DOCSLIB.ORG

Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in the United States Part 3-B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in the United States Part 3-B. CUMBERLAND AND TENNESSEE RIVER BASINS By PAUL R. SPEER and CHARLES R. GAMBLE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER. 1676 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after page 340. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Pane Abstract_____.__________-__.__-___.__------- _______---_-__-_ 1 Introduction._____________-_-__-________------_-_----_--__---_- 1 Purpose and scope______-___________-___-----__----_-_--------- 1 Acknowledgments. __-______----___-_----_--------_-_-------__- 3 Application of the method_______-__-___-____----__--_--_----_---.-_ 4 Magnitude of flood of selected frequency-_-___-____-----__---__-_ 4 Illustrative problem________-__-__-_- _____________________ 6 Mainstem streams_______________-_-_-_-_--------_---_--___-__- 6 Site flood-frequency curve______________-------__--_-_-_---_-___ 8 Maximum known floods__-___-_--__-______-__-_--------_----_---_-- 8 Miscellaneous flood data______________________________________ 10 Flood-frequency analysis._________________-_--_-_---_--_-_--__--_-- 13 Description of the area_________-__-__-_------------------------ 13 Characteristics of flood runoff._______________--__-_---_--__--___ 15 Method of analysis-_______________-__--_--_--_-_----^---_--------- 16 Flood frequency at a gaging station____________________________ 16 Records used_._________________-_-___--_----___-__-___-.__- 18 Fitting frequency graphs-____-__-_-_-_--_-._--_--------_-__- 19 Regional flood frequency.____________-___-__----__----__-_--_-- 19 Mean annual flood__.______________________________________ 19 Flood equations-________-______--__---_-----_--_-_---- 21 Composite frequency curve. ________________________________ 21 Homogeneity test______-______.-_--_-_----_---_---__-_-- 22 Limits of probable accuracy_____._____-___--___--__-__--__-_-- 22 Summary. _ _______________________________________________________ 23 Flood records at gaging stations and miscellaneous sites________________ 24 Explanation of the data_._____________.__-_---_--____-_------_- 25 Maximum floods at gaging station_____ __-________-___-__--__--_.. 27 Miscellaneous flood data___._____-_________-__-..__-__-_--___-- 40 Cumberland River basin______________________________________ 49 Poor Fork at Cumberland, Ky____________________________ 49 Cumberland River near Harlan, Ky___________-__-_-_____-_-- 50 Yellow Creek bypass at Middlesboro, Ky____________________. 51 Yellow Creek near Middlesboro, Ky__ _______________________ 51 Cumberland River near Pineville, Ky________________________ 52 Cumberland River at Barbourville, Ky___ ___________ _________ 53 Cumberland River at Williamsburg, Ky____________________-- 53 Cumberland River at Cumberland Falls, Ky__________________ 54 Laurel River at Corbin, Ky_________________________________ 55 Wood Creek near London, Ky___ ___________________________ 56 Rockcastle River at Billows, Ky___________________________ 56 Rockcastle River at Rockcastle Springs, Ky__________________ 57 Buck Creek near Shopville, Ky____________________________ 58 New River near New River, Tenn__________________________- 58 Brimstone Creek near Robbins, Tenn_ _______________________ 59 ill IV CONTENTS Flood records at gaging stations and miscellaneous sites Cor tinned Cumberland River basin Continued Page New River at New River, Tenn__________-_____-___-________ 59 White Oak Creek at Sunbright, Tenn.______________._ 60 Clear Fork near Robbins, Tenn_____________________________ 61 Black Creek tributary near Robbins, Tenn.___________________ 62 South Fork Cumberland River near Stearns, Ky_______________ 62 South Fork Cumberland River at Nevelsville, Ky_____________ 63 Cumberland River at Burnside, Ky---___----__---__------__ 64 Pitman Creek at Somerset, Ky_____----___-_-------___---__- 65 Cumberland River near Rowena, Ky-____---_-__---_-_----__ 66 East Fork Obey River near Jamestown, Tenn_________________ 66 Puncheon Camp Creek at Allred, Tenn_____________________ 67 West Fork Obey River near Alpine, Tenn____________________ 67 Obey River near Byrdstown, Tenn_____-_--_--_-_-__-----_--_ 68 Big Eagle Creek near Livingston, Tenn______________________ 69 Wolf River near Byrdstown, Tenn____________-___-__-_-.-_ 70 Obey River below Dale Hollow Dam, Tenn___________________ 70 Cumberland River at Celina, Tenn---__-_--_____---_____-_-_ 71 Mathews Branch tributary near Livingston, Tenn_____________ 72 Roaring River near Hilham, Tenn_______________-_-___-_---_ 72 Caney Fork at Clifty, Tenn_____________________________ 74 Bee Creek at Herbert, Tenn________________________________ 75 Calfkiller River at Sparta, Tenn_. ___._______________--__--. 