Final Regional Sesa for Oecs Crop

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Regional Sesa for Oecs Crop FINAL REGIONAL SESA FOR OECS CROP Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 1 FINAL REGIONAL SESA FOR OECS CROP CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Scope ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.2 Background ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Legal Framework for Coastal and Marine Resources Management ................................ 6 1.4 Objectives of the SESA ..................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Critical Factors for Decision-Making for CSMP .............................................................. 11 1.6 Program 1 - Mitigation Measures for Vulnerability Reduction...................................... 13 1.7 Program 2 - Good Governance Framework for CMSP ................................................... 18 1.8 Regional Priority Areas for Action .................................................................................. 19 1.8.1 Immediate to Short Term Actions (2018-2020) ...................................................... 19 1.8.2 Medium to Long Term Actions (2020-2022) ........................................................... 19 1.9 National Priorities for Action ......................................................................................... 20 1.9.1 Legal and Regulatory Framework ........................................................................... 21 1.9.2 Planning and Decision-making process .................................................................. 22 1.9.3 Implementation, Monitoring and Compliance ....................................................... 23 2.0 SCOPE ................................................................................................................................. 24 3.0 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................... 25 3.1 Sector Programme justification and purpose ................................................................ 25 3.2 Coastal and Marine Spatial Plans in the OECS ............................................................... 26 3.3 Environmental policy, legislative and planning framework........................................... 31 Decision makers, planners, policies .......................................................................................... 31 (a) International & Regional Laws and Agreements for CMSP .............................................. 32 .(c) National policies, legislation, and regulations for CMSP ............................................ 34 3.2.2 Legal Framework to protect Land tenure and resource rights ....................................... 35 3.2.3 Broader Development Policies Integrated with Coastal & Marine Policies ........... 36 3.2.4 Institutional Framework ......................................................................................... 38 3.2.5 Financial Incentives, economic instruments & benefits sharing ............................ 39 3.2.6 Kalinago Territory Dominica ................................................................................... 40 4.0 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................... 43 4.1 General approach ........................................................................................................... 43 2 FINAL REGIONAL SESA FOR OECS CROP 4.2 What is Strategic Environment and Social Impact Assessment ..................................... 43 4.3 SESA Methodology ......................................................................................................... 45 4.3.1 Tasks of the Consultancy ........................................................................................ 46 4.4 PHASE ONE SCOPING ..................................................................................................... 47 4.4.1 Four Broad Themes of Inquiry ................................................................................ 47 4.4.2 Literature Review .................................................................................................... 48 4.4.3 One-to-one Interviews and Consultations .............................................................. 49 4.4.4 Expert Judgment ..................................................................................................... 50 4.5 Geographical or environmental mapping units ............................................................. 51 4.6 Assumptions, uncertainties and constraints .................................................................. 51 4.6.1 Assumptions ............................................................................................................ 51 4.6.2 Uncertainties ........................................................................................................... 53 4.6.3 Constraints .............................................................................................................. 53 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE STUDY .................................................................................. 54 5.1 Socio-Economic Drivers and Pressures .......................................................................... 54 5.2 Environmental Pressures ............................................................................................... 55 5.2.1 Cross sectoral Issues ............................................................................................... 57 5.2.2 Sector Specific Considerations ................................................................................ 58 5.3 Policy Responses ............................................................................................................ 61 5.4 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 62 6.0 IMPACT IDENTIFICATION & EVALUATION ......................................................................... 64 6.1 Base-case Scenario – Situation in OECS States .............................................................. 64 7.0 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................................. 73 8.0 MITIGATION OR OPTIMISING MEASURES ......................................................................... 