DOCSLIB.ORG

State of Illinois

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State of Illinois State of Illinois Illinois Department of Transportation District 1 – Urban Interstate Resurfacing Milling and resurfacing on Interstate 290 from Sacramento Boulevard to Interstate 90/94 in Chicago. District 2 – Rural 4 Lane Bridge Rehabilitation Miscellaneous repairs on the structure carrying Interstate 80 over the Mississippi River. District 6 – Rural 2 Lane Concrete pavement on County Highway 10 east of Elkhart. District 6 – Urban Streetscape Streetscape reconstruction that includes new concrete pavers, sidewalks, lighting, planting beds and traffic signals on Capitol Avenue between 5th Street and 7th Street in Springfield. District 8 – Urban Pedestrian Bridge Construction Construction of a 3-span pedestrian bridge, sidewalk, lighting, landscaping, sewer and retaining walls for the city of Alton over US 67 at Riverfront Park. Printed by authority of the State of Illinois, 0445-11, 01/11, 500 FY 2012-2017 Proposed Highway Improvement Program Spring 2011 Published by the Illinois Department of Transportation Springfield, Illinois 62764 Printed by authority of State of Illinois, April 2011, 275 copies. This document is printed on recycled paper. This document is available on-line at www.dot.il.gov/opp/publications.html. CONTENTS Page Program Development Process ................................... 1 Seeking Public Involvement – Outreach Meetings ....... 3 Executive Summary ..................................................... 5 Department of Transportation District Map ................. 21 Public Review and Comment Form ............................ 22 Guide to Listings ........................................................ 23 Glossary .................................................................... 24 Project Listing Index. .................................................. 25 IDOT HIGHWAY PROGRAM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Program Objectives . Preserve and maintain the existing highway system of roads and bridges. Upgrade existing facilities for congestion mitigation and safety improvements. Expand the system to enhance economic development. Program Planning . Estimate revenues from federal and state sources. Deduct costs for administration, maintenance and operations, certain other state agency operations and bond debt service to determine available funds. Determine the annual amount as well as the multi-year period. Assess highway needs for preservation, increased capacity and expansion of the highway system. Assess physical condition of the highway system, including bridges, using technical data and processes. Identify crash locations and safety needs. Identify needed additional capacity improvements on existing roads and new major arterials to relieve congestion and enhance economic development. The pavement and structural condition ratings, the type and volume of traffic being served, the functional importance of the route, accident history, geometrics and public input are considered in developing proposed projects. Funding targets and technical guidelines are issued to the Illinois Department of Transportation’s (IDOT) nine highway districts to develop, prioritize and submit projects for inclusion in the multi-year program (MYP). This guarantees statewide consistency in the overall level of service and ensures that each district is achieving the overall objectives of IDOT. Engineering, land acquisition, utility adjustments and construction are scheduled for each project as needed. The anticipated Fiscal Year for construction is dependent on the status of preconstruction activities and availability of resources. An annual element is identified that forms the basis of the proposed highway improvement program for the upcoming fiscal year. The program is reviewed and announced by the Governor. The published MYP is a highway improvement program developed by engineers using technical data. It is presented to the General Assembly and the public for review and discussion during the appropriation process. 