DOCSLIB.ORG

Magnitude and Frequency of Floods for Rural, Unregulated Streams of Tennessee by L-Moments Method Hongxiang Yan University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Magnitude and Frequency of Floods for Rural, Unregulated Streams of Tennessee by L-Moments Method Hongxiang Yan University of Arkansas, Fayetteville University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 8-2012 Magnitude and Frequency of Floods for Rural, Unregulated Streams of Tennessee by L-Moments Method Hongxiang Yan University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Hydraulic Engineering Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Yan, Hongxiang, "Magnitude and Frequency of Floods for Rural, Unregulated Streams of Tennessee by L-Moments Method" (2012). Theses and Dissertations. 451. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/451 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. MAGNITUDE AND FREQUENCY OF FLOODS FOR RURAL, UNREGULATED STREAMS OF TENNESSEE BY L-MOMENTS METHOD MAGNITUDE AND FREQUENCY OF FLOODS FOR RURAL, UNREGULATED STREAMS OF TENNESSEE BY L-MOMENTS METHOD A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering By Hongxiang Yan North China Electric Power University Bachelor of Engineering in Hydraulics and Hydropower, 2010 August 2012 University of Arkansas ABSTRACT This study presents a regional frequency analysis of Tennessee using the well-known Bulletin-17B method standardly used in the United States and the relatively new and developing L-Moments methods. Flood frequency characteristics were defined for 416 gaging stations located primarily in rural and lightly developed areas of Tennessee. All the gaging stations have 10 or more years of record through 2006. Using the L-Moments method, the generalized extreme value distribution was identified as the most robust distribution for each of four hydrologic areas. Multiple regression equations were also calculated for estimating the flood frequency of ungaged, unregulated, rural streams in each of the four hydrologic areas of Tennessee. Regression equations were computed using the ordinary least squares regression procedure. The standard error of prediction for the regression equations were calculated and used to compare the Bulletin 17B and L-Moments methods. This is the first study to indicate that the L-Moments method is, on average, the better of the two methods tested for predicting flood frequency for unregulated streams and rivers in Tennessee. This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. Thesis Director: _______________________________________ Dr. Findlay G. Edwards Thesis Committee: _______________________________________ Dr. Brian E. Haggard _______________________________________ Dr. Manuel D. Rossetti THESIS DUPLICATION RELEASE I hereby authorize the University of Arkansas Libraries to duplicate this thesis when needed for research and/or scholarship. Agreed __________________________________________ Hongxiang Yan Refused __________________________________________ Hongxiang Yan ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First I want to thank my advisor, Dr. Findlay Edwards, who tutored me to this topic. Without his kind guidance and valuable suggestions, I could not have finished this study. Also special thanks to Dr. Brian Haggard and Dr. Manuel Rossetti; thanks so much for being on my committee. Thanks to Dr. Yang Peng in China, without her patient teaching and helping, I cannot have a chance to study in America. Second I want to thank all my friends in America: Cheng Li, Drew Cunningham, Fan Wang, Jeff Rudolph, Jin Zhang, Lei Huang, Robert Rembert, Jiao Wang, Xin Xiao, Yaohua Cheng, YoYo, and Yiwei Qian. Thank you so much for being my friends and helping me to get through the difficult parts. Third I want to thank the Hunter Family: Joey, Tammy, and Lydia. Thanks so much for picking me as your student in the Friendship Family Program. I feel so lucky that I could be one of your family in America. Finally, I want to thank my family in China: my parents, my big brother and my sister in law. You guys always encourage me when I feel down; thank God that we are a family in this life. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 Statement of Problem ...................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of Study ............................................................................................................. 4 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................... 5 Overview ......................................................................................................................... 5 Previous Studies in Tennessee ........................................................................................ 5 Flood Frequency Studies in Other States ...................................................................... 