DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 169/Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 169/Wednesday, August 31, 2016 59846 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2016 / Rules and Regulations annual fee, and each person excepted II. Background impoundments, interbasin transfers and from paying an annual fee under Section 26a of the TVA Act requires certain water intakes. TVA will § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B), will be provided a that TVA’s approval be obtained prior to continue to require approval of these unique account number that will allow the construction, operation, or and other obstructions not set forth in that person to access the registry data maintenance of any dam, appurtenant Section III of this Interpretive Rule, for the selected area codes at any time works, or other obstruction affecting when located across, along, or in an for the twelve month period beginning navigation, flood control, or public upstream tributary reach. on the first day of the month in which lands or reservations across, along, or in The Tennessee River has a 41,000- the person paid the fee (‘‘the annual the Tennessee River or any of its square-mile drainage basin. Thousands period’’). To obtain access to additional tributaries. 16 U.S.C. 831y–1 (2012). of miles of upstream tributary reaches area codes of data during the first six TVA’s rules governing such approval ultimately flow into the Tennessee months of the annual period, each are codified at 18 CFR part 1304. The River, making it impractical to identify person required to pay the fee under rules include a permitting process each upstream tributary reach in this paragraph (c) must first pay $61 for each whereby applicants may request from rule. For the purpose of this rule, additional area code of data not initially TVA a permit for various structures upstream tributary reaches do not selected. To obtain access to additional such as boat docks, piers, shoreline include the following: area codes of data during the second six stabilization projects, dams, and (1) The Tennessee River; months of the annual period, each bridges, all of which qualify as (2) TVA reservoirs, (TVA reservoirs person required to pay the fee under ‘‘obstructions’’ under TVA’s regulations. are listed in Table 1); paragraph (c) must first pay $30 for each An obstruction is generally any man- (3) stream reaches within a TVA additional area code of data not initially made physical condition that during its reservoir, the 500-year floodplain of the selected. The payment of the additional continuance after completion Tennessee River, or both; fee will permit the person to access the impounds, checks, hinders, restricts, (4) stream reaches downstream of a additional area codes of data for the retards, diverts, or otherwise interferes TVA dam (these reaches are listed in remainder of the annual period. with the movement of water or of Table 2); and * * * * * objects on or in the water. Over the (5) stream reaches where TVA owns By direction of the Commission. years, TVA has found that certain property (whether fee-owned property or other property right, such as a right Donald S. Clark, obstructions because of their location, to flood) in or adjacent to the reach Secretary. the nature of their construction, or both have not discernibly interfered with the (including property adjacent to a TVA [FR Doc. 2016–20817 Filed 8–30–16; 8:45 am] operation or management of the TVA reservoir or downstream of a TVA dam). BILLING CODE 6750–01–P reservoir system. In particular, this has TVA will continue to review the occurred at locations across, along, or in proposed construction of obstructions certain tributary reaches that are located across, along, or in the above- upstream of the control or influence of listed five categories of reservoirs and TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY TVA’s reservoir system operations. For reaches. These reservoirs and stream 18 CFR Part 1304 the purpose of this rule, these are called reaches are controlled or influenced by upstream tributary reaches. At these the operation of TVA’s reservoir system. When Obstructions on Certain locations, certain obstructions have an As discussed in more detail below, Tributaries of the Tennessee River Do indiscernible impact on water surface individual members of the public are Not Require a Section 26a Permit from elevations in the reservoir system or the encouraged to contact a TVA the Tennessee Valley Authority flow or volume of water entering the representative for help in determining reservoir system and thereby do not whether their location is across, along, AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority. materially interfere with TVA’s flood or in a reservoir or stream reach in the ACTION: Interpretive Rule. control or navigation responsibilities. above-listed five categories or across, Furthermore, at these locations, TVA along, or in an upstream tributary reach. SUMMARY: The Tennessee Valley does not typically own property and III. Scope of Interpretive Rule Authority (TVA) is issuing guidance therefore construction does not affect or stating that certain structures, while interfere with the management of TVA’s TVA hereby clarifies that, going obstructions across, along, or in certain property. These obstructions include, forward, the construction of the tributaries of the Tennessee River, do but are not limited to, stream bank following obstructions across, along, or not need a Section 26a permit from