DOCSLIB.ORG

GLA 2020-0242 Final Order

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GLA 2020-0242 Final Order Transport for London GLA 2020 No.0242 THE A12 GLA ROAD AND SLIP ROADS (BLACKWALL TUNNEL NORTHERN APPROACH, EAST CROSS ROUTE AND EASTERN AVENUE, LONDON BOROUGHS OF TOWER HAMLETS, HACKNEY, NEWHAM, WALTHAM FOREST AND REDBRIDGE) (PROHIBITION OF PEDESTRIANS, PEDAL CYCLES, HORSES AND HORSE DRAWN VEHICLES) ORDER 2020 Made 11th August 2020 Coming into force 15th August 2020 Transport for London in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984a, and of all other enabling powers, hereby makes the following Order— 1. Commencement and citation This Order may be cited as The A12 GLA Road and Slip Roads (Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach, East Cross Route and Eastern Avenue, London Boroughs of Tower Hamlets, Hackney, Newham, Waltham Forest and Redbridge) (Prohibition of Pedestrians, Pedal Cycles, Horses and Horse Drawn Vehicles) Order 2020, and shall come into force on 15th August 2020. 2. Interpretation (1) In this Order- (a) “Bow Interchange” is the circulatory traffic system at the junctions of the A11 Bow Road, the A118 High Road, Hancock Road and the unnamed on and off slip roads to and from the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern approach. (b) “carriageway” has the same meaning as in section 329 (1) of the Highways Act 1980b; (c) “cause” includes permit, and causing shall be construed accordingly; (d) “footway” has the same meaning as in section 329 (1) of the Highways Act 1980. a 1984 c.27 b 1980 c.66 GLA/2020/0242 1 (e) “Green Man Roundabout” the circulatory traffic system at the junctions the A12 Eastern Avenue, the A11 High Road Leytonstone, the A114 Whipps Cross Road, the A113 New Wanstead and Holly Road. (f) “highway” has the same meaning as in section 328 of the Highways Act 1980 and includes any structure, traffic Island, central reservation, kerb, verge, embankment and any land within the extents of a highway. (g) “horse” has the same meaning as section 329 of the Highways Act 1980. (h) “pedal cycle” has the same meaning as in schedule 1 of the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016a; (i) “vehicle” shall include any part of a vehicle. (2) The Interpretation Act 1978b applies to this order as if it were an enactment. 3. Sections of Highway where Pedestrians are prohibited No pedestrian shall proceed on any part of the highways listed below: 1. The full extent of the western and northern side of the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach, East Cross Route and Eastern Avenue between the northernmost nosing of the unnamed off slip road connecting the northbound carriageway of the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach with Bow Interchange and its junction with Kingfisher Avenue, London Borough of Redbridge, except for the footway at the western side of the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach between its junction with the unnamed on-slip road connecting Bow Interchange with the northbound carriageway of the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach and the extended north-western property boundary of No. 1 Baldock Street, London Borough of Tower Hamlets. 2. The full extent of the eastern and southern side of the A12 Eastern Avenue, East Cross Route and Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach between the westernmost nosing of Harrier Avenue, London Borough of Redbridge and the extended northern kerb-line of Culvert Drive, London Borough of Tower Hamlets. 3. The full extent of the eastern side of the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach between its junctions with Twelvetrees Crescent and Gillender Street. 4. The full extent of the unnamed on-slip road connecting Bow Interchange with the western side of the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach, except for the footway at its south-western side. 5. The full extent of the unnamed off-slip road connecting the eastern side of the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach with Bow Interchange. 