Abort Black Zones

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abort Black Zones Abort Black Zones NASASpaceflight.com 191 Agenda • Introduction • Bigelow Mission Design Recommendation • Designing a Trajectory for Human Flight • Black Zones from Unsafe Landing • Black Zones from High-G Re-entry • Trajectory Shaping to Close the Black Zones for 401 • Performance Impacts from Black Zone Closure • Backup Charts NASASpaceflight.com 192 Introduction • The concept of flying people on the Atlas has been assessed at various times over the years. • The most in-depth study (aside from Project Mercury) was during the Orbital Space Plane (OSP) study. • Atlas worked closely with NASA and the OSP contractors (LM, Boeing, and Northrup Grumman) to perform detailed trajectory studies and assess every aspect of crew deliveries to orbit. • The Bigelow mission will be able to benefit from the extensive analyses that have already been done to make sure the ascent is safe for human spaceflight. NASASpaceflight.com 193 Background • For any Atlas flight, the mission requirements are evaluated and a trajectory is designed that meets those requirements. • For a typical GTO or satellite delivery mission, the most obvious parameter is performance (mass to orbit), however there are numerous additional constraints that we design to meet – Maximum Dynamic Pressure, G-level limits, Angle of Attack constraints, Time at specific throttle levels, etc. • For human missions, the over-arching design parameter is safety for the passengers. • The trajectory design is modified for human missions so that all safety concerns are addressed. NASASpaceflight.com 194 The Bigelow Mission Our Recommendation for the Bigelow Mission: • Mission orbit of 489 km (264 nmi) circular, 41° inclination • Atlas will deliver the capsule to a low-perigee transfer/phasing orbit (131 x 489 km or 71 x 264 nmi), capsule will perform circularization – This stable delivery orbit will allow several revs before re-entry (time to react/plan) should a return be required NASASpaceflight.com 195 The Bigelow Mission (Cont) • Mission orbit is a repeating ground track orbit • Provides daily launch opportunities to Bigelow station with minimum phasing, which reduces on- orbit capsule mission duration requirement • Provides 4 daily landing opportunities at Utah Test & Training Range, and Edwards AFB compatible with low capsule cross range • Inclination is high enough to allow tourists to see most populated parts of Earth and allow communications links to US-based tracking facilities, but lower than ISS for improved launch vehicle performance NASASpaceflight.com 196 Ground Track Plot The same ground track repeats each day NASASpaceflight.com 197 Sub-vehicle Trace NASASpaceflight.com 198 Instantaneous Impact Point Trace NASASpaceflight.com 199 Designing for Human Flight • During the OSP work, NASA identified a term that is used for human flight - Black Zones. • Black Zones are any period of flight when an abort would be unsafe for the passengers • Threats to passenger safety takes different forms: – Unsafe landing conditions if the aborting capsule falls into hostile terrain – High-g loads which occur during a re-entry • Deceleration can exceed human tolerance if the aborting capsule falls from too high an altitude, and hits the dense lower atmosphere too fast and too steeply • A great deal of effort was spent during OSP identifying potential black zones and modifying the mission or trajectory design to eliminate them. NASASpaceflight.com 200 Black Zones from Unsafe Landing Conditions • Black zones from unsafe landing conditions – The location of the vehicle impact point at the time of an abort will determine whether the capsule will have unsafe landing conditions • Capsule impact points from any given abort is determined by the timing of the abort • The resulting impact point is predictable pre-launch • When a capsule aborts, the re-entry impact point is already set (high L/D vehicles have greater flexibility) • Unsafe landing conditions are largely a result of the launch site and the final orbit desired – Orbital inclination is a key parameter of the final orbit • High inclinations such as ~50 degrees requires impact points that cross the North Atlantic and could cross the Alps NASASpaceflight.com 201 Black Zones