76 Critical Risks and Mitigation Standards for Future Scenario ................................................. 76 9.0 INDICATORS, INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITIES AND GAP ANALYSIS ........................................ 83 9.1 Indicators ........................................................................................................................ 83 9.2 Framework for Good Governance ................................................................................. 84 9.3 Regional Gap Analysis - Political Economy Constraints ................................................. 85 9.3.1 Independent Small Island States ............................................................................ 85 9.3.2 Governance arrangements ..................................................................................... 86 9.3.2.1 Legal and Regulatory Framework ................................................................................... 86 3 FINAL REGIONAL SESA FOR OECS CROP 9.3.2.2 Planning and Decision-Making Process .......................................................................... 87 9.3.2.4 Implementation, Monitoring and Compliance ............................................................... 87 9.4 National Gap Assessment............................................................................................... 88 9.4.1 Component 1: Policy, Legal, Institutional and Regulatory Framework .................. 88 9.4.2 Component 2: Planning and Decision-making Process ................................................ 91 9.4.3 Component 3: Implementation, monitoring and compliance ................................ 93 10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................ 96 10.1 General Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 96 10.2 Program 2 - Priority Areas for Action to improve Governance in OECS MS .................. 96 10.2.1 Recommendations– Policy, Legal, Institutional and Regulatory Framework ......... 97 10.2.2 Recommendations – Planning and Decision-making process ................................ 99 10.2.3 Recommendations – Implementation, Monitoring and Compliance ................... 101 10.3 General Recommendations for Implementation of CROP ........................................... 102 10.3.1 Stakeholder Participation ..................................................................................... 102 10.3.2 Planning Context and Decision-making Process ................................................... 102 10.3.3 Regional Cooperation and Coordination .............................................................. 103 10.3.4 Project Implementation ............................................................................................... 104 10.3.5 Policy Legal and Regulatory .................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Heritage Education — Memories of the Past in the Present Caribbean Social Studies Curriculum: a View from Teacher Practice Issue Date: 2019-05-28
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/73692 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Con Aguilar E.O. Title: Heritage education — Memories of the past in the present Caribbean social studies curriculum: a view from teacher practice Issue Date: 2019-05-28 Chapter 6: The presence of Wai’tu Kubuli in teaching history and heritage in Dominica 6.1 Introduction Figure 6.1: Workshop at the Salybia Primary School Kalinago Territory, Dominica, January 2016. During my stay in Dominica, I had the opportunity to organize a teachers’ workshop with the assistance of the indigenous people of the Kalinago Territory. Although the teachers interact with Kalinago culture on a daily basis, we decided to explore the teachers’ knowledge of indigenous heritage and to challenge them in activities where they could put their knowledge into practice. We then drew animals, plants, tools and objects that are found in daily life in the Kalinago Territory. Later on in the workshop, we asked teachers about the Kalinago names that were printed on their tag names. Teachers were able to recognize some of these Kalinago names, and sometimes even the stories behind them. In this simple way, we started our workshop on indigenous history and heritage — because sometimes the most useful and meaningful learning resources are the ones we can find in our everyday life. This case study took place in Dominica; the island is also known by its Kalinago name, Wai’tu Kubuli, which means “tall is her body.” The Kalinago Territory is the home of the Kalinago people.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgements References
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/65998 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Ariese, C.E. Title: The social museum in the Caribbean : grassroots heritage initiatives and community engagement Issue Date: 2018-09-27 Acknowledgements I am grateful to many for their assistance and support in the completion of this research. Firstly, I am indebted to my supervisors. Willem Willems encouraged me to great- ly expand my research throughout the region and to dedicate myself to fieldwork. Thank you for trusting me to work independently, but for checking in every Thursday. Following Willem’s passing, Corinne Hofman took over supervision and was greatly helpful in expanding my contact network and providing feedback on the manuscript. To Mariana Françozo, thank you for getting my research, strategizing along the way, providing perfect feedback, and for your mentorship. There are a million ways in which you have guided me, from academic support to safeguarding my wellbeing. Suffice it to say, after many fieldwork adventures shared, I am the luckiest. I would like to thank the members of the reading committee whose careful reviews and thoughtful comments greatly improved this manuscript. Thank you also to Tina Solos for the diligent proofreading under tight deadlines. Secondly, this dissertation owes much to collaborations and conversations with colleagues. Mereke van Garderen, thank you for your computer science intervention and the fruitful visualization collaboration. To my office buddies, Eldris Con Aguilar and Eloise Stancioff for working together, travelling together, panicking together, and helping each other. There is no bond like sharing a LIAT flight.