75 Calfkiller River below Sparta, Tenn________________________ 76 Barren Fork near Trousdale, Tenn____----_-_-___--_-_----__- 77 Owen Branch near Centertown, Tenn ________________________ 78 Owen Branch near Trousdale, Tenn___---_---____----_--_--__ 78 Collins River near McMinnville, Tenn_______________________ 79 Charles Creek near McMinnville, Tenn_____________________ 80 Sink tributary at McMinnville, Tenn________________________ 80 Collins River near Rowland, Tenn_____---_--_-____---_---__- 81 Caney Fork near Rock Island, Tenn_________________________ 81 Falling Water River near Cookeville, Tenn_________-____--_-_ 83 Caney Fork near Silver Point, Tenn____-_-______-_--_-_-_--_ 84 Caney Fork below Center Hill Dam, near Lancaster, ^enn----. 85 Cumberland River at Carthage, Tenn____----____-_____---_-_ 85 Spring Creek near Lebanon, Tenn___________________________ 87 Spencer Creek near Lebanon, Tenn________.-_______-_____--_ 87 Drakes Creek above Hendersonville, Tenn____________________ 88 Cumberland River below Old Hickory, Tenn_ ________________ 88 Bradley Creek at Lascassas, Tenn__________..___-_________-- 89 East Fork Stones River near Lascassas, Tenn___-_--_---_-_--_ 90 West Fork Stones River near Murfreesboro, Tenn_____________ 91 Stones River near Smyrna, Tenn_-__--_-___---------_-_---_- 92 Stewart Creek near Smyrna, Tenn_ _____._---_____--_______-- 93 Stones River above Donelson, Tenn_ ________________________ 94 Mill Creek near Antioch, Tenn_____________-_-_--_-_-_____-- 95 Cumberland River at Nashville, Tenn_______________________ 95 West Harpeth River at Leipers Fork, Tenn__________________ 98 Harpeth River at Belleview, Tenn___-__--___-_--------_---_- 98 Harpeth River near Kingston Springs, Tenn________--___---__ 100 CONTENTS V Flood records at gaging stations and miscellaneous sites Continued Cumberland River basin Continued Page Cumberland River below Cheatham Dam, Tenn______________ 101 Red River near Adams, Tenn_______________________________ 102 Sulphur Fork Red River near Adams, Tenn __________________ 103 Cumberland River at Clarksville, Tenn______________________ 104 Musterground Creek near Erin, Tenn________________________ 105 Cumberland River at Dover, Tenn__________________________ 106 South Fork Little River at Hopkinsville, Ky__-___--___-___ 107 Little River near Cadiz, Ky__________-_____----__-____-_-_ 108 Cumberland River at Smithland, Ky_______-___---__-____-___ 109 Tennessee River basin________________________________________ 109 French Broad River at Rosman, N.C--------------_--_----__ 109 French Broad River at Calvert, N.C____.___-_-__________ 110 Catheys Creek near Brevard, N.C--__-___--__---_----___-___ 111 Davidson River near Brevard, N.C___---_---_-_-_-_---_--___ 112 Little River near Penrose, N.C_______-_-___--__-__-_--_-____ 113 Crab Creek near Penrose, N.C-___-_____-_-_----__---__--___ 114 French Broad River at Blantyre, N.C_____-____--__-__-____ 115 Boylston Creek near Horseshoe, N.C-__-_---------_-----__-_- 116 South Fork Mills River at The Pink Beds, N.C_____.____ 116 Mills River near Mills River, N.C __ -- _-_-_ ____ 117 Laurel Branch near Edneyville, N.C_____-__-_-_-_--_-______- 118 Clear Creek near Hendersonville, N.C_---__--_---___-________ 119 Mud Creek at Naples, N.C ____-_ 119 Cane Creek at Fletcher, N.C______________________ 120 French Broad River at Bent Creek, N.C._______._____ 121 Hominy Creek at Candler, N.C_----------------------__---- 122 North Fork Swannanoa River near Black Mountain, N.C______ 123 Swannanoa River at Swannanoa, N.C____---_-_______-_-_____ 124 Beetree Creek near Swannanoa, N.C_----------_-_-_-_------- 124 Swannanoa River at Biltmore, N.C, _________________________ 125 French Broad River at Asheville, N.C___--_-_-______----_- 127 Sandymush Creek near Alexander, N.C__-______-___________- 128 Ivy River near Marshall, N.C_____________________________ 129 French Broad River at Marshall, N.C__-______.__________ 129 Brush Creek at Walnut, N.C________.___._________ 130 Big Laurel Creek near Stackhouse, N.C______________________ 131 French Broad River at Hot Springs, N.C__-______________-___ 132 French Broad River near Newport, Tenn_____________________ 133 West Fork Pigeon River above Lake Logan, near Hazelwood, N.C-_--_----_-------_-- ------_---------------------_-- 134 West Fork Pigeon River below Lake Logan, near Waynesvilte, N.C--- 134 East Fork Pigeon River near Canton, N.C________________.___ 135 Pigeon River at Canton, N.C____-____----_-_______-_-___-_- 135 Alien Creek near Hazelwood, N.C_-__-_-_--_-__-______------ 137 Pigeon River near Crabtree, N.C_-___--_--_____-_____--____- 137 Jonathan
Recommended publications
  • Stream-Temperature Characteristics in Georgia