from High-G Re-entry • Capsule altitude, flight path, and velocity determine the re-entry deceleration profile – Capsule altitude, flight path, and velocity of any given abort is determined by the timing of the abort – The resulting re-entry deceleration profile is predictable pre-launch • When a capsule aborts, the re-entry geometry is already set Ascent Trajectory 18 16 14 12 Abort Entry 10 Trajectory 8 Altitude (ft) 6 4 Load Factor (G's) 2 0 750 775 800 825 850 Range (nmi) Mission Time (sec) NASASpaceflight.com 202 Causes of High-G Black Zones • The combination altitude, flight path, and velocity which result in black zones can often be seen in lofted trajectories – Lofted trajectories are associated with high orbits, low Thrust/Weight upper stages • High orbits require the vehicle to achieve high altitudes for insertion – Limited burn durations require the vehicle to loft to achieve those altitudes before the final stage burns out (time to orbit) • Low thrust to weight vehicles require the boost stage to loft the upper stage and allow it the time required for its full burn – Low time to orbits from high thrust upper stages or high orbits can result in lofted trajectories – Low thrust/weight upper stages can result in lofted trajectories • Low L/D re-entry vehicles also increase the likelihood of black zones (results in steeper re-entry) • The boost phase trajectory and the resulting re-entry trajectory determine high-g black zones NASASpaceflight.com 203 Abort G Level Requirements • G Requirements come from NASA-STD-3000, Volume 8, Feb 1, 2005, “Human- Systems Integration Requirements.” Project Constellation using CXP-70024– (Same Requirement) +Gx Eye Balls In OSP Crew Loads Limits for sustained or short term plateau accelerations 100 Maximum allowable for automated crew abort /escape Design limit for nominal ascent & entry (conditioned crew) Design limit for deconditioned, ill, or injured crew References: 198, p. 13; 415; 418; NASA-STD- 3000-50 10 Acceleration (g's)Acceleration 4 sustained 1 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Duration (sec) Figure 5.3.3.1-1 Linear Sustained Acceleration Limits NASASpaceflight.com 204 Closing the High-G Black Zones Assumptions: • Launch Vehicle – Injection Orbit 131 x 489 km (71 x 264 nmi) at 41 deg – Maximum boost acceleration of 4 g's – Impact point trace • No North Atlantic, no Alps – No constraint on Q and heating (covered by capsule) • Capsule – L/D = ~0.3; conservative – Capsule has control during re-entry – Assumed ~350 fps Delta V required for capture/ circularization (provided by abort escape system) – Seat angles were varied to improve re-entry loads NASASpaceflight.com 205 Shaping the Boost trajectory • Depressing the boost trajectory reduces the altitude from which the capsule will fall, and provides a less steep re-entry flight path angle • The Atlas V 402 has a higher thrust Dual Engine Centaur and flies a more depressed trajectory which causes no black zones • A lower thrust Atlas V 401 flies a more lofted trajectory which requires re-shaping to close black zones 402 Already Satisfies Black Zone Requirement 401 Requires Shaping to Close Black Zones NASASpaceflight.com 206 Abort Load and Black Zone Analysis Process CAD Model NASA Human Factors Limits Capsule Generic Abort Tables of G, q, and Aerodynamic Trajectories for load margin Analysis all Starting Conditions vs Altitude, Velocity, (EVADE) (POST) Flight Path Angle Cl, Cd, L/D G = f (h, v, γ) Ballistic Coefficient Target CG Location Seat Angle Atlas Ascent Mission-specific Adjust for Dispersions & Trajectory Shaping Abort Trajectories Crew Orientation, (POST/TRAJEX) (POST) Validate Against Reqt’s Payload to Orbit Load vs Time Approximate abort load 18 Loads vs Duration in the +Gx direction ("Eyeballs in") 100 16 14 12 10 10 8 Loads (G's) G G Load 6 G Limit for Abort/Escape G Limit for Nominal Ascent/Entry 4 Predicted G Exposure During Abort 2 1 0 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 1000.0 700 750 800 850 900 Duration (sec) Time (sec) NASASpaceflight.com 207 Black Zones Elimination • Abort loads can be reduced by “depressing” the launch trajectory to fly lower and flatter – This is more easily done by upper stages with higher thrust/weight ratios • Trajectory shaping using a flattened ascent profile