­ trict of Columbia, Virginia, North Caro­ Columbia, Virginia, North Carolina, ties specified above, on return. lina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Missis­ South Carolina, Tennessee, Mississippi, HEARING: April 22, 1964, at the M id­ sippi, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Ken­ Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Kentucky, land Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Examiner tucky, and New Orleans, La. and New Orleans, La. [Joseph A. Reilly. HEARING: April 22, 1964, at the Mid­ N o t e : Common control may be involved. i No. MC 20783 (Sub-No. 69), filed De­ land Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Exam­ cember 26, 1963. Applicant: T O M P - iner Joseph A. Reilly. HEARING: April 22,1964, at the M id­ [KINS MOTOR LINES, INC., 638 Lang- No. MC 95540 (Sub-No. 564), filed De­ land Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Examiner rley Place, Decatur, Ga. Applicant’s at­ cember 19, 1963. Applicant: W ATKINS Joseph A. Reilly. torney: David Axelrod, 39 South La MOTOR LINES, INC., Albany Highway, No. MC 108207 (Sub-No. 127), filed ; Salle Street, Chicago 3, 111. Authority Thomasville, Ga. Authority sought to October 28, 1963. Applicant: FROZEN sought to operate as a common carrier, operate as a common carrier, by motor FOOD EXPRESS, INC., 318 Cadiz Street, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Dallas, Tex. Applicant’s attorney: Leroy ¡transporting: Frozen foods, from Darien, ing: Frozen foods, from Darien, Wis., Hallman, 617 First National Bank Build­ Wis., to points in Alabama, Florida, to points in Alabam a, Connecticut, Dela­ ing, Dallas, Tex. Authority sought to Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North ware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, operate as a common carrier, by motor ; Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Virginia. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, ing: Frozen foods, from Darien, Wis., to Note: Applicant states the proposed opera­ North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode points in Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Louisi­ tions will be restricted (1) against tacking Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Ver­ ana, Memphis, Tenn., Mississippi, Mis­ with any authority presently held by appli­ mont, Virginia, District of Columbia, and cant and (2) against interlining at Darien, souri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas. Wis. New Orleans, La. HEARING: April 22,1964, at the M id­

N o t e : Applicant states that the proposed land Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Examiner HEARING: April 22, 1964, at the Mic operation is to be restricted so that no tack­ Joseph A. Reilly. Chicago, 111., before Examint land Hotel, ing or interline privileges will be permitted No. MC 114045 (Sub-No. 126), filed A. Reilly. Joseph at Darien, Wis. It is further noted that December 23,1963. Applicant: T R A N S ­ No. MC 25798 (Sub-No. 109), filed D< common control may be involved. C O LD EX PR ESS, INC., Post Office Box 17, 1964- Applicant: C LA 5842, Dallas, Tex. Authority sought to HYDER TR U C K IN G LINE S, INC., 3( HEARING: April 22, 1964, at the Mid­ land Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Exam­ operate as a common carrier, by motor Highway North, Dade City, Fla. Appl vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ cant’s attorney; Thomas F. Kilroy, Suil iner Joseph A. Reilly. No. MC 105813 (Sub-No. 109), filed ing: Frozen foods, from Darien, Wis., to I irar° F^ eral Bar Building, 1815 H Stree points in Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Louisi- If!” -: Washington, D.C., 20006. Ai December 23, 1963. Applicant: BED­ FORD TRUCKING CO., INC., 1299 NW., anan (except New Orleans), Missouri, [ sought to operate as a comma Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, | mer, by motor vehicle, over irregi 23d Street, Miami 42, Fla. Applicant’s representative: H. R. Marlane, 2020 Bis- South Dakota, and Texas. I transporting: Frozen food HEARING: April 22,1964, at the M id­ I n S? Darien, Wis., to points in M ain cayne Boulevard, Miami 37, Fla. Au­ thority sought to operate as a common land Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Examiner I sAtt« ®ampsiure, Vermont, Massachu Joseph A. Reilly. VnS Sonnecticut, Rhode Island, Ne carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Frozen foods, from No. MC 115841 (Sub-No. 160), filed De­ [ land tW Jersey> Pennsylvania, Mary Darien, Wis., to points in Alabama, Flor­ cember 23, 1963. Applicant: COLO­ I D *strict of Coliunbii NIAL REFRIGERATED TRANSPOR­ fbama ^ Teflnessee, Mississippi, Ala ida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennes­ TATION, INC., 1215 Bankhead Highway •» see, and Virginia. West, Post Office Box 2169, Birmingham, Ala. Authority sought to operate as a I oper°a«;nAf PiiCtnt s^ates that the propose N o t e : Common control may be involved. common carrier, by motor vehicle, over U g oi inti U° be restricted so that no tael HEARING: April 22,1964, at the M id­ irregular routes, transporting: Frozen [Darien, prLvUege8 are Permitted i land Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Exam­ foods, from Darien, Wis., to points in iner Joseph A. Reilly. Virginia, North Carolina, South Caro­ la5 w 01if? A April 22> 1964> at the Mid No. MC 107107 (Sub-No. 295), filed lina, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama., [ Josepht’R ^ yag°’IU*' ExamInc December 18,1963. Applicant: A L T E R - Georgia, Florida, Kentucky, and Lou­ MAN TRANSPORT LINES, INC., Post isiana. 2978 NOTICES

