DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 105/Friday, May 30

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

31180 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 105 / Friday, May 30, 2008 / Notices Public Hearing—Projects Scheduled for River), Borough of Archbald, Cecil County, Maryland. Modification of Action Lackawanna County, Pa. Application for surface water withdrawal, groundwater 1. Project Sponsor and Facility: surface water withdrawal of up to 0.499 withdrawal, and consumptive water use Fortuna Energy Inc. (Catatonk Creek), mgd. approval (Docket No. 20001203). 12. Project Sponsor and Facility: Town of Spencer, Tioga County, N.Y. Keystone Landfill, Inc., Dunmore Public Hearing—Project Scheduled for Applications for consumptive water use Borough, Lackawanna County, Pa. Enforcement Action of up to 0.250 mgd and surface water Applications for consumptive water use 1. Project Sponsor and Facility: withdrawal of up to 0.250 mgd. Standing Stone Golf Club (Docket No. 2. Project Sponsor and Facility: East of up to 0.100 mgd and groundwater withdrawal of 0.020 mgd from Well 1, 20020612), Oneida Township, Resources, Inc. (Chemung River), Town Huntington County, Pa. of Big Flats, Chemung County, N.Y. 0.010 mgd from Well 2, and 0.020 mgd Applications for consumptive water use from Well 3, and settlement of an Public Hearing—Petition To Reopen of up to 0.250 mgd and surface water outstanding compliance matter. Docket 13. Project Sponsor: United States withdrawal of up to 0.250 mgd. Gypsum Company. Project Facility: 1. Petition of East Hanover Township, 3. Project Sponsor and Facility: Washingtonville Plant (Well W–A8), et al., Dauphin County, Pa., to reopen Fortuna Energy Inc. (Chemung River), Derry Township, Montour County, Pa. Docket No. 20020819, Mountainview Chemung Town, Chemung County, N.Y. Application for groundwater Thoroughbred Racing Association, Inc. Applications for consumptive water use withdrawal of 0.350 mgd. of up to 0.250 mgd and surface water Public Hearing—Request for Hearing on 14. Project Sponsor: Kratzer Run Administrative Appeal withdrawal of up to 0.250 mgd. Development, LLC. Project Facility: 4. Project Sponsor and Facility: East Eagles Ridge Golf Club (formerly 1. Request of East Hanover Township, Resources, Inc. (Seeley Creek), Town of Grandview Golf Course/Susquehanna et al., Dauphin Co., Pa., for hearing on Southport, Chemung County, N.Y. Recreation Corporation), Ferguson administrative appeal of Docket No. Applications for consumptive water use Township, Clearfield County, Pa. 20080305, Mountainview Thoroughbred of up to 0.250 mgd and surface water Applications for consumptive water use Racing Association, Inc. withdrawal of up to 0.250 mgd. of up to 0.099 mgd and surface water 5. Project Sponsor and Facility: East Opportunity To Appear and Comment withdrawal of up to 0.099 mgd. Resources, Inc. (Tioga River; at Tioga 15. Project Sponsor and Facility: Interested parties may appear at the Junction), Lawrence Township, Tioga Commonwealth Environmental above hearing to offer written or oral County, Pa. Applications for Systems, L.P., Foster, Frailey and Reily comments to the Commission on any consumptive water use of up to 0.250 Townships, Schuylkill County, Pa. matter on the hearing agenda, or at the mgd and surface water withdrawal of up Modification of consumptive water use business meeting to offer written or oral to 0.250 mgd. and groundwater approval (Docket No. comments on other matters scheduled 6. Project Sponsor and Facility: East 20070304). for consideration at the business Resources, Inc. (Crooked Creek; near 16. Project Sponsor and Facility: meeting. The chair of the Commission Middlebury Center), Middlebury Lykens Valley Golf Course (formerly reserves the right to limit oral Township, Tioga County, Pa. Harrisburg North Golf Course), Upper statements in the interest of time and to Applications for consumptive water use Paxton Township, Dauphin County, Pa. otherwise control the course of the of up to 0.250 mgd and surface water Applications for consumptive water use hearing and business meeting. Written withdrawal of up to 0.250 mgd. of up to 0.200 mgd and surface water comments may also be mailed to the 7. Project Sponsor and Facility: withdrawal of up to 0.200 mgd. Susquehanna River Basin Commission, Fortuna Energy Inc. (Susquehanna 17. Project Sponsor and Facility: 1721 North Front Street, Harrisburg, River), Sheshequin Township, Bradford Spring Creek Golf Course (Spring Pennsylvania 17102–2391, or submitted County, Pa. Applications for Creek), Derry Township, Dauphin electronically to Richard A. Cairo, consumptive water use of up to 0.250 County, Pa. Applications for General Counsel, e-mail: [email protected] mgd and surface water withdrawal of up consumptive water use of up to 0.081 or Deborah J. Dickey, Secretary to the to 0.250 mgd. mgd and surface water withdrawal of up Commission, e-mail: [email protected]. 