successfully eliminated black zones NASASpaceflight.com 208 Simulation Re-entry Acceleration Re-entry simulated from worst point on the ascent profile. Trajectory Trajectory Shaped for Shaped to Optimum Close Black Zones Performance (Bigelow Orbit) Trajectory (GTO) Shaped for Optimum Performance (Bigelow Orbit) NASASpaceflight.com 209 GTO Mission - High Re-entry Loads Abort Limit for loads taken into chest Loads vs. Duration (Assumes seat is oriented such that all loads are Loads vs. Duration taken through chest) 100 +Gx Accel, Eyeballs In GTO Design violates Maximum abort g-limit 10 Re-entry Acceleration Loads (G's) Loads +15% for Disp. 1 Simulation Re-entry Acceleration 0.1 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Duration (sec) NASASpaceflight.com 210 MPG Shaped - Marginal Re-entry Loads Reentry Loads, Shaped with MPG Rules (Assumes seat is oriented such that all loads are Abort Limit for loads taken into chest taken through chest) Loads vs. Duration 100 MPG Shaped Design just touches +Gx Accel, Eyeballs In Maximum abort g-limit – no additional margin 10 Re-entry Acceleration Loads (G's) Loads +15% for Disp. 1 Simulation Re-entry Acceleration 0.1 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Duration (sec) NASASpaceflight.com 211 Shaped to Close Black Zones – Re-entry Loads with Margin Re-entry Loads, Shaped to Close Black Zones Abort Limit for loads taken into chest (Assumes seat is oriented such that all loads are taken through chest) Loads vs. Duration 100 +Gx Accel, Eyeballs In Extra Margin Desirable to account for RSS Effect of Gy and Gz loads 10 Re-entry Acceleration Loads (G's) Loads +15% for Disp.
Recommended publications
  • Human Issues Related to Spacecraft Vibration During Ascent
    Human Issues related to Spacecraft Vibration during Ascent Consultant Report to the Constellation Program Standing Review Board Jonathan B. Clark M.D., M.P.H. Suite NA 425 One Baylor Plaza Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX 77030-3498 1731 Sunset Blvd Houston TX 77005 713 859 1381 281 989 8721 [email protected] [email protected] Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not reflect the views of the National Space Biomedical Research Institute (NSBRI), Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), or the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Human Issues related to Spacecraft Vibration during Ascent Consultant Report to the Constellation Program Standing Review Board Jonathan B. Clark M.D., M.P.H. Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not reflect the views of the National Space Biomedical Research Institute (NSBRI), Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), or the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Pogo in Liquid Fueled Rocket Motors The pogo phenomenon, or fuel pump inlet pressure fluctuation/ cavitation due to tuning feed line resonant frequencies was a major concern in the early space program. Pump tests showed that as inlet pressures were reduced toward cavitation, the pump started acting as an amplifier, causing large oscillations in the thrust chamber pressure. As the rocket engine thrust develops, liquid propellant is cyclically forced into the turbopump. This fluctuating fluid pressure is converted into an unintended and variable increase in engine thrust, with the net effect being longitudinal axis vibration that could result in spacecraft structural failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of GX Launch Services by GALEX Koji Sato∗, Yoshirou Kondou
    Acta Astronautica 59 (2006) 381–391 www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro Overview of GX launch services by GALEX Koji Sato∗, Yoshirou Kondou Galaxy Express Corporation, Tokyo, Japan Available online 19 May 2006 Abstract Galaxy Express Corporation (GALEX) is a launch service company in Japan to develop a medium size rocket, GX rocket and to provide commercial launch services for medium/small low Earth orbit (LEO) and Sun synchronous orbit (SSO) payloads with a future potential for small geo-stationary transfer orbit (GTO). It is GALEX’s view that small/medium LEO/SSO payloads compose of medium scaled but stable launch market due to the nature of the missions. GX rocket is a two-stage rocket of well flight proven liquid oxygen (LOX)/kerosene booster