6. The full extent of the unnamed on-slip road connecting Hancock Road, London Borough of Tower Hamlets with the eastern side of the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern approach. a SI 2016 No.362 b 1976 c.30 GLA/2020/0242 2 7. The full extent of the unnamed on and off-slip roads connecting the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach / East Cross Route with Wick Lane, London Borough of Tower Hamlets. 8. The full extent of the Cowdry Road off-slip road connecting the western side of the A12 East Cross Route with Wick Road between its junction with the A12 East Cross Route and a point 1 metre north-west of the extended common boundary of Nos. 12 and 13 Cadogan Terrace, London Borough of Hackney. 9. The full extent of the unnamed on-slip road connecting Wick Road, London Borough of Hackney with the eastern side of the A12 East Cross Route, except for the footway at the eastern side of the on-slip road between its junction with Wick Road and a point 30.5 metres south-east of northern face of the triangular traffic island at the junction of Wick Road and the unnamed off- slip road from East Cross Route (measured along the south-western face of the traffic island). 10. The full extent of the unnamed on-slip road connecting Wick Road, London Borough of Hackney with the western side of the A12 East Cross Route, except for the footway at the western side of the on-slip road between its junction with Wick Road and the extended northern property boundary of No. 16 Benn Street, London Borough of Hackney. 11. The full extent of the unnamed off-slip road connecting the northern side of the A12 East Cross Route with the A106 Eastway between its junction with East Cross Route and a point 17 metres south-west of the extended western kerb- line of Eastway (measured along the centreline). 12. The full extent of the unnamed on-slip road connecting the A106 Eastway with the south-west bound carriageway of the A12 East Cross Route between a point 19.5 metres south-west of the extended western kerb-line of Eastway (measured along the centreline) and its junction with East Cross Route. 13. The full extent of the unnamed off-slip road connecting the westbound carriageway of the A12 Eastern Avenue with the A106 Eastway from its junction with Eastern Avenue and a point 9 metres north-east of the extended eastern kerb-line of Eastway (measured along the northern edge of the pedestrian refuge traffic islands on the off-slip road). 14. The full extent of Temple Mills Road on-slip road connecting Eastway with the eastbound carriageway of the A12 Eastern Avenue, except the area of footway at the south-western side of Temple Mills Road from its junction with Eastway and a point 15.5 metres south-east of the extended south-eastern kerb-line of Eastway and the area of footway at the north-eastern side of Temple Mills Road between its junction with Eastway and a point 11 metres south-east of the extended south-eastern kerb-line of Eastway. 15. The full extent of the unnamed off-slip road connecting the south-westbound carriageway of the A12 Eastern Avenue with Green Man Roundabout. GLA/2020/0242 3 16. The full extent of the unnamed on-slip road connecting Green Man Roundabout with the south-westbound carriageway of the A12 Eastern Avenue. 17. The full extent of the unnamed off-slip road connecting the north-eastbound carriageway of the A12 Eastern Avenue with Green Man Roundabout. 18. The full extent of the unnamed on-slip road connecting Green Man Roundabout with the north-eastbound carriageway of the A12 Eastern Avenue between the extended southern kerb-line of Cambridge Park Road. 4. Sections of carriageway where the riding of pedal cycles, ridden or accompanied horses, and horse drawn vehicles are prohibited. No person shall cause or permit any person: to ride a pedal cycle, ride or accompany a horse or any horse drawn vehicle to proceed on the lengths of carriageway listed below. (1) The northbound carriageway of the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Southern Approach, East Cross Route and Eastern Avenue between the northernmost nosing of the unnamed off slip road connecting the northbound carriageway of the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach with Bow Interchange and its junction with Kingfisher Avenue, London Borough of Redbridge. (2) The southbound carriageway of the A12 Eastern Avenue, East Cross Route and Blackwall Tunnel Southern