10 L-Moments Method ...................................................................................................... 11 Need for This Study ...................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 3 METHODS.............................................................................................. 16 Overview ....................................................................................................................... 16 Description of the Study Area ....................................................................................... 17 Annual Peak Flow Data ................................................................................................ 20 Physical Basin Characteristics ...................................................................................... 23 Data Sources ................................................................................................................. 25 Watershed Modeling System (WMS) ........................................................................... 26 Bulletin 17B Method..................................................................................................... 26 Screening the Data ........................................................................................................ 28 Identification of Homogeneous Areas .......................................................................... 29 Choice of a Frequency Distribution .............................................................................. 33 FORTRAN Program for L-Moments............................................................................ 34 Regression Analysis for Annual Peak Flow ................................................................. 37 Regression Model Adequacy Checking ........................................................................ 38 CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ............................................................. 42 Overview ....................................................................................................................... 42 Basin Characteristics ..................................................................................................... 42 L-Moments .................................................................................................................... 43 Data Screening .............................................................................................................. 43 Formation of Homogeneous Areas ............................................................................... 47 Choice of Frequency Distribution for the Four Hydrologic Areas ............................... 54 Choice of Frequency Distribution for the Five Hydrologic Sets .................................. 56 Bulletin-17B Method .................................................................................................... 58 Regression Analysis ...................................................................................................... 59 Comparison of Methods ................................................................................................ 63 Computation Examples ................................................................................................. 66 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................... 68 FURTHER RESEARCH .................................................................................................. 70 REFERENCE .................................................................................................................... 72 APPENDIX CONTENT ................................................................................................... 78 APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF SIX PREVIOUS STUDIES IN TENNESSEE ............ 79 APPENDIX B: THE SELECTED BASIN CHARACTERISTICS AND FLOOD-FREQUENCY ESTIMATES..................................................................................................................... 91 APPENDIX C: THE C++ CODE FOR L-MOMENT RATIO CALCULATION ......... 175 APPENDIX D: THE C++ CODE FOR DISCORDANCE CALCULATION ............... 177 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1. Problems in practice by using flood frequency analysis (Wang, 1999) ............ 3 Table 1.2. The 3rd generation flood control standard of world dam (Berga, 1992) ............ 3 Table 3.1. Summary of the distribution of data and average length of record ................. 22 Table 3.2. Eight basin characteristics used
Load more

Recommended publications
  • For Siltation and Habitat Alteration in the Nolichucky River
    TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) For Siltation and Habitat Alteration In The Nolichucky River Watershed (HUC 06010108) Cocke, Greene, Hamblen, Hawkins, Jefferson, Unicoi, and Washington, Counties, Tennessee FINAL (Modified) Prepared by: Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Water Pollution Control 6th Floor L & C Tower 401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243-1534 April 18, 2008 Approved by: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV February 26, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 WATERSHED DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROBLEM DEFINITION .................................................................................................... 5 4.0 TARGET IDENTIFICATION ............................................................................................. 33 5.0 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND DEVIATION FROM TARGET ......................... 36 6.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................ 36 6.1 Point Sources ............................................................................................................... 38 6.2 Nonpoint Sources ......................................................................................................... 45 7.0 DEVELOPMENT OF TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 27/Friday, February 8, 2002/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2002 / Notices 6021 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY final EIS. Recirculation of the available on the Internet at: document is not necessary under www.efw.bpa.gov Federal Energy Regulatory Section 1506.3(c) of the Council on EIS No. 020050, DRAFT FINAL EIS, Commission Environmental Quality Regulations. FHW, WY, Wyoming Forest Highway [Docket Nos. EC02–5–000, ER02–211–000, EIS No. 020044, DRAFT 23 Project, Louis Lake Road also and EL02–53–000] SUPPLEMENTS, FRC, WA, Condit known as Forest Development Road Hydroelectric (No. 2342) Project, 300, Improvements from Bruce’s Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Updated Information on Application Parking Lot to Worthen Meadow Corporation, Entergy Nuclear Vermont to Amend the Current License to Road, Funding, NPDES Permits and Yankee, LLC, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Extend the License Term to October 1, COE Section 404 Permit, Shoshone Power Corporation; Notice of Initiation 2006, White Salmon River, Skamania National Forest, Fremont County, WY, of Proceeding and Refund Effective and Klickitat Counties, WA, Comment Wait Period Ends: March 11, 2002, Date Period Ends: March 25, 2002, Contact: Contact: Rick Cushing (303) 716– Nicholas Jayjack (202) 219–2825. This 2138. February 4, 2002. document is available on the Internet Take notice that on February 1, 2002, at: http://www.ferc.gov EIS No. 020051, REVISED DRAFT EIS, the Commission issued an order in the EIS No. 020045, FINAL EIS, FHW, NM, FHW, WA, WA–509 Corridor above-indicated dockets initiating a US 70 Corridor Improvement, Completion/I–5/South Access Road proceeding in Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Nolichucky Reservoir Land Management Plan
    Document Type: EIS-Administrative Record Index Field: Final Environmental Document Project Name: Douglas and Nolichucky Tributary Reservoirs Land Management Plan Project Number: 2008-30 DOUGLAS-NOLICHUCKY TRIBUTARY RESERVOIRS LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME III Nolichucky Reservoir PREPARED BY: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY AUGUST 2010 For information, contact: Tennessee Valley Authority Holston-Cherokee-Douglas Watershed Team 3726 E. Morris Boulevard Morristown, Tennessee 37813 Phone: (423) 585-2123 Fax: (423) 585-2151 Page intentionally blank Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... III-1 1.1. Background ............................................................................................................................ III-1 1.2. Purpose .................................................................................................................................. III-2 2.0 PLANNING PROCESS .......................................................................................................... III-5 2.1. Planning Goals ..................................................................................................................... III-11 2.2. Allocation Process ............................................................................................................... III-11 2.3. Committed Land ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN RESERVOIRS in TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN 03468500 DOUGLAS LAKE.--Lat 35O57'40", Long 83O32'20", Sevie