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast Roads
    Pre-Engineering and Design Services - East Coast Roads ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) June 2019 TYPSA Group C/ Gomera, 9 28703 - S.S. de los Reyes (Madrid) Tel. +34 917 227 300 e-mail: [email protected] www.typsa.com Pre-Engineering and Design Services – East Coast Roads Environmental and Social Impact Assessment QUALITY CONTROL SHEET DOCUMENT Environmental and Social Impact Assessment PROJECT Pre-Engineering and Design Services – East Coast Roads CODE RD1415-FD-ESIA-Ed03 INITIALS AK SC AUTHOR DATE 12/09/2019 13/09/2019 INITIALS AME VERIFIED DATE 19/09/2019 RECIPIENT Ministry of Environment, Climate Resilience, Disaster Management and Urban Renewal NOTES RD1415-FD-ESIA-Ed03 1 Pre-Engineering and Design Services – East Coast Roads Environmental and Social Impact Assessment CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 9 2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 12 3. ESIA METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 13 3.1. THE ESIA TEAM ............................................................................................................................ 13 3.2. ENVIRONMENTAL ....................................................................................................................... 13 3.3. SOCIAL .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DOMINICA Country Profile
    October 2017 DOMINICA Country Profile Summary indicators Indicator Value Year Population number (last census) 71,293 2011 Population number (projection) 73,000 2015 Population growth rate 0.5% 2016 Population density 105/km2 2011 Urban composition 67% 2011 Average household size 3.02 2010 Age distribution (% under 15) 21.84% under 15 2016 Life expectancy at birth (years) 77 years (male:74 female:80.1) 2016 Under-five mortality 11/1,000 live births 2013 Maternal mortality 92 per 100,000 live births 2016 HDI ranking (value) 96 (0.726) 2015 Corruption Perceptions Index ranking (value) 38 (59) 2015 People below the poverty line 29% 2015 INFORM Risk Index Ranking (value) 113 (3.00) 2017 Literacy rate 91.8% (male:91.2% female:92.3%) 2015 Net migration rate -5.4 migrants/1,000 population 2016 Immunisation Coverage 96% 2013 Sources: IFPRI 2015, Census 2011, World Bank 2016, Caribbean Development Bank 2010, CIA World Factbook; Transparency International The Commonwealth of Dominica is a sovereign island country, part of the Windward Islands in the Lesser Antilles archipelago in the Caribbean Sea. The island lies - southeast of Guadeloupe and northwest of Martinique. Its area is 750km2, and the highest point is Morne Diablotins. The island’s vegetation is dense, a consequence of its elevation and very high rainfall, which varies from about 1800mm per year on the western coast to over 7,500mm in the mountainous interior. Dominica is a lower middle-income country and the poorest of the southeastern Caribbean islands. (Clarke G. Collin 1991). Hazard profile communities of Canefield, Massacre, Mahaut, Cochrane, Coulibistrie and Campbell were most affected (IFRC 11/10/2011).
