DOCSLIB.ORG

Former Truman Brewery, Units 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Former Truman Brewery, Units 1 Subject: 19/00185/FUL: Former Truman Brewery, Units 1 - 6, Stour Road, London, E3 2NT Meeting date: 18 December 2019 Report to: Planning Decisions Committee Report of: Anne Ogundiya, Principal Planning Development Manager FOR DECISION This report will be considered in public 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1. This application seeks planning permission for the redevelopment of a partly vacant industrial site known as the Truman Brewery. The site borders the Fish Island and White Post Lane Conservation Area which lies to the south and east of the application site. 1.2. The application site is a rectangular shaped plot and covers an area of approximately 0.3ha. The site is located on Stour Road, at the junction with Smeed Road; Beachy Road bounds the site to the north. The site slopes from south to north i.e. from Stour Road to Beachy Road circa 1m gradient. 1.3. The proposals are for the redevelopment of the site and involve the demolition of the existing buildings and construction of two buildings ranging in height from five to seven storeys. One building is proposed to be a part 6 and part 7 storey purpose-built student accommodation (PBSA) block with flexible B1(c) incubator space at ground level, and the other would be a standalone 5 storey commercial block. 1.4. The scheme proposes a total of 1,854m² GIA of commercial floorspace (B1c), B1 yard space (994m²), and a 330-room purpose-built student accommodation block (9,940m²) including 37 shared flats and 6 self-contained studios (Use Class Sui Generis). 1.5. In terms of employment floorspace 475m² GIA, representing 25% of the proposed overall employment floorspace, is proposed as affordable workspace, and would be offered at a peppercorn rate save for utilities in perpetuity and secured via s106 legal agreement. 1.6. It is the applicant’s intention that the proposed PBSA accommodation would be delivered by a higher education institution (HEI) through a nominations agreement secured by way of s106 legal agreement, in line with relevant planning policy. Subject to no net loss in industrial floorspace capacity, the development would be required to deliver 35% affordable student accommodation, which would also be secured by s106 legal agreement in accordance with policy. 1.7. 5% of the student bedrooms (17 bedrooms) are proposed as wheelchair accessible. The proposals include associated public realm improvements, car parking for disabled people, cycle parking, refuse/recycling stores and a new substation and the provision of podium amenity space. 1.8. The key matters for assessment are set out in the report, and include the following: Principle of development and proposed land uses on the site, including student accommodation and replacement of commercial B1 c floorspace; Quality of design including heritage considerations; Environmental and amenity impacts; Accessibility and inclusive design; and s106 Heads of Terms. 1.9. The principle of the redevelopment of the site is supported in the Local Plan. Overall, the proposals are considered to be an acceptable use for the site and within the surrounding context. The development is proposed to be located on the site appropriately and would be built to a scale and form which would not cause any significant loss of amenity to local residents including in terms of outlook/daylight/sunlight. Impacts from construction noise and disturbance can satisfactorily be mitigated by the imposition of appropriate conditions. Officers are satisfied that the proposals would not harm the character and appearance of the Hackney Wick and Fish Island Conservation Area. 1.10. The proposals have been subject to a Quality Review Panel (QRP) review, who offer ‘…strong support for the proposal for the former Truman Brewery and has no hesitation in recommending approval of the planning application …’ and comment that the scheme ‘…promises to be a highly successful addition to Fish Island…’ 1.11. The proposal would satisfy a demand for student housing in the area, result in public benefits, including 35% affordable student accommodation, which has the potential to release existing housing stock currently occupied by students to family occupiers, as students occupy the purpose-built student accommodation. The proposals include good quality amenity for the student accommodation, would provide enhanced public realm in the area with robust landscaping and new public routes connecting to the Lee Navigation River, to the south of the site. The proposal would also create an increase in employment density. The proposed scheme would maximise the use of previously developed land and would make a valuable contribution to creating a mixed and balanced community. 