Approach between the westernmost nosing of Harrier Avenue, London Borough of Redbridge and its junction with Hancock Road, London Borough of Tower Hamlets. (3) The unnamed on-slip road connecting Bow Interchange with the north- westbound carriageway of the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach between the extended northern kerb-line of Payne Road, London borough of Tower Hamlets and its junction with the north-westbound carriageway of the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach. (4) The unnamed off-slip road connecting the south-eastbound carriageway of the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach with Bow Interchange. (5) The unnamed on-slip road connecting Hancock Road, London Borough of Tower Hamlets with the south-eastbound carriageway of the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach. (6) The unnamed on and off-slip roads connecting the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach / East Cross Route with Wick Lane, London Borough of Tower Hamlets. (7) The Cowdry Road off-slip road connecting the north-westbound carriageway of the A12 East Cross Route with Wick Road, London Borough of Hackney. (8) The unnamed on-slip road connecting Wick Road, London Borough of Hackney with the south-eastbound carriageway of the A12 East Cross Route. GLA/2020/0242 4 (9) The unnamed on-slip road connecting Wick Road, London Borough of Hackney with the north-eastbound carriageway of the A12 East Cross Route, (10) The unnamed off-slip road connecting the north-east bound carriageway of the A12 East Cross Route with the A106 Eastway.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Olympic Park Application
    Appendix K Assessment of Olympic Park Application Transportation and Highways Comments February 2007 Index Page Olympic and Legacy Travel Plan Group 2 Highway Mitigation Measures 3 Revenue Support 4 The Existing Situation 2006 5 Highways 5 Public Transport 7 Walk/Cycle 8 Site Enabling and Construction 10 Highways 10 Public Transport 14 Walk/Cycle 15 London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympics 17 Highways 17 Public Transport 22 Walk/Cycle 25 Olympic and Legacy Facilities Transformation (2013/14) 27 Highways 27 Public Transport 33 Walk/Cycle 35 Olympic and Legacy Facilities Operational (2021) 37 Highways 37 Public Transport 38 Walk/Cycle 39 Travel Plan Framework 41 Bridge Design and Construction 43 Code of Construction Practice 44 1 Olympic and Legacy Travel Plan Group Travel Plan Co-ordination Volume 13a Section 1.3.16 identifies the need for committed co-ordination and management of the Travel Plan to deliver site-wide and programme delivery-wide success. It is proposed that an Olympic Park Travel Plan Group is set up to deliver this across all phases of the delivery programmes from construction to occupation of the Legacy land uses. The role of the group will be to: • Coordinate the Construction Phase transport and review transport effects through on-going development and implementation of the Code of Construction Practice and the Traffic Management Plan. • Refine and implement the Olympic Transport Plan to deliver reliable, inclusive and sustainable transport for spectators and visitors • Co-ordinate the construction traffic impacts during Legacy Transformation • Co-ordinate the development, implementation and enforcement of Travel Plans for the Legacy land uses.
    [Show full text]
  • The GLA Roads Designation Order 2000
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2000 No. 1117 LONDON GOVERNMENT HIGHWAYS, ENGLAND The GLA Roads Designation Order 2000 Made - - - - 10th April 2000 Laid before Parliament 26th April 2000 Coming into force - - 22nd May 2000 The Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14A of the Highways Act 1980(1) hereby makes the following Order: Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the GLA Roads Designation Order 2000 and shall come into force on 22nd May 2000. Designation of GLA roads 2.—(1) The highways specified in the Schedule to this Order are hereby designated as GLA roads. (2) In accordance with section 14A(2) of the Highways Act 1980 3rd July 2000 is hereby specified as the date on which those highways are to become GLA roads. Interpretation of the Schedule 3. In the Schedule to this Order— (a) a reference to the boundary of London is a reference to the boundary of Greater London; (b) the description of a highway includes the intersection of that road and any other road that crosses it at the same level; and (c) the description of a highway which, or any length of which, is a trunk road includes any highway constructed as part of the trunk road for the purpose of relieving the main carriageway of the trunk road from local traffic. (1) 1980 c. 66; section 14A was inserted by section 260 of the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • London Lorry Control Scheme Review2017