8. Project Sponsor and Facility: East to 0.081 mgd. Comments mailed or electronically Resources, Inc. (Tioga River; near 18. Project Sponsor: Pennsy Supply, submitted must be received prior to Mansfield), Richmond Township, Tioga Inc. Project Facility: Hummelstown June 12, 2008 to be considered. County, Pa. Applications for Quarry, South Hanover Township, Authority: Pub. L. 91–575, 84 Stat. 1509 et consumptive water use of up to 0.250 Dauphin County, Pa. Application for seq., 18 CFR parts 806, 807, and 808. mgd and surface water withdrawal of up surface water withdrawal of up to Dated: May 19, 2008. to 0.250 mgd. 29.925 mgd. Thomas W. Beauduy, 9. Project Sponsor and Facility: 19. Project Sponsor: Titanium Hearth Fortuna Energy Inc. (Sugar Creek), West Technologies, Inc. Project Facility: Deputy Director. Burlington Township, Bradford County, TIMET North American Operations, [FR Doc. E8–12057 Filed 5–29–08; 8:45 am] Pa. Applications for consumptive water Caernarvon Township, Berks County, BILLING CODE 7040–01–P use of up to 0.250 mgd and surface Pa. Application for consumptive water water withdrawal of up to 0.250 mgd. use of up to 0.133 mgd, and settlement 10. Project Sponsor and Facility: of an outstanding compliance matter. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Fortuna Energy Inc. (Towanda Creek), 20. Project Sponsor and Facility: Franklin Township, Bradford County, Conestoga Country Club (Well 1), Manor Environmental Impact Statement— Pa. Applications for consumptive water and Lancaster Townships, Lancaster Douglas and Nolichucky Reservoirs use of up to 0.250 mgd and surface County, Pa. Application for Land Management Plan, Tennessee water withdrawal of up to 0.250 mgd. groundwater withdrawal of 0.281 mgd. AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority. 11. Project Sponsor and Facility: 21. Project Sponsor and Facility: Rock ACTION: Notice of Intent. Neptune Industries, Inc. (Lackawanna Springs Generation Facility, Rising Sun, VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:52 May 29, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00129 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM 30MYN1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 105 / Friday, May 30, 2008 / Notices 31181 SUMMARY: The Tennessee Valley management area. TVA presently Recreation, and Shoreline Access. If Authority (TVA) will prepare an manages a total of 3,198 acres of land on there are multiple Action Alternatives, environmental impact statement (EIS) the two reservoirs that are the subject of they would likely differ in the amount addressing the impacts of various this Plan. of land allocated to each of these zones. alternatives for managing project lands The Plan will allocate lands to various Under all alternatives, TVA on Douglas and Nolichucky Reservoirs categories of uses in accordance with anticipates that lands currently in northeastern Tennessee. Public the following goals: (1) Apply a committed to a specific use would be comment is invited concerning both the systematic method of evaluating and allocated to that current use. Under all scope of the EIS and environmental identifying the most suitable uses of Action Alternatives, changes that issues that should be addressed as a part TVA public lands using resource data, support TVA goals and objectives and of this EIS. stakeholder input, suitability and the TVA Land Policy can be considered. DATES: Comments on the scope of the capability analyses, and TVA staff Committed lands include those subject EIS and the environmental issues that input; (2) identify land use zone to existing long-term easements, leases, should be addressed in the EIS should allocations to optimize public benefit licenses, and contracts; lands with be received on or before July 1, 2008. and balance competing demands for the outstanding land rights; and lands that ADDRESSES: Written comments should use of public lands; (3) identify land use are necessary for TVA project be sent to Richard L. Toennisson, zone allocations to support TVA’s broad operations. The committed lands are 26 Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 West regional resource development mission, percent of the public land being Summit Hill Drive WT 11D, Knoxville, which involves the management of TVA planned on Douglas Reservoir and 66 Tennessee 37902. Comments also may reservoir properties to provide multiple percent of the public land being be submitted on the TVA Web site at public benefits including recreation, planned on Nolichucky Reservoir. http://www.tva.com/environment/ conservation, and economic Uncommitted lands on both reservoirs reports/dnlp, by telephone at (866) 601– development; (4) provide a clear process total 889 acres. This EIS will tier from TVA’s 1998 4612, or by fax at (865) 632–3451. by which TVA will respond to requests for use of TVA public land; (5) comply Final EIS, Shoreline Management FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. with federal regulations and executive Initiative: An Assessment of Residential Chris Cooper, Tennessee Valley orders; (6) ensure the protection of Shoreline Development Impacts in the Authority, 3726 East Morris Boulevard, significant resources, including Tennessee Valley. That EIS evaluated Morristown, Tennessee 37813. threatened and endangered species, alternative policies for managing Telephone: (423) 585–2138. E-mail may cultural resources, wetlands, unique residential shoreline development on be sent to Douglas- _ habitats, natural areas, water quality, TVA reservoirs.
Recommended publications
  • For Siltation and Habitat Alteration in the Nolichucky River