    Stream-Temperature Characteristics in Georgia

    STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA By T.R. Dyar and S.J. Alhadeff ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 Prepared in cooperation with GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Atlanta, Georgia 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130 Denver Federal Center Peachtree Business Center Box 25286 Atlanta, GA 30360-2824 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 2 Previous investigations. 2 Station-identification system . 3 Stream-temperature data . 3 Long-term stream-temperature characteristics. 6 Natural stream-temperature characteristics . 7 Regression analysis . 7 Harmonic mean coefficient . 7 Amplitude coefficient. 10 Phase coefficient . 13 Statewide harmonic equation . 13 Examples of estimating natural stream-temperature characteristics . 15 Panther Creek . 15 West Armuchee Creek . 15 Alcovy River . 18 Altamaha River . 18 Summary of stream-temperature characteristics by river basin . 19 Savannah River basin . 19 Ogeechee River basin. 25 Altamaha River basin. 25 Satilla-St Marys River basins. 26 Suwannee-Ochlockonee River basins . 27 Chattahoochee River basin. 27 Flint River basin. 28 Coosa River basin. 29 Tennessee River basin . 31 Selected references. 31 Tabular data . 33 Graphs showing harmonic stream-temperature curves of observed data and statewide harmonic equation for selected stations, figures 14-211 . 51 iii ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing locations of 198 periodic and 22 daily stream-temperature stations, major river basins, and physiographic provinces in Georgia.
  • For Siltation and Habitat Alteration in the Nolichucky River

    For Siltation and Habitat Alteration in the Nolichucky River

    TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) For Siltation and Habitat Alteration In The Nolichucky River Watershed (HUC 06010108) Cocke, Greene, Hamblen, Hawkins, Jefferson, Unicoi, and Washington, Counties, Tennessee FINAL (Modified) Prepared by: Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Water Pollution Control 6th Floor L & C Tower 401 Church Street Nashville, TN 37243-1534 April 18, 2008 Approved by: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV February 26, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 WATERSHED DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROBLEM DEFINITION .................................................................................................... 5 4.0 TARGET IDENTIFICATION ............................................................................................. 33 5.0 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND DEVIATION FROM TARGET ......................... 36 6.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................ 36 6.1 Point Sources ............................................................................................................... 38 6.2 Nonpoint Sources ......................................................................................................... 45 7.0 DEVELOPMENT OF TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS ..............................................
  • Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards

    Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards

    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards ( 1) Purpose. The establishment of water quality standards. (2) W ate r Quality Enhancement: (a) The purposes and intent of the State in establishing Water Quality Standards are to provide enhancement of water quality and prevention of pollution; to protect the public health or welfare in accordance with the public interest for drinking water supplies, conservation of fish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other reasonable and necessary uses and to maintain and improve the biological integrity of the waters of the State. ( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters. (i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected. (ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located.
  • TMDL Implementation Plans for Goat Rock Lake

    TMDL Implementation Plans for Goat Rock Lake

    TMDL Implementation Plan for Nottely River, Downstream of Lake Nottely -- Dissolved Oxygen Introduction The portion of the Nottely River downstream of the dam for Nottely Lake, is located near Ivy Log in Union County, a few miles northwest of Blairsville, Georgia. The Nottely Lake dam is operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). Reservoir water flows through the turbine generators in the dam to produce hydroelectric power. The water that for such use is taken from the lower (hypolimnion) zone of the Reservoir where the water is naturally lower in dissolved oxygen (D.O.). Plan for Implementation of the TMDL The TMDL for this and seven other low D.O. river segments below dams, was finalized in November, 2000. The designated use for the Nottely River downstream of the dam is for recreation. The applicable water quality standards there for D.O. are a concentration of 5 milligrams per liter (mg/l) as a daily average and a concentration of 4 mg/l as a minimum value. Attainment and maintenance of these two D.O. water quality standards are the goals of this Implementation Plan. The TMDL recommends that the appropriate federal and state agencies work together in developing an implementation strategy to provide higher oxygenated water from these dam releases. The TMDL adds that these strategies may include oxygenation or aeration of the water, redesigned spillways, or other measures, and that ongoing water quality monitoring is needed to monitor progress. The TVA has added compressors and blowers to add air to the water going through the turbines, when D.O.
  • Investigation of Alkali-Silica Reactivity in Four Dams in the Southeastern United States

    Investigation of Alkali-Silica Reactivity in Four Dams in the Southeastern United States

    REC-ERC-89-4 Denver Off ice July 1989 U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation .._. INVESTIGATION OF ALKALI-SILICA JULY 1989 REACTIVITY IN FOUR DAMS IN THE 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES D-3731 7. AUTHOR(S) 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. David Stark REC-ERC-89-4 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Construction Technology Laboratories 5420 Old Orchard Road 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Skokie IL 60077 5-CP-81-06560 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED 2. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS Bureau of Reclamation Denver Office Denver CO 80225 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE DIBR 5. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Microfiche and hard copy available from Denver Office, Denver, Colorado. Ed:REC 6. ABSTRACT This investigation of the alkali-silica reactivity of four dams in the southeastern United States supplements a similar study on five dams in southwestern United States. The investigations involved an onsite inspection and laboratory studies of concrete cores. The investigative procedures included petrographic examination, relative humidity measurements, length changes of cores exposed to moist air at 100 OF and to sodium hydroxide solution, and osmotic cell measurements. A comparison or observations on the southeastern and the southwestern dams is made. The manifestations of distress due to the reaction are similar, and the effects of alkali content of the cement, different types of reactive aggregates, surface drying, and climate exposure conditions are noted. 7. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS . DESCR JPJORS-- *alkali-silica reactivity/ *alkali-aggregate reactions/ concrete/ concrete cores/ aggregates/ petrographic investigations/ concrete dam IDEN JIFfERS-- Fontana Dam, NC/ Hiwassee Dam, NC/ New Savanna Bluff Lock and Dam, GA/ Oliver Lock and Spillway, AL .
  • Take It to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities Was Licenses and Regulations

    Take It to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities Was Licenses and Regulations

    Illustrations by Duane Raver/USFWS Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency ke2it2to2the2nkke2it2to2the2nk TennesseeTennessee bankbank fishingfishing opportunitiesopportunities Inside this guide Go fish!.......................................................................................1 Additional fishing opportunities and information..........6 Take it to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities was Licenses and regulations........................................................1 Additional contact agencies and facilities.....................6 produced by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and Tennes- Bank fishing tips........................................................................2 Water release schedules..........................................................6 see Technological University’s Center for the Management, Utilization Black bass..................................................................................2 Fishing-related Web sites.................................................... ....6 and Protection of Water Resources under project 7304. Development Sunfish (bream).........................................................................2 How to read the access tables.................................................7 of this guide was financed in part by funds from the Federal Aid in Sportfish Restoration Crappie..................................................................3 Access table key........................................................................7 (Public Law 91-503) as documented
  • Lake Cumberland