and LOX/liquid natural gas (LNG) upper stage. This LOX/LNG propulsion under development by Japan’s Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), is robust with comparable performance as other propulsions and have future potential for wider application such as exploration programs. GX rocket is being developed through a joint work between the industries and GX rocket is applying a business oriented approach in order to realize competitive launch services for which well flight proven hardware and necessary new technology are to be introduced as much as possible. It is GALEX’s goal to offer “Easy Access to Space”, a highly reliable and user-friendly launch services with a competitive price. GX commercial launch will start in Japanese fiscal year (JFY) 2007–2008. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Background of GX rocket (R&D) budget was filed to the Ministry of Finance (MOF) to start the R&D as “Advance Technology The origin of GX rocket can be traced back to Demonstration Rocket Program” from JFY1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas As a Human Rated LV
    AtlasAtlas As As A A Human Human RatedRated LV LV STAIF Conference 2006 Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company Atlas for Human Spaceflight 15 Feb 2006 1 © 2006 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved Reliable and Versatile Launch Vehicle Family Atlas I Atlas II Atlas IIA Atlas IIAS Atlas IIIA Atlas IIIB Atlas V-400 Atlas V-500 AC-69 AC-102 AC-105 AC-108 AC-201 AC-204 AV-001 AV-003 Jul 1990 Dec 1991 Jun 1992 Dec 1993 May 2000 Feb 2002 Aug 2002 Jul 2003 8/11 10/10 23/23 30/30 2/2 4/4 4/4 3/3 Legend: First Flight X/Y X successes in Y flights •8 of 8 First Flight Successes •78 Consecutive Successful Atlas Centaur Flights •100% Mission Success Atlas II, IIA, IIAS, III & V Families •487 Total Launch Successes Since Atlas Program Inception Mission Success—One Launch at a Time Atlas for Human Spaceflight 15 Feb 2006 2 AV-010 Launch • January 19, 2006 • NASA Pluto New Horizons Spacecraft • First 551 configuration • First Block 2 Fault Tolerant Avionics • First Block B SRB • Nuclear certified • Nominal flight profile • Injection conditions well within 1 sigma – C3, RLA, DLA Fastest Spacecraft Ever Launched Atlas for Human Spaceflight 15 Feb 2006 3 Atlas Evolution History Atlas I/II Family Atlas III Family Atlas V Family 5-m PLF ) 30 GSO Kit T m ( y 26 t i l Avionics i Single Common Upgrade b Engine a 22 Centaur Centaur p a C 3.8-m . Common c 18 r LO2 Core i Tank Booster C Stretch ) 14 m n 0 2 10 Liquid 2 SRBs ( Strap-ons m RD-180 SRBs k 6 Engine 7 0 Atlas I Atlas IIAS Atlas IIIA Atlas IIIB Atlas V Atlas V Atlas V 4 2 Atlas II (SEC) (DEC)
    [Show full text]
  • GEMINI 9 N66 28552 R (To Be Launched No Earl& E Than May 17) S CONTENTS S
    . NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION wr) 7-41 r,? 1 WASHINGTON, D C 20546 TELS wcl f-f,w-, FOR RELEASE: TDESDAY A.M. P RELEXSE NO: 66-97 PROJECT: GEMINI 9 N66 28552 R (To be launched no earl& E than May 17) S CONTENTS S K I T . -2- -End- NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMlNmRATlON WO 2-41 55 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20546 TELs.wo 3-6925 COR RELEA- TUESDAY A.M. my 10, 1966 FEJXASE NO: 66-97 GHviINI 9 LAUNCHES SET MAY 17 The National Aeronautics and Space Administration will launch the Gemini 9 spacecraft and its Age- Target Vehicle no earlier than May 17 from Cape Kennedy, Fla. Objectives of the mission are rendezvous and docking of the Gemini with the Agena and extravehicular activity by the pilot, Launch of the Agena is scheduled for 10 a.m. (EST) with the Gemini to lift of'f at 11:39:09 a.m. (EST). Command pilot for the three-day'Gemini flight is Astro- naut Thomas P. Stafford, Pilot is Eugene A. Cernan, Backup crew is James A. Lovell, Jr,, command pilot, and =win E. Aldrin, pilot . Stafford was pilot on the Gemini 6 mission which accomp- lished the first space rendezvous. Gemini 9 will be Cernan's first space flight. Lovell was pilot on the 14-day Gemini 7 mission which served as the rendezvous target for Gemini 6, Aldrin has not yet made a space flight. -more- 5/4/66 -2 - Stafford is an Air Force lieutenant colonel, Cernan a Navy lieutenant commander, kvell a Navy captain and Aldrin a major in the Air Force.