    358 TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN RESERVOIRS IN TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN 03468500 DOUGLAS LAKE.--Lat 35o57'40", long 83o32'20", Sevier County, Hydrologic Unit 06010107, at Douglas Dam on French Broad River, 6.5 mi north of Sevierville, and at mile 32.3. DRAINAGE AREA, 4,541 mi2. PERIOD OF RECORD, February 1943 to current year. GAGE,water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is sea level. REMARKS.--Reservoir formed by concrete main dam and 10 saddle dams. Spillway equipped with 11 radial gates, each 32 ft high by 40 ft wide and 8 sluice gates 10 ft high by 5.67 ft wide. Closure of dam was made Feb. 19, 1943; water in reservoir first reached minimum pool elevation Feb. 25, 1943. Revised capacity table put into use Jan. 1, 1971. Total capacity at elevation 1,002.00 ft, top of gates, is 743,600 cfs-days, of which 631,200 cfs-days is controlled storage above elevation 940.00 ft, normal minimum pool. Reservoir is used for navigation, flood control, and power. COOPERATION.--Records furnished by Tennessee Valley Authority. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--Maximum contents, 760,000 cfs-days, July 25, 1949, elevation, 1,001.79 ft; minimum after first filling, 1,000 cfs-days, Jan. 16, 1956, elevation, 883.7 ft, estimated. EXTREMES FOR CURRENT YEAR.--Maximum contents, 693,300 cfs-days, Sept. 20, elevation, 999.18 ft; minimum, 112,000 cfs-days, Jan. 23, elevation, 941.25 ft. 03476000 SOUTH HOLSTON LAKE.--Lat 36o31'15", long 82o05'11", Sullivan County, Hydrologic Unit 06010102, 470 ft upstream from South Holston Dam on South Fork Holston River, 7.0 mi southeast of Bristol, Virginia-Tennessee, and at mile 49.8.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 02 SSAR (Rev. 0)
    Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report SUBSECTION 2.4.3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 2.4.3 Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) on Streams and Rivers .......... 2.4.3-1 2.4.3.1 Watershed Characteristics ...................................... 2.4.3-1 2.4.3.2 Probable Maximum Precipitation ............................ 2.4.3-1 2.4.3.3 Precipitation Losses ................................................ 2.4.3-3 2.4.3.4 Runoff and Stream Course Models ........................ 2.4.3-3 2.4.3.5 Probable Maximum Flood Flow .............................. 2.4.3-6 2.4.3.6 Water Level Determinations ................................... 2.4.3-7 2.4.3.7 Coincident Wind Wave Activity ............................... 2.4.3-7 2.4.3.8 References ............................................................. 2.4.3-8 2.4.3-i Revision 0 Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report SUBSECTION 2.4.3 LIST OF TABLES Number Title 2.4.3-1 Flood Events Analyzed 2.4.3-2 Sub-Basins, Areas and Rainfall Depth 2.4.3-3 Temporal Rainfall Distribution for the 7980 Sq Mi PMP 2.4.3-ii Revision 0 Clinch River Nuclear Site Early Site Permit Application Part 2, Site Safety Analysis Report SUBSECTION 2.4.3 LIST OF FIGURES Number Title 2.4.3-1 Tennessee River System Watershed Sub-Basins 2.4.3-2 Rainfall Time Distribution – Typical Mass Curve 2.4.3-3 PMF Elevation and Discharge Hydrograph at Clinch River Nuclear Site 2.4.3-4 (Sheet 1 of 2) Flood Operational Guide – Norris Dam 2.4.3-4
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Frequency of Streams in Rural Basins of Tennessee
    FLOOD FREQUENCY OF STREAMS IN RURAL BASINS OF TENNESSEE By Jess D. Weaver and Charles R. Gamble U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 92-4165 Prepared in cooperation with the TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Nashville, Tennessee 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 810 Broadway, Suite 500 Federal Center Nashville, Tennessee 37203 Box 25425 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Abstract .......................................................... 1 Introduction ....................................................... 1 Description of the study area ......................................... 1 Data used in the analysis ............................................ 4 Flood-frequency analysis at gaging stations .................................... 4 Regional flood-frequency analysis .......................................... 4 Ordinary least-squares regression analysis ................................. 18 Generalized least-squares regression analysis ................................ 18 Methods of estimating flood frequency ....................................... 20 Gaged sites .................................................... 20 Ungaged sites ................................................... 20 Method A .................................................. 20 Method B
    [Show full text]
  • Nolichucky River
