DOCUMENT RESUME Cohort Default Rates for Schools Due to FY 1995, FY 1996, and FY 1997. Sorted by Alpha Name. INSTITUTION Departm
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 434 635 HE 032 413 TITLE Cohort Default Rates for Schools Due to FY 1995, FY 1996, and FY 1997. Sorted by Alpha Name. INSTITUTION Department of Education, Washington, DC. REPORT NO ED-PEPS311 PUB DATE 1999-09-00 NOTE 1259p.; For a related document, see HE 032 414. PUB TYPE Numerical/Quantitative Data (110) EDRS PRICE MF10/PC51 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Colleges; Federal Programs; Higher Education; *Loan Default; *Loan Repayment; Private Colleges; Public Colleges; *Student Financial Aid; *Student Loan Programs; Tables (Data); Universities; Vocational Schools ABSTRACT This document presents federal student loan cohort default rates for postsecondary institutions, including two- and four-year colleges, universities, church-affiliated schools, historically black colleges and universities, tribally controlled schools, and proprietary vocational schools. Each listing, sorted alphabetically by school name, contains the institution's name, address, a code indicating program length, type of school (proprietary, public, private), numbers of borrowers in default and in repay for each of the 3 years (fiscal years 1995, 1996, and 1997), the default rate, and the program rate (federal family education loan rate, direct loan rate, and dual rate). (DB) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ******************************************************************************** I DueCohort toSORTED FY(Report Default1995, BY No.:FY RatesALPHA 1996, PEPS311) for and NAME Schools FY 1997 EDUCATIONALOfficeU.S. of DEPARTMENT Educational RESOURCES Research OF EDUCATION and INFORMATION Improvement September 1999 lid ThisoriginatingMinorreceived document changes from it.CENTER the hashave person been been(ERIC) reproduced ormade organization to as officialdocumentPointsimprove OERIof reproduction view do position not or necessarilyopinions orquality.
[Show full text]