    London Lorry Control Scheme Review 2017 1 Contents 1. Introduction 03 2. Background to the LLCS 04 3. The scheme as it is today 06 a. The Permission 06 b. Permission Conditions 06 c. Enforcement 06 d. Key facts and statistics 07 4. Reasons for the review of the LLCS 10 a. Assess the effectiveness of the scheme 10 b. Consider and address concerns 10 c. Propose amendments and future actions 10 d. Raise awareness 11 e. Improve compliance 11 f. Better control of freight in London 11 5. The Steering Group 12 6. The Working Group 15 7. Operator Engagement 17 8. Borough Engagement 19 9. Results of the engagement with key stakeholders 21 a. Working group meetings 21 b. Operator survey 23 c Operator workshop day 29 d. Borough survey 38 e. London Freight Borough Officer Liaison Group workshop 45 10. Possible solutions and recommendations 54 a. Communications, awareness and understanding of the scheme 54 b. Technology 56 c. Enforcement 58 d. Administration 62 11. Conclusion 65 12. Appendices 66 2 Introduction London is the largest city in Western Europe with a population of more than 8.6 million (2015) that is expected to increase to 10 million by 2031. This will create significant additional demand for passenger and freight transport on what is already a highly congested road network. The success of London as a lively, prosperous and diverse city is dependent on many factors and the effective management of freight is a key element in ensuring that London continues to grow as a major business, tourist attraction and residential centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Estimates 1971-72 Class VI
    [).() !,I f_R C3 ,l, 0 R EF'"_I ._ '¥.... c: ' U ,.. No, fa. El q 11-1:2. EstimatesA ) for the year ending 31st March 1972 CLASS VI ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Presented by Command 0/ Her Majesty Ordered by Tbe House of Commons to be printed 19th March 1971 LONDON HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE £ I. I s. Od. [£1 ,05] net 302-VI , CLASS VI ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES page I. Department of the Environment . 4 2. Scottish Office (Central Services) . • 15 3. Scottish Development Department • 18 4. Welsh Office . 28 5. Civil Accommodation Services, &c., United Kingdom 38 6. Civil Accommodation Services, &c., Overseas 51 7. Defence Accommodation Services, &c. • 54 8. Housing, England • 58 • • 63 9. Housing, Scotland • 10. Housing, \Vales • • 67 71 11. Transport Industries • • • • 12. Transport Services . • • 75 13. Roads, &c., England 78 14. Roads and Transport Services, Scotland 99 15. Roads and Transport Services, \Vales • I I I J 6. Local Government and Development . 120 17. Rate Support Grants to Local Revenues, England and Wales 128 18. Rate Support Grants to Local Revenues, Scotland 131 19. Department of the Environment (Research) 134 I Treasury Chambers MAURICE MACMILLAN I 19th Ala"h 1971 302-VI (IJ8f>S7149926) �--------- I ____________________________________ SUMMARY 1971-72, Class VI � CLASS VI. ENVIRONMENTAL " STATEMENT OF THE GROSS AND NET ESTIMATES - 1970-71 TOlal Uumllf�· VOle S(R\ ICE No. .\ppro­ Appro­ Grou pmlUonJ Gro�� prlauon� In AId In AId I Deputmenl t)f the (n�lron- men! 10t.259,000 32,9Of>, 000 71,353,000 114,978,000 32,643,360
    [Show full text]
  • London's Street Family Chapters 3-3.1