    Lake Cumberland

    Lake or Pond LAKE INSET National River, Stream MAP Wildlife or Creek Reserve State Capitol BOAT RAMP See LAKE Creek LAKE or Rive or LAKE r County Seat Wildlife POND FRANKFORT ACCESS SITE 33 InsetInset Management NWR Area Inez State Road WMA 89 U.S. Highway U.S. Military 420 TROUT 3D Base Licking Big U.S. Interstate STREAM Lower River Sandy 64 Parkway KY p.38+39 & Salt PKWY River River Little State State p.22+23 Nature Forest National p.18+19 Sandy Preserve Park State SF Rivers Lock & Dam Park SNP NP SP Lower Upper p.42+43 State USFS Resort SRP Green KY Proclamation Park Area SNA River River State SHS Upper County or Natural p.8+9 p.26+27 State Line Area Green State Tennessee, Upper Historic Site Lower Cumberland, River Cumberland p.12+13 Tradewater & Mississippi p.30+31 Fort Boonesborough Rivers p.2+3 SP 0 50 100 Approx. Scale in Miles: LOCK & DAM #10 S t o n 75 e 627 y LOCK & DAM #9 Run White Hall TUCKY EN SHS K 169 388 RIVER 1156 r MADI e v i R 27 LOCK & 25 DAM #8 LAKE REBA Richmond k 876 e x HERRINGTON LAKE e Di r C r a g u S TAYLOR \FORK GARRARD 595 LAKE P ai nt L re ic ilver C ek 1295 k S C re e k 421 39 75 Lancaster 595 Big South Fork of the Cumberland River 1016 590 25 Upper areas of this river are within the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area which is in both Kentucky and Tennessee.
  • Stream-Temperature Charcteristics in Georgia

    Stream-Temperature Charcteristics in Georgia

    STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with the GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA By T.R. Dyar and S.J. Alhadeff ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 Prepared in cooperation with GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Atlanta, Georgia 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130 Denver Federal Center Peachtree Business Center Box 25286 Atlanta, GA 30360-2824 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 2 Previous investigations. 2 Station-identification system . 3 Stream-temperature data . 3 Long-term stream-temperature characteristics. 6 Natural stream-temperature characteristics . 7 Regression analysis . 7 Harmonic mean coefficient . 7 Amplitude coefficient. 10 Phase coefficient . 13 Statewide harmonic equation . 13 Examples of estimating natural stream-temperature characteristics . 15 Panther Creek . 15 West Armuchee Creek . 15 Alcovy River . 18 Altamaha River . 18 Summary of stream-temperature characteristics by river basin . 19 Savannah River basin . 19 Ogeechee River basin. 25 Altamaha River basin. 25 Satilla-St Marys River basins. 26 Suwannee-Ochlockonee River basins . 27 Chattahoochee River basin. 27 Flint River basin. 28 Coosa River basin. 29 Tennessee River basin . 31 Selected references. 31 Tabular data . 33 Graphs showing harmonic stream-temperature curves of observed data and statewide harmonic equation for selected stations, figures 14-211 .
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 27/Friday, February 8, 2002/Notices

    Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 27/Friday, February 8, 2002/Notices

    Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2002 / Notices 6021 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY final EIS. Recirculation of the available on the Internet at: document is not necessary under www.efw.bpa.gov Federal Energy Regulatory Section 1506.3(c) of the Council on EIS No. 020050, DRAFT FINAL EIS, Commission Environmental Quality Regulations. FHW, WY, Wyoming Forest Highway [Docket Nos. EC02–5–000, ER02–211–000, EIS No. 020044, DRAFT 23 Project, Louis Lake Road also and EL02–53–000] SUPPLEMENTS, FRC, WA, Condit known as Forest Development Road Hydroelectric (No. 2342) Project, 300, Improvements from Bruce’s Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Updated Information on Application Parking Lot to Worthen Meadow Corporation, Entergy Nuclear Vermont to Amend the Current License to Road, Funding, NPDES Permits and Yankee, LLC, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Extend the License Term to October 1, COE Section 404 Permit, Shoshone Power Corporation; Notice of Initiation 2006, White Salmon River, Skamania National Forest, Fremont County, WY, of Proceeding and Refund Effective and Klickitat Counties, WA, Comment Wait Period Ends: March 11, 2002, Date Period Ends: March 25, 2002, Contact: Contact: Rick Cushing (303) 716– Nicholas Jayjack (202) 219–2825. This 2138. February 4, 2002. document is available on the Internet Take notice that on February 1, 2002, at: http://www.ferc.gov EIS No. 020051, REVISED DRAFT EIS, the Commission issued an order in the EIS No. 020045, FINAL EIS, FHW, NM, FHW, WA, WA–509 Corridor above-indicated dockets initiating a US 70 Corridor Improvement, Completion/I–5/South Access Road proceeding in Docket No.
  • Hiwassee Geographic Area Updated: June 1, 2017

    Hiwassee Geographic Area Updated: June 1, 2017

    Hiwassee Geographic Area June 1, 2017 **Disclaimer: The specific descriptions, goals, desired conditions, and objectives only apply to the National Forest System Lands within the Hiwassee Geographic Area. However, nearby communities and surrounding lands are considered and used as context. Hiwassee Geographic Area Updated: June 1, 2017 Description of area The Hiwassee Geographic Area is defined by large rivers running through broad flat valleys and two large lakes surrounded by mountains that provide distinct visitor experiences. The broad river valleys lie at lower elevations than other geographic areas in North Carolina’s National Forests. The steep mountains of this area support short leaf pine, mixed hardwood forests, and large pockets of eastern hemlock. Passing through a gentler mountain landscape, the major rivers of the region include the Hiwassee, Valley, and Nottley Rivers which flow into the Chatuge, Hiwassee, and Apalachia lakes. These rivers and the lakes created by Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) dams provide reactional opportunities for fishing, boating, and other water sports. The lakes of this geographic area form a chain that is home to a diverse number of plant, animal, and warm water fish species that are native to riparian floodplain ecosystems. Prior to European and Anglo-American settlement along with westward expansion, the Hiwassee geographic area was home to the Cherokee and Creek tribes. This area contains several landscape features that figure most prominently in Tribal history and have significant meaning to Tribal identities and beliefs. These locations are important traditional and ceremonial areas for the Cherokee. Communities within this geographic area include Murphy, Hayesville, Warne, Peachtree, Brasstown, Hiwassee Dam, Ranger and the smaller incorporated areas of Unaka and Violet.
  • A Geographic Study of the Tennessee Central Railway: an East-West Transport Route Across the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee

    A Geographic Study of the Tennessee Central Railway: an East-West Transport Route Across the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1969 A Geographic Study of the Tennessee Central Railway: An East- West Transport Route Across the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee Dennis E. Quillen University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Geography Commons Recommended Citation Quillen, Dennis E., "A Geographic Study of the Tennessee Central Railway: An East-West Transport Route Across the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1969. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2782 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Dennis E. Quillen entitled "A Geographic Study of the Tennessee Central Railway: An East-West Transport Route Across the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Geography. Loyal Durand, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Robert G. Long, William N. Cherry Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Au gust 1, 1969 To the Graduate Council : I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Dennis E.
  • 20117202334.Pdf

    20117202334.Pdf

    Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and other affected and interested parties. Plans are reviewed by the public and submitted to additional peer review before they are adopted by the Service. Objectives of the plan will be attained and any necessary funds will be made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific tasks and may not represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in developing the plan, other than the Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. By approving this recovery plan, the Regional Director certifies that the data used in its development represent the best scientific and commercial information available at the time it was written. Copies of all documents reviewed in the development of this plan are available in the administrative record located at the Asheville Field Office in Asheville, North Carolina. Literature citations should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. Recovery Plan for Cumberland Elktoe, Oyster Mussel, Cumberlandian Combshell, Purple Bean, and Rough Rabbitsfoot.