1 SEEKING PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT – HIGHWAY PROGRAM OUTREACH MEETINGS Effective transportation is vital to the Illinois economy. In an effort to ensure that the public is given opportunity to review and comment on the multiyear highway program, IDOT held a series of public outreach meetings throughout Illinois in the fall of 2010 concerning the development of the FY 2012-2017 Proposed Highway Improvement Program. A total of 20 meetings were held, and a combined 378 comments were received. The cities and dates of these meetings are noted in the table below. The overwhelming majority of the comments received at the outreach meetings involved specific individual projects. In many instances, those providing comments sought additional lanes or intersection improvements in order to decrease congestion or improve safety. In Districts 1 and 6 a few comments surfaced regarding the program development process itself, primarily focusing on the goals of the process as well as the goals of local planners. In District 8, all comments pertained to a single project, which most people who made comments desired (although there were a few comments in opposition). Similar to the comments, attendance at the outreach meetings varied from meeting to meeting – even within a highway district. For example, District 1 had a few meetings where over 20 people attended. At the same time, they had a few meetings where attendance was less than ten (at least one meeting with less than five). Those who did attend the meetings almost universally appreciated the opportunity to review the program and to talk with IDOT staff. IDOT staff expended an extensive amount of time and energy in preparation for these meetings. In summary, the meetings were a useful first step in obtaining input into the highway program development process. Additional groundwork needs to be performed in advance of the meetings to encourage the Department’s stakeholders to participate more fully in these meetings to provide input into the program development process. 2010 MYP Outreach Meetings Date City August 18 Rock Island September 1 Sycamore September 2 East Dubuque September 7 Kankakee September 13 Crystal Lake September 13 Rockford September 16 Grayslake September 20 Peoria September 21 Chicago September 21 Champaign September 22 South Holland September 23 Collinsville October 4 Effingham October 5 New Lenox October 5 Carterville October 6 St. Charles October 7 Decatur October 18 Lisle October 19 Quincy October 21 Springfield 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Illinois Department of Transportation’s FY 2012-2017 Proposed Highway Improvement Program totals $11.525 billion and includes an FY 2012 annual program of $2.952 billion. Funding for the 6-year program is made up of $7.185 billion in federal funds, $3.624 billion in state funds including $230 million in Transportation Series A bond re-appropriations from Governor Quinn’s Jump Start Capital Plan and $2.044 billion in Transportation Series D bonds for the Illinois Jobs Now! program, and $716 million in local funds. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) provided an additional $936 million of federal funds for Illinois highways. Illinois was in the national vanguard for implementing the projects made possible through the ARRA and obligated 100 percent of its allocated road and bridge funds before the March 1, 2010 deadline. Illinois was recently identified as one of only 30 states that had complied with all federal Maintenance of Effort requirements. This keeps IDOT eligible for potential additional federal highway funds as part of the 2011 Redistribution of Obligation Authority. The Jump Start Capital Plan was approved by the General Assembly and signed by Governor Quinn in April 2009. Public Act 096-0005 authorized $2 billion of Transportation Series A bonds. The Illinois Jobs Now! program was approved by the General Assembly in July 2009. Through Public Acts 096-0034, 096- 0036 and 096-0037, this comprehensive infrastructure program included an additional $3.05 billion of new Transportation Series D bonds for highway projects that address congestion needs in urban areas and provide for economic development opportunities statewide by expanding the state highway system. Of the total bond amount appropriated, approximately $1 billion of projects is planned for implementation in FY 2012 including engineering, other pre-construction activities and construction. Planned highway projects for Illinois Jobs Now! shown in the project lists are highlighted by shaded gray boxes and are footnoted. To continue the early success of the ARRA, Jump Start and Illinois Jobs Now! the General Assembly approved Governor Quinn’s proposal to advance almost $1.6 billion of ready projects into the 2010 construction season. The Accelerated Construction Program was a mixture of Jump Start, Illinois Jobs Now!, previously-identified regular highway program projects and newly-identified system condition needs. The additional funding was made available in 2010 and contributed to the largest highway construction season in Illinois history. All of the remaining Transportation Series A bonds were appropriated for the Accelerated Construction Program. Federal transportation legislation titled Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act - A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) was signed into law in August 2005 and expired at the end of September 2009. The federal legislation authorized an increase in Illinois’ share of highway funds by more than $300 million on an average annual basis. Of this amount, over 60 percent was for special