N o t e : Applicant states the above authority plication is filed and shall not be ad­ A. King, 77 South Washington Street! will be restricted against tacking or inter­ dressed to or filed with the Interstate Waynesburg, Pa., attorney for appii-1 line privileges at Darien, Wis. - Commerce Commission. cants. HEARING: April 22, 1964, at the Mid­ State Docket No. assigned M-3363, filed No. M C -F C 66477. By order of Febru-1 land Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Exam­ December 23,1963. Applicant: C A R T E R ary 25, 1964, the Transfer Board ap-] iner Joseph A. Reilly. T R U C K LIN E , INC., 500 North 3d Street, proved the transfer to Welling Truck] No. MC 117119 (Sub-No. 129), filed De­ Fort Smith, Ark. Certificate of public Service, Inc., Aviston, 111., of the operat-1 cember 16, 1963. Applicant: WILLIS convenience and necessity sought to op­ ing rights issued by the Commission SHAW FROZEN EXPRESS, INC., Elm erate a freight service as follows : Trans­ M arch 11, 1952, under Certificate in No. Springs, Ark. Applicant’s attorney: portation of general commodities, be­ M C 38403, to Leo Welling, doing business] John H. Joyce, 26 North College, Fayette­ tween Van Buren, Ark., and Alma, Ark., as W elling Truck Service, Aviston, ill,,] ville, Ark. Authority sought to operate from Van Buren over Arkansas Highway authorizing the transportation, over reg­ as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, 162 to Alma, and return over the same ular routes of general commodities, ex-i over irregular routes, transporting: Fro­ route, serving all intemediate points. eluding household goods, commodities in zen foods, from Darien, Wis., to points in HEARING: M arch 31, 1964, at 10:00 bulk, and other specified commodities, Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, a.m., in the Justice Building, Little Rock, between Aviston, 111., and St. Louis, Mo.; South Dakota, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkan­ Ark. household goods, as defined by the Com­ sas, Kansas, and Louisiana (except New Requests for procedural information, mission, over irregular routes, between Orleans) including the time for filing protests, St. Louis, Mo., on the one hand, and, on j HEARING: April 22,1964, at the M id­ concerning this application should be ad­ the other, Trenton and Aviston, 111., and 1 land Hotel, Chicago, 111., before Exam­ dressed to the Arkansas Commerce Com­ such commodities as are transported in I iner Joseph A. Reilly. mission, Justice Building, Little Rock, dump trucks, over irregular routes, from I No. MC 119767 (Sub-No. 14), filed De­ Ark., 72201, and should not be directed St. Louis, Mo., to Aviston, HI. cember 16, 1963. Applicant: BEAVER to the Interstate Commerce Commission. No. M C -F C 66610. By order of Febru- ] ary 27, 1964, the Transfer Board ap-j TRANSPORT CO., a corporation, 100 By the Commission; South Calumet Street, Burlington, Wis. proved the substitution of Donald G. Applicant’s attorney: Charles W . Singer, [ s e a l ) H arold D. M cC o y , Randall and Dorothy M. Randall, a Secretary. 33 North La Salle Street, Chicago, 111. partnership, doing business as Prescott] Transfer & Storage Co., 624 West Gurley Authority sought to operate as a common [F.R. Doc. 64-2082; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular 8:51 a.m.] Street, Prescott, Ariz., in lieu oi l routes, transporting: Frozen foods, from Robert W. Tharp, doing business as: Darien, Wis., to points in Michigan, In­ Prescott Transfer & Storage Company, diana, Ohio, Illinois, Minnesota and [Notice No. 948] 624 W est Gurley Street, Prescott, Ariz,,, points in Iowa, on and east of U.S. High­ as applicant in No. M C 98699 (Sub-No. 2) for a certificate of registration to oper­ way 61, extending from the Iowa-Mis- MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER ate in interstate or foreign commerce j souri State line to Dubuque, Iowa, in­ PROCEEDINGS authorizing operations under the former; cluding Dubuque, and those on and east F e b r u a r y 28,1964. second proviso of section 206(a)(1) of of U.S. Highway 52, extending from Du­ the Act supported by Arizona Certificate i buque to the Iowa-Minnesota State line, Synopses of orders entered pursuant No. 3092 authorizing the transportation and St. Louis, Mo., Louisville, Ky., and to section 212(b) of the Interstate Com­ of household goods, between all points Pittsburgh, Pa. merce Act, and rules and regulations pre­ scribed thereunder (49 C FR Part 179), in the State of Arizona. N ote: Applicant states that no tacking or No. M C -F C 66624. By order of Feb­ interline privileges are sought at Darien, Wis. appear below: As provided in the Commission’s spe­ ruary 25, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ It is further noted common control may be proved the transfer to Faucher Bros. involved. cial rules of practice any interested per­ son may file a petition seeking recon­ Cartage, Inc., 223 West Ontario Street, HEARING: April 22,1964, at the M id­ sideration of the following numbered Chicago, 111., of the operating rights in land Hotel, Chicago, HI., before Exam ­ proceedings within 20 days from the date Certificate in No. M C 79303, issued Sep­ iner Joseph A. Reilly. of publication of this notice. Pursuant tember 23,1941, to Ed Faucher, doing business as Faucher Bros. Cartage Co., By the Commission. to section 17(8) of the Interstate Com­ merce Act, the filing of such a petition 223 W est Ontario Street, Chicago 10, 111. [ seal] H arold D. M cC o y , will postpone the effective date of the authorizing the transportation, over ir­ Secretary. order in that proceeding pending its dis­ regular routes, of general commodities, [F.R. -Doc. 64-2080; Filed, Mar. 3, 1964; position. The matters relied upon by excluding household goods, commodities 8:50 am .] petitioners must be specified in their in bulk, and other specified commodities, petitions with particularity. between points in the Chicago, 111., com­ No. MC-FC 66405. By order of Feb­ mercial zone, as defined. NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTOR CAR­ ruary 25, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ No. M C -F C 66641. By order of Feb­ RIER INTRASTATE APPLICATIONS proved the transfer to Nick Encapera, ruary 24, 1964, the Transfer Board ap­ doing business as California Bus Serv­ proved the transfer to Miles L. Webster, j F e b r u a r y 28, 1964. Minburn, Iowa, of the operating rights ice, California, Pa., of the operating The following applications for motor rights issued by the Commission Feb­ in Certificate in No. MC 68072 issued * common carrier authority to operate in ruary 6, 1964, under Certificate in No. by the Commission December 19, j Ted Leak, Linden, Iowa, authorizing tne intrastate commerce seek concurrent MC 115634 (Sub-No. 1) to Silvio Di transportation of livestock from various motor carrier authorization in interstate Prampero, doing business as Keystone points in Iowa, to Omaha, Nebr., and or foreign commerce within the limits Transit, Waynesburg, Pa., authorizing livestock and feed, from Omaha, Neo •, of the intrastate authority sought, pur­ the transportation of passengers and to Panora, Iowa, between Panora ana suant to section 206(a) (6) of the Inter­ their baggage, in round-trip special and Chicago, 111.; between Greenfield, Iowa, state Commerce Act, as amended Oc­ charter operations, beginning and end­ and Chicago, HI.; between Winterses, tober 15, 1962. These applications are ing at points in Greene County, Pa., and Iowa, and Chicago, HI.; between Atlant , governed by Special Rule 1.245 of the extending to points in Alabam a, Connec­ Iowa, and Chicago, HI.; and between c - Commission’s rules of practice, pub­ ticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hli- lished in the F ederal R e g ister , issue roll, Iowa, and Chicago, HI. William^ nois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisana, Landau, 1307 East Walnut Street, JJes of April 11, 1963, page 3533, which pro­ Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mich­ Moines, 50306, Iowa, representative iw vides, among other things, that protests igan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hamp­ and requests for information concerning shire, New Jersey, New York, North applicants. the time and place of State Commission Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode [ se al] H arold D. M cCo y, hearings or other proceedings, any sub­ Secretary- sequent changes'therein, and any other Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Ver­ related matters shall be directed to the mont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wiscon­ [F.R. Doc. 64-2083; Filed, Mar. 3, l96*’ State Commission with which the ap­ sin, and the District of Columbia. Floyd 8:51 a.m.] Wednesday, March 4, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 2 9 7 9