1.12. Some refinements have been made to the scheme since the application was submitted. The changes have been principally to the courtyard layout serving the PBSA, the commercial yard space and the façade treatment of the buildings. The scheme described is the amended scheme. Areas of clarification have been requested where appropriate and officers are satisfied that all issues raised by this proposed scheme, including in the objections, have been robustly addressed and that the proposal is acceptable in accordance with relevant development plan policies. 1.13. The application has been extensively consulted on, with some 871 letters sent to neighbouring properties. 10 objection letters have been received from local residents on the grounds of construction noise disturbance, loss of views, impact on the conservation area, impact on property values, height and design. Conversely 12 letters of support from local residents have been received, 8 letters from local businesses including Creative Wick, Stour Space, plus a further two from University College London (UCL) and Loughborough University London. 1.14. The London Cycling Campaign also raised objections to the scheme on the basis of a lack of clarification of the cycling usage. Clarification has been provided, and officers are satisfied that the provision is in accordance with draft new London Plan targets. 1.15. The Environment Agency (EA) had originally objected to the proposal on the grounds of deficiencies within the FRA. They also requested the submission of a Safe Refuge Plan in the event of flooding. This information has been submitted alongside an updated FRA. The EA have confirmed that the updated and additional information provided is sufficient. 1.16. The GLA reviewed the scheme as originally submitted and commented in its Stage 1 response. The Mayor considered that the application does not fully comply with the London Plan but that possible suggested remedies centred around commercial yard space design, energy, drainage, and a public realm contribution, could address these deficiencies. Officers are satisfied that the further detailed information and refinement provided by the applicant would address the GLA comments. 1.17. Subject to conditions, and other measures proposed to be secured by a s106 legal agreement, it is considered that the impacts of the scheme can be robustly mitigated. The scheme is considered to represent a sustainable form of development in compliance with relevant planning policies and legal obligations to be secured through a s106 Agreement. 2. RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 The Committee is asked to: a) Approve the application for the reasons given in the report and grant planning permission subject to: 1. Referring the application to the Mayor of London and any direction of the Mayor of London 2. the satisfactory completion of a legal agreement under s.106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and other enabling powers to secure the planning obligations set out in the recommended heads of terms which are set out in this report; and 3. the conditions set out in this report. b) Agree to delegate authority to the Director of Planning Policy and Decisions to: 1. Finalise the recommended conditions as set out in this report including such refinements, amendments, additions and/or deletions (including to dovetail with and where appropriate, reinforce, the final planning obligations to be contained in the section 106 legal agreement) as the Director of Planning Policy and Decisions considers reasonably necessary; 2. Finalise the recommended legal agreement under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and other enabling powers as set out in this report, including refining, adding to, amending and/or deleting the obligations detailed in the heads of terms set out in this report (including to dovetail with and where appropriate, reinforce the final conditions and informatives to be attached to the planning permission) as the Director of Planning Policy and Decisions considers reasonably necessary; and 3. Complete the section 106 legal agreement referred to above and issue the planning permission. 3. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 3.1. There are no financial implications as a result of this application. 4. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS 4.1. The recommendation is that planning permission is granted, subject to the satisfactory completion of a s106 legal agreement to ensure adequate mitigation of the impacts of the development. The contents of the required s106 agreement are described within this report (Draft Heads of Terms). Site Plan © Crown copyright and database rights 2012 Ordnance Survey 100050265 Location: Former Truman Brewery, Units 1 - 6, Stour Road, London, E3 2NT London Borough: London Borough of Tower Hamlets Proposal: Application for full planning permission for demolition of existing buildings and mixed use redevelopment comprising construction of two new buildings ranging in height from five to seven storeys to provide 1,854m² (GIA) of commercial space (use class B1c Business), 330 student rooms including 11 wheelchair accessible and 6 wheelchair accessible studios) (Use Class Sui Generis) provision of B1 yard and podium amenity space, along with public realm improvements, 5 bue badge car parking spaces, cycle parking, refuse/recycling stores and new sub station. Applicants: Future Generation Agent: Southern Grove Architecture: Henley HaleBrown 5. SITE & SURROUNDINGS 5.1. The application seeks consent for the redevelopment of the site known as the Truman Brewery, which lies within Fish Island, in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Olympic Park Application
    Appendix K Assessment of Olympic Park Application Transportation and Highways Comments February 2007 Index Page Olympic and Legacy Travel Plan Group 2 Highway Mitigation Measures 3 Revenue Support 4 The Existing Situation 2006 5 Highways 5 Public Transport 7 Walk/Cycle 8 Site Enabling and Construction 10 Highways 10 Public Transport 14 Walk/Cycle 15 London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympics 17 Highways 17 Public Transport 22 Walk/Cycle 25 Olympic and Legacy Facilities Transformation (2013/14) 27 Highways 27 Public Transport 33 Walk/Cycle 35 Olympic and Legacy Facilities Operational (2021) 37 Highways 37 Public Transport 38 Walk/Cycle 39 Travel Plan Framework 41 Bridge Design and Construction 43 Code of Construction Practice 44 1 Olympic and Legacy Travel Plan Group Travel Plan Co-ordination Volume 13a Section 1.3.16 identifies the need for committed co-ordination and management of the Travel Plan to deliver site-wide and programme delivery-wide success. It is proposed that an Olympic Park Travel Plan Group is set up to deliver this across all phases of the delivery programmes from construction to occupation of the Legacy land uses. The role of the group will be to: • Coordinate the Construction Phase transport and review transport effects through on-going development and implementation of the Code of Construction Practice and the Traffic Management Plan. • Refine and implement the Olympic Transport Plan to deliver reliable, inclusive and sustainable transport for spectators and visitors • Co-ordinate the construction traffic impacts during Legacy Transformation • Co-ordinate the development, implementation and enforcement of Travel Plans for the Legacy land uses.
    [Show full text]
  • The GLA Roads Designation Order 2000
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2000 No. 1117 LONDON GOVERNMENT HIGHWAYS, ENGLAND The GLA Roads Designation Order 2000 Made - - - - 10th April 2000 Laid before Parliament 26th April 2000 Coming into force - - 22nd May 2000 The Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14A of the Highways Act 1980(1) hereby makes the following Order: Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the GLA Roads Designation Order 2000 and shall come into force on 22nd May 2000. Designation of GLA roads 2.—(1) The highways specified in the Schedule to this Order are hereby designated as GLA roads. (2) In accordance with section 14A(2) of the Highways Act 1980 3rd July 2000 is hereby specified as the date on which those highways are to become GLA roads. Interpretation of the Schedule 3. In the Schedule to this Order— (a) a reference to the boundary of London is a reference to the boundary of Greater London; (b) the description of a highway includes the intersection of that road and any other road that crosses it at the same level; and (c) the description of a highway which, or any length of which, is a trunk road includes any highway constructed as part of the trunk road for the purpose of relieving the main carriageway of the trunk road from local traffic. (1) 1980 c. 66; section 14A was inserted by section 260 of the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • London Lorry Control Scheme Review2017