    For Siltation and Habitat Alteration in the Nolichucky River

    TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) For Siltation and Habitat Alteration In The Nolichucky River Watershed (HUC 06010108) Cocke, Greene, Hamblen, Hawkins, Jefferson, Unicoi, and Washington, Counties, Tennessee FINAL (Modified) Prepared by: Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Water Pollution Control 6th Floor L & C Tower 401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243-1534 April 18, 2008 Approved by: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV February 26, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 WATERSHED DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROBLEM DEFINITION .................................................................................................... 5 4.0 TARGET IDENTIFICATION ............................................................................................. 33 5.0 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND DEVIATION FROM TARGET ......................... 36 6.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................ 36 6.1 Point Sources ............................................................................................................... 38 6.2 Nonpoint Sources ......................................................................................................... 45 7.0 DEVELOPMENT OF TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS ..............................................
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 27/Friday, February 8, 2002/Notices

    Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 27/Friday, February 8, 2002/Notices

    Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2002 / Notices 6021 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY final EIS. Recirculation of the available on the Internet at: document is not necessary under www.efw.bpa.gov Federal Energy Regulatory Section 1506.3(c) of the Council on EIS No. 020050, DRAFT FINAL EIS, Commission Environmental Quality Regulations. FHW, WY, Wyoming Forest Highway [Docket Nos. EC02–5–000, ER02–211–000, EIS No. 020044, DRAFT 23 Project, Louis Lake Road also and EL02–53–000] SUPPLEMENTS, FRC, WA, Condit known as Forest Development Road Hydroelectric (No. 2342) Project, 300, Improvements from Bruce’s Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Updated Information on Application Parking Lot to Worthen Meadow Corporation, Entergy Nuclear Vermont to Amend the Current License to Road, Funding, NPDES Permits and Yankee, LLC, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Extend the License Term to October 1, COE Section 404 Permit, Shoshone Power Corporation; Notice of Initiation 2006, White Salmon River, Skamania National Forest, Fremont County, WY, of Proceeding and Refund Effective and Klickitat Counties, WA, Comment Wait Period Ends: March 11, 2002, Date Period Ends: March 25, 2002, Contact: Contact: Rick Cushing (303) 716– Nicholas Jayjack (202) 219–2825. This 2138. February 4, 2002. document is available on the Internet Take notice that on February 1, 2002, at: http://www.ferc.gov EIS No. 020051, REVISED DRAFT EIS, the Commission issued an order in the EIS No. 020045, FINAL EIS, FHW, NM, FHW, WA, WA–509 Corridor above-indicated dockets initiating a US 70 Corridor Improvement, Completion/I–5/South Access Road proceeding in Docket No.
  • Nolichucky Reservoir Land Management Plan