CUMULATIVE CODIFICATION GUIDE— MARCH The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during March. Page Page 1 CFR 7 CFR— Continued CFR checklist. 2909 1138...... _____ 2929 7 CFR 1421______¡401------2925 9 C FR Announcing a New '728______... 2925 74______2910 ._ 2909 Statutory Citations Guide 1 4 C FR 907— 2926 71 [New] (7 documents)____ 910- - 2909 2930-2934 95 [N e w !______HOW TO FIND 1008. .. 2926 288______11009. .. 2926 ____ 2938 507 (2 documents) U.S. STATUTES 1031. T 2926 2943, 2944 P roposed R u l e s : 1035. 2927 and 73 [N e w ]______¡1036. _ 2927 ____ 2949 241______U.S. CODE CITATIONS 1040. 2927 302______1041. 2927 This pamphlet contains typical legal refer­ 507______2950 1042. _ 2927 ence situations which require further citing. 1043. _ 2927 1 5 C F R Official published volumes in which the ¡1047. - 2927 371— ______2911 citations may be found are shown along­ [1048. _ 2927 side each reference— with suggestions as 1049. 2927 1 9 C FR to the logical sequence to follow in using ¡1062. _ 2927 2 4 ...... ____ 2911 them to make the search. Additional 1066. _ 2928 finding aids, some especially useful in 2 6 C FR 1067. - 2928 citing current material, also have been l — ______1072. _ 2928 ____ 2911 included. Examples are fumishëd at per­ 1075- . 2928 3 8 C FR tinent points and a list of reference titles, 11090- with descriptions, is carried at the end. _ 2928 3______„ ______: ______2944 1096- - 2928 Price: 10 cents 1098.. . 2928 3 9 C FR .. 1101 _ 2928 46— ...... ----- 2911 Compiled by: Office of the Federal Register, 1120.. _ 2928 96 ______2911 National Archives and Records Service, 1125.. . 2928 98______General Services Administration 1126- _ 2928 168 ______1128.. _ 2928 [Published by the Committee on the 1129.. . 2929 4 6 C F R Judiciary, House of Representatives! 1130.. 309...... ____ 2944 _ 2929 Order from: Superintendent of Documents, 1131.. _ 2929 4 9 C FR Government Printing Office, Washington, 1132_. - 2929 120______. . . . 2947 D.C., 20402 1133— - 2929 205______2947 1134.. . 2929 1135— _ 2929 5 0 C FR 1137.. . 2929 33 (3 docu m ents)______2948 No. 44------8