stabilization, bridges and culverts, in an upstream tributary reach of the TVA, because they have an stream crossings, fences, launching Tennessee River, does not require a indiscernible effect on navigation, flood ramps, boat docks, piers, and certain Section 26a permit from TVA: control or public lands or reservations. fills and intakes. For these reasons, TVA (a) Stream bank, bed, or channel stabilization structures—Natural or DATES: Effective August 31, 2016. has determined that certain obstructions do not require approval pursuant to man-made obstructions to stabilize and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Section 26a of the TVA Act when protect banks, beds, or channels of Rebecca C. Tolene, Vice President, located across, along, or in an upstream streams or excavated channels (e.g., Natural Resources, Tennessee Valley tributary reach of the Tennessee River. vegetation, riprap, gabions, fiber rolls, Authority, Knoxville, Tennessee (865– Conversely, based on years of stacked rock, retaining walls, etc.); 632–4433). permitting experience, TVA has found (b) Stream restoration, enhancement, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: that other obstructions across, along, or relocation, or treatment structures— in upstream tributary reaches do Natural or man-made obstructions for I. Legal Authority potentially interfere with the relocating a stream or for restoring or This interpretive rule is promulgated management of TVA’s reservoir system. improving the stream’s function (e.g., under the authority of the TVA Act, as These include, but are not limited to, weirs or sills, boulders, wing deflectors, amended, 16 U.S.C. 831–831ee. structures such as dams, log, brush, rock, trees, fill, etc.); VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:15 Aug 30, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM 31AUR1 ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 59847 (c) Bridges and culverts including Members of the public are responsible Property right—Any legal right acquired or riprap or other stabilization necessary for knowing whether their proposed reserved by TVA that concerns property, for their construction; construction project is located across, such as a right to flood private property. (d) Stream crossings—A stabilized along, or in an upstream tributary reach Reach—A segment of stream between two area or a structure (culvert, bridge, or or on TVA property. If your proposed locations. Tennessee River—The river reach from its fill) constructed across a stream to obstruction is located on TVA property, mouth at the Ohio River to its beginning provide a travel-way for people, in addition to a Section 26a permit for at mile 652, at the confluence of the livestock, equipment, or vehicles, the obstruction, approval from TVA to Holston and French Broad Rivers. including riprap or other stabilization use the property may be required. TVA Tributary—Any watercourse the contents of necessary for their construction; encourages members of the public to which, if not obstructed, diverted or (e) Fences, playgrounds, picnic tables, seek TVA’s help in identifying whether consumed, will ultimately flow into the benches, grills, and other recreational a Section 26a permit or TVA approval Tennessee River. structures; to use its property is necessary. For TVA reservoir—The impoundment created (f) Launching ramps and marine more information or assistance in by a TVA dam constructed across the railways; determining whether your project Tennessee River or one of its tributaries (g) Buoys; requires a Section 26a permit, contact (including all streams reaches impounded (h) Docks, piers, and other water-use TVA at 1–800–882–5263 or visit TVA’s by the dam). One dam may impound reaches of more than one stream. The facilities; Web site at tva.com. impounded stream reaches together form (i) Decks, gazebos, patios, and other Except as it applies to TVA’s regulations implementing Section 26a, the body of water (i.e., the reservoir) open structures; created by the construction of the dam. For (j) Enclosed land-based structures; this interpretive rule is not a substitute example, the construction of Douglas Dam (k) Water intakes with a combined for the requirements of any federal, impounded a portion of the French Broad peak withdrawal of less than 50,000 state, or local statute, regulation, River as well as many other stream reaches, gallons per day (0.08 cubic feet per ordinance, or code, including, but not including, but not limited to, portions of second) and having a pipe diameter less limited to, applicable building codes, Pigeon River, Nolichucky River, Flat Creek, than 6 inches; now in effect or hereafter enacted.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stream-Temperature Characteristics in Georgia
    STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA By T.R. Dyar and S.J. Alhadeff ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 Prepared in cooperation with GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Atlanta, Georgia 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130 Denver Federal Center Peachtree Business Center Box 25286 Atlanta, GA 30360-2824 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 2 Previous investigations. 2 Station-identification system . 3 Stream-temperature data . 3 Long-term stream-temperature characteristics. 6 Natural stream-temperature characteristics . 7 Regression analysis . 7 Harmonic mean coefficient . 7 Amplitude coefficient. 10 Phase coefficient . 13 Statewide harmonic equation . 13 Examples of estimating natural stream-temperature characteristics . 15 Panther Creek . 15 West Armuchee Creek . 15 Alcovy River . 18 Altamaha River . 18 Summary of stream-temperature characteristics by river basin . 19 Savannah River basin . 19 Ogeechee River basin. 25 Altamaha River basin. 25 Satilla-St Marys River basins. 26 Suwannee-Ochlockonee River basins . 27 Chattahoochee River basin. 27 Flint River basin. 28 Coosa River basin. 29 Tennessee River basin . 31 Selected references. 31 Tabular data . 33 Graphs showing harmonic stream-temperature curves of observed data and statewide harmonic equation for selected stations, figures 14-211 . 51 iii ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing locations of 198 periodic and 22 daily stream-temperature stations, major river basins, and physiographic provinces in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • For Siltation and Habitat Alteration in the Nolichucky River
    TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) For Siltation and Habitat Alteration In The Nolichucky River Watershed (HUC 06010108) Cocke, Greene, Hamblen, Hawkins, Jefferson, Unicoi, and Washington, Counties, Tennessee FINAL (Modified) Prepared by: Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Water Pollution Control 6th Floor L & C Tower 401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243-1534 April 18, 2008 Approved by: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV February 26, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 WATERSHED DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROBLEM DEFINITION .................................................................................................... 5 4.0 TARGET IDENTIFICATION ............................................................................................. 33 5.0 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND DEVIATION FROM TARGET ......................... 36 6.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................ 36 6.1 Point Sources ............................................................................................................... 38 6.2 Nonpoint Sources ......................................................................................................... 45 7.0 DEVELOPMENT OF TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Dissolved Oxygen Mitigation at Hydropower Dams Using an Integrated Hydrodynamic/Water Quality/Fish Growth Model
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNT Digital Library ORNL/TM-2005/188 Assessment of Dissolved Oxygen Mitigation at Hydropower Dams Using an Integrated Hydrodynamic/Water Quality/Fish Growth Model MARCH 2006 Prepared by Mark S. Bevelhimer Charles C. Coutant Environmental Sciences Division DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced after January 1, 1996, are generally available free via the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Bridge. Web site http://www.osti.gov/bridge Reports produced before January 1, 1996, may be purchased by members of the public from the following source. National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone 703-605-6000 (1-800-553-6847) TDD 703-487-4639 Fax 703-605-6900 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.ntis.gov/support/ordernowabout.htm Reports are available to DOE employees, DOE contractors, Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) representatives, and International Nuclear Information System (INIS) representatives from the following source. Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone 865-576-8401 Fax 865-576-5728 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.osti.gov/contact.html This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Stream Runoff Trends in the Blue Ridge and Piedmont of Southeastern United States
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Geosciences Theses Department of Geosciences 4-20-2009 Analysis of Stream Runoff Trends in the Blue Ridge and Piedmont of Southeastern United States Usha Kharel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/geosciences_theses Part of the Geography Commons, and the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Kharel, Usha, "Analysis of Stream Runoff Trends in the Blue Ridge and Piedmont of Southeastern United States." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2009. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/geosciences_theses/15 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Geosciences at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geosciences Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANALYSIS OF STREAM RUNOFF TRENDS IN THE BLUE RIDGE AND PIEDMONT OF SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES by USHA KHAREL Under the Direction of Seth Rose ABSTRACT The purpose of the study was to examine the temporal trends of three monthly variables: stream runoff, rainfall and air temperature and to find out if any correlation exists between rainfall and stream runoff in the Blue Ridge and Piedmont provinces of the southeast United States. Trend significance was determined using the non-parametric Mann-Kendall test on a monthly and annual basis. GIS analysis was used to find and integrate the urban and non-urban stream gauging, rainfall and temperature stations in the study area. The Mann-Kendall test showed a statistically insignificant temporal trend for all three variables. The correlation of 0.4 was observed for runoff and rainfall, which showed that these two parameters are moderately correlated.