    3. Case studies and priorities for street-types The following pages illustrate each of the street-types in greater detail. For each street-type, this chapter identifies the typical issues found in these locations, the different ingredients required for a successful street-type, and an aspirational view showing what a successful street of that type could look like. These are supported by case studies of locations within each street-type that these principles could be applied to. Case studies Typical issues Ingredients Aspirational view The purpose of these case studies was to inform the development of the street- types, including the specific interventions and broader measures required to achieve the emerging RTF vision. The challenges and recommendations identified are designed to illustrate the challenges of the relevant street-types, and the measures that would be of greatest benefit. The case studies are not intended to be a list of confirmed improvements to these roads and should not be treated as such. The case studies were chosen from the top two rows of the street family matrix. For street-types on the bottom row (local streets, town squares/streets, and city places), please refer to the ‘Better Streets Delivered’ supporting document for studies of how specific issues have been resolved at locations across London. The case studies that were chosen provide a spread of geographical locations, town centres, and anticipated challenges. A map of the case study locations and a table of the anticipated challenges at these locations are
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 9
    Agenda Item 9 Subject: Local Plan Consultation Document Report No: Appendices to Agenda Item 9 Meeting date: 29th October 2013 Report to: Board of the London Legacy Development Corporation F OR INFORMATION This material will be considered in public Appendix 1 – Draft Local Plan Consultation Document Appendix 2 – Interim Consultation Report Appendix 3 – Draft Summary for Consultation Leaflet Appendix 4 – Non Technical Summary for Sustainability Appraisal of the Local Plan Consultation Document Appendix 5 - Sustainability Appraisal of the Local Plan Consultation Document Appendix 6 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Screening Report Appendix 7 – Equalities Impact Assessment This page is intentionally left blank Appendix 1 Appendix 1 Draft Local Plan Consultation Document 9th October 2013 Version Control Version / Date Description of changes Reviewed/edited revision by 1.0 09/10/13 Alex Savine All maps within this document: © Crown Copyright 1999. Reproduced from Ordnance Survey Land-Line data with the permission of the controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Ordnance Survey and Land-Line are registered trademarks. Draft Local Plan Consultation Document London Legacy Development Corporation Local Plan Interim Consultation Document/draft/vs0.1 PROTECT - POLICY 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 1. Spatial Portrait of the Legacy Corporation Area ......................................................................... 4 2. The
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Lane Notes.Pages
    Wood Lane, 30th January 2018, Steve Marston Introduction I don’t suppose many of you have given much thought to Wood Lane, the road that runs from Shepherd’s bush north. In fact neither would I if it had not been that my place of work was moved to the area, a new research Building attached to the Hammersmith Hospital, some 8 years ago. I had to commute there and so became interested in the area. It’s an area blighted by railways and motorways for well over a century. Until recently, it was place you would pass through on the way out of London: not a place to visit, still less to live there. However in the last 10 years Wood Lane has been transformed into a destination, with vastly improved public transport and is now experiencing an avalanche of building developments. 1 The start- geography. This is Wood Lane on John Roque’s map of 1755. In those days, as now there were only three routes out of London to the west- The Bristol Road through Hammersmith, the Oxford Road through Shepherd’s Bush and the Harrow road through Willesden. Wood Lane runs from the Oxford Road to the Harrow road, but it’s an insignificant lane through open country. Prominent on the map is Wormwood Scrubs -scrubs because only stunted trees grow in the marshy ground- and the end of the North London ridge, the same one that we are on here, slopes up from there. Not shown on this map is Counter’s Creek, draining the area.