    Nolichucky Reservoir Land Management Plan

    Document Type: EIS-Administrative Record Index Field: Final Environmental Document Project Name: Douglas and Nolichucky Tributary Reservoirs Land Management Plan Project Number: 2008-30 DOUGLAS-NOLICHUCKY TRIBUTARY RESERVOIRS LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME III Nolichucky Reservoir PREPARED BY: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY AUGUST 2010 For information, contact: Tennessee Valley Authority Holston-Cherokee-Douglas Watershed Team 3726 E. Morris Boulevard Morristown, Tennessee 37813 Phone: (423) 585-2123 Fax: (423) 585-2151 Page intentionally blank Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... III-1 1.1. Background ............................................................................................................................ III-1 1.2. Purpose .................................................................................................................................. III-2 2.0 PLANNING PROCESS .......................................................................................................... III-5 2.1. Planning Goals ..................................................................................................................... III-11 2.2. Allocation Process ............................................................................................................... III-11 2.3. Committed Land ..................................................................................................................
  • TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN RESERVOIRS in TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN 03468500 DOUGLAS LAKE.--Lat 35O57'40", Long 83O32'20", Sevie

    TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN RESERVOIRS in TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN 03468500 DOUGLAS LAKE.--Lat 35O57'40", Long 83O32'20", Sevie

    358 TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN RESERVOIRS IN TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN 03468500 DOUGLAS LAKE.--Lat 35o57'40", long 83o32'20", Sevier County, Hydrologic Unit 06010107, at Douglas Dam on French Broad River, 6.5 mi north of Sevierville, and at mile 32.3. DRAINAGE AREA, 4,541 mi2. PERIOD OF RECORD, February 1943 to current year. GAGE,water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is sea level. REMARKS.--Reservoir formed by concrete main dam and 10 saddle dams. Spillway equipped with 11 radial gates, each 32 ft high by 40 ft wide and 8 sluice gates 10 ft high by 5.67 ft wide. Closure of dam was made Feb. 19, 1943; water in reservoir first reached minimum pool elevation Feb. 25, 1943. Revised capacity table put into use Jan. 1, 1971. Total capacity at elevation 1,002.00 ft, top of gates, is 743,600 cfs-days, of which 631,200 cfs-days is controlled storage above elevation 940.00 ft, normal minimum pool. Reservoir is used for navigation, flood control, and power. COOPERATION.--Records furnished by Tennessee Valley Authority. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--Maximum contents, 760,000 cfs-days, July 25, 1949, elevation, 1,001.79 ft; minimum after first filling, 1,000 cfs-days, Jan. 16, 1956, elevation, 883.7 ft, estimated. EXTREMES FOR CURRENT YEAR.--Maximum contents, 693,300 cfs-days, Sept. 20, elevation, 999.18 ft; minimum, 112,000 cfs-days, Jan. 23, elevation, 941.25 ft. 03476000 SOUTH HOLSTON LAKE.--Lat 36o31'15", long 82o05'11", Sullivan County, Hydrologic Unit 06010102, 470 ft upstream from South Holston Dam on South Fork Holston River, 7.0 mi southeast of Bristol, Virginia-Tennessee, and at mile 49.8.
  • Part 02 SSAR (Rev. 0)

    Part 02 SSAR (Rev. 0)

    Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report SUBSECTION 2.4.3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 2.4.3 Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) on Streams and Rivers .......... 2.4.3-1 2.4.3.1 Watershed Characteristics ...................................... 2.4.3-1 2.4.3.2 Probable Maximum Precipitation ............................ 2.4.3-1 2.4.3.3 Precipitation Losses ................................................ 2.4.3-3 2.4.3.4 Runoff and Stream Course Models ........................ 2.4.3-3 2.4.3.5 Probable Maximum Flood Flow .............................. 2.4.3-6 2.4.3.6 Water Level Determinations ................................... 2.4.3-7 2.4.3.7 Coincident Wind Wave Activity ............................... 2.4.3-7 2.4.3.8 References ............................................................. 2.4.3-8 2.4.3-i Revision 0 Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report SUBSECTION 2.4.3 LIST OF TABLES Number Title 2.4.3-1 Flood Events Analyzed 2.4.3-2 Sub-Basins, Areas and Rainfall Depth 2.4.3-3 Temporal Rainfall Distribution for the 7980 Sq Mi PMP 2.4.3-ii Revision 0 Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report SUBSECTION 2.4.3 LIST OF FIGURES Number Title 2.4.3-1 Tennessee River System Watershed Sub-Basins 2.4.3-2 Rainfall Time Distribution – Typical Mass Curve 2.4.3-3 PMF Elevation and Discharge Hydrograph at Clinch River Nuclear Site 2.4.3-4 (Sheet 1 of 2) Flood Operational Guide – Norris Dam 2.4.3-4
  • Flood Frequency of Streams in Rural Basins of Tennessee

    Flood Frequency of Streams in Rural Basins of Tennessee

    FLOOD FREQUENCY OF STREAMS IN RURAL BASINS OF TENNESSEE By Jess D. Weaver and Charles R. Gamble U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 92-4165 Prepared in cooperation with the TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Nashville, Tennessee 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 810 Broadway, Suite 500 Federal Center Nashville, Tennessee 37203 Box 25425 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Abstract .......................................................... 1 Introduction ....................................................... 1 Description of the study area ......................................... 1 Data used in the analysis ............................................ 4 Flood-frequency analysis at gaging stations .................................... 4 Regional flood-frequency analysis .......................................... 4 Ordinary least-squares regression analysis ................................. 18 Generalized least-squares regression analysis ................................ 18 Methods of estimating flood frequency ....................................... 20 Gaged sites .................................................... 20 Ungaged sites ................................................... 20 Method A .................................................. 20 Method B
  • Nolichucky River

    Nolichucky River

    DRAFT· wild and scenic river study january 1980 NOLICHUCKY RIVER NORTH CAROliNA/TENNESSEE AS THE NATION'S PRINCIPAL CONSEHVATION AGENCY, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HAS BASIC RESPONSIBILITIES FOR WATER, FISH, WILDLIFE, MINERAL, LAND, PARK AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES. INDIAN P,ND TERRITORIAL AFFAIRS ARE OTHER MAJOR CONCERNS OF AMERICA'S "DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES." THE DEPARTMENT WORKS TO ASSURE THE WISEST CHOICE IN MANAGING ALL OUR RESOURCES SO EACH WIU MAKE ITS FULL CONTRIBUTION TO A BEITER UNITED STATES NOW AND tN THE FUTURE. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary United States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240 APR 16 1SbtJ Honorable Douglas M. Castle Administrator Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 20460 Dear Mr. Castle: In accordance with the prov~s~ons of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (82 Stat. 906) copies of the Department's draft report on the Nolichucky River are enclosed for your review and comment. As provided in Section 4(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, your views on the report will accompany it when transmitted to the President and Congress. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act provides for a review period of up to 90 days for the draft report. In order to expedite the study process, we would appreciate receiving your comments within 45 days of the date of this letter. The National Park Service is providing staff assistance on this proposal and can provide any further information you need to complete your review. Please contact Mr. Robert Eastman of that agency (telephone 202/343-5213) if you have any questions.
  • Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in the United States Part 3-B

    Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in the United States Part 3-B

    Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in the United States Part 3-B. CUMBERLAND AND TENNESSEE RIVER BASINS By PAUL R. SPEER and CHARLES R. GAMBLE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER. 1676 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after page 340. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Pane Abstract_____.__________-__.__-___.__------- _______---_-__-_ 1 Introduction._____________-_-__-________------_-_----_--__---_- 1 Purpose and scope______-___________-___-----__----_-_--------- 1 Acknowledgments. __-______----___-_----_--------_-_-------__- 3 Application of the method_______-__-___-____----__--_--_----_---.-_ 4 Magnitude of flood of selected frequency-_-___-____-----__---__-_ 4 Illustrative problem________-__-__-_- _____________________ 6 Mainstem streams_______________-_-_-_-_--------_---_--___-__- 6 Site flood-frequency curve______________-------__--_-_-_---_-___ 8 Maximum known floods__-___-_--__-______-__-_--------_----_---_-- 8 Miscellaneous flood data______________________________________ 10 Flood-frequency analysis._________________-_--_-_---_--_-_--__--_-- 13 Description of the area_________-__-__-_------------------------ 13 Characteristics of flood runoff._______________--__-_---_--__--___ 15 Method of analysis-_______________-__--_--_--_-_----^---_--------- 16 Flood frequency at a gaging station____________________________ 16 Records used_._________________-_-___--_----___-__-___-.__- 18 Fitting frequency graphs-____-__-_-_-_--_-._--_--------_-__- 19 Regional flood frequency.____________-___-__----__----__-_--_-- 19 Mean annual flood__.______________________________________ 19 Flood equations-________-______--__---_-----_--_-_---- 21 Composite frequency curve.
  • Educational and Promotional Films

    Educational and Promotional Films

    LEAVE BLANK REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY • JOB NO (See Instructions on reverse) iJ I --/Lfl- ~~1'~(p TO: GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DATE RECEIVEO NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE, WASHINGTON, DC 20408 /t-/It; - ff' 1. F ROM (A,~nc)' or ~atabli'hment) NOTIFICATION TO AGENCY Tennessee Valley Authority In accordance with the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 3303a 2. MAJOR SUBDIVISION the disposal request. including amendments. is approved Governmental and Public Affairs except for Items that may be marked "disposition not approved" or "withdrawn" in column 10. If no records 3. MINOR SUBOIVISION are proposed for dlsoosal. the signature of the Archivist is Media Relations not required. 4, NAME OF PERSONWITH WHOM TO CONFER 5, TELEPHONE EXT. ARCHIVIST OF THE UNITED STATES _~C~ C Ronald E. Brewer 615/751-2520 Z ;:;D ~~ 10 6. CERTIFICATE OF AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE I I hereby certify that I am authorized to act for this agency in matters pertaining to the disposal of the agency's records; that the records proposed for disposal in this Request of page(s) are not now needed for the businessof this agency or will not be needed after the retention periods specified; and that written concurrence from the General Accounting Office, if required under the provisions of Title 8 of the GAO Manual for Guidance of Federal Agencies, is attached. A. GAO concurrence: D is attached; or [!] is unnecessary. B. DATE C. SIGNATURE OF AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE D. TITLE Assistant TVA Archivist 9. GRS OR 10. ACTION SUPERSEDED TAKEN ITEM (With Inc/u.ive Datet or RetenHon Period.) JOB (NARSUSE NO.
  • Low Flows and Flow Duration of Tennessee Streams Through 1981