    [Show full text]
  • United Launch Alliance Overview
    UnitedUnited LaunchLaunch AllianceAlliance OverviewOverview DanDan CollinsCollins MayMay 18,18, 20072007 File no. Copyright © 2006 ULA. All rights reserved. ULA Joint Venture Team Two World Class Launch Systems Operated by a Single Provider to the U.S. Government – Lockheed Martin’s Atlas Program – The Boeing Company’s Delta Program – Commercial Sales Through LMCLS or BLS – Does Not Include: Reusable or Shuttle Derived A Century of Combined Experience in Expendable Launch Systems Providing Assured Access to Space – Pooled Experience of (850) Launches – Legacy Reaching Back to the 1950s File no. | 1 Copyright © 2006 ULA. All rights reserved. ULA Vision & Mission Vision – One Team Launching the Quest for Knowledge, Peace, and Freedom Mission – ULA provides the best expendable launch systems and services to assure access to space for our customers. Together, we protect our nation, explore the universe, and enable the commerce of space. We are a values- based team and, building on our heritage, are committed to mission success, continuous improvement, and stakeholder satisfaction. File no. | 2 Copyright © 2006 ULA. All rights reserved. ULA Guiding Principles Ethical Behavior Mission Success Performance Excellence Business Excellence Employee Involvement File no. | 3 Copyright © 2006 ULA. All rights reserved. ULA Leadership Officers Atlas Programs Delta Programs Jim Sponnick Mark Wilkins Office of Internal Human Engineering Governance Resources President and Chief Chief Matthew Smith Executive Officer Operating Officer Cindy Corrigan Eric Anderson Michael Gass Dan Collins Business Production Mission Development Operations Success George Sowers Phil Marshall Wayne Brown Subcontract Corporate Secretary Chief Information Management & Deputy Chief Officer & Procurement General Counsel Financial Officer Controller Joe Potter Jim Hardin Carmine Orsini Mike Thomas* Peter Sloane Quality Assurance Transition Communications & System Safety Mike Greichen Julie Andrews Mike Jensen General Counsel * Acting Kevin MacCary 5.14.07 File no.
    [Show full text]
  • Masa Hashimoto
    Public-Private Partnerships in Space Projects: An Analysis of Stakeholder Dynamics by Masafumi Hashimoto Master of Science in Physics Osaka University, 2002 Bachelor of Science in Physics Osaka University, 1999 Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technology and Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2009 2009 Masafumi Hashimoto. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now know or hereafter created. Signature of Author ………………………………………………………………………… Technology and Policy Program, Engineering Systems Division May 8, 2009 Certified by ………………………………………………………………………………… Annalisa L. Weigel Jerome C. Hunsacker Assistant Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Thesis Supervisor Accepted by ……………………………………………………………………………….. Dava J. Newman Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Director, Technology and Policy Program Public-Private Partnerships in Space Projects: An Analysis of Stakeholder Dynamics by Masafumi Hashimoto Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division on May 8, 2009 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technology and Policy Abstract In Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs), private partners assume more responsibility for public projects than in traditional approaches. The larger responsibility of the private partner is expected to improve efficiencies of the project. However, it also increases potential challenges such as conflicts of interest. If the dynamic structures which cause challenges in PPPs are identified, they will help to predict potential challenges in future PPP projects. Therefore, this research develops a dynamics model of which challenges arise in the application of PPP approaches to space projects.