    [Show full text]
  • Watauga River Water Quality Management Plan (2002)
    WATAUGA RIVER WATERSHED (06010103) OF THE TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION August 13, 2002 WATAUGA RIVER WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary Chapter 1. Watershed Approach to Water Quality Chapter 2. Description of the Watauga River Watershed Chapter 3. Water Quality Assessment of the Watauga River Watershed Chapter 4. Point and Nonpoint Source Characterization of the Watauga River Watershed Chapter 5. Water Quality Partnerships in the Watauga River Watershed Chapter 6. Future Plans Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Appendix IV Appendix V Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology. 305(b). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires EPA to assemble and submit a report to Congress on the condition of all water bodies across the Country as determined by a biennial collection of data and other information by States and Tribes. AFO. Animal Feeding Operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Smallies on the Little T" BASSMASTER MAGAZINE Volume 32, No.7 by Jay Kumar
    "Smallies on the Little T" BASSMASTER MAGAZINE Volume 32, No.7 by Jay Kumar North Carolina's Little Tennessee River Is an untapped hot spot for hard-fighting bronzebacks . SOMEONE SAYS "bass fishing in North Carolina" ---what comes to mind? If you're like me, you can practically taste the sweat running down your face as you probe likely looking weedbeds in lakes and tidal rivers, looking for that monster largemouth. Certainly, smallmouth fishing wouldn't even come up. For the most part, we'd be right. But western North Carolina is mountainous and cool, much like its neighbors, Virginia. West Virginia and Tennessee, all of which are prime small mouth country. Western North Carolina is no different. And tucked away in the Nantahala National Forest is a place where these fish, the "fight- ingest" of all, swim free and largely unmolested: the Little Tennessee River. In fact, almost no one fished for "little T” bronzebacks until a transplanted Arkansas restaurateur decided, after searching all over the South that this was the place he was going to establish an outfit- ting business. It's an "if you build it they will come" story: in 1991, after getting lost on his way out of the Great Smokey Mountains, Jerry Anselmo found himself paralleling the Little T on Route 28. He stopped in town and asked where he could rent a canoe. The answer? Nowhere. So he borrowed one and "just caught the heck out of smallmouths.". That day he started looking for property on the river and the rest is history.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordovician Land Plants and Fungi from Douglas Dam, Tennessee
    PROOF The Palaeobotanist 68(2019): 1–33 The Palaeobotanist 68(2019): xxx–xxx 0031–0174/2019 0031–0174/2019 Ordovician land plants and fungi from Douglas Dam, Tennessee GREGORY J. RETALLACK Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA. *Email: gregr@uoregon. edu (Received 09 September, 2019; revised version accepted 15 December, 2019) ABSTRACT The Palaeobotanist 68(1–2): Retallack GJ 2019. Ordovician land plants and fungi from Douglas Dam, Tennessee. The Palaeobotanist 68(1–2): xxx–xxx. 1–33. Ordovician land plants have long been suspected from indirect evidence of fossil spores, plant fragments, carbon isotopic studies, and paleosols, but now can be visualized from plant compressions in a Middle Ordovician (Darriwilian or 460 Ma) sinkhole at Douglas Dam, Tennessee, U. S. A. Five bryophyte clades and two fungal clades are represented: hornwort (Casterlorum crispum, new form genus and species), liverwort (Cestites mirabilis Caster & Brooks), balloonwort (Janegraya sibylla, new form genus and species), peat moss (Dollyphyton boucotii, new form genus and species), harsh moss (Edwardsiphyton ovatum, new form genus and species), endomycorrhiza (Palaeoglomus strotheri, new species) and lichen (Prototaxites honeggeri, new species). The Douglas Dam Lagerstätte is a benchmark assemblage of early plants and fungi on land. Ordovician plant diversity now supports the idea that life on land had increased terrestrial weathering to induce the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event in the sea and latest Ordovician (Hirnantian)
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment for Transmission System
    Document Type: EA-Administrative Record Index Field: Draft Environmental Assessment Project Name: FY22 & FY23 Transmission System Vegetation Management Project Number: 2020-22 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ROUTINE PERIODIC VEGETATION MANAGEMENT FISCAL YEARS 2022 AND 2023 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Prepared by: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Chattanooga, Tennessee July 2021 To request further information, contact: Anita E. Masters NEPA Program Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market St., BR2C Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 E-mail: [email protected] This page intentionally left blank Contents Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ......................................................................... 1 1.2 Introduction and Background ................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 TVA’s Transmission System .............................................................................................. 1 1.2.2 The Need for Transmission System Reliability .................................................................. 2 1.2.3 TVA’s Vegetation Management Program .......................................................................... 2 1.2.4 Vegetation Management Practices ................................................................................... 5 1.2.5 Emphasis on Integrated Vegetation Management ............................................................ 7 1.2.6 Selection of Vegetation Control Methods .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards ( 1) Purpose. The establishment of water quality standards. (2) W ate r Quality Enhancement: (a) The purposes and intent of the State in establishing Water Quality Standards are to provide enhancement of water quality and prevention of pollution; to protect the public health or welfare in accordance with the public interest for drinking water supplies, conservation of fish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other reasonable and necessary uses and to maintain and improve the biological integrity of the waters of the State. ( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters. (i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected. (ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located.