    [Show full text]
  • London Assembly Transport Committee – Pedestrian Safety: Written Submissions Page 1) Tfl Submission on Pedestrian Safety Page
    London Assembly Transport Committee – Pedestrian Safety: Written Submissions Page 1) TfL submission on Pedestrian Safety Page 15) Appendix A RSSG Membership Page 17) Appendix B - List of sites where pedestrian green man time has been reduced Page 39) Appendix C - List of Sites without audible or tactile 12-12-13 v2 Page 59) Appendix D - List of pedestrian crossings which have been removed since 2010 v2 Page 65) Appendix E - 2012 Business Plan Road Safety Funding.pdf Page 66) Appendix F - Key Walking Routes Page 67) TfL letter March 2014 Page 73) Metropolitan Police March 2014 Page 77) City of Westminster letter February 2014 Page 85) RoadPeace submission February 2014 Page 91) Living Streets submission Page 93) KOVE submission January 2014 Page 96) KOVE Road Crossings report findings June 2008 Page 110) Southwark Living Streets December 2013 Page 114) Wandsworth Living Streets December 2013 Page 117) Hammersmith and Fulham Disability Forum Page 118) Road Peace: Causing death by driving in London in 2012 Page 121) Road Peace: Criminal convictions and pedestrian and cyclist deaths in London July 2013 London Assembly Transport Committee – Pedestrian Safety 9 January 2014 1. Introduction TfL welcomes the opportunity to provide the London Assembly Transport Committee with an overview of the steps being taken to improve pedestrian safety in London. The Committee has requested information ahead of the meeting on 9 January, which is included in this report and the accompanying appendices where appropriate. Summary of Key Points: • The safety of London’s roads has been improving steadily since 2000; • In June 2013, Safe Streets for London: The Road Safety Action Plan for London 2020 was published.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Study
    LLDC TRANSPORT REVIE W LOCAL PLAN REVIEW - TRANSPORT STUDY Prepared for London Legacy Development Corporation June 2018 CH2M HILL United Kingdom Elms House 43 Brook Green London W6 7EF T +44 203 479 8000 Name Signature Date Prepared by: Philip Edwards Checked by: Graham Stevenson Approved by: Richard Smith In preparing this report, CH2M relied, in whole or in part, on data and information provided by the Client and third parties, which information has not been independently verified by CH2M and which CH2M has assumed to be accurate, complete, reliable, and current. Therefore, while CH2M has utilised reasonable due kill and care in preparing this Report, CH2M does not warrant or guarantee the conclusions set forth in this Report which are dependent or based upon data, information, or statements supplied by third parties or the client. This Report is intended for Client’s sole and exclusive use and is not for the benefit of any third party and may not be distributed to, disclosed in any form to, used by, or relied upon by, any third party without prior written consent of CH2M, which consent may be withheld in its sole discretion. Use of this Report or any information contained herein, if by any party other than Client, shall be at the sole risk of such party and shall constitute a release and agreement by such party to defend and indemnify CH2M and its affiliates, officers, employees and subcontractors from and against any liability for direct, indirect, incidental, consequential or special loss or damage or other liability of any nature arising from its use of the Report or reliance upon any of its content.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the London Boroughs 5Years
    YEARS 5OF THE LONDON BOROUGHS TONY TRAVERS LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS & POLITICAL SCIENCE GUILDHALL, LONDON 50 YEARS OF THE LONDON BOROUGHS Tony Travers, London School of Economics & Political Science London Councils represents London’s This lecture relies heavily on the work of other 32 borough councils and the City of London. It is a cross-party people.The bibliography at the end of the organisation that works on behalf paper lists many of the excellent books I have of all of its member authorities relied upon to bring together the development regardless of political persuasion and history of the London boroughs. I would London Communications Agency particularly like to acknowledge the help over is an award winning public relations many years of my colleague Professor George and public affairs consultancy focussed on London and London Jones. The story of London’s government is issues. We are passionate about strangely gripping. It has attracted researchers the politics of London and use our and commentators over many years. I have also detailed research, knowledge and understanding to support our been enormously assisted by a number of officials clients in delivering change in at London Councils, including John O’Brien, our great city. Dick Sorabji, James Odling-Smee, Souraya This lecture has been typeset using Ali, Dan Drillsma-Milgrom, Sarah Fudge, Ian the Clarendon font. Clarendon, was Mitchell, Barbara Salmon and Emma Stewart. created in 1845 by the typographer Robert Beasley who went on to become the Sheriff of the City of My thanks also go to the City of London London in 1863 and the Lord Mayor Corporation and London Communications of London in 1869.