    DRAFT· wild and scenic river study january 1980 NOLICHUCKY RIVER NORTH CAROliNA/TENNESSEE AS THE NATION'S PRINCIPAL CONSEHVATION AGENCY, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HAS BASIC RESPONSIBILITIES FOR WATER, FISH, WILDLIFE, MINERAL, LAND, PARK AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES. INDIAN P,ND TERRITORIAL AFFAIRS ARE OTHER MAJOR CONCERNS OF AMERICA'S "DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES." THE DEPARTMENT WORKS TO ASSURE THE WISEST CHOICE IN MANAGING ALL OUR RESOURCES SO EACH WIU MAKE ITS FULL CONTRIBUTION TO A BEITER UNITED STATES NOW AND tN THE FUTURE. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary United States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240 APR 16 1SbtJ Honorable Douglas M. Castle Administrator Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 20460 Dear Mr. Castle: In accordance with the prov~s~ons of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (82 Stat. 906) copies of the Department's draft report on the Nolichucky River are enclosed for your review and comment. As provided in Section 4(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, your views on the report will accompany it when transmitted to the President and Congress. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act provides for a review period of up to 90 days for the draft report. In order to expedite the study process, we would appreciate receiving your comments within 45 days of the date of this letter. The National Park Service is providing staff assistance on this proposal and can provide any further information you need to complete your review. Please contact Mr. Robert Eastman of that agency (telephone 202/343-5213) if you have any questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in the United States Part 3-B
    Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in the United States Part 3-B. CUMBERLAND AND TENNESSEE RIVER BASINS By PAUL R. SPEER and CHARLES R. GAMBLE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER. 1676 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after page 340. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Pane Abstract_____.__________-__.__-___.__------- _______---_-__-_ 1 Introduction._____________-_-__-________------_-_----_--__---_- 1 Purpose and scope______-___________-___-----__----_-_--------- 1 Acknowledgments. __-______----___-_----_--------_-_-------__- 3 Application of the method_______-__-___-____----__--_--_----_---.-_ 4 Magnitude of flood of selected frequency-_-___-____-----__---__-_ 4 Illustrative problem________-__-__-_- _____________________ 6 Mainstem streams_______________-_-_-_-_--------_---_--___-__- 6 Site flood-frequency curve______________-------__--_-_-_---_-___ 8 Maximum known floods__-___-_--__-______-__-_--------_----_---_-- 8 Miscellaneous flood data______________________________________ 10 Flood-frequency analysis._________________-_--_-_---_--_-_--__--_-- 13 Description of the area_________-__-__-_------------------------ 13 Characteristics of flood runoff._______________--__-_---_--__--___ 15 Method of analysis-_______________-__--_--_--_-_----^---_--------- 16 Flood frequency at a gaging station____________________________ 16 Records used_._________________-_-___--_----___-__-___-.__- 18 Fitting frequency graphs-____-__-_-_-_--_-._--_--------_-__- 19 Regional flood frequency.____________-___-__----__----__-_--_-- 19 Mean annual flood__.______________________________________ 19 Flood equations-________-______--__---_-----_--_-_---- 21 Composite frequency curve.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational and Promotional Films
    LEAVE BLANK REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY • JOB NO (See Instructions on reverse) iJ I --/Lfl- ~~1'~(p TO: GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DATE RECEIVEO NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE, WASHINGTON, DC 20408 /t-/It; - ff' 1. F ROM (A,~nc)' or ~atabli'hment) NOTIFICATION TO AGENCY Tennessee Valley Authority In accordance with the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 3303a 2. MAJOR SUBDIVISION the disposal request. including amendments. is approved Governmental and Public Affairs except for Items that may be marked "disposition not approved" or "withdrawn" in column 10. If no records 3. MINOR SUBOIVISION are proposed for dlsoosal. the signature of the Archivist is Media Relations not required. 4, NAME OF PERSONWITH WHOM TO CONFER 5, TELEPHONE EXT. ARCHIVIST OF THE UNITED STATES _~C~ C Ronald E. Brewer 615/751-2520 Z ;:;D ~~ 10 6. CERTIFICATE OF AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE I I hereby certify that I am authorized to act for this agency in matters pertaining to the disposal of the agency's records; that the records proposed for disposal in this Request of page(s) are not now needed for the businessof this agency or will not be needed after the retention periods specified; and that written concurrence from the General Accounting Office, if required under the provisions of Title 8 of the GAO Manual for Guidance of Federal Agencies, is attached. A. GAO concurrence: D is attached; or [!] is unnecessary. B. DATE C. SIGNATURE OF AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE D. TITLE Assistant TVA Archivist 9. GRS OR 10. ACTION SUPERSEDED TAKEN ITEM (With Inc/u.ive Datet or RetenHon Period.) JOB (NARSUSE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Flows and Flow Duration of Tennessee Streams Through 1981