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gilman Industrial Park Brochure
    Illinois Gilman has an available 265 acre park waiting for you! o'Crossroadsof Opportunity" Location-Location-Location This 265 acre industrial park 90 miles south of Chicago is ideally located at the intersections of Interstate 57 US 24 and US 45. It is also bordered by the main lines for the TP&W (SantaFe) and Illinois Cenfal (CN) Railroads. The infrasffucture available is extensive. The property can be divided into lots to suit individual usersneeds. Shawn Coady Rick Theesfeld 204 N. Rt s4lP.O.Box98 215N. Central RobertsoIllinois 60962 Gilman, Illinois 60938 217-395-2281, 8t5-265-42t3 217-395-2572(Bax) 815-265-4640(Fax) INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE OR SCHEDULED/SPRING 2OO4 COMPLETED . 400,000 gallon vertical water storagetank on . Site Survey site . Topographicalmaps . Looped 12" x S" watermains in park . Illinois historical survey . 8" municipal sanitary sewer system . PhaseI Environmental . Two electrical serviceproviders with . Wetlands survey extensiveinfrastructure availablein the park . Drainage plans . 138 KV overhead . 69 KV overhead ECONOMIC INCENTIVES . 12 KV overhead . Substationlocated in the park Tax Increment Finance District Iroquois DevelopmentCouncil 8" natural gas service Local city incentives City streetaccess to the park 3 lane,concrete,40 foot curb and gutter RAIL SERVICE Lishted streetentrance . Illinois Central (CN) main line . Illinois Central (CN) Springfield line INTERSTATEACCESS . TP&W (SantaFe) , I-57,US-24, US-45 border the site . Switching yard in Gilman ELECTRIC WASTEWATER WATER AverageLoad Supplier 250,000gallons per Ameren CIPS day City of Gilman . 13,700MW Generation Design Capacity Source Capacity 500,000gallons per day 2DeepWells . Multiple interconnections Tlpe of Plant . ElevatedStorage Capacity Substationon site Primary .
    [Show full text]
  • STRUCTURE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Ramp D Bridge Interstate
    STRUCTURE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Ramp D Bridge Interstate 294 and Interstate 57 Interchange Project IDOT Job: P-91-186-08 (PTB 146, ITEM 1) Proposed SN 016-4102 Cook County, Illinois STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Mr. Spiro Pantazis, P.E., S.E. T. Y. Lin International 200 South Wacker Drive Suite 1400 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312) 777-2900 Prepared by: Geo Services, Inc. 805 Amherst Court Suite 204 Naperville, Illinois 60565 (630) 305-9186 JOB NO. 08015 05/23/14 May 23, 2014 T. Y. Lin International 200 South Wacker Drive Suite 1400 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Attn: Mr. Spiro Pantazis, P.E., S.E. Job No. 08015 Re: Structure Geotechnical Report Proposed Ramp D Bridge Interstate 294 and Interstate 57 Interchange Project Proposed SN 016-4102 IDOT Job Number: P-91-186-08 PTB 146, Item #1 Cook County, Illinois Dear Mr. Pantazis: The following report presents the geotechnical analysis and recommendations for the proposed bridge structures for the proposed Ramp D Bridge. A total of five (5) structural soil borings (SB-01 through SB-05) were completed. Copies of these boring logs, along with plan and profiles are included in this report. If there are any questions regarding the information submitted herein, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, GEO SERVICES, Inc. Kiran Adhikary, P.E. Andrew J. Ptak, P.E. Senior Project Engineer Office Manager enc. 805 Amherst Court, Suite 204 Naperville, IL 60565-3448 Phone (630) 305-9186 Fax (630) 355-2838 www.geoservicesinc.net TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 01: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 2 SECTION 02: PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................... 2 SECTION 03: SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES ................................