    London Lorry Control Scheme Review 2017 1 Contents 1. Introduction 03 2. Background to the LLCS 04 3. The scheme as it is today 06 a. The Permission 06 b. Permission Conditions 06 c. Enforcement 06 d. Key facts and statistics 07 4. Reasons for the review of the LLCS 10 a. Assess the effectiveness of the scheme 10 b. Consider and address concerns 10 c. Propose amendments and future actions 10 d. Raise awareness 11 e. Improve compliance 11 f. Better control of freight in London 11 5. The Steering Group 12 6. The Working Group 15 7. Operator Engagement 17 8. Borough Engagement 19 9. Results of the engagement with key stakeholders 21 a. Working group meetings 21 b. Operator survey 23 c Operator workshop day 29 d. Borough survey 38 e. London Freight Borough Officer Liaison Group workshop 45 10. Possible solutions and recommendations 54 a. Communications, awareness and understanding of the scheme 54 b. Technology 56 c. Enforcement 58 d. Administration 62 11. Conclusion 65 12. Appendices 66 2 Introduction London is the largest city in Western Europe with a population of more than 8.6 million (2015) that is expected to increase to 10 million by 2031. This will create significant additional demand for passenger and freight transport on what is already a highly congested road network. The success of London as a lively, prosperous and diverse city is dependent on many factors and the effective management of freight is a key element in ensuring that London continues to grow as a major business, tourist attraction and residential centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Estimates 1971-72 Class VI
    [).() !,I f_R C3 ,l, 0 R EF'"_I ._ '¥.... c: ' U ,.. No, fa. El q 11-1:2. EstimatesA ) for the year ending 31st March 1972 CLASS VI ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Presented by Command 0/ Her Majesty Ordered by Tbe House of Commons to be printed 19th March 1971 LONDON HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE £ I. I s. Od. [£1 ,05] net 302-VI , CLASS VI ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES page I. Department of the Environment . 4 2. Scottish Office (Central Services) . • 15 3. Scottish Development Department • 18 4. Welsh Office . 28 5. Civil Accommodation Services, &c., United Kingdom 38 6. Civil Accommodation Services, &c., Overseas 51 7. Defence Accommodation Services, &c. • 54 8. Housing, England • 58 • • 63 9. Housing, Scotland • 10. Housing, \Vales • • 67 71 11. Transport Industries • • • • 12. Transport Services . • • 75 13. Roads, &c., England 78 14. Roads and Transport Services, Scotland 99 15. Roads and Transport Services, \Vales • I I I J 6. Local Government and Development . 120 17. Rate Support Grants to Local Revenues, England and Wales 128 18. Rate Support Grants to Local Revenues, Scotland 131 19. Department of the Environment (Research) 134 I Treasury Chambers MAURICE MACMILLAN I 19th Ala"h 1971 302-VI (IJ8f>S7149926) �--------- I ____________________________________ SUMMARY 1971-72, Class VI � CLASS VI. ENVIRONMENTAL " STATEMENT OF THE GROSS AND NET ESTIMATES - 1970-71 TOlal Uumllf�· VOle S(R\ ICE No. .\ppro­ Appro­ Grou pmlUonJ Gro�� prlauon� In AId In AId I Deputmenl t)f the (n�lron- men! 10t.259,000 32,9Of>, 000 71,353,000 114,978,000 32,643,360
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Lane Notes.Pages
    Wood Lane, 30th January 2018, Steve Marston Introduction I don’t suppose many of you have given much thought to Wood Lane, the road that runs from Shepherd’s bush north. In fact neither would I if it had not been that my place of work was moved to the area, a new research Building attached to the Hammersmith Hospital, some 8 years ago. I had to commute there and so became interested in the area. It’s an area blighted by railways and motorways for well over a century. Until recently, it was place you would pass through on the way out of London: not a place to visit, still less to live there. However in the last 10 years Wood Lane has been transformed into a destination, with vastly improved public transport and is now experiencing an avalanche of building developments. 1 The start- geography. This is Wood Lane on John Roque’s map of 1755. In those days, as now there were only three routes out of London to the west- The Bristol Road through Hammersmith, the Oxford Road through Shepherd’s Bush and the Harrow road through Willesden. Wood Lane runs from the Oxford Road to the Harrow road, but it’s an insignificant lane through open country. Prominent on the map is Wormwood Scrubs -scrubs because only stunted trees grow in the marshy ground- and the end of the North London ridge, the same one that we are on here, slopes up from there. Not shown on this map is Counter’s Creek, draining the area.