    --- -_-__ LOW FLOWS AND FLOW DURATION OF TENNESSEE STREAMS THROUGH 1981 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4347 Prepared in cooperation with the TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, DIVISION OF WATER MANAGEMENT Table 2.--LOW-FWW CHARACTERISTICS FOR PARTIAL RECORDSTATIONS AND HISCELLANEOUSSITES--Continued REF STATION STATION N&E DRAINAGE LOCATION l-DAY MEAN ~-DAY MEAN 7-DAY MEAN )-DAY HEAN NO. NO. WW FIDU LoWfIRW WWFWW LOW FLOW ,~~I, lo-YR 10-m 10-m zo-YR REaRHENCE REOJRRENCE RECURRJNCE RECURUNCE (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) TENNGSSEERIVER BASIN--Continued 382 D3565DBO LITTLE CHESTUEE 8.54 LAT 35 25 36, LONG 084 26 46, 2.05 2.07 2.10 1.97 CREEKNEAR HCHINN COUNTY, AT FORD, 1.6 ENCLEUOOD,TN. MILES ABOVE MOUTH, 1.8 NILES EAST NORTHWLSTOF ENCLEWOOD. 383 03565087 CHESTUEECREEK AT 33.5 LAT 35 24 22, WNG 084 29 49, *** *** ** 6 WY 4llNWIR MCNINN COUNTY, AT BRIDGE ON ENGLEUOOD,TN. U.S. WY 411, 1.4 MILES SOUTHJESTOF ENGLEUOOD. 384 03565130 DANCING CREEK NR 2.90 LAT 35 31 09, WNC 084 25 17, 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.04 CHRISTIANSUWC, TN. MONROE COUNTY, 1.8 MILES SOUTHEASTOF CNRISTIANBURG, 50 FT SEWW (DNFLUENCE3F THREE TRIBUTARIES, 60 fT BEWU OUNTY ROAD BRIDGE. 385 035654135 LITTLS CHATATA CREEK 2.04 LAT 35 lo lo. LONG 084 49 30, l c* 0.3 NR CLEVELAND, TN. BRADLEY UJUNTY, AT BLYTHE FERRY ROAD. 2.8 MILES NORTHEASTdF CLEVELAND. 306 03565410 CNATATA CREEK NEAR 24.3 LAT 35 13 11, LONG 084 45 56, ** *** 3.1 TASSO, TN.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Instabilities with HEC-RAS Unsteady Flow Modeling for Regulated Rivers at Low Flow Stages
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2014 Investigating Instabilities with HEC-RAS Unsteady Flow Modeling for Regulated Rivers at Low Flow Stages Jennifer Kay Sharkey University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Hydraulic Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Sharkey, Jennifer Kay, "Investigating Instabilities with HEC-RAS Unsteady Flow Modeling for Regulated Rivers at Low Flow Stages. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2014. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3183 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Jennifer Kay Sharkey entitled "Investigating Instabilities with HEC-RAS Unsteady Flow Modeling for Regulated Rivers at Low Flow Stages." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Environmental Engineering. John S. Schwartz, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Jon M. Hathaway, Thanos N. Papanicolaou Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Investigating Instabilities with HEC-RAS Unsteady Flow Modeling for Regulated Rivers at Low Flow Stages A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jennifer Kay Sharkey December 2014 Copyright © 2014 by Jennifer Sharkey.
    [Show full text]
  • TDEC Comments on Nolichucky Dam Gate Replacement
    August 2, 2018 Via Electronic Mail to [email protected] Attn: W. Douglas White, NEPA Specialist Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive, WT 11D Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 Dear Mr. White: The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Nolichucky Dam Gate Replacement Project, located at Nolichucky River Mile 46, just east of Highway 107/70 (Asheville Hwy) and about 7.5 miles south of Greeneville, in Greene County, Tennessee. Nolichucky Reservoir, also known as Davy Crockett Lake, extends about 6 miles upstream from the dam. The Nolichucky Dam is a decommissioned hydroelectric facility with no active means of controlling the reservoir’s water level and is owned and maintained by TVA.1 In addition to replacing the dam gate, TVA is evaluating options to manage sediment that has accumulated upstream of the dam, to support replacement of the gate. TVA’s preferred alternative is Alternative B2, Replace the Existing Gate and No Dredging in the Nolichucky Reservoir. Actions considered in detail within the Draft EA include: • Alternative A – No Action Alternative. Under this alternative, TVA would not replace the Nolichucky Dam gate. Consequently, TVA would not be able to temporarily remove water from the downstream face of the dam to allow inspection of the spillway. This alternative would not satisfy the project purpose and need and, therefore, is not considered viable or reasonable. 1 The dam was originally constructed in 1913 as a hydropower facility by the Tennessee Eastern Electric Company to provide power to the surrounding areas.
    [Show full text]