    [Show full text]
  • THOR 7 – Telenor's Pure Growth Satellite
    THOR 7 - The Complete Picture THOR 7 was launched on 26 April 2015 from the Guiana Space Centre. Image source: Telenor Satellite THOR 7 – Telenor’s pure growth satellite The THOR 7 satellite, constructed by Space Systems LORAL (SSL), was successfully launched by Telenor Satellite on 26 April 2015 from the Guiana Space Centre. Telenor Satellite’s first HTS is positioned to cover the North Sea, North Atlantic/Norwegian Sea, Baltic Sea, Black Sea, Caspian Sea, Red Sea, Persian Gulf and Mediterranean. The Ka-band HTS was designed for the mobile VSAT market, with 6-9Gbps of throughput and 25 spot beams. In addition to its tradition of serving the broadcast industry, Telenor has decided to target the maritime sector with THOR 7. Amy Saunders visited Telenor Satellite in Norway in February 2016 to find out more about the progress made since the launch of THOR 7, to tour Telenor’s satellite control centre and the Nittedal Teleport and to discover the company’s near-future plans. Telenor’s THOR 7 satellite was launched last year in the Morten Tengs, Telenor’s CEO, explained that although 1° West position, mainly to serve the broadcast industry. It is Telenor continues to strive ahead with new satellite capacity, a pure growth satellite with an expected lifetime of around “Assets aren’t everything. It’s everything that we build around 20 years, depending on fuel consumption. The new HTS it, like the competence and the skills. As we are still a relatively satellite cost around US$190 million in equity funding and is small player, we can respond quickly and adapt to customer insured by AON.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Spacecraft Technology State of the Art
    NASA/TP–2015–216648/REV1 Small Spacecraft Technology State of the Art Mission Design Division Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California December 2015 NASA STI Program . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. to the advancement of aeronautics and space Collected papers from scientific and science. The NASA scientific and technical technical conferences, symposia, seminars, information (STI) program plays a key part or other meetings sponsored or in helping NASA maintain this important co-sponsored by NASA. role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, The NASA STI Program operates under the technical, or historical information from auspices of the Agency Chief Information NASA programs, projects, and missions, Officer. It collects, organizes, provides for often concerned with subjects having archiving, and disseminates NASA’s STI. substantial public interest. The NASA STI Program provides access to the NASA Aeronautics and Space Database • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- and its public interface, the NASA Technical language translations of foreign scientific Report Server, thus providing one of the and technical material pertinent to largest collection of aeronautical and space NASA’s mission. science STI in the world. Results are Specialized services also include creating published in both non-NASA channels and custom thesauri, building customized by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, databases, and organizing and publishing which includes the following report types: research results. • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of For more information about the NASA STI completed research or a major significant Program, see the following: phase of research that present the results of NASA programs and include extensive • Access the NASA STI program home page data or theoretical analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the GX Launch Vehicle, New Medium Class Launch Vehicle of Japan
    Vol. 43 No. 1 2010 Development of the GX Launch Vehicle, New Medium Class Launch Vehicle of Japan IZUMIYAMA Taku : Manager, Space Development Department, Aero-Engine & Space Operations SHISA Akira : Manager, Space Development Department, Aero-Engine & Space Operations KOBAYASHI Kenji : General Manager, Technology Division, Galaxy Express Corporation The GX launch vehicle is a medium class launch vehicle, objectives of which are to support launching demand for medium-size satellite flexibly, to be back-up for the national main space transportation system, and to establish LNG propulsion system technology. This paper describes outline of the GX program such as its configuration, program merits including establishment of the LNG propulsion system, the main characteristics and its performance, etc. The future development concept of the GX is also described. 1. Introduction Figure 2 shows the configuration of the GX launch vehicle. The GX launch vehicle adopts the first stage of Atlas V The GX launch vehicle is a Japanese medium class launch launch vehicles, which are the most-advanced launch vehicles vehicle developed for operations beginning in the middle developed in the United States and are highly evaluated of the 2010s to flexibly meet diverse future launching among all countries of the world for its high degree of demands for small-and medium-size satellites and to back reliability. The second stage of the GX launch vehicle is up the main national space transportation system. Figure 1 equipped with a LNG engine, which is developed in Japan shows the appearance of the GX launch vehicle. Its for practical application for the first time in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Control Stabilization of High Power Rocket Valeria Avila Guerrero Santa Clara University, [email protected]
    Santa Clara University Scholar Commons Mechanical Engineering Senior Theses Engineering Senior Theses 6-2018 Active Control Stabilization of High Power Rocket Valeria Avila Guerrero Santa Clara University, [email protected] Angel Barranco [email protected] Daniel Conde Santa Clara University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/mech_senior Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Guerrero, Valeria Avila; Barranco, Angel; and Conde, Daniel, "Active Control Stabilization of High Power Rocket" (2018). Mechanical Engineering Senior Theses. 81. https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/mech_senior/81 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Engineering Senior Theses at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mechanical Engineering Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ACTIVE CONTROL STABILIZATION OF HIGH POWER ROCKET By Valeria Avila, Angel Barranco, Daniel Conde SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT REPORT Submitted to The Department of Mechanical Engineering of SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering Santa Clara, CA 2018 Contents Contents iii List of Figures v List of Tables vii 1 International Traffic of Arms Regulations Disclaimer viii 2 Abstract 1 3 Introduction 2 4 Systems Level 3 5 Preliminary Rocket Design 7 5.1 Sizing of Engine Motor to Determine Body Dimensions . .7 6 Rocket Design Geometry 9 6.1 Canards............................................. 10 6.2 FinalDesign .......................................... 12 7 Modeling and Analysis 13 7.1 Static Stability . 13 7.2 Dynamic Stability . 16 7.3 Finite Element Analysis: Mode Shapes .