    [Show full text]
  • London Assembly Transport Committee – Pedestrian Safety: Written Submissions Page 1) Tfl Submission on Pedestrian Safety Page
    London Assembly Transport Committee – Pedestrian Safety: Written Submissions Page 1) TfL submission on Pedestrian Safety Page 15) Appendix A RSSG Membership Page 17) Appendix B - List of sites where pedestrian green man time has been reduced Page 39) Appendix C - List of Sites without audible or tactile 12-12-13 v2 Page 59) Appendix D - List of pedestrian crossings which have been removed since 2010 v2 Page 65) Appendix E - 2012 Business Plan Road Safety Funding.pdf Page 66) Appendix F - Key Walking Routes Page 67) TfL letter March 2014 Page 73) Metropolitan Police March 2014 Page 77) City of Westminster letter February 2014 Page 85) RoadPeace submission February 2014 Page 91) Living Streets submission Page 93) KOVE submission January 2014 Page 96) KOVE Road Crossings report findings June 2008 Page 110) Southwark Living Streets December 2013 Page 114) Wandsworth Living Streets December 2013 Page 117) Hammersmith and Fulham Disability Forum Page 118) Road Peace: Causing death by driving in London in 2012 Page 121) Road Peace: Criminal convictions and pedestrian and cyclist deaths in London July 2013 London Assembly Transport Committee – Pedestrian Safety 9 January 2014 1. Introduction TfL welcomes the opportunity to provide the London Assembly Transport Committee with an overview of the steps being taken to improve pedestrian safety in London. The Committee has requested information ahead of the meeting on 9 January, which is included in this report and the accompanying appendices where appropriate. Summary of Key Points: • The safety of London’s roads has been improving steadily since 2000; • In June 2013, Safe Streets for London: The Road Safety Action Plan for London 2020 was published.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the London Boroughs 5Years
    YEARS 5OF THE LONDON BOROUGHS TONY TRAVERS LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS & POLITICAL SCIENCE GUILDHALL, LONDON 50 YEARS OF THE LONDON BOROUGHS Tony Travers, London School of Economics & Political Science London Councils represents London’s This lecture relies heavily on the work of other 32 borough councils and the City of London. It is a cross-party people.The bibliography at the end of the organisation that works on behalf paper lists many of the excellent books I have of all of its member authorities relied upon to bring together the development regardless of political persuasion and history of the London boroughs. I would London Communications Agency particularly like to acknowledge the help over is an award winning public relations many years of my colleague Professor George and public affairs consultancy focussed on London and London Jones. The story of London’s government is issues. We are passionate about strangely gripping. It has attracted researchers the politics of London and use our and commentators over many years. I have also detailed research, knowledge and understanding to support our been enormously assisted by a number of officials clients in delivering change in at London Councils, including John O’Brien, our great city. Dick Sorabji, James Odling-Smee, Souraya This lecture has been typeset using Ali, Dan Drillsma-Milgrom, Sarah Fudge, Ian the Clarendon font. Clarendon, was Mitchell, Barbara Salmon and Emma Stewart. created in 1845 by the typographer Robert Beasley who went on to become the Sheriff of the City of My thanks also go to the City of London London in 1863 and the Lord Mayor Corporation and London Communications of London in 1869.
    [Show full text]
  • GLA 2020-0242 Draft S6 Order
    Transport for London GLA 2020 No.0242 THE A12 GLA ROAD AND SLIP ROADS (BLACKWALL TUNNEL NORTHERN APPROACH, EAST CROSS ROUTE AND EASTERN AVENUE, LONDON BOROUGHS OF TOWER HAMLETS, HACKNEY, NEWHAM, WALTHAM FOREST AND REDBRIDGE) (PROHIBITION OF PEDESTRIANS, PEDAL CYCLES, HORSES AND HORSE DRAWN VEHICLES) ORDER 2020 Made -- -------- 200- Coming into force -- -------- 200- Transport for London in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984a, and of all other enabling powers, hereby makes the following Order— 1. Commencement and citation This Order may be cited as The A12 GLA Road and Slip Roads (Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach, East Cross Route and Eastern Avenue, London Boroughs of Tower Hamlets, Hackney, Newham, Waltham Forest and Redbridge) (Prohibition of Pedestrians, Pedal Cycles, Horses and Horse Drawn Vehicles) Order 2020, and shall come into force on -- ------------ 200-. 2. Interpretation (1) In this Order- (a) “Bow Interchange” is the circulatory traffic system at the junctions of the A11 Bow Road, the A118 High Road, Hancock Road and the unnamed on and off slip roads to and from the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern approach. (b) “carriageway” has the same meaning as in section 329 (1) of the Highways Act 1980b; (c) “cause” includes permit, and causing shall be construed accordingly; (d) “footway” has the same meaning as in section 329 (1) of the Highways Act 1980. a 1984 c.27 b 1980 c.66 GLA/2020/0242 1 (e) “Green Man Roundabout” the circulatory traffic system at the junctions the A12 Eastern Avenue, the A11 High Road Leytonstone, the A114 Whipps Cross Road, the A113 New Wanstead and Holly Road.