    [Show full text]
  • Chatuge Hydroelectric Project Chatuge Dam Spillway
    NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Office of Archives and History Department of Natural and Cultural Resources NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Chatuge Hydroelectric Project Hayesville, Clay County, CY0025, Listed 08/11/2017 MPS: Historic Resources of the Tennessee Valley Authority Hydroelectric System, 1933-1979 Nomination by Thomason and Associates Photographs by Thomason and Associates, July 2015 Chatuge Dam Spillway NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Chatuge Hydroelectric Project_________________________ Other names/site number: _________Chatuge Dam_____________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___Historic Resources of the Tennessee Valley Authority Hydroelectric Project, 1933-1979 (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: ____221 Old Ranger Road Road_______________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • 110.00+Financial Statements.Xlsx
    FANNIN COUNTY, GEORGIA Annual Financial Report For the year ended December 31, 2016 This page intentionally left blank. FANNIN COUNTY, GEORGIA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the year ended December 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBIT PAGE FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report……………………………………………………………………………… 1-3 Management's Discussion and Analysis………………………………………………………………… 4-13 Basic Financial Statements: Government-wide Financial Statements: A-1 Statement of Net Position……………………………………………………………………………… 14-15 A-2 Statement of Activities………………………………………………………………………………… 16 Fund Financial Statements: Governmental Funds: A-3 Balance Sheet………………………………………………………………………………………… 17 A-4 Reconciliation of Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position…… 18 A-5 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances………………………… 19 A-6 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities………………………………………… 20 A-7 General Fund - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual…………………………………………………………………………………… 21-22 A-8 Excise Tax Lodging Special Revenue Fund - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual………………………………………………… 23 Fiduciary Funds: A-9 Statement of Fiduciary Assets and Liabilities……………………………………………………… 24 A-10 Notes to the Financial Statements……………………………………………………………………… 25-65 Required Supplementary Information: B-1 Schedule of Changes in the Net Pension Liability
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 March Newsletter
    2019 March Newsletter March 2019 Heavy Rains Fill Temporary Coffer Dam; Delay Work on Replacement Lock at Chickamauga Dam One of Chattanooga's biggest construction projects is being delayed after heavy rains filled in a temporary coffer dam erected to help build a new $758 million replacement lock at the Chickamauga Dam. Within the new 110-foot- by-600-foot lock being built beneath the dam, a major excavation project was completed in January just before record February rainfall forced the Tennessee Valley Authority to open up most of the spillways at the Chickamauga Dam and raise the Tennessee River by 12 feet above its normal level. The higher river and heavy rain complicated efforts to keep the water out of the coffer dam, where crews have removed more than 100,000 cubic yards of dirt and rock to dig down 35 feet to the riverbed. Adam Walker, project manager for the Chickamauga Lock replacement project for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, said the excavation equipment was largely removed from the lock chamber early last month, but the rains a few weeks later delayed the start of the next phase of the lock construction. "The decision was made last month that if we were going to be battling high waters and having to burn a lot of fuel trying to keep the dewatering pumps running to keep the water out of the coffer dam, it just made more sense to turn off the pumps and allow the coffer dam to fill until conditions return to normal," Walker said.
    [Show full text]