    [Show full text]
  • United Launch Alliance Presentation to the National Research Council
    United Launch Alliance Presentation to the National Research Council 04 February 2013 Copyright © 2013 United Launch Alliance, LLC. Unpublished Work. All Rights Reserved. United Launch Alliance Two World Class Launch Systems Operating as a Single Provider to the U.S. Government – Atlas V Product Line, Delta IV Product Line, Delta II Product Line More Than a Century of Combined Experience in Expendable Launch Systems & Providing Assured Access to Space – Pooled Experience of More Than 1,300 Launches – Legacy Reaching Back to the 1950s Responsible for Design, Development, Production, Spacecraft Integration, and Launch 401 431 551 Delta 2 Medium 4,2 Medium 5,4 Heavy Atlas Delta 13 March 2013 | 1 ULA Launch History (Through 2012) Sixty-Six Launches, 100% Mission Success 13 March 2013 | 2 TDRSS-KULA Launch History Sixty-Six Launches, 100% Mission Success 13 March 2013 | 3 13 March 2013 | 4 ULA PROPRIETARY INFORMATION. See Title Page For Details. ULA Human Spaceflight Programs Exploration Flight Test Commercial Crew Space Launch System Delta IV HLV Launch of Atlas Launch of Commercial Interim Cryogenic Upper Orion Capsule in 2014 Human Spacecraft in 2016 Stage for Heavy Lift in 2017 Broad ULA Support to the Nation’s Human Spaceflight Program 13 March 2013 | 5 Exploration Flight Test Exploration Flight Test 1 (EFT-1) of LMC Orion Capsule – Integrate and Launch on Delta IV HLV – Controlled Re-Entry of Orion Capsule ULA Effort Includes – Mission Unique Accommodations – LC-37 Infrastructure Upgrades • Modify MST Platforms at Levels 9/10 for
    [Show full text]
  • The Exploring Machines. National Aeronautics and Space Administra
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 283 723 SE 048 258 AUTHOR Nicks, Oran W. TITLE Far_Travelers: The Exploring Machines. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC. Scientific and Technical Information Branch. REPORT NO NASA-SP-480 -PUB DATE 85 NOTE 265p. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Books (010) -- Viewpoints (120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC-11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Aerospace Technology; *Lunar Research; Navigation; Research and Development; Satellites (Aerospace); Science and Society; Science Education; Science History; Scientific Enterprise; *Scientific Research; *Scientists; .*Space Exploration; Space Sciences; *Technological Advancement IDENTIFIERS *National Aeronautics and Space Administration ABSTRACT The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) program of lunar and planetary exploration produced_a flood of scientific information about the moon, planets and the environment of interplanetary space. This book is an account of the people, machines, and the events of this scientific enterprise. It is a story of organizations, personalities, political and perceptions of the golden era of solar system exploration._The engineering problems and outstanding accomplishments of the missions are narrated. Both failures and successes during the development and flights_oi the spacecraf-:s are highlighted. Although this book is not priwarily a scientific report, it does include technical aspects of space flight and conveys some of the excitement
    [Show full text]