    Low Flows and Flow Duration of Tennessee Streams Through 1981

    --- -_-__ LOW FLOWS AND FLOW DURATION OF TENNESSEE STREAMS THROUGH 1981 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4347 Prepared in cooperation with the TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, DIVISION OF WATER MANAGEMENT Table 2.--LOW-FWW CHARACTERISTICS FOR PARTIAL RECORDSTATIONS AND HISCELLANEOUSSITES--Continued REF STATION STATION N&E DRAINAGE LOCATION l-DAY MEAN ~-DAY MEAN 7-DAY MEAN )-DAY HEAN NO. NO. WW FIDU LoWfIRW WWFWW LOW FLOW ,~~I, lo-YR 10-m 10-m zo-YR REaRHENCE REOJRRENCE RECURRJNCE RECURUNCE (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) TENNGSSEERIVER BASIN--Continued 382 D3565DBO LITTLE CHESTUEE 8.54 LAT 35 25 36, LONG 084 26 46, 2.05 2.07 2.10 1.97 CREEKNEAR HCHINN COUNTY, AT FORD, 1.6 ENCLEUOOD,TN. MILES ABOVE MOUTH, 1.8 NILES EAST NORTHWLSTOF ENCLEWOOD. 383 03565087 CHESTUEECREEK AT 33.5 LAT 35 24 22, WNG 084 29 49, *** *** ** 6 WY 4llNWIR MCNINN COUNTY, AT BRIDGE ON ENGLEUOOD,TN. U.S. WY 411, 1.4 MILES SOUTHJESTOF ENGLEUOOD. 384 03565130 DANCING CREEK NR 2.90 LAT 35 31 09, WNC 084 25 17, 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.04 CHRISTIANSUWC, TN. MONROE COUNTY, 1.8 MILES SOUTHEASTOF CNRISTIANBURG, 50 FT SEWW (DNFLUENCE3F THREE TRIBUTARIES, 60 fT BEWU OUNTY ROAD BRIDGE. 385 035654135 LITTLS CHATATA CREEK 2.04 LAT 35 lo lo. LONG 084 49 30, l c* 0.3 NR CLEVELAND, TN. BRADLEY UJUNTY, AT BLYTHE FERRY ROAD. 2.8 MILES NORTHEASTdF CLEVELAND. 306 03565410 CNATATA CREEK NEAR 24.3 LAT 35 13 11, LONG 084 45 56, ** *** 3.1 TASSO, TN.
  • Investigating Instabilities with HEC-RAS Unsteady Flow Modeling for Regulated Rivers at Low Flow Stages

    Investigating Instabilities with HEC-RAS Unsteady Flow Modeling for Regulated Rivers at Low Flow Stages

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2014 Investigating Instabilities with HEC-RAS Unsteady Flow Modeling for Regulated Rivers at Low Flow Stages Jennifer Kay Sharkey University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Hydraulic Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Sharkey, Jennifer Kay, "Investigating Instabilities with HEC-RAS Unsteady Flow Modeling for Regulated Rivers at Low Flow Stages. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2014. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3183 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Jennifer Kay Sharkey entitled "Investigating Instabilities with HEC-RAS Unsteady Flow Modeling for Regulated Rivers at Low Flow Stages." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Environmental Engineering. John S. Schwartz, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Jon M. Hathaway, Thanos N. Papanicolaou Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Investigating Instabilities with HEC-RAS Unsteady Flow Modeling for Regulated Rivers at Low Flow Stages A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jennifer Kay Sharkey December 2014 Copyright © 2014 by Jennifer Sharkey.
  • TDEC Comments on Nolichucky Dam Gate Replacement

    TDEC Comments on Nolichucky Dam Gate Replacement

    August 2, 2018 Via Electronic Mail to [email protected] Attn: W. Douglas White, NEPA Specialist Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive, WT 11D Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 Dear Mr. White: The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Nolichucky Dam Gate Replacement Project, located at Nolichucky River Mile 46, just east of Highway 107/70 (Asheville Hwy) and about 7.5 miles south of Greeneville, in Greene County, Tennessee. Nolichucky Reservoir, also known as Davy Crockett Lake, extends about 6 miles upstream from the dam. The Nolichucky Dam is a decommissioned hydroelectric facility with no active means of controlling the reservoir’s water level and is owned and maintained by TVA.1 In addition to replacing the dam gate, TVA is evaluating options to manage sediment that has accumulated upstream of the dam, to support replacement of the gate. TVA’s preferred alternative is Alternative B2, Replace the Existing Gate and No Dredging in the Nolichucky Reservoir. Actions considered in detail within the Draft EA include: • Alternative A – No Action Alternative. Under this alternative, TVA would not replace the Nolichucky Dam gate. Consequently, TVA would not be able to temporarily remove water from the downstream face of the dam to allow inspection of the spillway. This alternative would not satisfy the project purpose and need and, therefore, is not considered viable or reasonable. 1 The dam was originally constructed in 1913 as a hydropower facility by the Tennessee Eastern Electric Company to provide power to the surrounding areas.