    [Show full text]
  • River Mileages and Drainage Areas for Illinois Streams—Volume 2, Illinois River Basin
    RIVER MILEAGES AND DRAINAGE AREAS FOR ILLINOIS STREAMS—VOLUME 2, ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 79-111 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS RIVER MILEAGES AND DRAINAGE AREAS FOR ILLINOIS STREAMS—VOLUME 2, ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN By R. W. Healy U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 79-111 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1979 CONTENTS Conversion Table . .iv Abstract . .1 Introduction . .1 Methods . .2 Explanation of tables . .2 References . .3 Index . .291 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map showing Illinois counties . .4 2. Map showing stream systems, hydrologic units, and major cities in Illinois. .6 TABLE Table 1. River mileages and drainage areas for Illinois streams . .8 i CONVERSION TABLE Multiply inch-pound unit By To obtain SI (metric) unit mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) square mile (mi2) 2.590 square kilometer (km2) iv RIVER MILEAGES AND DRAINAGE FOR ILLINOIS STREAMS— Volume 2, Illinois River Basin By R. W. Healy ABSTRACT River mileages are presented for points of interest on Illinois streams draining 10 square miles or more. Points of interest include bridges, dams, gaging stations, county lines, hydrologic unit boundaries, and major tributaries. Drainage areas are presented for selected sites, including total drainage area for any streams draining at least 100 square miles. INTRODUCTION Expansion of water-resource investigations within the State of Illinois has amplified the need for a common index to locations on streams. A common index would aid in the coordination of various stream-related activities by facilitating data collection and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportationtransportation
    Transportationtransportation City of Elmhurst Comprehensive Plan TransporTATion Elmhurst’s transportation system consists of an extensive roadway network, including direct access to Interstate High- ways I-290, I-294, and I-88, an extensive commuter rail and bus transit system, as well as a well-connected pedestrian and bike network. This transportation network allows for easy and accessible travel within the City and excellent con- nections to the surrounding metropolitan area. Elmhurst’s interstate highway and commuter rail access are among its strongest assets, making it a very desirable community for living and conducting business. Therefore, maintain- ing a well-functioning and efficient transportation system is critical to sustaining the high quality-of-life in the com- munity. A review of existing conditions, including average daily traffic and transit ridership history, formed the basis for the development of the transportation framework and functional street classification. Through this analysis, pri- Commuter and freight rail tracks ority improvement areas were identified, as well as general improvements or suggestions to manage population and employment growth, relative to a functional and efficient 8. Improve wayfinding signage throughout the city to aid transportation system. This section provides an overview pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists in locating and of the transportation network in Elmhurst and offers some accessing key community facilities. recommendations to sustain and strengthen community mobility. Goal 2: Maintain and determine adequate parking facilities to serve land uses throughout the city. Goals AND OBJECTIVES Objectives: Goal 1: Continue to enhance mobility within the City by 1. Actively monitor, manage and address on-street and effectively managing local traffic issues and anticipating the off-street parking needs within the city to ensure ad- impact of future development on current traffic patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide
    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Highway Boondoggles 2
    Highway Boondoggles 2 More Wasted Money and America’s Transportation Future HIGHWAY BOONDOGGLES 2 More Wasted Money and America’s Transportation Future Written by: Jeff Inglis, Frontier Group John C. Olivieri, U.S. PIRG Education Fund January 2016 Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Phineas Baxandall of the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center (and for- merly of U.S. PIRG Education Fund); Patrick J. Kennedy of Space Between Design Studio; Deron Lovaas of the Natural Resources Defense Council; Beth Osborne of Transportation for America; Peter Skopec of WISPIRG Foundation; Bruce Speight of WashPIRG Foundation; and Clark Williams-Derry of Sightline Insti- tute for their review and comments. Thanks to U.S. PIRG Education Fund Transportation Fellow Lauren Aragon, Frontier Group intern Johanna Moody and U.S. PIRG Education Fund intern Mengyang Zhang for their contributions to this report. Thanks also to Tony Dutzik and Elizabeth Ridlington of Frontier Group for editorial support. Frontier Group also thanks ESRI for making possible the ArcGIS mapping conducted for this report. U.S. PIRG Education Fund and Frontier Group gratefully acknowledge the support of the Rockefeller Foundation for earlier projects upon which this research draws. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. Policy recommendations are those of U.S. PIRG Education Fund. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. © 2016 U.S. PIRG Education Fund. Some Rights Reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Com- mons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported License.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHWEST COUNCIL of MAYORS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Agenda
    NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE 1600 East Golf Road, Suite 0700 A Regional Association of Illinois Des Plaines, Illinois 60016 Municipalities and Townships (847) 296-9200 Fax (847) 296-9207 Representing a Population of Over One Million www.nwmc-cog.org MEMBERS NORTHWEST COUNCIL OF MAYORS Antioch Arlington Heights TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Bannockburn Agenda Barrington Bartlett Friday, April 23, 2021 Buffalo Grove Deer Park 8:30 a.m. Deerfield Via Zoom Video Conference Des Plaines Elk Grove Village https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88625528035?pwd=eEZ6N3k4L0RtcExsdlloYXZkM0xzU Evanston Fox Lake T09 Glencoe Meeting ID: 886 2552 8035 Glenview Grayslake Passcode: NW042321 Hanover Park Highland Park Hoffman Estates I. Call to Order Kenilworth Lake Bluff Lake Forest II. Approval of January 22, 2021 Meeting Minutes (Attachment A) Lake Zurich Libertyville Action Requested: Approval of minutes Lincolnshire Lincolnwood Morton Grove III. Agency Reports Mount Prospect Niles a. CMAP Report (Attachment B) Northbrook b. IDOT Highways Report (Attachment C) Northfield Northfield Township c. IDOT Local Roads Update (Attachment D) Palatine Park Ridge d. Illinois Tollway (Attachment E) Prospect Heights e. Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways Rolling Meadows Schaumburg (Attachment F) Skokie Streamwood f. Metra (Attachment G) Vernon Hills g. Pace (Attachment H) West Dundee Wheeling h. RTA Wilmette Action Requested: Informational Winnetka President Kathleen O’Hara IV. Northwest Council Surface Transportation Program Lake Bluff A. Current Program Update (Attachment I) Vice-President Staff will provide a brief overview of the current program, noting any Joan Frazier Northfield changes since the previous meeting. Action Requested: Informational/Discussion Secretary Dan Shapiro Deerfield B. Cost Increase Request – Village of Streamwood (Attachment J) Treasurer Staff recommends approval of the Village of Streamwood’s request for Ray Keller Lake Zurich $220,783 in Construction funding for the Park Ave Resurfacing project in FFY 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 NCFPW Meeting Information General Schedule
    2019 NCFPW Meeting Information Thank you for registering for the 2019 NCFPW Meeting! Here is some information on the meeting and the surrounding area. The meeting will be held at the Morton Arboretum in Lisle, IL, 25 miles from downtown Chicago. The Morton Arboretum is an internationally recognized nonprofit organization dedicated to the planting and conservation of trees. Its 1,700 acres hold more than 222,000 live plants representing nearly 4,300 species from around the world. https://www.mortonarb.org If you will be driving to the meeting, please inform the person at the gatehouse that you are with the North Central Forest Pest Workshop and they will let you in for free. General Schedule Monday 9/23/19 Meet and Greet/Afternoon Morton Arboretum exploration on your own Participants arriving early or staying on after the meeting can explore the grounds by car or on foot. Here are maps and directions to the Arboretum Grounds: https://www.mortonarb.org/visit-explore/plan-visit/maps-and-directions You can also join the troll hunt: https://www.mortonarb.org/events/troll-hunt We would also like to invite people arriving on Monday to take advantage of the Tram Tours which happen throughout the afternoon (schedule TBD) for which we will have vouchers for interested people (https://www.mortonarb.org/events/acorn-express-tram-tours).Please let us know on the registration form if you will be taking advantage of this so we know how many tickets to reserve. This will be followed by a Meet and Greet at the Visitor Center Sycamore Room (across the entryway from the main Visitor Center) from 5-7 pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Muncy Creek Township
    Muncy Creek Planning Area Plan Adoptions 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Plan Adoptions HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> MUNCY BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> SHREWSBURY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> WOLF TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> Lycoming 2030: Plan the Possible 2 Muncy Creek Planning Area Acknowledgements 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Acknowledgements Muncy Creek Planning Advisory Team (PAT) WALTER REED, REPRESENTATIVE OF HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH RICHARD SMITH, REPRESENTATIVE OF HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH STEVE JAQUITH, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH (ALTERNATE) BILL RAMSEY, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH LINDA STEIN, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH STEVEN CULVER, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BILL POULTON, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP ANGELA SNYDER, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BILL DORMAN, REPRESENTATIVE OF PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH EUGENE OTTERBEIN, REPRESENTATIVE OF PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH DEAN BARTO, REPRESENTATIVE OF WOLF TOWNSHIP MELANIE MCCOY, REPRESENTATIVE OF WOLF TOWNSHIP TERRY DINCHER, REPRESENTATIVE OF SHREWSBURY TOWNSHIP REBECCA FOUGHT, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING RECREATION AUTHORITY DAVID MACIEJEWSKI, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT MICHAEL PAWLIK, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT GENE CAHN, REPRESENTATIVE