Latest Edition in the series o f . . . PUBLIC PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES John F . Kennedy, 1962

Contains verbatim transcripts of the President's news conferences and speeches and full texts of messages to Congress and other materials released by the White House during the period January 1-December 31,1962. Among the 557 items in the book are: special messages to the Congress on education, national health needs, and foreign aid; reports to the American people concerning the state of the national economy, nuclear testing and dis­ armament, and the Cuban crisis; joint statements with leaders of foreign gov­ ernments; and a special interview with representatives of the radio and television networks in which the President reviewed some of the highlights of his first 2 years in office. A valuable reference source for scholars, reporters of current affairs and the 1108 pages Price: $9.00 events of history, historians, librarians, and Government officials.

VOLUM ES of PUBLIC PAPERS of the PRESIDENTS currently available: Contents:

HARRY S. TRUMAN: • Messages to the Congress 1945...... ______$5.50 • Public speeches 1946...... ______$6.00 1947...... ______$5.25 • News conferences EISENHOWER: D W IG H T D. • Radio and television reports to the 1953------...... $6.75 1957------— $6.75 American people 1954_____...... $7.25 1958------___ $8.25 1955------______$6.75 1959...... - $7.00 • Remarks to informal groups 1956------...... $7.25 196Ô-61...... ___ $7.75 • Public letters JO H N F. K E N N E D Y : 1961 ______- ____ $9.00 1962...... $9.00

Volumes are published annually, soon after the close of each year. Order from the: Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing O ffice, Earlier volumes are being issued periodically, beginning with 1945. Washington, D.C., 20402