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) for the OECS Regional Health Project (P168539) Dominica May 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Page 1 of 92 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BMP Best Management Practice CEHI Caribbean Environmental Health Institute CITES Convention on Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna CUBiC Caribbean Uniform Building Code CZMAC Coastal Zone Management Advisory Committee DCA Development Control Authority EHD Environmental Health Department EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan EMS Emergency Medical Service EMT Emergency Medical Technician EOC Emergency Operations Centre ILO International Labor Organization MOPD Ministry of Physical Development, Environment and Housing MOHSS Ministry of Health and Social Services MCWTPU Ministry of Communications, Works Transport and Public Utilities NEAP National Environmental Action Plan NEC National Environmental Commission NEMAC National Emergency Management Advisory Committee NEMO National Emergency Management Organisation NEOC National Emergency Operations Centre NEP National environment Policy NEMS National Emergency Medical Services NGO Non-governmental Organisation NIC National Insurance Corporation OAS Organisation of American States OECS Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States OP Operational Policy PCU Project Coordination Unit PPU Physical Planning Unit PPDB Physical
    [Show full text]
  • Dominica Climate Resilience and Recovery Plan 2020-2030
    Government of the Commonwealth of Dominica Peace Planet Prosperity Dominica Climate Resilience and Recovery Plan 2020-2030 Partnership People “Building the World’s First Climate Resilient Country: Our Collective Responsibility” Copyright © 2020 by the Climate Resilience Executing Agency of Dominica and the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Planning, Resilience, Sustainable Development, Telecommunications and Broadcasting, Commonwealth of Dominica. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other non-commercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to: The Climate Resilience Executing Agency of Dominica and the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Planning, Resilience, Sustainable Development, Telecommunications and Broadcasting, Commonwealth of Dominica. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS CARDI Caribbean Agricultural Research and Development Institute CARICOM The Caribbean Community Secretariat CARPHA The Caribbean Public Health Agency CCCCC The Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre CCRIF Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility CDB The Caribbean Development Bank CDEMA Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency CERMES Centre for Resource Management and Environment Studies of the UWI CIMH The Caribbean Institute of Meteorology
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Healthcare Use Patterns in Dominica
    ABSTRACT HEALTHCARE USE PATTERNS IN DOMINICA: ETHNOMEDICAL INTEGRATION IN AN ERA OF BIOMEDICINE by Seann Dinnon Regan The power and influence of globalization and the worldwide dominance of biomedicine profoundly impact ethnomedical practices throughout the world. However, ethnomedicine still plays a prominent role in providing medical care to many people. In Dominica, widespread ethnomedical knowledge and traditional plant use as well as a biomedical healthcare system with inadequate infrastructure combine to create a situation of medical decision making. This research investigates how Dominicans make healthcare use decisions and seeks to better understand the state of medicine in Dominica. The results of this research reveal a complex blend of medical practices in the everyday lives of Dominicans and support the notion that biomedicine and national healthcare campaigns could benefit from greater collaboration, understanding, and integration with ethnomedicine. HEALTHCARE USE PATTERNS IN DOMINICA: ETHNOMEDICAL INTEGRATION IN AN ERA OF BIOMEDICINE A thesis presented to the faculty of the Geography Department of Miami University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Seann Dinnon Regan 2010 Advisor: ____________________ Dr. Thomas Klak Reader: _____________________ Dr. José Amador de Jesús Reader: _____________________ Dr. Marcia England Reader: _____________________ Ms. Robbyn Abbitt TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating Native Dominion in the Lesser Antilles, C.1635-1660
    Murphy – Draft – Please do not cite or circulate Negotiating Native Dominion in the Lesser Antilles, c.1635-1660 The man had grown “tired of living among his people.” Eager to find new lands, he “embarked his whole family” in the long dugout canoe, or chaboúlouibaie.1 The family traveled for many days; without the benefit of sails, they depended on ocean currents and large wooden paddles to propel their vessel north from the river basin into the open sea.2 After navigating through a long chain of islands—some small and rocky, others with volcanic peaks that disappeared from view into the clouds above—they came ashore in a sandy cove. With its many bays to land boats; dense rainforests to shelter them from attack and furnish chíbou trees for building chaboúlouibaie and dwellings; and dozens of tóna, or rivers, to provision them with fresh fish, the lush green island was the perfect place for the man and his family to call home.3 They named their new homeland Oüàitoucoubouli, but for generations, as their numbers grew and they spread out across the constellation of islands to the north and south, the man’s descendants continued to refer to themselves by the name of their adventurous ancestor: Kalinago.4 1 Missionary Raymond Breton translates the French word ‘canot,’ or canoe, as “chaboúlouibaie f. chábae coulìala áboucou, ou táboulou.” However, the word ‘canoe/canot’ was itself likely derived from indigenous Caribbean languages; Raymond reported that when asking a person to build a canoe, the Kalinago used the phrase “iouamatégue canáoa.” Raymond Breton, Dictionnaire François-Caraïbe (Leipzig: B.