    [Show full text]
  • CAL 139 London Roads Carrying Over 10000 Vpd Ranked by Volume of Traffic and Searchable
    CLEAN AIR IN LONDON Roads carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day Received from Transport for London on 060411 DfT Annual Road Traffic Census Counts Major road links within Greater London with an Annual average daily flow estimate of Greater than 10,000 vehicles 2009 Annual Average Daily Traffic Flows Estimates by link Number of All Motor Vehicles -------------Annual Average Daily Flow Estimates--------------- Easting Northing of count of count Road Road Name From…. ….to site site All Motor Vehicles 1 M25 N/A 14 LA Boundary 504031 176656 213,127 2 M4 N/A LA Boundary 4 506000 178400 170,726 3 A13 Newham Way A117 A13 543000 182214 148,977 4 A13 Newham Way A112 A117 542000 182120 140,175 5 A40 Western Avenue A312 A4127 514000 183445 136,071 6 A406 North Circular Road LA Boundary A124 543450 185670 135,043 7 A406 N/A A118 LA Boundary 543400 186000 135,043 8 M25 N/A LA Boundary 25 536250 200000 134,423 9 A4 Great West Road LA Boundary A4 522005 178312 133,364 Southend Road (North 10 A406 Southend Road LA Boundary Cicular Road) 540000 190450 130,196 Southend Road (North 11 A406 Circular Road) A104 LA Boundary 539445 190430 130,196 12 M4 N/A LA Boundary A312 510401 178265 125,029 13 M4 N/A 4 3 508900 178400 125,029 14 A1261 Aspen Way A1206 Aspen Way Tunnel 538620 180750 123,339 15 M25 N/A LA Boundary 29 558360 185100 122,011 16 M25 N/A 28 LA Boundary 555000 194030 117,523 17 A40 Western Avenue A4127 A406(T) 515000 183145 117,405 18 A13 Newham Way A1011 A112 540000 181700 114,549 19 M25 N/A 29 LA Boundary 557400 190260 114,392 20 M25 N/A LA Boundary
    [Show full text]
  • GLA 2020-0242 Final Order
    Transport for London GLA 2020 No.0242 THE A12 GLA ROAD AND SLIP ROADS (BLACKWALL TUNNEL NORTHERN APPROACH, EAST CROSS ROUTE AND EASTERN AVENUE, LONDON BOROUGHS OF TOWER HAMLETS, HACKNEY, NEWHAM, WALTHAM FOREST AND REDBRIDGE) (PROHIBITION OF PEDESTRIANS, PEDAL CYCLES, HORSES AND HORSE DRAWN VEHICLES) ORDER 2020 Made 11th August 2020 Coming into force 15th August 2020 Transport for London in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984a, and of all other enabling powers, hereby makes the following Order— 1. Commencement and citation This Order may be cited as The A12 GLA Road and Slip Roads (Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach, East Cross Route and Eastern Avenue, London Boroughs of Tower Hamlets, Hackney, Newham, Waltham Forest and Redbridge) (Prohibition of Pedestrians, Pedal Cycles, Horses and Horse Drawn Vehicles) Order 2020, and shall come into force on 15th August 2020. 2. Interpretation (1) In this Order- (a) “Bow Interchange” is the circulatory traffic system at the junctions of the A11 Bow Road, the A118 High Road, Hancock Road and the unnamed on and off slip roads to and from the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern approach. (b) “carriageway” has the same meaning as in section 329 (1) of the Highways Act 1980b; (c) “cause” includes permit, and causing shall be construed accordingly; (d) “footway” has the same meaning as in section 329 (1) of the Highways Act 1980. a 1984 c.27 b 1980 c.66 GLA/2020/0242 1 (e) “Green Man Roundabout” the circulatory traffic system at the junctions the A12 Eastern Avenue, the A11 High Road Leytonstone, the A114 Whipps Cross Road, the A113 New Wanstead and Holly Road.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Priority Route Order 1992