    [Show full text]
  • Public Comment Summary Report
    City of Chicago DRAFT Equitable Transit- Oriented Development (eTOD) Policy Plan Public Comment Summary Report 1 Contents Summary of Public Comments & Outreach Efforts ...................................................................................... 3 Themes from Public Comments .................................................................................................................... 4 Themes from Community Conversations ..................................................................................................... 5 Individual Comments .................................................................................................................................... 5 See Appendix for Attached Letters submmitted as public comment 2 Summary of Public Comments & Outreach Efforts The following document summarizes the public comments on the City of Chicago’s proposed ETOD Policy Plan, received between September 14 and October 29, 2020. Overview of comments submitted through email: 59 total public comments 24 comments from organizations 35 comments from individuals Local Groups Developers Transportation Environmental Chicago Metropolitan 3e. Studio LLC Metra Environmental Law & Policy Agency for Planning Center Esperanza Health Centers The Community Builders Pace Bus Illinois Environmental Council Metropolitan Planning Hispanic Housing RTA Sustainable Englewood Council Development Coordination Initiatives Red Line Extension Coalition Urban Land Institute Zipcar Elevate Energy Roseland Heights Share Mobility Community
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Provides Information on EGC ESP Site Location, On-Site
    CHAPTER 2 Site Characteristics This chapter provides information on the EGC ESP Site location, on-site activities and controls, present and projected population distribution, meteorological, hydrological, geological, and seismological characteristics. The purpose of presenting this information is to provide the bases for demonstrating the adequacy of the site characteristics from a site safety viewpoint and to provide input to support environmental characterization. The influence of the EGC ESP site characteristics on the design and operation of a possible future nuclear power facility will be assessed at the construction and operating license (COL) stage pursuant to 10 CFR 52 Subpart C. REV2 2-1 CHAPTER 2 - SITE CHARACTERISTICS SITE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FOR EGC EARLY SITE PERMIT SECTION 2.1 – GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY 2.1 Geography and Demography 2.1.1 Site Location and Description 2.1.1.1 Specification of Location The EGC ESP Facility will be co-located on the property of the existing CPS Facility and its associated 4,895 ac man-made cooling reservoir (Clinton Lake) (CPS, 2002). The EGC ESP Facility will be located approximately 700 ft south of the existing CPS Facility. The CPS Facility lies within Zone 16 of the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates. The exact UTM coordinates for the EGC ESP Facility will depend upon the specific reactor technology selected for deployment and will be finalized at COL. As shown on Figures 1.2-1 and 2.1-1 there is a complex transportation system surrounding the EGC ESP Site. The nearest major highways are Illinois State Routes 54, 10, and 48, all of which cross the CPS Facility property.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Final Budget Book.Indd
    ILLINOIS TOLLWAY 2015 BUDGET Published December 2014*RYHUQRU3DW4XLQQ&KDLU3DXOD:ROII([HFXWLYH'LUHFWRU.ULVWL/DÁHXU Th e Government Finance Offi cers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority for the Annual Budget beginning January 2014. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, operations guide, fi nancial plan and communications device. Th is page intentionally left blank 4 Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Tollway Organization and Background .................................................................................................................. 19 Revenue Sources and Underlying Assumptions ................................................................................................... 27 Fund Structure ............................................................................................................................................................ 33 Budget Summaries ..................................................................................................................................................... 41 Strategic Plan .............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]