    [Show full text]
  • Compete-CTO Community Tourism Toolkit Community Profile Template
    Compete-CTO Community Tourism Toolkit Community Profile Template Guidelines for Preparing Community Tourism Profile Template This Community Tourism Profile template was designed to be completed from a visitor perspective in order to create a destination-styled profile for your community. You may wish to refer to the Tourism Assets Inventory as you begin to prepare your Community Tourism Profile. Your inventory will provide much of the information that is needed but you will have to collect some additional information. This Community Tourism Profile template has two parts: Part 1: Community Profile – in this part, you enter profile and overview information about the community and community tourism experiences, products and services available to the visitor. Part 2: See, Do & Stay – o the top section of this part is designed as a directory of community tourism enterprises. You enter information about specific community tourism enterprises that offer community tourism experiences, products and services to the visitor. o in the bottom section, you enter information about How to Get to the Community and obtain information on Visitor Services In keeping with the spirit of Community-Based Tourism, businesses/activities shall be classified as Community-Based Tourism by meeting criteria (a), (b) and (c) and at least one (1) of the three (3) criteria named in (d) – (f). These criteria include: a) Operates in one of the eight (8) sectors of the tourism industry. These include Accommodations, Attractions, Food and Beverage, Transportation, Tourism Services, Travel Trade, Adventure Tourism (Tours and Activities), Events and Conferences. b) Is owned AND OR operated by a community member – whether it be an individual, family, group, organisation or any combination of these; c) Generates benefits for the community – either directly to community members (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Regional Environmental and Social Management Framework (Esmf)
    Public Disclosure Authorized DRAFT REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Caribbean Digital Transformation Program (P171528) Public Disclosure Authorized April 29, 2020 Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 5 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 14 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 15 2.1 Project Background ..................................................................................................................... 15 2.2 Project Description and List of Components .............................................................................. 16 3. LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................... 18 3.1 National Regulation .................................................................................................................... 18 3.1.1 Commonwealth of Dominica .............................................................................................. 18 3.1.2 Grenada ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Caribbean Communities: a Long-Term Perspective on Social
    sustainability Article Resilient Caribbean Communities: A Long-Term Perspective on Sustainability and Social Adaptability to Natural Hazards in the Lesser Antilles Corinne L. Hofman 1,2,*, Charlotte Eloise Stancioff 1 , Andrea Richards 1,2, Irvince Nanichi Auguiste 3, Augustine Sutherland 4 and Menno L. P. Hoogland 1,2 1 Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands; [email protected] (C.E.S.); [email protected] (A.R.); [email protected] (M.L.P.H.) 2 Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies (KITLV/KNAW), 2311 BE Leiden, The Netherlands 3 Independent Researcher, Touna Aute 00109-8000, Kalinago Territory, Commonwealth of Dominica; [email protected] 4 Independent Researcher, Kalinago Community, Kingstown VCO120, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Caribbean islands, like other Small Island Developing States (SIDS), are at the center of the vulnerability debate as current climatic trends predict elevated sea levels and increased frequency of storms, leading to significant challenges for local communities. Caribbean islanders Citation: Hofman, C.L.; Stancioff, have been exposed to climatic challenges since the initial occupation of the archipelago between C.E.; Richards, A.; Nanichi Auguiste, five to eight thousand years ago. They have been continually confronted with severe droughts, I.; Sutherland, A.; Hoogland, M.L.P. tropical cyclones, extreme wave events, sea-level changes, and the accompanying impacts. The Resilient Caribbean Communities: A various phenomena have stimulated island residents both to anticipate and respond to such events, Long-Term Perspective on adapting their lifestyles and socio-cultural and political structures and ties across the region over Sustainability and Social Adaptability to Natural Hazards in the Lesser time.
    [Show full text]
  • Dominica at a Glance
    Table of Contents List of Figures .......................................................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................................... ii List of Boxes ............................................................................................................................................................iii Annexes ....................................................................................................................................................................iii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations..............................................................................................................iii Preface ..................................................................................................................................................................... vii Dominica at a Glance ........................................................................................................................................ viii INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 NRDS and the Vision to Build the First Climate Resilient Country in the World ............................ 7 NRDS and the Sustainable Development Goals .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]