    [Show full text]
  • GLA 2020-0242 Draft S6 Order
    Transport for London GLA 2020 No.0242 THE A12 GLA ROAD AND SLIP ROADS (BLACKWALL TUNNEL NORTHERN APPROACH, EAST CROSS ROUTE AND EASTERN AVENUE, LONDON BOROUGHS OF TOWER HAMLETS, HACKNEY, NEWHAM, WALTHAM FOREST AND REDBRIDGE) (PROHIBITION OF PEDESTRIANS, PEDAL CYCLES, HORSES AND HORSE DRAWN VEHICLES) ORDER 2020 Made -- -------- 200- Coming into force -- -------- 200- Transport for London in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984a, and of all other enabling powers, hereby makes the following Order— 1. Commencement and citation This Order may be cited as The A12 GLA Road and Slip Roads (Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach, East Cross Route and Eastern Avenue, London Boroughs of Tower Hamlets, Hackney, Newham, Waltham Forest and Redbridge) (Prohibition of Pedestrians, Pedal Cycles, Horses and Horse Drawn Vehicles) Order 2020, and shall come into force on -- ------------ 200-. 2. Interpretation (1) In this Order- (a) “Bow Interchange” is the circulatory traffic system at the junctions of the A11 Bow Road, the A118 High Road, Hancock Road and the unnamed on and off slip roads to and from the A12 Blackwall Tunnel Northern approach. (b) “carriageway” has the same meaning as in section 329 (1) of the Highways Act 1980b; (c) “cause” includes permit, and causing shall be construed accordingly; (d) “footway” has the same meaning as in section 329 (1) of the Highways Act 1980. a 1984 c.27 b 1980 c.66 GLA/2020/0242 1 (e) “Green Man Roundabout” the circulatory traffic system at the junctions the A12 Eastern Avenue, the A11 High Road Leytonstone, the A114 Whipps Cross Road, the A113 New Wanstead and Holly Road.
    [Show full text]
  • CAL 139 London Roads Carrying Over 10000 Vpd Ranked by Volume of Traffic and Searchable
    CLEAN AIR IN LONDON Roads carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day Received from Transport for London on 060411 DfT Annual Road Traffic Census Counts Major road links within Greater London with an Annual average daily flow estimate of Greater than 10,000 vehicles 2009 Annual Average Daily Traffic Flows Estimates by link Number of All Motor Vehicles -------------Annual Average Daily Flow Estimates--------------- Easting Northing of count of count Road Road Name From…. ….to site site All Motor Vehicles 1 M25 N/A 14 LA Boundary 504031 176656 213,127 2 M4 N/A LA Boundary 4 506000 178400 170,726 3 A13 Newham Way A117 A13 543000 182214 148,977 4 A13 Newham Way A112 A117 542000 182120 140,175 5 A40 Western Avenue A312 A4127 514000 183445 136,071 6 A406 North Circular Road LA Boundary A124 543450 185670 135,043 7 A406 N/A A118 LA Boundary 543400 186000 135,043 8 M25 N/A LA Boundary 25 536250 200000 134,423 9 A4 Great West Road LA Boundary A4 522005 178312 133,364 Southend Road (North 10 A406 Southend Road LA Boundary Cicular Road) 540000 190450 130,196 Southend Road (North 11 A406 Circular Road) A104 LA Boundary 539445 190430 130,196 12 M4 N/A LA Boundary A312 510401 178265 125,029 13 M4 N/A 4 3 508900 178400 125,029 14 A1261 Aspen Way A1206 Aspen Way Tunnel 538620 180750 123,339 15 M25 N/A LA Boundary 29 558360 185100 122,011 16 M25 N/A 28 LA Boundary 555000 194030 117,523 17 A40 Western Avenue A4127 A406(T) 515000 183145 117,405 18 A13 Newham Way A1011 A112 540000 181700 114,549 19 M25 N/A 29 LA Boundary 557400 190260 114,392 20 M25 N/A LA Boundary
    [Show full text]