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1992 No. 1372 ROAD TRAFFIC The London Priority Route Order 1992 Made - - - - 10th June 1992 Laid before Parliament 11th June 1992 Coming into force - - 2nd July 1992 The Secretary of State for Transport in exercise of powers conferred by section 50(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1991(1) and all other enabling powers, and after consulting local authorities, the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, the Commissioner of Police for the City of London and London Regional Transport in accordance with section 50(3) and (4) of that Act, hereby makes the following Order:— 1. This Order may be cited as the London Priority Route Order 1992 and shall come into force on 2nd July 1992. 2. The following roads are designated as priority routes for the purposes of Part II of the Road Traffic Act 1991— (a) the roads specified in the Schedule to this Order; and (b) every slip road (not falling within sub-paragraph (a) above) which links a road mentioned in any paragraph of the Schedule to this Order with a road mentioned in any other paragraph of that Schedule in the vicinity of the place where the two roads join or cross. 3. In the Schedule to this Order the description of a road shall be read as including the area of any intersection between the road and any road which crosses it at the same level. 4. Where a paragraph of the Schedule to this Order contains a description of a road followed by a reference to the inclusion of one or more particular roads (for example paragraph 2) the reference to the inclusion of the one or more particular roads shall be treated as having been inserted for the avoidance of doubt and as being without prejudice to the generality of the preceding description.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspext, 411-415 Wick Lane Fish Island, London E3 2JG TO
    TO LET A DEVELOPMENT BY New Commercial Units Aspext, 411-415 Wick Lane E Use Available (Retail, Office, Restaurant, Community and Assembly & Leisure) Fish Island, London E3 2JG Alternative Uses Considered (STP) Kemsley LLP 46 New Broad Street, London, EC2M 1JH LOCATION DESCRIPTION VAT Aspext is a landmark development being undertaken by Taylor The scheme will comprise of five buildings, with the commercial element All rents, prices and premiums are exclusive of VAT if applicable. Wimpey, situated in the heart of Fish Island, and fronting the busy arranged over ground, first and second floors. The commercial allocation roundabout junction with Crown Close. will total approximately 24,000 sqft (2,230 m2). BUSINESS RATES Interested parties are advised to make their own enquiries with the Fish Island & Hackney Wick have both benefitted from the large scale Across the scheme, the space will benefit from a range of uses to include Local Authority, London Borough of Tower Hamlets. regeneration in recent years, which is continuing across the wider area, the new Use Class E (Retail, Office, Restaurant, Community and Assembly EPC and alongside the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park. & Leisure, Research & Development, Light Indsutrial, Medical, Nurseries To be confirmed & Gyms). Alternative uses will be considered (STP). With several mixed-use developments being undertaken in the SERVICE CHARGE immediate vicinity, Fish Island continues to build on its strong industrial ACCOMMODATION Further details available upon application. and creative heritage, enhancing its position to attract occupiers from within the creative, artist, tech and media industries. The new The available units have the following approximate Gross Areas: LEGAL FEES commercial units at Aspext provide the chance to join the existing range Each party to bear their own legal costs incurred in any transaction.
    [Show full text]